It's the world with my own two hands, make a better place with my own two hands, make
a two hands, and I can clean up with my own two hands with my own, with my own.
So as our greatest ally, that's why we let them run our critical infrastructure.
What could go wrong?
Michael! The Iranians hacked another water treatment facility!
Wait, I thought outsourcing our critical infrastructure to Israel would lead to less cyber attacks, not more.
Remember folks, letting Israel control America's critical infrastructure is national
suicide and I won't let it happen on my watch.
Actually Superman, it already did. Damn it! Damn it Jesse!
What did I tell you about section 219 of the NDAA?
Yo, Mr. White, I got it! Israel embedded itself into our military 50 years ago.
Freakin' out about section 219 is for noobs, bitch!
Did you hear Mary Silva is up 30% in the polls?
I don't like it, George.
We don't want an outsider in any position of power snooping around our operation up there in
Washington. Israel's entire defense strategy depends on it.
How are the Iranians getting these Israeli industrial controller chips?
America outsourced its most valuable technology, lithography machines, to Taiwan,
Belgium, the Netherlands. That sounds like something I would do.
Maybe you can tell us why Microsoft and Intel are Israeli companies now, Billy Boy.
We've been giving Israel all our high technology since the 70s.
Come on man, get your head out of your ass.
The Iranians hacking our water facilities.
Does this have anything to do with Israel running our critical infrastructure?
Don't ask too many questions, Michael.
In other news, Israel is running America's critical infrastructure with industrial
controller chips, the PAC-SILICA initiative, and 50 years of industrial espionage,
and I for one am glad.
And over here we're just going to paint some little guys that were high-fiving
over here in the corner in New Jersey.
What is going on here?
Why are we outsourcing our critical infrastructure to Israel?
It's anti-Semitic, even though the Israeli press has been screaming
about this issue for the last 15 years.
And we continue to do this while Israel falls into the orbit of Russia and China.
Make it make sense.
There are so many people noticing what Israel's doing,
and our Kabbalistic Voodoo name calling isn't working anymore.
It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the Daily Wrap-Up.
Sunday, August 9th, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now I started with this clip because it was something that I thought was pretty funny
and there's a lot of points you could make on it.
But I want to go ahead and start with the point to say that's not something we created,
just because of what we were just recently talking about,
but also something that they claim they did offline with their own resources,
not using data centers.
Who knows if that's even true.
But I'll include that when we start today.
Just an interesting, I actually posted that saying
what the world would be like if people went to T-Lab for their news.
And now there's more of a joke.
There's plenty of things in there that are, it's interesting.
One of the ways that you can see the kind of AI thing being used
in a way, if that is, I mean, obviously what it was,
but their claim was they did it themselves, what that even means.
But ultimately being that it's something that is,
like for example, using Jerry Seinfeld to argue,
getting inside the DC control,
it's just an interesting thing that you see that really does reach people.
And I thought it was humorous in its own right.
But really the point being that people are seeing the bigger picture
and ultimately now as they get deeper into it,
because there's people like us that have been doing this a long time
that they're coming to after the kind of surface level
mainstream, mainstream alternative media conversation
and finding that this is not something that's new,
finding it's something that's been going on a long time.
That it's been, and it's not that we shouldn't care.
I'll make a couple points today about the NDAA,
which seems to be stalled out still from the Senate side.
But it matters clearly.
Like I said, the first time we covered it,
but we need to understand that even if this fails,
it doesn't stop what we're already dealing with.
Now that in of itself can be a second tier
or rather secondary torque type of manipulation.
And clearly this is in the interest of both sides
that want this agenda in the sense of the power structures,
not Americans.
But then ultimately that even if it fails,
that they're still aware that that would convince people
or it could be used to convince people
that it never really, or really that it was beat off,
that it didn't happen.
They fought it away.
Who knows?
But anyway, the point of that is to think about
how much the conversation is changing.
And technology added to that makes an interesting difference
to the conversation and how it's used in both ways.
Now remember, the stuff like that is being done
not in humorous ways.
In a way stuff like that is even kind of making people
more comfortable with what will eventually happen,
which is already most likely government using this stuff
in ways that we don't even notice.
That really does alarm me.
Now today what we're going to get into is some opening points
about the two-party illusion as it relates to that kind of point.
And like I've been saying since the beginning
of this administration and frankly even the last one,
that people are tired of the two-party illusion,
that people are starting to wake up to it,
that it's starting to become a larger focal point.
The system and the partisan players in it,
even if they see the bigger picture,
will fight tooth and nail to keep the system the way it is.
Which will be, for example, saying that,
no, no, not everybody sees that.
That's crazy fringe people that want to attack you
for a different reason, maybe,
but ask yourself what the point is
about the two-party illusion.
Ask yourself about whether or not we can be trapped
in a cycle that's designed to make sure that this doesn't change.
Maybe you think that voting and democracy
and whatever else is still a viable option,
but recognize that even if that's how you feel
what we're trapped in,
we'll keep that from being a viable option in any sense.
But hopefully we can aim for something beyond government
if we truly start to see where the focal point
of the problem is.
But we're going to talk about, of course, the failure,
I guess, the implosion of the Iran War conversation.
And, you know, funny enough,
for how much we've been talking about this,
you'd think that this would be my title today.
But why would I?
It's not, today's, our show is never about in folk,
like it's the main case about saying,
look, we were right about the thing we talked about
for a long time ago.
I'll always point that out.
But today, the idea of what just happened,
now it's still being disdenied,
and they have their narratives.
But look, with what Trump just said
and what just happened
and what's been going on this entire time,
he lost, guys.
Now, even if they end up taking some massive,
let's say they fire a nuclear weapon
and all of a sudden claim victory.
The point would be that they have lost this
in every possible way, even in the kinetic sense.
Like, for example, if they did that
and just utterly destroyed everything,
the world would still look at them as the ones who,
I mean, win a war by destroying everybody.
I guess it's a bad point to make,
essentially, because they could always take that next step.
It's a question of whether they'll be driven there.
But today, the point would be
is that they have revealed
that what they tried to do failed,
that what they claimed they were going to accomplish,
didn't happen.
And now that even within, I guess, leaked information,
which we can confirm ourselves,
Trump has been floundering around this,
trying to find a way to make this look like he won.
You've heard that every single day
we've talked about that in the show,
long before it was corporate media
telling us that that's what we're supposed to think now.
Just always reflect on that.
How far ahead, people who have been accurate
and nonpartisan about this
or insightful, rather investigatory,
have seen this because it's clear.
Dropsite News, for example, has been doing a great job on this
and being way ahead of these stories.
But we're going to talk about what that is
and where it's going with the Iran War
and just the possible next steps
because it's clear that this is not over
in a sense that they could still,
and Israel, to put it most accurately,
will never stop doing what it's doing
until somebody stops them.
So this will continue to spin out,
but Trump has inevitably kind of found himself
in a position where he has lost everything he built.
I think we weren't worth asking
whether that was part of the plan.
But we'll get into that.
We'll talk about, of course, the Palantir part of that
that dovetails with Israel
and how important it is to see,
and this will be the latter half,
the idea that Palantir,
you know, the small thing Alex Jones told you to ignore
because Democrats hated it,
is it's an overtake of this country.
It's the same thing alongside Israel.
Now, is that two parts?
Are those two things vying for something of their own
or is that one agenda that just is scattered?
Israel and Palantir working together
for the genocide and surveillance of this country,
which Israel's also involved with, right?
But now you have this conversation of the kind of overtaking
of the, from the technological side of Palantir,
that goes back a long way,
courtesy of this philosophy
and what this means for the network state agenda
and the idea that they need to initiate
some kind of CEO run country,
destroy the Constitution, get rid of rights
because these are archaic things that never really existed.
That's what they've been arguing, guys.
Weirdly enough, that's the philosophy
largely driving Trump's administration
while they scream about your constitutional rights.
It's worth thinking about how that plays out
and why they would lie to you so blatantly
as they jam in exactly what you think you're fighting.
I think that's really important
and we'll talk about how Palantir is working its way in
on top of everything else
to multiple major newspapers.
It's already been the case with Reuters for a while.
Now it's USA Today, the insider, business insider,
telegraph, build numerous papers
around the world, huge influential newspapers
that they're now using, partnering with,
as they put quite plainly,
to use that data for actionable intelligence.
That seems, I mean, it's just,
it's not even being hidden.
It's just on the surface with a different narrative.
It's sort of like saying these shots are for your safety.
But we can see right through that
but the narrative is still there, the thin veneer,
so it's important we go through this today, break it down.
So I'll start with this.
Just a shout out to the person that asked you to post this.
After I posted the Instagram,
I realized it looks like they do have,
I believe it's the same account,
do have a Twitter account.
Smaller in reach, but it's called I Can't Even Productions.
And here I'll show you really quickly what I was saying.
It says, this video was made locally and offline.
No data centers used.
You know, who knows if that's even possible?
I would imagine so.
I mean, remember, stuff like this has been being made,
maybe not to the level of like a deep fake kind of vibe,
but a long time before AI.
Worth considering.
Either way, I think it's humorous and makes a point.
So think about all the people that would be going,
yeah, what we knew about Israel doing this a long time ago,
what we knew about, you know, it's not just T-Lab though.
It's to make the point about people who are doing accurate coverage,
like we'll be doing today,
about things way ahead of the major mainstream,
mainstream alternative coverage.
And as always, the point that I make,
even about the two-party illusion stuff, guys,
imagine we had acted as a population
when we first broke one of these stories down,
or anybody, or that I may, or anybody else.
Imagine if we did something then
and didn't wait for the Alex Joneses of the world
to come out and yell about it
when it was way too late to do anything about it.
That's what we're thinking about.
Now, this is, Bethany O'Leary, I'm not familiar,
looks like independent journalist, posted this.
Anyone else at this point?
August 7th.
And it says, for the podcast, I'm a Democrat at the top.
Trust the party.
Middle one says, I'm a Republican.
Trust the party.
The bottom one says, I'm an American.
I don't trust either of you.
Now, I would like to believe
that this has been a growing sentiment in this country,
or I wouldn't like to believe that.
I've been thinking that, that the evidence suggested that.
Not that I could prove it.
I don't know how you do today
with this kind of a thing outside of the media
telling you that's what everybody thinks,
which we shouldn't be trusting that.
But I do think this has been changing, guys.
I genuinely think, as you all know,
that this has been something that's been growing.
Now, what I'm seeing is these other, you know,
I mean, she's got 102,000 followers on this platform.
I kind of get the sense
she's sort of a MAGA X sort of now,
I'm no longer either kind of a thing,
which is a growing thing.
And that's not an insult, guys.
I'm very much, I'll make a point about this next.
I'm just, I saw a lot of these people
that were Trump supporters
who have woken up to this because of what just happened.
Now, some of them are saying that
you can decide which ones and not really meaning it.
Sort of like the ones that were glomming on
to the Trump thing when didn't really mean it before,
or even those that were previously Democrats
that glommed on the Republican side to make this argument.
It's all nonsense, guys.
And that's why I'll play this clip again in a second
to show you that they, you know,
either hate each other or they love each other
and they lied about it whichever way they want to
when they need to.
These people will say anything to get the job done.
And then you should wonder why.
When all they really would have to do
is, you know, follow through with their promises
and they'd be very popular.
It's because other things are their interests.
Funding, lobbying, outside foreign parties.
Right, that's the idea.
I said, hopefully everybody at this point,
I'd like to believe it's really easy to see.
So for those that have been saying this for a decade
or more, please raise your hand
that I know you're all in this audience,
guys.
That's the point to think about
is that it's not about necessarily,
you know, it's, we need to recognize
this is not just, well, two things,
like I just said.
It's clear now.
And don't just derot, you know,
I guess, like with the COVID thing,
people that saw it late aren't necessarily dishonest.
Consider both.
Also consider whether them coming later to the party
is a fact that I'm trying to be an opportunist,
but still go correct.
My point would be that we point out that it's right,
but also recognize that it was clear,
it was provable a long time ago.
And I do think that matters.
So here on this, this is the patriotic blonde
who's one I've been highlighting since early this administration
because she was very pro-Trump
and then started calling him out, which I appreciate.
And she says the irony, Trump ran as a Republican and won,
but became the best thing that's ever happened
to the Democrat party.
Now what I find interesting about this
is that what, the way I take this
is the way, if I said that, my point would be
that it's a cycle, right?
As you know, that just like last time,
what did Biden do?
Well, he completely, you know,
so to tooted Trump during his administration now,
but Biden funded Israel's genocide.
And any number of obviously horrendous things
that Biden did.
And so the point then becomes,
and with Kamala, of course,
one of the most unpopular people,
that ultimately you then,
and then of course Kamala runs for president,
and it becomes an obvious no-brainer
for people to think there's only two choices.
How simple that is.
And then you even on top of it get the spit in your eye,
which is that, well, lesser of evils obviously.
Like they'll even tell you
that they're both evil,
but go with a lesser evil.
I can't believe we ever,
it was just, you know, I digress.
The point is that what they create is this cycle, guys.
And I argue that's why Trump was picked for this.
I don't think Trump is necessarily even aware
that he's being used in half the things that we see.
That's my opinion.
And that ultimately he's chosen to create,
to be the stumbling fool, like a Biden, by the way,
to ultimately create the drive to the next side,
to keep us trapped in this never-ending teeter-totter,
instead of just taking a step back
and realizing that we don't need to keep going worth a point, guys.
So,
Oh, by the way, let me know if anything is acting funny.
Now this won't go back for some reason.
There we go.
Let me know if anything's happening,
you know, doing the same kind of stuff.
Please keep letting me know if the video was a riddle
for getting any breaks, audio.
Please let me know.
Oh, all I said, all I really said was my point that I added to it.
Round and round we go, right?
That's the cycle.
Now the Democrats are better because Trump was bad.
Well, now Trump, the next one Republican is better
because the Democrats were terrible.
Well, what do you take from that if you stand back?
They're all terrible.
So there's no cycle.
It's just a long string of terrible government
that pretends to be against each other
so they keep that string going.
Solution?
Step off the broken ride, guys.
Now, here's the thing, though.
You may go, oh, no, but we don't know what that looks like.
What does it, what, what do you mean?
How do we not go?
Well, you know, even if it's unknown,
if we have done this incessantly,
and to the point to where we're all going,
yeah, yeah, this is getting tiresome,
like so, should have been a decade ago or more.
But shouldn't we see what that step might look like
instead of just going, well, you know, fear, uncertainty,
let's fall back into what we know fails?
That's basically the logic.
I used to do those people that I talked about with voting.
We go through the whole thing.
They'd agree, yes, voting machines are broken.
Yes, the side, you know, maybe one side,
but whatever is trying to rob this and steal and cheat.
They both do it, but at the same point,
there's cheating, right?
So then we, then you could acknowledge,
I would ask that the system is broken,
that the voting doesn't even translate out.
Well, yeah, okay, then what are we going to do?
Well, we're going to vote.
What am I like?
How did we just disconnect right there?
You just said, and the point is,
because they just don't know what else to do.
It's like, well, give me another option.
It's like, well, I could do that,
but you should find the other option.
Anyway, I digress again.
I think that's important though.
So here's what I'm bringing this to.
This person, of course, this is corporate media,
interviewing what they say to Trump supporter.
Now, regardless, you know, take for,
consider that this might be, you know,
fake or that they might be lying always.
I shouldn't even need to add that.
It's always the thing we should be considering.
But the point is that is about,
I do believe this is what people are thinking.
I've personally talked to people
that are in this position.
And like I said before,
carrying over into this administration in Tennessee,
especially, there are people all over,
and I know the houses I drive by them,
they have, you know, huge Trump flags.
And major signs in the front yard.
There was a clear line between the last eight months
where they just stopped being there.
And I made that point in the previous show
where I'm like, oh my gosh, look at that.
Now they've switched them out
for local political posts.
I just, I think at least it's a step
in the right direction, but there's change, guys.
And so this person is asking them about what,
you know, what do you feel about this right now
and are you, what are you going to do next?
I'll play it first.
That's how you expected the second Trump term to go?
No, not at all.
I hoped it was going to be so much better.
He also promised no new foreign wars
where I would see in this war in Iran,
which is why we're seeing the grass prices so high.
What do you make of the president
not keeping those campaign promises?
And he just told us what we wanted to hear
to vote them back in.
What would your message be to him
about the economy right now,
about prices, about day-to-day life?
I would tell him you promised us
you would lower prices, bring back what it used to be.
I was hoping that gas was going to go down
so I could do something, you know.
You can't do anything with gas prices
and you just can't, you can't afford to breathe at this point.
Are you regretting your vote right now?
I have, the last two years, yeah, I have.
I'm actually not even voting the next time.
That, to me, stands out.
I thought I was supposed to switch this.
That, to me, stands out, guys.
All right?
You know, it's one guy, but trust me.
I mean, I shouldn't say that just because it's never,
you know, you shouldn't trust me.
But, you know, in the sense of blindly,
you should just check things for yourself.
But my point is that I have personally experienced this.
Go out for yourself.
Engage with people like I was just talking about.
Engage with people you haven't, you know, randomly.
And what you'll find is that it's much more,
you know, you might not find this, the people willing to go,
you know, stream, like during COVID,
even people that thought or were concerned were afraid to say it.
The, like the middle grouping, which is the majority,
whatever side, because they just were afraid.
They didn't want to look crazy.
They were told that's insane.
There's a lot of people right now that see what Israel's doing
and are from want to say it out loud.
You know, that's my, it doesn't,
it's not as easy to get to that level.
But the basic kind of stuff, people are seeing through it.
And what I wrote was this is the way.
Right?
You may not agree with that.
That's okay.
I could be wrong.
But I think voting in this broken system
is about the least politically active thing that you can do.
You can argue there's, you know, action there.
There's things that can happen.
People even just the momentum of people thinking
they're on the same side.
But when you realize, like both sides will argue
that things are, you know, stolen from,
machines don't work.
Or even the fact that if we're literally watching
a foreign power dictate policy,
that we don't have control of this, guys.
So I argue the voting process every so many years
is the least politically active thing you can do.
Recognizing this, in my opinion,
is simply addressing the obvious.
And it doesn't imply that you don't care.
That's how they love to frame this.
And of course it can.
There are those out there that don't care,
so they just don't even pay attention.
But in my opinion, as I've experienced,
the no voting crowd, or whatever you want to call them,
is they're very active and aware.
And that's the people that are like aware,
not because they're just going,
I don't care.
It's that they are, at least in their mind,
like me, are aware of what they think is a broken system.
So why am I going to, you know,
go gamble on that tilted table?
It doesn't make any sense.
But I'm going to be politically active
because I care about this country,
because I care about the people in this country.
See, it's not always all or nothing
the way that the media loves to sell what you do.
I think, guys, this is where most people are.
I know that's insane, but I really do.
And I think this is becoming more and more clear.
Now, that doesn't mean that a week from now,
another massive agenda, the next PSYOP,
won't just scare everybody back into line,
which is what's happened our entire lives.
Ebs and flows, ebs and flows.
But I think we're gaining traction here.
And I think right now, whether 51% or whatever it is,
our people are going, okay, there's something wrong.
They just did genocide.
Trump just did genocide.
They're all spying on us.
Nobody believe.
You know, and look at what the other parties are saying.
I mean, look at even the El Said point, guys.
I was going to go over it again today.
But the point is that he is saying things that seem,
you know, that are accurate or correct about
we shouldn't be funding anybody overseas,
even my own country.
We should be caring about Americans.
Now, does he mean that?
Who's to say?
I guess we'll find out.
But here he is going.
We need to support the Ukraine war.
He wrote an article about that or supporting Kamala Harris
recently after she's been supporting the genocide
that you're calling out.
Like it just seems disingenuous.
Now we'll find out, I guess.
Maybe that's just what he did to play the game,
which I don't respect.
My point though is that all of them seem
to be the same type of thing.
And now that's just the new narrative
they're using to get people to support them.
And it'll turn.
I mean, I hope I'm wrong, but historically,
that's always what happens.
Look at Gabbard, look at RFK, look at Bernie Sanders.
I mean, it's just what always happens.
That's not to suggest that I had belief in any of them,
but people did and they turned out to be wrong.
So here's this clip again.
I played it not too long ago,
but it's worth playing to make this point
as we'll get into in a second.
I'll play this and then I'll read what David Ike had to say
about this.
And it will make a few points
about some recent changes in the mainstream alternative media.
I want to talk to the Trump supporters for a minute.
I don't know who you are.
And if you don't remember,
this is about the duplicity of politicians.
Who knows what the real belief is?
Do the outside of Lindsey Graham,
who's no longer here, thank God,
is there other people out there in this video
who mean what they're saying right now?
Or this video, rather, or mean what they're saying right now?
Because they're different.
Here they are saying Trump's the worst.
Now they're saying Trump's the best thing of mine.
Well, you can only have it.
Ultimately, the reality is they were lying.
And I think the obvious one is
that they're either don't care what their sociopaths
don't care one way or the other,
or they actually did dislike him
because the only thing that's changed
is when they suddenly gained power
from being alongside him and saying that they liked him.
So, you see what I'm saying?
But that's my opinion.
Here's what he can do.
I don't know why you like this guy.
Whatever he does,
he accuses everyone else of doing it.
The man cannot tell the truth,
but he combines it with being a narcissist.
A narcissist at a level,
I don't think this country's ever seen.
And my concern is that he would grab up that power
and really treat the country
as sort of his little bully-fifthum.
Donald Trump is everything I taught my children
not to do in kindergarten.
Yeah, you get the point.
So, let's get back to the voting department, right?
Seeing as how it's so frustrating to some people
that we continue to talk about
how the voting process is legitimate
and I don't think you should vote.
Would you like me to continue?
I could talk about it all day long.
I do think it's actually very relevant
to understand that we're in a system
that designed itself to make sure
that people like that are the ones keeping you lost.
Anyway, you know, the bottom line here, guys,
is I think that the big picture here
is that there's a lot of people
who have an interest in trying to keep you distracted.
Like right now, that's just constant.
And like I said before,
it's not just about an idea at this point.
I really believe part of this
is just getting us to just be, you know,
like it's not hard over the years
to watch the system keeping us misguided
and misdirected and missing each other
and, you know, unaligned.
Today, I think it's more important than ever.
I think there's a window
and that if we are kind of just blinking,
waiting, hesitating that this is going to be too far, you know?
And I really do think that that's the big picture.
Bannier says none of this would have happened
if votes had gone the other way.
Is that your contention?
You know, David Ike says, yes.
And Tucker Carlson, well, first, I did it backwards.
Tucker Carlson, yes.
And Tucker Carlson knew what Trump is
before promoting his election.
Now, I believe that.
We'll get into the Alex Jones point to second.
You know, the idea being that I think
that these people were well aware of who he was.
How could you not be?
I was and I thought that I hated him.
It was about seeing what he did
and watching him not follow through.
It's pretty simple.
So why do these other people support them?
He says they knew but told you to vote for him.
Who do you think changed their minds?
So this frustrating comment is always the case, right?
What do you mean?
Would you vote for Kamala?
Like, I can't even believe those people still exist.
Maybe that's a bot.
I don't know.
But I just said that how exhaustingly expected
not face this always is
because that's not even remotely what he's actually saying.
And even if it was his other thought,
it's not relevant to the case of did Tucker know
and did he lie?
It's just this game that that's the point.
Like some of the people we see in the chat
is people that keep you distracted.
Now, David, Ike also said this about this post we talked about.
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene
put out this idea of the new party.
America First, whatever they want to call it.
David Ike says, great idea.
Gather together a group that urge you to vote for Trump.
When some of us could see since 2016
what he is and who controls him.
Then trust this same group to start the new political movement
when politics is a very trap through
which the population is tricked into giving their power away
to cult govers who follow the same cult agenda
no matter what party they claim represent.
He's accurate.
Now, should we still, like I said, hope that they're doing?
Yes, of course.
That doesn't mean allow that hope to blind you
to what's happening in front of you
or to ignore skepticism or to have it at all, right?
Like you can have those two things.
He says, but feel free to fall for it again.
I don't know why anybody would.
Like, I mean, here's the thing,
even if all of them come out with all the best answers
and said all the same things and really promised
everything you could possibly want.
Isn't that what Trump did?
Why would we then go vote for them at this point?
That's a real question.
Like you may go, well, they're saying,
but that's what they all do.
So here's the crazy thing I'm putting forward
is that it's not about trying to vote and then hope.
It's about trying, you know,
if we are in a system that we recognize
that really just covets the vote from you,
the compliance as opposed to anything else,
then maybe it's worth as a population going,
you know what, we're going to hold off on this process
until we can see, you know, I mean, this is the idea, guys.
I could go down that rabbit hole
and give you all my ideas, but these are just my thoughts.
I'm not, or I don't want to be some kind of a thought leader
in how we change this in regard to,
I want everybody else to think about this
and come to their conclusions about where it should go.
Now, to be clear, I'm happy to play that role
if that is what's thrust upon me.
That's not what I want.
But what I'm saying is it's about realizing
that we should individually find that path,
not just follow the next person
who yells out what sounds right.
You know what I mean?
Like we need to learn this and understand
that going through this process
is not going to gain us something
and then make the conscious choice to choose not to do it.
And even if you sit back and feel like,
well, I'm not a part of this,
well, go through that process and learn that for yourself
instead of just listening to what everybody else says
you shouldn't do.
I mean, I feel like that's so crazy logical today.
Elvin simply says,
the movement should be about the people regaining power
by destroying their Republican and Democrat unit party.
And this, I love George Washington rather,
this is just something they posted.
It's not even important to me
whether it's he just says,
political parties are likely to become potent engines
by which cunning ambitious and unprincipled men
will be enabled to subvert the power of the people
and to usurp for themselves the reins of government.
Exactly what I agree.
Exactly what I think rather.
So by the way, I wanted to reiterate this.
So here, you know, I do have hope that it goes in the right direction
but here's Thomas Massie who met with Flynn
and said, Flynn went to yesterday to give a speech
where I showed you this by the way,
random, my favorite Patriots, General Flynn.
I just was kind of like, great, like that's not a good,
a good indication of where this might be going.
But maybe it's just kind of leaning into the game.
But I wanted to make a point for this.
So Flynn says, breaking and this is on the eighth yesterday.
The storm has arrived, he says.
So yeah, I mean, either he's still aggressively playing
into the queue thing or the people that said he was queued.
Maybe you're right.
I mean, who knows?
I think it's an operation.
I think it's been multifaceted.
I think it's been a used thing by power structures
and people playing it when they want to.
Alex Jones pretended to be queued for a minute.
Remember that?
The point is, it's playing into it
and it is something that has been, in my opinion,
very clearly proven to be a psychological operation.
He says, the storm has arrived.
He says, you can read the whole thing if you want.
Points has stood out to me.
He goes, most of America doesn't realize how far
they've gone over to socialism.
Now, this is where he's going with this.
Now, I'm not saying you shouldn't be concerned about this.
I think all governments are equally concerning.
And I always make sure that's clear.
Because people try to frame it as like I'm secretly promoting.
I think any government, that's not some kind of cop out
legitimately, anything like that.
Aggressively disagree with any type of government.
Because that's not the world in which we should live,
should not be one that has overarching hand
dictating how your life should run
based on what works best for society.
But my point is that he's focusing on the one kind
instead of all, first of all, like that's my point.
But then socialism, is that really what we're focused on
right now?
Is that seemingly the biggest issue?
Now, Ren, don't mishear me.
I think all of them, government, democracy,
but is any of them, is that the focal point?
Or are we worried about foreign influence
taking over our country?
Now, again, I guess you could argue
it's a little bit of a mixed point
because we're still talking about protecting government,
in a sense.
But anyway, I'm going to make that more confusing.
If we want to get on board, you all want to follow
the interaction that's no government.
I'm all for that.
But since we exist within this broken state of society
and people are determined to keep it going,
are we only focused on socialism?
Or should we be focused on anything
that is removing our rights?
Should we focus on anything that is trying
to subvert what Americans want?
I feel like that's a red herring,
not in the sense that we shouldn't be concerned
about what might happen through that.
But all of them simultaneously, but realize
right now, that is a misdirect, I argue.
He says voting still matters.
Frankly, I disagree with that in itself.
But we must still seek new leaders
and quickly get rid of the uniparty.
So here we are.
Now he's leaning into that.
Tell me if I'm wrong.
I haven't been following him too closely.
Has he been talking about the uniparty?
Has he been talking about the two-party illusion?
All of a sudden, with this new push
from Tucker and the rest to be this new party direction,
we get this, everyone's now uniparty,
two-party illusion, which we should be skeptical of.
But again, that doesn't mean
the two-party illusion is a false idea, is it?
It's sort of like the flock pointed.
And he says, they get rid of the establishment uniparty
that has brought us to our knees.
Seriously, we can't even pass voter ID.
Now, what he means by that is real ID,
because we could easily pass voter ID.
In fact, we all have IDs we could use.
The point is that they want the digital ID.
But he says, when I say globalists are on the march,
okay, these are the points that I wanted you to take away from this.
But I do find that very interesting, you know?
We're talking about the idea of a Muslim invasion.
Frankly, I'd be concerned about any type of invasion of any kind,
from any religion or any group.
Point out where you see that happening
and not some scattered illusory thing that you think might be.
I'll hear you, though.
You want to walk me through why you think that is happening.
But we can prove it's happening for other types of groups.
And I don't mean even Muslim versus Jew or anything like that.
I'm just saying we can look at, for example, the Israeli government,
literally, which the whole country can see at this point.
So why would we be misdirected this way?
I think it's a play, guys. I really do.
So on that same note, as he says, as the globalists march in.
So clearly what he's talking about is this new direction fighting the globalists.
But, you know, and fighting socialism against the Uniparty.
Okay. So Jones, by the way, back in December 7, 2025, was already going,
hey, has Trump sold out?
He sold out MAGA to the globalists, the neocons.
You know, the same thing that he was shouting everybody down myself included
for saying they were back when we were saying that long before he was finally
being willing to acknowledge what was happening.
December 7, 2025.
Okay. Then on July 3, 2026, he interviews partisan girl or rather Syrian girl.
And I always do that because that's what she changed her name to for a minute.
And she says, or he wrote, she warns that President Trump has walked into
a globalist trap in Iran.
Okay. So that's July 3, walked into a trap for the globalists.
Then on July 17, he says, we just blew up the Death Star.
Which, of course, if you don't know lore for Star Wars, that's a huge deal.
That means we won. We beat them.
We stopped the enemy. Okay.
And he says, Trump's release of thousands of classified documents have completely
exposed how the globalist deep state working through communist China has been attempting
to manipulate the US.
Great. Okay. So just want to be clear.
He's pointing out the globalist deep state that they've stopped,
even though weeks before that or months, it was somehow Trump was maybe working with them.
Okay. The battle is over. Jump forward to July 30th.
That's the one you saw before where he goes, Trump and the people are in his orbit.
They have become nothing but globalist puppets.
So hold on. I thought the Death Star was destroyed.
I thought we won. I thought it was over.
I thought you get the point, guys.
All I want to highlight is these people.
This is the same thing Trump does.
These people just will yell into the wind and hope that,
or even sometimes scatter three different things at once and hope that you just pick what you like.
The idea is you can't have all these statements and then suddenly be like, well,
so now he's a globalist puppet, which by the way,
I clearly believe what his agenda is in line with some kind of larger globalist agenda,
which what we see playing out is obvious.
But it was obvious before. It was obvious in January.
It was obvious in his last administration.
And he lied to you about it the entire time or he didn't see it
and now suddenly changes even though before he was worried about it,
then suddenly won and we won and Trump's the best.
And then after that, now he's lost.
He's just following.
This is fair weather stuff, guys.
It's a he's a fair weather follower.
That's what we're talking about.
David Knight, who used to work for him says,
Alex Jones is better than any pollster in determining public opinion.
Now, you could argue that's a compliment.
But what he means in this context is that the guy literally is a fair.
He just goes along with what people want to hear.
That's what Owen Schreuer said about him.
That's what Dr. Grove said about him.
That's what the true stream people have said about him.
That is what Rhys has said about him.
Everyone that's left working for him has said the same thing.
I feel like that's relevant because people still fall for this.
But he says, I worked for Alex for nearly a decade.
He always knew about Trump.
He was just grifting with Stop the Steel and Vax is sugar water,
which he literally said privately and sometimes publicly.
He couldn't contain his rage, but he always came back
because his audience loved Trump and Alex loved their money.
Now, you can question this and wonder, I still argue at some point,
he's probably going to turn back into Trump in supporting him.
In ways, I feel like it's already slightly happened,
like I was saying, midterm points, you'll see.
But either way, it's going to follow what is in their interest.
Now, if you want to pay attention to people who are accurately
continually to call these things out, look to the IMA.
Look to people who are ahead of these stories because they're
objective and nonpartisan and continuing to break these things
down long before it's ultimately shoved in your face.
And usually at a time when it's far too late to do anything about.
Just January 13th, 2025, just to remind you,
one of the earliest things we talked about,
the fake globalist resistance ushering in the globalist plan.
So if Alex was honest, he'd be like,
wow, T-Lab was calling this when I didn't see it.
You'll never get that.
Seeing as how we went through this before,
where they used our work on their platform and then
deleted it because they didn't want to get it.
Anyway, we've been through all that in the past.
I got deleted from their band.video platform,
the whole sensor-free platform.
We've had that going on a long time.
Now, here, independent reports,
Trump says voters are angry with Republicans,
but not him as midterms near.
Now, this is the same thing with the Ron guys.
This is just what desperation looks like.
Now, I wasn't positive about that when it was first starting.
That was my, remember, I said a lot over the last year.
It seems desperate, feels like desperation,
but I'm never sure.
And still even now I could argue that this is my opinion.
I mean, it is, but I think it's very,
it's becoming increasingly more clear
that this is simply him just not knowing what else to do.
So he's lost all the support.
It's hemorrhaging.
And so he goes, oh, he has to acknowledge
that they're unhappy like I keep dealing with,
or I'm like, guys, listen to me,
Republicans are angry with them.
And people that should see that choose to push back.
Now he has to acknowledge it.
So he says Republicans are angry,
but it's not me.
Why would it be me?
This just seems insane.
President acknowledged that voters are growing
increasingly angry with the Republican Party,
but it's not, he has no idea why.
And I simply wanted to put the point at the last part.
He says, not everybody was a bad president.
We've had good presidents and even good presidents,
they tend to lose the midterms.
He's already trying to give himself it out.
So even if I lose, I'm still a good president, right?
So I don't know what this is or that is.
He says, other than that, I would say we win easily.
So if you think we're going to win easily,
you'd be like, we're going to win for sure.
You don't go, we might lose.
And if we do, I'm still great, but we might win.
That's you going, we're screwed.
That's how I read that.
But we'll find out, I guess.
Also, just to make the point on this end of the segment,
as Mr. Soss just pointed out,
whatever happened to building the wall?
Where'd that go?
Let me forget about that huge running campaign promise
that we just never mentioned again.
I mean, I don't even need to make that point.
It's obvious.
Now, whether it's that he just didn't care
or never wanted to follow through,
it didn't mean at the first place,
it all amounts to the same thing.
People who believe what he promised are not happy with him.
That's got to be the easiest thing
to see in the entire conversation.
Now, getting into Iran and one point with Gaza,
just to show you the same point from Israel's perspective,
Trump's involvement with all of this,
and really just the idea of the global dynamic
that we're dealing with.
These people are monsters, guys.
They are literally torturing, raping,
bombing entire tents full of people.
I mean, this is non-stop right now.
In Gaza and every other field of war they're involved in.
And what's frustrating about this
is it's so shockingly clear.
Now, with this point,
there seems to be a little bit of a,
or maybe it's organized, I don't know,
but some kind of a schism between Trump
and Netanyahu when it comes to the plan for Gaza.
Now, I would read that as not even really a split.
I don't think that's even possible
because of some things behind the scenes,
but ultimately that it's because their agenda's
have diverged.
Trump is desperately needing it out.
Netanyahu never had that in the cards.
Like, in his mind, I would argue,
watch the US car drive into the ground
before he'll stop gaining from his benefits of this.
And that's the point, guys.
They've, he's, as Ben Gavir and Smote,
they've all said, nah, nah, we like this the way it is.
We'll just sit back and let you guys fight our war.
They've basically been honest about that.
And shocking, it's like most of us said in the beginning.
Flag draped coffins with Israelis sitting back and watching
like every other war that the Israeli government
have driven into reality.
Netanyahu rejects Trump's plan to disarm Moss.
Now, again, this wasn't some super big insight.
It was all he had to do was look,
but this is what you get from people
that don't look.
That this has been something been dragged along for last week
where Trump had a deal in Gaza.
Some of the MAGA, I guess, fake today,
some of the blind Trump supporters who don't,
who, you know, still pretend he's succeeding,
even though he's doubled back on every promise,
are still out there going, you know,
Trump gave right peace to Gaza like a Nick Sorter type, right?
But what did I tell you the first day, the second day?
Well, Netanyahu said that's not even what he agreed to.
That's not even what's on the table.
That's not even happening.
So what's funny about this
is that Trump literally said, Israel agreed
and we're looking great.
Now, I thought was this Iran 2.0
in the regard to the cycle of the, I just seem ridiculous,
but just quickly, it says Israeli government,
as of this is today, these really government has rejected
a 15 point plan backed by Trump administration
aimed at disarming the Palestinian disarming Hamas.
And this is from, this is what he said today.
Did not reflect Israel's position.
That's pretty stupid, right?
On Sunday, Mr. Netanyahu openly dismissed the plan.
He says, I want to be clear here.
Israel is ruling out the 15 point plan.
God, this just doesn't get, this gets dumber by the moment.
And here's what Trump just said.
And we already played this for you, but here's what he said.
And so here's the whole same point.
Why did Trump get up and say Israel agreed if they didn't?
Or did Netanyahu set him up to look like a fool?
Either one makes sense of where we are right now,
but it's still the same general point.
You see, why would Trump not say something?
Because he doesn't have a choice.
I just don't even, I don't know why in his position
he wouldn't make a bigger case unless he was somehow not able to.
On the disarmament deal that you announced,
do you have assurances from Israel
that they are on board with this deal?
And what comes first?
Does Israel pull back and then Hamas disarms?
Or does Hamas lead to disarm?
And then Israel does not.
Here's what's funny is that's not, it's a good question.
You know why she's asking that?
And probably just because they're like,
they don't want to make Trump look bad in the moment,
is that ultimately this is always how this goes.
In the past, Yemen, Saudi Arabia,
I've made this point before, right?
Where, and this is ultimately the sticking point
for Netanyahu.
We will not remove ourselves from the area
until Hamas disarms.
And if you read the actual agreement,
it says basically when the disarmament's done,
that then like simultaneously they'll back up.
No, because Israel, it will never remove themselves.
They'll simply go, we'll remove ourselves
when they disarm and then even if they disarm,
they'll go, well, they didn't.
Or look, they fired a rocket.
We're here forever.
That's what's happened every single time in the past.
Or some variation therein.
It's the truth.
And so this is ultimately what ended up happening.
Israel said, no, no, they were not going to agree
because we can't let Hamas do that.
So the real question is, why did Trump say this?
Standing with Israel, Israel's very happy about Israel helped us.
And they've been very good.
So I think Trump is up, it's who he is.
And it's the same thing I think he thinks he's doing with Iran
is that he thinks he can just yell out the narrative.
Like China did the virus thing he did right in the beginning of COVID
and it worked.
He grabbed the microphone and was like, the China,
even though we already knew at that point that that's how this works.
They yell the narrative out.
And so with this, I think he, and he's lost that power,
like as him or just the US government,
he's trying to say that Israel agrees because it's great
and hopes that that momentum will kind of force Netanyahu to go along with it.
Or Netanyahu lied to him.
But either way, Israel agreed.
They did not.
Or at least they're saying they didn't now.
And now it's not happening.
So through its ups and downs, it's a very complex situation over there.
The people are very complex.
And yeah, most of them dead, you know,
because you're starving to death, you know, that whole complex thing.
Difficult.
Many cases, wonderful.
And many cases, not so wonderful.
But I don't even know what he thinks he's saying right there.
What?
Some of the people you're killing and raping and torturing
are kind of wonderful and some of them aren't?
Yeah, probably.
That will be a, it's a great breakthrough.
Nobody's ever thought that would,
nobody thought that would be possible.
Yeah, nobody ever thought the deal that he's not
going to complete whatever be possible.
Have you ever heard something Trump said he's doing
and never not hear him say,
nobody ever thought the thing that I just did was ever possible?
I feel like he says that every time he announces something.
This is just who he is.
And that's why it's become really difficult
for even people to support him
because it's just cringy.
It's weird.
Dude, disarm Hamas.
That shows you how much success we're having with Iran.
Oh, okay.
So now that it didn't happen,
now that it shows you that they're not
having access to the wrong.
Okay?
No, two ways.
That's a simple one way or the other, right?
So it's just showing you that he,
I think he put a lot of weight in this,
hoping it would gain him something.
And also that this was supposed to be
one of the things he said that he already solved, right?
It's on that like list of a thousand words he stopped that,
you know, that's one of them.
He says that if you look at the list,
and he's not, you know,
even this deal shows you that it's not solved.
It wasn't.
Because if you go four months ago,
five months ago, a deal like that would have been impossible.
So it's a big step for the Middle East.
And people are really impressed by it,
and they're surprised.
Did you love that?
Nope.
No, no, no.
Not really.
Israel denied it flatly,
and nobody else even released.
I mean, other than the idea
that it might have happened,
there's nobody out going,
wow, the thing's so impressive
that you haven't done yet.
That's just Trump doing what he does.
I think he thinks by saying that,
he can get people to call it impressive.
And that's where you get the lacking,
you know, all people we talk about.
The people that are chipping at his heels
to go, yeah, you're the best.
Whatever you said is the thing we should do.
Those people will jump in there
and go, God, it's impressive.
We each said it's impressive.
Hashtag impressive, because he said that.
And we all see that.
And that's the same thing on left and right.
It's the political obsessive type people.
And what comes first, Mr. President?
What comes first?
And of course, the point is, if you read it,
it is that they do it essentially at the same time.
And that's him trying to think he's being savvy,
I argue.
So here is what Dropsite News wrote.
I mean, really, it's just pretty much the same thing.
Israeli officials immediately signed
signaled opposition to key things.
And he still lied about it.
And they were like, right away, as we told you
when we last talked about this.
Now, in regard to Iran, starting six days ago,
just briefly, and then we'll get pretty much into today,
BBC, as we showed you then, and I mean,
you could go back and look at any,
literally like I've been saying,
you can go back and look at our coverage from April
and you'll know what's going on right now.
Not a joke.
Not specifics in regard to the current day points,
but generally speaking, yes.
Iran says it's in talks with Oman, but not the US.
Now, where did we leave off last time we talked about Iran?
We said the US, excuse me, Iran and Oman are talking
and they're stressing that the US is not involved.
Now, what I told you before,
which has now been acknowledged,
that they are allowing them to send through mediators
that's always been there.
Like, so for example, the Trump is reaching out going,
we want this or whoever is, Wic Off,
and Iran's getting those messages.
But whether they're sending them back or not,
that's a different point.
But they're saying Iran says it's in talks with Oman,
but not with the United States.
After Trump says negotiations resume.
So it's embarrassing him.
The statement came after US President Trump said
that he knew talks on ending the war with Iran
would begin on Monday.
That's last week's left off and this was last week.
And that he had called off massive strikes.
They're bigger than World War II.
Trump said not, that did not specify
who would take part in the talks.
Now, that's a good point, right?
Because he didn't.
He just said talks are happening.
Well, he's hoping you think they're involved.
That was the first ploy.
Because I think they knew because they got word
that they were talking, right?
And they publicly said that.
And he said he did not specify.
And this is Iran, however, said it was not negotiating
with the US and had no plan to do so.
Very embarrassing.
Tehran's denial irked President Trump,
who later wrote on True Social
that Iran's leadership was unbelievably duplicitous.
Now, three possibilities.
Either Iran convinced him they were going to do it
and then lied to him just to make him look stupid.
And he keeps falling for it.
Why? I don't know.
Israel lied to him and he keeps falling for it.
Why? I don't know.
Or he decided to lie about it thinking
it would come out different.
Why? I don't know.
You tell me what I'm missing.
One of those three things are happening.
And in my opinion, it has to be.
They're going on right now.
This is the last chance for them to sign a good document.
That's what he said.
They're not, they weren't.
They were dealing with Oman and not him.
And so even that,
it's just hope that if they sign something that he can go,
yep, yep, that's us and we agree and we win.
That's essentially where this says right now.
Now, back on the 6th,
I mean, this is just how grim and embarrassing this is.
Trump literally came out on True Social
again on the 6th for like the what?
56th time and says,
Donald Trump won the Iran war literally in the third person.
As Gen X girl says,
imagine posting about yourselves in the third person
in the declaratory statement of victory.
Which has been proven false 48 times.
Wow.
I mean, this is going to be written about guys.
This is something spectacularly stupid.
Trump says he thinks Iran war will end pretty soon.
That was three days ago.
Now you can read it if you want.
It's the same old nonsensical,
secular stuff about the deal and no nukes and blah, blah, blah.
And he's not in control.
That's very clear.
Now the hormones report put this out.
Now this is one of the,
the, I've seen them put out stuff that's not accurate
just to be clear.
I pointed it out.
So don't blindly take his face value.
It does directly come back to the Wall Street Journal
article, which we'll go into next,
but I didn't see it here first.
And it says,
Donald Trump has quietly admitted defeat and privately
signaling he's willing to end the Iran war
without a nuclear deal.
If the straight up removed simply opens a humiliating
retreat from his demand for unconditional surrender.
Now that's not exactly what the article says.
We'll go through it,
but this is what is being,
as I agree, it's generally the framing.
My point in highlighting this is that Trump,
this has got almost 2 million views.
They see this.
And if you want to think, if you,
I mean, you know, as well as anybody else,
Donald Trump, that's like kryptonite, in my opinion.
The idea that he's being framed not only as a loser,
but somebody who is pretending to win.
And it's just, it's got to be something he's having a hard time with.
Trump privately told AIDS,
he would declare victory based on reopening the straight.
And now I can't verify,
that's Wall Street Journal that they're getting it from,
but isn't that what we'll be talking about?
I too felt that was logical.
And I said this back in April,
now they're at a point where they're just going,
we're just going to hope this, you know,
juxtapose this in a way to where it looks like
we gained something and just go, we won.
And then just walk away and just yell that narrative
until we have to, you know, that's,
but it's, they've never,
they've never gotten to a point to where that was going to be
even possibly successful, right?
I mean, at some point you feel like
they're just going to do it anyway.
But I think they were hoping for some kind of a win
and then to carry that through.
And they just haven't gotten one, not really.
Trump privately told his aide that he would do that,
that, you know, get the straight open
and arguably that's why Iran is kind of holding that back
because they, I think that they recognize that they're desperate.
It says they far cry from his promises
a two decimated Iran's nuclear program,
but it says, but Iran just raised the price of that exit.
The same thing we have been asking for,
$300 billion in compensation,
$123 billion in frozen assets.
Whether you think it's reasonable or not,
it's still the same thing that's been on the table
pretty much since April.
Trump wanted out, Iran is making a pay for it.
U.S. officials, now here, by the way,
is where you get this kind of secret
pallets of cash dynamic, right?
You could argue that they try to secretly
get them that money so Trump doesn't get seen for doing it.
Well, Iran's going to make sure we know that.
So we'll see how this goes.
U.S. officials say Trump sees the straight
as his only viable exit,
but Iran's new demands mean even that it's now in doubt.
Tehran knows Washington is desperate to leave
and is holding the waterway hostage
until Trump surrenders on every point.
And that's the way they framed up.
It's not inaccurate, but I mean,
it's just a little bit of, you know,
kind of taking liberties with it,
like in where it may go, right?
That like they're holding him hostage kind of a thing.
Let's go through it and I'll give you my thoughts.
I mean, I do agree generally with what this is framing.
Now, Wall Street Journal came out today,
entitled Trump Thought Opening the Straight of Hormuz
was eminent, imminent.
Iran had other plans.
I did that because people give me a hard time
for saying them too close to the gather.
Eminent, imminent, but I'm not wrong,
but, you know, I am saying them with an eye in my mind.
Now, this is important because I think where we're at
is that, you know, he like,
it's the whole point about trying to kind of
create the illusion that he got what he wanted.
But from the beginning,
what people like us have been saying is,
well, look, he laid out his objectives,
then said he met them all,
but then they kept going and they didn't meet them all.
So they just, they were hoping we're just dumb.
And then ultimately going, well, no, no,
no, Nuke said in a straight knowing,
and here's the crazy part that neither of those things
were ever the issue until they made the straight the issue.
But the Nuke point was not the issue guys.
They knew that it was an excuse
because Israel wanted a justification for their agenda.
But then the straight became shut down
because after April and their bombing of communion,
everything else Iran just said,
were taking that work work, you know, they pushed us to this. And so even that got thrown out. But
even if they had gotten both those things, that would have been back to where they originally
started and not any gain for them at all. And everyone knows this. For weeks,
President Trump has been laying the groundwork to declare victory in Iran. That's what they put
out in the beginning of that post. Should they fully reopen the straight, even floating the idea
privately to senior aides that he would willing to take that deal. But that scale back
objective became more difficult when Iran insisted Saturday on its highest price yet.
That's the extra money. And actually what it really was is the increased percentage
on potential tolls, which is still up in the air, really. But again, this game they play
where that's somehow unprecedented. It's just not the difference is this could be one of
the most profitable because it's a major oil oil choke point. And so if you're charging
three, five percent on total goods, I mean, it's going to be a good amount of money.
But again, if every other one of these main locations, and again, this is not
international waters, not the main choke point, which we've proven many times in
regard to the straight of her moves. So like every other one that is not international
waters, they have the legal right to do that. I mean, it's unless we're going to
start just getting into every single one, whether any individual country has that
right. It's just about the US government not wanting Iran to be the one or Israel.
And it's continuing. Where was I? It was seeking billions. Yeah. And it says
American troops in the region and the end of the blockade. Now, it says Iran's recent
hardline demands, how they frame it, by the way, for reopening the straight, make it
increasingly difficult for the president to manufacture a face-saving off-ramp.
So it's funny. You get this mix of, you know, Wall Street Journal was at least
ostensibly anti-Trump or whatever, even though when it really matters, they're
always on the same side. And so it's the, you know, making it, you know,
difficult for a face-saving moment, you know, because Trump's failing,
which is true. But, you know, the point is leaning into that. But then Iran's
recent hardline demands for reopening the straight, I mean, take a second to think
about that framing. Hardline is usually about, you know, like terrorist extremist
kind of a thing. Hardline isn't Iran. What in any way about what they're doing
is hardline? I mean, in the sense of what they're doing here, they were attacked.
In fact, they operated in good faith, insanely, with people they knew were not
acting good faith and even in community diet because of that. And so the point
is that they continue to engage with them. And only once they continually took,
you know, action and killed people and ignored their agreements,
did Iran finally start going, well, we demand things which aren't hardline at all.
Control over our own waterway. The bill had told something that we control.
I mean, it's hardline demands. Washington Post is trying, or The Wall Street Journal
was trying to frame this like there's some kind of extremist group trying to
take control of the waterway. That's not the reality. And of course,
it comes directly from a Washington think tank. And that's why these so-called
experts on Iran that have never been in Iran, that are experts on state
department information about Iran, the Iranians fully believe Trump wants out.
And by the way, I'm saying that generally, I don't know whether
Mona Hayer has actually been. It's a general point about most of these
experts that are coming forward that Roberts made that point often.
And most of the think tanks, by the way, the Iranians fully believe Trump
wants out and is focused on opening the straight, which is why they are playing
hardball. It says handing over diplomatic talks or hanging over diplomatic talks
since April has been the White House's ultimatum that Iran will never
obtain a nuclear weapon. Trump sought to include nuclear talks as part
of the broader negotiations with Iran, but those have proven too difficult,
leading the White House in recent weeks to focus on reopening the straight.
Well, again, you know, the reality is Tulsi Gabbard, international
atomic energy agency, and everybody else involved, including the U.S.
government, said that wasn't the case, that they did not have it.
They weren't seeking it. They're lying. Guys, we know this.
We've proved we go back a long way. Netanyahu has been lying about it forever.
What I find interesting is this with something at the end of the article,
which is, you know, so they decided to move on to the straight.
So not stating that, but, you know, putting the concern about the nuclear program
behind them. One, because they know that's not a real issue, to be honest.
But where it goes at the end, I find interesting. So remember that.
Trump has declared repeatedly in recent weeks that this rate of promos was fully open,
but each of those promises had proven premature.
So again, why would he keep making a fool of himself?
I really don't know. And I don't know whether he's being driven to do that
or he thinks it's going to be different every time.
It's weird. Trump has been looking for ways to tell the American public that the war is won.
I agree with that. He insisted that the deal was imminent,
although one hasn't materialized yet. He keeps doing that, right?
And that's also embarrassing.
On Friday, the president on social media suggested victory was already in hand,
even without a nuclear agreement. And what's funny is, so a nuclear agreement
was one of the things that you said was a primary goal.
You've said more than once you've already achieved all of your primary goals.
But now you're saying we're not going to do that now.
So how have you achieved all your... You get it.
You already know that's stupid,
but it's worth making the point for those that didn't connect those dots.
Linking to an article declaring Donald Trump won the Iran war.
That was what he was... That's what I posted that, or I showed you that.
That was the six days ago that he won the war.
Vice President JD Vance told Fox News that the US would continue to pressure Iran
to make long-term changes in its relationship with Washington.
And if not, he says that's fine too.
We're just going to keep on applying the pressure we can apply
on getting as much oil and gas out of the Middle East
so the Americans can enjoy lower gas prices.
Oh, so you're giving up? Is that what you're saying?
We're just going to keep going through the motions and hope this goes away.
That's a crazy answer. And if not, that's fine too.
Wait a minute. Remind me, these are the monster terrorists that hate our freedom
that you've been telling us want to kill our families.
And now we're just going to go, yeah, yeah, they can just keep going.
You know, we'll just tell them what we want and hope it works out.
Now, I'm not suggesting that they go to war.
It shows you these people have been gaslighting you the entire time
and have been failing and now just act like what we told you should have been.
They're just, they're failing and now they don't know what else to do.
That's the reality, guys. That's insane.
And people who actually have been listening to them,
which is most of their followers are going to go, what?
Wait a minute. What do you mean that's fine too?
You just told us they need to be wiped off the earth,
that they need to stop their nuclear program and now we're just going to go,
yeah, just give us some concessions and we'll move on.
We're in the middle of the game, Vance says.
Well, Trump just said it was over. Trump just said you won,
but you're in the middle of the game, according to Vance.
It's just laughable, guys.
It's like these guys can't even connect and get their story straight.
Tehran, which closed the waterway once the war began in February,
which by again, Wall Street Journal, they did not.
And you can literally prove that.
Now, they've had moments where they've literally closed it
and moments where it was very restricted.
In the beginning, I argue that it was restricted,
not even in extreme sense.
It was shut down for the people that were at war with them
and they kept making that clear.
It was Trump and his team who made the argument
that their minds in the straight,
which we can pretty much prove weren't the case.
Even though Iran keeps, you know,
when they make that case in the memorandum and they leave it there,
why not?
It works for them.
But the point is there's been traffic.
There are, guys, it's just clearly as the admiral from the UK made the point,
they're not there.
As I said as well, I didn't know for sure,
but the logic makes sense to me and the evidence makes sense.
The point, where was I?
Was the, oh yeah, the idea being that they didn't put the minds in the water,
they didn't try to, they just simply deterred them.
And they needed them to shut it down
because that was the original idea that I think Netanyahu convinced Trump
that Iran would react crazy and shut it down and bomb everybody.
And ultimately, they would use that to win.
And Iran didn't do that.
So they had to manufacture the justification.
And that's where we are.
And now, every time Iran deters ships for trying to go the illegal way
through the routes, through the strait,
they claim they're firing on ships, they broke the deal,
even though they've never complied with the deal.
In Lebanon, with threats, with, you know, I've been through all this.
It's just a cycle of stupidity and people that don't pay attention
will only take a side.
The prospects of the deal appeared to darken over the weekend
when the UAE said Iran launched a missile attack on one of its ships.
On the top, Iran official laid out the series of tough demands.
Now, that is the newest one.
Last night, my due diligence shows that neither Iran has not claimed it,
which doesn't mean they didn't do it.
I mean, realistically, every time in the past,
they pretty much claimed it right away because they said
and even posted their radio communications
where they said, turn around, turn around,
you're going the wrong way, and if you keep going,
we're going to have to fight, you know, bomb you
and not sink them, just deter them.
Now, I can't tell the details are fresh,
whether the damage was.
I don't think they were sank.
So to me, that seems like a deterrent.
But it also could be, we have to remember,
Israel doing this to blame it on Iran.
That has happened so far.
That's not saying we accept, assume that,
but that is a possibility and has happened.
And at this moment where they're trying to get this to finish
and Trump's leaning away from it,
that would make more sense than ever.
So consider that.
By tomorrow, the next day, I'm sure we'll get more details.
Secretary of Iran,
Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council,
so Mohamed Zogard,
said the U.S. would need to permanently end the war.
Lift its naval blockade.
Withdraw all its forces and all sanctions.
Free Iran's frozen assets.
Pay war operations and threats and insults.
And stop military action against Iran's militia allies
around the region before Iran would open the strait.
That's pretty much now saying,
even with the current, like last I checked,
they're going, we're now shutting it to you guys entirely,
until you make good on the memorandum
and you make good on all the things you've done
since you're, you know, basically pretending to negotiate,
pretending agreements and then just double crossing everybody.
So now they're demanding the memorandum
and that they basically apologize, essentially,
or at least make it right, which I doubt that's going to happen.
A White House official insisted that the U.S.
completed all of its military objectives against Iran.
But I mean, this is how laughable this is.
Like you guys can't get together and be like,
okay, we need to change direction.
We can't keep saying we've done all this
and then you come out and say,
but we're going to give up on nuclear.
So I argue this is because Trump is such a,
like tantric, like a problem child tantrum kind of thing
that he just like insists on what they need to say,
even though people are going, damn it,
that's going to make it all look stupid.
I mean, that's my opinion.
But look at the way Trump's operating.
It's all or nothing with him.
It's all a bunch of yes men.
It's all a bunch.
And I think that's kind of by design.
That's my opinion.
But at the end of the day,
why would you keep pushing the narratives
that seem inconsistent?
Unless that's the plan.
If the U.S. can keep the nuclear program in check
and traffic resumes in the straight,
Trump is more likely to extend the current ceasefire
indefinitely, his own official said.
So that seems to be his path, right?
Keeping the program in check,
which I'll read this last part in a second,
which means so he fails and that objective he claimed
was to take control, remove it, destroy it,
and traffic resumes.
So back to the way it was before,
but it won't because Iran's going to be in control of it now.
But I bet you if given the illusion he'll take it
and not even end it, but go indefinite ceasefire
and we'll just kind of leave it there
and we're not, we didn't win or lose yet.
We're just going to leave it and it says,
Trump also is expected to lift the U.S. military blockade
and Iranian ports if Tehran fully reopens the straight,
which by the way, they've tried to more than once,
like this current deal.
It's the U.S. who's keeping this from changing and all,
and it's largely because they don't want it
to be something Iran gains without their inclusion.
I think that's pretty clear.
There's also, excuse me,
there also is a dispute about whether the U.S.
would issue waivers to let Iran sell oil
on the open market, which they already kind of did
and then provoked.
And it was also part of the agreement
that they double-crossed them on.
The U.S. had agreed to the waivers last June
as part of the interim peace agreement with Iran.
That ceasefire fell apart after Iran attacked ships
in the strait. No, it didn't.
I mean, come on, Wall Street Journal,
you fake journalist platform.
How is it possible that you can't wrap your mind
around the obvious evidence that's already been proven
that they did not randomly attack ships?
They were the middle of this so-called fake agreement
that Trump and Israel had never accomplished.
They were still bombing Lebanon.
They were still levying threats,
multiple examples of their violations,
but even so Iran still held their side.
Then they tried to make ships go through the strait
that were not going the route.
This has all been broken down.
There's even radio communications
that proved they were going turn around, turn around,
and they didn't sink them.
They bombed them and they turned around.
And Wall Street Journal still has the nerve
to frame that as ceasefire fell apart
when they attacked ships in the strait
without any context.
And the U.S. reinstated sanctions and oil trade,
which were things that violated the memorandum.
I mean, it's just, it's so infuriating.
And so you have to recognize
whether this is just bad journalism
or that's a conscious choice at the highest level
to not frame that the way the system,
you know, really, this is our larger point.
Left, right, all of the government, whatever it is,
the system wants war with Iran
because Israel wants war with Iran.
Now, right now you've got Democrats
pretending like they're resisting this
because, you know, Trump is illegal war.
Well, realize if you listen to them,
they're not saying the war with Iran is bad.
They think Iran, bad guy,
we have to stop Iran for Israel.
But Trump did it illegally.
So it's just, it's a game of word.
They just, they're going to go bad
the same way they can
and just get Congress to declare it,
which I would still disagree with.
Maybe the point is, it's an illusion.
The U.S. Blockade and Iranian ports
meant their straight up promos
was sort of open right now, Trump just said.
Very stupid.
Though the president acknowledged
Iran could still damage ships
with missiles, drones, and mines,
which is always the case, guys.
That's literally always the case,
whether it was a deal or not,
whether this has ever even happened.
He also said, also suggested Iran's
buried uranium stockpile was a non-issue.
Right. Okay.
So the thing you said you've accomplished though,
didn't you say you've accomplished
all of your wartime goals?
Well, okay, right there.
If it's a non-issue,
that means you did accomplish it,
which means, you know, obviously.
But he goes on to say,
we've already got the nuclear material.
Not true because it's so far underground.
Oh, so you don't have it.
It's, they have it on their territory,
underground, they control.
But we've got it.
That's him trying to change
the way that's framed,
so he can frame us getting their nuclear material.
Watch as that statement
becomes something framed
by the fake media on Twitter.
The statement, Trump,
we already got the material,
becomes a report.
Trump's got the material.
You know, that's what happens
on this fake news cycle.
The reality is, you don't have it.
It's in Iran, underground,
if that's even the truth.
And then it says,
Trump said, or the article continues,
Trump said during his July summit,
nobody's going to be able
to get it except us,
which means you haven't accomplished that goal.
And the reality being
that you're essentially giving up on it
because you're claiming they can't,
even though that's not actually true.
I mean, this speaks for itself,
not even the frames
that Wall Street Journal
or the way they frame it,
but Trump's own statements
make this undeniably clear.
Chris Mayahan points out,
and just showing you the system,
this is Fox News side of it,
trying to convince you this is acceptable,
Fox News stealth edits their report
from Efrat Lachner,
a former IDF spokeswoman,
surprise, surprise,
which claimed, matter of factly,
that Iran's chief had declared Wednesday
that they were working on nuclear weapons.
How often do we get this done?
That's like a fourth time.
I've got some, you know,
side of the two-party paradigm
pushes an idea that Iran admitted
they're working on nukes.
It's not true.
I mean, in most cases,
the actual claim isn't even true
that they even said it.
But there's been plenty of times
where Iranian elements have said,
maybe we should because,
blah, blah, blah.
It's just like any other country.
There are people with different opinions.
But at the leadership level,
it's a fought war,
and they still stand by that.
Maybe that changes.
They have a legal right to do it
if they want to.
It says, as Ynet News reports,
the almost certainly fake quote
first went viral after being shared
by Israeli propaganda mill
Mossad commentary.
The one that Elon Musk shares
like it's a tick.
But the point is they stealth edited
to where it first said,
Iran's top Revolutionary Guard commander
declared Wednesday
until they quietly changed it to
reportedly declared Wednesday.
Cowards.
This was all to get people to think
absolutely that they were saying
we're making nuke
so Trump could use it.
This is how this goes, guys.
Now, in this case,
we have Fox News talking with
Muckabee.
Now, what's funny, by the way,
is this statement's not in there.
I think maybe they clipped it wrong
because I do believe
this is a statement within
the larger clip.
But I'll play the clip regardless.
But the idea is simply
that even Fox News is giving pushback,
which just shows you the windows
changing here, guys.
And so he said the point was
they're saying,
but their missile capacity has grown
in response to him going,
we're winning and they're failing
and the same old rigmarole from Trump.
But listen to this,
because I think it's relevant
that ultimately what he's doing
is pushing on the false narrative
and even Fox News is kind of like,
well, you know, everyone,
how is that going to change it?
It's been the same way every time.
I mean, and that's like the simplest thing.
Well, if you're doing the same thing again,
why is it going to be different this time?
How dare you?
You hate Mr. Trump.
You know, it's like,
that's such a basic question
and it gets barely asked.
It's time for us to wake up.
President Trump did.
Thank goodness.
And he's the first president
that really has acted upon this threat
that has been hanging over our heads
for all these many years.
Yeah, go ahead and demonstrate that for me.
Walk me through where anything has ever happened
in any, I mean, like,
don't talk about roadside bombs in Iraq
when you were legally dating Iraq.
Don't talk about, you know, that's what they do.
Hundreds of Americans
when you were legally dating their countries.
Yeah, maybe that makes sense.
The idea that you could point to
anything Iran's ever done to Americans
in a sense of, in this country,
in the conversations outside of this,
there's things that you could point to
in a not in a close to the sense
they're going to make,
but realize that what we're talking about
is U.S. and Israeli foreign policy,
targeting them, disrupting them,
killing their scientists.
Like, not again, it's like,
it's been like a state of war
from that perspective on Iran
for a long time.
The point is that if you really want
to stand back and argue that
they've been at like
some kind of evil villain
that's always been hanging over
American's heads,
good luck trying to prove that.
In reverse though,
it's very obvious.
You can go back to Operation Ajax
and many, many, many, many, many
things they've done since.
Ambassador, I hear what you're saying
and thank you so much for being
here with us today
and the work that you're doing.
You would say how many beatings
to essentially get Iran
to correct their behavior?
Well, I think that's a question
a lot of Americans are asking themselves.
You look at the efforts
against Iran so far.
Why hasn't it accomplished that goal?
Why hasn't it gotten
them to correct their behavior yet?
Yeah, right? Very simple.
Well, you're not making it clear
why this same thing
will be any different this time.
Well, it's bigger or whatever,
more bombs than ever.
Well, we'll get to that in a second
about the way that they've,
I think they call it the mosaic strategy,
which Roberts talked about.
We knew this from before.
That's part of what they did
with the mountains and their ships.
Right?
But the point is
even they can be like,
well, that's just going to
end up in the same place, won't it?
The big reason, Lisa,
is because the Iranian regime
really is much more able
to absorb the pain.
They don't care.
They don't care if they kill
60,000 of their own people
in the course of just
shutting down the protest.
Which didn't happen.
Verifiably so.
And like, you know,
sort of like the conversation
with Israel in October 7th,
if you're still trailing along
and don't realize
that is an utterly false story
that even Trump has been like
100,000, 150,000.
Like, they lied, guys.
And I think it was something
like 3,711 or something
like that was the number
that Iran is admitted to
and you can literally prove
it on the ground.
Question it.
You should.
But realize the bottom line
is that you can prove
like I've gone through
from the very beginning.
These were organic protests.
They were taken over
by mass faceless people
that they've admitted
to arming, guys.
They've literally admitted
to arming the Kurds
and sending in covert groups.
They've admitted to that.
And so we're not going to
consider that those covert
groups going in mass
and shooting
and burning policemen alive
is a judge.
What do you think the U.S.
government would do
if that was happening
in our country?
I mean, for crying out loud,
they made up a fake story
about invasion
to attack Americans.
You don't think that.
I mean, it's obvious.
So the point is
when that turned
even the unions,
the support of the Iranian
protest turned around
and said, whoa,
this is not that anymore.
This is something outside,
foreign elements.
And those are the unions
and they were protesting
the government, guys.
And so the point was clear
that this was something
they created.
And that was not 60,000
and that was people
that they put into play.
But the point becomes,
what do you mean?
They're punishing.
Who is causing the death?
You're bombing Tehran.
You're bombing their infrastructure.
Why would Iran be responsible
for your illegal bombings
because they can suffer the pain?
You're causing the pain.
Like it's the only...
See, the way he tried
to make that work
is by aiming at what he
pretends they did
before you started bombing them.
I mean, it's just lunacy, guys.
This is a floundering art.
This they don't have
any standing right now.
Huckabee is a
hardcore religious Zionist
who is advocating for Israel
half the time over the United States.
And so all he's really trying
to do is pretend
that they have justification
for doing what they're doing
and also Iran's failing
even when they're not.
They're also a regime
that frankly
doesn't think like
a government should think.
They're not...
Oh, is that a bad thing?
Not even to get into
what he says next,
but like,
do we want someone
to think like a government?
Historically,
our government's on our side.
It's weird.
It's...
I think they've missed the...
I think they missed the mark a bit.
I don't think they even
understand who it is
that supports them anymore.
Thinking in terms of their future,
this is a government
that is based on a radical
theological basis,
not a geopolitical one.
What does that sound like to you?
Is there another group
that we could possibly think of
that's in that realm?
Ones that don't really
define themselves
by certain boundaries
but are saying that
this general area
and overtaking
and absorbing countries
and people's territories,
does that exist anywhere?
Definitely not Iran,
ladies and gentlemen.
So if any...
I just to be clear,
being facetious to a degree,
I mean, yes,
Iran very clearly
has a theocratic government dynamic.
That's obvious.
But if you really stand back
and compare
between what Iran is
in their country
and what they do
and what Israel is
and what they do
in their country,
because it's...
it's like painfully,
disgustingly clear
the differences.
Now, as I've said many times,
I don't support government in general
and Iran's government
has done plenty
of oppressive things
to their people
and that's why people
are protesting
and people push back
and it's the same thing.
It's like saying
that our government
does things that we see
in the street
and then justifying
that the UK should come in
and remove them from power.
Is that what any American wants?
Well, no.
Does the American...
Do Americans still criticize?
Yes, in many cases.
So it's the same kind of game
they're playing.
Israel, in its own right,
is one of the most repressive
theocrats...
Like, you have to understand
the dynamic there
is so much worse
than what we're...
what we can see in Iran.
Even regarding the theocratic
led government, guys,
look at the...
They're claiming
they're leading the world
to Armageddon.
That's not what Iran is doing.
They've got the U.S. military
fighting for their end times.
That's what Hexeth told them.
That's what they told the media.
And they want you to think
Iran is the one
with some theocratic...
I mean, even Hexeth
tried to lie to you
and tell you that Iran
had some end times agenda
they were fighting for
because he knew
we were talking about Israel's
focal point.
That's not true.
That's not what Iran
thinks this is.
That's not what Iran
is even talking about.
So that's insane to me
that he's willing to do that
but they know
why they're doing that.
As a religious Zionist
who believes in their end times
prophecy.
I mean, it's...
You just can't even make this up.
One understands
that they don't just sit down
at the negotiating table
and say,
hmm, what would be good
for our people?
So will it ever...
Yeah, they literally do, though.
I mean, you can literally
prove it over the years.
Robert's covered this.
Now, do they take
self-serving action
like every government?
Absolutely.
But if you compare
even the U.S. government
to them, I mean,
take a look at things
that have changed
in their government
through people's engagement
with it.
It's...
I mean, frankly,
there's things that
seem to change more accurately
than what we see in our country.
Now, there's obviously benefits
you could point out here
that don't exist there.
But you have to understand
the difference is that
what they're framing,
like, they would be happy
if you thought they're
a bunch of Muslims
living in caves.
That's how they really
want you to frame this.
And it runs
one of the most technologically
advanced places
in the earth, guys.
It's obvious
that they're misleading you.
For their people.
So will it ever work?
Well, here's one...
One thing that...
See?
And that shook him
for a second
because that's not what
you're supposed to get
from Fox News.
Will it ever work?
Right?
Well, all these problems
and all these things.
And will it ever work, then?
Why would it work now?
Has happened...
The Iranian regime is weaker
than it has been in 47 years.
I mean, you could...
You could argue that's
somewhat true,
but they're lost
of ships and whatever else.
But in the context
of what they're trying to
accomplish,
they're nowhere closer
to actually gaining
that, in my opinion.
The infliction of harm
to them
and of pain to them.
Yeah, the pain you just said
that's being inflicted
on the people
that they're able to absorb.
So thank you for making
that cycle clear
that you're the ones
hurting their people
and they're just
trying to last it out
because that's arguably
what any people would want
is not allowing
a foreign power
to take over, right?
Is not something
that is imagined.
Their ability
to produce a nuclear weapon
has been greatly set back.
But their missile capacity,
unfortunately, has grown.
And in one year,
they went from being able
to deliver a ballistic missile
from 22,000 kilometers
to over 4,100 kilometers.
That puts their capacity
to touch any city
in most of Europe,
London, Paris, Berlin, Rome.
All of those cities
are now in the
just sites of Iran.
How long will it be
before they can launch one
toward the United States?
OK, you want to point out
the last time that ever happened?
By the way, now I'm seeing
what I thought
for some reason
that was her,
that he just said it,
by the way.
That's I was listening
for her saying it
the earlier today.
The point is the same.
So first of all,
isn't that what Trump said
isn't happening?
How are they gaining?
How are they growing?
Like it's clearly showing you
that they're not failing.
But on top of that,
why is this
overhanging threat of Iran
bombing all these places?
You have circled them
with your bases.
You are bombing in Iran.
In fact, here's the crazy
thing I keep bringing up.
You realize,
if you haven't heard this yet,
that is the Iran,
the United States is bombing
directly into Iran.
Iran knows that.
So by every rule of war,
they have the legal ability
to bomb inside the United States.
And they haven't.
Thank God.
And that continues
to be something I point out
to show you
that they're choosing
to show restraint.
They're choosing not
to kill Americans
because they know
that wouldn't even benefit them.
It wouldn't work
in their interest
because it would only
turn people more
against them.
And what's crazy
is it simply shows you
that they're not
what they claim they are.
This bloodthirsty maniacal
want to kill you
because of your freedom
which means that
they would take
every opportunity
even if it killed them
like he just told you.
Even if they lost,
even if they suffered,
even their own people died,
they would do it
just to inflict pain.
Well, then why don't they?
How could be?
Because they're not
what you pretend they are.
It's got to be simple by now.
It's got to be clear
to people that care
to pay attention.
Wu Tang for his Fourth of Children
points out
Barak Reveed's
usual propaganda
right on time.
As he says,
LOL,
like clockwork
with his Sunday tweet
about Trump and Iran.
I mean, you realize
like in session,
like, I mean,
literally every time,
every time this happens
over the weekend,
this guy comes out with an article
that's later proven to be false
or at least it's citing
what they say that turns out
not to be the reality.
Same point.
And he writes,
President Trump signaled
on Sunday
in a telephone interview
that he is not rushing
to make a decision
neither regarding a deal
nor with Iran
nor regarding renewing
military action against it,
but it's betting
economic pressure
will do the job.
So you're just doing nothing.
Okay.
So the point is that
you're pretending that the
what you're doing to them
will drive them to give up.
I mean,
you just said
that they're willing to absorb it.
So by your own statement,
then they would be willing
to just last this out, right?
And realize
that's the truth.
They built this
as we'll show you here
or actually in a
is it right here?
Or in one of these next clips
about the,
the,
oh yeah, I see where it is now.
The, the
style of
the plan that they laid out,
the way that they reorganized
their military in order
to be able to fight
what they're doing right now,
which we all see happening,
right?
Clearly.
Could be a letter
today.
President Trump says
he's low-keying it with Iran.
I mean, I gotta be,
that's just gotta be
one of the most embarrassing
things.
So this,
this is what you get.
Like this person is incapable,
like most politicians,
to be honest,
of just going,
you know,
we lost.
I didn't get,
I didn't accomplish what I
wanted to.
He will forever pretend
like somehow it all worked out.
Low-keying it with Iran
is that what it could be.
You said you won 50 times.
Why would you need a low-keyed
if you won already, right?
You don't need,
nobody believes this anymore.
And remember,
very early before it was accepted
that we were telling you that
because the evidence was clear to us.
He is preparing to allow economic
pressure to mount
as opposed to ordering
a military offensive
per axios.
Now realize the whole general
agenda is what we should be
questioning.
Whether Trump stated that
is pretty clear.
He's been doing the rounds
and making the idea
that it's sort of like
we're just kind of walking it slow.
It's kind of open,
like it's weird change.
Details.
On Saturday,
Iran issues a new list of demands.
It's not new.
Same stuff.
I mean, maybe some small variations
but ultimately what they've already
demanded.
Quote,
we are only semi-negotiating
with them, Trump said.
I don't even know what that means.
As somebody jokingly said,
it's about the same as being
semi-pregnant.
It says U.S. officials say
President Trump is looking
to de-escalate for now.
U.S. stock market futures
open in under five hours.
Who knows what's going on with that now?
Not like I believe it's even organic.
Now, again, today,
like every time,
no, they could be lying
like I say every time.
Like I say every time,
tomorrow or the next day,
you'll be able to look back and decide
whether or not it was even happening,
which you can prove they've been lying
to us or been lied to.
Trump's team.
This is our gachi,
Iran, not currently engaged
in talks with the U.S.
That's it.
Now, what it says,
we are not currently engaged
but messengers are being exchanged.
Which is, like I said,
been going on the entire time.
So, they can go to Pakistan
and be like sending this message
and they'll accept it
because they seem interested
in ending this.
Unlike Israel and the United States,
at least Israel,
now with the United States,
seems to be desperately looking
for a way out.
That's important, though.
Mario, of course,
not fall comes in as Trump says
the U.S. is deliberately low-keying
it with Iran for now.
Instead of launching
a new military campaign,
he's letting economic pressure
to the works.
Yeah, they love to just like
wrap this up for him.
Good job, propaganda.
In a short interview,
he pointed to Israel
or Iran's storing inflation
empty coffers
and an inability to pay
its own troops.
Now, look, there's probably
some level of that.
The question is, does that have,
I mean, what do we really,
is this,
it's, look at it like this.
They're trying to frame this
the way Americans might feel this.
Who, I don't believe
it's the same situation.
I think most Iranians
are very aware of
what's happening to them.
And this is a kind of a
national thing.
Like, think of it like this.
Imagine right now
you had some government
or some element
that Trump pointed to
that openly started
taking over the U.S.
You would have, like, luck.
And honestly,
you'd probably even have Democrats
standing with Trump.
That's kind of the way
that's kind of where I think
this is in, in their country
right now.
And on top of that,
the idea that, you know,
economic pressure
doing the work
is that even really
what's happening
on top of the fact
that I bet you Iranians
are kind of standing in unison.
I don't think so.
I think that they bombed
the hell out of them
and ultimately the sanctioning
part of it
has long since been able
to truly cripple them
because they've,
it's been going on
for my entire life.
So Iran is built around it.
It's just like Russia
and China.
It's the same kind of idea.
It says in a short interview
he pointed to Iran's
soaring inflation
empty coffers
and inability
to pay its own troops.
Well, maybe they're projecting
a little bit too close to home.
Maybe that's kind of
what they're dealing with.
The naval blockade
is intensifying
that crisis
while oil prices
have eased enough
to reduce the pain
in America's pump.
That's not true at all.
So Mario just screaming
what Trump,
yeah, that's not even accurate.
Last I checked
it was over $4, Mario.
You're just going to repeat
what they tell you.
Trump described the standoff
as a chess game
that always works out.
Does a chess game
always work out?
Remind me,
why don't you tell us
how to play UNO again, Trump?
That worked out for you.
I mean, I think,
even thinks about his analogies.
Remember, he said,
we've got all the cards
and showed all the wilds,
but the game of UNO,
you're supposed to get
rid of your cards.
Like that was embarrassing.
So a chess game
that always works out
is just stupid.
All the chess people
laughing out there.
Los Angeles Times.
This is as of yesterday.
Iran believes time
is on its side
with the war
in the United States.
It's worth reading.
The point is simply
the Iran is simply
feels that they have
the upper hand.
I think they're accurate
with that.
Now, on top of that,
showing you the,
I guess, the lower hand
or however you'd frame that
with the United States,
Pentagon presses defense firms
to build weapons.
Trump already brought up
the Defense Production Act.
For people that remember
the COVID-19 time frame,
that should be alarming.
Just because it's not called
the COVID-19 or a virus,
the same elements
of the same kind of stuff
seem to be rising.
The idea of a
basically production of martial
law,
the idea of potential
like ice things
and like,
you know,
all of this stuff.
Similar things are happening.
I just personally
just align it with the great reset,
the control grid,
where it goes.
Just my secondary opinion.
But the point is on this,
they're essentially
pressuring people to build more
because they're depleted,
which we now know.
But remember,
Hexeth and Trump,
they all lied about that.
Not true.
I'm going to go after those
leakers.
Put it in prison.
Well, they were right,
despite them yelling
about putting them in prison,
which shows you
how desperate they are,
how clearly they did not want
that to be talked about,
even though it was accurate.
Travis Acre says,
Pete Hexeth said
the reports were false.
This is about the ship.
But now the families of the sailors
on board USS Lincoln
are speaking out.
So what it needs to show you this
and that and plenty of others
is that they care so little
about the people they claim
they support,
the troops,
Americans,
that they will lie
about what they're suffering
to keep their agenda clean.
So you don't realize
they're failing them,
right?
In this case,
Mike Levin reports,
right now,
more than 5,000 sailors
and Marines are stuck aboard
the USS Abraham Lincoln
in the ninth month
of the deployment
that was supposed to be seven.
Alone, that seems to be a little bit,
no, it's military.
They don't seem to care much
about your rights.
But it's a supporting
military operations
against Iran
that Congress never authorized.
Doesn't that seem a little bit
extra relevant right now?
How you're keeping them deployed
longer than they were supposed
to be on a war that's illegal?
Yeah, that's crazy.
You're going to start to get some
people that are
thinking about how they change,
you know,
whatever,
people in the military
who decide to start
protesting.
Their families are
begging someone to listen,
moldy showers,
broken toilets.
No, this is something they denied.
Now, I can't verify
the full extent to it,
but there are people in there,
you can read about it
who are saying,
that's what I'm dealing with.
And watch as they try to
go after the military people
exposing the truth.
I mean, I guarantee that'll happen.
Even if it doesn't get reported on,
I guarantee somebody's
already going find them,
arrest them,
you know,
dishonorable discharge.
Watch.
I'm only to bet you
that's not even a joke.
Moldy showers, broken toilets,
hot water,
no hot water for weeks,
meals that came down
to half a cup of rice
and two tortillas.
No hot water for weeks
is insanely dangerous,
especially on a boat,
the ship.
Ask any cook or chef
who's ever worked on a cruise ship.
It's insane
the level of safety they take.
Like, wild.
If you ever worked on a kitchen,
you know, things that you would
keep for three days,
they have to throw away every 12 hours.
Like, it's crazy.
Why?
Because you're on a ship.
Because you have to be extra careful
because if somebody gets sick
and it spreads,
you know, it's dangerous, right?
No hot water.
If you ever worked in a restaurant,
if you lose hot water,
you're legally required
to shut the restaurant down
because you don't have
water to clean.
You can't sanitize properly.
You know, there's other ways
around it,
but just realize
I'm just pointing out
that on top of everything else,
that seems insane.
Dangerous.
A ship store out of soap
to deodorant,
toothpaste.
Sailors were so worn down
that according to one family member,
the ship's own doctor
warned they need to reach port soon
or people are going to start
losing their minds.
Back in April,
when families first raised the alarm
in April,
Hexeth dismissed the reports
as fake news,
which is what they always do,
both sides.
There are other...
There are the people we ask to serve.
These are the people we ask to serve
in one of the most dangerous
workplaces on earth,
the flight deck
of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.
They and their families deserve answers.
That's my point, guys.
They don't seem to care about them.
They are tools in their mind.
And here's Pete Hexeth.
This is two days ago.
Trump won the war,
that's the one Trump posted to
the link.
So here's the reality check,
the inconvenient truth
that doubters don't want to talk
about, it says.
If Trump were losing this war,
or his war,
his war,
none of these initiatives
would be happening.
Instead,
what is being witnessed
has increased American influence.
I mean, guys,
that's just embarrassing.
Increased partnerships?
Where?
What are you talking about?
I mean,
where are the new ones?
I mean,
you could talk about the Abraham Accords,
but that's even Saudi Arabia's
pushback on that.
And more momentum
for the framework
Trump envisions for bringing
long-term peace and stability?
These are,
you're imagining these things.
Guys, this is,
you are in fantasy land.
These are not signs of defeat,
but regional transfer,
right?
Yeah, if they existed,
you could baby,
but even if they did,
you would still argue
he was losing the war.
The spin doctors can spin
whatever they did.
Well, please.
So your narrative is opinion.
How pathetic.
And I just simply said,
well, this waged,
aged as expected.
And here's another example
of something aged wonderfully.
Here's percent
on the seventh.
Here's what he said.
You're never going to let them
have a nuclear weapon.
That's right.
They were,
Trump just said,
well, that's not important.
Well, that's buried.
We don't have to worry about anymore.
Funny how they don't talk to each other.
We had Epic Fury,
which was the kinetic portion
at Treasury.
We did economic fury.
Yeah, which he admitted
was a direct effort
to destroy their currency,
which was the reason people
protested,
which they said they did.
They literally manufactured all of this.
By the way,
all of which would be crimes.
You don't just get to
unilaterally economically attack.
It's called economic terrorism.
It's what sanctions are.
They use them the same way every time.
What goes little publicized
is on the kinetic side,
air forces wiped out,
navies wiped out.
Is he still,
I mean,
are they still playing this game?
This was,
I mean,
so we're talking about
the Navy wiped out.
How are they still controlling the
straight?
I mean,
you have to realize as percent,
you must go,
are we really still saying that?
Like you're going for the interview,
right?
You,
you're,
I mean,
these people aren't in third grade.
Guys,
you're going to go,
but wait a minute.
Right now,
they have clearly
still stopping us
from going the straight.
So then we have to acknowledge
they have some form of a Navy.
So saying that don't have a Navy
makes me look stupid.
Like clearly,
these people are just there
for the power.
Importion of their missiles,
more importantly,
their missile production.
Yeah, right.
That percent or that
Huckabee just told us had increased.
Like we should,
we should be hearing like the
always sunny or the
whatever that other song of
Larry David,
you know,
like that kind of music
in the background,
like that's how dumb this is.
Like it's like a,
you know,
some kind of a joke
sort of feels like
on the economic side,
we have them by the throat
and they've,
they've got 150,
180 percent food inflation
not able to pay.
Anyway, so what you're doing is
we're bragging about
how we're making people suffer.
We're bragging about
how we are making Iranians suffer.
Like think that's,
what do you think that affects?
You think the government is paying
the government,
the people are paying
for the inflation.
They are the people you claim
you're saving
are paying 150 times
for their food,
you know,
sort of like Americans too.
That's my point,
why Iranians are not going,
yay, the U.S.
Look for yourself.
They don't support
what the U.S. government's doing
because it's making their lives bad.
Just like it wasn't the beginning,
guys.
It's not hard to see the troops.
So I think shortly,
maybe even today,
tomorrow we are going to see,
see an agreement
30, 60 day ceasefire.
And okay, so that is getting
a little bit ahead.
So that's the idea
that Trump is going to have
some kind of extended ceasefire
that he wants to drift
in the background.
So clearly that seems to be
their kind of
back burner.
Then if I can't frame this,
I won,
then we'll just kind of
let it become an end of
ceasefire
that we just drift
in the background.
We didn't lose.
Like not losing is better
than, you know,
clearly that's in Trump's mind.
We can just end up
like we haven't finished yet,
forever.
And straight will be open.
Energy prices should come down.
Yeah, but the straight
will be open
the way Iran wants it to be.
That's clear,
unless you somehow
remove the ships
that don't exist.
Just hard, man.
It's just,
it's, I don't even,
the words don't even
to do it justice.
It's embarrassing.
It's pathetic.
It's depressing.
So here is a conversation
about what they did.
Now this is interesting
seeing as how it's not new,
which is funny,
by the way,
somebody says,
good plan,
funny that Massad,
funny that you know this,
but Massad didn't.
Now there could be
kind of a joke
to say Massad's
bad at their job, too.
I don't know
how you want to frame that.
Well, what's funny is,
it's not new.
I mean,
this is March 9th.
This is the
Sufran Center Iran's
Mosaic Defense Strategy.
This is from
Radio Free Liberty,
Radio Free Europe.
I mean,
it's literally a US
government propaganda platform
with top brass dead
Iran's deploys
decentralized Mosaic strategy.
Interesting, right?
Now this is
after they've engaged,
right?
But the point is this was
it taken,
this was done
arguably long
before this ever came
to happen,
like before February 28th.
And this has been
the long-term plan
to,
you know,
be able to do it
through now,
to be able to
fight off
or survive
the endless plan
from the US and Israel.
So watch this for yourself.
I mean,
who's to say this is,
I mean,
this is just a video
someone did
based on the public
information.
So it's,
or, you know,
maybe some things
they add it to.
Who knows?
The point though
is that
it's just an opinion.
Consider this for yourself
and ask yourself
whether this makes sense.
We do know,
for example,
about the general plan,
like the idea
of the way
that they decentralized,
the way that they
did move things,
munitions scattered around,
they did put ships
under the,
under caverns
in the,
in,
in mountains with waters,
they could save them
from being bombed.
All this happened,
you can prove it.
Especially now,
they still have these things,
right?
I think this is generally accurate.
And I think what it's showing you
is,
is essentially
two things.
Right now,
clearly the cryptonite
to what they're trying to do
because they can't just
keep bombing,
it's not going to do anything
with this plan.
At least not
get them what they want.
But it also shows you,
I guess,
the lack of foresight,
which is what so many people
pointed out,
that they just didn't even care,
it posted on radio
for liberty
and they didn't plan.
In fact,
technically it was,
that was again later,
but the information
was people like us,
were talking about this.
And they didn't expect this.
To me,
it either shows you,
like one thing I,
I think that someone like Trump
is literally being used
right now.
Whether he is all the time
or not,
in this case,
I think this is,
people,
this is so he is there,
so Trump can be tricked
into being the front of this.
That's kind of how it feels
right now,
just a thought.
Because the truth is,
I don't see why
he wouldn't have been able
to see this.
I think somebody
used this
to allow this to happen
because in,
nobody wanted to be
the scapegoat,
the fall guy.
Here's what they did.
Iran has built a military
that cannot be completely
destroyed,
not by bombing,
not by assassination,
and not even by Iran itself.
This is the doctrine
that explains how Iran
is still surviving
this unequal war.
In 2003,
when Saddam Hussein's
military collapsed
in just 11 days,
Iran's generals were
watching
and they reached
one conclusion.
Kill the head
of a centralized military
and the entire force
falls apart.
So in 2005,
IRGC General Mohammad Jafari
formally built a structure
now known as
the Mosaic Doctrine.
What is its core idea?
Divide the military
into 31 parts,
one for each province.
Did I say Mosaic?
I think I said something else.
Mosaic Doctrine.
And make each part
fully capable
of fighting on its own.
Each of Iran's
31 provincial commands
has its own headquarters,
its own weapons stockpile,
its own intelligence network,
and its own pre-written,
pre-approved seal orders.
Now, here's what I find
interesting about this.
I mean, obviously,
this could work against them,
right?
So now you have
different locations
which are essentially autonomous.
You still have a
central command,
but can operate on,
sort of sounds like the
state militia dynamic
of the U.S. original setup,
which is interesting,
where you have the
president,
but that each location
has their own kind of
fully functioning
for local defense
that can be called together
for the larger defense.
And so it's interesting
that this is something
that you could argue
that individual locations
could be infiltrated,
manipulated,
as opposed to top-down, right?
But it depends on
if that's something
that people are, you know,
if that's...
I think right now,
like I was saying,
that this is such a cohesion
because of what they've
driven them to,
that it's something that,
like, I don't mean just
recently.
I mean, the years
of non-stop attacks,
assassinations,
I think it's caused this.
It's caused sort of
a unity in that way,
at least in regard
to outside forces.
And so what we're seeing
here is the ability
to create that
and, as they'll continue to
see now,
giving directives
that should,
as we saw,
leadership could taken out
their goal
would be just to keep going
because they got no response,
which would explain
where we are.
An intelligence network
and its own pre-written,
pre-approved sealed orders,
orders that activate
the moment
central command goes silent.
No signal from Tehran is needed.
No order from the supreme
leader is required.
The absence
of any order to stop,
that is the trigger.
This is not a flaw
in the design.
This is the design.
On February 28th,
Israel and the U.S.
struck Iran's
leadership infrastructure.
Khamenei was killed
and thousands of strikes
destroyed the very
communication backbone
that would have carried
the ceasefire order.
But still,
all 31 commands
kept attacking
because the doctrine said,
if no one tells you to stop,
you don't stop.
Interesting.
Makes sense.
Now, I'm sure there's more to it.
Right?
But it certainly makes sense.
And the question again is,
how could they not know that?
So this is March 9th.
Iran's mosaic
defense strategy,
you can read more about it.
Desensualization as resilience factor.
And then again,
radio free liberty.
Now, this is in Hebrew,
but this is the Mossad.
Now, just again,
it shows you,
and this interestingly was on
August 7th,
Israel Channel 12
reporting that the very high
ranking Mossad officials were
dismissed due to the failure
of overthinking Iran.
So it shows you that this was
already,
maybe this is why you're seeing
actions in the United States,
because Israel's already sort of
like you guys failed,
you know, that they're getting,
you know,
it's the media's calling it out
for how the Iran war is a failure.
Everyone is now,
it's,
you can't ignore this anymore.
Like I said,
doesn't mean they might not
decide to push this even further,
which I hope to God doesn't happen.
But at the end of the day,
right now,
I mean,
it's,
it's effectively a failure
in this regard.
And that's what we've been
telling you because the evidence
has been there.
Foreign policy put this out.
This was June 16th.
So last month,
I find it interesting.
It's even more clear now.
And it's talking about Iran
as a bigger defeat than Vietnam.
What I find fascinating is that
you, you know,
I agree,
I would have argued this was clear
then too.
I mean,
I was essentially saying it,
but it's even more obvious now
with what's recently happened.
At its second,
at his second inaugural,
US President Donald Trump
pronounced his hope
that our recent presidential election
will be remembered as the greatest
and most consequential election
in our history of our country.
Losing,
but he says,
by losing the Gulf War,
marks a strategy,
a strategic calamity
far greater than US defeat
in Vietnam.
Defeat in the Iranian war
looks on the surface
like nothing,
nothing like other US military defeats.
The speed of the war
and its remoteness
have lent a air of unreality
to the whole endeavor.
There was,
however,
a national consensus
in regard to Vietnam.
That it was a stain
on the national fabric.
A 2014 Chicago Council
on Global Affairs poll
found 58% of Americans
in regard to Vietnam
described it as a dark moment
and only 12%
has something to be proud of.
The most difficult point to grasp
about that conflict today
may be why the United States
fought so hard
given how little the conflict
turned out to matter
to Washington.
Now, what this won't get into
as sort of a somewhat pro
establishment,
you know,
to some degree platform,
the idea being
that,
remember,
what we're talking about is
administration game
where it was clear they were failing,
which is interesting.
They don't really make the point
in this article.
That's where I kind of thought
this was going to go
is that
Vietnam was kicked down the road
multiple times
or three minutes.
knowing they were losing,
not wanting to be the one
to be seen to fail.
And what happened
because they did that?
Americans continued to die
in insane numbers
just so these
elitist men
would not be seen to lose.
I mean, you don't,
I mean, look at what we're
dealing with now, guys.
Maybe we're having less casualties,
maybe.
I mean, I could say for sure
less than this,
but who knows
what the real casualty numbers are.
But clearly it's the same dynamic.
But it's about ego.
So it says,
for all the US policymakers
waging war,
waging war tolerated
what would now be
almost unimaginable in casualties.
US failure in the war
ultimately mattered little
to broader American strategic
objectives in regard to Vietnam,
which is interesting.
It says as early as 1964,
internal US government debates
questioned the domino theory,
the idea that one country
becoming communist
would lead it to its neighbors
following.
That would become popularly
identified with the US war in
Vietnam.
Well, yeah.
Well, how did that work out?
The point that you can dictate
what other people can decide
their lives should be
should not be something
we take part in.
The result of the war mattered
to Vietnam
as did the description,
a desperation of the refugees
who fled in the years to come.
The point being is that clearly
what happened to Vietnam,
despite Americans putting
into their minds,
continued long-term.
Yet those observations
do not change the fact
that for the United States
itself,
the consequence of a costly defeat
were in the long run
relatively minor
and inward looking
in regard to Vietnam.
The United States emerged,
and what we're talking about
is like a strategic
US government interest,
not the people.
Very different.
The United States emerged
from the wider Cold War
triumphant.
Again, from their perspective,
Vietnam itself is a power
surprisingly friendly
to the United States today.
In contrast,
compare that to right now.
The United States is
inarguably,
which I agree with,
inarguably
in a weaker position
than when it began
this war of choice,
with core US strategic
objectives harmed.
Like they've lost publicly.
And Iran is a site
from losing
munitions
and certain military
equipment,
ships and whatnot.
I argue,
wildly benefited.
Their position
is incredibly increased.
It says contrast
how its military performance
has seemed during this conflict
with the US-led coalition's
war to reverse
Iraqi President
Sam Hussein's
conquest of Kuwait.
In the 1990-91 conflict,
the seeming ease
with which Iraq's military
was dismembered
stunned the world.
By contrast,
the technically superior
performance of US arms
in the Iran conflict,
not even that,
is somewhat debatable,
by the way,
whether Iran has been holding back
or not.
But they're saying
that in regard to that performance,
the has been overshadowed
their superior performance
by the shallowness
of US arsenals.
Calling into question
US preparedness
for a conflict
with any foe
more powerful
than the Islamic Republic.
Very concerning
in that future step,
that's very short-sighted,
especially with the very same
people going,
China,
Russia,
they want to take over.
And then you just
completely deplete
yourself in front of the world.
Seems crazy,
unless that's the plan
for Israel.
The lasting image
of high-tech combat
from this conflict
will be the blood-spattered bags
of Iranian schoolgirls killed.
That's what's going to be remembered, guys.
Iran was nevertheless
able to penetrate
those systems
to great effect
the allies
of the United States
and Israel,
by the way,
calling into question
how those systems
would fare
against a more focused enemy
over a longer conflict.
Strategically,
the outcomes are far grimmer.
The United States
achieved regime change of a sort
rather than turning Tehran
into a pliable client,
which is usually their goal,
not benefit for the people.
The war made Iran
more hard-line.
Now, in that sense,
you could agree with that, right?
This isn't again,
the sense is that you did,
like right now,
you had a group
that might have been
aiming for more collaboration,
regardless of what they were
saying,
that you could look and find that.
Look at our gacha,
look at plenty of them.
They were more wanting
to have a place in the stage,
the world stage,
if you will.
Now,
what do you think you did?
You murdered their families.
You literally,
you know,
you created the people
that will lead
with more of a military mindset,
which probably is what
is real wanted, guys.
In a sense of,
like at least
manufacturing more narratives
to go forward
outside of actually just
taking over,
that says,
leaving the Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps effectively
in charge of the country,
Israeli and U.S. arms,
however brutally effective
in the first days of the war,
ultimately demonstrated
the limitations of
kinetic solutions,
especially in the world,
the warfare of today, right?
To Iran's great benefit.
Iran's nuclear program
has now endured two rounds
of joint U.S.-Israeli attacks
and it seems unlikely
a third would farm it,
fair much better.
The effects on U.S. leadership
in the global system
have been more profound.
Regional allies,
many of whom reportedly
argued against the venture,
bore the brunt of the costs.
What do you think that does
to the GCC,
you know,
Kuwait,
UAE,
Saudi Arabia?
I mean,
we're already seeing it.
A Ramco being bombed,
like they're making
their own agreements now, guys.
Like this has completely shifted
the entire thing.
Maybe that was an ultimately
point and Trump wasn't the one
doing it.
Most tellingly,
Iran learned that its capacity
to throttle the strait of
promos could deliver
economic leverage
on a worldwide scale.
Now,
still again, fair,
but let's remember
the reality of this.
This was not something that was
done like
as a deliberate sort of
terrorist tactic to gain.
It was only done in response
to an illegal war
that was thrust upon them,
whether or not they had designs
to be terrorists,
you know, whatever.
It's,
you just have to be real
about how this was driven
into reality
and their way that they
dealt with this.
Even if that was from the sense
of trying to project
a different thing than they are,
which I've always said
about something like Russia.
Just consider,
maybe they're just playing the
role that counterbalances
the belligerence of the U.S.
government
and not just that they are
wanting good for the world.
I don't think that about
any of the governments,
by the way,
but it also doesn't make
them the villain
that they frame them as.
Question all of it, guys.
The United States,
under whatever management
it finishes,
will come,
will confront these consequences
while being itself
weakened at home and abroad.
I mean, this is a foreign policy,
but this is a platform that's been,
you know,
it's not,
it's,
it's not some fringe blog, okay?
They've been in depth discussing
literal government dynamics for him.
You have to understand that this,
it's still an opinion,
but it has weight in the group
that might later talk about
whether or not the U.S. is failing,
whether or not they're losing,
you know, depleted immunizations,
whether or not this will,
you know, it matters.
It has weight for that community.
And it says its allies will
have less confidence
in its capabilities
than they already had,
sorry to the case.
Its public will be less willing
to bear the cost
of even productive engagement.
Its rivals will be likelier
to challenge Washington's will.
These,
those results will be far more
lasting and severe
than the U.S. failure
in the war with Vietnam.
One thing will be similar,
however, decades from now,
students looking back
to understand
this American conflict
will raise the same question.
He says he asks about
the U.S. war in Vietnam.
Why?
And of course the answers will
probably not be satisfying.
That's what it finishes with,
you know?
I mean, it's very real, guys.
So what's interesting
is where this goes.
I mean, with that framing,
you could very easily
ask yourself whether,
I mean,
any number of things,
problem-reaction solution.
Not that this is even
most likely,
I don't think it is,
but isn't it possible
this was an effort
to create this,
to rationalize
the multipolar direction?
You know,
it's,
the point is that it's clear
that there's
ulterior motives
everywhere.
And clear that U.S.
government and Trump
is sort of the fall guy here,
at least they drove
themselves to this position.
Worth considering.
Now, we're obviously
going to keep up on this.
It's going to keep going,
I think,
but we're right now
with a, you know,
the peak it seems to,
it's going down.
I feel like this is going
to be them trying
to distance themselves
with Israel
trying to pull them back in.
That's what I get
the sense of.
But I guess we'll see.
But is it crazy
how we, you know,
months into this,
what we were saying then
is literally
where we ended up.
Crazy how that keeps
happening with this show,
isn't it?
It's wild,
how that always works out.
I shouldn't say always,
but pretty,
look for yourself.
It's not,
it's our record speaks
for itself.
Now, in addition to this,
Trump says,
in regard to a different,
the Ukraine-Russia conflict,
which is just interesting
to me.
There's two points
to make on this.
I'll play it first.
Here's what he says
when asked about this.
Thanks to an increase
their attacks on
civilians.
I know that, yeah.
I know that.
That must be a concern to you,
Mr. President.
Well, it's,
look,
we're not involved
from the standpoint
it's,
we're separated
by an ocean,
but I hate to see
25,000 young people
a month get killed
and that's what's happening
between Russia
and Ukraine.
They're losing on average
25,000,
mostly soldiers
a month.
And,
you know,
we're working on it
and I think
we're making progress,
but it's a violent,
very violent war.
There's a lot of hatred
in that war,
a lot of hatred
between the two leaders.
I settled eight wars.
I thought this would be
maybe one of the easier ones
and it turned out to be
the most difficult,
but progress is being made.
Thank you very much.
So, did you catch that?
You got to love that.
Okay, thanks.
Bye.
Move on.
I think you realize
he screwed up there
at the end
because,
wait a minute.
Here,
let's go to the middle.
Oops.
Mostly soldiers a month.
Let's be a concern to you,
Mr. President.
No, it's,
look,
we're not involved
from the standpoint
it's,
we're separated by an ocean.
Yeah,
sort of like
another war
you could talk about,
right?
Weird how one matters
and one doesn't.
Even though it's a war
you're clearly involved with
that you funded
in this administration,
but you know,
it's an ocean away,
so I don't know.
Pretend we're not involved
in that right now.
It's just embarrassing, guys.
Yes, you're involved,
but so too is Israel,
so too is Iran,
so too why,
why is it different?
You know,
it's,
it's a lazy argument
and why don't they
call it out on it?
But I hate to see
25,000 young people
a month get killed
and that's what's happening
between Russia and Ukraine.
They're losing on average,
25,000.
The accuracy of this is,
you know,
who knows,
the point would be
that you're engaged in a war
and they're killing,
and this is a war
that the U.S.
Israel and Israel
have literally
stoked into reality,
probably to keep them
involved.
I mean,
who knows,
there's other areas
to get into
and I don't want to distract
the point of today,
but there are plays around here,
whether or not this is
in order to keep Russia,
like one of the earliest
points
was to kind of get them
mired in this,
like with an Afghanistan point,
that was originally the idea.
Who knows?
But either way,
it's a kind of a lazy argument
to say that somehow,
you know,
I mean, as you conduct a war
of choice that somehow
they're responsible,
you know,
Russia, yes,
is responsible for their actions,
absolutely,
like any government is,
but we need to again
remember how this started.
We're talking about
the ethnic cleansing
of people
that Russia had
a responsibility to protect.
Crimea,
Dondas,
this is the idea, guys,
and are we still pretending
like we don't know that?
I'll still reference
Eva Bartlett's work
and the reality
that goes back a decade
where she was proving to you
that they were
murdering these people
and they were screaming for help
and, you know,
it's just,
it's just such a broad,
the whole thing.
It's mired in nonsense.
And so right now,
the second part of this,
isn't that a war
that he told you
he already solved?
Yes, it is.
Mostly soldiers a month
and, you know,
we're working on it
and I think we're making progress, but
you mean the one you
finished,
dissolved?
That's the one of the 10
that you've dissolved.
That's your list,
but you're working on it?
Cool.
It's a violent,
very violent war.
There's a lot of hatred
in that war.
A lot of hatred
between the two leaders.
Yeah, unlike this one,
that you guys love each other.
He's just weird.
I don't even understand.
I think Trump
just likes to hear himself talk.
I settled eight wars.
I thought this would be.
Oh, wait a minute.
No, it was 10.
And now there's two still going
that didn't get finished.
I mean, who knows?
It's like a hundred million people
that were killed in Iran.
He just says
whatever needs to work.
The point, though,
he has said
this was one he solved.
That's just embarrassing.
And that's why he ends with.
Maybe one of the easier ones
and it turned out to be the most
difficult.
Whoa, it turned out to be the most
difficult as if you solved it.
But whoops, you just said
that you were in the middle of
trying to solve it.
It's all about progress
is being made.
Thank you very much.
Come on, leave the room.
I messed up.
Kind of kidding.
Who knows?
The point is clearly
that is also another lie.
But you know what?
It's not even worth getting into
anymore because
anybody that doesn't realize
he's a dishonest person
at this point deserves to be lied
to or doesn't care.
I mean, guys,
it's insanely obvious
what this person is.
No more than different than Biden
and any of the rest.
Now, quick point on this
and we're going to get into the
point to Palantir
and have a clip from Whitney,
by the way,
and talk about this
interesting continued sort of
regime change, if you will.
Infiltration, if you will,
from the technocratic side of it,
which I argue are two parts
of the same larger agenda.
But Shannon Joy just simply,
I wanted to highlight this.
She had called out,
I showed you this clip before,
last show, I believe,
and I made the point again
as Glenn Beck is trying to convince you,
alongside this other Liz Wheeler,
one of the most transparent in history,
standing there with that fake binder
in front of the Epstein files
and then never talked about it later
when Trump told him to ignore it.
Yeah, so one of those,
one of those people you should laugh at
and never watch again.
The point, though,
is that she's talking to this other
fake news media person, Glenn Beck,
and it says,
Trump's reorganizing the global order
and he's doing this to change the world
for your benefit,
trust the plan,
because it's all coming down.
That's what he's doing.
And remember, these are the people
that were lying to you.
Like, this is what we were considering
in the early parts of this.
They were the ones telling you
to trust this in Iranis to be killed
because nuclear power and all the same stuff,
now that's failing,
now they're changing the direction.
That's what I originally was worried about
with that first narrative,
even if it was true
that Trump would simply jump on it to go,
that's my thing, I'm doing that.
I'm not really failing,
it's all a grand plan
to reorganize energy.
Maybe, in fact,
I am seeing that to some degree
and that is something we should be considering.
I don't think Trump's the one making that happen.
That's just what my gut would tell me
based on where this is going.
But I think, and especially with
lazy glum on arguments like this
from Glenn Beck,
where now that we've failed,
let's make it about something else
that we're actually changing
the global order and we'll trust the plan.
Okay, so Joy, Shannon Joy called him out.
You're wrong.
You're a criminal.
It's not Forty Jess.
Don't trust the plan.
Just stop, Glenn, she said.
And she said, I'd like to invite Glenn Beck
to come on the show
and answer questions about his statements here.
Now, he hasn't followed up.
I didn't surprise him.
But on that note,
just a brief point to this,
and we're going to come back around to it,
as you guys know,
what I think we're referring to there,
like what I think Glenn Beck
is lazily trying to point to
is a real thing that's happening.
And it really is a sort of,
like, I'm going to make this very clear right now
with the connection to what Whitney just talked about
and the larger point
that we're going to get into
about Palantir working with media groups
like USA Today,
the Telegraph in Business Insider
and using their data on you
as actionable intelligence.
Now, what I think we're talking about here
is a larger thing,
the larger point we've been making
about the transition of governance,
the way we engage with authority in our lives.
So what Glenn is talking about in that clip,
and in fact, you know what,
let me just do this real quick.
Because, you know, I try not,
you know, as much as I clearly don't care
about being redundant on this show
because I think sometimes it's necessary
to replay certain clips and so on.
Like in this case, I was like,
I don't want to play it again,
but I think I do.
I think I should play it again.
Just briefly in the beginning of it.
I'll grab it real quickly
because the point for me
is the, of what, you know,
I want you to hear what he's saying
and not just hope that you watch the last show.
And it's a very quick part about how,
you know, what, like again,
like I said, you'll hear what I was briefly saying
is that he's basically just saying
that we need to trust this.
Trump's got a bigger plan.
It's going to be best for the country.
Paraphrasing is what he's getting into.
Here it is.
It seems to me what you mean
when you say that these are indications
that President Trump is resetting
the world order and the implication of that.
I find this funny.
It's a clip, by the way, juxtaposed,
but she says reframing the world order.
Now, why I find this relevant,
I mean, it's my opinion,
but he goes on to say
reframing the new world order.
Now, I don't think that's,
I think that's just Glenn trying to,
like, I think these guys, like honestly,
look at some of the people in their
audiences and laugh at them.
Like they're,
I think they're playing a role
into what they think.
And I think that it's,
it's like with Donald Jones.
I think half the things they put out,
they don't even believe.
It's about trying to tap into
whatever they think.
And I think most of the time,
they don't even respect the people they,
because they have,
you know, they're lying to you.
So they, why would they respect you?
Either way, all my opinion,
we're talking about, you know,
the reimagining the order,
which again, my point was something
they tried to tell us wasn't even happening
was Trump trying to fight the globalists, right?
Now you're reimagining the global order.
Wouldn't that make you a globalist?
Right? I mean, think about how silly this all is.
Donald Trump is changing the new world order entirely.
How do you change the new world order?
You could have a new world order,
which just simply means like a multi-polar world
versus a, you know,
unipolar world.
But, or you could talk about it
like the new world order,
like a group of cabalists in a circle
talking about, right?
What do you mean?
So I just want to point out how silly that is.
If you're changing the world order,
that's one thing.
We're changing the new world order.
It doesn't make sense.
It's said for a reason.
I'll leave it there.
Fairly.
And it won't be...
Donald Trump is changing the new world order entirely.
And it won't be fully understood
for probably another five to 10 years.
Oh, great. So well after he leaves power.
So just trust the plan, guys.
That on top of the...
He says it's over $20 trillion of investment.
Let's just say it's $10 trillion.
$10 trillion.
Yeah, let's just guess.
Let's just blindly guess into what Trump says is happening
because it's all going to work out.
Why do people laugh this guy out of the room?
$10 in building new factories here at home.
So we are making things again.
You mean data centers?
That's what he's actually talking about, by the way.
With AI, with the rebuilding of factories,
with the dominance of energy and oil.
I'm sorry.
That's not what's happening.
Chris Martinson, I think,
has been breaking that down, actually.
It's an illusion.
I've said a long time ago about the illusion of
even the shale and the conversation of the oil.
Like these are...
They've lied about the possibilities in a lot of these cases.
And they haven't even truly...
It's just about trying to frame it a certain way
for their benefit on the world stage.
These people are not on your side,
or they're bad at their job.
Gang, but the world doesn't work without real energy,
without gas, LP, and oil.
It absolutely can, if we really wanted it to.
That's a question of individual choice, though.
But the idea that we're somehow beholden
to this Rockefeller, petrol, standard oil,
medical, pharmaceutical, petrol.
Or rather, I meant a petroleum-based pharmaceutical.
Everything in our life, it's built around that.
That's not necessary.
Just like where it's not necessary
to be bound to the type of for-profit,
monetized electricity.
It's like we have other paths.
These people just either don't know or don't care.
And I'm going to leave it there.
That was the main point.
I went over this all last time.
But again, the question is,
why is he pushing that?
And so I want to highlight that I think
this is what he's actually leaning into now.
No joke.
And I think he already knew this.
It's about trying to walk you into it.
It's this whole Curtis-Yarvin philosophy
that's up taken by people like Alice Karp and Andreessen
and Peter Thiel, Joe Lonsdale, Lucky Palmer.
It's a whole inner circle, guys.
And it's not a secret.
Like, I want to be clear about that.
Whether or not this is interconnected,
this is not a secret.
They've written books.
They're publicly saying,
and I brought it up many times, as you all know.
So the network state agenda,
as they call tech-scientism in the book they write about,
I think that's what they're now getting at.
They want to reimagine the way this works.
And I think they're now getting close to admitting
that this is the direction they're actually taking.
This is the dark enlightenment movement.
This is dark enlightenment movement.
This is dark MAGA.
Anyone must.
Like, these are not jokes, guys.
It's all very real.
So that, as well as the another way to look at it,
is the rapid transition to a techno feudal state,
or rather back to a feudal state,
but this time techno feudal,
because it never really went away.
They just pulled back.
Now they're stepping back out of the shadows,
as an analogy.
Now, to start up with a clip for Whitney Webb.
This is when she was Holden Colada pointed this out.
This is when she was on Chris Hedges' report.
It's a good clip.
Whitney Webb just said the quiet part out loud.
Big tech has fused with the national security state.
Now, I don't think that's that shocking for most people.
I think because of Whitney's work,
and people like Derek and, you know,
IMA in general,
I think people are well aware of this fusion,
that many of them just sort of rationalize why it's necessary.
Sort of why they're trying to rationalize
the fusion with the Israeli government is necessary.
And he says their goal isn't just mass surveillance
using block cameras and data.
It's even darker than that.
They're openly transhumanist.
And again, this goes back to something
we've talked about a long time.
Well, I'll play the clip.
And let's get into the point of the intersection here.
I've read this case is specific,
but the overtaking of these media organizations
as Palantir showing you this kind of,
rather just using their data,
but let's be clear about where I think this is going,
infiltration and use of the kind of larger apparatus,
the control grid,
but the bigger point of where this all goes
and the Curtis Jarvan-type philosophy
about changing this country,
which is not a secret
and is literally what we're seeing take place.
Obviously, it's fair to say that the network
behind the data center push
is extremely large and influential,
obviously spearheaded by big tech companies
that at this point have for all intents
and purposes fused with the national security state.
And this has been ongoing for some time.
So a good example is to look back at the 2018
National Security Commission on AI
that was chaired by Eric Schmidt,
the former Google CEO,
and a close associate of Schmidt
who had previously held a top position
at what is now the Department of War.
And basically everyone on that commission
was either a major executive
at one of these big tech companies
that is behind the data center push
or figures that had previously worked for the military
to establish basically the U.S. roadmap on AI
and what needed to be done
for quote unquote national security purposes.
And it's fair to say that even beyond that,
you can see how these two groups
have become so intertwined by the fact
that the intelligence community
as well as the military
and other major aspects of the federal government
contract extensively with these same big tech companies
and are arguably largely dependent on them
while at the same time
a lot of these big tech oligarchs
are major donors to our politicians.
So on various levels,
they have much more influence
than arguably any other group right now.
And I think as a very visual example
that people will be familiar with
that's a testament to this
is after Trump's inauguration
or during Trump's inauguration last year
behind him was a line
of who's who of big tech CEOs
like Jeff Bezos
and in other figures like him,
a testament to their role and importance
in getting him elected for a second term.
And he is obviously so far
been generously repaying their patronage.
But there's important people to look at too
in the buildup of this AIDEN
as you know, the data center deluge
as you called it
that aren't such public figures at this point.
So there's a lot of AI infrastructure companies
that are becoming increasingly important to this
but they largely stay out of the news.
So one good example I think for this
would be a company called Crusoe AI
which is for example building the Stargate Project
for open AI and Larry Ellison's Oracle
which was announced in the early days
of I think one of the first announcements
actually of Trump soon after his inauguration
this time around.
Don't forget that's also SoftBank
the Japanese guy in the middle
which is wildly intertwined with Israel.
Easy to look up.
I covered my first coverage on Stargate.
And they're basically building
a lot of the data centers
and working as sort of a middle man
between these big tech companies
and the actual creation
and infrastructure that they rely on.
And so those companies
are an important part of this
constellation of actors as well.
And it's also something that's happening
well beyond the U.S.
So one of the founders of Crusoe AI
for example is named Cully Cavness
and he accompanied Peter Thiel
on Peter the co-founder of Palantir
on his recent trip to Argentina
to meet with Javier Malay.
Later they also met with Chilean politicians.
Really quickly just so you can see this
that's why I included it.
Metrocent points out prosperity
is ahead for Argentina 2023.
Elon Musk goes and oh my god
he's libertarian it's great
and now they're literally collapsing
and they have been for a while now
but here's a better look at it.
This is from the 7th of August.
Argentina's peso has fallen to an
all-time low against the U.S. dollar
and has now collapsed 99.8 percent.
Now that's not just you know
understand this is what happens
when you let Zionists influence your
direction and use identity politics
to justify your actions.
That's everywhere we're seeing right
now guys I think that's very important.
Apparently including the president
of Chile that wasn't publicly
announced and also the president
of Paraguay and you know not long
after that you know at least in
the case of Malay there have been
these proposals of having you know
allowing companies with no human
employees that are run by AI
to operate in the country in an
announcement of Stargate Argentina
on behalf of open AI run by Sam
Altman who's closely affiliated
with Peter Thiel.
So these people are looking to
build data centers really all over
the world and you know why are
they doing it why data centers
it's essential to basically their
various plans from AI which run
which include not just you know
their their plans for you know
AI related businesses but also a
lot of these people subscribe
to specific ideologies that see
that extreme investments in AI
and AI compute capability are
necessary in order to further
the development of what they call
artificial general intelligence
or an AI super intelligence and
some of them hold an almost
religious fervor you could say
from having for having that
come to fruition and are openly
transhumanist and think that the
nature the the end goal of
humanity is to have humanity merge
with AI in some capacity.
Now that's really important when
you get into the overlap of the
philosophy that they're pushing
now it doesn't have to be the
same as the you know
it doesn't have to merge
with what we'll show you
but I believe it does and it's
clear with what their own statements
are in the books they've written
that in many cases they see
themselves as I've said before
as some sort of profit class of
the technocratic age I think
that's very relevant.
So first I'll include this again
the idea that what she mentioned
it's right here the dark money
campaign is paying influencers to
frame China AI as a threat
that's open AI that is
Andreessen Harowitz that's
Mark Andreessen
Palantir they are literally
funding the idea to get
people to think they have to
race this through because China
is going to beat us even
though they're far far far ahead
of that so it's an illusion
now why would they do that
because they want you to act
without thinking because this is
going to we're going to look back
once this is done if we get there
and go man we should have been
paying attention while they built
this thing around us.
Now I'll include this point
about detachment 201 as I called
technocracy and uniform
it's the same this is the
merging guys is right in front
of us they have kernels in the
military from meta open AI
Palantir and not some white
lab not white coat you know
they have civilians in the
military that don't wear
uniforms these were given
literal official positions
I spoke to Brad Miller about this
they command anybody
underneath their position
their second in the highest
chain of command guys
how do we not see that for
what it is it's crazy on top
of that as I just pointed out
Mark Andreessen himself
Peg Seth recently appointed him
to the defense policy board
and they said technocracy
is rolling out before our eyes
and there was one other I
couldn't remember there's
somebody else was it Joe
Longsdale or somebody who got
another government position
it's happening right in front
of us now to this point
and we've already seen the
Palantir point I'll actually
include the Derek did an
excellent job on this I mean
really like seven or eight of
them in the lead up to the
election and after but this
is just welcome to the
Palantir world order April 24th
2025 outlining where this
was going to go and where
we're dealing with and
well before most my name is
right so bigger than you know
I mean we talked about the
ice overlap the surveillance
the partnership with Israel
we'll get to in a minute
and the idea of where this
all you know this is a
massive thing that's
building around us
Palantir is a central part
and not the only part
but clearly a central part
in this at least as it
appears to be
and so what's important
to stand is that they're
building out all this
round us but this is a
ongoing process that's
continuing to grow
because what there was
other aspects of it
remember working with the
NSO group only one
of many toka being
another we could talk
about a second
and the surveillance
like flock elements
the data center called
the AI growing the
I'm just trying to think
it's what I'm missing in there
through ice we have the
biometric elements
we've got the flock
biometric elements
we've got Palantir involved
with the AI development
using our personal data
on silent personal
formation alongside Israel
like the point is
they're just this is
becoming some kind of
this is a part of our
government
and I don't mean that
that's not a joke
you literally just saw them
they're literally part
of our military leadership
and the government
that's not something
you should downplay
so thinking about that
this part of the government
and the military
is now partnered
with the media
I mean take for example
that you let's just say
you had the White House
partnering with the media
what would we go
well that's crazy
why that's not even
how that's supposed to work
right
so why would Palantir
they're a military contractor
they're literally part
of the well
that's the point
America's largest
newspaper chain
and plenty of others
partners with Palantir
to analyze
audience data
as traffic fails
now they try to make this
about something
other than it is
I think it's about AI
I think as we already know
AI and the AI bots
are circumventing
people looking for
corporate media anymore
just asking the bot
and giving information
and being misled
half the time
August 6th
USA Today
has made a deal
the company
with software company
Palantir
to analyze
and monetize
user behavior
I thought we were all
outraged about this
just all doing it
this is as of Thursday
he expects the partnership
to strengthen
how we collect
connect
and activate
audience data
to drive more effective
and faster monetization
across our platform
every visit
and this is
that was from USA Today
every visit
every session
and every moment
of attention
creates a signal
yeah we know
when we connect
those signals
they become
actionable intelligence
now whatever they go on
to fill in the blank after that
doesn't matter
because the point is
you're creating a system
that creates actionable
intelligence
that you then
a military contractor
or anybody else involves
could decide
how they want to act
in this case
they say allows us to engage
more effectively
to monetize your relationship
which sounds gross
in its own right anyway
but they're saying
we can use your personal
information
which this system
can parse through
and create information on us
to better serve your interest
what does this sound like
no no we just want to
collect your data
to make our user experience better
can you point to
I mean how many times
has that ever been the case
ask twitter
ask facebook
ask anybody
it's never the case
as they've always said
if you can't see the product
you're the product
right so in this case
they want you to believe
like you're
you're they're
selling your newspaper
but this is
most these things are so
nope
the internet has
circumvented all of this
and the only way they've become
they've made themselves
somehow viable
in this new system
is by putting it online
and now nobody's
even looking at that
so this is them
saving their business
and they're trying to free them
as
using this to help them grow
they're like
to
using the data to help their
business go stronger
when this is now their business
your data has now become
their business
which it was already somewhat
the case
now let me clear
this is how I read this
but I think we all know
how this works guys
just like every other field
like this
when they start taking your
data
that becomes so wildly profitable
that it's no longer
I mean it becomes
their focal point
social media platforms
are not social media
platforms
they're data harvesters
with a social media
application
so in this case
it's becoming
your news too
but we already know that
we've been
hopefully you're well past
the point of thinking
the so-called news
out there was
on your side
every visit
every session
every moment
creates a signal
it's our work
the work our team is doing
with Palantir
is a direct extension
of this strategy
to create actionable intelligence
which the point is
you realize Palantir
will have access to
and that's really
the point that I'm getting to
we are applying Palantir's
AI powered platform
the same one
killing people in Gaza
to one
of the largest opportunities
in front of us
converting the sheer scale
of our audience
into known
orchestrated
first-party relationships
is that what you want
when you're reading
their newspaper
because that is what
turns our reach
into sustainable
high value revenue
well maybe
it just shouldn't exist then
today
USA Today
co-owns
more than 200
local newspapers
which this is part of
in the United States
along with its national daily
us today
USA Today
excuse me
USA Today
co-reported
158 million
unique visitors
in the second quarter of the year
that which was down
from 180 million
in the first quarter
so we're seeing like
in quarter to quarter
like rapid decline
engagement
so they're desperate
I mean the
dying corporate media
has been desperate
for a long time guys
they just haven't been
really showing us that
that's why they've been
you know
desperately getting involved
on social media
and the podcast field
even though they made fun of
all those things until
like just recently
this decline quote
does not reflect lower demand
for the content
they desperately want you to
believe
but it says
what it reflects is
lower referrals
from traditional searches
because those consumer
discovery changes
or because of those
consumer discovery
changes that we're seeing
and witnessing
that does
I just sounded weird
as I was reading it
but see
it's kind of true
but the point is
when people are going online
they're asking grok
and they're not going to
these papers anymore
grok's
you know
giving them what
Elon wants them to see
which is usually
half the picture
and half the time
even not even accurate
USA Today Co
isn't the only media company
to enlist
Palantir services
Alex Springer
which owns
Business Insider
Politico
Build
and the Telegraph
and Fox News
has also partnered with
Palantir
for its data intelligence tools
Reuters
also supplies data
to Palantir
which has been used
by ICE
404 Media
reported in March
I mean
that's insane
Reuters
Thomas Reuters
Fox News
Telegraph
Business Insider
this
they're absorbing
everything they can
and this is a military
this is not just military
military contractor
Palantir is a kernel
in the military
or one of the representatives
of
and now they're
absorbing all of your data
for actionable intelligence
and they're
using this intelligence
to direct things
that in local enforcement
I mean that's how I read that
how would it not
especially if we're in the middle
of some kind of chaotic event
and we need to enforce in the streets
you think they're not going to
rationalize using that
if they aren't already
it's important to note
all of our data remains
our data
cool whatever that means to you
we'll still use it
we'll still steal it
but it's ours
the more known relationships
we have
the more data we create
the more signals we create
the more actionable intelligence
we have
sounds exactly like I'm worried
about
that the Palantir partnership
could result in better recommendations
and offers
based on what we actually care about
yes here are those socks you like
what are you going about
you know
here's a concert
you know
whatever we just heard you talking
about this thing
you want to see
how about you go here instead
is that what anybody wants
does anybody ever wanted that
I know new generations
have grown up into it
without realizing what's happening
that you're being spied on
and being force-directed
advertisement
which is weird
but most people don't like that
most people don't like talking
about a private conversation
with their spouse
and then having Google ads spit
something at you
for the next week
that you talked about
I mean that's what they're talking
about guys
using your engagement
to better recommend offers
based on
well why are they selling you
things in the first place
I don't want offers
from your news organization
it's just weird
the whole thing is weird
and it says and smarter
subscription and advertising
experiences yet
for your engagement
but your better experience
not the point
they don't care
that's the way they sell it to you
USA Today Code
complies with applicable
data protection
and privacy laws
meaning they don't
get me
that everyone says that
nobody does
so it means nothing
maintain strong standards
for data security and governance
unless somebody yells
national security
and then it no longer matters
or you're working with
the military contractor
that works for the U.S. government
that doesn't care in the first place
you tell me where I'm wrong
oh and then here's the actual
just the post USA Today Code
because you know how to be
role on this platform
one example I'd like to highlight
is our work with Palantir
which we expect to strengthen
how we collect, connect
and activate
audience data
to drive more effective
and oops
that's right here
effective
and faster monetization
across our platform
now it comes from the article
we just read
which is now
I think been
put out into other platforms
important to
you know cite the original
platform
on top of that
Plunderbund
shares this
just highlighting
the local papers
that will be effective
I'm willing to bet
you can do this
in every location
you can see
that's included
this one's Ohio
and says
all these Ohio newspapers
teaming up with Palantir
to connect
collect
to connect your online
user behavior
with your true identity
that's the point
or one of them anyway
all of which they will
send to marketers
I mean think of not just
absorbing it to be able
to better
you know
sell you things
or surveil you
but to create a profile
digital twins
even US government
enforcement
the idea that they're
associating this with your
behavior
so when the flock camera
gets a certain ping
on a certain site
and it connects back
with this thing
that says well these people
involved with this same
idea
bad way explaining it
but the idea is
if you're connecting your
behavior with your identity
in ways that are
not things you want out there
whatever that is
your the political ideas
that you most engage
with online
that's what that would be
well
that will be connected
with your footwear profile
and if suddenly
there's some kind of
massive operation
that absorbs
with you know
some kind of
politically motivated
Antifa
domestic terrorism
whatever
and you happen to drive by
at the wrong moment
well these things will get
connected
and you'll be somebody
of interest
I mean this is
and you may think that
all makes sense
well I don't want to live
in that technocratic
hellscape
where they become
that you're guilty
until proven innocent
which is how this
seems to work
it's terrifying
now briefly
New York Post
Palantir has quietly
become text
hottest sweat
streetwear brand
or is that what
this ridiculous platform
wants you to believe
and fans are paying up
for the privilege
it's not a joke guys
this is becoming
they mean
this is not just a company
this is a
they're literally
trying to frame themselves
this is a lifestyle choice
they want
like that says
when I see Palantir
Chevron
it's like seeing
the American flag
that's not only
exactly on the nose
of what I'm trying to sell
to point to today
it's just creepy
it's patriotism
why is it patriotism
do you have you heard
what these people think
they don't even believe
the guys barely able
to say human
should exist
and we're gonna say
yay they believe in our
constitutional rights
well don't forget
guys Curtis Yarvin
the philosophy that drives
all of them
literally doesn't believe
your constitutional rights
should exist
we're coming back to that
like they're
gaslighting you
to support their
crazy agenda
so you wear their hat
and act like
you're on their side
and you're the last person
they ever think about
Palantir Technologies
the software company
best known for
its secret of government
contracts
has developed an
unlikely side hustle
apparel for those
who want to wear
support for America
it's not a side hustle
it's propaganda
this is becoming
your new government
in least in some way
and they just want you to
think that it's part
they're literally
in fact
want you to think
it's the government
little on the nose isn't it
he added
they literally
all they do is
save lives
except for when
they literally murder people
right
yeah exactly
unlike more obvious
political or patriotic
apparel
that's what they want
you to believe
this is
Palantir's logo
wear is low key
and if you know
you know
creepy
since going to public
in 2020
Palantir has built a large
unusually passionate
retail investor base
wait
so a military contractor
who does nothing
that produces
things for individual people
like it's a
it's a larger
right
it's not
you don't go buy
Palantir devices
yet they have a
very passionate
retail investor base
shareholders are drawn
not only to their technology
but their
outspoken leadership
yeah
this is not secret
they're building
like the justification
for them to be
I mean
for all we know we're gonna have a
Palantir like
what they'll run for president
or something
and then merge at all
like that's where I see this going
and maybe not even that
maybe they just rationalize
that it's the same thing today
they don't even need to run for
president because you know
we don't believe in the system
like the system
oh which I don't believe in
government either
but the idea that
we don't want them stepping in
as CEO run countries
telling you that
you're now
dictate what happens
because the CEO knows best
that's what they're actually
arguing
I think of us like a
lifestyle brand
he says
fans like arm
the guy wearing them
are eager for an alternative
to attacking the left's usual
basically the usual things
they go to attack
data centers
billionaires cops
you see how
New York Post is not so
suddenly trying to convince you
that attacking data centers
is just a left wing thing
lazy
so here
Pedro Gonzalez highlights
that article
that's where I saw it
and he simply says
the point references
what the article is going over
Curtis Jarvin
in a long public
and humiliating
psychotic episode
he says that shattered
the carefully constructed
image of him
as the intellectual
for the new right
now that's not
then you could argue
that's been the case
for some of the people
like the average people
online
but when it comes to the
ideological
I like the
Peter Thiel
like they're still
goblin it up
or
don't care whether
it's even accurate
it's about using it
but it says
JD Vance was supposed
to be Peter Thiel's
political hope
for winning over
young people
but everyone hates him
and thinks he's a
massive dork
who knows if that's
accurate
I think I agree
but who knows
if that's what everybody
thinks
Thiel World's latest bid
is to cultivate
cultural cachet
of things that's necessary
for enduring political power
so I just want to point out
that you know
he's calling it out
this weird effort
and he mentions
Curtis Jarvin
so let's talk about that
I've pointed to this before
there's plenty of this
kind of step out there
I just want to go
in brief overview
read the entire article
it goes into a lot more
June 2nd 2025
Curtis Jarvin's plot
against America
now whatever you think
whether
Curtis Jarvin's plot
is the way to look at this
because a lot of people
support what he says here
written with the
sneering
basically I'll just read
the first part
it's just in the spring
of the summer of 2008
when Donald Trump
was still registered Democrat
an anonymous blogger
known as
meant uh
what is it
Manisha's
mold bug
or
what is it
meant the seat
how do you say that again
mentisha
meant meant
and what is that
Chinese philosopher
that's why it's not
as clear
so uh
mentisha
that's not
that's what looks like
it's pronounced
phonically on the thing
but it might
it can't be right
anyway
Mentia's
gold mold bug
will say
give me
give me a phonic spelling
in the chat
if you guys have it
exact
the point was
that was his
sort of his online
pseudonym
right
and it says
posted a serial manifesto
under the heading
an open letter
to open-minded progressives
so clearly aimed
at this kind of
this is the whole like
blue
you know
what are the red wave
or whatever
you know bringing
people over
like never blue again
kind of a thing
now it says
written with
the sneering disaffection
of an ex-believer
like I used to be a democrat
right that's the idea
the 120,000 word letter
argued that
egalitarianism
you know
everyone's equal
far from improving the world
was actually responsible
for most of its ills
basically that if everyone
has equal rights
then that's a recipe for disaster
how was that even possibly
the argument
that it doesn't
you know like
you could argue that
I mean
well clearly what's happening now
isn't successful
the point is society is clumsy
society is going to be
disjointed and disagreeing
the idea that the answer is
not to give everybody equal
but to make sure somebody
always has all control
of everybody else
is the
is the authoritarian answer
is the answer that billionaires
and technocrats
want you to gobble up
let us control your life
I mean guys
what's different than that
than electing somebody
to control your life
the difference is
you don't get to even have
the illusion of some kind of
engagement
they just tell you what to do
and you acknowledge it
and what it goes on to say is
that his
as readers thought otherwise
moldbug contended
that was due to the influence
of the media and the academy
which worked together
however unwittingly
to perpetuate a left
liberal consensus
basically that's what he's fighting
to this nefarious alliance
he gave the name cathedral
and he says moldbug called
for nothing less
than its destruction
and a total reboot
of the social order
this is why I've been saying this
it's not a secret
like I've been saying
there's an entire philosophy
right now
of trying to redesign
you know
like the great reset
mind you 2008 forward
the democrats picked it up
the republicans
are carrying it forward
that's what's happening
it's continuing
is that these literally talking
about reimagining
rebooting the way the world works
he proposed
the liquidation of democracy
the constitution
and the rule of law
that's a direct quote
and the eventual transfer of power
to a CEO in chief
and he goes someone like
Steve Jobs or you know
Mark Andreessen
he literally named him specifically
who would transform the government
into a highly armed
ultra profitable corporation
welcome to every dystopian movie
you know it's like that's
why is that what anything
this is what he argued
then a lot of weirdly
libertarians picked up on this
which is insane to me
moldbug acknowledged that
his vision depended on the sanity
of the chief executive
meaning if you have a maniac
then we're all screwed
why can't we see that
inevitably ends up that way guys
clear and by the way
these people are insane
in my opinion
clearly he writes
if he or she turns out to be
Hitler or stolen
we have just recreated Nazism
well that seems insanely stupid
to just hope
that it doesn't end up that way
like if it's not an
if it's not an engagement
what happens if the good guy gets
you know chosen
and then
I guess he gets fired
or however that works
and somebody bad gets into place
it guarantees that only people
like them will ultimately have
insight or rather
the ability to dictate
what happens to that high level
the billionaires
you know
clearly all the good people
right can you
can't you see all the good
they're doing in the world
you know I'm not saying
there are all that
the point is that
by and large
these fake philanthropists
are the ones out there
doing all the horrible things
we're talking about
and it says
though critics labeled him
as a techno fascist
which
very clear they believe in that
he preferred to call himself
a royalist
literally
or a jackal bite
a nod to partisans of
James II
and his descendants
doesn't that
isn't that just exactly
what we're talking about
bloodline descendants
and it says who
in the 17th and 18th centuries
opposed
Britain's parliamentary system
and upheld the divine right of kings
so this guy is literally arguing
for the divine right of kings
or at least that he
calls himself the name
that associates
with a bloodline of kings
but we'll just call them
CEOs today guys
I mean you don't see how
I mean it's like he thinks
we're the dumbest people in the
world that we're going to bite
at exactly what he points to
and just barely changes
the royal you know
the the monarchy
into some kind of a
CEO system
I mean you might as well
just call the king of England
the CEO and it's no
I mean that's what he's talking
about
Mulbug believed that the
English and American
revolutions had gone too far
so you've really
I've read this
in depth before
on a previous show
last part of this
many of whom formed
the shock troops
of an online intellectual
movement
that became known as
the neo reaction
or the dark enlightenment
and then we already
this is Elon Musk
and the way they frame this
like you need to understand
this is not a secret
these are not opinions
these people are
act they talked about this
they they bring it up
in conversations
in in simple
you know a
you know events
they're at when they're
speaking
but read this
it's worth your time
and realize that this
is truly guiding
where this goes
and as
Derek Rose wrote about
meet the man
whose philosophy
has influenced Peter Teal
and the technocrats
look at that
February 2025
almost like again
if you're following our work
you'd be way ahead
of where people are today
people still haven't even
gotten around to what
I think is currently
happening with this today
not you know
the majority anyway
and he talks about literally
Curtis Jarvin
that's him right there
and he also
started with this one
meet the Peter Teal
acolytes in Donald Trump's
second administration
that then part two was the
Curtis Jarvin example
now in regard to the
network point
that's what I think
we're talking about here
like from Curtis Jarvin
and Peter Teal
and Carp and Andries
and all of these people
with the military side of it
with the network state
agenda
I think they're literally
building this
that's what they say
these should be
now in case you haven't
connected it
when they talk about
the network state agenda
when they're talking about
Prospera
Seasteadic
Praxia
all of them
they literally frame it
exactly the way he just did
a CEO in country
that's about you know
that's how they frame this
so it is the same thing
so when he talks about
the reimagining America
and Trump talks about
freedom cities
and you find out the same
funding circle
is the same ones
telling him to do that
and Roger Stone's back there
saying Prospera is a freedom city
and it's the same thing
and we're gonna take over America
literally
we need to start recognizing
this is not a joke
this is not some secondary thought
this is not some hyperbolic
discussion
they're literally doing this
and if
maybe you agree with it
well it's for you to decide
but I think
I think we need to first
establish in this country
that we're living through this
it is happening
and what we're
you know
and I look
I think the
Israel side of it is
very clearly a part of this
and whether that's because
they just kind of joined
together
it was always the same thing
that's hard to say
but it's obvious
that this is in one
one clear direction
I would even argue
that the Iran part of it is
sort of
making this more difficult
for them to accomplish
and that may cause some
a divergence
but as I wrote here
on 2024
the technocratic regime change
under the guise of freedom
technocrats are slowly taking control
I mean that was before the
other one from 2025
I mean I think that's
I think this has been clear
for a long time
I also
and this is also from Derek
also 2024
before the election
as we were being called
black pills
by
Lucretowski and Alex Jones
and whatever else
election 2024
Zionist technocrats
versus Zionist technocrats
again
maybe we could have stopped it
if we'd been paying attention
and here we are
I know you guys were
and we did try
so to finish on this side of it
let's realize
the connection
you know to
to all of it
Israel has a strategic partnership
with Palantir
now despite the fact
that they try to claim
that the technology on the ground
was something Israel created
it's
it's not debatable
it's been proven
so it
Palantir works with Israel
gives them access to their tech
that Israel creates
what they're using
and lavender and hopsour
it is Palantir
as has been broken down
my point is they try to gas like you
into thinking it's not
because they
is created in Israel
well they're working with them
in Israel to do so
the bottom line
they created this partnership in 2024
and they all blindly support
the ongoing genocide
as they've expressed
and that matters to me
with all we just discussed
on top of the fact
that as
oh where was that
oh tell me I didn't close that
that's too bad
there was somebody
I wanted to give a shout out here
and I just
I guess I closed the link earlier
shoot
I'm thinking before I even went live
that's frustrating
well somebody did some good work on
this basically highlighting
the the reality that
Palantir is connected to flock
which we already knew
we already talked about it
but I wanted to give them credit
for it
and this is simply showing you
Palantir
a militarized high-tech data and
analytics firm that enables Israeli
war crimes
US deportations and military
operations and
controversial policing tactics
Palantir develops artificial AI
that this isn't the one I was
thinking of
but that's right here is where I
was going to include that
in any case
this is just simply to show you
what they're doing
as well as this one
highlighting
Palantir Technologies
US Headquartered Data Analytics
and Artificial Intelligence Company
that has emerged
as one of the most documented
foreign technology contractors
operating connection
with the Israeli defense
and his intelligence apparatus
the most documented foreign
technology working with Israel
but I mean that's crazy
and it says the company entered
into a formal strategic partnership
with the Israeli defense
Ministry of Defense
in 2024
for their war-related missions
which is everything they do
and it says provided for Israel
artificial intelligence platform
Gotham Foundry
all the things they're currently
using against people in America
the rice
and it says I am proud of that
what we're supporting
that we are supporting Israel
in every way we can
acknowledging that most they've
mostly killed terrorists
Alice Karp said
they don't even care
and that's not true by the way
but mostly would imply that
that you're killing
and it's people too
they are okay with that
now here is an article
Palantir is leading a new age
of empire
this is from Guy Christensen
I've seen online
wrote this in March
just simply the first part
a former Palantir executive
recently confirmed
what many have long suspected
and a public statement
the whistleblower
that's the link I showed you
a second ago
said it plainly
quote Palantir intended
to take over the U.S. government
and many of his former colleagues
are now installed
inside Federal apparatus
he called it an occupied nation
he's not alone
13 former Palantir employees
engineers managers
and a member of the company's
own privacy team
signed a letter
shared with MPR
warning that guardrails
meant to prevent
discrimination
disinformation
and abuse of power
have been violated
and are being rapidly dismantled
what Palantir represents
is something unprecedented
the convergence of American
imperialism
Zionism
and techno fascism
and surveillance capitalism
into a single instrument of control
understanding how we got here
requires looking at the machine
Palantir has built
who built it
and what they believe
it's a good article
you should read it
we've talked about this
former Palantir workers
condemn company's work
with Trump administration
now this
is the other
or is the post
I believe we've shown this
as well on the show
he says I am an ex-Palantir
executive
and it's factually correct
that Palantir tech
intended to take over
the U.S. government
while heavily funding the effort
many of my colleagues
are now installed
inside the U.S. government
there's a reason the C-suite
to Palantir has me blocked
the enemy is within
we are currently an occupied
nation
we basically have a terrorist
entity deeply embedded
inside the U.S. government
pretty crazy
right
I mean question it
definitely
but you see why this comes
back to the relevant part
of the relationship
between that group
and Israel
and whether that's all one
the same
the NDA discussion
as I bottom line
if you don't remember
where we're at with this
the Senate
has tried twice to
re-initiate the vote
I believe Thune has kept it open
for like an ongoing vote
going forward
but right now it's stalled
I think that's important
and right now what I'm seeing
is this argument about
yeah you know
I think I'll say
plenty of others
are trying to argue
about this anti-Israel point
and I agree
right
we shouldn't allow the funding
we shouldn't allow anything
this to happen
we shouldn't allow the integration
absolutely
but what I worried about
is that what you're going to see
is this push to stop that
but then
allow the
like so right now one of the biggest issues
to really briefly point this out
one of the biggest issues
in regard to this
they claim
is that the Senate
the Democrats
disagree with the
with the Iran war
but really as I said earlier
just with Trump's illegal war
they would love to go to war with Iran
just to frame it as a different way
that's all it really comes down to
but then also the amount
they say it's too much
I don't believe they even mean that
it's about trying to play
the political game
if it was flipped
the Republicans would be the ones doing it
but the reason I'm bringing this up
with Donald Trump's current walking back
of the Iran war to a degree
let's just say he ultimately ends up
sort of doing a
ceasefire
that goes on for a month
two months
six months
what I believe that opens the door for
is the Senate
to argue that we don't
not we
or rather
Trump Trump and Republicans
arguing we no longer need the funding
for the Iran war
at least not right now
and so the NDA gets passed
with 219 in it
because they they no longer argue that
the issue is money
or the Iran war
which is the only things they point to
Democrats don't seem to care
about the other part
because they're all in line
when it comes to Israel
excuse me
so that's what I believe this goes to
just a brief point on the way out
following as this goes forward
but watch
if this comes to pass
the way I think it might
you'll see Trump changes position
you'll see them now argue
that the funding has changed
therefore the NDA can pass
the way it is
I hope I'm wrong
because I really hope this doesn't pass
the way it is
but like we played in the beginning
guys realize
whether or not that passes
we're still already dealing with this
that's just more of like an official
change that's really difficult
to roll back
but it's already happening
it's been that way for a long time
now to end with these points
Janice girl points out
something you might have seen going around
this is a person who just got elected
Michigan
11th district
here's what he said
she posted this on the 8th
I'm sure you've seen this going around
it's a little bit quiet
so I'll play it twice
I would say that in her purpose
of life and needs
is to make her American
to use to support Israel
you know I don't think
I don't think it's wrong
because it's an American point
within our privacy
America is not our homeland
and we have been victims
and some assistance here
so
honestly I would say
that in her purpose
of my time
this is
Jeremy Moss
Democrat running for U.S. Congress
and as I understand it
he just just got elected
so the point is or
what is primary
the point is here
purpose of my time
he says
say that in her purpose
of my time
higher purpose of my campaign
needs to make sure America
make sure
for Israel
now this was caught on tape
this is what he was saying publicly
you know I don't think
it's wrong for
America as a pawn
that's what he said
is not our homeland
he was born here by the way
he's talking about Jewish people
and why the world
he argues this place in the
Middle East and in Palestine
was where all Jews came from
it's ridiculous
this is them pretending
because the
Belfort Declaration
and the handing of this land
legally to the Zionists
somehow
and they name it Israel
somehow that means
that this is the Israel from the Bible
like that's just the stupidest thing
in the world
it's obviously not the case
especially since when they were
first discussing this
there was multiple locations
they were deciding between
so how then would it be
that location is the one
it's just a lie guys
and anybody with a brain
is already determined to see that
and so what he's saying
is probably something he either
you know
believes because he's being used
or is aware of the lie
and playing it anyway
the bottom line
America is not our homelandemitism
here this
is a person who's in
the U.S. government think
I mean whether
that's organically or
not like
realize this
this came out this
was discussed and
as she says who
won is primary
now this is after this
so this is circulating
and and and it doesn't change
I mean what it shows me
is that your engagement
with this process
has no effect on the outcome
that's what it shows me
in fact
I'll end with something
that you guys have seen many times
not even necessarily related
to the large
this is just an old
the old clip about
how our process works
actually completely
I wouldn't say irrelevant of
but you know
largely disconnected from
technocracy or Israel influence
they're playing through
these things for sure
I'll end with it
I'm not going to play it now
but I'll
it the the democracy
and like the lie
of the point about
whether or not our government's
just bought off through lobbying
is the real point
and we know that's the case guys
and so in this kind of thing
it's like they don't even
I don't think they even
worry about your engagement
the process
on a on a secondary
connected point
you have the recently
elected president
in Colombia
who stands up and says
Viva Israel
with the yarmulke on
you know it's like
it just doesn't
I mean
maybe it's just a Jew
who believes that Israel's
homeland that is
it doesn't realize why he's
wrong
but it doesn't change the fact
that it's this kind of weird
it's obvious to people
watching
that Israel and Zionism
and the Jewish supremacy
that some of them represent
is absolutely
being pushed
when most people
are pushing back
it's not hard to see
now to
I wasn't sure if I was
just quickly on the way out
because
in two days
Derek Bros and I will be doing
our first episode
for open source
which is the new
unlimited hangout show
I believe it'll probably
come out that day
I'm thinking we'll play it
live but it may change
but we're filming
on the 11 for sure
and we're going to be
talking about this topic
of the Israeli spyware
the infiltration
like the larger point
and using
the unlimited hangout
limited hangout
work to talk about it
that's at least the plan
right now
so just on the way out
connecting it
to the very point
to Palantir and the
surveillance
and even the flock point
because remember
the reality is
and that was
see I knew I
I knew I lost one
you know what
this is what I did
see I knew
this is
it's right here
I'm
well
sometimes I do this
as you know
I'm organizing beforehand
that I'll
I'll change something
and I
this is just out of order
result really was
so this was meant to be
connected with
what I was just talking about
you'll see the point
connected here
which is that
when we're talking about
the idea
of Palantir and infiltration
and then the flock
and surveillance
there's clear connections there
in their own right
but as this person
points out
White County Georgia
the flock cameras
pointed directly at this
gunshots parking lot
this person says
MAGA voted for this stuff
and Trump bought stock in it
now you could
what's important to highlight
is vigilant solutions
he owns stock
that's through Motorola
he has stock in that
he also has stock in axon
that's undeniable
so very much
he does have stock in this
direction
but also Palantir
is part of our government
guys is literally part of this
and as this person
says flock safety
is privately held company
that and has no
Trump investment
but she adds
and then specifically
flock where
we're not only talking
about flock
remember when we're talking
about when the
license plate reader
when sassy baker says
Founders Fund
an investor in flock safety
it was co-founded by
Peter Thiel
who has been a major
financial supporter
of Donald Trump
and JD Vance
Andries and Harowitz
flocks lead investor
in 2025
which they were
funding round
see this
this is why you need
to see the inner circle
of this and not just
individual
it's not just Peter Thiel
or just carp
it's like you know
it's a bigger point
and not even just Palantir
the firm is led by
Mark Andreessen
and Ben Harowitz
both have publicly
backed Trump
in recent elections
and the firm has become
increasingly active
in Republican politics
okay so my point
I would argue
or her point
that I would want to point
out
is the Founders Fund
element
and and and and Harowitz
because the reality for me
oh gosh you come back to
that
is that
is that there's a lot of
the like with everything
we just highlighted today
I think it's pretty clear
that these kind of connections
are relevant
so here Andreessen
Harowitz backs both
flock safety
and camera hacking firm
called TOCA
which we've talked about
for a long time
this is August 7, 2026
here's flock safety
pointing out that
the Founders Fund
and Andreessen Harowitz
$275 million
and for all of them
in 2025
and then 2022
Harowitz before that too
so this long term
Harowitz has been
continuing to
specifically
Andreessen Harowitz
the company
but that's both of them
have continued
to support
and grow this
and they are
I mean look
Mark Andreessen
as I just showed you
is literally
has a
Hegseth made him
an advisor for the government
so that's literally
now the government funding
that you know
see what so she's accurate
and what she's pointing out
I think that's important
so back to this
flocks biggest investor
that's Andreessen Harowitz
also is investing
in a group like TOCA
which
as well as the overlap
we showed you from things like
Leonardo and Signal Trace
and all the different interconnections
from these companies
and the
and the governments
it's building to a very dark point
now on top of that
as I recently pointed out
first so
full I guess after I did it
but so Brown was pointing out
that
this flock element
was directly tied for working
for APAC for
five years
I just wanted to add to that
to highlight
for a few guys already saw
Schlomo Leor
is the algorithms
and systems engineer
literally for the algorithms
and you know
the database part of it
he spent seven years
with the Israeli military
I find that to be incredibly relevant
now Douglas McGregor
was pointing out the
the discussion here
about flock and TOCA
lead investor
behind flock camera
that's Harowitz
just want to highlight
that he's pointing to
I find it interesting
that Douglas McGregor
is leaning into just
you know
this is going around right now
and even Douglas McGregor
is like
oh my god
look
he also funds TOCA
like everyone sees this
TOCA is the firm
that's able to locate
hack and alter
live information
so now you have a conversation
of somebody funding
the ability to hack
alter and change
what you see
as they use flock
to claim that you're guilty
which means they can create
whatever reality
they want to
if that's the case
without a detectable trace
Epstein connection
incoming
bookmark this
well remember guys
you don't need that already
the Epstein connection
is through all of this
is we'll go through
another show
well it's twofold
whether it's TOCA
which is Iubarach
which is literally
partnered with Epstein
but carbine
which is also absorbed
by axon
and other groups
connected to their very inner
circle
is literally connected
it's literally funded
by Epstein
and Iubarach
and other Israeli spies
but to continue on this
the point here
is that TOCA
and flock
and all this is connected
to Palantir
which is building out
this other surveillance
data space
on top of that
just to connect it
see this
I knew
I didn't organize this
well this should have been
the end
I'll come back to that
the point here
is to include TOCA's website
you can look for yourself
empowering governments
to protect citizens
through cutting edge
intelligence
nah
here is Whitney's article
going back to 2021
meet TOCA
the most dangerous
is rarely spyware firm
that you've ever heard of
the mainstream media's
myopic focus
on just Pegasus
which we both agree
is very important
but it's not just the only
not the only one
and the threats it poses
means that other companies
like TOCA
go
uninvestigated
we're going to come back to this
read something quick
from this where she also
mentions TOCA
this is Whitney's
so this was Whitney's
article for unlimited
Hangout in 2021
this is Whitney's article
for Last American
Bagoban in 2023
The Prince and the Spy
as I've referenced many times
for plenty of different reasons
this one highlights
the overlap of the
creating fake companies
but also
with specifically TOCA
and
let's elitium
the Israeli spy and
Eric Prince
in addition to carbine
Leshem also worked for
Blackcube
Leshem is an Israeli spy
which has since been removed
from her LinkedIn
there she had been
the firm's director
from a marketing
Blackcube was specifically
outed as an Israeli
intelligence front
organization in 2019
the article
Calculus Tech
wrote an article about it
it says that same article
also contains the
stunning revelation
that many Israeli companies
including Blackcube
have been founded
as fronts
for Israeli intelligence
and their operations
since 2012
it states that
since 2012
cyber related and
intelligence projects
that were previously
carried out in house
in the Israeli military
and Israel's main
intelligence arms
are transferred to
companies that in some cases
were built for the exact
purpose
now this is in addition
to let Leshem
has also worked
for another company
tied to EO Barack
that
has been described as
worse than the
NSO group
which produced
the notorious Pegasus software
which Trump by the way
is working with ICE
and the US government
not a joke
called TOCA
no no
Pegasus by the way
so I'm talking about
but TOCA
is now finding its way
into the same conversation
its top executives
like Carbine
are largely veterans
of Israeli's unit 8200
where Leshem
also serve
or former commanders
of Israeli military
cyber operations
TOCA
which EO Barack
founded in 2018
is very very likely
to be one of the
front organizations
produced as a result
of the aforementioned
2012 Israeli intelligence
policy
and now
and it connected to
Andreessen
who is
in the government at this
point
who is
finding his way into
all sorts of internal
positions
and we're
and you know
with the
technocracy element
detachment 201
and that he has the
technology
as he funds
both Flock
and this
to make it something
much more manipulative
and you know
any of the ways it could
go realize
these people
probably eventually do
the company
is directly partnered
with Israeli military
defense
of course
and other Israeli
intelligence
security agencies
since its founding
and the company
only sells its products
to countries
that are considered
allies of Israel
it purports to be able
to hack
not just smartphones
but any device
with internet connectivity
didn't we just talk about this
such as doorbell cameras
and their smart devices
as well as
as will be noted later
in the article
which you should read
Leshem herself
has noted
that TOCA
has a relationship
with the CIA
after which
is just a concerning
after being involved
with a series of Israeli
intelligence fronts
and her enduring ties
to Israeli military
intelligence
through her
reserve duty activities
Leshem was courted
by a surprising figure
Eric Prince
war profiteer
and founder
of the controversial
mercenary
outfit
Blackwater
and this is at a point
you know
since this point forward
now less today
but he
worked his way
into the inner circle
of Trump
tried to do
the MAGA phone
which is built in Israel
like it's all
very clear
what this was
in my opinion
just to end with this
interesting
US appeals court
rules Trump
can't build
his 400 million dollar
ballroom
and what's funny is
a lot of us were going
well it's not a ballroom
it's data center
it's a military thing
and they lied to us
they said no
it's about
well
he just told you
and he just said
took a US court of appeals
halting Trump's
400 million dollar
ballroom
for the truth to come out
as we suspected
it's not a ballroom
it's a military center
with a bunker
now you could argue
it's a bunker
you could argue
it's military center
it's a data center
but they
both of them are
military elements today
but just realize guys
that the
it's always like this
Trump's entire thing
seems to be some kind of
mirage to hide
what's happening
I don't even know
if Trump knows that
frankly it feels
like he's being used
you can decide for yourself
I really think it's
important that we
at least consider
all of this
but we'll leave it there
for today
wild isn't it
I mean I find this
to be insanely obvious
both the larger
agenda that I think
is rolling out
the embarrassment
of what's happening
the influence from outside
and that's why I'm telling
you that I think
most Americans too too
and that's an important
moment for us to try to
capitalize on that
get their attention
show them our content
show them other content
that you think is accurate
just get people on
the right path
or at least the path
you think is right
let them make their own choices
but people are open
more than you might think
right now
give it a shot
thank you for tuning in
I appreciate you all
this platform exists
with your support
so let us know
how important you think this is
we're going to keep working guys
but we need your support
to be able to grow this platform
and keep putting out the work
and I think that's
you know
one of the biggest battles of today
is you have an effort
to not only diminish
our ability to buy anything
to spend money
to have money
but also
to make you question
whether or not
you know I mean
well I think
if you're out there
and you support this work
and you believe that
what we're doing is helping you
and you believe that
what we're doing is
acting in good intention
objective
you know
with due diligence
then keep it going
but there's plenty out there
that also need your support
people in the IMA
right I mean
it's important to understand
that this is an ongoing problem
but anyway
thank you for being here
thank you for supporting this
platform because as I said
it literally would not exist
without you
you are the last American backbone
I love you all
as always
question everything
come to your own conclusions
stay vigilant