There we go. Aha. Okay, there's that.
Hello, hello. Welcome, welcome. Yeah, I can't see the chat for some reason. That's weird.
Hey, folks, how you doing? Let me know if you can hear me.
There we go. Okay, that's good now.
I am doing a stream tonight. And I'm actually, I was going to just do a Twitter space. But I
decided to just tack on a stream at the same time. Might as well. And yeah, let me know if
you guys can hear me say hello in the chat or whatever. For some reason, the chat on my end
isn't showing up though. I don't know why this has done this to me before. And maybe I need to
open my other browser actually. That's probably what it is. And then I'll be able to see it. So
yeah, welcome. It's been a while since I've done a stream. I've been more on Twitter these days
actually. And I enjoy it. So I've been a little less on YouTube though, you know,
post things from time to time. But life has also been busy. Ah, here we go. Success.
I just got to open it on Brave browser, which is a better browser. And yeah, I've been cranking on
the homestead. I've been really, really busy. I've had a lot of time to think about things.
I have been, hey, folks, hey, Dan. Hey, Johnson, I have been doing a lot of consulting these days.
And, you know, when you're a consultant, you, you're just having to, oh man, somebody
spamming the chat hard. You're just solving people's problems all the time, helping people
solve problems. And it really gives you a cool perspective on life, because you see the world
through a bunch of people's eyes. And this whole, you know, a lot of this consulting I've been
doing has been just, it makes me think about macro issues. And, and some of the consulting
I do is in law, most of it is in law, but not in the, in the way you would normally have a lawyer
do something like that. But you get a real perspective on the way things are and the way
that people engage with the state. And one thing I've observed, I've talked about this maybe in
past live streams, but one thing I've observed is that there's kind of three ways you engage
with the state. One is politically, which is kind of neat doesn't need much explanation,
but that's the rhetoric. That's the, the, the politics, the bullshit that you ever listen to
the House of Commons in Canada, that and it's the, it's the campaign rhetoric and all that.
And then you've got the administration, the second thing, which is the apparatus of the state,
and that's the people, that's the buildings, the infrastructure, the programs.
And then you have the law and the law dictates what the administration and thus politics
does. And I've just found over the years, you know, you get, you can get so pissed off about
issues and things, but when you just learn the law and why things are the way they are,
and you look into the actual reasons, you can actually find that there's solutions.
And I'm, I'm, I am of the opinion that the legal system is just a big Swiss cheese.
It's just a big thing full of holes, much like when you compare an analog signal to a digital signal.
So when you're talking about music, for example, or sound, if you ever see sound on a,
on a, you see a sound wave when it's a pure sine wave, it's, it's, it's got this pattern like this.
But what a digital copy is of something is a sampling. So you have lines on a sine wave
going up and down and the polarity is really, and then you have snapshots in between. Now the
higher the resolution, the more realistic things get. And I kind of use that analogy for the
matrix or and or the legal system. And once you start looking into things and you see
that there are answers, it's, it's quite fascinating. And actually gives me a lot
of optimism really with, with where things are going, because it doesn't seem so bad when
you can find solutions to so many things that burden so many people.
And that's, it's been an interesting journey for me. And tonight, I'm going to share some
thoughts with you guys that I have about that. But what I'm going to do now is I'm going to,
and this is going to be a bit of a technical thing. So you'll have to bear with me and I
might have to just jump ship on it and then come back in another way. So I'm talking about
I'm going to join the Twitter space. And I'm going to do this while I'm streaming. So
I have to be kind of careful. So I've got this muted. I'm going to bring in my sound.
And I'm hoping that I can share it. And then you guys can watch it and or and listen to it.
And so I don't hear anything yet in it though. What's going on here? Okay,
it says I'm joined. Hmm. It doesn't seem to be working.
Maybe it hasn't started yet. Let's see if I can hear it on my phone. So bear with me,
guys. There's going to be some technical things. And I'll, and this is why
generally don't like doing this is because then it gets, it gets annoying as I flumber,
fumble around on this thing. I don't have a whole tech support team with me
doing this kind of stuff for me. So I just do it myself. And, and sometimes
it's annoying. But if you just bear with me, I'll try to see if I can.
Why can't I see it on my Twitter page? There it is. Okay.
And how we talk. Okay. Yeah, that's what I'm going to do. But while we wait for him,
I'm going to bring up a friend of mine. I see Mr. Wolf in here who I'm currently working with
to schedule a, here we go. So can you guys hear that in chat because I'm going to start talking
to Twitter. And what I'm going to do on this is, I'm going to turn that down for a second.
What I'm going to do with this is I'm going to kill the, the, the Twitter's,
the, the YouTube stream is only going to go to a certain point. And then I'm just going
to completely go over onto X spaces because we're probably going to talk about some things that
I can't talk about on YouTube. And so you'll have to join on X. I shared the link in the show
notes of this video. If you guys want to see that. Okay, what's going on here?
Hey, sorry.
So you guys are going to listen to this space
at the same time. Okay, here we go.
So they love that. And I'm going to forward this, this space on to some of the other folks that
were anticipating here from the moderators. I'm just going to kind of do this and hope that it works.
Mr. Curtis, while I do, I know that, that a lot of my audience is very familiar with Mr.
Truth Teller, who we should have in here and maybe less or so with, with Zach Logos, but,
but probably more so than yourself. And, and so while you're a pretty regular in some of the space
that we've been holding and I, uh-oh. Wow, that was bizarre. Yeah, that was bizarre. Are we back?
I think so. Can you hear me okay? Yeah, they, they, the whole app just, just crashed there.
Maybe I'm at, I'll tell you what, Curtis, I'm just glad I got you up here as co-host for
the whole space would have just crashed. We would have had to start a new one all
together. So yeah. So, hey, quick technical thing. What do we do when that happens? Do we,
when you say cycle somebody, what does that mean? So a little bit of, I guess, first time on the,
on the co-host here. And like I said, we'll get Truth up here as, as well and certainly, but
so, so the good news is if the app crashes and you only have a host, the entire space
immediately ends. X has been playing some real strange games the last 48 hours. The space
that I was in with Truthteller got nuked. It must have been three or four different times where
everything just suddenly crashed for everybody. I don't know if that's what was just happening,
but when it comes to cycling, what sometimes will happen is if we bring up a speaker like
we've got Wolf up here right now, speaker. Sometimes it seems to happen more in, in
our spaces than others, but hosts or co-hosts or sometimes speakers can't hear one another
and sometimes by just removing them from speaker, which pushes them back down to the listener
category and then bringing them back up as a speaker sometimes just clears whatever little
bug is in there. And so, okay, much of that. But thank goodness, like I said, you're up here as
a co-host and forward it's worth. You'll notice at the bottom of the screen, since you're on
co-host role, you should have the mute everyone functionality. And then also as we have
individuals start requesting to speak, you'll see another little bubble down there.
You can easily bring folks up or open that panel up and just click an accidental,
send it back down to listeners. And while on that front, I just want to say to everybody,
we're certainly, this is going to be an interactive and engaging space. And so,
if you do want to come up and ask some questions, certainly feel free to request
the microphone. But what we're going to do certainly is probably for the first 60 to 90
minutes is to allow Curtis will walk through his take on this idea of kind of the new social
and political pack that could be made. And the thing I'm really excited about here is that
he's looking at this from a technical and a tactical perspective. Oftentimes, we kind of,
we come into these spaces and folks like myself, we can illustrate the problem,
we can discuss the problem, we can clearly identify the problem. But then we got to
figure out what could we do? And there's some individuals with some radical approaches, some
that, you know, maybe have violent approaches. I always, I project all of those because I think
what we need is a conversation that leads to a national movement. And I think that would
become an international movement, frankly, because it's something that plagues the entire
Western world. It's not the world at large, frankly. And then it would need to have
some kind of peaceful, legal, political remedy. And that could take shape many different ways.
But one of those would be to say we need a new set of agreements and laws, restrictions,
because we can't get back in the situation that we're in right now. And so Curtis has been thinking
a lot about what that might look like. He's a guy with a really pragmatic approach.
He's a guy who is basically disconnected himself from a lot of the ills of modernity,
you know, a self-sufficient individual who is certainly very competent. He's economically,
you know, able to live off the land. So I think if I miss a Canadian John Dutton for anybody that
watches this show, very successful individual in his own rights, but also one that comes with a
lot of political takes and kind of approaches to libertarianism in the traditional sense. So
really excited for him to walk through this. And I just suggest that because I want to make sure
that we give him ample time. He's also put together some visualizations that he'll be sharing here on
X and also for his audience, like I mentioned on YouTube. So with that being said, Curtis,
do you want to kind of introduce yourself to anybody and everybody that you're new to?
Totally. And then we'll kick this off. Totally. So, yeah, a lot of people know me as
Curtis Stone, the urban farmer. That's kind of how I became known in the internet world at about
2014. I launched my YouTube channel and at that point I'd been farming on this urban farming
operation for about three years. And yeah, I got on YouTube, you know, kind of got YouTube famous,
I guess you could say to some degree, I've got a channel that has 600,000 subscribers,
though I'm significantly shadow banned on YouTube. And that's partly why I don't post
there so much anymore. Once because what I've discovered, as many of you have, is that once
you start telling the truth, they throttle you, right? And I'll also say I'm also live. I'm also
simulcasting this on my YouTube channel. So I'm just kind of sitting there from the camera talking
to you on the phone. I tried to do this on the computer, but it wasn't working for me.
And yeah, that's how people know me. All of that time and before that as well,
I was a truther. I was, my dad told me about the Federal Reserve in 2020 on a drive to who's driving
me to university or college. And I was going to study music composition. And on that drive,
he told me about the banking cartel. He told me about the whole thing. And I just the whole
drive, I kept going, dad, I just don't get how this small group of people can just print money.
And then that means everything to everybody else. But for them, it's just this frivolous thing
they can just spend on whatever they want. And then I started to really unravel over many,
many years what that actually meant. And I mean, at the time too, he sent me on all kinds of
conspiracy theory rabbit holes with the Rosa Crucians and the Illuminati and the Freemasons
and the Knights of Malta and the Vatican and, you know, the city of London and all that stuff.
And I spent a lot of time on pointless rabbit holes that didn't go anywhere.
So I guess rush forward a little bit into my career during COVID or up until COVID I had
and still make content. But that was a big part of my life up until then. And I kept doing it
during COVID. But I moved off grid. And so my life changed a lot during the COVID show.
My family and I bought a rural piece of property that was off grid. And we've
been on that ever since developing a very ambitious off grid homestead that has,
you know, all the fundamentals of food, water, energy and shelter.
And during that time, my life changed a lot, you know, certain things happen to my family.
I have children being out in nature all the time. One thing I found with that is it really
changes your perspective on the whole world. And my worldview now is pretty much shaped by
when the time, the few times a year that I travel. And I do travel, you know, maybe once a month now.
And also just going on Twitter. Other than that, I'm in a forest in nature. I have a beautiful
property and view every morning. Unbelievable privacy with that. But just the being surrounded
by nature changes you. And I think how I like to put it is it's being surrounded by God's creation
allows you to see the nature of God more in my opinion. That's what I can observe. And I know
people who live in rural areas often share the same sentiment, but it's really changed me and
given me this broader perspective on the whole world, if you will, because I've had time away
from it. For many, many years, I was very metropolitan. I lived in a big city, Montreal,
for many years. And I also traveled around in my urban farming stuff. I've traveled around
the world. I've been to many different countries and I've been to most of the US states.
You've got a pretty good perspective on things. But kind of like, you know, my opinion started
to change. I had always been a left, calling myself left leaning. I grew up that way. My mother
was a campaign organizer for the NDP, which is the Canada Socialist Party, the New Democrats.
And I grew up in politics in a way because my mom's friends were all
politicians, not a lot of politicians, more political activists. Some politicians that she
helped campaign for, but mostly political activists. And I grew up with all these lefties.
And I grew up with this opinion that the grass is greener on the other side because somebody
else took something from you. And it's this sort of myth of the zero sum game. There's some
truth to zero sum, for sure, especially in an economy like we have. But it's not really the
way the world is at large. And I started to figure that out when I became an entrepreneur.
And I started to kind of realize that just working hard and being a good person can really get you
far in life when I always thought, you know, according to the way we were raised as socialists
was that it had to involve taking from somebody because that's what, you know, Marxism fundamentally
wants to do. And maybe tonight we'll get into some of the national socialist stuff that guys
like Zach talk about and some of the in your spaces. But so out of that, I kind of became
an anarchist actually, and I've shared that sort of political philosophy for many, many years.
And I, during all the time that I was being a content creator and doing all this kind of stuff,
on the back end, I had always been consulting and I'd been consulting mostly in with farms.
It was a, it was a, it was a great way for me to travel around the world and get paid to do it.
Also develop great relationships with people online. But the traveling is great because
like say I was going to go and be a YouTuber and make videos, I would always, I would always
stack in consulting trips and things like that. I'm very entrepreneurial. But I really started to
learn how the new world order actually operated on the boots on the ground since.
So in my truther journeys, I read Agenda 21 a long time ago. I have a physical copy of it.
I started to read legal documents just out of interest to be like, what are these assholes writing
about? But then on my consulting side, I would also see these things, these policies implemented
on local levels around the world, whether it's New Zealand, Canada, the US, Australia, Mexico
even in some instances, not quite the same as they are in North America, but all over Europe.
And I started to see that there was this concerted effort to immobilize people,
basically just put up roadblocks for people. So instead of having a society where, you know,
we encourage people to do well and succeed and thrive, right? And create abundance,
like how we are as creators, I believe that's how we naturally are. But our system
just continuously throttles us and throttles our human potential and then degenerates it to
a point where you get to, say, why my republic or today, for example, when I'm sure we'll get
into some of that stuff later. But I started to see it on the farming level. And there
was a trip in 2016, I was on a consulting trip. I was on Vancouver Island farming,
consulting. And I was sitting around with a group of farmers in the area, and it was sort of
just like a round table that the people that I was working for invited me to come and sit
and listen to these farmers and help and just try to understand what's going on with the agricultural
land commission, which is this sort of Marxist land grab strategy from the NDP that was put
in in the 70s. It's just a way of collectivizing land and immobilizing people in a real
broad sense. But I went there to listen to these guys. And I just, they're all telling me these
stories. Every single one of these farmers, there was nine different people, nine different families.
And all their stories were the same. They had a family farm, and they just wanted to
live on their land. And they wanted to retire on their land, build a secondary home so
the grandparents can move into the smaller home. And then the children can move into
the family home with their kids. Like what an idea, right? What a beautiful thing,
but what a nightmare in terms of policy. And these policies continuously would grind families
and farmers and split them up. So essentially what was happening on the localized level
was the degradation of the family farm. And if you've ever listened to anybody,
Joel Salaton, who's a friend of mine, and read any of his books, he's a prolific author.
He's been talking about this for a long time. But the thing that I really started to see in my
consulting is that I saw it everywhere, in every country, and in every Western country at least.
I started to get really pissed. And I went home after that trip and I read the Agricultural
Land Act, which is the act for the Agricultural Land Commission. And it's just a bunch of
words, solid legalese. But I immediately started asking questions because when I looked
in the definitions, there would be like a definition of a person in their definitions in
the document says includes a First Nations government. And I'm sitting there going,
what the hell? That doesn't make any sense. Because if you know legalese, the word includes
in legalese doesn't mean what social justice lawyers say it means. Includes in legalese
means the inclusion of one is the exclusion of everything else. So when you see in legal
language that says so and so is included, and it'll say something, that's all it's included,
unless it says included but not limited to, which is often what they'll use in contracts and stuff
like that. But includes in legal language means that and only that. So I started then,
let me on this rabbit trail where I started to get really obsessed with reading legal
documents because I found myself laughing. Every time I'd go into the definitions,
I'd be like, you've got to be fucking kidding me. This is what this means.
Definition of Canada, for example, in the interpretations act says, for greater certainty,
Canada includes the territorial and internal waters in and around land mass knows Canada,
something like that. And, and you just go in what and then and then you start looking
up the definition of person, a person's a corporation, blah, blah, blah, you go
through all this legal stuff. And you find there's just all this weird
stuff that doesn't make sense. And to make a real long story short on this legal journey,
what I found is that all of those inconsistencies that we find are actually little bits of remedy.
And I believe there is something on a macro level, I'm going to get a little bit esoteric here,
so take it for what it's worth. But I think your space will will dig it is that on a macro
level, what's has really happened in the world is that we live in a dichotomy where you have
the world created by God. And as as that world is embodied in law in the Western world, it's through
the King James Bible. And that's why there's still a Bible in every court today for the most part in
Western country. And then so that's the world of God, the world that God created for man
to have dominion over. But we have this inverted side of it, which is the legal side of it,
which is, I believe the devil's realm, which is the administrative system of the state and the
state basically being the paper world that all comes down from the Vatican through the city of
London. And then it's it's police through Washington DC. And so on a legal the legal
world, the matrix, if you will, is the world of paper, it's your paper against my paper,
it's the all camps name, it's the registration number, it's the securitization, it's the bond,
it's the trust, it's the agent, it's the trustee, all of these things. And and that's and that's the
world that we're kind of stuck in. But the thing is, is that God doesn't, we don't have to stay in
that world per se, we can walk out anytime. But there's a reason to stay in it sometimes.
And mostly that comes down to convenience, because this world of convenience, it's all
based on money has been created for us. And we can use that to our advantage,
or we can just let it railroad us. And my opinion is, is that, that they're just going to,
they just want to railroad us. So I'm kind of railroaded my, my story, but let's kind of
go back to my journey here with this. So I started just reading legal language like crazy.
And in 2017, I was tested, and it's going to take a quick sip of water, man.
I was tested. And I was far, I was at the height of my farming career, my farmers doing very well,
I had one and a half full time employees. And for a small farm like mine, an urban farm,
it was a really great thing. Business was great, wrote a book about it. You check it out,
it's called The Urban Farmer. Really profitable small business that was easy to run and didn't
take a ton of time for my life. But the government came after me. So the Canadian
food and specialty agency came after me. And this is the only remedy story I tell publicly,
but I'm going to tell it because it really takes you into this journey that I've, that I've become,
that we're going to go in and share some bigger ideas I have. But it gets us there.
So they sent me this letter saying, you need to do XYZ because article this says this and
article that says that. And that's really all you need to know. And I said, okay, well,
I'm not going to sit over and roll. I'm not going to roll over on this one. I'm just going
to, I'm just going to ask some questions because at the end of the day, they're sending me a piece
of paper that wants me to do something. And if, if what I do fails, well, then all I have to do
is what I had to do to begin with was to do the thing they want me to do. And that I really
had no downside. And so I kind of, I kind of dropped my fear from it, though I'll tell
you, I did have a bit of fear. I won't, I won't deny that. So I responded in the letter and
I basically just asked them three things. Now, three things of these aren't all that
important, but they're funny and they're interesting. If you understand a little bit
about Canadian law. So the first thing I said is I'd be happy to they, what they did is they
wanted me to, they wanted to do an inspection on my farm at this date. And according to article
this and this, I have to do that. So what I did was it's called a conditional acceptance in law.
And this goes into a way bigger conversation about ways you communicate with the state
in legal writing and all that. But this was called a conditional acceptance.
And basically what I did is I accepted their offer for inspection because that's what it is
in the matrix is just corporations. It's all corporations doing business and everything
has to be on consent. And they ultimately, they need your signature or written consent,
either tacitly or written to do something, unless it's criminal or something like that.
And you can get specifics on that as well, but more or less, that's what they need.
So I asked for three things. I said, I'd be happy to have you to do this inspection
at this date upon these three conditions. I said the first condition is I want a copy of the act
that shows me that the act had been granted royal assent. And now that's a thing in Canadian history
that with the Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General and the way acts and bills are
passed in the House of Commons, they have to get what's called royal assent. And it used
to be done with a signature from the Governor General or Lieutenant Governor,
or originally the Queen. But the Governor General, Lieutenant Governor are the authorities
of the Queen in Canada and they have the sign in authority. But after the Statute of Westminster,
they stopped doing it in Canada. And the reason is, is because the Statute of Westminster,
and go look it up and go read it, was the end of the Dominion. And what we have in Canada now
is the de facto corporate state. It actually has no real ties to the monarchy at all, except
just money and appearance. Canada has the full authority to just end that at any moment,
but it's held there in an appearance. It's just the big dog and pony show. So I asked for that.
And I said, secondly, I said, I want to copy over here, Oath to Her Majesty, and that you
promise to operate in good faith. And then I said, Thirdly, I want $250 an hour for my time.
And I said, and you can compensate my staff for being available. We'll make SOPs for you
available and such. And so this guy came back at me, this beer crap. And this guy's head
was spinning. And he wrote me a response that was like pages long about, Oh, well, this and this
and this and this. And all I did at that point, and he basically said, sorry, I can't give you
what you need to make a long story short. Unfortunately, we don't have a budget.
There is no, there is no certified true copy and I don't have an oath.
And so I basically just walked away. And what happened and what happened with that legally,
and it's taken me years to unwind this and what what actually happened is that
he gave me an offer and he it's the law is like a court. Imagine a basketball court or a court of
law in a way they're the same things is that the balls in my court, I write some paper and then
I cue it up to you. Now it's in your court. And then you got to cue it back up to me
until one of us is in dishonor. And what happened was I put him in, he put himself
in dishonor by not accepting my offer because I accepted his offer, but then he didn't accept my
offer, which was conditional to his. And so he was in default. And so he basically disappeared.
And and and that was a huge moment for me. I will be honest, for six months after it,
I didn't sleep much, but they never came back to me. And ever since then I've realized
this whole system is this this big dog and pony show of words. And some these words
have power. There's no question about it in 2014. I did what was called a notice of liabilities
before this one. I just explained 2014. I did this thing with a guy named Cal Washington.
And we sent a notice of liability to the CEO of Fortis, which is the big energy company in
British Columbia. And they were trying to put smart meters on a British house. We had 200
people send registered mail to this guy. And in 24 hours, he resigned. Okay, it didn't end
the smart meter thing, but I did see at that moment the power of paper. And it kind of blew
my mind. And so ever since then, I've been on this journey. And after COVID, I definitely got
the during COVID, I got pulled more into it. And in the last year, I've been pulled a lot more
into it, where I'm actually just kind of working as a cowboy lawyer in a way who just who just
basically solves problems on an individual basis. And I focus on just, you know, some
real weak links in people's experience in life. And basically, you know, what are the
things that are causing you the most amount of friction? And I just address those things. I'm
not like a lawyer in any traditional sense whatsoever. What I tell people is I'm a conspiracy
theorist with 25 years of experience. And that's it. And I've read some law. But anyways, on this
journey, I have been learning a lot of things about the law. And one thing that is probably
the biggest thing that is the most empowering to people is that everything needs your consent.
And if you remember during the COVID scam, the things that were done, if you were paying attention
to the media around the world, and you were listening to what was going on in countries here
and there, it was all consent. And there was, and you know what, I can't say I won't say
that it's all consent because I'm going to come back and say, well, in this place, in this place,
it wasn't okay, maybe. But by and large in the Western world, they gave us notice on everything
they were going to do. And they often put the remedies on the first page of the mandate. So for
example, the BC mask mandate that came out, the media did a really sneaky thing. And they
still do this all the time is the media obfuscates what the law says. So there's so during COVID,
these health authorities in the government who aren't elected come out and say all this stuff.
And then the media kind of spins it. And when the BC mask mandate came out, it said, you got to wear
a mask for all the same reasons everybody else said it. But it write an article for it said,
right on the first page, it said, if you have a medical exemption, you don't have to wear a mask
full stop. It didn't say you need to get a doctor's note, blah, blah, blah. So the point here
is that the remedy was right at the front door. It's just that nobody fucking reads the law. Nobody
understands anything about it. Like by and large, I would say easily 99% of people
know very much about the law at all. And maybe like, you know, there's 10% of people that are
somewhat educated that might know more than the rest. But when it comes to the real shit
that really delivers for people that solves the problem, the remedy is as I call it,
that comes from knowing the shit. And there are sort of three things that I've identified in remedy
on, on, on how we get remedy in the law. And I'll just kind of talk about them broadly. And
then we can get into this other stuff and I get more specific. But there is jurisdiction.
So jurisdiction can get you out of something if the act that somebody's come in after you
for, so say some county or municipalities coming at you for article this, because you put you, you,
you didn't get a building permit or whatever it is. If you find a law above that. So in law,
there's stages of jurisdictions, right? So let's say at the bottom, we have corporate law,
tort law, contract law, just basic law for companies, stuff like that. Then you have
municipalities, then you have state or provincial, then you have federal, then
you have international and so on and so forth. Then you have courts of appeals and all that is
that if you can find a statute in a higher jurisdiction that makes a lower jurisdictional
statute repugnant to it, it's null and void, but here's the catch only if you claim it.
Remedy isn't there to be just put out for you. Hey guys, here's all the answers and the
keys to the kingdom have at it. It doesn't work that way. You have to claim it. And so
one thing I say is the only equitable rights you have in law are the ones that you claim.
And so, so there's jurisdiction. The second one is principal. And with principal,
that means that there's a loophole in the articles somewhere that gets you through
something like, for example, article for the mask mandate remedy right there, boom,
just right in the dirt, right in the matrix. Just give me the remedy. And then the third
thing is money where if all contracts come down to consent, there has to be fundamental
compensation for work. And we can look, we're going to look at some articles
in the ICCPR that kind of explain that, that you can't just ask somebody to perform.
Performance requires something. So with those three things, we can do a lot in law.
So that kind of brings me up to where I want to start talking about some ideas that I have.
But just kind of checking in with you, Ian, how are we doing?
I mean, that, I think you're doing fantastic. And this, this approach that you're taking,
I think is so fascinating and curious, because this idea of consent, and you're exactly right,
like the consent of the people, whether it's voting in an election that may or may not be
fraudulent or faked or staged, whatever you want to call it might be theater,
or whether it was the situation with COVID. I mean, every individual that got one of the
jabs, they went to a clinic, they signed a piece of paper that said, I hereby sign away all my
rights to sue the manufacturer of this vaccine, the administrator of this vaccine, the clinic
that is issuing the vaccine, et cetera. Everybody just agreed to those rules before they could
inject anything into your arm. And the wildest part about it is, and I saw this firsthand,
I didn't believe it. But the, any drug, you can go into any pharmacy and you can get
any over the counter prescription, they will give you 15 pages of all sorts of
of ingredients for it, of potential side effects of whatever they're giving you,
of the way in which you should take those things that they're giving you, et cetera.
When you went asked for those for the COVID vaccine, it was literally blank pieces of paper.
Yes, exactly.
You could sign your name next Tuesday and put this inside of me and I hereby give away any
rights to sue you for whatever goes wrong in the process. And so that idea of consent,
I think is extremely important. And essentially everybody every day, whether it's paying your
taxes or all these other things, we are consenting to this tyranny that is oppressing
everybody. And so where you're going to go with that consent and how it can be
potentially removed or taken back and then it could be replaced with a very curious
serum of this. Yeah, yeah.
Real quickly, also true teller, just to get you involved in the mix, any initial thoughts on
kind of the way that Curtis has walked through this so articulately?
No, I'm looking forward to hearing more about how he's able to gain his financial freedom,
but autonomy from the current establishment systems in place that essentially impede
your ability to control your own destiny and how it is you want to lead your life.
And now he's managing it with wife and kids, managing your business.
He has to set up his own energy grid as well, his own food supply.
So he's prepared, you know, and I guess he's living in a rural area too.
So he's prepared in the events of, well, God forbid that's a more against good evil
apocalypse or whatever it is, ours that we have planned for us that we're not aware of.
And I guess this way, if there's another scam, Demi, which he alluded to,
he can avoid having to be subjected to possible lockdowns and also mandatory jabs,
which obviously are violating informed consent laws, which I think he's quite
familiar with because that's the law of the landing kind of there.
That you have to provide informed consent before they can force you to take a job,
even though that is sort of backtrack backtrack backpedal from that.
And they blamed those who took the job and injured themselves.
There was their choice when in fact it wasn't a choice really, because he had to
essentially decide between keeping your jobs, staying employed, and getting jobs.
So you can have it both ways.
Because 90% of people are employees, right?
So it's about less than 10% that can help the liberty of deciding.
But no, I've been enjoying the talk so far and we're just getting started here.
And Curtis has spent many years, I guess, getting to the stage of disaster.
So he's got some incredible business to share.
So it should be a great talk.
Thanks for hosting the space team.
Look forward to more Curtis.
Thanks, Truth.
Of course, my friend.
And Stephanie, just wanted to call out.
I see you down there.
We'll definitely go you first when we go to the Q&A.
But we'll save that portion for after Curtis walks through all this.
I just wanted to let you know.
Yeah, we'll be a bit.
Hey, Ian, it's kind of hard for me with all that I'm doing to share
stuff in the nest.
But would you mind if I just, could I DM you this?
And then could you, I just sent you a screenshot of Article 1 of the ICCPR.
Would you mind throwing that in the nest while I kind of talk through stuff?
Because it's so hard for me to multitask.
And I'll do that.
I'll just basically drag screenshots into our messages.
And you could just, could you just put them in the nest?
I sure will.
And just keep sending them as messages as long as it's not like a link or something to it.
Yeah.
No, it won't be a link.
It'll just be screenshots that I just drag in there.
Basically like slides and we'll just put them up there.
Cool.
So I want to, Ian's going to pull this up in the nest, but I want to point to a document called the ICCPR.
This is called the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
And this document is almost the same as the United Nations Human Rights Declaration.
It's almost the same.
And some of the articles are exactly the same.
And the UN Human Rights Declaration is a good one as well.
But I like this one because it is a bit more specific.
And so if we look at, so what you got to understand about law is we talked about jurisdiction.
And jurisdictions go down from international to local.
And so international law is actually, as far as the matrix is concerned,
international law is at the top of the heap.
There are things above that, no question.
And I don't know what all of them are.
This stuff can get really fucking esoteric.
And it can really actually lead to really dark places and how it all links together.
But I try to just come at all this stuff from a real layman's perspective,
just like sort of as I am a farmer and an entrepreneur,
just kind of thinking about things like, what do I got to do to get this thing done?
I got to put this implement on my tractor and get out there and do this thing in the field.
I think about things that way.
And because I've done so much consulting for so many years with farmers,
it kind of just, that attitude came into my legal and lawful journey.
But back to jurisdiction is that this document, the ICCPR,
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
has been signed on by every Western nation.
That includes the United States.
That's Canada, like every Western European country.
Most of the major countries in the world have signed on to this.
Now, what that means is that that is the highest law in the land, because it's a treaty.
So you have treaties and you have federal laws, state laws, and so on.
Treaties are the most superior laws.
So if a country is in violation of a treaty,
that country can actually be held in an international court.
Now, I'm not going to sit here and say the courts are this, that, and the other,
and they're all great.
That's not the case at all.
My way in law has never been to just go and fight in court.
That's it.
Judges are corrupt.
They're mostly Freemasons.
You know, there's all kinds of stuff to it,
but it's to just win in the paperwork.
In that, there's kind of this analogy that I use in law is like, imagine you're in a high school
locker room and you're a teenage boy, you're 13 years old, like grade eight or nine,
and you just want to go along to get along.
But the high school alpha bully who's probably abused by his father comes into the change room
and he's fucking smacking everybody in the side of the head.
And the thing with the bully, because there was a period of time in my life
when I was a bully and then there was a period of time where I was bullied.
And so I'd kind of seen it on both sides.
But a bully is really just looking for a victim.
Bullies aren't really looking for a fight.
And that's actually the same as the state, by and large, though sometimes the state will
want to fight.
No question.
But by and large, they just want you to roll over.
And so the bullies coming in the change room and he's smacking all these guys nuts.
He's like flicking their nuts.
He's fucking hitting them in the back of their whatever teenage bullies would do
back in those days.
And when he comes to you, instead of just taking it,
you fucking hammer him across the head as hard as you can.
And he's completely flabbergasted and stunned.
And I know a lot of young men that had this exact same experience in school
and that bully never touches you again.
So that is to set up this article in the ICCPR.
This is what this kind of stuff does.
If you can take it to them and call them on it.
And I'm not going to get into too many specific.
I don't want to get into any specific remedies in this discussion tonight because
remedy is so powerful that it actually doesn't serve most people
because most people won't benefit from it anyways.
But if we fuck these things up, they can change for us because they can change laws.
So I won't get into specific remedies,
but I'm going to talk about things in a broad enough way that I think it'll be,
it'll be obvious kind of where things can go with this.
But so we look at article one in the nest there.
And again, this is of the ICCPR.
This document is higher than any federal document in the United States or Canada.
And they both signed on to this.
So article one says, and this fucking article is article one for a reason
because this says everything about the way things are in the matrix.
Okay. Listen.
And in legal language, words are very specific.
All peoples have the right of self-determination period.
Okay. That sentence on a loan is significantly powerful.
By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status
and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
Period.
That article alone almost says everything you need to know about your remedy
is that it's almost all right there.
Yes, it gets more specific and we'll look at some other articles.
But this article alone, we have the right to self-determination.
What do you think 1776 was?
That was exactly self-determination.
Now the ICCPR wasn't written then.
This ICCPR came after the so-called revolution in the United States.
But in 1776, what essentially was happening is people in the United States of America,
not the United States as the corporate fiction in Washington, DC,
but in the land of the many states of America said,
we've had enough with these British assholes controlling our shit,
our resources.
We want to start our own bank and print our own money.
And lo and behold, big scythe that people in your spaces are very familiar with.
But it starts with something like that.
And where I'm going to go with a lot of the stuff
is because we're going to look at some things that I've written.
And we don't even spend that much time on the ICCPR.
We're going to look at things that I've written based on what's out there and newer things.
But the fact that we have the right to self-determination
says everything you need to know.
We could go down deeper on this and maybe we will in the conversation.
But that alone says that we have the right.
And you'll notice this says all peoples have the right.
So all peoples is very specific.
It's not all persons, all residents, all citizens.
Right.
It's all peoples, meaning all the people in a geographical area.
And where I want to go with this as a guy who's an off-grid homesteader
who lives in a very rural area.
I'm very set up as far as the shit hitting the fan, if you will.
But my context becomes a little different out here because
what I need out here is resources with people.
We're lacking that in a rural area.
Whereas in a metropolitan area, you have a lot of that.
But it's also one of these double-edged swords
where people and many people can be your greatest resource
or they can be your greatest liability.
Because if you're, say, it won't be a shocker to say it to your audience.
But if you're a white guy living in Atlanta, Georgia,
you're not as good off as far as crime being done to you
as certain other places in the world
that are maybe, like, say in Idaho, for example.
So people can be your biggest asset,
but they can also be your biggest liability.
So one thing I think needs to happen with people,
just like we did in 1776 or attempted to,
is we need to separate ourselves from the state
through self-determination.
Through people coming together and basically saying,
instead of trying to change, let's say in imagining
we're America trying to separate from the Brits,
is instead of trying to win an election in their House of Commons,
they just separated by a Declaration of Independence
and saying, we're done.
That we can essentially do the same thing.
There's no reason we can't.
People live in geographical regions, and we live,
if you're in North America, we have a ton of space.
Despite the amount of migrants being dumped into this country,
into both countries, Canada and the US,
we still have a ton of space.
People can move.
In the United States, you still have the freedom to move around.
And I don't think you'll ever lose that freedom,
but they'll make it economically unsustainable in some ways.
But people can move.
So with that, what I think is a big solution for people
is to start getting to geographical regions
and writing a Declaration of Independence,
a sort of a Constitution, and a Bill of Rights.
And the reason I'm not suggesting that we do this through elections
is that I think you can all see, especially your audience, Ian,
or anybody who follows truth or wolf
or any of the guys that are on your regular spaces,
the Zionist Jewish establishment has complete control.
And actually, that might get me kicked off YouTube.
We'll see.
Hasn't yet.
Has complete control of Trump and his administration.
And with all this hopes and dreams stuff
that's coming down to the rhetoric of Trump and RFK and MAHA.
And then there's that latest image
where they're all eating McDonald's.
To me, it looks like absolute blatant gaslighting
is that this thing's in the bag.
This thing is in the bag for the establishment.
And they're just going to swing it back to the right.
So we came out of many years of woke,
liberal, neo-liberalism stuff.
Now we're just going to burn the woke stuff as an effigy.
And it won't make any difference.
And then we're going to go to right-wing neo-conservatism
with just warmongreen and everybody.
And they're going to virtue signal about it the whole way
because these people have control of everything.
And I have a whole other story on my awakening to that.
Maybe we can get into it later.
But I think what we have to realize fundamentally
is people who are created by God.
And I really do believe that a belief in God
is necessary to get to take for us to go or we need to go.
Is that you have to realize that we are the ones
that we've been waiting for.
That we are the creations of the Creator.
And we are the ones that create.
And all of this establishment, all they do
to make a new world order as they have done
is they get us to do the work.
That's how their scam works, is they get us to do the work.
And we do the work either through tacit agreement,
which means we didn't reply to the letter
that said if you don't agree,
if you don't reply within 21 days, you're going to accept.
Or you accepted it in some way or another.
We got noticed in public notice.
We never responded.
We never cared.
We basically got to the place where we are
because people stopped giving a shit
because the corporate establishment
made the world so comfortable for us
that we've traded all of our rights
and responsibilities for privileges and benefits
through conveniences.
And we're out of state now where,
and this is another reason why I think politics is hopeless,
is that you might think that the rhetoric sounds nice.
You might think that there's going to be some change.
But then you go to Walmart and you look at the people there
and you go, holy fuck, this is insane.
And you could go to any Walmart anywhere.
And yeah, it's going to be a little different in rural Alberta
than it is in, say, Atlanta, Georgia,
a lot different actually.
But by and large, what you find is that the common man,
the common individual in our society,
is out of shape, unhealthy, can't even process thoughts,
goes along with everything the establishment wants them to do.
And you might be able to sway some of them here and there,
but with great cost, with great cost to your reputation,
with great cost to your economic well-being,
like we saw during the COVID scam,
that sticking your neck out to wake up the masses
isn't really that lucrative when you look at time spent or return.
It's return on investment economically is very poor.
And so what I say is, fuck it.
You're not going to convince these people of anything.
What you're better off doing is getting together
with other like-minded people who are hard core,
who have the same values as you
and are actually willing to step forward
and form some kind of economic relationship with you.
And I think this is where the rubber has to meet the road
is people have to start coming together geographically.
You have to, and that's a tough thing to do
because people are like, well, how do I move and what do I do?
And there's all kinds of logistics to consider with that.
But if we don't and we get caught up in these liberal hell holes,
we will be burnt at the stake.
Now all you have to do is look at history to see how that goes
is that in every communistic or authoritarian rise to power,
the people that fled the cities actually did better than the others.
Now people will say, oh, what about the Kulaks and all that?
Yeah, they did go around and collect the farms and all that.
But those are even in the farming areas.
I'm talking about people need to move to rural areas,
get out of all these types of areas where there's
large-scale agriculture and such.
But people that were outside of it fared better.
And you hear this term white flight and all that.
And yeah, if people don't start getting out of these areas
and start having economic relationships with individuals,
they can't form an economy of any scale.
Because if you live in an apartment and you don't have any fucking reason
to know your neighbors, except for maybe the guy who lives across the hall from you,
because one time your blender broke and you needed to borrow his blender
to make some gravy or something, you know what I mean?
You have no reason to know them.
Whereas when you live in a rural area,
you actually will get to know the people who live closest to you very well.
Because you have a reason to.
If you're in a cold climate,
sometimes you're sharing the duties of managing the snow on the road below.
Like that's what it is up here.
You might trade vegetables or eggs with them.
You might have a help a guy get his truck stuck out of the mud.
You know, there's hundreds of reasons that you'll get to know people
who live around you in rural areas.
And that's actually important.
Because if we don't have reasons to have economic relationships with one another,
we can't really coexist.
We're just going to be siloed out in these Twitter spaces.
And these spaces are good, right?
Don't don't get me wrong.
I'm not saying let's throw the baby out of the bathwater,
but you need to have reasons to get together with people.
And I think starting to geographically move into places is key.
And I won't rail on this too much longer,
and I'll start getting into some of these points
that I want to make about things that we need to do.
But Ian, you had a great space not too long ago.
And maybe you want to chime in for a second
to tell people who that was.
But you had a guy who was going on about Ozarkia.
And there's a bunch of people in the Missouri Ozarks
and maybe parts of Arkansas that were coming together
and doing a similar thing.
Do you want to say something about that?
I should go back and see if I can't find that space
and put it up in this mess as well.
Totally.
It was Texas vet, Billy Roper, or Tom's.
I want to say it's Khazarsky.
But I think I'm mispronouncing his last name.
But the three of them, I've done spaces with them collectively
and then I've done, I think, two or three spaces with Tom.
And Tom has written multiple books on this subject
of the balkanization of a future United States,
what it might look like.
Between those three individuals,
they've all got different takes on what that might look like.
But all of them agree with you that it seems almost inevitable
that there's going to be a break at some point
that people are going to move away.
And as they do, they're going to need to figure out
how they collectivize and normalize
this new world outside of this big machine.
And that's why I think all three of them,
if they were here in this space right now,
I think they'd be extremely interested
in the way that you're approaching this political
or ideological embodiment of what might serve as a framework
for what they more described,
which is kind of the physical manifestation
of what that division might look like.
Totally.
But even in US history, we've seen balkanization, right?
We've seen groups try to break away.
It's happened many times.
Even in Canada, there's history with that,
with the Russian dukebors who were Russian dissidents
who fled Soviet Russia and came to Canada
and were granted quarter sections by the government,
and they became just these sort of agrarians.
But then eventually didn't want,
was said to the government,
well, we don't want our kids in your public schools
because you're indoctrinating them with bullshit.
And they actually rounded these people up
and put them in concentration camps,
not so much concentration camp,
but they rounded up the kids
and put them in residential schools and such.
But you don't hear about that because they were white.
And so it doesn't suit the political narrative
as much to talk about those people.
But it was essentially the same thing,
where people were just staking a claim.
And if you look at some of their history,
they have all these legal charters they wrote
that say, we do not bow to tyrants and stuff.
And it's fucking badass.
But anyways, we've seen this many times.
And so what I'm going to propose here
and what you were just talking about
and what we talked about on that space before,
it's nothing new.
This has been done before.
People do these things because
everything gets to a breaking point
where you have to do it.
You have to eventually say enough is enough
because if we keep playing in your game, it's over.
So what I want to talk about now is three things
that I think are needed in this.
And I'm just using some boiler plates of U.S. law.
And we're not going to go through all these
because I'm just going to throw them out there.
To people and just put it out there that it's like,
if you can understand this in a general way,
there's no reason any of us can't do this.
It all that is required is people coming together
and writing down words and doing something with them.
Just like, for example, I said in 2014,
when 200 people in Kelowna sent registered mail
to the CEO of Fortis and made him resign
is the word has power and it can do things.
And once it's agreed to upon a bunch of people
and people will follow through on their obligations to it,
that's everything.
That's all the government is supposed to be.
It's just that there's just been a small group of people
who have got together over the last hundreds,
if not thousands of years and said,
hey, guys, what have we got to do to rule the world?
Let's get together and make it happen.
And that's all they've done.
So there's no fucking reason.
The rest of us can't do it.
The problem is the average Walmart shopper.
That's the problem.
And so that's why I say some level
of regional balkanization is the only way forward
is that if you're going to say,
let's even get the entire state of Georgia together on this,
no fucking way and it's going to happen.
If you say, let's get the entire state of Missouri
together on this, no way it's going to happen.
But then when you say, hey, wait a second,
how about Ozarkia?
Well, now you're talking because Ozarkia
and the Ozarks of Missouri are a very special
geographical area that's rural.
And rural is very different than urban,
suburban and peri-urban.
When you look at maps of how people are distributed in the world,
I use Google Earth on a regular basis through my consulting,
some of my consulting, and we do land analytics.
And we publish real estate listings
on good homestead real estate listings.
And we look and analyze topography all the time.
And so when you look at the topography,
you can correlate tyranny to how people are placed
by understanding this concept.
The more concrete that you're surrounded by,
the more tyranny you're surrounded by,
simply because the more concrete, the more roads,
the more buildings, the more infrastructure,
the more sewer services, utilities,
things like that that need to be brought in involve money.
And there is a saying that I have in law
is that where the money flows, the policy goes.
So anybody who's lived in a big city to a small town
can attest to this just by an observation.
Think about the amount of bureaucracy in the place,
in somewhere like New York City compared to Selma, Tennessee,
tiny little town.
It's so obviously observable.
And so what that means is that if you can get away
from the concrete, which is where all the people are,
most people are, you can get away from a significant amount of problems
because now you have the variable that's outside of your control,
which is the socioeconomics of a place
or the crime rates of a place or whatever,
you can get away from them.
So big, big time problem solved.
When you do not have to worry about your car
getting broken into every night
or having something stolen off your property,
having your kids BMX bike stolen from your front yard,
it really changes the way you live.
Like on my property, I have walls of tools
on the outsides of buildings.
I couldn't live in a city and do that.
Those tools would get stolen.
Somebody would jump the fence and take them.
But out here I can do that.
I don't have to lock my doors.
I can live in a way that I wouldn't have to in the city.
And so that alone is important.
And then when we start talking about law,
there's a whole other level to it.
But so what we need is we have to look at three documents.
And these are all in US history.
And I would encourage anybody to go online
and just look them up and look at the articles.
So the first thing we have is a Declaration of Independence.
Go ahead.
Go ahead, Ian.
I will.
I'm going to put up some of these.
This would all start right now.
I'm going to share this one to you.
This is my Declaration of Independence.
But this is not complete.
So the caveat here is this is not complete.
I want you guys to help me complete it
because we can all write our laws.
We don't have to ask permission.
We can all start by doing this ourselves.
So I'm going to just drag this one.
This is the first one.
And we might not necessarily go through all these
because I don't know how long we've been going
in about an hour so far.
I want to be requesting.
But everybody, I'm going to just make this very clear,
we're going to save all questions for after Curtis's presentation.
So if you jump in, I'm just going to,
I'm going to remove you from speaker
and then just take you from the space.
So please just respect that request
and encourage us to send over the screenshots
and I'll add them up to the nest for you.
Yeah, so I just sent that first one to you
which is a Declaration of Independence.
Now again, and these don't even rec,
all of the declarations of the independence,
all of the American Declaration of Independence,
that's not in this.
This is just stuff that I've thought about.
You could add anything from the traditional
Declaration of Independence to this.
But I've got some specific things in here
that I think need to be agreed to upon
by people in geographical regions.
So I'm going to go through these
and they should be up in the nest in a second.
People on YouTube will,
once we start getting into the Q and A,
we'll probably close it and just go to Xs
because we might get a bit algorithmically incorrect
on YouTube.
But so far, so good.
I dropped one little bomb there.
I thought it'll get the space, the stream cut,
but it wasn't so all good.
And anybody on YouTube too,
I have the spaces link in the show notes.
Okay, so on our Declaration of Independence,
I think the first thing that people need to agree on,
this is like probably the biggest thing.
And this addresses Ian and Truth,
the JQ stuff and all that.
We can get into that later too,
but I don't think we need to for this at this moment,
but we need to end all central banking.
So the central bank that's in charge right now
that issues the money to the nation state
is owned by the constituents of that nation
and they are not the beneficiaries.
So the people that did Jekyll Island, 1913 Federal Reserve Act,
or in Canada, the Bank of Canada Act 1973,
they own that fucking debt.
None of us were privy to that contract
because in law, for a contract to have force and effect on you,
you have to have agreed to it.
And I never agreed to that.
We don't agree to these things being made.
So this debt is odious.
And when the shit hits the fan,
and when it comes down to it of who's going to pay the piper,
who's going to pay the big bankers
who've been printing money for generations,
who's going to pay them?
Nobody. Nobody's going to pay them.
It's odious debt.
Nancy Pelosi is going to pay it.
Trump's going to pay it.
All these banking cronies, they're going to pay it
or they're going to get hung.
I'm not saying that we have to do that,
but we have to end central banking.
And what we have to do, and I'll address this more
in the Constitution of the Bill of Rights,
is that we have to change the entire system
where everybody in a nation state
is a beneficiary of the nation state.
Where we are right now legally is we're agents to trustees.
We're not even actually trustees.
We're agents to trustees.
We barely have skin in the game.
We can make some decisions
in what happens with our state.
But for the most part,
we don't know what the hell is going on
and we don't get any benefit from the state,
except pittance that's delivered to us in crumbs
as bullshit welfare programs,
where the government prints money
and it doesn't, we don't need taxation,
but I'll get into that.
So we need to end all central banking,
and I'm going to talk about
what the solutions for that look like.
We need to end all foreign interest in countries.
So if you're going to operate a company,
and again, folks, take this stuff for what it's worth.
This is me spitballing
and getting excited about sharing ideas.
Tear these apart.
Tell me I'm crazy.
Tell me, why don't you make this that?
Absolutely.
Tell me whatever you think needs to go in this.
I'm just throwing shit out there
and making myself a bit vulnerable with it
to be like, hey, I'm not the brilliant mind behind this.
I just want to encourage people
to start thinking about
how they can make these things themselves.
So we need to end all foreign interest.
So you can't have an APAC type thing
in the United States or in Ozarkia,
if we're talking about, let's pretend
we're setting up a declaration of independence
for Ozarkia.
And so if you're going to be in Ozarkia,
you can't have any foreign interest.
You can't have a foreign corporation come in
and then just exploit resources
without the same liabilities
and responsibilities
that somebody in the nation state would.
So you have to end that.
That's critical.
You have to have all the companies being
organized by natural born citizens,
people born in the country.
And that's one thing I'm going to hammer on this
because I think it's a big solution
to the migration problems we have.
The next thing is commercial banks
have to end all fractional reserve lending.
So I think we're going to have to have banks maybe.
And maybe not.
I don't know.
Maybe we can go full socialist.
I don't know.
But I think we might need to have
a free market of banking to some degree.
But if we do,
you can't have fractional reserve lending
where banks today, commercial,
like most people don't realize
that the Federal Reserve prints money,
but the banks actually print
nine times amount of that money.
Because when the Federal Reserve
lends money to the commercial banks,
the banks go ahead and lend that money
nine times out.
So when you get a mortgage
and you go to get a $500,000 mortgage,
but it requires a $50,000 deposit,
the deposit you put into the bank
was the only money that existed.
And then the bank lend you
the other nine times on that money
at interest.
So it's a scam.
It only benefits the rich
and it needs to be done away with.
So that's crucial.
So I mentioned this earlier,
but the previous date
of the nation's aid is odious.
So the citizens have no obligation
to that at all.
The next thing is
we need to deport all illegal migrants.
And I'll get into more details of this.
And this one can get harsh.
And I might have made
some harsh statements on here.
And again, this is your document too.
This is all of ours.
We can we can make this however we want
or maybe Ozarkia's is different
than Idaho's or wherever it is you are.
We can all have our own, right?
But we need to deport
all illegals hands down.
We need to we need to deport
people that have only been here
for a short period of time,
in my opinion,
and this is where it gets kind of harsh.
But if we have to come up
with some kind of amnesty
and say if you haven't been here
for this long,
you're fucking gone.
And so I said in this one five years
is that if you've been here
five years,
you can get some sort of amnesty.
And if people,
you know,
people come in and do anchor babies,
tough shit.
You got to go back with your anchor baby.
Sorry about that.
But that's how it goes.
Next one is you can't have
any dual citizenship period full stop.
So if you're going to be a citizen
of Ozarkia,
you must only be a citizen of Ozarkia.
You have to renounce your citizenship
somewhere else full stop.
That's that solves
a lot of big problems right there.
The next one.
And people aren't going to
people might not understand this,
but is the elimination of all taxes.
So all taxes,
income tax, corporate tax,
sales tax,
any type of tax,
all of it has to be eliminated.
And the reason why
is that income tax
actually pays for fuck all.
Income tax actually doesn't pay
for anything except interest
on debt to print money.
And you can that's easily provable.
It doesn't pay for anything.
Everything in the government
is paid by printing money.
All governments,
they do that.
That's they print money.
And so what's the point
of tax? There is no point.
The only point of tax is to basically
it's a psychological operation
to basically keep people in line
and demoralize you.
That's it.
That's all it does.
You don't have to have any of it.
You can literally have.
Go ahead.
Like slavery.
Yeah.
It keeps the population in line
because in the U.S.
if you don't pay your taxes
and engage in tax evasion,
they can put you in jail.
Yes. But while what?
What I'll say to that, though,
the truth is in U.S.
tax code and Canadian tax code,
what you said is correct,
but not fully.
The real thing is
if you don't file your taxes.
So filing is what's important.
The matrix just wants the paperwork.
The money is another thing,
but maybe that's for another
conversation in the time.
But but yeah, you're right.
It is a complete.
It's just a sign up to control people
and make you feel like
you're contributing to the state
in some way,
which you are not your only pain
for Jewish bankers.
Really, let's just be honest.
The second thing is that
all medical and religious practices.
So this is the next one
that compromise the bodily autonomy
of any individual,
whether born at any age
or unborn full stop.
So this this this eliminates
the practice of abortion,
circumcision,
or any bodily mutilation.
That cannot exist full stop.
So that solves a lot of problems
there,
especially with special religious
groups who have special interest
and special rituals
and things they can do
that nobody else can do.
The next thing I've got in here
is we need to abolish commercial law.
And this is the beginning
of natural law.
And this is a big conversation.
And I just kind of put it in here
to like if people want to
come back at me
and talk about this one
further weekend,
but commercial law
or merchant law is the matrix.
It's the paper world.
It's it's where legalese
that my my my copy
of Blackslaw 5th
has more pages
than the Bible and Webster's
dictionary combined.
That's how the legal world
is the world of bullshit
and the world of obfuscation.
So we need to end that world
and have a world of natural law,
which is law that's just
based on common sense
to really sum it simply.
It's just law that's based
on common sense.
And you have all law written
in common language
because this is the way
the legal system manipulates
and obfuscates things
and railroads people
as their language.
When the judge says includes
and you think
you know what he's talking
about, you don't
because you don't know
what includes means
in legalese.
And so they railroad you that way.
And so that has be fundamentally
changed changed.
And the last one I have on here
is we need to abolish
the Gregorian calendar.
And people might be like,
well, what the hell
that sounds crazy
and out of the field.
But the reason for that
is that in the legal world,
the calendar,
the Gregorian calendar
is copyrighted by the Vatican
and they own the right to it.
And by the way,
we date our legal documents
and all that.
This all ties us into them.
And so by eliminating that
and then moving to something else
and I suggested, you know,
13 month calendar
with 28 days
and then you have an extra day
and a half, I believe
after Christmas
or however that works out.
But it's really simple
because Monday is the first day
and Friday is the
is the last day
of every single week.
And it's the 28th day
is a Friday
and the first day is the first.
And it makes a lot
of logical sense.
It lines up with the
moon cycles.
It it it makes sense.
So I don't know
what we should do now
me because I've got
so much more
like I've got the Constitution
and I've got a bill of rights.
And so I don't know
what do we want to do?
And we want to like
talk about this a bit
and then maybe go back
to the other ones
or what do you think?
Should I just keep going?
Maybe maybe Ian stepped away
for a minute.
I will just keep going then.
I'll just keep going.
Well, truth,
do you have anything
you want to add or anything
or?
No, we do have a few hands,
but maybe keep going
for another five minutes
so then we'll do a round of
hands and we'll resume.
Yeah, you know what?
Why don't we do this?
Why don't I?
I might be able to blast
through these other ones
in five minutes
and then and then we could
just kind of take it to
conversation
and then just kind of open it
up because I've already
been kind of riffing
for a while here.
And so I'm just going to
I'm just going to screenshot
these next ones to Ian
and then he can throw them
in the nest.
And so I'll just kind of burn
these ones are last two.
And so.
Yeah, I can hear you.
Yeah, I can hear you now.
So on on this side,
but but you guys sounded
all scratchy and
pixelated for lack of a better
term.
But yeah, if you send those
over to me and what I would
actually like to do
is to keep it
from getting disjointed
because I know if we just
go to a Q&A.
It's just going to fall.
Yeah.
That's a straight
tangent and we'll never
come back to where we are.
And I like I'm so excited
because tomorrow I'm going
to take what you just
walk through
those ideas
of this new declaration.
I'm going to condense it
into a two minute clip
with with everything that
you're throwing out there
because this is so
important because I've
we've talked about these
things for a long time
in these spaces.
And I've heard so many
people have said
what would come next?
What is your solution?
And it's such a big,
big, big thing to try
and digest.
But the the bullets
that you just provided
could legitimately serve
us a framework of you know
the foundation for all
that could follow and
resonate.
And so that the love
that you put into this
the way that you just
articulate is beautiful
and I don't want to be really
I want you to be able
to continue walking
through what you think
that other major aspects
of this would look like
and then we'll open
up to everybody
if that's OK with you.
Yeah, totally, totally.
And yeah, so so so
I'm going to so again.
You know to give credit
where credit is due
for the most part
what I just went through
with that Declaration
of Independence
was in the Declaration
of Independence in the
United States.
I'm just adding
some other stuff
to be more specific
about the times that we're in
and and address
the elephant in the room
essentially that you know
if some of these things
don't get addressed
we're never going to change
anything we're going to keep
in the same hamster wheel
doing the same thing.
So OK, so so
so a Declaration of Independence
is a fundamental document
that that separates you
and says we're done.
Thank you very much.
Next is a Constitution
and then next is a Bill
of Rights.
So a Constitution
is the framework
of a government.
And so, you know,
go to the U.S. Constitution
for sure.
But I'm going to go through
some of these ones.
I've sent them to Ian though.
This the Constitution
might be up in the nest now.
And people can kind of look
and again,
I'm just spitballing this stuff.
Help me make this better.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Tell me what I missed
like whatever it is.
I want people to use their
brain and and and think
about and just be empowered
to go, you know what,
we can make our own laws.
Why can't we
these this group of assholes
just threw a bunch of words
on a piece of fucking paper
and told you needed to care.
Why can't we write
some words on a piece of paper.
And instead of telling people
who don't care,
we go to people that care
and we start there
instead of trying to convince
the average Walmart shopper.
So anyway,
going back to the Constitution.
Start with this.
The constituents
are the sole beneficiaries
of the government.
Full stop.
Okay.
All programs
and benefits are created
for the benefits
of the constituents.
All government agents
are trustees
to the beneficiaries.
So people
like to constitutional people
in America and Canada
like to always say things
like you work for me
when they're talking to politicians
and all that.
And yeah, that sounds nice.
And if the Constitution
really had the force and effect
that it was supposed to,
that would be true.
But it's not today.
They don't owe you shit.
They work for a foreign corporation
has nothing to do with you.
You're you're just
manual labor for the meat grinder.
Like that's that's really it.
You're just an agent to a trustee.
And until you understand
that authority,
you can't get any remedy.
You can't.
So I'm not saying
that there's a remedy in law.
There is.
But what we need is to create
something new
so that we don't have to do
remedy like in the way I do.
This can benefit everybody.
So the second one is
the primary function
of the government
or I guess the
after this second one
of the other form of government
is to protect the rights
and the freedoms
of the constituents
and to facilitate
maximum benefit
of economic and cultural growth.
So this is where we go.
Instead of the system
just trying to slow you down.
It actually either gets out of
the way or helps you
in some way or another.
And that has to be the function.
It's just like
because government is just meant
to slow you down.
It's actually meant to
stifle human progress.
That's literally what it's meant to do.
And that's what it does.
It works very well.
It stifles human progress.
But when you look at some of
what was done with
national socialism
it was trying to actually
make the cream rise to the tops.
And this is where socialism
always fails
is because socialism
traditional socialism
wants to tax people
and take away
the ability of the high achievers
and distribute it
to the people on the bottom
through taxation.
But the reality is
is that never has to happen.
You can have a society
literally
where the best people
can go out and crank it
and be super hardcore
entrepreneurs.
You can have all those like
super mega productive people
be productive
and not pay any fucking tax
so that they're not inhibited.
So this actually incentivizes
them to create better and more.
And then we allow
a society to stratify
into a proper meritocracy
where the cream rises to the top
because that actually happens in nature.
That's that's a natural thing
that humans do in tribal societies
in every fucking society.
You can look at
it stratifies naturally
to some degree.
It's only the state
that comes in
and fucks with that stratification
and appoints
you know
other agents to be
to be superior
when they're not
right because we all know
that most bureaucrats
are retarded
like most people who work in government
are not even close to as smart
as entrepreneurs
and this says a lot about society
because entrepreneurs
are just people who shoot from the hip
and they're just fucking winging it
but they go out and succeed
whereas these bureaucrats
go to university for six
seven eight years
and they're just losers
who just want a pension
and they have no creativity
they don't solve problems
all they do is stifle progress
and so this article here
fundamentally addresses that
the next thing is
and this gets rid of the APAC
and the dual citizenship stuff
is that all government members
must be born in the country
so
you cannot be in the country
and this already exists in the US
and that's why you get
these you know
fake birth certificates
and stuff like that
but this has to be
abide by that
that exists in
the US constitution I believe
or one of the amendments
next is all government employees
must swear an oath to the nation's date
which is how it used to be
and then can
they cannot be a member of
any other organizations
that require an oath
that gets rid of the Freemasons
that gets rid of
anything like that
is that
if you're a Freemason
and I'm not going to say
that
people can't have their own societies
I think people should be able
to organize
into their own self-interest societies
no problem
okay
but you can't work in the government
if you are swearing an oath
to another society
so that eliminates
a lot of conflict of interest
okay
next thing
somebody's got their mic on there
next thing is
all government
this is kind of boring
but
is important
is that all government
boards and minutes
must be made public
except in the case of national security
that's kind of obvious
we have that in
a lot of the constitutions
and things that we have already
here's a big one
this is a big one that
eliminates so much conflict of interest
in the state
is all government programs
and regulations
because I'm not necessarily opposed to regulations
but the regulations
have to be for the benefit
of maximum benefit of people
so there can be regulations
if it's like
don't dump fucking oil in the river
downstream
things like that right
but all government programs
and regulations
must be made free of cost
including but not limited to
emergency medical services
assisted housing and care
licensing and registrations
utilities such as water and power
building and maintenance
of the roads
court fees and filings
this one eliminates law fair
that one right there
eliminates the ability
for law fair
as we know it today
where people can basically
just run you through the courts
and they bleed you through the courts
because you can't afford
because court fees
to pay a lawyer to go to court for you
sometimes like $6,000 a day
so they have this railroad you
even though they don't have any case
and they just have bullshit
but they'll go and waste the court's time
and waste your money
and bleed you to death
and so this essentially eliminates
that ability for that to happen
and by not having these regulations
and licensing
and all this stuff costs anything
you get out the conflict of interest
for these programs
to stifle human development
because there's no money in it
so if the government
can't pay for the program on itself
then fuck it the program's pointless
so that's what that does
the next one is all government services
and programs must prioritize
the citizens who are born
in the nation state
so I'm not opposed to immigration
though I think at the moment I am
I think there should be a complete
full stop on all of it
but I think over time
you probably
you know you can make a case for immigration
in small amounts
and done where people come in and integrate
I mean maybe like the way it was done
in like the 70s or 80s or 90s
up to the 90s even
but the state prioritizes
the national born citizens
so that the policies and directives
first prioritize them
before anything to do with immigrants is
and I think people will still want
to immigrate to a country
like this regardless
because most of the countries are shitholes
so the next one
this kind of ties into the first one a bit
but is that all new laws created
must not impede or inhibit
the self-determination of an individual
or a company that's in the in the in the country
if the law recommends a new procedure
or protocol it must be covered by the state
so that kind of circles back
that other one I had there too
so that's the basis of my constitution
there's a lot more to add to that
there's no doubt about it
but these were things that I thought
that hadn't really been properly addressed
in the original constitution
and that are kind of pertinent
and specific to today's world
that eliminate a lot of the problems that we're in
okay the next one
is the bill of rights
we'll go through this one
these are shorter
and then we'll just open it up
and yeah we'll kind of
maybe not
I don't know if we're going to open
the space up to just like everybody
I think I'd rather have
a smaller type of conversation
but we'll see
Ian's really good at doing spaces
and I trust how he wants to run this
so
bill of rights
so for
just ask as we go
going to the bill of rights
and folks as we
do then transition into that space
where we'll start to have some more
more speakers
just know me how
heavily shadow ban the spaces
if you wouldn't mind
sharing it out
much appreciated
so we can get Curtis
kind of maximum exposure
on some of these ideas
that'd be awesome
yeah share the space guys
Ian's spaces usually have
like a thousand people in it
there's only 400 people in here
people on youtube
you got
we're just around 300 people there
if you guys are on x
once we go into the
the q and a we're just going to
move over to x entirely
so that links in the show notes
when the time comes
you can jump in the space
but yeah share the space people
people follow me
please share the space
okay so let's get into this bill of
rights and again
just some stuff that I threw down
the original bill of rights
there's way more to it
okay thanks Ian
yeah so anybody on x
that's up in the nest
you can see it there
so first one I put is just
freedom of speech is absolute
it's just like there's
no fucking if ands or buts about
this
I think you know
you can make a case for the
the cliche of
if you yell fire in a crowded
room and then that causes
a panic and causes damage to
property well then
there's a case to be made
outside of
that's not really a freedom of
speech issue actually really
it's more just a
responsibility issue
but I would say freedom of
speech is absolute
you have to be able to
criticize the government
especially
and you have to be able to
criticize establishment
figures and you have to be
able to criticize anybody
that's the point of it
so that that's that's key
that has to be
re amended to be
really what it's supposed to
mean
the second one is the
absolute right to bear arms
and so I would just even
get more hardcore on that one
it's just like
maybe we don't even
maybe there's only a
certain level of registration
and you know we should
actually encourage
citizenry to have arms
just like they do in
Switzerland
we should encourage
families to be armed
for more for more reasons
than just hunting
and and what not is to
actually defend
against tyranny
and and defend against
more audience
you know hoarding
bands of bandits
you know
people should be encouraged
to own firearms
a third one here is
all citizens have the right
to self determination
so no no law
and this kind of connects
to the constitution
and the
and it kind of does
that in the original ones
too as you kind of need
to hammer things a bit
and kind of bring them
back in another way
but no law can be made
to inhibit the
social economic
cultural development
of an individual
that's similar to
article one of the
ICCPR
next one here is
absolute right to travel
within the country
and to leave the country
so no covid stuff
none of that
with with what I said
in my Declaration
of Independence
regarding medical stuff
that addresses that anyways
but we have that
another one that we need
for the times that we're in
especially the digital
times that we're in
and this could even go
into another further
conversation is that we
almost need to have
a digital constitution
digital bill of rights
a friend of mine
Paul has kind of
give me some ideas on that
but we need to have
things
and Julian Massange
has actually written
some stuff like this
apparently somebody
posted this on X
the other day
on my feed
but we need to have
absolute right to
privacy and anonymity
so anonymity online
so you can be online
it can be anonymous
and that's okay
and the state's not
going to monitor you
or any of that stuff
and then
lastly I just have again
the security of the person
that the state
that the primary purpose
of the state
is to protect the rights
of the beneficiaries
and so the beneficiaries
are the people
that benefit from the system
and the trustees
are the people
that work in the system
but the trustees work
for the beneficiaries
that's what's fundamental
and that has to be addressed
because
that's not the way
the system is now
the system has
been taken away
where you're not even
a trustee
you're just an agent
who has a fiduciary duty
to trustee
to do all this bullshit
that the government says
you have to do
that's all you are
you're not a beneficiary
that has this amazing thing
called the birth certificate
which is just a legal fiction
but it's actually tied to
security
which is how governments
lend the money
is they lend money
based on our promissory
future labor
to pay the interest on the debt
that's how the whole system works
is that
you do have a benefit
in an estate
but you're not the
you're
you have been taken away
as beneficiary
and you've been appointed
as an agent to a trustee
and so you don't get
the benefit
and this is where you get
people in law
who do amazing stuff
like Barron and Joe Williams
and guys like this
that will go in
and they'll pull credit
out of the system
and you can do it
it works
there's actually ways
to do this
but it requires
a lot of legal knowledge
but that's essentially
what that's doing
in a sense
is it's it's getting you
to pull from
the the benefit
of the estate
and we can do that
and we can literally
have that
we could have a state
that printed money
yeah
printing money
is not perfect
but inflation
at a small amount
isn't the worst thing
in the world
when I think about the inflation
over the last 20 years
of my life
it's insignificant
to the inflation
of the last five years
of my life
and so
we can have inflation
we can print money
to pay for stuff
that we may want
for the common man
or to make sure
that you know
somebody who's been
a victim in some ways
isn't left out
on the street dying
or somebody who's in the
military
is like
a fucking drug addict
we can take care of people
but we don't have
to tax people
this is the thing
that's amazing
and I think
if Zach Logos is in the space
he might chime in
and bring some stuff
to that
or truth could
or he could as well
but
but we don't have
this whole idea
that we have to have
income tax
or tax in general
is just an illusion
it's just
it's just a complete
PSYOP
legally too
it's provable
you can look at the
court of the reports
of the countries
and see that
income tax pays for
fuck all
except interest
and it barely touches
the principal
so
I guess I'll
I'll leave it there
and maybe we can open
it up a bit
but you know
I wanted to put
this out there
just to like
show people like
look
you can write words
you can write down words
and share them with people
and
and people can criticize
those words
good
criticize them
let's make them better
tell me where I'm wrong
tell me where I'm right
tell me what I could change
tell me things
that I should consider
but
yeah
just want to leave it there
and maybe we can open it up
thanks again
like I
I don't mean to oversell
but I have chills
and in some sense
kind of a little bit
misty eyed almost
because
what you just said
what you just articulated
what you just walked through
it
this
this is the
this is the culmination
of where things
have to go
as a result
of what we're trying to
create here
which is this awakening
to the
the political
media
economic
matrix
that we're all living in
and that we're all
essentially slaves to
and if we can construct
this awakening
and awareness
where we can get
not just
hundreds of thousands
but millions of people
worldwide
to recognize the problem
to start speaking out
against it
and start demanding
solutions
this is where things go
because if we get
those millions of people
to say enough
it's over
this is done
we need to hit
the reset button
not with violence
not with hatred
not with animosity
but via
via the law
via a peaceful
course correction
and and via some kind of
logical pragmatic approach
to how we get there
this is
that solution
and I see all these people
that that
you know they
they suggest
different ways
to go about it
this is one of the
most well articulated
presentations
I've seen
of these types of ideas
you've given
kind of groundwork
and and the
humility that you have
to say look
this is not perfection
this is a rough
sketch
let's take it apart
let's improve upon it
as a community
it's exactly how we need
to approach these things
and this
this world that we live in
right now
where you basically see
the dynamic of endless control
and the idea of
open source
and it's one way
or another
for the entirety of the world
and this approach
of open source of
here's an idea
let's fix this as a team
this is exactly
correct
and so I'm
so excited to
to be able to
to ideate on all of this
what I would love to do
is to actually
since we do have
Truth and Zach
to basically take
some of the ideas
that you've presented
maybe do a little bit
of a condensed
compare contrast
to what you've
kind of showcased
in terms of
of course correcting
the system
and contrasting it
to a national
socialistic approach
which I think
would basically aim
to provide a similar remedy
albeit via a different
mechanism
and then maybe we can go to a Q&A
and open it up
because there's lots of folks in here
who are aware of
the national socialist
and maybe the true
history that they
they represent
but maybe Zach and
and Truth can kind of walk through
how this might
mirror some of those ideas
how it might differ
from some of them
and then we can come back
and have this
this group conversation
around it
if that's okay with you
yeah absolutely
I mean
what I'm gonna say here too
before any of these guys jump in
is I'm gonna shut down
the YouTube stream
if we start talking about
national socialism and Hitler
the YouTube stream
is gonna just get hammered
and so I might as well
just stay ahead of it
and I'm just gonna encourage
everybody who's in YouTube
who's not following me
on X to go over there
I don't know if there
and do you know
is there a way to listen
to spaces
if you're not on X
or no
you just can't
that's a good question
Zach Truth
can you listen as a guest
or not
I do not think so
okay okay that's okay
I'm just gonna
shut her down now
so people in the stream
go and follow the link
and I'll I'll see you over there
but go ahead guys
Zach do you want to proceed first
truth or truth
if you would mind going first
I'm just finishing up
a little bit of house work here
I'll be current misdescribed
just from legal standpoint
and what he's been able to achieve
to be able to create this
essentially is
autonomous little area
where he's operating out of
it is a bit antithetical
to what national socialism entails
because national socialism
would entail more about