I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough, and it's very hard for me to
see how the United States president can get us to war with Iran, which leads me to conclude
that if, in fact, compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to
war is what would be best for U.S. interests.
Some people might think that Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War II, as
David mentioned, you may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor.
Some people might think Mr. Wilson wanted to get us into World War I, you may recall he
had to wait for the Lusitania episode.
Some people might think that Mr. Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam, you may recall we
had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode.
We didn't go to war with Spain until the U.S.S., until the main exploded, and may
I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel he could call out the Federal Army until
Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander at Fort Sumter to
do exactly that thing, which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.
So if, in fact, the Iranians aren't going to compromise, it would be best if somebody
else started the war.
But I would just like to suggest that one can combine other means of pressure with
sanctions.
I mentioned that explosion on August 17th.
We could step up the pressure.
I mean, look, people, Iranian submarines periodically go down.
Someday one of them might not come up.
Who would know why?
We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure.
I'm not advocating that, but I'm just suggesting that this is not an either or proposition
of just sanctions has to succeed or other things.
We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians.
We could get nastier.
Could you please explain Tulsi Gabbard's role in DOJ activity regarding the Fulton County
search?
What do you mean her role?
It was reported that she was she happened to be present in Atlanta.
I'm not involved in it, but they are inspecting and checking the belt.
Why is Tulsi Gabbard there?
I don't know.
She took a lot of heat two days ago because she went in at Pam's insistence.
She went in and she looked at votes.
I was at Fulton County, sir, at the request of the president and to work with the FBI
to observe.
Starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves, and as the
next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Thursday, March 19th, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Start played that clip of Patrick Klosson, Washington Institute, plenty of times.
Many, many times it feels relevant right now for plenty of reasons we'll get into about
concerns of false flags, the kind of obvious reality of the U.S. and Israel, you know,
losing the war, it's a there's a major, a lot of nuance to what that might mean
with the way this has been done.
But effectively, let's just say not reaching the goals that they wanted to achieve.
And it appears there might be some level of pulling back, but not the same as decreasing
the amount of manipulation, psychological operations, funding the Kurds from within
their government.
That stuff never seems to stop from what Israel is doing.
But I am generally worried about where this is going.
And this will make more sense as we go through it and we will discuss the points
and why I think that may be where we are.
But, you know, what are you saying right there?
And this is just one example of one think tank that very much.
I mean, if we're getting into the larger conversation of the influence of outside
forces and foreign elements, that's these think tanks are packed with that kind
of conversations, Zionism and otherwise and realize that whether you agree with
that or not, the point is just the U.S.
I'm just making sure you understand that that's influenced.
But from the U.S.
mindset of these politicians revolving to our scenario are just casually
sitting around thinking about how we get to war with Iran and then casually
discussing how every war that this country's ever been involved in was
essentially started by a false flag or rather just simply waited for the
opportunity because you always wanted the war, not how we frame our own history,
but how the people that write that history collectively talk about it
behind closed doors tip.
That's a perfect thing.
You've understand it like a microcosm of how what we're dealing with in
the world and our country.
But just think about that and what that means for today.
We're in the game of psych, you know, I forget the exact phrasing
he just used, but, you know, we're in the game of using psychological
operations against Iran and we can get nastier at that.
Think about whether that's where we are right now.
Now, I also played on there.
The beginning was just a clip randomly made by some account about the
just inconsistent statements from this and any other administration,
but this one just is especially bad at what they're doing.
And that one was, we talked about it, the Fulton County point about the
and remember the importance of that if you, if for that specific story,
which is not necessarily relevant to the conversation today, other than
what I showed you just about their dishonesty or I guess lying or even
not knowing what the narrative is, but that story was Tulsi Gabbard
and Fulton County being sent, I guess, arguably because of the
the claim was rather the concerns were a local domestic kind of partisan
vote count discussion, which she shouldn't be involved in.
If it was about what, which would be the only like legal justification
for her to do what she did, if it was involving some kind of foreign
influence in this conversation, well, then she would have been required
to inform the intelligence community of which they said that didn't happen.
So that's just why that all went down.
But clearly there was something weird going on there at the very least.
They're stepping outside of their legal roles.
And as you look, Pam Bondi told her to do it.
Oh, no, Trump told me to go.
I don't even know why she's there.
This were like day after day after day where they just say
and even Trump day after day will give you a different explanation.
Say something completely different.
And this isn't an evolving narrative.
This is just dishonesty.
It's no different than past administrations, as I said,
but it's very, very on, you know, people see it.
Let's put it that way more than usual.
I think that's because of the change happening in this country,
but it is just worse.
And I want you to think about that as we go through important parts.
We start today with Tulsi Gabbard and her congressional testimony
and around this exact conversation.
Now, I didn't think this was going to continue to be this kind of conversation.
I just didn't sense that it was, I guess maybe because of the past times
these of what I tend to see is that these things go to this kind of point.
And then when they recognize they're just not getting what they want,
they declare victory and back away, even though they didn't,
like that was the 12-day war, guys.
They did not win in that exchange.
If you understand what actually happened, but they yelled that they did
and they reeked and we obliterated them.
And now these, those lies are being exposed today.
But my point, though, is that, you know, I kind of felt this would go
somewhat like it had in the past.
But right now it seems like this is, you know, at least the point of
explaining like why it's important to continue to rehash and day to day
go over like the discussions of whether this was eminent and what Tulsi
Gabbard is saying from the DNI position and how that contradicts Trump
or her refusal to answer certain questions as we discussed in the last show.
There's more of them we'll discuss today.
It just has to show you where we really are, that this is a very dangerous
position for them and why would they put themselves in this position?
When nobody in this country wants that, you already know the answer.
It's literally mainstream conversation today, which is kind of crazy to me.
I'm glad it's there, but I'm also very suspicious of why.
I mean, I'll tell you my thoughts.
I think it's kind of clear, but I'm suspicious of why some of the people
are choosing to put it forward, seeing as how their entire careers have been
built on claiming the opposite for some of them.
But really take a step back right now.
And this is this is, you know, you can claim I'm, you know, saying,
I was the fur or whatever.
That's not what I'm doing, but you could demonstrating our value.
That's for sure of how consistently we were right on this point,
but many before, but a sign of all of that.
Just look at whether me or Derek or anybody in the IMA, we've talked
about this a lot over the last year because of where this
administration has gone, but right now more than ever, and I probably say
this in a week from now, as it gets even more clear, I'm sure you guys have seen it.
You get this weird pushback from some of them, but pretty much the vast
majority of the independent media, even the mainstream is in some way or
another grappling with the point of whether Israel is controlling our government.
How long have we been talking about this?
Not saying it without evidence, but going through the actual proof,
rather the evidence that I think has led to proof, and it's very clear.
I mean, six months ago, most of the people right now acting
like Trump has suddenly changed, which by the way, he has not.
He's gotten more obvious, but he's the same person that we warned you
about in 2025, and most of them call this Blackfield for pointing it out.
Now, again, if they're genuinely starting to see it, that's great.
I have no problem with that.
I do think it's important to highlight that that's the evolution
of their understanding and why, how in the world they missed it
when it was just as obvious back then.
But I think we should be on guard about people who are being dishonest.
Like a lot of the ones we saw from COVID when it became the safe, dangerous,
right? It was dangerous, dangerous.
When we were breaking it down in the midst of it and getting censured
and attacked, then it became something that was just obvious
to most people who were not blindly part of the mainstream conversation.
That's when it was safe, dangerous.
That's when you get the Jones and the rest that grapple into it
and start taking over the part of the conversation.
And because of their massive reach and because they're technically
part of the mainstream apparatus, that's where all the conversation swirls.
People argue Tucker and the rest, but you can decide for yourself
because now he's doing things I think continue to challenge it.
But I still question that the same point, especially since Tucker 2028 is coming around.
But think about how wild it is that we talked about all of this,
whether the Israel influence, whether it's about the two-party paradigm
breaking down, no one's really talking about that,
even though that's what this actually is in part.
Look at where we are.
Look at how much is happening in this conversation where you've got people
like Owens and, you know, Tucker, Dave Smith.
I mean, you go down the list of tons of people now.
What's her name?
They just went on peer saying, Maga is dead.
I don't even recognize Trump anymore.
You know, it's it's it's important to see that that's there.
And not just like this.
Oh my God, we suddenly see this, but this has been there for years.
We've been calling this out from his last administration.
Anybody who's been consistent with his criticism, with their
criticisms will recognize that Trump was doing part.
Let's throw it away to say it out.
There were elements of the same things he's doing today
in his first administration, the same dishonesty, the same tactics.
It's just the evolution of where it's gone.
Now, the other thing, you know, rattling in my mind right now with
where we are, as I briefly said, is that I'm worried about where this
all, how it's all happening, how obvious it is, how clearly
most Americans are not OK with this revelation and then the lack
of any concern from either side of our government, apparently, and
that shows you the point, but that there's now going to be
something that drives support.
And that's always in the past been something serious.
A major event, right?
A jarring situation that drives people to stand by the team.
Now, we'll make a point about that to some degree today, because
as always, when they're conducting an illegal war and they know
it's unpopular, they shift immediately.
And remember, at first, there's not going to be flag drape coffins.
That's not what we're having to do boots on the ground.
And now we're seeing flag drape coffins.
And the same point as always, while Israelis are sitting at
that mountain and watching it all take place, the point is
that that did start to happen.
And now we are seeing Americans die.
Now, what are they doing?
Well, we have to fail.
Now that they've died, we have to honor their sacrifice.
Well, and I'm not even disagreeing that you can think that way.
But don't let politicians who never cared about them in the
first place use their sacrifice.
And I shouldn't even put it in quotes, because as I've always
said, plenty of them still think they're fighting for
freedom and that makes what they're doing honorable, despite
the fact that I think it's pretty obvious that it's not
where we are today.
But I can't decide who and when and where.
But some of them are like that.
So consider that the point, though, is that that using
that person, putting their life in the line for whatever
justification in order to get you to support something you
don't otherwise support, because otherwise you're un-American.
In the midst of the illegal war, we got to side with the team
because otherwise you're not part of this country.
That is literally the most un-American thing in this
country, that statement right there.
Blind support, as Theodore Roosevelt famously said,
that it is servile and unpatriotic to blindly support
the president, whether they're right or wrong.
Funny how we don't learn our own lessons.
But I'm worried about where this goes, where the
administrative hermoose, which we'll get into today.
I'm worried about this conversation with these
drones that have been mimicked to look like Iranian
drones. That's not to say Iran is not capable of
carrying out their own illegal attacks.
It's just that we have to understand where this has
always gone and what Israel and the US government do as
a matter of policy.
And that is, as we heard Patrick Klossin tell you,
conduct psychological warfare.
They have entire teams dedicated to psychological
operations. They have videos they put out about
how they're dancing in the background with their
special. I mean, we've played these for you.
And yet then when you discuss whether or not they
might carry out an attack and blame it on Israel,
how dare you, Pearl clutching ensues.
It's crazy. So keep this in mind as we go through,
because it's quite obvious, I think, that we're
drifting into this and that they're already starting
to pull back on the conversation about where
this may go, already suggesting that, you know,
Iran might not even go away.
They're just weakened.
And that's what we were going for.
No, it was not.
And you do it every single time.
Your claimed outcomes are not even close to
happening. So the moment they try to
correct and claim like the bombing destroyed them
and we obliterated them, it's not what they were
ever trying to do and it's not even actually what's
happening. So to that opening clip, and we'll get
into a lot of other stuff to update today,
including some stuff here to start.
This was the account that it came from and just
that clip in case you want to watch it where
it's just showing the blatantly inconsistent
statements. And of course, when you watch
Todd Blanch, I'm just convinced as a dishonest
person at the core is, you know, the way
you respond to these kind of things, right?
So they're asking a very simple question,
like Tulsi Gabbard and the thing, and the way
he responds, like, what?
What do you mean?
And then immediately jumps in and cuts her off
and starts like, well, you knew what she was
getting at. Then why did you act like you didn't
know? Because they're coming from a dishonest
place because they know that there's
something weird going on and they want to act
like it's outrageous for you to even bring it
up. That's not left or right or light
versus left. It's just the government and
power always gaslighting people, whether
it's the other side of the paradigm,
using that point to gain clout.
They'll push back on anything that exposes
the larger agenda.
So on the Epstein part of this, a couple
of points of starts because you didn't see
this.
There's also one more thing, too, that I
want to add just kind of the general
sentiment today is we'll touch on some of
the things of Joe Kent again today.
There's a part of me that's very skeptical
about what this is.
Now, I want to say again, like I said
yesterday, like, regardless of the, like,
whether this will say it was something
done by the people controlling this to
push you in a certain position, like, as
a, like a desperate effort because we see
what's going on. So they release the
valve a little bit and admit certain
things, but then call them a traitor and
a loser. But then they let that be
acknowledged, right? That's how this can
work, possibly, has in the past, or he
just genuinely was not OK with what was
happening and called it out. Those are
just as likely to me with where we
are.
But I'm skeptical of what this all is.
And my point being is that this is
all happening right now at a time
where, you know, as I said, we'll
get into this part as well again, we're
Glenn Beck and Alex Jones are
essentially arguing that this is
doubling down on supporting the team
and that Trump is working this in a
way where he knew Israel was
controlling it, but that he did it
so he would be the one to control how
it went for us.
It's just insane. Oh, no evidence, by
the way, to back any of that up.
And in fact, plenty of evidence to
prove that that's clearly not what's
happening, but they'll get you to
support the team even as they admit
to you Israel's control in our
government. It's baffling to me.
But my point is all of this is
coming out right now, even through
platforms that have been trying to
gaslight you away from it.
And so in this clip we're going to
play, you have Barack
Tom Barrick or Barack
admitting to you, as we all know,
by the way, that Epstein was just
universal. He was in everybody's
lives and it was big business back
then. As Lowkey points out,
basically the existence of the
Epstein class and that it was his
ties to Israel that gave him that.
Can you imagine saying this like
we'd like you think he doesn't
know where's going on in the
conversation? That's by design to
me. I don't you can ask why.
And if you think it's because
Trump is saving Israel for last.
My God, you need the idea of,
you know, look, if that ends up
that way and somehow he masterfully
brings us all back around and
explains why everything he did was
not a violation of the Constitution
and was not killing Americans, you
know, then maybe we'll all obviously
make decisions because I don't even
see a way you could possibly bring
this around. Let's just say he
kills Netanyahu and controls
everything. Maybe he already did.
I already see that filtering through
the conversation.
What is that? What would that
change? So he double crossed his
ally in the middle of an illegal
war. He's the one that's saving
us. You know, it just it's a
desperate point for them to try
to make it seem like it's always
what they promised. But back to
the point, I've worried Kent
or anything else, whether that's
just being used or maybe part of
this is a design to
keep us like basically put it as
simple as possible to give the
Donald Trump supporters the dishonest
ones who don't want to make America
great again, but believe that just
means whatever Trump says, give them
the out to say, ah, I knew
it like Jones and Glenn are giving
you. It wasn't that he was always
lying and, you know, part of Israel's
agenda. It's that he knew the
problem. He saw that Israel was
doing this and he even so he put
himself in this position to make
sure he could save things where he
could.
That's what they're giving you
right now.
And so this is a last ditch effort,
I think, to when everyone is seeing
the Epstein files connections to him
and more than anybody in his
administration or our government
rather.
And every other part of this,
whether it's the challenging of
everything in MAHA or MAGA, it's
the lies you've done. This is a
point where they're desperately
unpopular
unpopular.
And yet they're telling you they're
100 percent supported.
That's what just came out yesterday.
They're drowning.
So what do you get?
A secret plan that shows you this
is the old everything bad is
happening only because Israel's
doing it.
And that Trump has been desperately
trying to save you from within.
Trust the plan because you'll get
there.
I'm telling you guys, that's what
you're getting from some of these
people right now.
And it's alarming to me because
it's partly true.
Some of the things are true, but
they're driving you right back in.
That's QAnon. That's Russia Gate.
We've talked about this over the
year so many times.
So back to this clip.
Here's what he says about the
Epstein class or rather that's
a low key frame is it.
But why is he saying this now?
I think it's to shift that blame
and you're going to have some
intention with Israel.
If that's the case, maybe they're
involved in this massive
organizational lie to get you into
the board of peace, new global
order, which is also part of this
conversation.
Just wanted to ask you about
what I read in the Epstein files
about your association with him.
Why did you introduce him to
Peter Thiel and Vitaly Cherkin?
What were your dealings with
Jeffrey Epstein?
Well, I didn't introduce him to
those people, but all of us
dealt with Jeffrey Epstein in
the 80s as a business person.
He was bigger than life, bigger
than life was a 30
year story.
OK, so right there, that means
that they all all of them work.
And that's what we're all trying
to show you. We're interconnected
with this person who was collecting,
you know, blackmail material
for intelligence networks on every
person in power they could get a
hold of. And that is real.
And that's the CIA and arguably
I genuinely think we're talking
about the Israel Zionist
connection there. But that's my
opinion. Either way, Mossad's CIA
connections, you can't deny that
whether he is an agent is a
different story.
But the idea of pretending like
Blanche just again lied about that
there's zero connections to
intelligence is just flatly
dishonest.
Of this that I think most of us
actually thought that he
had he had built his wealth and
his prowess over his international
relations with Israel.
Oh, is that what you thought?
Just casually admitting that we all
knew he was doing that because
Israel allowed that form.
And then yet today when that
comes up, you act like we're
racist.
That's funny how that works out.
That's always what kind of the
background was.
I didn't see the rest of it later
in the year.
In the files that I read, you're
having dealings with him after
he became a convicted sex
offender. Why?
And that's the major point there.
They always like try to avoid is
that almost every one of them you
can show we're dealing
like Teal
and Trump and plenty of them had
many dealings after despite their
lies. And it's on the record now
and has been quite frankly that
they deal. They worked with him,
dealt with him well
after he was a hear it guys
convicted sexual predator
convicted on the record.
And yet they still work with him
and still hung out with him.
A dealings meeting.
He was emailing me asking me for
access to
the president or a trans I was
running a New York Stock Exchange
company trying to get a hold
of me for relevant information.
That that was it.
You met with him and you met
with the daddy chicken.
You might would be to Teal and
Epstein. Oh, never mind.
Bye.
Yep.
That's not that's not easy to
see, right?
Oh, you're bringing up the things
I just tried to lie about.
See you later.
I'm busy.
I mean, you think this is the
kind of insulation like you
really even think he would have
the courage to say those
things
without knowing or at least
believing that he's completely
protected.
And of course, you could also
be objective and argue that's not
even the reality and that we're all
wrong about this.
But that there's basically
nothing to back up that argument
and there's tons of evidence to
back up what we're considering
but you can work that out for
yourself. Now, as he just says,
he just admitted the existence of
the Epstein class and kept it
moving.
Right.
Now, on another point,
following a committee wide vote,
Chairman James Comer has
issued a subpoena to Attorney
General Pam Bondi.
Why?
I doubt this goes anywhere.
I'm sad to say, but to appear
for a deposition regarding her
handling of the Epstein
investigation, specifically the
compliance with the Epstein
File Transparency Act.
So here's another example.
I hate to say it.
I know, I mean, you know,
I'm pessimist, you know, I'm jaded
when it comes to government.
Our entire lives have given you
every reason to understand.
That's why the I mean, you
can look at how infrequently, if
not ever, they actually
follow through with what they're
going to do. And I mean, outside
of like specific wedge issues,
like these kind of things where
Clinton gets in front of
Congress and oh, she's going
down, nothing happens.
Or this administration every other
day, Pelosi, Obama,
Comey, they're all going down.
Oh, by the way, Comey was
subpoenaed for some conversation
about him investigating Trump.
So now you're getting these
renewed calls for C.
We told you he's going down
just like last time.
And just like last time, I told
you that there's likely nothing
there. Now, I haven't got into
subpoena today, but just like
last time, my argument is
that it'll end up being nothing.
It'll be a bunch of back and
forth, the big grandstanding
comments in Congress and
nothing will happen, despite the
fact that I do think he should
be in prison.
So in this case, they broke the
law. We know this, it's very
easy to prove they violated the
very explicitly outlined
Transparency Act that showed
that they had to include, for
example, the conversations
between Cash and Bondi, or
anybody else involved.
And they did not.
Or they blacked out names, or
they withheld information.
I mean, it's just all the time.
Les Wexner, for example.
So the point is, if this ends
up with anything other than at
least Bondi and ever hopefully
people around her getting at
least some kind of a criminal
charge, then there is no
honesty in the situation.
Or at the very least, that
there's enough control over it
by the dishonest people that it
does not ever go anywhere.
I don't know how many times
we can go through this without
acknowledging that basic
reality.
They broke the law.
It's unequivocal.
But I'm going to argue this is a
bunch of grandstanding
conversation and it ends up
going nowhere because they're
all likely majority, if not
all, are on the side of this
conversation.
And I want to really stress
that I get that that's a very
jaded opinion.
I just want to again stress
that I think the history of
what they do shows you have
every right to realize that's
most likely where it goes.
While, as always, and I
always emphasize having hope
that it goes the better
direction, because I
genuinely do.
I genuinely hope that anybody
for whatever reason makes this
happen to where Bondi and then
if it makes you feel better
every other one before and
every other Democrat
administration gets arrested
for the same thing.
Great.
I just doubt it will happen.
Now, on the Daily Beast
article, Pam Bondi's DOJ
forced to lower hiring
standards.
Why?
Because the lawyers have quit
in droves.
Now, you have to realize,
just like the last
Comey situation and the guy,
I forget his name now off
top of my head quit because
he said he's a Republican.
He said there's nothing there.
I'm not going to bring this
to court.
I'm going to embarrass myself.
And that's when the Habba stepped
in or Abba and then she backed
away.
And yeah, and they still went
forward and get ultimately it
didn't go anywhere because why
there is nothing there and it
ultimately got dismissed.
And that's not because he's not
a criminal.
You see how crazy this is.
So what I want you to
understand is this is their
people, guys, in their
department.
And these are lawyers that are
leaving.
We'll get into, I think,
if we have time.
It's at the end.
I think we should.
The point of Kexa being
called out by his own people
and saying he's drowning.
He doesn't know what he's doing.
He's wildly outside of his
depth.
Doesn't that sound familiar?
Yeah, because that was my opinion
just based on what he was saying.
Turns out by his own people
and his own administration,
what they think too.
I don't think that's
necessarily super insightful.
I think it's quite obvious
that these people aren't fit
for these positions.
But it's interesting to think
that they're just fleeing
their own people.
Think about working under
somebody like this,
who is so obviously juvenile
and one-sided.
There's no understanding of
the real depths of the job
and they don't want to work
for him because they're
being driven to do things
that whether they're
against their morals or
integrity or just basic law,
which is what we're talking about.
But I want you to think about this,
that this is the administration
that's supposed to be winning
for you, that's basically
just driving us
into a direction that's...
I mean, I don't even need to...
Like right now, because again,
the major part
of the Republican conversation
is, oh my God,
Israel's controlling our government.
I can't believe we've never
seen this before,
even though it's always been there,
that you have to realize
this is just one part
of a larger,
failing direction
of your government,
not just Trump.
Now, on the technocratic side
of this before we get
into the Tulsi Gabbard conversation,
I won't play this again,
but I'll include this clip
from yesterday
that I really think you should watch.
Decentred News included
the entire exchange,
which you really should watch all of.
We'll come back to that.
Insider paper.
First look at Twitter's
upcoming region
conversation control feature.
Now, you can argue
this is just for your benefit,
I guess, in a platform
that's just about sharing
ideas or whatever.
But we all know
what these things have become.
And that's just because
they've driven us here.
It is what it is.
You know, we've always talked about
why these things are problems
and what the social media platforms
have done to children
and their people's minds.
You know, but nonetheless,
I know and that's why
my argument in the past
is that I weighed into this for you
because this platform,
unfortunately,
does have what I argue
is the most real time
kind of flowing information.
But every day,
I feel like that's getting worse and worse
because they know
that's what we're looking for.
I just think right now
that it's worth it's
all of them engage with
because it's information.
But you have to understand
that it half, if not more,
is going to be lies,
misinformation,
outright deception,
you know, whatever.
If long as you can understand that,
engage with it.
Question at all.
Engage with what you can.
Try to suss out the information.
That's the world we live in today.
Like I've always been telling you,
question everything.
People used to push back like,
oh, it's so exhausting.
Well, welcome to the reality that we live in.
And now people see it more than ever.
We have to
question what we look at.
Consider all possibilities.
It's the only way to be honest with yourself.
My point is you can consider this as just a,
you know, a cool little feature
to be able to,
I only want to hear from what the,
you know, people in South Africa
have to say, you know, whatever,
that's what this is.
But you know how this will be abused
because this is what this platform
actually is today.
This is the one massive social
engineering narrative control
AI management is what it comes down to.
Users will be able to restrict replies
to their posts based on specific
regional geographic regions.
Now, right now,
you who can reply everyone,
your subscribers,
that I think that already exists.
But what I want you to think about
is whether this being applied to,
you know, only accounts from Israel,
for example,
or only accounts from Iran,
for example,
and whether or not that will be
easily identifiable by the post.
Because what happens when you look at a post
that's claiming something crazy
that you could prove is false,
but all you see is massive support
and you eventually find out,
oh my God,
it's only people that are supporting
the IDF.
But that is weird.
And you find out that they restrict your
replies to only one certain area.
If you, unless that's notified,
where you can see restricted
to only Israel,
well then this is going to be a way
to deceive you.
My opinion.
And will be used by the very people
who are screaming about your free speech
to convince you of what needs to happen
for a foreign power,
most likely,
but simply not in American interest.
My opinion,
but I mean,
have we not seen how these things
continue to get used
and what Elon has allowed to happen
on this platform,
despite the screeching screams
of free speech
while they censor people
on this platform?
It's just,
it's just,
we are in the,
it's a 1984 analogy
is where we are.
We are in a world
where things are exactly the opposite
of what they appear to be
and you get enough people to stand up
and go,
that's the thing.
Either whether they know it or not,
don't care or making money,
they just do it.
And then it confuses tons of innocent people.
But this is where we are going
and having Catherine Austin Fitz
points out that the
Save America Act,
which don't forget,
has added on to,
but still includes the real ID discussion.
That's digital ID,
as I've said every time.
If you want to support this act
and you believe it's important
because of the voting discussion,
well, guess what?
You do not.
I repeat,
in any way,
do not need real ID compliance
to effectively do what they're claiming.
You don't.
In fact, it actually over-complicates the situation
by adding another level of
administration and control.
You could go back to basics
and this would be exact.
Just make sure they require ID of any kind.
Verifiable ID.
To make it specific
and to box certain things out
is because they're eventually driving it
towards only
digital versions of all of those things.
I've made,
I've proven this to people.
And as Catherine also writes,
goal of the Save Act,
in general,
she writes is to build a control grid.
Don't fall for it.
Tell your rep and senators to vote no.
Now, my argument would be
if you take away the real ID part of it,
in part at least,
that would be the digital ID issue.
But as she's writing,
there's plenty of other parts of the act
that seem to build up the control grid as well.
I just really want people to think about
the way that this has been used.
We called this out back in 2024
when it first came out
and they tried to convince you
it was necessary for the next election.
And then Massey came out and said,
well, guess what?
Even if you vote for this,
it won't even come into effect until afterward.
So they all lied to you.
Shocker.
Or they didn't even know that,
which is,
you know, as always,
stupidity or dishonesty.
I don't know what's more alarming
was where we are right now.
Now, Julie Barrett adds something to this
that I think is important that I just saw.
America's newest digital ID proposal
just dropped in the U.S. Senate.
Republican Senator, Marsha Blackburn,
has introduced a new AI bill
that bundles 17 different policies
into one massive 291-page bill.
This is just like all the other tech bills
we've been seeing,
a massive digital ID framework.
Not even secret, guys.
It never has been.
The Save ID Act,
the Save Act or Save America Act now
is simply just one part of creating this
and creating the part that,
once it comes together,
like the mobile driver's license part
that I often mention from Biden's administration,
which is now being pushed again
in Republicans in Florida, for example.
This is how it all comes together
and it leads to a place where you have no option
but to use a real ID, digital ID component.
And now a bill that will make sure
this framework is in place
for when that becomes the reality.
The bill includes mandatory age verification
for every existing account
and freezing accounts
until users verify their age.
This is the same thing in the UK
and this is all about control.
They're using things you care about
to convince you just like the voting part
to convince you you need these things
when you don't.
And as Owen Schroeder says,
what bill is it in?
Is it the Save Act?
And she points out no.
Here's the link to it from Blackburn's own site
just introduced yesterday.
So this is on the 18th.
No bill number yet.
It's still being proposed and it's going forward
and it says, well, it's not the Save Act.
I think there's a lot of overlap
and I could see in the database
it's being interlinked,
meaning that I bet you
this ends up being folded into the Save Act.
That's how this tends to work.
But wait and see.
Either way, guys, Republicans, left, right, whatever,
it's all going in the same direction
if you just pay attention
and stop listening to screaming partisans online.
Aaron Day also adds, the board of peace
has a CEO for life.
That's Trump.
A private army and no auditor.
Totally sounds like an American first national idea,
right, Alex Jones?
Totally doesn't sound like exactly
what a globalist organization looks like.
They signed it at Davos
because that's not about globalism, right?
It's literally about globalism.
It's amazing the stupidity we can get from these people.
Like I try to be facetious to sort of make it funny,
but I say, I even need to make fun of it.
How in the world can anybody
take these people seriously
with what we're looking at?
Now I'm talking about Alex Jones
and the rest of them like Glenn Beck.
They signed it at Davos.
They called it a peace board.
And let's not forget,
that peace board was literally called
an adjacent UN Security Council by the UN.
You can't get any more clear than that.
This is literal globalist discussion.
And it says, it's a corporation with 20,000 soldiers.
20,000 soldiers.
What are we even talking about right now?
This is the reimagining of our society
like I've been telling you.
Here are the eight people running the board of peace.
Apparently forever.
Let this sink in.
Trump, chairman for life.
Convito, any decision to remove any member state
to solve the entire board, if he wants to,
retains this power after leaving office.
Not as president, not as a private citizen.
Of course, Jared Kushner.
Totally makes sense, right?
The unelected person that has no reason to be there.
Affinity partners, management,
billions from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar,
the same countries on the board.
So he manages their money
and directs where $30 billion in reconstruction goes
and let's not pretend like we all don't know
directly what forces he's working for.
Mark Rowan.
Apollo Global, of course, $785 billion.
AUM valued Gaza's coastline of $50 billion,
currently facing securities,
class actions over Epstein ties.
Apollo shares dropped 15%.
It's all the good guys, right?
Whitcoff, of course.
Now, can you not see how this is already working out?
These two people that just happened to also be
in the conversations about the Gaza discussion
who were also met, literally,
about the profit wildly from the next step.
It's just incredible.
Trump's real estate partner,
Whitcoff, turned Middle East envoy,
randomly, apparently,
sold his stake to resolve conflicts.
His son took over and kept dealing
with the same golf investors,
just like Trump's sons.
So they lied to you.
I mean, it's just really,
it's a shuffle of people.
The money is still in Trump family.
It's the same conversation.
UAE bought $500 million in world liberty
financial days before the inauguration,
you know, that coin that collapsed.
Right.
But either way, and I bet you that they
sold it off before it collapsed
and probably made lots of money.
Tony Blair, the Iraq war architect.
Tony Blair, guys,
can you even imagine why he would even
be brought back into the conversation?
One of the most unpopular politicians
in the world because of what he all
got exposed for some reason.
It seemed as if even Americans focused
more on Tony Blair being caught
for the WMD conversation,
at least in some circles.
The reality is our government was
obviously just as much a part of that.
And he is a proven war criminal,
like all of them.
But he lied about WMDs and just like Bush did.
And Trump even called that out, guys.
He literally said that was a lie.
But here, come on in, Tony Blair.
Be a part of the peace board,
even though you created
one of the most destructive wars in history.
Ajab Benga, world bank president.
The world bank president made the bank a trustee,
destroyed decades of institutional neutrality.
Rubio, Rubio, Marco Rubio,
his own state department condemns
the human rights records of the partner
states that he's literally working with.
This is a cartoon, guys.
Robert Gabriel,
the deputy NSA,
NSA commanding 20,000 troops.
This isn't diplomacy.
It's an occupation with a business plan.
This is exactly what he'd been telling you for,
I mean, pretty much since the beginning
of this administration.
$1 billion membership fee,
except Israel, of course.
No independent audit,
no inspector general,
26 member states,
and only four rated free by Freedom House.
France, Germany, and the UK,
which, by the way,
are not even remotely that.
It's just because West versus whatever else
in their minds.
But this is where we're going.
You think this is not globalism?
I mean, guys, you need to be shoving this
in the face of people who are pretending
that Trump is fighting globalism.
It's embarrassing.
And I'll include, as well,
the conversations we had.
This is when Board of Peace was introduced.
Remember, he literally introduced this at Davos
and then also introduced it at the UN.
I don't know how you can ignore
how obvious that is.
Gaza's Board of Peace
seeks to reimagine the global order,
the idea that this has always been
a fake globalist resistance,
ushering in the globalist plan
that we called in the beginning of 2025,
as well as, and to bring this
into the conversation today,
we discussed yesterday,
ISIS al-Qaeda was created
by the US and Israel.
It's an open secret.
It's just that obvious.
Genuinely so.
It's amazing to me
the kind of obvious conversations
we just can't get our minds around
in this country.
Watch it.
There's other stuff included.
Well, it's a long show,
but there's a lot included.
And I think it's worth your time.
Now, on that note,
I'll include these,
I posted these afterward.
This is only part one.
There's three parts to this,
and I hope you'll watch them all,
but I posted James Corbett's
actual video on Twitter
so people could see it.
Valls Flags,
The Secret History of Al-Qaeda,
part one.
It is absolutely unequivocal.
You will never see it the same again
if you just sit down
and watch the information.
And every single,
every single thing
he cites just like T-Lab
is listed below.
You can prove everything
he's saying in there
for yourself.
You will never find that
on any of the mainstream
alternative media platforms.
Now, Ben Swan,
Truth and Media,
Origin of ISIS 2015.
I think James is with 2021.
I forget.
2015, Ben put this out.
And this is 12 minutes.
It's well done.
I played it at the end of the last show.
Now, James goes in
much, much, much more detail
and I think much more damning.
But this is really important
because this is about the,
I mean, basically the surface level
but the ones that nobody talks about.
The reality of like we went over last night
that the actions of the United States
in these locations
literally created the circumstances
that allowed this to happen.
But then Ben goes further
and points out
it wasn't just a byproduct.
They deliberately took action
to make sure this happened.
As Ben highlights,
all on the record,
it's easy to prove
but yet here we are,
we still get lied to about it.
Now, keeping that in mind today,
the idea of what those forces are
and now that,
as they're claiming
they're fighting terrorism,
think about the stupidity of this.
Well, they literally support
Jolani in Syria
who is literally the terrorist.
They told you they were fighting
years ago.
You can't make this stuff up.
It's just ridiculous.
So we played this in the yesterday show.
Now, it's a four minute 18 clip.
And the point was he's asking her
specifically about her job.
And the job is very clear.
And the actual hearing
is specific about the threat assessment.
And as the DNI,
Director of National Intelligence,
her job is to present that threat assessment
from the intelligent community.
There's no misunderstanding that.
Now, the game they're playing
and it's only working on stupid people, apparently,
is that she's trying to convince people
because she doesn't want to contradict Trump
because she's already been punished for that is,
I just handle a bunch of scattered information
and he's apparently supposed to put it all together
because he's smart enough to do that, apparently.
Or as the time.
So that's not true.
And he calls her out and he says,
that's false.
That's not true.
And you can prove it for yourself.
You can look it up.
You can read the state department.
You can ask Rob, do whatever you want.
It is easy to see.
The reality,
and this is the nuance you're trying to play you on,
is the DNI or the intelligence community
is supposed to present their assessment
because that's what this is about,
their assessment.
Now, it's also then Trump's prerogative
to take that information and then decided
he thinks that that's the correct assessment.
Now, we can get into whether
you might criticize him
for refusing to ignoring what the assessment was.
That's already happened in the past.
But the point is always the same.
It's about their assessment.
We believe this is the case.
And what was it before?
They're not building a nuclear weapon and we know that.
You can prove this, guys.
You can prove this based on all the evidence,
including what they say,
including the previous administration,
including the International Atomic Energy Agency,
everything other than statements from Israel
and their people they work with.
So the point is that the assessment was,
there is no immediate threat.
That's the reality of the assessment
because they've already made this clear.
But in this hearing, he asked your point blank,
was that the case?
He said, well, it's up to Trump to decide.
Clearly, that's the new talking point.
And he goes, that's not true.
That's not.
The idea that you're going to pretend out there
that she's supposed to just give him
a stack of information that's not,
I mean, but even if it's an organized stack
of these categories
and that he's supposed to sit down
to the side for himself,
the idea is he's always told you
through the last administration
is because the people that are around him.
So they are the people.
Is Trump an expert in foreign policy?
Is he an expert in understanding the cables
and information they get across?
No, he's not.
Most people are not.
So it's her job to collect that,
to contextualize it for him.
You can look this actually description up
about what their job is.
And they hand it to them as the assessment.
And the assessment is whether or not
that is imminent, whether or not they're doing it.
Okay.
And then I agree with the second part
that Trump's prerogative
is to then decide for himself.
Well, what she's trying to do
is pretend that that first part's not the case
because she does not want to contradict Trump.
So they go back and forth
and it's undeniably clear in this clip.
Now, this is a new clip.
Is there any evidence that Iran,
at least one we haven't played,
is there any evidence that Iran
intended to conduct a preemptive attack
on the United States?
Well, no.
The evidence has already been shown.
That's not the reality for tons of reasons.
First of all, one,
that it's already been very clearly proven
by their own assessments.
There was no imminent threat.
But you also have the proof
that they put out before.
For example, the statement
that was presented to the United Nations
that I'll show you in a second
that literally said,
if they attack us,
we're going to bomb the countries
where they have bases.
And those are legal targets to understand
because they're refueling,
they're arming like Qatar and UAE, right?
So explain for me how if Iran came out
and said if you attack us,
we're going to do this
and that that's them planning to attack them.
And that's why they attack first.
It doesn't make any sense.
And on top of that,
that Trump also said we attacked first
because they were worried
that Iran would attack Israel
or some variation
because they've said both
or that they would attack us
if Israel attacked them.
But then that was a lie
because Rubio said it wrong.
And it's just every day
there's a new variation
and it's just embarrassing to watch.
She won't answer the question is the point.
Is there any evidence
that Iran intended to conduct
a preemptive attack on the U.S.
prior to beginning this war?
Yes or no?
Congressman,
the answer to this question
needs to be reserved for closed hearing.
I will.
Well, that's a different answer.
Okay. So what that tends to mean
is top secret national security.
So now what are we talking about?
Oh, how much you want to bet?
Trump has now labeled all this national security
because we're getting exposed.
That's what we're talking about, guys,
that now suddenly this is considered
top secret information
because that's Trump's prerogative.
And now the reality is
we can't even get into
whether it was eminent
because that's top secret.
But we swear that it was, though.
Trust us, but we can't show you.
You tell me what I'm missing.
Let's say, however, the intelligence community
does provide the assessments
of the threats that exist to the president.
Yes. So you provide the assessment.
So pause, Gabbard.
What was the assessment?
It's up to Trump to decide.
That's what she said yesterday.
But what you just told us
it was your job to present the assessment,
not just present data
that could be led to an assessment.
You see the difference?
That he can make that determination
within the body of it
does provide the assessments
of the threats that exist.
However, the intelligence community
does provide the assessments
of the threats that exist
to the president
so that he can make that determination
within the body of information
and intelligence.
Right. So just be clear,
she just agreed with me.
You provide an assessment
of the information
and then allow the president
to make his own assessment
based on your advice
and his cabinet
and people around him
and whatever else he wants
to pull into his decision-making process.
That's the reality.
So for her to now refuse
to acknowledge or even state
what she apparently won't do again
that whether or not
what the assessment was
from her perspective,
it just shows you everything.
And if somebody rightly points out
what a disappointment
because she definitely seemed
like an honest person before, right?
Now really think about that.
Think about her or Obama
or anybody else that presents
like somebody who you can trust.
Even though they're like Obama's case,
for example, one of the most dangerous people
in the room.
The point is that
that is how these tend to go.
Why today do we get a bunch
of bumbling idiots
that then show you what they're doing?
I tend to think it's because
that's by design.
Like we're being destroyed.
However you want to look at it,
that Israel is collapsing the West
for their end times prophecy.
I don't even know what you want to think.
Just recognize
there is a shift happening
and we're being dragged into something.
I'm not even talking about the war.
I'm talking about what this country
is suffering
because of these people,
these utter fools.
And activities within the region
that ultimately he is responsible for.
What is an imminent threat?
And if there is an imminent threat,
what actions need to be taken?
Okay, so again,
I'm going to play one more time
so it's clear
that that's exactly the point.
No one's disagreeing
that Trump has the prerogative
to decide based on what you hand him.
What she's refusing to answer
is whether she
or the intelligence community
decided that it was or was not
before they handed it to him
which was their only job in this point.
We'll say, however,
the intelligence community
does provide the assessments
of the threats that exist
to the president
so that he can make that determination
within the body of information
and intelligence
and activities within the region
that ultimately he is responsible for.
What is an imminent threat?
And if there is an imminent threat,
what actions need to be taken?
I knew I was going to do this.
Let me grab this one really quickly
because this will make this flesh.
I'll just play a little bit at the beginning
because of this exact point.
Like I do actually think this is relevant.
I was just trying to be redundant today
because on the show,
I often will play things
I think are important to bring the point around
because as I've said so many times over the years,
I don't see my job
as just simply continuing to inform
the people that I think are already on the path
or aware of the reality
or whatever you want to call it.
That's part of it.
I want to make sure we're always
we're all working together
to see the truth and keep informed.
But my primary job
is to reach the people
that don't know what's going on
every day.
And that does sometimes
end up being redundant for you guys.
You see, because my job,
my mindset is not to
get the most reach
and be the most popular
and grow the most
some of the things I do
are counterintuitive to that degree
because to me, it's about the outcome,
the truth,
the change has always been.
Now, Sir,
oh, wait, did I grab it?
Let me make sure I was like,
I was speaking off the cuff to past time
and then I stopped doing what I was doing.
Just crack myself up sometimes.
So here is the
the clip from yesterday.
And you guys will remember this one.
I just think this
and you'll see what I mean
of why I think this is relevant
to include after this
because of the
the claim of that eminent threat
and how she refuses to answer.
So you could just for sake of conversation,
let's pretend this came afterward
because either way, I didn't.
It was before.
But the point is
that she's directly being asked
after you just heard her say
it is the job of us to
provide the assessment of the threat
and then yes, to let Trump
then decide for himself.
Director Gabbard,
I'd like to reground this
in your core responsibilities.
Under the law,
you are responsible for providing
national intelligence to the president,
correct?
Yes.
And to the heads of executive branch
departments and agencies.
And to the chairman of
a joint chiefs
and senior military commanders.
Across the IC, yes.
And to the Senate
and the House
and relevant committees,
correct?
Yes.
And the law states
that the national intelligence
you provide to Congress
quote should be timely, objective
and independent of
political considerations,
correct?
Yes.
And you noted in your opening
statement, you're here fulfilling
a statutory responsibility
and that your testimony, quote,
represents the IC's assessment
of threats, correct?
So right there, she just, yes.
That I represent the assessment
of the threat,
not giving the materials for
Trump to decide the assessment.
That opening statement
as submitted to the committee
in advance of this hearing
stated that as a result
of last summer's air strikes,
quote, Iran's nuclear enrichment
program was obliterated
and quote, correct?
That's right.
And is that in fact
the assessment of the
intelligence community?
And a point that I'm not going
to get into again today
was to remember the part
they did actually destroy
was the enrichment facility,
which is why,
based on every expert
in the conversation,
including the International
Atomic Energy Agency,
that they're not even capable
of enriching further right now.
You can, I mean,
you could disagree with that,
but there's only evidence
on one side.
The rest is just
screaming narrative
of people who disagree
with everything that is
seemingly fact-based.
The assessment of the intelligence
community is that Iran's
nuclear enrichment program
was obliterated
by last summer's air strikes.
Yes.
In the opening statement
you submitted to the committee
last night also stated, quote,
there has been no effort
since then
to try to rebuild
their enrichment capability
and quote, correct?
That's right.
And that's the assessment
of the intelligence community.
The White House.
Right there again,
the assessment was
they were not even
trying to rebuild it.
Yet, we're going to be
told today suddenly
there's an eminent
nuclear threat.
I stated on March 1st
of this year
that this war was launched
and was, quote,
a military campaign
to eliminate
the eminent nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime,
end quote.
Which, of course, they've
waffled with
and now, you know,
while the missiles
and drones possibly too
and, you know,
but the statement
to begin
was the nuclear threat.
That's a statement
from the White House.
Yep.
Quote, the eminent
nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime.
Was it the assessment
of the intelligence community
that there was an eminent
nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime?
The intelligence community
assessed that Iran
maintained the intention
to rebuild
and to continue to grow
their nuclear enrichment.
Which, by the way,
seems to contradict
your last assessment,
which was that they
weren't even trying to.
But I guess the intent
remained.
Whatever the hell that means.
And I don't even
think that's the case,
by the way,
with all the rest
of the evidence.
But you're going to get
into with the Ratcliffe
clip as well,
just what I would argue
is just
blind partisan dishonesty.
And I think,
I mean, come on,
we've been debating
at this point
about how many times
Gabbard
has already been shoved
into the corner,
Venezuela,
everything, guys.
She's literally contradicting
everything that grew
her support
for Donald Trump
or whatever else
is controlling
her actions right now.
Was it the assessment
of the intelligence community
that there was a quote
eminent nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime?
Yes or no?
Senator, the only person
who can determine
and what isn't
is not an eminent threat
is the president.
False.
This is the worldwide.
You see?
So I hope that was very clear
because you can argue,
yes, that Trump
is the one that gets
to ultimately decide.
But he didn't ask that.
He asked if it was
the assessment of
your not the
intelligence community,
which as you just heard,
she told you
is literally her job
to present that assessment.
And then yes,
allow Trump to make
his own decision.
You know what you mean?
Look, she's not stupid.
She knows very well
what she's doing.
And the reason
I'm stressing this so much
is because you need
to understand
that somebody like
Tulsi Gabbard,
somebody who
you might even argue
is genuinely honest
or whatever else you think
and has now been forced
into this position
because of what this
administration is doing,
what our government is doing
or because of an outside
force that controls it all.
You can decide
what you think
the influence is.
But this is a very important
kind of stark moment
to see
that she is
choosing
to hide this information.
Now you could add
a third possibility
that maybe she's hiding this
and that second statement
about being behind closed doors
national security
is because that
we're, you know,
bumping up against
some very important thing
that we don't even
understand in a year from now
we're going to find out
that they just,
they save the world
and this is what it all is.
I doubt it.
But that's possible, I guess.
That's the whole trust
the plan kind of idea
that maybe we don't know
and we're stirring up
their plan to stop Israel.
You could,
you could assume
whatever you want to
if it makes you feel
better in the moment.
I care about the facts
and even if those facts
turn out later
to be the wrong direction,
I would still argue
and I think anybody would
that in that moment
the right thing to do
was to follow the facts.
The point is you could find,
you know,
let's say you stumble
across a few facts
that show you
or suggest that she's lying
and then a year later tomorrow
you have 100,000 facts
that prove that she's not.
It was still the right thing
to do to let those facts
guide you
even if they were limited.
And this is just
the way this game
has played today
is they try to get you
to ignore certain things
because of a subjective reason.
And it works against you guys
every time.
Well, I have to come back.
Give me a second guys.
We just,
the whole thing just crashed.
So as usual
when we're,
you know,
getting too close to,
well, I shouldn't,
I mean,
you know, I always joke
but that is certainly possible
that we were shut down
for some reason
but, you know,
glitches happen.
But,
as T-Lab is used to
this stuff happens every day.
So the podcast
for whatever reason
that was in the middle
of that statement
and the whole thing
just crashed
and, you know,
threw away all my videos
and all of my organization
but who cares?
We'll get right back to it
as always.
So on that note,
let's let me play this
real quick
and we bring up back
by a videos
and we'll get right back
into it.
Brzezinski was
the strategist
for Jimmy Carter
and convinced Jimmy Carter
to say,
look, the Russians are
dominating Afghanistan
with a civilian
secular government.
Let's create al-Qaeda.
Let's back Osama bin Laden
and give his supporters
weapons to begin
fighting the Russians
and we can pull a coup d'etat
there
and the Russians
will fight back
and then we'll say
the Russians invaded
and it worked.
Saudi Arabia
made a deal with America
that they would push
the Wahhabi extremists,
the al-Qaeda,
the most right wing
wing of Islamic parties
and it worked.
Essentially, al-Qaeda
is a contract army
for the United States.
Well, the same thing
was happening
in Russia.
What Brzezinski wrote
was that
America's faced
with a possibility
of not being able
to rule the world
unilaterally.
Any country's
economic ability
to be self-sufficient
means
potential
military power
and in order
to prevent
any country
from threatening
America militarily,
you have to prevent it
from developing
economically.
The American nightmare,
Brzezinski wrote,
was that Russia
would get together
with Germany
and with Western Europe
creating Russian
raw materials,
German industry
and somehow,
finally,
Russia would become
westernized.
America under
Brzezinski's strategy
said this would be
a disaster
because if Russia's
westernized,
if it becomes
democratic,
if Europe
and Russia
are prosperous,
then we cannot
control them anymore
and they will have
no reason to be NATO.
We've got to stop Russia
and the place to stop
this Russian-European
conglomeration
is to split it
right at the border
down Ukraine.
Let's do in Ukraine
what we did
in Afghanistan.
Let's back the crazies.
Well, most of them are
the former
neo-Nazi groups
that have been
so prominent
that fly the Nazi flag.
Okay.
Just how this works
in this platform, guys.
So, let's get back to it.
So, where we were,
which I think
I was probably
in the middle of a point here.
Hold on.
Let me just make sure
I didn't miss something,
which is always how this works.
Open new things.
There we go.
So, the last point,
yes.
Right.
So, we're talking about
Tulsi Gabbard
and the reality of her dishonesty
and how important
I think it is
to recognize
that that's being driven
through her,
whether or not
she's always been dishonest.
I think it's an important point
for people to see,
especially if they support her.
So, as we know,
Joe Kent came out,
which this says
98 million views, by the way,
which as we get to a point
in a minute,
maybe today,
we have time
about the
propaganda side
for the White House.
Just because you get
that many views
does not necessarily
signify support.
I think it does,
in this case,
my personal opinion,
but what you're getting
from the White House
perspective is these
childishly stupid videos
that have no meaning to them,
even though they claim
they're trying to correct
the record
of like bowling
or video games,
it's sad.
And acting like,
oh my god,
it got 500 million impressions
that we could tell
that we're winning.
That's what they're focused on
in the White House.
It's pretty damn sad.
And I'm pretty sure
that's not what those
views mean, by the way.
Seeing as how
we're all going,
oh my god,
look at this,
I know people put it
in videos and articles
and it's
kind of embarrassed,
my opinion.
But Joe Kent comes out,
as you might have seen
and said,
after much reflection,
I've decided to resign
from my position
as Director
of National Counter-Terrorism Center.
Now, Trump
before said,
oh, he's a great guy
and a great career,
he's so smart.
And then the moment he quit,
he said, oh, he's a loser
and he's never been good
at the job.
So you can decide
was which one he was lying at
from,
which from which position
he was lying.
Because then you have
to acknowledge this is not,
if he was thinking
he was the worst person
in the world
and why he hired him
and if it changed along
the path,
why did he do something
about that?
It takes,
it's, it's,
you know,
a choice
to pretend
like that's not obvious.
It's obvious that he
liked him
or maybe he didn't
but used him
because he wanted him
there.
And then the moment
that he disagreed with him,
now he's the worst guy
in the world.
And if he had always
agreed with him,
even if it was bad
at that job,
he would have stayed
in that position.
I think we can see that
with the likes of Noam
and Bondi
and Cash
and Bongino
and whether they've left
some places,
they're all just bad.
Like unprepared
for the job.
He told you
he cannot,
in good conscience,
support the ongoing war
with Iran.
Iran posed no
imminent threat
to our nation.
Now,
as we showed you,
I might even have this
pop up.
I forgot to grab it.
I think this is it.
Nice.
Here's
Caroline Leavitt
who, by the way,
responded to this post
going on American
and there absolutely
was a threat
and he's wrong.
Even though,
as you all probably saw,
on the 12th,
this is the 17th,
on the 12th,
this is what she said.
To be clear,
no such threat from Iran
to our homeland exists
and it never did.
Oops.
See, they'll lie
because in that moment
they were trying
to contradict what the
fake news was saying
and they all are fake news
but this is ABC
and it's the bad Democrats.
And so they were saying fake,
that's fake
because they were claiming
that Iran might attack
California.
So they said
not only was it no threat
but just in general.
There doesn't no threat
to our homeland exists from Iran.
Never did.
And then a week later
she goes,
you're wrong.
There's been an imminent threat.
We knew it.
You just have to laugh at
how stupid this is, guys.
This is what we're being dealt.
It's obvious
if you aren't ridiculous.
They're lying to you.
And so Caroline Leavitt
is trying to convince you
that this is imminent
because they need to
to make the argument
that they are not
conducting an illegal war.
Oh, let me save this for you too.
So he said it's not imminent.
Merton, it was imminent
and that Israel importantly
was why this was happening.
Literally says that
we started this
due to pressure from Israel
on his powerful American lobby.
Now regardless of his previous
statements which are relevant
in plenty of other ways
and even in this to some degree
don't change the fact
that he said it.
So you could argue
he has interest in something
other than the truth
but end of the day
the evidence backs up
this assessment
even if you think
he's making it up.
It does.
And on top of that
that it wasn't imminent
by every possible data point
but it also could be
like I said in the beginning
that this might have been
an effort to give you a win.
Like to slowly give you
that release valve
in the interest of
it was always Israel playing us
because everyone sees that now
and so they might as well admit it
you get my logic
and hopefully use that
to get you back
into supporting the team
which is what Glenn Beck
and Joe and the rest are doing.
So maybe that's just how
they decided to read it
but I tend to see them
or being coordination
and how this all works
and in the past
it tends to be that way.
So whether Joe Kent
was part of this kind of thing
if that's the case or not
it's still being used that way
I argue
that they're now using this to go
oh okay that's our last effort
our last ditch effort
to make it Trump not responsible
right that just Israel played him
and then they'll add
that it turns out
this is what Glenn Beck is saying
that he's actually
within that fighting for us
because he knew
that was what they were doing
he knew the Democrats sold us out.
It's just such lazy arguments
and everything proves
the opposite of that.
So if they want to find a way
to pretend Trump's not the one
that did it all to them
and and every violation
of every promise turned out
because it was he was fighting
Israel the whole time
it's something people will grab
because they need to.
Lindsey Graham of course
comes out and says
he's anti-Semitic
because that's what you expect
from people who are fighting
for a foreign power I guess
and Israel exposed
makes a good point
because their people are calling
him anti-Semitic
why for claiming
that the Israel government
was forcing a war
that they wanted?
I'm not sure exactly why
you think that's racist
you know why they're trying
to make that argument
because you're not allowed
to criticize Israel's legal actions
unless you just somehow
hate Jews apparently.
It's stupid guys
nobody falls for that anymore
and the point is
he blames Israel
for his wife's death
because he knows very well
that ISIS funded
and controlled by Israel
Mossad and the CIA
I've added the CIA
to the statement
but that's the truth
that this is what we're
this is I mean
this is his statement
this was a lie
and is the same tactic
the Israelis used
to draw us into the
disaster shack war
as a gold star husband
who lost my beloved
wife Shannon
in a war manufactured by Israel
this is important
now what you're getting
is a lot of people
who are calling him racist
and so
and saying it's anti-Semitic
and that you turned it all
you just went for
the low hanging fruit
and blamed Israel
no it's because
this is what the world
is coming terms with
and you've got these
right now it's
becoming more clear
than ever
people who are not
acknowledging this
still
like there's tons of
what I argue
are opportunists
and they're not
honest people
who are now leaning
into this
even though they fought
for Trump their entire
life and
or just the last year
and I
you shouldn't trust
those people
but at least they're
saying the right thing
because they see an
opportunity in it
what I say about politics
but
all the people
who at this point
are still
like I'm not saying
you have to go
everything's controlled
by Israel
I'm not even saying
you can prove that
in fact that
I don't even think
that's the case
I do think it's
very easy to prove
that Israel
influences U.S. policy
if not can control it
with certain tactics
not everything all the time
but you can argue
as I wrote in the title
U.S. controls you
at Israel controlling
U.S. policy
which is not the
same thing
is saying controlling
everything
is there are people
out there who are no
long or just
in every way
trying to avoid
even acknowledging
the influence
of their lobby
those people
need to be seen
for what they are
right now
it is all
it's been provable
for a long time
today
it's now even being
acknowledged
by the corporate
conversation
and they're still
trying to gaslight you
take note of
who those people are
just like we did
during the COVID-19
aftermath
take note of the ones
who are still
trying to deceive you
even at this day
media ight
points out
the White House
boosts
calls
excuse me boosts
White House boosts
posts calling Joe Kent
a loser
and crazed
egomaniac
because clearly that
somebody who destroys
their career
to put the truth out
is clearly an
egomaniac
I mean I guess you could
argue it's about
their own personal
perspective
you know but
10 egomaniacs
tend to be more about
their wealth
and their job
and their career
influence too
but
after he resigns
in protest
from Trump administration
well that point
showing you this is
just
Trump's
you know he's a loser
he's even though
he's right
even though what he said
is correct
it's just has to call
you have to call
it out
now Aaron
from Power Point
post this clip
and now I have to point
out Gomez here
he's really bad at this
just I just wanted
that out
the way he's doing this
is just
I feel like it's
almost
hurts the points
he's trying to make
because he just doesn't
seem to
he's not like assertive
enough or something
you can see from
yourself but
nonetheless
there
the way exchange
I thought was
kind of interesting
and it's
and it's really
more so about
Ratcliffe
and then in the next
one as well
and how he chimes in
and basically
just gives you
right here
wait this one
basically this guy
just
this one
this you know
MAGA Republican
Senator
is just giving him the
you know
this is happening
all play let it speak for
itself
basically giving him the
kind of
quick little presentation
to deny all the things
and that's what they're
all going to post
even though the evidence
denies what they're saying
but here
is the engagement with
Gabbard and him
and the question being
you know
when Trump
Trump said she was wrong
and deny what she said
was she
wrong or was he lying
of course she won't
answer the question
but
the assessment point
when Trump was asked about
your
testimony
he said you were wrong
were you lying
or not
I stand by the
intelligence community
right with that
right so what that means
is what she said
she stands by
even though
Trump said it was wrong
so you can have fun with
that
you can
I mean
they can disagree
sure but what we're
talking about
is intelligence that led
to actions in the world
and so if the
intelligence is there
and she still stands
by and Trump
didn't care about that
then you might want to
ask what is guiding
his action
probably
Jared Kushner
as he told you
I don't know
but it's certainly not
the intelligence coming
from the intelligence
community
whether or not
that's even what we
wanted to listen to
the point is
in this moment
you can see
that it's not
what she's putting forward
at least in some of these
cases
you know what I think
guys
I think the evidence
makes it clear
but I'll let you
fill that in for
yourself
complete assessment
Director Radcliffe
when it came to
the directors
testimony
she said that
Iran was not building
the nuclear weapon
last spring
in Congress
and so the Supreme
leader
had
has not authorized
the nuclear weapons
program
do you agree
with what she said
or not
yes or no
the directors
right here
she can speak for herself
oh so
I thought this
was an intelligence
community
follow up man
you just
waffled that point
because the point
would be
I asked you
a very direct
question
I didn't ask
what she thinks
I asked you
what you think
about the intelligence
he presented
stop trying to
avoid the question
even if he doesn't
answer
that makes it
clear to people
watching
I mean like and so it just
kills me that he just
lets that go
because Radcliffe
just very clearly
avoided that
in a dishonest way
because the question
again was
what do you think
about the intelligence
he presented
why would she answer
for that question
if he's asking you
your opinion
Radcliffe
these people are dishonest
I'm telling you
and this is what the
community
this kind of community
does
now very quickly
before we've passed
it Spirit of Age
in the chat says
what they watch
I'm glad he brought
this up or they brought
this up
because this is a point
that I didn't want to
include
they watched
the Tucker
Tucker already interviewed
Joe Kent
and apparently he
ended a lot
I did see some of these
fooling around
was apologizing for Trump
was basically
arguing some of these
similar points
and right now
weirdly enough
there's this sentiment
going around
about the
Iran proxies
in Iraq
and elsewhere
that that Trump
that the US
was funding
to attack the US
like it's a basically
a misrepresentation
of the reality
of the information
what we're talking about
is the PMU
and the different
which are not
Iran proxies
but yes
there was a point
at which they were
being funded through
things the US
was funding for Iraq
but they're not
terrorist organizations
and so they
they're it can
it turns this weird thing
into essentially
that the US
probably the Democrats
by the way
is where that seems to go
we're funding
these people to attack
the US
and it leaves open
the point
that Trump
is trying to stop
all of that
so I agree
with what they're
saying there
I get the sense
that that's what that
what that was
one of the reasons
why I'm feeling skeptical
about all this
that he does
kind of feel
to be like
bringing this
into the pro-Trump
protein conversation
with some criticism
which makes it feel
easier to digest
you know why
because they know that
everybody's unhappy
with this
and that's what you have to
come to terms with right now
they're lying to you
Jones
all of them
the ones out there
trying to tell you
we even see an end
by the way
that every one of the
GOP agrees with this
they don't
rather the
Republican side
not the
the government
or always agrees
MAGA
left right
the American people
we are calling this out
I think we can see that
so recognize
the ones hiding from it
a briefing
he just let it go
you know he's sad
let's move on
Trump also said
he didn't care what you
thought
or said
he did
should he care about
what you have to say
when it comes to
intelligence
is obviously
that's a bad way to frame
that right
I mean you could do it
in a more tactile way
the point is that
you're literally the
director of national
intelligence
you're supposed to be the
one is presenting
these assessments
like you're trying to
avoid talking about
and he said he doesn't
care what you think
doesn't that seem important
you know what I mean
like shouldn't
shouldn't it be important
that the president
cares about the
assessable
apparently not
seeing as how she just
is claiming that
Trump's the one
you making the decisions
without their assessment
or the way she's
trying to make this
I continue to provide
the president
with the intelligence
communities assessments
on all matters
ah well look at that
what do you mean
you just told me
that Trump
besides those assessments
you just paid
you said you provide
Trump with the
assessments of the threat
when asked about
the assessment of the
threat you say
well Trump decides that
so how do you
that she
this is dishonesty
she damn well knows it
and frankly
I think you can see it
on her face
so let me just
kind of get this straight
the department
you said that
Iran was not building
a nuclear weapon
last year
President Trump said
he didn't care what you
thought
and you're wrong
they engage an
operation
midnight hammer
he then says it was
obliterated
we hear later reports
that
in open source reporting
that it was only set
back by a few
months
now let's be clear
about that
now that was
so after the obliterated
that what they claims
of obliteration
and the enrichment facility
one of the things
that were bombed
but
it was not obliterated
and that was them
that was Trump's effort
to make it look like
he won
whatever that was
and that's what he said
mission accomplished
ladies and gentlemen
and but now here
we're back because
there's still
it's just
it's
him trying to
take a win
from something that was
not
because what we
if you understand
the way it went down
they hadn't
basically Iran
ended up bombing
right through their
defenses
and bombed a bunch
of important locations
and ultimately
there was collaboration
behind the scenes
about letting that
waffle away
basically the argument
with the Israel
pointed to locations
they already wanted
to destroy because of their
technocratic ambitions
I can't verify that
but the point was
those locations
then got bombed
now
why would that be
there
would there be
collaborate
why would they choose
to bomb the locations
they wanted
well the only reason
that would make sense
if that's what happened
is because
and this has
provably happened before
they get to a situation
where they don't
want this to continue
and so
so they don't lose
face
they make an agreement
I'll bomb there
you bomb there
we'll both back away
that's happened before
guys you can prove this
and so that
I wonder
whether that's the way
that went down
because Trump
felt like he was
losing
and then
yelled I won
and that's probably
something I allowed him
to do anyway
but either way
they lied about what
happened
one way or another
you have to be all
honest about that
now because
if it was obliterated
then they
wouldn't be able to work
back
but if it was only
a couple more months
then
you know
it's either way's lying
and the last point
is that this is
not about a nuclear weapon
according to
all of the intelligence
it is simply
the civilian program
and the at levels
according to the
IAA
at the end of
of the end of 2025
are still literally
within the safeguards
that's the number
that
Whitcoff lied about
60 percent
465 kilograms
that's legally
allowed within the
agreements they have
he tried to pretend
they were bragging
about that
because he's clearly
working for something
other than American
interest
or trying to stop
a war from
spinning out of control
and hurting
American citizens
or anybody
for that matter
and at the beginning
of this war
he said that
there were
weeks away
I just want to kind of
get a sense
were they weeks away
of achieving
a nuclear weapon
yes or no
Congressman
this is a serious matter
and you've made some
very serious
mischaracterization
yes or no
where
what in the world
was mischaracterized
fine
then characterize it
correctly for me
like I do
this is just
so impossible
what he just said
was basically
exactly what went down
yes in a clumsy fashion
but nonetheless
that
look it up
that's exactly
what happened
so if
if the mischaracterization
is that he left
something out
then fill it in
but that's not what
happens
it's just about
I won't answer
because you didn't do it
right
now I will point this out
this is why people like her
are dangerous
because this is well done
because in the past
what do you get
like recently from
Nome or Bondi
just lashing out
and you're a stupid one
and you're ugly
like that's the kind of stuff
like equivalent
that you get from them
oh well you said this
in 2045
and you didn't care about your
team
what does that have to do
with what we're talking about
that's what you got from
those people
because they're bad at this
here's what she did
which is very tactful
and I argue
you're going to hear
this a lot more going forward
that an open source reporting
war
I just want to kind of get
were they weeks away
of achieving a nuclear weapon
yes or no
congressman
this is a serious matter
and you've made some
very serious mischaracterization
yes or no
were they weeks away
yes or no
and so it would be a disservice
to you and the American people
to answer this question
with Amir
yes or no
reclaiming my time
well done
you've mischaracterized
everything
so it would be a disservice
to the American people
to simply answer yes or no
damn it
that would that
I'd be in the audience
like well shoot
maybe she's right
I mean that's
that's a well crafted response
but that's
she's not correct
you understand
because the
the you just
listed off
publicly available information
and then asked a very
pointed question
was it or was it not correct
that they had
what he said they did
I mean
you have to be honest
about what is happening here
this is easy to see
were they weeks away
or not
the American people
need to know
if this was an imminent
threat or not
if they're a weeks away
or not
and by the way
weeks away
would not be an imminent threat
nor would not having it at all
both of which
well the point is they
the evidence shows that that's
the the the second part of the
the latter
they do not have it all
but even if it was a couple
weeks away
by the very definition
of what it means
that's not imminent
because the
entire point for the war powers act
is that it has to be imminent
immediate
because that would suggest that
there's a bomb flying
or that they're being invaded
is the only circumstance
because otherwise
if you have weeks
well you go to congress
you say hey
we have this coming
we need authorization for war
because that's the law
or we need an authorization
for military force
like in Iraq
which they probably would have
gotten
but they did not do that
because there was
no imminent threat guys
it's very simple
and all of this is very clear
if they're a months away
or not
none of this dodging
were they
an imminent threat
yesterday
and she and he moves past
why wouldn't you keep pushing
you know what I mean
like it's just
part of me thinks
because that's how this is
supposed to go
performative theater
ooh
they're pushing it to them
and calling them out
and then nothing happens
you know what I think
about how this usually works
now just to include
so you can see it
here's Donald Trump
telling you
we attacked first
that's alone
enough to understand
what happened
they attacked first
now if you
argued it was an imminent threat
well they've had ample time
to prove that
and when they would
be required to prove that
if this was the war powers
act allowance
they're not doing that
this is congress
just letting this waffle
in the middle
with no a poor power
they voted
they voted it down
there's no authorization
there's no
there's no congressional
there's no
author
the military force
authorization
there's no congressional
approval
and it's not war powers act
so we're just apparently
just war
if it was okay
no matter what
uncontained war
no no guidance
no congressional approval
no war powers act
so this is an
illegal war
by every stretch
of the imagination
that they're just
carrying out
because nobody in our
government
is willing to do
anything to enforce
the law as it stands
how do you not see
that as an occupied
territory guys
we are
absolutely lost
even whether it's just
lobbying
you know
you can earn the pharmaceutical
lobby
paid everyone
to not care about anything
that would make
just as much sense to me
with where we are
but we know it's not
just that point
we attack first
he says
because that is obvious
and it shows
it's not eminent
but I thought
we were going to
have a situation
where we were
going to be attacked
they were getting
ready to attack
Israel
oh okay
that's important
so this is
the first response
they were getting
ready to attack Israel
this is after
Rubio made the statement
and he felt
like he was
you know
being called weak and so
no no no
I attacked first
because I'm the one
I attacked
that's what he does
and then he shot
himself in the foot
by doing that
but then tried to lie again
then kind of came back
to that original statement
because that's how dumb this
is and I'm literally
not making that up
you can look for yourself
and I've showed you
on the show
my point
is that he said
this
they were getting ready
to attack
they were getting ready
to attack
okay
bear that in mind
as we go through
this next part
as he then contradicts
himself about that very point
where we were going to
be attacked
they were getting ready
to attack
Israel
they were getting ready
to attack
others
you're seeing that
right now
you mean the legal response
to
blizzard into the war
because you attacked
without justification
yeah yeah
we're seeing that now
what he wants you to think
is that's
we knew
that we're gonna do that
well as I showed you
they told you
in the UN
before you did this
if you do those things
we'll bomb those countries
and he acts like
huh who knew
who knew
well
he just told you
we
knew they were preparing
for an attack
a lot of those
missiles that are hitting
and those are stationary
those were aimed there
for a long period of time
which also means
that they very clearly knew
they were aimed at those
locations
because those locations
are housing
us bases
and us refueling
and everything we talked
about
legal belligerence
which means they're allowed
to be attacked
these other countries
so I think it was right
about that
we attacked first
and if we didn't
it could have been
you know look
we're really
decimating them
they're being
oh they're so
we're Lou
we're winning so much
all the time
so
keeping that in mind
just again
that we attacked first
unequivocally shows you
that there was not
immediate
an eminent threat
especially since
they didn't just obliterate
their ability to bomb
right
so they bombed them
and then Iran kept bombing
so explain for me
or rather
responded with bombing
and then it's continued
to bomb after that
showing you
they didn't just
stop their ability to respond
right
so if the eminent nuclear
threat
was about to happen
and then you bombed
them
and then they were able
to keep bombing
why didn't they bomb you
with that eminent nuclear
threat
ah
logic
how frustrating for people
who try to lie to you
so the next point
why it read
as we highlighted before
he's
that
in nine days before
and also shows you that the
Iran
goes to the UN Security Council
and says
hey there's bad things going on
they're violating the law
and
yeah that's what terrorists tend
to do
right
well
what's crazy is you never
see the US and Israel
doing that
and I think you know why
because
oh UN is a loss
apparently
nine days before the US
Israel sneak attack
Iran publicly warned
that it was
attack
if it was attacked
quote
all bases
facilities
and assets
of the hostile force
in the region
would constitute
legitimate targets
but yes
let's pretend there was a
secret plan
we literally told you
what we were going to do
if you bomb us
but there was a secret plan
to attack
according to these children
so
he just told you
we knew they were preparing
for an attack
well here's what he said
later in this conversation
the power
look
look what happened
in the last two weeks
they weren't supposed to go
after all these other countries
in the Middle East
why not
did you make a agreement
or something
you just told us
they were planning it
those missiles were set
to go after them
yep
because that
apparently that means
they weren't
about to
or going to
so they hit
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
UAE
like
like they told the UN
they would
if you attacked illegally
right
Bahrain
Kuwait
nobody expected that
oh oh
okay wait
let's let's
let's have Donald Trump
debate Donald Trump
they were getting ready
to attack others
oh oh
they're seeing that
right now
and a lot of those
missiles
nobody expected that
we were shot
to attack others
you're seeing
nobody expected that
we were shot
they were getting ready
to attack others
you know
this is not like an
oopsie
this is not like
the evidence evolved
he lied to you guys
he lied
he wasn't even probably
about covering something
it's just about
what am I needing to say
right now
to make it look like
I'm always in control
or like
I'm winning something
and just
why
and the next time
comes out
well in this moment
I need to make it sound
like we are
not the ones
breaking the law
so you know
who thought
this would happen
and it makes you look
like terrorists
I just don't know
why anybody in the room
who's not a complete child
supports people
that are so blatantly lying
and I think
like I've been saying
that that's where we are
I think we're at a point
where people in this country
are so shockingly aware
of where we are
because of this
because it's ridiculous
we're watching a cartoon
pretending like
that's the representation
of the world
these people
are obviously not
the kind of people
like we're
this these are people
who are being put here
in my mind
to convince us
that this is what
we're dealing with
when it's quite
obviously whoever's
pulling the strings
like the picture
we use today
again
that's my opinion
but the reality
of the evidence
showing you
that influence
guys is provable
but to the degree
is up for you to decide
do it again
right back around
geez man
does anybody
anywhere else
and in the
the entire media
is who else deals
with this stuff
I'm sure it's somebody
but for crying out loud
guys they have a
a gigabyte
fiber connection
that's directly plugged
into my computer
that is completely up
and that right now
I can see it
but somehow these things
just crash
and break down
in the middle
of our conversations
it's just so hilarious
to me
well so be it
as always
we'll just keep going
let me
let me preface
these remarks
with I never
never ever
believe Israeli figures
I've been in the government
too long
to know that the Israelis
are patent liars
in their intelligence community
in their propaganda community
certainly
and in their leadership
they are
in veteran liars
let me say that again
they are liars
so
my father told me
when I was a child
people in authority lie
and we all
if we are going to continue
Yes, yes
good note from RFK jr
as he's in authority
and lying to you
never stops on this plot
on these
it's just so crazy to me
so anyway
back to what we were talking about
the idea that this was a
a disgust acknowledged strike
they told you
we were going to do this
because that's our legal right
if you illegally bomb us
all on the record
and yet they just lie to Americans
very simple guys
every single
time
they were getting ready to attack
others
you see
Kuwait
nobody expected that
apparently not
nobody expected
what I told you 30 seconds ago
what was it gonna happen
what are you crazy
yeah apparently so
and keep this
because this will become
more relevant guys
this is a legal document
that's on the record
proving that they knew
that they were going to
illegally attack them
or suspected
and that they were not
planning to respond
or rather attack first
but they told you
we would respond
if you take this act
and it's exactly what they did
they literally turned around
and said
those legal responses
they told you
they were going to take
or didn't say that part
but those are illegal terrorist
attacks against our allies
there's such gross dishonesty
in this
it's just beyond the pale
now as we told you before
as Ryan Rosbiani's pointing out
they came out and says
or said about Trump
that it was a feeling
that's what Leavitt said
it was a feeling
based on the facts
is what she said
well it's the feeling
this means it's your opinion
which is based on the facts or not
so there you go
add this to the court of
conversation
there is no legal eminent threat
if there's ever any honesty
in this conversation
there's every legal accountability
all of these are on the record
they're just because
they're bad at this
also
here's what Trump said
about how he was told
to do this
because Kushner said
but apparently that's
evidence of an eminent threat
because Kushner
and what you kind of
insinuated is what
that's his fault
because he misled me
because that's what
good leaders do
the situation was very quickly approaching
the point of no return
and the United States
found it intolerable
in my opinion
based on what
Steve and Jared
and Pete and others
were telling me
yeah you know the liars
the ones who've been proven
to have lied
in the conversation
who were called out
by the other diplomats
in the conversation
who the foreign minister
Homan
quite literally told you
or lying to you
about what's going on
and that's when they
they were about to give up
their enrichment
and everything else
and they bombed
to the next day
every part of this conversation
is very clear
and you can easily prove it
Marco so involved
found it intolerable
in my opinion
based on what
Steve and Jared
and
Pete and others
were telling me
Marco so involved
yeah good guys right
I thought that
they were going to attack us
I thought they would
all the people
by the way
that the same
MAGA team right now
told you were rhinos
and were always lying
and hated Trump
and they were
oh but yeah
now Marco
he's the one
he knows
he's also on the
board of peace
is going to control
our totally
not globalist future
hashtag winning
if we didn't do this
at the time
we did it
I think they had in mind
to attack us
and
oh yeah
yeah so you
think maybe
we kind of
maybe
but eminent threat
the evidence
is absolute
what leave it says
but it's national
security now
we'll keep
Gabbard can't tell you
now just to be
clear
it shouldn't always be
like a
dismissive
like facetious
thing
where it's like
I'm kind of
making fun of it
but the reason I'm doing
that is because
this is ridiculous
this is not some
like articulate debate
about the nuance of
what the data shows
this is just
whole cloth lies
as they get caught
from day to day
lying to you
and then we're
supposed to engage
with this
like it's not a joke
you know
no guys
no
this is dumb
and these people
are obviously dishonest
we just got to be
real about that
because if you can
catch them lying
the next day
then why are we
even debating
whether they're liars
since pretty simple
based on what Jared
said
well that's good
good advice
well here is
well of course
Eric Daugherty
just in the big thing
we're winning
whatever
whatever the team just said
Ratcliffe is asked
now what we
we just went over the information
just even just today
just want to show you alone
today
is enough to make you understand
that they're lying about this
but you can go back
through all the last shows
we did since March 1st
since very clear
from the very beginning
I'll even play what Rubio said
in a second again
that this is not the case
don't forget
Gabbard said
in 2025
that they are not
seeking a nuclear weapon
the international
atomic energy agencies
have said every year
since they're ever doing this
that they're not doing that
and they can confirm
through their watertight system
that that's not the case
and yet
here's what Ratcliffe has to say
and what you're going to see
right here is some kind of
coordinating
I'm going to rattle off
five questions
that are basically
everything we've already
proven is not true
in this very setting
but I'm just going to answer
directly
and then this clip
clipped and put out
and that's what you're going
to see right now
all of the team
that wants to blindly pretend
like we're all being lied to
by Democrats
about what Iran's really doing
even though
they also support the war
because that totally makes sense
that ultimately this is the truth
that what Ratcliffe just says out loud
despite the evidence
is what we should believe
because
Democrat lies or whatever
even though they're all dishonest
Iranian regime
committed to America's
destruction
in your opinion
yes
does the Iran
let's just
first point
are they committed
to the destruction of America
okay
based on what
are they ever done that
no
is there any evidence
other than what you guys
say they want to do
no
other than the funding of groups
that in fact
are not actually proxies
that you claim are
but are not the reality
or groups that you in fact
have funded yourself
no
the idea is insane
to in any way insinuate
that they've
designed to destroy America
then why haven't they
taken that opportunity
you've literally
and then this is actually
really important
I just said this
to somebody today
take a second
and think about this
what happened just now
or other first
and and afterward
we're told this is a
terrorist organization
that has designed to kill
the guy
to kill everybody in America
and kill every Jew
and they've got
Secular secret nuclear weapons
or they're almost there
they've got missiles
aimed at us
and they want to kill everybody
okay
let's just pretend for conversation
sake that that's the reality
so then
let's walk through what happened
so then Donald Trump
in the United Israel
even if you want to pretend
they were attack us
bombs them
right okay
so what does that do
well that gives them
the legal opportunity
to do everything
they told you
they wanted to do
so you're telling me
all this time
they've got these secret
nefarious plans
to do this illegally
and then you bomb them
and you give them
the legal opportunity
to bomb everybody
and what do they do
they don't do that
there's not been a single bombing
inside the United States
they bombed bases
because they're legal
but they're legal targets
because you guys illegally attack
them
they bombed in Israel
because Israel's continued
their entire lives
to attack them
they bombed in
I mean
but where's the belligerent
mindless attacking
of innocent people
where's the terrorist attack
well guess who is doing that
Israel the United States
guess who's using
white phosphorus
and cluster munitions
Israel the United States
guess who's constantly lying
to you as
psychological operate
Israel so just think about
the opening
if you want to believe
they were willing to do
all these crazy things
you gave them the legal pathway
to bomb everywhere
and they didn't
I just don't know
how much more clear this can get
and that's not about
good guy bad guy
it's about the fact
that they've lied
about this country
this government
the people of Iran
and at this moment
they have self interest
and their interests
are telling them
that this is not going to
work out for them
if they do that
so they don't do it
they don't mind the straight
they don't bomb
the straight of removes
they simply threat
to use threats
to keep them hindered
while letting everybody else
come through
we'll get to that too
and the point is
that if they were
what they said
they wouldn't be doing
any of this
now it's in their interest
to make sure that
they don't give them
the justification
that's not terrorism
that's not lunacy
that's tactics
I just hope that
really make breaks
through people
because it's easy to see
basic points
that really just
bring it all together
so on that very point
back to this clip
you've got Ratcliffe
being asked you
are they held
bunch of destroying
the government
of the US
the country
and yes simply
okay I'd love to see
some evidence on that
and if there's
if the evidence is
the State Department says
well there's no
it's never happened
they never try
I mean it's
same thing
it's tiresome
Iranian regime
committed to America's
destruction
in your opinion
yes
does the Iranian regime
have American blood
on their hand
since its founding
in 1979
yes
very broad way to frame that
and that's thousands
the same number
we always talk about
and what is it
you want to tell me
in the chat
I'm sure you remember
it's when
US government
illegally invaded Iraq
anyone debate that
anyone disagree
with that framing
the lies about WMDs
and guess what
Soleimani
and Iran supported Iraq
in the resistance
of that illegal invasion
we literally
can prove that
that's our Wikipedia
about the dynamics
and yet then
when you point out
the fact that
that's where they were
killed
they never do that
you see
because they don't
want you to recognize
that
they call them terrorists
so you're telling me
that if
if Mexico invaded
Texas
and then people
the the
the people in Texas
fought off the
invasion of Mexico
would they be terrorists
obviously not
nor are the people
defending the invasion
of Iraq
when you're doing it
illegally
but that's the game guys
did they kill
America thousands
well as even
Harrison pointed out
the other day
beastings
killed more people
in a given year
than the
then you claim
Iran's killed Americans
over our entire
lifespan
they're just
gaslighting you
and on top of that
again the numbers
they're talking about
are people that
were killed
in an illegal
invasion
so you can't make
anything out there
so and then
then they assassinated
Soleimani in Iraq
under the guy
him being the bad guy
when in fact
he's been the only
power center
of the
really in earnest
the element
that's been fighting
ISIS on the ground
while there have been
as we just showed you
supporting them
across the countries
has Iran
plotted assassination
attempts against Americans
on American soil
yes
yeah okay
so this is based on
what even
Tucker Carlson
told you
was intelligence
that came from
Israel
and the New York Times
verified that for
themselves
question all of it guys
I do too
but what I'm always
pointing out
is what you got
is that
versus what Ratcliffe says
or what Trump tells you
that's not evidence guys
that's statements
well I guess you
it's still evidence
but it's not
high quality evidence
it's subjective
it's a personal statement
of somebody involved
what we're
what we can see
is that this has been
something that's been
manufactured
I mean are we really
pretending like
what happened in Butler
was not ridiculously obvious
it's obvious that
we've been lied to
this entire time
the point
is that the lie of Iran
trying to assassinate
him literally came
through Israeli intelligence
that's all the record
but yeah
sure why not
because they said so
was Iran developing
a nuclear weapon
prior to our military
action last June
and did Iran
remain committed
to developing a nuclear
weapon that will lead
up to this conflict
yes so I want to
clarify on that
so yes
the answer is no
by the way
of all the evidence
including from
his own his own
department
the information shows
the opposite
but he said yes
out loud
so all the MAGA people
who want to
rather the dishonest
people who aren't
even trying to make
America great again
but call themselves MAGA
who are in the
Republican party
are the ones pushing
this today
because it's a one-stop
shot
all the questions that
disagree with what
we're proving today
because there's been much
talk about
about a fatwa
against the development
of a nuclear weapon
you come back to that
one second
of course
don't get into that
we don't want to know
that
which means they have
a religious
a religious reason
based on their own
political religious beliefs
to not ever
seek a nuclear weapon
which you can prove
that that exists
whether they care
about it or not
is a different question
but historically
you can see
that they do
and haven't done that
based on the evidence
as always
what we can see
in front of us
could there be a
secret bomb somewhere
of course
I'd love to be able to
prove that
if you have evidence
that I'm not just
statements from people
that have always lied
to us
but let's talk about it
but that's how
this game is always
played
you finished
using that
that's okay
if left unchecked
do you think Iran
would have the ability
to develop missiles
capable of reaching
the United States
yeah missiles
capable
do you mean like
literally every government
of the world
has missiles and ICBMs
that can go as far
yes
so the only real
argument is they're
they they have the
ability to
to fight back
and we can't allow that
yes
did Israel force the US's
hand and make us take
action
as some have claimed
no
well done
fact-based
you know like
okay
so because
he just responds
with one word
answers
we're supposed to act
like that just
sounded very
that's what they're
doing today
Mr. Gabbard
do you agree with
the CIA director
assessment on that
last question
in particular
okay and she says
yes
even though
she just told you
that's not the case
she literally told you
that they weren't
seeking nuclear weapons
but she answers
yes
there's no
misunderstanding this
something's
driving this
whether it's just
Trump pressuring them
or something else
she just literally under
oath lied to you
based on what she said before
even what she said
in this hearing
contradicts what she just
answered yes on
how pathetic
that's your legacy
Tulsi good for you
Eric Daugherty
yay
whatever the team said
that day
Tulsi Gabbard
again are the goals
of Israel aligned
with the goals
of the United States
well let's get into
did Israel drive this
and whether Israel's
influencing this government
here's what she had
to say about this
and like we even need
to play this video
quite clearly
the answer is
what Trump says
our agenda is
is quite different
than what Israel
was openly doing
that should matter
to people
especially since it's
now becoming clear
that Israel is the one
driving this war
but understand
my mind is that
this is the same thing
right and all you're
getting is that
Trump is just
telling you what you
want to hear
while being
well aware that
Israel's the one
deciding how this goes
that's my belief
so my question is
what does the intelligence
community assess
Israel's goals in this
war to be
and are those goals
aligned with the goals
of the United States
I'm thinking
carefully here
about what can be said
in this open setting
versus the closed setting
of course
are the goals aligned
I mean it's a very objective
question yes or no
you won't reveal
any inside information
you have to understand
why she's being
careful right there
I think we all know
that have been laid out
by the president
are different
from the objectives
that have been laid out
by the Israeli government
yep
even though that
doesn't change his support
does it
and how do they differ
we can see
through the operations
that the Israeli government
has been focused
on disabling
the Iranian leadership
and taking out
several members
obviously beginning
with the Ayatollah
which by the way
despite their lies
Trump was
all was absolutely
in support of
and the evidence
clearly shows
that he knew about
him beforehand
despite the teams
lot that the team
sport lying on twitter today
despite what she said
you can prove this
it's been widely covered
both from his own administration
and many different reports
covering this
based on the
what was it again
I'll bring up the article
in a second
there's plenty of
clear evidence
showing you that
this was on the record
beforehand
including Israel themselves
telling you
that this was planned out
or you could point
to the Kurds
being funded and armed
for the very purpose
of this process
a month before
while they were pretending
they were in peace
negotiations
the supreme leader
and they continue to focus
on that effort
how does that differ
from our goals
the president has stated
that his objectives
are to
destroy Iran's
ballistic missile
launching capability
their ballistic missile
production capability
and their navy
the irgc navy
so just normal things
that every country
is allowed to have
but it's only bad
when Iran does it
so not nukes
no just their
their missiles
which by the way
is because
that's just what
Israel moved into
well
their missiles are bad
too
because they're bad guy
yeah
very very articulate
I mean that's
what we're ultimately getting
is that just
they can't have those
because they do bad things
not really though
not that I can see
and as you're committed
genocide by the way
but okay
so
their interest are not aligned
that's pretty obvious
and even she just told you
no no they have very
different agendas
okay well then explain
something for me
one
are we
are we only just
finding this out
and if so that's
pretty embarrassing
right
that you lumber us
into this action
and to commit a U.S. soldiers
that you told us would never
happen and now
other people are dying
you told us would never happen
and the boots in the ground
you told us would never happen
did it all happen at once
or were these
increasingly changing steps
and at what point did you
continue to support Israel
even though you knew
they did not have the same
agenda
if that's even the truth
I'm just making a point here
right okay well the last
time you sent them
what was it
10 million dollars
was that because
they were not agreeing
with your agenda
or because you didn't care
whether it was the same path
I mean you just can't
miss this stuff
if the case was that Israel
was conducting something
against what Trump wanted
why does he keep funding them
you know why
because I don't think he has
even a choice at this point
but either way
that shows you
there's one or two things
he's either bound to
continue supporting them
whether or not he literally
spits in our face
does whatever he told us
they weren't going to do
drags the U.S. government
into yet another war
or he was always in line
with that
and it's just a lie
to make you think
that he wasn't
I don't know how
to look at that
the bottom line is that
I think that my opinion is that
they're both conducting this war
rather that you know
it's the same entity
we're talking about here
but that from Trump's respect
if he needs to project
that he's the one controlling
everything
then it's not the case
and that's I think
that's what explains
is my mind
is that what she's telling you
is that what Trump's yelling
is just not what's happening
because the real agenda
is what Israel is doing
and that Trump won't push back
on that
now that may change
based on how much
they continue to get hurt
by this
even if they are bound
or he's blackmailed
or whatever
there's always a breaking point
where you can just recognize
that no matter how much pain
they can do to me
if I keep going this path
I'm going to lose everything
that's what I kind of think
we're getting to right now
and I'll go into that
more in a second
mine Lang
wait what's that last part
did I miss that
hold on
oh that was the very end of it
our GC navy
and mine Lang capability
their ballistic missile
oh so basic
and see this is funny
basically you're going to
stop their mine laying
capabilities
what does that even mean
so being unable to make
basic like just bombs
mines
or the ability to put them
in the water
or you know
these are just benign
why not just banned guns
or whatever
no you're
I'm going to
you're not even allowed
to have training
you know it's like
why not just go all the way
because that's what they're
doing
there's no logic in this
there's no legal justification
to claim a government
can't have things
that everybody else has
it's just
because they want to control
this
and apparently they know
that is real once this
and that's enough for everybody
to ignore the basic
realities of fundamental
international law
so Candace Owens
and plenty of other
massively influential people
like I've been showing you
for a very long time
and every day
there's more of them
are coming out
and saying
mag is dead
Trump has changed
everything's different
it's not
he's the same person
it's just becoming more clear
rather
my argument is that
it's now
impossibly obvious
and they know that
everybody largely has come
to understand this
and so
whether this is that
or she's calling out
herself
there are people that then come out
to try to release that valve
and say yes
like
like I'm getting to with Glenn
and Alex
it's well yes
yes
we see it now too
even though
they've spent the last year
trying desperately
to keep you to not see that
the point now becomes
but keep supporting it
because we have to work our way
through for the freedom
of the country
whatever their narrative is
it always comes down to
keep doubling down
he literally even says
double down in his clip
I played it yesterday
but my point here
is what they're calling out
is the Zionist influence
on this government
everyone sees it guys
it's literally every part
of the conversation now
even the mainstream
is being forced to grapple
with this
and Candace Reid
writes
read in between the lines
because this comes out
from New York Post
just like telling us
literally from CNN
that a hundred percent
to people on Trump's side
support what he's doing
a hundred percent
somebody pointed out
the joke yesterday
that Kim Jong-un
got reelected
with 99.3 percent
Kim Jong-un
in a place
in a place that we
literally like
even they have the insight
to be able to go
well let's not make it
a hundred because that's
just obvious
it's just
you don't get a hundred percent
in any sense
that's never the reality
in polls or mathematics
because there's always
some kind of variable
a hundred percent
means you made a mistake
that's kind of
just classic understanding
or that you're lying to us
or that you just
gamed it to such degree
that you literally said
who are you voting for
okay here's a poll
that kind of thing
but it says
Republicans overwhelmingly
back Trump over
Tucker Carlson
and Meghan Kelly
around war
what that means
is they support the war
because that's
what this is about right now
they do not
other than
Eric Howdy
Benny Johnson types
which are just
we should just be laughing
rolling on the ground
laughing at these people today
it's pretty clear
that nobody supports this
I've been selling you
that long before
that was even
as clear as it is now
because I felt
that was the reality
and I'm not afraid
to make my arguments
based on the facts
even when nobody else
is saying it
read in between the line
she writes
Trump is angry
and they need to show
him something positive
which would imply
that he's being handled
cow
didn't maybe not aware
of that
now I'm worried
about that kind of sentiment
because
I think it's important that we have
you know
we should not assume
that he's
not aware of what he's doing
that's not in our interest
even if it's the case
that we can prove that
he's accountable guys
and he always will be anyway
because of a thousand other reasons
but it's as Zionists
are now moving to Provada
publishing fictional polls
which I agree with
so they have something positive
to put on his desk
in the morning
this is like Loomer
telling him that 90% support him
and that's what you end up
hearing from him
even though it's
provably not the case
because he's being
handled by people
who are not
acting in American interest
no one she writes
Candace Owens
no one
supports the war
outside of a never Trumpers
no one supports this war
outside of never Trumpers
who have always been Israel first
think about that
never like like Ben Shapiro
like Mark Levin
who quite literally
I mean this was
I don't remember the date actually
but said
I will never vote for Donald Trump
there's headlines
articles that were put out like that
and then when it was in their interest
they gravitate towards him
like Teal and Karp
and everybody else
Israel to either side of the paradigm
it's about the real agenda
so these people are now the ones
that are MAGA apparently
and it's and that's what
that's some of these other
genuine MAGA people
whatever you think that may be
the ones that actually
what whoever it is
my point saying that
is people who genuinely want
to make America great again
and we may even disagree
on what that means
whether or not we disagree
about immigration
or whatever else
the point is
none of us are getting
what Trump
what was promised
because even what they think
they want
even if I disagree with that
that's not what Trump is giving them
so everyone's being played
and I think that's what's starting
to happen
and the only ones going along with it
are the dishonest ones
who are getting what they want
and that's not Americans
or rather at least not people
who are fighting for American interests
and it says they are losing the war
badly
and I agree with that
I just don't think we can prove that
right now
like there's a lot of
information up in the air
but what I'm seeing
that's the impression I'm getting
and seek to further delude Trump
into believing his face wanted this
that's certainly possible
I mean how can you ignore
a Tucker Carlson
or even a Macon Kelly
somebody who was
who told you that
Palestinians would rather watch their children
starve to death
than allow a Jew to live
like she made those statements
and yet we're gonna
now she's suddenly calling out what Trump is
I just something is
I think opportunism probably
because they know
that we are right
Macon Kelly
she said this yesterday
you want to rip the GOP apart
right to its core
yes please
same with the other side
but it says and prevent
a single America first voter
from participating in the midterms
what does that even mean
and it says indict Joe Kent
and Tucker Carlson
see how that works out
because this is now centered around
not just the war
not even just Zionism in Israel
but around Joe Kent
and the idea that he came out
and did something
that is objectively honorable
even if you disagree with his intentions
the point is
you can prove what he said was correct
and he came out and he said
I can't in good conscience
support this because
there was no imminent threat
now even if he is a
like diehard Israel supporter
the point is that he
or however you want to look at that
like I argue this comes down
to the Zionism issue
that we talk about with Charlie Kirk
that a lot of these people are clearly
if you listen to his interviews
he still supports Trump
he's still largely I think
he still supports the partisan agenda
the Iran bad guy narrative
however
they want to see it
as Trump and America first
making that happen
not Zionism and Netanyahu
puppeteering Trump
to make that happen
even if they get the same result
you see what I'm saying
and I think that's a huge part of this
and so you're getting this divide
where they're going
you're going after Joe Kent
you're going after Massey
like you guys are showing what you actually are
and whether Megyn Kelly cares or not
this is what people are now seeing
that is the majority of the conversation
so you're going to get the
profiteers and opportunists
who lumber into it
and act like they always saw it
every time
but either way the point is
I'm glad it's happening
because people see it
you understand
now here is the Guardian
we showed you this before
UK security advisor
who attended the talks with Iran
who literally told you
and this is the foreign minister of Haman
we'll give you some points on that second
sitting with Witt Koff
and Jared Kushner
and what did the UK elements say
about these two
so this is an ally of the United States government
one golf diplomat
with knowledge of the talks
said well I technically I guess
the implication was
this was from that side of the conversation
but one of the people involved
we regarded Witt Koff and Kushner
as Israeli assets
that dragged a president
into a war he wants to get out of
again I don't believe he wanted
to get out of this guys
I don't believe that for a second
you can see his own rhetoric
before telling you
Iran had to be taken out
so why would he be telling you that
running up to after the election
but when the conversation
was being driven by Israel
he kept telling you
we have to go after Iran
so if you want to get out of it
why would he be saying that in the first place
you know
but either way
it's the point is that people see that
these two are very clearly working
for something other than US interest
I think Trump is too
but take the point you can
so Glenn also points out
Netanyahu and America's Israel loyalists
have long been clear
that their supreme goal
was to lure the US government
into a war to destroy Iran
yes this is basic understanding
if you're not a blind partisan follower
Israel's key adversary
once Saddam was gone was Iran
that the Jake Tappers
and the ADLs want to suppress
this very point
as somehow anti-Semitism
is pathetic and it will fail
and this is what Justin Logan points out
do not say Israel pushed for this war
but also
here's what the foreign time
or foreign handouts of times
literally reported
for Netanyahu
the war that ultimately ensued
was the culmination of a mission
that has defied his decades-long career
in politics
to anchor the US
in a confrontation with Iran
it stopped true because the media says it
it's true because it's provable
it's like saying the sky is blue
he's been openly telling you this
entire career
and again
the direct quote that we played for you
right after this started
this alliance with the US
allows us to do what I have been
hoping for for 40 years
which is to drive the US to attack Iran guys
this is obvious
and he says strike the regime squarely in the face
Netanyahu said this from the
well they claimed it was the roof
of the idea of headquarters
people argued he'd left the country
but either way
how do we misunderstand this
I'm glad that people like Glenn
and others are having the courage
to call this out
he's a Jewish person himself
so understand how difficult that is
to be pushed back on by
other people who believe they're fighting
for Judaism
and are misguided about it
either way
whether you think this case or not
how can you reconcile that
with killing innocent children
just don't know how anybody can make
sense of that
now also Lindsey Graham
Wall Street Journal is exposed
that Lindsey Graham was coaching
Israel
on how to convince Trump
to go to war with Iran
now this is actually why
this is a very easy thing to see
we know he's been doing this
what's now come out
is that there's behind
the scenes information
about how before we got here
Lindsey Graham was going to Israel
and going here's what you need to say
to get Trump to think this is our
in our intro
yes
and yet
he's been endorsed by Donald Trump
not messy
you understand
but this guy
the one that they all call
the rhino
and that everybody hates
and but apparently that's MAGA
because that's what he said
this is just never been more clear
how in the world
is this US politician
going to be going to a foreign power
and convincing them
telling them
what they need to say
to trick or convince
the president of his country
into a war for their interests
this guy should be put in prison
guys I mean that's borderline treasonous
I mean you could just
basically call that treason
if you understand what's happening right now
and then I want you to think about this yet again
I'll show you again in a second
for the podcast
it's this same meme
that I'm sorry you feel assaulted by this
and I'm not trying to make it
about the literal citizens of Israel
I'm trying to make about the government
and what ultimately is the outcome
which is that what you end up with
is that government driving
our government into a war
and you end up with
what we told you
flag drape coffins
coming back while Israelis
sit back and watch
now look
there's been Israelis that have been killed
by the bombings
I'm not trying to diminish that
what I'm trying to highlight
is the ongoing war
not just the bombings
that hit in locations
but the ongoing war
the deployments
which are already happening
to the island
or otherwise
the Kurds on the ground
the people who were there before
Americans have already been dying
Iran argues
that's about 3,500
of course
the US disagrees
it's probably somewhere in the middle
but
what was the thing we said in the beginning
this is how we would end up
whether Israelis or not
that Americans will be dying
for a war that is not in our interest
and they said
no
that's not going to happen
we're not even going to move to the ground
it's limited strikes
it's about stopping their leader
all the same talking points
and then they extended it
extended it
just like every war we've ever been through
and now what are we doing
every day we're hearing about
more Americans dying
more Americans deployed
while Israel's government sits back
and lets it happen
now I'm talking about their government
not just every Israeli in the world
understand what I'm saying
but that is the case
that their government is letting
that be fought by US interests
you can't deny that
why is America first okay with that
now here's what Clint Russell had to say
and this is kind of a mixed bag on this
where of course Trump comes out
and says
Israel out of anger
for what has taken place in the Middle East
whatever that means
like because they responded
it's just
he's trying to sound like
the Iran's just attacking it
indiscriminately
but he says
has violently lashed out
and we'll talk about this in a second
at a major facility
known as the South Pars gas field in Iran
which is
there's parts of it that are also owned by Qatar
now early arguments for that wasn't damaged
but now there's
later reports that are showing
that it wasn't that damaged
and Qatar's not happy about that
which by the way led to a massive
spike in gas prices
which I think is now
I think the Brent crew was over 110
I think last I checked
they forget what it is now
that what he's promising you
it's going to go down
well that's not going to happen
when Israel keeps deliberately
making sure it doesn't
because this is not an accident guys
and this is designed to make this
problematic
for Americans
so they then can turn this into Iran
is making this happen
for all of us
and so we have to fight Iran
that telling you
that's how basic this is
at least in one part of it
there's many moving parts
but he says
a relatively small section of the hole
has been hit
the United States knew nothing
about this particular attack
well there you go
seeing as how they're making the decisions
and in the earlier parts of this
when you were talking with Iran
and offered a ceasefire
on day two
and they denied it through Italy
that's all publicly available
and Israel spoke up and said
why are you talking to them without us
and the White House told them
they wouldn't do it anymore
also easy to look up
and so here we are
Israel's carrying out the attacks
that represent their joint war
without even talking to Trump
and it says
at least that's how he says it
it could very well be
that he's using this
like I'm going to get to
to make it seem like
he's calling out Israel
even though he's still funding them
and still supporting what they do
every single day
but it says the United States
knew nothing about this attack
and the country of Qatar
it was in no way shape or form
involved with it
or did have any idea
it was going to happen
well we don't know that for sure
ultimately unfortunately
Iran did not know this
or any of the pertinent facts
pertaining to the self-farms attack
and unjustifiably
an unfairly attacked
a portion of Qatar's
LNG gas facility
that's not what appears
to have happened
you see the argument appears
to be this was
was bombed by Israel
and this is an effort to
to make it out
that somehow Iran responded
by bombing
in the same location
like that would make sense
now technically
these are separate things
but you have to understand
this doesn't
why would their mindset
be that cutters the one
that bombed a location
that it's in their interest
to not bomb
this is just lazy arguments
in my mind
I think this is quite clearly
Israel doing what it's
continued to do
bombing oil fields
that caused chaos
for Lebanese people
for Iranian people
for everyone in the world
and hoping you just
lazily blame Iran
like every other thing
they're doing
starvation
they're killing everyone
what's you guys
doing those things
their money's collapsing
look how bad they are
you guys are sanctioning them
that's just very
they can't even manage
their oil infrastructure
you're sanctioning them
like it's so lazy
but that's what seems
to have worked from the past
so I guess they keep going
no more attacks
will be made by Israel
he says
which by the way
has already been proved
to be false
so he wants you to think
I'm so in control
because it's in capitals
no more attacks
and while he's riding
this Israel keeps attacking
pertaining to this
extremely important
valuable south parts
well that location
you could argue
but my point is
that if Israel wants to do
they bomb it right now
and you damn well know it
and it says
at which instances
the United States of America
with or without help
and our consent of Israel
well it's weird that he says
consent isn't it
aside from coordination
or discussion
consent
meaning that up until this point
they've been getting the
consent of Israel
is basically the way
you would read that
but not no longer
but I still doubt that
and it says
I do not want to
authorize the level
of violence and destruction
because of the long-term
implication that it will have
on the future of Iran
but if
always fantastic
Cutters L and G is attacked
again I will not hesitate
great so Israel attacks it
again blames Iran
and suddenly just
the everything
you can see how this goes
we're getting into the false flag
territory here
which I'm convinced
is already happening
you have to understand
that what he just said
first of all
which I believe is based
on a misrepresentation
is that if they bomb it
I don't want to do the thing
that will destroy
all Iran
why is that even the framing
but if they attack
this one location
I'll just gonna do that
I don't even believe
that's what's gonna happen
this is just him
muscling
his blustering narrative
as he pounds his chest
while showing weakness
as usual
but here's what
Clint says
they are simultaneously
calling Joe Kent a liar
while the president is
openly chastising Israel
for escalating the fourth run
no he's not
I mean
do we have the point
journalists
where we just blindly accept
what Trump says
as the reality
good journalism
the point here guys
is Trump is telling you
what he wants you to hear
as he always does
consider that it could be
the reality
but as we know
Trump was well aware of this
they were well aware of
because it was planned
and he says
seems to me
that Joe Kent told the truth
and you're all cashing
in $7,000 checks
sir
because that's just the thing
apparently it's all $7,000
and everyone's doing
it's a sentiment
it's a meme
yes there was examples
of $7,000 coming from Israel
but that's why
that became a token conversation
that then makes us all look
ridiculous
for claiming that somebody's
being influenced or fund
by Israel
because it just becomes
an allegation
that gets floated
with no verification
and it's always $7,000
but the point is
to make the sentiment
but let's
you know
let's care about the facts
and care what we can prove
but overall
as Dominic Michael Trippie
points out
he's flatly lying
Trump
big surprise
he not only
he not only knew
about it
but approved the strikes
only after seeing
how bad of a decision
it was that he publicly
reversed course
because it was a major
it was a majorly bad move
the same
because the gas price
the
Brent Crews shot up
the gas price
it's not smart
Israel probably convinced
him somehow
that it would be in his
interest
while Cutter didn't know
of the Israeli attack
advance
Trump did
according to Israeli officials
Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu and Trump
coordinated about the strike
and aim was to try
to deter Iran
from continuing
disrupt oil supply
of course by doing that
you bomb oil supplies
totally makes sense
but you understand guys
at the very least
this is what Israel is telling you
they could be lying
but then ask yourself
why is Israel
counter signaling
the leader of the
United States
and claiming
that he told them
about these
because either he wants
them to look that bad
and Trump still doesn't
call him out for it
or it's the truth
when Trump is trying
to lie to you
either way you pick
it still shows you
the reality here
now what I want you to
highlight here is
chastising Israel
for being against his will
so what this is
being what I'm reading
into right now
that you're getting
is the sentiment
that of course
Trump is against it now
and he's being
you know
he's gonna push back
on Israel
and ultimately
I just don't think
that's where we are
and as well
as the fact
I showed yesterday
from him and others
that come the
sentiment is
what happened
why did he suddenly
change
but he didn't
as I said
we were telling you
this was the person
back in 2025
we were called
Blackfield for it
right
so you knew
because we told you
so it's not
some brand new sentiment
it's clearly what we
already warned
was going to happen
so anyone claiming
they're shocked
and surprised
by this new sentiment
that's not new at all
is either
I guess
this should reflect
on their ability
to see things
in basic reality
until they're told
to look at it
which doesn't
that's not a journalist
by the way
or we're talking about
well I mean I think
that the
where was it
there's one other thing
there was the real point
that I was going to give you
more thoughts on
but then I just lost it
what was that
shoot anyway
so the general
the general sentiment
back to the
the
other post about this
was the reality
that we're talking about
Israel influencing
this government
and giving them the pass
like the idea
that somehow
Trump is being played
by Israel
therefore he's not
responsible
for all of the actions
that was the end point
but I mean
there's not always going
to make another point
there I just lost the thread
but this was the one I want to end
with because this builds
to the next clip
which is
that that's what
they're actually doing
right now
now I'm not suggesting
he's doing that
but that's the sentiment
that's circulating
which he's sort of
leaning into
whether he knows
that's what it's going into
or not
that's what happens
in partisan media
but this guy
Glenn Beck
I just can't believe this
because we just showed
you this yesterday
this is now
this is Alex Jones
posted this
literally saying
Israel has successfully
conducted a coup
which again
my point yesterday was
well I'm not
I'm not even making that
argument are we
are we now
arguing can verify
that there was
a coup d'etat
that took place
and that they've now
shifted people
in different positions
I can't verify that
as usual
he tries to jump ahead
and make the
bambastic claim
acting like
he was always the one
leading this conversation
no guys
he's the one trying
to glom on
to what we've
always been showing you
he called us black
killed everybody else
who tried to call this out
the entirety of the
IMA
before we got here
but now suddenly
bombshell breaking news
Israel conducted a coup
and is now in control
of the Trump White House
okay well
I agree with the fact
that Israel's
very clearly influencing
US policy
he goes calls for all Americans
to peacefully take action
to restore our sovereignty
well guess how he means
doubling down
supporting the team
he literally tells you
in this clip
to support their next
appointments
Mark Wayne right
because it makes sense
when the White House is
controlled by a foreign power
to support whoever
they put into the next
position
right
double down
midterms
that's what he's talking
about fighting globalism
as we literally just
showed you
you've never seen a
more obvious example
of the government
leaning into that
direction from the
you
doesn't matter
just understand
this is about trying to
use the reality
to then fold you back in
it's the key one on
Russia gate point
that made over my entire career
it's about trying to
get you in a position
where the actual solution
is to yet again
support the team
but maybe only part of it
right
that was my point
about Russia gate
here went on
either side of that
happening simultaneously
what was the ultimate point
trust this side
of the government
right over here
it's because
these are the ones
exposing that
Russia controls Trump
well over here
it's because they're
the White House
fighting the other
bad guy Democrats
so both of them
effectively convince you
to trust the government
house
how obvious is that
so here we are
yet again
with the situation
where they're trying to
get you to
read the thing
there we have to support
the white hat
anti-globalist ones
who are apparently
controlled by Israel
though
but simultaneously
support their next
appointments
and then
Glenn Beck today
after I saw
President Trump
call out Israel
oh because that's
what they did
right
that's why
use the Clint
point for striking
the South
Park gas field
something clicked for me
oh really
it's just so
this is this
I mean I'm
more even than
Alex Jones
I feel like this guy is
such a
piece of
it's a
it's performative
theater
almost always
he didn't join
Israel's war
with Iran
because he was
duped
oh okay
he stepped into it
to control the outcome
yeah totally lines up
right
aside from the fact
that he was
talking about this war
before it started
and telling you
how Iran
need to go away
and how he's been doing that
long before he got to this
position
or the fact
that what we're really
talking about
is that you're saying
he did something
that Americans
did not want
and supported something
he could have called out
because he wanted to
control how it went
why is that even a
positive thing
so you're saying he did
he challenged what
Americans wanted
because he wanted
in a certain outcome
was at the same point
you still understand
these guys are so
desperate in my mind
to get you to
continue supporting
the very team
that a
waterfall
calling out
think about trying to do this
in this moment
because this isn't out
this is for people
who are going no
no
I was
I thought I was right
and I was yelling
and everybody
disagreed with me
and I'm so desperate
to want this to be
what I thought it was
and they go
oh okay
fine there isn't out
this is the thing
right here
because he just
needed to go the right way
it's just a blind
assumption
in order to hope
that it was always
what you thought
despite Stargate
and Glyphosate
and every other
star
every other thing
we've talked about
or the other wars
that are still ongoing
but sure
and I said
this is what Alex Jones
and this blind partisan clown
are pushing now
any evidence to back up
this wildly self-serving
assumption
Glenn
I doubt it
it's curious
to see
you know
what the response
oh and then here's
you know the intelligent
insightful
political commentators
like Rosanne Barr
Rosanne Barr
claims Trump is actually
disrupting the
hidden global
cabal network
tied to British power
who are behind the big banks
and war profiteering
like she's just
you know
certainly possible
but of course
you know this is the
blind assumption
like the idea that
we're just going to grasp
it's really
who knows
who cares about
all the broken promises
it's only because
what he's really doing
everything
we're actually promises
because he had to make
the promise
in order to
to bring down
the global cabal network
well allowing the Epstein
network to continue
because they're
not a part of that
apparently
or to not arrest
anybody
or not go after
Pelosi or Obama
or anyone
Rosanne told us
was part of that cabal
but it'll all work out
trust the plan
you know
the new haircut
really makes it all work
together
I mean it's just sad
why anybody
even gives these people
the time of day
like that's insane
like of course
as I said
it is possible
but there's no evidence
to back it up
and it's on top of that
everything we're talking
about
everything shows you
that what you're being
what's being done to us
is the opposite
of what was promised
the
cabal behind
the big banks
and the war profiteering
and yet he's conducting war
and works with all big banks
then it really is
buddy buddy
with Larry Fink
and Bill Gates
and I mean come on
like it's just
this takes such a
special level of
willful ignorance
to not acknowledge
where we are
and then
if you've got someone
like this
Dan Bongino
of course
red light
just in
flashing
breaking news
from Nick Sorter
Dan Bongino
goes off
on those claiming
Trump was
goaded by others
and the lunging strikes
underrun
you know like
like Rubio
told you
was the case
okay
and he goes
you don't know
Jack Squad
about this guy
if you think
he's
getting dog walked
by anyone
he's the one
walking the damn dog
I promise
oh whoo
fact-based argument
right
all flash no substance
so you could
so he made his argument
this is clearly
what Dan passionately
thinks
but there's nothing
in there
other than
his stressful statement
that makes that would
convince you otherwise
he's not the one
he's the other way around
I promise
whoo
well that that sold me
right
well the obvious
reality is
that you could prove
it's not the case
why
because everybody told you
because literally
everybody
even Trump told you
that Israel was gonna
that Iran might take action
because Israel was involved
we might have to do
something about that
so in and of itself
that shows you
that they
felt they had to
because Israel might take
action
as he says
right here
now you could argue
that's not the same
as controlling policy
but that would not be
not being
watched or whatever
you want to call it
that would be Trump
being led into this
or coerced
or forced
or you know
driven to it
whether they
when he argues
they didn't want it
because of what they were
going to do
this is just partisan
BS to get you to
convince
to think that
Trump's always in control
whatever happens
it's exactly what
was supposed to happen
even if you don't like it
so shut up
and trust the plan
these people are embarrassing
and I think
right now
to most Americans
the second question
that's been asked is
why now
well there's two reasons
why now
the first is it was abundantly
clear
that if Iran came
under attack
by anyone
the United States
or Israel
or anyone
they were going to respond
and respond
against the United States
to
so explain for me
how that's an imminent
attack
right this is what really
frustrated Trump
in order to
why he tried to
change it into
we attack
for
but they all shot
themselves in the feet
the reality here
is that if you
attacked
because
if they were attacked
you knew they would
respond
that doesn't even make sense
even especially in
an imminent threat
that's you initiating war
simple
this is that's like
a perverse
manipulation
even of the
Bethlehem doctrine
that is preemptive
self-defense
like that's not even
that doesn't even get
met by what he just said
as we told you
because they told the UN
we see what you're doing
and if you bomb us
we will respond
he knew that
he knows that
he's playing
on the ignorance of everybody
because
it's all on the record
that you
the Israel brought
the rather Iran
brought it to the table
in the UN
and said
we know what you're doing
and will respond in this way
now again
this is a point
that I mentioned earlier
listen to what he says
right
the orders
have been delegated
down to the field commanders
right
as I keep telling you
so what does that mean
that means that
there's a break
between the executive branch
and what our military is doing
so is it not possible
that's Hexeth
Hexeth is a religious scientist
is it not possible
that he's not taking orders
from the people you think he is
or is it possible
that even whether he's there
or not
it's
Steinberg
who's actually in control
or even belonging to that
that it's actually just Israel
in its own way
just conducting this war
with our military
I mean I'm not saying
I can prove any of that
what I'm saying
is it's absolutely insane
to me
these are considerations
is my point
it's insane to me
that we're at a point
where he just admits
in the midst of
starting an illegal war
that you're not even the
ones giving orders
on the ground
the executive branch I mean
that's not how this is supposed to go
I've never agreed with that logic
the idea
and by that very logic
that while you
I could go in a lot of directions
about the
having experts around you
and how that contradicts
other things he said
but you just have to be clear
about this guys
this is
obviously
not eminent
I mean everything we
every point we made so far
just what he's saying here
seems to make that clear
it was automatic
and in fact to bear it to be true
because the assessment that was made
that if in fact
those are even prepositioned
the third is the assessment
that was made
that if we stood and waited
for that attack to come first
before we hit them
which wasn't happening
as they've testified to
there was no evidence of that
and again
why would they come and say
here's where we're going to bomb
if you attack us
if their plan was to attack first
and also that there's never been
an example of them ever doing that
in the first place
it's always been a response
but let's just take their word for it
because you know
Rubio is an honest guy
right guys
we would suffer much higher casualties
and so the president made
the very wise decision
we knew that there was going to be
an Israeli action
we knew that that would precipitate
an attack again
you can't miss that guys
we knew that Israel was going to do something
because that's what actually
ended up coming out
even before he said this
that Israel was already planning it
that's why they talked about the curve
they talked about the assassination
this you can't deny
that either Trump is involved
the entire way
or he was completely snowed
and played in the situation
Israel would attack
which means Iran might do something
so we had to act
against American forces
and we knew that
if we didn't preemptively go after them
before they launched those attacks
we would suffer higher casualties
but think about what he just said
that if we didn't preemptively go after them
that they would get those attacks
but the attacks he means
would only happen if Israel attacked first
unilaterally without justification
you just can't miss this guys
again
you need to understand
that's incompetence
or for some reason
Rubio was trying to let you see what was happening
I don't believe that
it's just wild
and here they are
trying to convince you otherwise
as you on the record
can hear them tell you the thing
that contradicts their current lies
but don't you think for one second
Jack that he was walked by his dog
what a stupid thing you say
I promise
says the guy who quit
because he couldn't do
he was being called out
for not doing anything
and now he's out there
telling you the same nonsense
now Netanyahu says
no guarantee of a war
Iran regime change after the war
on March 12th
well it's just interesting to me
wait a minute
didn't you guys tell us
that the moment you removed
community that the whole thing
would come down
because they were so
desperate for somebody else
well that's not true
and it never was true
and you can prove it wasn't true
like we told you
so he comes out
12 days into this
and goes well you know
maybe it's not maybe gonna be
so already showing you
that they were walking back
the outcome
which is what I said before
funny enough today
earlier I was talking with somebody
and I said
you know what I think's gonna happen
that ultimately this is gonna end up
where like we saw before
they don't meet their goals
and just like the 12-day war
they then just go
we win
which Trump and Netanyahu have already done
and then
end up going
well
they're weakened
and we got them in a place
where they're easily controllable
so we win
and we're done
even though that's
that's not even remotely
what you promised
you said
we're gonna take control of this
we're gonna remove them
and we're gonna put them in a place
because around the tears
or anything
so to end up allowing them
to continue to be there
doesn't even remotely make sense
with anything you've ever told us
up until now
but apparently that won't matter
as it hasn't before
because we win mission accomplished
that's what I believe is
and this is
my point was I said that earlier
today
that's already starting to happen
I wanted to show you
that was already being floated
March 12th
can't guarantee that we'll get
the only thing we claim
we're trying to accomplish here
Netanyahu on the 13th
the next day
says he doesn't know
if Iranians will oust regime
threatens new leader
so again
we were promised guys
promised that
probably just like a rack
they lied to us about
the Iranian people want this so bad
like that woman on Fox told you
oh yeah they just
we're worried the bomb is gonna stop
because that means we're not
you're talking about
innocent people being murdered
and they're like please do it
because freedom
nobody in the world thinks
that makes sense
Republicans wouldn't want
their own people bombed
to be able to take over
it's not how that actually works
so in this case
he's telling you
well we don't even
we don't think they're going
now it's the regime
oh how quickly that changed
now suddenly they don't support
your new puppet
well they never did guys
and so all it shows you
is that now they murder this guy
who essentially you could
you could
for comparison's sake
it'd be like
Israel murdering the Pope
in the United States
now that's Kamini in their sense
murdered him
he wasn't a military target
and then they go oh
that you know
they're gonna rush in
and take over
no one did
now we're gonna kill the new guy
okay so what point to acknowledge
that they lied to us
and they're not
they don't support
what you want in there
they don't care
Trump doesn't care
and more baby
he's being lied to
well Israel has won the war
with Iran
says Israel
on the 17th
but but but the goals
remain unmet
oh what now hold on
so you won the war
but you haven't reached
your goals
so that one of the goals
wasn't winning the war
okay
but no that's
it's obviously a joke
this is just like Trump
this is their mission
accomplished moment
it's pretty pathetic
they came out and said
we won but there's more to happen
or whatever
that's not even the truth
in fact you don't say that
in this moment
where you can clearly see
it's not even close
unless you're obviously
failing guys
I don't even know
how to frame that
they read differently
on the 9th of March
vague and contradictory
Trump says Iran war one
but not one enough
perfectly Trump statement
right there
so you can see both of them
already floating it out
where we want already
you wouldn't say that
with what was happening
unless you wanted to frame it
the opposite of what was
happening
at least that's what I would
think makes the most sense
so today
Netanyahu says
the Iranian regime
may survive in fact
but it will be weak
I just fell out of my chair
I'm like jeez
I just said that today
and here we are
and so the reason I'm
bringing it up
is because I think
what this signifies
is the two things
the indication that
they know they're already
losing
and they need to save
face by making you think
they somehow won
but also
to create the
kind of the situation
and I
this is where I'm leaning
and this is more my opinion
where you create
the situation
where Israel sort of
backs away
and lets the US
continue in some kind of
dynamic
and then carries out
false flags
and makes this a
sole US war
which is kind of
where we already
are to be honest
but
you'll see what I mean
but just recognize this
going within 18 days
from we're going to
remove the regime
we're going to save the
world to well you know
they may survive
but they'll be weak
so you're losing
is what you're saying
okay understand
here let me close
this real quick
so
on to the false flag
potential
okay so this is something
that happened
over the last 24 hours
drone detected
above Washington DC
army base
where Pete Hanks
ethnic Marco Rubio
just happened to live
I thought
I thought that was
very interesting
I actually hadn't
picked up on this
I've seen some reporting
about the weirdness of them
moving to these
secure locations
I'm not sure everybody
knows this
top Trump officials
this is on the 30th
of October last year
top Trump officials
are moving on to military
bases
that just screams
support from the
American people
doesn't it
guys this is not about
Iran attacking this
country
I'm telling you
this is about the fact
that they know
America
and that's what I'm
telling you
I can see it
like anybody can
is being honest
the American people
since a year
before that
people are changing
they're becoming aware
of the two-party illusion
they're calling this stuff out
and that's why
I think we're being
transitioned into
some new control structure
and this is why
they reckon people
are not happy
with our government
and so they're hiding
I'm genuinely
think that
but even it could
mean something else
so drones
detected above
this army base
and that's what made
me think of that
like why are they
in an army base
drones have been
detected above
an army base
in Washington DC
where Secretary of State
when defense
Pete as Secretary
Hanks said
live
the US officials
have not determined
where they came from
of course
but they said
multiple drones have appeared
and what can you
already assume is happening
I shouldn't say like that
what is already happening
in Twitter
tons of MAGA people
are going Iranian drones
are attacking Pete
headset at their home
yep both of which
are unverified
or at least
they're not at their home
well technically
you're saying it
like that to make it sound
like it's their residence
in a normal sense
no no
they're in a military base
so what happened
was Iran attacked
if that's what actually happened
a legal military target
where they happen
to be living
and then
claiming Iranian drones
when even they're telling you
we're not sure about that right now
just typical partisan nonsense
that happens every day
this triggered a meeting
at the White House
over how to respond
and whether to increase
security measures
argue clearly
about you know
framing it as Iran
no matter what
the military is already
operating on a high alert
threat
and the Iran war
and the United States
and Israel have been
engaging
the illegal war
that suddenly is a war
by everyone's account
even though we were
quibbling about
whether it was a war
funny how that works out
it's not a war
it's not an operation
now it's a war
everyone say
even Hanks said
it's a war
you know
so why'd we
why'd we find about that
in first place
just distract
I guess
so
one
they're living a military basis
which I'll get into in a second
but two
the idea of this attack
well we already went over this
now this is a real thing
but whether that's always the
case is it
who can say
but that there's examples
well before this
by the way
where you can prove
that they have
you know like for example
from a
a hacking perspective
Vault 7 showed you
that they have the tools
to make it look like
somebody else
conducted the attack
it's a cyber
false flag
it's what it is
in this case
we know that they have technology
I showed you this
during the Iraq
during Syrian war
that they
literally have the ability
they buy old Russian weapons
and use them
and blame Russia
or whatever
in this case
we know that they can
reproduce
weaponry
or drones
that they claim
are on
so in this case
this is being called out
Abbas
Argachi
the U.S.
for
Iranian foreign minister
claims the U.S.
is using
Lucas drones
that match theirs
perfectly to blame
Arab nations
other framing
that is more
from the
Israeli
joint U.S. agenda
but we know that's possible
we know they've done it before
so we need to consider that
that's all
so
is it
one
in the interest of Iran
to do this
well
it's hard to say
seeing as how it's where
they're located
but I would argue
clearly either way
it's a legal target
it's a military base
but
now we're talking about
in the United States
which is my whole point
I don't think Iran did this
I think
whether there's even
a drone there
quite frankly
but if there is
I think we know
what's going on here
I think is Iran
why would they
suddenly send a drone
to
maybe attack a U.S.
location
when they could be legally
bombing the U.S.
right now
maybe because
they want to hide
they did it
but look
they didn't even do it
it didn't actually
bomb anything
this just feels
very obviously suspicious
and I want to highlight
that the fact is that
if they did do it
though it would be
a legal target
but that would be
a major line
that was crossed
in regard to the way
the world views
what's happening
so I just argue
they're not going to do
that until
they're pushed to
and I argue they won't
ever
unless it becomes a desperate
like
this is not going to stop
unless we do something
more severe
okay
I was talking about this
earlier as well
that it's a compounding
situation
where
Iran
over the years
has shown tremendous
restraint
in any number of
locations
where they don't just
respond
when they're attacked
unilaterally
and
they said this
in this last
12 days discussion
they said
look we've
we've come to learn
clearly that
we show restraint
and you guys
just attack us more
you perceive it
as weakness
and you attack more
which
because they're belligerant
so at this point
ask you where
their minds are at
whether you want to
pray in those terrorists
or not
it doesn't change the
legal reality
of what every country
can do
and they're not
by the way
with the point
is that
now they're a situation
where they go
okay
they illegally attacked us
we're not
we could bomb the U.S.
right now
by every rule of law
but we're
we're a
law of war
but we're not
because they don't
want to push that line
but the point is
that if they just
keep showing restraint
that they keep
letting them do it
well
how long until
Israel keeps going
harder and harder
until they go
well what else
are we going to do
because if we don't
take further action
that it's only
going to be seen as
weakness
but if we take the
further action
it will be used
to justify
their next step
so you basically
create a circumstance
where they become
just as
just belligerent
and illegitimate
and you know
just
unconcerned
with international law
as what you've created
because that's the
only answer
that they can find
I hope we don't
get there
but how do we not
see where the U.S.
and Israel
that's some of these
articles that have
been written
about where they're
driving the global
situation
where they're
driving this
this nuclear threat
with just chaos
because they're
creating a situation
where nothing
means anything
ever
it's all up in the air
there's nothing sacred
there's no agreement
we're powerful
we'll take what we want
no
what was the term
no something give
no no court
are given
as Hegseth said
meaning we're going to
kill everybody
even though it's against
the law
there's no
there's no air
in that conversation
it's very simple
so
in regard to the drones
consider what is
actually driving this
and if this is the
next step
so again with the point
of maybe this
winding down a little bit
well suddenly
you'd have a drone
attacking U.S. bases
in Washington D.C.
Now would Trump act on that?
What if they bond the location?
What if somebody got killed?
Do you think Trump would
then feel he had to respond
and would that then
make it no longer
Israel situation?
Is he really going to
back away from this
and allow this to be
what they've always
wanted to be?
Probably
that's just my opinion
but I think I see
that's where it's going
and here's what
Mario Nafal puts out
one of the ones
I was talking about
drones detected
over the base
where Secretary of
Rubio and Hegseth
live
and it says
the war in Iran
isn't 7,000 miles away
anymore.
Oh, it's Iran now.
Are we certain about that?
Is anybody claim that?
No, no, they even said
explicitly that
we don't know
where it's from.
But now we know Iran
and it says
unidentified drones
are now flying
over the homes
of the two official
but you just said
it's Iran
and you said
now it's at home.
See this is the sentiment
we're supposed to be
feeling that now
it's coming home.
Well if it does
in fact come home
it's because of the
people in that very picture
it's because of their
illegal war
and their unjustified
actions that drove
the legal response
that Iran could do
in the
that's the last thing
that I want
but it would be their fault.
Now on to this article
Kristi- Stephen Miller
Marco Rubio
Kristi Noem
you know
all the totally
not Zionist
America First people
and others
have taken their homes
to military bases.
Of course
it stems back
to Stephen Miller.
The former
White House advisor
Katie Miller
mother of three
young children
and wife of the
presidential right hand
Stephen Miller
right hand man
the unelected
you know
advisor
who suddenly
has more power
than Marco Rubio
according to
pretty much everybody
in the room.
Walked out of her
front door
one Thursday morning
and last month
and was confronted
by a woman
that she didn't know
you know just
because we're
in the world
and people
are outside
okay
and it says
when she told
the story
on Fox News
which she
widely embellished
according to
plenty of people
she described
the encounter
as a protest
that crossed a line
did what happened
did you get punched
did you get assaulted
no apparently not
there was a person there
meaning
saying
mean things
the stranger
had told
Kate Miller
I'm watching you
she said
this was the day
after Charlie Kirk assassination
because apparently
that's why
no it's not
guys
the government
is on watch
people that
that would
it would probably
make more sense to me
that that would be a
Republican
it doesn't even matter
to me though
the point is
Americans
are critical
right now
or their government
or we know
what they're doing do
look at the
Epstein file
look at everything
and so these people
are trying to frame
that
trust with our own government
as some kind of
outside force
you know what is the
outside force
Steven Miller
and then turning this
around on itself
and creating them
as the
the victim class
and moving into
military bases
because they're
protecting themselves
from a run
no
from you
that's my opinion
anyway
and of course
even Grock
will tell you
this is something
starting with
Trump's administration
part of the broader
trend
of several
Trump administration officials
we just listed them
it's not all of them
it's those people
moving into military
housing
because they're unpopular
because nobody likes them
other than the lying
partisans
that pretend
that everybody does
the primary reason
reported across
multiple sources
guess what
enhanced
personal security
that also folds into
the ice
and the lie
about
you know
what they claim domestic
in America
because that's the case
Americans are
looking to them as criminals
so they wanted to
turn it into a domestic
terrorism
Democrat plot
well that's
they've never verified
the reality of that
even though I know
there's elements
of parts of what
they're saying
that you could prove
on either side of the
conversation
that come back to them
in fact
but look
I mean
did we just
going to pretend
we didn't go back
what happened
where's where's the
Antifa home base guys
where's all the terrorists
that cash told you
we're all coming down
oh I got their names
oh it's all coming down
he said
I'm like three
podcasts
over the last
month
you're uh
what six months
oh yeah
oh so nothing
got it
nothing
what about the terror
Halloween plot
oh yeah okay nothing
what about all even
bust bluster
and lie and hype
and nothing happens
you know some
some small
like basically
arresting people
under claims of
terrorism
and all this stuff
and it ends up being
some kind of
misdemeanor charge
you know it's
constant
but what they told you
was were
under attack
by the
that's why they
did partial security
and
which again
just to be clear
means protection
from Americans
protection from
potential threats
protests
harassment
so just in case
it's unclear
the Trump administration
some of their
worse people
are living
a military basis
because they're afraid
of the American people
meanwhile
here's the Iranian president
wandering in the open public
down to run
because
that's something important
to understand
and as much as people
wanted to pretend
like this is not true
guys you can
this just does not
suggest that
they're the best person
in the world
that everybody in the
country loves them
but what it shows you
just like when a
sod would do it
just like when
Maduro would do it
it's not because
it's North Korea
it's because people
there support them
and it's actually
very easy to prove
if you're not
completely blinded
by state department
talking points
and partisan
nonsense
it's obvious
that these people
have mass support
in their countries
when's the last time
you saw
any one of these
monsters
walk down any street
they know
but people
walk up to them
and go
you're a liar
you're a terrorist
on either side
and you know it
I think this is
really important
to understand
now
back to the point
about the
false flag discussion
is we
I think this is
going to be added
to the conversation
because this is
what's needed
because they're losing
and so what I'm
worried about
is where this ends up
going
now I just want to
include this
because I find it
interesting
this is what Mike
Dave has put out
on the 17th
so first of all
it's a clip
that will play for you
now in a
case we haven't talked
I mean
you haven't seen
me talk about this
this ridiculous argument
about Sharia law
there's a
there's a reality
of that in the world
but first of all
understand that that's
wouldn't be legally
possible in this country
doesn't mean it
can happen
but it's unconstitutional
so again
we've seen
what our governments
are doing about
but the reality is
that there's no
legal mechanism
through which that would
even happen
but certainly possible
also then you could
take a second to look
and you can even
ask rock
if it makes you feel better
and realize
what a small sliver
of even the people
that they claim
or want
that the Muslims
in this country
by and large
do not want
any of that
I'll read it to you
in a second
according to
their own discussions
according to
what they say out
like
okay if you want
to get into
the secret
behind the scenes
wink wink
what we think
they mean
well
that mean
that's your opinion
of what you think
they mean
they're over here
doing different things
and saying
different things
there are people
in any category
that are ridiculously
extreme left
right
because it exists
there's extremism
and all of it
and any one of them
should be called out
it's not unique
to a certain color
or religion
anyone seeing
otherwise
is a disgusting person
is trying to deceive you
I think
because they're
blinded by their own
hatred
or because they're dishonest
my opinion
all that aside
what the argument is here
is that they're
bringing Sharia law
they want to impose it on us
all that is about
is trying to convince you
that there's Muslims
trying to take over
our country
while the whole country
is becoming aware
that Zionism
has done that already
and what do you think
Zionism
hates them
I think you already know
where that goes
so the point
is that Mike Davis
playing this clip
which says
terrifying Islamic scholars
in the U.S.
reveal their plan
which is not at all
what they say
or what happens in this
video
but it says
there are not enough
Muslims in America
right now
to demand full Sharia law
and replace the secular system
that by the way
is not even a quote
in this discussion
let's play it in a second
and call out
these disgusting people
what they say in there
is about
influence for their communities
and the idea
that what they want to do
is potentially
find themselves in positions
of power and influence
and try to change their communities
you know what that's called
democracy
it's amazing to me
and I don't support democracy
mob rule
but realizing
that what they're actually
criticizing
is what they tell you
they're fighting for
everywhere in the world
the idea that people
can move here
become a part of their community
and then
try to change it
for the ways
that they want it to be
whether Christian or Jew
or just because
you like things a certain way
it's wild to me
I'll play it for you
it'll blow your mind
how disgusting
these people are
and it's for them
just because
they don't like Muslims
and they think
these people are dangerous
now look
you could argue
that that's the case
but I can show you
tons of examples
of people who are
like the same thing
about a person who
practices
Muslim culture
or Muslim religion
but is not very ardent to it
like a Christian who
doesn't go to church
or a Jew who
just you know
it's the same thing everywhere
and the idea
that they're all the same
is just disgusting
it's not true
and so
here's what he says
in response to the statement
that he didn't check
because it's not what
actually is said
but that they don't care
because it's about trying to
push this narrative
Mike Davis says
dear Islamists
which is not even a term
they meet
what they
that's not even
what they think it means
what they're talking about
is terrorists
but they use Islam
as a
as a synonymous
with terrorism
because they're disgusting
it says try it
try it as in
to make this plan happen
that no one down
there's calling for
dear Islamists
try it
we dare you
unlike Europeans
Americans have guns
well Europeans have guns
too even more on
the point
is that he's
think we dare you
come and try and make that
think about what a child
that is
first of all
and secondly
realize always trying to do
is make himself
look tough
when he's responding to a video
doesn't even say
what they claim it does
and always pointing to
is something that's not even
like that's not
what's going to happen
do you believe that
Mike Davis was standing
face to face with people
that were threatening
violence
he would go go ahead
and try
bring it on
probably not
in this case
what he's trying to do
is look tough
about fighting things
that aren't even happening
secondarily
if it was happening
why would you
goat them into doing it
who cares
if Americans die
bring it on
we'll fight you back
yeah
that's the mindset of your
government
you're expendable
we'll we'll go
bring it
go ahead and try
because I'm not going to be
the one fighting
my family's not going to be
fighting
you guys will fight it
but bring it on
this ridiculous
now let's watch this video
shoot
did I miss that
hold on
pretty sure I grab that
I'm gonna grab right now
either way
how strange
it's weird
it's got feedback right there
so why I think this is interesting
is first of all
there's a group
of what appear to be
Islam Muslim academics
which I don't know
I can't speak to
because there's no information
about it
they're not giving you any
insight into what they think
what they believe
and where they've got
you know it's
which clearly matters
because to them
Muslims are all the same
totally not a big
perspective
and they're speaking
about how you influence
your community
for what they believe
is the right
like are we pretending
that Christians don't do that
that Christians don't
sit around whether
in this country or not
and discuss how they can
bring Christian values
to their community
is it only wrong
when it's values
you don't agree with
then you're gross
it's just ridiculous
or is it when
Jewish people
do it in this country
is it wrong
no
it's not wrong
when Jews or
Christians or anybody
try to influence
what they believe
is in their community
yeah there's people
in this very
conversation would argue
well it's bad
when the Jews do it
because they're the problem
and you're just the same
as the ones doing this
about Muslims
some of them
in any conversation
you're right
but not all of them
because that's
just not accurate
so here is the clip
pick up
okay if we don't want them
to implement secularism
not the same thing
by the way
now understand
the Sharia law
conversation is varied
depending on
different extremists
the point is it's about
a sort of Muslim culture
influence that is
like religious law
just for the easy
sake of the conversation
so what he's talking about
is secular versus non-secular
right
so a government
that separates
religion and state
versus those that
blend together
Israel
blends them together
just like Iran
funny how we criticize one
but not the other
even though one is wildly
more extreme
and I'm talking about Israel
do we want them to implement
they say that America
here's what's funny
now he cuts off
so if you're believing
what he just was about to say
with implements Sharia law
then why would he cut that out
the reality is like
you'll see what he's talking about
here
but see what they're constantly
trying to do is
is to convince you with things
like
do you want
by Israeli intelligence
current and former Israeli
intelligence
found it and run that platform
and that's what Jones
and and Laura Loomer
and all the rest use
I just saw an Alien Wolf
share something from Emmy
or it's that
that red circling
little plot
it's and it's what they do
is either pluck out the
worst people they can find
or it's you know
their unique opinion
about why every
Jews should be killed
or whatever
and make that out to be all
every Muslim
or they have literal agents
has by the way
has been exposed over the years
like literal people
pretending to Palestinians
saying certain things
or it's just gross
but if we don't think
that's happening
I don't know what
you're watching in the world
my point though
is that they're deliberately
trying to present this
as something
then why would they have
to manipulate you
into thinking it
if it was so obvious
and everywhere
now okay there is not enough
Muslims for them
and to implement this
but now again
it is our challenge
as Dua'at
as intellectuals
as academic
but you know
but the extremist
monster academic
intellectual
present solutions
based on Islamic values
but in again
to some people in the
Magna in the
well not Magna
not the real
with the dishonest
I shouldn't say
that who knows
where these very opinions go
but people in the
partisan side
who believe they're all
but Islamic values
are terrorism
that's what
that's what Lumer
would tell you
literally said
in front of an entire room
of Indian people
or I guess
in an Indian location
which is predominantly Indian
where there's a lot of Muslims
and she literally sat there
and told them
why their very religion
was disgusting
and ruining the world
just she's horrible
the second level
degree
not to tell them
replace secularism
with Islam
it won't work
so just to be clear
he said not to tell them that
and not to tell them
what you could argue
means to secretly do it
but all he's really talking about
is to change the culture
to where that's what
what they believe
it should be
now you could argue
that's dangerous
but this is not
surreptitious
this is not
where there
this is some kind of public
conversation about
how they can change
and influence their communities
in a place that we argue
is supposed to be evolving
based on the community
democracy
whatever else we call it
if we don't agree with that
then say that
then say you don't
what you want a
only white Christian country
or whatever you think
it should be
and that's the way it is
because that's what it was
not it's not the truth
but then be honest
about what you actually think
if you want it to be
an all brown country
an all white country
an all Christian country
and all whatever
clearly people seem to want
a certain category
maybe just a certain color
maybe only Christians and Jews
I don't know what they want
my point though
is to understand
that if you
pretend that we are the country
we've always said we were
it would include
anybody
from anywhere
who can come in
and influence
what they want
that doesn't mean
it's going to happen
it's about supposed to be a majority
right
so unless there's a majority
and this is where like
the Dearborn Michigan point
comes into play
isn't that important
to think about the reality
of what we talked about there
and first of all recognize
they have aggressively
misrepresented that situation
every single time
but that there are
there is a large Muslim
population
and they're there in this community
and they have a community
if they want certain values
represented
and so they vote for those things
and it happens
that's not surreal
law
it's not even close
it's not even legally possible
I mean it's just the same
old tired conversations
I'm taking too much time on this
but I think it's important
I have a whole section
that I haven't gotten into yet
of just this
aggressive
like coming from the
meme there for I am
and cat turd
and that whole same kind of
like honestly the group
that I think is like
this own little island right now
because most everybody
conservatives
are starting to see
that they're just blind
supporting no matter what
but that they're just pushing
this hard core anti-Muslim sentiment
it's right
it's like post 9-11 stuff
and what did that come from
Israel
it's the same thing
and now they're in a war
so Israel's pumping it back
through again
that's my opinion
yeah presenting
Islam as a civilizational
alternative
so different than forcing it
right presenting them
with the alternative
and let them
this needs from us
different way of addressing
this generation
addressing in fact
the whole world
trying to get into
just imagine watching this
and acting like this is
representation
representative of Islamist extremist
trying to overtake your country
you know
while the obvious point
is happening
that we're talking about today
I mean you could argue
that's what they somehow
mean behind all this
but this is just a very basic
intellectual conversation
about how they could
potentially influence
what they believe the world
should be like
in communities with their values
and that they're telling you
that we should present them
I mean it seems very clear to me
key positions where you are
influencing the decisions
right
this is my point from before
that's what they jump on
and go ooh
they're trying to work their way
into government
yeah maybe that's what they mean
but what he just said
was try to gain your way
into positions of power
to influence what the outcome
is that not what democracy is
is that not what we claim
every group is doing
is it only bad
when certain colors do it
I mean you have to understand
there are Jewish organizations
that fight for that very thing
in this country
there are Christian organizations
and you know you could argue
that there's weaponized
points of all of them
and if you have an issue
then it shouldn't be about one
it should be about all of them
the bottom line
is this is just how
this country operates
I just think that's
very important to reiterate
this is your making
if we are
whatever we do
and we are not
I sure as hell would like
to see the not completely
clipped up another thing
like this
do you understand
this is their effort to
make it bad
and it's not
with all the clips
we if we are
whatever we do
and we are
not influential
we cannot influence the
the how politics is running
we are not
influence the decision
making processes
we know that
right
so that was the middle of a
point
what he was getting to is that
you know we're not influential
we're not influencing that
and the other point
seems he was making
without really context
is that we should do
our best to explain
what we believe
and hope that people
like he's
here I'm in the beginning
was that we shouldn't just
come out and
and just push
the I know the
the
you know Islam
versus this
the whatever he framed
at the beginning
but rather
explain the difference
and talk about
you know it's just
this is such a
fundamentally different
stance than
than what Zionism does
everywhere
and whether you think
that's terrorism or not
it's just forceful
like pushing
that you have to feel
this way
and if you don't
you're bad
it's just very different
now look
there are Muslims
that act like that
that's the point
now for whatever reason
they just cut it in
with this other random guy
who I have no insight
and I don't know
what he believes
I don't know
what I believe
based on the way
they cut this
is this
because it's the guy
that mentioned Sharia law
is a guy discussing
what those guys
were actually doing
or what Muslims want
listen to yourself
if we were to do this
from zero to 100
the people are going
we being what
context matters
the country
if the country was to
switch to Sharia law
that's not happening
it's not even possible
right now
but hypothetically
should that be the case
you know
say
we're not going to have this
type look
look Afghanistan
look other places
and people understand
they're not going to go
from zero to 100
overnight
suppose a Muslim part
an Islamic party
comes in
and they start changing
you know what
yeah so like democracy
right
but understand as he says
we want to make sure
there's no alcohol
being sold
okay like in places in
Utah and plenty of other
states in this country
that already happened
like that
after certain points
in time
because of their religious
beliefs
but it's bad
when it's a Muslim guy
doing the exact same thing
but understand
what he's actually highlighting
there
is what we like
okay
so you say a Christian group
that comes to a certain
community
may even say
Michigan
Dearborn
you want to influence it
away from what they're
doing
would that be evil
is it only value
the idea that comes from
certain groups that
believe that it's
an only Christian
country or whatever
which is just not the
reality
based on the way this
country started
if you want that
then make the argument
as always
just don't hide behind
your dishonesty
and pretend that you want
things you don't
to I think very clearly
hide your bigotry
which is rude in this
entire conversation
so can we
for the time being
because here's the point
any type of
stuff we do
it's not a
Staghfirullah
to substitute the Sharia
no
it's a program to
eventually apply
the Sharia
right
great
that's it guys
that's the whole point
I don't even know
how those things connect
or what he was
really getting into
the context is not there
point
is that that's not
even happening
there's no
anywhere
look it up
look at the
the legislative points
on every single state
there's no effort of that
you know what you will find
is ridiculous
scientists like
Randy Fine
trying to push legislation
that says
we're not allowing that
even though it's
literally not happening
anywhere
and would be illegal
if it even started
doesn't mean it can't happen
of course
but it's obvious
they want you to
think this is happening
to drive you into position
to where you can
coming back to the point
believe that somehow
they're
go ahead and try it
we dare you
it's just this
disgusting adversarial
stance against
Israel's enemies
that's it
I hope this is
raging people guys
because the point is not
that there's not extremists
in any of these religions
including Muslims
but it is being
misrepresented
about invading
one of the obvious
point that most
even Republicans
are seeing
is that it's not
Islam
that's doing that
oh and this is
to grok
I just said
what percentage of Muslims
in the US
believe in Sharia law
evidence from
reputable surveys
suggest that
only a minority of
US Muslims
supporting applying
in any official
or compulsory way
with the American
legal system
now of course
it's a poll
take it for what you will
you could
you could argue
it's lying
you could argue
so the polls
you could find
the reality is
the evidence
as a whole
backs that up
and on top of that
here's what grok
says run by Elon Musk
US Muslims generally
prioritize constitutional
law
and show high levels
of civic integration
compared to Muslims
in many other countries
for the most accurate
current insights
refer to sources like
you or I
okay
so you know
sort of like
when you ask this
question
immigrants
ask rock
look it up
and the stats
from the US government
currently
and what do you find
that most immigrants
I mean the
that the
numbers
almost can
I mean consistently
immigrants
are committing
less crime
than the average American
now you could argue
it's gained
that there's more
nuance to it
that's a part
you're missing
fine fine
the point is
that's there
and it does exist
so this argument
that they're all the
ones raping
and murdering
and it's just
it is a construct
guys and there are some
sure just like
there are Americans
doing the same thing
the point here
is that they will tell
you every day Muslims
or Laura Loomer
they're taking over everything
and it's just
not backed up by the facts
now here
is
John Federman
sharing
Alina job
quite literally
somebody paid
by the US government
again
same point
it is on the record
you have a state department
website
saying that
you can ask rock
and he'll tell you
yes she is funded by
funded by
again
I only see that
because people will try to
push back on these
data points
because of
where it comes from
it somehow makes it
more influential for you
to look at what Elon says
on through rock
then you can look for yourself
and it says
she is paid by the US
government
so what she says
today
literally
today the 19th
and let's be clear
before I even say this
there was already
a live floating
about how Iran
like killed
all the Olympic team
because they didn't do
well enough
or whatever that wasn't
true guys
it was
very easily shown
to be false
didn't matter though
is shared by
all these ridiculous people
and half of the
MAGA team
the dishonest ones
and she says
today in Iran
in the middle of a war
the regime executed
a 19-year-old
national wrestling champion
for the crime of
joining
January protests
not true
not as far as I could tell
based on all the evidence
after signaling to the world
including the President
Trump
that they would
and here's the point
halt executing protests
that never happened
first of all they
weren't even doing that
based on
I mean
other than Israel
in the United States
every data point
we can find
including from the Iranian
labor unions
that were supporting the protests
which they pointed to
which Trump said
look look we're the protest
we support
and then those unions
stood up and said
well
it's not
protests anymore
these are
armed mass men
from foreign countries
and then they told you
Pompeo
Trump
Mossad
Netanyahu
were arming them
oh yeah
we're finding the courage
and we told you
that was a month ago
guys this is obvious
and so what the point was
they created
an obvious
insurgency
and Iran
was killing people
that were attacking
their police
and burning buildings down
does that mean
they didn't kill innocent people
no I argue
that they would be capable
of it like anybody
the point
is that they never once
stood up and said
okay Trump
we promise to stop
doing something we weren't doing
or we promise to stop
executing protesters
that didn't happen
this is a woman
who's working for the state
department
and it says
the regime has done
the exact opposite
they promise to stop
killing us
people know
they started again
why does that even make
sense to anybody
this is such
lazy propaganda
and it says
three young protesters
were hanged in calm
after a sham trial
reports indicate
torture or forced confessions
okay there's nothing
to back this up
no it very well could be true
but there's nothing to back it up
I look at this all day
of course
John Federman comes in
and goes the Iranian regime
executed
do you think for one second
that he actually checked this
anyone want to offer a guess
as to whether he did
his due diligence on this claim
or did he just reflexively
share the allegation
of this US paid
Iranian activist
without any investigation
you can decide for yourself
as always the reality
the core claim
in the quote
in the post by Federman
does not appear to be true
based on available information
there is no credible reporting
of the confirmation
of Iran executing
an ideal Russian champion
and you know
and you could look
anywhere you want
there's nothing about it
there's no information
this is basically coming
through Iranian
you know
the Israel controlled
US controlled Iranian activists
and and also
just before this
they lied about assassinating
the entire team
that turned out to be false
I just don't know how many
things we can keep
I mean
and what this needs to do
is call up people
like John Federman
like this guy is clearly
just a player
and it shows you
the overlap of the team
left and team right
but they're just clearly
on the side of the agenda
they'll share whatever
weirdly just like them
the mainstream alternative media
now in regard to the
facilities that were attacked
to get into some of the bombings
and the you know actions
and this is an important one
because this is a big deal
in regard to the location
one thing I'm going to do
really quickly actually
play one thing
grab one thing
and I'll be right back
actually let me see if this one
let's see
yeah we'll just play this one
just give me 30 seconds
but this starts
and it's really fascinating
to go back
it starts in 1996
with Netanyahu
who wrote a book called
Fighting Terrorism
and the thesis of the book
is quite straightforward
and very dangerous
he says you know there are
there's Hamas
there's Hezbollah
they oppose Israel
it's not good for us
to fight them directly
yet that won't work
what we need to do
is topple the governments
that back them
so what we need
is regime change
throughout the Middle East
and he actually gave
a long list of seven countries
that included
Syria
Libya
Iraq
Iran
Somalia
Sudan
and Lebanon
and systematically
the United States has done
Netanyahu's bidding for
almost 30 years now
going to war
with every one of them
except for the big one
that Netanyahu so much longs for
which is the war directly
between the United States and Iran
well it's a good timing
and actually important to play
at that moment
you've seen it many times
okay so the attack
on this facility
which as we just talked about
is is being misrepresented
in my opinion
and what we're discussing
is an attack on a
oil facility
that has already been
or rather the
the oil facilities have already
been attacked by Israel
after the fact that Trump said
that wasn't supposed to happen
and then the US government
attacked multiple tankers
I mean so you have to
understand that Trump
tried to make it seem like
that's not what you're
supposed to be doing
we didn't want that
and then bombed oil
so there's only two ways
to look at that
they lied to you to make
you think that wasn't
going to happen and did it anyway
or he genuinely didn't want it
to happen
and then Israel made them
you could decide for yourself
because that's how that went
and then we have things like this
and so what it shows you
clearly in my mind
is that Israel is creating
the situation
to drive a boil prices
even though that hurts Trump
because this is what they'll use
to kind of drive the world
into a point of chaos
which is what they do
to justify its actions
because you think of it
like a form of global sanctions
right so Israel is basically
creating a situation
where everyone's going to start
to suffer because of what
they're doing
everyone knows they're doing it
but at some point
they're going to go
you know what
we don't want to suffer anymore
we know you're doing it
Israel fine
just take out Iran
let's get this over with
and then we can
and we'll you know
that's what I see this as
energy facilities
attacked in Iran
and Qatar sending prices soaring
now it says
Iran and Qatar on Wednesday
accused Israel of attacking
the Iranian part
of a giant offshore
natural gas field
that the two countries share
sending the prices of oil
and natural gas soaring
on what would be a sharp
escalation of strikes
on energy infrastructure
in the war
and this is particularly
an important one
hours after the strikes
on the Iranian facilities
the state owned
Qatari energy company
who's arguably
on the side
of Israel and the United
States
at least in the
con in the
you know
this action
and you know
pretty much because of the
like most of these countries
have been
overtaken and manipulated
by outside forces
they said that a major
energy hub in the country
Ross Lafon
industry city has sustained
quote extensive damage
from missile attacks
that's Qatari officials
and they blamed Iran
for the attack
Qatari officials
international oil prices
settled above $107
a barrel
their highest settlement
level since
the war started
on February 28th
natural gas prices
are more regional
but they climbed
in Europe
the United States
and Asia
Iran's oil ministry
set on social media
that airstrikes
that damage a number
of its facilities
connected to the
offshore South
Paris field
part of the world's
largest offshore
natural gas reservoir
one of the part
of the world's largest
which is shared
by Iran and Qatar
it appeared to be
one of the most
significant energy sites
to be hit
since the U.S.
is real air war
against Iran
began nearly three weeks
ago
now
this is why I find
so interesting
about this
well first of all
let's be clear
Qatar is obviously
on the side of them
in this engagement
they were already
bombing
or rather helping
them bomb Iran
that's why Iran
responded to them
as one of the locations
and that's important
let's remember
I think it was the
what's that
I forget the location
but the installation
1.1 billion dollar
installation
they bombed there
now so the U.S.
Israel couldn't utilize
that technology
my point is
if Qatar
stands up and says
that it should be questioned
it's just
like I said before
it's just as likely
that Iran
decided to respond
because it would be
I guess an easier action
the direct bombing
of Israel United States
it would be seen as
kind of a side step
but it would still be a
response
if they are maybe
trying to walk it back
of some degree
but I just don't
to me
and this is my opinion
it doesn't make much sense
because I'm waiting
for Iran's response
to say
you know
if you know Israel
did that
or see what they said
because to me
especially since
it's in the same
basic general location
they're not necessarily
the same thing
but they're close
an idea being
that Israel would bomb
this
why wouldn't they bomb
I mean I guess
the point
because Qatar
would be in set with that
but
maybe it's because
they wanted to
blame Iran
like we have to start
thinking about it
either way
Israel did in fact
bomb
or rather excuse me
the
bombed these locations
and they're
arguing is that
Ron packed the
Qatar location
Omar Badar points out
Israel's creating
an environmental
catastrophe in Iran
and a global economic crisis
by forcing
an unprecedented disruption
to the world
energy supplies
that's what I was saying
you're creating
a situation
where even though
I know you're doing it
you're gonna
there's so much
fallout from this
you know
for the billionaire
elitist class
so
but the real
but you know
average gas prices
and everything else too
if
if Genocide and
Gaza wasn't a red
lining says
we know Israel's
rogue regime
will stop at nothing
to get regional domination
and this is
drop site news
Israel has struck
Iran's
South Park gas field
the world's largest
natural gas field
and a core pillar
of Iran's
energy supply
so
then do you think
Iran responded
by bombing Qatar
which is right next to it
especially since
they're trying to make
sure that
I mean also
and this is again
there's so many angles
to consider the
false flag point
whether this
wasn't Iran
but a drone
made to look like Iran
but also
that they told Qatar
that they would not
bomb them if they didn't
if they if they stop
bombing or helping them
do that
so
the question is
was Qatar still
helping fuel
and you know
help them use their bases
probably
so then it would
justify the response
my simple point
is to question
who is responsible for it
but again
either way
Israel's the one
that targeted
the South Park's
gas field
which is the real
like the most important
part of this
because it's a massive
natural gas field
and that's something
that's going to affect
the global prices
I think that's by design
so here's Ryan Grimm
citing on Abatran
saying he says
I was unfortunately
in the right ballpark
Qatar Energy
just announced
that they have to declare
for a force major
on long-term contracts
for up to five years
as I wrote
he says
we're deep into
worst scenario territory
and it says
Qatari Energy CEO
tells Reuters
we may have to declare
force major
on long-term contracts
for up to five years
for LNG supplies
to Italy, Belgium,
Korea and China
so that adds
to in my mind
to the more likely
that Iran did it
because this is something
that was a response
they knew
if that's the way
that went out
went down
would affect
the
I guess
you know
what's
I see it so hard
because China
that doesn't seem to line up
with what they're aiming at
but you know
Italy possibly
so it's just hard
but I think that
you could see a world
that might make sense
but I would think
that my gut
is leaning in the direction
that this is done
because of this
that original point
of creating a supply issue
and blaming it on Ron
and then in this case
even claiming
that Iran did it
and it's what
Arad said this yesterday
I hate to be the very bad news
but if infrastructure
like this
and points to that exact place
gets blown up
as of this moment
it will take at least a decade
to recover from this war
and the truth
is that the world's energy picture
has probably changed forever
now think about this
in the larger context
so you're in a situation
where you're losing
and you're Israel
and clearly
your point was to make it
that Iran was the one
holding us all hostage
with nuclear threat
didn't work
no one buys it
because it's not true
so then
you turn it into a situation
where they're the ones
that are
starting the war
and that didn't work either
so then you're in a situation
where oh they're blocking the
straight
and they're causing oil prices
no no they're not
they didn't do that
they're letting everybody
through except you guys
yep
and I proved that right
in the beginning
you still have
mainstream alternative
claiming it's closed
how embarrassing
mainstream
still says that
how ridiculous
it's been open
since day one
they never closed it guys
it's very easy to look
I'll show you in a second
right here
it's been open the entire time
now what they're telling you
is they restricted
specifically
scientists
that's what they said
Hormuz is closed as only
designers
that's what they just said
we'll come back to it
the point though
here is they shifted into
they're blocking the straight
and everyone's gonna suffer
but that wasn't happening
they put mines in the water
Trump
clumsily created
by saying
if they do
it's not happening yet
and like an hour later
though they're doing it
doesn't seem they did
otherwise
that would be a big deal
right now
I just
I don't think it happened
even though they have
and it's happened before
I think that they knew
they didn't want to cross
that line
because
what would happen
they would turn the world
against them
they're tactful
they're very
they're
have tacticians
and all this
so now it switches to
Iran
bomb the main thing
that will cause
a decade of issues
for our supply line
but was it Iran
ask that question
Ryan Grimm says
outrageous murder
suicide
unfolding
essentially the U.S.
and Israel
doing this to themselves
in the world
right
for no reason
he says
and this is the most
important part
as we told you before
Iran
put
a strong
deal on the table
but
the U.S.
and Israel decided
to destroy the world instead
which
perfectly lines up with
ushering in
the new structure
doesn't it
to
build back better
don't forget that
because this isn't very much
part of it
if you understand
where this goes
but overall
the deal
for a minister of
Amman
what I tell you
that we
they offered to give up
their enriched material
right
so
this comes down to the idea
that they're trying to
stop that
and they have to do this
to stop that
even though we already know
that it was not even a problem
to begin with
but it gets even more
interesting
here's what they just put out
this is from
today
Trump faces
his most difficult
Iran decision
they're literally thinking
as they're discussing
considering
about deploying U.S. troops
to seize
the uranium
in Iran
so you already realized
why that's insane
because
one
they don't have
anything enriched to a point
it's violating any kind of agreement
and two
that the main thing that they offered
was that they would give up
their enriched uranium
and then they bomb them
right
so they offer
through the deal
which the
for a minister of Amman
will tell you
and I've already played this for you
and here's the actual article
that they agreed
to give up their stockpile
which is what they're now saying
we need to go in to get
you see how crazy this is
so the reality is
they either didn't
want this to happen
so they could make the justification
to invade Iran
and Trump's a part of that
or he is being wildly played
because the reality is
that they were going to give it up
so if you're going to send
American troops into Iran
to take the thing
they were already willing to give to you
this is Israel
destroying this country
within hours of Amman
foreign minister saying
quote
and he went on
I made fun of this
because face the nation
was like
unable to accept
that that was the case
she's like
so they're making palms elsewhere
it's like
no
they're willing to give it up
because they don't want bombs
so they're making some bombs
that was basically how it went
it was really bad
but he's very clear
he agreed the article
they agreed to zero enrichment
uranium stockpiling
and he said that they would either
downgrade or both
they would downgrade
what they currently have
in use
and that they would give up
their enriched uranium
that they have stockpiled
entirely
but we have to go in to get it
the point is
the next day they bombed them
peace within reach
as Iran agrees
no nuclear material stockpile
Israel immediately bombs Tehran
and US promptly joins
this can only mean
that it was never about
nuclear weapons
well we know this
because they didn't
and the evidence shows that
but we also know
that they were planning it
before they ever got to this point
as Israel told you
weeks before this
they already planned the day
they would bomb
they also told you
and Trump admitted
they were arming the Kurds
a month before this
so this was always planned
just like every other illegal war
they've been in
and Israel seems to be driving
it like before
so Trump says he's
not afraid of a long forever
Vietnam's type war
but don't worry guys
no more forever wars
because that's just not how
this is going to work
in fact let me
where was it
there's a there's a clip from
Hague Seth
yeah so this he says
the media here
not all of them
but much of it
they want you to think
just 19 days into the conflict
that we're somehow spinning
towards an endless abyss
of a forever war
nothing could be further
from the truth
well maybe
I mean I like I said
maybe they're going to stop
because they're losing
but meanwhile
oh by the way
we need 200 billion dollars
not 21 billion
we need 200 billion dollars
for the Iran war
that we're going to spin up
really quickly
totally like
makes sense doesn't it
on top of that
the point
is that well
if it's not a forever war
then why is Trump willing
to say that he's not afraid
of it becoming a forever war
that's just crazy
where we are
and on top of that
I just have to point out
this is just
it's cringy
is the right word
that this person
asked a very point
a very clear question
are you afraid of this
becoming a long-term war
fine use the word
concerned
but ah
they use the word afraid
and Trump is just too small
of a person to admit
that he's afraid of anything
if you put boots on the ground
in Iran
it will be another Vietnam
are you afraid of that
no I'm not afraid of
I'm really not afraid of anything
oh he's so tough
I'm not afraid of anything
that's not even the effing
question man
are you worried about this
becoming a long-term war
I'm not afraid of anything
what just
he's just such a small person
and it's just
anybody who's not blindly
supporting or blindly hating
can see
so I'm not either of those
things
it's obvious
that's a very childish thing
to say
not afraid of anything
everybody has something
they're afraid of
the point is
it's not
one is because
obviously this is where it's
going
and money
and everything else is
showing you
this is turning into
just another long-term war
probably what
which is internally
in their own discussions
probably the plan
if you want my honest opinion
but either way
it's not going to be the thing
that we always know
it's always going to end up
it has always ended up
but I'm not afraid of anything
does that
does that in any way
give you the feeling
that he's
not afraid of anything
does that in any way
give you the feeling
that he's tough
I mean to me
it screams the opposite
weak people do that
I've never known a truly
strong
I don't even mean like
muscle strong
I've never known a truly
strong person
to need to bound their chest
and scream
I'm the strongest one
in the room
I've never known somebody
like that that wasn't
inherently wildly
insecure and weak
so on the next point
he gets asked about this
right
saying well
when you
basically in regarding
when this is just
from person from Japan
one of the government elements
saying you know
why didn't you tell them
before this was happening
and so on
and Trump responds by
well why didn't you tell us
before pool harbor
and this Eric guy is like
holy smokes
that's what he actually says
holy smokes
Trump just dropped
the bombshell
and I said
who wants to tell Eric
from the new media
what actually happened
at Pearl Harbor
you know
that it wasn't a surprise attack
the new media guys
well one thing
you don't want to signal
too much
you know
when we go in
we went in very hard
meaning we don't want to
tell our allies
that we might be doing
something
and look
there's some logic to that
if it's like
if it's a clandestine
operation
you don't want to
broadcast in the world
what you're doing
sure
you know
aside from the fact
that we're talking
about an illegal war
that's
from a benign sense
yes
I get the sense of not wanting
to just to
disclose your plans
and we didn't tell anybody
about it
because we wanted
surprise
who knows better
about surprise than Japan
okay
why didn't you tell me
about Pearl Harbor
okay
what a weird
and like
uncomfortable thing
to joke about
you realize a lot of people
died right
those were American citizens
that were killed
because the U.S. government
allowed that to happen
I mean this is
it's the same as talking
about the
the reality of the bombing
in the world war two
and bombing
after you knew
they were
restraining
you can easily prove
these things
but the narrative
from the government
is the opposite
and so people blindly repeat
what Trump said
as opposed to the facts
that you can prove
which is that they bombed
them even when they were
treating
because they both wanted
to see what happened
and scared Russia
they murdered all
these people in Japan
with that bomb
because they just wanted
to use it
right
in this case
we can prove
that there was
I mean multiple examples
I've done shows on this
that there was knowledge
insight
into the fact
that it was coming
and as I just played
for you from
Patrick Clausen
we had to wait for
Paul Harbour
to get into the war
it's exactly
what he told you
so does Trump
not know that
certainly possible
but my point
to laugh about this
is one
first we're getting
the point is about
disclosing
what's going to happen
from troop movements
which is the next point
but that you've
got people like
this Eric
guy going
Bob Joe
why didn't you
tell me
you know
and everyone's
everyone is laughing
if you look at the comments
just like really
I think Max Egan
and everybody else
are you seriously
that misinformed
what happened
you know
he's all over the place
what says
as soon as Trump said
Pearl Harbor
these are just
young people
like it
mentally
whether they're
45 or not
just these are
like the
holy smokes
holy crap
Trump thing
and we're all
so excited
about the team
it just
what's gross
and it's embarrassing
and these people
I honestly
they might
this probably
AI for all I'm concerned
like I don't even think
how these are
real things
these people
like we just got
an insight
into what one
I think it was
Gunther Eagleman
people are suggesting
he told people
that he just can't
wait to stop doing this
but he's getting
paid too much
who knows
could be a lie
but I think we know
that element exists
in all of this
and right now
more Republican
than I ever seen
are
going this guy's
a clown
because we are all
aware of what's
actually going on
and this is
blind cheering
for whatever
they're doing
this same guy
was like
no war with Iran
because Kamala's
the worst
and now he's like
yay
war with Iran
because Trump's
the best
laugh at people like this
and so
who was to tell him
but they don't care
about it
it's about narrative
control
and of course
Eric Trump
jumps in
and goes one of the
greatest responses
to a reporter in history
yeah
there was
the U.S. knew
very well
Pearl Harbor
was going to be attacked
these guys
this is basic
basic basic stuff
it's not conspiracy
theory
it's documented
information
and everybody
not a government
blocky
and blind partisan
is down here
going
you're an idiot
we all know
that's not the case
doesn't matter though
okay back to the point
independent
Trump on Iran
this is from
today
at least reported today
I'm not putting
troops anywhere
but if I were
I certainly wouldn't
tell you
exactly
that's that's kind of
it's the same point
right
same conversation
so
yes guys
and this is the point
is that
well we
even
he says he's not
but
if he was
he wouldn't tell you
so that
is a meaningless answer
so
we know that
they're doing it already
we know they're
funding the Kurds
we know that
they've deployed
2500
which I know
we're done
there were people
before that
they're always are
and on top of that
we just got told
that well
deploying them
to the island
is not the same thing
because it's not the same
my own
it's not moving to the ground
it's just
it's always
it's like Ukraine
it's not boots on the ground
unless they're marching
just like this
and yelling these words
it doesn't count
it's just dumb
like it's not a war
but now it's a war
everyone sees this
so
the reality is
that if they are going to
which is pretty clear
they are
he's not going to tell you
anyway
so
why would you pretend
that him telling you
it's not happening
is enough to convince you
because you're a
blind follower
if that's the case
so here
is what
Mike Johnson said
you know the rhino
that everybody hated
before he was the best guy
on Trump's side
it is
that it's not going to be
boots on the ground
or rather a war
regardless
well honestly
I'm doing a bad job
explaining it
if there are ground troops
should they come to Congress
first if there are ground troops
so
if there's ground troops
which there already are
will you go to Congress
it's a good question
right
because well
you know
you could argue
it's a
imminent threat
even though
the war powers act
is clearly not involved in this
but if they
if you're going to put boots
on the ground
well yes
that's very clearly
an act of war
there's no
I mean
so too is
bombing a country
so I know
you know where it's going to go
but
if there's boots on the ground
there's not anybody
in any world
can argue that
that's not a war
or it doesn't need
congressional approval
or whatever it is
or some form
whether it's
war powers act
authorization
like
Iraq
or actual congressional approval
that's boots on the ground
stuff guys
he asked him
if boots on the ground
are you going to Congress
again
all the details matter
this if
if we're completing the mission
and it's a limited
scope
then that's not a declaration of war
if we complete the mission
I don't even know
why that has any bearing
on whether it's legal
in the first place
if we just win
that doesn't matter
apparently
and there's
authoritarian
elitist mind
but that we don't need it
then that's not a declaration of war
it's not a declaration of war
because
if we're completing the mission
and it's a limited
scope
that's a limited scope
it's not
so it just doesn't matter
like so we'll all
for
it doesn't matter
we can have 100,000 people
but if we call it limited
and it's just a specific thing
we're doing
that we're
claim is eminent
but we don't use that to claim it
like this is just dishonest
and everyone can see that
you're saying
you're
if you deploy troops
on the ground
against Iran
you're not going to declare war
yes
anyone supporting this
needs to be called out
for what they're doing
and I don't mean that
you could support
that Iran needs to be removed
and I'll disagree with you
in the case of what
what they claim is happening
but if you support these
so blatantly dishonest things
then you are fundamentally
destroying this country
for your team
a momentary win
to destroy the very
thing you claim you're fighting for
in the long run
some of them genuinely
don't care about these things
and that's what's so alarming
but again
with all of this
and the $200 billion
they're asking for
for this Iran war
that apparently will be over
in a week
this is what Hegze says
my 13 year old son
popped into my office last night
while I was editing
these remarks
he asked about the war
and the families
I met at Dover
and I looked at him
and I said
they died for you
son
so that your generation
doesn't have to deal
with a nuclear Iran
God, I mean it just
makes me
it makes my skin crawl
right
first of all
I'm willing to bet you
that never happened
it just uses his son
I could be wrong
my opinion
but just with what
we've come to custom to
how much you want to bet
that didn't even happen
but irrelevant
so as son comes down
we were
they died for you
all the Americans
you're currently
covering up
that actually have been killed
or the fact
that they were killed
in a war you said
wouldn't happen
or in fact
that they were deployed
in a war
that you said
wouldn't even be deployed
there would be no
boots in the ground
or
I mean
on and on and on
you're talking about
the idea
that these people
died for you
how in the world
is invading Iran
for Israel
dying for Americans
in any way
and on top of that
generation
doesn't have to deal
with a nuclear Iran
the claim
that we all know
is not true
based on all the evidence
that they have
that somehow
by doing this
is for you
because we're stopping
a nuclear threat
that we all know
doesn't exist
it's based on evidence
that we presented
that the IAA
that we point to
has told you
doesn't exist
that Whitcoff lied about
that the foreign ministers
around them
told you they lied about
and even claimed
they're working
for Israel
Mr. Zionist
just makes me sick
like truly
it's the truth
oh yeah
it's the truth
because you normally
stressed that it's true
when you
tell the truth
so to the family
I mean that's actually
funny by the way
that doesn't always
mean that
somebody can say that
and it could be the truth
but it's a classic thing
like psychology
when somebody goes
you know
trust me
or it's a truth
it's sometimes a good indication
that they're not telling the truth
said finish this
we will
and I say the same
oh yeah
son said
finish it dad
finish it
do you believe that
to every American
who wants peace
through strength
may I'll
apparently that means
peace through genocide
what's happening
and I mean all of it
not just Iran
but they're supporting
the genocide in Gaza
they're supporting
the invasion of Lebanon
they're supporting
the terrorist overtaking
and ethnic cleansing
of Syria
peace through strength guys
pretty clearly
mighty god
continue to bless
our troops in this fight
disgusting
and again to the American people
the idea that you
fold in Christianity
when you are literally
killing people for no reason
at all
and in fact
killing them for a religion
that's other than
Christianity
if you understand
the Zionism perspective
from Israel
how in the world
does that even possibly
make sense
everybody should be outraged
that he would even
include the idea that
God supports whatever he's doing
which by the way
they believe
because this is a religious war
for them
they're not even hiding it
he told his people
that's come out
in a hundred different reports
that their own military
are telling them
why is our government
telling us
this is a religious war
to bring on Armageddon
that's a direct quote
how in the world
is that not the biggest part
of the conversation
guys that should have
stopped everything
that we all stand back
as Americans go
whoa whoa whoa
you're telling
we were fighting for
Armageddon
pretty sure we didn't vote
for that
that doesn't matter
because the left
or the right
Fox and CNN
nobody really talks about it
I don't know how you can miss that
200 billion dollars
guys that that that's
it's just incredible
that's a hundred percent jump
or even more
it'd be a
whatever
bad with math
what was the
actually change
if it was 11 billion
then it was 21 billion
200 billion
I mean you have to understand
this is a group
that we're supposed to be told
is fighting
this operation
like so you're talking about
involving of Democrats here
so you're telling me
Democrats
and Republicans
jointly decide
to increase the budget
200 billion for a war
they want to stop
it's just
it's just hard
to wrap your mind around
I mean this is
like not that it's
it's an easy lie to see
but that we're even here
like that they
I mean I can't see it
as anything other than
desperation
that they keep going
through this
even though we all see it
on top of that
Trump now calls
for war reporting treason
and now of course what he says
is the fake news
lying about what's going on
which they do all the time
Foxy and then lie every day
but what he means is the ones
that are just simply
pointing out the truth
by the way
now I shouldn't even frame it
like that
because I'm sure people can lie
about him
he also doesn't like
but realize
he's not talking about people
who are
you know
if I you know
coming out with
false information
that's in his interest
he doesn't care about that
he cares about people
coming out and saying
you were tricked into this war
the is real situation
has driven this to reality
that you're you know
all the things that we know
that there's no imminent threat
things that their statements
have proven
and yet he calls treason
because he's trying to scare
people away from reporting it
that's also a massive crime
this is unconstitutional
whether they're lying or not
you see this is the
understanding of free speech
whether it's CNN or not
and they don't care
but you think it's free speech
you're an idiot
like he says
about the rest of the examples
where he threatens free speech
and people cow
well as Iran says
take it with a grand salt
because it's usually
somewhere in the middle
but Iran is claiming as Trump's
what at
1520
3200 American casualties
I've seen it 3,500
depending on who's reporting it
which should add more salt
the point is that they're claiming
a lot more than what
Trump's administration is admitting
and based on the evidence
that seems to be the case
just like the last bombing
in Iraq
where they lied about it
yet 100 traumatic brain injuries
but no one was killed
I don't even think that's possible
unless it's some kind of
sonic bomb with no explosion
but that's not what it was
so the point is that
I think we can clearly see
that they've been bombing
locations that have troops
and they're just hiding it from you
and watch as we get
some weird series of random
plane crashes
and helicopter things
that you're oh
couple of Marines died over there
my opinion
but that weirdly happened
after the Iraq conversation
and it's just
like a couple petered out
of many different things
and then all of a sudden
I think we all know
that they would try to hide
things like this from us
because they don't
want you to know what's going on
all my opinion obviously
so here Heng Seths
comes out and says the point
we just read
my 13-year-old son
popped into my office
don't have to deal
with nuclear Iran
and as Kirstel Ball says
what a lying sack of SHIT
the first Trump administration
as we just went over yesterday
ripped up the nuclear deal
that was working
and literally showed you the deal
I brought up the JCPOA
I showed you the actual agreement
and in fact it was Article 36
that said explicitly
that if one of the groups
which includes the United States
violates the deal
exactly like
excuse me exactly like they did
that that
would be justification
for them to do what they did
it's all very simple
which was increase enrichment
until they went back in the deal
they didn't
they then blamed
they pointed to the very
enrichment that I proved
to you at the time
which I can still show now
was allowed
because of what they did
and they said terrorism
look what they're doing
just like Trump is now saying
look what they borrowed afterward
which was a legal act
because of their attack
they know all these things
they're just trying to play
the stupid people in the room
or maybe they're that stupid
I don't know
but so the reality was
that they created it
then drove them a position
to where they tried
to make it seem bad
and still to this day
they have not gone past the
the reality is
as I just showed you
the IAEA in 2025
proved to us
that they were well within
their safeguards at that moment
and even cited the number
that Whitcoff lied about
saying it was a crime
wild
the Iranians had offered
extraordinary concessions
in the latest round
as we showed you
they offered to give up
their entire stockpile
and they bombed the next day
but let's continue to pretend
this is about you
stopping the thing
that was never there
and he says
we will finish this
we will honor their sacrifice
and I was saying earlier
right
what this means to me
is we're trying to use
the people who died
who we told you would never happen
in the first place
to convince you
that we have to keep going
because well
their sacrifice
you know the very sacrifice
you promised wouldn't happen
and now using to coerce
people who never wanted this
into supporting
what they still don't want
very horrible
except
you know what I'm saying
like this is disgusting to me
because you guys
lied us into the situation
to begin with
yesterday at
Dover Air Force Base
President Trump
the chairman
and I stood in solemn
silence as heroes came home
flag draped caskets
we honored them
we grieved with their families
and we listened
what I heard through tears
through hugs
through strength
and through unbreakable resolve
was the same
from family
after family
they said finish
kills me
despite the fact that that's not
what's happening
and you can like
literally one of the people
they've already used
their family
stood up at a press conference
and said this is not okay
we don't support this
even though they just stood up
and said they support the war
these guys are disgusting
they're using you
they're using everybody
they don't care about you
this guy is fighting for the
end times
which in his mind
necessitates the fall of the west
sure work work
out that for everybody
the end of the day
this is him using people dying
and it's the
flag draped coffins
that we told you
this would lead to
that they swore
we're not going to happen
that we weren't even going to
get involved
limited strikes
no boots on the ground
I mean it's not like we all knew
for a fact that this is where it
would go
but we told you
this is what they've done before
this is what we know
Israel wants
this is what they usually get
driven into
and what I think they actually
my opinion
truly from behind the dollar
trying to accomplish
from the global perspective
but I didn't know for sure
and then here we are
and like every other example
like the conversation of
Israel and influence
and everything else
isn't it frustrating
that you don't have
like this waterfall
of people going
holy holy crap
Nick Sorter tells you
I can't believe Ryan called this
all that time again
no that's not going to happen
I can't believe Whitney was on this
that long
nope
not going to happen
despite the fact that we were
being pushed back on by
everybody for calling this
all of the IMA
and none of this is really
getting acknowledged
as the Joneses of the rest
use what they said wasn't true
to drive you to support them again
like I don't even care
about it being like we got it
it's about understanding that
this was clear in 2025
and we called it out in 2025
and now those people are
trying to grapple on to that
to use it to keep you
stuck in the thing we tried to call out
and people like this
are using the very death
they told you would never come to pass
to convince the good people out there
that they just have to fight
for their sacrifice
why because they're good people
because you can use their morals
and their wish to care
about these people
to drive them
do something you don't want
that's what they do
it's exactly like that sentiment
we read the other day
oh it was actually
from that
from JP's video
about Zionism
the idea that ultimately
this is some people
I forget the term
but they it's bad people
evil people
convincing good people
that what they need to do
is the right thing
but really it's the evil thing
so you've got them thinking
they're doing it for the right reasons
I keep talking about this
but it's ultimately evil
or bad or whatever you want to call it
so on that very note
just like I told you before
this is where we are
like they promised it wouldn't happen
and now he's trying to convince you
that those coffins
that they promised wouldn't happen
is why we have to keep going
demonstrate for me how Israel's
governments involved at all
as the U.S. is deploying troops
as the U.S. is largely the one
on the face of this
while Israel's the one conducting the actions
we told you guys
anybody with a brain
because of like Jeffrey Sachs just told you
every war before this
has been the same thing
here we are again
and just to be clear
what I'm talking about
is this is the Israel government
and then the people they might use
which would be Israelis too
but that's not how this is going
watch
I'm worried it's going to go aggressively
in the one direction
even more so when I think
when Israel might just back away
now lastly
the reporting from
connews their telegram channel
which is Israeli media
so this is the actual post
it's on their telegram channel
but they are news media platform in Israel
the statement was that Trump was planning
to take control of the strait of removes
by force
now this should be very very
we should be very skeptical
many things this could be
this could be Israel reporting this
to drive the action
whether Trump wants to or not
it could be that this is what they agreed on
and this Israeli platform
got it inside word
and is spoiling the game
but it says in a move
that could also last several weeks
keep tacking on the time
according to an Israeli source
see
Israel is also preparing to increase operations
in the strait of removes
nobody else wants to
but clearly Israel does
and they guess nobody jumped up
so Israel's like
we're going to do it with the US
like every other time before
so question it
this may be hype
maybe false
what I find interesting is this is on the 17th
this comes out of the telegram channel
actually it was specifically
yeah the 17th
here's Jerusalem post
the 17th
Trump's operation in strait of promuce
could extend war with Iran by months
now to be clear
what they're talking about
is his
you know discussion of like guiding ship through
which nobody wants involvement with
I guess other than Israel
but I'm pointing to the timing here
of them telling you
that what they're going to do
is seize control militarily
at the same time
you have Jerusalem post
generally is referencing the larger conversation
but you know it could extend
so how generally could that extend it by months
well if it was war
always I'm telling you
is really media less the cat of the bag
to benefit themselves
and makes the US government look weak
and manipulated
and they never do anything about it
I think that speaks for itself
now this is on the 17th as well
US drops five
5k pound bunker buster bombs on
underground missile sites
near the strait of promuce
okay we'll start to feel like something's going on isn't it
you start to feel like this is exactly where it's going
and that the US is now bombing in preparation
for something they're going to do
but again this could all be window dressing
well understand that this is the US government
continuing to bomb
legal locations without a declaration of war
because every country has the right to have missiles
and bombs and whatever else
and just there's still ongoing
but the idea of whether the strait of promuce
will become a focal point
now again I want to reiterate the reality
that it is open
it's not closed
now restricted
different word
arguably restrict restricted
I can't really
I don't know how to really verify that
but the point is the claims that has been
dramatically restricted
I honestly think the claim of restriction
being like 94% they claim
or whatever in the beginning
I think that was overblown
I think it was done with the idea
to make the case that
everyone's affected
but look at this
it's a live map
you can check it all day long
and there's tons of traffic in there
you know the point
in case you missed the last show
was that this is something the US needed to claim
that they shut it down
and just like tanks rolling into Kiev
there was a lie in the beginning
because they wanted to pretend
that Russia took over all of Ukraine
but they did not
so too did Israel or Iran
not block the strait
they did not put a blockade
like like
it seems everyone told Trump that they would
to get him into the position
to say look it'll end quickly
because they'll do that
everyone will be unhappy
the world will come to back us
and it'll be over
not what happened
because Iran's not stupid
and so they didn't
but what they did do was threaten them
and say well bomb you if you go through
and apparently didn't do that
and then it comes out
and this is what I said
right in the beginning
I said wait a minute
so I'm hearing it's closed
but I'm like
but it's not though
and yet you look back
and box
CNN
MSNBC
every major alternative
ridiculous person
the straits closed
because they're all just parroting each other
and it was not
and even I was like
am I missing something
like is this
it's just why I figured well
is this like a lie
is Iran lying about that
it just was
it wasn't
they all lied
and now it's come out
as I showed you before
that they said
it's only blocked
to the enemies
and here is actually what he said
the foreign minister
this is an additional one
I've already shown you points
where they've said this
they are asking other countries
to come and help them
so that the Strait of Hormuz
remains open
which of course
from our perspective
it is open
yep exactly
it is only closed
to our enemies
to those who carried out
unjust aggression
against our country
and to their allies
we have not sent any message
we are not asking for a ceasefire
but this war must come to an end
in a way that it will not
be repeated again
is he my point
that's what I was saying earlier
they've come to the understanding
that going through the normal
you know like
okay sake of conversation
because I'm not going to say
I know for a fact
that they're honorable
and doing
but they demonstrate that
with their continued actions
and restraint
my point though
is that you could argue
that it's a good ploy
but that ultimately
we're talking about
oh I just lost it
but this war must come to an end
in a way
the point about the change
of their action
right the idea being
that's when I end up
clicking things
as I lose it
but so you know
we can see the change
in the way that they deal
with this
because they're restraint
that's why I went into that
about you know
maybe it's just because it's a ploy
but nonetheless
their restraint
has been demonstrated
like they continue to show you
that they're not just
diving back in
and can causing this
to cascade bigger and bigger
which is what Israel and the U.S.
will do
they do it every time
and arguably
if they did
this would already be consuming
everything
and they don't
but so what they're arguing
is look every time
we do nothing
you guys just come back
and bomb again
you use it over and over
so they're driving them
to change their action
which is not in the
interest of anybody
but even when
they're midst of that
and even given the legal
justification
to return the bombing
which is what they claim
they always wanted
they still don't do that
all they're saying
is we're no longer
going to treat with them
we're not going to allow them
to give negotiations
we're not going to let them
through the straight
they did this
and we're done
like you know
we're we're
we're standing our ground
essentially
where it goes
is up to them
I mean
I think this was a
artfully done tactic
whether they're good guys
or not
this is done in a way
that creates a situation
that puts the ball
in their court
and you and you're
proving they're calling
their bluff
and you're proving to the world
that they're the ones
causing the problem
I think they did
they they handled this
very well
so as I said
anyone who was ever reporting
the straight was closed
and especially those
still claiming this today
is either not an honest
person or somebody
bad at their job
make sure you take note of that
now I'll always include
this link
by the way
the maritime link
you can do this
and it's air
and it's the whole world
there's plenty of these
out there by the way
just important to keep an eye
because you know
this is how easy it is
to prove that people
are deceiving you
now here's Netanyahu
and I've seen got a point guys
how long have I been talking
about this
and plenty of other people
not unique to me
I think that what
has to be done
is to have alternative routes
instead of going through
the choke points
of the
Hormuz Straits
and the Boba Mandem Straits
in order to have
the flow of oil
just have
oil pipelines
gas pipelines
going west
through the Arabian Peninsula
right up to Israel
right up to our Mediterranean ports
and you've just done away with
the choke points for
forever
that is
definitely possible
so I see that as
ah now here's an important
thing to think about here
so what you just described guys
that is
one of the major drives
behind all the pipeline
conversations
that's what we're talking about
this has been an issue
the
seven year
seven countries
five years
the clip I just played for you
from
from Jeffrey Sachs
I mean the conversation
of driving this very thing
with the endpoint being Iran
well they always knew
that Iran could do this
and it would
manipulate the supply of oil
so ever since then
you've seen the U.S.
in Israel trying to create
workarounds
trying to force pipelines
but they've got pushed back on
bombing ones they don't like
like trying to create this
and on top of that
the main thing I'm
constantly pointing out
is the war with Yemen
or against Yemen
the war against the people of
Yemen
and it's
this is what he just described
now what
what I think he's doing right
there
because you don't come out and go
like the idea is that
why wouldn't you just
take over Iran
which is what you want
if you took over Iran
the threat wouldn't be there
now he's standing back and going
look we need to work around this
that is not what Israel does
it shows me that they're
admitting that they are
ultimately not winning this war
that's my
impression of it
but just remember this
we've talked about this for so long
what he's talking about
is the straight of her moose
right
that this is what Israel
Iran can control
which he's offering the choke point
so
for the longest time
and what he's saying is we
just need some way to get the oil
from the
the peninsula
just directly to Israel
so either directly through
Saudi Arabia
and through Yemen
and Oman or whatever
well you know that
that's what he's talking about
which hasn't happened
because there's been resistance
and part of it's been Yemen
and so then
they talked about the
taking over Yemen
to control the other side of the mass
so they could at least
get it down the
Bab al-Mendib straight
which is what he just named
that's right here
right there
or where it'll show
if you get closer
that's the name of it
I don't know where the name
is on there
the Bab al-Mendib straight is right here
so the point
is that they've been trying to
overtake Yemen
and they have not successfully done
that
in order to control that waterway
now my point the whole time
has been because once they can
control it
they would go after Iran
now for whatever reason
I think Netanyahu just feels
like this is his last chance
that's why Lebanon
got pulled into it
even though that's clumsy
so he just literally told you
what we need
is another way around this
which shows you both
that they're not winning in this regard
because otherwise taking out Iran
would solve that problem
but also just that it's
always been about this
all of these wars at least in part
have been driven by that need
and that's human lives guys
starvation tactics
sanctions
just murderous actions
while claiming everybody else
is the bad guy
back to the point
so as I said
this is an admission
in my mind
of failure against Iran
Decentre News points out
the Trump on 314
countries of the world
that receive oil through the
Humor the Strait of Hormuz
must take care of that passage
by the way
I saw it for myself
he posted it
and spelled straight wrong
and deleted it
and reposted it
I think I've done that before
it's just funny
you know somebody who's involved
with this
and he can't even spell it
but it says
work it as a typo
for that matter
that they must take care
of the passage
with U.S. help
this should have always
been a team effort
and now it will be
it will be a world together
because he thought
they would sign on
and nobody did
Japan Australia
I mean all their chief allies
even the UK was like
we'll find a viable option
but it's not that
now that may change
it might have already changed
but as of right now
like I can see
it has not
Trump on 317
because clearly nobody was
involved
and they didn't want to be
the United States has been
informed by most of our
NATO allies
that they don't want
to get involved
with our military
operate
yes because it's obviously
one of the most unpopular
things we've ever seen
and it says
we no longer need
or desire
the NATO countries assistance
we never did
it might
it's like
what a child
like you
I mean you just said
you did man
you just said
right here we need that help
we want you to come out
but now you don't want to help
we didn't need anyway
you're dumb and ugly
that's what it feels like
just childish flailing
and it says
likewise Japan Australia
South Korea
we do not need help of anyone
then why'd you ask for it man
you know what I mean
like it's just
it's just a embarrassing
series of events
where this guy just
keeps saying
whatever he thinks
like it's almost like
he don't think we can
just look back at
what they just said
maybe he is getting old
I don't know
as Aaron says
this is literally
the dumbest war
in human history
no hyperbole
guess what
the US may
unsanction Iranian oil
you know
the ones they're fighting
right now
and to ease pressure
from their actions
against Iran
and the oil
and the price fallout
I mean that's just
just crazy
I mean that's incredible
you know
it's
I've pointed out in the past
like for example
what was one of those examples
like just you know
the guido point
where they just drop him
like a bad penny
the moment
they don't need him anymore
you know they don't care
about anything they're doing
but what's hilarious to me
is that you're
sanctioning Iranian oil
to stop Iran
forbidding from the oil
and then you attack Iran
which creates an oil issue
which everyone in the world
saw coming
and then you have to
unsanction the oil
that will help Iran
to stop what you created
with an illegal war
while you're still fighting Iran
which will increase
the price just doesn't make
any sense
unless again
that there's a bigger
point to this
that there's more coordination
is worth considering
but every day
it feels less and less likely
to me
in regard to specifically
the way Iran fits into
what they're trying to
accomplish
but that it doesn't mean
they could all be fighting
for a different globalist outcome
if you want to look at it that way
but it's clearly
I think there's a divide here
it's worth considering
that it's more coordination
but I don't see it
not right now
US may unsanction Iranian oil
even Bassent came out
trying to argue
what's okay
because you know
we did it with Russian oil
back then
well that was stupid too
not that it
it shouldn't be sanctioned
the first place
but the point is
that you're talking about
on removing the very thing
that you first of all
told us would collapse the country
the sanctions are so strong
and they're always working
they never were
because they worked around it
just like Russia did
I mean it hurt them dramatically
people were starving
but they survived
so they kept trying to claim
that they were
all they were doing
was hurting the innocent people
which is the way this works
we unsanctioned Russian oil
in the coming days
we may unsanction Iranian oil
that's on the water
this guy with this
where he talks
in other words
Iran would be able to
sell oil at a premium
rather than send it at a discount
so the the group
that you're telling us
are the terrorists of the world
literally working with ISIS
who want to nuke everybody
you're going to let them profit
from their oil sales
you know what
just like they let ISIS do
which is actually a bad point to make
because it's not to suggest
that Iran's the same
but it's just funny to me
that in whatever they're fighting
there's just nothing sacred to them
though literally let
ISIS sell oil from Iraq
for the longest time
which they wildly benefited from
Algeria
you know it's just
they were
the US government
was just stealing all that
it's just it's so gross
how the corruption is so obvious
there's a reason we call Iran
the number one state
sponsor of terrorism
let's do what he says
and then we'll go back
to the other point
as an energy rich country
could be should be
instead like
so many other places
driven by radical ideology
they've spent that
money instead of investing
in their people
and that's why you had
millions of
Iranians protesting
oh is that why
they felt like
their condition quality of life
didn't match what it could be
or should be
and what was the Iranian state
that's actually
entirely not the truth
like literally posted
by the people protesting
on the union supporting it
not at all the truth
very clearly
so well
I've gone into it all
but you know
it doesn't matter
because he's just giving you
probably what somebody
handed to him
the reason we come
call Iran
the number one state
sponsor of terrorism
which is
verifiably not true
because they took the
the money they make
and they invest it in tunnels
and they invested in missiles
oh tunnels and missiles
where we got it again
and they invest it in launchers
why why do you
talk no we've proven
that they have the
like in the desert
secret spots of launching
but we're not tunnels
what what are we talking about
this is not some insurgency
we're talking about Iran
this is in a majorly
high developed
and advanced to call
I just guys
this is just so lazy
and at the end of the day
what did he just start with
Iran is an energy
rich country
could be should be
instead like
so many other places
driven by a radical ideology
they've spent
that money
instead of investing
in their people
they spent it on
massive war fronts
that end up using
all of our tax dollars
like that
like you guys do
our entire lives
no not like that
we're fighting for freedom
Ryan
the point
is that he literally
just argued
by the way
this is Israeli talking points
about anyone they're fighting
insert tunnels
and pursuant shields
it's like the same thing
they do everywhere
they've always been proven
to be lying
not that they don't
or can't do them
but they make up stories
even though there's
the reality
mostly in Gaza too
is that Israel was
involved in building
most of those tunnels
it goes back to
well before
proven this
on their own documentation
the ones under
the chief of hospital
by the way
were built by the Israelis
while those being used
easy to look up
and anyway
that they use that money
to build their
tunnels and things that are
have
and that's why they're not
an oil
okay but wait a minute
didn't we just go over this
we did
the reality is that
they are sanctioning
Iranian oil
okay wait a minute
so you're telling me
that despite your sanctions
that restrict them
from being able
to become an oil rich country
that they should have
just done it anyway
somehow magically
or or suggesting
that the money
that they're not
getting because you're
sanctioning them
was somehow still spent
on tunnels
Hexeth you're a moron
and I think that's what
everyone's starting to see
quite frankly
and I think either way
it's the person
who is just parroting
the narrative
but in a way
that I think it sounds like
he's just reading off a car
that someone handed him
you can't stand there
and tell me
we're going to
unsanctioned their oil
that we've always been
hindering
and then in the others
in the other press
conference
telling me that they're
not that they're
they could be the greatest
oil rich country
if they just weren't
using the money
they're not getting
through that thing
because you're sanctioning them
on things that they
shouldn't be spending them on
the stick
that mean the
the ridiculousness
of this administration
just continues
to impress me
now in general
for time
just because it's
just longer
I'm going to
I'll get into this
into more depth
but today
we'll end with this
Pete Hexeth
hits embarrassing
behavior exposed
Defense Secretary
doesn't understand
anything
and he is over his head
during classified
briefings
now this
this is with Democrat
there's Democrats
but there's also people
involved with the
which one is it
the subcommittee
on the House Committee
and over the
what was it
military and foreign
affairs subcommittee
on the House of
wait
that's some read weird
military and foreign
affairs subcommittee
of the House Committee
on
Oh, I just read it weird
so again
military and foreign
affairs subcommittee
of the House Committee
on oversight
and government reforms
so somebody within that
is expressing
I see Pete Hexeth
in the classified
briefings
and I'm embarrassed
for him
he can do nothing
beyond read the script
that's given him
and this is
where was it
reports to Midas
Midas network
he added
he can't answer
detailed questions
he doesn't understand
the strategy
not that there is one
he doesn't understand
the tactical operation
okay
now clearly
you could argue
as one
as Democrat
is one of the people
in here saying this
that they're
hate him
and it's because
they're partisanship
always probably
the case to some degree
but it's also the fact
that we can just
quite literally see
that this man is
out of his death
and the idea
that he is not
qualified to this position
so that should matter
right there in the beginning
he's never done this before
he has no reason
to understand what he's doing
but no
he's got the best people
around him
well guess what
the people around him
are the ones
telling you
that he doesn't know
what he's doing
and he's in fact
more focused
on memes
because that's
the ultimate point here
literally
says
jump to it
a senior white house
official
so
in their team
was closely involved
with the video
making effort
described as a
collegial
creative endeavor
we're over here
just grinding away
on banger memes
dude
says the person
in the white house
working for XF
also granted
anonymity to speak
candidly
there's an entertainment
factor to what we do
but ultimately
it boils down
to the fact
that no one
has ever attempted
to communicate
with the American people
this way
you mean
like
every other time
before this though
with memes
and
that's just not true
but what they're
actually talking about
is these ridiculous
things they're putting
out
and I'm going to go
into this
more depth
I just want to
point it out
before we finish
where they're trying
to tell you
that no no
no we're
we're course
we're correcting
the narratives
we're making sure
you understand
that this is not the
this is what it is
a bowling meme
where the guy bowls
strikes
and then it
overcuts that
with something else
of
bowling pins saying
we're not
we won't stop
making nuclear weapons
that's supposed to be
Iranian I guess
and
then it gets a strike
with American bowl
and
and that's it
pretty sure
there's nothing of a
substance there
that's what I keep
telling you
it's all just
a bunch of flash
and no substance
and there's no point
they're not
correcting anything
but if you read this
they're convinced
that what they're doing
is changing the opinion
about what's really
happening
by pointing out
or giving you things
that show
Grand Theft Auto
and then a bomb
blowing up
and that's it
it's over
and that
literally the whole thing
it goes back and forth
back and forth
what's supposed to be
corrected right there
guys this
the whole point
to the people
criticizing it
this is
literally just about
like entertainment
while they're
letting Americans die
while they're fighting
for a foreign country
telling you're
working for American
interest
you're putting out
slop
you're putting out
nonsense
that's supposed to
what convince people
and all they keep saying
is oh my god
look it got 17 million views
we're so popular
I'm not kidding
you don't
you could factor in
that that's a lot of people
who like me
think you're ridiculous
right
that we're watching it
because we're going
oh my god
I can't believe
some of us at least
but somehow
all the impressions
are all they care about
because this is the
social media plot
presidency
this is the
the performative theater
that we're living through
it's painful
because it's embarrassing
and the world sees it
and there's tons of them
guys
we'll go over them
each one of them
is even more ridiculous
than the last one
none of it has any substance
none of it even has a
point that you could really
discern
other than
we're cool
and they're bad guy
and that's exactly
literally what it's
trying to purvey
or a relay
excuse me
and of course
you know
this post back from
the 14th
where it says
one mission
clear objectives
destroy Iran
cherish prox
and then that's not
what we're doing
no different new
clear mission
every 30 seconds
did we destroy the proxies
are we talking about
Hamas and Hezbollah now
are we talking about
other Houthis
are we bombing now
no no
we're bombing
the civilians
in certain locations
and other facilities
and then I guess
just bombing oil stuff
but trust me
it's about the proxies
because he promised
that was the one
clear objective
no it wasn't
because that one
clear thing
changes every 20 seconds
you talk to somebody
in this administration
and just to end
the brutal reality
of what's still happening
to people in the West Bank
which I actually can't believe
the New York Times
also
Palestinian man
recounts brutal sexual assault
by Israeli settlers
Linda points us out as well
this is the first
New York Times headline
actually acknowledging
sexual violence
against Palestinians
it's been going on
for decades
I don't know how much
people can deny guys
this is insane
I mean it's very clear
what this group is
you have this person
who is supposed to be
the moderate person
in the Knesset
who is literally screaming
about starving
people in Gaza
you have
drop side news
highlighting that there's
currently 51% of Palestinian
children who are being held
in Israeli prisons
who are there without charge
which we've tougher
well before our field for 7th
it's just much worse right now
351 Palestinian children
are currently detained
in their prisons
with no charge
or rather
51% without charge
the rest of them
they're under
other kind of administrative
allegations
and whatever else they're doing
it's insane guys
throwing rocks
or whatever else
but this is the
democracy we're fighting for
right
well that's not happening in Iran
they have all kinds of claims
about the weird thing
but they
always end up
like
I shouldn't even say it like that
but the reality of what they
continually claim about Iran
every day I do this
shows to be false
that's not to say Iran
is not capable of doing
terrible things
that's my point guys
you have to understand
just because they're being
lied about
does not mean that they're
not capable
haven't done other things
but it should still matter
to you
that what they do is lie
about them
in the midst of a war
that's killing Americans
as Israel quite literally
demonstrates
that it's one of the most
egregiously brutal
and just
I mean you tack on
the things that you
they're committing genocide
and this is what we're doing
we're fighting with
the genocide group
to fight against the people
they don't like
they're bombing in Lebanon
airstrikes
apartment buildings
in Beirut
it's like bombing
New York City guys
and doesn't matter
on the record
public and plain daylight
videotape
literally killing
and the idea is
well we gave them time to
leave
okay fine
so Mexico says
guys get out of Houston
we're bombing there next
week
you're gonna leave
is it do you have
you're home
you live there
secondarily
they don't have the legal right
to bomb this location
and on top of that
what you'll always find out
is they go
we're gonna bomb there
in an hour
and they bomb in three minutes
every time
I've gone over this
extensively in Palestine
it's the same thing here
and they kill all these people
and they go
well we warned them
well what about the law
just because you say
look Lindsey Graham
will they drop leaflets
okay what legal rights
do they have to do this
is there a declaration of war
no they're killing civilians
doesn't matter
they drop leaflets
and even when they do that
they I mean
I could go through this
so it just makes me sick
that we have to continue to pretend
that these are not monsters
actively murdering innocent people
in their homes
and acting like what they're doing
is the right thing
yeah we'll go into more of this later
they're they're bombing
this was something we'll get into in depth
they are they bombed
another Reuters journalist
in Lebanon
the guy was literally giving a report
and one of these bombs
dropped down behind him
and seriously hurt one of the people with him
and just before
here's what he posted
targeted journalist is a war crime
and Israel saw it and said
oh yeah
and then bombed him
this is what we're dealing with guys
and and I already showed you in Lebanon
this happened early
this was October 13th 2023
Reuters journalist killed
by Israeli bombing
I cover this at the time
not even Reuters
was willing to acknowledge this
right here
when it first happened
I reported on this
before Reuters admitted it happened
and then finally Reuters admitted
yes it what they were killed
by an Israeli bomb
and you can prove it
even even Twitter
came in and told you
yes it was killed by an Israeli airstrike
you know what happened
nothing nobody was ever charged
there was never crime
doesn't matter
and by the way
in case you understand
you can prove they targeted this area
they actually told you
they were going to bomb it
then bombed it
and killed these journalists
because they were there
that's my opinion
but you can prove that they
targeted a location
that they told them they were in
they told them they were journalists
told them they were there
and then you can prove that Israel
ordered somebody to bomb that location
I went over all of it
it was it was different points
in the conversation
but the timelines were exact
and obvious
and even they had to cover it
now it's happening again
but nobody seems to care
who's supposed to be fighting
for the freedom of the world
and it's all very clear
we'll leave it there
we'll come back tomorrow
but guys you know
the reality is that this stuff is clear
and we just can't hide from that
like there's just no reason
not to be honest about what we're seeing
that the obviousness is one
that this country is
dramatically being driven
into a position
that is in the interest of anything
but Americans
and on a world
on a global sense
you got both of these elements
I think trying to recreate
some global structure
where they're in charge forever
apparently
for the emperor
and she forever
Donald Trump with Rubio
and Hex
and Jared Kushner
and Whitcoff
and some kind of forever
board of peace that runs
I mean it's just insane
how we can't be honest
about what that is
and the people that are out there
telling you they're fighting globalism
how we can't see
how ridiculous they are
how embarrassing it is
that they're still trying to push for this
and anybody that is now shifting
over to the other conversation
at least give them credit
for calling it as it is
but consider whether they're opportunists
and not truly caring about the truth
but either way
the ones that are still there guys
you've got to be clear about what this is
and I just hope people can see this
because right now
where this is drifting into
is just
this is pre-stage rack stuff guys
we're watching this happen
people called it out then
we're not going to be welcomed as heroes
this is going to be chaos
it is going to kill more Americans
it is going to affect the global conversation
and guess what
in every single case before this
Israel has stood by and watched
and benefited every single time
but today
is different
because the different thing today
is that I think right now
especially Americans
can see that
they're literally talking about Israel
doing this to our country
to the point to where
they're using that to argue
that Trump somehow within it
fighting back
hey I hope so
but if that's the case
then you have to ask yourself
why he gave them
20 billion dollars
you have to ask why he sides with them
in every conversation
you have to ask why he what he does
is clearly in the interest
of what they want
you know
but aside from all of that
clearly he's fighting from within
but question everything guys
because yeah
if they are like
aside from the fact
that there's plenty of crimes
that have been committed
regardless of whether he's secretly
fighting from within
if it ends up in a way
that this stops what they're doing
and evil
even I will say
I'm glad that it ended up that way
but I will never be the one to say
that the
the ends justify the means
because that's not true
it matters how you get there
and I also just don't think
that's what's happening
in case you want to know from my
my gut
it's pretty clear that the evidence
and my gut back up the fact that
Trump is either a
willing participant
in what's happening
or he has no choice
that's what the facts line up with
but we'll keep covering it
as it goes forward
thank you for tuning in
I love you all
as always
question everything
come to your own conclusions
stay vigilant