This is more important than anything else in your life, and the media is burying it.
It is a devastating, unstoppable surgical strike weapon that basically drops metal lightning out of the sky like Thor's hammer or the comets of God.
Nobody has a defense against it, and the range of these weapons, once mounted on intercontinental boosters, is global.
The West must now either back off or go nuclear. They will probably choose to go nuclear out of desperation, be warned.
Russia has just changed the course of warfare and achieved global dominance.
Nobody in the Western press even has a clue. They are too stupid, too woke, or too arrogant to realize what just happened.
Twenty-two years ago, when the US pulled out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty with Russia,
Vladimir Putin held a press conference and announced that if we pursued this development of anti-ballistic missiles that his only response would be to develop next-generation weaponry.
Then, 17 years ago, he held a press conference and announced that they were actually doing it.
Eight years ago, he held a press conference and announced that they have it.
What he was talking about was the Orzhnik missile that was just used against Ukraine last week.
In this video, I'm also going to show you that one of the greatest threats to your life right now is Western media
and the big tech giants that control a lot of the media as well, that you are being lied to.
So, let's get into it. This is a video that I made eight years ago, and it was from a Silver Summit presentation in 2016.
So I'm at the Silver Summit in San Francisco.
And just before going to the Silver Summit, I saw this video with Vladimir Putin that was so important that I had to take a large chunk of my stage time.
I only had like half an hour on stage. It's very important.
And I took a large chunk and I dedicated it to this because people had to know about it. Why?
Because this super important press conference by the president of Russia was not carried by any of the Western media.
Here, he says, how can you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction?
So let's get into it.
Now, what I've done here, the video was put together with his 2016 press conference.
And then at the end, they put the 2007. So I've switched those to go in chronological order.
So this is from 2007. And this is actually where he discloses that they are working on this next generation weaponry.
So again, hypothetically, we understand that there will be a moment in time where our nuclear potential will be completely neutralized.
So he's talking about if Russia gets surrounded with NATO countries that have these anti-ballistic missiles,
their nuclear potential will be completely neutralized.
And for somebody in the West, that sounds like a good idea that he goes on.
Our current nuclear capability, I mean, can be completely neutralized by this anti-missile defense system.
If this is the case, then that means that the balance of power in the world will be completely upset.
And the balance of power is what stabilized things.
That means that one of the powers will feel a complete sense of security,
which in turn means that it can do whatever it likes, not only in regional conflicts,
but now we are talking about its unmatched might in global conflict.
Therefore, we will respond accordingly. But how?
So remember, this is 2007. We can match you in your actions and build an equally great multi-million dollar anti-missile defense system.
Or, taking into account our economic and financial capability in the current day back in 2007, Russia was still in a shambles.
We can respond asymmetrically.
So that it is clear to all that, yes, there is an anti-missile defense system in Europe.
He's talking about the US's installations in NATO.
But as it relates to Russia, it is entirely pointless.
Because we have, we have 2007, we have a weapon that can simply nullify it.
This is the path that we are going to take. It works out cheaper for us.
Now, by the way, this is exactly what Robert McNamara said to Kossijian back in, I think, 1967 when the USSR was going to build an anti-ballistic missile system around Moscow
so that our warheads couldn't get through.
He said that our response has to be to just build more offensive weapons and overwhelm your anti-ballistic missile system.
But in no way is this aggression against the United States.
I fully mirror your behavior when you say that your anti-missile defense system is not targeted against us.
Then our new weaponry is not targeted against you either.
So this is 2007 announcing this next generation.
Now we're skipping to 2016.
And this next thing that he's saying here, I mean, he knew that our press was constantly lying to us.
But I'm not even going to hope that you are going to relay everything exactly how I said it in your publications.
So he's talking to a whole bunch of reporters, but the reporters from the West didn't even cover any of this.
They didn't take the opportunity to twist what he says and turn him into this evil guy.
What they did was they completely ignored this huge press conference that everybody should have known about.
I must remind you, though, that you already know this, that the major global conflicts have been avoided in the past few decades
due to the geostrategic balance of power which used to exist.
The two super nuclear powers essentially agreed to stop producing both offensive weaponry as well as defensive weaponry.
It's simple how it works. Where one side becomes dominant in their military potential,
they are more likely to want to be the first to be able to use such power.
So first strike capability if you know your opponent can't strike back.
This is the absolute linchpin to international security, the anti-missile defense system as previously prohibited in international law
and all of the surrounding agreements that used to exist.
It's not in my nature to scold someone, but when the United States unilaterally withdrew from the ABM Treaty of 72,
they delivered a colossal blow to the entire system of international security.
That was the first blow when it comes to assessing the strategic balance of power in the world.
At the time, 2002, so that's when we pulled out of the anti-ballistic missile defense treaty,
I said that we will not be developing such systems also because A, it's very expensive and B,
we weren't yet sure how they will work and then they've inserted for the Americans.
We're not going to burn our money.
We're going to take a different option and we're going to develop offensive weaponry in order to retain geostrategic balance.
And I assure you that today we have had every success in that area.
So we have had past tense.
They already had the basic workings of the Orzhnik missile that was just tested,
which as you're going to see is quite a weapon.
And we continue to develop new generation warfare.
I'm not even going to mention the systems against the missile defense system.
No matter what we said to our American partners to curb the production of weaponry,
they refused to cooperate with us.
They rejected our offers and continued to do their own thing.
And whether or not you believe me, we offered real solutions to stop this arms race.
It's only you that they tell tall tales to and you spread it to the citizens of your countries.
Your people in turn do not feel a sense of impending danger.
This is what worries me.
And this is absolutely true.
We aren't feeling this impending sense of danger,
but we are so very close to World War III.
It is just absolutely ridiculous.
How can you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction?
I don't know how to get through to you anymore.
So that was the presentation that you didn't get the opportunity to see.
This has 4.7 million views from eight years ago.
And a lot of those came because I made that presentation in San Francisco in 2016
and told people to go watch this video.
But the mainstream media did not carry this thing that was and is still so important to your life.
Now, let's take a look at what the mainstream media is doing today.
There is a risk.
I don't know how big the risk is,
but there's always a bunch of probabilities and possibilities.
And there's a bell curve.
And I feel like there's maybe a 1 in 10 chance that we won't be around in April.
And it's because of neocons in Washington that have the administration's ear.
I think there's probably some very evil people that we don't even know about.
We don't know who their names are.
But they believe that a nuclear war is winnable.
And so Putin just unveiled this weapon to try and sort of shut them up.
They didn't go on full attack.
You'll see what they bombed in just a moment.
So how is the press handling this?
Well, here are the headlines.
Not that we are nearing World War III.
This is important to me.
I'll make a video on it later.
But look at all this stuff.
There is just a lot of this.
Some of it's important to some people.
Some of it is just fluff.
But there's nothing in here about the war in Ukraine
and the escalation that is happening.
Nothing.
And then you go to Google News.
And again, there's some news, some fluff.
Everything has a spin to it and almost nothing about the war
that has us right on the edge of World War III.
Let's go to a publication that tends to lean one direction only.
But again, it's buried.
There's nothing there.
And so this is the most important thing in my life and your life
unless you have a loved one or you are dying right now.
This is more important than anything else in your life.
And the media is burying it.
Now, I tried when I did my US Enters World War III video
a couple of weeks ago.
We tried to boost the map that shows why Russia feels surrounded.
That video that I did eight years ago.
And you pay YouTube and the algorithms and stuff
will recommend a video that you're paying to boost.
And it was disapproved because of election advertising policy
in the United States.
It requires a certificate as election advertising.
And it was clickbait and sensationalist.
This video I did eight years ago that has 5.5 million views.
Their saying needs an election advertising certificate
for us to be able to boost it.
So the video is still there.
You can go and watch it if you want.
Then I googled maps of which countries are NATO members.
Unfortunately, this video is not available in your region.
Now, I'm seeing this more and more and more that the news entities
and the big tech giants that run tech media,
if the history is not the way they would like it to be,
they delete it.
And so we're getting a spin that is you're being lied to.
That's what it comes down to.
Now, after I had released that video,
I discovered that John Mirzheimer released a video nine years ago.
So a year before that video, why the Ukraine is the West's fault.
I highly recommend watching this video.
We are going to put all the links in the information just below the video.
So click that more information button and open that up.
All the links to all of these things are going to be there.
But basically, John Mirzheimer is professor of political science
at Chicago University.
He's a government advisor and he has written a lot of books on these subjects.
But in my video, that stage presentation back from 2016,
I showed a map of the NATO expansion.
So in 1942, it was just a few countries.
And then this is 1982.
Now, in 1990, we promised that the United States promised
that NATO would not expand one inch eastward.
And if they let us unite,
let East and West Germany unite, unify.
And NATO will stop its expansion.
And that was a promise by the United States.
Well, where are we today?
This is the NATO expansion and these super dark blue countries.
This was 2023 and this was March of this year, 2024.
We're still expanding NATO.
The Ukraine wants to be part of NATO.
And so that is what this war is being fought about.
Russia, these NATO countries, we can install U.S.
It's a NATO military base, but it's basically a U.S. military base with U.S. weaponry.
And so it's in all of these countries right on the border with Russia.
Well, what does this do to the threat of nuclear war?
Here, look at the buffer zone that there was between Moscow,
which is slightly misplaced.
I have to apologize for that.
Moscow is right about here.
So this is a map.
When you're dealing with maps, the borders are constantly changing.
And I had to find something that had some uniformity over the period from 1949 to 2016 when I made this presentation.
And so I settled on a map and then I had one of my animators and graphic artists make this thing.
But we added Denmark.
I can't remember what year, but all their subs and ships can be monitored now trying to get to the Atlantic.
We keep on adding countries.
But look at the buffer zone going across here to Italy and then up West Germany and Norway as far as the distance to Moscow.
And then we were going to unite East Germany and that was it.
Just allow East Germany.
That's all we would take and look at what has happened since then.
And so they just cannot, and Putin has said this, that they cannot allow pretty much at any price.
At the price of World War III, they cannot allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO and have U.S. military bases.
They're going to be NATO bases, but with all the U.S. weapons and a bunch of U.S. soldiers right on their border.
This is the cause of this war in Ukraine.
And John Meersheimer said it nine years ago in that video.
So I highly suggest that you watch some of these things.
By the way, that video is long, but the end of it, I believe there's a Q&A.
So actually you only need to watch like the first 20 minutes.
This is from the U.S. Department of Defense.
U.S. withdraws from intermediate range nuclear forces treaty.
And so it withdrew.
The treaty was from 1987.
It withdrew in 2019.
21 years ago, today, this was back in 2000, written in 2002, U.S. rips up the anti-ballistic missile treaty with Russia.
Slow slide toward the current crisis.
U.S. withdrawal from ABM treaty continues to adversely affect global security 20 years after.
Now, I included on purpose U.S. Defense Department, so coming from the United States government,
but also Sputnik International.
I don't know what SputnikGlobe.com is,
but just in case it's Russian, I wanted to balance it out with U.S. announcing these things.
But this has destabilized things.
So now Zelensky offers an end to the hot phase.
Not an end to the war, but the hot phase of the war in exchange for NATO membership.
So he's saying that if Russia allows them to join NATO,
the whole reason for this war, that he'll end the hot phase of this war.
And U.S. officials discussing nuclear weapons, giving nuclear weapons to Ukraine.
Well, it's actually giving the nuclear weapons that we bought from them to create a more secure world after the USSR dissolved.
The U.S. bought up a bunch of these weapons.
So it would be giving them these old nuclear weapons that...
I can't imagine that these nuclear weapons that were built in the 70s and the 80s are all that safe to have sitting around these days.
But we actually had discussions about giving them back to Ukraine.
Now I would imagine that these talks have come to an end now that we've seen the Orzhnik missile.
So Russia says that if the West transfers nuclear weapons to Ukraine,
it will equate to an attack on Moscow providing grounds for a nuclear response.
Now no matter which side of this you're on,
if you think that the U.S. is always right or if you think that maybe Putin was reasonable throughout all of these years,
it doesn't matter which side you're on.
What matters is, do we want to have a world where there is a risk that we won't be around in four months?
And my biggest problem is that... I'm going to move on with this. I'm sorry I'm rambling.
Those who dream of beating Russia on the battlefield ought to know Russia has not started anything serious yet.
And then President Putin says Russia will not allow Ukraine to obtain nuclear weapons.
We will use every weapon at our disposal, every weapon.
We will not let this happen. So this cannot happen.
Ukraine cannot become a NATO member. They can't have U.S. bases on their soil.
They can't have nuclear weaponry or U.S. weaponry.
This is what is destabilizing the entire world.
Russia's state media, how fast can the Orzhnik missile hit U.S. bases across the world?
So this is a Russian... he's a colonel. This is him right here.
He's a retired Russian Army colonel explaining the capabilities of the Orzhnik missile.
And so what we're going to do here, from where they launched it into Ukraine,
they can hit U.S. air base in Kuwait in 11 minutes, U.S. fleet headquarters in Bahrain in 12 minutes,
U.S. air base in Qatar in 13 minutes, and U.S. air base in Djibouti, which is down in Africa in 20 minutes.
But this goes a lot further than that. You really need to watch these things.
If they make an installation, and this can be a mobily launched missile, you're going to see that in a moment.
It can hit the U.S. air base in Alaska in 12 minutes, Guam 22 minutes, and Pearl Harbor in 25 minutes,
but it gets even worse if they... I don't know how to pronounce...
Anyway, if they put an installation there, you're talking about 23 minutes to the Minuteman silos in Montana
and 24 minutes to the Minuteman silos in North Dakota.
Now the way that this really destabilizes the world, if this is submarine launched,
it means that it could be six minutes that the U.S. has to decide whether or not to end the world
because Washington is about to be vaporized.
Actually, this system doesn't vaporize things. You'll see that in a moment.
But I want you to look at some of the things he says.
If today these schemes and routes seem fantastic to some,
the escalation spiral of the U.S. and NATO may tomorrow make them a reality.
The world is being dragged in this irreversible direction, as Putin said,
and we, you and me, we need to stop it.
You need to pick up your telephone, write a letter, make an email,
and send it to Congress and the Senate because where are they on this?
They haven't said anything.
They need to be a nuisance to the White House on this.
We all need to slow this down and it doesn't matter what side you're on.
If the potential is that humanity doesn't exist in just a few months,
then we all need to get together regardless of your opinion about Russia, Putin, or the U.S.
We just need to slow this whole thing down and figure out a way out of it and talk.
So I highly recommend reading this analysis by Black Mountain Analysis.
And please watch these videos.
This is important.
This should be the most important thing in your life.
If you have kids and you want to see them grow up, watch this.
This is important.
So both of these videos, and then, like I said, it can be mobile launching.
But here I'm going to play once again because this is how they calculated the speed of Mach 11.8.
They know from the weather reports and everything, they know the cloud cover height that night.
And so they can measure the time that it takes the incoming missiles to come through the clouds and strike the ground.
And with backing that up, they can calculate the, it's four kilometers per second or Mach 8.
So that's it for that one.
Here is a close-up.
So you can see the multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles.
I'll back that up.
So you can see that there's six of them that land at once.
Now, they do a great, it gets very technical.
It has formulas and all of this kind of stuff.
But these aren't weapons that are explosive.
It's a kinetic energy weapon.
And so this is the speed measured in Mach number.
This is the equivalent metric tons of TNT as the force that is released solely from the impact.
So this is nothing but a bullet striking the ground.
And the thing about this is this only goes to Mach 10.
Mach 11 would be about there.
Mach 11.8 would be way out here.
So for this exponential curve, you'd have to go way up here to like eight or nine metric tons of TNT.
As far as the, if it's a 500 kilogram mass, it's not a warhead.
It's a bullet.
And then they show the way the impact fractures all of the ground below it.
So this fractures underground bunkers.
It can destroy ships or silos or almost any military installation.
And it's a precision missile.
It can, it not only flies more than twice as fast as any of our missiles, but it can make evasive maneuvers.
So this is unstoppable by, there is no country that has anything that can stop this.
So here they've got more formulas and stuff, but the conclusions are pretty important.
This message by President Putin is clear.
Stop it or there will be consequences.
States have the chance to steer away from World War III, which is just around the corner.
The next few months will be critical.
And so if we don't want World War III, we need to stop this.
This is another one that was very enlightening, mostly because recalling how concerned he, now they're talking about Putin here.
Recalling how concerned he is about avoiding World War III.
It also makes sense why his spokesman confirmed that Russia informed the U.S. about this, about the attack on Ukraine with the Orzhnik missiles approximately half an hour ahead of time.
So Russia contacted the United States, said we're doing an attack and we don't want you to misinterpret this as nuclear.
This is not World War III. This isn't the beginning of World War III, although I believe that the beginning has already begun.
Now, Jeffrey Sachs, Professor of Sustainable Development, but he's also a great historian and political analyst.
And I highly recommend watching this next video.
This is really, it truly is.
The Savior says everyone needs to watch this video and you do.
So I'm going to scrub through this just so I can bring out some highlights.
This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day.
It started in 1990 and James Baker III, Secretary of State, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification.
Now I'm going to scrub through a little bit more of this and then starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off, basically a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine.
And in context, we're putting the goddamn missiles.
After breaking a treaty in 2019, we walked out of the Internet, intermediate nuclear force treaty.
And so a lot of this has been the United States fault and it's these neocons that are threatening your life and mine.
We don't know who they are, but we have to get rid of them is what we need to do.
So watch that video moving on.
There's another video of John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs.
This is 54 minutes long, so it's a bit long, but it's a very good video and they both have valid points.
But Jeffrey Sachs is more, his point is to try and prevent the end of humanity.
And I side with that one myself.
Now this is spreading globally, the triggers for consequences of Russia's possible missile deployment to the Asia Pacific.
So this is in response to a question as countries deployment will depend on the deployment of corresponding U.S. systems in any region of the world.
So their plan is, you know, we've got bases all over the world. Russia does not.
Well, you know, they're talking with North Korea.
There's going to be tit for tat.
There will be bases around the world.
So the world is becoming a more and more dangerous place all the time.
It is, this is really bad.
You and I need to do something about it.
We need to write our congressman, email your congressman, your senators, congressmen and women, I should say.
And pick up the phone, do anything you can, get somebody else involved in it.
But if you want your children to grow up, do something about it.
This is your job and my job.
It is the most important thing that there is right now.
Now, so far, almost nobody in the West fully comprehends the OSHNIC weapon system just demonstrated by Russia.
I've done the math on the kinetic energy of the sub munitions and I've studied up on what's publicly known about these weapons so far.
My conclusion, NATO is done.
The West has no idea what just hit them.
Russia's OSHNIC weapon system is checkmate for NATO and the U.S.
All U.S. aircraft carriers can be destroyed in a minute.
All U.S. military bases, all underground bunkers, all ICBM launch sites, naval shipyards, etc., can be destroyed with a non-nuclear kinetic energy via the OSHNIC.
There are no active treaties that I'm aware of prohibiting this weapon system and it does not destroy surrounding infrastructure or masses of civilians.
It is a devastating, unstoppable surgical strike weapon that basically drops metal lightning out of the sky like Thor's hammer or the comets of God.
Nobody has a defense against it and the range of these weapons, once mounted on intercontinental boosters, is global.
The West must now either back off or go nuclear.
They will probably choose to go nuclear out of desperation, be warned.
Russia has just changed the course of warfare and achieved global dominance.
Nobody in the Western press even has a clue.
They are too stupid, too woke, or too arrogant to realize what just happened.
So I urge you, read all of these things, watch these things.
It's time to pull back, take a breath, get our senses about us once again.
And you know, I wanted you to watch another video, but this video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on violent or graphic content.
It didn't have any violent or graphic content in it.
I mean, a lot of you watch this video.
I urge you to watch this version of Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot.
But the powers that be think this is information that they don't want you to know.
Well, the Pale Blue Dot is probably the best information that you can take in that gets you to just sort of pull back from all of the stress, the opinions, the antagonism that is going on.
And take a breath and take a look at this thing realistically.
So I found this version.
Make sure you watch this.
It's great.
It's another version, probably better than the old version.
And you've got to watch it to the end where you see Carl Sagan from the series Cosmos, which by the way, I purchased recently on DVD so that I can it's from the 70s that I want to rewatch it.
This man, you should have great reverence for him after you watch this.
I want to thank you for watching this video.
Please like and subscribe and do something.
Call your congressman, send a letter, send an email.
Thanks for watching.
We'll see you next time.