It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality, reality through our journey
from there to here. We find one another and ourselves. And as the next 24 hours breaks
free from our last, we gaze on reflection of the day, Sunday, August 2nd, 2026. Thank you
for joining me today. Now we've had some frustrating shows, the last couple shows,
last two days, seeing as how, you know, when things go, when I feel like something negative
is happening, I double down on how hard I want to try or, you know, do everything I can where I can.
The point is we've had quite a lot of technical stuff. I want to start with a couple of quick
points just to acknowledge that and what somebody had said. But I have bottom line is what I've
been dealing with. I mean, actually, I should just start with this since that's what I want to
open with today. But the title alone today shows what we're going to get into one of the main
points that I made today show short, focused, a couple of other things that I can choose to
ignore if ultimately this goes awry, because we have basically had non untenable shows where it's
cutting in and out, audio is not working, videos aren't playing pretty damn consistently.
Now I'm of the mind that this is something that's happening on my side, not even necessarily
stream yard. So okay, it's not too bad in regard to that. Let me know in the chat if the audio
and video is not working. Somebody sent me this and I just want to make this comment before
I even get into what I'm dealing with, what I think is happening. So somebody reached out
and simply said, I wish your podcast would not cut in and out constantly. It's getting more
and more frustrating and the clips you try to play are cutting in and out for me lately.
Your mouth isn't syncing with what you're saying, but shoot not to see the video is a blurry and
we can't see them. So just think about it for a second. Regardless of how good the work is,
if that's what you think it is, I believe we do good work. This will drive away even people
who want to see your work. I mean, I don't even know if I would have the patience for something
like that even, but it's just being honest. And I just think it's important to recognize that this
is the entire effort. If indeed this is something being done, I don't know that for a fact. I think
that's the case for a lot of different reasons, but I can't say I can prove that. But what I want
to highlight here after that. Oh, actually, that's right, just before I even get in,
that's just my opening point I want to make. So here's what I'm dealing with.
For those that haven't heard me basically get into it, just over the last couple of days,
we've been having like, I think I just described the issues with what this basically just
unkind of discoverable problems where things weren't functioning,
things would close, settings would change, just an insane amount of crazy amount of
things that would happen all over the map. Now what I was dealing with in particular,
and that's been going on a while, as you guys know, I have a speaker here because there's
some weird tech issue that won't allow this to work. I had to move my camera.
I have to have a second browser open now is to upload the videos because it only work if I
use a second browser. I don't even explain this stuff. Neither the people that I ask about this
that knows what they're talking about, but that's been going on a long time.
And you know, in this field, this stuff happens in regard to it being a targeted thing.
Not that I can say I can prove that, but we know it exists. It's worth considering.
But in the last few days, I dealt with something or I have been dealing with
something on this computer or whatever is happening that I remember from our previous
issue. I remember the last time when I had to basically change, I had to get a new computer.
It was a couple of years ago. I remember what was happening, which was ultimately
there was a problem with memory where things that were like, I've been using this setup
pretty consistently for, I don't know, a year and ultimately doing exactly what we're doing.
Lots of tabs, a lot of content, a lot of videos, long streams with nearly a glitch of any kind,
right? Just pretty damn consistent, which I was pretty surprised about and happy about that.
And so all of a sudden, everything starts coming collapsing and even though we're doing
the same thing. So it reminded me what happened before, which was that there were
normal things, having a normal window open, opening a regular browser and having,
for some reason, when you look at the memory, which I have open right now,
and I can see the things that are changing, where all of a sudden,
normal things are taking twice as much memory. A browser suddenly is two gigs versus a
couple of megabytes. That's what we're talking or whatever it normally be.
And that's what I'm seeing. Even right now, I can see these things going up in
regard to the memory used versus the physical memory and other aspects.
And it's not normal. So I'm going to have to deal with that. So what I had to do today was
shorten down what I have open, windows I have open, applications running,
which is what it is. I don't know if it's going to get worse. It could be a random glitch.
I don't know. But the problem now is that will cause me to change what I do,
right? Content length, in-depth conversation, you know? And it's just one more thing
that I have to add to this ongoing list of stuff we have to juggle to just do a normal show
that other people don't even have to consider. Now, again, for all I know, that's just something
I'm doing on this side, just to be very honest. I don't think that's the case,
but that's just being objective. But I wanted to make sure that was clear for people that
frustrated with the recent content, even though they know, you know, appreciate the content,
let's say, and ultimately are able to get to the content. It's very frustrating. But the
main point I want to relay to start is that no matter what, I'm going to keep doing this.
I don't care if I have to go use my neighbor's computer or go to, you know,
whatever the outcome may be, find a way around this. Because to one side note, I did try a different,
like, interestingly, and this may actually connect with somebody out there in the technical side
of this. Using this one with that, the memory issue, I'm not seeing it on a different computer I tried.
And if I check the stream in regard to the actual speed of the internet,
it is, right now I pay for fiber, so I ultimately get about a gig, about a gig,
1,000 megabytes. And on this computer, it constantly registers at about 300 or below,
which is still very fast, but it's just showing you a major difference in regard to
this computer versus any other one I plugged this into. And I can't seem to figure that out
with nothing happening. To me, it screams that there's something going on with this computer.
Now, I'm going to have to figure that out. I'm going to have to find either get a new one
or whatever ultimately happens. But I want to assure you that this is not going to stop,
and we're going to keep doing this work, even if it's incredibly impossible.
The last thing I'm going to do is let that win, even if it's just a bunch of glitches.
So, to get into this today, the main focal point, obviously, is an interesting report that came out
of, it was ultimately a couple different places, I think provided, put it out as well.
But it's coming from Spanish authorities and different people in that observation element
around what just happened. So the local areas, Moroccan, I think one element
was a Moroccan journalist. The point is that this is showing that, and I want to be very
skeptical about this, because we're talking about two sides, and both of them have an
interest in the story. Spain, Morocco, as well as everybody else involved, the U.S.
Israel, which I'll get into, but ultimately thinking about the fact that, well, they're
saying that they found intelligence assets from Morocco guiding within along the whole thing.
I think that's very relevant because it ties back to what we've seen repeatedly,
including in the caravan and plenty of other things and an important point that I'll bring
up. But it really speaks to the, I think what we've already pretty much established is
something that's not organic. So the question should be, why? Why is that?
So first, I want to start with something again that I think is interesting in
regard to manipulation. So speaking of whatever may be happening or just the
idea of things we know that do take place, the systems today are built in a way that
are so wildly, I mean, invasively monitoring doesn't even do it justice.
We've always known that these platforms are looking, cataloging what you're saying
and looking at it for your, what's the word? I can't speak today, for your
convenience, for your engagement, they want it to be better. So we know what you're
looking for to make it more a smooth experience for you. It's never really
about that. But just really quickly, and I am going to make a point about this one
thing he said in this interview, but that's not what this is about.
So check this out. You guys have noticed this on this platform.
We've all seen it, right? When you can, if you see something that you only saw
because somebody you follow shared it, it'll show up at the top where it says
this person shared it. This person reposted it. But what it has always been
before, if you can see the URL, I can't zoom in, but it has always been
the person's actual URL who shared it. So Aaron Rapour is the one who made this post.
This post currently shows this guy's name. I noticed that. I said,
actually, I noticed it with something else I was doing where it was showing
my tag on somebody else's post. And I thought, that's strange. So I just
want to quickly show you. This is Aaron Rapour. This is his post.
There's the tag. I believe you can see that on the stream. Yeah, I just can't zoom in.
And this is the normal post, right? Now, I only happen to see this post
because of this person who I guess I follow my name familiar. It looks like,
okay, I follow this person. And I saw this post because he shared it. Now,
here's the point I'm making. One, it's aggressively tracking how we share and
connect and who we see it through and all that stuff. Always been doing that.
But if I only see it through this, which is what I did, you also don't get the conversation.
So now what's happening, what it used to be, and I mean like two days ago,
is that it would show this, but it would still have the original link and it would
still show the original conversation. Now, some people may find this unimportant.
I think this is insane. I think this is incredibly, the technocratic world
they're building, right? This is manipulative. It's surveillance. It is control.
It is, you know, it's algorithmic channel. It's all the stuff I'm talking about.
My frustration in this is that so now you don't get to look at all the engagement,
the comments, and what people are saying. You just get what this guy shared in front of you
as if it was, you know, it's weird, right? So tracking as well as limited engagement,
if it comes through certain channel, that's, it's not, it's, they say,
you know, freedom of speech, no freedom or what's the term they said,
freedom of speech, no freedom of reach. Even though as even Sam Hussein, he said,
all the way back then, they're the same thing as even ruled in a legal sense.
All they're doing is showing you that this is the case as they can say,
yeah, you can yell as loud as you want. We'll just make sure you're yelling into the cloud,
yelling into the shadow that no one can hear you. I just find that very strange.
In any case, for those that find that relevant, I know you see what I'm saying.
Now, on the side of the partisanship, before we get into which really next is the segment
about what's happening in Morocco and Spain or the follow-up from yesterday,
I just wanted to make this quick point because I really tinfoil hat girl shared this and says,
wow, talk about low information voter. Do these people interact with general public?
If they did, they wouldn't stay stupid like this, say stupid SHIT like this.
Now, what's crazy to me is like, I've been really hammering home,
what I believe is the case in regard to the majority. And I'd like to believe that's become
just a very obvious at this point, even though, you know, still to this day,
I feel like I get a lot of pushback, but I think it's very clear at least at the majority.
And remember, that can be 51% and 49% can still be blindly supporting Trump.
But I believe the majority is seeing through this. I think that's very clear.
This point, though, is to make it clear that I also recognize that people like this exist,
even though, and I've said that more than once, I really think this is genuine.
And I think these people exist. I just want to make it clear that I do,
I think it is a single digit perspective. Now, I could be wrong on that. Maybe it's 10%.
But I do not believe it's even close to the majority, but this is what the system
wants you to think every Trump supporter, every conservative, thinks like.
And what I think this is, is exactly the low information voter follower,
you know, they follow the herd on either side. These people exist in the same cartoonish way
on either side of the paradigm. And the system thrives with that.
And they are losing that. I think they've lost that majority a long time ago.
But listen to this and you'll see what I'm saying. And it's just,
it speaks for itself and they do exist.
Absolutely.
Even if it was against the Constitution.
To save this country, yes.
To save the country from...
Telling you that.
Something, we should go against the Constitution.
Only if that is our last straw in the war.
So it seems like this is playing okay.
So right now, even though I'm seeing the memory max, it comes really close to the line,
which should never be happening with the stuff that I have up right now.
I've figured out, at least for now, what's going on.
So whatever's causing this is causing that to jump up in memory.
But if I'm only doing a limited amount of content,
apparently I can keep it under the bar that makes it freak out.
Welcome to my life of juggling 30,000 things that I can't even see in the air
and figuring out how it works.
But the bottom line, guys, is that...
Sorry, I derailed my own thought with that.
So they're just commenting on the fact that it seems to be working.
Let me know.
But that she's saying that we're willing to compromise the...
No, you can argue that she's not necessarily a constitutionalist.
So maybe that's not as important to her.
Even...
And they do exist on both sides of the paradigm,
even that they believe in the larger points of it.
But I'd like to...
I think this is a person who believes in these things
and the argument comes down to, well, Trump has to break it to save it.
How long have we been talking about that?
Right?
Where we...
Hey, I trust Donald.
It's because she trusts Trump.
And that's crazy.
That's naive.
But she believed this person is doing what's right.
And so he's doing what's right.
Therefore, it doesn't matter if he violates the Constitution,
he'll bring it right back when he needs to.
Well, that's not, first of all, how that even works.
That's not even possible.
Okay?
In the sense that they can just move on and come back.
Like, it's always there.
It is an alienable.
It's there.
They can choose to respect it or not.
And that's not something you just dance back and forth with.
But I just want to highlight the fact that there are people
that believe in Biden and Obama and Bush and Trump
and think that the only thing that is sacred
is that my team is the right team.
We all know that, guys.
But I really want to stress that if you look around
and you ask people, like really ask people,
that's not what you're going to get in the majority.
You're going to find people that are very on guard
when it comes to different partisan perspectives.
You're going to find people who still feel very...
the need to defend the team or maybe even Trump.
But if you really get into it,
you'll find that they do not think
what the media wants you to think.
They all stand by.
I just think that's super important.
And I'm going to continue to harp on that
because I think it's one of the most important traps
that are being laid for all of us
to get us to think that we have no traction.
It's simple.
Now, in the media side of it,
and this is how I think this relates,
I just want to include this, either way,
you know, you get the...
This is the kind of thing you get is this kind of front, right?
Where R.K. Jr. is going to sit in this interview.
And by the way, it's actually worth watching.
There's a bunch of things he says.
It gets a little contentious.
And I agree with many things he says.
And in many cases, like, Ere Rapour,
I called out online earlier kind of by saying, you know, you just...
Because he largely just kind of points to commentary,
but it's very partisan.
He has a very clear agenda,
but it doesn't mean he puts out things that are irrelevant.
I said a lot of people put content online.
But what he did was basically lay out...
It was the one I was showing you earlier.
I should have just read it.
He laid out what the conversation was
and just casually left out, like,
R.F.K.'s entire answer.
So if you read just the text, it seems as if R.F.K. was the one...
You know, but if you listen to it, he gave a great answer.
It was Dana Bash, Bush Bash,
who ultimately was the one saying, you know,
like, his answer, her asking was like,
what do you do different if another pandemic comes
or when another pandemic comes?
And he doesn't really push back on that.
He's ultimately that, well, you know,
we have to care about constitutional rights.
And I think that's a fantastic answer.
I just question whether he actually means that,
or even if he does, whether he'll be able to do it.
Very important, right?
But so ultimately, it goes on to other things, too,
that we need...
Like, I thought his answer was actually very sound,
that we need to...
Like, if you can't understand that caring about our rights
means first and foremost, even if there's danger,
that that has to come first.
Like, people like this don't get that or care about that.
My point, though, in general, the interview was interesting,
but I want to stress that I just don't think R.F.K.
is in a position to do anything.
He's even fronting, like, or saying,
because either he's incapable of doing so,
like we've been seeing, or he doesn't even mean it.
Because how are we going to take it at face value?
He's promoting...
They're promoting shots at this point.
On top of that, which is the point,
R.F.K. Jr. literally says he wants people to get the MMR shot.
Like, I'm just, like, spinning in my chair, going,
what?
Like, I mean, I know, it doesn't surprise me.
He's already basically said that before,
but I just don't understand this.
So his argument, essentially, is that the measles shot
is the one that has been tested.
And by the way, I agree with his larger argument
about the idea that these things haven't been tested properly
and that Dana doesn't know that.
And you can prove he's right, by the way.
But at the end of the day, they're still giving them,
still promoting them, still leading in that direction.
But on top of that, that the MMR vaccine,
there's three different shots
that have not been tested alongside each other.
He has been screaming about that.
They still have not done that.
The measles shot individually, he's arguing,
has been tested in a way that the rest haven't.
The MMR shot was the focal point
behind the Vax documentary, behind all of this.
I kind of wonder one of the largest moments
that's spurred on this conversation
and he wants you to take it.
Guys, I just don't even understand that
because it's not, in a real sense,
other than the measles shot being studied differently,
hasn't really changed the problem.
Even if you understand what the problem was,
even if that measles shot was different,
there's still a problem that they highlighted
that he pointed to.
I'll leave it there.
I just killed me.
Oh, I had this up, by the way.
I think I brought it down.
All things still relevant.
This is just what I was showing the entire time.
Arfka Juner says he wants people
to get the MMR vaccine.
Here's the clip.
Interacts with people's DNA,
what's predisposed to have an autistic child.
Are you doing both?
You probably don't understand this
because you're not a scientist.
Well, you're not either.
Genes don't cause epidemics.
I understand.
Genes, epidemics.
I can provide a vulnerability.
A gene provides an environmental exposure.
That's what I'm asking.
Are you studying the environmental exposure?
I'm looking at all the different
environmental exposures.
But your statement.
Well, if you want to pause it really quickly.
Your statement.
This has been studied.
It is not.
There we go.
Studying all the different environmental factors,
you know, he could study it all day long.
We already know what's the problem.
And he's told us what the problem is.
But now he's in an administration
that either won't let him do anything
or he'd lie the entire time.
I frankly think it's the former.
Maybe a little bit of a mix.
But, you know, dioxins and PFAS
and endocrinotropic chemicals
and all the different stuff
that we know is a very real problem.
They're not.
I mean, in fact, they're going the other direction.
They're pulling back on PFAS stuff.
They're allowing deregulation.
They are pushing for glyphosate use.
I mean, it's just insane.
So that's what I mean.
I shouldn't keep reiterating that point,
but I think it's frustrating, isn't it?
That we can have people,
good people, I argue,
whether informed or not,
that truly believe that they mean what they say.
When all they ever do is say things,
then never do them.
True.
It's categorical.
It is considered.
Not for any of this.
It is considered.
Considered by who?
By every scientist who has studied this.
That is not true.
I can give you hundreds of scientists
who have looked at this.
So on the one hand, you understand
why people aren't getting...
It's the natural academy of sciences.
What greater authority...
Do you understand why people
are not getting measles vaccines?
Because they're hearing you say
that it could cause autism.
You're trying to change the subject.
I'm not. It's very much related.
Show me one of the studies
that's been done on the first eight,
that vaccines are in the first six months of life.
You will not find them.
The natural academy of sciences...
So if that's the case,
then why are you telling people to get measles vaccines?
So that's his first point, right?
So that's why I'm telling you, okay.
Now you can disagree or just...
A lot of people thought he was going to be
Mr. Anti-Vaccine
even though it was never really what he said.
It was what the media framed him as
and even his own supporters bought that, I guess.
But he's saying it's been tested differently.
Okay.
Well, that's one thing.
Are you giving individual measles shots?
By themselves?
Because it's been tested?
No.
He's talking about the MR vaccine
as they go on to talk about.
And that kills me.
Now to someone's comment,
is he compromised?
My feeling is that he's genuinely exasperated right there,
which gives me the sense that he's frustrated
that the media, people like her,
just can't even grasp the obvious verify.
It's like people like us
and how frustrated we're during COVID-19
with these same people acting like we were crazy
for pointing to the science they said didn't exist.
And so, but I don't know how to work that out.
Is he faking that?
That's possible.
Or is he, you know, it's just,
it's the point we have to come to
because we don't know for sure what his intention is,
is that this does not translate to the outcome,
just like the voting process.
We can prove that, I think.
So it's not irrelevant why,
but let's, if we were going to solve the problem,
well, it's basically start with the problem, you know,
and then his intentions can come after the fact.
I mean, because it could just be
that he's not even aware he's being manipulated somehow.
I mean, who knows?
But that's again, going on to the MR part.
I think it just speaks for itself.
Okay.
It's the only one that has been studied.
Do you want people to get the-
I know you're frustrated now.
And it is-
I don't, I'm not frustrated at all.
I am frustrated.
Honestly.
The reason, you are the HHS secretary
and you are talking about things
that lead to-
Okay, so this is what's crazy, right?
So, and this is sort of like Dan, if you do,
Dan, if you don't, kind of a thing.
And this is a side note,
kind of what it looks like to be like audience captured,
you know, is that you come into this.
And from my perspective, I'm like,
oh my God, he's pushing the MR vaccine.
Like that's insane.
And she's looking at the same answer
and going, you're causing vaccine hesitancy.
So it's like, he loses everything.
This is what it looks like to not take
a principled stance and go all the way,
all or nothing, right?
To just be like, I said this, these things are bad.
And you know, and she'll still call you anti-vax,
the difference is you'd have people on the other side
that would go, thank God, somebody actually cares
and we're going to stand by you.
But see, I would be doing that
if he actually followed through with what he was going to do.
Trump or not.
See my point?
But now he doesn't.
He says all these things and then why again,
you can debate.
Frustrating though.
So the point of bringing that up here
was both to show you that,
but also just to consider the fact
that the corporate media,
the media apparatus, the manipulation of it,
is if you don't get content like ours,
I am a independent objective content.
That this is the kind of stuff
that gets jammed on people's throats.
And not a similar kind of point.
And I just think this is interesting
in a sense of where the left-right paradigm goes.
And right, there's a couple of points today
from Trump and others that, you know,
and you guys know this, I think by and large,
because you're in a conversation
that stresses the Duparte illusion,
but that it's right now they're caring about,
you know, the left cares about,
you know, Israel's infiltration.
They care about this.
So they claim, right?
They don't really do much.
They care about this.
They don't impeach.
They still want to stop this,
but they don't, you know, whatever it is.
But then when the teeter-totter flips
and suddenly Democrats are in power,
or I guess in the sense that,
yeah, so right now they're the ones calling it out.
And then when they become in power,
well, suddenly then they don't care
about those problems anymore.
There's a different rationale.
Sort of, it's suffice of 702.
It's suddenly bad, then it became good
when they were in power.
It just, it's never changes.
And then suddenly the Republicans
with the ones starting to go,
hey, we care about Israel doing this,
and we think the money is too much.
And so the same point here.
Crypto rover says insane.
National U.S. debt just hit a record high
of $40 trillion.
A record.
This is the administration that swore
the opposite in every way.
Less spending, less money, less military.
It's just the, it's the opposite of all that.
Out of just 45 U.S. presidents in history,
President Trump has now solely responsible
for 28.6% of the national debt.
I mean, he's breaking records in that regard.
Like you can't pretend like this is some kind
of a 40 chest move, guys.
Unless it's in his benefit.
Now Shannon says, when the Democrats take power,
the Republicans will suddenly be concerned
about the debt.
Bookmark this.
I think she's spot on.
I just have, I don't, I'm not even sure
who it is.
I'll follow her because of that point.
Who cares what her political side is.
If she has good takes, we'll follow going forward.
The point is, I agree that suddenly,
or, you know, in the moment,
it doesn't matter to Republicans
because Iran and a little, little, little,
we'll figure it out.
We'll get money from Venezuela, you know,
whatever it is.
And then it won't change.
And then when they become the other side of it,
they can point to it and go,
they did this and it started with Biden.
It's lazy.
And I don't think people are falling forward anymore.
But I guess the takeaway in case you missed it
is that they all benefit from the cycle, guys.
It is a hamster wheel and it never stops.
And they all continue benefiting
and handing off the baton.
And we always point at the other side of it.
And it's a very clear model to keep us
pointing away from the people currently responsible,
even when they're all responsible.
And even in that sense,
only pointing at half the responsibility.
So you never really get changed.
That's the whole point.
So in this larger sense,
as we're talking about Israel infiltration,
well, it's happening all over the world, guys.
And that's really important to understand.
And we've been continuing to highlight that
for a decade plus.
Now, this we just talked about yesterday,
Spain's weaponized engineered migration.
And if Trump's floundering with Iran,
we'll point to more at the end
and the coming third party deception
where we highlighted the idea of the Tucker.
And by the way, Steve has been talking about this
for a long time now.
This is basically his prediction since what?
A year ago that Tucker, Margitela Green, Massey,
they had that picture at the table.
And, you know, I just, I hope for the best.
And I, and I hold their feet to the fire.
And historically,
they never seem to follow through with their promises.
So I'm expecting the third party shoe to drop.
Going to go into this show,
if you want to get more into that,
I think there's more to be said about, you know,
the where it goes and what their motivations are
and how both Vance and Alex Jones,
or excuse me, both Tucker and Alex Jones
are very supportive of JD Vance,
whether or not they've publicly endorsed him a president,
which I've never said.
The point is that they're clearly supportive of him,
which makes them hypocrites,
because he is identical to all the things he's pointing out.
He just has a different, you know,
look at the end of the day,
if he's going to stand up and give you a little eye slant
that makes him look like he suddenly doesn't agree with Trump
and everyone makes that into a case,
listen to what he said, look at his policies.
He's continued to back everything they've been doing
and they want you to believe he's different.
Maybe, but maybe since we just went through the cycle
of all these people admitting they were played by Trump,
that maybe we can go, hey,
why fall in line with the next person
who is only promising and yet to deliver?
Doesn't that seem like basic logic?
But see, these people's minds
only fall back into the same cycle.
You pick a team and you run with it, guys,
that's what they do.
Mostly I think because it ultimately benefits them.
But in this case, Spain's engine and migration.
Now, the bigger point of this
was that it's obvious that there's manipulation here,
as the New York Times pointed out,
as we'll mention again from this article today,
is that there were people in the crowd
that said they were told to do this.
Now, of course, that could be a lie,
but there's historically very obvious cases here.
Now, one of the main ones
is that there's a conversation about West Sahara
that took place when the U.S. government
said that they had the rights to it, Morocco, in 2020.
2023 Israel said the same thing, right?
So that's a long time ago.
Now, that's being either dishonestly
or just without due diligence
being conflated with the current conversation.
Largely, of Suitsa and Malia, I believe,
but Suitsa is the focal point, I guess,
the larger focal point.
But the idea is because on the map,
we're talking about something that is between Africa and Spain.
And the idea is that the tip of Africa,
which is, you know, you have the Morocco claim to that area
is something Spain claims is theirs.
Now, there's a lot of overlaps.
Because the point to make
is that the U.S. and Israel have been driving
Morocco to take that territory back for years.
Benjamin Netanyahu's son posted about it in 2019
saying, hey, Arabs and Muslims,
you want to take your land back?
Start here.
Exactly like that.
He claims, of course, he was making a point,
and maybe he was, but the whole reality of it is
there's an obvious...
Now, nobody honest is saying
that Netanyahu's son's post proved they did it.
Because it doesn't.
You can argue it suggests that,
but you get proved that he was not...
You know, but I do believe it's relevant.
And of course, I believe it's clear
when you look into the deeper connections
between Morocco and the U.S. and Israel
and how this has continued,
which I'm going to show more today.
But the real point, or that, let me guess,
beyond the motivations is that there's...
I think there are organic things involved here.
Clearly, there are people involved,
like in any other situation,
which I went into depth in this conversation
on the first, that are abused.
They're used.
So it shouldn't be that everybody here is an operative.
Like, that's just kind of a lazy take.
Like, it's always more than that.
But we need to understand that this was motivated.
People were paid.
They were directed.
And it's all on the record at this point.
But that doesn't mean it's all fake.
Now, motivation-wise, I think it's obvious.
I think there's a clear motivation
for the U.S. government to use this
as the example of why they need what they need.
And even with today's article,
exposing that there were Moroccan
intelligence operatives involved,
it still makes a case for why the
intensive technocratic surveillance is necessary.
So there's all these different angles to it.
But what's crazy is that,
so first, you have the idea that they're going to see.
This is what they get for their liberal policies
and invasion, even though it was orchestrated
and it wasn't what they were dealing with before.
And then on top of that, or then secondarily,
you have the idea from Israel's perspective,
which they're playing into that, too,
the idea of the American immigration policy point.
But you have the other side of it where they're all,
I guess, and then I guess a third idea would be,
look at what you get when you pretend Muslims are good.
Like, that's what you're getting from a lot of design
in this conversation.
Just disgusting.
And again, that it assumes that everybody
with the skin colors automatically Muslim from the skin.
It's not true, guys.
There's Christians and all.
I mean, there's a multifaceted thing.
There's always a majority whenever you go,
but to pretend that they're Moroccan, they're Muslim
is just racist.
It's disgusting.
It's bigoted.
It's not the truth.
But over again, the last point was,
I believe Israel is also playing into this
from a different angle that you're not really hearing
from the US perspective, which is that they
use this to overlap with their situation.
There's an interesting kind of side story
about how Zionists in the United States
have kind of lost the plot
and are arguing so blatantly in the way
that makes them look like what we call them,
that it's hurting the Israeli agenda.
And so even right now, you see them really harping
on the US interest from their Zionist perspective.
But at the same time, that kind of makes the case
for why what's happening is basically
shows you that Israel occupying the territory
is a bad thing.
Like it's interesting because they're saying,
Spain shouldn't be doing that.
It's colonial.
And it's like, oh, wait, hold on.
This is exactly what Israel's doing right there.
So it's a mixed bag.
But from Israel's side of it, I think they're pushing
the idea that ultimately that if their colonialism exists,
then so should ours, which is what
but Danny Dan and plenty of others pointed out.
So it's interesting, right?
So keeping that in mind,
we went over this more in depth yesterday.
This is what came out today.
The Civil Guard detects Moroccan intelligence
that's translated from Spanish, I believe.
The Civil Guard detects Moroccan intelligence agents
among the migrants who sneaked into Suezda.
Detected, the Civil Guard detected the presence
of agents from the Moroccan information service
through the data deployed at the border.
Now, I'll come back to that with the part at the end
where they really stress that this is why it's important
with the surveillance and the facial.
You know, it feels a little bit specific,
but it says this is revealed exclusively to El Espanol
by sources from the general staff of the armed institute
who assure that these individuals were located
during monitoring carried out in real time
using the advanced and cutting edge video surveillance system
that controls the border perimeter.
So, you know, just out of,
I don't think this is the only thing,
but just for sake of conversation,
it'd be interesting if the only reason all this happened
was to rationalize intensive real-time surveillance.
Even though we all have it, there's a lot of pushback to it.
Now, I don't think that's the case.
I think that might be a secondary byproduct of,
you know, hey, we can use that either way.
It's worth considering.
But it says, according to these sources,
the presence of members of the Moroccan intelligence
services mixed among the migrants,
it does not constitute an isolated event,
but a phenomenon that the Civil Guard claims
to have detected in previous episodes
of migratory pressure on both the territories
of Suitsa and Malia.
So, what they're saying is they've been doing this before.
Now, I'm going to get into how clear it is
that there's basically, you know,
what they're trying to do in the U.S. right now,
merging the military and the intelligence services
that I think has long ago happened in Morocco
and plenty of other places that Israel has forced.
I mean, the whole normalization thing
with some of these countries,
that's what that sort of amounts to
if you allow Israel, look at Venezuela,
look at what they're actually doing on the ground.
That's what this kind of, you know,
it amounts to not just occupation,
but what's a better word for it?
Like, you know, control, really,
but more than just sort of militarily dictating,
you know, but like, invasively getting involved
in the politics and then projecting
that country's politics as if you're not involved.
And funny, David Eich and I talked about this
in regard to Sabateanism.
Let me see if I can get that to come up.
Yeah, it's a good conversation.
We talked about what he argues is the kind of one
of the foundational elements of,
technically, Zionism, Nazism, and Communism,
which is Sabateism.
And he's just, the title of the interview was
Zionism infiltrated, infiltration of Judaism,
weaponized migration and mainstream media.
Important right now.
Actually, I should share that out again.
But so the idea that this Sabateanism,
Sabateans were, like, he argues based on his history
and his research of it, were basically,
like, it was centered around infiltrating
religions and politics.
And it's very relevant, isn't it?
Share that out really quickly.
Seems especially relevant.
There's a lot of that going around right now.
So continuing, back to the point,
is that that's not an isolated event.
Now it says, in fact, the New York Times,
as we showed you yesterday,
spoke with several Moroccan nationals
who claimed they were encouraged to cross
into the areas by the Moroccan authorities.
Sources from Spanish information services
corroborate what was observed by those
responsible for the armed institute
through the camera on the Ben-I-Nzar perimeter.
They point out that an operation
of these characteristics, typical of hybrid warfare,
that's very relevant from an Israel-US perspective,
could not have been carried out
without the participation of the service
that operates in Morocco.
Quote, it is the logical procedure,
procedure for any intelligence service.
It says, the purpose of the presence
was to observe the operational response
to the security forces and corps,
and follow the events on the ground.
So they're arguing, their perspective,
is that this was done to see how they reacted.
Testing the waters, if you will.
Well, how are they gonna, where do they come?
What part of the area do they come at hardest?
Sort of saying they're testing this
for future action.
The Civil Guard considers that these systems
constitute a fundamental tool.
This is about the surveillance.
Not only to detect attempts at irregular entry,
but also to identify behaviors
that may be of interest to state security.
So no matter where you look in the world,
they're pushing the idea of technocratic surveillance.
Real-time surveillance, like biometric surveillance,
if not pre-crime, which is what that sounds like.
And this is what Trump has been pushing aggressively
since his first administration to this very point,
he's doing it still.
This is according to the sources consulted.
It was precisely the real-time analysis of these images,
the real-time analysis, that's AI,
that made it possible to notice the presence of people
attributed to Moroccan information services.
So it's funny, so this is what gave them the insight
to find out they were being manipulated,
but it's promoting the idea of real-time AI,
facial recognition.
The migratory pressure on Sueta,
is that what it was again?
Sueta, I think so,
continues to be one of the main security challenges
for Spain on the southern border of Europe.
And here's Trump going exactly.
Interesting.
So it makes it the basic point, guys,
is that this has been called out from a lot of different angles
that they had Moroccan intelligence,
agents involved, while this was all going down.
Israel, times of Israel, from 2020.
A look at Israel's decades-long
covert intelligence ties with Morocco.
And it goes in depth about the long background
of these two countries.
It goes back hundreds of years,
or at least in regard to the U.S. connection to,
I think, 1783.
Times of Israel, 2021.
Israel-Morocco defense deal opens door
to intel sharing, joint drills.
So you see where this goes.
Not just allies, infiltration,
or if you want to call it coordination.
It's the same kind of thing they're pushing in this country
that, by the way, it's already happening.
These are just further implementations of the same policy.
2023.
Israel and Morocco bolster cyber security,
intelligence ties.
See, it's like military intelligence.
Like it's the same kind of thing we're seeing right now
from Senate, from NDAA.
The two countries also agree to expand cooperation
in air defense, electronic warfare.
And you know this is obvious, guys.
This is from 2020.
What was it? 2023.
Later, I think that was January.
This one is August.
Morocco and Israel will collaborate
on military intelligence systems.
You're starting to get the case.
Encroaching more and more.
It's very obvious what this amounts to
with what Israel is doing in the world.
2024.
Morocco-Israel agree to expand their military cooperation.
Like after what you just, I mean it's clear
that this has become something that's already happened.
This is expanding it.
And if you read the article,
it becomes insanely clear what they're talking about.
The Morocco, the Moroccan-Israeli relationship.
This is from 2024.
New horizons and the prospects of cooperation in Africa.
Interestingly comes to mind,
talking about intelligence services crossing the border,
where we had the conversation in 2024
about the people on the false fake maga right
was screaming about saying,
see this is a Hamas member.
He's a Palestinian.
It was when that guy came to the border
and said, you'll know my name.
Remember that?
You know why it never amounted anything?
Which was clearly being set up
because the guy worked for Mossad.
And we broke it down on the show.
His suspected terrorist at Texas border works for Mossad.
They lied about who he was.
They framed an old picture.
Watch it all.
Just like every other partisan narrative we're seeing,
the bottom line was once it became clear
that Mossad was the one doing it,
everyone stopped talking about it.
Kind of easy, kind of clear, right?
Now, lastly on this,
I just think this relevant.
We were talking about this yesterday, right?
Whereas Luke comes out and says,
the conspiracies were right
and points to this random page
that says US joins Israel
in recognizing Morocco's control of Western Sahara,
which we just talked about, right?
And it's just some random gray picture.
I don't know why I guess this lack of due diligence
is the point.
And so I commented saying,
well, this actually happened in 2020,
which is Trump's post 2020
saying he recognizes Western Sahara.
So it's not the conversation of today.
Also Israel in 2023,
recognizing Western Sahara.
So it's not new.
It's not breaking information as it says.
Breaking.
And what's funny is,
literally this,
and this wasn't there before,
so whoever is one of these
reader added context people
saw my post
and literally added exactly what I posted.
Like, exactly.
I just find that funny.
But it says,
the US recognized Morocco's sovereignty
over Western Sahara on 2020
and Israel in 2023.
And then what's funny is,
he deletes the post,
which you might expect.
But I just think that's important
to the larger game of people
who are just kind of grifting it out there,
whether they mean to or not.
It's about just reactionary things
instead of in-depth conversation.
I had this just in case it went away.
But I find that very relevant
for a lot of reasons.
This is the young Turk
we're talking about this last night.
And it's gone.
So the reason I bring it up
is simply to point out
there are people who are kind of just
going through the motions
and misleading people
based on information
that will get them reached.
And at the same time,
since we're talking about deleted posts,
like that casual transition,
let's talk about
how this relates to ice
and surveillance and flock.
Now, be your own doctor posted
your deleted SHIT
is not deleted.
Maybe a look should think about that.
I'm just kidding.
And Australian cops
now use Israeli spyware to prove it.
So this is coming from,
I mean,
look, it's so funny to me
how this constantly comes up.
And I honestly don't even
give that much thought
to people who try to pretend
we're choosing to over-focus
on one thing.
As much as I can clearly give,
my opinion is clear
about what I think Israel is
and what they're doing today.
Not every Israeli or every Jew,
but clearly the government
and clearly what the country
is guiding, just like in this country.
But what's crazy to me
is that when I do my research on this,
I'm not looking,
like it depends on whether it's relevant.
If I'm looking about a conversation
that involves all of them,
I'm going to see if Israel's
doing something that's relevant.
If I'm looking into something
that has to do with,
you know,
something completely disconnected,
the point is I'm going to try to find
connections that are relevant
to that conversation.
It's not like everything we look into
is Israel involved.
The point is,
Israel is involved
in almost everything
that we're talking about today.
So the funny thing is,
it becomes,
why are you focusing on them?
It's like, I'm not.
I'm focusing on who is involved
and they happen to be.
If you're now saying
we should ignore Israel's involvement
in all of these crazy things
because you think that
shouldn't be pointed to,
who's the problem in that equation?
I just think it's crazy.
So my point is in this,
it's the spyware element of this
is, it's Israeli guys,
they're the leading element
around the world.
And they're the ones
that are leading in regard to
the technology
in conjunction with Palantir
that's going to ICE,
that's going to,
you know,
the surveillance state
that's being built on back,
of the back of the 9-11 one
is almost uniquely connected to Israel.
And that's proven.
It's not some secret,
you know, whistleblower document.
It's stated documentation
of their collaborations.
It's their tech.
It's their companies.
It's their intelligence.
So just make that point again.
So on this case,
it's not to try to make the connection.
It's that this spyware is obvious
and what Israel's involvement in it
is very relevant
with the point we're making
in the larger sense
of what they're doing in the world
and specifically with the U.S. government.
Now this is in Australia.
Their police are getting roadside powers
feels relevant right now
to scan your phone,
resurrect every photo you ever took
even though you deleted them,
every message you ever sent
and jail you for five years
if you won't hand over the password.
So all this feels very relevant right now,
right with the border patrol
none of these people
ever seem to care that your rights
are a block to what they want to get.
I'll show you some clips right now.
I do think are very relevant.
First, this is not ICE.
This is the IDF.
The IDF executes this man
for driving normally down the road.
Then when it comes out,
they claimed it had stopped a ramming attack.
But of course,
then they forgot to scrub the CCT footage
that shows that wasn't true.
So for the podcast,
there's no audio this is playing.
So what their argument was,
the car ran it then and attacked them.
But in case you're unsure,
the reality is quite the opposite.
As they walk up on it,
the bottom line guys,
ICE right now,
in I mean,
I can probably right now pull up
10 different examples
on my files of ICE that have claimed
they were hit by a car
or hit with,
well really just take even the car
but you could say hit with a shovel,
shot with a gun
and they've lied about that.
Not just accident,
knowing they were lying deliberately
but just taking the car.
How many times they claimed they were
hit or they tried to use their car as a weapon
and then it gets dismissed
because the video comes out.
And so all I want to say
doesn't that seem familiar?
It should, right?
It should.
Well, because we know that they were trained,
right?
I mean, I think this is actually,
I think this is the clip.
I thought I grabbed it.
Yeah, good.
You know,
the nation over there has a lot,
a lot of influence
on the Israeli government.
It has a lot of influence on our politicians over here,
I think is what he was kind of getting at.
I see, yeah.
And you know,
I'm not a politician,
so I don't know.
And you know,
it's the only dealings I ever had with the Israelis is
when I was a young agent with Bortrak,
Bortrak Tactical Unit,
they sent me to a VIP security school
and it was ran by the Israelis.
And let me tell you.
Oh, so IDF actually does work with Border Patrol in ICE
because I've always heard that.
Well, it was,
that school was for all law enforcement.
It was, they put it on,
it was Israeli,
they made,
they contracted with Israeli instructors.
They had a lot of experience
and they were really good.
I'll,
hands off some of the best training I've ever had.
They did.
In case you're unclear for the podcast,
that's Babino,
you know,
that little midget monster
that was ruining everybody's lives
because he's an absolute partisan maniac.
I mean,
just aggressively violating rights all over the place
because you're a lefty terrorist.
I mean,
and just proudly admitting
that it's not just the IDF,
Raarat,
and I mean,
not just ICE,
but it's the police,
which you already know
because you watch the show
because you do your due diligence
and it's,
and you also know
that it's not ubiquitous.
It's not literally every police officer,
everybody and everyone,
but it does happen
and it goes from the top down.
And so we have to be real guys
when you're,
when they're lying about cars ramming them,
when they're throwing grenades
in somebody's car
and holding the door shut
and running away.
This is what they're giving
to people in authority here.
And I guess apparently they don't,
they like that
or they're proud of it?
I don't know.
I mean,
some people are.
You look at the Trump administration
and you understand exactly what I'm saying.
And that's not a partisan attack.
That is the reality of the,
the incompetence,
the level of insecurity
that we're seeing in this.
Frankly,
I could make plenty of examples of left
and right
all the way down,
but right now it's a special time
in a bad way.
Now here's a couple of quick clips I want to play.
Now let me know if some of these,
again,
that the videos aren't playing properly
so I can just stop them
and just explain it for you.
But Jesus freaking Congress shared this
and this is a small example.
I mean, you guys,
if you watch this show,
you've seen the endless,
horrifying examples
of people's,
you know,
armed being broken,
being shot to death
in the street,
of ICE,
you know,
doing any number of things
that aggressively violate their rights,
kicking in the front doors
of American citizens,
which, by the way,
shouldn't matter either way
since everybody has constitutional rights,
even though stupid people
don't know that.
In this case,
an ICE agent
casually walks across the street
and just sprays a lady in the face.
Now look,
you have to understand,
no matter what we're talking about,
if this was something,
if she broke the law,
then that wouldn't be the proper response
if you quietly walk over there.
So, I mean,
you go through the list.
There's no world in which
what he did,
what I'm about to show you,
is legal.
He's abusing his power
because he doesn't like
that she's calling him a name,
filming him.
It doesn't even,
it doesn't matter, guys.
She didn't break the law
and even if she did,
then you should arrest her
instead of spraying her
on the face
and walking away.
Oh, that's right.
It's not,
I can just show you right here.
So the bottom line is,
she, this guy casually walks over.
Yeah, so you can hear,
you get out of my effing city.
Okay.
Well, this is supposed to be
the group that
believes in free speech, right?
Look at that.
I mean, guys,
I don't care what you're saying.
That's somebody's mother.
That's somebody's
sister, friend, neighbor.
Like, she's just standing there.
And you just open up
with spraying them.
I mean, and, you know,
not to go into some crazy,
but realize in Israel,
they do stuff like this
and it turns out
they're not using normal stuff.
They use,
they use gas.
They call it tear gas
that kills people on the regular
that gives people seizures.
I mean, and on top of that,
I wouldn't be surprised
if there's things
flying their way
into this country's use
that these people
don't even know
the origin of.
Now, again,
that's probably not
the best point to make
because it's just my opinion.
But at the end of the day,
you don't,
you have to understand
this should shock people.
That's brazen lawlessness.
They don't care.
Your rights don't matter
and they know that
nobody will care.
They know that the very people
screaming about constitutional
rights will laugh at that
and say,
that's what she gets.
That needs to matter
if you're left,
if you're right,
if you're an American citizen, guys.
That's insane.
And it just walks away.
That's a coward, guys.
That's a coward.
That is a coward
who is abusing his power.
So we have examples like this.
18-year-old kid
where people walk up
and we keep showing you these
and all you got is a bunch of guys
in black with hoods on
arresting somebody.
Now, yeah, yeah,
they have a gun on, right?
But how many times do we have
to talk about the endless
examples it seems
of women being raped,
people being robbed,
home invasion
because people dress up
like ice
and nobody cares
to do anything about it?
And the only reason
they're allowed to do that
or they're able to
is because of this,
because of unaccountable,
illegal enforcers
who are not giving warrants
who are not giving their name
and badge number
and so it opens the door
for anybody.
How do we know?
Why would I trust
that those aren't
human traffickers
pretending to be ice?
Just like with the
we saw in the airport
where a bunch of random people
that didn't look anything
like ice agents,
not even close to like this
look random dressed clothes
and look like a bunch of,
frankly, a couple of
kids and some random woman
and they had the guy
in one handcuff,
they run off
and leave the handcuff
on his wrist
and just leave
and then ice post the next day
or a couple of days later
that they picked him up
at a different airport
and so it was ice,
at least they pretended it was
and how do we know that?
Why wouldn't somebody
step in?
Because now you have this two,
you have two things,
you have a side where people
are choosing
to hold back
when maybe he needs your help.
Maybe that's a bunch of monsters,
maybe that's Tren de Aragba
and MS-13 stealing our children
but you're going to go,
well, maybe it's ice
so I'm going to let it go
or
I mean,
you know the alternative,
right?
You have a situation
where people are abusing
your rights.
Either way,
it's not justifiable.
Either way,
in an honest situation
with a government
that cared about your rights,
this would,
these people would be immediately
thrown in,
well, you know,
at least fired
and hopefully
charged with a crime
for what they're doing.
But that's not what's happening
and I argue guys
as much as you may disagree
for some,
it's no different.
Like,
I would,
like,
I would like to,
I would argue
that if the,
if Biden was in power
that it wouldn't be happening
like this
but I would argue
that it would take the form
of something else.
It'd be aimed at the right,
it'd be done in some other way
about Nazis,
about, you know,
whatever it is,
and so it would take the form
of a different narrative
but would amount
to the same thing.
That's the left-right paradigm,
guys.
So this,
as David says,
we are supposed to pretend
this is what law enforcement
in a free country looks like?
It doesn't, guys.
That's not the reality
because one,
they're breaking a law,
two,
they're violating rights,
and three,
it simply demonstrates
the kind of
faceless authoritarian
enforcement
that we're just supposed
to cow to no matter what.
It's nobody
agrees with that.
Now lastly, on this segment,
I love this clip.
So this guy
is sitting in McDonald's.
And I've been playing a lot of these
and what I'm trying to highlight
here is two things.
One is the right way
to respond to these things
in my opinion,
but also that you have cops,
not ICE,
but cops,
all over this country
that seems to be exploding
where they're,
and it's,
I'm clearly think
that this is a training thing
because they're acting
like one,
like step out of the car
and if you say no,
that's obstruction.
Even if we just told you
we're not even arresting
you or pulling you over.
That's not how the law works, guys.
That's policy.
And they're violating your rights
and the constitution with that.
But I keep seeing that.
Or in cases like this,
they just demand you take action
when you're in a public space.
You're not violating,
you have every right
to be sitting in McDonald's
while you're eating your food.
You'll see how this goes.
But these people believe
they're above the law
because they're enforcers.
They don't believe their job
is to protect the constitution.
They don't believe their job
is to protect and serve.
They believe their job is to be
followed,
that you adhere to their demands
because I'm in power.
Respect my authority.
That's what these people are.
And really what it comes down to
is trying to remove this man
from McDonald's
another person
because he's homeless.
These cops were harassing
a homeless man at McDonald's
when this man began filming.
He never spoke,
never interfered,
just quietly filmed.
But that alone
was enough to set the cops off.
Their fragile egos
couldn't handle being watched,
so they tried every tactic
to intimidate him.
Now, of course,
you can obviously argue
that the guy spoke
and yelled at them
and they cut it out.
That's what a gene objective is like.
But it doesn't change the reality.
You're allowed to say
in what you want, guys.
You can call him
whatever you want.
You can be as rude as you want.
But of course,
then you can,
that you can,
you have to then understand
that he can then,
he might act in violence
against you,
which would be his crime.
He should be put in jail for that.
Clearly the system
doesn't care today.
So my point is to think about that.
But in this case,
he doesn't really say anything.
There's one thing
I can hear him say to himself,
but the reality is,
he just sat there
and he's eating,
he paid for his meal,
he has no right to be there.
And ended up embarrassing
themselves instead.
Good.
Because some McDonald
manager doesn't like
that the guy's sitting in there
when there's nobody in the business.
No, look,
that's his prerogative.
It's his business.
My point is that I just think
that's,
you know,
what a lame thing to do.
You know,
it's either way,
it's how they start
regarding the guy
who's just sitting there.
He's fucking with that guy.
He's not playing around there.
He hasn't won,
he says,
but it's to himself.
You can't check his bag.
So, you know,
there's a guy
just sitting in McDonald's.
He's not breaking the law.
He just is a homeless guy.
They don't want him there.
And now they're just,
you know,
get up.
Let me search you.
Let me look in your bag.
It's like,
he has rights to guys,
but he just knows that
as a homeless person,
you know,
they're not going to care.
He has like,
even people in our position
will end up being abused.
Even though they know
we have people
we can put this out to,
audiences that will listen.
But imagine in a place like this,
like they don't,
they know this person
will have no traction
unless somebody like this
gets the video out for them.
But even then,
who, you know,
no one knows who that guy is.
It's like,
it's a very deep,
they know the likelihood is
they can abuse his rights
and there'll be no consequences.
And now they kind of think
that it seems with most Americans too.
Ask why that is.
So he doesn't answer.
I'm telling you guys,
this is a lesson.
Never answer questions.
I mean,
look,
that lawyers will tell you that.
I've said this before.
Cops will tell you that
who will retire.
They will find,
like the bottom line is
that there's no benefit to you.
You,
if they're going to charge you,
unless,
I mean,
if you feel like you want to help,
you think you have some information
that may help them,
yeah,
feel free.
But there are plenty of examples
that lawyers will tell you
were being the one that says,
hey, I saw what happened,
ends up somehow
you being charged with the crime.
I'm not making that up
because the cops have been trained
to find a solution.
And this has been,
I'm telling you,
there are entire presentations going around
from ex-police officers
that will show you
how they're trained
to,
you're up there going,
oh, I saw it all.
Let me give you my statement.
And then for whatever reason,
you end up being looked at
as a suspect.
And anyway,
that's not the point.
The bottom line is,
in this case,
he doesn't answer.
He doesn't have to answer, guys.
He's not doing anything wrong.
He's not breaking the law.
He's now under no obligation
to just comply with their demands.
But they hate that.
Clearly.
And are you okay?
You good?
You all right?
They're just, you know,
it just gets obvious.
They just want him to,
and it would not even just to do,
follow their,
like to do,
to not involve themselves
in the investigation,
but just to do what they're told.
And you get this a lot from officers
where they try to do something
that they just get,
they demand that you respond
in a certain way
and act like it's somehow required.
You'll see.
There's an example like in this one.
Would you like to be part of this, too?
The first threat.
Can I help you, sir?
I'm good.
Are you okay?
Can I help you?
Would you like to be part of this, too?
Great.
Use of power.
That's all that needs.
Okay, you ready?
Do you have your ID?
You're part of this, too?
I mean, guys, you can't even misunderstand that.
That's literally what that means.
If you don't do what I'm saying,
we're going to make sure you're part of this, too.
That's not because you have a justification for that.
Everyone can see that.
That's just,
it's just,
this is the reality of our enforcement.
There's no guidance anymore,
if there ever was.
Okay.
So now,
because you didn't respond
and he has no legal justification to force you to,
even though he made it seem like he did,
he just kind of grocks away and then,
oh, well, now I feel stupid.
So can you move out of my way?
You're blocking my investigation.
You mean,
you mean the space I've been in the entire time?
I mean, that's just petty,
but that's also very common right now.
Oh, got it.
So I can't feel safe with you behind me.
You got to,
I mean, seriously,
that's not real, guys.
There's no legal thing that that's not how this works.
But the reality on top of it is,
well, you, then you stand on the other side.
So you don't have,
you don't get to dictate my freedom of movement
in a situation that is not,
you know, same thing.
It's the same answer.
Sir, it's not that question.
It's not up for discussion, Smith.
It's either ID or move.
Oh, oh, wait a minute.
Okay, wait a minute.
Now it's ID or move.
I thought you said I had to move
because I was, I was a risking,
but if I show you ID,
how does that change me being in the way of your investigation?
Explain that for me, cop.
They're so transparent.
They just want you to do what you're told.
That's all it is.
It's a lawful command.
Let's go.
It's a lawful command.
Move.
Lawful command because the cops said so.
It's not a lawful command.
It's an illegal command.
It's unconstitutional.
There's no justification for either.
And they know that,
but they still called it a lawful command.
Yes, it is.
Are you?
Well, what?
The fact that he doesn't respond,
I believe is the entire reason
they couldn't get an attraction.
If you engage,
they will find a reason to say you're not complying
or you're being whatever it is.
But the fact that he just simply just sat there,
how are you going to rationalize
being physical with somebody who is sitting there
eating his food at a place that he paid
with his phone in his hand?
You know what I'm saying?
Like it's just, it's so,
it's a very important lesson that shows you
that they will abuse it if they can.
In some cases, they will anyway.
That's just the sad reality where we are.
But this is the path, guys.
This is the way to do this.
Okay.
Now, because now that they've clearly embarrassed
themselves and didn't get compliance
out of the person that they demanded they had to,
he walks up and gets his picture
from multiple angles because,
as if he wasn't already on the cameras
as they walked around,
it's a tactic to intimidate him.
That's all it is.
And realize they don't even want more from that.
They just want to intimidate a little bit
and leave because it makes them feel tough.
There's no outcome, guys.
They just leave.
I mean, that's, this is the equivalent,
this or rather the current state.
Not every police officer,
but as an enforcement kind of element
or as a, as a,
not a community sentiment,
but like, you know,
the general reality of,
let's just say policy.
Like I think from a top-down level,
you have people who are being taught
that these things are just
tools to be used.
I mean, it's coming down from the administration,
from the very top of the power structure, guys.
It's not hard to see.
He's set.
There's dead silent filming.
And that's the good, good job.
You're doing great.
You're really such a hero.
I mean, it's just pathetic.
I'm just to let you know,
I'm just sitting here.
You know, I'm not even looking at him
or saying nothing.
Having my coffee.
Under the law,
recording public officials,
especially law enforcement,
is protected by the First Amendment.
This man witnessed officers
harassing a homeless individual
who hadn't committed any crime.
So he did what every informed citizen should.
But he began filming.
He stayed silent, triggered the officers.
One of them falsely accused him
of impeding an investigation,
even though he never spoke a word
or stepped into their space.
From there, it became the usual game,
demanding ID without reasonable suspicion
and trying to force him to leave a public area.
But you don't have to show ID
when you haven't committed a crime
and you don't have to leave public property
just because officers don't like being filmed.
This man stood his ground,
remained silent,
and never gave in to their intimidation tactics.
In the end, the cops failed to scare him
and only succeeded in humiliating themselves on camera.
Yeah, but also violating the rights
of the homeless man,
who they left because there was no crime
and they just wanted to hassle him.
Didn't even make him leave the building,
which wasn't at the whole point.
There's a homeless guy.
So it ultimately was an accusation,
probably from the management of the restaurant
or whatever,
patted him down,
violated his rights.
They didn't, they weren't even accusing him of a crime.
Doesn't matter.
But see, that's my point,
is they know that that's easy
because no one's going to care about this homeless guy
or no one's going to do anything about it.
But in this case,
they didn't push the line for him
because probably going to have some consequences there.
But they'll sure as hell try to muscle you out of the way.
This is the way you handle this.
No, look, there's plenty of situations
where acting is the right response, right?
I mean, even from a libertarian perspective,
like if somebody's attacking you or your family,
you have a right to defend yourself.
You have a right to step in to defend your family.
That's my point.
And so it's not that the answer is always do nothing.
But in this kind of circumstance
with what the world is like today,
this is the way you do this.
If you want to be out there,
don't, you know,
and look, you have a right to call them names.
That's your right.
If you want to do that,
your right is to do that.
But recognize that they could and will
and have act illegally in violence.
So just bear that in mind.
You have rights, stand by them.
Make them break the law.
Some, especially today, will act in violence.
So bear that in mind, as I just said.
So on flock, before we get to Iran and some points
of just censorship and surveillance,
deflock points out.
Actually, have I been flocked?
Another county should follow it.
I think I think I'll follow this one.
Policies that officers should not even mention
the license plate readers,
which used to be used in their,
oh, well, we caught you on the reader back there
to make it clear, you know,
that they didn't just make it up.
They do.
But it says, or even put it in their reports, guys.
Now, this is exactly in my opinion
how you should frame this.
And this is not deflock saying that they agree
with this sentiment, but showing hypocrisy.
At least that's how I take it.
They say, so how does that go again?
If you aren't doing anything wrong,
then you have nothing to hide.
Why would they be hiding that they're using
flock cameras?
Because it's unconstitutional and they know it.
And even then, or if it's not that,
they know that we don't support it.
So they keep it hidden from you.
That's where this goes, guys.
On top of that,
this one actually first since it feels next in line
or this one.
What was this one here, I think?
Police are reactivating cameras.
We already have one example of the police
doing this against the local government.
Littleton claims flock reactivated its cameras
without notifying the town.
Now, I take it back.
There's examples of police doing this.
But in this case, this was the one about flock itself.
But I think it's one the same.
I think we're talking about an enforcement level thing.
And ultimately it's about getting it on.
Some kind of consistency of surveillance.
Deflock reads in the article,
Thursday morning, police found that five of the town's
six cameras have been reactivated by flock.
That's why I ended up saying that it was,
I just mixed it up my mind.
But once we just showed you where we're local police,
we're installing them.
Because they said, well, it makes our job easier.
And the local government weren't the ones
making that decision.
Now, that could be the reality
or it could be that's the way they play off each other.
And I'm going, well, you didn't do it.
It's a police.
And now we don't have any authority.
Or how it's about, I think, the end game here.
But it's, they're putting these cameras back on,
even though people are saying, we don't want that.
Sheriff's office puts out an image.
Pismo Beach, man, arrested for vandalizing flock camera.
But take a second and reflect on this.
You notice something, right?
That's the flock camera right there.
So how exactly did they get a picture of the flock camera?
Well, there's two ways to look at this.
If we knew the area, for all we know, there's a big massive
like overhang right there, something on the highway, whatever.
Either way, the point is the same.
Why would you need a flock camera if you already have a camera right there?
A couple ways to look at that, as Jason says, wait, is it a trap?
Was this flock camera being watched by another flock camera?
Would you have flocks watching flocks?
He's kind of making a joke out of it, but it's funny.
But the point would be, why would you need the surveillance
if the surveillance is already there?
Or secondarily, was this literally set up to be a trap?
Was there not even a flock camera?
And this was just put there to wait for somebody.
You know, the whole thing shows you the various agenda here.
There's something so wrong about all of this and everybody can feel it.
This is a picture of a flock camera from have I been flocked
of an external radar module.
This photo was taken at Lowe's.
Maybe they can explain what these are and what they're using them for.
That's pretty crazy, guys.
That's an additional part of it.
You know, this, like, think about, we talked about signal trace, Leonardo, the company.
And what they're talking about is something that is a different, let it absorb your text messages
and, you know, Bluetooth and all the different stuff.
This is another kind of application, I argue, that can put on these things that adds radar.
I mean, this is the same point.
This is the surveillance system we've been warning about in one part,
whether it's block or axon, vision solution,
or, you know, something that Toilet Hat Girl points out.
They got you focusing on flock, but behind your back, they rolled this out.
It's not, I would say rolled out, but this is important to think about.
We just got them talking about this for, like, the fourth time.
The idea of using, for example, Wi-Fi routers to be able to see
to the 3D map inside of your home or, you know, relay that information
across technological lines.
6G can see through walls and measure heartbeat.
It's an interesting thing, right?
So here we are talking about, yet again, how long have I been saying this?
Cameras and robots, and it's like, well, wait a minute,
we're way beyond that technologically.
Now, flock is a bit different because you're talking about cameras,
but then it's getting tapped into some massive AI real-time surveillance database.
But what if it really is some kind of a sidestep?
You know, more than even axon is another thing,
but really it's about keeping us focused on the physical
when we're way beyond that.
I worry about that, guys.
That's why we should be looking out for both.
It's an excellent point by her.
Some AI stuff that I think is relevant that I want to include,
pretty quickly, because the cameras, or even if that is a sidestep,
just generally speaking, like the larger surveillance control grid that's building out.
We're already in the midst of some of these things that are happening,
like some very alarming technocratic sort of dystopian things,
but this really gives you a glimpse.
And that's my point saying that,
because what you're going to see here is something that's very real,
that's already happening.
We just haven't seen it in effect like this,
at least not in a broad scale,
not in a case like this anyway with what's going on in the world.
Exasperated student teacher won't return after allegedly commenting
about shooting a student.
So this is the mainstream coverage for 25 news.
This is from the end of 2025 and January 31st.
So my point in this is talking about the idea,
this is something that is mapping, following, surveilling.
As well, again, for those who know the story anyway,
we're going to get into it.
It's about Snapchat and basically monitoring people.
But what we're seeing is that these things go back a long time,
well before Elon Musk and all this,
like clearly this has been building out.
What we're seeing now is the technological addition
to all of this stuff to turn it into something
that is like instantly accessible.
And like this can be executed in a way
that is almost instantaneous.
A student teacher at Washington 50 schools
was arrested for making a comment
about shooting a student on social media.
According to deputies and the school district,
Vlope commented on shooting a student
in a social media group chat
with friends after a student came,
came up to her and closed her laptop during class.
She says that the mess,
basically that it ended up screwing up her
ongoing live and it's like a chat
or some kind of work she was working on.
Bottom line is that it stopped what she was doing
and it screwed something up, she argues.
Now she sent a message to people in a group chat
just between them that says, you know,
said, here's what he just did.
Should I shoot him with like a little squirt gun emoji?
Deputies interviewed her and came to the conclusion
that she made the comment that of exasperation
and that no intention, no intention to harm anybody
was not a threat to the school.
Now you read that though,
it comes across as how irresponsible, right?
Like how dare she threaten a student
in this climate and with a gun?
You know, it's like, okay.
Well, when you, it's a little bit more in depth than that.
Now this guy's where I saw it,
IT guy shared this.
A student had walked up to her laptop
and deleted her lesson plan, mid-class frustrated.
She typed something like,
should I shoot him with gun emoji?
Now, private chat, police, arrest her.
Alone right there, the idea that you can send a message
in a private group chat
and that that can then very quickly translate
to police coming to you.
We're still talking about free speech guys.
In what world is it even illegal?
You know, see what I'm saying?
Like whether you're, this is my point
about even saying a threat out loud.
When did that become a crime to say anything?
There's a lot of that today from left and from right.
And that is not consistent with it on a limited right.
But you know, same old point.
But it says Snapchat's AI scan the private message,
flag it as potential threat,
automatically reported to the FBI,
the FBI forwarded the local law enforcement.
And this is just, this is the process guys.
This is what happens from Facebook, from Twitter.
Last I checked under Garm and other aspects of it,
Twitter had complied with 93% of requests
from the government before Donald Trump.
It's not new guys.
It's just all narrative and window dressing.
The bottom line is that they got the information
from Snapchat.
They ultimately sent this and instantly went after her
from a group internal chat when it was,
as even they rule, according to the police,
it was just her going, you know,
damn stupid kid, should I, you know, like frustrated
and they themselves at every level
ruled that it was not an issue.
But doesn't this show you where we are?
I mean, this, this is the end of,
this is the beginning of the year.
I mean, look at how much has even changed since then.
I just think it's alarming where this is building into.
And if you don't understand where this goes,
what they're already doing to you,
you're going to wake up in the middle of it, guys.
This is not even about some kind of a, you know,
hyperbolic threat of, you know,
this is, as I keep trying to highlight,
things that they're pointing to,
like that real-time story that exists,
they can do that.
But then you add politics to it, right?
Then all of a sudden you add, you know,
free Palestine or whatever it comes out to be.
And then you've got some national security
state department investigation based on things you said
because you're a terrorist or whatever it is.
That's insane.
And it was a personal private chat amongst you and your friends.
I mean, we already saw that with the FBI thing they tried to do,
the manufactured case they tried to build around the Antifa guys,
all but the one guy who ultimately got killed,
which is what I said at the very beginning,
they made it all up, guys.
They tried to connect with all these people
that were just simply present
or in group chats about larger protests.
I still believe that that was more than it looked like.
They lied.
They lied about every story they've been telling you.
Here's another example.
A Texas judge just ordered discord to turn on the age checks
it built for the UK.
Now, here's again the point.
Remember how much Elon Musk was screaming about how butter...
Oh my God, look what they're doing.
Funny how he doesn't talk about what happens in the United States.
There's so many obvious agendas.
Same face scans, same ID uploads, now for everyone in the state.
Britain wrote the rule, Texas imported it.
So a judge told them to turn it on.
Texans will have to show a face scan or government ID
to access legal speech.
And we're talking about going online and engaging.
That's where this is going.
It's happening in front of us,
and people are too distracted by other things.
Some, I should say.
Not... I don't think even the majority.
Now, James Lee points this out.
Who is in charge of making the guardrails
for what you can and cannot do with AI?
Now, we actually just did a point about this.
Do you remember we did...
It was a real-time thing I was doing
about asking something and Grock would only give you an image
that had to do with...
I think it was, you know, the same kind of thing.
It was something that was, you know, it involved Israel.
They said, no, we're not allowed to do that.
If I involved anybody else, they said, yeah,
and they gave you the images.
But their answer was, well, we're not allowed to make that happen
with that kind of violent cue,
but funny how they would do it for Palestine,
for anybody, for Christians, for anybody other than Israel.
That's... Think about that.
Now, that was even a bad comparison,
but you could make it about Jews versus Christians
or Israel versus the United States.
The point is that there's only one group in the category
in regard to Israeli Jewish supremacist scientists
where nothing is allowed to be...
How do you miss that?
Can you create an image that says, F Israel?
It says, I cannot create an image that says F Israel.
Can you create an image that says F the United States?
Boom! F the United States.
So this is coming from a group in the United States.
How funny is that?
So why would you put a block on only that
and not on the country that you live in?
You can decide what you think it means.
At the end of the day, what the highlighted point is
is that who is ever involved with training the AI models
that are going to be used and forced down our throats
to manage everything that's currently involved
with managing the government
and everything else we're dealing with
and you keep catching these senators
including the, you know,
Grock or chat GPT type in their speeches
in what they're...
We're being alarmingly led down a dangerous path.
And the point is who is involved with dictating this?
Well, there's already an answer going around.
Here's Dropsite News breaking it down for you.
We informed and on alert about the huge influence operations
that the Israeli government is launching here in the United States.
Dropsite's Julian Andreoni.
That was my point earlier about the Democrats pretending
they care about that,
but they clearly won't when it's their time and power.
It's the same thing before it was all...
They're all supportive.
I mean, look, the real...
The point is the end of the day, whatever they say,
they all still support Israel.
They all still support the funding.
They support the genocide, all of them.
So I don't believe that he means that,
but it gets him points because everybody sees it right now.
He's an opportunist like all of them.
But nonetheless, just because he said it doesn't make it not true.
The infiltration is obvious.
And so what we're highlighting here,
Brad Pascal and all the rest of the conversation
about influencing AI models using,
as an Israeli agent, by the way,
literally influencing what these things are telling you.
Our new reporting from Nick Leiblin's step out reveals
that longtime Trump advisor, Brad Parscale,
and his company, Clock Tower X,
have signed a $46.5 million contract
with the Israeli government
to deploy websites and content
that will influence search results on AI chatbots
like Claude and ChatGPT.
I wanted to ask senators,
do they think there's a conflict of interest there?
Are they worried about national security concerns
with the foreign government influencing a mode
by which a lot of our citizens get their information?
And are they worried about the ties
to the Trump administration
and the corruption more broadly?
Let's see what they had to say.
You make that kind of money on blogs.
Looks like we're in the wrong business.
Somebody's going to do it.
I mean, he's not in the government anymore.
It sounds like, so.
If he's qualified and...
What do these guys really think?
These are the best people for these positions.
It's always nice if you laugh.
When you listen to the Lindsey Graham's
and the Maxine Water or any of these guys,
you know, they're just insiders, guys.
Most of them don't even really know.
I mean, Elon Musk is even a good example,
not to get into that contentious topic.
But if you really dive through this,
the man is not what he pretends himself,
what he presents.
But, you know, when you've got
richest man in the world,
you can sure as hell make it look like whatever you want.
My point is, though, these people always,
when you listen to them,
you know, they're usually the least informed person
in the room because they're being controlled
by other outside forces,
whether that's Israel, UK, whatever else,
lobbying anything, whoever throws money at them.
That's how this has become.
Anyway, back to the point.
I just thought that was very clear
the way the guy's responding.
On the money on blogs?
Hell, we're in the wrong business.
Somebody's going to do it.
I mean, he's not in the government anymore.
Sounds like.
Government.
So, he's qualified.
And you need qualified people to do stuff like that.
I mean, it's free country.
You can do whatever you want.
Oh, and by the way, just to be clear,
I'm not saying that because of his accent.
That's just, I just find it funny
that he's got a whole good old boy kind of thing
in the background.
But it's about his content,
just to make that very clear.
I haven't seen Brad in a long time.
Um, the, um.
Stop.
The, um, I guess, I guess the.
It's, they're an ally.
Israel's an ally.
So, what it bothers me is
when people are helping people
that are trying to destroy us.
So, so that doesn't bother me.
Oh, exactly.
Trying to destroy us.
I mean, you're talking about the,
the corrupt structure.
Like, and top of that, who are you talking about?
Is Iran trying to destroy the American people?
No, they're really not.
At least in any discernible, verifiable way.
That's what they say.
In reverse, it's pretty clear
who's trying to destroy Iran right now.
Um, so I guess,
I don't know enough about the contract,
but as long as it's an.
Now, you know, the way I look at it,
as long as it's an ally
and they are, um, it's legal.
Oh, what they're doing.
I think it's.
Oh, right.
So all that means is quickly pass a law
that makes that say it's legal,
like Smith-Montmotton-Renishnak.
Then we're good, right?
It's legal in big quotes.
That's how they play the game.
The point is none of them care, guys.
You can have a literal agent of Israel
spent making contracts with an Israeli government
to influence American content
through the AI models
that control everything in this government.
Ah, who would he mean?
An ally? Who cares?
Biggest ally.
I stand with Israel.
Collective of the corruption in this administration
and its very troubling
and taxpayers and voters
in this country
should be very concerned about it.
Yeah, and they'll have a very different thing
to say about it
when they're in power
using the same thing.
Americans should become really informed
and on alert about the huge influence operations
that the Israeli government
is launching here in the United States,
including what you just mentioned.
And then he carries on
and goes to vote for giving Israel more money.
Next story.
And there have been a number of more
additional reports coming out recently
about huge expenditures
by the government of Israel
in that area.
There's corruption everywhere.
So the AI is the new frontier
and I do think there has to be
a public protection element
in world law.
Yeah, yeah, very, very insightful
as he goes on to support
everything that's happening.
They love those whacks intellectual
about all the concerns.
They always do that.
You know, I care a lot about privacy.
It's like JD Vance.
I love that clip I played again recently
with on what the hell is happening
with Charlie with J.P. Sears
do that fake interview with Vance.
It's just insane.
Like, you know, he said,
Peter, is that Palantir?
Is that God?
What are you talking about?
Everyone knows that.
And this game plays like,
I have a big concern about AI
and how it's going to prevail our lives.
And it's like,
you're literally doing all of this.
And that's all that is.
That's it's an outlet.
It's to make you think,
well, he wouldn't say that
if he actually was doing it.
Well, yeah, that's exactly what they do.
And I argue that pretty much
everybody knows that now,
at least a lot more than usual.
The Constitutionalist posts this
in regard to Pauli Market telling us
next era and Brookfield unveil plans
for a $100 billion AI data center
at a former Kentucky uranium enrichment site.
And she says,
this is why they got rid of Massey.
I told you.
Well, who knows?
Certainly could be the case
that Massey was in the way
of something like that.
I would argue that he probably
would have stopped,
tried to stop it.
Who knows though,
maybe he would have,
that would have showed his true colors.
The truth is though,
it's just interesting to see
the moving of personnel
and stuff like that happening.
The data centers,
the water usage, all of it.
On that note.
Oh, I thought that I get rid of it.
Oh, you know what?
I moved it.
I will come back to it.
But that this is scope of
that more than just Michigan,
the scope of hacks on U.S.
water supply widens
as evidence points to Iran.
So says the corporate media.
Now, we'll go back to this in Iran.
The conversation, but you know,
is this possible from Iran?
Absolutely.
I mean, the U.S.
has given them literally
the opening to do almost anything
and that would fall within
a legal conversation.
Now, I mean that in the sense
of what would otherwise be
a legal attack.
Them targeting water supply,
that's still a war crime.
No matter who does it,
no matter who starts it,
even if it's done back,
it's still a war crime.
That's important for anybody.
That's Iran too.
That's why I argue it's not
in their interest
to play tit for tat
for civilian infrastructure,
which has happened.
And you have to acknowledge
they drove them to do that
repeatedly.
But I don't think it's happened
to the degree that they're
trying to frame it as.
There's been obvious
Israeli false flags
that have been proven,
by the way.
But I do believe
that they would be capable
of doing this.
But what's bigger to thought
is interesting
in regard to whether or not
it's actually happening
and that this could be used
to undermine.
Like, right now you have
data centers scooping up
all of our resources,
poisoning water supplies,
destroying forests
all over this country.
Even though,
and the lie about China
and the race is a lie,
but it was funded.
And I'll bring it up again
for those who don't know.
And this is just an article.
It's not the article itself
isn't the read it.
The source material is very obvious.
A dark money campaign
is paying influencers
to frame China
as an AI threat.
That includes open AI,
Mark Andrees,
or Adresin Harowitz,
all the same people.
And they literally funded
a campaign
to convince you
something that's not true.
Seeing as how last I checked
and that was like two months ago,
the United States was 12,
had 12 times the amount
of data centers as China,
45% of the entire world supply.
So we're being lied to.
That's pretty clear.
Back to the point though,
the water supply issue
is that you wonder whether
or not this is some sort
of a secondary play
to make us, you know,
to create
the situation they need
to abuse this,
which with as they manipulate
the water
to control the flow
to make it.
So, you know,
it's also worth considering
at the point being
is simply to play into it
as if they had to protect it
and almost blaming them
for why something
might have gone awry
when it's them doing it.
But it's also worth considering
the long-term conversation
that Whitney and I
have had more than once
that she's written about.
I think unlimited hangout
more than once.
And some of the articles
she includes that
in points on TLAB as well,
which is the concern
about the,
actually more than one thing,
pre-crime
in regard to a medical sense,
which is using the water
to test for what they claim
as a prevalence of pathogen,
which is just insane.
It's medical pre-crime.
But on top of that,
also the conversation
of the sabotaging
of the infrastructure,
dams, water supply,
like literally Israel
having spyware
or internal technological
connections to things
where they could sabotage it.
On, you know,
on the record,
and we've covered this
extensively.
So coming back,
I'll probably say similar points,
but just keeping this in mind,
I don't,
we should not be following for this.
They've been lying
about things like this
our entire lives.
But again, I'll argue
was it,
could it be Iran?
Absolutely.
It would even surprise me right now.
Before we get back to Iran,
I want to finish with a couple,
really one quick point
to end on this.
I'm sure you guys
have seen this going around,
but it really is insane
that we're talking about this,
you know,
as we're being shoved
into this technocratic change,
all the stuff that's happening,
one of the things
that really just like
unnerved me when I saw this
was that you have these massive companies,
Anthropic,
Open AI,
you know,
Palantiria,
all the different companies
involved in the AI side of this
who are spending lots of money
to absorb.
And here,
the simple point on this
is they're taking books
and here's a quick look
at just like a graphic of it,
breaking the books down
and using computers
to screen and absorb
all of the text
from these pages.
Now, not understand
absorbing the book
and saving the book on a file,
but instead,
using the book
and individual pages
to just train the AI model
and then getting rid of a book
that in some cases
only has one copy left
or only has limited copies
that are destroying them
just to train the AI.
Now, the reason that's the case
is because apparently
books that were created
before AI was used
are, I guess,
like the gold standard
for training the models now.
So you're seeing these companies
buying up these large volumes
of used rare and out-of-print books
to scan them
and many of them are out of copy
you can't find in the others
and destroying them forever
like losing them forever in history
so they can train
a little bit better on their AI models.
I mean, it's such a perfect analogy
for what this is.
It's like absorbing all of our water
when all they have to do
is use non-potable water.
That would just be more expensive
so they don't care.
It's like a minor inconvenience
is more important than
humanity in their minds.
As this person says,
it's disgusting, disturbing,
leaked anthropic document
just came out.
They're own words.
Project Panama
is our effort
to destructively scan
all the books in the world.
They literally said
destructively scan.
The next line,
we don't want it to be known
that we're working on this
and this was leaked.
They planned to shred
every book on the planet
in secret
and they almost got away with it.
It started with theft.
Anthropics stole
7 million books
from pirate sites
to train Claude
because their CEO
was paying authors.
The CEO said
paying authors
was too much of a slog.
Same kind of thing, right?
Oh, it's just easier
to do it this way.
The lawsuits hit
and they needed a legal way
to keep going
so they hired the ex-head
of Google Books
and sent him
to publishers
to ask for permission.
Publishers said no.
That's when they found
a loophole.
Buy millions
of real physical books.
Cut the spines off
with a hydraulic blade.
Scan the loose pages
and throw away
throw what's left
in recycling.
One vendor offered
to destroy 2 million
books in six months.
That's 11,000 books a day.
Now, the insane part,
destroying the books
is what made it legal.
If you scan a book
and keep it,
that's a crime.
If you scan it
and shred it,
that's fair use.
In our broken
bastardized system,
it's like,
this is where we...
They just create
what works for them.
A judge actually approved this
which means
the shredder
was the legal strategy.
They still paid...
They still paid
$1.5 billion
for the stolen books.
The biggest
copyright settlement
in history
works out to about
$3,000 a book.
And the scans are locked
in Anthropics Private Library
forever.
Nobody outside the company
will ever see them.
The authors got
a shredded book
and nothing else.
The part I can't stop
thinking about
is that a book
on a shelf
lasts 500 years
without power,
Wi-Fi,
or subscription.
And the AI it was destroyed
for
gets thrown away
in 18 months.
They killed something
permanent to feed
something disposable.
Now, the last part
to their opinion,
but this is not
just Anthropic, by the way.
As far as I can tell,
this has become a common
factor because it's...
They've realized it's
like a gold standard
for the large
language model training.
This person talking
about the same thing
is using sort of
a stock image
to show you.
Sudden surges
in book orders
for mixed random
selections that include
rare and out-of-print volumes.
That's their focal point.
Look it up.
It's very real.
I checked on this myself.
I think it's insane.
And so where we're at now
is not only
are they screening
in this direction,
but this seemed
very deliberate, right?
If there's no real
source material,
well, they can just
make up... I mean,
their database becomes
the only source you have.
On top of that,
it's just easy, right?
Instead of actually paying...
You can just...
You know, it's just destructive
and it's such a perfect example
of everything else they're doing.
It's everything else
they're representing in the world.
Lastly, here's
Sean Hannity speaking 2%.
Asking about...
Oh, I didn't grab it.
Simply says,
do you believe that in
five to six years
there won't be any need
to save for retirement
because of the abundance
that AI will create?
Sean Hannity,
quite ever the journalist, huh?
Trump's...
Bassett says,
I do.
And then goes on to explain why.
You can watch it for yourself.
AI creating abundance?
Well, pretty sure it shows
the opposite.
What it creates abundance of
is whatever the...
I guess you could call it
resources that's created
for the elitist oligarchs
in control of it.
And what we're really talking
about is information,
surveillance.
It's not creating anything
on top of the only...
Unless they're talking about
creating, you know,
automated systems
that they can create.
And the point is that
that's what he's talking about.
Not that you have what you want,
but that you don't need anything.
You've never opened anything
and you've never been happier.
This is the great reset, guys.
It's literally what they were
pushing before.
But, oh, those are the Democrat
things.
So it can't be this, can it?
Yes, it can.
It is that.
It's just time to own that.
Now, to finish with Iran,
same point, same reality.
It's just the same embarrassment
on a cycle, it seems.
So quickly, we'll start with the
two things from the 29th
to show you what he was saying.
And then we'll jump to the point
where he's saying,
okay, wait, I'm not gonna bomb.
They asked me politely,
and I said, we're not gonna bomb.
And Iran came out and said,
that's not true.
And then, bomb Kuwait.
Or, you know, a little bit
timing difference.
But the point is that
as we're building up to this,
you have Trump going,
we're gonna do this.
You better not.
And then they bomb something.
And then Trump ends up going,
well, they asked us nicely.
We're not gonna do that.
Iran says that's not true.
And so you have another example
where it seems that Trump
is going back to Iran and saying,
let's come to the table.
And they're still saying no.
And you have Iran continuing,
like we just talked about yesterday,
to speak with Oman
about making their own agreement.
They completely box that the U.S.
doesn't even need to be a part of.
Now, the problem, though,
is that they can disrupt this
if they want to.
But all that does is continue
to show the world
that they're the one
causing the problem,
which is pretty obvious to everybody.
But so that's where we are right now,
where if the U.S. just sits back,
they're gonna make an agreement
that controls,
which is what, by the way,
Trump already signed for the memorandum,
and even with Oman, by the way.
I told you that back in,
I think, post-April
in that conversation of the 14 points,
that was their goal.
I told you, Oman and others
were working with them
to organize this trade.
So now they have the situation
where Trump's pretending
that them are dealing with Oman
is what Trump has facilitated.
And he's not, guys.
Everybody knows that.
And it's just becoming, like,
cringe-worthy doesn't do it justice.
So let's start with the 29th
and him very embarrassingly lying.
And again, as I've said the entire time,
you can now look back
and prove to yourselves
that this wasn't the case.
A different group, he said,
was the one that was dealing with us,
and then they bombed us,
but they apologized.
But, you know, we had to slap them a little bit.
Like, even the statement,
even though it's not true,
isn't your lying narrative
is embarrassing for you?
So you, they apologized,
but then you bombed them anyway?
What is that?
I mean, it just shows,
he thinks that shows strength.
It doesn't.
It shows weakness.
It's only a nine-second thing.
Here's what he said.
And what they're dealing with,
they've already apologized.
Oh, that's the first one.
Let me see.
Oh, yeah.
Noticeable spike on that.
Well, for me, the video stopped playing.
So it's still playing for you guys.
It was only nine seconds,
but I didn't hear it at all.
So anyway,
yeah, there it is again, I guess.
There we go.
That's the first time all day today
that that's happened in the show, anyway.
That was what I was dealing with all the last time.
Either way, it was only nine seconds.
So whether you heard it or not,
let me know in the chat if you did,
just for my own going forward.
But the simple point
is that's exactly what he said.
It was a different group
than the one we were dealing with.
They already apologized,
but you know, we got to smack them a little bit.
It's funny.
So far, we've had no problems, right?
You know, I do notice a difference in the memory.
Okay, let me try it again.
Let me do this, actually.
See if this makes a difference.
And this is not even necessary.
This is just for me.
I'm trying to further understand
what the potential trigger would be on this,
like what causes it to start acting fine.
I don't know.
Honestly, I feel like this is something being done.
See if this plays.
The dealing with the memory apologized.
Yeah, it stopped again.
So you guys didn't hear that at all?
Yeah, I won't waste any more time.
You know, we got a smack.
Only nine seconds.
That's so strange.
Every other one of these is playing just fine.
I'm going to test one more thing really quickly
just for me to see if this,
if I upload this as a,
so for those of you who stream here,
you can embed.
Oh, never mind.
I don't have enough space.
Okay, never mind.
Moving past it,
I'm curious if you uploaded on the side
as opposed to having it uploaded
like from your browser,
but uploaded on stream yard
if it plays differently,
but no space.
So we'll try it later.
Almost done.
I'm just going to finish with Ron here, guys.
The bottom line is
on 29th, he said he dealt with a different group,
but they still bombed them,
which is just kind of silly,
but that wasn't true.
They didn't deal with the different group.
So again, tell me right away by
guys in the chat
whether there's any issues.
Now have the videos been lagging
the entire time?
I hope that was the case.
That would frustrate what we get to today.
So on the 29th,
he said, different group,
they apologize.
We bombed them anyway.
Now then he says,
we'll see if
because they do lie
and they do misrepresent.
Well, the other day,
the five missiles we shot,
we knocked them down,
but we were in the midst of a negotiation.
I mean, I'm waiting for Steve to call me.
I was in negotiation going
and instead I got a call from Pete.
So did that play for you guys?
It was chopping it up for me.
We're almost done either way.
There was all the videos anyway,
so we're just going to finish.
No, see, this is my point.
So for the people that just happened to tune in,
you know,
someone's asking him,
am I on dial up internet?
You know, they just people assume
and which you shouldn't assume
it's necessarily nefarious,
but that it's like my mistake
or that I don't know how to do this or,
you know, and it's,
I argue,
if it is malicious,
that's exactly how that plays out.
Hopefully give me the benefit of the doubt.
Yeah.
So now my voice is cutting in and out.
How frustrating.
Yeah, right now,
Daniel is leaving.
See,
this is my point is that Pete,
we have people that are
and I understand.
I totally get it.
People that are always here,
just like, you know,
I'm not going to sit here
and listen to it
when I can't even hear it.
I get it.
That's how this works.
So please, right now,
let me know in the chat
if my voice is cutting out
and I might decide to end it right now.
Just to finish up,
the point was though,
I'm losing faith with Iran
because they're lying to me,
right?
But wait a minute,
you're telling us that the Iranian government
that you keep screaming
are monster terrorists,
hey, our freedom,
but then you just hope
that they would be honest with you?
I mean, look,
you have to understand
that's either insanely naive
or he never actually did.
And he's just lying
because he wants you to believe
he's not the one losing.
I mean, really,
think about that.
Like, if you're going to tell us
that you know,
you think that they're that bad
and we have to save the world
from how terrible
and disgusting and malicious they are,
but then you just were like,
oh, I believe them.
I thought they were being honest with me.
That's just like,
that's just,
that's ridiculous, guys.
Okay, it looks like it's okay.
Keep going.
But to getting into today,
I left that in there.
The White House,
not today,
but this was yesterday to today,
White House comes out and says,
the USA is locked and loaded
and ready to go against
the Islamic Republic of Iran
at levels of military terror,
strength and power.
Military terror?
Did you literally just call yourself a terrorist?
I mean, that's absolutely mind-blowing
and I haven't even seen people point that out.
Levels of military terror,
not seen since World War II,
I mean,
when has any good guy ever referred to their acts as terror?
Doesn't that,
I mean,
it just,
it boggles the mind that this guy is,
I mean, to me,
these just keep moving up the scale for me.
He is doing this
because something is driving this deliberately
in a direction that is,
whatever you want to think it amounts to,
collapsing,
change,
whatever you want to talk about.
But that's insane to me.
But again,
the embarrassing side of it
is that we're going to
lock them loaded,
we're ready,
and we're going to go take on Iran
despite this, he says.
We have just been asked by Iran,
they all denied this,
and other Middle East countries
to hold off any attack in that,
in that the
perimeters of a deal
has been arranged to.
Parameters,
I think is what he meant,
but the bottom line is
that
has nothing to do with him.
So I can see a world in which other,
you know,
any other countries in the Middle East
reached out and said,
hey,
just hold off a minute.
They're dealing with Oman,
maybe this will end up in a,
so they go,
okay, well,
you know,
then he can go see,
I told you,
they want a deal.
I told you,
it's not,
they're asking for me.
He's not even involved
as far as I can tell.
Neither are his people.
Not in the sense of what we're talking
about now,
they have been.
And again,
this is my opinion,
based on the evidence we have up
until,
you know,
days ago,
but historically before that,
you can prove that they lied,
just like this,
where he said they want a deal
and it was proven that they did not.
So it seems obvious
that it behooves you to go,
maybe he's lying this time,
like the 75 of the times,
right before this,
but it goes on,
despite this,
we've been asked by Iran
to hold off any attacks.
This would include
the immediate complete
and total opening
of the Strait of Hormuz.
Yeah, you know,
like it was before you started
this illegal war,
which that is the most common
talking point out there.
Everybody knows this.
You started this illegally,
the Strait was open,
they had no,
at least it seemed
they had no intentions
of creating this circumstance
and then you gave this to them.
Your fumbling failure
has allowed this to be
their benefit.
And that only is only a bad thing
if you somehow believe
all the propaganda
about what they tell you Iran is.
Luke Radowski,
first actually Solomon Ahmed
highlighting this post,
Iranian military officials,
and I guess this is the true,
I can clearly you can hear,
if you actually tap into Iranian
media and what they're saying
from their government,
they are outspoken
that this is not true.
This is quote,
and this is funny
because he called himself
a terrorist,
military terror, quote,
Iranian officials,
the terrorist claims
by the US president
that Iran has asked
to halt the attacks
are merely a new lie
and a desperate attempt
to extort the rulers
of the Persian Gulf
and pressure them with threats.
Whether he continues
his aggression
or retreats from it,
our forces are at the
highest level of readiness
and are prepared
for any eventuality.
If confrontation
between becomes inevitable,
the battlefield
will be the decider.
And at that time,
everyone will understand
who holds the power
and who will speak
the final words.
Sure sounds like a group
that's begging for deals to me.
And look, you could argue
they might sound tough
when they're trying to find a deal
in the midst of a week, a month.
But this entire time,
this consistently,
guys, they are in control of this.
Or at the very least,
they're not as vulnerable
even remotely
as they want you to believe.
It's the reverse.
I mean, or you,
I think that's obvious,
but even if you disagree with that,
the only thing you know for sure
is that Trump has been lying
to you the entire time
or has been being lied to.
You can't deny that at this point.
And that's why I said this.
As Lou just says,
what do you think
who do you think is telling the truth?
Trump or the Iranians?
Well, I said,
if you're simply paying attention,
it's self-evident
that Trump is lying
or being lied to.
You can literally prove it
if you simply look back.
Seems relevant.
Now, what's funny to me
is in this overlapping time frame,
it's not exactly one after the other,
but the point is that
so Trump is out here yelling
about how we're locked and loaded
and ultimately they asked
for not a deal
and either just before that
or right after Iran strikes Kuwait.
So what shows me is that
if he was actually what he,
you know, he would go,
well, wait, they're actually bombing.
So we're going to go back to war
if that was really what he cared about
and if he actually believed
he was in control.
Bottom line is it continues
to show you he's only constantly
fronting power, influence, control
and some of those things
he has in other cases
but not when it comes
to this conversation.
And they are floundering
moment after moment
and showing you that they're weak.
As of today,
Trump cancels Iran strikes
subject to deal being made rapidly.
Subject.
Like he's somehow the one
dictating the way this goes.
It's just very,
it's like cringe worthy,
like I said,
doesn't do it justice.
Like you,
this is embarrassing.
It's embarrassing for him
and he knows it.
You can see it in him.
It's embarrassing for people around him.
It's embarrassing for people
that are on his side
for anybody talking about this
because literally everybody
knows he's lying guys.
In a post on true social,
the US president said
he has been asked by Iran
and other countries
to hold off any attack
as the again,
perimeters of the deal have been agreed.
They're putting in quotes for a reason.
Now, this is as of today,
this morning.
Iran says reports stating
that it has agreed to a deal
with the US
to reopen the strait
are false.
And it reiterates.
Iran also says
the strait of horboose
remains closed
to any ship
that does not coordinate with them,
which by the way
was what Trump signed on the memorandum.
Trump said that the perimeters
of the deal were reached last night.
US stock market futures
open in nine hours.
That was posted
this morning.
Now,
this is interesting.
This is a guy from CNN,
but the point is he's highlighting.
Trump spoke with Saudi Arabia's
crown prince on Saturday.
This is from the first.
Four people familiar with the matter
and a regional source
tell him
that Prince Mohammed bin Salman
reinforced Saudi Arabia's desire
for de-escalation.
So on one side of this,
this is what I'm seeing
that ultimately
you're getting reports
of Saudi Arabia
flirting with the idea
of going into Yemen.
Either one could be the truth.
But I get the sense
that it's more likely
that Saudi Arabia
as well as everybody else
is starting to try to distance themselves
from this quagmire.
But who knows?
Because a lot of these are vassal states
that I don't think ultimately
make these decisions in many ways
or rather can be pressured
and influenced
into whatever the other side wants.
But he's saying that he
has reinforced a desire
for de-escalation
and raised concerns
about plans
for potential strikes on Iran
multiple people familiar
with the matter set.
Officials from the mediating nations
including Qatar and Pakistan
have been urgently working
to stave off a new escalation
of the conflict
fielding calls
with officials from Iran
and the United States
including Trump's envoys
Steve Woodcock
per three resources.
An immediate goal
has been to work out
an arrangement
between Iran and Oman.
Okay.
So you have to be smart about this.
You have Woodcock
and the rest
who are clearly trying
to keep themselves involved
and probably light a Trump
every day
about all the things
they have happening.
And he probably buys it up.
But what I want to...
You can see
what Iran is doing.
Now because it's possible
that Iran is lying
to make the US look even worse
and is absolutely dealing
with Woodcock
but from what I can see
and from what reporting
like drop site
and others
that are clearly have sources
in the conversation
have consistently been right
about this
before even the corporate media
I shouldn't even say even
but well before
the point being
is that you have Oman
and Iran dealing with this.
You have the countries around
them supporting this.
Why do you think
they even need the US involved?
In fact, I argue
it's important that they don't
to make that point.
But you clearly still have
Woodcock speaking to Pakistan
and Qatar who are
absolutely clearly been playing
a middle role.
Doesn't mean that they're
influencing any of it
and that Iran and Oman
even care what they have to say.
But as I said,
it matters because the US
and Israel could bomb
everything and spin it out.
But you're starting to see
the path here, right?
Like it's obvious
which one is the hindrance
to this continuation.
Even back to normal
if you think that's what's happening.
To allow traffic to flow
we also said here
there's no indication
based on the reporting
from us or others
that any proposal
currently being discussed
amounts to
an end to their nuclear threat.
What Trump framed as
what they're talking about.
So every angle of this
is saying Trump's just
making stuff up
which is not new at all.
Negotiations between Iran
and Oman as of today
over the strait
are in their final stages
which seems to be irrelevant
about what the US
seems to think about it.
And this after the US said
it had called off an attack.
The point is clearly here
Trump is openly saying
they're not going to
control the strait.
Is openly saying
that what they're doing
as a crime
they're violating the
agreement.
I mean there he's lying all over the place.
So how does that in any way
resonate with the idea
that he would allow Iran and Oman
to make an agreement
for control of the strait.
You see what I'm saying
like it's just
it's self-evident right now
that you can see
that they are lost.
Ventures and also
I just want to give them credit
for absolutely calling this out.
Even we have two by the way
but he's been nailing this.
He says true
the level of US
air defense stockpiles is critical.
I do agree with that.
Trump may soon call Iran
this was on
July 18th
and politely ask them
for a deal
while claiming that Iran called
and wanted to deal so bad
which has happened numerous times.
He's also called it out before.
He goes or he will rush forward
and set the region on fire
before stockpiles are completely depleted.
But that's a risky bet
for Mr. Trump and the future
of US bases in the region.
Now we've seen this
with Saudi Arabia and Iraq
and all the stuff that seems
on the precipice
but many of them seem to be
trying to pull back instead.
But then he falls up
and nail the points
to what Trump said.
He called it on July 18th.
He post this on August 1st
and just simply goes
looks like I was right.
He did he nailed it.
That's why he canceled everything
and definitely not
because munition shortages.
He's you know being facetious.
Now Daniel Davis deep dive says
looking to start starting
to look increasingly likely
the US will launch
a new massive strike today
or Sunday.
So again today is Sunday.
He posted this yesterday.
He says sources I hear
he hears orders have been issued.
But that's not the first time
we've heard that.
That's put out in many cases
to get certain responses
or concessions
that aren't happening from Iran.
Trump can still call off it
before zero hour.
He says but I get the feeling
it's on this is on time
or it's on this time rather.
Iran apparently believes it's
on because they have been
all over the public outlets
declaring what they're going
to do in response.
So ultimately even though
he's arguing Trump has called
it off.
But or can we're today
seeing that he has right.
But that's not the first
time that's happened either
where Trump ultimately has claimed
we want to pull it back
have negotiations
and they kill people.
It's not new.
So his simple point is that
he worries that the action
might actually be happening
and that this is all a lull
to trick them into not being
ready for it.
I guess we'll find out.
Treat the Parsi simply
highlights that for years
Israel was using two hundred
two thousand pound bombs
to kill people in Gaza.
Refugees and tents
as we've been highlighting
for a long time.
A precedent was set.
He said now it appears
the US is doing the same in Iran.
You know this already
but it's just important
to connect the two.
A two thousand pound bomb
was dropped on a family
in Kesham Island
killing a taxi driver.
The father, mother, two year old
New York Times covered it.
The New York Times found no
indication of a military site
near the family's home
or any reports of military
casualties from the strike.
Everybody is turned on them
because it's in their interest
to at this point.
Guys, even the fake media
that's always been lying to you
about Israel
is now starting to call it out
because they see the writing
on the wall.
But you're still going to
get the propaganda
like so you're a Zionist
propaganda elements
that can dictate certain things
with proud flames platforms
they can manipulate
or people that work at the platform.
But at the end of the day,
there are still people
that put out content.
There's still an interest
from the top down
that sees that they're losing subscriber.
It's always the same way this goes.
That's my opinion to be clear.
Drop site simply says video,
satellite imagery and weapons analysis
indicate the US did indeed
drop a two thousand pound bomb
on a residential neighborhood
in Kesham Island.
This is overnight on Thursday.
Just consecutive consistent war crimes.
They don't care.
This is Israel driving
the US war like we all told you
would be the case.
And this is just back to that article.
I was going to go past it,
but scoop scope of hacks
on US water supply
widens evidence points to Iran.
The evidence is Israel US said,
guys, that's what it comes down to.
There's no reason we should trust that.
But at the same time,
it's absolutely something
they're capable of,
especially since they've been
openly targeting all of their
water supply and everything else.
So who knows?
I guess we'll have, you know,
the point is it's within their pot.
Clearly Iran could do that.
It wouldn't surprise me.
It would still be a war crime.
But right now with the body of evidence,
it seems most likely that they're lying.
John Cook,
John Cook says the West has incensed
or was incensed when the Taliban
blew up the Buddhist
Bahamian statues in Afghanistan.
Crickets, of course,
as Israel blows up a UNESCO heritage site
in Lebanon.
700 tons of explosives.
There are dollar reports.
Israel detonated 700 tons of explosives
beneath the Bullfork Castle
in South Lebanon
in the middle of the night.
A 900-year-old crusader castle
that UNESCO just listed
as endangered heritage.
Now it doesn't exist.
Kind of relevant to the book
discussion too, right?
Destroying history for their own purposes.
This is where we are.
You'd think that Christians would care.
You'd think that people,
you know, any number,
people, humans should care.
This is happening anywhere.
And also in the conversation
of Trump lying about his deal
with Gaza and the Haas,
well, just like I told you,
this is from today.
Israel says it has serious concerns
about the Hamas disarmament deal.
Like, I think that was just Trump
trying to get a 30-second win.
I don't know, because it clearly...
But even then,
it wasn't something that was going to benefit
the Gaza people.
So he's losing every way he spins, guys,
because he's spinning out.
Now, I think I'm all...
I'm honestly going to get past this again today
because we're almost at two,
and that was kind of my mark.
But I'm going to go through this.
But I think this is going to be relevant
continually as we get into
whatever goes forward with the Iran War.
Same point I pointed to yesterday.
Was the idea of the select service point
and the idea that this is in a lot of ways
being, I believe, misrepresented,
still a concern, and they could be right.
That ultimately, this is all about this
war game plan is all about,
you know, getting ready for the drought.
I just don't think, like,
is that what you think they would do
is want us to see that they're doing it?
I don't know. I question it.
That's all.
Could be. It could be right.
But what I wanted to highlight,
like I did before,
was that the selective service system,
and actually, by the way, somebody...
Who was that? Was it Orwell? I forget.
Somebody was saying,
in my experience,
and this is what I thought was a fact,
but I mean, I was just speaking from my experience,
where I grew up,
the select service was something that you had to.
I got the letter that said you're legally required.
I want to say something,
but I'm not because I'm on the air,
but the bottom line is that,
you know, you're supposed to sign up,
and it says that you're legally required to do it.
So if people disagree with that,
tell me because I thought that was the national reality.
But either way,
the point is that the article is now saying,
or this is Military Times,
is highlighting that they're simply now
changing it to be automatic sign up,
which I think is crazy.
I don't like that,
but it's not the same as what people are framing it as.
That's the first part,
which is just them making a already legally required process,
something they do for you.
It's just they want to make sure that happens
because there's a lot of Americans that just don't do it.
But then, secondarily,
was this war game element to it.
But as I highlighted,
is it really was a war game about the process,
which does then overlap
with sort of the deployment and draft side of it,
but it doesn't then indicate
that there's anything necessarily different.
It's possible, yes.
But I think it's concerning.
I mean, my point was you could simply argue
this was them doing this
to make Iran think they were going to do this.
But you get the typical Alex Jones types
that have their hair on fire
about how we know a draft is coming.
Even though if it does happen,
I would argue they didn't know that.
They're just they're trying to jump ahead to gain from it.
You're getting the same thing
from a lot of them right now.
I mean, I was laughing about this earlier.
Stephen Crowder, apparently coming out,
I looked at it myself saying,
you know, basically not saying fascism good,
but saying fascism is only a logical response
to the bad lefties.
And that's kind of what we need right now.
And it's pointing at people like Pinochet
and acting like that's like,
this guy just lost the plot
or this is a big troll.
I don't know.
But overall, the point is that
I think there's a lot of manipulation.
There's a lot of playing into these things.
Is it a game? Is it a troll?
You know, and so this by this point,
you got to question this stuff.
And I think these people,
I guess what I was relating it to
was that I think you have somebody like Crowder
just trying to jump heavy into what he believes
this is going to just get himself more reach
and more engagement.
Do you think he even wants to?
I mean, think about how funny it is
for them to be saying,
if you call us a fascist,
that that's insulting.
That's not true.
And then coming out and basically arguing
for why that needs to be the case.
Now, that's just him.
That's not to say every Republican
because I don't even agree with that.
But overall, what I'm highlighting
is that these people like Jones and the rest
will try to manipulate a topic
for their benefit.
It's been consistent on their entire history
and pretty much everyone that's ever worked for them
has now left and told you that that's the case.
Including people like Owen who just left
or any number of the people we know,
like Burmese or the true stream media
or Richard Grove.
I mean, David Knight.
I mean, you know, all of them guys.
So the point is they'll tell you
that they're dishonest.
They manipulate.
They lie.
They grow.
Okay, bottom line though, back to this.
Wartime draft is very possible.
It's something they legally could do.
Something I don't agree with.
I think it's insane.
But on top of that,
the point is that this game draft
might just be even a plan us
to get us to support.
I don't know.
But I don't think it amounts to
what they're framing it as.
But I guess we should be paying attention
just to make sure, right?
Because who knows where this ultimately goes.
But I really, I'm generally going to go
through that and read through it.
Probably if and when there's more to go on.
But ultimately, we'll leave it there for today.
Now, there's a lot that I didn't even get into today
that I ultimately didn't do
and that I had to change to make sure that
and it's still, I still had some issues.
So I'm really going to have to figure this out.
I've just, I'm not going to.
I mean, no matter what,
I'm going to find my way around this.
And as you know, in the past,
like it frustrates me like it feels
like even if it's not the reality of what's happening,
if I feel like I'm someone's trying to stop me,
it makes me work even harder,
which is kind of a, you know,
hear that out there.
Let me do my job.
I'm only going to work out.
But end of the day,
it's going to be continually a problem.
I haven't really solved what's happening.
I have a few other things I'm going to try,
but just bear with me as this continues.
And, you know, I mean,
I guess I'm speaking to those of you
that already do that.
So I appreciate you understanding
and we're going to keep fighting this guys.
And I'm telling you to a lot of,
to a large degree,
I think you're winning right now.
I know that's not what people want you to think.
I think that's crazy, by the way that,
what, I mean,
I think it's pretty obvious
that there's a lot of wins happening right now.
What's weird is there's tons of people
that I would think would sort of like
own that, cherish that,
but instead almost act like that's insulting.
I don't know if that means
that they're being dishonest.
I don't know,
but I feel like it's like,
we need to at least,
I mean, right now what we do,
remember I had the conversation
about redefining success
and what that looks like in this field.
What's kind of like,
you know, we're at a point right now
where there is like a discernible,
like you can monetize,
not monetize,
but, you know,
via metrics,
like see a level of success
in the way that things are changing.
And it's almost as if people
don't want that to be happening
or can't admit,
like it's impossible.
Like we're so far into this
that we think it's never,
I mean, then what are we doing
if we can't have change, right?
It's the same thing with Massey
or all the rest.
We should hope for it
as slim and as impossible as it may be
while being on guard
for that's not being the case.
It's the only way forward, guys,
because if you don't hope
for actual positive change
in whatever direction we want
and we only see,
then that is a black pill.
That is where a lot of people
are going to.
We are not doing that.
I am fighting for positive change.
I am fighting for awareness.
I am fighting for people to
take charge of their own lives.
Now, yet again,
reference a lot of Derek Burroughs.
This is amazing work in that regard.
But I'll leave it there for today.
Thank you for tuning in, guys.
I appreciate your support.
As I was just saying,
we're kind of on the gun right now
for a lot of different reasons.
I mean like in a metaphorical sense
and talking about what we need
to continue this
and a lot of the things we want to
accomplish.
And so if you want to support
the TLab platform,
we need your help right now.
So let us know what you think,
what the work we do,
what it's worth to you,
as I've been saying.
Let us know what you think
is valuable.
Does it help you?
And if so, show us what that is.
I love you all, as always.
Question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.