to share, and either wisdom, story, or logic. And it's clearly amazing to hear all the different
missing links discovered by people unique to their own journeys. And in how they have
come to discover them, together we can help to build a bigger picture for a better future
for a brighter tomorrow. Let's stand united, let's remove the veils, and let's create
a new world together, argue that missing link. Join Jesse Hale on the missing link talk show,
as he helps to unveil the mystery through the unique wisdom and story of others.
Welcome, welcome, welcome. Welcome everybody here back to the missing link. Today we're
excited to have back on for the 14th time, 13th time. Not exactly sure how many times,
but someone who is a forensic historian. He's got the history of propaganda and the co-founder
of bulletproofpub.com. He's got a background in three arts, fine, utilitarian, and liberal.
He's done deep dyes research into what's going on, who may be pulling the strings,
and maybe why we are where we are today. And we're going to talk about the Fabian Society and how
they play a pivotal role, but welcome back to the missing link live, our friend Duane Hayes,
aka Diego Garcia. How are you doing today, brother? I'm doing fantastic. You can hear me?
Yeah. You can hear me and see me. That's a good start for today.
Thanks for having me. Really appreciate the opportunity to come on and talk about Fabianism.
We've got a lot of people interested in understanding what this British ethical
socialism is and how we can see it today. So I'm looking forward to getting into that.
Awesome. So maybe start off with telling us a little bit about yourself, your journey,
a little bit about your background, your education, what got you into knowing about
history, anything that you wanted to share with our audience for all of our new subscribers,
and maybe people that haven't caught you the last 13, 14 times you've been on the
missing link live. Yeah, we've been on here talking about the rise of the expert because
I'm a forensic historian. I started asking myself, what are the major institutions of our
society that are causing the damage? And so we started looking into these things and went,
chased two primary source material to try to find the best answers as possible so that we
weren't confused as to what was going on in this world. So we are busy now making sense
of this for everybody. We've uncovered the progressive era as the main
time in history where the new world order actually enters the West. I'm a previously a
carpenter. I'm a musician going way back. I've got very interested in the Trivium, this
grammar logic rhetoric. This really steered me in the direction that we're going.
This is the knowledge that they removed from our education. So we're all very aware,
especially your viewers, about this K through 12 education system and how it was corrupted
through the adoption of Prussian education system. And so we're just uncovering all of this.
And I've taken that knowledge that nobody really asks, what is the knowledge that
they took from us? Well, it's grammar logic rhetoric. It's actually boils down to the
liberal arts. This is why it's very important to understand the definition of liberalism.
Okay. So this is really the difference between living a life and making a living. So you could
be working a job just over broke, or you could find a way to really navigate this
world successfully, maybe with an entrepreneurial mindset. So that's what we've done.
I just kind of switched careers probably 2016. And I just decided, because we saw such a
hole in our society for, first of all, truthful journalism, and then second of all,
trustworthy food system, we felt like we better start filling those holes that we'd
identified. So while we're researching the history, we're also living that life as well.
So we're full-time farmers. I'm taking time away from the farm this morning. My wife is right here
seating salad greens. And we're going to be off to the farm since we're done here. And you're
about the only guy that I'll take some time away from the farm at this time of year for,
because I appreciate these conversations and I appreciate you. So that's a little bit about
me. And so we're going to talk about Fabianism. For those that aren't familiar, this is a British
philosophy. It's really based in socialism. These are the people that we call ethical
socialists. So these are the guys that we have to be most wary of, the ones speaking the real
kind nice words. And so this is where I ask people to sort of level up in their thinking.
We can't have the same thinking that got us into these issues to get us out.
So the removal of our knowledge, our ability to discern was taken from us. And so
what we've been doing the last 10 years is really learning that knowledge. And I think
that that's what's allowed us to get to the source of all of the issues here.
And one of the major issues, one of the main ideologies that are problematic for the West is
the Fabian society. This idea of it's really a militaristic approach. And it's being turned
not on the enemy any longer, but on your domestic population, your own people.
And so it comes from Fabius Maximus. And I'm going to share a screen here.
Got a question for you. So you said that basically we're living in maybe
liberalistic times. This is liberalism 101. The Fabian society brought liberalism to
the forefront in our society. So does that mean it doesn't matter if you have a left
leaning liberal government or you have a right leaning conservative government?
If we're living in a liberalistic system, it doesn't really matter if it's a liberal
or conservative that's steering the ship. We're all still living in that liberalistic times.
Yes. That's a great point. And it's a great time to bring that up because
this was their goal. The Fabians, the American progressives, when we look at the Paris Peace
Conference of 1919, they wanted to make a largely liberalized population, a liberalized
world is what they talked about. So we see that today and it has infiltrated both parties.
And what we call it here is progressivism. And what we're going to show you is how the Fabians
and the progressives worked together to bring it here. So it's really the Fabian society that
introduces trade unionism, industrial democracy in the late 1800s. And this evolves through
the friendships of leading and founding Fabians with the American founding progressives like
Louis Brandeis, Walter Lippman, these are the guys that we've talked about on the previous,
how many ever episodes we've dedicated a lot of time to the American progressives.
And so today, we're not really going to talk about them, but we're going to show you
the connections between the Fabians and the American progressives because
the progressive flag is purple. And I know this is kind of anecdotal, but it's important that
what color do you get when you mix blue and red, but purple. And so I invite everybody to go and
look at like the efficiency movement. There's a wiki page on the efficiency movement, you know,
Musk is talking efficiency now, so is Pierre Pollyivieri, whoever that guy is. I saw
him talking about efficiency too. So this is over 100 years after the first efficiency movement,
and we're largely unaware that there was an efficiency movement prior to this. And it all
goes back to progressivism. And that is all inspired by Fabianism. Okay. So you can see here,
I've got the Fabian society website up, you can see that, Jesse.
Yeah, we can. It's Roger Jokey and Hi, Roger, our friend. He says the Fabian logo is Wolfen
Sheep's clothing profoundly chose a sheep. Are we of that strong nature of the like of sheep?
I don't see that logo that he's talking about, but do they change it off of their website
or do you know what he's speaking of? I do know. And I'm just going to show you
remember in T2 they asked him about how much he knew of humans and he says, I have detailed files.
Well, I got detailed files of the Fabian society too. And I'm just going to bring that up here for
a sec. If I can find where I am, everybody just be patient with me. Okay. I'm a farmer.
Let's go to present and I'll bring you up the Fabian folder that I have.
We'll see if that works and we'll show you the logo
if I can find it. I think I know what I did here. Hang on one sec. If I bring that up
and I go to here, there it is. Okay, figured that out. Okay, so you can see some file folders there?
Yep. So that's my Fabian society files. It's a work in progress, but you can see there's all kinds of
folders that you can look into some of the leading Fabians. Annie Basant goes off to be
in the theosophy and connections to, you know, Alistair Crowley. You can see that they were
called the coefficient club. So this efficiency, this idea of an efficient society goes back
to their secret societies and the very origins of the Fabian society. Okay. Consumers is cooperative.
So Dwayne just froze. You know, he's caught a relatively new computer. He's got,
oh, it's interesting. We're having trouble streaming to Twitter. This may be an issue on
Twitter's end. We'll keep track at the same time that he froze Twitter. We lost our Twitter feed.
So not sure if you were on Twitter and you were watching, then I would find our other platforms.
I'm not sure if you can still hear, but he's got a new computer. He's got a new reset as modem.
And from time to time when he comes on the show, he gets frozen a lot. I guess, you know,
they don't want this information there. They booted him right out. So just bear with us.
He said every time this happens, well, he'll try to be back as quickly as possible.
Sometimes we go through quite a bit of the stream without him being booted out.
And then other times, you know, it happens quite frequently. So I hope you can stay patient
and not really sure what's happening with our Twitter. But I guess,
at the same time that you got frozen, our Twitter feed got cut.
Yeah. Well, I'm going to leave all the speculation to everybody else, but, you know,
this is the story of my life here. So where did I end?
Did we have the Fabian Society folders up?
Yeah, you had the folders up and then you froze and then got kicked out.
Okay. Awesome. I appreciate that. Whoever's behind all of that.
So let's go back to that folder and try again.
So I was bringing up this logo. Now, can you see the Wolf and Sheep's clothing?
No. I could just see a whole bunch of folders.
Okay. So then I've got to figure out how to do that too.
I can see them moving your thing, your mouse.
Okay. Let me just stop here for a sec and see if I can figure this out.
Okay. So you should be seeing a Wolf and Sheep's clothing now.
Oh yeah. There's the...
Okay. So this is what Roger's talking about. Roger, good morning.
Thank you for being on. I appreciate your interest.
And this is a great point, great place to start. Okay.
This is an old Fabian Society logo and this tells you everything.
You want a picture telling you a thousand words? This is it.
And so Sheep's clothing to me would be like your suits.
You're talking politicians with their suits so they put on clothes
so that they look like you and that you think that they are like you
and they've got your interests at heart, but they don't.
They're wolves. And as we get going, you're going to start to see the level of malevolence
of the Fabian Society. Okay. So there's their logo.
That's fascinating that they write on the logo of the Fabian Society.
They're so arrogant that they would tell you that they are actually wolves
in Sheep's clothing, but they didn't do it so blatant that they just show the wolf head.
We're the wolf. We're like pulling out and the rest of the people
that they're going to indoctrinate, impregnate with their ideas are all sheep
and only the wolves are the ones that are pulling the strings.
Yep. And so as we get into this interview and this conversation on Fabianism,
you'll start to see the other slogans and emblems that they use and they're just as equally
disturbing, especially when we get into what Robert George Bernard Shaw says about human beings.
And so here's the Fabian window. Okay. Can you see that?
Can we all look at the Fabian window? Yep. I'm going to enlarge that so we can get
right involved here. Okay. So we've got, this is a famous window that George Bernard Shaw, the playwright,
commissioned. And it's one of these ladies here down here in the bottom right
that actually made the window. Okay. And so what we see here is the wolf in Sheep's clothing logo
between George Bernard Shaw and Green and I think that's Sidney Webb, the other major founder of the
Fabian Society. And here we are, the world on top of an anvil getting slammed over the head.
So that's why last week when we were promoting this show, I said, you know, something about
being hit over the head. Have you had enough of being hit over the head? Well, this is really
that Fabian Society ideology. And what are they doing? But if you look at the top says
remolding it nearer to the heart's desire. And to whose desire there's these ethical socialist
Fabians. And so today, so that we don't underestimate their importance, they are today the British
Labor Party. This is where the British Labor Party came out. So when we talk about Tony Blair,
he was a Fabian Society member. And so you can see the books that they're all praying to.
These are George Bernard Shaw plays. Man and Superman, which is a book I have right behind me.
Another Shaw piece of literature. And then you have some of the books written by the
Webb's Minority Report on the Poor. Their most famous industrial democracy. This is
what we live in today. And we've shown how Lewis Brandeis and the American Progressives
took that idea of industrial democracy and created it here in the West.
So history of trade unionism. So trade unionism is an important aspect to understand English
local government Fabian tracts and essays. And then you see some of the founders here reading
HG Wells New World for Old. And HG Wells is bringing up the rear here. I'm not sure what
he's doing. Yeah, what about the logo that's just up there? It says devoutly hammer stoutly.
What does that mean? Pray devoutly hammer stoutly. Well, it would be ethical. It's
definitely their ethical socialist approach. And so another slogan that they say is when we
strike, we strike hard. So I'd say that it's in the spirit of that. Okay, and it all comes from
they name their society after this warrior, Fabius. And we're going to get to him right now.
Okay, so those are your Fabian founders all sort of hanging around their own writings and that
window. Actually, I should show you this too. If I can just give me one sec,
just to sort of show that this is still very prominent today. I just want to show you a picture
of Tony Blair when they they kind of refound this Shaw window. And so when they presented it to
the Fabian society, they had Tony Blair there at the opening ceremony. So I'm just going to show you
the picture of him sitting there smiling beside the Fabian window just to show you that this is
you know, very relevant to today and what's going on. So here's Tony Blair. I think you'll
like Liz Elm's comment here. She says it's astonishing how in our face it has been
the whole time. Yeah, that's a great point. And good morning, Liz Elm. Thanks for all your
support and paying attention to what we're doing here. I think
Liz gets the progressive era, as does Roger Jokey, as does Andy Rouse and a growing number
of people we're starting to see just how we've been fooled all along by smiling faces like that.
But all I see is a snake. Tony Blair is a snake. And you can see now why the Bushes and Blair
combined well when they went to Iraq, because progressivism is about militarism and about war.
War is progress. Peace is stagnation. And peace to all of these guys is bad for business.
So really, if you wanted to defeat the New World Order, we just got to
start convincing people to rid ourselves of those that think that peace is bad for business.
You understand? I like that. So, and they're all Hegelian, all of these guys.
This is the Hegelian dialect that we see of them. We're actually playing out in it right now
with the political environment. Everybody's busy voting and, you know, booing national anthems.
This is the chaos out of which comes order. And so this is why I'm asking everybody to sort
of raise their level of thinking, step out of that total stream of bullshit and look for new
approaches rather than voting, because voting harder hasn't worked for over 100 years. And
it's all because we don't understand the progressive era. Both sides are progressive.
No matter who you voted for in the American election, Kamala Harris or
Trump, it didn't matter. The progressive vote or the train was going to still go,
as it has for over a century. And progressive and meaning liberal, liberal, progressive,
Fabianistic, like isn't it the same? That train is basically just worded differently.
This is important. When we use the word liberal, we can't just say liberal or liberalism. We
it's radical liberalism that a lot of the left are in now. And they don't even realize it because
it's been influenced by progressivism. And progressivism is that social radical reform
aspect because classic liberal is straight out of the US Constitution in the spirit of our
ability to speak, think, and assemble freely, right? So we have to be careful not to just
liberalism. I've actually had some pretty profound conversations with some close personal friends
about how they misused the word liberalism and how this perpetuates this misunderstanding and it
covers for progressivism and how it kicks the rock down the road further for the next
generations to understand. We at bulletproofpub.com for whatever reason came to these
conclusions that it's the American progressives, but we're going to bring it right back to
the Fabians because this is where the American progressives learned a lot of this from their
progressive or their Fabian friends. So let's go back to this Fabian website and talk a little
bit about their history. Can you see that the Fabian Society? Yeah. Okay. So this is straight
from their website, guys. I'm not pulling up a wiki page, right? So they say it our history
and you can go there now. See the link up there? That's .org.uk about us, our history. So you go
onto that website, find about us, click on that the drop down thing and click on our history
and you'll find the same place. So the Fabian Society is Britain's oldest political think
tank. Founded in 1884, the society has been at the forefront of developing political
ideas and public policy on the left for 140 years. So they're distinctly left.
So the Archives of the Fabian Society are held at the London School of Economics. This is
one of the organizations that come out of Fabian Society. I'm sure a lot of people have heard
of the London School of Economics. Now economics is a very important work, right? It's about
the organization of society when you talk about economics. It's not just your monetary system.
So including a comprehensive digital archive. If you're interested in the history of the Fabian
Society and would like to write us on any aspect of society's past, please contact our editorial
director, Kate Murray. So the Fabian name, the Fabian Society derives its name from the
Roman general Quintus Fabius known for his strategy of delaying his attacks on the invading
Carthaginians until the right moment. The name Fabian Society was explained in the
right moment. You must wait as Fabius did most patiently when warring against Hannibal,
though many censured his delays. But when the time comes, you must strike hard as Fabius did,
or your waiting will be in vain and fruitless. Okay, so this is why we see a rattling of the
cages of society all the time. And in that chaos, much like 9-11 and all of those things,
out of those chaotic moments in history comes change. So there's a before and after of history.
We can feel that with 9-11. We can feel it with COVID that there's a defining break. And from that
break, and you know, during COVID, it was emergency wartime measures just as the same as
what was produced out of 9-11. We went to war only this time on a virus. And that's still
an existential threat, which is important for the progressives. As long as it's an existential threat,
it doesn't matter if it's an army from Iraq, China, or aliens coming from another planet.
Okay, it's all about a fear of the future. And when we're in states of fear, it's harder
to think. So we must calm ourselves down and be reasonable and logical in our understanding.
Am I still on? Yes, you are. Beautiful. So the early Fabians educate, agitate, organize. Now that
is straight out of the French revolutions, right? This same sort of thing. So the Fabian
Society was founded on the 4th of January 1884 as an offshoot of the fellowship of the new
life. So there's that word new that we all must be aware of if we're going to sort of rub shoulders
with the progressives or in political life at all. If you want to engage in, you know, voting for the
PPC or Pierre Polyviary or Donald Trump, whoever it is, be aware of that word new. As we've shown
in the previous 14 or whatever episodes, the new society soon attracted some of the most prominent
left-wing thinkers of the late Victorian era to its ranks. You can see the highlighted names that
they are stating on their own website. In the 1880s, so an upsurge in socialist activity in Britain
and the Fabian Society was at the heart of much of it against the backdrop of the match girls'
strike and the 1889 London dock strike. Now what's crazy is if you've been up to date on our
work, you can see that a lot of the social change that came here in America was because of
strikes like that, like the triangle shirt waste buyer, where all of the doors were locked and all
of those women either burned to death or leapt to their death. And out of that horrific situation,
Louis Brandeis, Louis D. Brandeis, the first Jewish Supreme Court justice stepped in and was the
lead attorney in establishing precedent in labor law relationships, labor relations, scientific
management. We know that he's coined that term, but you can see it's the same thing happening just
prior in Britain and you can now see why the Americans were adopting these things because
they were working in establishing a leftist socialist idea in Britain. They applied the
same methods, much like they borrowed the Prussian education system because they knew
it had worked, so they established it here. So George Bernard Shaw, Graham Wallace, that's
a misspelling by the way on their own website, that should be W-A-L-L-A-S, Sydney Webb, Sydney
Olivier and Annie Besant, all the contributors were united by the rejection of violent upheaval as
a method of change. So this aligns with internationalism and why we got away from
material force of arms in Paris 1919 and went to this international order where we're going to
try to talk our way through things using diplomacy rather than blowing each other up.
This was the idea, although we still see the UN and NATO is still perpetuating war perennially
all the time and right now as we speak they are at war. So really what they did was created a war
machine. Okay, am I still being heard? Beautiful. So we're going to get back to Graham Wallace
because he's the connection to the American progressives. He's a close personal friend of
Walter Littman as we've shown. So the early Fabian's commitment to nonviolent political change was
underlined by the role the Fabian society played in parliamentary politics, having initially sought
to influence the liberal and conservative parties. There it is right there. Okay,
they're influencing both parties, they're saying it. And there's a direct link between the
Fabian's way of doing things and the American progressives. So this is why the American progressives
have a purple flag. They're influencing and they've long ago infiltrated. There's no reason for you
to vote. The only worthwhile vote right now is a no vote. If we all just stood back and didn't
vote and didn't enable this corrupt sick system that would definitely raise their eyebrows
the oligarchical controllers, that would definitely make them ponder if we just didn't vote, if we
refuse to enable and comply. But when you mean when you mean if we refuse to vote, it seems like
only 30 or 40% of say Canadians are actually voting. So you know that things are being
controlled by the 30 or 40% that do go out and vote. So we run in that system. If 60% of people
that choose not to vote, like you say, went out and voted for somebody other than any of
these established parties, which it's pretty difficult because most of them are established
parties, then we would actually have some type of change. But because that 60%, like you said,
choose not to vote. So if say another 10% or 20% drops, say only 10% of the population vote,
it's still business as usual. And so there's got to be something done when it comes to that
because just choosing not to vote doesn't mean that their tyrannical rule just goes away.
Well, what it would do would not enable them. It would show that we aren't interested in
participating in this corrupt system because we've had long enough of a time to see.
And so this is why I say understanding our history in the Progressive Era first
is key because then you know which direction to go and then you know who to avoid.
So I've never voted in my life because I saw it as ridiculous when I was 10 years old.
And so people can go out and vote, but I'm just telling you that that's enabling, that's
complying, that is participating in a sick society we all know is long ago corrupted. So
my recommendation would be to start educating ourselves with the knowledge they removed from
our schooling and start to approach life from an entrepreneurial mindset and see where
you can actually contribute in reality because a lot of this is being controlled through our
pseudo environment that Walter Lippman created. I mean, we know that all of those politicians,
Jesse, are lying through their teeth because their lips are moving. So that's where I'm at,
that's my perspective. And that's a perspective of a forensic historian, somebody that's gone into
the books and done the work. And I stand firm on granite when I say those things that
voting harder is not going to work. We see at least the candidates that they give us.
If we were to find somebody that was refusing to comply to all of this and had such a
magnetic personality perhaps that we could make things happen, but then we're stepping into
cults of personality. And so I choose to have faith in myself first and foremost.
And if I'm going to bet on anybody, it's going to be on me. So that's what I got to say about
that. Dirk McGurk from our YouTube says voting doesn't matter. Yeah, I agree, because it's
all infiltrated by progressivism. It doesn't matter. It's purple. You can vote. I mean,
to sit there and talk and use labels like conservative or the left or Democrats and
Republicans, it just shows a lack of understanding of your environment. You're
most running around looking for cheese, but you don't quite understand.
And so this is why this conversation here today is important. So out of the Fabian Society comes
the London School of Economics. We've talked a little bit about that and this magazine,
the new statesman. So propaganda has to have brick and mortar building that you can congregate.
And then you have to have a piece of literature, a periodical, a monthly magazine
like Foreign Affairs for CFR. You'll see that all of these organizations have their own magazine
to disseminate around the world what their message is. And the Fabians were no different.
They had the new statesmen. So they have the word new in there. And what's it going to be the
new statesmen? Now, that's important. So the London School of Economics today,
one of the most preeminent universities in the world. And we see a lot of these American
progressives coming from there began far more humbly. A bequest of 20,000 pounds left by Derby
Fabian, Henry Hitchinson in the Society for Propaganda and Other Purposes. End quote. Okay.
Was used by the webs Wallace Shaw to found a research institute to provide proof positive of
the collectivist ideal. Collectivism means globalism. Collectivism means internationalism.
These are the globalists. There's and like Liz said, it's just right there right in your face.
So the LSE flourished and continue to associate with Fabian academics, including Harold Lasky,
who's living at the House of Truth, Richard Titmus and Brian Abel Smith.
So today, the society and the LSE continue to work together. The London School of
Economics holds the Fabian Society archives, including extensive correspondence and early
photographs of Fabian Society events. It is also home to the Fabian window. So that's where the
Fabian window is at the LSE stained glass image of early Fabians designed by George Bernard Shaw.
We've already gone over. So we've already learned quite a bit here of the Fabians and
sort of the basis of it, but it goes back further. We'll get to that. The new statesman
was founded in 1913, this most amazing of years. You go to bulletproofpub.com, look for 1913,
dawn of a new age. And we've done an extensive article on it. So the with the financial support
of George Bernard Shaw and other Fabian Society members, the webs recruit Clifford Sharp as
the founding editor of the magazine. So we see just like Brandeis and Harvard,
the creation of the Harvard Law Review. He uses that as his main tool of propaganda and that and
through that Harvard Law Review, he's established sociological jurisprudence totally flipped over
our world of law. So there was something here I saw. Did I miss something? Give me one sec.
There was a key I thought I saw progressive here a word. The members of the society were
radicals for their time, but their views reflected the age they lived in leading members of the society
held racist prejudices. So they're actually connected to the eugenics society, which we're
not in keeping with the society's commitment to equality for all either then or now. Fabians
engaged in debates on eugenics and were racist towards people of Jewish black and Asian origin.
Views on the role of empire varied amongst members with some supporting rapid decolonization
and others seeing the British Empire as a potentially progressive force in the world.
So there's contention as to ways and means, but the ends are all agreed upon. If you get what I mean.
Liz is asking, Dwayne, where do you see the House of Truth being present today? Do you see one?
Well, it was a political slown where they flipped the definition of liberalism and introduced
progressivism. We do have new Brandeisians and we do have today a progressive movement very
healthily moving along as progress does.
But has House of Truth gone to secret society like a lot of these other things potentially?
Yeah, I think that the House of Truth served its purpose in changing the definition of liberalism
and introducing progressivism during the New Deal. Interestingly enough, I haven't disclosed this,
but through my newest research, the newest articles, the first American fascists, we see
a similar House of Truth situation going on with the New Dealers. So FDR had a brain trust
and Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter and all these guys are there. But these are the guys
that were recruited through Harvard Law School and given to Brandeis and Oliver Wendell Holmes as
clerks. So we're talking Dean Atchison and some very prominent names into the 30s and 40s and 50s
into the Cold War era. And these guys, the New Dealers actually had a place that my wife and
I were sitting there going, this is just like the House of Truth. Except it's not just a piece
of crap row house. This is a beautiful home. And so in our research in the coming, you know,
few months, I'm going to present that maybe I'll just throw a picture of that up on Facebook and
show that these New Dealers were actually holed up in a political salon home too. And it was
all directed by Felix Frankfurter, Louis Brandeis and the original House of Truth members.
So yeah, and today I would say that it's more of a normalized thing, kind of like MK Ultra just
went mainstream. So that's what I see. So writing in the Manchester Guardian of the new magazine,
Sidney Webb, who's a founder of the Fabian Society and the primary author of Industrial
Democracy and Trade Unionism, he says, quote, it's distinctive feature will be its point
of view, absolutely untrammeled by party or sect or creed. You see that? It's apolitical, yet we're
still very political. Its general attitude will be best designated by the term Fabian,
but it will endeavor to bring to light and to appreciate in a wide Catholic spirit all those
features in other social projects or movements, which can be recognized as making for what?
Progress. Just to generalize the term. Yes, this apolitical progress that we're all living in,
they give the facade of the political that it actually makes a difference or that it changes
anything, but we're continuing, the ship continuing this, you know, progressivism keeps
moving on. Yeah, we're just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. There's probably a never,
never better an analogy of what's happening today. You know, it's just people have cleavages
and people want things to be true. And I would say that there is a personality type that needs
to have something to hold on to. And so, you know, that's complicated. That's not my personality. I
feel like I go out and we try to make things happen in reality and try to fill those voids that
we talked about earlier. Yeah, but exactly right, Jesse, that this is the illusion that's allowed
this thing to keep going. You can see that they're saying it right there. And when they say
Catholic spirit, I'm not sure they really mean literally Catholic. They're more talking about
the religious religiousness of it. You know, we're going to we're going to perpetuate this
idea of progress with religious fervor. So this really connects to Christian Christianity
and the social gospel movement because, you know, Christianity has a social aspect to it.
And I'm not saying that that necessarily is wrong, you know, like
many, many years ago, if you were in, if you were destitute and you needed food and you were
coming into a town, the first place you'd go would be the church.
So the new statesmen remain true to Webb's independent vision and the voice of Fabianism
gradually diminished over time. But the new statesman remains a leading voice on the
left in contemporary British politics. So back to Liz's point there, Fabianism is now the
first secret, but now they're mainstream. And we don't ever question them. I wonder how many
people actually know that the British Labor Party comes from a secret society.
So they get into the between the wars era, 1945 into Cold War. I invite everybody to
continue to read this. But they're showing you that it's from this Fabian, this Fabias,
okay. And so now I'm just going to click this tab. Do we see Fabian strategy here now?
I see our history, the Fabian society.
So I'm going to stop sharing and I'll do this again. Hang on one sec.
Because we'll get into the Fabian strategy as they say it in a wiki page here.
And it might help bring that together. And then we'll move on to
more detail into the new ethical society, I think is what we wanted, the very origins of it.
Okay. So you should be looking at the Fabian strategy wiki page now.
Yes.
We're going to reiterate what we were talking about. But I wanted to go to the Fabian society
website first. So nobody was going to give me a hard time about being on a wiki page.
One thing I will say about wiki is there's a lot of sources on here.
And to a certain degree it is very, very trustworthy. But once you get into the weeds,
this is where you can be sort of steered in the wrong directions on wiki.
But I vet all of this information that's stated here. So the Fabian strategy is a
military strategy where pitched battles and frontal assaults are avoided in favor of wearing
down an opponent through a war of attrition. So that's what we're in right now.
Right. An information war, a war on our mind, and it's a war of attrition. How much can you handle?
So the best thing you can do as a warrior, information war is to gather the necessary
weapons and protection. So an understanding of logical fallacy to prevent yourself from being
lied to ever again by lying politicians is your protection. Your sword would be this knowledge
that they've removed, your ability to reasonably and logically ask questions,
and to chain reasoning together. This is your weaponry. And so we've been trying to do our
best just being a representative. And creating a farm from my mind is a great weapon. So that's
why we do it. A couple quick questions. Dirk McGurk from YouTube says, could it be a strategy
of tension you speak of? Sure. Yep, this is the Hegelian dialectic of creating tension
and out of that chaos, right? It's written on the American dollar bill. Order ab kale,
chaos, however you pronounce it. So the other one was Cecil Rhodes, a Fabian.
That's a great question. He's an Anglo-American. He's part of the Anglo-American establishment.
He's really the founder of the Rhodes Round Table, and they are working hand in hand with
the Fabians here. They are all in meetings talking about the origins of Israel. Okay, so
yeah, Cecil Rhodes, you start to talk about Lord Milner. And two of these guys,
let me see. Eustis Percy and Lord Lothian are two people from the British government that are working
beside David Lloyd George that are actually living at the Host of Truth with Walter Lippmann,
Felix Frankfurter, rubbing shoulders with Louis Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes and the American
Progressives, same with Harold Lasky. These are socialists too. So they're all hanging out at
this political salon, 1727 19th Street, about one mile from the White House, real close to the
Phi Beta Kappa Society headquarters, world headquarters. So yep, Cecil Rhodes, I'm not
sure if he was a Fabian, but he's definitely involved here. He is an important faction to
understand that we've actually never gone over. But yeah, it's his dream. It's out of his dream
that has created the Council on Foreign Relations and the British counterpart, Chatham House, the
International Affairs, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. This was his dream to
govern the world and have two headquarters, one in New York and one in London. And so those
were established 1921, 1917. Really is where we go back with the origins of the CFR, when we show
you the inquiry and the lead up to the first American war. This is really where the CFR comes
out of. Walter Lippmann is the leading, the first organizer of it. And I'm not sure if you
mentioned this before, but Cafe 25 says, has he mentioned Pierre Trudeau? He was a Fabian.
Yes, that's absolutely true. So you can see that this is how it comes here to Canada and
I live in British Columbia. So this is a great connection between the Americans and the British,
because it's the District of Columbia, the manifest destiny of America was really
under the auspices of Columbia. So through some recent research and watching this
nine part series on the creation of Canada, we see that these are the things going on,
Fabianism, the British and here in British Columbia, we were actually under a condominium,
that's what they called it, the reciprocity act, where we were actually under the control of
both the British and the Americans for quite a while. So I encourage everybody to go check
that creation of Canada series out. It's on YouTube. It's a little kitschy, but very entertaining
and very informative to give you a general sort of idea of how Canada was formed.
So Quintus Fabius Maximus varicosis. This is him.
And I may have just switched over. You might not be able to see that actually.
So we're just reiterating. Sorry, I was just saying things, Jackie.
Okay, so we're just showing you that it is here sort of substantiating what we've already talked
about on the Fabian Society website. Okay, so again, I invite everybody to go finish that
this wiki page and start to really understand the history of the Fabian Society.
Okay, so we're going to start with the long view here about the Fabian Society,
because there's a there's an interesting connection to all the socialists going back to the
French Revolution. Okay, so there's the utopian socialists, there's these ethical socialists,
and we go back to the origins of the Panopticon. So if you go to bulletproofpub.com and look at
Brandeis part seven, the philosophy of law, we get into, you know, David Bentham and this idea
of utilitarianism and being of good utility for the greater good. These are terms that they were
using. So we heard that term in during COVID. So let's start here with Havlock Ellis. This
may be somebody familiar to anybody that's looking into the Fabian Society. This is the
origins of the Fabian Society when it was the ethical, what was it called ethical socialist
society, something like that, we'll get to it. And so you can see Havlock Ellis is one of the
guys and you can see a progressive intellectual, eugenicist, social reformer who studied human
sexuality. So he co-wrote the first medical textbook in English on homosexuality. He creates the first
term for transgender. You can see that he's done deep studies on narcissism and autoeroticism,
later adopted by who, Sigmund Freud and psychoanalysis. And so we are pretty sure at this
point that both Sigmund Freud and his double nephew, Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda,
were both Frankists. So you can start to see why our society is so inverted now.
And it's really, we point to the Fabian Society as well as Frankism. And so there is a little
confusion as to the two things, Fabianism and Frankism. But Frankism comes from Europe
and it's an antinomian sort of rejection of all ethical and moral law.
And Fabianism is this British sort of born idea out of ameliorating the poor and needy. This is
one of the things that they said when they created the K through 12 education here in the
West in the 1850s was that if we institute this education system, we're not going to need the
need, there will no longer be a need for penitentiaries or we will eliminate the poor and
needy just because we're going to educate people. Well, we can see, we're almost 200 years
later, there's still, you know, poverty is prominent and there's still penitentiaries. And so,
you know, Jeremy Bentham is the guy that creates the Panopticon and Panopticon is a prison
where you can control all kinds of prisoners with one guard because the one guard can see
all of the prisoners. So that's what we have concluded that we live in when we talk about
an open air prison or an invisible prison, something you can't see. These are the
creators of it, the creators of the literal matrix. And the Fabians were able to keep...
Yeah, let's take away your freedoms to keep you safe.
Yeah, and it's all done in our convenience and safety and you see this all the time.
Okay, so the fellowship of the new life is the word I was looking for earlier
and it's most famous splinter group, the Fabian Society.
Are you looking at the fellowship of the new life?
Yes.
Beautiful. So I can just go through those tabs like that.
So you can see Edward Pease, we've already talked about him.
He's one of the founders on that Shaw window, Slammin. I think he's the guy in behind
blowing the air into the fire to keep the fire heated on the far left of that Fabian window.
And then, you know, Ramsey MacDonald is a Labour Party leader. He's the first Labour
Party leader and this is right at the Paris Peace Conference 1919 in those years.
You can see how the Fabians are meeting up with the American progressives and establishing
really socialism or communism here in the West. It's just under the names progressivism,
Fabianism. And you can see it's layered in its obfuscation.
You know, you have to dig fairly deep to get through the Fabians,
through the American progressives to understand the New World Order.
But once you understand the New World Order, you can see it.
But what's fascinating is that they target communism and communists as bad and Russia
bad and China bad as their closet communists. You know, it's the whole thing that they
accuse the other people of what they're actually doing.
Yep, exactly. And so I've just switched over to Fabian Freeway,
High Road to Socialism in the USA. Do you see that?
No, we're still on Fellowship of the New Life.
Okay, I'll just get out and go back in.
So somebody's written books on this and this is one of the sources in our articles
at the bulletproofpub.com. It's called Fabian Freeway, High Road to Socialism,
in the USA, 1884 to 1966. So this book is written in the 60s, and she's talking about
the Fabian society and how it infiltrated America. And she gets into Brandeis.
I'm not the only one out there talking about this. You can see throughout history,
there has been people that and this is really, it was well known. We can see during all of this,
there's contention and fighting against all of this and it's properly being identified in real
time as socialism, yet they're able to sneak through and underneath, sort of underneath the radar.
So on the forward, the very first page, the American people have been and are complacently
unfamiliar with communism's helpmate, Fabian socialism for over 50 years, but especially
since the middle 1930s, there have been insinuated into high places in our government at Washington.
Men whose collaboration in this socialistic movement has been greatly responsible for
breaking down our constitutional form of government and substituting therefore the
socialist idea of centralized government. This is just plain documented historical fact
when we look at it. You look at FDR and Woodrow Wilson, they are two very socialist presidents.
You can see through the architecture and the buildings that they established that they,
along with Stalin, Lenin and Mussolini created stripped architecture. This is the
Federal Reserve architecture, stripped architecture. You can see all of these dictators,
including Wilson and FDR, exclusively using that kind of archaeology. So I can argue
a New World Order exists through architecture. So every loyal American should read this book.
It is well documented and proves beyond doubt that those who have wielded such vast
influence upon successive presidents, especially since Franklin Roosevelt,
do not have a desire to retain the freedom of the individual and the free enterprise system,
but rather seek to establish the very coercion from which our forefathers fled.
So you can see on the bottom of the page, there are Walter Lippmann's name and the
Schlesinger's. Very prominent in this Fabian idea. Now Walter Lippmann is a Fabian society
member. He is the first Henry Kissinger. He is considered today the father of modern
journalism. Now that should resonate in your brain right now that this guy who's a Fabian
society member, an American progressive, the first Henry Kissinger and really the author of NATO and
UN is also considered today the father of modern journalism. Now if you want a character to
look into, he's one and we've done that extensively. So you can go to the history
of propaganda on YouTube and we've done deep dives on Lippmann and how he infiltrated your media.
This is why I say progressivism infiltrated everything, including your media, all at the
same time, 1917, all in the lead up to war. This is why we called one of our series from
the embers of war because all of these changes come out of emergency measures,
executive orders, right? And we see them now. Trump was just doing them all and during COVID it
was an emergency act that enabled all of these changes in society that we still see today. You
can see through COVID how systems and protocol get established that never go away like the
glass covers it. You go to stores and some people still have those glass things and I tap on them
and I ask them why they have those still here because I want them to answer. So I direct you
guys to that book. She gets deep into this and this is one of the sources for our work.
And so I'm going to just now quickly go to some of our work and show you that we've gone
over this through bulletproofpub.com work. So go to bulletproofpub.com
and you'll get this landing page. Okay? And at the top you've got our two newest articles
and that's about all I'm going to be able to write now because the farm is almost full bore.
But if you go into the rise of the experts series you're going to start to see that
all of our challenges that we're trying to overcome today exist right here
in this 10-part series. Federal Reserve, usury, speculation, infiltration of political parties.
You can see Brandeis was the creator of the new freedom. Now,
when you see how deeply he influences our world you can see how he connects to the Fabians.
So I think I might have to stop share and we'll click on the article
right there. Hang on one second.
And it's called Brandeis Part 5, Industrial Democracy and the Protocol of Peace. So we
mentioned earlier that he, through the Triangle Shirt Waste Fires and the Cloak Makers Strike
1910-1911, he establishes the Protocol of Peace which is our eight-hour workdays,
five days a week, those kinds of things. Okay? So this is why we say he is the architect
of our modern-day social contract. So just like progressivism kind of uses smoke and mirrors,
there he is in the smoke. So where does he, where does this guy get inspired from? But
Sidney Webb. Sidney Webb is often represented as a descendant of the utilitarians. Okay? We talked
about David Bentham and the utilitarian philosophy of being of good utility for the
greater good. Social democracy in the welfare state thus stands as a continuing
development of enlightenment rationalism. So we've pointed that this goes back all
the way to enlightenment. This is what we're dealing with is this traditional argument of
scientific man versus God. They're trying to get out into this real world, the effective environment
and measure everything and understand our world better than God so that they can direct society.
So here we are a hundred and something years later and this is what another reason why I
say don't vote because we are governed largely by the scientific expert. It doesn't
matter who you vote for, they're still going to defer to the scientific expert like we saw
on COVID. So alternatively Webb appears as the representative of a new managerial and administrative
class. Social democracy in the welfare state here stand as the elitist and bureaucratic
expressions of the power of this class. Now where do I get that from? Sidney Webb, utilitarianism,
positivism and social democracy, Mark Bavir. Bavir is director of the Center for British
Studies and professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California at
Berkeley. So that's like a Marxist conclave. So much like we're going to the Fabian society
to get our information, I look to that as an important source too. So it was through his
early legislative career as the people's lawyer that Louis D. Brandeis established
much of what he even called himself an industrial democracy. From even before his earliest
precedent setting case is working with the National Consumers League in 1906, we see an
early career obsessed with labor law adopted directly from Sidney and Beecher's Webb's
famous book, Industrial Democracy. First written in 1897, I think it was written,
republished in 1902. The purpose of this paper is to first map out for the reader the
important personal connections between Brandeis and the Fabian-bred idea of industrial democracy
and then secondly show how Brandeis used the Fabian method of industrial democracy,
this idea of trade unionism, collective bargaining, we've heard these terms before,
combined with labor relations and scientific management which Brandeis coins the scientific
management of the labor worker. There was wars. The laborer did not want anything to do with
being scientifically managed. The manufacturer of course wanted it and this is why they had
to establish a trade union to put all of the workers under a board of maybe just a few men
which are far more manipulatable and exploitive than the millions of workers around the world.
To impose lasting socialism and even fascism in America as early as 1912.
So first and foremost, both Brandeis and the Webb's held an identical appreciation for
trade unionism and collective bargaining while Brandeis was the great American practitioner,
Beecher's Webb coined the term collective bargaining. That's Sidney Webb's wife,
the co-author of industrial democracy and they both looked to the union labor leader as a necessary
expert. So we talk about the three tenets of progressivism, efficiency, preparedness and
trust the science, always having an expert to defer to place deliberately between labor and
capital as a spokesman for the worker. Now like I said, manufacturer had no problem with the
union being brought in in this perspective and that it was easier to manipulate the workers and
get them to work and we see that that's exactly how history played out. So this introduction of
small arbitration boards or councils to settle labor grievances of which Brandeis was at the
head of and he used Walter Weil as his right-hand man who was also living at the host of truth
is a common pattern evident in both the work of Brandeis and the Webb's,
secondly both Brandeis and the Fabians shared an important common friend, Walter Lippmann,
who wrote of intelligence bureaus led by expert entering wedges in his famous public opinion,
1921. Lippmann, both a founding American progressive and Fabian society member,
was very close friends with Brandeis and Graham Wallace. Graham Wallace is a founding member
of the Fabian society and he dedicates his book The Great Society as you can see there
to Lippmann. Brandeis is very much the honored guest at Lippmann's own political salon. This is
where he's living with his new wife that he stole from Hamilton Fish Armstrong, another member of
the CFR. They had an affair. He stole her and they eloped at the house of truth. So both
the Fabians and the progressives knew it was far easier to manipulate an arbitration board with
its few members than it was to manipulate or attempt to leverage the thousands or even
millions of independent workers. They were able to shift or commandeer the nature of labor
dispute by introducing collective bargaining, placing debate into a framework that they could
easily manipulate almost always in favor of the factory owner.
Am I still on? Yes, you are. Beautiful. So the next quote, collective bargaining, a term
and idea the webs pioneered was therefore central to industrial democracy. These trade
agreements would in the best of all possible worlds have the status of law because they
would have government sanction as legally enforceable contracts. Ultimately, the webs believed
that unions would bargain directly with the state in industry-wide agreements, thereby
ensuring the betterment of society as a whole. That's from the triangle shirt waste fire,
the protocols of peace and industrial democracy and progressive air by George A. Greenwald.
That was largely Jewish. The triangle shirt waste fire, the laborers, the lawyers,
and the owners were all Jewish. Rose Martin makes that connection too
in Fabian Highway, Fabian Freeway. The links that I want to make here is in the language.
We live in an industrial democracy today largely pushed by technology now. We're entering into
this bioconvergence and AI, but it's all an extension. This is the furthest imagination of
these clinicians working out of the public purview. We're starting to see that
it's like the eugenicism just went mainstream. Brandeis is one of the first,
if not the first to establish sterilization laws along with surveillance laws, but we've
gone over all that. The terminology is key. Industrial democracy, trade unionism, scientific
management, it all links these guys. They're ends united in that they had all of these
efficient workers working in factories for other people to create war machines. This is really
Kansas University scholar works. He, Brandeis, spoke before citizens groups and legislative bodies,
wrote articles for popular magazines, put his ideas about industrial democracy in the briefs he submitted
as a lawyer, and later in the opinions he wrote as a Supreme Court justice and advised presidents
Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. Now, here's George Bernard Shaw. Conventional history
places George Bernard Shaw as a prominent playwright, political activist and social critic,
but few will mention his membership as founder of the Fabian Society and even fewer will tell
you of his most deepest wishes. Quote, there is an extraordinary number of people of whom I want
to kill. End quote. So I'm going to play this. Let me know if the volume's there, okay? Yeah.
We'll start it at the beginning because you got to hear this from the beginning.
I never know exactly how to make my opinion clear because I object to all punishment whatsoever.
I don't want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people whom I want to
kill. Not in any young kind of person, but it must be evident to all of you. You must all know
half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world. Who are more trouble than they are
and I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board,
just that he might come before the incorrect commissioners and say every five years or every
seven years, just put in there and say, sir or madam, now will you be kind enough for
justifying your existence? If you can't justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight
from the social group, if you're not producing as much as you consume or less than you are,
then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive
because your life does not benefit us and it can't be very much useful.
Well, there you go. Wow. To justify your existence and if you aren't effective in making
money for the government, then there's no use for you. And that isn't just a 100 year old video.
It is what we live in today. This is why I'm trying to tell people that voting harder is just
rearranging the deck chairs and we aren't moving forward. We are just rolling around in
the same mud, blood and beer as we always have. So it's critical to know here and certainly
worth the digression that by being identified as descendants of the utilitarians, both Brandeis and
Webbs are immediately associated with the thoughts of Jeremy Bentham, the father of utilitarianism
or the pragmatic determining of correct action by focusing on hedonic outcomes, pleasure versus
pain. So we start to relate that to the world today, right? This is how people make decisions
on how much pleasure it's going to bring them and then it's the avoidance of pain at all
costs. That is the greater good as determined by Jeremy Bentham and you better be of good utility.
You better be of good service to society or you're going to be asked to go in front of a
tribunal and justify your existence and they won't mind killing you, not in any unkindly way.
But just for the efficiency of government, these guys are coming out of the
coefficients club. These are the founders of this idea of how do we make society
efficient? And so what was Musk talking about last month, right? And where's the arrests?
This is what I'd like to see. So again, part seven philosophy of science, we go deep into
Bentham and the creation of the literal matrix. Another guy important to understand is August
Comte. He's the founder of positivism, but he's the founder of social science.
So this is what Brandeis implies into the U.S. Constitution. They go into the U.S. Constitution
and reform it entirely because this is why we have a total flipping of the word liberal
and why people misuse that term all the time. They're not specific enough. This is the
raising of the level of our thinking. Don't just say libtards or liberals be specific.
Are you talking classic liberalism or are you talking neoliberalism or, you know, anytime there's
radical social activism, that's not democracy. That is progressivism. That's a radical, right?
Louis Brandeis was considered the first radical reformatory U.S. Supreme Court justice.
So here's a picture of Sidney Webb.
It says in the preface of his book, Industrial Democracy, in the Anglo-Saxon world, so we're
talking, there was a question earlier about Cecil Rhodes. You can see that there's a definite
linking of them. In the Anglo-Saxon world of today, we find that trade unions are democracies.
That is to say their internal constitutions are all based on the principle of government
of the people, by the people, for the people. This is what they wanted to establish a
democracy on the shop floor and then to the shop and then to the other surrounding shops in the region
in that state and then across the states and fill the entire nation with this idea of
building your democracy through working hard and through sweat equity, right?
So Sidney and Beatrice Webb wrote in their scientific analysis of British industrial
relations, the history of trade unionism in 1894, that sociology, so sociology is
the original term for social science. Like all other sciences can advance only upon the
basis of a precise observation of actual facts. So we're talking about creating of the feedback
loop, observing society, observing the changes that they needed to direct them to their heart's
desire and then inputting that information into steer. That is the feedback loop being
created, you know, nearly at the same time by Norbert Wiener and the Macy conferences
and the origins of the MK ultra. This is all connects because there's there's a
Tavistock is deeply connected to American MK ultra projects too. This is really where they
get that from too. Tavistock, a lot of our ideas coming from Europe. So from triangle
shirt waste, Richard A. Greenwald quote for the webs and their American counterparts,
the professional expert, whether civil servant or representative was of decisive
importance in bringing about industrial democracy. Americans quickly noticed the idea as it
appealed to their newly found sense of rational or objective science as a means to solve
social and economic problems. American adherence to industrial democracy included future
Supreme Court Justice, Lewis Brandeis saw in it a vehicle to rationalize American industry
with a democratic framework. Put everybody to work in factories under, you know,
these leaders of capital. Now you're removing people from their own source of labor and their
ability to build whatever they want and enjoy the fruits of their own labor 100%. Now we are in
divisions of labor. You're only putting a wheel on a car. You're only one member of a long line
of workers. You never really enjoy a full 100% reward of your work. So you're stepping away
from the entrepreneurial aspect and being your own business owner and a master of your own domain
and the direction of which you want to steer your life. Now you're under the direction of
these people who are telling you they know the best. So many American progressives were keenly
aware of European experiences with labor problems. They studied Europe for guidance or a model.
Industrial democracy, one such import is most often associated with Sydney and
Beatrice Webb and their circle of British Fabian socialists. The webs in their seminal 1897 book
Industrial Democracy called for a reinvigorated democracy, one where unions played a central
role. For the webs, modern capitalist industry had put an undue strain on democratic society.
We talk resistance. There it is, undue strain. There's some tension out of which comes
our modern world. Unions could bring democracy to industry because they were or at least could be
representational bodies for workers. Its communist Marxism here we're starting to see, right? The
production, labor, it's all sort of fitting into the Marxist idea. So as democratic institutions
themselves, they offer the best hope of bringing democracy to industry by providing a counter
measure to unchecked industry. So we get into more brand eyes and how he influences through what
we've kind of already talked about. We show London School of Economics and here's a picture
of Walter Lippmann with Graham Wallace and Harold Lasky sitting by a tree. It's a very
Fabian photo. They're always taking photos of themselves outside. But here's Walter Lippmann,
your father of modern journalism right here. And then his mentor, really in many ways, Graham
Wallace. Lippmann would stay at Wallace's house when he was in Europe. Harold Lasky's a Marxist
London School of Economics, Harvard Law School professor. I'm not sure who the lady in the
middle is. Anybody can help me. I appreciate it. So you can see definite connections. We're
finding primary artifacts, historical artifacts. We're forensic historians. This is a forensic
piece of evidence that's very important. And so we include the preface of the Great Society and
we underline exactly where he dedicates the book to Walter Lippmann. We see that it's
created out of the London School of Economics. The Great Society. Supposed to be a society
run by scientific experts and a centralized government with a might is right approach to
military. So you want to be prepared. This is why we saw the word prepared through COVID so many
times. You go into some of those those scenario planning like event 201. And you can see I've
done a podcast on it on how many times they use the word preparedness.
Okay, so there's a Fabian window again. So I direct you to bulletproofpub.com. You can get
into this and then we get into sort of how they established it through legislation and these
committees and conferences. And they establish an industrial democracy here,
which is basically Fabianism as we're showing, right?
So is there any questions at this point?
Communitarianism. Do you know about what that means? How it relates to all of this?
Yeah, so communitarianism is sort of a regional approach and bringing people together in
developing this similar idea. I mean it aligns with progressivism. I think that progressivism is the
larger umbrella under which communitarianism is as the word implies a sort of communist approach
under which you're going to find co-ops and
the consumers. So here's consumer's cooperative movement by Sydney Web.
So you go to old bookstores and you can find this magic. So you're talking communities,
it's still going back to these people. Consumers, cooperatives, communitarianism,
it's all essentially the same and it goes back to the Fabians. So that's one of the sources of our
information. We've got this one here, Fabians. These books you can find. Go to book sales,
look for old bookstores. You can get these things for like 10 bucks but they are treasures.
Okay. Treasures in the meaning if you want to learn about our past, not really treasures
about, you know, something to treasure but just for information on how we got to where we are today.
If we're serious about winning, these books are important. So the dynamics of industrial
democracy, agitate, agitate, organize, 100 years of the faving socialism by Patricia Pugh,
it's another source, Science of Life, HG Wells, of which I'm waiting for the match from the
bookstore. So just to show you some of the sources, we're actually going to the real books as much as
possible. Okay. So I'm going to show you just one thing on more on communitarianism. So
when were you seeing the Fabianism started? 1884. So can the term communitarianism originated in
1840 with John Goodwin Barnaby, a leader of the British Shrest movement. He used it to describe
utopian socialists and others experimenting with communal lifestyles. The term gained traction
in the 1980s when political philosophers like Michael Sandell and Charles Taylor used it
in a broader sense to refer to a philosophy emphasizing community and the common good. So
it started from communitarianism. They changed it to Fabianism and just to kind of, I guess,
get away from the communitarianist model too much like communist, communitarian. Maybe they
didn't, they wanted to target communism, but it seems like maybe that's where Fabianism
maybe even originated from. That quite possibly could be the case there for sure.
Interesting terminology that they're using linking the two movements for sure undoubtedly. I call that
an ominous continuity of language. Okay. And the key there to understand is, and I'm going to try
to attempt to find it here, you said utopian socialists. And this is what Rose Martin identified
in Fabian freeway, is that there is an ominous continuity going back to the utopian
socialists, the French Revolution and their creations of, or their first attempts in creating
a panopticon. And so we go back to, she shows that there's an ominous continuity between most
prominently Beatrice Webb because she coins the term trade unionism or collective bargaining.
And so this was the idea of the early utopian socialists. So there's a, I mean, John Stuart Mill
here is one advocate of liberalism, like the classic liberalism, and he's involved here too,
but there's an ominous continuity that connects these early utopian French socialists with
the ethical socialists of the Fabian society 50 something years later. So just like there's a
ominous continuity from Marx through internationalism into the Paris peace conference and this idea of
internationalism, same with the idea of socialism and the Fabians, this goes back to the French
Revolution. And really they were misdefining the word liberal back then, because Louis Brandeis
was coming from a liberal family, but they were revolutionaries, Frankist revolutionaries.
So I would agree that, you know, communitarianism, co-op movements, those kinds of things are of
interest for sure. And the more we understand those things, the less we can be persuaded into,
you know, movements that aren't going to be good for us.
But the crazy part is, is that some of this stuff that there's good in mixed with the bad,
right? Because some of these things on how, you know, people should be taken care of, you know,
there should be enough for everybody, these type of there shouldn't be no man left behind,
you know, there's these things that, you know, in, you know, you're only as strong as your
weakest link. And so, you know, this guy's talking about killing people, you know, that
you mentioned if they weren't, you know, but that's not, you know, healthy, moralistic,
you know, and so there are people, especially with all of the drug epidemic, you know, pharmaceutical
epidemic that are in pain, cancers are in all these chemicals and toxins and, you know, what,
you know, is made the solution just to get rid of them all because they've been poisoned
and they didn't, you know, or, you know, like again, it's, you know, there's a balancing act
to where this stuff is, you know, detrimental compared to where this stuff is beneficial
for the collective as well.
Yep. And that is the trick. And it's, it's greatest example is through the Progressive Era,
that they say nice things and they promise nice things, but we can see over a hundred years very
clearly that none of those things have happened. They haven't ameliorated the poorer,
it's gotten worse. We're seeing homeless camps and almost homeless cities here even in the
town that I live in. And it's very evident to everybody that this situation is getting worse,
not better. And so this is why it's important to understand progressivism and to point the
finger at the proper culprits, right. And so we talked about that connection between the
utilitarian and the ethical socialists. Well, I've got this here on Felix Adler,
who's a brother-in-law of Louis D. Brandeis. They both marry Goldmark sisters, and those Goldmark
sisters come from a larger family underneath Joseph Goldmark, who comes from exactly the
same area as Brandeis' family in Prussia. And he has seven daughters. He doesn't have a boy,
he has seven daughters. If you've looked at our work, Louis Brandeis marries Alice Goldmark,
who is his second cousin. So they're related to the Goldmarks. But you can see that that Frankism
that's, you know, established in the 1880s, 1848 around the Revolution in Europe connects.
And Louis Brandeis marries his second cousin. So, you know, it's questionable. And so Felix
Adler, he is the founder of the ethical culture society. So here's a connection,
right? We're using the ethical word as a connector, because he has the same perspective
as the Fabians. Okay. So, we're going to go to the... Sure. Yeah, one question while you're fighting
that. So, we have Jeremiah Danowski from our Facebook says, natural law sounds easier to me.
What do Fabianistic society think about natural law? They hate it. The progressives hate it.
The Fabians hate it. They hate nature. This is what they talk about. They hate human nature.
They hate natural law. Anything to do with it. What they are trying to do is predict law. So,
when you look at the movie Minority Report, that's exactly what they were thinking over 100 years
ago. How do we prevent crime? We're going to try to predict it. And they're talking about it
a hundred and something years ago, how to predict crime, recidivism, right? The
recommitment of crime so that they know who's committing a crime, then they try to stop it.
It's straight out of Minority Report. We get into that in philosophy law part seven.
So, yeah, they hate natural law. Okay. So, we're a league for industrial democracy. Do you see that?
Now we do. Okay. So, that is a major connection between the progressives here in the west
and the British Fabians and this socialist conclave. Okay. So, we see and this
league for industrial democracy still exists today. It was founded as a successor to the
Intercollegiate Socialist Society and who invented and created that but Walter Lippmann and these
same Fabian socialists. So, we get into Upton Sinclair, Eugene Debs, 1912 election, Jack London.
Some of these names you guys are familiar with. Okay. So, this is how they connect
through the Intercollegiate Socialist Society. And if you just look at that term, what they're
doing is they're creating socialist, secret socialist societies in all of the colleges
and connecting them. That is what that means. And Lippmann and his buddies and Brandeis and
his buddies are creating secret societies, not just of socialist ones but also free masonic
secret societies, multiple on Harvard campus and Zionist secret societies, the menorah society and
the and the parachute, both being established on university campuses all during this time. Okay.
And we see that it's all established through this friction, through tension created by the
muckrakers. People are probably familiar with that word, the muckrakers. This is Ida Tarbell,
Lincoln Stephens, those kinds of guys. They're writing articles being critical of American life
and they're showing these monopolies and these giant trusts that are created like standard oil.
But when you look at the example of standard oil, you know, they broke the trust and
everybody celebrated that they broke that Ida Tarbell was responsible for breaking standard
oil. But when you look today, standard oil still owns everything, whether it's Exxon, BP,
SO, you know, SO stands for Eastern States Standard Oil. So they still dominate
our economy and the oil industry dominate better than they did before.
Well, everything is made out of now everything plastics, you know, computers, pesticides,
you know, you name it, you know, everything basically is made from oil and plastic.
Yeah. And in our American, first American fascists, we introduce you to the father of plastics. And
this is really, again, out of the embers of war, they established, they create plastics
because they needed it for whatever, you know, building their war machines.
Question here from Chris in our YouTube says, did Fabianism evolve out of Frankism?
It would explain the connection to the bloodlines and Zionism.
Yeah, I think that they align. I'm not sure what came first and who came out of what,
but they certainly do align in their ideologies in the inversion of what is morally acceptable.
You know, we see Edward Bernays, the father of modern journalism, early establishing in
Broadway film before there was radio and television screenplays with plot lines that were degenerative.
And that spills into the creation of Hollywood and film noir and horror genres,
something that we take as normal today. This is where it comes from to degenerate
the American movie gore, to, you know, demoralize. This is really what it is. It's a demoralization
agenda. When you read the books of the fathers of critical theory, like Max Horkheimer and Theodore
Adorno, they're hanging out with Huxley in Los Angeles and the creation of Hollywood,
they talk about a demoralization project, the demoralization, taking morality out of law
in every aspect of our lives. And you can see that that's very clearly happened.
So here is some things I just wanted to mention. So Frankism, a heterodox Jewish movement
originated in Podolia, present day Ukraine, is the second half of the, in the second half
of the 18th century. It's founder, Jacob Frank, emerged as the leader within the existing
Sabotian movement, which had begun with Sabotinian Zevi in Samaria, Turkey. Jacob Frank's movement
later split from Sabotian and developed in its own distinct religious practices and beliefs
often characterized by syncretism, encompassing Jewish, Islamic and Christian elements. And one
more thing, Podolia, Frankism was a Sabotian religious movement of the 18th and 19th centuries
created in Podolia, named after its founder, Jacob Frank. Frank completely rejected Jewish
norms preaching to his followers that they were obligated to transgress moral boundaries,
embracing anti-nominomianism. Yeah, exactly. And we cover that in part one
of our Rise of the Experts series. So let me see if I can just bring that up,
because Brandeis is the architect of the Federal Reserve. We know that. We've already established
that through, you know, our work and through podcasts here. We've shown that very clearly.
Let me just find that. And so the first paragraphs of this 10-part series I found
that it was important to establish Jacob Frank and the understanding that this is
where Lewis Brandeis comes from. So there's a picture of Jacob Frank, yeah, called Frank.
And so he is considered a founder of the Illuminati, along with Jacob, or a Rothschild
and Adam Weisshoff. There's three founders of the Illuminati, and Jacob Frank is one. Okay, so
we can see that the Brandeis family was part of a long rabbinical line of social reformers.
Adolf, who is Lewis' father himself, a liberal revolutionary who moved his young
family to the States before Lewis was born. See, I use liberal revolutionary to distinguish
we aren't talking classic liberalism here. They're not out for our freedom to speak and
think freely. They're there to suppress. So Lewis' great-grandfather, Aaron Beer-Wale,
and his brother, Jonas Beer-Wale, were apparently the leaders of the Frankus
Movement in Prague. And that's where Brandeis comes from. They come from the Brandeis on the Elbe.
That's what the city is called. So you can see that they're aristocracy. They're high
society members. If they're coming from a city of the same name as them, highly likely that they are
controllers, managers of society back then. So we see where Lewis Brandeis actually has
a picture of Eva, or Jacob Frank's daughter Eva, on his desk. Okay, and here we refer to Rabbi
J. Michelson. You can go find him on YouTube right now. He's talking about these things.
He's the PhD in Jewish thought. And he says, Jacob Frank slept with his followers and maybe
even his daughter. He preached a nihilistic doctrine that saw this world as intrinsically
corrupt and believed that the best way to imitate God was to cross every boundary,
transgress every taboo, and mix the sacred with the profane.
That's so crazy. And that kind of shows when it says Frank completely rejected Jewish
norms preaching to his followers that they were obligated to transgress moral boundaries.
You know, that's a classic example of it. Yeah, so Frankism and Fabianism are very
aligned. And I would say that there's a degenerative bisexualness to all of this too. All of these
people partake in taboos that are generally not accepted in society. You know, whether you
know the 1917 club or the Cambridge apostles of which, you know,
not B.F. Skinner, but the other guy, the British intellectual leader comes from.
And they're all sort of, who knows what's going on in there, right behind closed doors,
but they are all admitted bisexuals. They all talk about having sexual
escapades with the same sex. Huxley and Isherwood are close. And they're in Berlin,
hanging out with Alistair Crowley during the fall of Berlin. So you tell me what's going on there.
So, yeah, that is, you know, I think that that's really the source of all of this
Satanism, Luciferianism too. I think that those are covers for Frankism in much the same way
progressivism is a cover for communism or whatever this sort of
totalitarian control of government is. That's the word that I would use is totalitarian,
because that is born out of fascism, another F word. But the chosen economic model of the
progressives is fascism, a public-private partnership. You have private manufacturing owners
teaming up with the government to build things for the government to go out there and to expand.
So we're talking a manifest destiny around the world, and you know how that they expand.
It's not out of compliance. It's out of total coercion and murder, if necessary. We see that
the United States are, you know, all over the world with military bases, including Diego Garcia.
And they are really, you know, still to this day, they are the aggressors. Well,
well, being the defenders of democracy, right? It's the Department of Defense now, not the
Department of War. It's not Secretary of War, it's Secretary of Defense. So they've flipped
it, and they are the aggressors. So that's another great example of how they tell you one thing,
but they're doing another. And it's not even hard to understand. You just see it today. Look at what's
going on in Europe with the UN and Israel and the Gaza Strip. This is all very related to the
same thing. Louis Brandeis, as we've shown, was the primary author of the Balfour Declaration
that creates Israel. So we see Cecil Rhodes and the Round Table members along with the
Fabians, you know, creating all of this. And actually, I could refer you back to the inter-allied
socialist labor conferences that led up to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, where Sidney Webb
was the chairman. And that's where they established the UN. They called it the
League of Nations then. And then they said, back to Liz's point, that the League of Nations
is now dead. But what it did was went mainstream. We live in an international world now.
And what is NATO in the UN but direct descendant of the League of Nations? I have proven that over
and over. There's no debate. They even admit it. We go to their own website. That's what they say.
Linda says democracy is not a good or positive thing.
Yeah, I think it's just one of these words that we get attached to. This is a cleavage.
You want to talk of cleavage and you get comfortable in the bosom
and you want comfort. And we're in a time right now where you shouldn't be comfortable.
We need to be getting uncomfortable so that we can really see what's going on. So
that's Chris Morrison. She's a friend of mine on Facebook. I appreciate her effort and time and
attention. So thank you. Infiltration is the hallmark of Frankism and it is the hallmark of
Fabianism and American progressivism. It's the toe in the door that the vampire gets.
As soon as you invite that vampire in, you're in trouble. And there's not a better analogy than
that because we can see that the progressives got in by saying nice things and you were like,
okay, well, I trust this person. I'll let him into my home. Well, what ended up happening was
total inversion of our traditions and values and those things that we want to hold on to here.
So this is where I warn people before they get into anything new. I think we all have this
sort of innate quality about ourselves to appreciate tradition and things the way that
they were. This I think is human nature that we like to look back on things and see where
we came from and see progress, but not to weaponize it and use it to infiltrate society like we are today.
So that's about all I've got on the Fabian society for now. If there's any other questions,
I got about 13 minutes before I got to go. We can do whatever you want to do.
Anybody have any questions, please put them into the comments. I wanted to know
what, you know, and we mentioned, I guess, a little bit with this Frankism and stuff, but
how does Fabianism, how does progressivism, how does that, how does that, you know,
I guess, associate with, you know, the Jewish people? Where does this come from? How are they
involved in it? Because it seems like a lot of these names potentially,
you know, are from Jewish descent. Yeah, that is true. There's a lot of Jewish people here. There's a
lot of, you know, Boston Braumans and Anglo-American, you know, the Anglo-American establishment is
here, but we're seeing at every turn, wherever there needs to be control of a faucet of information,
it's a Jewish person there, whether you want to talk Samuel Gompers and the founder of
the American Federation of Labor, I believe. He's Jewish, very prominent, and they're surrounding labor,
because they understand how important labor is. This is one thing that took me a while to understand
why were they also interested in labor. Well, we see through trade unionism, collective bargaining,
that this is the one thing that unites all, right? We can all be sort of the visionary
in our interests and beliefs, but we're all human and we all need to work for a living,
so much like they put really influential commercials on at the Super Bowl, because they
know that all eyeballs are there. This is why they sort of surrounded labor in general. They
wanted to be able to control it, because if they could control labor, they can control everything.
And so the other thing I'd like to say about definition of terms, when they can control
your definition of a term like liberalism, they control your culture. That's how they got
this. That's how they've been able to infiltrate our societies, because they have the definition of
terms. And one of the things that you get taught in the Tribune, one of the first things in this
liberal arts that they remove from us is to define your terms. And so we never ever really hold
our politicians accountable by saying, what do you mean by liberalism? Or what do you mean
by that term? Why don't you explain what that is? Because then what happens? We come to terms.
And that is the ultimate that we need to do now. Your show is called The Missing Link,
and why you name that is because you want us to understand and come together and fully understand
this world. What is The Missing Link? To me, it's progressivism. It's this idea of socialist,
I mean, we largely live in a socialist idea world. We all have social insurance numbers.
There's, you know, all kinds of programs, social programs to help the poor, the old,
the needy. And I'm not saying that those things can't be part of a society. It's just that they've,
it's about how they use it, right? It's like our education system. We have to have that.
We have to be able to educate our youth. And so it's about the curriculum,
not necessarily even the people that teach it. So if we were to start schooling with
our understanding of grammar and then move into logic and asking who, what, why, where, when,
being able to chain reasoning together and develop a sophisticated worldview,
this is how we do it. But they removed all of those mechanisms from us on purpose,
and they even talk about it in there. You know, the founder of our Western education system,
Johann Gottlieb Fischta, he says that they want the whole program was designed to remove
our free will in the soil before it was sprouted. So I'm busy. My wife and I are busy out here
on a farm showing you that free will exists. We are creating a farm from our mind.
So we went and found some leasable land and some like-minded people. And we've built a
storefront and we're allowed to use their tractors and, you know, those kinds of things. And we're
busy trying to create in reality what we want to see because they've got everybody busy in the
pseudo environment. So there's a pseudo environment and an effective environment. When you read
public opinion by Walter Lippman, you can see that this is what they wanted to do. He says
it right in there. They wanted to create a pseudo environment as close as they could to the
real environment or the effective environment because then they could now manipulate everything.
So that's why we have the scientific expert. That's why we have Bonnie Henry in BC telling us to put
masks on, not necessarily the elected officials. They're saying the same thing too, but the
ultimate authority was Bonnie Henry here in BC. And that's, you know, there's no better example
of a scientific expert than her.
Voi is asking, what would be an antidote to infiltration?
Well, being a well-developed individual is the perfect antidote to a tyrannical government
or tyrannical anything. So be well-developed. They can't fool people that understand how
to be fooled. This is why I say if we were ever to get a program going of
awakeness, the first thing we need to do is read a book. We need to read this and infuse
within us this knowledge, this empowering knowledge that allows us never to be fooled again.
This is what logical fallacy does. So I direct people to go find the Trivium, look at Chapter 9,
and, you know, there's names and labels for all of the lies, whether you want to talk
argumentum ad hominem or the appeal to authorities, the red herring. You know, we hear these terms,
but we aren't privy to it because it's not in our school books. And so we talk about it all the time.
Oh, I wish that was in our schooling. Why don't they teach us this or the power of compound
interest or all of these things? Well, they don't for a reason because they're empowering.
So the perfect antidote is to empower yourselves to understand when you're being lied to and call
them out on it. So that's what I would say. That's why he said I like that answer. And that's why
they say it's easier to fool somebody than to convince them that they're being fooled.
That is correct. That is exactly right. Any other questions? Go ahead.
Good job, not you saying that. It's a Mark Twain quote because it's not,
nobody knows where that quote came from, by the way, but it's, it's good. I agree with it.
So we've gone through the London School of Economics, the British Labour Party today,
Graham Wallace, Walter Lytton, Great Society, both Fabians, Trade Unionism and the Plantation
Analogy. So go everybody and watch the animated film Mr. Jones's Plantation
because it shows exactly how the middle manager comes in, promises you all kinds of things,
but nothing changes. So what we're saying is that we all live on a plantation. So when,
when Abraham Lincoln emancipated the slaves, all they were doing was making more efficient
their form of governance. It wasn't about race or color. They just wanted us all in the same
general population because we're easier to manipulate and control when we're all one.
And this is really, you know, you see commercials today, even where they're
talking about the mulatto person being the person, what, what people are going to look
like in the future is the mulatto. You can see that they're mixing all of the races,
except their own, right? This is important to understand too, is that, you know, those that
are steering our society aren't necessarily mixing with the goyum, you know, the whites
or the blacks or the Chinese. They're pretty much staying exclusive. And, you know, we see a genocide
going on in Israel right now of this, I have no doubt. And you can, I can refer you to
Brandeis part three, American Zionism and the creation of Israel. These are the same people
that created Israel. You know, Brandeis was the leader of Zionism, international Zionism.
He, he makes it popular. This idea of dual loyalty, dual citizenship in our Congress,
this all comes from Louis Brandeis. So is what happening in, you know, Palestine right now,
is that progressivism? Yeah. Yeah, it's all about progress for the Jewish nation.
And so this is one thing maybe important time to point this out, is that there's 77 branches
of Semitic speaking people in that region. The largest is the Arab at over half a billion.
So the Hebrew is way down that list and a fraction of that number. So when they call
somebody being critical of Israeli foreign policy, anti Semitic, they're actually staking
claims that entire tree of 77 branches. It's a little bit egotistical, as far as I'm concerned,
that they're, they're all of a sudden the spokesman, even for the Arab. Now,
this is one thing that we need to understand there's 77 branches. So if you ever get
called an anti Semitic, ask them, oh, which branch? Well, the other thing is we just mentioned,
and I was going to mention what you just said at that time was that they define the words.
And that's another classic example of them defining, you know, taking ownership of,
of a word anti Semitic doesn't mean anti Jewish. It doesn't mean anti Israel.
It means anti Shem, anti Shemite. Shemite comes from Shem, comes from the Semitic languages come from
Shem. And, you know, sex of these people aren't even Shemitic. They're not even, they're not even
Semitic, even though they start speaking Hebrew, their bloodlines don't even come from Shem. So
actually improper use of that word if they're not even coming from a Semitic bloodline.
Yep. Yeah, there's all kinds of errors when you start using that word. And that's what we see is a
sort of reactionary response to anybody being critical. You know, it can be anybody on Facebook
too. They'll just, Oh, no, call you an anti Semite. And then I remind them that there's
77 branches, something that they didn't know. And then I never hear from them again. Now,
this is the way it is. They learned something though, right? But they don't come back at me.
And this is the greatest way to get rid of those that are bugging you. Give them some truth like
that. You know, like we did with the counter protesters here in Kelowna. When I asked them,
how do you come down here and counter protest us? When you already forfeited your,
your opinion to the greater good? How do you come down? How do you justify being down
here expressing opinion when you already gave it up for the greater good, the utilitarian
idea Jerry Bentham created of the greater good? We're all in this together. Remember all that
shit? And they all walked away that day, never came back. I'm telling you, that's a classic example
of, you know, how do you stop the infiltrators through the knowledge you have? If you have
the proper way to address people, then you can actually stop that infiltration. Yep. And
Jesse, I was going to those rallies every Saturday for months. And I watched every member in that
crowd go over to those counter protesters. And what did they do? Just spit at them, like not
literally, but spit vitriol, you know, just what do you guys think you're doing? There was never
an intelligent argument. And so I just told my wife, it says, I'm going to go over there
tomorrow morning. And I'm going to walk up with my cup of coffee. And I'm just going to
have a nice conversation with them. And I asked them first and foremost, Hey,
does anybody here know where the Spanish flu started? And I gave them a second and I said,
don't say Spain. And I had them on their heels immediately. And then I asked them about them
forfeiting their opinion for the greater good and still coming down here. And they all put
their signs in my face. But they walked away before the end of that rally. And they retired
on Facebook within 24 hours, their leader retired on Facebook, and they've never been back.
And so, yes, that is a way to fight the infiltration and understand that you got to come at these
people from a human level, right? It's the one way they can't divide us. And it's the one thing
that they hate. And this is really the, the, the, this is where the battlefield is nature.
And so when you come at people from a place of common humanity, and you just talk about
those things, don't include conservative, liberal, red, black, white, whatever, get out of that
conversational labels and talk to them as if they're a fellow human, and you're compassionate,
and you see yourself in them. And you'd be amazed on, you know, even if you don't get the response
or reaction that you're, you're hoping for, they still go home and think about those things that
you say. So the 77 branches is important to understand. How do you express opinion when you
already forfeited it for the greater good? I mean, these are silencers. Where did the Spanish
flu start? Well, Kansas, almost exactly Central America at a military base called Camp Funston
after a Rockefeller inoculation program. Now, bam, right, that wakes some people up.
And I've seen little boys look to their dad because they thought,
my dad will know the answer to where the Spanish flu started. And they watch their dad
look at their shoes as I walk by. So right there, there's profound learning going on
with that little man, right? And about his dad and his dad's interest in this world.
So that's how we get through here is we speak on a, on a human level. We try not to offend.
We speak to them in a, in a sophisticated way. And how do we get there? But understanding grammar.
Grammar gives us the ability to communicate properly, to take the, the phantasm or the idea
that you have in your head and put it into the person you're speaking to. And it's
nearly identical. So you come to terms. So this is why I'm asking people to share the
tech native America. Because I think either side of the political environment that you're on,
that's gonna, that's another silence where it makes you definitely sit back and think
when you see that the Gulf of Mexico has already been renamed. The Black Rock is purchasing
two ports on either side of the Panama Canal. There's all kinds of talk about Canada being the
51st state ownership of Greenland, Venezuela, Colombia. You look at the map of the tech
native America and Musk's grandfather's dream as one of the founders of the technocracy
in Canada starts to make a heck of a lot of sense that this is where we're going.
Especially when we understand the progressivism is about efficiency, the technical experts.
And so what is the economic model of, of the tech native America founders,
but fascism, universal basic income is the term that they use. Okay, so back to Liz.
Liz's comment again. Everybody tells me, oh, the technocracy is dead. No,
it went mainstream. So I invite everybody to come to our wall on Facebook. I'm at Diego Garcia.
Next time I share the tech native America map, save it, copy and paste that for your own files
and use it in these conversations. And you don't have to be confrontational at all. Just
offer this informed perception or informed opinion of our reality. And in the meantime,
I steer everybody towards bulletproofpub.com. There's all kinds of work there that gets deep into
these subjects. We've provided all of our source material at either the bottom of each article
or within the body of it all. And there's much more to cover here than just American
progressivism or just Fabianism or just Anglo-American establishment. They all team up. So
like the Godfather, when they all have that meeting and they ask Corleone to divvy up
and start to share some of his sources, it's the same thing. They decided that they were going to,
it was going to be a shared governance. This is the important part to understand that
they aren't all, you know, the Jesuits, the Jews, all of these people that we're talking about,
they actually come together at the Paris Peace Conference, much like the Godfather movie,
and say, okay, shared governance is going to be important. And they all sort of play their roles.
And so here we are 100 years later looking at that.
And with what you said earlier, you know, comes the term the pen is mightier than the sword.
That's why we get to learn this stuff. Yeah, we're interested here on not what people think,
but how they think. So make sure you remember that about me. I'm not coming at you for any
other reason than an interest in changing how you think or at least having you consider
how you think, right? Because I think that's the key. We all need to think better.
And when I see people voting, it's, you know, it's not a way to be able to,
we're not going to find change in that direction. I will agree that in a regional area,
you can probably get in and make some sort of effect, but you're still in a very small little
regional area. And we're still very infiltrated by collectivism, internationalism, you know,
we've gone to city council meetings here. And those meetings have just deteriorated into arguments,
because nobody knows what to do. And if somebody like me was to start to talk about
progressivism, I think I'd get probably ushered right out of there. So
I think a collective understanding, a general understanding in the population,
right? Of all of us go laughing at them when they try to lie to us is when they
really fully realize that maybe their whole plan is compromised. And so I encourage everybody to go
to bulletproofpub.com. Understand progressivism and how it's linked to Fabianism and how this
all goes back to the Illuminati and scientific man versus God. That's really where we're at
now. And all we really have to do is convince everybody that peace is good for business
and war is not progress. And here the definition that pops up on the search,
progressivism is a left-leaning political philosophy and reform movement that seeks
to advance the human condition through social reform, adherence hold that progressivism has
universal application and endeavor to spread this idea to human societies everywhere. So they
don't just want, you know, one country. This is about changing the whole world to their
philosophies and ideas. And that's where this takes a bad turn because every society should
be able to dictate their own progress, not the progress of this collective,
communitarianistic, frankest, you know, group of people that, you know, comes from the Fabian Society.
Yeah, well said. And so to end today, I'm going to see if I can share this little video.
We are going to come out with a bunch of pictures because we've been building our farm.
We've been really busy over the last week. And I'm up against a deadline. And so we're
going to try to get as much done in the next seven days of our farm. And so we've been taking some
video to see if I can share just a quick little video of me on a tractor. Okay. So this is a new
place. This is our new place. Can you see that? It's popping up. Um, yeah. Nice. So this is in
the Dilworth area. We're about four doors down from the greenery. If anybody in Kelowna is
watching, this is where you can find us. Look for the big red building. Oh, it was just a picture.
Did you play your video? Yeah. Is it playing now? No, it's off. You've cancelled it.
Oh, hang on. Let me try this again.
And Chris says, New World Order. But that's what they want you to think. It's the old
world order. It's the order that they've always had. They're just trying to, you know,
impregnate the rest of the world with that old world order, making people think it's a new world
order. But it's nothing new to these people, their bloodlines and how they've controlled things
for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Some people even think it's a 6,000 year old death
cult that's got us to where we are today. Yeah. And I would say when I see the world,
New World Order, or the term New World Order, I think that we live in the new world, right?
Columbus came and discovered the new world. This is the context that they look at it in,
and it is an old world thing. It's like the scramble for Africa. All of these colonialists
scrambled for ownership of all kinds of resources in Africa. It's the same thing here.
They were all in a race over to North America to try to establish themselves, Spanish,
the British, the Portuguese. And this is where the Monroe Doctrine comes from. This is why they wrote
the Monroe Doctrine. They were like, British, stay out of the West. We want all of these
colonizers out of the West. And that includes North, Central and South America. So everybody
go read the Monroe Doctrine quickly, because it's a direct connection to Trump today.
Trump was talking about manifest destiny. He's removed the Resolute Desk from the Oval Office
for the first time, and I don't know how long. And so we're seeing a breaking away from the Brits now.
So we're going to end on this little video. Can you see it? Yeah. Nice. So this was yesterday.
All of the land up there, you see the cherry trees, all of that I'm going to till
right now when we leave. We're going to start planting out where we're going to plant things
and how we're going to set up. So like all the land in front of the cherry trees,
you're going to till all that and plant stuff that's going to be kind of those cherry trees,
are going to be co-planting like it's going to kind of work together, right?
Yeah. And so we're going to look into seeing if we can maybe try to get those cherries
without spraying them. That would be very great. So you can see there's a lot of trees up there.
And so today I'm going up on that hill. We can see our garlic just sort of along the grass line
there. Everything above that tree, we're going to till today. And we're driving right now where
I want to have my sauna one day. But this is me on a tractor. I never knew how to drive a tractor.
I didn't know how to grow anything. I didn't even know what I was doing at first. We didn't
have money to start. But here we are in our eighth year. We've started a new place in Kelowna,
closer even to our house. And it's a dream. The owners are very like-minded in how they want to
approach their property. They've given us a great deal. And they're happy to see farmers running this
area. And we've got lots of pictures and more videos coming. And we're going to show you
exactly what's going on in the storefront that we built. And that's all I got for you today, Jesse.
I appreciate you having me on. I think it's very important that we have these conversations. So
anybody that's still listening and following, thank you. Just let me know
in a month, two months, three months, month, whatever, whenever you want to come back on,
whenever you feel the need, you're always welcome here on the Missing Link Club.
I appreciate that so much. Thank you. Thank you, Angeline. And yeah, I'll be in contact with you
because we've put out a couple new articles. And the fascism aspect is incredible, Jess,
that we taught Mussolini fascism in the 1910s. This is where Mussolini and Hitler get
their fascism as the first American fascists. So that's one of our new articles there,
along with Brandeis, the social justice. So those are fresh new ones. And we won't be putting out
too much more content other than maybe individual podcasts like this until the fall.
So are you saying that the old world order comes over to the new world of North America,
creates this new world order, old world order in the new world, new world order.
And then in 1917, the Federal Reserve Act, all these things that happen, create all these things.
And then they have the people that's here in the new world now go back to Europe,
the old world, and start teaching them about these fascism and things like they took
over this place and started introducing it back to Europe.
That's a great question. Because what we're talking about is a public-private partnership.
That really is the definition of fascism, right? So that was going on in Britain long before too.
Just private manufacturers of factories and whatever they were creating,
partnering with the government. So yeah, this idea probably goes back to the,
you know, it's hand in glove with war, I would assume, right? And it goes way back.
This is an ancient sort of way of dealing with things.
Now, one question that was at the beginning from Sleeping Giant, he wants to know if you know
about February 3, 2022, about Queen Romana Ditchula. She went to the convoy and burnt
the flag. He wants to know if you know about that. He asked that right when we first started.
I don't know anything about that.
Andrea L. Pulaski. Hello.
She says, I missed most of this, but Juanitas Diego, he saw any footage from the Pope's funeral
and what he thought. Did you see them all? They're hooded black hoods.
It's like, you can't even create like a scarier movie about his funeral. If you go look at some of
the footage, anybody of the funeral, it looks like a crazy satanic ritual that they're, you know,
and apparently prophecy states that he's actually the last poop. There's going to be,
or the second last, there's going to be one more and he's going to be the last one. And
apparently all of the time and the end of the world is supposed to be 2027.
Apparently all these prophecies, the last poop is coming up and is obviously going to be only
be for a year or two years or whatever. And there's a whole bunch of prophecies that go along
with, and it seems like a lot of these people that are pulling these strings, they are trying to
accelerate their accelerationists. They're creating these things on purpose to
make prophecies look like they're coming true. So, you know, in order to keep the slaves,
you know, feeling that if they vote harder, they pay more taxes, they pay more ties
that, you know, they'll be accepted in the kingdom of heaven.
Yeah, that comes straight out of the Talmud.
Right. They're manifesting their own destiny. This is what started to make me question even
the idea of manifest destiny because we have links between Lincoln and the Jews,
and some people say that Lincoln himself was a Jew. So, this is where we're researching.
This is the era that we're trying to get into. Yeah, crazy. Okay, awesome. Well,
thanks again, brother. Hopefully, Angelina, and then I'll be able to come see you this
this year if we can. Maybe even stay a little longer, maybe even help out a little if we can.
That would be excellent. I think that would be awesome for us. I guarantee you a good time.
Okay, that's wonderful. Well, you all have a wonderful weekend. This is the last show. I'm
going to be on a galactic conference tomorrow at 1030 Mountain, so 1230. I'll see if I can try to
post a link or something to it if possible. I'm asked to be a speaker. I don't really get
asked very often to speak places, so I'm going to be a speaker. And I just wanted to
tell everybody, oh, maybe I'll just keep this a secret until I make it. I reached out to an ex
mobster, the top mob guy. And apparently his dad was a big mobster and went to jail. He was a big
mobster, went to jail. Now he's done a whole bunch of movies and all this kind of thing.
And I saw a clip and I just found his email and I reached out and I said, hey, would you like to
be on the missing link? And he just messaged yesterday and said, sure. So I think that's going
to be a fascinating interview of someone high up in the mob or whatever.
Well, the mob was connected to the government too and war times, taking care of the peers around
New York. Yeah, there's a definite connection there that needs to be talked about. And
which faction of the mob is rarely talked about? We talk about the Italian Sicilians,
but who are the ones that we never talk about? The Jewish mobsters like Meyer Lansky and those
men. So that would be very interesting to watch. What is the Zionist connection to Iran?
I'm not sure. Well, someone came on here and said that in Iran, there's a lot of Jewish people,
but I did a little search on it and it said it's only 0.1% or whatever. It's not even that many.
So someone came on here and said, oh, yeah, there's like a majority of people that are actually
Jewish in Iran. So I actually searched it up after the interview and it didn't seem like that
was the case. But when it comes to what people think that some of these, what the whole connection is,
the Khazarians, they're Iranian Turks. They moved over to Khazaria from Iran. And then they kind
of, that's where kind of their bloodlines come from. So that's maybe how this is all, you know,
intermixed because the true Israelites, the true Jewish people aren't from Khazaria, right?
They just took over that religion to hide behind this whole anti-Semitism that we're looking at
right now. But they aren't the true Israelites. They aren't the true bloodlines. They aren't
true Shemites that come from Shem. That was an infiltration. And some people think that their
blood come, they're Iranian Turks and from the Turkish Mongols, they're the Carolingians
when they came over and they, you know, kind of took over the monarchy and, you know,
try to eradicate all the true bloodlines. And so that's kind of, you know, if you look down to,
you know, the bloodlines part of it, that apparently is, you know, how that all relates.
Yeah, Turkey's, Turkey's part of the Ottoman Empire. And this was a focus by Brandeis even
as early as like 1912. This is, they were starting to really promote the idea of a Jewish
state and where was it, the Turkey in that area. So, yep, I agree. Okay, next week.
Oh, go ahead. No, go ahead. Next week on the Missing Link Live, Monday, we've got Honey
Pimi back on. On Tuesday, we've got James Edwards. Oh, and on Monday night, I've asked to be,
that's the election. I've asked to be on a PPC election party panel, I guess, you know, they'd
like collect their, they're going to be talking, they wanted some people that aren't part of it,
just on, on some, some voices for someone that's not part of the party. They're doing an election
night type of thing and they've asked me to be on it. So, Sunday and Monday, I can't believe
I've been asked to be on, you know, two shows, two shows in a row. But so that's on Monday night.
Ask them if they understand the influence that progressivism has played on both parties.
Okay. Although that might get you kicked out of there.
No, no, no, no. I definitely need to remember to ask that. So, on Thursday, we've got, whoops,
on Thursday, we've got Ricardo Phoenix, which is an old friend of mine. I was going to talk about
his story, written a book. And then Friday, we've got RB Ham coming back on The Missing Link Life.
He's a great, you know, lots of knowledge. So, that's this upcoming week. Love y'all.
Knowledge is power. The more knowledge we have about progressivism, the more less power they have
over us. For one love, one heart, one life. Let's all face infinity without flinching.
And if they ever ask you to put on a breathing inhibitor again,
Duane, you know what to say? No masque. No masque. Okay. Love y'all. We'll see you next time. We
see you back here on The Missing Link. Love you, everybody. Thank you, Jesse.
Thank you so much. Thanks again. Bye now.