U.S. can't articulate what they're a political objective, and if the political objective is regime
change, and that seems to be the underlying commonality between statements from Israel and the U.S.,
if we triangulate it, we say it's probably regime change. And what matters is the political
objectives, not the military objectives. The military objectives are as Klausowicz would
say, the war is an extension of politics by other means. There has to be a political idea
or an object that they're pursuing. Otherwise, it's just kill your way to victory. And that
has proven to be a failing war strategy throughout history. And specifically,
we could look at Israel and Gaza. Well, they might think it's fine in terms of
the ethnic cleansing and the genocide of the native Palestinian population.
That might be acceptable from an Israeli point of view, but they haven't defeated Hamas,
and they've lost their standing in the global community. So many would view that as a loss.
So the United States isn't trying to adopt Israeli type total warfare, siege warfare,
maximum pressure, maximum suffering, as Pete Exet said, death and destruction all day long.
It's hard to say where we're at with this. If this is just going to continue,
they're going to continue to incur costs in terms of their relationships
with all of their allies in the region. And that's really what matters, because the U.S.
can't project power without the cooperation of all of the Gulf States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar,
Oman, Kuwait, UAE, Jordan, Bahrain, and Iraq as well.
It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the Daily Wrap-Up. Monday, March 23rd, 2026. Thank you for joining me today.
One important article that I think is going to change a lot of people's perspective on this
today. And it's not because of the article itself or the location it came from, New York Times,
but because of how obvious this has been the entire time and because of follow-up information
we're going to add to it and things that we've discussed right up until now.
But I thought this was an important piece in the way it came out and the timing of it and
what it really articulates. We should always, whether it's left or right,
up or down, New York Times, Fox News, it doesn't matter. We should question all of it and always
consider that they could be lying, could be wrong, as always. The reason I'm saying that is because
I don't want anyone to think that as usual, partisans tend to perceive it as trusting
one source or the other. And then we all have to get away from that if that's the way we
view it. But the point is that this is coming from internal sources, from the White House,
from people in the diplomatic situation, and really just adding contextually what we already
knew what was going on, that this entire time and the reason it's so important is not just
the dynamic during the so-called negotiations and who was pulling what and who was driving what
for, so ultimately Iran being told they were going towards peace. It turns out that wasn't
the case. But really, I get, like I said, the few weeks, even months leading up to that,
as well as what happened right afterward. And you'll come to find that it's very,
very clear. We pointed out the things like the Kurds and the funding that went on there,
not a new story for the US government. We talked about the US, the Israeli government
admitting publicly in interviews elsewhere that this was decided. The date they bombed Iran was
decided weeks at least before they got there. That means they were under the guise of negotiations
for peace, killed the group that met in Iran, just like in Lebanon, just like Soleimani.
It's not secret. In fact, it's exactly what they did during the last so-called 12-day war.
This is what they do. Very important to understand this and this only continues
to flesh out not only that that happened, but who was pulling those strings.
What element, as I'm sure you can decipher, was really telling certain groups, Trump included,
what was going to happen, how it would play out. And if we just push this the right way,
if we just yell this thing at the right time, who cares if it's all lies,
we'll get this the way we want it. And on top of that, the real core point
is the idea that Iranian people wanted any of it. And this is not new. If you followed
this the entire, like I say that the last American vagabond as a platform,
since we've been doing this, we've covered the false Iranian revolutions many times. And I don't
mean the fact that there's not potential revolution or protest within the government,
in the country. Those are always real. In any country, you can find that. It's how they're
manipulated and abused and turned into the opposite of what the people on the ground wanted,
happened over and over and over. And many times they're caught doing it.
And a little bit of time goes by, a new president's in place, and suddenly it's like we can't,
well, we all seem to remember. I think what average people and most of the media independent
to started to see is that the mainstream is always lying. They don't even have any
surprise. They can tie their shoes in the morning and then they're being fed what to say.
And then you got this new mainstream apparatus alternative side that is doing the same thing.
But we're all going, okay, yeah, this is just the same old cycle. We'll end with a good video
from Decentred News showing you how this is identical to the Iraq war rhetoric,
a good long clip showing you identical framing. But that article alone is just one
more perspective, more evidence, more source material showing you what we already know,
that this is being driven by a foreign power. And you could look at it one or two ways.
In my opinion, with the facts that we have either that Trump is being played,
which just because he's being played does not mean he's the guy you all hoped he was.
We can consider that. I think there's plenty of other evidence that shows that he's been a
willing participant in a lot of this. And ultimately, even within allies manipulating
people, they play themselves or rather each other, I mean, and we always see that because
when you're a sociopath, as I would see it, or just a shameless profiteer opportunist,
you're going to take your opportunities and you're going to profiteer for yourself.
Because that's what they're all trying to accomplish, I think. And then for the larger
agenda, we're always discussing, even within the groups, you see variations that they
disagree on. So consider that even if this was, you know, Trump wholesale played
about how this would go down, consider that he already has plenty of other things he's
showing you that demonstrate his interest to ignore what he's promised you.
But if it makes people out there feel better to consider that he's completely snowed or
that he somehow worked his way into this terrible situation to save you from within,
as Glenn Beck and Alex Jones, Jones seemed to be from whole cloth making up because it
sounds better and makes you feel good. Consider it. I did. I don't think there's
any evidence to back it up. And if we can prove that, I'd love to find that out.
To find out that he is actually maybe the person that you want him to be.
Why would I not want that? The problem is the facts don't back that up.
And it's getting more and more clear every single day that we go forward on this.
So what we're going to get into is obviously the
awareness around all of that and what has happened since and a lot of lies that
are being spun. And of course, one main point, which is the secondary,
large point we're going to talk about today, pretty much the latter half of the
show is the idea of the so-called discussions that we're just had.
We're going to go through the really embarrassing timeline of just the last
week where Trump says there's no deal except total surrender.
Oh, they were going to obliterate them entirely or you have two days to deck
2X, Y and Z until finally going, oh, none of that meant anything.
And I either lied or I was inaccurate. And now we have talks ongoing.
That's up and, you know, was preceded by multiple days of Iran saying not even
happening. No possible, not possible. They've lied to us every time.
Deals aren't happening. Now, that doesn't mean it's not.
Obviously, maybe they found someone within the government they could speak to.
That's possible. Look at Venezuela. We're going to get into the evidence
about that and whether or not there was a conversation and whether or not
Trump was all bluster and just made up a story to make it look like he didn't,
well, like that they didn't call his bluff or whether there's somebody inside
they're actually dealing with and they may fall tomorrow.
But there's a lot going on within this story that's as usual,
interesting and hard to read. But I think it's important to go through it
all to understand where they may really be and whether the United States
government is in a much weaker position than it wants people to think.
We're also going to start with a couple points.
Shout out to Patrick Henningson from that opening clip.
We don't often, we don't reference 21st century wire and Patrick enough.
They do excellent work. Make sure you're following them.
Just a really great clip to kind of break down the thought
of what's the real goal here. The just murderer to the end point
as our, how we frame that is exactly what we're seeing right now.
And even if that's the goal and you think that the endpoint will still be
good, how in the world have we allowed that framing that's,
that doesn't align with what anyone in the world pretends they are,
let alone the US government.
But here we are, murder and destruction and power is all we care about.
Just take Greenland because they're not strong enough to keep it.
The leading advisor of the White House seems to tell people.
You know, and I think it's ultimately about more than that,
but I think it's important to see that this is,
this is being driven by something other.
And I think that's what's wrong true for me in that other than US interest.
And I think most people are starting to see that.
Now, again, shout out to his work.
I'll include that so you guys can check that out as well.
But we're going to start with a couple of important things today.
One is something going on with Twitter.
Rather, yeah, I mean, pretty much just Twitter itself,
but specifically something I think goes beyond the platform.
And then we're going to talk about the SAVE Act and some lies around that.
And we've been focusing on that for a while or rather just discussing it.
There's some points I want you to see.
You already know the basic reality of what I think that core point is.
There's a lot to get into with now the SAVE America Act.
And we've talked about almost every part of that in one sense or another over the years,
or even just this administration to be honest with the DHS and so on.
But the SAVE Act part with the Real ID discussion we'll briefly point to again
is one of the most important parts of my mind,
at least in what I think they're trying to accomplish with that,
which is why they started it as the SAVE Act alone with really that focal point.
And then just kind of folded it in to a larger bill.
Because now the point is that's how these tend to work,
where they get folded in behind something else.
We'll get to the shutdown TSA argument.
It's the same conversation in the sense of how it's being used.
Before we get to that and then get into the main point today,
this is something I want you to see because I'm actually really frustrated.
I'm actually mad at myself for not having brought this to discuss last week
when I first picked up on this.
And it's a combination of that it's, at that time,
it didn't seem like a super important story.
And I wasn't sure exactly what it was, even still not really,
but also that there's a ton going on.
And every day I'm balancing what I think will be important.
And some days things turn out to be randomly important
that you wouldn't have expected before.
So right now, and I hope you guys are listening to this
because this applies to everybody using this platform,
be very careful what you are engaging with.
And frankly, this is a lesson for life,
whether it's on your cell phone, anything, email,
you should not be engaging with things that you don't recognize.
Today, I think it's called no click spyware
is where you'll be in the leading in the world on that.
Surprise, surprise.
You don't even have to engage with these things at the time.
Just look, just having it on your phone,
it's already too, but too late.
That's not, I shouldn't even say that.
That shouldn't be the reason why you just engage with everything anyway.
That's the wrong mindset.
But on Twitter, weirdly, and I shouldn't even say it like that,
perfectly timed with the update on the message app side of this.
And you know what I think about this.
And I shouldn't even say think, autentics, CHEQ.
These are Israeli intelligence connected things
that are basically running the backside of this platform
in regard to your identification.
Now your messages, the bot element that they told you
they were fighting, which was, I think it was censored man,
basically proved.
And I went through it extensively.
I think it's very clear was the solution to the bots
which ultimately just flooded the market with Israeli bots
or their propaganda.
All that aside, what we're seeing,
that was all my opinion about the timing and so on,
was that suddenly people were getting these notifications.
I got them.
I got I think like six or seven over the first couple of days
and people said, hey, I just wanted to share this with you.
I'm running for a podcast co-host position
and I wanted you to vote for me on this Google link
and they give you a link.
The one's right above it.
I wanted to show you that they followed up
with another one saying, with the same message twice
and then followed up the next day saying, please support me.
So clearly there was an effort to get certain people
or other just people, but I think it was a tailored thing
to get people to click because if you had clicked on it,
you lost your account.
Now here's with additional part of this
and I'll go through more about more evidence of this.
People like Zoe, who this is from, lost their account
and now they're being told by Twitter
that they can't recognize who they are.
So they can't have access back
and they're still locked out as of this moment.
Unless that changed in the last so many hours,
I haven't spoke to Zoe since this morning.
So think about this because what's happening
is people are being tricked by their back,
but somebody who hasn't messaged them,
that doesn't have to be Twitter yet, by the way, connected.
I just think the timing's interesting
and I'll get into some other points.
But people are being sent the link, they're clicking on it
and the next thing you know, they're out
and people are posting then that,
then they go on to post those on everybody else's messages.
That's what happened.
This Zoe was, it was being sent from Zoe's account
saying, Ryan, vote for me on this new podcast thing.
And she text messaged me saying,
hey, don't click that.
But I had already basically caught on
because I'd seen that in the background
and seen weird people do it and just ignored it.
But at that point I was mad because I could have warned her
or could have warned anybody
but I just didn't know what it was, right?
So here is another example.
Blakely was actually the first person I saw.
She sent me a message going,
you know, hey, do you want to click this?
And I was gonna, I like what her work
and I think she does calls out good things
and I was just weirded about it.
I said, is that from you?
And then she responded going, oh my God,
you're, I'm glad you caught on to that
because she's now been locked out of her account.
Now I haven't checked if she's back yet.
Last I checked, she was posting only on her backup.
Let's see.
No, that looks like an hour ago.
But see, this is hard to tell because I don't know.
I'll let you guys decide.
I don't want to do the, try and prove it on here.
But because, you know, this, she posted this saying,
please only follow her backup account right now.
Yeah, she got, she says I got hacked while having 2FA.
You see my point, guys?
Telling you, this is not some, there's something going on here.
Anyway, but you can decide if she's back up or not.
But she posted this on a regular account saying,
please follow me on this because I'm dealing with this crap.
So overall, before I get into this next post,
which is a different point, is that I've seen this
with a lot of people and you've probably seen this going around.
Now on top of that, it doesn't seem to be connected
with the podcast voting link, Whitney Webb just had her account hacked.
And I thought she should have been right there.
Actually, here it is.
And she reached out to let me know that.
And, but I asked her and she said, no, there wasn't any kind of a link
that I clicked or anything like that, which is pretty weird, right?
So that means that some, some other random thing,
somebody was able to hack Whitney's account.
And so she's now locked out.
And the same thing is happening.
As Mark wrote, hey, support, you blocked Whitney's ability
to log into Twitter due to suspicious login detected,
asking for help to bump this to the support.
Now she's reached out and they're saying the same thing.
We can't verify you.
So this is going on, right?
This is not, I honestly don't know.
I honestly genuinely think this is not a bug.
It's a feature.
Okay?
But you can decide for yourself what you think this is.
I just saw this weird kind of series of these things happening
and it all seemed to time right around when they changed
and updated their background message thing.
So be aware of that.
On top of that, before we get into some more things,
I mean, really the same point was just, you know, what's going on.
I don't want to make it, because that point alone,
just to be clear, is just about the hack and what might have happened.
My thought is that it connects to Twitter.
And I think with Whitney's thing, it's more relevant.
Whether or not that's the case, I want to be very clear that's my opinion,
because I do think that there's a lot of, not weaponization, that too,
but that they're, you know, use profiteering from your information,
your data, your engagement, training their AI models with their CAPJOs
and whatever else we've always been doing.
So here is another point that on Twitter, we already,
and this is Alan McLeod from MintPress News,
reported that Twitter users were finding their real names
being Googled in Israel after their verification software
autentics had verified them for Twitter.
Surprise, surprise, right?
What a coincidence.
It's literally Israeli intelligence connected.
It's run by Israeli intelligence elements.
I think the owner was a former 8,200.
The point is that I think that there's something to this
and where this all goes.
Now think about this and the weaponization of it.
We, I mean, I can't even count so many of us.
Now, not because we felt we could verify this, maybe some of us,
but just the idea of what we saw in Pokemon Go.
When that came out, remember what we all talked about?
Well, that's pretty weird.
I mean, you're basically, you know, you were using this,
this, what's it called?
I forget the term where it's not fake, but it's not real.
You're using a lens and you're looking through your lens
and it's like the world around you through the lens,
but it puts things on the screen.
So Pokemon.
So you're looking at your living room
when you see Pokemon in the living room, for example.
The point was what a lot of us tried to show you
was both because of the connections to the app itself
and who built it.
We said, look guys, the US government's basically
using this to get real time 3D mapping
of everything around you.
Oh, and everyone thought we were so crazy.
You guys are so conspiracy there.
Turns out that was the case.
I don't even think we, that's not even that surprising
with everything we're dealing with.
With our, you know, Tesla, basically.
I mean, the idea of that car system
and how many times we've had wild accidents and crashes.
And yet it just still seems to be the thing that even,
it's part of the growth of the whole system, guys.
That's the point.
143 million people thought they were catching Pokemon.
They were actually building one of the largest
real world visual data sets in AI history.
And this is a, you could please look into this guys.
The point is to understand
that this has been going on a long time.
Now this is just one point to get into
some tech points to start today.
But I really want us to think about the bigger picture,
whether it's warfare or not,
these things in many cases can be planned out.
And it's not the one plan,
but multifaceted directions based on how we respond.
And today, even using AI algorithms and modeling
to get there.
Twins, digital twins, a whole thing.
Just be aware of how this stuff is applied.
And then back to the point of how this is being used
on these platforms.
That you get the whole Twitter experience,
I feel is exactly that.
My opinion, however you think that relates,
that we are being harvested in a sense.
And I don't mean that in the weirdest way,
but just like what we're engaging with,
just training these models and so on.
On top of that, Jordan points out,
just in case you didn't see
where the world's actually going
when we're all being distracted.
And I don't mean that it's not real,
but just that this is an over focus,
like anything major going on can be,
data centers under construction in the United States.
The number of data centers currently under construction
by states shows how quickly AI infrastructure
is expanding for the podcast.
I mean, I'm almost willing to bet you
there's more than this.
Texas, 135.
One of them being the Elon Musk discussion.
Virginia, 134.
Georgia, 51.
Ohio, 45.
Arizona, 35.
These are billion dollar data centers
that are absorbing unprecedented amounts
of water and resources.
135 in Texas, 134 in Virginia.
And it goes down the list, 21 Mississippi,
Illinois, 19, Iowa, 16.
That's insane.
Why do we need all of this?
Because they're turning your life
into what they need for their preeminence.
If you think otherwise,
I don't know what world you're living in.
These people think,
you think these people care about our lives
every day, every second.
We get examples from their own mouths
that they don't care about human life,
let alone our interests.
I'll include the welcome to the Palantir World Order
point. You just include this
to the segue to the next point,
but realize all of this is interconnected,
DHS, foreign policy.
It's all coming in the same, from the same place.
Kim.com on the 14th posted about,
to the White House,
don't listen to Palantir,
Calcs, Carpeter, Teal.
You are losing.
This cannot be turned around.
Kim.com is trying to get their attention
from the whole...
And this includes everything.
I wanted to point this out again.
At some point, we were going to do
probably a deeper conversation about this.
This is a guy,
his name is Dirty Indian on Twitter,
who's claiming he's an ex-Palantir executive.
And it is factually correct, he writes,
that Palantir intended to take over the U.S. government
while heavily funding the effort.
Many of his ex-colleagues are now installed
inside the United States government apparatus.
He says,
there's a reason that the C-suite of Palantir
has him blocked.
Now, consider it for yourself.
You know, the reality of the point,
the situation is accurate.
But whether he is...
His claims are accurate.
Whether he is the...
Maybe he's the crazy one.
It feels spurned and wants to lie about him.
Who knows?
But consider what he is saying,
since he literally worked for them,
and they are all blocked him now.
And he seems to align with an opinion
that most of us see coming.
On top of that, Yannis points out
from Gaza's killing fields to the NHS,
now to Britain's financial conduct authority.
Palantir's ghastly tentacles
have penetrated every pore of the British state.
The UK's demos is now well
and truly expelled from the UK's democracy
in name only.
But don't worry,
Alex Jones told you it's a small little Democrat thing
that we're overreacting about.
So just shut up about it, right?
Listen to Jones.
He knows what he's talking about apparently,
that it's totally not taking over everything around us
all over the world.
Now, by the way, on that note,
and I don't want to say too much
because it very well may not end up happening,
but I've got an interesting interview planned.
And I'm hoping we'll be coming out
in the next couple of weeks
with somebody who has some pretty,
pretty alarming and insightful things to say
about Palantir and how it connects
to the global conversation.
Mr. Nobody points out,
Citadel CEO Ken Griffin says,
the world needs a savior,
and the hope is that AI will be the savior.
Now, he did go on to say in production.
So it's selectively edited,
even that it does make a big difference
on what he said, doesn't it?
But nonetheless, that we need a savior
and AI will be that in production
or anything else is still alarming to me.
This is the way they're viewing the world,
sitting there with Larry Fink
at the World Economic Forum.
You know, Trump's right-hand man
when it comes to the financial world.
I mean, if you think that's a joke, by the way,
I'm still blown away
how so many people don't even know
what's going on in the administration
of the people that they support.
Black Rocks, Larry Fink,
abruptly becomes part of Trump
inner circle.
And this is not just one article, guys.
You can care to look if you want to.
He was super a part of Trump's first administration.
But apparently Black Rock is only bad
when it's next to Democrats' names.
Hashtag two-party illusion.
Even Oren Schroer points to the AI framework.
Hope you can read that.
It's really everything we know.
It's just an extension of the same.
As Captain said, it is the framework
for the control grid.
It is what they're building around you.
And even Oren points out
they're building the AI surveillance state government.
Hey, guess what, guys?
Too late.
That's been built.
So I disagree with his framing.
This is bigger than that.
The AI surveillance state government guys,
we were there long before Palantir.
Here is the Palantir and the rest of it
is the building stage.
But what we're talking about
or what he's pointing to
rather Trump and his AI framework
is the global dynamic.
And it's not just about surveillance
if you understand where this really goes.
But at least he's pointing to it with concern.
You know, it says straight out of dystopia
and some of you are celebrating it,
we've lost our minds.
Well, only people in the partisanship have.
See these, I'm glad he stepped away from Info Wars.
But what I tend to notice is people,
whether honest or not,
will step away from that
and then just fall right back into the partisan divide.
We need to start going back,
not go, we've lost our minds,
but partisans have lost their minds.
That's the right perspective
because as far as I can tell,
anybody I'm talking to
that recognizes the two-party illusion
also seems to see the bigger picture.
And we may disagree on what it ultimately ends up being,
but it seems without fail,
every one of you that goes,
yeah, two-party illusion
seems to recognize everything else too.
What a coincidence.
I'm dead serious, by the way.
I don't think I've even met somebody
who agrees with the idea
that it's an illusion of the political divide
who doesn't seem to see almost everything else.
Think about that for a second
to recognize why certain people tend to
malinger within the partisan game.
I'm not even necessarily talking about,
oh, I'm just saying there's plenty out there
that he's kind of freshly broken from Info Wars.
So I'm giving him time to see where that goes.
Wall Street apes in regard to the partisanship
comes out yet again
and wants to let you know it's all coming down.
Donald Trump was right.
This is posted on the March 22nd.
Gee, what else is going on in the March 22nd?
It's like, who knows?
Nothing else, apparently,
because this is all that matters.
Director of the FBI,
Cashpartale confirms with Bax,
by the way, I'm pretty sure this video
is from like a year ago,
but whatever.
And it says Nancy Pelosi,
and if it's not, it's even better for the point.
Nancy Pelosi involved in setting up January 6th,
correct, she made sure there was no National Guard
correct, Nancy Pelosi and her team
were busy filming, correct.
250 agents, okay, correct, good, correct.
Hooray, guess what?
Nothing's going to happen.
Watch, now watch as nothing happens.
I mean, look, I hope I'm wrong.
I say it every time.
I mean, but I don't even,
I can't even take this seriously anymore.
How many times can people like this
hype the same point
and not even with new information
and to, and nothing ever happening,
not even the direction,
not even a, not even,
not, there's, I don't see a single piece
of legal momentum, documentation.
Even like prepping for some kind of a lawsuit,
nothing or indictment or anything.
I don't believe Pelosi or any of the rest
or Obama or any of them
are actually going to be held accountable
because they don't want to,
because the team is not just one side.
If you really understand it,
I genuinely hope I'm wrong.
But as I said with Comey,
as I said with James,
both of which you should be in prison,
both of them have been dismissed
because they set it up to fail,
like I said in the beginning.
But hey, Wall Street names,
ah, it's all coming down
and everybody down there.
Yay.
Except the ones like us
who are going do something then.
And a lot of them are big Republicans
who are starting to catch on to the game.
Now, in regard to the Savak
and other partisan manipulation,
this is an interesting clip.
You could take it two ways.
I'll play it first
and I'll let you hear what he says.
As Ford News writes,
it appears Speaker Johnson
was caught on a hot mic
discussing the Savak.
Well, we thought it would be 12,
but it might be 18 percent.
That would be huge for a turn out.
Yeah, and it is correct for the subtitles.
Turn out.
So vote or turn out?
Because remember,
I'm actually less concerned.
I mean, I shouldn't say I guess correct.
Less concerned about the voter turnout part of it
because of the reality
of how I feel our votes
are not actually translated to the outcome
because that's been stolen
from us a long time ago.
Not that it doesn't matter.
So I'm less concerned with that
than I am with the digital ID part
of the specific Savak part
that's been added
to the larger Save America point.
But it's important, though,
because there are very valid points
to show how this will diminish
the percentage of people
who are able to vote.
I'm of the mind.
That's just a simple directional.
I mean, look at where that leads to.
It's going to lead to the point
where people will get digital elements
to be able to get back inside the game.
That's exactly what they want.
The point, though,
is that you could read this
as either cheering on
the reduction of the percentage,
which is what all the Democrats
are saying, see, we told you,
they want to phase out the people
who can't vote me, I guess.
But again, just like the right
and the right,
why does that only mean Democrats?
Are we of the mind that only Democrats
are the ones who aren't able to?
No, I would argue many of them,
if not more, are Republicans
in rural areas.
But even then,
that's not the same as it was
before back in the day.
It's not only rural Republicans, guys.
We are lied to and missed
like about so many fundamental
things of how these all,
like the point about the immigrants
is that you can look at the stats.
The game of where immigrants
only vote for Democrats
is just not true.
It's not.
In fact, it's changed a lot.
Even Trump played that point
during his last administration.
So the real question is,
if this is diminishing,
is it in their interest anyway?
But the second point,
or I guess more of the real question
is, is it him praising
the idea that they're reducing that
and then would that even help them?
Or is that them pointing out
that this is an increase in voting
and that that would be good for them?
And in that then point is,
in that point,
then is he only talking about
Republican percentages?
I think either way,
it makes a very important point.
I'll play it one more time.
Well, we thought it would be 12,
but in the fact it might be 18%,
that would be huge for us.
Right, okay.
So there's only a couple ways, right?
So first, let's take it as
what some of the Republicans
are arguing they're talking about.
Well, he's just talking about the fact
that it will increase
the percentage of Republicans that engage.
Well, guess what?
What does that show you?
It shows you that nobody in this country,
at least let's just take Republicans,
but combine that and you have
under 40%,
which is always what Steve and I are talking about.
Every election,
you have basically 40%,
barely 40% of people that even engage
and then within that,
the vast majority of them
identify as independent.
So it's so clear
how we've been played for so long,
we just get the same old screaming
people at the top
that keep you wrapped up
just like the same one screaming
on the war,
like with the Iraq War.
It's the same grouping.
I don't know why as average people
we can't recognize that.
Who knows?
Maybe we can
and we're just not allowed
to be in the conversation.
Part of me thinks that's where we are,
the same as the majority of everything else.
You get the screaming idiots,
you get framed like they're,
well, everyone thinks that we're all going,
we don't think that.
I don't know.
But my point is,
if it's only 18%,
and that's a positive number,
then nobody believes in these people,
but nobody votes for these people
and they're hiding that.
But if it is because he's talking about
the total turnout,
well, then it's the same point.
Anyway, now I want to be clear
that this will reduce
percentage and voting turnout.
And I don't know why that wouldn't
matter for people
if the argument is to make sure
every American votes
seems kind of counterintuitive.
But all that aside,
I think what's most important
is that, one, they're lying
about a lot of this stuff
and really, again,
that this is more than just
about voter turnout,
especially when you realize
what I think the reality is
about the voting.
But as he writes,
it appears Mike Johnson
got caught in hot mic
that the SAVE Act
would result in 12% to 18%
voter turnout.
You could take it that way,
saying that would be huge
for the Republican Party.
SAVE Act is a voter suppression bill.
That's what he says.
Elon Musk, of course,
says failing to save,
the past of the SAVE Act
is an act of high treason
against the American people.
I'm just so tired
of the hyperbolic,
nonsensical politics from the...
These people are just trying...
Like, I don't mean this
in, like, a dismissive way.
They act like children.
Look at the way Trump is acting.
Look at the way Elon acts.
They act like children
with billions of dollars.
That's what they act like.
What kind of statement is this?
It's legislation,
which means it could fail or pass.
Like any other bill ever,
no matter how important you think it is,
you could be incorrect.
Majority of the country
could disagree with you.
Or it's all a big fraud
and everyone does
and the government lied to us anyway.
Happens every day.
And that degree,
my point is,
to say it's an act of treason
for the one thing
you want to happen,
not happening,
is just manipulation.
It's just...
And again,
it's no more important
than any other thing
we've dealt with before.
It's just another piece
of legislation
that continues the funding
of all the things
that I personally want to go away
on top of the fact
that it will enshrine
digital ID going forward.
Why do you think he wants it,
ladies and gentlemen?
You can decide for yourself.
As I said right here,
real ID, compliant ID,
which is what it requires
with this bill.
On top of the extra pieces
that are currently added,
like we talked about,
the birth certificate,
the passport, right?
But as I told you,
and as you can read
right in the documentation,
of course,
when you add on
to the mobile driver's license part
that's also continuing again,
eventually,
all of those will be digitized.
It's very clear.
So all it is
is giving you those options now
until you can eventually
end up using
old digital versions of them.
This is where it's going.
It's a slow path
to slowly break off
different options
with the one thing
being continued.
The real ID,
compliant,
the real ID act,
you don't need that.
You don't need that part of it
to do what they claim they want,
which is to protect voting, right?
So if it all it is to protect voting
and that's just
the original SAVAC part of it,
then you don't need the digital part.
So why are they doing that?
Right?
If that seems to be a hit,
a point of contention,
and it is for a lot of people,
then why wouldn't they just move it
out of the way
if what they really wanted
was to protect voting?
You know the answer.
And it says you're using the
the desire to enforce the law,
which is immigration,
in this case,
to trick Republicans into supporting
backdoor digital ID,
remove the real ID aspect,
and you know what, guys?
You get the exact same outcome.
If you understand that,
and you can prove it
because I'm giving you the materials
to do so,
then call it out.
But they don't care about this.
In fact, it seems that
I mean,
you not got some support,
but here is the article of the show
we did back on 2024,
July.
And I'll just include the act again.
This is the update one
consistent with the requirements
of the real ID act of 2005,
which I think I actually closed it
on there,
but I included in the last show
we discussed,
and it's in the original show.
And the point is,
you can just look it up
and read it for yourself.
And it's very clear.
It's all about the digital
transition.
And same thing with the ID 2020
element,
which was,
they're one the same.
They're two parts
of the same large agenda.
It's about digital transition.
Now,
again,
I want to,
in case you didn't hear me say it,
there are a lot more pieces to this.
And this is where we get into
the TSA overlap.
Guess,
guess where this all comes back to.
And this is just,
honestly,
this is such an unimportant
point. It's just really just about
dishonesty,
which if you're out there
believing these people are not
dishonest,
then I don't know what kind of
cartoon you're watching
because these people,
left and right,
all across the board,
are some of the most dishonest
people I've ever had the
dishonor of watching.
White House,
the crazy Democrats are not
allowing TSA agents to get paid.
Well, gee,
does that think,
you think that's the truth?
It wouldn't surprise me
because both sides are petty
children that are willing to
hold up what Americans
may want in order to get what
they want.
But the point here is
that's not actually the
reality.
And it's the same thing he did before.
And by the way,
this does actually have a piece of,
it's relevant to the
larger Iran conversation
before we get into the lie
about what I think is the lie
about the potential talks.
Because this guy,
more than anyone I've seen this
position,
seems to be willing to just
blant,
like whole cloth lie,
knowing that you can look up
the opposite,
like look up other information.
It's as if he believes he's
the only source of info out there
where they so full of hubris,
he believes you won't listen
to anybody else.
I don't know.
But let's go through this.
The crazed Democrats
are not allowing TSA to get paid.
Would it shock you
if I just told you
that every single Republican
just voted down funding the TSA?
Would that seem strange
for what he just said?
It should,
because it doesn't make sense,
does it?
And if you're an honest
Republican and you know that,
wouldn't you go,
is he either being lied to
or is he lying to me?
And either one
should be alarming to you
if you're an honest person.
This person back,
this is even back on the 16th.
And this is what I was going
to show back when this was
happening on the 16th.
I never got to it.
It only came,
it only came back around.
In 24 hours,
Senate Republicans
block five separate bills
to fund TSA and so on.
Now, you could pretend
that's not true.
It is,
but that's not the point
for today
because it happened again.
We'll get to that right now.
The point is
that did happen
and they are claiming
Democrats don't want it,
but the reality
of the poll thing, guys,
is that Trump on the 8th
and before that
said very clearly
that he refuses.
And this is my point.
He knows he said this.
He knows it's out there.
He knows we're aware
that it was stated, right?
Just like with the Iran
conversation we'll get to,
only sees obliteration.
No sees fires possible.
Donald Trump refuses to sign
other bills
until SAVAC is passed.
Okay.
So here's the thing.
You could argue
that you agree with them.
You can say,
you know what,
SAVAC is so,
so important
that we won't allow
anything to happen
until they give us that.
But what you can't do
is pretend
that that's their fault,
right?
Because, I mean,
it's both of their fault,
as always,
like the shutdown
as always
because both sides
are failing to put,
you know,
compromise.
In this case though,
this is Trump saying,
we want this
and you won't get anything
until we get what we want.
Now, I guarantee you
they're playing their same
games,
but you can't pretend
like this is anybody
else's point
other than him
putting his feet down
for this.
And maybe that's
what he thinks you want.
That's what I'm saying.
You could even agree
with that.
But it's his choice.
So vast majority
responsibility
goes to the person
who set the table
with that divide.
Trump warns Republicans,
this was yesterday,
no compromise on DHS deal,
which is what he wants
ICE to be funded
until country destroying
Dems, Push Through,
Save America Act.
And on top of that actually
it was Dems,
I mean, the government wants DHS
quite obviously
because that's their left,
right.
They all want to control your
lives.
So the point is
that Trump is continuing
to this day,
yesterday saying
you can't get that
unless you
push through the Save Act.
That's just childish politics,
guys.
That's not how that's
going to work.
I mean,
it might work
at the end of the day,
but it won't,
it'll create the situation
that he's creating
foreign policy.
Where it's just
nothing but chaos
and screaming
and power struggles.
That's all he wants.
Here's what he said.
This is today.
And this is at the,
in Memphis, by the way,
which I could have had some
people to go check out that,
you know, film it
and be there.
You know, I, by the way,
by the way,
this middle of the show
I just randomly jumped them
on.
I forgot about this,
but I'm,
I'm looking to set
something up locally here.
And I mean,
for those,
largely for people
who are in the field,
you know,
but reach out
if you're interested,
I'm probably going to get
back to everybody.
But the point is,
I reached out to Brad Miller,
seven C's,
they're local, they're in Tennessee.
I haven't heard back from seven yet,
but Brad got back to me
and I basically just saying,
let's start like some kind of
a local media group
of our own,
but also for community.
So it's not just work,
it's also just being local
and having people we know here
and having that community
of like-minded people,
but also so we can,
you know,
reach out and be like,
Hey, you know,
what's going on in this,
that Memphis thing?
Let's get somebody down there
to film it.
We can work with you.
Like, I think that's important.
So if you're out there
and you live in Tennessee,
even whether I know you're not
and you are in this field
or in somewhat adjacent,
reach out, you know,
email, whatever else.
I've seemed to have to get
half of the things that people
send to me.
So do your best
or put it to somebody in the chat,
let them reach out to me.
That's probably the best,
to be honest.
Call the phone line in the office
or give it to somebody in the chat,
let them relay it to me.
That's where the best relay.
But back to that,
the point was,
this is in Memphis,
where he gave the speech
and here's what he said.
There's a few points
we'll bring,
grab from this.
Just blaming the Democrats.
After the appalling lines
and massive disruptions
at major airports,
nationwide last weekend,
I'm again demanding
that Democrats in Congress
immediately end their disgraceful
shutdown of the Department
of Homeland Security
and restore the full funding
for airport security
and the TSA.
They are holding it up
because they want to take care
of illegal immigrants
coming into our country.
Oh, is that why?
Or maybe they do though,
but you seem to be leaving
out a very important part
of that story, don't you?
They want to take care of criminals
that are in sanctuary cities.
They want to take care of transgender
for everybody,
literally the...
Okay, so do you get what he's doing here?
Okay, and these aren't
necessarily incorrect points
in the broad sense,
but what does that have to do
with this?
What he's doing is simply going
all the things you hate
about Democrats,
which we all know,
which are involved
in many different overlapping bills.
By the way,
that half the time Republicans
involved in,
they just don't talk about it,
or that over the seas funding
with NED or USAID
that fund the same things.
They all criticize right now.
We're just all about to dishonest
partisans in this country,
apparently.
I don't mean that,
but that's the framing
we're showing,
why nothing ever seems to change
because they're all lying
to each other and laughing about it.
But we all call it out.
The point
is that this is quite obviously
not the reality, right?
You're creating this false back
and forth to make it look like
they're the ones shutting you
down when you set the table
to stop this from ever happening.
Now, the bigger question is,
is that by design,
is for something else happening?
Is this just petty division politics
or is there something intentionally
happening here?
Maybe just creating this discussion
to stop this from paying attention
to how catastrophically
they're failing at everything else.
Mutilization of our children,
men in women...
By the way, the mutilization,
in case you missed that.
Men in women, literally
the mutilization of our children,
men in women's sports,
but what they don't want to do
is give us anything to do with
citizenship for voting
or voter ID.
Yep, digital ID, ladies and gentlemen,
is what he's really talking about,
whether he even knows it or not.
You don't need that to make that work
because I just showed you.
But isn't that just dumb?
Like, if you're out there going,
that's their fault.
Then you're a partisan juvenile person.
Like, there's no...
This is not about left or right.
It's about observable facts.
And it's just people...
He'll just say the thing like that
and people just follow along.
And it's the same on the left.
Now, this, I find insane.
So, take a look at this for yourself.
And, oh, I have the wrong one.
It's either way, at the same point.
Take a look, okay?
This is the voting.
And the point, specifically TSA funding.
Every Republican.
Nay, nay, nay, nay, nay, nay.
Okay.
So, if you want to make it about the TSA
and why the TSA won't be sure...
That's why we have to deploy ICE to this whole hot...
The airport.
Yeah, that's totally not by design, is it?
And that means that they're playing their role
as the Democrats.
Either way, if you think that or not,
the point is, you can't say the Democrats won't fund the TSA
when every single Republican voted no
and Democrats all voted yes.
I mean, to a T. That's insane.
This is inversion of reality.
Or just that, you know, you're making it out to be some kind of
a nuanced thing out to be definitive.
It's not.
You can't claim it at the very least.
It's both responsible for making sure
that they don't get what either side wants.
It's just sad.
And here's an art...
Here's the... I was showing you.
This is the United States Senate Committee on Appropriations.
Senator Murray responds as 49 Senate Republicans
vote down Bill to pay TSA.
That's two days ago.
And you... Now, he's up there saying that they won't fund the TSA.
That's just stupid, guys.
I don't know why we don't call it what it is.
Now, here's an even crazier point I saw before I went live.
This is from today.
Republican Senator Kennedy blames Trump for why it's still shut down.
So this is getting even more ridiculous.
And who knows what's driving his decision here?
I tend to see him as a very team player Republican.
But who knows?
Suddenly, he's coming out and going,
Trump's the reason they gave him a deal and he said no.
You know why?
Because he said no dealing with Democrats.
And then has the gall to stand up and say they're refusing to deal with us.
That's just dumb, guys.
And again, my larger point, I feel like this country is being broken down.
Senator Cruz and I came up with a plan.
We said, look, it's a two-step process.
The Democrats have offered to open up everything but ICE.
Ted and I said, okay, let's accept their offer.
And then at the same time, we would offer a bill for reconciliation
where we don't need any Democratic votes to do whatever we wanted to do with ICE.
And that way we're out of the shutdown and DHS is back open.
Make sure you heard that, that the deal would have worked out to where they ultimately would
have had the votes to do whatever they wanted to do with ICE.
And that was Trump that said no.
Well, he's going to say that next.
Not because of the ICE part, but because I think he just wants so desperately what he thinks.
I mean, I'm not going to speak to his intentions.
The SAVAC part, I think it's digital ID,
but who knows if that's what's driving his decisions.
Either way, what he's saying is that if they would have done the deal that
Trump's the one that said no to, they would have ultimately given them the free pass.
I mean, who knows if that's the way it worked out.
But what he's claiming is that to do whatever they wanted with ICE,
which is exactly what he's claiming they all want and what Republicans want.
And that right now what they're doing is stopping somehow.
So in a sense, he turned down the very thing.
He claims the Democrats are stopping.
We submitted that, Senator Crafon submitted that to President Trump.
As is his right, he said no.
No deals with the Democrats.
It would have worked.
We could have had TSA paid by the end of the week.
But the president said no deal.
Seems pretty simple to me.
But yeah, those Democrats just won't let TSA get paid.
It's like the common narrative right now.
And you know what?
You can look at every single one of the red light holy crap guys,
whatever you want to call them.
Benny Johnson or whatever, you know, or Nick's or guess what?
Every one of them have made that point.
Oh, the Democrats, TSA, they won't let me.
Why? Because that they're, I'm not even sure if it's that they have
some kind of like a website they check or somebody's texting them
what to say or they just look at each other and share the same thing.
I honestly don't know.
It's equally embarrassing.
However you want to look at it to me, it's just about whether you're honest
and you can see this now into the Iran point.
And it's the same thing that's important to hear.
We have a few more other dishonest points to get to.
But from the Iran perspective, but it's important to think about that.
Like if they're willing to be so shockingly dishonest,
just knowing that you can look and see that they're lying with something
so small in the context of what's going on in the world.
I mean, you need to consider what they're willing to lie about in a context
of what we're dealing with in this conversation.
The Iran regime change effort.
Now, Max Blumenthal pointed this out.
New York Times essentially confirmed that Israel played a role
in stimulating the violent regime change riots that left 3,000 dead in Iran.
Now that's reports.
That's what seems to be proven or rather the evidence can back up,
but it's only limited evidence.
It's not proof.
Iran can be lying about this.
But the claims of what, I mean, depending on who you listen to,
30, 40, 80, 100,000 millions, depending on what Trump said that day,
that really needs to show you who obviously they,
and every one of those claims come directly from Israeli intelligence.
That was clearly reported.
The numbers, I think it was 3,000 to 4,000 was what Iran admitted to,
and it seems to back up with what we were dealing with.
But question it, question it.
And remember, those are people we're talking about,
that even the unions called out as being masked, armed foreign elements.
And then they admitted to arming them.
So I don't know what we're even debating.
The point, though, is that the New York Times has covered more information
showing that they actually, Israel, as with before, is behind the protest movements.
So he didn't include the link,
so I include the archive for you right there.
Let's get into it.
Israel thought it could spur rebellion inside Iran.
Now what you'll find, by the way, and it says that hasn't happened.
So one of the most obvious points is that that means, guys,
even with them trying to create it,
that people of Iran don't want what they're offering.
Every time we've seen this, and every time we come back to the same point,
because Israel drives this government into place,
and most of the American people seem to not want that,
and they do it anyway, over and over and over.
But now the difference is,
it seems most Americans are becoming aware of that.
But think about this in the sense of, you know,
so thought it could spur rebellion inside of Iran.
Now, the New York Times has a total flavor to this,
one where Iran bad guy all the time.
They're killing everybody and they're murdering and they're raping.
It's just like the same kind of sentiment you get from these platforms.
Consider that, and then look for evidence,
and you'll see the same path that we're on.
The point, though, is that despite the framing of Iran bad guy
from this article, it's still undeniably showing
that Israel has been trying to create this.
And remember, look, I know people in this country especially,
tend to frame this as just Iran's, the terrorist,
terror, whatever, you can, if you come from a lens where you,
it's all one or the other good guy, bad guy,
you're not, I mean, you're not objective in the conversation.
And ultimately you will be misled.
And it's rarely that one-sided in any conversation.
So the point is, coming at it from this perspective
and thinking about what Iran is dealing with,
think of it, think of it, a random country,
you know, pick a, it's Greece, okay?
And ultimately, you have a situation like this
where Israel decides they don't like the Greek leadership
and just decides to go in there and spur unrest and arm and fund
and put their own assets inside and drive these things
and then literally start creating paid revolution.
Now, right there, do you think that's legal?
Do you think that's justified?
Whether or not you like or dislike the Greek government,
whether or not you think Greeks fund terrorism,
that's not legal.
Just in case that wasn't clear to everybody, okay?
It doesn't.
Just because we have these Cloak and Dagger movies about what the CIA does,
they're, most of those movies are showing flatly illegal things.
But we're good guys, so we do it.
It's okay.
That's the, that's the idea they want you to think.
It breaks international law.
I mean, most clandestine operations do,
if you really break it down.
It's weird that that works that way, right?
But it's always framed as like we're good,
you know, sabotage, Cloak and Dagger, assassination.
Well, these are all crimes.
Literally, there's no situation where you can just unilaterally,
Osama Bin Laden, that was a crime, literally,
because that he, if we're supposed to tell ourselves that we,
we present the evidence and we charge them with crimes,
but we all just let it, you know, because he's a bad guy,
you know, any of them like that.
Now, you may even argue that that should have worked that way
because he was just so bad.
And you may be right.
Then ask why the US government worked with him for all those years
and why the Washington, I always do this,
was an examiner, Washington Post called him a warrior on the path of peace.
That's Osama Bin Laden, until suddenly he was a bad guy,
because Osama was saying with their ally until suddenly he was the bad guy.
And that's not even to say they're not bad guys.
The point is they work with those people is the point.
But realize that they, doing what they're doing inside this country is illegal, period.
And so that should matter when you're talking about doing things for democracy
and change me, even though they still scream that word.
But when's the last time they ever actually followed through with that?
Because they don't want that.
But so think about that as we go through this, that from its core,
its origin point, what they're doing is wrong and illegal.
And they're destabilizing the very country and the very people,
the very communities that they claim they're fighting for in Syria,
in every other place they've ever done this in my experience.
It really is that simple.
President Trump's hopes that an Israeli plan
to ignite an internal uprising against Iran's theocratic government
could bring the war to a swift end have so far been dashed.
And I remember when they're talking about a theocratic government,
which simply means relating to or denoting a system of government
in which priests rule in the name of God or a God.
You realize they also have a president.
They also have a car.
The same, so the same situation exists in Israel,
despite how you want to think about it.
In fact, there's, I think tomorrow,
oh, damn, I was going to start with that by the way,
but tomorrow I'm going to get to some stuff about,
maybe depending on what else happens about the racial aspect of this
that's being manipulated by plenty of people.
Like I've shown you, the extreme Orthodox Jews in Israel
that wear full covering, blackface covers, the whole fun.
Like, Dallas Jones just shared some clip that turns out
it's from Afghanistan of a couple of kids that almost look
like it's a joke, like a costume thing.
But even if it's not, you got a couple of kids wearing full,
you know, black garb, cultural differences, agree with it or not.
The game of what he's playing is called slave, Muslim, Islam, terrorism.
It's insane what these people are trying to do.
And the point is, if you're concerned about that,
then you should be concerned no matter where it takes place,
including in Israel, which you'll never hear them called out,
including Tommy Robinson tried to use the picture of the one
happening in Israel and says, look how bad Islam is.
And he didn't even realize it was actually in Israel.
And I broke it down.
I even just showed you from the forward.com
in his Jewish platform saying, yes, those are Orthodox Jews.
So why don't we care about that?
Why don't we care about the head coverings for many
Orthodox Jewish women are forced to care?
It's the same thing.
And it's always one-sided because they're framed as the bad guy.
Now, I digress.
The point, though, is to realize that we're deciding
what's good and what's bad based on what Israel seems to want.
Within days of the war beginning, said David Barnea,
the Mossad chief, his service would likely be able
to galvanize the Iranian opposition, meaning Mossad.
So just be clear, right out of the gate,
Mossad has been doing this our entire life.
Constantly nonstop, nonstop trying to manipulate
what's happening in Iran.
So if you ever stood back and wondered why
they might do things, you might, you know, selectively stop,
you know, censor this, stop these platforms,
don't let their media come through.
Yeah, my point is I don't think censorship should happen
from a government's perspective in general
when it comes to its people.
The people should be able to access what they want,
access whatever they want,
whether it's foreign government, nonsense or not.
So that's just always my stance.
The point is you can understand why the government might go,
well, they're constantly, every day,
trying to spin lies about what we're doing
to our own people and you're going to try to stop that.
Weird exactly like these governments do here.
When they stop, press TV and whatever else,
but they're bad guys.
The one-sided perspectives in this country
seem to blow my mind sometimes,
but I don't think it's the majority.
Not for a long time now.
But so they've been in there doing it for a really long time,
igniting riots and other acts of rebellion
that could even lead to the collapse
of the Iranian government.
Totally not legal, by the way,
in case you were curious,
Dr. Barnea also presented the proposal
to senior Trump administration officials
during a visit to Washington in mid-January.
Well, that's interesting.
So that means the Mossad went to Trump in mid-January
well before this while they were in peace talks
and said, we're going to bomb the Iranian government.
We're going to go after,
we're going to create a divide and conquer situation.
We're going to regime change Iranian government.
That's our plan in January.
And then he went on to pretend
to be having talks all the way through.
Even when they bombed him in the room,
they were supposed to be discussing their proposal.
Happens every time.
This is genuinely what they do.
And I mean like design.
They plan this.
It's just the most,
there's no honor.
These people have no honor.
They have no respect for anything.
And of course,
some people now think that's okay
because bad guy,
you've fallen for that trap.
Bad guy or not,
it's about you.
It's about how you are.
If you become the bad thing,
because they're bad,
then you are the same thing.
And some people just don't care about that.
Dr. Mr. Netanyahu adopted the plan,
despite doubts about its viability
among senior American officials,
which we all told you,
they said it's not likely to do anything.
Some officials in other Israeli intelligence agencies,
both he and President Trump seem to embrace
an optimistic outlook.
So in case you missed that,
American intelligence,
and even Israeli intelligence says,
that's probably not going to work.
And he both said,
let's do it anyway.
Now, do you think that's Trump just being optimistic,
or do you think he's being misled
by whoever is in his ear?
You can decide,
but I think it's quite obvious.
Well, as Dan Bongino,
you think someone's walking his dog,
he's only walking his dog.
Well, guess what?
There's plenty of other people in the room,
and people in there were going,
that's not true.
That's not going to happen.
US intelligence,
Tulsi Gabbard.
And he listened to somebody.
So Dan Bongino's lying.
Big surprise.
Killing Iran's leaders at the outside of the conflict,
followed by a series of intelligence operations
intended to encourage regime change,
they thought,
could lead to a mass uprising
that might bring about a swift end of the war.
Now, again,
nobody believed that was what was going to happen.
Both intelligence, it seems,
at least parts of Israeli intelligence,
but specifically American intelligence,
was telling him,
if you take out the leaders,
remember the quote,
you're likely going to put more of a hard line person in there.
Now, whether that's their perspective
through their broken understanding
of what Iran's government is,
or that's the truth,
either way,
it was the opposite of what Netanyahu was telling Trump.
I don't think it's hard to miss.
He listened to Netanyahu, guys,
against American interests,
against American intelligence,
against what other parts of his American government had to say,
even against what some of the Israeli government had to say.
Killing Iran's leaders at the outside of the conflict.
So again, this was their plan.
So understand that all the time leading up from then
in between,
where they were pretending to have negotiations,
they were already planning to assassinate these people.
They were already planning
these intelligence operations,
which are currently ongoing.
So ask whether the lies about everything.
I mean, really,
the best way to look at it is everything could be an operation,
could be a deception.
That's how they see this today.
And they thought it would lead to a mass uprising.
And again, it did not, according to them.
So there's no room in which you should be thinking
that Iranian people wanted what they were selling,
just like every other time before it.
Three weeks into the war,
and Iranian uprising has not yet materialized.
The belief that,
and again, right now you're hearing the opposite.
Here's a good point, actually.
Take a second and step back,
and now think of all the people
who had the last three weeks have been telling you,
everyone's falling, Iran's coming down,
everyone's like, no, again,
it could actually be the reality.
I don't see any of the evidence to back that up,
but as an objective person,
clearly it could be falling down behind us
and we don't see it and they're lying about it.
But the point is all the people who were saying,
everyone in Iran is protesting and they all agree.
Well, that's not true.
Even if they ultimately lose, that wasn't true.
So all these major Iranian activists
who are literally lying to you
with fake pictures of massive,
they weren't either misrepresenting
what was happening or lying.
It happens every time.
So just remember which ones are doing it
if you're somewhere in the middle
and you look at these manjavis
or I forget whatever their name was
or whatever it is or Pahlavi himself,
just whole cloth lied to you
because that's what their job is.
Continuing it says,
the belief that Israel and the United States
could help instigate widespread revolt
was a foundational flaw in the preparations
for the war that spread across the Middle East.
Just casually speaking about a,
you know, multi-nation war
that spread across all wide
because they unilaterally illegally attacked Iran
based on the incorrect assumption
that by doing so that they could cause a revolution.
So they caused all the death and suffering,
all the killing of the Americans
and all the killing of the Iranians
and all the killing of the Israelis
because they thought they could just
make this happen by strength
or I guess what they think is strength.
It says instead of imploding from within,
Iran's government has dug in
and escalated the conflict.
By the way, it's a harsh way of saying
they legally responded and it's all they've done.
Striking blows and counter blows
against military bases,
cities and ships around the Persian Gulf
and against vulnerable oil and gas installations.
Right. Only, and again, I don't need,
I'm actually wondering whether any of them,
by the way, have been attacked by Iran
because I have not seen them claim
many of these ones they claim
they say, but most of these have been Israel
and even the United States.
That's not, that's a fact.
Even the U.S., Trump spoke up and said,
he's angry that Israel's bombing
these is delay and then went on to bomb two tankers.
So I mean, I don't think,
I wonder whether that's even
Trump making those decisions, quite frankly,
because all of this has hurt him
in the sense of the oil prices
and they're lying about it right now
to get the prices to go back down.
But so this shows you
that they tried to create this
at the expense of literally everybody.
Since Mr. Trump's first speech,
American officials have largely abandoned
speaking publicly about the prospects for revolt
inside Iran because it was never real
and it's not happening.
Some remain hopeful that one could materialize.
Through his rhetoric has become more,
though his rhetoric has become tempered.
Mr. Netanyahu still says
the American and Israeli air campaign
will be aided by forces on the ground.
Well, watch as that ultimately happens
and guess what guys, it already has happened.
As I've said from the beginning,
whether you want to talk about the curves
that they've armed
or their operations we already know are taking place.
This is, and that doesn't mean
official deployment of the blank ranking file,
but it is happening
and Netanyahu is very clear about that.
But it's not because he said it,
but realize if it continued,
I mean, if we get to a point
where we're just marching in,
then Netanyahu told you it would
and that's likely why it happened.
Behind the scenes, however, it continues,
Mr. Netanyahu has expressed frustration
that Mossad's promises
to foment revolt in Iran
have not materialized.
Now, I mean, that very well could be the case
and that both Netanyahu and Trump
were sort of misled.
I get the sense that this was Iran or Israel
like every time in the past
creating the construct
where Trump thought he would get his war
that would save the world
and he'd be remembered forever for the hero
is what he always wants.
That's all he seems to want, his legacy.
So, just like every time before,
Netanyahu fed him exactly what he needed to hear
to think that would be the case,
probably knowing it wasn't.
Just getting one more,
they're just another battering ram,
another U.S. presidency to throw it Iran
and get what they just, at least they're weaker now.
We'll wait till the next president, do it again.
You have to understand that this is how Israel's operated
and this is the reality when you understand
the wars the U.S. has gotten into
at the behest of Israel my entire life.
It's not even a secret anymore.
It's publicly discussed.
He's written books about it.
This is where we are.
Iran was the endpoint.
And now Lebanon's spinning off around the side of it
because he seems, I think, his last opportunity.
But realize that's not the same.
Right now, they need to frame that as all Iran, right?
Because that's how they justify it.
But watch as we get into the continuation
of Lebanon still being bombed right now,
even to the guys of pausing the war.
Well, weird how that works out.
So, we're being told that shows us then, I guess,
that Lebanon is another war of aggression
for no justification.
Yes. Yes. Welcome to the conversation.
It says, in one security meeting,
days after the war began,
the prime minister vented that Mr. Trump
might decide to end the war any day
and that massage operations had yet to bear fruit.
OK, you can't miss this.
OK, what this just said is that Trump
is being played by Netanyahu.
And what he said is, look, if we don't get this done now,
Trump could end this any day.
So, think about that with where we are.
Well, right now, Netanyahu is going to do everything he can
to manipulate the situation and to continuing to be what he wants
and at the expense, clearly, of more U.S. soldiers.
And it's right there in front of you
that he, quick, we got to do this or Trump's going to stop.
How do we not see where we're at?
In the run-up to the war,
current and former American and Israeli officials said,
Mr. Netanyahu invoked Massad's optimism
about a possibility of an Iranian uprising
to help convince Mr. Trump
that bringing about the collapse of the Iranian government
was a realistic goal.
Again, despite his own intelligence
and despite everyone around him,
other than the Israel, you know,
influence like the Stephen Miller types,
telling him that this was unlikely to be the reality,
but Netanyahu convinced him otherwise
and that it was possible.
So, we're going to engage with one of the most unpopular wars
in U.S. history, knowing it was going to be a catastrophe
because of everything we've always been talking.
I mean, everyone's been theorizing and gaming this out forever
because it's always been Israel's plan.
It's not even secret.
And a possibility of this outcome was enough to make this happen,
that has to be alarming.
Many senior American officials, as well as intelligence analysts
at the IDF and their military intelligence agency,
Eman, viewed the Israeli plan for a mass uprising
during the conflict with skepticism.
Think about that.
Even their own team didn't agree with that was possible.
U.S. military leaders told Mr. Trump
that Iranians would not come out to protest
while the United States and Israel were dropping bombs.
Gee, who could have pieced that together?
Maybe because you were bombing.
And it says, again, guys,
the point was ultimately that this was all fed to Trump
and he doesn't even realize how, you know,
one side of it is that he wouldn't realize
that it was clearly not going to come to pass.
And you should ask why that speaks to a lack of intelligence.
Or I think he's completely involved in line with the agenda.
The actual outcome, what Netanyahu wants
is exactly what Trump wants.
I don't know how to see it any other way.
I'm not trying in any way to give Trump a pass,
but that's how it seems to make them all sense right now,
that he is being completely manipulated.
And like I said in the beginning,
that does not mean he's the good guy.
His own actions have brought that.
But E.O.R., he is a diehard Zionist, a part of the plan.
I don't know.
I just, what seems to make them all sense
with where we're at right now.
U.S. military leaders told Trump that they would not come out.
Intelligence officials had assessed
that the possibility of a mass uprising,
threatening the theocratic government, was low.
Please let this sink in,
especially for those that support what he's doing.
They knew that this was the likely outcome.
An ending, a never-ending reality of war
that was going to spiral into another forever war.
And they doubted that the U.S.'s rarely attack
would ignite any kind of civil war, and they did it anyway.
So either he decided to gamble on your lives,
or he was lied to.
Now, regarding the Kurds,
it says, while many of the specifics
of Mossad's plans remain secret,
one element included supporting an invasion
by Iranian Kurd militia groups based in northern Iraq,
which, by the way, is already happening.
Now, whether or not they've been directed,
and they're there, and they have been armed,
and they have been funded, as Israel told you,
months before we got here.
Just because Trump says,
we don't want that now,
after they've already initiated it,
that could be that he genuinely didn't want it to happen
because he realized something,
realized he was being played,
or he just did it to make it seem
like he wasn't involved with that.
I don't know.
But it's yet another example of an illegal insurgency.
They're funding and arming a proxy group,
a literal proxy group.
They used them in Syria.
They've used them a lot of places,
and literally of the word used,
they dropped them the moment they don't need them,
and they never give them what they're promised.
Yet, here they are again.
It says, both the CIA and Mossad
have given arms in support to the Kurdish forces
that goes back in multiple places around the years.
The CIA had existing authorities
to support Iranian Kurdish fighters
and had provided arms in advance advice
well before the current war.
You have to understand,
that means with the intentions of doing this in Iran.
Now, the uprising has yet to come, it says.
American officials briefed on intelligence assessments
before the war, said the CIA,
evaluated a variety of possible developments
inside Iran once the conflict began.
Intelligence agencies considered a full collapse
of the Iranian government
to be a relatively unlikely outcome.
But yet, that's what we were all told.
Oh, it's so weak, it's gonna go down.
We get rid of comedians all gonna come down
because they just tell you whatever they need to say
in the moment to make you think like it's all going to plan.
It's amazing we don't know this yet,
or again that we all do,
and yet we all seem to still know
and yet look to a bunch of liars on TV.
The most likely outcome, however,
was that hard line elements of the existing government
would maintain control over the levers of power,
the report said.
Yep, and even when Trump was point blank
asked about that, he lied.
So here we are, where he was either played
or absolutely knew this wouldn't work
and was deciding to risk your lives
and your families anyway.
Mr. Barnia's predecessor at Mossad,
he's the current head of Mossad,
predecessor was Yossi Cohen,
the one that was funding Hamas and Thurcutter,
decided that trying to foment rebellion inside of Iran
was a waste of time.
This is before we got here.
And he said,
and ordered that the resources devoted to that matter
be reduced to a minimum.
During Mr. Cohen's tenure,
which ended in 2021,
Mossad calculated how many of the country's citizens
would need to participate
in protests for them to truly threaten
the Iranian government,
comparing the estimates
to the size of actual protests in 79.
Okay, one more point here on the same thing.
So what have we been told about Iran our entire lives?
Everybody hates them and it's a theater,
it's a dangerous terrorist government
that's only holding,
it's basically holding them by gunpoint
and nobody wants to be there,
everyone hates the government.
And yet, all this time,
they've been trying and trying and trying.
I mean, look, this goes back to,
well before, this is just referencing 2021,
but it goes, so all this time,
they've been in there trying to incite rebellion
and yet still they have failed.
And now we're coming to a point
to where they truly just give it its final shove
and Trump and Netanyahu go full blow
and they fail yet again,
at least so far.
How can anybody honest look at that
and go clearly the Iranian people want to revolt?
No, it's anything's possible.
One of the arguments the article tries to make is,
well, they would if they wouldn't,
basically if they go out,
they're all going to get shot by Iran.
Well, certainly possible,
wouldn't that have been factored in
if that was the case before you got here?
That wouldn't be some accidental awareness
once you're doing it.
Clearly, it's also just not the truth, guys.
I'm not saying Iran's government's not capable
of all the things we've seen,
but it's just not the reality.
You could prove it 100 different ways over,
including people we often talk to,
people that have been in the country,
people who are currently in the country.
But who cares, right?
Because Trump said,
but the reality though is how long they've been trying,
it just shows you that they're not really,
that country, the people are just not what they're saying.
It says, quote,
we wondered if we could bridge the gap,
Mr. Cohen said in 2018,
and we came to the conclusion that we could not.
It's very simple that we were trying to create unrest
and revolution.
We were trying to create that
and we just couldn't make it happen.
That is as clear as it gets,
the people were not on board.
Instead, massage strategy during that period
was to try to weaken the government
until it essentially surrendered to Israel
and American demands.
Oh, okay.
So who cares about the people?
Who cares about saving them?
We're gonna, what we always wanted was just to control.
So the effort to make them revolt
against their own government
to hide our actions is not gonna work.
So let's just go right at it.
Yep, that's it.
And it's not about freedom.
It's not about new government.
It's about control as always.
To weaken the government until it essentially surrendered.
And guess what happens in that long-term sanctions?
People starve to death.
Families die.
Babies die.
That, yep, that's the reality.
But it's worth it to them.
Just ask Madeline McCain.
It's worth it.
Using a combination of crippling economic sanctions
and operations to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists,
by the way, which is a shockingly obvious war crime,
and military leaders and sabotage nuclear facilities,
which could end up being huge explosions.
But you know, who cares?
Israel good guy, apparently.
Doesn't matter.
They can do all the terrible things.
White phosphorus, cluster munitions, gas attacks.
But it's okay when they do it
because they're fighting evil guys.
Just don't forget that.
Over the past year, as the prospect
of Israeli military action against Iran
became more likely, Israel.
Just like Rubio told us,
they were gonna attack one way or another.
So we felt that was probably the last way
they pushed Trump into it.
And that's not to say he was not willing
because he said it beforehand that he was.
But it says over the past year,
as the prospect of Israel's attack unilaterally
and illegal became more likely,
Mr. Barnia reversed Assad's approach
to voting the agency's three sources
to plans that could lead to toppling the government
to Iran.
So all he said was that over the last year,
when it seemed clear that Trump was going to be
a malleable partner to shove into this war,
well, they started funding regime change again.
And I think they always had.
It's about where they focused on the effort.
In recent months, according to officials,
the Mossad element came to believe
that Mossad could potentially begin igniting riots
around Iran.
Right.
The protests.
They want the people with the mask burning things down,
beating up cops.
Those are the riots, exactly.
After several days of intense Israeli-American airstrikes
and assassination of the leaders.
And that's the recipe to save Iranians, right?
To bomb their leaders without any concern
of what happens next,
to just create riots and burn things down
and release a bunch of extremist crazy people
who are ethnically cleansing and raping,
and like every other place they put them in,
Syria, Iraq, same thing.
Right?
Hashtag winning.
After the strikes and assassinations
of the war's earliest days,
the uprising did not come.
But Israeli officials say they have yet to give up hope.
What a lovely ending.
We're not done with all of our terrorism.
We've yet to give up hope.
We still believe we can torture these people
right into submission.
We're winning.
Quote, I think that we need boots on the ground,
it ends with,
but they've got to be Iranian boots.
Or American is the real point.
Watch.
That's what they're talking about.
I mean, there's even conversations of Israelis
on Israeli media who are saying
we need to make sure that U.S. boots
are the ones on the ground.
Watch.
Take time to look at the Israeli media.
It'll make you sick.
It's everything they don't want you to hear
proudly discussed.
Now, interestingly,
Trump has, in the midst of this,
this is today,
this is on 23rd,
Trump is in Memphis, remember?
Blames Pete Hegseth for the failure on war.
And a few other things that I think are relevant.
This just speaks to weakness.
As far as I'm concerned,
it shows you that it's the same thing he did
with Rubio in the beginning.
And oh, that was Rubio's the one that did that.
And then Rubio came out and said,
no, Trump started it.
They're just all trying to shove back and forth.
They ultimately hate each other,
as you've seen in the past.
It's just about trying to work alongside for power,
but they're trying to shove responsibility
back and forth.
That's not what leaders do.
And unfortunately, I came,
I called Pete.
I called General Kane.
I called a lot of our great people.
We have great people.
And I said, let's talk.
We got a problem in the Middle East.
We have a country known as Iran for 47...
Oh, is that what happened?
Funny how we just learned the opposite.
Funny how we just got told
that Israel basically pandered Trump
into getting into this.
But he wants to wax a tail
about how I just woke up one day
and I said, you know, Iran's bad guy.
So you know what?
I'm going to call.
What do you think, guys?
Should we just go and illegally destroy Iran for freedom?
This guy is an infant.
I mean, I don't know why we can't be honest about that.
He's got his savvy parts in some discussion,
but maybe it's just he's getting old.
I don't know.
The way that he does this is so infantile
and it's just embarrassing.
Again, because you can literally look
at what he did before this.
And it wasn't what he's saying.
He just tried to re-correct the narrative
because he knows that the blind followers
will repeat it and it becomes...
I mean, you might be...
It's worth thinking about.
Well, let's just say 90% of Americans
are aware that's not true.
But he says it.
So you get the million follower, 10 million follower,
Elon Musk types on Twitter who yell the thing.
That gets more influence
because they have more influence on the platform
than their AIs grade.
That is somehow being more realistic.
And I mean, you go forward 10 years, look back,
and I bet you it tells you that he was right.
Think about that for a second
and how they can manipulate that kind of idea.
But maybe it's not even by design.
But the reality is how far we go until one day
it's just the history is written by the winning hand, guys.
And he just embarrassingly dishonest.
Fortunately, I came...
I called Pete.
I called General Cain.
I called a lot of our great people.
We have great people.
And I said, let's talk.
We got a problem in the Middle East.
We have a country known as Iran
that for 47 years has been just a purveyor of terror.
Incorrect.
In like literally every possible way.
I mean, it's just...
We've gone over it a thousand times.
And I'll show you my interview with Robert we just did
which goes through pretty much everything they've claimed
about Iraq, about Houthis, about Hezbollah, about Hamas
and just how embarrassingly dishonest it all is.
And how quite literally, with ideologically,
you could prove that they're lying.
It doesn't even matter.
On top of the fact that they provably fund,
I mean, I can't...
It's amazing to me, like I say this every time.
You take what they claim about Iran,
even though most of it's false,
and just pretend it's all real
and compare even those false claims
to everything we can prove.
Not even the full picture,
but just we can prove the U.S. is capable of or have done
or Israel or combine.
It is in...
It doesn't even come close.
Unparalleled.
Like, it's incredible how much they've provably done in the world.
They just call freedom.
And they can just lie and lie and lie about what Iran...
And we still can't see through that.
And they're very close to having a nuclear weapon.
Also incorrect, but do we really need to do this again?
Like, this is my point.
Every day, people can't...
I mean, there are so many elements out there
from the IA to Gabbard,
their own administration,
the previous administration,
to other experts, to scientists,
other governments,
everybody,
but he can just keep saying it
and people keep pitting,
as Rubio said and Vicent said.
It's not true, guys.
The evidence doesn't back it up
is actually the more accurate way to say that.
There is no evidence whatsoever
that shows that's the case.
It could be somewhere we don't see.
The facts don't not show that.
And they just lie to you.
We can keep going and get that 50,000
up to 55 and 60 is no end.
Oh, yeah.
You know, the Dow, I guess,
because nobody cares about that.
Or we can take a stop
and make a little journey into the Middle East.
Oh, right.
Just a casual little day.
We're just going to swing in there
and destroy everything.
What he's trying to say is,
don't worry, though,
the prices are going to go up,
even though I promised you they wouldn't.
But take it on the chin for Ukraine.
Oh, I mean, excuse me,
for Israel.
Oh, I mean, excuse me, for Iran.
So getting...
And eliminate a big problem.
And Pete,
I think you were the first one to speak up.
Oh, yeah.
I don't think you did it.
Because you can't let them have
a nuclear weapon.
Yeah.
Well, they don't have it.
We all know we don't have it.
You have it in the show.
They don't have it.
Yeah, you do.
We are now having really good discussions.
They started
last night.
Oh, you thought about that for a second.
Wait a minute.
Can I lie further?
Can I stretch it further?
Well, it's not.
I'm already lying.
The night before that.
Oh, oops.
Yeah.
See, now you're a little way.
You can't...
He just can't resist, you know?
So he just argued that 48 hours ago,
they were negotiating with Iran.
Let's get into that.
That's fun.
Let's see what he's talking about.
Okay.
So let's get into the main point here.
Oh, actually, really quickly before,
we're gonna...
This is...
We're gonna get into the argument of...
Oh, you know what?
I did include a few of those things.
This is all part of the same conversation,
but you'll see why it all relates.
We're gonna get into the main point of
his allegations.
Here's what it's article.
Trump says Iran wants to make a deal,
but Iran claims that never happened.
So first, this is just...
In the lies.
I mean, Trump just blatantly lied
about what happened like they do every single day.
For just a carryover point,
understand how willing they are
to just blatantly lie to you.
Trump and Biden will...
Trump literally just referenced
beheaded babies like a week ago.
In regard to October 7th,
it is one of the most easily proven...
Easily demonstrated...
I hate the word debunked this way to use today.
It is dishonest.
It's wrong. It's false.
It's easily proven.
Israeli media has proven that.
The people involved with the claim
have walked it back.
And yet here they are still
making these allegations.
Appointed, this is from Simon Majin
saying the defense editor at the Economist,
which was one of the ones pushing that at the time,
like a lot of them were,
has now admitted the beheaded baby story
that he promoted
and which was widely used to justify
Israel's atrocities against Palestine
was fraudulent.
And, guys, we don't need him to say that.
We knew long before he figured this out yesterday.
I mean, this is my point is,
do you really think that he just
foutstumbled into this yesterday
as when he posted it?
Suddenly I just realized that was wrong?
No, there's something shifting here.
These people are either trying to gain more clout
by admitting they were wrong.
I don't know.
But I guess it's possible he just stumbled into it.
But it's not like there was a new story.
The evidence has been out there for...
What?
I don't know.
Almost two years.
But just the point to take is that
even he is now going,
yeah, yeah, that was false.
Even though Trump just said it,
and as this guy rightly points out,
it's called atrocity propaganda.
It's used by colonizers in every conflict
they provoke to portray themselves as victims
and justify their subsequent aggression.
It's true.
I mean, this is dehumanization 101.
It's what they do.
But realize they lie to you as a matter of policy.
So here's Joe Kent.
And this is, I believe,
on the Megyn Kelly show of all places.
But he's simply saying,
Afshan Ratsani is the one sharing it,
and I'll play this clip as well.
As we know,
as we just heard from the New York Times in a way,
but we already know all of this.
All 18, the intelligence community,
was clear that there was no imminent threat,
and Trump listened to Netanyahu.
How was that America first?
Intelligence agencies do agree on anything.
It's very challenging.
It is a very laborious
and sometimes a very intense process of coordination
and happy people argue their cases.
When you have the 18 intelligence agencies saying
without a doubt that Iran
is not working towards a nuclear weapon,
and the Defense Intelligence Agency
doing battle damage assessment,
which is what the DIA really specializes in,
is having these military-based assessments,
that's what I'm going to go with.
Being influenced by the IAEA
or by another government, Israel in this case,
saying like, oh no,
even though you conducted midnight hammer
and your 18 intelligence agencies
say that their nuclear capability is gone,
they're still somehow digging out from the rubble,
and they're going to be able to assemble 10 bombs
in two weeks.
Again, sorry, I'm going with what the Director
of National Intelligence said,
and she's saying that based on the research
and the analysis and the rigorous debate
of 18 intelligence agencies.
But we don't even need that,
because as we know,
as we watch the show
or care to look at the evidence
that we're all referencing,
they destroyed their enrichment facility.
They did not obliterate their nuclear capabilities.
If you want to use that point
to argue they might have it,
recognize their enrichment facility was demolished.
That's publicly acknowledged,
and the point is that means even if they had them,
they wouldn't be able to enrich it.
That's on top of the fact
that they aren't even going in that direction
as Whitcoff lied about
and the International Atomic Energy Agency's
Director General said at the end of last year
that 60% of 265,
465 kilograms was within their safeguard.
And that's what he lied about.
He says they're bragging about 60%,
they can make 10 bonds.
That's where that all comes from.
Whitcoff's brazen lie
based on nothing but whole cloth lies.
What do you think is driving that?
You think Whitcoff just unilaterally decides
to make this happen for his own devious?
No, guys, that's Israel.
That's what drove it from the beginning.
Trump was influenced by it.
Clearly Jared Kushner and Whitcoff
who were both called Israeli assets
by other diplomats involved
and even the foreign minister of Oman
came out the day before they started
and said they were willing to give up
their entire enrichment,
everything they had.
All the enrichment that they had,
that 465, they were going to give it up
and Israel bombed that night.
You just can't miss this.
It's so obvious.
Now, he also shows this link in here
showing you that their strategy of Iran.
Iranians have only been very methodical
and actually judicious in their escalation.
They have actually only escalated,
like basically they've been responding
to their attacks.
And you can look for yourself.
It's not hard to see.
I think they're doing this the right way.
They're showing the world
they're not what they've always claimed they were.
I think that's always been obvious,
if you care to look.
You have said and you've warned us all
since the 12-day war, actually,
that this war was coming.
Just how would you characterize Iran's
escalation right now,
the escalation strategy?
Because I suppose that's what everyone's
thinking about right now.
Yeah.
Well, I would actually, and again,
as no supporter of the regime in Iran,
I would tell you that the Iranians
have been very methodical
and actually judicious in the escalation.
They have not actually escalated on their own.
They have always counterpunched.
So the Americans and Israelis,
as you noted,
we initiated this fight on February 28th
against the best judgment of the year.
They did.
We don't speak like we're the government
because we're not.
Now, we always do.
I do it in passing sometimes by accident,
but important to think about.
We are not that they did that.
They do not.
In fact, let's be real.
They don't represent us.
They're supposed to.
They do not.
U.S. military joint chiefs of staff.
The president wanted to do this
because he was convinced
this would be 72 hours to 96 hours,
one and done.
Yeah.
And where do you think that came from?
His own intelligence told him the opposite.
It's not hard to see.
Like, I really want this to be clear to people, guys.
There's not even debate here.
His intelligence community said,
one, there's no nuclear bomb.
Two, there's no element of threat.
Three, that if you do this,
you will not topple the regime.
Some clearly something other than U.S.
interest and U.S. intelligence told him that.
I'm sure you could piece that together.
And then the people of Iran would overthrow
the benighted regime.
That did not happen.
And now here we are three weeks in
with no end in sight.
The Iranians have escalated
only after we or the Israelis have.
You notice they didn't start attacking
things like the oil refineries
until after they really started getting
hit in those target areas in Iran.
And so what you're seeing is a very
graduated escalation program
by the Iranian military.
Clearly they have gamed this out for a long time.
This has clearly been the game plan
from the very beginning
because the Iranians studied
the American and Israeli ways of war
and they knew decapitation strikes
would be coming in.
So they decentralized their regime.
They decentralized command and control
capabilities.
They went underground like Mao did
during the Chinese Civil War
or the North Vietnamese did
during the Vietnam War.
Okay.
And then they caution around and say
terror tunnels and whatever else.
Right.
Even as they've driven them into these
responses and it's objectively not
what we're actually talking about
is Heng Seth just tried to argue
that they're dumping all the money
into their terror tunnels and their
weapons.
And it's just not even close to the
reality especially since the very
oil money references do that
is the same oil they've been
sanctioned aggressively.
It's just so I don't think I don't
think Heng Seth even knows what he's
talking about in that regard but
either way.
They very adeptly created an
insurgency a high end insurgency
profile for fighting the Americans
and the Israelis and now they're
tethering it to economic attacks
which is brilliant because they know
that the Americans and Israelis
are far more and the Arab states
are far more exposed to economic
disruptions in the aggregate than
are the Iranians who have been
sanctioned and you know contained
for so long it doesn't affect them
the same way.
Exactly.
This is really interesting right
because essentially you could
argue this planned that they plan
this but essentially the situation
that the US government Israel put
them in is now why they're
essentially insulated from the
issue that that's being created
by the US and Israel.
It's interesting and again doesn't
that just show a staggering lack
of planning of the US and Israel
interest or as I think is more
likely that Israel didn't even care
that they're using they're throwing
the US government in Iran and just
they're going to get whatever they
can from it.
That's that's how I'm starting to
feel this is gone but on the lies
before we keep going forward just to
see some of this stuff.
Pete Hicks says bombastic claims
of record-breaking strikes in Iran
exposed as bogus by military data
but it's a small point though
but we all know they do it but
just think about this that you have
to stand up and be like this is
the like this is very Trump style.
You bomb then it's the most
aggressive most you know
we did more bombing than any bombing
thing that ever bombed in a history
of bombs it's always how we talk
it's always how we frame things.
I don't know why it shows weakness
to me you don't need to pound your
especially when you're clearly more
military militarily powerful than
most but they're just making things
up right now on top of that this
one just makes me sick.
Think about doing this knowing that
that family is going to see this.
Remember in the beginning when
they pointed to the people that were
killed I get the few they admitted
to as they hide the fact that
Americans have died.
Father of service member who was
killed in Iran war excuse me and
killed in Iran war said he never told
Pete Hegseth to finish the job.
I mean think about what a sick person
that is now again you could argue
that he was lied to maybe his own
staff gave him that from somebody
else and was convinced that was real.
I don't know I can see that
happening because these people are
just being played everywhere
but in either way guys I mean
all he has more specifically if he
just lied about that to make it
look like the people supported
they came out and said no we did not
and they used them that means they
used the soldier they're using the
family makes me sick.
Oh and then just speaking on you know
I guess you know looks to me like
one of the more Israeli assets in
the US government so a little bit
frustrated it's not going the way he
wanted it to.
Here's Stephen Miller at the
recent discussion with Trump.
He is not happy with Trump I mean
of course it could be something
else but look at that face guys
I'm telling you I'm this guy right
here this guy gives me more
villain vibes and it's just a
personal feeling right that's
maybe he's the best guy in the world
for all I know I doubt it but
he gives me more of a villain vibe
than even somebody like Klaus Schwab.
There's just something off about
this person completely my opinion
and I just I feel like I have a
good sense of these things in my
life but that's for nobody other
than me you should never just take
my personal feeling about anybody
but it's interesting though but
here he is listening to Trump talk
about the Iran war.
I don't know how else you can see
that is literally no one's talking
to him he's sitting around he's
listening to Trump talk
and that's what he does
and of course as they frame it which
is kind of funny to me
this is the Tennessee Holler says
Memphis ABC catches deep sigh from
Stephen Miller as Trump peddles
his ever-changing justification
about Iran now I doubt I doubt that's
what he you know who knows but
I do think it's important to
recognize that this person has been
viciously trying to drive some of
the worst agendas this country's
ever seen and I don't even mean
what you may think he's doing I mean
what he's actually doing around
what you may actually want and this
man is just not on your side guys
I don't know why people can't see
that now getting into the larger
point the pretty much the rest of
the show is the main point here
this is just and this why I want
to include right here was just
understand what this what Israel
is still doing and what they're
capable of and that right now the
U.S. government is being
shoved into this or tricked into it
by something that is doing this
as Glenn points out now we're going
to I'm not going to get into an
explicit in depth today but Lebanon
is exploding like it's always been
going on it's been going on well
before the Iran part has started
but they're just bombing just
bombing homes and literally
telling you they're going to be
bombing homes and it doesn't even
blip on the U.S. media
here's Glenn Greenwald citing
Sarah Wilkinson saying CNN says
the Israelis are dropping huge
bombs on residential areas in East
Iran leaving entire private blocks
blown up no I don't take CNN's word
face value that's not what we're
referencing in fact I'm going to show
you the articles written by Israeli
media that are telling you they're
going to do that directly from the
mouth of the U.S. of the Israeli
government so for those that were
already dismissing this because CNN
know you're the problem in the
room the point though is that this
is what they've done every single
war I've ever seen them involved
in and if you don't know that
then you weren't paying attention
look at what they've been doing
publicly whatever you think the
narrative is hundreds of thousands
of hospitals and schools and human
shields everything they claim the
other side would do that they did
not as Glenn writes oh wow I can't
believe this targeting civilians
with bombs and death is so out of
character for the Israelis he's
being facetious case you didn't catch
that Sean King cites Reuters exclusive
patriot missile involved in Iran
blast you know one of the
comp many of the conversations being
just like just assumed that it's
Iran bombing all of the allies
well guess what it's not how this is
working and I'm this with this will
actually I'll bring this to the end
this will tie in with some of the
later parts of whether I think the
Israeli government is trying to trick
or or continue to manipulate the U.S.
government to taking further action
that we already saw them of the
drones that Israel and the U.S.
government were able to use that
mimic Iran drones and the reality
of that means these bombings could
be anybody doesn't mean we should
assume Iran's not capable we know
that they're doing some of these
things but you should consider
whether some of the more extreme
actions might be something they would
think is not strategically smart
and only group in this three-way
dynamic right now that seems to take
strategy or or I mean human human
humanitarian rights or whatever you
want to talk about as much as you
may not think that if you're blinded
by U.S. politics the only one that
seems to care about those things
right now but patriot missile
involved in that they run blast
likely U.S. operated out analysis
fines Sean King writes now we know
the deadliest missile to hit the
country of Iran
definitely came from the United
States it killed dozens of
citizens in their sleep the U.S.
is slaughtering people and making
enemies all over the region I
wouldn't say definitely but I
think that's what the evidence
shows so these are not mean all
around this conversation you're
seeing things like this happen
whether it's oil locations or
you know things that I think I
want us to wonder ask whether or
not this is about trying to
drive action we'll come back to
that Gaza model Netanyahu
cats both Israeli government
entities instruct IDF to strike
bridges homes southern Lebanon
this is what we're being told this
is what they're publicly announcing
you're not going to hear this
anywhere in the western media
they literally call the Gaza
model guys exactly what they
pretend they did not do in Gaza
they're bombing civilian locations
this is what they call mowing the
lawn it's amazing we can't be they
write these things down we still
can't be honest about it we all know
it's about choosing to say it out
loud despite what the screaming
idiots in the room say
despite what the media everywhere
lies about it's obvious
stop playing the games
they're bombing civilians because
that's what they do
here's herettes the leading Israeli
newspaper quote like we did in
Gaza Israeli defense minister says
IDF ordered to flatten homes in
Lebanese border villages but let's
keep debating like let's keep you
know it just kills me that we
have to pretend like this is not
obvious this is what they've
always done my entire life
Kud's news network points to
something you might have seen
already miss and I saw this
myself before it was deleted
it was in Hebrew that's usually
how they slide by in these
conversations because they
most people don't see it
and I'm not just about Hebrew
in the specific conversation of
the Israelis writing in Hebrew
that happens often is my point
and Israeli academic or at
Perlov posted a tweet in Hebrew
later deleted it in which she
argued that confronting Iran
requires a harsh religious
approach literally targeting
Iranian children
shouldn't surprise you
citing biblical references to
killing of newborns you know
Amalek the whole thing
she claims similar tactics were
previously applied in Gaza
we know that's the truth
where over 14,000 children were
killed according to UN statistics
it's much more than that
and suggested applying the same
model in Iran and Lebanon
she also stated that instead of
targeting power stations
if top Iranian visuals cannot be
reached their children should be
killed
and this got a lot of reach
no one's removed from her job
not that I even think they should
regardless of how disgusting your
statement is I don't believe
people should be
you know free speech
I believe in it regardless
about disgusting she is for saying
it
the point is that in this country
if somebody had said this same
thing about in Israeli
which we would rightly also say
you're a horrifyingly disgusting
person
they would be stoned
it's hard and feathered
they'd be fired from their job
you damn will know it
even people that simply say
Israel's committing crimes
getting fired from the job in
this country
but this kind of casual
genocidal mania
is totally okay when it happens in
Israel
we're thinking about
and that's because of the government
now Amir also points out
according to haritz.com
IDF strikes over a hundred
medical facilities in Lebanon
kills 40 medical workers
just another casual Monday
or whatever day it was
this is the reality guys
one bombed hospital
might be a horrible mistake
Amir writes
two bombed hospitals
are undeniably crimes against
humanity
more than a hundred bombed hospitals
in the work
is the work of the most effective
and barbaric terrorist organization
the world has ever seen
that is where we are
do you want to pretend
Iran's a terrorist organization
go for it
they're a government
probably not that far off
but if you cannot see the difference
between what they're alleging
Iran is doing
and what Israel is publicly doing
to everyone it can
I don't know what you're looking at
Marwa Osman points out
and this kills me
because they're just using
a very expensive munition
just to kill one person
because hate I would argue
Israeli army used an icebreaker
missile
but which by the way
the U.S. government
and rest funds
in almost every possible way
everything they're doing
we're dumping billions
and billions in their hands
so they can waste
a two million dollar missile
to kill one person
walking by themselves
completely unarmed
does video source
the Israeli army
no problem
as long as American taxpayers
are footing the bill
just just a random person
in Lebanon
again if you don't understand
how common this is
I don't know what you're watching
there's no justification for this
Zachary Foster
Israel has killed
a Palestinian child
every hour for two years straight
and this is again
with the U.N.
this is the estimation
based on what the
there's still rubble everywhere
because they can't even move it
because they removed
the ability to do so
20,000 children killed
in 23 months of war
more than one child
every hour
Netanyahu comes out and says
anyone needs an explanation
of why Iran is the enemy
of civilization
as the enemy
and the danger to the entire world
you got it in the last 48 hours
oh yeah yeah
that was when they responded
to bombings
right
or bombed locations
that were literally military targets
like for example
in Tel Aviv
as even John Kierke
I always want to say Kierkegaard
not not the former CIA American guy
but the former military IDF
member John something
I forget his last name
who was on Pierce Morgan
and publicly admitted it
even though we know it
Tel Aviv is literally a human shield dynamic
they built their base
underneath the most central
civilian location in their country
now I would so argue that if I
that Iran
if I was any of these groups
I would not
that's not something that I would fall to
that you know
you could argue maybe I understand
the way war works
maybe you're right
the end of the day
they did anyway
and you and I disagree with that
but you can understand why
especially since it's quite literally
by law
a military target
according to what they are doing
and what the
the law reality is
except I would argue
if they hadn't done
what they've been doing
everywhere
Gaza, Lebanon, Iran
that they Iran
likely would not have done that
why
because they'd be civilians there
and they haven't done that
anywhere else
until they were pushed
in these locations
and then I'm talking about
specific military targets
that happen to have civilians
or military personnel
and so on
the reality is guys
let's just even say
like I said before
say that they did exactly
what he just said
how are we going to pretend
like that is the villain
with what the Israeli
U.S. governments are doing
every single day around the world
the point would be
they would both be that
but that's not where we are
is it
TRT world
Israeli soldiers torture
a one-year-old child in Gaza
including burning his leg
with a cigarette
and inserting a nail
into his leg
according to report
to pressure his father
to make confessions
now this comes from one
is a Palestinian journalist
in Gaza
so take it for what you will
that's to me
that's just as valid
as any other journalist
the fact is for some people
that means fake
because I'm blind to anything
other than Israeli media
but the point
is that more has come out
more evidence has been developed
and at the end of the day
if you don't think
they're capable of this
you have not been paying attention
now knowing that this is what
we're actually dealing with
and that's a
0.01% of what I could have
shown you just from today
here's what Trump came out
and said on the 21st
if Iran doesn't fully open
without threat
the straight of promos
now that's why he said
fully by the way
because they've been lying about that
the entire time
as I've been telling you
which you all know
it's you have eyes
you could have told
but note how all of the corporate
media
and all of the usual
idiot suspects
and mainstream alternative
have been telling you
it's been closed
because they pair it
what they're told guys
it's been open
the entire time
it's been restricted
as Iran quite literally
pointed out
to Zionists only
and really it's just
the US government
and their allies
and what they're doing
now they
as far as I can tell
as I continue to show everybody
continued to go through
now here's warships
which I find interesting
by the way
before I continue
all the way over here
you have a USS ship
and then
oh they moved down here
ah they moved
and refresh it
oh it did
okay that's quick
there were some down here
I thought that was interesting
seeing as how they're
essentially blocking
the bottom end of straight
but you got two US ships here
and USS Michael
on the inside up there
now let's get to
all ships
just to show you
because you haven't seen it
that it's
as of right now
clearly open
lots of traffic
but is being restricted
to mainly US and Israel
which is causing them
tremendous problems
and they want the world
to think that it's
their problems
but it's not
Iran played this very well
and so that's why they tried
to make you think
they was closed
because they wanted
the rest of the world
to think they had to act
because that being closed
for the world
would be a huge problem
but it's only a huge problem
for the US and Israel
largely right now
and that's why this
tact has worked very well
for them
but so it says
if you don't open fully
without threat
and straight up removes
within 48 hours
for this exact
point in time
which I laugh
because he's done this
like six times
and he's all bluster
and the way
that does not mean
he's not capable
you damn well know
he's capable of saying
that and bombing
within one hour
it's the same thing
Israel does
the point though
is he often blusters
with no follow through
I've seen it countless times
doing exactly this
with Venezuela
with plenty of examples
but look
I mean same thing
look at how it ended up
right
so you could argue
the point is just to realize
that there's a lot of things
like this that are just kind
of weakness
of displays of weakness
and don't always mean
like I said
just strength
or military power
but more of a weakness of
you know
you know what I mean
plenty of other types
of weakness
somebody has to scream
they're powerful
or constantly threaten
everybody to get
what they want
is not really that strong
United States of America
will hit
and obliterate
their various power plants
which by the way
are crimes
this is my same point
that's a crime
if Iran doesn't
it's a crime
these are not military targets
you don't just get to go
but they use it
for military things
there there is civilian
infrastructure
and then there is
military targets
that's not like they care
any of them by the way
that's the whole point
but recognize
that him doing that
by setting this standard
basically saying
I'm threatening a war crime
if you don't capitulate
and doing something
that is not a crime
by the way
starting with the biggest one
first right
so what that means
is hurting civilians
we will attack
your civilian population
with your energy
like they always do
Glenn says
liberating the Iranian people
by bombing their oil refineries
poisoning their air
destroying their fresh water supplies
exploding their elementary schools
and now obliterating their power plants
who wouldn't be grateful for this
this is how stupid this is
is anybody even still pretending
like that's what it was about
no no they've gotten rid of this whole
where they've moved away
from saving Iran
because nobody in that country
wants their saving
right
so they've just moved into power
because bad guy terrorism
nukes or whatever
or whatever whichever one you want to take
it's not working
because remember guys
Iranian or Americans
didn't want this in the first place
not Republicans
not Democrats
at least out of the government
all of the government wants this
this is a point that you need to hear
I wasn't even aware of this
until I looked this up
and this is correct
TMT
I'm not familiar with
give them a follow for this
the Iranian Foreign Minister addressing the world
now honestly I'm not even sure if he said this
the point for me is just that this is real
this is an accurate point
that I was blown away
to understand how much this frames
though the way everything works
in a different way
Iranian Foreign Minister addressing the world
says let me get this one thing straight
or at least just this is the sentiment
Egypt charges
hundreds of thousand dollars
per transit through the Suez Canal
large container ships of tankers
they claim as exceeds a million dollars
I did look into it
it is very expensive
Panama charges hundreds of thousands of dollars
per transit
Turkey charges for the
what is it?
Bosphorus Strait
Canada charges for the St.
Loris Seaway
can you see where this is going
the United States charges
for ships to pass through the St.
Loris Seaway
Iran however
has refused to collect these
for the Strait of Hormuz
for decades
they made it free
despite the defamation
the sanctions
the isolation
and yet you want me to believe
he writes that Iran is the bad guy here
they very well could be
the point though
is think about how different that is
how are we going to pretend
that they're the monster terrorist
pirate that's been
holding the world hostage
with the Strait of Hormuz
when they're not even charging anybody
when everybody else is
I mean it just seems so stupid to me
and now for the first time
in a long time
they're stepping in to try to stop
some flow because of the way
that they're being manipulated
and that makes them the one and the wrong
don't you find that crazy
like these are things like
how do we not all know that
maybe you guys do
I hadn't heard that before
and it's all because these little
select facts they
it's important
and it shows you
the real picture
I would argue
and that again
does not mean good guy
bad guy guys
now
shadow of Ezra points out
what Mark Levin and Maria Bartolomo
said Bart Bartolomo
how do you say that
Bartiromo
I thought it was Bartolomo
no anyway
talking basically
getting all excited
about taking the oil
which is always how this goes
I mean look
even if this was everything they said
let's say they're all terrorists
and they're getting the bad guys
out of the way
why is it every time
and I mean I don't you know
the answer to this
that they feel it's somehow the
like you can almost see the excitement
we're gonna get the way
we get influenced over the oil
why
why would they even remotely be the case
why did you just all of a sudden
just steal from Venezuela
the moment you drove
because you do every single time
is that what Venezuelans want
no does that benefit
feels well
Venezuelans
no it does not
what it does
benefits the corporations
that are around Trump
and the people that profit from his regime
J
it does not help the people
they claim they're trying to save
oh and let's just even say
let's move that point aside
entirely let's just even say it does
is it legal
is it against the law
or is it within the law
for the US government to
regime change a country
and alleged to put somebody
now in power
who allegedly runs the country
and then just take what they want afterward
no it is not
don't think that should be hard to wrap your mind around
but this is what they do every single time
because they go
we're the good guys
and we're trying to save the world
by raping and stealing and torturing
and collapsing countries
and assassinating people
and you know
shoving star
yeah I used to go off forever
it's just insane
the the lies we tell ourselves
within the mainstream community
I'll play this first
then I'll read what Daniel says here
this enemy is defeated
and there's some level of change in the government
oh in case you didn't catch on
it's there they want already
it's over
they're defeated
and said don't we win
you know
now frankly I think that there's more to the statement
but
you've seen that already
Trump has already claimed they won
but there's more to do
Israel came out and said
we want already
but we're not done with everything yet
you wouldn't say that
unless you thought you needed to
I mean really
if you just to me
that's one of the largest reasons
why I sense weakness in this
which would not suggest
that they're about to win this tomorrow
which we'll get into with this
the next argument
for a minute
pray to god
we would have a lot of say
about that oil
wouldn't we
just like we have a lot of say
about the oil in Venezuela no
why yeah we
why
what legal reality is there
that says the U.S. government
can say anything about
what Venezuelans government
does with their oil
now you can argue
that you could simply suggest things
and their benefit
and they could take their own actions
but let's not be silly guys
we know that's not what's happening
didn't happen in Iraq
didn't happen in Syria
didn't happen anywhere
I can still show you the clips
of them driving the oil
out of Syria
in those U.S. tankers
I showed it then
they got the same
lying people that said
that's not real you're a liar
it is and it was
just like every other one of them
we'll have a lot of say
about that oil for sure
but let's not forget
the fact that the United States
is an independent
oil and gas exporter
and that's also really important
to remember
because that's part of
this president's agenda
oh okay case you didn't catch on
we just shifted into an advertisement
guess what
Trump's the greatest
and this is what we're going to do forever
okay cool
what does that have to do
at the point
it's just funny
it's we're doing so great
and guess what
when we steal Iran's oil
to tap into the capacity of America
and when you're talking about
all that oil
coming on to the market
and all that gas
coming into the market
legally
simple supply and demand
oil prices and gas prices
will go down
okay so
and justify the means
we'll rob steel and torture
but your gas price will go down
promises kept says Donald Trump
to cares if we weasel through
13 different agendas
and everything else fell apart
but with the end
oh it went down about half a cent
it went up thousands of dollars
came back down
I'm just kind of being facetious
but realize
why does that make sense to anybody
so you get some cheaper gas
so it's okay to ignore
that we're just ruining places
around the world
the stealing and
it's just it's wrong guys
and maybe that doesn't matter to you
that's fine
we can you can
I don't care
I'm like Stephen Miller
take what I want
because we're strong
well then you're a terrible person
that's the reality
we can disagree
but let's own what we are
if we want to
if you want to go out and do that
then then
don't pretend you care about the constitution
don't pretend you care about the law
or your rights
or anything else you talk about
just be honest
that we won't we want
no matter what
shut up
and I'll okay
hey fair enough
that's your argument
it's not what we're doing though
so he says
do you realize what Maria
is saying here
and Mark Levin
they seem to be revealing
in an imperial America
revealing
reveling excuse me
in an imperial America
seizing the oil
from Venezuela by force
it's exactly the point
and they imagine
they're going to steal it from Iran
and as well
and then use it to leverage against China
now realize
this is what they're genuinely trying to change
not just one side of the other
but all of them
they're driving us to a point
to where we're just more comfortable
with imperialism
with authoritarianism
with CEO one countries
that do what's right for us
no matter what our rights
you know
that's that's what they want
because that leads to a place
where eventually they just go
what was that again
constitution
sit down
that's that's
what they're already doing
but they're driving us to a place
to where they just go
this is what's best for us
is it
has it worked out
they told us
Iraq was best for us too
but of course Lauren
Lauren with C points out
with ski excuse me
points out you know
the two weeks to flatten the curve
the same game
or or take it on the chin
for Ukraine
they all made fun of
and rightly so
well here's the republican version of that
is the oil prices
people just need to stop panicking
it's worth it
to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon
those are the same prices
they swore would never go up
because Trump's
promises caps
and he's winning
and then it does
well shut up
it's because we need to
that's typical
left and right
so if I have to pay
a little bit more for gas
I'll do
pay the price
semi
in order to have long-term stability
the disruptions in the global markets
are real
and may be painful
but the long-term benefits again
are incalculable
there may be some sacrifices
to be made at the pump
on a temporary basis
I'm willing to pay 30 percent
or 30 cents more at the pump
to make sure that
Iran does not have a nuclear weapon
to win
you know the same claim
despite them each having
a different claim for the most part
that's not true
when you can all prove that
in life you gotta suffer
short-term pain
for the long-term gain
for short-term pain
for long-term gain
freedom is not free
Americans
he literally just said freedom is not free
America
they're gonna have to make some sacrifices
this is short-term
and I'm asking you
to just trust the man
okay trust the system
let him call
yeah did you
did you miss that one guys
hashtag trust the plan
it's coming back
so what he just said
he literally just said that
just trust the man plan
man man plan
with the plan
here we are
I can't believe we're actually
freedom isn't free
I mean we're just going back
to like square one
like the oldest
we're most ridiculous
most blatant
apparently they don't know
what else to do
so Trump says
the state of Hormuz
will be under joint control
maybe maybe him
maybe the new Ayatollah
but yeah see same thing
apparently we're just
seasoned control things
we're not even thinking
about the reality of legality
because that's who they are
thank you
what about the state of Hormuz
who's gonna be in control of that
that'll be opened very soon
if this works
how soon
well it's open now
just in case you're confused
and who's in control of it
will Aran still be able to control the flow of oil
be jointly controlled
by whom
maybe me
you want the United States to be in control of this
me and the Ayatollah
whoever the Ayatollah is
yeah Trump for life
apparently
emperor for life
for the peace
maybe be forever
like this is not a secret
that he's trying to create systems
like this
that end up keeping power in his hands
well beyond the presidency
that's not even a secret guys
I mean these are very clear
he is emperor for life
or whatever you want to call it
chairman for life
of the board of peace
that's his statement
that's what you can look up for yourself
Jared Kushner
Whitcoff
Tony Blair for crying out loud
now this may not relate
we're thinking about though
maybe me
me and the Ayatollah
whoever the Ayatollah is
whoever the next Ayatollah
yeah you know the guy
is real sure
there'll also be a form of a
a very serious form of regime change
now in all fairness
everybody's been killed from
regime change
didn't we don't want regime change
how dare you guys keep talking about regime change
it's a form of regime change
this is why people laugh at this
because yesterday's argument
while you're wrong
becomes today's statement of fact
and yet you can go back and go
but he just said yesterday
that's not the case
and the people that don't want to hear it
don't want to hear it
doesn't matter
I argue most are aware
the regime
they're really starting off
there's automatically a regime change
but we're dealing with some people
that I find to be very reasonable
very okay here we get into the point
oh he's dealing with people
okay well that's being denied
and we'll go through all of this
so the real question to start
is whether he's actually talking to somebody
is it an Iranian
is it isn't Israeli on the phone
pretending to be Iranian
is it an Iranian who is not actually
working for the Iranian government
or is it an Iranian government element
that's bucking the Iranian government's stance
all those are possible
it's solid
the people within know who they are
they're very respected
and maybe one of them will be
exactly what we're looking for
look at Venezuela
by the way would mean the U.S. government
gets to handpick
who they claim is the democratic leader of Iran
worth laughing about how dumb that statement is
but that's what they put out
the Shah is the prince
the crown prince of democracy
they don't even try anymore
oh well that's working
we are doing so well in Venezuela with oil
and with the relationship
between the president-elect and us
yes yes that's it
that's all that matters
right delcy who we handpicked and put there
despite her being a part of it
who seems to be the one who allowed this all to come down
was you know speaking out about standing up
and then just count
and hear access to our oil
exactly like I said
how it ended up would show us a lot
no I can't speak to whether
delcy rodriguez was knowingly part of this
it could say like I said before
it could be that she thought
you know that if she didn't
they would just do what they always do
destroy everything and hurt all their people
and she maybe even her maduro was like
look just they're gonna get this
we've already realized they're gonna come take me
so just capitulate
otherwise they'll destroy everything
I mean look you have to be able to see
despite the stupid narratives from our government
like with every other location
Bolivia Venezuela everywhere
Iran they do not treat their people the way they claim
they exploit them like any government does
I would argue in plenty of examples
but look at what you can see on the ground
like with maduro and his people
or as I just showed you
Iranians president walking through his people
or Assad wandering through
these people were wildly mischaracterized
that doesn't mean good guy
but clearly they are not hated the way they claim
that's very important to think about
because the reality is
they've turned this over to groups
that are outselling their country
out to the highest bidder
and Venezuela will now genuinely fall into
like look at what we see in Iraq
or Syria or anywhere else guys
does that is it freedom or liberation
ask Libya how that worked out
so even though they were starving
due to US sanctions
it was not their policy
now you're turned into a situation
where you're forever in that position
is forever destabilized
and suffering and slums
as the elitists live at the top
like the Shah
before they took their country back
in Iran
and maybe we find somebody like that
yeah somebody who we can manipulate
is the point
it's what they want guys
I don't know why anybody thinks otherwise
it's there it's like
they're written down policy for crying out loud
so
before we get into the statements
that continue from there
I thought it's important to go back
a couple of days
and hear the narratives that built up
okay so this is from the March 1st
important to understand this
this is one sentence one statement
that I want you to hear
because it's important
Iran and this is just a sentiment
from their government
but I believe this was the
a professor
and the university of Iran
and basically this is a sentiment
that's been expressed by their leadership
Iran learned a hard lesson
from the June 2025 war
the so-called 12-day war
restraint
which Iran has shown it's in
my entire life
like whether you think it's for some
evil tactic
or whatever you think it is
they've shown restraint
more times than I can count
where the US and Israel would have
bombed relentlessly
and killed as many people as they could
and they show restraint
in Syria
in plenty of locations
when that was the overlap
right
it like bombing in Iraq's
Iraq's US base for example
instead of bombing the US
or in this circumstance
when the US is literally bombing
in the Iranian government
in Tehran
in Iran
the US government
not just threw it out
then they would have the legal right
to bomb the US
I hope to God that doesn't happen
the point is they chose not to
because they know how that would be
turned around
but they had the legal right
so if they were these belligerent
terrorists
you're telling me you gave them
the legal opening
to do everything you claim
they've always wanted to do
and they just didn't
because
they chose not to
so it sounds like the
straight-up removed point right
so maybe they're not what they're claiming
but the point is Iran
learned a hard lesson
restraint is interpreted as weakness
you know by bullies
by belligerents who we're talking about
the new calculus in Tehran
is likely to be a scorched earth policy
that's his opinion
I don't believe that's even what
they're demonstrating
but it's showing you that
they're not going to just try
to find some way to roll it back
because they will never let that happen
Israel's shown that that in their
entire life
I'm surprised it took this long
the decision has been made
if attacked
Iran will burn everything he said
but even then
they're proving that's not true
because they're still showing the
restraint when it comes to the
legal line
international law
but that was March 1st
then we've got also March 1st
don't forget
a U.S. official
via a mediator made it public
now this was
okay so March 1st
we saw this
it was over I think the last 24 hours
we saw this kick off
a mediator proposed
an immediate ceasefire
now right there
and you have to ask this why
it's also possible this was lied
about but I think this has been
round this has been
backed up by numerous sources
which is the idea that
immediately Donald Trump tried
at least somebody with
administration at the very least
tried to offer a ceasefire
that Iran outright rejected
this according to Israeli media
according to one source
and an American official
conveyed an even more immediate
proposal
through a mediator
apparently Italy
he suggested reaching a ceasefire
agreement today or tomorrow
Iran rejected the idea outright
showing you anything about
weakness or at the very least
determined not to
knowing that if they did
that they would just get
bombed again
every time they've shown that
so understand
what it shows right there
is either Trump being aware
he was being played
or at least
at least coming to terms
with maybe he was not
led in the right direction
and offers a ceasefire
or somebody else around him
did it
showing you that they knew
this was going in the wrong
direction and we didn't hear
about that
ceasefire
okay
so they turned it down
what she got mad about
he responded later going
no ceasefire ever
which is what he does
Trump says no deal with Iran
in Iran
without unconditional surrender
until today
right like that's how this
tends to go
never ever ever
until I decide to
now we're going to do it
IDF says it destroyed
Camille's bunker
okay
this is March 7th
so no deal
that's right now we're
claiming
Trump's claiming there in a
five-day ceasefire
Trump says no deal
without unconditional surrender
March 7th
so clearly that's not true
so here's on
March 22nd
the day before
it's yesterday
this is what the
Iranian foreign minister
had to say
now remember
this is coming off the
point where they said
look we're done dealing
with you guys
and here's why
you bombed us
last time we came to a deal
and we're in the room
community everybody
you bombed the room
we were dealing in
we all should know that
by now
that's what actually happened
here he is telling you
think the question of
talking with Americans
or negotiation with Americans
once again
would be on the table
because you know
we have a very
you know
bitter experience
of talking with Americans
we negotiated
with them last year
in last June
and they attacked us
in the middle of negotiations
and again this year
they tried to convince us
at the foreign minister
Homan
right there
was that this time is
different
they promised us
that they don't have any
intention to attack us
so
and they wanted to
resolve the Iran's nuclear
question peacefully
and to find the negotiated
solution
and we finally accepted
but again
see and right there
now you could argue
it's all lies
but hypothetically
for sake of conversation
what does that show you
right
that these people
who they want you to
believe are
villain terrorist monster
whatever extremist
continue to see a possibility
even from the groups
that we know better
what they're really doing
all over the world
and even they are like
let's find
let's just give them an
opportunity
to maybe maybe
Whitcoff and Jared Kushner
are different
nope
thus
and realize the
level of dishonesty
that these people are just
gosh you know
we're gonna find a solution
and they know
what they're already
planning to do
but just think about that
is that the representation
of what they want you to
think they are
a group that's
constantly trying to find
middle ground
constantly trying to come
to the table
and as always
that doesn't mean good guy
it just means
that's not what they're
claiming they are
at the very least
after three rounds of
negotiation
and to resolve the Iran's
nuclear question
peacefully
and to find the
negotiated solution
and we finally
accepted
but again
after three rounds of
negotiation
and after the
American team
in the negotiation
you know
said itself
that we made a
big progress
still they decided
to attack us
so I don't think
you know
talking with Americans anymore
would be
you know
an our agenda anymore
okay I don't
I just anybody
not understand that
you could
or whether
you could argue
that's not the
the truth but
logic wise
they kept trying
to deal with them
and every time
they just bombed them
anyway
I said this
with the
with the Houthis
in the past
with Saudi Arabia
why would anybody
keep dealing
with somebody who
every time is a deal
like with Gaza
the same thing
Gaza's a little different
because they didn't have
any other choice
they're
they're literally
in an open-air prison
they have only one group
to deal with that point
and so they kept
at least trying
and they played them
multiple times
by accepting things
they knew they weren't
ready to give
and then once they
accepted
they bombed them back
anyway
how many times
did we see
Blinken come out
and go it's up to them
even though we just
saw them accept
or the same thing
afterward with
you know
the US government
is the same point
either way
so this is obvious
as Kyle here says
told you
Trump's signature move
and I agree with this
regardless of
whether Kyle's partisan
which he is
Trump's signature move
is in fake negotiations
leading to murder
he did it with Salimani
correct
I've said every time
he that was the
authorization of
use of military force
they argued
they had legal right
to maneuver in Iraq
if there was
destabilizing factors
so they literally
and this is the way
I interpret this
but this was the current
reality of the legalities
invite him
under the guise
of diplomacy in Iraq
he lands in Iraq
and they bombed him
the minute he lands in Iraq
because I argued
they thought that would
give them legal cover
but either way
they murdered him
under the guise of diplomacy
and Salimani guys
is probably the least
terroristic of all the ones
are discussing
he was a very highly
respected person
in the conversation
as always
that is not good guy
I'm not going to speak
to the moral reality
of somebody
especially not somebody
who's no longer here
but it is not what
they claimed
and the guy was
very highly respected
and in fact
was the one fighting ISIS
when the US government
was arming him
so you could work that
out for yourself
he did it during
the 12 day war as well
Trump and Netanyahu
why would anybody
negotiate with them
and take their words
he says us
gotta stop framing it
that way guys
they are not us
or even
do a treaty with them
Trump just ripped them up
I've said that
not just Trump
Biden all the rest
he probably thinks
differently of Biden
which shows you
the hole there
the point is
our government is
the same
why would anybody
deal with them
now here's
what he said
on the 20th
we are getting
very close to
meeting our objectives
as we consider
winding down
our great military
efforts in the Middle East
with respect
to the terrorist
regime of Iran
okay
we are getting
very close to our objective
I mean guys
that was said in the
very beginning
they've already
missed their marks
like this is just
an embarrassing extension
they have not
accomplished anything
they claim
they're trying to
accomplish
and I just said
this is just sad
this is just
you just pandering
we're doing
everything you're
winning
it's like always
so on the 20th
right here's also
on the 20th
now again
you could argue
that this might even
be the reality
if what it meant was
we're speaking
with somebody in Iran
and that we might
almost be
ready to make a deal
and he'll
turn on their government
and we'll take control
we'll be finding out
quite soon
I argue
but
I sense the opposite
in all of this
especially since
when you get these
kind of
these kind of statements
that just doesn't feel
like it rings true
especially with
who I just showed you
of them saying
you know
no deal whatsoever
but now we are
or you know
these different
contradicting statements
here's a percent
had to say
this is nonsense Maria
you know for
for the regime
you know we're back
back to
the stuff of
Baghdad
Bob here
all that really means
is a guy in the
military who was reporting
you know
we're winning
and we're never
going to be failed
and we're never
always
when they didn't
right
ultimately lost
so the end of the day
the argument becomes
false reporting
about what's going on
in the war
which by the way
that's every piece
from every side
all the time
I don't mean
all like
entirely whole cloth
but we must know
that by now
what do I say
every time
a bombing takes place
they go
we killed a thousand
one of them goes
none was killed
it's probably 500
every time we see this
so in this case
the idea that is
what you're hearing
in many cases
are things I can prove to you
are true
he just wants you to dismiss
an out of hand
because we're the greatest
ever and we're winning
but he goes on
so that's just
want to explain what
Bob back
Baghdad Bob meant
just
military misinformation
the regime is
in collapse
and the people
maybe right
but does that
what is there
any indication
other than what
they want you to think
are they collapsing
I mean okay
here's the thing
if the regime is in
collapse
then why are they working
with somebody in the regime
to let them maintain power
when they just rush in
and take control
I mean because
that does not make sense
so at the very least
they're trying to give you
more of an impression
of like
utter almost collapse
maybe with the intention
of getting somebody
over there to turn
see that's how this works
but they're lying to you
to do that
in hopes that somebody
in the government
might think that's the truth
and then decide to join
Trump
and turn on his own people
they tried to do that
met as well
the last time and failed
I'm not even sure
the reality of how it worked
down with when it's failed
this last time
I honestly think they just
threatened and did
dirty tactics
are starting to turn against
them
we're starting to see
defections
at treasury
we now know
where the
Iranian leadership
bank accounts are
do you really believe that
do you really believe
that with what they know
as we just heard
the endless
decades of sanctions
and manipulation
that they would just allow
it to be that accessible
just a bank account
they can get access to
I don't believe that
but who knows
and those are being frozen
and we will hold them
and see
who comes forward
in terms of defections
but
what that means is
we'll give you the money
that we stole
if you come forward
and take that
that's a bribe
well we don't have money
what else are there on our side
starting to see defections
throughout the regime
and that's how this ends
so the idea of some
tolling arrangement
is ridiculous
what President Trump
is talking about
what they're trying to say
is they might come to some
middle ground
about the strait
and stuff like that
they just need
they're just projecting
we're going to win
at all costs
no matter what
I get the sense
that that's the opposite
and to be clear
he has focused on
Karg Island
since 1988
before the shaw fell
that the U.S.
should be focused on that
he is
what that means
is we should steal
the island
because they've got
most of their oil there
I mean it's not even
hiding this anymore
these are criminal gangsters
these are pirates
the real pirates
not even hiding it
but because they yell freedom
I guess it's okay
ladies are focused on it
as I said
there was a bombing campaign
last week
the military assets on Karg Island
were destroyed
and here's the other thing
I can tell you
if you're an
allegedly they put boots
in the ground
but nobody
they're not going to admit that
oil worker
you don't want to work there
so all the oil workers
they're being coerced
to stay there
and you know we
we will see
what
yes
I mean why would that even be the reality
so you're like
chaining people to work
in their facilities
you know it's
this is just
I mean certainly possible
but with knowing
they've lied about
everything our entire lives
maybe we should wonder
whether this is also not true
just a
just a thought
I mean genuinely
it certainly could be
but this is the thing
is we have to start
flavoring this
with some salt guys
these people will lie to you
but of course
you get the partisan report
war
colon
the war is going
so well for Iran
its remaining leaders
are fleeing the country
he says the moves
right
that just the
the count that I guess
blindly repeats what
Bassent said
because he's often correct
no he's not
I mean come on guys
like this
if you're going to be
the new media
then you can say
Bassent claims
they're about to collapse
and here's why
I think that's an evidence
bastard
no
they said it
we're winning
I mean this
this is
700,000 dollars
and when the last time
you heard a government official
rattle something off
on Fox News
and it turned out to be
entirely
correct
entirely correct
they say things that are
slightly correct
but they're lying
every time they open
their mouths
now
Trump on the 20th said
I don't want to do a ceasefire
in the Iran war
and then I guess
three days later said
ceasefire sounds good
but he says quote
we have
we could have dialogue
on the 20th
but I don't want to do a
ceasefire
Trump said
for the White House
before departing for
Florida
of course you can change
his mind right
but it says
you know you don't
do a ceasefire
when you're literally
obliterating the other side
that's the point
okay
so hypothetically
if he's correct
and he's literally
obliterating the other side
somebody tell me
why he's claiming
he just went to a five
disease fire
right
I mean if
if you are
then
you could argue
both work
maybe he lied here
to push that
and then he got
is what he wanted
over there
that's possible
but recognize
that it seems
pretty clear
that there's something
in the middle there
but they're not
obliterating everything
like he didn't obliterate
their nuclear facilities
right
and if that's the truth
then maybe wonder
whether the entire
thing is a lie
and that they're all lying
to have to hide weakness
quote
they don't have any navy
they don't have any air force
they don't have any equipment
Trump continue
okay
no ceasefire
okay next part of the story
all again
so the twenty yesterday
Trump threatens to obliterate
their powerless
they fully open the straight
back to the starting
and then
Trump warns
total decimation is coming
it's yesterday
after straight-up
removed threat
they're getting
their comeuppance
so you realize that
hours before
we got to this point
he was literally threatening
they're gonna get
what's coming to them
I just don't
I feel like this is kind of
hard to take seriously
and again
still the 22nd
mind you
23rds
where we get into
the argument of this
happening
Nira Krause
a Zionist journalist
in Israel says
I had a phone call
with Trump
about Iran
here's what he said
quote
it's from the same article
you'll find out
what's gonna happen
when they cave into
the ultimatum
you're gonna find out soon
it's going to be very good
total decimation of Iran
okay that again
that means
effort decimation
but you know
he's just
Trump's hyperbolic
and bombastic
so he may just mean
we're gonna kill
the military things
but if he
if he's not
being bomb out
of decimation of Iran
would mean everything
I mean the houses
and the people
and the dog
and the left
you know
whole thing
which is what Israel wants
but let's just pretend
for he's just
being I guess
dishonest
is the right word
it's gonna work out
very good
gotta love that
total decimation of Iran
it's gonna be great
about NATO countries
they're not doing anything
it's too bad
they've been very bad
for 47 years
I guess NATO
or Iran
well I guess we can guess
now they're getting a
come-of-its
hey man Iran
okay
so you're telling me that
yesterday
according to her
question that
he says
it's gonna be big
you're gonna find out
and they're gonna be
destroyed
so
kind of think that
doesn't mean a
five-day ceasefire
right
you can decide
or maybe that was a lie
to get us here
now
early
this is what he came out
and said
in front of
these military personnel
behind him
their leaders are all gone
the next set of
they're not though
by the way
their leaders are all gone
incorrect
and the next set of
leaders are mostly gone
they incorrect
I mean you literally
had one change
you get the one guy
who's the
I mean there's
rumors
which I haven't gotten into
because nobody can
verify anything
that he's
not responding to anybody
and he's not even in charge
or this one says
he's dead
or this one says
he fled to some of the country
it's the same thing
they do every time
they said the same things
every time
but again
you didn't need to
right there
he could have just said
we killed the leader
and now they're in trouble
nobody
he made three
he had to say
we killed them all
then we killed them all again
why would you
just flatly lie about that
you realize that
not even they have reported that
that's just what he's saying
off the cuff in front of these people
their leaders are all gone
the next set of leaders are all gone
and the next set of leaders
are mostly gone
but that's again
that's that's diplomacy
right and not totally
war crimes
illegal action
with no declaration of war
and now
nobody wants to be
a leader over there anymore
except the guy
who's currently in charge
we're having a hard time
we want to
talk to them
and there's nobody to talk to
okay
well that's interesting
seeing as how
they have told you
they're not going to
because you always lie
and bomb them in the middle of negotiations
we have nobody to talk to
and nobody to talk to
you know what
we like it that way
okay
well suddenly
hours later
we're talking to somebody
we just made a deal
now as he writes
that I could see a world
in which that is a ploy
it's also being dishonest
everybody
but that's war I guess
they say
there has probably never been
he says a more blatant example
of market manipulation site
three days ago
Trump said there was nobody
talked to in Iran
now just before the markets opened
he says talks are happening
which we're going to get into
that's the point today
but they are striking
and still
which we're going to do in a second
by the way
despite the claim
that we are pleased to report
that they have
had good talks
over the last two days
where he told you
they couldn't talk to anybody
just then
that they are still bombing
I'm going to end with that
but make sure you hear me on that
we're pleased to announce
he writes
pleased to report
that the United States of America
and the country of Iran
have had over the last two days
yeah we just went over that time frame
very good
in productive conversations
regarding a complete
and total resolution
of our hostilities in the Middle East
sound like it makes sense
with what we're talking about
but it could be
based on the tenor
and tone
of these in depth
detailed
and constructive conversations
laying it on a little thick I think
which
okay
well it's not worth fixating
on the fact that he wrote
W I T C H
but you know whatever
will continue throughout the week
God we're so doomed
I have instructed the Department of
War to postpone any
and all military strikes
against Iranian power plants
and energy infrastructure
all of which would have been crimes
no matter what you spun it as
for five days
meeting and discussion
thank you
that's a that's a
five days he's fired
that's what that means
is somebody's got
is anybody made fun of him
using the wrong word
I think sure somebody has
now
I'll show you at the end
and you should it's easy to look
Israel has carried on bombing
to this moment
as far as I can tell
which makes its own point
which we'll finish with
that Israel is not going to let this end
regardless of what Trump says
but to
guess who else has continued bombing
the U.S. military
so there's only two ways to take that
now you could argue I guess three
I guess three
one is he's not in charge
two is that he lied to you
three is that there was some sort of
overlap
where they had to finish these ones
and they're going to stop after that
which
that Israel tried to do something
similar
it's ridiculous
if they wanted to they could go stop
and they would stop
but keep this in mind as we go forward
so here's what you get
Trump says Iran wants to make a deal
but Iran denies it
so it's very simple right
so this is you could
this could be
political
military maneuvering
to try to get a certain outcome
of course Eric Dowder
to you the
the holy crap team
says
Trump just said he's postponed all attacks
and I just have to laugh
he says
he's really going to do it
whoo
with a flag with a
just I just I can't
I can't stop laughing
I can let me put it this way
why do these people who are framing
themselves as like the new media
who think they're so important
why do they have to make it so
juvenile
you know what I mean like holy crap
and the lights and you know
it's just it's like you're dealing
with you have to act like a second
grader while you're making this stuff
done I maybe so maybe that's the
drive I don't know
peacemaker in chief is hard work
you mean the guy who started the
illegal war with Iran
you you're not a peacemaker when you
end a warrior start dummy
but they don't care
it's not about the information
I just think we we need to
recognize that this game
and all of it
but of course he then
Tehran once deal badly
that's quickly funny how
that escalated quickly
it starts out well we might have a
deal and we have time we're gonna
now it's they want a bad deal so
bad well how many times have I
shown you him doing that
that was not true
everyone meant to deal please
Trump make a deal with me and
didn't it wasn't true guys
I can prove to you that that
wasn't true
but he said it because he
wanted you to think that he
was the deal maker that was
going to make all the world
leaders
well look at where we are
they do not respect him
now they they're afraid of his
belligerence that's for sure
but Iran calls BS as Trump
claims Iran talks are underway
now again the real point is just
that he said I'm you know pleased
to report that
we're in a five days
he's fired and I've been
talking for the last two days
so effectively three day period
based on the tenor and tone
of the in-depth and detailed
constipated blah blah blah
we're going to
pause
so here is the response
Iran says there's been zero
dialogue
zero dialogue between Trump
and or Tehran and Washington
here's where Maria steps in
and says I spoke to Trump on the
phone here's what he says
and it's just that
I will let it all speak for
itself
come back I just spoke with
President Trump and he told me
that Iran wants to make a deal
badly
he said that the talks have been
ongoing I said how much longer
will this conflict go on
he said the talks
I said five days
to halt or postpone strikes
on the electrical infrastructure
it could happen sooner
he said
but I have put down five days
I asked him what his reaction
is to Iranian state television
saying that there are no talks
and he said
he's not sure what they're
referring to
because the most recent talks
happened in fact last night
with Steve Wittkoff
and Jared Kushner
and their counterparts
when I asked about the Iranian TV
saying that no talks have happened
he said
it's hard to get any information
there because of the U.S.
is blowing up so much
of their infrastructure
so again he wasn't sure
where the Iran state TV
was talking about
because the most recent talks
he said happened last night
with Steve Wittkoff
and Jared Kushner again
the president just told me
moments ago
that the Iranians
want to do a deal badly
the market of course
has reversed course
this morning
after the president posted
this morning
in the middle of a big decline
in markets
he said that he has directed
the military
to postpone strikes
on the electrical infrastructure
and the power plants
for five days
as these talks continue
so
essentially just Trump said no
you know I don't know
what you're talking about
so it's just
it was not
it was kind of a non-answer
right
so he says
I don't know
but it kind of leaves open
that reality
so she's pointing to all the
U.S. futures
like it's
it's
I don't know why
they think this
makes sense to people
but let's be clear
the people that are
in the elitist circles
the people who are
actually benefiting
from what Trump
is doing in the world
these are people
who care about these things
the vast majority of people
in the
American situation
don't have 401ks
look it up for yourself
do not care
or blogs even understand
what the Dow is in the world
and this is what's so frustrating
is that they report to this
like this is supposed to be
what most people care about
they do not
their gas prices are higher
despite the numbers fluctuating
because these gas
these locations
are not playing
this up and down game
they know what's going on
these prices are staying
pretty high
the reality on top of that
is that you can see
food prices going up
rent prices going up
that's been a consistent
kind of up and down
but largely up scale
situation
since he's been in power
more spending
the government
I just don't know why
people aren't honest about that
other than
I mean I do
I shouldn't say it like that
but I don't know why some
that still
hold on to it
don't give up on that
I should say
now here's
a one of the
Iranian accounts
saying contrary to what
Trump claims
there are no ongoing
negotiations
between Iran and the United
States
now
that could mean
that it's an
defector
indirect messages
have reached Iran
which that's interesting
but they do not include
any proposals
of value
or worth
consideration
so that could be them lying
that seems to suggest
that they're acknowledging
yes they did
send something
but we don't care
like they told you
moreover
the channel for sending
these one-sided messages
has been ongoing
since the beginning of the war
meaning
nothing new is happening
Iran will continue to
the war until it achieves
its objectives
and there is a conviction
that the five-day
deadline
announced by Trump
is nothing but a trick
to lower Iran's level
of alertness
which is what they do every time
with the possibility
of any strike
by the adversary
occurring during this period
every time they have
some of lol
potential ceasefire
that's when they take
the opportunity to bomb
they did the same thing
in Yemen
it's what they do
that's my point
these are not honorable people
they're devious
Iran views a response
and again
for those maybe
didn't hear me say it
last time
or new just tuned in
if you think that
it's okay
because they're bad guys
that makes you
just as bad as them
it's about your honor
right
your morals and values
and integrity
not whether you go to their level
because they're bad guy
that makes you the same thing
Iran views a response
to the energy infrastructure
in the region
and Israel's
power grid as inevitable
and Trump's timings
hold no value
from its perspective
straight up he moves
her muse
her move
excuse me
will remain closed
they write
but again
remember
is not closed
I just showed you
it's closed to them
and that's the point
here is the speaker
of of Iran's parliament
Iranian people demand
complete and remorseful
punishment of the aggressors
all Iranian officials
stand firmly behind
their supreme leader
and people
of course he could be lying
no negotiations
have been held with the U.S.
and fake news
is used to manipulate
the financial
and oil markets
and escape
the quagmire
in which the U.S.
and Israel are trapped
that makes sense
because they are
and I think you can see this
and nobody's helping them
at last I checked
Australia, Japan
all of them
they're even the U.K.
I think the last thing I said
was looking for other
viable options
but they were
that's why they're
they're not even talking about this
whole guiding ships
through a discussion
doesn't make any sense
it doesn't it's
illogical
because of the control
over the area
everyone knows Iran
can ultimately control that
if they want to
it's a risky situation
and you're coming at it
from a place where you do not
have legal backing
they started this
they are the aggressors
it's very simple
so here's what Trump had to say
and this is
the same kind of conversation
oh you know what I think
oh no this is a different clip
here he is talking about the
unnamed person
and then we'll get into
what people claim is the person
and then
the final points on this
a top
a top person
don't forget
we've wiped out the leadership
phase one
phase two
and largely phase three
but we're dealing
with the man
who I believe is
the most respected
and the leader
you know it's a little tough
they've wiped out
we've wiped out everybody
is that the supreme leader?
no not the supreme leader
we don't
it's not much trouble
well nobody's ever
nobody heard of
the second supreme leader
the son
nobody we have not heard from the son
wait did he just say
supreme leader
the son
you know
well nobody's ever
nobody heard of the
yeah that's
this is so funny
this is just his
childish nature
the guy
obviously was heard of
the guy was not a nobody
he's part of the family
that was
it was one of the possibilities
so for him just to pretend
like nobody's ever heard of him
it's just a tiny slight
it's a juvenile jab
that they probably
don't even care about
it's or to make himself
feel big in the conversation
it's just sad
you don't need to do that
you I mean you could argue
that it's just his tactics
maybe you're right
not working
it's actually really sad
and it makes all look like
children
but whatever
second supreme leader
the son
nobody we have not heard
from the son
every once in a while
you see a statement made
but we haven't
we don't know if he's
living
but right because
that's the response
him really living
because clearly you're
supposed to
insinuate that he's dead
is there any evidence of that
not that I can see
the people that seem to be
running it
and they seem that
based on really fact
because things they've said
oh that was a wise
that was a very
well thought out statement
listen to that one again
seem to be running it
and they seem that
based on really fact
they seem that
based on really fact
because things they've said
have taken place
cool
very well
well thought out argument
because because I said
might as well say it like that
Mr. President
again
Mr. President
I know you deploy
because I don't want him
to be killed
okay I don't want him to be
I got it
yeah that wasn't planned out at all
because I don't want him to be
killed
did you get that
killed
got the clip
okay good
right the point is clearly
that I don't want to tell you
who the guy is
because they're Ron will
murder him
probably
just like you would
if there was an
asset in the U.S.
government that was working
with Iran
you guys treason
put them in
you damn well know it
either way
the point is
I doesn't feel like
that's what you would say
right
if you're in the midst
of a negotiation
you're going to let it
be publicly known
that you're doing that
that he might be killed
I can't say his name
so Iran then goes
ooh which one of you
to me
that is the most ridiculous part
but you know what's crazy
knowing who Trump is
honestly it wouldn't surprise me
if he actually just
put their deal at risk
because he wanted
to bluster about
how he might get a deal
that is exactly who he is
but still
I argue it's more likely
that he's making this up
that's crazy to me
heard from the sun
every once in a while
you'll see a statement made
but we haven't
we don't know if he's living
but the people that
seem to be running it
and they seem that
based on
really fact
because things they've said
have taken place
or a plausible possibility
is that Iran's playing you
I don't want him to be killed
okay
I don't want him to be killed
nobody wants to be there
nobody wants that job right now
you know
nobody's exactly looking forward
to being the head
of that particular country
but
other than the leader
who's taken charge
I'm not saying that in a positive
good bad
just it is the reality
he is now in charge
he has run
and he stepped up and did it
so that's an incorrect
statement apparently
perhaps we'll be able to
solve that problem
what's the president
I mean think about the insanity
of that
again just
not to belabor the point
but the state
you're
the argument is
you're in a secret
negotiation with a defector
and that's why they're
saying nothing's happening
and that you're going to publicly
lay that out
when you know Iran is going to see
that
does that make sense to anybody
I'm telling you that
I mean the weirdness is that
I can see a world
in which Trump would do
something that's stupid
but
it's just most logic
most likely
that just seems like a lie
but we will find out
and it wouldn't I mean
one of those possibilities
is that this is literally
you know like they've done
in the past
and it's just
what's their term for
not cloaking down
you know
but just the
an intelligence operation
where you worked with somebody
over the years
and convinced them to turn
and then with that influence
you're able to get what you want
and it doesn't mean
even remotely
that that's what Iranians want
or that it will be in their benefit
now
this is what's being widely shared
this one's got like a million
what is it
almost two million views
oh look at this
okay but this isn't the same point
now this is correct
I did these pictures are old
but even the guy below
he addressed it well before this came out
and it says the person in the picture
has denied any
oh okay that's actually interesting
I didn't see that
so this guy has just added
a whole lot to this story
all these screaming people online
but still question it
still question it
oh is that okay that's
see this is actually interesting
I didn't put
that's funny
I was reading those other statements
and I had put together
that that was the same guy
the point here
first
is that this guy already did this
but he did follow up
hours later
when everybody called him out
is these
it says this
Iranian Air Force flight
which he reported on
landed and carried the delegation of
Islam
basically Israel then allowed it
to fly out as the point
right so oh my god
they allowed it to go out
they're make
they're meeting to discuss this
and he said that
hours later he posted this
those pictures I posted were
archives
and it's not that it's
those images weren't the point
that it's happening
and I use the images to make the
case
okay that does happen
but it was
you know like four hours later
he posted that
but now
even Twitter is saying
because he's the post
he says
no negotiations with America
have taken place
that's him
so that's the guy that they're
claiming was on the way
to me that
is pretty damn clear
but let's keep going
I'll include this for you
which other one was already in
there actually
the the other version
so same Adam
Adam Cochran points out
that these are the old images
that is correct
and then somebody goes
no and people believe
that they're basically saying
no it's old
but it's a real thing
but as we now see
he said that's not the truth
but even still
like hypothetically speaking
it could be that they got the
person wrong
and there is an agreement
you know question everything
right but you know what I lean
I'm leaning towards exactly
that this is a manufactured thing
to drive the wrong
to a place of weakness
in order to take advantage
because
they're losing
Israel and the United States
are losing this agenda
is what the facts seem to
suggest to me
drop site news comes out today
and says a senior Iranian official
tells drop site news
tells Jeremy Scahill
quote there aren't any negotiations
taking place the Iranian side
has simply communicated
its conditions to the United States
take a listen
and then we'll end
with a couple of important points
I think about
really the main thing
I want that I'm concerned about
is that be in this situation
because
what I believe is the reality
that they're ultimately weak
is that this will be something
driven by Israel
in order to get Trump to feel
that he has no other choice
or that it's
ultimately the right choice
I'm worried about where that
goes
before we get there
here's what Jeremy had to say
debated how to even
deal with this
and they
they literally ghosted
Steve Whitcoff
they did not respond to him
when we reported that last week
the White House went nuts
they denounced
drop site news
accusing us of engaging in
they did too
actually I have a report on that
but they did
they literally called them out
by name
and called them like
propaganda or something
America last behavior
said we were abhorrent
and then they went
and they spun a story to Axios
saying that it was actually
the Iranians that had been
begging president Trump to speak
and and so you know
this this kind of played out
over the the past few days
and that's my point in general
this that's what he
if you were in this
for the agenda alone
you wouldn't respond to that
you just let it carry
like you know there's no point
but Trump it seems to be
so small and narcissistic
that he can't let that go
so he has to force a story out
that says they're begging me
for a deal
when ultimately all it does
is hurt the agenda
by the way good
the agenda that I don't think
we anybody should want
but realize that it's them
like that's that's what it's like
dealing with somebody like Trump
in the situation
that his narcissism and hubris
often supersedes the actual
agenda
maybe even he wants to
I don't know
but that's my opinion
but that's what we have
and we have seen
I've seen this countless times
because it's not true
right they weren't begging it
they made it clear
relentlessly
doesn't mean they won't work
with somebody
but he had to push that out
and I think that's what shows
this starting point
but Iranian sources
were telling me Daniel
is that through a series of
intermediary countries
including Turkey
Pakistan
Egypt
and also some Gulf countries
there have been a series of
messages passed on to the
Iranians
by the United States
where according to Iranian
officials
these third party
intermediaries have said
that the US wants to
wrap up this war
and that happens while
publicly Trump is saying
we're going to bomb
Iran's electrical
and power infrastructure
which by the way
would be a war crime
if they did that
in a sweeping manner
Iran then said
hey let us tell you
what we can do
we can hit not only in Israel
but we can hit in
all throughout the Gulf
and this would cause
just like catastrophic shock
to the global economy
we can talk about later
but the most
breaking stuff I have for you
is that Trump today
posts on truth social
that there's been this
breakthrough
that he's pausing his threat
to bomb the Iranian
electrical grid
and other energy infrastructure
because there have been
these talks going on
between the United States
and Iran
and Trump implies
that he has some
secret squirrel
that he's talking to
in Iran
and he doesn't want to name
who it is
because he doesn't want
that person to be killed
it's unclear
does he mean by Israel
or by the Iranians
you know
but what I'm told
is that there have been
no negotiations
direct negotiations
with the United States
and that what the Iranian
officials are telling me
is that every time
a third country comes to Iran
and they say
the United States wants to talk
Iran says
let us explain to you our conditions
and in short
what the Iranians are saying
is that they will not agree
to the kind of ceasefire
that took place last June
after the so-called
12-day war
because the Iranians view that
as having been a gimmick
to buy the United States
in Israel time
to rearm
to reposition
and then come back in
with this full-blown war
that they launched on February 28th
so they're saying
they won't go
for just a ceasefire
that doesn't have conditions
attached to it
they also want any
cessation of the war
not only to apply to Iran
but to apply to two other fronts
of battle
as the Iranians see it
Iraq
as well as Lebanon
where the Israelis
are increasingly engaged
in ground operations
very heavy bombing
Hezbollah
which Israel had said
was wiped out
has been launching dozens upon
dozens of rockets
every single day into Israel
so they want
those two countries
also to be party
to this ceasefire deal
they're also saying
that they want
reparations paid
by the United States
and they want
Israel to pay
but they don't want
Israel to pay directly
they want that to happen
through the United States
because they don't want
to take anything directly from
Israel
but the other thing
and this is
you know
I think very relevant
it's
and many people
I know you've made this point
before and I've heard other
smart analysts make it
that because of the way
the United States
and Israel
have lied about the negotiations
have used it as a veneer
or a cover
to then wage these wars
the Iranian position
has hardened
and what Iran is saying
now
is that there will be
no discussion
on its ballistic missile program
that if there is a ceasefire
Iran is going to move rapidly
to continue
its ballistic missile program
recognizing
that it's only deterrent
against the United States
and against
Israel
they're also saying
and they wouldn't go into
more detail on this
that they're going to
that they're in the process
of developing a new doctrine
on the nuclear question
they didn't say
oh we're going to go
and we want to enrich
uranium to make nuclear weapons
but what they're saying
to me
is that
that because of
the U.S.
and Israel
targeting their nuclear
infrastructure
because they blew up
the negotiations
where the Iranians had put
terms on the table
that went beyond
the Obama era deal
they're saying now
that they're having discussions
about developing a new
nuclear doctrine
potentially in partnership
with the
with Russia and China
well
yeah
and and what that guy's
going to get into
that's not good
Ron Nukes
oh my god
here we go
like that
like that's
it's
question it
as well by the way
whether
Jeremy or anybody else
question it
he could be lying
this misinformed
but the point is
it's legal for every other
country in the world
including Iran
the idea that they're not
allowed to do that
is just arbitrarily
stupid
it doesn't apply to anybody else
it applied arbitrarily
to North Korea
until they reached that point
and then they never talked
about it again
and the the lesson
from Libya
North Korea
is obvious
nonetheless
they've continued to point out
that it's a Fakwa
and it's something
they won't do
and the evidence
has always backed that up
and yet they've
lied the entire time
in fact
all their actions
have shown
that they don't have it
they wouldn't be doing this
if they knew
they had those nukes
they've lied
but the point is
they've driven them to a
place to where
maybe
they're rationalizing
why they might need to do it
anyway
which would make sense to
everybody who also
would not be a crime
regardless of what Israel says
including Israel
having nukes
by the way
but I still argue
the point is
I would have questioned
whether that is
actually what they're gonna do
one because it is in fact
a religious issue for them
but secondarily
that it ultimately would
give them the very thing
they need
to justify see
we always told you
despite how we've been
saying it for 20 years
we told you
and here it is
that it just seems
like a bad choice right now
but
it very well may not
be the case
but just
understand that
regardless
it's not a crime guys
and it's only an issue
because Israel decides
to make it an issue for them
despite them being the ones
that seem to use their power
unjustly
every single day of our lives
including being the first ones
to actually use nuclear weapons
on groups
that were already retreating
which in case
you don't already know that
look it up
it's very provable
they were already winning
the Japan was already
retreating
they used those nukes anyway
because one argument is
they wanted to see
what happened and two
they wanted to make sure
Russia saw it
that is who we've always
dealt with since
now
this is grok
in case you want to see
what grok has to say
have the US
or Israeli military
carried out any bombings today
right
okay so
let's get into a second part
of this
like I said earlier
so Trump says
we're five day ceasefire
right
that's what he just said
apparently three days
we've been talking about this
frankly I think he's
making it up
but he said ceasefire
so
what happened
here we are
this is that
he said that earlier today
right
Israel tax
just today
wide-scale strikes
on infrastructure
in Tehran
in the capital
you know
more packed than New York
City
because that's okay
strikes in other Iranian
locations
this is just Israel
by the way
continued operations
in Lebanon
targeting homes
as Israel told you
they were going to
additional reports
of strikes in Gaza
because that's
still happening as well
just you know
despite what Trump said
okay military actions
from the US government
so Trump says
pause on military action
and then they continue
bombing Iran
because that's what happened
today
and you can easily prove that
reports of heavy us
Israel joint
airstrikes
okay just to make it even
more clear
specifically
were there any of these
attacks that were carried
out
after Trump announced a hold
on all attacks
due to these alleged talks
of course
it's real
still to this very moment
by the way
bombing relentlessly
Tehran
Lebanon
and even if they stop
bombing in Tehran
and kept bombing
in Lebanon
which will probably happen
if they stretch this out
what does that show
you aren't we being told
that that's because it's Iran
well then that would apply
to the ceasefire
would it not
no and it won't
because they don't see it the
same
and it's not Iran
it's because they want Lebanon
just like they want Iran
they want Syria
they want Iraq
because
of greater Israel
and because of ethnic cleansing
and that's what they do
but recognize
when if and when that happens
but nonetheless right now
still bombing in Tehran
after Trump said
we were pausing
which shows you Israel's
the one leading the war
these occurred
after Trump's announcement
ad confirmed by reports
of ongoing
or new waves
on Monday
Israel's completing strikes
in Tehran
evening local time
well after Trump said stopped
well after they should have known
that
which aligns with us
evening and afternoon
the point
watch as they keep bombing
tomorrow
you think I mean
I'm completely guessing
only thing I'm using
is what Israel has always done
my entire life
now watch
as they keep bombing
into tomorrow
I mean that will only show you
they kept no concern
for what Trump is doing
and claiming it's their joint war
yet they're going to do
whatever they want
and Trump will probably not do
anything about it
which shows you Israel's
completely in control
also
continuing into Lebanon
which won't stop
regardless it should
now
this is the crazy part to me
so they did ultimately stop
and you only U.S. strikes
right
and this shows it even more
clear
guess what they didn't stop
even though Trump
who's commander-in-chief
of the military
said no more
joint U.S. Israeli strikes
did continue
all across Iran
as part of a broader campaign
it's you can look it up for
yourself
look at the timing
so what does that show you
that means there's some U.S.
military personnel
who are working at the
orders of something
other than Trump
that's how I would read that
or at the very least
he's lied to all of us
and they were bombing anyway
that has to
that really has to
register with people guys
your Trump is not in control at all
and somebody else is making the top
the call in the shots
or he's lying to you
or there's somewhere in between
because they're still bombing
now
as afton rapsadi points out
Trump is signaling a total
resolution of hostilities
like that's the same post right
but
Israel wants the war to continue
clearly they're still bombing
will Israel escalate
and bomber runs
critical infrastructure
to spoil these
and worse yet
will they do so
and blame it on Iran
in other locations
right
well they bomb cutter
and say Iran's still bombing
and causes to spin out even further
probably
if Israel's left to fight Iran alone
which they won't do
Iran could continue
hammering Israel
and the possibility of Israel
using nuclear weapons remains
now this was
that similar discussion
with the guy we pointed out
earlier
but it simply says
if the U.S. withdraws
from a war on Iran
Israel may use nuclear weapons
the U.S. government
especially under Republicans
is so tethered
to the Israeli agenda
we can't pull out
even if we wanted to
that's what they said
because let's just say
Trump wakes up tomorrow
and he pulls out
I'm done
I'm out
everything every wanted
the problem is that
might actually put the Israelis
into
the position to use news
now this is the argument
being used by some of the
more
extremist Republicans out there
to argue that's why
Trump has to stay in here
Glenn Beck and the rest
that Trump saw this plan
and he knew we had to
stop them at the end
it's just gross
and it's disgustingly wrong
because of everything
you've already seen
but even if it was
the case it still means
that he's lied to you
every other way to get here
like that's
that's literally
trust the plan
lied every which way
but it's okay
because he's just
saving you from Israel
even though
he's panders to them
every single way he can
I don't think
I think the reality is
that clearly
they're under control
or part of the plan
now as this is happening
you have Israelis
on Israeli media
basically trying to
make the argument
for using those nukes
and it's former Israeli
intelligence officer
openly calling for nuking
Iran in a broadcast
not new by the way
and James Lee
points out a potential
false flag point
and this is in regard
to the Diego Garcia base
now before we play this
let's not forget
that that's a military base
it's not an escalation
at all
it's a literal response
to their illegal bombings
that became an open
military target
when they initiated
this illegal war
because that's
part of the U.S. base
so that when they
report every action
Iran's taking
like they're
breathlessly
clutching their pearls
going
oh they just
committed terrorism
by bombing a base
or a bombing
it's
they started the war
illegally
and Iran is responding
and every single time
they have the opportunity
to stop
and they keep doubling down
because that's all
they know how to do
this appears to be something
with the midst
in the midst of what's
happening
it could very well be
Israel
trying to make sure
this doesn't stop
a few days ago
we were told that
two ICBMs were fired
at Diego Garcia
which is a joint
U.S.
UK military base
in the Southern Indian Ocean
now the Israeli military
very quickly
claimed that Iran
fired these missiles
and that they could soon
hit Europe
including cities like
Berlin
Paris
and Rome
which I don't know
why that claim
continues to scare people
you realize how many
other countries in the world
have missiles
that are all
adversarial
or Muslim
or whatever else
you want to think
you should worry about
including Iran
by the way
despite I mean
argument being
that there's a low
max but I look
I think most these countries
have the ability
to go farther
than we probably think
it's it's all
that's I mean
why would it be a worry
that they might be able to
but we don't worry
that the U.S.
government can bomb
all over the world
why is that not an issue
is it only bad
when brown people do it
or because
they tell you they're
terrorists
even though
your government conducts
terrorism every single
day of your life
it's all perspective
Minister Netanyahu
then tweeted out
quote
I asked the leaders
of the free world
what are you waiting for
Israel is not only
fighting for itself
but fighting for all of you
Oh is it now
or do you mean
U.S. personnel
as Israel
continues
they were already
attacking Lebanon
I'm pretty sure right now
Netanyahu is trying to get
appear as if
he's doing Lebanon
and Trump's doing Iran
and we're both fighting Iran
they were already
occupying and invading
Lebanon
they were already bombing
them
they were already making
settlements
with the Hebrew names
in the beginning
of post-October 7th
so right now
effectively you have
U.S. personnel
and Donald Trump
fighting Iran
and Netanyahu
letting it take place
so let's not pretend
like he's
we're fighting it for you
he's just trying to
get the world
to go against Iran
but there's just
one problem
Iran says
they got nothing to do with it
and if you read
the Wall Street Journal
reporting critically
it said that
one of the missiles
failed mid-flight
so it didn't even get there
and the other
may or may not
have been intercepted
so we really have
no idea
what actually happened
the U.S.'s own intelligence
indicate that
Iran lacks the capability
of firing any missiles
outside of about 1200 miles
now Diego Garcia
is located in the
southern Indian Ocean
about 2500 miles away
from the nearest point in Iran
so something is not adding up here
okay the UK
has now publicly come out
to say that
there is quote
no assessment
to substantiate Israel's claim
that Iran has
long-range missiles
capable of hitting London
the NATO
we just keep spinning the lies
right whatever
gets people to feel
like there's a problem
the secretary general
said they
have no evidence
that Iran
fired missiles at
Diego Garcia
so if that's
again though
remember my point though
it's not
it's certainly
it's just possible
they have that ability
but it's not about
the ability to do so
it's about whether or not
they would
in this case
yes
I believe they would
because it's a military base
but the point he's making
is that the evidence
doesn't back that up
so this is my point in general
it's not about whether
you know
it's about the idea
of creating the illusion
that one
right now
they're bombing through
what he claims
is a five-day thing
that maybe they didn't even
agree to
but also just Israel
trying to use these
these pressure points
to drive
or maybe manipulate
Trump into taking
another step
really the case
that Iran didn't fire
those missiles
then the elephant in the room
of course is
who did
and of course he's pointing to
the USS Liberty picture
in the background
you know what he means
it's clearly wondering
whether the Israeli
government is creating this
with yet another false flag
Trump's former counter
terror chief Joe Kent
says
president needs to focus on
restraining the Israelis
otherwise the war escalates
sure seems like
everybody understands
what's going on
including his own
intelligence community
who told him not to do this
and he does it anyway
I don't know how much more
clear that can get
John King says
now we know the deadliest
missile to hit the country
of Iran
definitely came from
the United States
showed you this earlier
and I just continuing to
show you
that maybe
maybe this wasn't
like maybe this was
Israel carrying this out
to create this overlap
like wonder this
or maybe the US was
bombing it to blame it on Iran
like this is the world
that we are in
in fact that sounds
very much like that
Patrick Coss include
maybe I'll finish with that
today
we are in the game
of covert means
against the Iranians
we could get
we get nastier with that
is what he says
and very much
exactly what we're
dealing with today
now lastly
let's be real
about the
at least the sentiment
that came from
his administration
while trying to claim
pieces where he's going
they're very clearly
making preparations
for an invasion
which I argue
they already have
some level of boots
but this is about
the official deployment
which regardless of
the claims
we're always in the
carts
that's important to hear
now as you saw
probably over the last few
days
Heng Seth saying
we're extending
the department's
reinstatement
and return service
to the people
that they forced out
because of covid shots
which by the way
happened just as much
in Trump's administration
as Biden's
Robert Barnes says
oops we're
sorry about the
vaccine mandate
will you please come
back now
and die for Israel instead
you gotta love
how many republicans
who were very much
supporting of
Trump being put in power
who by the way
a lot of them
called us Black Pilden
and didn't you know
tried to shout our voices
down
and we tried to
warn about
exactly what we're
dealing with now
I'd like to believe
some of them
who if they are on us
would point that out
and say
look those guys
right back then
either way
a lot of them
have started to call
this out
at a high level
I mean you could
point to the
Countess Owens
and Tucker's
and Jay Smith
and there's plenty of them
and yet still
the cartoonish people
in the mainstream
alternative media
you know
it's just fine
I'm starting to
wonder if it's like
they
like think about
in the circle
of the major
conservative
conversation
I'm sort of think
they look at those people
and laugh at them
and it's only about
presenting that to people
other than their
it's just
it were being
gaslit
everywhere
my opinion anyway
well Trump was also
discussing
and was already just
there was even
floated ideas
that they might have
already put boots
on the ground
on this island
and then it always
been his plan
and he's talking about
taking over the island
of course
to open the straight
now it's about the oil
it's about everything
else we're
talking about
we already talked about
it was
discussing
whether he had to
go in to get the uranium
even though the uranium
was what they said
they would give up
had you make
taken the deal
instead of bombing them
but now we have to
go in to seize it
it's all manufactured
kind of stuff
but it's all about
boots on the ground
and state department
the U.S. State Department
under Trump
warns Americans
around the world
yeah that escalated
quickly didn't it
a quick the
limited strikes
to decapitate the leader
and here we are
with them
warning the world
everyone in the world
Americans everywhere
you go
watch your back
yeah
peace president
does that sound like
that works out
well interestingly
let's just say
for a thick of
conversation
that maybe this is
going to end
with the ceasefire
because Trump made a deal
well guess what
they have
they'll ask him
a little question
like what about
what happens
if we do it in the war
right what happens
if what about
happens at 200 billion
dollars
you know why is that named
do you still need
200 billion dollars
we uh
it's always nice to have
it's a very
inflamed world
and the democrats
inflamed it
you know largely
the democrats
inflamed it
let me just talk
about the other
so yeah yeah
yeah right
democrats suck anyway
great
so basically
it's an inflamed world
you know war
is going to happen
war is going to war
guys
we got to have that
200 billion dollars
for the other war
that won't happen
hashtag freedom
we can't be this stupid
200 it was
never even about
this is just
this is the control grid
that's money for the
thing they're building
around you
the point though
is that even though
the war won't be any
yeah
but you could take that as
it's not going to end
which is kind of the
likely reality
I think is coming
but even if it does
yeah we need it anyway
all right guys
if you are a special
kind of willfully ignorant
if you are not calling this
out
you either never cared
about everything he said
he was going to do
which is a lot of them
and they just want to be
a part of the team
or you somehow can't see
that none of it's happening
in fact the opposite's
happening
time to wake up
and face reality guys
he's robbing you blind
while telling you
he's selling you
everything you need
when I can't see
anything but taking
happening right here
lastly
he said the news
has a great clip here
make sure you stay tuned
it's nonstop reality
of how they're basically
just parroting
the Iraq war lies
never stops
thank you for tuning in
actually I
briefly said this
then didn't even say
the point in the middle
of the show
I'm better at the end
anyway
you might have thought
what I was going to say
if you remember
what I'm talking about
point was in the beginning
I actually wanted to say this
but we have a jam packed week
as for those of you know
that I'm trying to get
this on more of a routine
kind of path
my goal is the week
not always to take two days off
I doubt I'll let do that
all the time
it's more about family stuff
right now
but my plan is
right now
Monday to Friday
and it won't always be
Monday to Friday
it might flow
but five shows is my plan
and sometimes that may be
an interview
like with Robert
or a co-host
on daily wrap up
but my goal
is to just keep this
going through the week
because it's better
it's easier for us
to to maintain a flow
of information
so that being said
I'll see you tomorrow
and have a lot of stuff
that I ultimately had
touched on
like for example
the Pete Hegseth
kind of propaganda point
I want to get to that
some point
maybe the
Muslim discussion
that's coming up
back in this country
and of course
whatever happens
in the next 24 hours
and other information
we're going to probably
include
or maybe touching
on some older stories
for example
Jason Bassler
made a great point
the other day
the anniversary of
of the
you know
three years since
East Palestine
and as he said
no I didn't go away
it just fell out
of the news cycle
people are still suffering
they've never really
gotten much
I mean they're
they're
Black
Norfolk Southern
as a constant showing you
has benefited
from the outcome there
so too does everybody
else involved
with these kind of operations
the point is
there's a lot
that we could get into
there's a good reporting
going on right now
showing you
new studies
that are showing you
what we already have proven
but it's still important to see
that these shots
are killing people
and giving myocarditis
but
plenty to talk about
so I'll see you tomorrow
thank you for tuning in
I love you all
as always
question everything
come to your own conclusions
stay vigilant
fellow citizens
at this hour
American and coalition forces
are in the early stages
of military operations
to disarm Iraq
to free its people
and to defend the world
from grave danger
a short time ago
the united states
military began
major combat operations
in Iran
oh shoot
I'm sorry guys
I was saying something
and I forgot to
my video in there
that was me
it didn't freeze
I apologize
so all I said
I'm gonna start this over
so there's
there's like a
30 second gap in there
my apologies
I just did
and didn't have the video up
now the point
all I was saying
very quickly
I'll try to do
as quick as possible
is I had a thought
about this
in regard to
Donald Trump
remember the
the point about
whether that video was
AI remember that
now really quickly
the point was
that we have seen since
then that there were
videos they put out
that were arguably
pre-recorded
that they ultimately
had something set
and were waiting to release it
that's what I think
this might have been
that there was an overlap
to maybe
and maybe something
was altered within it
because I think the
program argues
did say that
there was something
off about
like it was
altered in some way
but that could have just
been touching up
corners of the video
as I like I talked about
but I think what
we're talking about
now that we learned
more of the timeline
is that they
plan to do this
and they were in
the midst of
negotiations of peace
and he'd already recorded
the video just
waiting for the moment
of when they executed
the plan
that's my thought on that
I'm probably never going to
bring it up again
because I just
it's not going to become
relevant as we go forward
unless that story
comes back around
so I wanted to throw it in there
because I thought that was
interesting
it just really speaks to the
forward the planning
the foreknowledge
the lack of honor
and you know
willing to
feign negotiations
of peace
and then murder people
while they're doing it
over
and over
and plan it out
as they did
okay
I'll leave it there guys
thank you for tuning in
sorry for the gap
see you next time
in the early stages
of military operations
to disarm Iraq
to free its people
and to defend the world
from grave danger
a short time ago
the United States
military began
major combat operations
in Iran
the threat comes from Iraq
it arises directly
from the Iraqi regime's
own actions
its history of aggression
and its drive
toward an arsenal
of terror
its menacing activities
directly endanger
the United States
our troops
our bases overseas
and our allies
throughout the world
this terrorist regime
can never have
a nuclear weapon
Saddam Hussein
is a homicidal dictator
who is addicted
to weapons of mass destruction
our objective is
to defend the American people
by eliminating
imminent threats
from the Iranian regime
a vicious group
of very hard
terrible people
there can be
no peace
if our security depends
on the will and whims
of a ruthless
and aggressive dictator
and they are indeed
sick and sinister
the Iraqi regime
was required to destroy
its weapons of mass destruction
to cease all development
of such weapons
and to stop all support
for terrorist groups
the Iraqi regime
has violated
all of those obligations
following our
obliteration
of Iran's nuclear program
we warned Iran
not to make any attempt
to rebuild
at a different location
but they ignored
those warnings
and refused to cease
their pursuit
of nuclear weapons
the evidence indicates
that Iraq
is reconstituting
its nuclear weapons program
we warned them
never to resume
their malicious
pursuit of nuclear weapons
satellite photographs
reveal that
Iraq is rebuilding facilities
at sites
that have been part
of its nuclear program
in the past
we sought
repeatedly
to make a deal
we tried
they wanted to do it
they didn't want to do it
again
they wanted to do it
they didn't want to do it
they didn't know
what was happening
they just wanted
to practice evil
the entire world
has witnessed
Iraq's 11-year history
of defiance
deception
and bad faith
for decades
and decades
they rejected
every opportunity
to renounce
their nuclear ambitions
and we can't take it anymore
some believe
we can address this danger
by simply resuming
the old approach
to inspections
and applying diplomatic
and economic pressure
yet this is precisely
what the world has tried to do
since 1991
for 47 years
the Iranian regime
has chanted
death to America
and waged
an unending campaign
of bloodshed
and mass murder
targeting the United States
our troops
and the innocent people
in many many countries
Iraq possesses ballistic missiles
with a likely range
of hundreds of miles
far enough to strike
Saudi Arabia
Israel
Turkey
and other nations
the regime's conventional
ballistic missile program
was growing rapidly
and dramatically
and this posed
a very clear colossal
threat to America
and our forces
stationed overseas
in the last year alone
the Iraqi military
is fired upon American
and British pilots
more than 750 times
the regime already
had missiles capable
of hitting Europe
and our bases
both local and overseas
and would soon have
had missiles capable
of reaching
our beautiful America
regime change in Iraq
is the only certain means
of removing a great
danger to our nation
the dictator of Iraq
is a student of Stalin
using murder
as a tool of terror
and control
the regime has armed
trained and funded
terrorist militias
that have soaked
the earth with blood
and guts
Saddam Hussein
is harboring terrorists
and the instruments of terror
we're ensuring that
the world's number one
sponsor
of terror
can never obtain
a nuclear weapon
in addition to declaring
and destroying
all of its weapons
of mass destruction
Iraq must end
its support for terrorism
we're ensuring that
the Iranian regime
cannot continue to arm
fund and
direct terrorist
armies outside of their borders
it has given shelter
and support to terrorism
and practices terror
against its own people
Iran is the world's
number one state sponsor
of terror
and just recently killed
tens of thousands
of its own citizens
on the street
as they protested
we've experienced
the horror of
September the 11th
and it was Iran's proxy
Hamas
that launched
the monstrous
October 7th attacks
on Israel
we have seen that
those who hate America
are willing to crash airplanes
in the buildings
full of innocent people
slaughtering more than
1,000 innocent people
including 46 Americans
while taking 12
of our citizens hostage
it was brutal
something like
the world has never seen before
the attacks of September the 11th
showed our country
that vast oceans
no longer protect us from danger
before that tragic date
we had only hints
about Qaeda's plans and designs
today in Iraq
we see a threat
whose outlines
are far more clearly defined
and whose consequences
could be far more deadly
an Iranian regime
armed with long-range missiles
and nuclear weapons
would be an intolerable threat
to the Middle East
but also to
the American people
the Iraqi dictator
must not be permitted
to threaten America
and the world
with horrible poisons
and diseases
and gases
and atomic weapons
I'll say it again
they can never have
a nuclear weapon
if we know Saddam Hussein
has dangerous weapons today
and we do
does it make any sense
for the world to wait
to confront him
as he grows even stronger
and develops even more
dangerous weapons
this was our last best chance
to strike
what we're doing right now
and eliminate the intolerable threats
posed by this
sick and sinister regime
now is before
we will secure our nation
protect our freedom
and help others
to find freedom of their own
to the great proud people of Iran
I say tonight
that the hour of your freedom
is at hand
the lives of Iraqi citizens
would improve dramatically
if Saddam Hussein
were no longer in power
when we are finished
take over your government
it will be yours to take
this will be probably
your only chance
for generations
America is a friend
to the people of Iraq
America is backing you
with overwhelming strength
and devastating force
America believes that all people
are entitled to hope
and human rights
people everywhere
prefer freedom to slavery
prosperity to squalor
self-government
to the rule of terror and torture
now is the time to seize control
of your destiny
and to unleash
the prosperous and glorious future
that is close within your reach
our demands are directed
only at the regime
that enslaves them
when these demands are met
the first and greatest benefit
will come to Iraqi men
women and children
this is the moment for action
do not let it pass