because I'm running for the presidency.
I'm here because I'm personally tired
of seeing this great country of ours being ripped off.
But as far as Trump is concerned,
our allies are only part of the problem.
The real culprit is Iran.
Why couldn't we go in and take over some of their oil,
which is along the sea?
How would you do that?
Would you send in the Marines?
Would you take a chance in a war?
Let them have Iran.
You take their oil.
That's what I do.
Well, how?
How?
I mean, do we want a war?
What do we mean we take their oil?
You go in.
How do we go in?
You're going to have a war by being weak.
OK, how do we go in?
What do we do?
Excuse me.
You're going to have a war.
And it's going to start in the Middle East.
What if the Soviet Union said you do this to Iran?
We're going to come in.
I don't believe they'd do it.
The next time Iran attacks this country,
go in and grab one of their big oil installations.
And I mean, grab it and keep it and get back your losses
because this country has lost plenty because of Iran.
It starts with a simple question and ends
in objective reality, reality, reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the Daily Wrap-Up.
Monday, March 30th, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
I'm sure you've all seen that clip going around.
What you may not know is that that was posted by Trump,
which was today after it was posted yesterday
by somebody who called him out.
I find the timing very interesting of that.
With no comment posted on true social,
the exact clip you just saw.
So I don't think that that cut was somehow us editing
that video.
But I think it's not a certain way.
It's exactly what they posted.
Very interesting, isn't it?
We'll touch on that to start today.
But the main thing that we're going to talk about today
is something that I thought needed its focus.
A study that was shared with me that is,
or rather an article discussing research that shared about
a field of research that I'm very concerned about.
It makes me uncomfortable.
Like the direction it's going in,
especially with the way the world is today
and the seemingly increasing inability
of the average person to see even the most basic
of things our government involved in today.
And that has to do with what's called longevity research
or life extension research.
Now, this is something that's gotten very prominent,
but in the same way, almost more quiet as that's happening.
And I don't mean quiet in the sense
that it's not being pointed to.
It's in corporate media, but it's just not being discussed.
It's not being, it's not being true.
And I think there's a very clear effort
to make sure that's the way this goes.
So you get the controlled people in the media,
the people in the, and I mean controlled this
in the sense of sort of influenced or controlled,
but mainstream alternative government
and ultimately just never really engage with this
in an earnest way.
And this point is really to cut to the chase
of the article about putting, about basically
growing human bodies, one for the use of organs
for rich people who like Ryan and I
of every dystopian movie we could talk about.
And then even at the point of creating full human bodies
without brains for the potential of that same purpose,
but then maybe even being able to put your brain
into a new body.
Now this is stuff that's in the, this is ongoing research.
And even just saying it out loud,
I guarantee there's somebody who's hearing this going,
that's just crazy conspiracy there.
Not only is the research real,
not only is the direction very, very highly funded
and with very, very influential
and adamant people about this topic, very real
and it is happening.
The research has gone in a way,
I don't wanna say dark,
but it's gone to a location where there's really no oversight
at least in the category that I'm going to discuss today.
My concern is not just the whole category
of that work worries me about what is going toward
who's involved with it
and what it almost always leads to
when anything like that one developed.
But the focal point specifically
of how that problem overlaps
the overlap between that problem
and what I see as a very clear engineered transition
and the, I guess overlap between the people involved
in that transition
and what they want for the world
and what they're driving
and the wars that they're currently conducting
and overlap with them
and this alarming research
and what they may see that used for.
And I just really worries me where this all goes.
Now I'm trying to make it as sort of,
which general as possible
just to keep important not to be flavored by other things.
I mean, you know what I've talked about
when it comes to the idea of the network state agenda
about Prospera in particular
and I think it's a concerning reality.
Not to say that there's probably people
that are doing things there
that you might find important
that maybe they have the best of intentions for.
It's about the larger over the umbrella
of influence over all of it
and what I think it's in my opinion
doing and plans to do to the world
in a governance sense
as well as a lot of, you know
very weird scientific experimentation
that's being publicly discussed
in certain ways that is happening.
Many circles one is very public
and this gets into the realm
of the genetic manipulation
as well as the kind of stuff
we've talked about in the past
that overlaps with the gain a function category
and it's interesting that the group
that can be the primary group anyway
that can be so adamant about
why that is a problem
is predominantly involved with the group
that now seems to be leaning into that aggressively
from a private perspective
which is way, way worse
ultimately in my opinion
but a lot to get to in this conversation today
and I think we're going to start
with some updates that I just wanted you to see
I waffled on whether I was going to include them
but I do think it's important
with what's going on in the world
for you to see the quick updates
on what's going on with some points
I wanted you to see about Iran
hopefully do that very quickly
and then we'll get right into the main point today
which is about that overlapping connection
and you know where I see this going
and where that dovetails with 5G, 6G
what that may also add to
and you know these are things
whether or not you
I mean I actually don't even want to say believe
because it's fundamentally obvious
you can see that these things are being worked on
but whether or not you are concerned about them or not
it's important to understand from a very core level of this
that these things are inherently
in many ways inherently dangerous
take 5G for example
this is very clearly
I mean as far as I can tell
basically not even truly studied
from a government perspective
about the dangers that we all know are there
I'll cite Derek's excellent research on that
toward the end
and how we know that
and I mean know that
sort of like fluoride and the rest
not the crazy game we play
where we can all know the evidence
and yet we still have to battle
with these ridiculous partisan
or government people
that just yell that we don't know
or you're taking the wrong size narrative
or you're on the left
or the right or it's wrong
even though it's all there
we can see it
fluoride is bad for you
our own government
is basically telling us that today
but the current administration doesn't care
quite for say it's killing you
COVID-19 show
I mean go down the list
we know these things
and I don't see that lightly
my point is that we know that these
technologies where they started
for military technology
are hurting people
and if it's undeniable
and we just been shoved
right into the 6G level
with Donald Trump
we need to see that these things
have their own inherent danger
that on top of that
what that will lead to
so
two quick things
before we go back to the clip
from Donald Trump
just because I find that
interesting to talk about
I noticed this from yesterday very quickly
for those that have tuned in
this as always
even with a platform like this
that we know very well
has censored aggressively
throughout the years
and still does
could just be a glitch
right but
I found it interesting
yesterday with the vocal point
which I'll point to this show
at the end today
as it relates to the connection
about the title
Trump releases White House app
with dangerous spyware
and Israel spyware quiet
spyware is quiet come back under Trump
now this would this was
if you have not watched this show
this is incredible
absolutely unreal
what they're doing
and again maybe they don't even know
what's happening
maybe somebody did this through them
and Trump's administration
is not even aware that they basically
I should even say basically
released an app that is spyware
and then what I did is
I went through and showed you the
I mean undeniable overlap
of Israeli spyware companies
like Paragon Solutions
NSO Group, Pegasus
kind of the same conversation
and overlap with US
spyware and technology
two of them, AEI
and Red Lattice
are groups that are
US Virginia based company
that blended together
with the NSO Group elements
or rather excuse me
Paragon Solutions specifically
and now it operates out of Israel
still but it's considered a US company
and this is my point though
is that you could argue
that these things are the same
either way
what this app was
was incredibly alarming
and invasive
and is spying on you
every second is using
your phone to access
your storage
things that will blow your mind
that they're not even
addressing as far as I can tell
the point was
I did this show
and as of right now
YouTube is acting
like I haven't even gone live
even though it was live
I double checked with multiple people
it was streaming on there
as you can see it just says
waiting for this platform
to start streaming
so I guess they just removed it
I guess
or it was a glitch
the only reason I don't think
it was a glitch
because interestingly enough
and I want to be clear
it did stream on both
these platforms
and everywhere else
because and I can prove that
right now
is that it's also like
that on Bitshoot
which I find frustrating
it's the same thing
acting as if I didn't go live
and I did now
I guess it's possible a glitch
from you stream
or to stream to all of them
simultaneously
and it went to everyone else
and these two
because it did stream
but didn't show up
makes you wonder what's going on
could just be a multi
multi-platform glitch
for the two
only these two
out of all the rest
that worked
I don't even think
that makes sense technologically
but
what I think is frustrating
is it's happening
on this topic in particular
but just consider
one of the point out to you
as always
I will note by the way
that I still will
I will always support
Bitshoot for the most part
as long as they uphold
their mission of no censorship
and I believe
and support the people
who built this platform
however have a very
negative opinion right now
of the person
at the very top
the person I was recently
doing a podcast with
who kicked me off the show
because he didn't agree
with the opinions
that I was stating
a platform that's supposed
to be no censorship
and I got the same sentiments
from people that work
around him
that's what he was doing
even hinting
at deleting comments
by the way
came directly from
one of the people
they worked with
all that to be aside
the point was
worries me that this may be
what drives something
like this
and I haven't commented
on that by the way
it's something that's not
as important
but I was doing that show
and ultimately
made some comments
about how Zionism
is involved
what's going on
how technocracy
or the idea of
these kind of deep
state elements
rather just
unelected power structures
very clearly
are part of the conversation
and didn't like that
apparently
and I brought it up
again on the show
and then he's decided
to kick me off
to the frustration
of everybody else
still have very
very
serious respect for
Bruce
and Dennis by the way
for those who know the show
we're talking about
anyway the point was though
that these are
suddenly not being there
not played
I think it's worth noting
and I wonder whether
we're getting more into
the old style of censorship
while we're dealing with
the algorithmic manipulation
now to start back
with the clip
this isn't probably not
the first person
that shared it
but
it is
somebody who shared it
on March 29
4 million views
2.4 million views
excuse me
probably the first person
seeing as how much engagement
it got
but this is somebody
whiplash 374
looks like
146,000 followers
says
that's it
I give up
Donald Trump is a time
traveler
well that's weird way
to frame it
as a positive thing
seeing as how
all you really
have to note
is this has always been
his opinion
and the truth is
he's been lying to you
about that
up until now
and now he's going back
to doing what he always
wanted to do
that's not
don't need to be
a time traveler
to work that little
Gordy and not out
the reality is clearly
he has always been
the person
it's also another point
to make the start
like I keep saying
Trump did not change
guys this narrative
about
I don't even recognize
him anymore
are people who either
never really saw
what he was
or just don't admit
that they were fooled
because the truth is
and we were calling
it out then
in the last administration
yes there's examples
of things that have
gotten crazier
or that I also think
that Trump is sort of
being cornered right now
whether it's a combination
of him realizing
he is in a way
being played by outside
forces doesn't make him
the good guy
or not innocent
but he's realizing
that to some degree
my point is
I feel like
he's cornered right now
his propaganda
is catching up with him
and so that's what
you're seeing
I think
he started
I see him sort of
like a toddler
having a tantrum
right now
and lashing out
and everything around him
that's not
because I hate Trump
and I'm like
they're both
Trump, Biden
left, right
all ridiculous
the point is that
you have to acknowledge
that who he is right now
and what he's doing
as you can clearly see
is who he's always been
guys
and also it's funny
that Barbara Walters
can't be like
you mean a very
very public and obvious
war crime
which is what you're
describing
even then
you can't acknowledge
just seizing the oil
is not what
that's illegal guys
that Geneva
convention
it's always been illegal
same thing it is now
my point is that
they posted this on the 29th
and then Trump
just posts it with no comment
the next day
that's not something
that you should praise
that's a
weak move
to act like somehow
you own
you're posting it
like it's your thing
now
the commentary becomes
Trump posted this
not that somebody else
posted it
and he tried to post it
to sort of hide the fact
that that was going around
I don't think
you want you to see this
but that's what you do
you own it
you scream the word loudly
that you
you said something wrong
that people hated you for
so you scream it loud
17 more times
that's what Trump does
every time
who he is
I think that's a sign of weakness
either way
that's what he always thought
guys
that's the real point
and I think that's very clear
today and guess what
he even doubled down
on this very sentiment
just yesterday
with financial times
Donald Trump says
US could take the oil
in Iran
it's just the perfect timing
and realize
here's what's funny
about this
this is why that clip came out
because he said this
yesterday
he posted that clip
on his own social
today
so it says Donald Trump
and so
I guess you could argue
if he wanted to point that out
he would have right
until after the fact
Donald Trump has said
he wants to take the oil
in Iran
and could seize the export hub
of Karg Island
at the end
as the US
sends thousands of troops
to the Middle East
US president told
the Financial Times
an interview on Sunday
that his preference
would be to take the oil
like you understand
like I'm not saying
you have to care
about international law
but at least acknowledge
that in other conversations
and make sure you're consistent
with your logic
and don't gas
when you claim Iran
violates international law
right
the point though is that
if you do and you believe
that it should
in some way
guide
or at least influence
directions of governments
around the world
when seizing the oil
with no real justification
outside of
you know
there are legal pathways
in this case
in a legal war
started with no justification
or even after warfare
the reality is
you're not supposed to
just seize the resources
of another country
because you can
now at today
what a what a
Hegseth and
all the rest tell you
we're powerful and we can
well that's
you can agree with that again
but then don't
gripe when you see
another country
doing that to you
which is what happens
they're not allowed to just
take us and bomb us
and do that
well you set the table
if you're going to act
like you can do this
well they can do it right back
now it says
and I'm not advocating
for that
I find that to be
insanely stupid
but that's what
you know
making sure we're consistent
with our logic
but he says
my preference would be
to take the oil
comparing it to a move
to Venezuela
yeah thank you Donald Trump
for highlighting
that you were also breaking
the law with Venezuela
which anybody who's not
a child will already
acknowledge because that's
what they've been doing
their entire lives
where the US intends
to control the oil industry
indefinitely
I mean he just said
that out loud
so that's in the
interest of
Venezuelans
like my point
like I've been saying
over the last couple
weeks they're not even
trying anymore
they're not even
trying they yell
democracy and then
just put someone in place
and just go forward
is Delcey
was she elected by
come on guys
they put the person
there that was
amenable to their interest
and even said
if she doesn't line up
with the way we like
we'll pick somebody else
and yet they call
that democracy
and I'm not joking
they literally say
democracy we're
we're saving the
Venezuelan people
while stealing their
resources and controlling
their government
it's insulting
to our intelligence
same thing
where the US intends
to control it indefinitely
following its capture
he's saying that's
what I want to do in Iran
yes thank you for admitting
the crimes on the record
but it's not like the
international community
is going to do anything
about it
Trump said quote
to be honest with you
my favorite thing
is to take the oil in Iran
but some stupid people
back in the USA
why are you doing that
but they're stupid people
he's got this
like same mantra
he does with every
time he
okay
they're stupid people
that say
burning the flag
is you know
it's unconstitutional
to make that illegal
well it is
it's been uphold
upheld
countless times by the
Supreme Court
but he said
people to say that
they're stupid people
well no
they're actually correct
people
and they're not stupid
if they're correct
you're either lying
or incorrect
but you call them stupid
because you don't want
that to be the case
okay
he said
we need to shut down
the internet
with Bill Gates
and a lot of
they're doing bad
things on the internet
remember that 2016
and he said
there are people
will say
oh free speech
those are stupid people
or
something like that
stupid was one term
and
so are they stupid
no they're correct
because that would be
a free speech issue
but he said it
because he's either
lying or doesn't know
he's wrong
and he keeps doing it
so in this case
they're stupid people
for saying
that you can't just
illegally take the oil
you understand
there's
in my opinion
they're not saying
don't take it
they're saying
don't do it like that
at least give you
some kind of
illegal framework
such a move
would involve
seizing Karg Island
though
which most of Iran's
oil is exported
and it's this game
they've been playing
where that's sort of
been floated but not
and I can't tell
whether it's a head fake
but it seems likely
maybe we take Karg Island
he says
maybe we don't
oh you're so crafty
Trump
we have a lot of options
it would also
mean we had
to be there
in Karg Island
for a while
he says
asked about the
state of Iranian
defense in Karg Island
he said
I don't think
they have any defenses
we could take it very easily
well
no you really couldn't
you could probably take it
and then they would
non-stop
rain down missiles on you
like Robert
clearly outlined
and then you would
call them terrorists
I guess
but you'd be seizing
their territory
and I even
I would argue
this is probably
even likely
it's gonna happen
but that means
he doesn't care
about the
interest of Americans
or any other thing
other than his
I guess inch
or doing what
Israel says he should do
I'm not even sure
how he frames that
and same with everything else
as now he's floating
potential attacks
on desalination plans
which are crimes
we'll talk about that next
and like
Robert already outlined for you
it's
it's very clear
Iran has built themselves
into a position
where even if they
attack one of their
main locations
it barely
barely affects
the long-term
feasibility of what they're doing
or
continuity
however
in reverse
most of the places
where Iran can bomb
can take out one location
and basically destroy
their ability to have fresh water
at least in a couple of main locations
and he did a great job
breaking that down
but here he is
telling you we're gonna
at least
he's at least floating the idea
he could be
trying to trick them
he says quote
we've got about 3,000 targets left
we bombed 13,000 targets
and another couple of thousand to go
totally in the midst of negotiations
clearly
he said ideal could be
made fairly quickly
I mean the game
that anyone is pretending
like
saying you better hurry up
make a deal
we're gonna bomb you
is in any way negotiations
no that's
that's at the barrel of a gun
so let's just even say
they go fine fine
we make a deal
well you did it at the barrel of a gun
so it's not technically
any kind of illegal deal
under any standard in the world
and it says
and again so he's saying
13,000 targets
well who else told you this
Israel told you that
last week they said
we've got four weeks
more of bombing planned out
not to say it's gonna
end in four weeks
so and they said
we're gonna keep going
so clearly
whether Trump says
one thing or the next day
he seems to constantly
no matter what he says
be on the track of whatever
Israel's doing
so we can yell
we're gonna do a peace deal
tomorrow tankers this day
10 over there
but then we come back
finally look back
and then oh well
exactly the same time
frame Israel said
the same bombing targets
Israel pointed to
so either he doesn't know
that he's on their track
or he's just pretending
like he's in charge
while he's literally
Maggie Steele
and we're all in the
Simpsons
last week he said
that Iran had permitted
10 Pakistan flag
wheel tankers
straight up for moves
let's not forget
by all means
all accounts
GPS and otherwise
literally didn't happen
and yet we can't have
an honest conversation
about how we obviously
lied about that
or he was misled
or somebody simply
told Trump
that they were going to
and then he just
off the cuff said
it happened already
because that's what he's
known for
I shouldn't even say
known for
that's just the kind
of stupidity that he
does or
I guess is known for
but it continues
and the number of tankers
had not been doubled
had
last week he said
they permitted 10
the number of tankers
had now been double
to 20 he told him
that's not actually true
now maybe he misquoted
that to them
what he originally said
and what leave it
followed up with today
which appears to be
nothing involving them
is that they did
20 more
so it's funny
it becomes
total of 20
when what he said
was 8
that became 10
that 8 plus 2
for whatever dumb reason
he keeps saying that
and then later said
they sent 20
not added 10
to the total
I mean this is
so ridiculous
the fact that we even have to
like wade through this
and try to make sense of it
is anybody
anywhere of the mind
that this is an honest
conversation
now it could turn out
down the line
that he's been working
with somebody
but we know
provably he's been lying
about most of this
it says they gave us 10
he said
now we're giving 20
and the 20 have already
started
they're going right
up the middle
straight
no they're not
man they're absolutely
not
now the 20
we're going to get to
he pointed to
are a deal that
Iran actually made
or rather just a conversation
with Pakistan
to do
I think it was 2 a day
up to 20
so you can literally
prove what he's talking
about is something
that they're dealing with
in regard to just letting
ships through
like I've been telling you
it's not closed
take note of everybody
who's been telling you
that it has been heavily
restricted by them
and the US
and Israel screaming
to the world
that it's been closed
which has caused
its own restrictions
but it has not
been closed
they've been letting
people through
as I've been showing you
since the beginning
many people just were afraid
to try it
that's because of the
US and Israel threatening
that they would do that
for them apparently
even though they did not say
other than bombing
the US and Israel
and enemies
and so in this case
they're going up
the middle of the straight
he says
well that's not true
because what they were
talking about was some
over the process of days
so he just either
lied about that
or he didn't even know
what was going on
somebody relayed information
to him and he just
vomited it out
thinking he knew
what was going on
Trump added that
Mohammed Bagheer
Galaboff
Iran's parliamentary speaker
and one of the country's
top board time leaders
had authorized the additional
tankers
yeah that's the same guy
that's literally saying
yeah there's nothing happening
there's no negotiations
Trump's making this up
he's trying to fool you
he's been tweeting about it
now could he be lying
of course
my thought originally
was maybe they are
making a deal
and this guy's going
stop saying it
Trump you're going to
get me killed
I actually think
it's more likely today
he's trying to get him
killed
and he's not actually
working with him
I think what we're dealing with
just a guess
but the way it's starting
to feel to me
is that they're literally
because remember
the Israeli
times of Israel
said on the record
that this is the guy
Trump was speaking to
Israel said that
before that
we only had insinuation
from people online
this was the guy
well now
Trump added
that Galaboff
is the one
who authorized the tankers
okay so now
is that because
Trump heard that
from his people
or is that because
Israel told him that
now it started to look
more and more like
Trump is being played
by everyone around him
and I don't think
he's even capable
of truly engaging with that
think about that
for a second
what that would mean for him
and on top of that
the point would be though
that this or
I guess you can add
that the idea is
to get this person killed
somebody who clearly
seems to be influential
and is important
in the conversation
and they think
they can just go
we made a deal
with him
and Ron's going to
go kill him
because they guess
that's who they think
that people are
no they're not like you guys
that's the truth
they may be just as bad
like all governments can be
but they have continually
demonstrated that
they don't do the kind
of things that you do
reflexively
violence and belligerence
with no justification
look for yourselves
don't listen to what
the State Department says
take a look
my point is
they could have tried
hoping they would
get that done
and it didn't work
sounds like a
half-thought-out
Trump plan to me
then it says
he's the one
who authorized the ships
to me
Trump says to me
every other account
shows you that he didn't
even speak to them
it says remember
I said
they're giving me a present
and everyone said
what's the president
BS
when they heard about that
they kept their mouth shut
negotiations are going
very well
he is just doubling down
on this nonsense
the son is either
dead or extremely bad shape
he keeps saying this
is that the same guy
you told us was dead
now he's kind of dead
maybe or just in bad shape
or is he hiding somewhere
30 seconds ago
he told us he was
irrelevant and he was
speaking with somebody
entirely different
then the next day
you presented that same group
him as the leader
with a 15-point plan
that he denied
how many times can we not
I mean he should be
laughed at
in front of people in these
rooms but yet you get these
bootlicking following
you know how
you know what
how are you feeling getting
Mr. Trump
what kind of shirt are you
going to wear tomorrow
like the dumbest kind of
things that's
actually a little bit over
the top
they get some
they get questions that
are engaged
but it's just like
nonsensical
like you could clearly
ask questions that
would
I mean
would completely dismantle
what he's doing
they don't
because they'll never be
welcome back into those rooms
access journalism for you
yeah I was making sure
that was the end
yeah so continuing
so remember this is the guy
on the 23rd
who said no negotiations
have been held
it's fake news
used to manipulate the markets
that's exactly what happened
literally the same five-day
period that we predicted
is exactly what happened
not we meet everybody
not I
that wasn't even me
I was reporting on somebody else
I think it was James Lee
who made that point
but as the independent media
just people on Twitter
were like what do you bet
it's going to come down to that
and sure enough
well here he is today
the United States of America
is in a serious discussion
with a new
and more reasonable
regime
oh okay
but it's still a regime though
it's still an evil terrorist regime
but they're just a little bit
less terrorist regime
okay got it
the regime is supposed to be
a derogatory thing
maybe he doesn't know that
either way
now we've gone from
we're dealing with a
random guy
that Trump is now
literally telling us
is Golubov apparently
that's the guy
who's giving you the tankers
this is all come
this is from yesterday
on financial times
yesterday
he gave me 20 tankers
apparently
okay he denies that
then for whatever reason
after the first 10
he makes an offer
for a 15 point plan
that the administration
he just told you
we're all dead
just denied
okay
and then he said
they better get serious
or we're all gonna go to war
you just said you were about
to make a deal
but now you're threatening them
I mean it's just
it's impossibly embarrassing
and then
after that
he comes back and says
now I'm dealing with a new
regime
a new or reasonable
responsible
okay
is this a third person
is it the same government
is he making it all up
is he talking to Israel
on different phones
who knows
but this is just sad
no look
it may very well turn out
that this is something that
you know
he turns out to be the master dealmaker
and
you know egg on our face
or how are you gonna look at it
sure possible
there's no
there's literally no reason
to think that's the case
the evidence everywhere you look
counters what he's doing
so it wouldn't have been smart
to assume
based on what he says
even though he lies all the time
even if it turns out to be correct
it's always the press
the stance is always
to stand the facts in front of you
even if it turns out
to go the other direction
after more
I was at it
so right now
there's nothing to indicate any of this
in every part
other than his team
has denied this
and it says
great progress has been made
but if for any reason
a deal is not shortly reached
it will
which it probably will be
which no one's agreeing with
by the way
and if the straight is not
immediately open for business
which it is other than for you guys
we will conclude our lovely
stay in Iran
by blowing up
and completely obliterating
all of the electric
generating plants
oil wells
and car garland
and possibly all diesel
and Asian plants
Jesus
good God
which we have purposely
not yet touched
yeah cause those would be
crimes Donald Trump
like everything else
you're doing
so I guess it doesn't matter
for him right
but think about this
we're doing so great
and he talks in front of people
oh we're making a deal
they're just
they're giving me everything
I asked for
they just love me
they said here
take more oil Trump
because we love you
we agree with you
and then 30 seconds later
you damn well better do it
we're going to blow up
everything
that's true before that
see I don't
I feel like I'm wasting breath
even going through that
does anybody not see that
I mean seriously
it's a real question
because I can't believe
we can't recognize this
from one second to another
and if we do
then I should just stop
talking about it
but I feel like there are some
that seem to get
lost in this
just in case you missed it though
those are crimes
no way around it
this will be in retribution
he says for our many soldiers
oh because
so your soldiers died
in your legal war
so you respond
by illegally bombing
civilian locations
sounds like a US war to me
and others
that Iran has butchered
and killed over
the 47 year of rain
47 year
rain of terror
that's stupidity
do you realize
I mean this is like
like Caitlyn Johnston
laughed about funny how
we never even heard
of this 47 year war
until March 6
or whatever the day it was
technically 4th February 28
is what it was
the point though
is that you all of a sudden
it's a 47 year war
forever nonstop
that we never heard about
it's just obviously
not true guys
I mean it's embarrassing
and it says thank you
for your attention to this matter
okay
so this is a no tweet
from Galaboff
which says heads up
pre-market so-called news
or truth is just
often a setup for
market profit taking
basically it's a reverse
indicator
do the opposite
if they pump it short
if they dump it go along
don't always do that
see something tomorrow
you know the drill
suppress news
as Trump is predictable
he did exactly
as Galaboff said
he did
so here we are again
threatening war crimes
but apparently it's all going well
if you listen to him on that show
over there
well as the typical
red light holy crap morons
come out and say
whatever Trump said
which is that Trump just revealed
that Iran is sending
20 more oil boats through
well that's not what he said
by the way
what he said was
I watched them go through
which would have been yesterday
which I guess this is
technically 20 hours ago
but that didn't happen
you could check for yourself
that literally didn't happen
as a sign of respect
oh so as a sign of respect
they sent you 20
boats full of oil
millions and millions of dollars
but yet they're not making a deal
you have to threaten them
with war crimes
and from what I can tell
and I'll just read it next
directly from the Pakistani government
this has nothing to do with Trump
next level gaslighting
here's the clip from them
he's speaking with
the White House
or it's on Air Force One I believe
and I just wrote that
this is sad
because Pakistani officials
which you could look for yourself
have publicly confirmed
that Iran agreed
before this
to allow 20 Pakistani flag vessels
roughly two per day
see that's quite different
than watching eight run through the middle
or 20 go right through the middle
when Trump just happens to mention it
through the straight
as a confidence building measure
tied to regional talks
hosted in Pakistan
not as anything directed
at the United States
or involved with the United States
or having anything to do
with Trump's claims
so they all said
I mean how much more
can we laugh about that
I mean at what point
do you just stand back
and go he's just blatantly
lying or somebody's lying to him
and what point does he realize that
if he's being lied to
I mean so again
we can talk about the reality of this
and how what you know
the truth that the truth has always been
wherever that was
of course right there
is from and look this
I really want to stress this again
I've said it many times
from the very beginning of this
what did I tell you
because you know you could look
and you have eyes
whether tankers are not
because the tankers are the main point
and if you want to make it
only about tankers
well based on their reaction
to what the U.S. and Israel said
was the reality
pretty much everybody paused
but the point was it was open
and I showed you that the date
was going on
and Iran was very clear
it said as I just showed you
Hormuz is only closed for Zionists
or the reality being close to
close to enemies
that's what he said
and then you want there
just recently Spain was going
through with oil
and the point was in the beginning
that's what they were saying
now look is it possible
they were lying about that
sure but I'm not seeing them
bomb any tankers
the only tankers we saw bomb
were the U.S. and Israel
right in the beginning
why would they have done that
clearly Trump pretended
he didn't want it to happen
this way
and then they made sure
the oil crisis became an issue
because they needed that choke point
they needed this to be an issue
so they could try to drive
the world against Iran
that's what I believe
that's why I believe
they thought they would break
the straight down immediately
and they did not
they didn't take the bait
so they pretended they did
and they said there was mines
there were not mines
did we remember that lie
that went by real quickly
didn't it
and now they are just going
now they're letting people through
that's important
I'm of the mind
that they're genuinely going
anybody can go through here
who is not fighting us
at war right now
just like the Houthis
we do the same exact thing
with Israel
now look at some point
you have to look at the consistency
whatever the rhetoric is
and then recognize
they're not what
the people claim they are
so here's what he said
in his press briefing
he may be alive
but he's obviously very seriously
in trouble
so that's really low
so I won't talk after this
but what he said basically
is he may be
he may be
maybe not dead
but he's in serious trouble
the leader right
so it's just one day after day
because it's a little bit more
more always in trouble
like I'm a school mom
you're in trouble now
I mean really
the point is that he hasn't
there's been no indication
anything he ever said was happening
they just acted like
the point was always
selling you on this idea
that Iran was 30 seconds away
from collapse
they're all hiding in their tunnels
with their phones
and their woods with their fires
like Jesse Waters told you
and then yeah
here we are
where they're increasing their bombings
and Trump seems to be desperately
seeking a way out
but keep listening to those guys
who told you the start was shut
and still pretend
like it was shut closed
all the way the entire time
he may be alive
but he's obviously very seriously
in trouble
he's seriously wounded
you had offered that
15 point plan to Iran
that they ever come back with a response
what did they say?
they gave us most of the points
oh they gave you most of the points
did they?
you mean aside from
literally none of them
you can go through that
and laugh at that guys
I went through at the last show
they didn't
I mean see here's what I really think
is part of this
what he's trying to lead to
but Iran is just
not allowing it to take place
you see in the past
Iran has been very passive
in the narrative side of it
where Trump can come up
and be like we here win
and we did it
like the so-called 12 day war
they really didn't push back that much
in the regard to lie
he spun about what
because I think they wanted this to stop
that was why I think
they sort of made an agreement
we'll bomb you bomb
we back away
and Trump said we win
and really if you look at the damage
it was clear that I think Iran
came out on top
in regard to what they did with Israel
you can look for yourself
look back
same thing we're seeing right now
and so I think part of this
is him expecting
that he can just yell I won
like always and think
they're not going to push back
but they're not letting it happen
so in this case
you know they gave us 15-point plan
they gave us most of it
most of the first two
two of the main three
revolved around
not having nuclear weapons
so my point is
I think he was going to say
we did it
they agreed
like he already said
not to have a nuclear weapon
knowing that they never
actually planned to
knowing the evidence showed
they didn't have one now
and acting like
that we did that
that seems very Trump
if you understand
how he's always operated
to take the
like to use the lie
he knew was a lie
to go to war for Israel
and then try to wrap it up
by claiming that he made them
not do the thing
they never did in the first place
and all the life that was killed
just for that
my opinion
being point plan to Iran
did they ever come back
with a response
they gave us most of the points
why wouldn't they
maybe because you're murdering
their families
you make it sound like
they've made some concessions
can you identify those
they're agreeing with us
on the plan
I mean we asked for 15 things
okay so again
now the other side of the possibility
they're agreeing with you on the plans
so again he could just be lying
but with that kind of a statement
doesn't make you wonder
whether he really is talking to somebody
I get that sense half the time
and if that's the case
then he's being played guys
somebody's on the phone
acting like whether it's
I mean look as again
guys Kushner
and Jared Kushner
and Whitcoff
are the people who are
relaying this to Trump
he's not in that room
he's admitted that
so and these are people who have been publicly called
essentially Israeli assets
that's a quote
from the diplomats in the room
when they're dealing with Iran
I mean diplomats in regard to
like there's Foreign Minister from Oman
there's people from multiple points
the conversation
and they did they did it
they didn't want to say who they were
it was two diplomats
involved the conversation
the point though
is that you can clearly see that reality
and then you can see that Israel's
doing the same to Trump
from the very beginning
driving this into reality
Trump admitting that they did this
they had to rush
because Trump was going to stop
come on you have to think about this possibility
and then he
and now even if he
maybe even senses that could be happening
what's he going to do
you turn around and blow up his own agenda
he would go to jail
I mean right now he could go to prison
for the illegal war
if he turns around
and pushes back against
what the Israel side is doing
just thoughts
for the last part
we're going to be asking
for a couple of other things
and just to prove that they're serious
they gave us all these books
when I talked about four days ago
a present I said they gave me a present
but I didn't think I was
at liberty to say what it was
what it was was eight plus two
it's ten massive
boatloads of oil
which by the way
according to everybody
with the GPS
I mean it didn't happen
they said they're right
when he said that
there's nothing happening
there was no eight boats
that went through today
didn't happen
I mean you can look for yourself
I reported it the day it happened
so are we just going to know
that that's a lie
or are we going to
question whether or not
he's being lied to as well
they gave us another present
they gave us twenty boatloads of oil
that sucks
right so even right there
so why would you then frame it
on five times the day before
as ten more make it twenty total
he just clearly said twenty more
right
it's kind of like when he talks about
the ships and we're saying from Iran
how the number seems to change
every single day
and the first three days
we took down forty five
and the first three days
we took down sixty ships
the first three days
we took down twenty all their ships
the clip's going around
watch for yourself
tomorrow we're having very good meetings
both directly and indirectly
and I think we're getting
a lot of very important points
sure sure
and he's been saying that for two weeks now
and Iran says that's not true
and keeps bombing locations
and by the way
regardless of what Trump says
when they were supposed to right now
be pausing infrastructure
as I showed you yesterday
they were bombing infrastructure
both the US and Israel
largely Israel
and specifically nuclear infrastructure
and so Trump lied
or is not in control
I mean there's really no other way
to look at that
oil US oil tankers flying pack flags
Iranian embassy rejects Trump's claims
so you know it's all public
I really don't see how
there's any other possibility here
he's either just so concerned
with how embarrassing this is for him
that he'll just lie
like himself into the ground
or he is of the mind
this is really going this way
and he's being played by somebody
those are the two most obvious possibilities to me
I mean unless there's some major part of information
we're not seeing
in my mind it has to be one of those two things
or I guess or you could say on top
that he is speaking to somebody
but there's been a thousand reasons
why like little points within this
that show you that he there's
like there's something that doesn't add up
but that very well could mean something other
than he's being lied to
but include that to be objective
now here's what tankertrakers.com
put vessels meaning all categories
which is important by the way
but as far as tankers are concerned
it says it is still around to a day
well sorry this is just
Bessent is saying
seeing more and more ships go through Hormuz
and this says vessels according to them
means all categories
but as far as tankers are concerned
it is still around to a day
and half of those are carrying
Iranian oil and refined products
now this is from the tankertrakers
now what I'm showing you is Bessent
which I'll show you clip next
is saying we're seeing more ships go through
but that doesn't appear to be the reality
and I'm not saying it's because Iran is stopping them
as I keep showing you
I think my opinion is that they're
only hindering people who are fighting them
so one
why are they first pretending
like it's been shut down
we addressed that two
why would he suddenly be saying more
is now going through even though it appears to be
the same it's been the entire time
where they could
but because of the threats
and what either the people are
hesitant
well I think that's obvious
because Trump said they're happening
so the narrative becomes well more going through
but they weren't and it's never really been
closed in the first place
we're living in this like shadow game
of just complete nonsense right now
it's wag the dog stuff
or we wouldn't even call it wag the dog
they're just whole cloth making up stories
that's what I think we're dealing with
all the man to kind of beef up
whatever Trump happened to
off the cuff say that day
right he just randomly says something
and all the rest of the shuffle around to make sure
his story looks like it's actually happening
I mean it's probably more complicated than that
but I just think it's interesting how clear
we're being lied to
and again
Iran has been clear up until right now
that they're only stopping enemies
here's a percent just said
coming right over the top
after everything we just heard
we're making deals and we're talking
and this is what percent comes out and says
deals with the Iranian regime
for the time being
but over time
the US is going to retake
control of the straits
and there will be freedom of navigation
whether it is
retake
implying they ever had strategic control
over the street of Formos
they did not
now I've never argued that Iran
should even legally have soul control
since there's other land masses that sort of
are in that situation
but
the only reason this has always been an issue
and the only reason they've always talked about
what they might do should this come to pass
is because everybody knew
in a strategic sense Iran controls the strait
as they're demonstrating right now
right it's not about whether they should or not
it's just what the reality was
and so this idea that they would regain control
that's never been the case
at least not living memory with what we're dealing with
so it's a funny way to frame that
you need to think about it's not
these are not just accidents in language
these are deliberate
dishonesty in my opinion
the US is going to retake control of the straits
and there will be freedom of navigation
again there is now for people that are not
illegally bombing foreign countries
it is through US escorts
or a multinational escort
which nobody agreed to
and it seems that still nobody wants to
despite how they tried to claim
that was happening right
remember first he said that
and nobody agreed to it
which was kind of embarrassing
then he came back around and said
we got all these nations
and you got this kind of weird push
from the typical red light holy crap guys
where they were like oh my god
all the democrats were embarrassed
because 75 countries signed on
for Trump's initiative
not that I can tell
you got a lot of people to sign on
for sort of a general sentiment
conversation
as far as I can tell
that was a misrepresentation
of countries that were involved
with the ongoing conversation towards Iran
but did not in any way sign on
to escort military or military
excuse me militarily export
I can't talk
militarily escorts
ships through the Strait of Hormuz
which is a very different thing
you understand
because that is something
that would be very
one they'd be seen as cobalt
adherents for the US government
and they would be legal targets
going with what's going on
and they would also then be
restricted to the Strait
that's why they all pretty much said no
but don't forget how the fake
mainstream alternative media
patriot MAGA movement wanted you to believe
it was all coming down
because Trump said it that day
so you also are you concerned
at all about the Houthis
getting involved
they shelled Israel
the real name is the
on Sirala movement
remember that
with two rockets
you worried about the Red Sea
not as much
the Houthis have been
very quiet so far
yeah right because you guys
technically have a ceasefire
right now with them
which they're not going to tell
you because they don't care
about any ceasefire agreement
they do though
and the Houthis have
maintained that
and what they just said is
we're now going to enter
this war
on the side of Iran
and if you bomb us
you're breaking the ceasefire
we're not going to bomb you
we're only going to be focused on Israel
I guarantee they'll bomb them
when they want to
now and recognize though
that he is worried
because they got utterly destroyed
in the sense of strategy
in regard to
what they did in the Red Sea
they didn't kill anybody
they didn't sing any ships
they only bombed in a
in a
hindrance capacity
didn't take any ships
didn't kill anybody
didn't steal anything
but effectively stopped them
from bringing things to
to a large degree to Israel
and
they called them pirates
even though you have
our government
the US government bombing
and you know without any
investigation
without rather any
you know process
they can claim they investigate
I frankly don't even believe that
but just murdering boats
and ships and things
all over the world
but these people
who were helping the people
being genocide
and who were stopping the people
who were supposed to be
arrested in the world
didn't kill anybody
didn't steal anything
and didn't take a ship
but they're the pirates
got it
meanwhile here's Saudi Arabia
who's illegally occupying
their territory
working with the foreign government
to steal things from Yemen
starving the entire population
and bombing them periodically
but yeah
you tell me again
while the Yonsaral movement
are the terrorists
and pirates
while they're supported
by the majority of people in Yemen
it's like every other story guys
this is who we deal with
now
in regard to the
conversation
I'll include the two shows
that we you know
the recent ones
Trump's claims of an Iranian defector
on the 25th
belied the 24th really
but the fifth conversation
belied
by new US proposals
for current Iranian leadership
that's when he said
here's my 15 point plan
and I said
well that doesn't make any sense
and here we are
and now the follow up
was the simply
Trump's
faux negotiation
here again
is what he said
serious discussions
with a new more reasonable regime
to end the military operations
oh wait this the one
yeah we read this a second ago
and the point was
a new more reasonable regime
and then he posted again
on the White House account
the United States of America
is in a serious discussion
with a new
and more reasonable regime
okay so how do you take that
what are you going to do
with a more reasonable regime
did the Iranian people
have an election
okay so then you're just
hand picking individuals
that you want to be in power
yes yes as always
you called it a regime
now why would we think that
say what happened to the guy
you were just talking to
what happened to the deal
you just gave them
what if they accepted that
on top of all of it
the new more reasonable regime
that you want to put in power
why why wouldn't we consider
that that's literally the Shah
or the MEK
which by the way
the very provable thing
is the reality is that
the Iranians
they despise both those groups
I guess we'll find out
or he's lying about all of it
or somebody's lying to him
here's what leave it out to say today
Ron the president has said
that the administration
is talking to
a new and more reasonable regime
how confident are you that
they are legitimate
and have enough grip on power
Marco Rubio said earlier that
he's not sure
and it's not clear
whether they will be in power
so are you also talking to
other factions
as the president is trying
to make a deal
how do you ensure that
you're making a deal
with the people who can
accidentally implement it
well that's part of the
ongoing process that's
taking place
and the ongoing negotiations
of course anything that
they say to us privately
will be tested
and we will ensure that
they are being held accountable
to their word
and if they are not
the president has laid out
the military consequences
that the Iranian regime will see
if they don't hold true
to the words that we are
hearing privately behind the scenes
when the president says more
okay so here's an interesting thought
hypothetically
should he be being played
by Iran
or excuse me by Israel
but he's of the mind
he's talking to Iran
and they go we promise
all of this
and she said well if they don't
follow through then we'll bomb them
how easy would that be
for Israel to simply manufacture
Trump's bombing of Iran
to drive what they want
out of the situation
don't forget
their own media
yesterday and today
are publicly saying
that if this goes to ground troops
which it already is by the way
that Israel will not be doing that
like we all told you
ongoing process that's taking place
and the ongoing negotiations
of course
I said that the administration
is talking to a new
and more reasonable regime
how confident are you
that they are legitimate
and have enough grip on power
Marco Rubio said earlier
that he's not sure
and it's not clear
whether they will be in power
so that again
that's what I wanted to play again
right there is this
think about that
the idea that we're not clear
if they're in power
so what does it even mean
why would you even negotiate
with somebody who again
you understand
Whitcoff they're in the maroon
with the Iranian government
the ones they keep pretending
like they're dead
we don't know what they are
they're not even in power
except we sit down with them
every day and have negotiations
they're lying to you guys
a thousand ways
they can prove for yourself
if you're not completely stupid
are you also talking to
other factions
as a president is trying
to make a deal
how do you ensure
that you're making a deal
with the people
who can actually implement it
yeah who can actually
follow through with that
why because well
they'll militarily force in
whatever they decide
is in the interest of them
otherwise known as
what they pretend is
for the Iranian people
what they for them
for what they want
we will force in militarily
what we want in this situation
and call that democracy
welcome to US foreign policy
well that's part of the
ongoing process
that's taking place
and the ongoing negotiations
of course anything that
they say to us privately
will be tested
and we will
ensure that
they are being held
accountable to their word
and if they are not
the president has laid out
the military consequences
that the Iranian regime
will see
if they don't hold true
to the words
that we are hearing privately
behind the scenes
when the president says
more reasonable
again these folks are
appearing more reasonable
behind the scenes
privately in these
conversations
then perhaps some of
the previous leaders
who are now no longer
on planet
so your response
when she asks
what that means
is to simply repeat
that it's more reasonable
very well done leave it
because I don't think
they even know what
they're talking about
right now
I don't even think
she has any frame of
reference on the group
that they're even
referring to
right so the question
what do you mean
more reasonable
what's with the group
it has laid out the
military consequences
that the Iranian regime
will see
if they don't hold true
to the words
that we are hearing privately
it says more reasonable
again these folks
are appearing more reasonable
behind the scenes
privately in these
conversations
then perhaps
some of the previous
leaders who are
more reasonable
they'll give up
everything they want
for you
right who cares
with the Iranian people
take whatever you want
just let us rule
yes more reasonable
now no longer
on planet earth
because they lied
to the united states
they
they strung us along
in negotiations
and that was unacceptable
to the
oh wait a minute now
so what are you talking
about the only people
that we know of
that have been killed
are the people
that were in the middle
of negotiations
while you bombed them
let's not pretend
let's not let her
muddy the waters here
guys this is important
12 day war
they literally
murdered them
in the midst of
negotiations
they did that again
with Kamini
they did it again
like this is their tactic
they did it in Lebanon
they did it with Salimani
so realize
that was all before this
since then
we've had this weird
game of
I'm dealing with Iranians
that doesn't seem to be
happening then we have
the weird defector point
with the new guy
maybe Gelaboff
talk with him
then next day
back to Iran's government
now a third group
that's more reasonable
apparently we're
talking to them
but so what are you
saying that
you're saying
you murdered people
for not
for lying to you
and not
and stringing along
negotiations
well where would that have
possibly taken place
did you murder people
that we're not aware of
or are you trying to pretend
that when you
illegally murdered
the group of Iranian
negotiators
who were not military
targets
while they were
literally about to
agree to everything
you asked for
and Israel murdered them
that was you
bombing them
because they
lied to you
and strung you along
maybe because
Israel lied to you
about what was
actually happening
seeing as how we can
literally prove
from the foreign
monastery of Oman
that what they agreed
to was to give up
everything
one
what they already
were doing
no nuclear weapon
but they were really to give
up there in rich
uranium even for civilian
programs
they finally agreed
that never before
and that night
Israel bombed them
you can't miss
how this goes
president
which is why
many of the
previous longer
on planet earth
because they lied
to the united states
and they
strung us along
in negotiations
and that was
unacceptable to the president
also point out
that apparently in
Trump's mind
it's legal to just
murder somebody
because they said something
that you thought
wasn't true
I mean let's just
make that clear
at this point
we're not talking about
a legal war
there's no declaration
of war
there's no imminent threat
so what you're saying
you could just
literally murder
people anywhere
because they
lied to you
I guess so
I'm actually baffled
they even say
these things out loud
anymore
I don't get it
where is their
international community
these people should be
in prison guys
I mean
so should Biden
so should the rest of them
but this is insane
how blatantly obvious this is
which is why
many of the previous
leaders were killed
so again this is another
historic opportunity
for Iran to do the right
thing
to rid themselves
of their nuclear
ambitions
to rid themselves
of their nuclear ambitions
you mean what
they already agreed
to give up
before you started
this illegal war
you just can't make
these people are desperate
and they're dishonest
I mean I'm of the mind
that even leave it
knows they're making this up
just by the way
that they're returning
this information
and to come to a deal
with this president
in the administration
or again
they will see the
grave consequences
of the United States Armed Forces
which they are
so we'll murder you
we'll militarily act
if you don't
give us what we want
that's called negotiation
in Trump's mind
continuing to see
everyday throughout
this operation
wow
so
here's Trump
a new more reasonable
regime
right well here's Rubio
contradicting that
to a degree
today we have to see
how these people
end up being the ones
in charge
seeing if they're the ones
that have the power to deliver
we're going to test it
we are hopeful that
that's the case
there are clearly people
they are talking to us
in ways
that previous
people in charge
in Iran
have not spoken to us
in the past
now what I think
is hilarious about this
the same thing
they do with
Delcey Rodriguez
what did he say
and always note
the little inconsistencies
between the way
he frames it
and Trump frames it
they said
well we're going to see
if Delcey does
what she says she'll do
if she doesn't
we'll get rid of her
they mean
they're not even hiding it
that was basically
maybe one word difference
paraphrasing exactly
what Trump was saying
and Rubio
so we're being told
you know
people save Iranians
and democracy
and then
we're going to give her
a chance to see
if she does
what we want
basically without
that's exactly
what he said
and that if they
don't give us our interest
that we will get somebody
else in place
and even insinuated
they could just take her out
kill her
that's what they said
and he's doing the same thing
right now
well we're talking to them
and we'll see if they can
give us what we want
and if they don't give us
well we could take action
these are terrorists
just
well it's not men's words
this is what terrorism
looks like
the things they're
willing to do
some of the things
they're saying
they're willing to do
obviously they have to
go do it
we're going to test
that proposition
very strongly
because we always prefer
to settle things
through negotiation
and diplomacy
but we also
have to be prepared
for the fact that
that effort might fail
that we are dealing with
a 47 year old regime
that still has a lot of people
involved in it
who aren't necessarily
big fans of diplomacy
right right right
okay we get it
so Trump tells you
it's all good
it's more reasonable
great regime
we're going to make a deal
like he's told you
the last three days
with different people
and he comes in
and says
we're dealing with
an old regime
and it's got a lot of
unreasonable people
perfect
so here is
what he says about the strait
the world should take note
of Iran's threats
to set up a system
in the strait
I commented on this
the Iranians are threatening
that they're going to set up
some permanent system
in the Straits of Hormuz
where they get to decide
who goes through international
waterways
that will never be allowed
to happen
by the way
the rest of the world
should take note of that
they have more at stake there
than we do
we get very little of our energy
in this country
coming through the Straits of Hormuz
the rest of the world
gets a lot more
oh well then I guess
thank you for admitting fully
that you're doing this
for Israel entirely
seeing as how
you would have an interest
and why are you involved
for Israel clearly
thanks for clearing that up
but
the point
oh did I
oh how did I forget that
there was
maybe it was over here
nope
shoot
it's not necessarily important
there was a meme
that somebody shared
but some of the point
I want to make here
as Daniel says
guess when Iran wasn't talking
about such a system
before you launched
a sneak attack against them
idiots
right so
first point
as everything else they're doing
is well they're now doing
something
that justifies our action
but
they're only doing that thing
because you started this
illegal war
so you
attack them illegally
they do a thing
and then you go
that's the thing
that's the reason
we're at war with them
that's how this is working
now
like for example
similarly people are saying
well we're at war
to keep the straight open
yes
now this is different
this is about the toll
but the straight wasn't closed
before you did this
and it's not closed now
it's restricted to you guys
but
what did I say
this was on the 25th
now the point is
not to forget guys
that
oh I say it right in this tweet
comment really
I said watch as the usual suspects
frame this
the toll
the conversation
I saw either unprecedented
like he's trying to do
or an act of terrorism
which he's also doing
in some conversations
even though it seems to be
common practice
just about everywhere else
in the world
looking for yourself
straights
canals
Panama
Suez
they all charge
now
you may argue
well in some cases
those are
unique to one location
well most of them are not
by the way
they just have agreements
well what about
like for example
in like the
you know the area
like the waterways
between Mexico
and the United States
you know the
the
what does he call
what did he change it to
I don't even know
the point
is
you know as well as I
or Cuba for example
didn't Donald Trump
just restrict
Russia from sending oil to Cuba
but you're going to tell me
it's not okay for Iran
you see it's a double standard
my point is always
is we know
as we've all acknowledged
which is why this is happening
that Iran has had strategic control
over the straight
this entire time
they're demonstrating that now
so my point is
why every other straight
in the world seems to be
okay
they're charged like a million
dollars for some of these gigantic ships
Iran has never done that
as far as I could tell
now yet the bad guy right
and I'm not even making it good bad
but the point is for them to frame them
as the evil one
and yet they're the ones that
haven't been extorting people
it just kills me
so my point again
is that we now can see them
playing this role as expected
as what you could easily predict
that they just find an opening
and they go oh my god
they're trying to threaten us
with fees
like everywhere else
and as Daniel points out
well they weren't before
you illegally attacked them
idiot
exactly
just crazy
now I'll include this as always
straight up for moves
so you can look for yourself
let me check real quick
and see where the tankers are
I found it interesting
that there were a couple
that were even US tankers
oh look at that
right there
now technically
I'm actually unfamiliar
I think the circle
is like an extension of
so if you remember these
little gray lines
that's the territorial waters
for the UAE right here
or for example on the other side
that would be for Iran
right
and that's why you can argue
that they
that side would be theirs
but they can control it
from the island here
right and bomb
anything comes through
that's the argument
but here we have tankers
these are oil tankers
here's two right there
and this one is
what's the details
let me just make sure
I'm not misrepresent
Marshall Islands
two of them
and weirdly enough
a US tanker
right in there
no more than I can see
but you know and this is going
this is changing all day long
so that's not what we're hearing
I mean anyway the point
simply is that this is
technically open
and it has been from the beginning
and tankers are the main conversation
but if you want to just
look at generally speaking
clearly it's open
so and this is a live map
now
before we get into some
quick partisan points
and just finish with the
however long it takes
with the rest of the point
obviously that took longer
than I wanted
but I still think it was important
to make sure we're updated on that
just to really think about that
you know the lies
that we can see
and I'm not going to say
I know what it means
I don't
like for sure
like I said it could be
that he's being misled
it could be that he's just lying
lying to you
seems to sort of be like
Occam's razor
it seems to be the simplest
explanation
but I feel like there's
parts to it
it's a mixed bag
where maybe he's lying to you
but then maybe he's also
over here being played
by somebody else
maybe his inner circle
maybe it's even like
personal agendas
within his administration
I don't know
and you see it's not
it's not
in our interest to assume
wait for facts
converse
theorize, discuss
for me right now though
I just think it's painful
to watch how these people
are trying to sort of
gaslight you into thinking
one
that they just
are succeeding
by falling back
into the situation
that existed before
they started this
and all that really
got happened
was that the Israel
got what they wanted
to a small degree
or they tried to
out of Iran
and essentially failed
what they are doing
is gaining ground
in Lebanon right now
which nobody wants to
consider as part
of the same conversation
apparently
even though it's always been
part of the greater
Israel agenda
which is what this is
but just question
the stuff
call out the
partisan people
that we're going to point
to now really quickly
because this is all
they're doing right now
now I almost didn't
include this
because I point
to this last couple
of days
and I just had to
because of the last
thing that I saw
but it just
really quickly
just to continue
the same point
if you guys
have been falling
last couple of shows
is we always get this stuff
from partisans
they come out and go
well a lot of different
things you know
a hype story
to get you to go
oh my god
look at that thing
and then never goes
anywhere right
many most
times stories
that I care about
things that I do want
to see accountability
for Obama
Pelosi
I do think
they should be in jail
maybe not for
the same reasons
you may think out there
but I do agree
I think they're
criminals
so what's frustrating
and funny
and alarming
at the same time
is how often
these people come out
and it will play
old videos
or hype this idea
in a general sense
right
but then right now
or in certain circumstances
what I see
is that it just explodes
you know
like when
they're
uncomfortably
being seen
to lie about
an Iran negotiation
or when
the Epstein files
are very uncomfortable
for them
you get these massive pushes
where the typicals
you know
the Glenn Beck's
the Jones
the Nick Sorter's
the
Bajabani Johnson's
they all
I mean
almost identically
share things
that are like
look at that
now Jones
do the whole red light
holy crap thing always
but they're all generally
selling the same sentiments
and I think that's very clear
and it's about trying to
convince you
that one thing is happening
when something else
is going on
so same thing here
and this is the same guy
that seems to be doing this
constantly
and it just is
Tulsi Gabbard
is actively investigating
the Ukraine officials
paying by
yeah good
arrest him
pretty sure it's clear
you can see that there was
corruption going on there
why isn't he in jail though
Eric
if you care so much
and you post this every
30 seconds
don't you then also get
frustrated
that this is
regurgitated information
from a year ago
that we are clearly aware
this has been going on
right
now there's
new stuff coming out about
this
but this story
is not new
and even if it is
why isn't there action
it's not
there is not action going on
there's nothing in this
direction now look
I hope it does
and if it happens tomorrow
I'll be the first to say
oh I was wrong
I'm glad it's happening
but it's not happening
right now
as this person says
you Luins post one of
these official
groundbreaking
news investigations
three times a week
everyone seems to see it
if you look at the
comments
it might
same thing I just said
and watch as nothing
happens as always
and all these teams
who are politics players
won't say a word
but they'll sure as hell
hype the next hollow claim
that Obama
Gates and Pelosi
are going down
with a couple of red lights
well here's even
Annapolo and Aluna
who shares this guy's post
without due diligence
well I guess
really just they all share
the comment
it was Russia collusion
it was dem collusion
or it wasn't Russia
it was dem collusion
and USAID
and now watch
as nothing happens
about it
same old story
so just continue to note
these people are hyping
the story even though
nothing is going on about it
just like they did a week ago
and a week before that
and a year before that
so you can
you can stand back
and go
maybe they care about it
but wouldn't they be angry
that the team
they fight for
is doing nothing
about the people
that they were swore
they were trying to kill
our family
and you know
destroy our party
well here's the same thing
Luna doing the same thing
from the Obama side of it
new evidence from ODNI
confirms what many suspected
she literally wrote
she's in Congress guys
this is her congressional account
and she posted
new evidence
this video is from 2025
check for yourself
2025
we're talking about an old video
that is relaying
what that
because it's based on
the Tulsi Gabbard thing
that came out
last year
where she's like
big bomb she'll report about
how Obama did that
good arrest him then
I'll support that
but they didn't
Trie
Miller and Trump
Trump even called him a traitor
treason was used
there's not
if I were to tell
there's not even legal process
he's going on
nothing's happening
he should be in jail
same thing here
this SCIF
mostly his accounts
are 100,000 followers
so on
I think this one's
300,000
this is our greatest enemies
come from within
in the Russian collusion
your same thing
an old video
about Tulsi Gabbard
and Obama
you'd think you'd be
outraged that
nothing has happened
seeing as how that video
is from 2025
does it not bother you
that the government
you support
pretends to arrest these
criminals then does
absolutely nothing
it should
if your interest
is in accountability
but they just keep
doing it
over and over
and over
here's another one
this one I found
even more interesting
because it makes the
point even more clear
that Trump
is doing it too
so hey
Liz Croken shared it
isn't she part of
the most transparent
administration
Epstein file effort
well March 30th
this person posted
a screenshot
that shows Trump
sharing this
and says traders who
commit treason
belong in prison
oh big tough words
for the big tough
MAGA fake team
well guess what
Trump did post this
back in
July 2025
and they're just
talking about it
among one of the things
he posted was this image
this it says
until this happens
nothing will
change
and it shows Obama
and
what's his name
it was Clinton
and the brothers
blanking on his name
all of a sudden right here
what is it
the creepy pizza gate
related brothers
forget his name all of a
sudden but you know
all the different Democrats
right
none of which are in jail
none
so my point is
if Trump post this
which he did
who knows when
because the point is
they give you a screenshot
then he's playing that
game too
he wants you to think
he's doing it
but here we are
right
it was 2025
from the article
and it's been a year
okay Trump
okay SCIF
why aren't they arrested
don't you guys care
well you get the point
they don't care
if they care
they'd be screaming
about this right now
the ones that care
have already changed
you know have started calling out
the people who don't do
what they're calling for
Podesta thank you
the people that
you know like
like five times August
for example
was supporting the team
until he realized
they were lying to him
because he's not a moron
and he came out and said
you guys are ridiculous
and I'm going to call you out
and he has ever since
because he has principles
guys that's the point
these accounts don't care
Liz Kroken
Eric Hatterty
Benny John
they are go along
get along fair weather manipulators
it's what they do
next show by the way
we're going to make a point
about Alex Jones
suddenly going oh my god
look they fund Al Qaeda
like he's mentioned
in the past
but like it's a bombshell
and or pointing to what
Trump is doing in Iran
and calling it the
New World Order
he is such a fair weather
how embarrassing
he must be
so uncomfortable right now
he literally just told us
to double down with Trump
three days ago
he just told you Trump
was fighting the New World Order
and the globalism
and here he is now going
welcome to the New World Order
these people are spinning out guys
and I hope they find their way
to the truth
if that's even possible for them
like an honest path
oh one last little point
on this
which is just funny to me
if you go back and look
at this coverage
most of many of them
are being honest about the claim
which is 500 different groups
which collectively have
an annual revenue
of $3 billion
which is a very different thing
than saying that the No Kings
protest were funded
for $3 billion right
even though that's how
a lot of people
in the broken
new media reported it
well they put out
a page with
which by the way
I guarantee there's
probably things that aren't
even accurate in that
but it's not the point
the page they're all circulating
showing the finances
which by the way
shows you that they
publicly post this stuff
which means it's not
trying to be hidden
from anybody
but let's make that
but then the dark money
side of the Republicans
effort to steal
stop the steal
that's the one you could trust
no you can't trust
any of them
left or right
but he says Kevin Sorbo
even though he keeps getting
anyway it's just
I did the same thing
in him last time
how many times can he
support this until he
realizes they're not
doing it for him
I guess one more time
he's doing the same thing
go after Obama
showing old videos
I don't know why
he doesn't strike me
as a dishonest person
I just like to think
they can eventually see
through how obvious this is
but he says we now
have a list of
No Kings financiers
any list off the same ones
we showed you yesterday
and he shows you a
shade under $300 million
which if you remember
what we talked about yesterday
and they stopped the steal
was about $300 million
how funny is that
and there was only one
there was plenty of others
as well
so the argument becomes
that it looks like
that was something about
the same
shocking I know
because it happens
on both sides
and both sides do it
and we should concern ourselves with both
as I wrote here
Tom Wren says
if no one goes to jail
why does it matter
now
reading it now
you could argue he's simply saying
like in a general sense
if nobody ever goes to jail anywhere
why are you even
griping about it
I completely agree with that
and I'm glad he's calling that out
because Kevin does that a lot
but
if he was suggesting
somebody should go to jail for that
I thought this was a good point to me
I simply said look Tom
I'm right here
I'm right there with you
about the concerns over manipulation
taking place
via billionaire funding
of protest movements
on both sides
we all should care about that
but
what exactly are we suggesting
is the crime here
that this feels like a trap
to undermine people
fighting government overreach
in a time when it's never been more
necessary by the way
which is alright
all I'm saying
you know I'm concerned
about what they're doing
and how they're manipulating through this
but if there's not
what's the crime here
point to the manipulation
acknowledge it
but if it ends up being
well you're not allowed
to coordinate efforts
against calling out the government
well guess what
that very much works
in the interest of the government
worth considering
okay
took longer than I wanted
on that first part
but I don't know
you guys tell me
I feel like that stuff's important
to keep up on
even over 24 hours
because you missed some
but let's talk about this
this guys
beyond the pale
I mean this is just incredible to me
MIT technology and review
inside the stealthy startup
that pitched brainless human clones
or well sent me this
this was today
came out today
March 30th, 2026
I almost used that picture
actually just weird
creepy looking picture
inside the stealthy startup
that pitched brainless human clones
isn't that crazy
I mean just the idea of this feels
you know like you
you're
I don't even know what you call it
you just your
your instincts are like
that seems crazy
like I just
you know that's something
someone's trying to fool me
but no this
this seems to be really
ongoing
in an interview with Wired
it's R3
the group is R3 bio
is the name of the company
R3 listed three investors
billionaire Tim Draper
the Singapore based fund
immortal dragons
that's one that I'm going to focus on
and life extension
investors long game ventures
there is more to the story
and R3 doesn't want that
story told
MIT technology review
discovered that the stealth startups
founder
John I think it's a
slow and Dorn
also pitched a startling
medically graphic
and ethically charged
vision for what he's called
quote brainless clones
to serve the role of backup
human bodies
now what we're going to go
through here is the connection
to
some very alarming movements
that are driving I think
the reimagining of our society
right now
and the network state
agenda same conversation
but all and the connection
to the political drive
and the current
administration
but just this
overlap I mean we're one of the
weird things that constantly
jumps out at me
is that we're talking
about people that are
largely right now
and I think it's just because
this is always
these billionaires
that are sort of above
nationality above
political sides
I just it'll dump money
and whatever sides
will gain them influence
in the conversation
which is why we saw
Palantir dump on both sides
now they just
you know it's what
happens guys
it's the same game
the point is that
what I keep seeing here
is that right now
again maybe just
because that
but you see a ton
of these
technocratic transhumanist
longevity freaks
in this movement
who are
pretending they're Christian
right and you know
we believe in Christianity
you know and yet
what they're doing here
is inherently anti-religion
I mean this is borderline
becoming like
this is about creating
a circumstance where
you can live forever
where you can
create life or even
we'll get into
whether you want to even
call it life
but technically speaking
we're talking about
living things
that don't have
any brain process
human bodies and otherwise
I'm willing to bet you
without question
that the vast majority
of people who are genuinely
of the Christian perspective
and on the right in this
sense would be outraged
about this conversation
and it would be outraged
to find out that it's
very close to
Arcade Junior
and Donald Trump
the one that are
you know acting
like we're saving you
from all these terrible
things and all of which
is aggressively close
to the larger
conversation for
the global direction
we're talking about
now it says
imagine it like this
a baby version of yourself
with only enough
of a brain structure
to be alive
in case you ever
need a new kidney
or liver
there's
I've heard the name
of the movie
with Scarlett Johansson
I believe
where the movie like that
where the movie
starts with the people
inside of this
kind of weird
oh it's called the island
that's right
where they're inside
of this weird little
place they live
and they're told this
fake story about where
they have to grow up
and they can move
to the island
but the really turns out
well spoiler alert
in case you want to watch it
take a second to pause
ultimately turns out
where they're clones
that are grown for
very wealthy people
that are kind of a kept
on the edge of their
you know
as soon as we get your
number drawn
we'll send you out to
the world
and what their number
is drawn once they
need to kill them
for their organs
because they got
a car accident
or whatever
and it's just
creepy overlapping movie
and guys that's
it's not to say
that every single thing
like that is always the case
or can be but you have to
realize first of all
technologically speaking
scientifically speaking
at least based on
what they're presenting here
that's very possible
already
we'll get into that
there's a spewed on that
but you'll see what I mean
and so the point is
let's just even say
you get to the point
beyond this
where it's very much
possible
just because they
want to tell you
it's not something
we're doing
or because we see
ethical boundaries
the point is
once that line is crossed
maybe they're not
even the ones
making those decisions anymore
maybe they lied to you
or maybe another thousand
possibilities where this
becomes just the norm
and then we're
that's too late
happens with everything we do
and in most cases
I'm arguing they knew
it was going to go here
and they just gaslit you
into supporting in the first place
this is what our government
has done my entire life
with everything we're dealing with
I mean look at what
they happen with the
COVID-19 shots
from left and right
the point is that
I'm guaranteeing you
that the point
the direction
if not already taking place
is the darkest versions
of what you see in this
historically we're
we're absolutely right
in worrying about that
now it says
or alternatively
well I guess my point
to be more clear is that
if we open that
we cross that line
even like for the AI conversation
it shouldn't be about
whether we
which way we do it
we should be having
real conversations
about whether we
even want to cross
these lines
because the point is
from these kind of
billionaires
they drive with their
media manipulation
their forceful opinions
that that's just
what it is
it's inevitable
so we might as well
pick this
because we have to be
China
and you know
there's logic to these arguments
but it seems as if they're
just kind of gas
you know bull rushing over
whether we should be
doing it in the first place
at the very least
we should have that
conversation at the
highest level
and they're not allowing that
same with 5G
and all the rest
these conversations
they just rush it forward
and then once it's there
it's too late now
we have to
like start us solutions
for example
and all the rest
of these things
that's the way
they bull rush this in
so to imagine it like this
baby version of yourself
should you need the organs
or alternatively
he has speculated
you might one day
get your brain
placed into a younger clone
that could be a way
to gain a second life span
which is what these
older billionaires
are desperately seeking
through a still
hypothetical procedure
known as a body transplant
the fuller context
of our three proposals
as well as
activities of another
stealth startup
with related goals
have not previously been reported
they've been kept secret
by a circle of extreme
life extension proponents
who fear that their plans
for immortality
could be derailed
by clickbait headlines
and public backlash
well that's a sure
fire way to make sure
we're very skeptical
is to keep it secret
pretend like we don't understand
right
I mean guys
it's quite obvious
the reason they don't
want to be public
is because they know
that people would be
outraged by this
one because it's alarming
and well beyond control
but two because
most of the people that are
supporting their agendas
right now are connected
to the Christian right
in my opinion
it says and that's because
the idea can sound like
something straight from a creepy
science fiction film
what do you mean sounds like
it's quite literally
exactly the premise
of a scientific
science fiction film
one person who heard
our three bios clone
presentation
and spoke on the condition
of anonymity
was left reeling
by its implications
and shaken by
slow and slow and dawns
slower
how would you say that
properly I'm going to
decide right now and go for
slow and dawns
enthusiastic delivery
the briefing
this person said
was like a close encounter
of the third kind
with dr. strange love
it says and he's talked
and he's talked about
how to grow a clone
since artificial
wombs don't exist yet
so we're told
brainless bodies
can't be grown in a lab
so he said the first batch
of brainless clones
would have to be carried
by women
paid to the job
so one thing I want to
get into early
keeping your mind
because it does go there
in this conversation
is in the overlap
of these kind of
unregulated
network state
CEO run
technocratic health scapes
like prospera
these are the kind of
things they could be
doing right now
and I argue
they are doing right now
whether this exact thing
which I'm going to get into
like I said with many circle
you can look at what
they're doing
look up the name
look at the kind of stuff
they're working on
and with no regulation
there's a thousand ways
this stuff could hurt
the entire planet
I mean we're talking
about genetic manipulation
things that could
potentially I mean
we talked about this
when it came to
like this
the overlap of the
like Monsanto
and the seeds for example
and that's what
they literally made
these things that
could just blow into
your field
and then they patented
your seed
I'm going to get into this
I'll play a good clip at the end
that makes a point from that
but the problem
is you get into this manipulation
that has
even like different point
but the gain of function overlap
like with the COVID-19 time frame
these are things that
have shown
to have cascading effects
that they can't foresee
and they can't control
then the question becomes
is that part of the plan
creating something
that becomes out of control
to be able to use
to you know
this is what a start
a solution point
this is about the idea
of the insect allies
conversation
which is the same
self-spreading point
but from an insect perspective
that's all DARPA technology
we've talked about all of this
for you know
if you haven't heard
and seen any of the stuff
that we talked about in the past
that might sound crazy to you
these are all documented
government programs
just look up insect allies
in fact here
just to make the point
for those that haven't heard
of any of that
I believe this is a
yeah this is a
independent article
military plan
to spread viruses
using insects
could create new class
of biological weapon
scientists warned
and I think we did a
yeah right here
the article on it
scientists accused DARPA
of genetically modifying insects
for bio weapons
spread agricultural viruses
and that's this is
you know this is the
I mean here is
a video that I feel was
you know why not
seeing as how it's
relevant to the larger point
now coming back
we're talking about genetic
side of this
but there is an overlap
to this and how these things
can you know
even if you're talking about
from mother to
to offspring
right
same kind of idea
these things have effects
that go forward
this is the overlap
with the insect allies
that then bled into
becoming the
self-spreading vaccine
conversation
again you've seen this clip
this is from 2020
this was a
2019
and the overlap
and I think it was
this was EU
and it was a
massive symposium
that included the
United States government
they discussed about
this
since the
outbreak of covid 19
the word virus
has been dominating
media headlines
as well as our daily lives
did you know that
one approach that has been
proposed to control
virally transmitted diseases
is by releasing
a virally transmitted
vaccine
unlike traditional
vaccines
infectious vaccines
do not require
any individual consent
infectious solutions
are also being developed
for food
and agriculture
and are currently making
their way through
the regulatory approval
process
however
do we really
want to intentionally
disperse these
modified viruses
outside the lab
is this the forward
march of science
or a mistake
join our live event
at the 2020
Euro Science Open
so it was 2020
but you know
so again that's
self-spreading
that's you know
gain a function level
but there's an overlap
guys and my point is about
what the thinking
of something like that
like you could just
make it a different
conversation about
vaccine technology
that they're in a location
where there's
they've created a situation
where there's no real
accountability
there's no real regulation
they can do
whatever CEO run country
they can decide
what's in their best
interest and that's
probably profit related
and what happens
if that ends up
becoming something that
rolls over to the town
next to them
the state next to them
you know and look
there is a level
of understanding here
that needs to be like
it's not about
you know
it comes down to things
that very well
are dangerous
or like gain a function
that I think world around
we acknowledge
is something that
is almost playing with God
now that's a bad way
to go with it
or playing God
excuse me
a bad direction
to go with it
because you know
it overlaps
the religious perspective
but I do think
it makes sense
we'll understand
that these are things
that I just
I argue we shouldn't
even be involved in
and now going back
to the genetic side of this
you know if there's
a clip we played a lot
I'll play at the end today
that really does go back
to when this first started
when they were starting
to clone things
and patent life
and I think this is
where this is going
and now this is kind of
the meshing of that
into a kind of free-for-all
location and building
out of this direction
to the point to where
now we're talking about
cloning I guess
use like bodies
they can use
for future reference
and at this point
saying back to the point
that women would have
to be paid to carry
these basic clones I guess
you know and so
then at what point
does this overlap
that was a point
with the whole Christian point
so doesn't this
from a Christian
right perspective
doesn't this feel
like a violation
rest of the night
you're making
this woman is giving birth
to something that you
engineer
that you then
hack up for pieces
that you might need
pretty sure that doesn't
align with most values
last Monday
the same day
it announced itself
to the world
in wired
R3 bio sent a sent wire
technology review
sent a
they sent
R3 sent technology review
a sweeping disavowal
of our findings
so they reached out
and basically said
they called them out
for what they were saying
that they double down
because they have
the evidence to prove
what's going on
it said
Sloan Dorn
quote
never made any statement
regarding hypothetical
non-sentient human clones
he literally did
that would be carried
by surrogates
the most overarching
of these challenges
was its insistence
that quote
any allegations of intent
or conspiracy
to create human clones
or humans with brain damage
are categorically false
but
even Sloan Dorn
and his co-founder
Alice Gillman
can't seem to keep away
from the topic
just last September
the pair presented
at abundance
longevity
the longevity
is the word
that tends to kind of
mask this whole
endeavor
remember that
because its longevity
is like life extension
so it says
the pair presented at abundance
longevity
a $70,000
per ticket event
in Boston
organized by the anti-aging
promoter
Peter Diamandis
although the presentation
to
although the presentation
to about 40 people
was not recorded
and was meant to be
confidential
see they would
they were under the mind
and this was not
something people saw
a copy of the agenda
for the event shows
that Sloan
Sloan Dorn
was there to outline
his quote
final bid to defeat aging
in a session
called quote
full body replacement
according to a person
who was there
both animal research
and personal clones
for spare organs
were discussed
during the presentation
Gilman and
Sloan Dorn
were even stood
in front
of an image
of a cloning needle
pressed on whether
this was a talk
about brainless clones
Gilman told us
that while our
three's current
business is replacing
animal models
quote the team
reserved the right
to hold
hypothetical futuristic
discussions
so essentially admitting
that yeah we were
but we didn't want to admit it
when you asked the first time
MIT technology review
found no evidence
that our three has cloned
anyone
or even
animals bigger
than a rodent
what we did find
were documents
additional meeting agendas
and other sources
outlining a technological
a technical roadmap
for what our three
called body replacement
cloning
in a
2023 letter to supporters
so here's what I get
from this which will
get into more in this
article
I believe we're dealing
with a
a pay
like a paid service
for billionaires
where this is not something
that people know what's going on
sort of like when Peter
Teal tried to do his
ambrosia thing
which was pumping
young blood into
billionaires
which I think I even
had that to come up
hold on
yeah here it is
for those that wouldn't
want to believe it
because I know it sounds
crazy
the startup harvesting
the blood of the young
this was Peter Teal
it stopped
but I argue it really
didn't
because there's
a market for this
which is horrifying to think
about but it does exist
because they
and look there is evidence
showing that there's ways
you can scientifically
use this to in some way
better
give yourself longer life
so in this case
I believe we're talking
about as an industry
that is building
and possibly even booming
where you're dealing
with this kind of work
whatever they're able
to do now
but happening
in places where
there is no regulation
like I feel like a lot
of this is being
set up to
to create a circumstance
where they can go over
to Prospera or Praxia
or whatever these
these new locations are
to do all of this stuff
for them
for billionaire elitists
and so what we're talking
about here is the
body replacement cloning
later they sent out
in 2023
the timing is interesting
to me especially
and the idea
of that they
haven't cloned anybody
bigger than eroded
even though they've
had this technology
for a long time
I just don't find
that plausible
it says though
he holds a PhD
Shlullendorn is a biotech
outsider who has
published little
and is best known
for having once
outfitted a do-it-yourself
lab in his Bay Area garage
you know like that one
they closed down
that was owned by
the Israeli guy
kind of half kidding
still his ties
to the experimental fringe
of longevity science
has earned him a network
in Silicon Valley
and allies
at a risk taking
U.S. health
innovation agency
known as
ARPA H
fantastic
so the
manipulate
basically the one
that was started before
that I think it was
Melania Trump
just moved the age around
so they could pretend
like it was their own thing
it was harp before
now it's ARPA H
same thing
and ultimately Whitney
I talked about this as well
so a government program
literally the U.S. government
Trump's administration
who was involved
with this program
which I find pretty hard to believe
because of
you know I would have
let's say
before
but today it seems like
they don't even care
what they're showing
they're just bull rushing forward
in hopes that we're not paying attention
that's insane to me
so he's still
on top of that
the point is this is the guy
who seems to be regarded
in the field
or just in scientific fields
which we used to say
what that means these days
as sort of a
out you know he's
kind of a
what they call a
what's the word they used
fringe
outside
you know the
respected circles
and you know
the point is that
I think we have so
many billionaire elements
that are so
so over focused
on making sure
they can live forever
this is a science field
that they're dumping
so much money into
so this guy's in his garage
literally becomes
this major
ARPA age connected
billionaire funded program
together with his success
at raising money
for his investors
this signals that the
brainless clone concept
should be taken seriously
by a wider community
of scientists, doctors
and ethicists
some of whom
express grave concerns
or at the very least
they're going to try
desperately or otherwise
no matter what
anybody else says
and so U.S. government
involves silicon valley
high level people
all of which ties directly
back to the U.S. government
core today
it sounds crazy in my
opinion said Jose
Cibeli researcher
at Michigan State
University
says he
describing the whole
thing to him
the brainless clone idea
he said how do you
demonstrate safety
right
what is safety
when you're trying
to create an abnormal
human
20 and again
the converse
the question of
morality
of religion
comes into play
for people that
you know
that matters for
25 years ago
Cibeli was among
the first scientists
to try to clone
human embryos
25 years ago
but he was
trying to obtain
matched stem cells
not
make a baby
quote
there is no limit
to human
imagination
and ways to make money
but there
have to be
boundaries
he says
and this is the boundary
of making a human
being who is not
a human being
right
it's a creepy thing
to think about
and I'm one
I'm of the mind
this is happening
feasibility research
since Dolly the sheep
was born
and I've referenced this
many times over the years
in 1996
born
a clone
researchers have
cloned dogs
cats
camels
horses
cattle
ferrets
and other species of mammal
how come we haven't
heard of that
I'm sure it's out there
somewhere
but I'm going to
bet you ask anybody
most people
probably heard of that
sheep they talked about
but when
why did we
and I always say that
and then we heard
no more about it
horses
cattle
ferrets
species
where is all this
is it only one example
are we talking about
herds and cattle
and you know
herds of these things
I don't know
I find the
pretty damn alarming
that this is something
in 1996
they claim they did
claim is fair enough
to say
and that we just
never talked about it
again
not really
in any main conversation
doesn't that in and of itself
almost tell you
something's going on there
should anyway
make you consider that
that's just alarming to me
1996
those grave risks are
why we've never heard
of a human clone
because they go on to say
that there's all these issues
of you know
defects
deformity
still births
and that's why
you know we never heard
of a human clone
I find it interesting
when they frame that
even though it's theoretically
possible to create one
are we really going to tell ourselves
that they have had the ability
but no one's done it
does anybody believe that
with what we know
about the world
I don't
but brainless clones
flip the script
that's because the ultimate aim
is to create
not a healthy person
but an unconscious body
that would probably
need life support
okay
feeding like a feeding tube
to stay alive
because this body
would share the DNA
of a person
being copied
its organs would be
a near perfect
immunological match
okay
well here's
what we overlap with
kind of also showing you
the manipulation
of the political things
they tell you
what are we hearing from people today
well we you know
we're talking about the idea
well actually what's interesting
now another thought to it
you get Elon Musk telling you
we're having a shortage
we need to have
we need more kids
okay
well part of people
a lot of people
have been telling us
that we're overpopulated
I believe that was also
very clear manipulation
you can go back
and look at population bomb
and how many years
they kept moving that out
it's like climate change
same thing
there's levels of truth
to all these things
but there's a manipulation
within both
the point here
is that what you're saying
is we're creating
we could in the future
create clones for this
well wouldn't that create
like a doubling of society
or at least a
a doubling of the people
who could afford it
which would then
require life support
and resources
for people that are
you know
it seems like an
almost guaranteed
infeasible scenario
and it's just because
the body would share
the DNA
perfect match
backers of this broad
concept argued that
a non-sentient body
would be ethically acceptable
to harvest organs from
ethically for
acceptable to who exactly
to whom
yeah I mean
from a religious perspective
it doesn't change anything
just because they're non-sentient
I mean maybe it does
and people can have
their own opinions
but I think
or maybe you look at it
like they're not even human
because it wasn't created by guys
it's a weird
it's a very very unnerving
reality
that I believe we're already in
it says some also believe
that swapping in
fresh young body parts
known as replacement
is the likeliest path to life extension
since so far no drug
can reverse aging
so we're told
in this case
harvesting organs
so what's gonna get into
is a weird overlap to this
about whether these things
would even technically be
non-sentient
in a legal sense
or in a biological sense
and it says
and there's the idea
of a complete body transplant
quote
certainly for the cryonics patients
that sounds like something really promising
it says
prominent Swedish transhumanist
and expert
in the ethics of future technologies
he notes that many people
who opt to be stored in chronic chambers
after death
choose the less expensive option
of head only
so there might be a market
for having an extra cloned body
because there is a market
for real wealthy people
to have their bodies frozen
and there are possibly just their heads
showing you that they all believe
this is something coming
MIT Technology Review
first approached Shlollendorn
two years ago after learning
he had led a confidential
online seminar
called the Body Replacement Many
Conference
and over here
pushing back on whether he's even
talking about this
that makes you sense
that they know there's
something off about this
in which he presented
recent lab progress
towards making replacement bodies
that's a quote
according to a copy of the agenda
in that 2023 session
also included a presentation
of a cloning expert
Young Guy Chung
and there was another expert
another from Jean Hebert
who was then a professor
at the Albert Einstein College
of Medicine
and is now a program manager
at ARPA H
one thing I want you to really see
is this alarming kind of incestuous overlap
between this very field
and our government
and then interestingly
the very technocratic side of it
that applies just to the larger transition
that is just immersed in this current
this current administration
where he oversees
in ARPA H a project to use stem cells
to restore damaged brain tissue
Hebert popularized
popularized excuse me
the so-called replacement solution
to avoiding death in a 2020 book
called Replacing Aging
R3 now appears
on the ARPA H website
on a list of prospective partners
for his program
R3 bio making
what we're talking about
is on the US government ARPA H website
just to really
make it clear
now it's this quote
there are a lot of variations on this
where they're trying to find a socially acceptable form
says George Church
a Harvard University professor
who advises startups in this field
but Church says gestation
gestating an entire body is probably taking things too far
especially since nearly all patients on transplant lists
are waiting for just a single organ
like a heart or a kidney
there's almost no scenario where you need a whole body
worth pointing out by the way
that who we're talking about there is
George Church who is mentioned in
just overlapping connections to funding
and work that Epstein was doing at Harvard
George Church is a pretty prominent person at Harvard
it says even so
replacement technology has found a fervent base
of support
among a group of self-described
hardcore longevity adherence
who follow a philosophy called vitalism
that's actually something I should have saved on the tags
vitalism is a newer one to me
these terms evolved to hide the real point
vitalism
this is life extension
so vitalism is I guess the name for the more
hardcore longevity life extension
are adherence
which holds that society
should redirect resources entirely
from everything we care about
well just I mean that's my I read it as
redirect resources to me says you know redirect them
from what's currently happening
redirect them toward achieving unlimited lifespans
and of course I mean think about this
I've said this this is what anybody
that I've read on this topic
that talks about this from a point of insight
like they're scientists for example
or involved with the kind of projects
or we'll tell you that you know
if this comes to pass
it's going to be very clearly
it's not going to be free for all
everybody can live forever hooray
that's not what's going to happen
or even if it's extension because one
it's going to cause a very clear issue for the government
because that's all they care about
but on top of that the point is that it's going to be wealthy people
it's not going to be something handed out to everybody
so what you'll get is wealthy people
influential people will live a lot longer
than people who are not and then what you get
rules forever like Trump is literally
building his emperor for life new global order
probably because he wants to live forever and guide it
you think I'm joking I'm really
I think these people genuinely
this is connected to his current administration
I mean to a degree
kind of being facetious
that's a thought that just came to my mind
mapping this out but I
that does make sense to me
I think that these people are very much in this mindset
and it says vitalism which holds society
should redirect over three sources
to unlimited lifespans
the growing influence of this movement
achieved through lobbying
investment recruiting and public messaging
we was detailed earlier this year
in MIT technology review
one vitalist group
the longevity biotech fellowship
creepy
they see themselves that many of these groups
I'm not going to speak for the longevity biotech fellowship
but
there is a weird overlap
to like a religious perspective of this
where they see themselves in a lot of ways
becoming gods or becoming the new
like profit class of the technocratic
world this is why
we're talking about this stuff
one day looking back hopefully once we're beyond
this people will see more
clearly why we were so adamant about where
this was going or even before
me look at David Ike or James Corbett
or people that have been telling you what was
going on Katharine Austin Fitz
hopefully it's not looking back from within
this problem going gee we try to tell you
hope not but this is my
problem my point though is that there is this overlap
and if you understand what they're saying
I mean people that are like in the like the
Yavin Curvin Curtis Yavin inner
circle kind of stuff are very much of the
mind that they're like some kind of profit class of this
new age now what where we
get to the end this when we get to a second is
exactly what I'm worried about written by people
involved telling you we're
transitioning society right now
just hoping people can pay attention
hoping that somebody hoping that somebody out
there who can maybe actually get something to
go viral in this broken engineered
algorithmically controlled world
you know get in front of Tucker maybe you'll talk about
him maybe we'll actually see it and solve the problem
but because people like us are not allowed to have
these conversations beyond people that already see them
it doubt that will happen but you know as well as
I that if this conversation right now was on
Fox news it would be everywhere in the
world you know as well as I it would
be ever every nation alternative will talk
about it Tucker would have a show on they'd have
interviews about and maybe you could stop it
or maybe not
sure sure wish this is an organic field
where that could happen anyway right
anyway they reckon that a
proof of concept human clone
lacking a neuro cortex
would cost 40 million dollars to create
a tiny amount
relatively speaking
of course they would say that
40 million dollars being like you know
whatever you know just
that's an idea being
that at least the beginning that's
something that's wildly outpriced anybody other
than wealthy wealthy people
its report cited the existence of
two stealth companies
working on cloning whole
non-sentient bodies
right now
and again this goes back to 2023 if you understand what they're talking about
and it says although it took care
not to name them
why not
if these companies activities became public
quote there will
be a huge backlash
people will hate it
the entrepreneur Chris Borer said
while presenting the roadmap
at a French resort last August
so look okay
isn't there I mean look
how do you even take that
so these inner circle billionaires are
very aware that most people would be outraged
by this but they're quietly secretly doing it
in many cases with your overlapping tax dollars
alongside it public-private partnerships
and all yes
I mean look guys that's my point about what's going on in this
administration there's tons of money
flying out into the hands of Palantir
and Peter Teal these are people who are
guiding this movement
as we taught
was pointing out again in a second
when Jim O'Neill joined RFK
as RFK's right hand man
people like Peter Teal
in this article they addressed it
Mark Andreessen they were super excited because
O'Neill is a transhumanist
he speaks at events about this stuff
this is in here
this is in the core circle of this current
administration
so they took care not to mention this because
you know if people heard about it they'd be outraged
quote there are
a ton of dystopian movies and novels
about this kind of stuff yeah I wonder why
that is why
I don't talk about any of the companies working
on it they're trying to hide from public
attention yeah that sure makes you feel better about it
so not only are they hiding from public attention
they're going in places where they can do this
stuff without regulation because that makes it all
that makes it feel better
you just wouldn't understand
people who know
Schloendorn describe a
dynamo like presence who is a hundred
percent dedicated to the goal of extreme
life extension
extreme life extension
he's also well connected
in an interview
the influential and controversial fundraiser
and prognosticator
who co-founded SCNS
called
Schloendorn one of my protege
and around 2010
Peter Thiel reportedly invested
1.5 million in immune path
a company started by Schloendorn to develop
stem cell treatments though it soon
failed the point is though there's always been
an overlapping connection there with the interest
with the agenda with the ideology
and funding a representative
for Peter Thiel did not respond to request
to confirm the figure
now remember my point is that
it's always been happening but right now
especially today because of how much they know
we're paying attention this stuff has gone
largely dark there's a lot of money flying around
that these days that they're just going
through channels to make sure it's very difficult
to see by 2021
Schloendorn had moved on
founding our three biotechnologies
in 2023
letter to stakeholders signed by
Schloendorn begins by saying quote
that body replacement cloning will require
multi-component genetic engineering
on a scale
that has never been attempted in primates
2023
so you could argue that they
you know my point
they went from there which is what this entire article
was stressing and remember how it started
where they were trying to kind of gaslight
and deny they were even going in this direction
even though you could prove that
and he says what to work
well there's one way to find out the letter says
weighing the investor at immortal dragons
says he put money into
our three after it showed
him it is possible to create mice
without complete brains
quote there were imperfections
but the resulting mice survived grew up
and to me that's a pretty strong experiment
he says it was evidence enough
for him to fund our three attempt to quote
replicate results in primates
you remember immortal dragons
that's a important point of this
the R3 document refers to a birthing fix
it developed to future
improve to further excuse me improve
the cloning success rate
well at this point they're just a bunch of deformed clones
wandering around are they killing these things after the fact
this whole thing seems wrong to me
while MIT technology review
didn't learn what R3's process entails
we found a reference to it on a LinkedIn
page of
matriary matana
a scientist who
co-signed the 2023 letter to R3
stakeholders and is former
a former research assistant to
Hubert we were unable
to reach
mahat mahanta excuse me
now here
is one we're going to read in a second that I think is important
from LinkedIn
it says
like several other people interviewed for this article
degray made a resourceful
effort to avoid
directly confirming the existence of R3
when we spoke seems weird doesn't it
while at the same time freely
discussing theoretical aspects of body clothing
technology for instance he talked
about ways to shorten the weight
for your double to grow up to size
to suitable size for organ harvesting
a further genetic mutation
could be you to add it to cause
quote central precocious
puberty in the clone
he said
this condition causes a growth spurt
even pubic
hair in a toddler
I mean
there's no way I mean if you don't
feel uncomfortable about what this is showing
then I question where your mind is
that I mean what's
here's was crazy to me especially since we're talking
about the very same people who are all about
everything the Republican team is pushing right now
you know right well for example the trans
conversation not the same thing mind you
but we're talking about human growth
elements that are you know what you're
altering this weird I don't even want to get
into it this is just insanely disgusting
to me it makes my skin
crawl
cloning
dictators is the last category it says
and says who would clone a body
and pay to keep it alive for years
until it's needed
well the first customers for this costly technology
if it ever proves feasible would likely
be the ultra rich and ultra powerful
and the last most likely do you really
believe they're going to allow themselves to
basically potentially live longer if not forever
and then just let everybody else gain that power
guys that is a power to
rule forever
or at the very least rule seeing as how you
live longer than everybody you'll gain more
knowledge or gain more influence and money
that's what these people covet
and again this is not some hypothetical
guys this is technology and review MIT
recently covered this this is really what
they're doing and the point is that
this will not be handed down to the average
people unless it's some kind of like
moderated smaller version to give you
something it's just this is not the way
this will work and never has
as again as John Rappaport will tell
you there's a thousand different patents they have
in many ways that they utilize that they just
never allow the human species to
engage with
biotechnology is continuously
developing rights human organs can be
continuously transplanted the longer you live
the younger you become
and you can even achieve immortality
said Putin apparently through an interpreter
in a recent conversation with Xi
of course the article is trying to
insinuate that they're the they're the
dictators right like they're like
like somehow weirdly enough because China
Russia then dictator even though what our
governments are doing somehow democracy
that's just so sad where we are in the
world that we all collect it like the
mainstream just can't get past this childish
view that somehow because they just say
the right words that they're not murdering
children all over the world but you know and
look in my mind all these governments are
illegitimate all these governments are
dictators but it's just funny to me that
that's how they frame it anyway some
predict that in this century humans
will live to 150 years
Xi responded from China
there are companies working on this it writes
they are in the stealth
we can't reveal too much about them
but the general concept on this is
if you didn't have any ethical
qualms you could do most of it today
says will harbourn
chief investment officer of
long game advisors
basically saying they have the
ability to do it right now
and this was this was last
year so again I
argued do you really believe that the
people were talking about if not just the
world we live in that this somebody
somewhere would not have tried
you decide for yourself if we were the
dictator of some country and wanted
to clone yourself you know like the US
and Israel right now you would already go
grow one you can create a clone
embryo of yourself you can get a surrogate
to carry out the term you can
you can grow a body until age 18 with
the brain and eventually if you were
a dictator you could kill them and try to
transplant your head on their body
just casual conversation on this
podcast good times in order
to make the body and remember this is this is a
guy involved with the program guys this will harbourn
and chief investment officer of long game advisors
it says
in order to make the body replacement
process ethical the clones brains need
to be stunted
so it lacks consciousness
okay
will you tell me so you have a body
born from a woman apparently that's how
it's going to start who they just
engineered manipulated into not having
a consciousness
I guess how in the world by the way you
could ever truly verify that
okay so
whether you're religious or not
do you find that to be
acceptable
right that you can have this
this this human body
born of a woman
that they that you know it's like
any other thing in the environment
with crops that they could just just tweak
in a lab does that then make it no longer
a seed does that make it no longer a plant
and suddenly this is just not a human
because we say so we can just chop it up and take
pieces from it or do whatever you want to
this there's just something evil about this
my personal opinion
it says of course
the most extreme version of the replacement dream
isn't just to take organs it's to
take over the body entirely oh okay
well then what happens
okay elon musk and all the rest who are
all christian right and all using
all of these things to make you think they care about
what you care about he's adamant about this
so is peter teal telling you as a
libertarian christian guys they don't care
about any of this stuff peter teal could barely
bring himself to say the human race should continue
guys what we're talking about here is
when you then hypothetically
put your brain into a new body your
consciousness into a new concept
are you then still who you
are is your soul remain I mean all these
questions about whether religious or not are things that
people want the ideas what then happens
and again my point
is in a broad sense but speaking for people
that seem to be largely supporting the people
driving this agenda doesn't that contradict
what you believe
think about that they told me
and they also think about how in any
side of this left or right that these billionaire
elitists will tell the group in front
of them whatever they need to hear to believe
that they're on your side
Elon Musk does it every other year it seems
he just reinvents them the same thing
with any of these people guys they just constantly
feed you I mean Trump's done it numerous times
seems like he's doing it again right now
they told me they were looking
at a head transplant on a two
or three year old
he says
I stopped short
how could you even conceive of that
the biomechanical capability is not
there you have to wait until
at least 14 years old and I
and I would say 16
it was very clear to me
he says that these guys were not surgeons
they're biologists
just let that sink
in for a second
Sergio Canavero
a controversial Italian surgeon who was
has proposed head and brain
transplants
they told me they were looking at a
head transplant
on a two or three year old
and he simply said
it's clear to me these are not surgeons
they're biologists this is
this is Nazi level experimentation
guys I want to reiterate
that this is on
MIT technology review
it was recently on
Wired was the other article before this
now whatever you think about the platform
this is not some fringe conspiracy
theory platform or whatever you want to call it
just as likely to be wrong as anything else
but I really want to stress how alarming this is
so
what does this mean
are we talking about a clone grown
without consciousness and how do we know that
and that you're now chopping off another thing
to put on this three year old clone body
or are you telling us that you're trying to do this
to a living three year old that maybe is
dying or I don't know guys or maybe already
did this is
uncomfortable this is this is where this is
pushing us into and this is something
that should be discussed before we just
jump into this
now remember this part
because it matters to me
if this was hypothetically happening
where do you think that would possibly be
able to go on
even in you know like people
like China for example
anywhere else where in the US
we perceive it as probably going on
it's not it's just
China, Iran, Russia this very similar
at least feigned just like in the US
restrictions
what I think is you're talking about
places in the world that are
unregulated and ask yourself
whether or not this as we just showed you
being possible since 2023
is already happening
and this guy's literally telling you he's speaking
to them and they said
they were looking at a head
transplant of a two or three
year old
but if you want to use a clone it says
it must be a non-sentient clone
sentient clone otherwise it's murder
or homicide well that's a pretty interesting
distinction so you can just tweak
this here genetically alter that suddenly
they're just not human anymore at least
not sentient well okay if they're not sentient
they're still human though right so now
why wouldn't it be murder
right I mean there's just this
ethical black hole
then at what point do you then overlap this
with some other conversation that justifies them
killing all sorts of things or taking organs from people
I mean overlap that with
Israel's practice of stealing organs from Palestinians
I mean there's a market here that this
suddenly opens up
now
keeping this in mind and I'm sure we'll come
back to this
immortal dragons
backs unlimited bio
so there was three main investors immortal
dragon seems to be the primary one as far
as the article was framing
immortal dragons
October 22nd 2025
a 40 million dollar longevity fund announced
its strategic investment in unlimited bio
a biotechnology company developing
combinational therapies to address
the multi-system
nature of aging
says unlimited bios platform
integrates gene therapies
biologics plasma based intervention
cell therapies and small molecular
programs targeting complimentary mechanisms
across organ systems
aging is not a single pathway but a
multi-system failure involving independent
biological networks
it says extending functional
lifespan of both natural
and engineered tissues
creepy
so you know
what if it's all engineered tissue
what if it's a clone extending the lifespan
of clone you know it just becomes
it blurs the line between what is
and is not human or sentient
further clinical validation
will proceed
through special economic
zones specifically
Prospera
utilizing surrogate
endpoints in healthy volunteers
to enable cost efficient trials
meeting high safety standards
so the CEO run company
tells us with no real accountability or oversight
fantastic
so in case you're confused
what they're saying is that the clinical validation
that we were just talking about
at least from their perspective and what they're involved in
will be done from Prospera
utilizing surrogate
endpoints in healthy volunteers
so if you're talking about a woman bringing to fruition
some weird clone body that they can use
well that's what they're talking about
and it says looking ahead
unlimited bios near-term priority
in the first in-human clinical study
combining two gene therapies
in healthy participants
gene therapies
planned for late 2025 to early 2026
they were right in the midst
pending regulatory and ethical approvals
which don't seem to exist on Prospera
the study is described as
the first clinical evaluation of a
dual gene therapy combination
in healthy individuals as a
as and is aimed to serve
as a proof of concept demonstrating the
safety and synergistic
synergistic rejuvenate
rejuvenative potential
of multi-gene interventions
so the real point is to understand that
their clinical validation
they're taking place inside of this unregulated
unsupervised Prospera ZD
I think that matters
and again
let's not forget that in this current
administration which I'm about to show you is immersed
in that agenda
we have the reality of Jim O'Neill
who is type RFK's right-hand man
and is an adamant transhumanist
longevity expert
and if you read into this
as it'll tell you
although much less of a public figure
O'Neill is quite well known for his increasingly
well-funded and tight-knit longevity community
his acquaintances include
the prominent longevity influencer
Brian Johnson who we've discussed
who describes him as a soft-spoken thoughtful
and methodical guy and of course the billionaire
entrepreneur Peter Thiel
who again many articles discussed how excited
they were that he was going to be in the
administration
now we also talked about the fact that this was the same conversation
this was the one about Jim O'Neill
but they were building a freedom city in Gaza
which is relevant for what we're going to show you to wrap up here
what we were just highlighting is just
the concerning research
happening on that field
and then I overlap that with the concern that in many
cases I believe it's taking place in areas that are
deliberately created so there's no one
paying attention
and they used the idea of libertarianism to
trick people into thinking that's what they're fighting for
you're being played I'm telling you if you're out there thinking
in any way this represents what we're fighting
for you're being played by billionaires
who want you to think that's what they're fighting for
I hope I'm wrong in this case
Gaza freedom cities
being supported by the very people who fought harder than
anybody to stop freedom cities
excuse me to stop smart cities
which are the same thing
in every possible way talking about the
tokenization the digital money
the surveillance everything about this is
identical
and now it doesn't matter because in Gaza apparently
well it gets worse than that guys so first
I'll include these the network state conversation
because that's where this overlaps to and I think
what we're talking about in a separate conversation
is this great reset overlap
this is part of the same conversation
I believe this is the same conversation
and this is about reimagining
redesigning
building back better the system
of governance to what we just
heard or rather just the
the world in which that's the style of governance
and that kind of stuff could happen so this is a conversation
I had about this literally what they call tech
Zionism by the way
Shrini Vasan the former CTO of Coinbase
who wrote a book about this and many others used
the exact term calling this
tech Zionism freedom cities
charter cities network state same conversation
also this one about specifically Prospera
which is the first one that caught my eye the technocratic regime
change of the guys of freedom
technocrats
are slowly taking control
so what's important overlap with all of this
this appears to be
the first example I can see of an attempt
or rather
maybe not the attempt but the current
example of the attempt to start the first
freedom city
in the United States
which I hope I've made clear
which actually I should do this first
let me come back to this actually that's why I had that
realized I organized this wrong
we'll come back to this so this is poll
show support for transporting bell island
into a global spec special economic
zone this is the same point guys
connected to the same people this is
about the idea of the network state agenda
but here's the important parts of this
2025
startup groups
or startup city another phrase for the same thing
startup city groups say they're meeting
Trump officials to push for deregulated
freedom cities very important
so this was 2025 in March
March 11th 2025
tech execs are pushing Trump to build
freedom cities run by corporations
says a new lobbying
group dubbed the freedom cities
coalition and remember this
because this ties right back around into
Prospera Peter teal and I mean
you'll it's a perfect circle you can't miss how all
these things are the same conversation still
don't think everyone's grasping that the new
lobbying group dubbed the freedom cities
coalition wants to convince president Trump
and Congress to authorize the creation
of new special development zones within the
United States many of them revolve
around sort of using parks
and other you know government
controlled areas but
what I believe is it's going to be stuff like this
where it's sort of like a recapturing of certain
locations but it says the freedom city
coalition is a project
of kneeway capital also
important a company that has been
centrally involved in the development of Prospera
so right there is an obvious connection
to the idea of what they want to do
in this location right the freedom
city effort which Peter teal is supporting
of pro no less capital involved with
for this country which is
the same conversation of Prospera where they're doing those experiments
continuing
it says Prospera is also
part of something called the network state
movement
wired reports on the efforts
of the freedom cities coalition
to encourage
president trump and congress to
enshrine their project into
federal law currently
they're still trying to do this and it says
trade got the chief of staff of the start
up nation known as Prospera
tells wired that he
and other Prospera representatives working
under an advocacy group called
the freedom cities
coalition have been meeting
with the Trump administration
about the idea in recent weeks
he claims the administration has been very receptive
now I believe he was
very adamant about it people just didn't
it wasn't a lot of response people pushed back
and you have to essentially seize territory and
there was also a lot of other things he was dealing with
but I believe this has been slowly building
March 12
the next day what our freedom cities
billionaire CEOs
plan could
reshape America
a coalition of campaign groups opposed to
regulation has called for the creation
of quote freedom cities across the
United States and the idea is
backed by some of the most high-profile
billionaires including Peter Tio
and Mark Andreessen it still keeps going
we haven't even connected the full circle yet by the point
is to realize how this is all the same thing
it's a global effort
over here is called one thing over here it's called
something else but it is the same push
and it says the freedom cities coalition
I think tank pushing for the creation
of unregulated areas in every state
in the United States
says that it had informed the White House
about the use of interstate
compacts to create the cities
another organization pushing
for the concept is Prospera
which is supported by Pernomal's capital
the group we've covered pretty extensively
which is very clearly the funding mechanism
through Tio and everybody else in regard
to the focal point of this I argue there's more than just
them
a venture capital firm which is
in turn backed by Peter Tio
and Mark Andreessen
Tio already has close
ties with Donald Trump administration and a
support advance J.D. Vance especially why
he exists a political career since
he ran for senate in Ohio
so Pernomal's capital is an important
show I argue and the rapid transition
to a techno feudal state is about the funding
mechanism that seems to be leading and
we get into all praxia like every major
example of this in the world seems to tie
back to them and people they work with
so in this case this is
this article was March 12th
April 10th 2025
next month freedom cities
push on public lands gains visibility
under Donald Trump
so here
March 25th you know same month really
or same you know end of 2025
so my point was simply to show you the
overlap and connection between all the
different agendas and how those people were
court-dating financially and every other way
to push Trump to make this happen in this
country now before we read this last
article coming back to this point
March 26th
2026
bell island
freedom city
what the know what they're claiming
is that there's a majority of support
that's hard to say these days whether you could
I mean I don't I don't I can't I can't
take any poll face value ever consider it
maybe they want it but I'd argue if they want it
they're being misled about what it means for them
my opinion but they
support they want this island to be turned into
a freedom city in Detroit
transform the
982 acre island
in the Detroit River between Detroit, Michigan
and Windsor, Ontario, Canada
into a special economic zone
in order for the special
economic zone to be created it would require
passing of legislation by the United States Congress
in the state of Michigan
and the city of Detroit which I doubt they'll do
that I probably just forced it in but reality
being is once you pass legislation will you open
this door I think that's what they're
pushing for so simple
point is they're trying to do this you can find
very clearly that they the the very group
Charter cities pot rather
Rodney Lockwood
sat down
with Charter cities podcast
which is very
the point is that there's a clear connection between
Prospera and the agenda
now I'm not saying this is necessarily the same exact
group and what I can see it's the very
same political agenda and that they sat down
to discuss what they're trying to accomplish and it's
all the same kind of point it's not
necessarily in my mind whether we're talking about
every point of control but so much
but more so about the transition
of the way things are governed
and so sure from their perspective
if they can get this to start happening everywhere
it simply opens the door for this governance
to shift and I think that's what this is
that's why they sat down with this
podcast directly connected with Prospera
and had an entire conversation about why
Belle Island would lead to the same agenda
watch it listen to it for yourself
and I think what it leads to is exactly
what I'm worried about
now let me make this point even more clear
2025 the rise
of freedom cities this is posted
by Robert Muga
and that you can
this is somebody immersed in the same conversation
this is a person who's adamant about this agenda
and very clearly sees
the same thing I do but for me
like this is about promoting this agenda
and here this is a
where was it again
we do this just in case I lose my highlighting
I was just going to
go to his profile
founder
entrepreneur advisor
to governments companies
international agencies keynote
speaker
where was the
senior consultant
for the world bank just wanted to show you
that this is an influential person
in the sense of you know
the global technocracy
technical specialist
back faculty
any sense okay so the point
I find this
very interesting
the rise of freedom cities
there's a lot I know you should read but I want to cut to the chase
it says Mark Andreessen
the venture capital is behind California forever
which is originally what like what drew me to this
which was another effort
by the way right around the same time frame
of when this was really this push was starting about this technology
Andreessen was pushing to create a freedom city
a special autonomous
own all the same words you want to use for it
called California forever
and he offered the
Mark Andreessen was behind California forever
has offered a more
grounded vision in 2023
Andreessen announced plans to build a new city
in Solano County
funded by a consortium of Silicon Valley investors
it is the same agenda guys they've been trying
everywhere they can California forever reflects
the same techno libertarian
ambition it's not libertarian
that's just the name they gave it to try to
glom on it's the same thing they did with bitcoin
and everything else they're trying to get they try to
glom on to what they think you like
but as freedom cities
here's what he writes
needless to say freedom cities
come with significant risks
breathless promises of streamlined
governance could just as easily
lead to weakened control
of quality controls
regulatory oversight, labor protections
and increased social stratification
as has been the case with so many
smart cities because it's the same
conversation there are also
political risks if freedom
cities become enclaves for the
wealthy and technologically
technologically elite
as some of their supporters fully
expect they could exacerbate
exacerbate social and economic inequality
rather than alleviate it the shift
from democratic to corporate governance
raises questions about
accountability and repress representation
if cities are run like companies
who holds the executives accountable
will residents and not corporate backers
and shareholders have a say in the rules
and regulations that govern our lives
well they made that clear already
they just pretend that the screaming jackals
around them that cheer on whatever they say
represents what everybody wants
I don't think multiple even remotely want something
that completely reimagines the world
we live in in a way that you have no
I mean look let's not pretend like they care about
your inherent constitutional rights
but at least it exists and at least
we can at least it forces them to pretend they care
and acknowledge it and this point is they're just going
to do it all of it just
give power to a CEO who can decide your future
because that makes sense guys that's literally
you've owned nothing and you've and you've never been happier
that is the web plan for global
cessation it's the same conversation
it says
ultimately the success or failure of freedom
cities in the United States could have
global implications
if they thrive they could provide a template
for future techno enabled urban development
challenging the dominance
of the nation state which I believe is
what's on the table right now yet
the truth is that Silicon Valley's embrace
of charter cities and network
states reflects a broader ideological
shift the belief
that technology can replace
traditional political institutions
is gaining traction
among America's economic and
intellectual elite
yes
freedom cities are not
just about building new urban centers
they represent
a test case
for a new political order
that's what I've been trying to stress to people
and I know you guys are getting at the watch this show
I mean I don't even think this is debatable
now it may not succeed
I certainly hope it doesn't but my god
look at the influence
I mean we're talking about Peter Keel that's
Palantir we're talking about the influence
the overlap this global thing that is exploding
it's not
he's just one person in all of this
Mark Andreessen is wildly powerful
and these are just two people
I mean this is a massive thing that's happening right now
and I believe it is a test case for a new
political order legitimately
that they're trying to redesign the way this stuff
operates right challenging the
dominance of the nation state order
which you know I don't believe the government
I'm not I don't support government in general
that doesn't mean that I want some new
form of CEO run dictatorship
I want personal freedom
so I really do think that's obvious
now lastly
just a quick point out the door to overlap this
with where this goes technologically speaking
especially with all the weird things we're dealing
with it's also important to recognize that
as he writes it points out in this clip
President Trump takes action
to win the 6G race 2025
this is to ensure America's leadership
and 6G development
6G networks will provide
the foundation to operate cutting edge technology
of the next decade including AI robotics
implantable technologies and many other
advancements it will also deliver dramatically faster
connection speeds ultra low latency
so 6G rushing into it
before we even know what's going on now
or at least until they admit it what's going on now
sort of like fluoride and all the rest of it
as he says Trump signed the directive
to push this forward 6G
which will enable
AI brain ships known as the biological interface
system to cortex this paper thin brain
ship merges with AI
and I'm talking about this
direction for quite a long time right
I think what we're talking about is the
opening this door to the merging
of these things this is a connection
to the conversation because of the opening
to put your brain in
the cloud like to transition who you
in their minds what they think you are into
some new body
new shell new location
it's in my mind very much in the
same conversation of the way they see the longevity
like more maybe on Elon Musk side
of this where he's talking about the putting
your brain in the cloud kind of a thing
but I very much think this is where it leads
guys and overlap
that by the way with this conversation from yesterday
the idea of
what there's what they're siphoning from you and
and tracking you and monitoring everything
you know there's this there's something
very very alarming taking place and
whether that's about trying to make sure I mean
you could very easily find the connections
it worries me
out of top of that but these things are doing
to you and I'll leave you with Derek's
amazing documentary back from
2025 the 5G Trojan horse
and I believe that this is from before that actually
this he's reposted more than once
also include our conversation for 2020
where Trump was quietly
signing 5G law under the
cover of the coronavirus conversation
which by the way was the episode
that got our platform
deleted from YouTube over a hundred thousand followers
on subscribers on YouTube
and we were only talking about the fact that
Trump was signing 5G law
everyone's distracted with COVID and they shut that
down right away here is the
focus clip of it
does a newly published study
prove the 5G COVID connection or no this was a
different one either way the point is all 5G
conversations but
now Trump is rolling out the 6G conversation
because apparently that's what
Americans want hashtag winning
I don't think so
well I'll leave you
with a clip on the way out that I think is important
for you know where this is always going
guys and where right now
here's the interesting thing to think about this was a public
conversation like we said the sheep in 1996
at some point
some inner circle decided
we don't we should talk about this anymore
like we should this is something that we need
to control the awareness of my opinion
and so now and when you watch
this clip there was there was sort of a heyday
where it was patenting life and creating
and now suddenly it's like no one's even
at least from the average person's perspective
it's as if it doesn't even exist
and you I hope you know that
are as alarmed by that absence of conversation
as I am
but you know be skeptical don't assume
but with this and everything else we discuss
I think it's pretty clear that we have reason to be concerned
so thank you for tuning in guys
thank you for your support I love you all
as always question everything
come to your own conclusions stay vigilant
the
jacobarty case is one of the great judicial moments
in world history
and the public was totally
unaware it was actually happening as the
process was being engaged
general electric and
professor jacobarty went to the patent office
with a little microbe that eats up oil spills
they said they had modified
this microbe in the laboratory and therefore
it was an invention
the patent office the US government took a look at this
quote invention and they said no way
the patent statutes
don't cover living things
this is not an invention turned down
then general electric
and doctor jacobarty appealed to the
US customs court of appeal
and to everyone surprised by
a three to two decision they overrode
the patent office
and they said this microbe
looks more like a detergent or
reagent than a horse or a honeybee
I laugh because
they didn't understand basic biology it looked like
a chemical to them had it had an antenna
or eyes or wings or legs
it would never have crossed
their table and been patented
then the patent office appealed
and what the public should realize now is
the patent office was very clear that you can't
patent life
my organization
provided the main amicus curiae brief
if you allow the
patent on this microbe we argued
it means that without any congressional
guidance or public discussion
corporations will own the blueprints of life
when they made the decision we lost by
five to four and chief justice Warren
burger said sure some of these are big
issues but we think this is a small
decision
seven years later the US patent office
issued a one sentence decree
you can patent anything in the world that's alive
except a full birth human being
we've all been hearing about
the announcement that we have mapped the human genome
but what the public doesn't know
is now there's a great race
by genomic companies and biotech
companies and life science companies
to find the treasure in the map
the treasure of the individual genes that
make up the blueprint of the human race
every time they capture a gene
and isolate it these biotech companies
claim it as intellectual property
the breast cancer gene the cystic fibrosis
gene it goes on and on and on
if this goes unchallenged
in the world community
within less than ten years
a handful of global companies
will own directly or through license
the actual genes
that make up the evolution of our species
and they're now beginning to patent
the genomes of every other creature
on this planet
in the age of biology the politics
is going to sort out between those who believe
life first has intrinsic value
and therefore we should choose technologies
and commercial venues
that honor the intrinsic value
and then we're going to have people who believe
look life is simple utility
it's commercial fair
and they will line up with the idea to let the marketplace
be the ultimate arbiter of all of the age of biology