the legacy media covered for the crimes of their masters,
the ruling class, okay, got it.
I mean, that's what they exist to do.
That's why we have NBC News.
That's why CNN is right.
No, I totally, that's why Fox is here.
But to see people in independent media doing that,
one of the questions I still can't answer
is why is it that all the neocons
are the ones leading the screaming
and anyone who asks questions about Charlie Kirk's death
was an enemy of the neocons.
So for the neocon whom he at best didn't trust
and mostly really didn't like,
I never talk about what I think Charlie thought
because it feels so weird, but he's gone.
But I just have to say this,
they're the ones leading the charge and shut up.
Don't ask any questions.
Like, you tell me what this is.
Well, that's-
I'm not gonna take orders from them.
Who are these people anyway?
I can hardly put into words how happy it made me
to see Tucker Carlson, one,
having Dave Smith back on again, my homeboy,
but two, talking about the independent media
and then how compromised they are,
how not independent the independent media is.
And three, talking about why myself and so many others
have been pontificating and investigating
and diving deep on the Charlie Kirk assassination
because it's like everyone that hated
or opposed Charlie Kirk in life
has become his most ardent defender in death,
whereas people like myself or Ian Carroll
or other people who had disagreements with Charlie
when it came to foreign policy,
we seem to be the ones that were most interested
in finding out who actually took Charlie Kirk out,
whereas simultaneously people like Ben Shapiro
or Mark Levin and all these guys
are trying to convince you
that there's nothing to see here
that it's absolutely not worth investigating any further.
And you have to ask yourself,
if you're thinking at all critically,
why is it that the people who didn't even like Charlie,
like didn't like him at all,
in many cases Charlie was their overt enemy,
they are the ones who are trying to craft
and control the narrative about his untimely demise.
And we're gonna get to that,
but first I wanna talk a little bit
about Trump's speech last night.
And I could go through
and I could show you clips of his speech
or we could watch the entire thing together
and we can comment on it,
but I'm not going to
because there's genuinely no purpose in it.
There's only one thing of note that was said
and it's really just evidence
of how much of a liar he's become.
Regime change was not our goal.
We never said regime change,
but regime change has occurred.
But we also won regime change.
I said, I spoke with the...
We have really regime change.
You know, this is a change in the regime
but the Washington Post said,
what do you mean you have regime change?
You didn't have regime change?
I said, no, no.
We took out the first regime, 100%.
That was Khomeini.
And again, we have had regime change.
So I never say I wanted it.
So I never talked about regime change, but we got it.
One of those clips was from yesterday morning
where he's saying, yeah, we want regime change.
And then in the speech, the very same day,
but at night, he says that that was never part
of their actual intended goals.
And it's like, okay.
So that's the reason that I'm not gonna play you much
of his speech because it's just utterly pointless.
He gives you everything that you wanna hear
and a bunch of things you don't wanna hear
and you have no idea what to make of it.
And ultimately, I'm not even sure
that they really know what the timeline is
or what they're doing at all.
It seems more to me like they are essentially
trying to create a clip farm by which
they can just clip out portions of it.
And then whatever the ultimate result
of the war in Iran is, they can say, look,
he said this and then this is what ended up happening.
Whereas you can also pick other portions
of the very same speech and it'll be demonstrated
in a few weeks or a few months or a few years,
depending on how badly this goes.
And you can say, well, none of that happened.
Literally none of it.
So I think that's what they're doing.
He said four to six weeks, six to eight weeks,
three, it could be any particular number,
but we would never reveal precisely what it is
because our goal is to finish those objectives.
And we're well on our way.
And the chairman and I look at this every single day.
It will be the president's determination
and the president's determination alone
when those objectives are complete
and when it serves the interest of the American people
to cut that deal.
So as Pete Hegseth clarifies there
as the head of the Department of War,
basically the goals are whatever Trump says they are.
The timeline is whatever Trump says it will be
and the exit strategy is whatever
and whenever Trump decides to take it.
So yeah, we don't know anything.
We learned nothing and the stock market is reacting
and responding accordingly,
down over a percent across all indices over the past day.
Thanks to the progress we've made,
I can say tonight that we are on track
to complete all of America's military objectives shortly,
very shortly.
We're going to hit them extremely hard
over the next two to three weeks.
We're going to bring them back to the Stone Ages
where they belong.
The war that was briefly sold to us
on the idea of liberating the poor Iranians
has now pivoted into total demolition, as usual.
So even though we didn't want regime change,
we got regime change and ultimately now
we're going to liberate the Iranians
by bombing them back to the Stone Ages
and woke up this morning to find out
that we had blown up according to Trump
on a true social post,
which is always a fun way to find out about a war crime
is that we had blown up their largest bridge in Iran.
Oh, and he continues to threaten to blow up their oil fields
as well as their electrical facilities,
which would clearly be a war crime
as well as the desalinization plant.
So yeah, we're kind of playing with fire here,
if I'm being honest.
But the thing I found most notable was that he said,
thanks to the regime change,
which we created by killing all of their top leadership,
that we didn't actually want the regime change,
but now we have regime change
and these new leaders are much more open to negotiation.
The new group is less radical and much more reasonable.
Well, then a few hours after that speech,
if not less than a few hours,
it is reported that Israel once again
took out the top negotiator for Iran
by dropping a bomb on residential facilities,
as is often the case.
And in this instance,
for the first time out of the three attempts,
they did not kill him,
they badly injured him and killed his wife.
So I'm sure he'll be much more apt to negotiate with us now.
Obviously I'm being sarcastic,
he will almost certainly not be negotiating with us at all.
And this is the third, count them, three times now,
that the Israelis have reportedly,
this one is brand new,
so I'm gonna hold off judgment,
maybe it was the American military,
but it certainly looks as if,
based off initial reports,
that this is the third time
that the Iranian negotiators have been murdered,
mid negotiation with America.
And that, ladies and gentlemen,
is exactly what Joe Kent said when he resigned.
Trump even said it today when he was at the plane site,
he was asked, who are you talking with inside of Iran?
And he said, I don't wanna name them
because then they might get killed.
Mr. President, I don't want them to be killed.
Well, they might get killed by the Israelis
because the Israelis don't want us to have a negotiation.
Essentially, you're saying
we just need to tell them no.
And not just tell them no,
you have to take things away from them.
You're gonna run any strikes by us
and also, you're not going on the offense anymore.
You're done being on the offense.
If you're attacked, we'll back you up.
What takes place now when I ran,
that affects us, that affects the GCC,
that affects the Straits of Hormuz and World Energy,
you're done.
We don't have a problem doing that
to any other country in the world.
Why do we have reluctancy to do it to Israel?
I mean, there's obviously the Israeli lobby factor.
Mary Madelson gave, I think,
$100 million to Trump's campaign
and there's other really prominent donors
that are very pro-Israel,
many of whom are dual citizens.
Sure looks to me like Joe Kent was telling the truth,
that yeah, the Israelis don't want an exit ramp.
They don't want there to be any avenue for peace
because that is not their goal.
They intend to take this as far and as long
and as viciously as humanly possible,
a la the clean break doctrine from the memo
back in the 1990s, that this is their entire plan.
Now, we don't need to make peace with the Palestinians
because we're just going to actively assault,
aggressively any nation who lends them support.
And this is obviously extended
into the wider Greater Israel project.
And what I find most remarkable about it
is that despite the fact that it's so obvious
to any keen observer, anybody who's actually paying attention
to how this stuff is playing out,
it's become crystal clear.
Even if you don't believe Joe Kent,
just look with your own eyes.
This is exactly what's happening.
The guy who was trying to negotiate with the Iranians
was JD Vance, the vice president of the United States.
He was having communications with them
through the Pakistanis and near hours,
near hours after Trump's speech where he says
the new people that we're talking to
are much more reasonable, they bombed him also.
So you would think given how egotistical Donald Trump is,
given how much he wants to be viewed as the tough guy,
the leader of the free world,
the most powerful important man on the planet,
if not in human history,
we've never seen someone as powerful
and as great as Donald Trump.
That's what he wants you to believe, right?
So why would he not absolutely drag
Bibi Netanyahu and the Israeli government
and the Israeli military over their attack
on the lead negotiator for a third time
on the Iranian side,
if Trump is telling the truth about anything in his speech.
And as much as I found his speech to be filled with lies,
like the fact that we stopped them
from getting a nuclear weapon and blah, blah, blah.
I mean, almost all of it was filled with lies.
But the one aspect of the speech
that you think he wouldn't dare have the audacity lie about
is that we are looking to exit in two to three weeks
and that the new people we're talking to
seem to be much more open to peace negotiations
and look how great I am.
I've scared the Iranians into playing ball
and then the next day, your allies, scare quotes,
blow up the guy you're talking to
and you've got nothing to say about it.
JD Vance, hey JD,
you got anything to say about this, bud?
Your 2028 presidential chances are calling.
Oh yeah, your credit card just got declined.
You're in serious trouble.
The entire GOP is so, so terribly damaged
by this obvious betrayal,
by this obvious fealty to a foreign government,
none of which did we vote for.
And obviously they want to blame that on the Panikans
and the Black Pillars and the Canissons
and the Tucker Carlson's and Dave Smith's
or me or whoever else, right?
Anybody who's not just an overt abject water carrier
for the Trump administration.
It's our fault because we're just not cheering loud enough
as he betrays his base.
But let me remind you, this is who he was
when he was campaigning.
I am the candidate of peace.
I am peace.
People don't believe that.
A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for a man
who wants to end wars, not start them.
We do not want war with Iran.
We actually want peace.
The Iranians are clearly not very good at war.
Perhaps they should follow President Trump's lead
and give peace a chance.
Kamala is campaigning with war mongers like Liz Cheney.
How do you think that is?
She picks Liz Cheney, whose father
virtually destroyed the Middle East.
You know, Liz Cheney, she talks big, oh, I want war.
She always wants war.
Every time I was with her in the White House,
we should attack this nation, that nation,
nations that people never even heard of.
We should attack some big, big tough guys.
She sits back and Washington, oh,
we ought to go and attack Iran or Iraq.
We're going to attack everybody.
That's why I broke up with her.
All she wanted to do is go to war with everybody.
These war hawks, they want to draft your kids
to die in wars and they will never fight themselves.
These war hawks, they want to draft your kids
to fight their wars and wars
that they will never fight themselves.
Thank you, whoever that was.
Clearly not the guy in power today, that's for sure.
And as much as the wasted money and the loss of life
and all of the devastation,
obviously bothers me about all of this,
in some ways, the moral depravity
is what's even more disturbing.
When the president says more reasonable,
again, these folks are appearing more reasonable
behind the scenes privately in these conversations
than perhaps some of the previous leaders
who are now no longer on planet Earth
because they lied to the United States
and they strung us along in negotiations
and that was unacceptable to the president,
which is why many of the previous leaders were killed.
That's Karen Lalevitt on April 30th,
just the day before his speech,
where she's saying that, yeah,
these new negotiators are much more reasonable
and the reason that they're more reasonable
is because the people that we were negotiating prior
are no longer on this Earth, as she says,
with a cross on her chest and smiles
about the murder of peace negotiators.
And in many ways, I think that's exactly
what has disturbed Tucker Carlson so much so
that he became really an anti-war activist
over the past couple of years.
As a Christian, as a moral person,
it's very difficult to look at the leaders
of your government, particularly people
that Tucker Carlson campaigned for,
that he spoke highly of, that he defended,
that he helped usher into these positions of authority
and power and to hear them saying these things
that are so obviously deprived.
If you listen to Pete Hegseth,
I mean, he sounds like an absolute lunatic,
bloodthirsty psychopath for real.
I did the same with his boss, a colonel
with a heart the size of Texas
and a beautiful deployment mustache to match.
I witnessed lethality.
I met a junior airman as the sun was going down
and a chill was setting on the tarmac,
who when asked what they needed,
she simply looked up at me with a sly smile on her face
and said, more bombs, sir, and bigger bombs.
We will happily oblige her.
And then after Trump's speech last night,
he tweets out, blow them back to the Stone Age.
It's like, these are the people
that we were allegedly liberating just six weeks ago.
And for the record, I think this is exactly
why Tucker Carlson has railed particularly
against evangelicals, against Zionist Christians in America.
And he has described them, even though he's walked this back,
I know exactly why he said it,
that these are the people that he hates the most.
Because under the cloak of his religion,
they are perpetuating death and violence
and destruction all over the planet in the name of God.
And as someone who genuinely believes in God,
Tucker Carlson and many other heroic Christians
have stood up and said, not in our fucking name.
And I know I'm not supposed to cuss
while I'm talking about biblical stuff, but sorry.
It's necessary right now
because otherwise you get, you know,
Trump's spiritual authority leader, like Paula White.
And now, fire, fire, fire, fire, fire, fire, fire.
So yeah, I think it's probably worth
people of any moral stripe, Christians,
any religion honestly, who sees this for what it is,
who sees it as the perpetuation of evil
under the cloak of religiosity,
has an obligation to speak up, to say loudly in unison,
not in our name, not with our dollars, not with our blood,
not with the future of our country hanging in the balance.
The answer is no.
And Tucker did an entire show today
on basically what he thinks these actions
mean in terms of America's place
as the leader of the free world.
So the three headlines from the president's speech last night,
at least in the short term are,
no ground troops, didn't mention ground troops.
Yes, we are getting out in some number of weeks
by the end of April.
And there's not gonna be regime change.
Regime change, as he said explicitly, is not our goal.
So, are those true?
Well, of course, you can't tell,
you can't know at this point, as Trump himself said.
And I haven't had a chance to really talk much
about what I see happening on a more macro scale.
And what I think we're witnessing in real time.
And what I think the truth is,
is that we simply don't have the military capability
to take and hold the Strait of Hormuz.
Let me explain.
Obviously, we have the ability to take
the Strait of Hormuz if we're willing to risk
and probably lose thousands of soldiers' lives.
So it's not really the taking that is the impossibility.
It's the holding, which becomes very challenging.
Particularly if you do not intend to marshal
a force of a half a million or a million American soldiers
to invade and create a barrier
where you can stop both drone and missile attacks
and mine attacks and boat attacks.
I mean, you have to have a serious force there.
And it would have to be permanent
if you intend to take and hold the Strait of Hormuz.
So in my opinion, Trump has just decided
we're not going to take it
because we don't have the political capital to do so.
So we're gonna turn it on NATO.
We're gonna turn it on Europe.
We're gonna say, hey, you guys use it.
You guys need this oil more than we do.
So it's now in your lap.
How close are you to getting that?
Well, we have a coalition for them,
but they should have been up here a long time with them.
And you know, they're affected.
The amazing thing is we don't need the Hormuz Strait.
We don't need it.
We don't need it at all.
We have so much oil.
Our country is not affected by this.
We have more.
We have twice the amount of oil
as Saudi Arabia or Russia.
And soon it'll be three times the amount.
He then proceeded during that speech
and many other times over the past couple months,
if not the past couple of years,
to threaten to exit NATO,
which as you guys probably know,
I am in favor of.
I think that NATO has been not so much a defensive alliance
as it has been a mechanism for our empire.
However, the reason you will not hear me supporting Trump
in that is because I think this is a much more
nefarious maneuver.
And why do I think that?
Well, because Israel hates Turkey
and Turkey happens to be a NATO member.
Erdogan, the leader of Turkey,
came out very aggressively and cut off
all diplomatic ties to the Israelis
after the war in Gaza began.
Actually, after a year had already passed.
So he stood idly by and he bit his tongue for a full year.
He let the Israelis just demolish the Palestinians.
But after a year, given his Muslim population,
he had to come out and say, no more.
This is crazy.
Now, while it hasn't boiled over into overt hostilities
or aggression in terms of military activity
between the two nations,
I'm of the opinion based off of
you can go through all of my prior episodes.
If you want to see all of the reasons,
I'm so convinced that Donald Trump
is absolutely in the employ of the Israelis.
That's the reason I believe
that he's ultimately threatening to exit NATO,
not because it's bankrupting us,
not because he wants to end the empire,
but rather he is dedicated almost entirely
to bolstering and supporting
the fledgling Israeli empire
to the detriment of the American empire.
Now Turkey was never listed on the West Clark Seven
and maybe I'll be proven to be wrong
and I hope I will be proven to be wrong, obviously.
But it does seem to me like the consistent
and increasing vitriol between Donald Trump and Europe
is not so much about their unwillingness
to get into wars that we started that hurt them
because why would an ally want to help out another ally
as they are doing things that hurt their own countries
unless they absolutely have to,
unless like Donald Trump,
they were blackmailed or coerced
or had their lives threatened
in order to become in the employ of a foreign country.
And the really important thing to understand about all this
is that the reason that NATO doesn't lift a finger
when it comes to the Strait of Hormuz
is because, not because they don't need it,
Trump's right about that, they absolutely do.
They do need those resources
and it's not just oil and gas,
it's also fertilizer and helium
and all sorts of different minerals
that come through that straight on shipping.
But the primary reason that they don't feel
as if they have to lift a finger
nor should they feel like they have to lift fingers
because that's the whole deal, that's the whole game,
that the American dollar is used in global trade
because we ensure global shipping lanes
will remain largely free.
And if we refuse to do that,
then ultimately why should they be trading in the US dollar?
And this gets into very high level finance
and very, very kind of woo woo little tinfoil hatty
and some of you are probably,
I'm probably gonna lose some of you on this to be honest,
but I believe that Trump is being used
to usher in the death of the US dollar
as the reserve currency of the world.
And the reason I believe that is because historically
our actions in the Middle East
had been predicated off of going after leadership
in the Middle East who refused to play ball
when it came to trading their oil in US dollars.
We did that with Gaddafi.
We went after Saddam Hussein,
basically anyone that got in our way
when it came to the petrodollar system, they died.
But in this instance,
it doesn't seem to be a concern at all.
It seems to be collateral damage
in a way that they're not even worried about it,
which is totally misdefined.
And as I mentioned a couple of weeks ago,
the Iranians have now made a deal
where anybody who kicks out the Israeli
and American ambassadors from their country
and is willing to trade in something
other than US dollar is welcome to have their ships
sail through the Strait of Hormuz, unattacked.
Kick out the Israeli ambassador,
kick out the American ambassador,
trade in the yuan, you're good to go.
And I just don't think people understand
how big of a deal that is.
I mean, it is such a huge, huge deal.
It is a paradigm shift that really goes above
and beyond any of the things that Tucker Carlson
even highlighted in his monologue,
which was great by the way.
I'm not saying it wasn't good.
It was great.
But again, I think Tucker's weakness,
and this is just my honest opinion,
is that I think his weakness
is that he doesn't understand Austrian economics,
that he doesn't understand really
what being the empire of the world means,
what is the underpinning to our mechanism for control.
Tucker seems to believe
that it is exclusively about military might.
That's the secondary effect actually.
The military might is only utilized
to maintain our stranglehold on the global economy
in terms of exclusively using the US dollar.
And when you start a war in Iran
on behalf of Israel,
and you destroy one of the most important,
if not the most important straight
when it comes to global trade,
one that absolutely devastates your allies
in Europe's economy.
And after you've lit everything on fire,
you turn around and you say to them,
you deal with it.
What do you think they're gonna do next?
You think that they're gonna go
and lose thousands of troops,
fixing the shitstorm that you created
and still trading the US dollar
when they have a relatively stable currency in the Euro
that they could use anyways?
Why would they do that?
So this is the thing that I can't really
get my hands around.
I don't understand what the long-term game plan is
because it seems as if what we're doing
is we're kicking dirt
in as many people's eyes as possible.
Long-time allies, recent allies.
I mean, even the GCC who are recent allies
allowed them to get badly damaged in this war
that was against their will and not in their interests
and we didn't do anything to defend them
but we did everything in our power
to defend the Israelis who were ultimately
the catalyst for this war in the first place.
So what it looks to me like is that
we are trading every single positive relationship we have
with every other country on earth
and sacrificing all of it just to demonstrate
our undying, loyalty is not even the right word for it,
fealty, like absolute domination
that we will sacrifice everything we have,
everything that built this country up and our empire,
even if you don't like the empire,
we are sacrificing all of it on behalf of one country
that's smaller than New Jersey.
How the fuck is that possible?
I believe I can say with certainty
that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered.
So I mean, but of course I'm always open
to countervailing evidence, always.
Right, and let's see that.
So I'm reminded of my capacity for being wrong
but I can say if you could x-ray my heart
you would find that I believe with total certainty
he was murdered and the people in the US government
knew that he was murdered.
I don't want that to be true but I believe it is true.
So like it's gonna take a lot,
you're gonna have to show me that that's false.
Now Tucker will never say the part
that I'm about to say, but my opinion is that
given that Tucker Carlson had such a positive,
really long lasting relationship with Donald Trump
was in communication with him right up until this war began,
tried to prevent the war very loudly, very openly about it
and given that now that the war has began
and it's become a disaster,
Tucker Carlson has not relented
that he has continued to criticize it.
And then for you pair with that reality
the fact that he's now willing to talk about
the fact that he thinks that
Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in prison
and now add into that that Donald Trump
had a multi-decade relationship with Epstein
and now add into that that it seems quite clear to me
that Tucker Carlson believes that Donald Trump
is compromised by the Israelis
and if you just put all of those things together
well, he'll never say it.
I don't think he'll ever say it, he might,
but I don't think he's ever gonna say it.
But I think, this is my opinion,
that Tucker Carlson believes that Donald Trump
is compromised through the Epstein network.
They say the most dangerous time for a woman to leave,
the most dangerous time for an abused woman
is when she tries to leave, right?
Like that's when he might kill you
and that's kind of how I feel
about the government right now.
I think that's first of all so well put
and also so true because it can't actually last
that much longer because the disparity
in power is too great.
Now Dave was talking about himself,
us, he's talking about our danger
living under a government that's kind of on its last legs
under an empire which is on its last legs.
I personally see Trump in the same position
that we all are in.
And personally I think there's two possibilities.
I think either genuinely Trump has lost his mind
and he genuinely cannot actually realize what the truth is
or how badly he's devastating his legacy
or how badly this war is going
or how badly he's impacting the global economy
or how badly the Epstein coverup hurt his image,
the entire White House's image.
Maybe he's just so out to lunch at this point
that he can't recognize it.
The alternative hypothesis that I hold
and one that I think is slightly more probable
is that Donald Trump after Butler, Pennsylvania
knows for a fact who took that shot
and he knows for a fact who has his number
and he is just trying to keep him and his family alive.
And honestly at the end of the day
you don't need to go into any sort of hypothesis
along with me.
I think it's fair to assume that if either
of those options are true or false
it doesn't change the fact
that Donald Trump betrayed his base
and he has done so egregiously
and that ultimately he needs to be removed from office
because ultimately whatever your reasoning
or whatever you believe the justification is
for his actions, for his betrayal
is really secondary to the actions themselves
and what have the actions done to benefit us.
And the answer is not at all.
It hasn't benefited us at all.
It has hurt us terribly.
I just looked at the gas station yesterday.
It was $5.60 for gas for premium.
Now granted I live in Miami
and I'm sure it's cheaper elsewhere
but my God, I mean that's $2 per gallon up
just in the past 45 days.
Now I'm very fortunate in that I work from home
and I don't drive very often
so it doesn't really impact me
but my God for people who have daily commute
for those that are in the trekking industry,
I mean for businesses all over the country
and all over the world for that matter
this is a headwind to the global economy
that is far bigger than your opinion
as to whether or not Donald Trump has lost his mind
or whether or not Donald Trump
is compromised by a foreign government.
It doesn't matter.
What he's doing is damaging us.
He needs to go.
And it's not just serious political analysts
that are picking up on this betrayal
and this insanity, it's also comedians.
When you don't know, you don't know.
Right.
It's like the war in Iran right now.
We do know.
We don't know what we don't know.
We don't know why we're in.
We don't know why we're going.
I can give you some hints.
Yeah, I know but we're not a political show.
Yeah, we don't want to talk about it.
We're the same things, Iran.
I don't know why we're doing it.
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na.
Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, hey.
Okay.
That's subliminal enough.
So we don't know why.
We don't know why.
Yeah, we do.
We don't know why.
Yeah, we do.
Yeah, yeah, actually we do know why.
And like I said, it doesn't matter
if he's been coerced in that position
or if it's sincere or maybe he was not from the jump.
None of that matters.
What matters is his actions.
What matters are the consequences of his decisions
and his decisions have been catastrophic for us
as a people.
And that's why I've been so relentlessly antagonistic
towards people like Dan Bongino and Kash Patel
or Pam Bondi is that it doesn't matter
why you're betraying us.
I don't care at the end of the day.
If your life's being threatened,
if you're caught with compromise, blackmail
or you're just a traitor from jump.
Folks, is it difficult conversation for me
because I really believed in this guy?
I did.
I supported him for a while.
Even when, you know, him and President Trump
but it has been good on some issues.
But I'm gonna tell you something.
I have never been as disappointed
in a human being in politics as I am in Tom Massie.
For a second there, I thought Dan Bongino
was talking about himself.
No, he's talking about Thomas Massie.
I have never been more disappointed
in someone in politics than Thomas Massie.
Wow.
Or, I don't know, let me put on our thinking caps here
and think this one through.
Or could it be that Thomas Massie
highlighted the fact that the J5 Pipe Bomber
that you framed was not actually the perpetrator
where you covered up for a CIA asset,
was a Capitol Police officer
and is now a CIA employee?
Or could it be that Thomas Massie pushed through a law
that forced the Epstein disclosure
which proved that you had lied through your teeth
for an entire year about the nature
and the size of those files?
I'm gonna say it's probably the fact
that he just highlighted your depravity.
That's my guess.
Just guessing here.
I don't think that he actually disappointed you so much
that you've now hosted his primary challenger,
which by the way is funded by a bunch
of Zionist billionaire donors.
Same people that helped Trump get into power.
I don't think Massie's unwillingness
to go along with whatever Trump dictates
is actually the reason that you oppose him,
but rather the reason that you oppose him
is because he won't go along
with the coverup that you participated in
on both J5 and the entire Epstein operation.
And I'm not gonna say this is a smoking gun,
but ladies and gentlemen, we got it.
There was a post yesterday,
a showdown between Dan Bongino and Thomas Massie
that is one for the ages.
And in it, Thomas Massie lays out
much of those things I already described to you,
but he also identified that the phone calls
that Dan Bongino said that he had with Thomas Massie
and how it was ultimately Thomas Massie's fault
because he didn't pick up the phone.
Well, Dan Bongino shared screenshots of those phone calls,
and you won't believe what time zone those screenshots
say he was making those phone calls in
because Thomas Massie did the same thing.
He screenshotted those calls on his end,
on the American end, and he posted those screenshots.
And then he juxtaposed them
to Dan Bongino's screenshots,
which said that those calls were happening seven hours later.
And then a bunch of internet sleuths
started to think to themselves,
well, what time zone would be seven hours further to the east
than Thomas Massie's time zone?
And it just happened to be Israeli time.
So there's a couple of possibilities there.
Maybe, maybe it's benign, it's just a glitch.
Maybe Dan Bongino was on a plane and he had Wi-Fi
and that ultimately changed the time zone
when he screenshotted those texts,
but then he was just flying back to the good old US of A
to be a red, white, and blue Truton patriotic American.
Or there's two other slightly more nefarious possibilities
that as the deputy director of the FBI,
he has assets within Israel screenshotting
that have access to his communications
and are screenshotting his communications
and feeding him talking points
on how to attack Thomas Massie.
That's a disturbing possibility.
And the most disturbing possibility,
and maybe the most likely, I don't know,
is that he just works for him.
I don't know, maybe that's why.
You gotta make sure your phone is on the same time zone
as your boss's, right?
Dan, look, I don't know what to make of any of it,
to be honest, but wow.
I mean, these are historic moments
we're living through, that's a fact.
Oh, and by the way, the former Capitol Police officer
who was being investigated, this is true,
being investigated by the FBI
when it came to the J-5 pipe bombing incident,
she was put on a polygraph,
and according to the defense of the guy
that they're claiming planted those pipe bombs,
she failed when she was asked explicitly,
did you plant these bombs yourself?
And she failed a polygraph,
which by the way, according to Kyle Serafin,
you're immediately not in contention
or removed from power if you're in the CIA,
if you fail a polygraph.
So, I don't know, it's interesting
that after failing a polygraph,
she was immediately hired by the CIA.
Interesting, isn't that interesting?
So in conclusion, I don't really care
if you think I'm crazy,
I have shown you all of my work
for years how I've come to these conclusions,
and I believe that Crooks,
while he may have been the gunman, I don't know,
I think that there was an underlying motive
for that attack on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania,
and I believe that he has demonstrated
he is not the same person.
And every day since then,
he has not been the same guy as he was prior to that.
And I believe that every single cover-up
when it came to the Epstein operation
just added more fuel to that conspiracy theory fire,
and then BB and Netanyahu coming over here
spending seven trips, seven fucking trips in a year
to convince us to go to a war
that they had wanted for 30 years,
and you got the Secretary of State
and Department of War guy,
and everybody else is saying,
Trump too saying, yeah,
we had to fight this war in defense of Israel,
a war that Israel started,
but we had to fight it to defend them.
The war they started, oh, so we're just,
we're just their attack dog.
Okay, and then Joe Kent comes out and he says,
yeah, we're fighting it for Israel.
And then, and you got people like JD Vance
or Donald Trump himself saying that we're looking for
peace negotiations that we're looking to leave
in a couple of weeks and just over and over and over again,
the Israelis blow up the people
that you're trying to negotiate with
and you don't say shit about it.
You don't seem to be bothered about it at all.
And then, you know, at some point
you just kind of have to conclude
this guy ain't really fucking running shit.
And that's my opinion.
So you can get mad, you can yell at me,
you can leave a comment down below
and say how stupid I am.
That's fine, but I'm pretty confident
after years of analyzing this very deeply,
that yeah, we're being played,
that we've lost our sovereignty.
And I'm not going to bite my tongue about it
and I'm not gonna Dan Bongino myself over it
and I'm not gonna Pam Bondi myself over it.
I'm gonna tell you the truth.
By the way, Pam Bondi got fired today.
But if it makes you, before you breathe a sigh of relief,
did she get fired for covering up the Epstein operation?
Did she get fired for not imprisoning Anthony Fauci?
Did she get fired for not imprisoning
or prosecuting anyone in the deep state?
Or the FBI that tried to frame Trump
or the operation to frame the J-5 or the J-6ers?
No, no, Pam Bondi got fired
because she leaked investigatory details
about Eric Swalwell who had an affair
with a Chinese spy, allegedly.
So, yeah.
Oh, and before you get any hope off of that,
you should also remember that this is the guy
who is now replacing her, at least temporarily, Todd Blanche.
Just to clarify, or is the public going to learn
the identities of the men who abused the girls
with the information that you're releasing?
And if not, why not?
And then I have a quick follow up.
I mean, you just baked in an assumption
into your question that I have never said
and I don't know to be true.
Is the public going to learn about men
that abuse these girls?
Like, what does that mean?
I don't understand what that means.
So that's your new AG,
the guy who doesn't even understand the question.
Are we gonna be learned about who abused these women?
He's like, abuse women?
Where the fuck you been, Todd?
Been kind of the biggest story
of the past couple of years.
Anyways, yeah, we are a compromised nation
and a compromised people and we are ruled over
by fake politicians with fake influencers
which lie through their teeth to you every fucking day.
They cash checks as they propagandize you
to support things that devastate not just you
but your children.
These people are reprehensible
on a scale that I really can't put into words.
I'll try.
They're the worst people on the planet.
They are basement dwelling,
low rent versions of Rachel Maddow
or Sean Hannity or any of these other
water carrying hack fucking bastards
who have lied you into wars
and lied you into domestic strife and economic ruin.
These people on social media get paid pennies
to propagandize millions into supporting things
that devastate you and them.
They are reprehensible.
And that's the one thing I would like to see
Dave Smith and Tucker Carlson talk about
a little bit more in depth
because they touched on it today
when it came to the lack of curiosity
when it comes to Butler, Pennsylvania or anything, right?
All these big stories that we've been talking about
but they didn't really dive deep on it.
They didn't really just hammer out how and why
these people are doing what they're doing.
What is the mechanism for it?
I've done episodes on it
so you guys already know Project Esther.
These are things that are real.
These are not just conspiracy theory nonsense.
This is actually fucking happening.
Before I get out of here
I got to take one shot at my good friend Dave Smith.
It drives me absolutely nuts.
Dave comes on this show with me and Ian Carroll.
We're on here for two hours
and we're trying to talk to him about Charlie Cork.
We're trying to talk to him about Butler.
All these wild out there zany things
that everybody obviously thinks is something's up.
Something's rotten in Denmark, right?
And we're trying to have like really serious conversations.
These are things that I've, as you guys know
I've researched a lot.
Like I actually know what I'm talking about on these issues.
And Dave is just like, nah, he's just poo poo
and I slept it right.
But he gets on there with Tucker Carlson
or he goes on there with Rogan.
It's just like, man, I think there's a real reason
to be asking these questions.
And it's like, well, then what the fuck Dave?
So I guess me and Ian Carroll aren't all that crazy.
Now are we?
Oh man, I love you Dave, but I don't like it.
I don't like it.
I don't like how you play both sides of the fence.
You go, you know, these dudes, these dudes are wild
but then you get on with Tucker
and Tucker's like, yeah, I think
Epstein got whacked in prison
and I think Butler was not what we're being told it was.
And I think that the reason that we're fighting in Iran
is because Israel and he's like,
he lists all the things out that I agree with.
And it's just like, now you agree with it.
Look, I'm not on Tucker's level.
So I guess I'll accept that you don't take me as seriously
as you take Tucker Carlson, but I'm your homeboy.
So get it together Dave.
All right, no sponsors today
because I love you so, so freaking much.
But if you want to support my work,
I would really mean a lot to me.
You could start by hyping this video.
If you are watching on YouTube right now,
I don't know what it does,
but apparently it helps with virality.
The last episode did like 60,000 views.
So the more you guys hype it,
I think the better it is for the algo.
So I would really appreciate that.
And if you don't want to do that,
and by the way, I think you get three, three a week.
So if you can just save those up,
I only do two episodes a week.
So if you can save two of those up
and hype every episode I put out, that would help a lot.
And if you want to support my work
in a more financial avenue,
you can either pick up a Fafo,
America first and fucking only shirt.
Link are down in the description,
Aaron Water Designs,
or you can subscribe to me on X at Liberty Lockpot.
I'll follow you back or libertylockdown.locals.com.
I appreciate you guys so much.
Oh, what a crazy world we're living in, huh?
We'll survive.
But make sure that you pray for the gaze of Hormuz.
Isn't it a little bit homophobic
that we're so focused on the straights of Hormuz
and not the gaze of Hormuz?
I agree.
Yes, for sure.
Why do you think they're willing to leave
the gaze of Hormuz behind?
I think it's just history.
Historically, like, you know,
gays have always been very discriminated against,
which is wrong on so many levels.
Even in war.
Yeah, even in war.
It just takes more reform in government, obviously,
and then also educating society.
Just feel like if we're going to go in there,
we can't leave the gay people behind.
I don't think we should go in there at all,
but if we're going to the gaze of Hormuz,
we could turn it into Fire Island.
For sure.
Subscribe to Liberty Lockdown.
Great podcast.
Clint is tight.