Everything has something to share, and either wisdom, story, or logic, and it's clearly
amazing to hear all the different missing links discovered by people unique to their
own journeys, and in how they have come to discover them, together we can help to build
a bigger picture for a better future for a brighter tomorrow.
Let's stand united, let's remove the veils, and let's create a new world together.
Are you that missing link? Join Jesse Hale on the missing link talk show, as he helps to unveil
the mystery through the unique wisdom and store of others.
Welcome, welcome, welcome. Welcome everybody here back to the missing link today. We're
excited to speak with an Esquire who is also an artist, musician, and a 30-year civil
litigation trial attorney from Mansfield, Ohio, and over the past 14 years he's devoted
available time and creative energies to producing unique multimedia materials advocating for Christ
country and freedom, and he's also exposing Alex Jones and the Sandy Hook stuff, and he's
here to share his story, so welcome to the missing link live, Wyn Young. How are
you doing today, brother?
I'm great, Jesse. Thank you for having me here today to share this important story. I have
a PowerPoint to present to the folks as well as a copy of a motion that I recently filed
in Alex Jones Chapter 7 bankruptcy case that is still pending after three years out in
Houston, Texas, and I have sought leave to intervene to present evidence to the court
that the judgment, the main one for $1.3 billion coming out of Connecticut is fraudulent. And
so I'm ready to go today and very happy to be here to share this important story that
certainly all Americans need to know about as well as all freedom loving people across
the world.
So why don't you start off with telling us about yourself and your journey, a little
bit about your background, your education, what part of the world you grew up in,
what part of the world you're now, if you'd like to disclose an information, what got you
wanting to get into law, what got you knowing about, you know, some of these conspiracies,
I guess, you know, what got you on your journey? If you want to share with our audience
here today, especially if they may be hearing you here for the first time.
Well, I'm from Mansfield, Ohio. It's a small town that's between the capital city
of Columbus and our biggest city of Cleveland at the northern border. Mansfield was
the filming location of one of the best movies of all time, The Shawshank Redemption.
And I grew up in Mansfield, went away for college in law school and was gone for 30
some years and then back in Mansfield, primarily to care for aging parents, but
also at home and it feels that way. I wanted to be an attorney from the time I
was five years old. A family friend was an attorney and I certainly thought it was
a noble endeavor. I made it through a standard career, joined a law firm, made
partner and five years on the five year track. And after a while, I saw that
the legal community, Jesse, was becoming very much like the rest of the corporate
world, a lockstep in thought and also the ability of an attorney to exercise
independent professional judgment. Very difficult to do when you're in a lockstep
environment. So in 2010, I went out on my own and I also started exercising my
creative legs a little bit, starting around 2011, 2012. And I started producing
unique multimedia advocacy materials, advocating for Christ, country and
freedom audaciously. And so I combine the experience that I've gained over 30
years as a civil litigation attorney, federally licensed state licensed. I've
litigated in both state and federal court in various areas around the country.
And I am now doing so in regard to this public advocacy case that I am
pursuing to expose the Alex Jones, Sandy Hook, two part and treasonous
conspiracy against the United States. What is this all about? Well, if your
audience is familiar in December of 2012, there was an alleged mass school
shooting in Sandy Hook, Connecticut, where 26 people were allegedly shot and
killed inside five minutes by an 120 pound 20 some year old who allegedly
broke into the school building with an AR 15 and committed this horrific
act and apparently without reason. Fast forward a few years and in June of
2018, Alex Jones, the founder of Info Wars and probably the biggest quote
unquote conspiracy theorist in the country, if not the world was sued by
families of the alleged Sandy Hook victims for defamation. And a couple
years later, actually in November of 2022, Alex Jones was hit with a $1.43
billion judgment on related defamation cases that were consolidated for trial.
And that serves as a tremendous chill on not only free speech, but also
investigative journalism. So the Sandy Hook event itself, back
in 2012, very much indicate or implicates rather, the Second Amendment,
the right to keep and bear arms under our Constitution, because that
event very much turned people against AR 15s in particular, and other
quote unquote assault weapons. And then the Alex Jones lawsuits resulting
in that outrageous First Amendment speech chilling judgment very much goes
toward undermining the First Amendment. And if you have any questions at
this point, I'll be happy to answer, but I will next tell about how I
first came involved in this entire affair.
So do you think that, you know, being attorney or lawyers is still a
noble profession because it seems like, you know, the bar, the British
accredited Regency that lawyers are pledged their loyalty to takes
precedent over their clients. And it doesn't seem like that's very noble
when you're supposed to be representing your client.
No, my loyalty is always owed to my client. At the same time, I am an
officer of the court and I have certain duties as an officer before the
court, you know, that I'm appearing before that includes candor, that
includes upright conduct. But when I first became an attorney, and you
will see in my motion for leave to intervene in Alex Jones bankruptcy
case, which is currently pending in relation in large part to that
Connecticut State Court judgment, I am obligated first and foremost to
defend and protect the Constitution. I took that oath at least twice when I
became a state and then federally licensed attorney. It is essentially
the same oath Jesse that a soldier in the United States military forces
takes to defend and protect the Constitution. And therefore it is
a solemn mode and one that comes before anything else that is
personal to me. My oath is bigger than me and all self interest and
self expediency must fall before it. Certainly a soldier when he is
ordered to take a position or to attack a machine gun nest must put
behind self interest in order to fulfill his duty, excuse me, to
protect and defend the Constitution. So it seems like you look at that in an
honorable way, but why do most other attorneys, you know, not, you know,
uphold that same set of standards? Well, it's speculation with respect to any
particular attorney, but generally speaking, and I've been saying this for
years, going back at least 11 years. And that is that the bar seems largely
concerned with self interest, self expediency. And I think there's a
fair amount of cowardice to go around to be quite honest.
Okay, and tell us what the next portion is. Oh, I was gonna ask you,
wasn't this the David Hogg incident? Wasn't he one of the part of the Sandy
Hook where he's part of the dad's a CIA or something, and he was one of the main
speakers that was promoting that this thing that was going on, or maybe you
could refresh our memories? That was a later school shooting. That happened
when President Trump was first in office. I'm not sure if that was
2018, I think maybe 2019, but that was the Parkland school shooting in
Florida. What we're talking about here is the December 14, 2012, Sandy Hook
alleged school shooting in Sandy Hook, Connecticut, which is a very small
little Berg, if you will, right outside of bigger town called Newtown
Connecticut. So what do you know about the Sandy Hook shooting, like, you
know, like actual what you can prove, you know, what's your thoughts on what
exactly happened there? Well, it's interesting, Jesse, I kind of backed
into it a little bit. The last few years as I've been concentrating more
on my advocacy work, which you can find at always win.com. That is
my art and advocacy website. And my full name is Robert Win Young. My
middle name is spelled W Y N with just one N. And as you can imagine,
there are a lot of Robert Young's in the world. So I go by my middle name
and my website is always win W Y N.com. And as you will see, I have
placed my entire public case file for the Sandy Hook matter under the
videos section of always win.com. And the direct address, as we will see
here in a minute, is always win.com forward slash operation dash mad cap
M A D C A P. It derives from the movie Tombstone, which is one of my
favorites. And I was very sad to see that Val Kilmer passed away a
day or two ago, he played doc holiday. But I use movies, I use a
lot of popular imagery in and with my public advocacy work to
try to relate to folks and not just throw them a bunch of print
legalese to try to show how the story relates metaphorically to
things that are well known like movies, books and pop culture.
Tombstone is one of my favorite movies as well. So we definitely
have that in common. I remember, you know, I was in a state where I
actually felt I was in Tombstone and I woke up with my hands
drawn and guns. I was actually felt like I was in in that
actual movie. So it was a it was a fascinating trip that I was
on, let's just say. Yeah. And so the last several years as I've
been really working on my advocacy work, I've been doing
primarily contract law, just as a wage slave, if you will, working
through an agency, doing various projects, some of them very
big. I got off a two year assignment with one of the
largest law firms in Ohio, working on a very large
construction case. So the contract work that I've been
doing actually has been giving me a greater insight into the
workings of big corporations and big law firms, because in small
cases, they don't hire contract attorneys to do a lot of the
work, particularly with regard to discovery, and also court
preparation, that type of thing. But it was either the late
fall, Jesse, or the early the first week or so of January
2024, I was sitting at my desk and I was doing my contract
attorney work and I was listening to Info Wars kind out of the
side of my ear. And Alex Jones had Norm Pattis on P A T T I
S. Pattis was the second attorney that Jones had in
those big Connecticut defamation cases. And they were talking
about the appeal that Jones and Pattis had filed in June of
2023. And they were just talking about the status of the
appeal. And again, this is late fall, or maybe the first
week of 2024 in January. And I heard them out of the corner
of my ear. And Jesse, it didn't take more than a minute or
two. And I could tell based on my experience and probably
sitting through more than 1000 depositions in my career of both
parties and witnesses that they weren't speaking truthfully,
that something wasn't right. I looked over at my phone that was
playing the Info Wars and I said, those guys through this
case, it was a hunch. And so I went into the Connecticut
appellate docket first. And I pulled Alex Jones appellate
brief. And if you read it, you will be literally shocked by
the statements and admissions that Alex Jones makes against
the First and Second Amendments, people who I have shown
portions of that brief. Now, this is the document that
Alex Jones is submitting to the court of appeals after he gets
hit for 1.43 billion in the trial court. And he's going to the
court of appeals and making his best arguments quote unquote, in
defense of his actions, his statements and also his businesses
and his assets, because he's got to try to protect himself from
that massive judgment. But what he wrote in that appeal
brief, made it look like it was written by the plaintiffs
attorneys, not the defense attorneys. It was utterly
shocking in anyone looking at that brief would say there was
something very, very wrong with Alex Jones defense of the
Connecticut Sandy Hook cases. And so what did I do? I looked
at the end of the case with his appellate brief, saw that
there was massive capitulation and betrayal. And so then I went
all the way back to the beginning of the case, because
that's where you start at the beginning. And I thought that I
might find some egregious fraud. And I sure did. And Alex
Jones very first response of pleading, he threw the
Connecticut consolidated defamation cases against him
arising from that December 14 2012 alleged shooting event. And
my PowerPoint goes through here, when we can start and provides
not only again, advocacy in the form of imagery, but also source
documents highlighted to show you exactly what was done to
throw this case as part of a two part and treasonous
conspiracy against both our first and second amendment
rights as Americans.
Now before we get into your PowerPoint, what would be or
did you just explain why the reason why he would throw a
case and be on the hook? Pardon the pun for, you know, this
1.4 billion or $1.7 billion wouldn't you want to maybe
defend yourself if someone was trying and use every means
necessary to defend yourself if someone was trying to fleece
money from you?
Absolutely, you would do all those things Jesse, unless you
were in on it.
Okay, so and last question before we get into it, you said
you've been, you know, doing 30 years of litigation. And I'm
just trying to work out the numbers. I just turned 51 in
October. So I imagine you're relatively maybe the same age as
me. But if you are, you're probably the first person that
I've met that looks younger than me at the same age. Are you
in your 50s?
56 November 18 1968.
Wow, that's phenomenal. You're doing something good,
brother.
Oh, it's it's it's nothing on my part. My mother is in her late
80s and can easily pass for being in her early 60s. So she'll
have to take the blame on that one.
Okay, well, I'd say credit would be more like it.
Well, thank you.
Okay, so you want to get into your PowerPoint?
Yeah, can you see it?
It's up now.
All right, very good. Well, this is from my website
always win.com and here you have my case file page. And again,
I called it app operation madcap. And it is exposing the
capitulation and betrayal of Alex Jones in the Connecticut
Sandy Hook cases. And you will see that this page scrolls
down right away and goes through four phases. And so let's
get started.
Can you click on it to make it bigger? Because we're just
seeing it in a smaller and we see the bar on the on the left
hand side. So I'm just wondering if you could actually click
into the
I have it full screen now, Jesse. So I don't know how I
would do that.
Yeah, it didn't change for us. But it's okay. I guess you'll
just have to explain what's on there because I want my
computer and I'm having a hard time reading it.
Oh, goodness. I'm sorry.
I'm looking at a screen control here and it's not moving. You
must have you maybe you're because you're maybe back into
the actual computer side of it. Maybe I should stop sharing
and reshare with that. Yeah, try that. Okay, I just hit
stop sharing.
And you want to actually share that that PowerPoint like, you
know, okay, and I will go back to present share screen, or you
could click present and go right into is it is it a PDF?
It is a
it's a PowerPoint. I apologize for the delay. I don't see my
there it is. Now I got it. Now let's see if this works. How's
that?
Yeah, we're still seeing the the what we saw before.
Okay, well, I'm sorry, I don't know how to that I've got a
full screen. Maybe if I went to the slideshow settings and just
did a window, as opposed to a full screen, browse by
individual window, that would help.
Yeah, let's see if we can do that. Yeah, there we go. That's
okay. Now it's not full screen.
Hey, there we go. Much better. Okay, so here is the cover
that's the top of my public advocacy case. Now I am
representing Jesse, the American people here. Okay, they're
my client. I am an actively registered state, federally
licensed attorney, and I am representing the American people
and no one else in this matter for the specific purpose of
exposing this conspiracy. Okay, both parts. I'm not a
prosecutor. All I can do is bring this to light and
hopefully put it on a track for proper investigation and
prosecution down the road, most likely by a special counsel
appointed by President Trump.
So your goal is to bring awareness to what happened here
to the American people. That's your sole goal, because you
feel that certain amendments or certain constitutional, you
know, violations could take place because of, you know,
what happened here? Yes, I believe they already have. I
believe the conspiracy was designed to both undermine and
or destroy the first and second amendments. And I have
intervened in Alex Jones bankruptcy case as a pro say
attorney intervener. Again, this relates to my public
advocacy advocacy case. But I am now an admitted attorney
seeking leave to present evidence to the court in an
officially filed case. So I am also now a litigant as of
March 19 of this year. And we will get to all that as I
continue with my PowerPoint, you already went over the
main matters here on this slide, where I have a short bio and
set forth the major points that I'm making in this case. And
as you can see about halfway down, it notes that I filed a
motion for leave to intervene to present evidence of
fraudulent judgment in Alex Jones bankruptcy case. Okay, he
cannot get relief afforded on a fraudulently incurred
judgment. That's extremely important. Any evidence of fraud
giving rise to a judgment in a bankruptcy case should be
admitted. And if the folks look toward the bottom here, I
would also refer people to my always win rumble channel.
Again, when is spelled WYN and those are two words. And I
use that as my main video platform. And I have I believe
13 Sandy Hook videos on my main page. And if they will
check the playlists, I also have quite a bit of Sandy Hook
materials there in the form of my appearances for
interviews. Also other interviews when they're
talking about the work I'm doing on this case, and
also some source videos that I used for research on this
underlying event. But at the bottom of this slide, you
will see that I've recommended people go to a few pages. And
on my rumble channel, you will see a summation video called
Let's Dance. It's only 17 minutes long. And it's a
great introduction to the case. It'll give you the crux
of the matters involved in just 17 minutes. I then of
course, cite to my case file page where you can see
everything that I've done publicly and I update it on an as
need basis and as quickly as I can. And finally, you will
see I've got listed to give send go campaign there I quit my
day job as a contract attorney back on January 14th,
because of this growing case, which has come to take all of
my professional time. Now, people because, you know, for
some people are still having a hard time a little bit reading
it. It's a little small, but you know, it's you're going to go
over it. They can find this at the always wind calm slash
operation dash madcap. They can find this PowerPoint
presentation if they wanted to actually go through it and find
links and things they can actually find what you're
going to be talking about here and showing us.
Absolutely. And a lot of it is in the form of prior
interviews. I've got those posted with big slides,
descriptive slides, and all people have to do is click on
that on my case file page, always wind calm forward slash
operation dash madcap. And that will take you over to my
always win rumble channel where you can see the video
itself. And I've been going through interviews. And I
think this is the fourth or fifth PowerPoint presentation
that I've put together.
Okay, awesome. And so let's let's start with the basics. So I
look at the appeal brief and it's filled again with
betrayal and capitulation for a man like Alex Jones, who
claims to be a champion of the First Amendment and the
Second Amendment and sells all kind of merchandise in those
regards. Okay, so what did he do to throw the case from
the beginning? Phase one is about Alex Jones throwing the
case and how you had a fraudulent judgment coming out of
Connecticut in consolidated cases by different parents of
different alleged victims, all working together and being
represented by the same law firm against Alex Jones and
others. And believe it or not, Alex Jones literally
threw the Connecticut Sandy Hook cases with his very first
response of pleading. In short, Alex Jones and his attorneys
failed repeatedly to assert federal question jurisdiction
in removing these cases from the local state court right
there near where the incident happened in Connecticut to the
federal court, the US District Court of Connecticut, and
in order to get into a more neutral forum where the
District Court draws drawers not only from the local
county where this occurred, but from across the state. And so
you don't necessarily have the friends and neighbors of the
alleged victims deciding the case. Any defense attorney
worth his salt would have filed a notice of removal to get
this case out of state court and to get it to federal court.
You've heard often times of attorneys seeking a change of
venue for trial, typically in a criminal case, because they
want to get out of the local jurisdiction where the crime
occurred and get to a more neutral forum where people
don't know the parties involved. Also in federal
court, you have lifetime appointed judges, and they are
very used to and presumably more adept at applying federal and
in this case, constitutional law. But federal courts are
courts of limited jurisdiction. You can only get into
federal court on a civil case under two possible means. One
diversity of citizenship. That's where you have citizens
from one state suing citizens from a different state. And
federal courts allow jurisdiction or provide subject matter
jurisdiction to hear those cases so that one side doesn't get
homered, if you will, to use a sports analogy, the visiting
team will not necessarily get screwed over as likely or the
chances will be less in federal court if they were otherwise
going up against a home team. But Alex Jones and his attorneys
failed twice to do the simple thing of claiming their ground
for jurisdiction in federal court. They removed a federal court
based on diversity of citizenship and Jesse, it
didn't even exist because the Connecticut plaintiffs not only
sued Alex Jones from Texas. They also sued someone from
Connecticut who was helping him with the investigation that he
was supposedly doing. So there was no diversity and this is a
first amendment cases we'll see here in a minute. But Alex
Jones didn't claim first amendment or what we call
federal question jurisdiction so that the federal court could
actually hear his case. This could not have been the
result of mistake or malpractice by his very highly
qualified attorney. It is indeed smoking gun operative
evidence of fraud or collusion by the defense in the Connecticut
Sandy hook cases. When you say like operative like okay so here
we have a comment from just passing through in our YouTube
channel says a lot of us cut our teeth on Alex and now look
at him with disgust. So phony thank you sir for what
you're doing and please be safe. I'm sure these people play
dirty. Some people think that Alex Jones was actually Bill
Hicks, a comedian who became Alex Jones. I know we've had
you know someone on here who had some dealings with Alex
Jones and she feels feared for her life in Texas. She felt
like they were trying to put a hit on her. You know so
these people many people think that you know Alex
Jones is just a part of the CIA that you know he's doing his
bidding to you know do the dirty work to become the
conspiracy guy or whatever but to like Operation Trust you
know to you know spearhead any of the the movement so that
way they could put out the narrative that they want to
spin and you're probably exposing that is with that
narrative to take away people's freedoms is maybe what he
was championed for. Yeah Alex Jones through this case the
evidence is unequivocal. Why would he do that? Well there
must be some serious problems as I thought when I found
that Alex Jones through the case with the underlying
event. Why would you throw a case unless the underlying
event was bogus and so you know Alex Jones gets on
air to this day and talks about what a great champion of
free speech in the Second Amendment he is and of course
his court filings and his actions in these most
important cases that affect the First and Second
Amendments completely belie his alleged self
representations. I don't know Alex Jones background.
What I do know is that he called 9-11 two months
beforehand. This is back in July of 2001 and he was on
cable access I believe out Nostin Texas and he gave a
description that was recorded on video and I'm sure
you've heard about it where he essentially called the
event with airplanes the World Trade Center towers
and most likely Osama bin Laden and in an interview I
believe it was last year with Tucker Carlson. Tucker
questioned Alex Jones about this and said my gosh you
must be Nostradamus I can't believe it and I certainly
don't think that was the case. I think perhaps a
little bird who knew what was going to happen in
September of 2001 said something to Alex Jones
to enable him to make that prediction on cable access
TV and I don't think we're dealing with Nostradamus
here not by a long shot. Well just like I also
recently heard that every Jewish person that was
working at the Trade Center was told to not go in
that day. So this is another thing how did they
know was this another Nostradamus prediction or
was somehow you know this information you know known
that this was going to happen and you know they were
just trying to protect people that they didn't want
to get hurt in this you know crazy terror attack.
Well a lot of things are possible and as we see
here with the Sandy Hook event we shouldn't put
anything past those who seek to do damage to
the Constitution and the American people and our
freedoms are based on that document and we must
protect our rights and so getting back into the
PowerPoint here I show the first couple pages of
the main Connecticut Sandy Hook case that was
first filed against Alex Jones and here you
have the first page and it sets forth this
is a civil action for damages leading from the mass
shooting that occurred at Sandy Hook on December
14, 2012 just before 9 30 a.m. that morning Adam
Lanza. This guy's a 120 pound pip squeak that
doesn't even look real from the pictures he
looks like some kind of a composite but he
supposedly shot his way into the locked school
with an AR-15 paragraph three in less than
five minutes he shot and killed 21st grade
children and six adults two others were wounded
that is an alleged kill rate Jesse on small
moving targets of 93% in five minutes I would
say that is impossible and in paragraph six
the plaintiffs complain oh even though the
evidence is overwhelming Alex Jones and others
lied about this in order to defame us
well no evidence has ever been produced let alone
any overwhelming evidence that a the shooting
occurred or b that Alex Jones purposefully
lied about it now you will see that Alex
Jones later admits in this appeal brief that he
lied but the plaintiffs had the burden
of proving that the shooting occurred that
uh their loved ones died and that Alex Jones
lied about it or acted with reckless disregard
as to the truth that is a very high bar that
is called the actual malice standard for
public figure plaintiffs okay comes out of
a U.S. Supreme Court case in 1964 called
New York Times versus Sullivan and being in
the media I'm sure you've heard of that
decision and are well aware of it now I've
said this is a first amendment case and Alex
Jones most certainly should have claimed
federal question jurisdiction for his case in
federal court to which he removed the
Sandy Hook cases okay and federal
question jurisdiction is real easy it
simply means that the federal court has
subject matter jurisdiction to rule on a
case that arises under the laws of the
United States or the Constitution of the
United States and in paragraph 17 of
plaintiffs complaint they set forth the
plaintiffs bring this action in defense
of the values protected by the first
amendment to the U.S. Constitution not
in derogation of it okay now that paragraph
that allegation explicitly implicates the
first amendment this is a first amendment
case although as you will see it is a
complete inversion of the truth 180
degrees out of phase with the truth of
the matter for this complaint did not seek
to support the first amendment but
rather to destroy it and you'll see in the
next two paragraphs 18 and 19 in plaintiffs
complaint they spew more drivel about our
sacred first amendment and so here is
Alex Jones first responsive plea this is
how he threw the case Lafferty back on
July 13 of 2018 he filed us notice a
removal I only have the first page of
it here but that's all you need to
see because highlighted in red is the
statute for diversity jurisdiction
Alex Jones again only claimed diversity
jurisdiction not federal question
jurisdiction for a first amendment case
and diversity didn't even exist
you can see all the plaintiffs listed
here and all the defendants and one of
them was a resident of Connecticut
and so he did it again on a related
Sandy Hook case also in Connecticut
that one is styled Sherlock versus Alex
Jones again he did the same thing he
claimed only diversity not for or not
federal question jurisdiction on these
first amendment cases likewise he
threw the Sherlock decision okay and
all plaintiffs had to do to get rid
of the case in federal court and get
it sent back to the state court the
local jurisdiction the local venue
that was most unfavorable to try a case
like this all plaintiffs had to do is
put one portion of one sentence in
their motion to remand to get the
case out of federal court and back to
the local venue and that is the only
asserted basis is diversity jurisdiction
under 28 USC 1332 Alex Jones to stay
in federal court only needed to say
write down three words federal
question jurisdiction or 10 digits on
his word processor 28 USC section
1331 that is federal question
jurisdiction and the statute providing
for it and so if you don't claim
the right ground for jurisdiction in
federal court is our next slide shows
it's kind of like showing up for a
worldwide cruise you know what you need
if you're going to go on a worldwide
cruise Jesse take it yeah that in a
passport you better have a passport
if you don't have a passport i don't
care how much you paid for the cruise
you ain't going on it and that's
signal analogous here but not
perfectly so because for a passport
you have to go to the state department
and fill out all their paperwork and
submit all the documents in your
picture and wait a couple months
but for alex jones passport to get into
federal court all he needed to do is put
down the right ground to jurisdiction
and he didn't do it and is well
qualified attorney most certainly
didn't make that mistake twice and so
here in a little summary of phase one
and how alex jones through the
canadian defamation cases i have here a
summary plaintiffs came closest of all
parties to referencing this glaring
pleading air stating defendants only
asserted basis for federal jurisdiction
is diversity jurisdiction under section
1332 of title 28 not surprisingly
after briefing in the federal court
it ruled that diversity jurisdiction
was not president it remanded the case
dismissed it and send it back to state
court for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction and very very importantly
it terminated defendants unanswered
motions to dismiss as moot
okay what am i talking about here
within a week maybe even less time
of removing the cases to federal court
alex jones and his attorneys filed a
very well crafted anti-slap motion to
dismiss what's an anti-slap motion to
dismiss well a lot of states including
Connecticut have enacted statutes
that provide for expedited processes
and dealing with strategic lawsuits
against public participation that's
called a slap suit in states including
Connecticut say we can have a truncated
process for dealing with for journalists
for first amendment exercisers to deal
with such lawsuits to try to keep them
quiet and you can even use that state
court statute when you go to federal
court and litigate there and that's
exactly what alex jones and his
attorneys did as soon as they removed
to federal court they filed a notice
of removal and then they filed a well
crafted anti-slap motion to dismiss
what was it based on first amendment
protections so i ask in the middle of
this slide why would jones and his
randaza attorneys that was his first
law firm talk about mounting a strong
first amendment defense they did that
in an interview with the new york
times timely remove the sandy hill
lawsuits to federal court and
filed a well crafted anti-slap motion
to dismiss in federal court based on
first amendment protections all to have
that motion rendered moot unanswered
and the case sent back to state court
for the inexcusable failure to put
three words in the notice of removal
federal question jurisdiction could it
be jesse that from the very beginning
jones and his attorneys were doing
nothing more than making a show
of putting on a strong defense let alone
any defense at all against these
speech chilling cases and so this
unexplained failure to assert the
proper ground for jurisdiction in
federal court essentially ensured
that you would have the cases going
back to state court the worst possible
venue for resolution of these cases
and what we are looking at here is
most assuredly ostensibly a foustian
bargain any thoughts at this point yeah
so what you're saying is like if you
are handling his defense you know you
would have done things much differently
you maybe not could guarantee a win
but at least you wouldn't have just
given up like you know it seems like
they weren't they were doing things
that were going against them trying
to win like you know I'm not asking
if whether you would have win or not
but if you were handling it
it sounds like you would have done
things much differently than how they
handled it because what you're saying
to me it sounds like and I'm sure
everybody else is that they were
sounds like purposely trying to
railroad their own case
yes undoubtedly it was self-sabotage
there's no two ways around it
the only thing I would have done
differently Jesse is I would have
put the words federal question
jurisdiction in my notice of removal
of the Lafferty case and then later
again in the Sherlock case that was
also filed in Connecticut
I would have simply put those three
words in federal question
jurisdiction a site to the statute
28 USC 1331 and then I would have
pointed to those paragraphs from
plaintiff's complaint that I showed you
a minute ago
that specifically and expressly
raised the first amendment
the motion that Jones and his attorneys
filed a couple days after their notice
of removal is beautiful
well written
this was a high level attorney
at the randaza firm
that was hired and put together this
motion
but he knew he knew damn well
that that motion would never have to be
answered
how would the plaintiffs have answered
that motion
real easy by producing evidence
that the event occurred
that their loved ones died
and that Alex Jones lied about it
or acted with reckless disregard
okay
and they didn't have to produce
any of that evidence
because Jones and his attorneys
didn't put federal question
jurisdiction in their notice of
removal
do you see what a slight of hand this
was
it was nothing more than a show
Jones and his attorneys knew
that motion to dismiss
would never have to be answered
because they didn't
sign their ticket the right way
to stay in court
it's that simple
and here's the gentleman
that's that's fascinating there
yeah here's the attorney
now he's with the randaza firm
the main attorney
for Alex Jones
a fellow by the name of
mark randaza
he is a nevada attorney
okay
and his
partner
I guess or affiliate
attorney wolman
is in Connecticut
he's a Connecticut licensed attorney
and in the middle of his bio here
he is rated AV preeminent
by martindale hubble
that's kind of the
gold standard for rating of attorneys
and that's the highest rating you can get
he also
was a graduate of cornell
for undergrad
and georgetown law
and he's been practicing for 25 years
he did not
make a rookie mistake
now
here we have
petria said
thought the whole movie
was to expose the corrupt court systems
and the cia operation
to take down
the second amendment
were there any victims
any death certificates
autopsies
body evidence
of the perpetrator
like was there any actual
evidence that
people did die
in this sandy hook event
no
to date
no death certificate
has been produced
and also
there has been no autopsy reports
no insurance benefit payments
you must understand
this case
these consolidated cases
in connecticut
against alex jones
went from filing
all the way through the appeal
now to the
Connecticut supreme court
that alex jones
has filed
over a span of
seven years
and the sandy hook plaintiffs
in those connecticut cases
never had to produce
an iota
of evidence that the shooting occurred
or that their loved ones died
and such records have never been seen
and they're not publicly available
because strangely about a year
before
this event occurred
and at the insistence
of the state medical examiner
Connecticut law was changed
in order to seal
the
death records
including death certificates
and autopsy reports for minors
persons under the age of 18
so this was something
that appears to have been planned
for quite some time
and I have here
the front page of that
outstanding motion to dismiss
you can see it was indeed
filed on July 20th
of 2018 just one week
after the notice of removal
you can see
on the first paragraph
here
that
the plaintiff's case
should be dismissed
in its entirety
as the claims are based on speech
and on an issue of public concern
and plaintiffs cannot
succeed on the merits of the claim
so this was a very well crafted
motion to dismiss
and after
the full motions practice with
memorandum and opposition
and potentially a reply and support
if
first amendment precedent
case law was properly applied
this case should have been over
okay
but as we will see
these fraudsters
these sandy hook plaintiffs
would never have sued Alex Jones
or anyone else
unless they knew
he would take a dive on the defense
Hank from our YouTube says
how does
Alex Jones benefit
from losing millions
or even billions of dollars
and his main corporation
well um
Alex Jones is still on the air
I think you can pull up
info wars a band dot video today
so
what monies have been paid out today
and I don't believe
any
on none
Connecticut judgment
again
we're talking about a theatrical
production here
with the plaintiffs
and the defendants
okay
I do not blame the courts
Jesse
I don't blame any of the courts
that touched upon
the Connecticut defamation cases
we're talking about the trial
court here
we're talking about
the court of appeals in Connecticut
we're talking about
the Connecticut Supreme Court
and we're talking about the U.S.
District Court
for the District of Connecticut
okay
all kind of appeals
we're going up and down
over the course of this seven-year
litigation
every time
the trial judge
would issue a decision
that Alex Jones didn't like
he would seek to appeal it
to the court of appeals
or even the Connecticut Supreme Court
it went on for years
but you must understand
following removal to federal court
to get this case to the U.S.
District Court for Connecticut
these cases should never
have been back to state court
and all the garbage
that went on
and all the complaints
that Alex Jones made
about the state court judge
and all the unfairness
and everything that occurred
thereafter
that's his fault
because he never should have been
back in state court
this should have stayed in federal court
and been resolved
on
that motion to dismiss
if the case was defended
straight up
but it wasn't
they did the slide of hand
on the notice of removal
knowing that exactly
what would happen
is shown here
this is the
ruling
by the federal court
on the motion to remand
I show the first and last pages
and as you can see
the federal court
granted plain of request
to go back to state court
and rendered
not only Alex Jones
motion to dismiss
but the motions to dismiss
of other defendants
that were there with him
terminated as moot
not even
answered
let alone
reviewed and considered
by the federal court
so
that's it for that motion to dismiss
and Jones and his attorneys knew
that that red prohibition sign
would be stamped on it
now Hank's question is
from our YouTube says
what was Adam Lanza
doing at the school
and then he said
if that was true
that they
sealed all the
autopsies and you know reports
then
Adam Lanza would still
have an autopsy report
and it was easy to find
there's been no definitive
type of evidence
that would be admissible
in court
that any deaths occurred
I've heard
information that
an alleged
death certificate was produced
in a totally separate action
in Wisconsin
against Dr. James Fetzer
by another Sandy Hook
parent by the name of Posner
and it's also my understanding
that that alleged death certificate
I don't believe it was submitted
to the court
it was distributed
to other
parties
and it was quickly
debunked
as being an obvious fake
but again
that's not in the Connecticut cases
and I've never even seen
that alleged death certificate
produced by Mr. Posner
that again
across the internet
was shown
for many reasons
to have been
an obvious fraud
but I ended
I ended up
the
the first phase of
my Sandy Hook case
by pointing to some
very serious problems
with the underlying event
because after
I discovered
that Alex Jones
through the defense
of the Connecticut defamation cases
that question naturally became
well
what is wrong with the underlying event
and looking at it
and going back
through research that was done
upwards of 10 years ago Jesse
I found outstanding evidence
evidence that would be admissible
in any American court
that never saw the light of day
why?
because the media
that controls
the mainstream of information
didn't let it see the light of day
but this is there to be found
on places like Rumble
and with alternative media sources
certainly like you
and others
who want to get to the truth on things
and so this slide here
shows several things
it shows this alleged
Adam Lanza at the top
a little pipsqueak
that allegedly broke into a school
and in five minutes
did something that the most highly
trained American special forces
could not possibly have achieved
okay
and in the middle you've got
what appears to be
a stage set
before this alleged event occurred
this picture
supposedly came from the
Connecticut State Police
and it was posted by info wars
for a very brief time
with a short story
before it was taken down
and at the bottom
you see some of the alleged
C&D Hook parents
they're all smiles
within days of their six or seven
year olds
being allegedly torn apart
with high powered AR-15
and at the very bottom middle
you have David Wheeler
he is one of the alleged
C&D Hook parents
and he also appears
to have played the role
of sloppy sniper
that we will see here shortly
in the evidentiary video
that I created
and at the top right
we have a Facebook post
by one of the alleged
C&D Hook families
showing daughter
that they allegedly lost
but a crack researcher
whose name I'm sure you've heard
Sophia Smallstorm
did an expose
on C&D Hook about a decade ago
called unraveling
C&D Hook in two, three, four
and five dimensions
and she happened to notice
that here the Parker family
with an alleged
killed child there on the right
is actually a completely
photoshopped mock-up
and the two girls
sitting on their father's lap
do not happen to have any legs
so we have deception
of the most heinous sort
and not very well done either
do you have any questions Jesse
before we do a quick recap
of phase two
well someone said earlier
that they feel that the C&D Hook
school was actually closed
down at that time
when this was going on
what come to mind was
when the challenger
exploded for NASA
and all of a sudden
20 years later
we've got people talking about
all these seven astronauts
they have different names
or even the same names
changed a little bit
that they're actually still alive
there's pictures of them
with almost similar names
or the same name
or a little bit different name
but they're showing
where they actually gone to
it was almost like
again that was staged
they used these seven people
they all lived on
you know somewhere
college professors
now here is this
that same thing
or was this totally
you know the victims
totally made up
which they couldn't have
a death certificate
which they couldn't have
an autopsy
which they couldn't have
a coroner report
which they couldn't
they now if they were
suing Alex Jones
they couldn't get any money
because there was no one
to give money to
if these were fictitious
you know people are
fictitious victims
of Alex Jones's
state speech
or I don't know
kind of speech
he was you know
it was actually
you know kind of
why he would actually even be
you know guilty of
you know even if
he was just saying
some things that weren't true
I don't see how
it could be worth a billion
dollars you know
to to this whole narrative
unless there is something
that's nefarious going on
like you know
trying to take away
people's you know
constitutional rights
yeah it's
it's an interesting scenario
and I have analogized it
in this way
when I discovered
that the underlying event
was an obvious
improvable hoax
as we'll see here
in a couple minutes
it very much struck me
that this whole thing
is like the plot of a cartoon
are you a Scooby-Doo fan
Jesse do you
know Scooby-Doo
are you familiar with that series
yeah Scooby and Shaggy
yeah it's real easy
I started watching that
back in the early 70s
you know 72 73
something like that
in every episode
was the same
it's got the same basic setup
okay
you have a real
serious underlying crime
and it's typically confined
to a specific location
like a real small town
or maybe the
estate of some rich person
and the evidence
of that real underlying crime
happens to be right there
you know they can't move it
like buried gold
or something like that
right
and so what the perpetrators do
is they concoct
some ridiculous monster hoax
they put on some kind of monster
outfit
and strike
and try to scare
everyone away
from looking at the underlying event
the underlying crime
and seeing what was really going on
so what we have here
is Sandy Hook
the alleged shooting
as the real underlying crime
and then a few years later
you have this ridiculous
monster hoax
of unsupportable lawsuits
going to judgment
by default
against Alex Jones
and then you have
outrageous verdicts
and in Connecticut
1.43 billion
to any lawyer
that's going to be a monster
that he don't want to go anywhere near
how about this
to any news organization
that 1.43 billion dollar judgment
is a giant monster
that scares them away
and so it's real simple
you've got an underlying crime
you've got a ridiculous monster hoax
to cover it up
it's basically Scooby-Doo
make sense
yeah totally
so it sounds like
they put something into a show
like this
and make it all like a big publicized
and for someone who questioned
a false flag
they maybe want people to think twice
about maybe questioning something
that maybe potentially is a false flag
that doesn't seem to seem
like it's normal or legit
and would this be the exact same thing
that they did with Fox News
where they
you know
were charged 700 million dollars
for questioning the election integrity
of these machines
and you know they actually said
that there was obviously
there was some changes in the machines
and then they went through court
and had to pay this big fine
would that be the same thing
to try to scare people
from questioning the election
integrities
is in this maybe kind of
a line kind of in the same
type of bracket
yeah
um
it's possible
anytime you see
a runaway
ridiculous verdict
you've got to wonder
see I have a great deal
of faith in the court system
I've been working at it
for 30 years
in a lot of different
jurisdictions
okay
a lot of different counties in Ohio
probably 60 of 88
counties I've appeared in
and several states
I've litigated in Indiana
I've litigated in Florida
Pennsylvania
Texas
and I think a couple more
but
you really have to question it
when these massive
verdicts come across
because juries represent
the common
conscious of the community
and by and large
I've found
that regular folks
are pretty common
sensical
and they're not apt
to be
giving away
so to speak
other people's money
to the tune of hundreds of
millions
or billions of dollars
so anytime I see that happen
it raises a question
in my mind
because of my experience
juries for the most part
are pretty darn good
least if you pick them well
okay next phase
yeah this
after I
really
got the argument wrapped up
on the
throwing of the Connecticut lawsuits
I felt it very necessary
to put forth a compilation video
that shows
all the research
that I found as being compelling
and that forms of the same
would come in to any trial
to show
that this underlying event
was a hoax
and on this slide here
I point to
my rumble video
my sandy hook video
scrapbook
and it is a compilation of news
clips
and the work of two researchers
in particular
Sophia small storm
who I previously mentioned
in an anonymous fellow
who goes by ironically enough
Barry Sotoro
which was the name that
Barack Obama went by
during his college days
but you'll see it's 43 minutes long
I've added music
and interesting transitions
to make it entertaining
you will not fall asleep
and I think you will find it
very compelling
and what it demonstrates
and everything that I'm putting forth here Jesse
I want to make very clear
is to a standard of probable cause
more likely than not
I'm not saying
100%
all of these things happened
I'm not even saying
beyond a reasonable doubt
that's for a jury
if one's ever seated
in a criminal case
okay
what I am saying here
is that I have put forth evidence
showing at the very least
probable cause
for a grand jury
or a special prosecutor
to believe
that A. Jones through the case
and B. the underlying event
was a hoax
I do not have a high bar
to meet here
probable cause is more likely than not
and trust me
when you see this Sandy Hook video
scrapbook compilation video
you will most assuredly agree
that at the very least
probable cause exists
to believe this event was a hoax
and all the people associated with it
in and outside the government
this happened back during
the Obama administration
need to be investigated
now what's you know
super surprising
is the amount
in the dollar figure
of this insane part
because you know
you look at some of the other things
that you know
say pharmaceutical industries have done
where they've been caught
you know changing
you know results
and killing people
and they pay 500 million
or a billion dollars
when actually
they actually killed people
you know you got out of the images
that can be proved
yeah
quantifiable damages
what are the damages here
damage to the reputations
of these people allegedly
and the
mental anguish and the hurt
that they associated with
the damages to the reputations
okay yeah and again
whole things bogus
if you had
you know
a 10 million dollar judgment
it has the effect
of say a 10 size monster
compared to a 1.4 thousand size monster
you see the difference
and how
this massive again
outrageous judgment
accomplishes its effect
through its size
and outrageousness
yeah like you said
if it was a 10 million dollar judgment
you know
maybe would
look a lot more realistic
and you know
like if they were suing
a maybe you know
they would want to get compensated
if this was actually real
and went along
but you know
I still
1.4 billion dollars for what
because he said a few things
like you know
and like that's the whole
part that you know
is kind of makes it
you know
looks so fake
it must be real
right
and in his speech
was protected
okay
again
these sandy hook plaintiffs
would qualify as what we call
public figures
now in this instance
they're limited purpose
public figures
with respect to what
the shooting
and the alleged shooting
and and everything
attended to that
so under this
New York Times
versus Sullivan case
that I mentioned
the sandy hook plaintiffs
had to prove
one of two things
in order to have
a viable claim
against Alex Jones
they have to prove
that he lied
or that he acted
with reckless disregard
to the truth
just didn't even
look into things
just said
you know
they threw the case
it was all bogus
or not through the case
they staged the event
that could be seen
as reckless disregard
if you don't even
look into it a little bit
so
that motion to dismiss
that Alex Jones filed
as soon as he got
to federal court
if this was a real
case
and he was really defending
it straight up
should have been resolved
under Supreme Court
precedent
on motions to dismiss
okay
you have to
look at this
as a chicken and egg
type of thing
which came first
I will tell you this
there is no way in the world
Alex
or the sandy hook plaintiffs
would have sued Alex Jones
unless they knew
he would take a dive
on the defense
why
because if Alex Jones
would have had a competent
an honest
lawyer who
defended the case
straight up
those sandy hook plaintiffs
would have been exposed
for the frauds they are
any competent attorney
would have torn the plaintiffs
cases to shreds
and they would have been
exposed as fraudsters
and
they would have potentially
been charged with treason
okay
treason
under
American constitutional law
is a capital offense
for which
there is no statute of
limitations
so think about this
the sandy hook plaintiffs
given that the event
was approvable hoax
would they have ever dared
risking
charges for fraud
and treason
a capital offense
to sue someone for defamation
the answer
is no
who in the world
is going to risk their life
to sue someone
when they know it's
basically an impossible case
to win
for bad mouthing you
about
the biggest crime
you've ever committed in your life
do you see how
these lawsuits
would never have been filed
unless
the plaintiffs knew
the defendants would take a dive
so you don't see
any of the courts
being
or even having to be
in on this
it was
you know
whether or not
we know
you find
honor in the courts
you know
people can
you know
obviously argue that
in many different ways
but we're not talking with
you're just saying
in this case
the courts followed the law
it
everything was by the book
when it came to
the courts
it's just that the
defense
you know
basically
tanked their own case
and so the courts had
no other recourse
but to
award this judgment
yeah
let's take for instance
the U.S. District Court
for the District of Connecticut
okay
federal judges
especially because
there's only
one
district court in Connecticut
it's a small state
in my home state of Ohio
we have
the northern
district of Ohio
and then we have
the southern district of Ohio
and they have separate divisions
as well
so
in Connecticut
with the district court
it
all district courts
have jammed dockets
typically with
federal criminal cases
as you can imagine
a lot of drug cases
and so
when a civil case comes in
it's not the
judge's job
it's not the court's job
to make sure
that the right ground
for jurisdiction was claimed
by the person seeking
to get into federal court
and have their civil case heard
and so this wasn't
the fault of the
U.S. District Judge
in Connecticut
this is on Alex Jones
and his attorney
that helped him pull off
this slide of hand
this self-sabotage
this collusion
and yes
this treason
fascinating
so what's this sloppy sniper
for
the work of Barry Satoro
so Barry Satoro
isn't that
Obama's dad
yes that's what I was just
mentioning
in my Sandy Hook
scrapbook video
it's 43 minutes long
and I'm pointing to you here
the smoking gun
the undeniable proof
that the entire event
was a hoax
and it's a segment
of my scrapbook video
it's right in the middle
and it's 16 minutes long
I told you I
based my research on
bear news clips
and then the work of
Sophia Smallstorm
in this anonymous guy
I think he's from New York
based on his accent
and he goes by Barry Satoro
the name of Barack Obama
used back in the day
but you watch
this 16 minute segment
within the scrapbook video
titled with a title card
sloppy sniper
and you I believe
will come to the same conclusion
that I did
okay
and it is this
what you have
is this man
dressed up
in surplus army gear
he has no police department
insignia
on his army surplus gear
he is acting
like an absolute clown
in not observing
basic gun safety
for instance
he's carrying an AR-15
ironically enough
upside down
by its magazine
which is where the bullets go in
and which is detachable
and which could result
in the gun
falling to the ground
and going off
you see this man
this sloppy sniper
that is shown
in the inset picture here
with the helmet on
being paraded
back and forth
in front of the cameras
ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox
CNN
all day long
and he is with
fully uniformed
in very competent looking
officers
in FBI uniforms
and in
Connecticut State
police uniforms
so what in the world
are police units
doing
marching in formation with
and interacting with
and actually as you'll see
ordering around
this clown
in the army surplus gear
who doesn't know
how to handle a weapon
he's pointing the thing
at women and children
and it's supposedly a
loaded rifle
anyone who's handled a rifle knows
that you always hold it
with a muzzle
or the barrel down
to the ground
and a ton of other things
but I set forth here
on this slide
it certainly appears
that David Wheeler
who's shown on the right
as a Sandy Hook plaintiff
was the same guy that played
sloppy sniper
but even if it wasn't Wheeler
it doesn't matter
why because regardless
of who this actor was
the mere fact that the cops
were interacting with them
and pretending
like he was one of them
mandates
the conclusion that the entire
event was a hoax
as a matter of fact Jesse
and I'm sure you've heard this
term before
revelation of the method
I believe
that this ridiculous parading
of this imposter cop
this obvious imposter cop
all day long
in front of the network cameras
the cable cameras
the local TV stations
and appearing in print stories
of this event
around the world
was really
a revelation of the method
I don't see any way around it
and David Wheeler
as is shown at the top left
is a known actor
he appeared in a movie called
Faithful
and was credited by IMBD
for having to doing so
back in 2001
okay
and there he is in 2012
most assuredly
at the bottom right
pushing gun control
on behalf of C&D Hook
and then we have sloppy
sniper
there to the left
and they appear
to be the same man
I'll leave that to
your judgment
Jesse
and the audience as well
but I think probable cause
exists here
at the very least
so now they
obviously
went after
Alex Jones
for
whatever reason
they went after him to
shut him up to
shut up free speech
whatever it is
right
and you know
that they did go after him
but
they went after him
and got like a 1.4 billion
dollar judgment
against him
or I don't know it was 1 billion
or
what was the exact judgment
amount
it was 1.43 billion
coming out of the state court
and then
and then excuse me
on December 10th of last year
the court of appeals
of Connecticut
after hearing the best
arguments that Alex Jones
had to make
in that appeal brief
that I first talked about
today reduced it
all the way from
1.43 billion
down to 1.3 billion
so
so not really much
okay so now
yeah they knocked out
a consumer sales practices
act claim
they said it wasn't
sustainable under
Connecticut law
okay now
so for
you
are now
you know
stating publicly
you're on record
and you know
you're actually
going after them
in courts
and you're stating
the exact same thing
that
Sandy Hook was a fraud
that nobody
died
are you
not concerned
at all
that they'll
want to try to take
you to court
or would that be the
last thing that
you would think
that they would ever do
because you would
actually litigated
or defend yourself
properly
you're
are you hoping
that they take you to court
so that way
you can expose this
and in federal court
or is this
what you're trying to do
with your case motions
to actually get this
done in
you know to get it
exposed
in an actual court
setting
I'm going to show
the indication
of my motion
filing
here in a bit
let me make it
clear
Alex Jones
bankruptcy
arises
in large part
from
the
Connecticut
state court judgment
he also had a judgment
against him
in Texas
I did not
particularly look
at that case
other than to see it
follow the same
general pattern
okay
of a default judgment
being entered against him
and all kind of sanctions
from the court
but
it's important to know
that in
my motion for leave
to intervene
in Alex Jones
bankruptcy case
I am seeking
only to present
evidence of the fraudulent
judgment
and that is entirely shown
by phase one
of the case
that I just showed you
I am not
seeking to
convince the bankruptcy court
and I specifically state
in my motion
that I'm not
seeking
to convince the bankruptcy court
that the underlying event
was a hoax
okay
that's for separate proceedings
if justice prevails
what I'm seeking to do
is to prove
the second part
of the conspiracy
so to speak
by simply showing
that as a matter of law
meaning reasonable minds
can't differ
that that notice of removal
constitutes
operative
evidence of self-sabotage
or fraud
by the defense
and that was done
in July of 2018
they didn't claim
federal question
jurisdiction
and they got tossed
out of federal court
back to the state court
and then
the slaughter
with a $1.43 billion
judgment occurred
thereafter
all I need to show
is the operative fraud
that occurred literally
in the first month
of the defense
that's what I'm pointing
the bankruptcy court to
and I'm not pointing
to anything other
than what is in the case file
for the Connecticut
state court judgments
that remand file
from the federal court
is part of
the state court case file
so I'm not bringing in any
external
or what we call
extrinsic evidence
I'm simply pointing the court
to the case file
in the underlying action
that gives rise
to the giant judgment
that gives rise
to the bankruptcy
it's that simple
we've got a lot of good
researchers
that you know
come and hang out
while we're live here
on the missing
Lincoln
one of them
v11
from our
YouTube says
the Sandy Hook child actors
appeared and performed
as the fourth grade choir
at the February 3rd 2013
at Super Bowl
in New Orleans
were you aware that
some of those child actors
from Sandy Hook was
at the Super Bowl
in New Orleans afterwards?
I've heard those allegations
and I've seen
some of the video clips
I don't have an opinion on that
other to say
that most of the surely
anything's possible
Yeah, I like that
because you're just looking
for actual evidence
you're not
Yeah, I've got to present
evidence here
now it's important to note
Alex Jones
testified
out in the Texas cases
that I referenced earlier
and again
I didn't go through
the court dockets
or docket
on the Texas case
I did that in Connecticut
okay
but it's very important to note
that in testifying
in the Texas cases
according to the AP
Alex Jones testified
as I've highlighted here
on the slide
under oath
and facing a jury
Jones said
what happened in the
deadliest school shooting
in American history
was 100% real
okay
that appears to me
to be false testimony
under oath
on a material issue
and it was
done in furtherance
of the broader conspiracy
to undermine or destroy
our first and second amendments
and so again
Jesse I'm not a prosecutor
but I'll tell you what
that sounds a bit
like both
perjury
and treason
just in the Texas court
out there
as reported by the AP
and so that is
the end of phase two
and please
with your questions
and how would he
actually know
that it was 100%
true to be able to testify
that in court
like he wouldn't have
he wasn't there
he didn't see it
that it happened
you know
he wouldn't be able
to testify
honorably
that it actually did
unequivocally happen
because he doesn't have
any first-hand testimony
so
how could he actually
even say that
and be taken seriously
well of course
if I was there
and such a question
would be posed
I would have objected
to the question
on the grounds
that it calls
for speculation
outside
the personal knowledge
of the witness
see
we only have personal
knowledge
of what we perceive
through one or more
of our five senses
and that we remember
okay
that's personal knowledge
we can't testify
as to what someone
else saw
or what someone else
experienced
through their five senses
so I'm not exactly sure
why that question
was allowed
but he gave the testimony
and I submit
based on the evidence
I've seen
that that was false testimony
he knew it was false testimony
and it was done
to further
and protect
the overall
two-part conspiracy
to undermine or destroy
the first and second
amendments
and you're in Canada
which has a different system
I believe you have
the Charter of Rights
that protects
you folks up there
or supposed to
and in America
we have
you know
the Constitution
and then we have the
Bill of Rights
with all the amendments
but if you look
at the first two
they really embody
the entirety
of the American Republic
because the
American Republic
is based on freedom of speech
freedom of thought
freedom of
exercise of religion
okay
free association
the right to petition
your government
for grievances
and then the second amendment
backs all that up
and so in those two
amendments
to the Constitution
you really have
the entire essence
of the American Republic
and these attacks on them
are attacks
on the very basis
of the American Republic
and they should not
be swept aside
swept under the rug
or left to
the ash heap of history
this stuff
needs to be brought
to a reckoning
or we ain't got a Republic
first and foremost
and second in America
we aren't going to have
physical safety
because if we don't have
the right to protect
and defend ourselves
especially with open borders
and crime on our streets
out of control
then we don't even
have what it takes
to maintain our humanity
okay next
okay so I finished up
with with phase two
and I did a couple
of interviews
in particular with Dr. Rima
Labo
and then Todd Callender
and in my interview
with Todd Callender
he's an attorney
licensed in Colorado
he's based in
the Bahamas right now
and you might be familiar
with his Vax Choice
platform
and the work that he does
but I introduced phase three
of the case
and that was to go after
the Diaz brothers
and who are the Diaz brothers
right I like to use movies
so we switched
now to Scarface
another one of my favorites
and the Diaz brothers
are the gurus
of the Sandy Hook Truth
community
Wolfgang Halbig
James Fetzer
Dr. James Fetzer
and these guys
were both sued
by Sandy Hook plaintiffs
Halbig was sued
in the Connecticut cases
right along with Alex Jones
and you know what he did Jesse
he signed off
on
a consent
to Jones faulty
notice of dismissal
now
Mr. Halbig
was representing himself pro se
apparently he didn't think
he needed a lawyer
he could rely on the other
lawyers maybe
but all he had to do
really
is some basic research
federal question
jurisdiction is discussed
in civil procedure
on the first day of law
school
you've got two grounds
for jurisdiction
of federal court diversity
subject matter jurisdiction
heck that's even something
that they would probably
talk about
in the first day of a business
law class
that you might sign up
for in high school
it's the basic description
of our court system in America
you have the state courts
with full jurisdiction
to hear all the common pleas
that's why courts
in the state level in America
are called common police courts
then you have
the federal courts
of limited jurisdiction
okay
and Halbig was sued
and all he had to do
is look up on Google
or maybe
you know
one of these primers
that all these attorneys
are putting on the internet
and say hey guys
wait a minute
this is a first amendment case
shouldn't we be claiming
first amendment
or federal question
jurisdiction
shouldn't we be claiming
28 USC 1331
that's actually
I've already cited for you
it's literally
a five second Google search
to come up with that
but he went along
and he filed a consent
to that ineffective notice
of removal
all right
and the thing is
he could have spoiled the whole thing
he could have spoiled the whole plot
if he would have simply
raised that issue
and not got along
and I'm telling you what
all the people
that were invested
in putting together
this hoax
from the underlying event
would not have allowed
would not have taken the risk
of suing someone
who could potentially
have exposed
the entire conspiracy
like Wolfgang Halberg
with three words
federal question jurisdiction
therefore probable cause exists
to believe
that Wolfgang Halberg
was in on it
and we've got the smoking gun
the operative evidence
in the form
of his consent
to the faulty notice of removal
and so these guys
Halberg
and also Fetzer
will see how he was sued
and what he did
I believe to throw his case
are spewing nothing but garbage
and have been
as the Sandy Hook community
truth gurus
the Sandy Hook truth community
gurus
for the last decade or so
leading the community in circles
and getting nowhere
okay
and so my feelings
on what I call the Diaz brothers
are very well set forth here
by my friend Tony
and so
we send them
packing
and maybe
get a little bit more specific
on what I've already described
that's me back in the day
and here's Mr. Halberg saying
what is this
some kid
some cowboy setting himself up
in business
look at him
note what I want to look at
right here
is this consent to removal
that Wolfgang Halberg signed off on
July 13th of 2018
and again
he could have spoiled the whole thing
by not going along
doing a Google search
doing his basic due diligence
and saying hey guys
first amendment case
we've got to assert
federal question jurisdiction
he didn't do it
it is smoking gun evidence
of
collusion
self-sabotage
by defendant Wolfgang Halberg
so who benefits from
from this
charade
the people who
put it on and paid for it
Jesse
if you look at the film footage
from the day of this event
you've got the FBI
you've got
DHS
and
it's important to note
that this occurred under a prior
administration
okay
this was 12 years ago
12 plus years ago
and I referenced this
in some of my interviews
and you will actually see
the governor of Connecticut
at the beginning of the scrapbook
video
he actually says this
he says
a week or two ago
the lieutenant governor
and I were talked to
and we were told
that we might event
expect
an event like this
playing itself out
somewhere in our state
in the next couple weeks
and reports have it
that that talking to
to the governor of Connecticut
and his lieutenant
was done by none other than
attorney
Eric
attorney general
Eric Holder under Obama
okay
so this goes all the way up the
chain
why would they do it
I don't know
why would the powers that be
back under that administration
want to silence
and destroy
or rather
I should say at that time
destroy the second amendment
and then silence the people
in a later lawsuit
I don't know
what do you want to do to people
that you are seeking
to both silence and disarm
that's a very big question
and one
that I felt duty bound
in supporting and defending
the Constitution
to make sure
is brought to public light
and so the second
Diaz brother
that I list here is
professor James Fetzer
he was sued
again by a sandy hook plaintiff
in Wisconsin
he represented himself
he was sued for a book
that he wrote
called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook
and as
Wikipedia sets forth here
he was sued
by one of the sandy hook
alleged parents
and this was in Wisconsin
and he represented himself
Dr. Fetzer did a college professor
thinking that he could handle it
and he got hit
for a $450,000 judgment
he appealed it pro se
to the United States Supreme Court
and they denied
certiorari
they didn't take the case
they told him to pound sand
and so
I go back to my point
which has also been
endorsed
confirmed by other attorneys
the sandy hook plaintiffs
wouldn't have sued anyone
unless they knew
that person would take a dive
on the defense
why
because the sandy hook plaintiffs
aren't going to risk prison
or the gallows for treason
to file a defamation suit
unless they knew
the defendant was in on it
and Dr. Fetzer
well he got hit for a big judgment
and it fits the pattern
so in the same vein as Alex Jones
probable cause exists
to believe
that he likewise
threw the defense
he never would have been sued
in the first place
on a fraudulent claim
now I hear in America
that when someone does
want to civilly sue you like this
in a lot of cases
it's free to counter sue them
so if someone's suing you
it doesn't cost anything
to counter sue them
and if you know
you feel like you've been
wronged in any way
and someone is suing you
that's the first thing you would do
is put a countersuit claim against them
oftentimes if you do have a basis
for a counter claim
absolutely if you don't assert it
you lose it
and if you're sued
amongst other defendants
and they are more at fault
than you are
or entirely a fault
you cross claim against them
for what we call indemnity
or contribution
so you know
attorneys who are well experienced
and competent
know what they're doing
and would have torn
these defamation cases
to absolute shreds
based on the evidence
that I've already mentioned
lack of it
lack of death certificate
lack of autopsy reports
lack of crime scene photos
showing you know
bloody bodies
none of that's ever been produced
and so that takes us to phase four
because I really had taken
the public advocacy case
about as far as I could Jesse
with interviews
now a lot of people
wouldn't interview me
a lot of big names
who claim to be truth tellers
and freedom fighters
in the alternative media
wouldn't even respond
to emails that I sent on this
or public statements
that I made on this
but something happened
very significantly
at the beginning of February
and that was a hearing
in Alex Jones bankruptcy case
where the trustee
brought a settlement
to the judge who rejected it
and I read an article
in the news times
about that particular denial
of a settlement by the judge
and that meant that the case
was still viable
still pending
and I saw that as the opportunity
to get this crucial evidence
before the court of fraud
in the Connecticut defamation actions
which give rise to the bankruptcy
and so I entered into
the fourth phase
of the Sandy Hook case
and I call this
appropriately so
the fog of war
and here you have
a little Spanish
at the bottom
justice from the mountain
and initially
I didn't go to the court
to present this evidence
in looking at how bankruptcy law
works because I've never practiced
in that field before
I saw that
typically when
a member of the public
even an attorney
is presenting evidence
of a fraudulent judgment
giving rise to a bankruptcy
the main point of contact
in the party who is responsible
for ferreting out fraud
who is responsible
for receiving an allegation
investigating it
and telling the court
is the chapter 7 trustee
and or the United States trustee
so I sent notices
to the chapter 7 trustee
and the U.S. trustee
or rather the attorney
for the U.S. trustee
providing written explanations
as to why the Connecticut
state court judgments were fraudulent
it's really easy
Alex Jones didn't claim
federal question jurisdiction
in first amendment cases
that's it
and so I sent that
in letters
supported by evidence
and with written
explanatory statements
going to the chapter 7 trustee
and all these attorneys
representing him
in the U.S. trustee
and I didn't hear anything in response
and so during that
time when I was waiting for a response
I also challenged
two attorneys
who are very well-known cronies
of Alex Jones
and appear on band dot video
all the time
Viva Fry of Canada
and Robert Barnes
an American lawyer
none of those attorneys
appeared in the Connecticut cases
and so I challenged them
to a public debate
on one
whether Alex Jones
took a purposeful dive
on the defense of the Connecticut
Sandy Hook defamation cases
and two
their continued
failty or loyalty
to or involvement with Jones
in view of his collusion
his self-sabotage
and yes
his treason
in these cases
again
everything I'm saying
probable cause
and I challenge Barnes or Fry
to get on air with me
and tell me
if
anywhere
that I'm wrong
but I haven't heard from them
and I've sought
to reach them
through some
very well-known media figures
again
nobody's giving me the time of day
on this
but to date
Jesse
as well
not a single attorney
has come out
and challenged
my conclusions
that I've been putting forth
publicly
since November 1 of 2024
that's what my next question is
have you
met any resistance
have you gotten any
cease and desist letters
have you got any
threats
have you got anybody
who's trying to shut you up
when it comes to
all of this information
I
I did receive a cease and desist
email
last night
or early today
actually
from Dr. James Fetzer
and
wasn't
based on
any of the law
I've cited here
with respect
to the throwing of the case
for failing to
claim federal question
jurisdiction
I did not
reply
to
or respond
to Dr. Fetzer
I have had zero
contact
with Dr. Fetzer
to date
although he has tried
reaching me several times
since I first started
pursuing this
public advocacy case
I will not have
any contact
with any
of the people
that I see
as likely
co-conspirators
and who I've named
publicly
why
because I'm not a prosecutor
and I don't want to mess up
the prosecution's cases
because
these matters
need to be
investigated
and if probable cause
is found on
various counts of indictments
they need to be prosecuted
into the full extent of the law
and so I don't want to do
anything
to mess up
that
prosecutorial
potential
prosecutorial process
by having direct contacts
with these people
okay
so I've said
what I've said publicly
it's all
at alwayswin.com
forward slash
operation
dash madcap
everything I've said
about Dr. Fetzer
about Wolfgang Halbig
about Alex Jones
about the attorneys
it's all right there
I stand by
every word I've said
and I'm willing to defend
any defamation case
that anyone brings against me
any charge
for incompetence
or improper conduct
on my part
everything has been public here
and everything has been
above the board
and you will see
that I have put it all
in my motion
to
present evidence
of fraudulent judgment
in Jones case
people can pull it up
it's public record
and it tells my story
again
I don't present evidence
on the underlying event
in the bankruptcy filing
just
of
the fraudulent judgment
does that make sense
and here I've got it
highlighted
on
this is a screen grab
from Operation Madcap
and down at the bottom
you'll see it's chronological
I get to
what is
the point where the
rubber has met the pavement
so to speak
and those wheels are spinning fast
because I filed
my motion for leave to intervene
setting forth
all grounds
to conclude
that this was a fraudulent judgment
on March 19
and memos in opposition
are due
six days from now
on April 9
and the list of parties
in that case Jesse
the service list
that is automatically generated
when anything is filed
in the federal court
down in Texas
is literally 20 pages long
so there's a lot of people
and a lot of attorneys involved in that
so where do you go from here
I wait to see what the court does
and I talk to good folks like you
who are willing to get this information
out and people need to know
that this
motion is pending
and that it could potentially upset
that entire bankruptcy proceeding
and place
this entire two-part conspiracy
on a path to eventual justice
again
the president of the united states
will need to appoint a special counsel
why
because you can't have a grand jury
seated in Connecticut
it's a small state
and there's way too much
potential for local prejudice
and then second
the FBI
at the very least
and possibly DHS
are conflicted
due to involvement
in the underlying theatrical production
under the Obama administration
in December of 2012
so in that event
we need the new president
to appoint
a special counsel
because this was the management team
behind what happened
in Connecticut
in December of 2012
Janet Napolitano
on the right
head of DHS
Eric Holder in the middle
attorney general at the time
and apparently the one who spoke to
Governor Malloy
of Connecticut
and his lieutenant governor
and said
yeah you can expect something like this
to play itself out
in the next couple weeks
since when does a crazy person
breaking into a school
for no reason
in shooting 26 people to death
constitute
an anticipated event
playing itself out
the whole notion is ridiculous
and of course
they were working for our old buddy
Obama
and I'll tell you what
I never trusted that guy from the beginning
not one bit
because a man who doesn't keep his word
Jesse
is a piece of well
a piece of old scratch himself
the evil one
and so
I don't have much patience
for this type of conduct
because
as Jim Garrison
played by Kevin Costner
said in JFK
treason
doth never prosper
and that's the end of what
that phase
and I must tell folks
that back in
January of this year
January 14th
I had to quit that
that day job
that contract
attorney job
and it was a no-brainer for me
I didn't think twice about it
I had a big interview coming up on the 15th
I had so much time left in the day
and I had a choice to make
it's either
my current form of income
or it's doing everything I can
to fulfill my oath
to protect and defend the constitution
and that was a no-brainer
so I left that job
and I proceeded with the work that I had to do
actually to interview
or rather
introduce phase three
in an interview
and so
I left that job
and I set up a give-send-go account
and this is the thumbnail that I made for that
and you can find
my give-send-go campaign
at the address for that site
it's really easy forward slash win
dash young
and I much appreciate
the public support
in this public advocacy case
that I'm pursuing
because this is set forth in
my motion for leave to intervene
that I'll show you here before we finish up
I am devoting all my professional efforts
to seeing this case
to proper fruition
which again
will be putting this on the path
for investigation
by special counsel
or at the outside
perhaps
a federal grand jury
what's your thoughts on big mic
on Michelle Obama
she's
she's a very imposing figure
how's that
all part of this crazy facade
that's going on
with the government so
yeah I wouldn't I wouldn't trifle
with Michelle Obama
how's that
I'll stop sharing
but thank you so much folks
I know that
there was a lot here
and I went through it quickly
but but keep in mind
that that plot line
from scooby-doo
you've got a real real bad
underlying crime
and then the people that were
associated with that
underlying crime
come up with some crazy hopes
to scare one away
and that's what these
sandy hook lawsuits in
Connecticut were all about
in the in the giant
ridiculous judgment
you don't see those kind of
judgments
okay
you know the judgments
you were talking about
early earlier Jesse had
actual damages
you know
were buildings were destroyed
or businesses were destroyed
and and it's quantifiable
but but this was uh
this was all part
of a scyop really
to not only influence
but also very much harm
the American people
in our god-given rights
so it's really sad
is that you know
that they're actually
you know
doing these things
you know and
you know people are believing it
and it's really
you know a sad
state and place that this is
our current reality
and thanks to people like you
that you know it's probably not
so popular what you're doing
but you feel
but you feel what you're doing
is the right thing to do
and that's an honorable thing
and you know it's in a time
in you know age
where it seems like
a lot of men have lost their balls
literally too
and you know it's
good to see when someone
still has them
and you know is not
afraid to stand up to
the big bad beast
no when you're
operating according to truth
you know
you you can hear it
you can see it
you can feel it
you can sense it
that's why
we have the phrase
the ring of truth
it has the ring of truth to it
it's very much vibrational
and it hits us away
when we hear lies
when things don't make sense
when they're counterintuitive
like alex jones
a supposed journalist
getting hit
for 1.43 billion
for exercising free speech
that's counterintuitive
it doesn't
it doesn't make sense
and so then you know
you're taking a little more
information on it
like i did when i was sitting
doing my
my day job as a contract attorney
and and and i heard
something that didn't have the
ring of truth to it
alex and norm paddus
talking about their case
and and and so
you need to have
not only the interest
but the courage to look into
these things because again
this is a plot to first
disarm and then
to silence the american people
wow that sounds like a plot
that the cavalry might come up
with
with respect to the encampment
of the indians across the valley
oh
we're going to first
disarm them
and then silence them
what might that cavalry
regiment have in mind
for that peaceful village of
indians across the valley
this is very basic simple stuff
we're dealing with
our safety
our god-given rights
and your right
people need to stand up
and to protect their families
and to protect this society
that we have built
and that you canadians have also
built a society
where you have your rights
enshrined in a charter
and in western civilization
we enjoy the rights
of free speech
for the most part
of freedom of religion
of freedom of association
of freedom of conscience
of bodily autonomy
think what's happened in recent years
to our bodily autonomy
with the vax mandates
we need to find ground
solid ground on which to stand
and we damn better
better well make our stands
or
we're not going to have anything to stand on
and we're not going to have
these societies we've built
we're not going to have our safety
and we're not going to have futures
for our children and our grandchildren
and so I thank you sir
for having the courage
to have a Yankee on me like today
to speak to these things
and to get the time
and the access to audience
to relate these crucial points
thank you
you welcome Yankee Doodle went to town
you went to town here
so thank you for sharing this information
we have
I'm having a bit of trouble
with the screen share
so what you can do
and I would recommend
that everybody do this
is go to the bottom of my case file page
always win dot com
forward slash operation dash mat gap
go down to the bottom
and you'll see
the information regarding my court filing
I've got it there on a slide show
it's a little fuzzy
but you can see it
but below there
because they're just screen grabs
below there I've got a pdf button
and you can download
a razor sharp crystal clear
version of my 17 page motion
now I will tell you
it has very little legalese in it
it is written in pros
and it tells a story
and the grounds for why I say that I'm in court
and you look at it
the last section
sets forth in no uncertain terms
why that judgment
against Alex Jones
coming out of Connecticut
is fraudulent
and why the court cannot
under
binding law
afford any relief
based on that ostensibly
and provably fraudulent judgment
because it sets precedent
because it's against the law
the supreme court of the United States
just in 2023
in a case called Barton Werfer
kind of a German sounding name
held that in a chapter seven case
no relief can be afforded
based on a fraudulent judgment
even if
the debtor
the person who's in bankruptcy
didn't commit the fraud
if the judgment arises from anyone's fraud
no relief can be afforded in bankruptcy
according to the United States Supreme Court
get this
in a unanimous nine to nothing decision
which weighs heavily
in favor of the court
allowing me to come in
to that case
for the limited purpose
of setting forth the exhibits that I filed
16 of them
they're real simple
and they show without a doubt
the judgments fraudulent
okay
and so people can go
to my case file page
they can go down to the bottom there
they'll see a big PDF button
it's about two inches
in size
all they have to do is click that
the PDF will pop up
it's 17 pages
of one of the most interesting things
that you will read
in the form of a court filing
I guarantee it
it's current
it goes to the heart
not only of the American Republic
but the entirety of western civilization
including of course the commonwealth
and they can share it
with everyone they know
and you're not seeing
that is what will make the difference
because as Abraham Lincoln said
public sentiment is everything
and you're not saying that like
all school shootings are you know
faked or staged or
you know like you're just saying
this sandy hook you have
you know empirical evidence
that there is no evidence saying
that it was real because
the 11 says you know
we are due for another so-called
school shooting this year
we've only had three as of 2025
you know there obviously
there are some that are staged
there are some that are real
you know you're only focused on this one
because you found the evidence
that this has been a hoax
yeah I found and produced
pointed to really in the court file
undeniable operative evidence
of fraud in Alex Jones
self-sabotage
in collusion in the Connecticut
defamation cases that's simple
that's the notice of removal
that's missing the three magic words
federal question jurisdiction
that's operative that's undeniable
I have set forth as well
in my case file
most particularly in the
sandy hook scrapbook video
that there is more than probable
cause to believe
that the underlying event
back in 2012 was a hoax
okay
and it needs to be further investigated
in terms of the underlying event
and that is as basic
and as simple as my case goes
and no I'm not making any other
allegations with respect
to any other events
because that's not relevant
to my case
my case is one to represent
the American people
and exposing
the two part
and treason is sandy hook conspiracy
and I found it
I got into it
by first discovering the undeniable
operative evidence of fraud
in the lawsuits
that came later
does that make sense
hundred percent
well thank you so much for coming here
and sharing all this information
with us and doing
doing what you're doing
may the source be with you
and protection around you
during this pivotal time in history
uh knowledge is power
the more knowledge we all have
collectively the less power
they have over us
so let's all face infinity
without flinching
for one love
one heart
one life
now I'm gonna stay everyone
and if they ever ask you to put on
a breathing inhibitor again
when you know what to say
not me
not now
not ever
thank you so much for having me on
and same to your audience
all of them everywhere
you're very welcome
and you simplify it
you can just say
no masque
little spanish lingo there
very appropriate
thank you sir
okay bye everyone
we'll see you tomorrow
with elizabeth monroy
she wrote the book
uh the infinite human
that's tomorrow at noon eastern
standard time
so we'll see y'all later
next time we see you back here
on the missing link
I'm your host jesse howell
and we're just trying to
bring you the best information we can
y'all have a wonderful day
we'll see you next time
we see you back here on our show
bye everyone
bye win
godspeed