What's up y'all? This is Wheezy. If you enjoy this content, please remember to like and share.
You really enjoy it. Please feel free to leave a review, send love to each and one of y'all.
What's up friends? Happy Sunday. Hope everyone is doing rather exquisite. Thank you guys for
joining me on this very fabulous and fantastic Sunday from Florida with Love. I want to
shout out to the Australian listeners. Got a few of you that leave comments. Shout out to y'all.
Shout out to, of course, the lovely UK listeners that tune in every damn week. Shout out to the
Canadian listeners. There's quite a few of y'all as well. And can't forget the Irish. Hell yeah.
And everyone that listens out here in the States. Shout out to each and one of y'all man.
I'm really grateful for all the awesome people that listen. I don't call you guys followers.
If you guys vibe with me, we are friends. Now if you talk shit about me, we are not friends.
You are a follower. And we'll leave it at that. John will be joining me here very soon.
And we will be going over the Epstein stuff. John Brissum.
It's not because he's my friend. I love the guy. We view things in a lot of the same ways.
But as far as Epstein stuff, he knows his shit. We have some
differences when it comes to religion, for example. But as I stated before,
I don't want an echo chamber. You know, I know some people get mad at me because
I'll talk to this person. I got some someone saying I love you easy, but I don't like John.
I don't care. I'm going to talk to who I want to talk to. I don't care who it is.
And I'm not asking you guys to vibe with my guests either, you know, but John is
genuinely a buddy of mine. We view religion in polar opposite ways, but everything else we
vibe with, man. And when it comes to Epstein stuff, he does his research. He knows what the
hell he's talking about. And that's why I'm excited to have him on and break down what's
been happening. A lot of these things that we're going to cover today are things that him and I,
we were both shouting from the rooftops for many years now.
I've, uh, when I first started my show, if you some of you probably have, especially
the hardcore listeners that have gone back and listened to the back catalog,
some of my early episodes was talking shit about Trump. And even back then people was telling me,
look wheezy, I like most of the stuff you say, but don't go after Trump. Trump is here to drain
the swamp. He's here to turn the government upside down, root out all the pedals.
And I held my ground. I go, no, man, when you have someone that had to settle a Ponzi scheme
lawsuit in Trump University for $20 million, that's your hero. That's who you're going to put
your faith on. Hell no. So many years ago, I, I put my foot down. I put my line in the sand.
I go, I ain't falling for this shit. I view all politicians as corrupt.
Doesn't matter if it's on the left or the right. And I know that stings some people and I don't
care. I could only be myself. And so it sucks, but it's also satisfying to a degree that I've
been vindicated. All the stuff that I had been saying about Trump, even people that were
somewhat skeptical of Trump were saying wheezy, you know, I don't like Trump either,
but that's probably a bridge too far making these accusations of Trump and Epstein.
And I go, hell no. I have every damn reason, rhyme and reason
or the views that I have on Trump. He's a sleaze bag. Always has been a sleaze bag.
He was just giving a makeover via Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon is pretty much the architect of the
MAGA movement. Here you go, Trump. He put on this red hat, put on some jeans. You're good to go,
homie. And a lot of people bought that shit. And I kept telling these magas. Steve Bannon
is your guy. Steve Bannon, who was best friends with Epstein as well. That is your guy.
What in the hell am I missing here? Oh, no, no, but you don't understand wheezy. Trump is going to
root out the pedophiles. He's going to stop child trafficking. This is like the Fox Guard in the
henhouse. What are you talking about? And I feel vindicated. A lot of these things
that I had been saying for many years can now be, I guess you can say corroborated, verified.
And I wanted to discuss this when John comes back a little further because
now that a lot of this stuff has been corroborated, now what? Why are we hearing this now? What is
going on? Are we being styled with this new information? And that's just the way my brain,
my brain works. So for those that may have been
out of the loop as to what has been going on this week, I want to let's read an article
by a left wing, left wing rag NPR. And again, if you are new to me, it's not because I'm,
I'm a lefty or any of that. No, you can get some truth bombs from the left and the right.
You got to sift through it. You got to put it through the filters and
and see things for what they are. But let's see what the mainstream is talking about.
This room NPR by Shannon Bond.
From November 15th, 2025, right wing media shrugs off latest Epstein document release.
What do thousands of pages of newly released material reveal about the well documented
relationship between convicted sex offender Jeff Epstein and President Donald Trump?
Not much of anything, according to some of the right wing influencers who have long been
clamoring for the government to release more information about Epstein and his crimes.
To me, these are nothing burgers if they're even real.
Oh, pro Trump podcaster John Harold said on his Badlands media rumble live stream on Wednesday,
Harold gained an audience in the wake of 2020 election after spreading QAnon adjacent conspiracy
theories. We're going to touch on QAnon later on. Another sigh up to discredit serious inquiries
into Trump being part of the goddamn swamp himself.
Continuing on, his fellow Badlands media personality Brian Lupo took a slightly
different view on his own live stream this week. The emails didn't exactly say nothing,
he claimed, but they show that Trump was informing on Epstein and his associate
Ghislaine Maxwell, who was serving a 20 year prison term for helping Epstein sexually abuse
underage girls. And this is what the article saying Epstein died by suicide while in jail during
his first Trump administration. Yeah. Oh, shit. Continuing on, my take on this Epstein and
Maxwell are trying to figure out who's a mole or a rat or an informant in their circle of
friends, Lupo said, referring to an email in which Epstein called a dog that didn't bark.
The White House has denied that Trump was an informant.
This cracks me up. Epstein looms large for many conspiracy theorists, including QAnon believers.
He's seen as a prime example of the satanic cabal of pedophiles they believe are entrenched
among the world's most powerful people. QAnon adherents think Donald Trump is destined to defeat
the cabal. Trump has acknowledged he and Epstein were once friendly but fell out decades ago.
He's denied any knowledge of Epstein's trafficking or of underage girls. While
one of the newly released emails suggests Trump did know about Epstein's behavior,
some right wing media figures say the new disclosures prove Trump did nothing wrong.
He didn't do nothing. Nothing wrong.
They're claiming it's a hoax. They're claiming that the Democrats are cherry picking the things
that make Trump look at his worst and that these things prove that he didn't actually do anything
wrong and that he's not a criminal. Then he was actually gathering information for FBI on Epstein.
Said Mike Rothschild, an independent journalist and author who has written extensively about
conspiracy theories and QAnon. He said that is very different from the song they were
singing a few years before that, which is that if we just bring down Epstein ring,
all of the Democrats are going down with him. Bullshit. People like me have been saying
this episode stuff wasn't going to come out because it involves people on both sides.
So as I'm reading this article to you, you can see the bullshit narrative. This
as well as you can see the Psyop tentacles, even through this article,
which is supposed to tell us what's going on with the latest Epstein emails
continuing on. Many prominent Democrats are shown communicating with Epstein in the newly
released emails. Still, another common thread on the right is that the release is a distraction
by Democrats. They think that the Epstein thing is something that is going to distract you from
their failures. Although the Epstein thing, all it's really doing is exposing more Democrat
failures. Vince Conglianese, a radio host and editorial director of the Daily Caller,
said on his rumble live stream on Thursday that it goes, President Trump's true social post accusing
Democrats of using Epstein to deflect from the fallout over the government shutdown.
On Friday, he called on the Justice Department to investigate Democrats mentioned in the
emails. Attorney General Pam Bondi said he was appointing a federal prosecutor to lead a
probe. Meanwhile, some prominent influencers and conservative media outlets are essentially
ignoring this week's release of documents. They already know that their fans are on board 100%
with whatever Trump does. Rothschilds said there's nothing for them here. At the same time,
the emails are fueling new speculation on both the right and the left as people race to
interpret Epstein's often cryptic language. To Rothschilds, that is a fool's errand. Jeffrey
Epstein was like, not the most trustworthy person you're taking. You are taking him at his word
because you want to believe him when he says things that are either good about Trump or bad
about Trump, he said. It's absolutely maddening, circular discourse, and it gets us absolutely
nowhere. I actually kind of believe what he, yeah, I kind of vibe with that last sentiment.
People are going to take the shit they want to go with and ignore the other shit that counters
what they already value. And just as I thought, John, check, I, I check my phone because I was
like, fuck, I don't think I sent John the Streamyard link. Check your if you're listening,
dude, check the
check your
gosh darn it. Your ex, I'm going to send it to you right now. Gosh darn it. I tell you what.
The hell, dude. Okay. I just sent it to you on X, bro. Check it out. Sorry about that.
Uh, check X.
Yeah, I just it just barely dawned on me. I'm like, damn it. I don't think I I sent it over to him.
So he'll be joining me here very, very shortly.
And, uh, yeah, I have a feeling once John hits it, we're this going to be a banger of a show.
Uh, he knows a lot. I know some, I don't know as much as he does, but I know quite a bit. I know
my fair share of, uh, Epstein stuff. This is what actually one of the reasons why I started my podcast
six years ago.
It's following this Epstein stuff. And I was like, man,
how the hell is it that I'm seeing this and no one else is seeing it. And so that's why
I started doing my podcast and started giving my own takes. I started
shit talking Trump when I first started my podcast because no one else was doing it.
Even someone whose work I, I respect, I suppose, like Whitney Webb, she wouldn't talk nothing
about Trump and Epstein. And I'm like, well, if she's not doing it, I'm going to do it.
And that's why I started as small as my, my podcast was. And we now have Mr. Johnny
Bryson. What's up, my dog?
What's up, Weezy? Apologize for being late. And if I drop out, I'm going to have to
reset my, uh, router and modem again. I've been having internet issues with Spectrum,
uh, which is why some people have been listening to my streams, uh, especially
when I was interviewing Paul the other night, it completely went down.
So I have no idea what that's about. I'm just going to chalk it up to Spectrum
being a horrible internet service and not any other shenanigans. Who knows?
But I'm glad to be here. Weezy. Sorry that I was late. Apologize.
Dude, don't apologize, man. You're my, you're my dog, man. I completely get it.
Yeah. Um, I don't know if you caught the very beginning, but
I was listening to what you were saying. Yeah, I gave you a little introduction,
man. And as an Epstein researcher, you know, you know what the hell you're talking about.
And I trust you. There's other people out there that call themselves Epstein
researchers. Can't even say Epstein, right? They, they say Epstein.
Complete horseshit, man. This is my man, Johnny,
Bryson, who has done extensive research for those that may be hearing about you for the
first time. Give us a little intro. Yeah. I am a board again, investigative journalist.
I've run the, we've read the documents YouTube channel for years. I have studied Epstein and
Trump's relationship and have interviewed various people about it and have been researching it for
many years, as well as accounts for national policy, which is like the writing version of the
CFR. And I'm currently writing a book on the finders operation, which will hopefully be eventually
be released sometime even though I've been writing it for five years. So me and Weezy are
both ITPs. I apologize for that. It takes me forever to do something. That's how I know
that Stephen King had ghost writers because there's no way he could have written as long as books as he
did and their length and got as many done in the time that he did because he's the same personality
type as you and you and I. And I seriously doubt that. But definitely glad to be here. So
Absolutely, man. It's been, it's been a couple of weeks, maybe a couple of months since we
lasted the show and we were due and what better way to reunite with this week of Epstein
Bonanza, man. All kinds of madness and we're going to break it down.
Over 20,000 emails allegedly were released with many more allegedly due to come out.
And I want to, I want to focus the show today. Last time we did a show called Unmasking MAGA,
I believe, and it was a fire show. Really, really tons of great feedback.
But if at this point you are still MAGA,
I don't know what the hell, I don't know what you're waiting for, man. I mean,
the fact that MAGA voted for the Epstein, I mean, part of the reasons why they voted for
Trump was to release the Epstein files, bring down Epstein, bring down the cabal.
And now Trump is making every goddamn excuse to not release more information
on his best friend, his former best friend. This isn't conjecture. This is a fact that a
lot of MAGA's, for whatever reason, can't still accept it. I've been watching on X,
a lot of these MAGA influencers doing apologetics and doing terrible at it.
They are getting ratioed as they try to backpedal for the Trump administration
and their handling of the Epstein stuff. But what has happened for those that may have missed
it, a quick recap of what happened this week? Yeah, so the Democrat House Oversight Committee
released a lot of emails, have not gone through them all, obviously. We'll talk about
some of the more important ones. Today, and the narratives that have been going around it,
but they released what would be a good chunk of these so-called Epstein files,
if you even want to call it that. All right, so these are emails that Epstein had with Glaine
Maxwell, or emails that Epstein had with Bannon, Stephen Bannon, you know,
from Council for National Policy, remember. Emails that he had with his own brother,
Mark Epstein. Emails that he had with Michael Wolf, who's written a lot of
expose Trump novels, who I am not a fan of at all either. I don't think he's our guy either,
and we'll talk more about why that is later. And you know, just various people that Epstein had
interacted with and majority of the emails have Donald Trump's name in them, among other people
like Bill Clinton, you know. And so we have Epstein interacting with various mockingbird news
agency people, various heads of state, you know, and even giving a disseminating out talking points
to congressmen and women as well, too. I mean, it shows the control that Jeffrey Epstein had,
or at least his nexus, because I think Epstein was lower. I think Glaine was probably,
just like Maxwell is probably higher. So I think it probably went Epstein,
just laying, then people like Lex Wexner and Ahu Brak, right? So probably up here further,
you know, and we really don't know who's actually further than that. It's the same way I look
at the Franklin scandal. We have Laurence King, and then above him, we have Craig Spence.
Okay. So I think Jeffrey Epstein was the lower rung part of the Epstein pedophile nexus. And you
know, I think that though he had some blackmail and had some power, supposedly, allegedly, we're
going to talk about all the narratives, because ultimately, Weezy, and I know you agree with
me on this, ultimately, whether these emails could ever truly be substantiated or not,
right? We really can't to be to be fair. But let's say that, you know, whether they are
real legit, or they are not. Okay. It is a choose your own adventure for whatever part of
the right left paradigm, your own. Okay. If you're MAGA, well, the so-called victim that
was outed in the emails that Donald Trump spent time with was Virginia Roberts Guthrie, and you and
I are going to talk about that in depth with our knowledge of Virginia Roberts Guthrie. Okay. And
then they also have, well, Epstein and his emails, just like Glaine Maxwell, when she gave testimony
to the Trump Administration Department of Justice, you know, she was like, I didn't
read it really do anything. Epstein really didn't do anything. Trump never saw him do anything, right?
Well, these emails, Epstein says all these horrible things about Trump, which are true,
and alludes to Trump being a pedophile, right? But then again, there's some emails where he said
he never did anything, you know? And so right then and there for MAGA, that's enough for them
to spin it. You have Michael Wolf conspiracy with Epstein to blackmail Trump, right? Which is enough
to get them to not look at it at all and think that Trump's not guilty at all, right? Which means
it could go that way. It could be spun that way. Now, why? Because I mean, think if you were
Trump and you were the people behind Trump, right? If you want him to remain in power and not
get rid of him, right? You would think that you would have had him up there, you know,
saying it's always a Democrat hoax. I never had anything to do with it, which he's kind of saying,
but he's not. At the same time, he gets mad at everybody else, and he kind of like does as he
pleases and kind of like goes off the so-called cuff, right? And kind of like weaves all in
these narratives in where he could have been blaming them the whole time that this wasn't
real, right? But he hasn't been doing that. Or you could have them actually eventually have this
avalanche of information come out. And eventually, he has to step down. He's impeached or whatever
they put in JD Vance, which is Peter Thiel's, you know, boy who he's backed, right? But however,
Peter Thiel was in a lot of these emails as well, too, you know. And then you or and you also have
Israel and the Mossad nexus of Epstein through the controlled noticing being exposed as well,
tooth through all this. So again, it could go that way. And then the left, you have, you know,
a lot of emails really going after the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation and Epstein's
connections to the Clinton Foundation and a whole power nexus and Epstein interacting with
Democratic, you know, Congress people to give them talking points and stuff like that, you know,
really showing that that side is just as involved as much as Epstein as the right side is.
So again, it's whomever you want to look at it, whatever you want to look at,
dictates what you want to believe with all this information that has come out. It's a choose
your own adventure literally for Epstein. The thing is, is it's going to be very difficult to get
down to the truth. Now, I believe that Jeffrey Epstein is a pedophile. I believe Glenn Maxwell is
a pedophile. I believe Lex Wexner is a pedophile. I believe Donald Trump is a pedophile. I believe
Bill Clinton is a pedophile, right? But again, are we ever truly going to get any smoking gun
evidence presented to us for sure that this is the case? Or is this some narrative that
they're spinning? You're saying what I'm saying? Am I making any sense to you, man, of how we, you
know, we both look at it, these things to be true, but at the same time, very skeptical of all these
things as well. Yeah, that's what I said. I go, these are things that I had been shouting from
the rooftops for years now. And now some of these things can quote unquote be, I guess
you can say I've been vindicated when people thought I was loony for even suggesting these things.
But now I'm like, it's kind of like the UFO stuff. You know, when I was a kid, I wanted to
believe, I wanted to believe, then the government started promoting UFOs. I don't believe anymore.
And now that the government is kind of putting these things out, my skepticism enters. I'm
like, all right, well, I'm kind of vindicated in the sense, but I still don't trust it.
Why, why are we hearing this? You know, what is really going on? And that's what I'm
I'm trying to figure out. What if this is a another sigh after another sigh, you know,
and one thing I want to tell people, you have to get off of the left, right paradigm nonsense.
You know, when I first started questioning the government, I was still I still had those left
leaning feelings. And so when when the Epstein news went when the news came out that he was
getting arrested, I was already questioning the government. But I was like, damn, this gives
me hope. Maybe the left is going to shape things up. And they they're actually going to arrest Epstein.
And I kept saying when Trump was running, if the Democrats, man, I was rooting for the Democrats
because I had this visceral reaction for Trump. I go, all the Trump, all the Democrats need to
do is bring up Epstein and they win. They're going to win. That's all they got to do.
And I was just this is my stupid way of thinking in retrospect. That's how idiotic I was with his
left, right nonsense. You're going to see left wingers be vocal. We need to release the Epstein
files. We need don't trust any one of these clowns. I can't reiterate that enough
because you're going to fall into the constant left, right, left, right, left, right limbo.
And it does you any it doesn't do any good. And so what I'm being cautious right now
is are we being silenced with all these little drops with all this these new releases coming out?
And if I'm being honest, yeah, man, I'm skeptical because there's some very
salacious stuff that has come out and we're going to go over some of these more salacious bits for sure.
And just because I don't like Trump and I have this visceral reaction to Trump,
does that make these other things true? No, it doesn't. So you have to constantly be
you don't have your head on the swivel for lack of a better term.
Yeah. So let me share my screen. If you want to, we can start looking. Yeah, man.
So let's see. Yeah. So this is kind of what we name the show or what you name the show. Should I
say the show that we're on together? So this was the email that has been going around. I mean,
most people know about this. Okay, this is what I'm hearing from the people in my own personal
life. They're making jokes about this. Well, let me let me interject real quick. Some people know
about this. I was talking. I was talking to someone special the other day and brought this up
and she about like spit out her drink. So some people will be hearing this for the very first
time. Maybe it's made mainstream. It's I know that much because I had normies in my own
personal life, not using the word normie, but you know what I mean, just average people talking
about this. And it's it's made jokes and stuff like that. And it's making its rounds, even so that my
my son's teenage friends are making jokes about this. Okay, even though I told him to stop it,
but they they are. So this is definitely getting some traction. And this is definitely
getting around. Okay. So we have an email between Jeffrey Epstein and his brother Mark
Epstein. Okay. So it reads, How are you doing? This is March 19, 2018. Mark Epstein wrote to
Jeffrey. How are you doing a while back, you bitching that you're prediabetic? Has anything
changed with that? What is your boy Donald up to now? Right. And then Jeffrey Epstein says
all good. I guess he's talking about with him being prediabetic, right? Bannon is with me.
So Steve Academy Bannon is with Jeffrey Epstein at the time. And supposedly Bannon's
interviewed Epstein for so many untold hours and still has not released his documentary on Epstein
yet called Monster. Okay. Then Mark goes ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump a blowing Bubba,
not to be, I guess I could have said it nicer. Sorry about that. But yes, no, no, no, no,
apologize. That's exactly what the email says. And then Jeffrey Epstein goes and I thought I
had to service. We'll get to that maybe in a minute. And then Mark Epstein says you and your
boy Donnie can make a remake of the movie. Get hard. And then Jeffrey Epstein means you mean
Donnie T. And then Mark Epstein says I'd rather be in Donnie D's shoes. Okay. So first of all,
what? Huh? All right. What is going on here?
Something that I've discussed a lot and a lot of people don't want to believe me
is I believe that Roy Cohn groomed Donald Trump and had a homosexual relationship with Donald
Trump. You know, I there is a picture that I might be able to see if I can bring it up.
I'm gonna bring it up. Yeah, go ahead. You can bring it up. Donald Trump dressed in a Roman
Centurion outfit with Roy Cohn at a Studio 54 party. Okay, as well as one time in Dude,
I Cannot Find It. Me and George from CavDev.org have looked for hours. You're just going to
have to take my word on this. I remember reading this book that had this this excerpt that I
found discussing that Roy Cohn had a real estate developer who was blonde and in his 20s half naked
on his yacht. Okay. And I cannot find it again for the life of me, but I have messages of me and
George talking about it, discussing it and then, you know, me and him trying to find it and
not being able to find it. Now I believe that person was Donald Trump. Okay. Then when Roy
Cohn was diagnosed with HIV that later become AIDS that he later died from supposedly allegedly. Okay.
He Donald cut off all contact with him and he was in Roy Cohn was still living in Trump Tower
penniless while Trump was still giving him the money enough to live, but didn't want to have
anything to do with him or talk with him. Now to me that I would believe during the HIV AIDS
crisis with Fauci at the head of that during the 80s. Right. My guess is, is he was upset
that he thought that Roy Cohn could have given him HIV. Right. And that's what caused the rift
between them because we really have no tell between them of truly what the rift between them
was. Okay. So it's my belief that Donald Trump is bisexual. That's easy. Yeah. So for those audio
listeners, go to timestamp 34 minutes and you will see a picture of Roy Cohn with Donald Trump,
the young twink Spartan soldier. So some of you I've showed this image quite a few times already,
but some of you may be seeing this for the first time. This guy right here on the right is DJT
47th president of the United States. So this image that Donald Trump puts on a red
MAGA hat and jeans and like America. It doesn't really coalesce with this other vibe. So
this is important because a lot of people will say, Oh, you guys are, you guys are off base. You
guys are, you guys are out of line. Donald Trump is all man, man. This picture right here from
studio 54. Is he all man? We see? Yeah, man, maybe power bottom, man. Who the hell knows? But
so one thing, and I did a couple shows as well with my other buddy, seven seas.
And one thing that we can't miss or miss sight of here is that that Roy Cohn
was super close to Donald Trump and Roy Cohn, a notorious pedophile, a nefarious character.
And then a couple decades later, he's super close friends with another notorious pedophile,
Jeff Epstein. What are the freaking odds, man? Come on, man. Like, there's going to be people
that are still going to be scoffing. Oh, you guys, that's a bridge too far. That's a bridge
too far. So it doesn't matter what we say. Doesn't matter what evidence we present.
They're still going to hold on to their little fairy tale that Trump is just
a good old fashioned American man, America first, blah, blah, blah. And there's really no,
no use in presenting any any further evidence there. They're going to latch on to that no
matter what. And again, we have the mention of blackmail for Putin, right? We have blackmail
for Putin and probably blackmail for BB Netanyahu. So blackmail with Trump from Israel and blackmail
with Trump was Russia throughout all of these Epstein emails. And of course, I'm going to butcher
the Yiddish pronunciation of this word. Tessurus in Yiddish means trouble. So Jeffrey Epstein says,
you know, he goes ask him if Putin has photos of Trump blowing Bubba.
And Jeffrey Epstein goes, and I thought I had trouble. So, you know,
now this was made a joke. It's being pushed as a joke throughout social media. There was
another joke, oh, dear Lord, I don't even want to repeat this, where people were going
around saying that Glaine Maxwell had a horse named Bubba. Yes. Yes. That's true to my knowledge
that well, I tried here. I was doing further research on it. It is unverified. Yes. So it
hasn't been deemed false completely. But it also hasn't been verified. Correct. So to me that
that's interesting as well. So you can't completely write it off 100%.
Correct. Agreed. You can't. And then of course, what I sent you immediately right afterwards
was a statement from Mark Epstein, which should make us all giggle. Okay. So I'm going to read
this one. For immediate release, statement from Mark Epstein regarding Bubba reference in
recent released emails, which Bubba, by the way, me living here in the South,
that was the main nickname that was used for Bill Clinton here in the South. Okay. Like the moment
I read Bubba, I knew ultimately that was talking about Bill Clinton because I'm from the South.
I heard my father say it, who actually was, you know, all intents and purposes somewhat of a,
he was conservative socially, but fiscally Democrat, but he was no fan of Bill Clinton.
But he used to call him Bubba. My grandfather used to call him Bubba. That was always a codename for
Bill Clinton. Okay. It's like with Don, you have Teflon Don, right? For Donald Trump.
I don't know about no Teflon Don based on the picture I have on the screen right now.
Yes. So let me finish reading this. So statement from Mark Epstein regarding Bubba reference in
recent released emails and the light of recent speculations surrounding the release of eternal
emails related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Mark Epstein issues the following statement to
clarify the point that has been misinterpreted in public discussion. Recently emails from 2018,
between my brother and me, were made public. They were simply part of a humorous private
exchange between two brothers and were never meant for public release or to be interpreted
as serious remarks. For the evidence of avoidance of doubt, the reference to Bubba and
his correspondence is not in any way a reference to former president Bill Clinton.
Any attempt to conflate this reference with Bill Clinton or to read sweeping implications into them
misrepresents both the purpose and the tone of the original correspondence.
Well, it's to be absolutely clear on this point. So the public record is not distorted.
And so the speculation is not to fairly implicate people who are not actually
being referenced in these communications. So pause there for a moment.
What I could tell Mark Epstein is lying about this. Let me ask yourself, John,
how and why? Well, first he says it's a joke. And the second he goes, it wasn't about Bill
Clinton. It can't be both. So what Bubba? You don't give me a Bubba you were referring to,
Mark. You don't give me the Bubba you were referring to in this email. Now, if the whole thing was,
it was a joke between brothers. Fine. I get that. You know, I understand that. But that's how
you know that it's likely about Bill Clinton because he messes up his own statement here.
Yeah. Any thoughts on that? Yeah. My thoughts is
under what context you are you talking about a Donnie blowing a dude named Bubba?
You know what I mean? Like what other context is there to make out of that?
I can't think of any, you know, any other context. And who knows, maybe perhaps.
Perhaps. Yeah. Perhaps this is the version, you know, of Bubba that Donnie coalesced around.
Wearing the blue dress, right? I mean, you also have the picture of him
when they went golfing, right? In the video of him like touching Bill Clinton's like stomach and
love handles, right? I mean, you could even show the full video and out of the back of people
were like, well, you're just taking that one still out of context. I'm like, no,
you could go watch the whole video for yourself. The Clintons and Trump were like this.
Okay. We're like this. All right. It's not a hop skip and a jump to think as all as degenerate
as all these people are degenerous Epstein is degenerous. Clay Maxwell is. I mean, you know,
Clay Maxwell was molesting girls. You know, she was she was by herself. You know, it is
degenerate as Trump is degenerate as Bill Clinton is that Trump and Bill Clinton would not
have gotten together. I'm sorry out of all the now you could you could argue that the evidence
that we've all showed is all circumstantial. We really can't prove it. I understand that.
But man, don't lie to yourself. These people are morally bankrupt and corrupt. You don't
think this wouldn't happen? Yeah. Yeah. So this was my own little boots on the ground
research that I want to hammer. I've I've shown it before, but I've been getting new
listeners, new new followers. And so maybe some of y'all have missed this. But
last year around this time of year, I went over to the east coast of
Florida to Miami. We had a hurricane coming. I live on the west coast and the hurricane
was hitting up the west coast. So we went over to Miami. Before we went back home.
I wanted to stop by Mar-a-Lago, and I wanted to go to Epstein's house. I had heard
that Epstein lived extremely close to Mar-a-Lago. And I was like, man, I got I want to see this.
I want to feel this for myself. So here's a map. There's West Palm Beach. I live over here
on the on the opposite end. So we came down to Miami. Then I go before I head back home
over here, I want to go to West Palm Beach. So went to West Palm Beach.
And let's see.
Gosh darn it. I must have lost it.
Okay. So I went over to Mar-a-Lago in West Palm Beach. So there we go. We're going to zoom in,
zoom in, zoom in. Here's a little, it's a little two lane road. It's not a huge road,
two lane road that crosses you over the bridge. And as soon as you get over the bridge,
it's a roundabout. You pass Mar-a-Lago secret service here, here, here all over through
the property. This is Mar-a-Lago. Okay. Epstein lived on Brio Way. Okay. Boom, boom. These are all
walking distance. This is all walking distance. See that little mark? That's Epstein's.
Epstein, there's El Brio Way. This was his house. And I put it on my X. I'll see when you,
next time you give a little, little spiel, I'll pull up my little visit down here. But his house is
right here. Waterfront property on the very end of Brio Way. They knocked it down. And on the video
I'll show you when I was there last year, they built a new house and his original house number
is no longer, it's no longer 360. Or I'm sorry, I think it was 308 was the original number.
It was something different. And they changed the home address. The only thing I could think
about is the people buying this property, probably they don't want to get people continually, you
know, coming down this dead end. Because when we were there, there was other people there,
you know, the people that were in the know of Epstein's address. The point of this little map
session here. Look at this. This is a 20, 25 minute walk at most from Mar-a-Lago.
As we get deeper into our conversation tonight on Epstein and Trump, keep this in the back of
your mind. Because a lot of people don't really talk about this. I'm talking about it because
I was there. I drove it. I have video footage of me going down this road. It's a 25 minute walk
from Mar-a-Lago to Epstein's. When you realize when you understand that their friendship was super
close, as Michael Wolf has said, these guys were extremely, extremely close to each other.
Jeff Epstein, one of the world's most notorious pedophiles ever. And Donald Trump,
the current president of the United States, were best friends living within walking distance of
each other. Anyone trying to minimize their relationship, anyone trying to use the excuse,
well, Trump didn't know he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. And they continue to recycle this
worn out nonsense to try to put a wedge, try to put distance between these two.
Show them this goddamn map. Walking distance from Epstein's to Mar-a-Lago. So I just wanted to make
that little thing so as we continue on with the conversation, and if doubts want to creep in,
look how close these two BFFs lived from each other.
And you know what place was on that same island? It's a little bit further up north. It's not
really a walking distance, but enough in driving distance. The Kennedy mansion,
Locke Curita, where RFK Jr. would frequently go from there to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach
estate on Brillo Way. Yeah. Yeah. That little segment of real estate right there is very pricey.
I mean, when you get off the bridge off of that, before you get to Mar-a-Lago,
when you cross from West Palm over, it's kind of ghetto. It's kind of run down.
And if we believe the official stories on Epstein, that's where they recruited a lot of
these poor girls. So Florida is like that. You go to other places and you have vast
differences between the wealthy and the poor, not in Florida. You could have some multimillion
dollar, billion dollar properties and within walking distances, some little shanty town,
some little mobile home park. That's how Florida rolls. So when you cross over the bridge
that leads into Mar-a-Lago, just over the bridge, a couple of minutes away,
you now have the hood for lack of a better term. You have these underprivileged women,
young women. I wouldn't even call them young women, young girls, little girls
that were exploited by the Epstein enterprise. And once we get into the,
you know, the Virginia Jouffray, you know, keep that in mind. This is where they came
from, from the hood nearby. It wasn't miles away. It wasn't a boat right away. It was nothing,
none of that. It was right there across the bridge that leads you into Mar-a-Lago,
a couple of minutes away.
Yeah, yeah. Any thoughts? I'm going to pull up that little footage while you give some thoughts.
Yeah. No, I agree. They're all generally in that same area, which is why Juan Lisi,
the handyman for Jeffrey Epstein, when he was asked in his deposition in the 2000s
before Trump ever was going to run for president, at least in the modern era of the 2015-2016
election, when he was asked, well, who did you frequently see at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach
estate? Juan Lisi said, Donald Trump and RFK Jr. And see, that was when I really started looking
to RFK Jr. You know, I've talked about RFK Jr.'s vast connections to Jeffrey Epstein,
which are, you know, I would say Trump probably had the most if we're talking about
major figures on the world stage right now, right? RFK Jr.'s a close second. And a lot of people would
argue, well, Bill Clinton this, Bill Clinton that. And I understand that Clinton's had
significant ties to Jeffrey Epstein. You know, the whole foundation of Clinton Foundation
through Jeffrey Epstein do not get me wrong in any stretch of imagination. I'm not downplaying
the Clinton's involvement in Jeffrey Epstein. But most people downplay RFK Jr.'s involvement
with Jeffrey Epstein, which was significant. And, you know, and so it just makes me upset. One was
Whitney Webb. Why? Because Whitney Webb was working for Children's Health Defense.
So why other people, such as myself, were trying to get Whitney to look at this information,
trying to get Whitney to call out RFK Jr. And she eventually did, which was no longer working
for them. And supposedly because of what happened in Gaza, and RFK Jr. being an ardent Zionist,
which is something I've talked about for years to as well, but nobody wanted to pay attention to me.
His father, RFK, used to have, you know, frequent phone calls with the head of Habad
Lubavitch, Rebbe Minkheim-Schneerson, okay, for hours talking about policy and stuff like that
and everything. So don't come, you know, crying to me, Whitney, of how you fell for
RFK Jr. and you fell for his lies and you even published them in your books. Okay? Because
no, I don't believe it. I just don't. I'm sorry, Weezy. I just don't. I don't believe her. All
right? I just don't. You're entitled to your opinion. See, and I just want to make the caveat
for anyone that may have taken offense to that. But this is exactly why I don't trust anyone on these
large platforms. You know, they're not on our side. I don't know how I feel,
honestly, about Whitney Webb. I don't want to completely trash on her. I feel she's done some
good work, but that was, like I said at the very beginning, one of the reasons that really drove
me to start my own podcast was because I would see Whitney Webb on some of these shows on Sean Atwood
and I would be in the live chat. What about Alan Dershowitz? What about Trump and Epstein
Ties? What about this nut? And it would get ignored, ignored and no one would pay me any
attention. I was looked at as just some crazy Looney Tune on the live chat.
And that's what started me. And one of those was Whitney Webb. She would never talk about Trump.
She would never talk about Trump. Lately she has. And I've seen Jason Burmes
change tunes the last few days. Oh, we got to talk about Trump Epstein. Motherfucker, you
ran cover for Donald Trump all these years. You signed for Red Voice Media, but now, oh man,
the money's running out. Now I got it. I got to switch sides. I don't know how I feel about that,
man, because the signs I've been there, like John just said, we've been saying this shit for years.
And you guys shied away from it. Maybe there was some monetary gains to shy away from it.
I don't know. But it is what it is. I want to I want to play this
before we forget. I want to play this video clip of me down Brio Way Epstein's old pad.
This is super interesting. So I came over
to visit Epstein's old mansion and take a selfie.
And according to the records, his house is supposed to be 358
Brio Mar. And what we have here is a new property that they're building.
So I'm assuming they knocked out the other one.
And they changed the address to 360 because the house next door is 350. 350 right there. So
that is wild. They must have knocked down the house probably because they were getting a
lot of traffic and maybe they're trying to cover tracks little by little. I don't know.
That's super weird. So yeah, I just wanted to share that little clip that I took myself
driving down and confirming that the Epstein property tomorrow logo is literally a 25 minute
walk away. It's not very far at all. And yeah, I hope that contextualizes things a little bit more.
But I mean, when you see how Trump acted early on in the end, when he became president talking
about Epstein, he would get nervous. Then we can't forget also when he was asked about
Glein Maxwell and how he wished her well. He didn't wish her any bad ill will.
And instead of speaking for the victims, he wished Glein Maxwell well. It makes sense.
They were next door neighbors. You know, that's his homie. And I don't know how I feel.
If I'm being honest, if she's actually even in prison, and if that's a sigh up,
we're told that she's in a lush facility. She's even got a little puppy dog
that's in her cell and she's allowed to do this and that. And if any of the inmates harass her,
there will be retribution towards the inmates that harass her. She's like highly protected.
That's the that's what we're getting told. That's what we're getting fed.
But I don't even know if she's even behind any bars. If I'm being quite frankly with you,
man, I think that's more nonsense that we're being fed. I don't know, man. What do you make of all that?
It's an interesting footage. I'll say that. I don't know. I go back and forth on it.
They could put her under club fed where she's at now just for the optics,
or maybe she's not. It's just like Jeffrey Epstein. You saw information that came out today
with him saying to us, not today, but this week, him saying to his therapist
that he was too weak of a man to ever kill himself, to ever commit suicide.
So there you go on that narrative as well, that Epstein didn't kill himself.
So again, I don't know. Do I think that she's in prison? I don't have really one way or
another. I mean, you go look her up to see if she's in the federal system.
And she would show up as in the federal system. Yes, as Ashley said, same prison supposedly
of Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos fame, the con artist that she was. And so I don't know.
I really don't know. I mean, you could put some information up on a screen that I could
look at, you know, as far as like her federal information that she's in prison,
right? But she may not exactly be in prison. And the thing is, is she's higher up than Epstein
in the Nexus. So does Trump pardon her? If she is or if she isn't, does Trump pardon her?
I don't know what to make of any of that, man. It's it messes with my mind. And that's
what I mean if we're just getting south with all this stuff. This is a clip where Trump wished
Glaine Maxwell. Well, this is one of the clips that motivated me to start my show, man. I'm like,
man, I can't believe I just heard this from this guy. All right, let's play it.
Just Lane Maxwell is in prison. And so a lot of people want to know if she's going to
turn in powerful people. And I know you've talked in the past about Prince Andrew,
and you criticized Bill Clinton's behavior. I'm wondering, do you feel that she's going to
turn in powerful men? Have you seen that working out? I don't know. I haven't really been following
it too much. I just wish her well, frankly. I've met her numerous times over the years,
especially since I lived in Palm Beach. And I guess they lived in Palm Beach.
I guess they live since you live down the road from these guys,
the way he tries to like put distance, you know, like, I guess, you know,
I guess they live down in Palm Beach. Oh, man. And then this is from not too,
not too long ago. This was an interesting little, little bit that I wanted to play.
Might help you get into heaven. You had talked a couple of weeks ago,
you were doing an interview and you talked about how you hope to end the war and
Ukraine because it might help you get into heaven. How does, how does this help? Does this help?
I mean, you know, I'm being a little cute. I don't think there's anything going to get me
in heaven. Okay. I think, I think I'm not maybe heaven bound. I may be in heaven right
now as we fly in Air Force one. I'm not sure. I'm going to be able to make heaven,
but I've made life a lot better for a lot of people. And, you know, as an example,
at the election of 2020, not been rigged, you would have millions of people living
just in Russia, Ukraine alone. That would have never happened. And it didn't happen for four years.
It would have never happened. Now, hold on. Hold on. I gotta, I gotta follow up to that.
Let me, let me play something. There's a breaking news. There's a follow up to that,
Weezy. All right. Can you see my screen?
Why is it on? There we go. Are you ready? Yeah.
This is him talking to CMP Eric Metaxas. Okay.
CMP Eric Metaxas and says, this is the guy who's going to get me into heaven.
Got to follow up, Weezy. It's continued. The chosen one, the narrative of the chosen one.
Now you and I disagree. I believe Donald John Trump is likely the anti-Christ.
Okay. But that is the narrative that is being pushed as he's pointing to Eric
Metaxas who's a big CMP shill. This is the guy who's going to get me into heaven, right?
So, I mean, I don't know what to think about all this, man.
You know, there's so many ops on, ops on, ops on, ops on, ops on, ops on, ops on,
ops that are being played right now that I don't know which direction it's going to go.
Is it going to go where, you know, everything's revealed about the Epstein files, right?
Because they've been, think about it. You know this.
If they never want us to know anything about this,
it would have never made it in the news media at all period, right?
And not only that, let's say maybe it briefly did like the Franklin scandal or the finders, right?
It certainly not would have not continued for as long in as many years as it has, right?
This Epstein, you know, information being very slowly leaked over time has kept it in
public view and on their minds for so very long, right?
Well, then you have to ask yourself, well, why? Why is that?
Is it eventually, it's probably going to eventually lead to some grand conclusion, right?
So, I think about these scenarios. I'm sure since you and I are the same personality,
you think about these scenarios as well too, you know, often of where all this is going.
And, you know, obviously we don't know for sure, but I would say that there,
you know, the one possibility you have is all the stuff's exposed,
Trump ends up getting taken down in a peach because of it and instead J.D. Vance
rises the power of somebody else because Peter Thiel gets also taken down as well, right?
That's one possibility, right? Another possibility is that somehow it's spun
to take down Bill Clinton and the Democrats, right? Somehow Trump and the CMP spend it that way,
even though they've been doing a horrible job and it's the pendulum swinging back and forth,
right? And eventually it gets spin to take down that side of people, okay? Third,
eventually it's used to take down Israel and the controlled noticing, all right? That's the third
part, right? Another part is nothing happens at all and this just continues to go on for years
and years and years and years and years as things slowly continue to drip out.
Am I missing any? Am I missing any possible scenarios of how this could play out, Weezy?
I could play out a number of different ways, man. And that's what messes with my mind. I don't know.
I don't know which way it's going to play out. It threw me off for a loop when we first heard
that Trump was, or I'm sorry, when Epstein was arrested. I'm like, whoa. And then supposedly
he got, he got taken out allegedly. And now we're hearing a slew of information of Epstein stuff.
And I don't know what to make of it. I mean, I wanted to play this clip too, I suppose.
Let's see.
Is that on the screen? There we go.
This is Pam Bondi. Let's hear what she had to say back then.
I want to know why AG Garland and the Justice Department are so quiet on this tonight. You
know, they're out there labeling parents domestic terrorist, yet they're saying nothing about this
and these documents were so slow to come out. Human trafficking is a multi-billion
dollar business in this country. And Jeffrey Epstein is dead and Gerlaine Maxwell is in prison for 20
years where she belongs. And if people in that report are still fighting to keep their names
private, Sean, they have no legal basis to do so unless they're a child, a victim, or a cooperating
defendant by some chance against some potential case against Gerlaine Maxwell. And I think Mark
Garregos has a great criminal defense attorney will back that up as well.
Gerlaine apparently is a... Gerlaine, Gerlaine. I mean, I say Gerlaine, Gislaine.
I say he's Gerlaine Maxwell. I tell you who it.
Look what she was saying then. We need to do something about this. We need to
go after these rings and anyone on that list. And now Pam Bondi present day,
Pam Bondi is like, nope, it's a democratic hoax, everyone. Nothing to see here. Dude,
it's the same thing with Bongino. Bongino on his podcast was constantly talking about Epstein
and how he was a threat and blah, blah, blah. The list needs to come out. And now they're
like, no, case closed. Everything that the previous administration said happened with
Epstein was indeed true. Like, no, there's nothing to see here. What I don't know what
to make of that. Like, they were parading, they were pushing it. This is what the MAGA base
pushed for. This is what they wanted. And now they've had to do a 180 degree turn and like,
no, no, it's all made up. It's not real. It's a democratic hoax. What the hell, man?
I have Trump, you know, assigning the Department of Justice and Pam Bondi to
investigate Clinton's and the Democrats' connections to Jeffrey Epstein, right? It's like,
well, I mean, you know, they could contact any of us Epstein researchers. We have the
documents right there to give you. It's really not that hard to find. You know,
it's really not that difficult. You know, I mean, it's just like, the whole thing's
ridiculous, man. It's ridiculous. And then we all know that Pam Bondi has covered up for Trump.
She's a she's a new fixer like William Barr is, even though they've turned against CMP
William Barr, you know, she stopped the lawsuits in Florida for Trump University.
You know, when Trump gave her that, you know, tens of thousands of dollar campaign donation,
you know, that was a front because why would someone
risk their career for $10,000 or whatever the amount was like $30,000? I think $30,000. Yeah.
Why would anyone do that? Unless there was some bigger numbers, you know, in the back door, plus
promise, you know, cash considerations and promises to be the AG during his presidency.
25,000. Yeah. But but yeah, I mean, I thought there was I mean, was our promise to eventually
make her Attorney General or their promises to eventually, you know, do this and do that.
And we know Pam Bondi has numerous connections to Scientology. I'm not going to go through
them all here on today's show, but it's for anybody to go look, she's held numerous Scientology
fundraisers, you know, fund fundraisers that have been held by Scientology,
should I say, for her campaigns, right? So, you know, I mean, what can I say? Now,
I got something for you for us to start talking about. But primarily, let's see here. Look,
I have your favorite Clint Russell from Liberty Lockdown. He's your favorite.
Okay. You're right. Okay. So here we have the Democrat Congresswoman Plasquette, right?
Newly released documents reviewed by The Washington Post appeared to indicate that
2019 hearing where Michael Cohen testified, Jeffrey Epstein was texting with
delegate Stacey Plasquette from the Virgin Islands. Okay. The Post reviewed multiple video
feeds from the hearing and match the text, which were sent Pacific Time with the video.
So the text says, are you chewing? And then she says to him, not anymore.
Cohen brought up Rona, keeper of the secrets. And then Plasquette messaged Epstein, Rona.
Are you going to review it in our next break to correct the record? Yes or no?
Yes. And then quick, I'm up next. I'm up next is the, I can't read that part.
Is that the an acronym Plasquette asks Epstein? And then Epstein says that's his assistant.
Mr. Weisenberg and other individuals, Ms. Rona, who are those individuals? Are they
with the Trump Organization? They are. They're other people that we should be meeting with.
So Allen Weisenberg is the chief financial officer? Uh-huh. You gotta quickly give us
as many names as you can so we can get to that. Yes, ma'am. So here we have
her begging Epstein for financial support. Good morning, Leslie. If you would share this
invitation with Jesse, Jeffrey, I'd be much appreciative. I would be grateful for
support and support for those who made direct assist me. I'll be in New York City
the Thursday, the event through the weekend. Of course, we have other people, you know,
covering this for years that she claims that she was not working directly with Epstein,
but obviously based off of the new emails that we have, that is the case, right? So we have both
the right and the left being manipulated in blackmail and working directly with Jeffrey
Epstein. Thoughts, Weezy? Again, it's stuff that I think people like you and I, we
had already inklings regarding this, but for it to be vindicated now,
I still don't even know how I feel about it. I heard weeping sign up again, and that's where
that's where I'm at, man. I don't know what to make of any of this information that's come out,
you know, including all these emails that have come out. There was one particular email about
Trump spending hours. Yeah, we're going to get to that. Yes, yes. So let me share that email
real quick. There is email you're talking about. Okay, go ahead. Whoa, that, you know, that
real I played of, I made a, I made a clip and apparently it's going viral right now.
I've made a clip of Roy Cohn and young Donald Trump as the twink. And all of a sudden my phone
is blowing up with people liking it, liking it, liking it. I hadn't done anything to that.
That's hilarious. Hopefully it does go viral. That would be hilarious.
So what do you think about all this? I can't read it, man. Oh, you can't look at it?
Well, it's too blurry. Read it for me. Okay, so you have Jeffrey Epstein to
Glade Maxwell. I want you to realize that the dog that hasn't barked is Trump.
Redactive victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned,
police chief, et cetera. I'm 75% there. And then Glade Maxwell writes back to him. I've
been thinking about this. This was on April the 2nd, 2011. Now, interesting about all this is,
is we didn't know who this so-called victim was. Okay. Now, my inklings is something I said
live is I believed it was Virginia Roberts Guthrie. Just intuitively, it would make sense
that that's who they were discussing, right? Well, Carolyn Leavitt from the White House
confirms that these emails are true because that's the whole, you know, the whole MAGA kind of said
these emails are fake. They're released by the Democrats. They're fake news. These emails
are lies. They're not real. But Carolyn Leavitt comes out and says, no, actually,
these emails are legit. And not only are they legit, the redacted victim referenced in
his emails were Virginia Roberts Guthrie. And not only that, she has come out in statements saying
that Trump has never molested her or raped her and has nothing but been kind to her,
you know, forever. Okay. Well, so, okay, first of all, we have always had the
narrative that Trump didn't spend a lot of time at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate, right?
Even from his own mouth. Okay. You know, we know that's false. That's straight up false. All right.
We have one of Lisey's testimony, obviously, through the intimacy of Jeffrey Epstein and, you
know, Donald Trump and Glane Maxwell and Donald Trump and all the pictures they've had together,
you know, various events of Clinton, Mar-a-Lago. We know all this is false, right?
Because, you know, Jeffrey Epstein has been roughly friends with Donald Trump for roughly
anywhere between 14 to 16 years before the Abe Gosman estate. We actually got verification on
the Abe Gosman estate. You and I, something you and I both talked about. We're going to get to
that email in a minute. All right. But this right here shows what would Donald Trump be doing
at Mar-a-Lago. I mean, Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate with Virginia Roberts grew free for hours.
We have the testimony from Virginia Roberts grew free that we've had various testimony from her,
but her main one being that she never really saw Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump together.
And Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump never did anything to her that it was all Prince Andrew,
right? So what were they doing? Wheezy? Were they just chatting? Were they playing
Parcheese? Like what were they doing? Playing Jenga, playing Hangman. Yeah, man. That is super
interesting because a lot of these magas would constantly, this is what I heard the last few
years, Virginia Roberts grew free exonerates Donald Trump. And so does her attorney, blah,
blah, blah. I'm like, that to me doesn't exonerate anything. The fact that she said that.
What that means is what the hell was she doing working at Mar-a-Lago and getting pimped out by
Epstein and Maxwell to begin with when they were his friends? You know what I'm saying?
With her father working there as a handyman and later, you know, later when he retired
and getting awards from Donald Trump. Yeah. And no one would ever really go there. And
that's what drove me crazy. I'm like, and through these emails, it sounds like at some point,
Trump may have known and he may have not liked that his property was being used
for recruiting grounds, but he didn't go to the authorities. You know what I mean? Like,
he's like, oh, man, I'm not cool with that. None of this makes sense. And no one has ever
talked about that. Like Mac, I mean, Mar-a-Lago was essentially hunting grounds for these,
for these pedals, pedophiles, you know what I mean? Why go across the bridge and go into
these schools when you could just go to Mar-a-Lago just within walking distance away
and get the same quality of young kids for lack of a better term?
Yeah. And here we have a new video. I know, I know you email should I say Virginia
Roberts grew free Mar-a-Lago, right? That's where she, you know, she was working at it,
where she was poached, right? Whole bunch of redacted stuff. This is, you know,
from Jeffrey Epstein to Michael Wolf, right? Trump said he asked me to resign, said I was
never a member ever. Okay. Which we know all that is false because on page six,
I found an article where Epstein said that he never resigned from Mar-a-Lago in 2007.
Okay. Well, then, so that didn't happen. Of course, he knew about the girls
as he asked just laying to stop. Okay. Now, a couple of things. One,
Trump owns the Mar-a-Lago property, right? Is a private club, right? He asked
just laying Maxwell to stop. Stop please, just laying. Stop poaching girls from Mar-a-Lago.
And, you know, and this is the same. Yeah. And this is the same Glane Maxwell
that he wished well. Hold on. Please stop, Glane. Please don't do that.
He owns his property. He doesn't borrow her in bar Epstein from his property.
He doesn't get restraining orders and trespassing orders on them,
so that if they go on to his property, okay, they are immediately arrested,
he just goes, please stop. Please stop. Am I supposed to believe this? There's so many
dual narratives in these emails. It's ridiculous. Now, you could just chalk it up to,
these are a whole bunch of dishonest people, so they're going to say a whole bunch of dishonest
things and always try to shift the blame away from themselves. Okay. Logically,
I can't say that that could not be a possibility, all right? But there are so many contradictions
for what we think we know and what we hope is true to everything that is being said in these
emails. It's ridiculous. Yeah. And I want to touch on Michael Wolfe for those that may not
be familiar with Michael Wolfe. Michael Wolfe is a journalist that allegedly has over 100,000,
or I'm sorry, 100,000, 100 hours of Epstein on tape, just talking and talking and talking.
Michael Wolfe went to the jail cell and recorded a lot of these conversations, went and hung out
with Epstein. And I've listened to quite a bit of his stuff. Like you, John, I don't put a lot of trust
into this guy. And for me, the reason being is that he has all this material on Epstein and he's
been holding it off for the highest bidder. So it was almost like a business venture.
It wasn't because he was trying to be a crusader, trying to do the right thing. It was
all about the Benjamin's. And for me, that does not sit well with me.
We got a trump card in the chat. You two are a riot. I love your delusions.
You're the one that's still hardcore trump card, buddy. So the delusional one is you, my man.
Cool hippie, dude. If you do me a favor and actually go read Katie Johnson's first testimony,
her first court documents that were filed in California about Trump and Epstein molesting her,
all right, and molesting a girl, Maria, when they were both in their very young to early
mid teens. How about you go read those and give back to me, all right? Because there is
very strong evidence through, you know, there is a high degree of possibility.
I'm not possibly a probability. I put it 98% confidence that Donald Trump is a rapist.
Now, I put it at a high confidence, but not as high confidence as that,
that Donald Trump is a pedophile. Okay. Now, I think he is, but, you know, there are far
more allegations about him being a rapist than there is, you know, evidence that we have directly
that he is a pedophile. Okay. So though I think he is both, and I think that, you know,
take it for what you will, you know, Maria farmers evidence, whether all of it is truthful or not,
or Virginia Roberts could free whether everything is truthful about her or not,
or Katie Johnson and, you know, all her evidence and just everything that we have,
you know, like there is enough evidence for me to believe that Donald Trump is a pedophile.
And I think you would agree with me, Weezy. All right. And so I'm sorry, like all the comments
that he made about his own daughter, dude, I would never in a million bajillion years
ever make a comment or even think ever cry, I thought even cross my mind. Yeah. Any of that
stuff about my own daughter. That right there is one that has troubled me quite a bit is how these
magas, when you bring this up, they're like, Oh, it's just locker room banter. What the hell kind
of dad speaks about their own daughter that way. If she wasn't my daughter, I would have sex
with her. That's the locker room talk. That's yeah. Exactly, man. That is beyond me, man. I don't
understand a maga mind when you can show them these things and they still brush it off. Oh,
that's just the libtards. No, this is Donald Trump saying this about his own damn daughter,
man. Don't blame anyone else. Look at what your hero, look at what your
Superman, the guy that you think is going to root out all these evils in our society
is saying about his own damn daughter. Say what you will about Bill Clinton. He's never to my
knowledge ever made a joke about Chelsea, at least publicly is what I mean. All right. Say what
you want to say about Bill Clinton. I've never seen any comment where he's ever said that he
wanted to have sex with Chelsea Clinton. All right. Yeah. Do some dubious acts and other things.
I'm only saying that because all these guys, it doesn't matter if it's Bill Clinton or Donald
Trump. They're all slimy. Oh, I know. I'm not saying they're not, but at least Bill Clinton
has the less vileness to hide it. You understand Trump can't even hide any of this
stuff. He's been a vile person for decades, for decades. At least Clinton has the tact
to a degree. Call me bubba. Call me bubba. Call me bubba, Donny. I'll show you my,
show you my, my power, my power stroke.
Okay. Oh, oh, Don, come here boy. Who wore it better? Monica Lewinsky or Donald Trump?
That may be the poll for today's Spotify question. That's gonna be the spot of my question.
In the 2016 election was really between two people who were fighting for the heart of Bill
Clinton. Yeah, man. Oh, yeah. And that was the other thing that would annoy me when I would point
out how close Donald Trump and the Clintons, not just Bill Clinton, but Hillary Clinton.
There's a video of Donald Trump in 09. He's at Trump Tower at his little office and someone
asked him what his thoughts were on Hillary Clinton. And Donald Trump says, with all the
confidence in the world, he's like, Hillary, Hillary would be a fantastic president. She would,
she would be great if she were elected as the first woman president. He would be amazing.
And I would bring this up to a lot of these, both Trump Tards and these woke Tards,
like these guys, this is all wrestling, man. They're all homies. They all party together. Maybe
maybe Donald and Trump perhaps are a little closer than I even thought at one point.
Who knows? But it's all theatrics, man. All these guys, they run around the same circles.
They, uh, man, even for people that are averse to conspiracies, people that that's a conspiratorial
thinking is way off and far off. I always like to talk about the Epstein case because that is a
ongoing conspiracy, ongoing cover up with all these big names and it leads tied to this one guy
who apparently also has Israeli intelligence ties and all these other intelligence ties. And he was
blackmailing our politicians, our elites that make our laws to which our taxpayer monies go to
so that they take care of us. This big web entangles all these people that govern us
allegedly, you know, it's wild. And so anyone wanting to say, oh, yeah, conspiratorial thinking
is off base, blah, blah, blah, blah, like no, man. The Jeff Epstein case has entered the chat. John
Bristol is thinking. I'm thinking, you know, I, it could be, I mean, it depends on where it goes,
right? It could be used to expose Israel, it could be used to expose half of the world order,
you know, the whole Clinton democratic size. It could be used to expose Donny T. himself. You
know, I don't know. But I mean, this is proof that we're still talking about this and it's been
how many years? No. Nine-ish, right? So I mean, I mean, here we have Michael Wolf,
who I am not a fan of at all. Not saying that everything you ever wrote about Trump was fake,
but I think he is the definition of an opportunist. Yeah. I don't think I finished my thought on
Michael Wolf. I got a little distracted. But yeah, I view him in that same category as
an opportunist, someone that is trying to monetize. Now, he did do a lot of research,
and if his research is legit, I mean, I listened to several interviews he did this week.
He did several shows on the Daily Beast podcast, and he was even questioned about his tactics. Like,
well, Michael, you know, it sounds like here you're trying to scheme with Jeff Epstein
to ensnare Trump. That doesn't seem that doesn't come off very cooth like, you know,
it comes off uncouth, if you will. And he basically was saying, look, man, I was playing a role.
I was playing, I was playing a part. The only way Jeff Epstein was going to feed me these
tidbits of information was if he thought I was his homie.
And Michael Wolf also used his time at the White House. He goes, I was in the White House next to
Trump when, you know, when I wanted to write a book on Donald Trump, I was allowed unfettered White
House access. And I got to see Trump behind the scenes and in front of the cameras. And the
reason I was able to do that was they thought I was a friend of Donald Trump. And I thought
I was a friend of the White House. So
that you could take that information and use it in any number of ways. Well,
shit, if he was sneaky about that, why should I trust his reporting on these other issues?
That's a fair question. But I also understand his point, you know, you if you're going to be
getting these bits of information from these sleaze bags from these notorious
pets like Jeff Epstein, Donald Trump, you may have to use some sleazy tactics to get that
kind of information. So it's tricky, man. There's no denying the the Epstein tapes
that he does have are gold, man. He has a treasure trove of them. I just it doesn't sit well with me
his tactics. No, I agree. And here in this email, he says, on December 15, 2015, I hear CNN
planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you, either on air or in the scrum afterwards.
And Epstein says, if we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it would
be? And then Michael Wolf says, I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he
hasn't been on the plane or into the house that gives you a valuable PR on political currency,
you can hang him in a way that would politically generate a positive benefit for you.
Or it looks like he could win. You could save him generating a debt from him to you. Of course,
it is possible when asked, he'll say Jeffrey is a great guy, and he's gotten a royal deal on
his victim of political correctness, which is outlawed in the Trump regime.
So I mean, dude, like, I don't know, I don't, I mean, I don't like Michael Wolf. I've never
liked Michael Wolf. I think he puts out some good information time to time. I can separate
my own personal have how I feel for Michael Wolf. But I mean, it ain't looking good.
Yeah. Yeah, I mean, that that information about let Trump hang himself, you know, he's talking
to Epstein and let him hang himself. And it's also interesting how he was getting fed.
You know, they knew Trump was going to get fed certain questions and
how they were talking about if this is legit. I don't know what if all this is theater as
well. That's wild. I got to keep saying that because I don't know how much of this I actually
believe, man. This is news that's out there. This is being carried off as fact. But even so,
I don't know how much I put faith in any of this stuff. Why are we only hearing about this now?
And it's the Democrats, quote unquote, leading the charge. The Democrats had this
information when Trump was running and they didn't do a damn thing about it.
But now they've decided to put a full court press. It seems orchestrated.
This information had been out for years. So why now? I don't know.
And so I don't know. It may be disappointing for some people to hear that like I'm supposed
to make up my mind definitively on this or that. No, that's not how I work. I honestly don't
know. I will say I do err on the side that a lot of this stuff is legitimate.
I will say that at least what we know about the Epstein nexus. I do believe there is some truth in
it. Now, how might what be true than what may not be? We don't have all the documents or all of
the smoking guns or anything like that. Like a lot of it is circumstantial evidence. A lot
of it is things that we have gotten from the news media or even dubious sources like Michael
Wolf or Stephen Kedavid Bannon, for example. And again, do I think that Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile
and Glenn Maxwell and Donald Trump and Bill Clinton? Yes. Because there are victims who have come out
who have been pushed to the side like Katie Johnson, for example, that most of your audience
may not even be aware of who she was. She's not even talked about or discussed like Virginia
Robert Scafri is pushed to the forefront who covers for Trump every chance she got while she was
alive, right? Supposedly, allegedly. So if that is the case, then why isn't Katie Johnson talked
about? Why is she disappeared completely, not even brought up in the media? You know? Yeah.
That was right there, Katie Johnson. When the media wouldn't talk about her,
you know, it was just getting covered up like there's something here. And if there is a left
and a right, why aren't why isn't the left bringing this up? Bringing up Katie Johnson?
You know, remember when Trump brought, I think it was Juanita Broderick to one of the debates.
So Juanita Broderick was allowed to get brought up and I was like, oh, wow, what a what a wow
moment. Okay, why didn't the Clinton campaign bring over Katie Johnson? And that's something
that has never sat well with me, man. And so I know there's people listening. We have a friend that
still kind of holds hope that one side of the ideological spectrum is pushing back against the
Trump regime and trying to avoid getting us into a further mess. It's all nonsense.
It's all the same club. It's all the same team. The question is, why are we now getting these
tidbits of information that have been out for many years now? You know what I mean? And I say that
because for us, when we heard this news this week, it wasn't like mind blowing. Well, excuse the
I guess the bubble was the revelation was.
But other than that, I mean, a lot of the stuff we had already inklings about. We already knew this.
So if you and I, John, I'm a garbage man. You do you got a job that you do full time. You
know what I mean? You support your family. We're nothing. We're nothing fancy or nothing.
But we knew this information. You're going to tell me that these pundits on these left wing rags
that pump out millions of dollars in revenues a year and or pay their pundits all this amount of
cash. You're going to tell me that they didn't have the same access to the information that
me as a garbage man had and couldn't reach the same goddamn conclusions.
I'm no one special.
So what gives? Why weren't these pundits talking about it when they had the opportunity to?
Why wasn't most people talking about it when they could have?
Why weren't most people talking about RFK Junior?
Yeah, they still don't. They still do a lot of a lot of people still view
RFK Junior as a good guy. When he is a major transhumanist pushing the Peter Thiel operation
Tiberius Kirk, which is now under Doge. That's what truly Doge is, agenda. He's pushing the
technocrat health agenda. And he's still pushing for mRNA vaccines to be made properly
using your analyzed DNA. And you're still pushing Operation Cancer Moonshot, which was started by
Biden under the Obama administration during the first term, which has continued on,
for mRNA vaccinations to treat cancer. And so people aren't even talking about
any of this stuff at all. And I will say there is a possibility that I hold
where it could be the CFR and the CMP
jockeying for position, you know, among other groups like Los Cerkel and the Bilderberg group,
jockeying for position to see who can outdo the other to a degree, right? Now, ultimately,
you and I disagree. I think that, you know, Satan is controlling them to some degree and
ultimately got a sovereign above all. But, you know, I can't rule out that some of it in some of
the things that we do, because I don't think everything is completely controlled and manufactured.
I don't. But I do think a lot of things are, and at least if things do happen, the narratives
around them are spun and controlled by the media and majority of talking heads, right? And
I think you and I would agree on that aspect and that majority of what we see is controlled by AI
algorithms at this point and the media that we watch and, you know, people's various opinions
and the spinning of information and what was done through Cambridge Analytica, for example,
using people's psychological and psychographical profiles, which is a personality against them
to get them to believe certain things, right? And so that's definitely happening today.
There's no doubt about it. And it's worse. It's getting worse as technology increases.
So again, I can't say for sure that the Democrats and the Republicans, at least the CFR and the
CMP behind them, aren't having some fights sometimes in control of power like mafioso.
But I would also say that I could also see it too that they agree and push forth agendas
together in a lot of ways as well, too. Is what I'm saying makes sense, whether you agree or disagree
with me? Yeah, I feel you, man. The AI question is massive because they've been rolling it out
little by little over the last few years, but it's getting so much better, which with it
getting better, it kind of demoralizes me because we're going to be seeing people
deem everything as AI. Even stuff that is real will be considered AI. I'll give you a perfect
example. So I was scrolling down Twitter and there was a lot of people, especially on the
White House Twitter feed, you know, the White House Twitter feed has been trying to do
damage control all week and they've been going shit on. They've been getting ratioed by so many
people. Their damage control is not working. And someone in one of these threads I was reading,
I should have bookmarked it, I didn't, but they asked Grock, like, didn't Elon Musk say he had
he had dirt, you know, on Donald Trump, something along those lines. Well, remember
that he had read the Epstein Falls, right? To what you're discussing. Remember he had read
them and that we were going to be shocked about what the mark my words, you know, and everything
like that. So yeah, so yeah, they were basically Elon Musk made a few tweets saying like Trump is
on Trump doesn't want along the lines doesn't want to release the tweets because Donald Trump
is all over the Epstein Falls, blah, blah, blah. And this is when they were feuding.
All right. And then Elon Musk deleted the tweets. And then he got invited to the White
House and he shows up with the White House with a black left eye or right eye. One of the he had
a black eyeball and he fell in line again after making some crazy supposedly that was Scott
Besson giving him a punch to the eye supposedly allegedly. So that's what they
said. Well, supposedly it was little what what the hell's his little son Malcolm X.
Or well, they were saying it was his his son. I know you're talking about what the
hell's the little kids names. I can't remember but but they but there was also
an the narrative around going at the same time as him and Scott Besson got into a fight
about the doge stuff and Scott Besson's face. Yeah, but this kind of falls in line with
him talking smack on Twitter on Donald Trump talking about he how he was going to be in
the Epstein Falls. Then Elon Musk deletes the tweet. Well, what caught what really
freaked me out was I'm looking at this thread and then they're asking Grock Grock is
Twitter's AI version of chat GBT, I suppose. And they're like, Grock, is it true that Elon Musk
knew that the Epstein files would like down Donald Trump and Grock said there is no verifiable
evidence that Elon Musk has ever said that he has a professional platform. He would he would
never perform unbecoming tweets such as this. And then people are starting to argue with
Grock, like I've seen it. And someone's screenshot. Someone's put a screenshot and
Grock's like the these images are interesting, but that does not confirm this isn't verifiable
evidence. I'm like, whoa, man, this was freaking me out, man, because
this is what's going to happen. History is going to be rewritten. We all saw these
tweets that Elon Musk was making against Donald Trump, but now we're getting gasly
into it never happened. Elon Musk would never engage in unbecoming behavior such as this.
The other thing that Grock said was Elon Musk rarely deletes tweets. And people were like,
well, that doesn't mean that's no evidence of anything. What if these were some of the
very few tweets that he deleted? So but it's crazy times that we're living in, man.
You know, I posted a tweet of Donald Trump reaching over Bill Clinton's junk.
And I got a community noted on that retweet. It was actually a retweet. It was a community
noted that this is AI. Looks pretty damn rude. So what the hell are we to make of all this
stuff, man, especially when AI is getting so damn good and prevalent these days?
Oh, no, man. It's going to get wild. You know, they already have Roger Stone setting up saying
things are AI. This is AI. This is that. That's AI. Trump saying this is AI. This, that's AI.
You know, if anything ever truly got released, because there is, there is truth whether we
can't ever truly know everything about a situation or not. We should always try to
do our best to try to get to the truth of the situation or what happened, right?
You know, that should be our objective. I think you would agree with me on that, right?
So we should always try to. We may not always get there, but there is a truth that happens
with every circumstance or with everything that occurs, right? So, you know, I don't know.
What's AI? What's not AI? You know? Yeah. So here's the here's the little
thread I was telling you about. Imagine arguing with Grock, which is, you know,
okay, yeah, we actually know. Hold on. Oh, look, it got community, community noted.
Remember when Grock went full 1488 Hall Hill and then they had a lot of us had to like
rope it back into anything, right? Yeah. You remember all that? I expect that to happen again
and again and again. So here's the original tweets from Spencer, a command or however the
hell you say his name, and it shows a screenshot of Elon Musk tweeting, you are so proud of the
one liners you wrote. It must be hard to talk shit with a dick in your throat
at Donald Trump. So now that we know the Bubba stuff,
that tweet is rather interesting. And, and then Elon Musk even I remember him writing this and it
says, Mark, this post for the future, the truth will come out. And then Grock was working overtime
to say, Oh, yeah, that Elon Musk, look, someone wrote at Grock where these real Elon posts.
And then Grock says, No, those are not real. But I know the second one for sure is a real
post. The second one for sure was real. This one was real too, man. Like Elon Musk, I don't know if
he was on a cocaine binge or what? Ketamine. He was on that music. Ketamine Diamond Eyes
from the Maps Institute. This is what Sean Atwood did. Back in the Sean Atwood days,
I would do live stream and Sean Atwood. I'm assuming he was on cocaine as well
and just writing the most ridiculous stuff on my live chat, bro, through his account.
He was he was like he was saying he was doing sexual stuff while listening to
Weezy's voice in the background. Like, yeah, this is Sean Atwood. But I when Elon Musk was
making these tweets, I'm like, man, I wonder if he was just going through some binge and he was
just writing. That means reason is in that Cahill writing weird stuff. But
let's see those.
Okay, I want to play. Oh, OK. Can you see this right here?
Yes, you can. I just wanted to double check those little dance moves by Donald Trump make
a lot more sense now. No, but I wanted to play this from empty.
Spent million. All right, let's listen to empty G today. Marjorie Taylor Green for those that may
not know. I stood with President Trump when virtually no one else did. Campaign dollar for
the country spent millions of my own dollars helping him get elected. And I think that's
incredibly important. And I do support him and his administration. And I support them in
delivering the campaign promises we made to the American people. His remarks, of course,
have been hurtful. However, I have something in my heart that I think is incredibly important
for our country. And that is to end the toxic fighting and politics. And this has been
going on for years and it has divided our country, split up friends and families,
neighbors, and it's not solving our problems. The most hurtful thing he said, which is absolutely
untrue, is he called me a traitor. And that is that is so extremely wrong. And those are the
types of words used that can radicalize people against me and put my life in danger.
What do you think happened? What do you think is the reason for this?
Unfortunately, it has all come down to the etstein files. And that is shocking. And, you know,
I stand with these women. I stand with rape victims. I stand with children who are in
terrible sex abuse situations. And I stand with survivors of trafficking and those that are
trapped in sex trafficking. And I will not apologize for that. I believe the country
deserves transparency in these files. And I don't believe that rich, powerful people
should be protected if they have done anything wrong. And so I'm standing with the women
and I will continue to do my small part to get the files released.
What are your thoughts on hearing that?
Setting up for some sort of narrative. I don't know. Maybe she's maybe, I mean,
I got mixed feelings. I was just curious how you felt about it.
I mean, pragmatically, is it a good thing that MTG is out there saying that she apologizes for
spewing the toxic rhetoric of MAGA and Donald Trump? Sure. I don't know if she took back Jewish
space lasers or not. I'm choking there. But I don't know how far, how much, you know,
I need more specifics from her. Now, do I really believe this to be true?
No, I don't. No, pragmatically, could I assume that it is? Yeah, it's a good thing that she's
saying these things and coming out against Trump. Sure. But I don't, I don't trust her. I never
trusted her. So how do I know she's telling the truth now when she's lied so far much in
the past just because what now she's against Trump and now therefore I'm supposed to believe
her, you know? I don't. She's going to do whatever she wants in my opinion that's advantageous for her
if it's not all just a script for her to follow. I don't have an answer, but that's how I feel about
it. You? Yeah, I don't, I don't trust any politicians. I, you know, I like what some politicians
say from time to time, like Ron Paul, I like some of the stuff he says, but he still gets back
he'll still back Donald Trump and, you know, criticize him sometimes, but still get stands
behind him, ignoring completely ignoring the Trump's or the Epstein stuff. That to me is the biggest
thing. Like I can understand if you like Trump because you think he's going to do this or
because he talks smack about woke ism. I can understand that, but you can't ignore the Epstein
ties. This is what kills me each and every time is like, how do you just overlook that?
How do you overlook his nastiness, his dirtiness? It's just like, well, you know,
well, the economy is good. You know, yeah. All right. But now even if this is all true
to your point now, since his ire is turned towards her, now she's upset about it. And we're supposed
to like be like, well, you know, I mean, like really? Like now said, Donald Trump is a vile person.
Yeah. Now his violence is directly towards her supposedly allegedly. And now all of a sudden
we're supposed to be like, you know, oh, Marjorie Taylor Greene, we're so sorry. It's okay.
We welcome you back. You know, like, how about we just
pray for our adult? How about we don't trust any of these clowns? Yeah. Don't don't put your faith
in any of these clowns, man, because you get suckered in each and every time. I felt for
the RFK junior grift early on. I fell for it. I'm admitting it. I thought, oh man, this guy's
pushing against the the and I'm on YouTube. But the COVID narrative, I suppose he's
pushing against it. He was on James Corbett show. I'm like, man, this guy might be legit.
They start doing more research and more research. Oh, man, I got duped once again.
And so I don't have any any hope on any of these clowns. Whether it's MTG or a Massey.
Yeah. Yeah, it's it's we got to get out of that mindset that we we have saviors that these political
pundits or talking heads are going to save us from all this. What's going to save us is when
we start putting our trust in these clowns. That's what's going to save us and not falling
for the shenanigans each and every time. So most people bring up Ron Paul, right? Ron Paul was
a longtime Council for National Policy member. So was his son. And Ron Paul is a freemason,
you know, but a lot of people put their original trust in him. You know, the Bible says put your
trust in no man, put your trust in God, you know. So I mean, I don't see why
why are people now all of a sudden believing Marjorie Taylor Greene just because she's anti
Trump now and so called for the Epstein victims, right? Why couldn't she have been this
way the whole entire time? Or Thomas Massey, who spoke, you know, at the anniversary of the
John Birch Society, you know, so none of these people are our guys, none of them.
No, I agree. Now, here's one example of what's been going on with the with the Trumps and the
MAGA world. This guy is quote retweeting one of his tweets that where he ratioed
Donald Trump White House Trump. Yeah. So his post has 3 million views and 131,000 likes.
Here's the White House talking about the Golden Age. Welcome to the Golden Age, y'all.
He's got like 13,000 13,000 likes and 5.3 million views.
That's nice for that context, saying we're not in the Golden Age. Did you see that? At least
that's there. Well, look at look at the let's look at some of the. Yeah, that's the control
noticing left wing, right wing in the beat control noticing right there, chat.
Yeah. If you look at the comments, man, it is clown world, man.
Oh, good gosh.
Damn, bro. It is completely roast central. But hold on. Hold on. Is this post politics,
Weezy? Is this what politics is now? We're so divisive that this is what it is.
Is memetic warfare from the pits of Cambridge Analytica from the pits of hell?
Is that what all this is? Is that what all this is? I mean,
yeah, well, obviously this is anecdotal stuff for sure. But
not too long ago when the White House would make a post, America's back. Yeah, we got this.
We're drinking beer and wearing jeans and wearing mega hats. Yeah. The south rise again, brother.
The the White House Twitter, which is own, which is destroyed, boom, boom. If they wanted to make
fun of a left wing politician, they'd post them up and just clown them and every all the attack
dogs would jump in. Now we're seeing they're in damage full on damage control and their whole
Twitter feed is nothing. Yeah, it's rough, man. It's rough. But you have to realize who's running
the algorithm for access Elon Musk. So then you got to ask yourself, well, what's going on here?
Is this purposely supposed to be done? Like Trump is the king of chaos. I mean, Marina Abramovic
roughly alluded to that about Trump, right? And why she appreciated Trump, right?
So which, by the way, I'll bring up the Liz Kroken.
You want me to bring up the Liz Kroken? And we're going to we'll get to this ban and
article of the minute. You're going to find interesting. All right. So what did you think
about the Liz Kroken falsehoods that are being spin if we're going to take it all back to
PizzaGate, Weezy? If we're all going to take it back to pizza, how did you feel about the
Liz Kroken stuff? You want some pizza? Me there? You want some pizza?
Liz Kroken is one of these style influencers 100%. Any of these large accounts on X?
I'll I'll even put in Clint Russell in that mix as well.
Yeah, they're they're all style influencers. They get paid to spew propaganda and
ridiculous talking points. That's their job. Their job is to
I guess, produce some kind of reaction
and and and have the masses go with it. Have the sheep, if you will, go with it.
And they have quite a bit of sheep that they flock around.
Go ahead and share it, my friend. Let's show let's show the masses. Liz Kroken directly
puppeteered by Michael Flynn and the Flynn Nexus herself.
Breaking Jeffrey Epstein set his lawyer a high importance email about PizzaGate.
Jeffrey Epstein sent his lawyer an email noted as high importance in a late 2016 State of Hillary
and Bill Clinton's relationship with Epstein had the greatest bearing on
PizzaGate referring to an article in The Guardian. Read that again, please.
Epstein considered PizzaGate high importance and emailed his lawyer about it.
Epstein and the Clintons are PizzaGate and it's always been real.
Even freaking Epstein knew that which is why he or no anyone else ever sent me so much as a legal
letter over my nonstop reporting on PizzaGate over the past 10 years. Tick tock. Now you and I,
we're human. We've made mistakes as well. We've made mistakes in reporting. You retract it.
You move on. You know, it is what it is, right? And so when you analyze this email,
well, we should notice that that is right here is Jeffrey Epstein's email, supposedly allegedly,
J-E-E-V-A-C, you know, Jeffrey Epstein E-Vacation, right? It's right here, right at gmail.com,
all right? And that's the email to trade. Well, this one doesn't have a V. It has a Y,
which Psyop Influencer himself, Ian Carroll, interacts with Liz Croken and corrections
for it. Check the two different emails for Epstein. One has a typo. Now, Liz Croken instead saying,
you know what? I'm going to retract this. This email is likely false. It's a mistake. It's a
fabrication. She goes, maybe, maybe you can obviously tell the two emails are incorrect.
There it is, all right? So therefore, this whole email chain is false, okay? And she goes,
but does it change the fact that PizzaGate is real and Epstein is PizzaGate?
Yeah, definitely. This right there should disqualify Liz Croken
as an award-winning author and journalist for 25-plus years.
Yeah. Right there, this right here. Instead of admitting that you were wrong,
yeah, she's running with it. Click some views, bro. Click some views.
So, I mean, that right there should be enough. I mean, other than her deep Michael Flynn ties,
it should be enough. Which by the way, Michael Flynn's brother, who I've discussed for years
and years on my channel, and none of the, I brought it to many left-wing investigators on X
who eventually exposed to me through DMs that they were believing in their own version of QAnon,
which I call left QAnon because I don't really have a better name for it.
Where their catchphrase was hashtag follow the dominoes instead of hashtag trust the plan
and that Biden was going to send all of the CMP including Donald Trump to Gitmo to be charged
for war crimes and beheaded. It sounds very similar. It doesn't, Weezy. I used to send them
straight-up evidence of McChrystal's involvement in the QAnon operation with Flynn,
who I believe left-wing QAnon was being run by Stanley McChrystal.
But I would send them all information. I would send them all information that
Charles Flynn through Michael Hastings book was in on it and he was there as a major part of January 6
and Joseph Robin and Biden. You think since Michael, since Charles Flynn was a major part
of the January 6 mixed operation, you would think that the Biden administration would have
relieved Michael Flynn of duty, maybe court-martialed, not Michael Flynn, sorry,
Charles Flynn, really Charles Flynn of duty, maybe court-martialed Charles Flynn, right?
But no, they promote Charles Flynn because of January 6 to the head of Pacific Command.
Now, I kept telling them, well, this is proof that Biden ain't going to do anything
and the people around him, they didn't. And they continued working with Palantir in
building the B system brick by brick during the entire Biden administration.
So who does Charles Flynn work with now since he has stepped down from head of
Pacific Command and retired from the United States military? He is now a senior advisor to Palantir.
I told all of these people, I told them all, but they're all backstabbers in the leftist
parapolitical community. The major writers, and I've talked about them on my channel. I'm
not going to name them here. If you want to find out who it is, I've talked about them on
death of my channel over the years. And so none of them, they're all snakes. They're all snakes
because they were telling you that Biden was doing something and the Biden administration
was going to do something. And in reality, they were working lockstep with Palantir just like
Donny T is now. There's no difference. Yeah, no, no difference. That's what I,
that's where I'm at. Left and right, just two wings of the same damn bird.
Do not put your faith in any of these people. People. What do you got, Steve,
Ben and thing? Yeah. Oh, you want to read it? I'll make it bigger.
Yeah, make it bigger. Let's go. Is that big enough? Yeah, I got it.
All right. This is, can you go up please? Yeah. Who is this from?
The Guardian. Okay. Oh, okay. This is from the Guardian. Steve Bannon advised Jeffrey Epstein for
years on how to rehab his reputation. Text show. And what's the date on this?
From Jason Wilson, November 15, 2025. Oh, so this is recent. Okay. Hundreds of texts
over almost a year. Go MAGA influencer Steve Bannon and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein
workshopping legal and media strategies to protect Epstein from the legal and publicity
quagmire that enveloped him in the last year of his life. The text released by the House
oversight committee on Wednesday show that as early as June 2018, the pair were devising
responses to the gathering storm of public outrage about Epstein's criminal history,
his favorable treatment by the justice system and his friendships with powerful
figures in business, politics and academia. Bannon conspiratorially described the renewed
scrutiny of Epstein as a sophisticated op. And over time, he counseled Epstein in his
adversarial responses to media outlets, the justice system and his victims.
All the while, both men were also strategizing how to best promote Bannon's right wing
populist agenda and the political fortunes of its standard bear Donald Trump.
In all of Epstein's messages, the identity of his correspondence is redacted,
but Bannon's identity in the thread cited in this report is clear from the contextual clues,
including his documented activities at the time, details of his business and media pursuits,
and other disclosures. In one document, the sender's phone number is not redacted,
and it is the same number linked to Bannon in a legal case against Trump advisor,
Roger Stone. Bannon did not respond to requests for comment. When Elon Musk said earlier this
year that Bannon is in the Epstein files, Bannon told the Independent he wanted a
special investigator to look into all the Epstein documents. The men were discussing
Epstein's problems even before he came to broader public awareness as a notorious sex
criminal with odd connections to the Trump administration.
Bannon left the Trump White House in late summer 2017, but enjoyed a vibrant career as a
MAGA influencer. On June 22nd, June 2018, or I'm sorry, on the 22nd of June 2018,
days after Epstein had been the focus of an anti-Trump protest at a Trump speech,
the man began discussing the scandal that was beginning to loom over Epstein.
At first they treated it as a publicity problem, with Bannon seeing it as an
orchestrated campaign. All correspondence is reproduced with typos and unconventional spelling
and punctuation in originals. Bannon asked Epstein, who is running this up on you?
Something serious is going on. Epstein replied, first they protest at Clinton and then at
Trump. Lots of people very angry at our friendship. Bannon responded, it's an op,
dude. I do this for a living. The pieces that are dropping are deeply researched, adding,
this is sophisticated op. In November, blockbuster coverage from
the Miami Herald began highlighting Epstein's misdeeds, connections and apparent leniency
shown in him at center stage. In December, he was not only feeling the heat, but musing about
his capacity to damage the Trump administration. On the 18th of December, an unknown correspondent
tried to reassure Epstein, writing, it will all blow over. They're all really just trying to
take down Trump and doing whatever they can to do with that. Epstein responded, yes, thanks,
it's wild because I am the one able to take him down. In early February of 2019, Bannon
opened an exchange in the developing story by linking to an item at controversial news site,
Zero Hedge that quoted Republican then Senator Ben Sasse on the matter. Epstein responded, yes,
wild and linked to a Fox news item covering the same ground. He then asked for Bannon's advice
on how to respond. Continue, continue to ignore and culture on Hannity attack, op, ed, not my skill
set. Adding, what about the attunes pending something that suggests indignation and lays out
some of the facts? That drives it a week. Bannon responded, causing Epstein to seek
clarification. Sasse calling me a child rape is nuts. Sorry, do you mean ignore or responding
makes it worse? Bannon replied, I think it makes it way worse. Epstein responded,
Kate, what about Ken talking directly to Sasse? Bannon replied, won't help, but yes.
So what do you think about all that? It seems not too very good for Steve Bannon.
This is something that we've been talking about how close Steve Bannon was to Epstein for a long time.
And so if this is indeed real, and some of the reason I was struggling to read some of the
stuff is because some of the stuff is misspelled and there are typos. Yeah, that's Epstein,
he's horrible at typing stuff. Yeah, but he's the genius that we were sold.
Yeah, at the Dalton School and whatnot. Yeah, it's if this is real, if this is legit,
it just shows how close Epstein was to Bannon. You know, one thing that comes of mind as I'm
reading this, Steve Bannon is this big, massive, overpowering figure on the right, you know, for
MAGA, right wing, pushing right wing stuff, right wing this, right wing that conservative values
are under attack, blah, blah, blah. A lot of the Epstein stuff, he gets pitched as
apolitical, but if you were to put them in a box more of a lefty
and through this communication, they're pretty damn close. But via the optics, via the,
you know, how we've been presented to through the media and whatnot,
you would think that they were polar opposites of each other.
Yeah, I mean, if you continue reading it all, like here's one part that's interesting.
Go ahead, man, pick it up.
By April, the two were apparently planning a film production that would redeem Epstein's reputation.
On April 30th, Epstein wrote, The Christians I met with feel the media portraying me as beyond
redemption is deeply troubling and offensive. Bannon replied with strategic remarks,
yes, yes, yes, of course, but we must counter rapist who traffics and female children to be
raped by world's most powerful richest men that can't be redeemed. That's why we let them
blow up the argument while showing the 12 you redeemed. He added, can't redeem,
can't redeem undeemable. You are a lot of things which we will show, but you are not that.
Bannon then asked, did you get the film we shot? Epstein responded just landed.
Then appeared to discuss financing the film in a way that obscures Epstein's involvement.
Bannon then asked, are you far enough on your assignment? Could we film this weekend?
Epstein then asked, how many people would you bring? Bannon responded limited crew,
five max, probably three. Further on, Epstein asked, did you guys prefer beard or no beard?
And Bannon responded slight growth. In 2024 media reports, they gave the Bannon record
in some 15 hours of Epstein for a planned documentary as a way of assisting him with
his PR problems. In May 2019, Bannon was encouraged Epstein as he adopted a professionally
devised media strategy to deal with increased scrutiny after Miami Herald published an
explosive series into his plea deal with the federal government years earlier, which kicked
off a steady dumb drum beat of news coverage about the billionaire. He texted Epstein, did you hire
the crisis comms guy so he can drive the narrative off that great timespiece?
As he responded, he's here with me now. He thinks stick to legal, legal, legal.
A deal is a deal, etc. And then a few months from now, he again,
knowledge his image problem, decide how to deal with the pervert hermit image and fill
the box with another narrative. Bannon responded agree, how are we sticking to the legal,
legal, legal? Epstein responded articles by legal people, professors, lawyers, etc.
Now I'm focused. Bannon responded relief, you had me worried, focus good. On May 28th,
the pair expressed a shared irritation to Epstein's inclusion in Fire and Fury,
the first of the spring book five books by author Michael Wolf,
which chronicled Trump's career in national politics. Epstein wrote, I've now seen some
of what was booked mentions me in underage prostitutes. You as a man behind in the front
of the curtain, lots of Steve quotes, lots. Bannon replied, anything awful, wish he hadn't
done that. Why are you mentioned at all? Epstein responded Palm Beach House Purchase,
don't reach out to Michael, then offered details on Wolf's treatment on Epstein, Bannon responded
with an ug. Bannon also offered an ug in response to a link Epstein sent separately to a raw
story article that re-reported details of the real estate deal that Wolf claimed ended
Trump and Epstein's friendships. That would be the a gossip in the state.
Got more on that in a minute. Bannon frequently cheered Epstein
on as a fear around the case grew and in one instance joined in the late spasm
of Fault's optimism. On June 25th, just weeks before Epstein was particularly re-arrested,
he text Bannon a headline, Jeffrey Epstein plea deal must stand prosecutors tell sex abuse victims.
Bannon responded, dude, adding, is this the real? Tell me this is real. And later adding,
is that out anywhere yet? Epstein replied, Miami Herald, but more in better July 9th.
Miami Herald published a story under that headline the same day.
Bannon responded, epic, epic, epic. Epstein was arrested on the 7th of July. We think about all that.
Yeah, it pretty much what I just said earlier too, where you see how close these two were,
where areas prior to this, people would have said, no way. Steve Bannon and Epstein being
friends. Another thing that doesn't get often mentioned is how Steve Bannon visited Epstein
in the jail cell prior to the alleged happenings to Epstein. He visited with him.
And this is the voice of MAGA. He's got a large audience in the war room with Steve Bannon
breaking bread with Jeff Epstein. Steve Bannon was pushing thin ballards, sound of freedom,
you know, pushing that scythe. So I've been saying for a while, man, this whole save our children
was all nothing but unfortunately a scythe. Because who wouldn't want to save our children?
Of course we all do. But it was being used as a ruse to only I made a tweet earlier.
MAGA promised to stamp out pedophiles. They promised to drain the swamp. And instead what
MAGA did was emboldened pedophiles and make that swamp into a massive ass lake.
A polar opposite of what they portrayed and espoused to be.
Yeah, I can't share a picture I have of a tweet that I took. It was supposed to be something
that you might find quite interesting, which was there was a YouTube leak of an interview that
got taken down that we don't know who Jeffrey Epstein sent it to. But they said, how are you
send this interview to Donald Trump, please? It's going to be everywhere. And Epstein said,
okay, this was on June the 21st, 2017. Would you like to take a guess of what that YouTube
link at one time pointed to and what interview that might be?
What's that?
That would be the Katie Johnson interview.
Oopsie, oopsie.
And then
closing. We got some emails here. This is Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Summers. Recording,
I've told you I've met some very bad people, none as bad as Trump, not one decent cell in his
body. So yes, dangerous. Tell the MAGA people that that are saying that, you know, Jeffrey Epstein
is exonerating Trump and everything that he's doing. Right? No. This is Jeffrey Epstein
to Landon Thomas Jr., who's a reporter. He feels alone in his nuts. I told everyone from day one,
evil beyond belief, mad. And most thought I was speaking metaphorically. It's obvious he could
crack Stormy Daniels, lies after lies after lies. No. And then we've already read that one.
And then this one, this one, it's interesting. This is Thomas Landon Jr.
You know, now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you on Trump because
of this. And of course, Trump thing saying that, you know, I've known Jeffrey for 15 years,
terrific guy, the quote that we have, right? And then Epstein goes, would you like photos
of Donald and girls and bikinis in my kitchen? And Thomas Landon Jr. says yes. Yikes. So oof.
And then add zooks in that same thread. Now everyone's coming to me thinking I have juicy
info on you on Trump. Thomas Landon Jr. says. And then Epstein says, read the Buzzfeed,
read my airplane logs and Hawaiian traffic contests. Have them ask my house man, Wanylesi,
you know, Wanylesi was his house man, about Don Ad, Donald, almost walking through the door,
leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in the pool. And he was so
focused he walked straight into the door. Okay. Yeah. Which reminds me that in
Roger Stone's book, I believe it was Clinton's war on women. I remember he writes a story about
Donald Trump, you know, driving up with his limo to Jeffrey Epstein or driving by
his house, which he couldn't have drive by his house because it was a dead end, right?
And he, yeah, yeah, that's right. I think if I have to go back and track down the quote,
but if I remember correctly, it was he was driving by Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate,
okay, which would make no sense because as you showed it, you drove written to the water if
that was the case, right? And Trump. It's on the dead end. How do you drive by?
Trump goes to the limo driver and he sees all these like girls, young girls in the pool,
right? And he goes, oh, that's nice. Jeffrey Epstein must have some of the local kids over,
you know, in a pool for a pool party.
Yeah, that's not fine. Let me see if I can find that.
Wild stuff. Hope everyone's enjoying that. If you have enjoyed that, make sure you
hit those like buttons, fire buttons, whatever buttons.
Yeah, right here. Roger Stone's supervisor wrote in his book, The Clinton's War on Women,
that once after Trump visited Epstein's home in Florida, he commented about the girls he saw
saying the swimming pool was filled with beautiful young girls, but that's not the full quote.
The quote was tried to make it look like Trump was innocent. Let me try to find the full one.
Oh, make sure you share that tab when you pull it up if you can.
We'll do if I can find it.
I will do.
Man, they're making it hard to find.
You can't find it?
I find echoes like I mentioned earlier, but X because of these new emails, it buries everything.
Hmm. Gadzooks, bro. Gadzooks. Look, I'm watching my language because I have
John Brissum on the show. So my choice of this word today is Gadzooks.
Leaping lizards.
So while we wait for.
I might not be able to find a wheezy. We might have to talk about it.
I did reference it and I did show it isn't it is in his book, Roger Stone, The Clinton's War on
Women, which Robert Morrow, by the way, who co-authored that book with Stone has completely
came out and changed his opinion completely and said that Donald Trump is a pedophile.
By the way, he's completely done a 180 years ago.
Um, I mean, what do you think about all this?
It's the same as I told you at the very beginning. I don't know what to make of it.
It's a lot of information. A lot of it corroborates what I have been saying for years and
especially when people were writing me off like, oh man, you're you're a little bit far off
base, but I'm used to that by now. Anytime I have certain views and I, I espouse them at
first I get written off and then down the line I get vindicated.
Trump assassination being one of them attempt. So
what I think is, I don't know. It does vindicate me, but now it makes me more skeptical.
Why are we being led to see this?
Yeah, it's right here. It's in Clinton's War on Women by Roger Stone.
Trump's once returned from Jeffrey Epstein's home and supposedly when he, when he was driving by,
he had said to his chauffeur, the swimming pool was filled with beautiful young girls.
How nice. I thought Jeffrey Epstein let the neighborhood kids use his pull. That's the exact quote.
But how do you drive by? Exactly.
I just showed you. See, I didn't pay attention to that email earlier when I started and I showed you that map.
He lived in a dead end street at the water's edge pretty much. How do you drive by?
You don't just drive by. You have to physically go there and make it a point to get there.
So one last email I want to find is the Robolev one. We have new information about that.
So Trump Epstein email Abe Gosman. Since you and I have talked about Abe Gosman a state a lot.
Let's see if I can find that one. That one's a pretty long one.
I have some of these saved on past pictures on my
Discord, but I can't share pictures on the screen.
That one I might not be able to find. That one I might have to read.
Just read it. Yeah, that's all right. Let me bring it up.
Yes, sir. That one also mentions Bill Pulte, the home builder, by the way. That was previously not known.
So I'll read this to you. This should be it. Yeah, okay. So this is to Michael Wolf.
Prostitution is a state crime never before a man in his own house charged with soliciting.
In Florida, first offenders are required to take a sex ed class and get a pre-trial
diversion. No criminal record, this him talk about himself. There is a felony solicitation
for the third offense. A grand jury was held and they found me guilty of one count
of felony solicitation because there were many girls. Mandatory diversion, sentence,
a grand jury usually only for capital murder cases. Rikeri and reader police chief pulled
my garbage for months and surveilled the house, letting all the girls come and go,
called in the FBI. They did not like the grand jury result and released to the press the
raw sewage of police interviews. I know girl was cross examined ever unheard of. The girls
returned the house multiple times for $200 for a rub and tug. No sex. Well, a rub and tug is
sex. Sex work. Some worked in local massage paros most of the mid-20s. There is only press
stories told by strippers of me buying my girlfriend from Slovakia from her parents, girls under 15,
all made up to get press. FBI puts a task force together titled Operation Leap Year
to investigate my personal massage activity. Nuts interviews my chiropractor, medical info,
et cetera. Virginia Roberts-Grafrey worked at Mar-a-Lago. Trump knew of it and came to my house
many times during that period. The testimony of the house man, Juan Elise, he confirmed it.
He never got a massage. Abe Gosman, a friend of mine, ran into financial difficulty with
assisting living homes. His home was listed at $45 million with no takers for months on end.
He and I agreed on a price of $30 million. His wife, Blank, ends up going to jail for lying
to the bankruptcy trustee about her jewelry. This is the summer of 2004. I became a stalking
horse bidder at $36 million, i.e., if someone bid higher, I would receive a fee. Trump buys Abe
Gosman estate at the telephone auction. Only me, Trump, and his friend, Pulti, the developer
who's working currently for the Trump administration, Bill Pulti, who was the
one who was pushing for the 50-year mortgage, supposedly. And no one will touch it. It
is bought in the name of Trump Properties LLC. No idea who owns it, who else it owns.
Three years in 2008, he sells it to Dimitri Robolev for approximately $100 million. This is a Russian
oligarch. He should have had a 50 million plus capital gain. He tells people in press he spent
20 to 30 million to fix it up. That would justify a reduction in capital gains. Key question,
how did he report the sale if he did it all in his 2008 tax return? He has no money when
he buys the house. His business model is putting his name on a real estate development and from its
operation to venture a sale. Trump put his name on it and got a 2% fee and maybe a piece of the
profit, if any, on sale. He tells the project as his, just as his current financial statements
on follow as president, he lists his income as gross receipts of the clubs of no expense
deducted, not as personal revenue, i.e., the DeRoyle golf club loses money every year.
He pays out more than he takes in, but he lists the revenue as his income.
Amazing in all caps. Thoughts? Amazing. That's amazing.
Yeah, man. That's the style, though. That's Donald Trump. That's always been Donald Trump.
A sleazy New York businessman, real estate tycoon, mentored under Roy Cohn.
And it's confirmed Seth Abramson's work of saying that the house was sold in part through money
laundered through the Russian oligarch Dmitry Robilev. That was finally proven by this email.
So, you know, it is what it is. That was right.
Yeah. And Daniel Hopsker had been saying that for years. Daniel Hopsker was saying that
and it kind of ties into the whole Russia collusion stuff that a lot of people,
especially in the alternative media, they're like, oh, we all knew that the Democrats in the
Russia hoax and the Russian collusion, it's all it's been proven false. It's been proven false.
I was one of those small voices. I'm like, I don't know if I completely dismiss that.
And when I said that, I was laughed off. I'm sure people, some people are listening right now
and they're probably laughing like, oh, he believes that shit. I'm not saying I believe it. I'm also
saying I don't completely dismiss it entirely because that particular business deal, this is
what Daniel Hopsker was saying. It was a massive real estate fraudulent deal.
And for what means? Why would you risk so much to perpetuate this fraud?
What illicit gains were you out to make?
There had to be other ways that this benefited him. You know what I'm saying? So,
maybe that puts me in that minority position, but I never dismissed it completely, personally
speaking. No, I didn't dismiss Hopsker, who caught out Whitney Webb, by the way,
on my show with George from CavDev.org. And the reason he did it because it's crazy.
Hopsker was out here in Sarasota. This is where I'm at in Sarasota.
Whitney Webb is originally from Sarasota as well. Small world. Yeah, it's pretty wild stuff.
So many ties Sarasota to 9-11 as well. It's crazy, man. Everything is connected.
Yeah, man. I thought we killed Johnny B. Let people know where they can find you.
Yeah. You can find me. We've read the documents on YouTube. We've read the documents on Patreon
and Substack. Thank you for having me on, Weezy. There's still more information. There'll
probably still be more information that'll come out. We'll do it again, bro.
That was the biggest things that I had saw. And I know you shared the biggest things that you had
saw, too. And I still don't know what I think about everything. I would say probably the
Dimitri Robilev email is probably the most substantive one of things that I can quantify
because of our knowledge. Like you said, of Hopsker's reporting and Seth Abramson's reporting
and stuff like that. And how we know that Dave Gosman estate led to the fracturing of their
friendship, maybe allegedly, but maybe not. We didn't even get to cover or get to cover.
Was he there with Epstein at Thanksgiving? But then there was a lot of pictures and videos
that he was not, that he was busy the whole day. So is that email real or not? Even though it was
released in the list of emails by the Democrat Oversight Committee. So again, as we've talked
about in the show, joining either way. I mean,
one thought is that it's all a big sigh up where Trump and Bill are just laughing at everyone
discussing this. Like, hey, I'm going to say that I did this to you and everyone's going to
run with it and they're high fiving each other. Who knows, man? One thing that my rule of thumb
is if I sit on the mainstream, I take everything with a grain, a small pinch of salt.
Well, maybe a healthy dosing of salt because you don't know why we're
you're being presented, you know, whatever is being shown to you or you're hearing about
why what's what's the real reason behind it? You know what I'm saying? So
that's something to keep in mind as the madness continues. But yeah, follow my man, John Brissum
on YouTube, and he's on the substack as well. It's covered again, Weezy. You and I are, you know,
one of the few that's actually trying to talk about this and tackle it from all angles. So.
Yeah. Yeah. And we view things in a very similar lens. And that's what I like.
Running things past you because we do view things in a lot of the similar ways.
And then we don't come to these hard conclusions. Like this is definitely the way it did it. No,
we're open minded. We're like, I feel like this is the case, but it could be this other thing.
And that's what I appreciate, man. So many griptures in the space claim to I have
lock and key on the truth. Follow me. I'm the only one spouting truth. Blah, blah, blah. No,
that's nonsense, man. None of us. None of us have absolute truth. But I feel we we try to be honest
about it and as best as we can. And that's why I appreciate you, my man. Thank you, brother.
Take care. Thank you for having me on. Bye, everybody. Take it easy. Come on, sir.
All right. Hope you guys enjoyed that. I suppose I could do 30 more minutes.
Actually, if you want to call in, let me know in the live chat. You seem to be pretty knowledgeable
on a lot of things or anyone else. Maybe you know what? I'm going to put the rumble.
And if no one hates the rumble chat in a couple of minutes, I will just end the stream.
I thought it was killer. It was great. I always love having my buddy John on the show.
So if you are on rumble, I am putting the stream yard. I'm going to pin it towards the top there.
So should pin this message. There we go.
Should anyone want to opine? I know someone on Twitter
was upset with me, but her profile said MAGA, ultra MAGA, blah, blah, blah.
She was Superman. I go, look, don't get mad at me.
You want to discuss it? You can come on my show. I always do this. I do this,
not always, but I do it quite a bit where I invite people that disagree with me to
let me hear what they think. If you think I'm wrong about this or that,
you thought John said something incorrect. Here's your opportunity.
Instead of crying on the comments later on.
But yeah, let's see. Oh, okay. It looks like Ashley said she was going to haul in,
call in in a couple of minutes. Yeah, Ashley was the one that did the Vietnam War show
absolutely crushed and killed. So if you guys missed that, be sure to check it out.
Someone on YouTube says, to be fair, bubble might be because
Elaine's horse and not Bill. Yeah, we, we covered this at the very beginning, dude.
Either way, either way, it's still pretty bad. It might even be worse if it's a damn horse.
But yeah, we, we touched on that earlier on.
Let's see. Will's got some comments. Give some shout outs. Ms. Cajones.
Rob the musician. George was in here earlier. History man.
Uh, Ashley's in here. Her name is a think change and repeat. I'm a Terry's up in here.
Dusty dive. And, uh, I thought I saw the Melza and, um, on the YouTube chat, she's
another person that's been following me for a long, long time, many years now at this point.
So shout out to the Melza. She was on earlier.
Yeah, good stuff. I do not have a guest planned up for, um, next weekend.
Squeaky. Squeaky's in here. Raz. So Raz, I agree with the sentiment right here.
It's all have truths and misdirection. Any real evidence will be buried until the
POS piece of poo poo that do this. Sick things are no longer valuable. Yeah, I agree with you on that.
This is why I've been saying, I don't know what's going on. I don't know if I believe this.
I don't know if I believe that. Uh, what's up?
A. J. M. 1966. Yeah, it's, uh, it's wild. Can I ask what happened to your concrete job?
Oh, okay. Here's a question. Can I ask what happened to your concrete job? I can definitely
tell you what happened to my concrete job. Um, I did concrete for a short while. I
learned the trade pretty quick and then, um, I wanted to go back to garbage.
Which. Concrete pays well. I, let me, let me rephrase that. It can pay well way before I accepted
the job at doing a concrete mixer. I called several companies and
some wanted to pay based on concrete experience and I found one that paid me off a CDL experience.
I already have over 15 years with my CDL. So they paid me top of their wage and it was
making, I was making good money. What I didn't like about doing concrete was waking up at one in
the morning, two in the morning, and then nine in the morning, the next day, every day was different.
There was no set time as to when to wake up. So that's why I no longer did it anymore.
And, um, I went back to garbage instead. So we have Ashley here. What's up, Ash?
You are testing, testing. Can you hear me? Yeah, we can hear you loud and clear.
Awesome. How are you? I'm doing good. I've just been hanging out in the chat today and enjoying
this episode and enjoying the chat. Awesome. Shout out to nature. Boy, I forgot to give him a
shout out. Rachel Weasley, you and John brought the receipts. Hell yeah. Thank you, Dave.
Um, yeah, it's, um, it's always fun to get together with John. We view,
I think really the only thing that we view polar opposite is the religious, the religion question,
but it just goes to show that's a huge thing and it could make or break relationships in some
cases. And for us, it's not, I mean, obviously we don't see eye to eye on it, but it doesn't
tarnish the rest of our relationship. You know what I mean? We, we get along quite well.
And I cherish him as a, as a friend. I can call him up. Hey, you want to play some video games?
Hey, what do you think on this? And, uh, yeah, he, I love John. Yeah, it was a good conversation.
It is a good back and forth because there was a lot of interesting dialogue, even though
you are on the same page about a lot of things, but the analysis was very good. And I
think there's, um, it's good to leave room for, you know, for, we don't know, we don't know what
could have been implemented or could have been put out there for us to be fake or to be a
false bread trail, a breadcrumb as it were. And, um, but it was a great conversation. Very good
back and forth. Loved it. Oh, thank you. Thank you. But I wanted to get your thoughts,
Ashley. I saw you in the live chat. I was watching some of your comments and like,
whoa, that's you, you've been following this stuff quite a bit. So what, what's your take on,
on this week's Epstein news? So I think that something I've been trying to keep in mind
is what John was saying. He said he doesn't think everything is manufactured. So I think that
I can often really think that what we see basically is manufactured. So my overall take
is that maybe it's not, but because of the work that has been done leading up to this point in
data collection in them watching information dissemination and what we know about the work
that they've done with mind control, then I think that even if something comes out organically,
that they will be able to manage it in their direction, no matter what, even if that means
putting somebody who is like a mid-level player, like John was saying, he thought that Epstein was
sort of like a middle in the hierarchy. I think that they are willing to sacrifice those people.
And if you believe in like the blood, the bloodline narrative and the generational trauma that
we hear about, even in some low level cases, that it's very likely that they have no problem
even sacrificing one of their own for the good of the agenda, whatever that may be. And a lot of
people think that it's as simple as population control, as the digital takeover, as the 500
million population. And maybe that is it. But one of my questions is, if you are a psychopath
and you have no concern for the human condition whatsoever, and people's pain and suffering doesn't
matter to you, and if you have all the money, and if you have all of the connections from,
let's say Ivy League schools and secret societies and things like that,
and you have all the possessions that you possibly could want, what is left after that?
What would you do for fun if you had no conscience, no consequences, and endless money?
What would you do? And that's where I think that we come into the treating humans this way of
defiling humanity. And then we have this recent story that came out this past week about
in the Balkan War in Sarajevo that tourists were paying $90,000 to hunt humans. So that is one story
that's in the news, and we know that it's documented in literature. They were showing this
the most dangerous game when I was in the ninth grade. I was like, what, 13 or 14 years old,
and they're literally teaching you about human hunting, you know? Hunger games.
Yes. Yes. And so many more of these dystopian type of books. I mean, so I think if we,
yeah, exactly, Missy. So we see so many examples. So we have the most dangerous game. We have
Hunger Games. We have all of these other dystopian novels. And this is something that I talk to
my friend the Wizard about all the time, because a lot of these themes, we know them and we're
familiar with them from fiction, from literature. So of course, we can't look at that to say that
this is proof. But what we can say is that we know that well-connected people have been using
their ideas of the fiction as a means to introduce ideas for predictive programming or priming the
pump, as they say. So I always have to wonder, where are these ideas coming from? If it doesn't
exist at all, then where is it coming from? So I definitely feel, you know, in my opinion,
I wouldn't put anything past these people. I think there's probably a lot that we're
that we're missing. Sure, you said in the description of the show, 20,000 emails, right? So
all of that hasn't been read. But even so, when they're talking about this lower level stuff,
they're talking about this documentary, how many people are you bringing, et cetera. But
it has been well established that he is an intelligence asset. So there, even if you
read through all the emails, it's so likely that there's so much more of the picture
that we are not being shown. And then I go back to what you were saying with John
and the possibilities of this situation, because I think there are many. It could be that they are
ready to burn him. And Don Jeffries was saying this the other day that maybe they're done
with the Trump and Stein project, as he calls it. Maybe it will be swept under the rug. Maybe
there's 10 other agendas that this is going to be used for. So I think it is a wait and
see. But none of this stuff surprises me. Yeah, unfortunately, that's
that's how it is. I'm the same way when people put too much
too much value, too much stock into these Epstein files getting released or the JFK files
think you're going to get real good shit on classified docs.
They're classified to blackmail for for blackmailing, but to expose themselves,
you really think they're going to keep that in lock? Here's where we tattle on ourselves.
It's cartoonish. You know what I mean? So true. People people put too much stock
onto the shit. It's it's not realistic. You're exactly right. And if we look at,
and I'm not a classified documents expert, but I would say if we look at the oldest
classified documents, like I'm sure that there's still some stuff from World War Two that is so
classified, maybe even beyond that. So if these things were not connected,
Lincoln stuff is still classified. Okay. So 160 goddamn years and you still got
classified information on that. Right. So why? Right. Because these things are connected
because they matter, because if people got some of these pieces of information,
then maybe we would be able to put more pieces of the puzzle together. So I definitely think that
that is part of it. And I put this in the chat, but I thought it was really interesting. So
there's this book called Family of Secrets that was done by Russ Baker, and he is exposing
the Bush family. So a big to do back in the day was whenever Dan Rathers called into question
like George Bush, George W. Bush's military service, and there's some sketchy things and Dan
Rathers career supposedly suffered from this. And but there was a lot of effort to sweep
that under the rug. And we know that there was a lot of fishy things. There was a lot of
weirdness with the election, with the hanging chads, with the pregnant chads with all and this
was your state. We see it was Florida that was considered what the entire election hung in the
balance based on what the ballots were doing in Florida. And I think if we went back and
looked at that, there's a lot of Psyop elements in there as far as like mail in voting, digital
voting, all that kind of stuff. But anyway, so this guy was also looking at the history of
the Bush family, Prescott Bush. These guys are all bones wins. We know that the Yale connections,
the oil connections with Zapata oil, the intelligence connections through the CIA.
And he Russ Baker, the author was speaking to somebody because he made a connection with
a former intelligence officer by the name of Thomas Devine. And so he tracks down
Thomas Devine and supposedly Russ Baker's work is the reason that Thomas Devine ended up having
a Wikipedia page. And he's trying to get him to speak about his experience with the Bush family,
which was not going to happen. And Thomas Devine told him that. And Russ Baker said something to
him. And he said, Well, I read in this government document, and I'm paraphrasing, but Thomas
Devine, after that said, that's the problem with you people, you believe what you read
in government documents. So that has been something that I have been really thinking about
ever since I saw that. And what is the capability to even manufacture and or obscure and or change
government documents? What accountability is there? And back to what we were talking about
with Vietnam, look at how many crimes against humanity were perpetrated there. And nobody
was held accountable for what happened. So I think it's we always have to question and
just try to use our discernment as best as we can. Yeah, I agree. That's the biggest thing.
The only issue with the sermon is the John and I were talking about a shout out to Johnny
still listening. He just texted me is AI with all this, how AI affects all this,
because you could be seeing something and your discernment could be on point. But if it's fake,
if it's not even real, then what then? It's truly interesting times be alive. And I don't know
where where we are heading. What do you what do you thoughts? I'm having cat drama, sorry.
Yeah, I agree with you. I think that AI is going to be, I don't know, like in the Seattle Seahawks
stadium, not that I believe that professional sports is real, but they call the crowd the
12th man, right? Because it is something that is unique to that particular stadium that makes a
difference in games and intangible. And I think that that is exactly what AI is going to be
serving towards that. We don't even know the full ramifications of AI. And maybe we'll never
know because of the age that we're living in. But I absolutely do think that it is going to
be an important factor in the powers that shouldn't be ability to manipulate the narrative.
And the other thing that I wanted to point out is that in a lot of modern day, like we're talking
about predictive programming, it's already out there about fake AI videos having real life
consequences. And there's a movie, I feel like it may be called Mountain Head, it's on HBO,
but it's about these billionaire tech executives. And one of them has an app that is, I mean,
basically it sounds like it's Twitter, where people are able to make fake AI videos. And other people
see it and believe it and react. So it's causing essentially chaos in the streets, pandemonium,
war, et cetera. So I think that when we see these ideas being inserted into the,
you know, into the mainstream that we need to be on the lookout to know that there is going to be
something to do with that coming up. And it's not just that one movie either that I've seen.
I've seen it in other places of someone, a billionaire tech guy getting killed because
his app ruined people's lives because of the ability to fake videos, things like this. So I
absolutely think that it's going to be important. And I think that it's going to be set up
intentionally for us to be confused. I think they're already laying the groundwork for that,
the narrative managers. Yeah, it's a hard times for sure. Yeah, I don't disagree with that.
You know, I know you brought up John not thinking everything is manufactured. I think along
more similarly to you, Ashley, and that I do think a lot of things, not everything possibly, but
if I were to lean one, you know, more or less, I'd say more, more often than not,
things are manufactured. Yeah, well, I've talked about this before, I think. So there's a lot
of people probably aware of him, legal man. He's the guy that played Mr. Jones in Jones
Plantation. And he calls it the 179 degree club. So basically anything that's out in mainstream
media for longer than an hour, you should look 179 degrees in the other direction for what is
the actual truth of the story, but that it's there for a purpose. And I do subscribe to that,
although we have friends who do challenge that, right? And we don't believe necessarily or subscribe
to everything that they're saying, but I want to take what they're saying seriously.
And I want to do my due diligence and consider what they're saying, because I think that it's
important, first of all, for us to hear different opinions, I think it's important for dialogue.
And if we can't be challenged in our thinking, then I think that says more about us than the
person that's challenging us, right? And it's exactly like you wanting to have people that
disagree with you to call into the show, and it's not to troll them. It's not to humiliate
them. It's to have a conversation and for them to be able to express what they think and have
dialogue. So I do think that's important. So my idea that you and I both believe is that
most of what we see, most major events, most stories are manufactured have been challenged.
And I'm trying to think about that. And I'm trying to think about other things that
I believe support what we're saying that it is manufactured. And I do think that there's
a lot to point to that. I think we have, if we were to, you know, like Seven Seas does the
Lombardi style map based on the artist, Mark Lombardi, who did like these 9-11 connections,
and he ended up dying before he had a chance to debut his work. Then Richard Grove does
something similar with the mind map of basically making all these connections,
and then Seven Seas does it. So if we were to look at all these people and
like what he's doing and to see all of the secret societies, the groups like what John
talks about the CMP all the time, all of these other institutes, I would think that we would see
a ton of overlap. Or if we made it into a Venn diagram, there's going to be a ton of overlap
in those circles. So I think that that tells us something. And then I think that we need
to ask ourselves, like, well, what is that telling us? What are the odds of something organic
happening when we have this many people with these connections who are in positions of power?
And not just positions of power like traditionally, like in politics, but in everything, right?
In positions of power and tech, surveillance in the military, in the medical industry,
in the food industry, in media, all these things, they're connected everywhere.
So what are we to make of that?
I don't know. It befuddles me when I really start to think about it.
That's the word of the day, befuddle. I like it.
Yeah, it gets overwhelming when I really start to think about it. So I try not to
consciously not to think about it day by day and take it that way.
Yeah. And I think that we have to balance it, right? So people that care about what is going on
in the situation that we find ourselves in, I don't know that we're ever going to be able to
fully disconnect. Like, you may be able to disconnect in some ways, but I don't know that
you really can ever turn it off, like thinking about these things, making the connections,
wondering what's true. And maybe that's part of an op for us, is that we, even if we question
what we're being presented, that it takes up space in our mind. And maybe that is part of it.
So I think you do have to try to find a balance and acknowledge, like, if you're kind of,
if this is what you do, if this is your hobby to pursue this, that yes, it is,
but then there's other things that I still need to pursue in my life that
bring me joy and that are fun, right? Like you had your UFC show last night,
doing other things that you enjoy with people that you like.
Yeah. Yeah. If you get too enveloped in this area, it's easy to get overwhelmed.
And so you do need to kind of break out of it, wash some jokes. Some people get too rigid
as well. Like, oh, no, no, no, I can't, we absolutely can't do this. They almost get
fanatical and rigid with their way. Like, oh, you know, that person was on
FC 9. So I no longer find their comedy hilarious. If it's so funny, I'm still going to laugh at
the goddamn joke. Well, that's true. And the other thing is that you don't, I mean, maybe,
okay, if somebody is talking like that, then I would say, okay, that's fine.
But you don't know these people. Are there any entertainers that you don't think that there's
some suspicious something going on with their background? We don't know. We don't know. So
unless, so if people are practicing purity in that way, which is fine, I would support that.
But I would say so you don't subscribe to, you know, so you completely have gotten rid of
your television. Like, where's the line with this kind of thing? Yeah. Yeah, I,
and that's where discernment comes in. Because everyone's going to have their own line. Like,
for me, I'm not as rigid when it comes to that stuff. I try to recognize that everyone is different.
You know, what works for me may not necessarily work for that person or maybe
a bunch of other people. I feel that I have accepted that I am a little different
from a lot of people. And it can be, it can be weird for some people, but I've accepted myself
that I am, I do think differently from people. Some people may look at me as weird for the way
I conduct myself or the way I view things. And I guess when I was younger, I may have
cared a little bit more. Now that I'm older, I don't give a shit. You know, this is me,
this is how I am. This is how that's not to excuse, you know, certain bad qualities. I've
tried to improve on all these things. But this is me at the end of the day, and I have to
learn to love myself. That's one thing that I've been learning. And that's what everyone
should do. Not just me, you need to love yourself because it's not a narcissistic thing.
It's not an egotistical thing. When you start to love yourself, you can then radiate that
love back to upon others, you know, because now you respect yourself and you can accept it from
other people. So I think there's something like if you continually have an issue with yourself
for x, y and z reasons or you're in some sort of self-loathing spiral,
it actually creates a barrier for you to have relationships, healthy giving and receiving
relationships with other people. And I'm very convinced that that is one of the tricks to life
is finding people that is a give and take. It's not just one way, but people that fill your cup
and you fill their cup as well. And if you are in a self-loathing mindset or you have all these
issues with your, I mean, I have issues with myself. I'm trying to do the same thing,
like that you're talking about work on all these things. But I find that when I, as I am
working on my health in that way, that my relationships that I have in my life are also
healthier. And I do have more in the tank to deal with other people and to interact with them.
But that still doesn't, it doesn't address what you're saying that it is difficult to be
aware of all of this stuff or so much of the stuff and then trying to interact with people
who aren't aware. It can make it challenge, you know, I feel sometimes like I'm in the closet.
Yeah, yeah. Yeah, I've learned to temper that down, especially now after doing it for a few years.
I think when you're brand new, you want to shout it out to the world. And then you don't
realize that in the eyes of most of those people, you are crazy and outlandish. And then
as you do it for a few, you know, a little bit longer, you learn to
unleash who you can, you know, what information you can with this person, or maybe that's
a person that I should just keep my mouth shut and just talk normie stuff 100%.
So it's again, it comes down to the sermon. History, man, what's up, history?
How's it going, Weezy?
I'm all right, man. Good to hear from you. What's up, buddy?
Not much, just been, you know, paying attention to what you guys are saying. I just hopped in now.
So are you the same history from the Telegram group? Oh, shit.
Yeah, I am.
Sorry, I kicked you an accident. I just moved my keyboard. It was not on purpose.
Oh, yeah, man. That's cool. Good, man. What are your thoughts?
I just literally re hopped in now. So what were you guys talking about?
Just talking about discernment and navigate, you know, because
things are wild. You got AI, you've got all kinds of things going on.
Oh, yeah, no, no doubt. I agree.
Well, I agree. Discernment is very important, especially nowadays with all the psyops and
shit going on. So that's definitely something to be aware of. So for example,
I was on SNA yesterday. And as you know, you know what that is, right?
Saturday Night Anarchy.
Yes. Boo. Boo. I don't know about that.
For me, it is boo. Okay. Well, I'll use your name. I have my history
with them that I won't get into. But that's it. I'll leave it at that. Okay.
Well, so basically, Miriam Hanneen was on and she is a hell of a character.
And why am I going to say it? I don't want to turn this into that.
Like if we can keep it to like Epstein stuff or anything related.
No, I understand. Yes. Sorry. I didn't want I didn't want to use this.
I want to say discernment because we were talking about somebody named Sabrina Wallace.
And I'm sure you guys have heard of her.
I've heard her name, but I don't know much about her work.
Okay. So she extensively covers the entire biodigital convergence and actually Carl
in the chat knows exactly who she is.
And Dibu Masan as well.
Yes. Seven Seas has mentioned.
Seven Seas is fantastic. That's my boy right there. Not going to lie.
That's my boy.
I also like him too. Yeah. Yeah. So
I'm going to get them on at some point maybe next week.
That'd be great. I always enjoy watching the two of you together. It's really
phenomenal podcasts when you guys are together on the same, you know, show.
Thank you. Yeah. So
Sabrina Wallace basically she talks about the whole biodigital convergence.
When I mentioned her to Miriam, Miriam simply just started
talking about some saying that she's a, she's a Psyop and blah, blah, blah.
And, you know, she's, you know, all the information that she puts out is all
coordinated and it's all fucking and I'm like, nah, I don't know.
I mean, maybe you're right. Maybe you're not.
But, you know, that's, this is related to discernment because she was basically
trying to tell everybody to be discerning when it comes to people who have a reach
like that and that she tried to invite her on a few years ago.
But that did not, she refused to come on the show.
And before she was more well known, she thinks that she's being positioned now
to like be an authority voice like on this whole biodigital convergence.
So I don't know.
So it's always important to be discerning about everybody is my point.
Yeah. You can't trust anyone. I'm constantly saying that I even tell
people don't trust me just because you hear me say it doesn't make it.
Like I've listened to some shows that I've done like the next day just to,
especially if I got a guest that's dropping stuff that I never heard.
I want to, I want to catch back and see if I caught anything.
And there's been times where I hear myself and I misspeak.
I'll say a name and I didn't catch it at the time.
But I say a name and I make mistakes, honest mistakes.
But I everyone makes mistakes.
We're humans now.
Some people make mistakes purposely and some people do them on accident.
But the thing is you need to use your discernment as best as possible.
And who's out there trying to be the next Joe Rogan?
Who's out there trying to be sincere and genuine?
Who what's people's motives?
And so when I say that, I'm not saying that.
Oh, look, I'm the only one that's honest and true.
No, hell no, I get, I just told you I get shit wrong all the time.
Don't trust anyone.
That includes myself.
Question everyone.
If someone is telling you not to question them,
I'm going to question you even more.
You should be able to question everyone.
That's the way I look at it.
I agree.
Fully.
Yeah.
Fully agree.
I agree.
I mean, we do want to use our discernment.
And we all have people that we like who do podcasting or who are in the alternative media.
And I think that whatever your definition of is acceptable to you, for example,
if somebody does have a big platform and we've talked about this,
if you have a big platform, you're claiming to be organic,
but you know how difficult it is for other people who are organic or who are coming
from a similar place supposedly, how much they struggle to get ahead.
Or like if someone has a really nice studio, I'm not saying that this necessarily means X,
Y, and Z, but I think it's worth us considering.
And it's worth us considering, you know, I know that there are some people in alternative
media who are funded by the wellness company.
And Amazing Polly has done a lot of work on putting together information
for the narrative network, right?
These people that are funded by the wellness company.
And then we have that is in like the people that are involved at the top is like Foster
Coulson and Eric Prince of Blackwater who trained James O'Keefe and for whatever project
Veritas.
So the point is, is that I think the main thing for us is to be discerning as we're talking
about to ask questions like what we easy saying, never 100% just trust someone because you think
that they're trustworthy in this environment.
The reason that it matters is because the spoken word is influential.
Even if we don't think that we are being influenced, we are being influenced.
So that's why it's so important for us to be discerning about what we,
you know, take on what we think, what we agree with.
So I think it's worth asking questions and looking at are they sponsored?
Are they funded?
Where's that money coming from?
What, how much potential does this sponsorship or whatever we want to say or this
appearance on a show?
How much sway does this have or impact does this have for this person financially or
otherwise for, you know, for moving forward with their career or whatever you want to say.
I agree.
Good stuff.
Well, I'm hitting up on three hours and I got to work tomorrow.
I want to thank Ashley for hopping on in.
I truly valued your insights.
You were in the live chat pretty much the entire show, dropping truth bombs in the live chat.
And so I was like, oh, if anyone could call in, I definitely wanted it to be you.
So thank you, Ashley.
Thank you, history for hopping in a little late.
Yeah, I'd keep going, but it is Sunday and I got to work tomorrow.
I got to wake up at three in the morning.
Totally get it.
Damn, three in the morning.
Wow.
Yeah, I'm used to it.
But try to go a little early.
Thanks.
I just want to shout out the people in the chat.
It was a lot of fun today in chat.
The conversation was great.
And thanks for letting me come on and chat with you.
I always like talking to you.
People where they can find you, Ashley.
They can find me at nights of the storm on Saturday.
We're live streaming over on Rumble.
And then you could find me on Twitter at think underscore change underscore two.
And you can email me at think change repeat at Gmail.
And be nice.
That's awesome.
Yeah.
And as soon as you decide if you're going to start a podcast or not, let me know.
And we'll we'll do another show so we can help you build it up.
Yeah, we still need to do.
We need to do a second part on Vietnam anyway.
There's still a lot more.
Yeah, I really actually enjoyed the first part.
So thank you.
Yeah, I have a listener.
He I'm sure he'll listen to it.
Matt on Spotify, he's going to email me an outline and he wants to do a show.
So once he emails me and gets me a date, I'll get with you, Ashley.
And it'll be it'll be a good part, too, I think.
And yeah, excellent things around it because apparently he's gone super,
super deep into Vietnam, which is awesome.
So that was a great show.
And I even name dropped you yesterday, Ashley, on when we were doing the NASA
smoking guns, because once I started understanding how dirty Vietnam was,
I'm like, oh, man, this is exactly why they would fake the moon landings,
because the atrociousness that that was happening during that time.
That seems to get overlooked.
That's a great point.
And I've been continuing to study since we talked.
And I keep reading things that I'm like, oh, my God, oh, my God,
like it just the shock knows no end of what happened there.
It's insane.
Yeah.
So we'll definitely have to do a part two on that.
All right.
Thank you everyone.
Thank you for coming out.
Thank you everyone in the live chat.
And thank you and participating in the poll question.
It should be a funny one on Spotify this week.
Leave your comments.
Much love hugs and kisses.
Take care.
Oh.