Everything has something to share, and either wisdom, story, or logic, and it's clearly
amazing to hear all the different missing links discovered by people unique to their own journeys.
And in how they have come to discover them, together we can help to build a bigger picture
for a better future for a brighter tomorrow. Let's stand united, let's remove the veils,
and let's create a new world together, argue that missing link. Join Jesse Hale on the
missing link talk show as he helps to unveil the mystery through the unique wisdom and store of others.
Can you hear me? Yes. Okay, welcome, welcome, welcome. Welcome everybody here back to the
missing link. Today we're excited to speak with someone who's a computer information
system analysis. He's also a mathematical analysis. He works for a major international company,
while passionately advocating for Canadians in the community of the Calgary Confederation,
and he's here to share his story. Welcome to the missing link live. Artyom,
how are you doing today, brother? I'm doing fine. Thank you very much. Thank you for
having me. I really appreciate the opportunity to talk a little bit more about myself and
present myself as a candidate and also talk about people's party of Canada in general.
So why don't you start off with telling us about yourself and your journey, a little bit
about your background, your education, what part of the world you grew up in,
what part of the world you're in now. If you like disclosing that information,
I guess Calgary Confederation, maybe tell us about yourself and your journey
before politics, before you got involved, so people get to know a little bit about yourself.
You know, especially if they're hearing you here for the first time.
Right. Well, the story is a little bit going a bit long, I guess. I was born back when
Soviet Union was still a thing. I was born in the Kazakh Soviet Republic,
so which was part of the USSR at the time. And I saw the collapse of Soviet Union and
how fun that was, when you didn't have groceries, getting food was a challenge.
I mentioned before that in other interviews that
to get milk, you'd have to get up on a certain day. I think it was a Thursday.
You need to go to a certain store, which was like, there was a handful of them in the city,
early in the morning. And you have to wait in line and then you can get only like,
what was it, like five liters per person of milk, and that's it. And that was for the
whole week. And you had to pay for it, obviously, still. And I found like, I was a little kid at
that time, like six, maybe even five. I remember that fondly because it was entertaining, but
for my parents, that was not necessarily a fun thing to do.
So I saw like a lot of poverty in that sense. We grew up like, with my parents working,
my grandma helped take care of me because it was just no other way around it.
And slowly, but sadly, after the collapse of Soviet Union, the economy started to kind of
get back on track, but it still was kind of hard. I got my education, like my 11 classes
in the school in Kazakhstan, to the credit, especially now comparing to Canada.
Our school system was focused on actually education. So you would learn like, I learned English,
as you can tell, math, physics, chemistry, astronomy. So we were focused on, you know,
things that are important. We had history. So I knew a big chunk of, you know, world history,
not just, you know, Soviet Union history and whatnot, or Kazakhstan history for that matter.
So we learned that. And after I graduated school, I went to university in Kazakhstan. I
got my first degree, which was a mathematical analyst. And after that, I went to another
university and got my computer information systems. And later on, I was able to apply
to university here in Canada, in British Columbia, actually. And this was my first
stop. And I came here in 2011 as a student at the end of the year. I started here for
another computer information systems, got another bachelor's degree here. And while
studying here, I noticed that the university, especially here, was not focused on so much
education, so much on a lot of things were kind of relevant, you know, focusing on
all communication skills. I mean, in general, it's a good idea, but the way they were
approaching it, I did not like it. Again, I had two, you know, higher educations at that time,
so I could compare. And just it was a little bit, you know, unnecessary in my opinion.
But it was early 2000, you know, what was it, 14, at the time that, you know,
the Wokeness didn't hit Canada as hard as it did later on in time. So didn't pay really
much attention. I got my job here. I started working. Later on, I met my future wife,
and we got married. Later on, we moved to Calgary. We had our two kids here. The second
one is only a couple of months old right now. So he's taking a lot of our time and, you know,
energy. But yeah, I'm working in IT. That's my, you know, specialization, if you will.
And the more time would go on, and especially after I had my two boys, I started thinking
about their future as well, not just my future, right? And I've noticed that the schooling system
was failing students. Instead of teaching them, you know, the necessities of life,
it's teaching them Wokeness. Oh, you know, it's okay for you to feel like a girl today,
has nothing to do with schooling. School has to be school, not teaching kids what gender they are,
what, who they like. Like, more than that, like personally, when I was growing up,
from early age, I really liked long hair. I had my hair down to my shoulders, actually.
And whenever, like especially when I was little, people would see me, they think I'm a girl,
right? Because boys usually don't wear, especially in that part of the world,
long hair. And oh, are you a little girl? I'm like, no, I'm a boy. I knew I was a boy.
Nobody could convince me otherwise. And nobody was even trying to convince me I'm a girl.
But I'm thinking, what if, you know, my son, for example, decides to live here?
Some nut job teacher will start brainwashing him that he's actually a girl. And well,
I can't have that. So that was one thing. I've noticed how after, you know,
liberal party with Mr. Trudeau came to power, how everything went up in prices,
starting with housing, groceries. I remember, like in British Columbia,
I was able in back in 2012 to buy a box this big of chicken, chicken breasts for $20.
And it will last me almost for a month, because it was like full of chicken breasts.
Right now, like in Walmart, the cheapest one is $24 and only seven chicken breasts.
That's ridiculous, right? It shouldn't be like that. The housing went up in price.
Buying a house for young people right now, it's impossible.
The average salary in Canada is like what 50 maybe 55 grand nowadays.
You can't afford a house that price. There's no way you have to slave away the whole life,
not eating anything to be able to afford even mortage, let alone, you know, insurance and
whatnot. So, yeah, it started to kind of dig into me and irritate me more and more.
And next thing I saw, you know, the uncontrolled migration, that is, again,
what the liberals were promoting started, you know, increasing crime.
In Vancouver, there was like quite often shootouts between like, what was it,
Ethiopian and I want to say Indian gangs, but I might be wrong, maybe it could be like Bangladesh
or something like that. So, some gangs that not supposed to be fighting in the first place
were having a shootouts in the streets of Vancouver. Do I want that kind of future for my
children? No. Right? So, I started looking into parties. Originally, I was a supporter of
a conservative party until I saw what happened at the leadership race back in 2016 or 2017,
where Max was trying to run for the leadership. And I liked his program. I was his supporter.
And I saw how, you know, in the 12 hour, a bunch of ballots appeared that supported
Andrew Scheer. And then all of a sudden those ballots were destroyed right after the counting.
You know, that leaves a sour taste in your mouth. And I'm like, I don't know. I tried looking at what
the conservative party was going for, but I noticed that they decided to turn hard left
and become a liberal light party. They probably wore before, but you know,
didn't pay attention because there was nothing to compare it against.
And also, I wasn't too much involved into that. But then Max came with his program
and I compared it to conservatives. I'm like, well, this one makes more sense.
You know, it says, hey, we need to limit migration to only, you know,
vet people properly who are coming. You can't have our borders as Swiss cheese.
You know, the whole plethora of things was covered. And it was like, okay, that sounds
reasonable. Why can't the conservative party, you know, support that? And instead,
they're attacking it. It just didn't make sense to me. And I voted for them in the last
election. And closer to this election, they actually opened a position for candidates.
And I remember the good saying, if you want something done, well, you do it yourself.
Just apply it. I didn't know it would work or not. I thought, hey, maybe they have other
candidates, maybe not. But no, I went through the interview. They liked me. And here I am,
a candidate. I'm already on a ballot. I collected enough signatures to be on a
ballot. So I'm officially a candidate now, not just a representative.
So yeah, next election, you'll see my name if you're in Calgary Confederation. And
hopefully you'll vote for me.
That's, that's a great story. Thanks for sharing that with us.
My first thought was when you started talking about when, you know, you were five years
old and, you know, your family had to wait for, you know, milk and get five liters. Do you
by any chance recall if that was pasteurized milk or did you guys have real milk, you know, like
unpasteurized stuff that you're not allowed to actually even buy here?
No, I believe it was pasteurized, but it's hard to tell. It was like an automated
machine that would dispense it. And I'm not even sure if it was five liters. I just,
I just remember going for it. It was a small container. I don't know how much it would fit.
Maybe two, maybe five, maybe three, something in between that definitely no bigger than five,
as far as I can remember. Also, I do want to add one quick thing. I think that, you know,
me growing up in that kind of environment where it's, you know, it's harder to get
around and whatnot. And you see the difference in, you know, political structure. I think
it makes me a better candidate for change because I see the games that are being played here by
politicians better than people who live here all their lives. Because here the, so to say,
the frog has been boiled slow. And people don't realize how much they're being screwed over
by the establishment. You, you know, your family came here as immigrants. And,
you know, the immigration now, could you maybe, you know, speak on that being an immigrant yourself?
Well, first of all, I'm the only one who came here. So I am the family, so to say.
It's simple. All right. You, as a, let's say, homeowner, you don't invite random people in
your house. You don't open the door and say, come, everyone, I'll feed you and you can put
your rules here and they'll surpass my rules. You say, Hey, I like this person,
you can come into my house and I'll help you. But, you know, for a short time and after that,
I'll probably ask you to leave politely. Same applies to a country. You can't have open borders
because random people will come. Some of them will be amazing. Some of them will be geniuses
who can contribute a lot. But majority of those people are going to be using you because they
are saying, okay, those people are not vetting. So why not just use it? I'll come here and
I'll use the benefits and voila. I've met quite a few people who were talking, you know,
and they would tell me their story and just makes me want to cry for country because
one of the couple, I met a couple here. They're like Ukrainians, but they didn't come here
from Ukraine. They came here from Tunisia. They just used the whole Ukrainian conflict
as an escape to come here. Like, yeah, I saw that there's happening and there's a program.
So I said, I'm a refugee from Ukraine. Nobody vetted him. So he's here now getting, you know,
money from the government, which are my taxes and nobody. I'm not happy about that. I worked
hard to get here. Yes, I came here as a student originally, but I know I had to prove
everything that, Hey, I'm legit. I'm not, I don't have crimes behind me. I'm not
planning to commit crimes. Every step of the way from student to permanent residence to citizenship,
I had to prove that I'm worthy, so to say. And I see other people coming here and getting everything
without anything, without even a vetting by police. That's not fair to me. That's not fair
to anyone who took the same route to the hard way. Right. And again, I'm not sitting on
donations from the government. I worked hard. I contributed to the system.
So I think, you know, taking from me and giving it to people who came here just to,
you know, leech of the system is unfair and it's horrible. Because at the end of the day,
it takes away from my children that the government debt that was at 60 billion now in Canada,
that's not going to be from me. It's money from my children that they will have to pay.
I don't want that. And thankfully our party is the only party who is talking about how
in one year, we can get rid of that deficit. And after that, not even one term, one year.
And after that, it's going to be different and better.
So is that what you mean by, you know, kind of open border that anyone can come to this
country right now because of the Trudeau and the liberal policies?
The problem is it's not just Trudeau and liberal policies, right? That we have the
supposed conservative leadership that's, you know, openly says, hey, we want to have the
same amount of immigrants as Trudeau liberals. Trudeau liberals want 300,000. And Pierre
Polyver and his conservative party saying 250,000. There's no difference. 50,000 is not
difference in this case. It's just, you know, a percentage at this point.
What needs to happen, we need to be able to, and this is what our party stands for,
close income, like it's not income, sorry, incoming people say, hey, it's a maratorium now,
nobody comes in. What whoever came here legally has to integrate,
not just leech of the system, you came here legally to work, try your best. Okay,
maybe you can't find a job. It's a hard market right now, I understand, but more reasons not to
let more people in. If we don't have enough jobs, letting another 300,000 people a year
is not going to suddenly make the 300,000 jobs. So those people coming here, sometimes
they're even forced into crime. Nobody wants to starve to death. So some of them,
they want to be hard workers, but they can't. I saw there was a, where was it?
What was it? Tim Hortons or something like to work there? And there was a lineup of people
volunteering to do that because there's not enough jobs. And a lot of people who are coming,
unfortunately, they're low skill labor essentially. And we have too much of that right now.
And not enough jobs. So again, crime increases and just goes on and on. So closing the border,
deporting those who came here legally or under false pretense and integrating those who came
here legally, then letting the system catch up proper infrastructure, helping educate more
doctors, if you will, so that the system is not too overwhelmed with the number of people.
Because right now, God forbid, you have to go find a family doctor. Good luck.
Good luck. Pretty much all big cities don't have family doctors that are available because
they're all packed. For me, finding a family doctor when I moved to Calgary was a challenge.
Got to go for quite a few. So are you, are you saying that both the liberal and the conservative
party of Canada are, they don't care about the system, the economy, whether or not we could
handle more immigrants coming in, they just want to bring in hundreds of thousands of people
every year, whether it's a good or a bad thing, like there's no assessment, there's no for the
needs, there's no, hey, we got too many, let's wait till, so they're just influxing people,
are they doing that because they just want more voters? Or why do you think that
both parties seem to be just, you know, inviting as many people as possible?
There are several things to that. So first of all, the proper approach I would say is to
not consider them liberals and conservatives, consider them a uniparty. Because if almost
everything they stand for is almost exactly the same, like 95% the same, there is no difference
between them. Right? On one hand, we have liberals with their carbon tax, and now they
removed the carbon tax from, you know, end users, so to say, but they still left it with
companies, which means prices are still going to be high. And Pierre, the conservative party
is saying they still want to go on with the parish accords, parish accords call for
tax. So he's not saying he wants a tax, but there is going to be a tax. Same, both of
them want to contribute to the UN, what is it, the migration pact. That's another big
reason for that, right? They want more people here because they signed these papers with
the UN. Why they did? I don't know. Maybe they want to replace the population,
like some people say, maybe they think there's going to be their free voters,
or maybe they think, you know, those people are going to be hardworking and we become
billionaires. I don't believe that for a second, right? You can't invite, you know, the whole
planet into yourself and expect to have a prosperity, because unfortunately the whole
planet is not rich. If you're inviting people from, I don't know, let's say,
United States, who are legally, probably you're going to have a better outcome
if you're inviting people from some banana republic. But there is no discrimination,
so to say here. Everyone is invited and because there is no vetting, you don't even know who's
coming. Is that person from that banana republic, amazing engineer who's, you know,
going to create something brand new here and, you know, make a living,
or is he going to come here and push drugs?
Have you ever heard the phrase order out of chaos?
Yes, I know.
So do you think that, you know, part of this, you know, criminal syndicate that seems to be
controlling all the different countries is they destabilize all these different areas,
cause war and famine and, you know, kill off families. They create this chaos
and then they want to influx all those people into western, you know, civilizations after they've
made a lot of pissed off people. They bring them into these countries in order to create a lot of
chaos so they can come and be, hey, look, we need to be the order and to maybe justify,
you know, them being able to be, you know, I guess even almost tyrannical because,
you know, it's for your own safety from the mess that they created.
Well, of course, that's definitely plays a role. Again, look at the
pier and his rhetoric about the Ukrainian war, right? He says, oh, we need to send even more
weapons and faster and more money. I'm sorry, but like, that's not a conservative position
necessarily. So Trudeau is saying the same as pier, but what it will create it create more
misery in Ukraine and Russia to some extent, but also it will create a lot of displacement
of a lot of people coming here. Like we already have a big chunk of, you know, Ukrainian refugees here.
Thankfully, they're not necessarily, you know, upset at the Western countries. So
they might integrate much better in the Canadian society than let's say people
who were bombed in the Middle East by, you know, Western powers.
They're coming here. Are they going to be happy with, you know, your neighborhood?
No, probably not. They probably think that you're, you know, contributing to their
former homeland being bombarded. So they're going to start, you know, doing things and,
you know, voting in their self-interest and I can't even blame them for that.
And we see that trend in other countries right now. Again, look at London, what's
happening there, right? Terrorist attacks. How often that happens? And what the government
does instead of, you know, addressing the actual issue, similar to Canada, they're saying,
oh, you having weapons is a bad thing. You can't have self-defense. God forbid you have a,
you know, ability to defend yourself. In Britain, they're already forbidding people to have even
knives for granted loud. Buying a butter knife, you have to show a license.
Here recently, they added more, you know, semi-auto weapons, the banned ones.
And you only have, like, what was it, till October, I think, to get rid of them.
We don't have a problem, you know, with random Canadian going shooting places. That's not an issue
in the country. What we have is game activity with handguns, majority of it. But handguns have been
banned already, but crime didn't go down. What happened is just for regular people,
like you and myself, you know, defending ourselves is much more difficult now because,
well, if I don't have a handgun, you know, and somebody bars into my house,
it's much more harder for me to, you know, protect myself.
Yeah, maybe I have a rifle, but, you know, getting out a rifle is much more harder than getting a handgun.
So, yes, definitely, the part of it is to create a situation where people are afraid,
and the government is a big nanny that comes and says, hey, I can solve all your problems.
Just give me all your freedoms, and I'll deal with everything. It won't, but that's what
promises. Again, look at the former Soviet Union, how that started.
The concept was that, you know, SARS and at that time were horrible, and, you know,
Lenin and his Communist Party are going to be for the workers. You know,
the factory is going to belong to the workers. What ended up happening?
Millions and millions of people died because of the Communist revolution.
And factories didn't belong to the workers on the other day. It belonged to the party.
Party leaders were rich. Party leaders had all the benefits you can imagine. Everyone else was
dead poor. And until, you know, Stalin died, people were continued being killed, and, you know, famine
was a thing. Thankfully, you know, Khrushchev came and he had a little bit of brain to himself,
so he kind of started adjusting, you know, for the people rather than for the party. Even
that he was corrupt in that sense. Again, communists can't expect much from them.
So whenever I see here in the West, and Canada specifically, people promoting, you know,
leftist ideas, like as if they've never been tried before, it makes me laugh.
Oh yes, this time communism will work. Definitely. Don't look at Russia, 20 million plus dead.
Don't look at China, 100 million dead. Don't look at Pol Pot who killed people with, you
know, pickaxes and whatnot. That's not going to happen. This time we're going to get it right.
Sure, you will. Sure. Are you talking about the Bolshevik revolution in Russia?
Yes. Again, my family before the Bolshevik revolution, like I looked at my family tree,
we were apparently wealthy, like one of my great granddads or something like that.
He was a merchant. And what ended up happening when the Bolsheviks came,
we lost everything. We had to, you know, delete all of those, you know,
links to that granddad. I don't even know his name realistically speaking.
Just because we were afraid that if there is a link to him, we will be killed because a lot of
people were. And after the Bolsheviks came, my family had to pretty much be dead poor.
And it only started getting better around when my mom was a teen, essentially.
Years later, 50 plus years later after the Bolshevik revolution.
So I have a grudge against leftists because leftism doesn't bring happiness. It brings death
and starvation. Who were the Bolsheviks? And I heard that they targeted a lot of the,
you know, Orthodox Christians were the ones that were getting murdered at that time.
Yes. I want to say leftism is a religion in itself where people replace God with state or
state power, if you will. And they worship that. For them, that's the biggest, you know,
thing to go about. And yes, when the Communist Bolsheviks, same thing, came to power,
they targeted Christians. The priests were slaughtered. The churches were either destroyed
or made into, you know, storage houses. Like one of the biggest churches in my city,
actually the biggest at that time, was converted into a storage house. And only after the Soviet
Union fell, it was given back to the Orthodox Church. And the only time that actually the
persecution of the Christians slowed down, I don't even say stopped, just slowed down,
was during World War II because, you know, the Communists tried to stay to power and
they're like, okay, we'll close our eyes on the Christians. Just help us fight the war against the
Germans at that time. So, well, somebody says the Bolsheviks were financed from New York. It's
much more complicated than that. Lenin was originally brought from, he was brought from
Germany and some people in Germany were financing him as well. So it's not necessarily American
construct. It's much more complicated than that. And like you said, the whole persecution of
Christians was brutal. You couldn't go to a church. You couldn't pray openly. You pretty much had to
do what it is if you're a Christian now, let's say in Saudi Arabia. Do yourself quiet. Nobody
hears the seeds. What are the gulags that people talked about? Maybe do you know a little
bit about what they are and how they were used at that time? Imagine how they put it. Imagine a jail,
but much more strict. There is no human rights in it. And you get beaten up for anything
by both the security guards and other prisoners just because it's fun. And you have to work
and you have to work pretty much until you die.
You go and you build whatever they want you to build and they don't care that you're malnourished.
You work. You die during labor well, your problem. You survive all good for you,
but you know you have 20 more years plus to continue. Yeah, and most of the time those
places were more to the north, so imagine also cold. So yeah, it's quite a bad place to be.
Were the Bolsheviks worse than what it was under the Tsar? Oh yeah. I'll tell you this,
and this is going to be interesting to your listeners, viewers. What was it? In early 2000,
the Orthodox Church canonized the Tsar. Canonized means that in Orthodoxy the Tsar is now considered
a saint. He wasn't perfect. Nobody says he was, but he did a lot for the church. He did a lot
for the people. So the Orthodox Church said, okay, he is now a saint in the Orthodox tradition.
Not a single communist is considered saint. Tsar regime, especially in later years,
was inefficient. The whole world were one Russian involvement, Russian Empire's involvement in it
was a mistake. But how that went, because of the treaties between the countries were mismatched,
so to say. And a lot of egos were at play that didn't help. And later on when the revolution
started, the Tsar unfortunately didn't have the spine to stand up to it properly.
Hey, there was a communist killing people in the streets. You don't talk to them,
you send the army to deal with them, or police or whatever. But no, he was a little bit
on the softer side and that was his demise. And look, by the way, what did they do to him
and his family? They slaughtered him in a basement with his family, without regret or remorse.
So yes, the Tsar regime was way better. Also an interesting thing for people listening.
In the Soviet Union, up until the late 50s, even to the 60s sometimes, they would have
this interesting thing where they would say, comparatively to 1913, our economy is this.
1913 is when the Tsar was kicked out. So they are comparing themselves 50 plus years later
to something that the other regime had, because their regime was not growing as fast as it was
supposed to, so to say. So the Russian switch to the Soviet Union was like this.
And then slowly getting up again, again, again. So yeah, it's horrible.
Sleeping Giant from our rumble says, if you don't mind, if our guest gets a little bit more specific
on the origin of the Bolsheviks, it only gets better.
Well, I mean, there's a lot to unpack. And godless people, right, people who only wanted
power, the way Lenin presented himself, calling himself, what is Bolshevik in Russian language?
It means like part of the majority. So they pretended to be the majority of the country and
do that, you know, to get in power. But the reality, there was a small minority. They actually
had to join the Mensheviks, Mensheviks were a party of the minority, which were
like socialist. So Lenin is a communist, but there was a socialist party. And
at first they agreed to help each other because there was election at that time.
And they won together. But what happened later, the Bolsheviks got rid of Mensheviks
and killed them later. Same, what happened to a lot of people who were from the Tsar regime,
they decided to join the communists early in the civil war in Russia. And some of them stayed.
There were a few people who were even running the Soviet army during World War II,
but most of them were killed because people who came in power only wanted power. They don't care
about, you know, you're a human being. You're just a pig to them. So if they're hungry, they
slaughter you. And they were hungry for killings. Look at Trotsky, for example, one of my favorite
examples. Trotsky came up with a word racist. You heard that word or use a lot nowadays,
right? Do you know why he came up with that word? To shut up opponents, especially conservatives.
Oh, you hate somebody because you're racist and, you know, people didn't want to be called that
name. Even now, like it's almost a hundred years later now, and people are still afraid of that
label. Oh, you're looking up for yourself. You're a racist because you hate somebody.
What? Okay, so I'm an immigrant. I don't want random people coming here. That makes me a
racist. Come on. Come on. Thankfully nowadays, people pay attention to this less and less.
They're like, whatever, call me whatever you want because the word is losing its meaning,
so to say. And now if you disagree with somebody who doesn't look like you, they're racist
automatically. Before it was something much more serious, right? We are being called that
because we don't want to make friends as a party. But we have people from different backgrounds
and we're working together. So how does that work? We're international racists? What?
That's ridiculous. Do you think that the same group of people that did things like the Bolshevik
Revolution is potentially the criminal syndicate that may be controlling things on a world scale?
Oh, for sure. That's a given. This is a play of communists, what they do.
One of the easiest things to think about is the atrocities that were done during World War II.
The only atrocity we talk about is what the Germans did. But what Stalin and his Bolsheviks did
are way worse. Much more people ended up being dead due to Stalin's
machinations than to Hitler's machinations. In Soviet Union alone, it's presumed anywhere from 20 to
40 million people died before the war. Why are we not talking about it? Why is waving
the communist flag of Soviet Union is OK now? And nobody's calling you, oh,
also I would encourage people to look up an interview with a gentleman called Yuri Bezminov.
He was a former Soviet spy who essentially ran away and stayed in the States. And he talks in much
more detail than I can ever. Essentially saying that a lot of what we're seeing now is was done
by the powers that be in Soviet Union as a means to destroy the Western world from within.
So starting from schools, teaching about racism and telling people, hey, you shouldn't be proud of your
history. It's ridiculous. And he talks a way better. So again, Yuri Bezminov, I think it's
still available on YouTube. I hope they didn't delete it yet. It's like an hour long interview,
but definitely you should look it up if you have a chance.
Yeah, I saw that interview. I think it was like the 30 or 50 year plan to destroy the West or
something what he was talking about. Well, yeah, much more detail, right? But it's definitely
the same people who run the Soviet Union, so to say into the ground. Well, I should say
Russian Empire and killed millions in the doing so.
And the trick is, and I see what sleeping giant says that voting is not necessarily a good thing.
That thing is, you can get out of it because look at what happened in the States. Just because
so many people were voting for Trump, the machine of, you know, voter fraud couldn't keep up with
it. If people come up in big numbers, it's harder to hide it. If let's say PPC has only
one percent advantage over conservatives, for example, it's easy to adjust it. You know, Stalin
said that what matters is who's counting, but it only matters if the difference is small.
If the difference is huge, you can't hide it. If there's a million people outside protesting,
it's much more different than a hundred people standing under protesting. Look at some European
countries, right? What they tried to pull Romania. They jailed the gentleman who won
the second round of presidential election and they canceled the election.
Millions of people came out. So now we, as Canadians, know that something is wrong in Romania.
Right now in France, they try to jail Marine Le Pen, who is projected to win the next election
there. I mean, sorry, we're supposed to be Western countries. We're supposed to be for
democracy and whatnot. That's not democracy. That's not. The reason she's in trouble is
because she's projected to win. I'm pretty certain the next step that's going to happen is
they're going to try to go after the reform party in Britain and they're already going after the
alternative for Germany, AFD party in Germany. But both of those parties are projected to win
because those parties are like us are the only parties who are actually, you know, having
proper, you know, plans of how to get us back on track. And look at our country,
Marx has banned from the debates, from leadership debates. And just today they upheld that decision,
yeah, he's not coming to the debates. Why are you afraid of him? And by the way,
conservatives, I'm talking to you, don't you find that all that the conservatives are not,
how do I put it, stepping up and saying something about it? Where's the freedom of speech?
Where's why you're not saying, hey, he should be allowed on the debate stage.
You're not saying anything. Maybe because you don't want him there. Maybe because
you're part of the Uniparty and you don't want to rock the boat. And by the way,
I saw somebody said about the joining part. That was yesterday.
Yeah, I was going to mention that. So when you heard that, Linda, that was Max doing an April
Fool's, you know, kind of parody, I guess, and he said he was joining and he made all these
like stupid things that the liberal, I mean, the conservative party was for.
And then, you know, I think it was an April Fool's thing, right?
It was. The idea was to show people that look at the policies that conservatives are supporting.
Like this is what they're supporting. It's not us supporting those policies,
it's a conservative. So yeah, it's quite disturbing.
Yeah, she says, haha, got me.
Look at the comments next time. The comments were right away. Oh, that's April Fool.
Now, we talk about, you know, Canada. And you mentioned how Paul Yev wants to send,
you know, more weapons and more Canadian money and weapons and support for Ukraine.
Now, we saw the liberal party send money and weapons and things to Ukraine.
Now, they're poking, they're both seem to be poking the United States of America,
who's got probably the biggest military, you know, the world has ever seen.
And they're sending out all of their weapons and money and, you know, tanks and ships
and leaving Canada seem to be even more defenseless. They're sending all of their weapons and
helicopters and, you know, things to potentially defend themselves.
What kind of position does that put Canada in, especially poking the big bad bear that lives
right next to us? It's stupid. Again, the fact that, you know,
instead of saying it was a tariff war, what did Trump want?
A regional position was we don't want the border to be Swiss cheese.
That is it. That was original. Our conservative liberal and NDP leaders said,
oh, in that case, well, for normal language, screw you, we're going to, you know,
keep up our tariffs. Instead of saying, hey, yes, we actually have a problem.
Let's deal with it. And our people are going to be safe because, you know,
fentanyl issue in both, you know, Vancouver and Toronto, especially Vancouver.
It could have been tackled if we close the border and make sure, you know,
we don't have a Swiss cheese. But no, instead, oh, dollar for dollar, blah, blah, blah.
Let's have our prices here more higher than before because, you know,
we're living so great with it. It's okay for us to spend more money now.
It's dumb. And that's, like you said, poking the bear,
sending more money to Ukraine. I'm sorry. I'm going to be unpopular here with some viewers,
but that war was unwinnable from the start. Either the whole western countries needed to
attack Russia at the same time in the beginning of the war, or just sit it out and, you know,
limit the deaths. Them sending this weapons, sending money does nothing. People are dying
on both sides. Ukraine has no chance of winning.
It's a slow attrition. Russia has way more, yes, Russia has more older weapons.
They have more of them, even without the nukes. Forget the nukes. They have way more of everything.
Maybe they were preparing them longer. So what's the point of sending more money,
especially now? Like now it's clear that there is no way of winning.
But no, we keep on sending money and promising more and more and more.
So the point where it was even a joke where Tordor came in the straight face
said that the weapons that we're going to confiscate here from the, you know,
law-abiding Canadians are going to send to Ukraine. Ukrainian army needs, you know,
single shooter rifles. 22, yeah? Wow. They're going to kill those Russians like this.
Sure. Come on, 22 sending to Ukraine. That's going to help. Yes. Unless they're
using that to hunt pigeons or something. Now, what's your thoughts about,
do you know a little bit about the history? What happened in Ukraine? How the CIA helped overthrow
the elected Ukrainian government that, you know, the United States, Biden and Obama,
you know, they were actually, you know, doing some, you know, nasty dealings there.
They actually threatened, you know, they needed the prosecutor fired. These are things that actually
came out of their mouths. So it's not any conspiracy, it's stuff that they actually said.
And then the Azov Brigade was shooting the Russians, you know, inside of Ukraine.
They were actually really brutalizing the Russians that were living inside of Ukraine.
And with the American and NATO moving, you know, and breaking some of these treaties saying that
Ukraine can never be a part of NATO and wanting them to be a part of NATO, it almost, you know,
no matter what you think about the war or whatever, it seems like, you know, Russia was
forced into doing what they were doing. I'm not going to defend Russian position, right?
I'm not from Russia. I don't care about Putin personally. But for that fact, I also don't care
about Zelensky. I think both of those leaders are corrupt. I think Zelensky is just like Putin.
The only difference is he has a smaller country. But he's still an egomaniac who cares about
himself more than he cares about his people. Same applies to Putin. So people don't think
I'm a pro-Russian or anti-Ukrainian or whatever. But yeah, I know enough. I know that
Victoria Nuland there with went there with her cookies, you know, and doing all of those,
you know, shenanigans. I know how the present was overthrown. The funny thing is, the present
that was overthrown was heavily supported by eastern part of Ukraine, which was majority Russian,
ethnically Russian people who are Ukrainians, but ethnically Russian, and they voted for him.
So once that overflow happened, you know, unrest started in the eastern parties of the
country. Can I blame them? Probably not. I'd be upset if, you know, Alberta got a president,
prime minister in Canada and then let's say, I don't know, Ontario kicked him out.
I'd be pissed at Ontario for that too. Right, that would make sense. But yeah,
also people need to understand up until the war started, every single outlet would call
Ukraine the most corrupt country in the Western Hemisphere, meaning like from, you know,
European countries, Eastern European countries included, so more corrupt than Russia.
But after the war, Zelensky is a saint who is a savior of his people. I am not buying it.
I'm sorry, I'm not buying it. People coming, bowing to him and whatnot, just know.
He's a corrupt politician from a corrupt country that everyone knows is corrupt.
I'm sorry, I lived in Kazakhstan. I know how corruption works in that part of the world.
I know how you get around. I know how to get ahead. If you have the money, you can get a
pretty good living there as long as you don't talk about, you know, certain topics or certain people,
like in Russia. Right now in Russia, technically speaking, you have more freedoms
about when you talk. You can't touch a subject of the military operation that they're having.
You can't talk about bad about Putin and a few politicians. But other than that,
every topic is pretty much open to you. Is it the same here? Or we have topics that
are off limits. Can you talk about climate change openly here?
Will your videos stick on YouTube if you're going to talk about climate change and anything
that's not 100% aligned with the narrative, so to say? No.
And a lot of other topics here. But yeah, in Ukraine also, people don't know it. But
if you look at documentaries, child trafficking was a thing because, again, corruption.
That's unfortunate. But that's what happened. And again, right now, the media is trying to
paint Russia as evil and Ukraine as saints. It's no. Both of those are shades of gray.
People need to understand that. Do you know what it's like in Russia,
like the standard of living or the things there? Besides obviously not being able to talk about
the military or Putin. Are people there happy? Is the standard of living good? Is food expensive?
Housing expensive like it is all over here? Or is it a little bit more easier way of life for
the people there in Russia? It depends where you are in Russia. Moscow is very expensive.
But funny enough, Vancouver is more expensive than Moscow. Unless you want to live right
next to the Kremlin, probably. That would be expensive. Funny enough, it's safer because the
police is actually doing something about the safety of the citizens. You're much less likely to be
stabbed than in London, for example, in Moscow. Moscow is a big city too. And other cities that
are smaller, they're safer. I have a few friends living in a few cities around Russia. We talk
not complaining. We're like, life is fine. Nobody is going around grabbing people,
sending them to the front lines. Unlike Ukraine, but that's not happening according to Zelensky.
Although there are videos of that happening. People, the ones I've talked at least with are
pretty happy. Everyone knows Putin is a corrupt authoritarian. Everyone. But he does enough
for the country to stay afloat and even under sanctions, which are very brutal if you look at
them. The country is still going ahead. And actually, I think this year they have a bigger
growth in Canada, which should make people question what the heck we're doing? Why is a
country that's under sanctions doing better economically than we are?
We're supposedly the first nation. Russia is a second world nation. And we're doing worse
than them. Well, it seems like Canada is shipping, you know, all of its wealth
to other countries. What doesn't really make any sense is how Canadian seem to be struggling,
struggling for rent, struggling for food, you know, seniors, people with disabilities.
There's a lot more poverty, a lot more tent cities, a lot more people can't even afford homes. But
yet, you know, veterans, you know, there seems to be money for Ukraine. There seems to be
money for gender studies in Africa. There seems to be money for everything outside of Canada. But
when it comes to Canadians, you know, people living in this country, it seems like the
well is dried up for, you know, Canada taking care of its own people.
Because for politicians in power, Canadians thinking about Canadians is a big taboo.
They don't want you to think about, you know, your own country, because God forbid that will
bring nationalism. They're trying to depict that word as something evil.
When it only says that, hey, nation exists, and that each nation has its own interests.
America has their own interests. They might align with ours. They might not, like right now with
tariffs, right? If you look at it, they actually technically align with the border thing.
But they're spending money, trust me, most of that money is not going to the gender
studies in Africa. Most of that money is being pocketed. Like we found out with the USAID,
which they called USAID, which is not aid, it's AID, majority of that money was going to random
places. And some of it ended up with Soros, who used that money to bribe and install his
own people in different places. So he didn't use his money. He used taxpayers' money.
Do you think it's different here? No. Most of that money is in Trudeau's pocket,
somehow, maybe not directly, but through his fund or whatever, or somebody else's who's linked to him
or other Uniparty members. That's why they keep voting for it. If we had an actual opposition
party in parliament, that'd be talked about. Like, hey, why are we spending 20 million
dollars on transgender studies in Zambia when Canadians and veterans are in the streets?
Not a peep. Not a peep from the conservative party. Not a peep from NDP. Everyone is AOK with what's
happening. Either they don't know, which I doubt, or they have their own game in that hand in the
pocket, so to say. What do you know about the World Economic Forum's infiltration of Canada?
Enough that I don't like it. To the point where we have a Calgary conservative candidate,
Michelle Rampel, she's on the World Economic Forum website where she's called a young
WF leader, and she brags about it. So how is she a conservative? Pierre promised that he
doesn't have any ties to it, and he promised to get rid of people signed to it.
But Rampel is still running. And she's not the only one, right? We have Jagmin Sink,
we have Trudeau, who's also young leaders. And I remember that amazing video where,
what's his name? I forgot the title, Governor General was asked during one of the parliament's
hearings. There was a phone call. He was asked about the WF infiltration. Said, oh, sorry,
I can't hear you, bye. I remember that. There's a problem with the microphone.
What's, we can't, there's a problem here, and then made a big deal, and then they just
shut that all down when they talked about Klaus Schwab bragging. I saw that, and I thought,
wow, first of all, I was shocked that they actually brought that up. But it was even
more shocking or not shocking what the reaction was, because they can't have
Canadians knowing that there is foreign infiltration, you know, even though there is of our country.
Two more things, right? We have, we know that there is a few, at least a few MPs right now who are
linked to interference by foreign countries. Nobody talks about which ones. It's election
time. Shouldn't we know who's involved? No, everyone's quiet because they're all
impacted. Conservative is probably there, an MP person is there, a liberal is there.
Heck, maybe the Green Party is in there. Nobody saws anything about it. So that's a problem.
Another thing that I wanted to briefly mention is, you know how they say that
replacement migration is a conspiracy theory, right? You probably heard that. It's a UN
actual policy that is called replacement migration, which calls to replace the
populations of the Western countries. Why? Why is there a need to replace the population
anywhere? Again, I'm an immigrant. I'm asking this question. I came here to Canada because it's
Canada, not because it's, you know, amalgamation of different third-world countries.
But that's a policy and Canada signed to it. And now there are talks of, what's his name,
Carney actually mentioned in one of his books, I believe, that he wants 100 million people in Canada
by 20, 2100 or something. Why do we need 100 million people here? What is the point?
Do we have places for them to stay? Are they all going to go in Nunavut? Or like, where?
How are we going to feed them even?
Now, what were your thoughts on, you know, what happened in 2020 and how that was handled by the
current political system? The virus, the COVID, the 2020, everything locked down. It seemed like
they targeted the people taking away their freedoms. 5G seemed to be able to be installed
everywhere, but everyone else was shut down. It seems like it was pretty crazy. And then they
forced people to take a medical experiment. Like, what's your thoughts on that whole
thing that happened this last five years? From what I've heard and what we know now,
the virus was engineered, tempered with, at the very least, in Cheney's lab.
Reason for that, I don't know. I can speculate, but realistically speaking, I don't know. It could
be as used as a bio-web, and maybe they were trying to do research. And accidentally, and I do
believe that it was an accident that they let it out. But because it didn't purpose, it would
have been way more lethal. It went through them and our countries, Western, instead of, you know,
closing the flights to China on day one and, you know, preventing most of what happened,
they continued for a number of months before, you know, introducing any sorts of restriction.
By that time, it's too late, right? And the virus is spreading, and this is one of the
reasons why, by the way, slowly virus became less lethal, because it reverted back to its original
form. Viruses like to that are tempered with tend to do that. That's normal behavior for them. So
the first generation of the tempered virus is going to be much more lethal. And as generations
continue, it returns back to what it was originally before tempering. That's happened
before. So that's how I know about it. Now, the government panicked. But there is an unfortunate
saying, we're going to use any opportunity, you know, any crisis as an opportunity.
They used it. That was a crisis that they used for their opportunity to gain more power to,
you know, restrict movements. I will tell you this, the only thing I'm happy about the COVID
thing is that some, you know, professions were allowed to do remote work. I'm not going
to lie, I do like that. But aside from that, you know,
it was pretty bad. And the way everything was handled, the panic that was created around it
was bad. And the whole, you know, mRNA vaccines, you have to take it or you can't go on the
airplane. That screams a lot of bad things to me. You know, I don't like being forced into
things. And when somebody is trying to force me into something, it's, you know, red flags
raises the rate red flags, but not the Soviet ones.
What's your thoughts on natural law and per person's own sovereignty autonomy over their body
autonomy over their selves? It seems like, you know, a lot of what's going on when you
talk about this communism or socialism, you know, it's, you know, they're trying to, you know,
administer that the needs of the many outweigh your own personal individual and sovereign rights.
And it seems like, you know, that's the type of narrative that they're spinning that your own
personal rights don't matter, especially when it comes to these, you know, seems like manufactured,
you know, events that that they're creating to actually take away people's own autonomous right
to their body. There's several issues here, right? On one hand, going back to COVID. Before COVID,
a vaccine, a definition of vaccine was something that you take, and you don't have to worry
about it anymore. You won't get that disease, you won't have problems with your health,
unless like you are, you know, exceptionally have sensitivity to that particular vaccine.
But like a polio vaccine, for example, right, you take it once and you never get polio.
But when the COVID vaccines came out, they said, Oh, you need to have boosters. It's not,
it's not stopping you from getting sick. It will just maybe help you not get sick.
And maybe you won't get a strong, you know, reaction of your body.
So they changed the definition of vaccine. So in that sense, I have a problem.
Also, like in ideal world, where, you know, governments are made of people who care about
people, which is not our world, unfortunately, I would understand this concept. That's the
greater good. Understandable. But we don't live in an ideal world. We live in a world where
there's corrupt politicians who are probably getting paybacks from, you know, Pfizer and
Moderna and whatnot, who are AUK administering things. And we found out that in the States,
at least, doctors were getting, you know, payments for administering that vaccine.
Or to tell people, Oh, you're, you know, loved one died because of COVID.
Not necessarily. Yeah, he got hit by a car. He had, you know, he bled to death, but
he had COVID in his system. So that's why he died. They literally did that.
There is proof of that. Because they were getting money and also it contributed to panic. Oh,
you know how many people died from COVID? But he was hit by a car.
So yeah, and because we live in this kind of a system I don't like when the government,
you know, forces, one thing is, you know, you have a choice and the choice is real in the
sense that, let's say, my newborn, I took him to get vaccinated. And the reason is
not COVID vaccine. Just saying that, not COVID vaccine. And the reason is because I know what
the vaccines are. And, you know, they're pretty much the same that were administered to me when I was a
kid. And they will help my child in the future. I know that some people disagree with that, but
that's okay. We can have our agreements. I had a choice. That's not important. Right.
It's my child. I have a choice for him. When he's older, he will have a choice
himself going forward. If I was forced to have those vaccines, I'd be much more paranoid.
What are they giving? Why are they forcing me? Can I at least research what they're putting there?
Shut up and take it. Be a good slave. I don't like that approach.
Yeah, I would really look into what is in all of these, you know, back when we were kids
we had three or four. Now they're up to like 72 that kids have by the time that they're 16. And
I feel I was injured by some travel vaccines about 14, 15 years ago. And I did a lot of
research. And I've been telling everybody and every person that is having newborn parents,
I say I'd better not inject any of this stuff. And the people that have, you know,
not listened, that they seem their kids are always a lot more sick and will always
ear infections and all these things like I've seen visible, like that this is not like just
talking. I've talked to hundreds of people and like I've been doing this for a very long time.
And, you know, every person who I've, you know, spoken to that haven't put any childhood
vaccines into their kids, have super healthy kids, no issues, no sickness, no cold,
no nothing. And most of the ones who have given their kids these vaccines have issues and
some are really bad. And, you know, I would rather, you know, roll the dice. If something did
happen, we deal with it, then start injecting a bunch of unnatural substances into the kid.
But that's, you know, like you said, you have a choice. I know that parents are being pressured.
If you don't want to choose, it's almost they pressure people into this, even though you still
have the choice. It's they try to guilt you into getting it. Like there's so many methods that
they're using to coerce you that you're a bad parent. If you don't get this done and they're
using a lot of mind games for some reason. And so that's a that's a big, big issue. And, you know,
when it comes to recent with these COVID vaccines, I just heard a doctor study. I think it was today
I was listening to it that in the States, there's three million children have had the COVID vaccines
and they're mandatory, not mandatory, they're suggesting that children have three COVID vaccines
by the time they're nine months old. And this is what and they have, you know, there's three
million children, like, you know, under 16 or under 18 or whatever children that have had
already these, you know, these COVID vaccines. And, you know, they've had right now,
veyors, apparently it says 38,000 people have died from a direct link to the vaccine.
38,000 and it used to be if there was more than 50, I think it was they would pull anything off the
shelf. So they know that this is actually killing people, these injections, I'm not sure
where you are spiritually, but pharmacias like witchcraft and sorcery, they're, you know,
they've got a lot of benzene, which is, you know, allopathic, it's oil based, you know, when it comes
to medications, when it comes to injections, when it comes to, so every injection, every medication
that you're taking that comes from the pharmaceutical industry has got benzene in it and
benzene is something that has negative effects on the body. So it doesn't matter if you're
popping a Tylenol or you're injecting, you know, the MMR, it's got benzene in it and this is something
that shouldn't be put into the body. So there's, I do a lot of research and I've spoken to over
100 doctors in the last four years. So I would just really think twice about putting anything
into your, you know, children. Well, I do want to add like I'm personally not an anti-vaxxer. I
like I said, I don't, I'm not a fan of the COVID vaccines. And for a simple reason, majority of
vaccines, be it the flu vaccine or, you know, are made of a virus itself that's been neutralized,
if you will, or at least weakened. So your body has easier time fighting it. And what happens
is when your body fights a virus or more bacteria, for that matter, it learns how to do
that. And the next time the virus comes, like proper virus, so to say, not the weakened one,
your body already kicks it out faster. This is why people who had like, let's say,
polio vaccines don't get polio. And for other stuff, the problem, for example, with a flu
vaccine, why it doesn't work necessarily as good as some of those is because the flu virus mutates
much faster. Not just every year, every half a year, there's a completely new strain. And
whenever you inject a weakened version of the previous year strain, because you can't,
you know, predict exactly what's going to happen. And so if you're lucky, and there was a right,
so to say, guess, you're not going to get flu. But if it submits, you will get flu. So this is
why I personally don't take the flu vaccines, because several times that I got in it, I still
got sick. So it doesn't really matter. Going to be sick for a week anyway.
But I do understand that quite a few vaccines are, you know, my opinion,
lifesaving. I did a lot of research. I do have access to, you know, Russian literature when it
comes to that research. And when I say Russian, I mean, late Soviet Union and earlier Russia,
nowadays Russia, I guess. And I'll tell something that's going to make you probably cringe.
Late Soviet Union approach to medicine is better than the Canadian right now. Because a lot of
things that are well known and treated there like this are not even known here. A good example,
like for newborn, in like right now in Russia, Kazakhstan, you get, for example, sonography
off the head to make sure, you know, the bone structure is intact, that the brain has no issues.
Here newborn, they'll check his ears and that's it. Right. And they'll take the blood to see.
There's way more. There's like what was it 70 different tests that they do with the newborns
in Russia right now in Kazakhstan. None of that was done to my kid. And when I mean tests,
I don't mean they poke him and torture him. No, pretty like non-invasive ones.
They don't do that here. Right. There is a drug that was developed in the late
Soviet Union for the space program, for example, that only now there is a research done in it.
And there's paper work coming out for that drug. And that drug is has amazing properties.
I'm not going to, you know, name it so that people don't go out and try to get themselves
in trouble without, you know, learning more first. But that drug was, for example,
the only thing that helped me. I had ear infection, some sort, which I couldn't get rid of with,
you know, antibiotics. And just couldn't didn't know what to do about it. I was losing my ear on
my left ear. And it was horrible. And then like, I decided like, I knew about that drug from back
when I was in Kazakhstan myself. I decided to try it. Within less than a couple of days,
my hearing came back, because it was able to clear the infection. Unlike the antibiotics that
I was putting here from the recommendations of the doctors that I approached. So I do have
access to that information. And I am not afraid of vaccines. I'm, I just don't like the concept of
mRNA. And the reason is simple. mRNA plays with your cells. It, it tells your cells to
produce a virus in a very specific way. And but it doesn't have a stop mechanism. And this is
why a lot of those deaths, especially for younger kids, like you mentioned, they all have a problem
with their heart. Because the heart has to work extra harder to, you know, produce those cells
with all the nutrients that it requires to building the mRNA stuff, whatever it is. So,
yeah, I don't want mRNA. I don't want it in my kids. It's not going to happen.
But when it comes to, you know, your typical vaccines, like,
I forgot the naming of the stuff that my kid got. I remember polio, but I forgot the other ones.
But like that, I don't have a problem.
Now, not necessarily relying exclusively on Canadian doctors and, you know, pharmaceutical
company in Canada or whatever in states, but also because I have access to late,
you know, Russian research, which was separated. And at that time, not influenced as much by,
you know, what you consider big pharma here. So it's a little bit safer from perspective, so to
say. What's your overall opinion of big pharma? Clearly, they don't want to fix issues
permanently, like, you know, treating diseases better than curing you, because it produces more
money for them. I understand that. It's, you know, a business strategy for them.
It's an evil, but unfortunately, a necessary evil, because the big pharma at the moment,
at least in the Western countries, is the only thing that produces drugs that are needed.
Like it or not, Tylenol is needed, right? A lot for pain management, like for when you
have high temperature, especially like for younger children. Like my little one, not this one, sorry,
my first one, he had a fever when he was little. And I had no choice but to give him
something to, I tried putting him in a cold bath, like, you know, what I was,
what was done to me, but it wasn't helping. It was helping for like a couple minutes,
and then the fever would come back. I had to give him Tylenol, the children's Tylenol,
and it helped. Yes, I know that it doesn't cure him, but it prevents his body from overworking
itself, because what is fever, right? Is your body fighting the disease by increasing its
temperature so that the virus can't survive well in that additional heat? But it also puts
a strain on your heart, especially on a child's heart. That's a problem. I disagree with that
statement. East Coast 26 men is creating the viruses. Viruses exist in the nature.
There are viruses in dogs, there are viruses in cats, there are viruses in bats everywhere.
People can work with those viruses, creating bio weapons, look at Lyme disease, by the way,
if you're interested in that, go down that rabbit hole, you'll be shocked. Yeah, they weaponize
the ticks. We've gone down pretty much every rabbit hole you can imagine. This is our
thousandth, seventeenth interview that we've done. We've interviewed quite a few interesting people
with a lot of different interesting subjects. Yeah, they weaponize the ticks. The problem
is my mom got polio, and she was faxed for polio. I don't believe it's good. Well,
a lot of people believe that when you're injecting these things into people, they're actually spreading
it, and they actually have it right on there, that when you do get these vaccines that you're
live, you can actually spread what they're giving you. And people that I know that
I've never had a flu shot, I've had a bunch of travel vaccines 14 years ago, I'll never let
them inject me with anything ever again. I would never suggest anyone ever let their kids be injected
by any of it. There's always a natural things that you can use. And when it comes to like this
aspirin or Tylenol, there's white willow bark. So where they create the stuff that is the active
component in some of these things, they're making synthetic copies instead of actually,
because they can patent them instead of actually using where they actually get the
natural thing from, they'll make a synthetic copy that they can patent. So finding these,
if you find that there are some things that are necessary, find what the real thing was, get
that. And that is something where you have the old ancient Asian medicine or native medicine,
when it comes to these things, they're using herbs. They're using natural substances
opposed to synthetic copies that are actually doing more harm than it does good, even though
it may help with temporary symptoms. Well, the problem, let's say with some Asian medicine is
that it uses a very bizarre components in that, right? So not necessarily the best way to go
around, especially if you don't have access, like an elephant husk or something like that,
you won't have access to that, right? Now, like I said, for me, what's important is that
I'm not in a position where I have to or my life is done. That's why I'm not a fan of mRNA.
Now, some people think that all of these injections, vaccines and everything, they're
moving it all over to mRNA and potentially now even childhood vaccines have mRNA in it.
So that's something that we have to be wary of because they're wanting to have that put into
everybody. They're putting it into, they actually in the States, they talked about
putting mRNA into produce. And in one of their Congress, they were talking about,
this is crazy how you could not give someone the option whether they want to take it or not.
They want to make sure that it's labeled and it's like, how could you even allow it, first of all,
but saying that they need to label it means that they're doing it. It's not just somebody
talking about some conspiracies that they're actually doing this to our food. They're doing
it into the animals. They have 90% of the pharmaceuticals sold in the world get injected
into animals. So imagine how much pharmaceuticals sold, how many pill poppers Americans,
50 or 60% are on three or more per day. That only equates to 10% of the worldwide sales
of pharmaceuticals. The rest get injected into animals and people eat those animals
and they think that, oh yeah, I'm not taking anything big pharma, but yet they're eating
their burgers that are filled with pharmaceuticals.
Well, again, like I said, I'm not a fan of mRNA in any way or sense, but
in food as well, yes, that definitely needs to be looked at. We're the only party who is
actually interested in doing stuff like that. But I would do have to say that with the rise
of vaccination, the lifespan increased. So while again, I am not against vaccination,
I think vaccination is a general good as a whole. But we need to have a choice.
If you're against it, by all means, I don't want anyone standing with a gun next to you,
telling you you need to take your shot. But same applies to me. If I want the vaccine,
I don't want anyone standing with a gun next to me saying, you can't take it because I said
so. We are the party that says it's your choice, but you need to be informed of all
facts. There is a fact like this and not facts like CNN facts.
We don't want fact checkers like this. We want actual real facts. Hey, let's say this vaccine is
for this. This is how it was made. This is the side effects that you can potentially get
because technically speaking, everything has a side effect. Eating chocolate has a side effect,
but it has benefits, especially dark chocolate. Having too much calcium can
bring problems to your bones. Having too little calcium can bring other problems to your bones.
Knowing all of that is what we are standing for. You need to have the access to this information
so you can make an actual reasonable decision, not a decision based on fear, be it for or against it.
What are some of the other party lines that you agree with, that you align with,
made you feel that the PPC party is the one that you support?
Hard to really distinguish, because if you look at the party's platform, and I encourage everyone
to look at the people's party of Canada slash issues, it talks about everything in detail.
The problem and how we're going to address it. There is nothing really to stress out. Immigration
probably is the biggest one because I see the impact of immigration on this country every day.
But that immigration alone sips into economy. It sips into housing. It sips into medical system.
All of those things are in the combined. Tackling economy by itself is not going to fix it.
You need to tackle the source. Once you tackle the source, and this is, let's say,
immigration, then it's going to be easier. That one was a big one. Let's say
gun ownership and castle doctrine. We want to implement that. If somebody barges into your
home trying to kill you and you shoot that person, you shouldn't go to jail.
It's like what some states in the U.S. have, because it makes sense. Why would you get in
trouble for trying to defend yourself? That's what we're standing for. Gender ideology. We're
the only party. The cone conservatives, and I'm going to call them cone because they're
coning people by using their name. They have nothing to do with conservatism in any way or
sense. They're not speaking about the gender ideology and how harmful it is. One thing is
somebody is a legal adult 18-plus years who wants to change their gender. Sure, not on tax
dollars. If you have the money and you want to be a different gender and you're an adult,
by all means, it's going to be your problem, so to say. It shouldn't be my problem.
But when it comes to kids teaching them, hey, little Johnny, you're actually a little
Sally now, and you should go and have puberty blockers and have a surgery so you become
sterile for the rest of your life and not be able to have kids in the future, even if you regret it.
And the number of regrets among those people is quite big. I don't have the number in front
of me, but I know suicide rate amongst those who went through the surgery is about 40 percent.
That's a problem. I don't want kids dying because of suicide, because they are depressed
now that they thought that the problem they were having is being a wrong gender, and in the end
of their life they were the right gender, but now they can't go back. It's just ridiculous.
Kids need to be kids. My good example is if a girl likes cars and plays with toy soldiers,
in the past she was called a tomboy, and now she's called a boy and she needs to go and have
play with toys, later grow up and still will be a woman who will be able to have kids. But the
girl that went through the mastectomy, and mastectomy was just a best case scenario,
what if she decides to go do the full surgery. Again, if you're an adult and in your head
that's your solution, sure, kids should be protected from this. This is imprinting by
some teachers imprinting by, you know, sickos who just got maybe in their head it's a way of
sacrificing flesh. Who knows? I don't look into their minds and I don't want to, but I think
that kids need to be protected from that kind of nonsense. And I agree with if you're an adult,
you know, you have the freedom to do what you want with your own self and your body, but
where I think where we go wrong and why the kids are getting, you know, impacted or affected,
it used to be a mental illness to feel that you were born in the wrong body. And now it's
not only, you know, accepted, it's celebrated, it even pushed upon kids. And, you know, instead
of just, hey, it's kind of a mental illness or it's a mental illness. And, you know, there's
ways to deal with it. If you, once you're, you know, later on in life and you decide you want to
change things, that's, I guess, up to you. But, you know, if we still can classify it as a mental
illness, I don't think that kids would, you know, be, you know, targeted the way they are,
you know, by it being so accepted that it's okay. In a lot of ways, it's not even a mental
illness to a lot of those kids. It's just a fad. Oh, look, everyone says that, you know,
being transgender is cool. So I'm going to be a transgender now. But again, I told you,
I had long hair. I never thought of myself as a girl. I knew perfectly well that I'm a boy.
Nobody in my surroundings was telling me that I'm a girl. And if they did, probably my dad would go
and probably would do a good thing doing that. And that's because that's dangerous, right?
Kids are impressionable. If you start telling that pirates are cool, some kids will want to
have their legs chopped off and maybe put a hook in their hands.
I'm a pirate now. Should we provide that surgery to them?
No, nobody in their right mind will do that. But for some reason, you know,
cutting off genitalia is okay for kids. Like, no, no, you're sickos, you're wrong.
And if you're pushing for that, not receiving tax dollars, and maybe you should be
investigated because you're doing a hurtful thing. I know that the supporters of this
will say, oh, but those kids are, you know, feeling uncomfortable. They're feeling comfortable
because of you. You're pushing it on them in their head. They don't understand.
Kids don't know sexuality. They don't. They don't care about it.
And anyone who comes and tells me the opposite is lying. It's just simple. There is research on
that. And if they say, oh, there is research on the opposite, that research was paid for
by leftist groups with shutting down anyone who was against it.
I'm going to buy that research or not, you know, sarcasm.
Do you think that children are being hyper-sexualized then?
Of course. Of course. Look at the, there was a Netflix show. What was it called? Cuties,
I believe. Yes. I don't recommend you Google search it unless you want that to be in
your Google history. Hyper-sexualization of kids. The show was supposedly about coming of age, but
the producers had casting for, what was it, 500 little girls dressed up in very,
I don't want to say skimpy outfits, dancing in front of them for several days. 500 girls.
Why do you need 500 girls? What, one or two dressed up normally is not good enough for you?
That means the producers were probably sickos. And the show actually was attacked for that because
anyone who saw it was saying like, why did they even watch this?
Now in Canada, there's a big issue. And I was wondering how you, what you think about
the maids program and how it's being pushed upon Canada where I believe,
what was the 5% of all deaths in Canada now are from the maids program? I don't have the numbers
quite. I just read that a while ago, but that seems to be quite insane medical assistance in
dying. And that not only are doctors malpractices is another 5%. And then there was another 5%. It was
15%. The medical industry basically has responsible for 15% of deaths in Canada. But one is this
maids program. Yeah, I am not a fan of it. I understood when it was voted for
conservators clapped, just like they clapped with a bill C4 that attacking the parents who
don't want their kids transitioned. So again, I despise conservators for both souls. I understand
the premise of maids. I understand that in very rare occasions that is a dignified way
for somebody to go. I understand that there can be cases like that. That does not mean that
this program should be implemented. That means that this program is abhorrent the way it's
being applied. There's been a very famous case where an Olympic champion, I forgot her name
unfortunately, you can look it up, she was having problems with her prosthetic leg and she
requested a new one. And what they told her, oh, we don't have one right now. Maybe you
should apply for maid. She wants a prosthetic leg. She doesn't want to go kill herself,
but that's what's being pushed on her. There's been other cases where the gentleman who was talking
about his brother who was in an elderly care facility and he was saying, hey, they're trying
to kill me. Well, the gentleman thought maybe my brother is a little bit, you know, he's old,
maybe he's, you know, imagining things. And later on, he comes there and they give him
the urn saying, well, yeah, he applied for maid. Question is, did he apply for maid or was he
cursed into it? With elderly people who especially have, you know, mental decline,
why not curse them? The government doesn't want to pay for you. The government wants to get rid
of you. Perfect opportunity. Again, I know enough of Soviet Union how it used to apply to
people, you know, taking care of elderly is a net negative for the government.
You know, promote the maid, promote them killing themselves. You don't have to pay for them.
They're dead. Problem solved for the government. So no, I'm not a fan of maid. I think it's
important and I think it needs to be banned. Again, in some rare occasions, I would understand
why somebody would want to do that. But as a whole, it's a horrible problem that's going
to be misused. Don't live in a perfect world where only proper decisions are being made.
Encouraging somebody into maid is even worse. Now, with this whole COVID thing,
they were encouraging hospitals to, like you said earlier, a car accident,
oh, give them a test. Oh, yeah, he had COVID. Let's list it as a COVID death.
There was financial incentives because they wanted to make it look worse than it was in order for them
to be able to roll out the emergency act and be able to roll out these bio weapons that they
call vaccines, you know, and make it under the protection of the vaccine act so that way
manufacturers don't have any responsibility. So there was financial incentives that we know about,
that hospitals were getting, the doctors were getting. There was financial incentives about that.
I think it was hand-to-hand play. On one hand, the government helped the, you know,
pharma companies get away with murder, so to say, and big profits. On the other hand,
the government got away with imposing, you know, the Emergencies Act and which was not banned
or even considered, you know, excessive. The only party talking about this is again, PPC.
So it was a, you know, a team play of both government and pharma watching each other's hands.
And most people maybe not know that, you know, these vaccines or bio weapons, whatever you want
to call them, they still haven't had official approval. So they're being still administered
under the Emergency Act. So we're actually still under the Emergency Act when it comes
to these things. That's why they're still being pushed, you know, for the children
under the Emergency Act, not because they've ever gotten any official
approval. But the reason why I mentioned, brought this up again, have you heard of,
or do you think that there may be financial incentives for nursing homes, hospitals, doctors
to push people to the made program? Yes, definitely. Even if it's not explicit,
it's implicit, right? You get rid of an elderly person, the government doesn't have to pay for
his care. So it's beneficial. Oh, this nurse is tired of taking care of this gentleman who's,
you know, has problems. No, let's convince him to have made. I don't have to do that. I'm
just wondering if there's actually like specific, you know, value, because when it comes to a nursing
home, you know, the nurse is got her job because there's people that she takes care of. If they
start killing these people off, then they're less likely going to need, you know, as many nurses
means they're putting their own jobs in jeopardy. But if the nursing home, you know, gets
financial incentives to do this, that could see maybe how they are pushing people in that
direction. And I'll give you an example that, you know, came from actually my mom and she's
not into like the conspiracy stuff that I'm into. And she just told me that her friend,
which was in the 70s, went to a hospital in Vancouver. And he said he was sick with this
chest cold for a few weeks. And he was, you know, sick for a long time. And there was an
oriental doctor that came in and said, Well, I know you've been sick for a long time. Have
you ever thought of going on this maids program? And he's like, What is that? And he's like,
you know, medical assistance in dying, like, would you just like to transition, you know,
this cold is pretty bad. And this is my mom told me this. And so like, I was just like,
this isn't like I heard from somewhere, this is her friend told her about some doctor
wanting to push because he had a cold for two weeks. And so why is he doing that?
Is there a financial incentive if he pushes someone into the maids? Is he getting a bonus
of five, 10, 15, $20,000? I think that's something, especially if you're into politics,
we should research this to figure out why they would be pushing this on to the people.
Yeah, we won't know until we as a party, PPC gets into, you know, parliament,
because other parties don't want to investigate or don't bring it up because
they probably know there's probably some incentive, like I can't guarantee it,
probably by the looks of it. But you also need to remember, there's way too many people who don't
plan ahead in their life. In a sense, like, you know, give the game, that's example,
I talked to a gentleman who is a strong supporter of the Green Party, like,
environment is number one thing. Okay, makes sense. But you know what he also supports?
Unlimited migration. How can you put this and this together, and not have a cognitive
dissonance? Like, you can't. Those two things cannot work together. You can't have, you know,
20 million people coming to the country, and not, you know, wrecking the environment,
especially in the short term, I get it, like, if it's over 100 years, whatever,
yes, I can understand the logic. But he wants them here and now, because they're
amazing. But I want a strong, good environment. You can't have those two things. It's
impossible. People don't understand. Or like, you know, the whole multiculturalism act,
right, instead of promoting an integration of people into the country. Again, I'm from, you know,
Kazakhstan, I'm integrated, I speak the language. I'm considering myself Canadian. I don't consider
my hyphenated Canadian necessarily, like some people tend to, but look at my name, right,
very Canadian name, whatever. But what the the act does is promoting essentially ghettos
of different groups of people, because, you know, we as humans would tend to lean to people who are
like us, right, if you come from, I don't know, Guatemala, for example, you will probably, first
order of business will try to seek other people from that country to network with them, because
you have the same language, you know, you have the same background, so to say, they understand
your, you know, struggles, maybe a little bit better. And multiculturalism act, for example,
says that that's a good thing, you should continue. But we're saying as a party, no,
you came here, you need to become a Canadian, you don't need to be a Guatemalan living in Canada,
you need to be a Canadian, you can be from Guatemala, you can have your traditions and
whatnot at home, but it shouldn't be something that only defines you should be a human being,
a Canadian, who's working hard, and not a Guatemalan in Canada. Does make sense?
Yeah.
The reason I brought it up is because too many people don't think it that way. They think,
if we bring people from completely different cultures that sometimes even hate each other,
I mean, look at Israel and Palestine, right, those two groups of people really don't like
each other. There is a history between them, whatever. If we bring them here, put them
in the same neighborhood, what's going to happen? Are they going to live peacefully in
Sincumbaya? Or are there going to be some clashes and problems? I know the answer to that,
and so do majority of people who are going to be voting for us, but quite a few people who are
going to be voting liberal and NDP or whatever, they don't understand that. They think that,
you know, it doesn't matter where you're from or what you do. Come here and it's going to
be amazing. Unfortunately, that's not how it's going to work. And they can't think ahead,
and this is why I brought it up. And the same here. This nurse doesn't realize that by queuing
elderly, she won't have elderly to work with, and thus she will not be needed. In her head,
I'm doing what I need to do, and I'm not going to have a problem.
Now we have here East Coast 20 from Arambol says, we know fluoride was known to cause
mental illness in the 60s and bone cancer and lower IQ. So why does the EPA and CDC
not back down profit dumb down humanity? So you're in Calgary. Fluoride was taken out of the water
in 2012. This last election mayor election, Gondek got, you know, put in as the mayor of Calgary,
along with a was a referendum or a plebiscite or whatever it was where they asked the people and
somehow after even fluoride being listed by the World Health Organization, I think other places,
even medical journals as a neurotoxin, there's proven reports, medical studies of people
with children with lower IQ in areas that have fluoridated water. You know, what's your thoughts
on Calgary getting fluoride back in the water and what would you and your party, you know, do about,
you know, potentially trying to take fluoride. I think America is even talking about the
fluoride issue being a big problem yet Calgary is now putting it back into the water.
Okay, first of all, I didn't know about that. But the second issue is nothing we can really do
because this is, you know, different layers of power, right? The PC is federal, federal
jurisdiction is limited to federal issues. We cannot impact some provincial jurisdictions
and we cannot touch technical cities. We can, you know, suggest things. But in any way, like,
look, Trudeau government is trying to push certain things on Alberta and our Premier has
the ability to, you know, block or not even work with some of those because we have a separation
of powers. Same here. Unfortunately, even if I'm elected, the only thing I can say is maybe,
you know, promote an issue. But we're kind of tied by the Constitution how it's,
you know, the separation of powers. We can't go, you know, gun hoe into the city of Calgary and
tell them to do something or not to do something. We can only suggest. But if
Canadian in Canada, there is, you know, municipalities and many of them that are,
you know, adopting practices that are harming its people can't the federal government mandate
fluoride be taken out of all municipalities? If it's actually neurotoxin, if it's, you know, harming
its people, if for some reason it's being put into the waters places, like, isn't there any way
that, you know, a federal government can protect its citizens from municipalities or provinces that
are actually harming the people that, you know, have the fluoride in the water? I'll have
to look into it more because I don't know really what's, you know, way to do stuff like that.
Probably if you put it on a certain list, it will help. But again, in the end of the day,
it's municipalities that decide those things. And unless you have, you know, a municipality
run by somebody who supports our views, not a lot of things can be done, right? The federal
government can't come here and tell the hospitals what to do. We can the federal government
can come here and suggest, hey, we can give you more money if you do it our way. But in another
day, it's up to municipality to agree or not. If they say no, then they just won't get the money.
That's a separation of power. And actually, it's a good thing, because otherwise we'd have
federal government sitting in Calgary and doing all their nonsense and wrecking our lives long
ago. At least we're somewhat protected from that. Now, as in Albert, and, you know,
Alberta's economy is largely, you know, fueled by fuel, pardon the pun. You know, we have the
oil and gas industry, the tar sands and things like that creating energy for, you know, a lot of
people. But it seems like the stuff that is mined, you know, come out of, you know, the
earth in Alberta gets sold to America for cheap. And then we import expensive oil from Saudi Arabia.
And so not only does that impact the environment, because they've got a ship tanker ship
oil over the ocean and look at all the tanker stuff, you know, creating and they're worried
about climate change and all these gases. Why are we not, you know, first of all,
taking care of Canadians with our own resources, our own oil, refining it, providing gasoline and
energy for our own people. And then, you know, shipping out or selling anything that's in excess
after we take our own people. What's your thoughts? And maybe your party's thoughts on,
you know, you know, creating our own, you know, needs first before we sell it
somewhere cheap and buy it somewhere more expensive. It doesn't even make any sense,
except for we're being fleeced in another way. Well, again, our party's platform is simple,
right? We need to allow the businesses to prosper, including oil and gas, where we want
clean environment. We're not obsessive about carbon, right? We understand that carbon is
essential for plants. And actually, in the last 40 years, there's been a huge reforestation
in Europe and South America due to additional carbon that is available for plants to grow.
If you look at the actual statistics, right now we're at 400 particles per million of carbon
in the air. At 200, plants stop growing. So we're all die because there's no food.
And it's safe for humans up to 1200, at least particles per million. So, and if the amount
of carbon increases in the air, the plants grow faster and they, you know, grow bigger. So for
food production, it's amazing, actually. This is what they do in greenhouse, actually.
They pump it with full of carbon, so everything grows faster and bigger. Now,
again, what we want is want clean environment. And when I say clean environment,
stopping pollution of air, of water and of land. So making sure those, you know,
things are properly administered. There's filters on the, in the factories that dump their stuff in
the rivers. So that's not, you know, destroyed in the long run. We are for oil production. Again,
we're the only party who is actually Canada first. I know, I know Pierre talks about how he is
Canada first, but he took it from us. The funny thing is we came with that slogan before
he did. And if you look at our policies, there's still no policies of the Conservative
party. By the way, our policies have been there for the last seven years with pretty much no change
except for the migration thing becoming a moratorium. We want, you know, provinces, first of all,
remove the inter-provisional trade barriers, which we still have for unknown reasons.
And on top of that, we want to be able to, you know, companies to get oil, get gas,
because we understand that, especially for Bertha, it's a big bonus, but it's a bonus for the whole
country. Everyone benefits from it because, you know, if the country is much more richer, it,
everyone's richer.
Now, what do you know about, you know, the stuff that's being sprayed in the skies out of the
planes? Do you agree? We've had someone, we've had many people come and talk about, you know,
what's going on. And currently in 1996, they changed the jet fuel from JP4 to JP8.
And, you know, people think, you know, Cam trail and Con trail, what's going on?
There was fuel additives in 1996 put into the jet fuel with sulfur and aluminum and all
these other things that were actually wrecking the jet engines that they actually had to change
the engines because they adopted this JP8 fuel. And so stuff is being sprayed in the sky behind
planes, whether you see the lines or not, they changed the fuel. And some people are still so
stuck on, oh, that's just natural. It's, you know, you guys are crazy. It's just water
vapor. But there is an actual formula where they changed the fuel in 1996. And after 1996,
we started noticing all these lines all over the sky where we didn't really notice them before.
And I think a lot of has to do with them changing, you know, the fuel to this JP8 fuel,
you know, where do you see, you know, these crazy lines all over the sky? What's your
thoughts on what's happening out there? I don't know enough to talk about this subject. I
never read into it much. Like I mentioned, our party's platform is clean air as well.
So if there's something like that done, we can always investigate if we get into, you know,
power and, you know, look into it. But at the moment, because I don't have enough knowledge
to have an intelligent debate on that. Now you mentioned about why do you think
the carbon, why do you think that they are carbon taxing? Why do you think that
there's an attack on carbon? You mentioned, you mentioned about the carbon plants needing it.
We're based out of carbon. Some people feel that the attack on carbon is in the attack on us.
And, you know, not only will they, you know, our crops and things, they lower a carbon to
basically nothing, it could potentially create a food crisis. But they was a joke. The only
carbon they won't actually produce is you. Yes, it's definitely a place. First of all,
it's a simple scapegoat, right? Because carbon is produced when, you know, run the car. Oh,
we can ban people from using cars by saying they're saving the planet. So it's a very
convenient tool. But at the same time, it allows them to control the food production.
Because now they're saying, oh, you shouldn't in some states as well. And probably here
nowadays, you shouldn't grow food in your own backyard because it produces more carbon.
So it's a control tool on multiple levels. It's an easy one. And that's why it's carbon.
If it was something else that was used by both by cars and, let's say, plants,
they'd use something else. Carbon is just arbitrary and it's just very convenient for them.
And, and then on a day they want to control you. Leftists always do that.
They don't want you to be able to be independent in any way sense. No food production for you.
No easygoing outside. This is why the cars are being attacked. This is the whole concept
of 15-minute city. I love the idea of 15-minute city in its idea that, hey, everything is walking
distance. That's amazing. But what comes with it is you can't drive your car now. You are limited
to this area. And if you walk past it, you can get arrested. I think you know. I'll pass. I'll
pass. But in general, like a living Calgary, if I have to go to downtown, man, that's a drive,
right? That's not going to be 15 minutes. So if everything was a little bit much more
closer, it would be nicer. So in that aspect, I like it. But I don't like it in the aspect
how it's going to be brought up to me because I know the leftists, they don't want to make my life
easier. Because what history shows, every time the leftist gets in power and get their way,
millions of people end up dead. So no, thank you. Yeah. And I think the 15-minute cities
aren't so much. If you leave it, you'll get arrested. I think they want to monitor people's
carbon footprints. And I think that's why that's implemented. So leaving your 15-minute city means
you're using more carbon. So they want to have it so that way your license plate gets monitored
and they can see you coming in and out saying you're using so much carbon. Same as they want
things to be all digital when it comes to currency. So they can monitor how much steak
you're buying, how much carbon you're consuming. So that way, if you're consuming too much carbon,
then they can actually shut you down and shut you off. And I think that that is more of why
they're wanting than saying that if you leave, you're stuck here, you can't leave, you'll be
arrested if you leave. I don't think we're at that place yet. But I think it's more about
monitoring your carbon footprint. I think that's how they want to show it, that it's
appealing because people are way out of carbon and we need to do this. It's for the best interest
of everybody to make sure people aren't consuming too much carbon. I think that that's more of what
this 15-minute cities is intended for, at least at first. Maybe at first. But again, I grew
up in former Soviet Union. I remember a few things. It's about the control. It's not about
carbon. Carbon is a tool. People should not focus on it. Carbon is just a tool to get ahead in what
they want. And in Soviet Union, there was a thing, I don't know how to properly translate it into
English. Essentially, you were assigned an area and if you were to go to other place, you
turned around and said, no, you're not allowed here. You need to go back to your area.
In Moscow, if I was to go to Moscow back then and I didn't have the papers done,
they could arrest me and deport me back or have me sit in jail for a while.
So almost like modern-day reservations?
I'm not going to speak to that at the moment. I don't know much about that.
But essentially, that's what 15-minute cities is. It's a control. You won't have your car,
so you can't leave it. You won't have an easy way out of it. It's a prison. It's an open
air prison where you can't leave it. Again, the concept of everything being close to each
other is what they're using as a sales pitch. Reality, it's a prison.
Do you think we're currently living in a prison planet just most people aren't aware or want to
believe it? It's not there yet, but they're building it rapidly now. In the last 15 years,
10, 15 years, they accelerated the building process of that, that's for sure. The whole control,
the whole bank account frozen for giving 20 bucks to trucker support, the trucker protest.
So it's being built. It wasn't like that, but it's getting there.
The last part of this segment, I want to talk a little bit about China and its influence in Canada,
what you may know. But they have a social credit system in China where if you jaywalk and they've
got like a billion cameras or whatever it is, or a hundred billion, there's a lot of cameras
in China and they see you jaywalking automatically, you'll get dinged, it lowers your credit score
where you may not be able to get on a bus and different things like that. Do you think that,
what do you know about this social credit system and is there talks about implementing that in
places like Canada? Of course there is a talks about that. Trudeau openly says how he admires
Xi Jinping with his control of China. The leftists of the world would love that. Stalin and whatnot
would be drooling over the idea of having that kind of a control. They're doing that and that's their
idea of a perfect world where they can control what you do, what you think. This is why, again,
debates are forbidden. You go with an opinion that's not popular, you're going to get in so
much trouble, you're going to be ostracized, etc. Because it's simple. Leftism in an open debate
cannot win. There is no position that's defendable from leftism if you talk about it openly and
without screaming over your opponent and shutting him up. And this is why they're
trying to shut us up, especially us, the PPC specifically, because we're the only party
that says about their hypocrisy, what they're doing, what they're messing up and where it leads.
They don't want people to know that. That's why they're doing this. And social credit score is
just that. Oh, you talk bad about Trudeau, you can't drive the car for the next couple months.
So next time you're going to be much more careful about what you say because you don't
want to damage your lifestyle. Nobody does in their right mind.
Same with China. Even in Russia, for that matter, in Kazakhstan, you criticize the president.
Good luck. There was an old joke back from the Soviet Union where an American and a Russian
are talking to each other and the American says, you know what, I can go to like in front
of a White House and tell that my president is an imbecile. The Russian says, yeah,
I can do that too. I can go in front of the White House or like Kremlin and say that
your president is an imbecile. Yeah, that's funny. And it would probably be true,
because most presidents have been imbeciles, controlled puppets and not probably out there.
Sorry to say that, but Trudeau doesn't strike me as an evil genius. Evil, sure, genius.
You mean people don't speak moistly?
Yeah, he's a he's a drama teacher. Let's leave it at that.
Now, there's been reports that China's been influencing Canadian elections since the
80s. I was a little bit surprised about that. There's actually money that's being come from
certain ways. Even some of the criminal groups that are making money off of the illegal drug trade
is being funneled into some of the politicians through this, you know, fentanyl and other, you
know, other areas that they're they're getting this money. What's your thoughts on how China has
been influencing and or trying to take over Canada? Well, it's simple. Look at have you
heard about illegal police stations, the Chinese police stations in Canada? How many of them are
there? We don't even know. We're assuming it's several thousand, but there could be more.
Of course, they're using this tool. Again, this is a communist nation
who's trying to subvert the Western countries to, you know, have their control.
There's people here, like you probably received calls, phone calls, and they
start talking in Chinese. I don't know what they're saying. But again, maybe that's
something to do with those police stations. I know that they've threatened some people from
China who like are not supporters of Chinese Communist Party. They threaten them with the
lives of their relatives, like be quiet in the West, don't promote anything that we're doing.
And, you know, otherwise your relatives are going to get in trouble. There is this
theatrical group. I forgot their name. Oh, yeah, Shenzhen. Something like that. Yes.
I know which one you're talking about. Yeah. So they're openly talking about what's
happening in China and how it's oppressive. Shenyun. Shenyun, thank you very much. Yes.
Because there are some groups that are openly against it, but
China definitely has a, you know, control mechanism here. And Canadian politicians are
have been sold in both multiple times. Again, look at the fact that they're not supporting
freedom of speech, that they're not opening up to who's been, you know,
under the influence of, you know, foreign actors. That should be the front page news everywhere.
Now, you are running in the party Calgary Confederation. Who are the people, do you know
them, what they're, who you're running against? And are you able to debate them? Are you able to
attend any of their functions? Like, how is it, you know, the election is in what,
you know, 26 days? How are you able to reach more people? I know you're doing podcasts like
this to reach more people, but how are you, you know, being able to be, you know,
viable where people will know about you and what you stand for and not just want to vote,
you know, for liberal or conservative? It's a bit difficult because obviously
the other parties do not have open debates, right? Also like the conservative candidate
dropped and they replaced him with another one. He's actually from former UCP, so provincial,
who decided to go into mainstream, so to say, federal. The problem with him is, for example,
he was a, you know, a hard core supporter of vaccines and lockdowns while traveling apparently.
And again, I need to do a little bit more research on this because he just was announced
a couple of days ago. He traveled to Hawaii while lockdowns were implemented. A little bit
hypocritical if that ends up being true. So that's the conservative, the representative liberals
just lost one of their representatives because apparently some dirty laundry was found on him
and it was a little inconvenient for the liberal party, especially how they like to frame
themselves as defenders of women and their representative was apparently an abuser to some
things. And yeah, and well, NDP has somebody supporting unions and whatnot. Also, well,
NDP is NDP. Also, there is somebody running from the Green Party, but in my mind,
those parts, it's more like this, a PPC versus a union party.
You're not splitting the vote by voting for me. You're splitting the vote if you're
voting within the union party because there is no difference between them. Voting for me
is a vote for, you know, essentially an attempt to bring freedoms back to Canada.
Personal responsibilities, individual freedoms and fairness, right? This is
pillars of what we stand for. We can't live without them. And unfortunately nowadays
there's been kind of thrown out the window.
How are you making yourself more visible to people in your constituency?
I've been going around when I was collecting signatures, you know, the giving of flyers,
although some people don't want to look at us, slam the door in my face, a few of them.
A few of them were conservative supporters, which was very disappointing.
I had a few very nice liberal supporters who still, you know, signed me and looked
into even a flyer. I'm holding an event next Sunday. Oh, sorry, not next, this Sunday.
Got the week confused. At Kensington Original Joe's, you can look it up on my Twitter feed.
So at 4.30, people are welcome to come, ask questions, talk to me.
As long as you're acting politely and not having a tantrum, you're welcome to come.
Yeah. So trying to, you know, we're making flyers, trying to spread them, we're going to make
loan signs, but it's difficult, right? Our party is grassroot. We don't have any,
you know, federal funding and we're smaller, technically speaking,
and a bit more thinly spread than other parties. So last election we had, for example,
more votes in the Green Party. We had 840,000 votes and percentage rise as well more,
but because the Green Party members were much more compact in the, how they live,
they got two seats and we didn't, although we had more votes.
So it's much more harder. So we are a bit more limited on funding. So I do encourage
people donate to your PPC candidates as much as you can. Remember, it's a tax write-off.
What was it to up to a certain amount? I think you can donate up to $1,700
and you get up to $1,000 back in taxes. I don't remember the exact numbers, but I mean,
you can look it up as well. East Coast 20 says Canada got rid of the anchor baby
law, right? Do you know what that means? No, they didn't know. As far as I know, no.
You don't know what that means or you don't get rid of it as far as I know.
What does that actually mean? I've never heard of that.
Anchor baby meaning somebody comes here while pregnant, give birth here,
and now that kid is a Canadian citizen. Oh, okay. Maybe legally, maybe not legally,
not necessarily. So that's what they do in the States and Canada as well.
Now, as your party talked about having specific rallies, the big rallies were against these
lockdowns and against what the government was doing. Wouldn't it be strategic to every Sunday?
Let's rally in a certain area downtown and just try to get as much people handing out
flyers, everybody that wants a different government to go down to City Hall and you go
hand out, you give everybody 100 flyers, let's go down and we'll spread these out and actually
try to reach people. We've had those during the lockdowns to some degree.
Since then, it's kind of eased up. Max is trying to, he's going on a lot of podcasts,
he's traveling the country, going to other candidates to help promote them.
But it is a hard job. We will have our daytime jobs and we have families, so it's a little bit
harder to do that. And also, I'll tell you this, it's a very thin line between doing that every
Sunday and causing a fatigue. If you do the same thing over and over, people will get sick of you.
If there's only 26 days, the election was one month. I can imagine, like I said,
what you're having, you only have one month to get people to know that this is a better option
than any of the other donkeys that are in the Uniparty, all those other ones. But without people
knowing that this is a viable option, they're going to get them to vote, whatever they vote,
they're probably not going to switch too much if people don't know about you or your party.
To do that, especially now, it's a little bit more complicated for the simple reason.
We are like candidates as candidates. Right now, we're focusing on our writings specifically,
because people, let's say, living in
McKnight, for example, they can't vote for me, so me going there makes no sense to me.
Like, yes, they're their own PPC candidate, but if I show up there, I'm not necessarily
promoting that person. I'm kind of harming him in some way because I might cause confusion,
right? They come on the ballot and, oh, why is this guy here and not the other one? I like the
other one. So, I'm personally planning to have one event right now, and after that,
see how it goes. Maybe I'll, probably I'll try to have a few more, but again, the big issue
is planning in advance. Like, this election was a snap election, as you know, so we're much more
limited in resources and time. Again, where I tell people, please donate to the campaigns.
Remember, that money is not going to anyone's pocket, it's going to a campaign fund,
which is going to be audited at the end of election. So, not a dollar of that money goes to,
let's say, me personally. Like, it all stays within campaign. It all is going to be audited
where that money went. It's going to go on, whatever is donated to me is going to flyers,
loan signs, and if they're going to have access, probably like some radio ads or something.
Last question. Why should people in Calgary Confederation vote for you over any of the other,
you know, donkeys in the Uniparty? Well, simple is we are the only party that stands up for
Canadians. We want Canada to prosper. We don't want, you know, our money being
squandered away in other countries on dubious programs where that money gets laundered away and
ends up in people's, that don't need people's pocket. We want your money to stay with you.
And, you know, we want freedoms returned to Canadians. We want people to be able to
defend themselves. We want their kids to be free of indoctrination and only have education.
We want people to have the freedom to decide if they want to have,
you know, vaccines done to themselves or not. We want to stop migration and we're the only
party who says that. We want to stop the nonsense DI hiring practices because they hurt everyone in
the end of the day. You know, if your doctor is a doctor because he is a certain ethnicity or,
you know, gender and not because he's the best at what he does, do you want to go to
that doctor? No, do you want an engineer looking at an airplane that you're going to fly and
to be there just because he's a certain ethnicity? No. I don't care. He can be purple for all I care,
but if he's there because he's the best, I won't have a problem with that.
And we are the only party who says that openly. Other parties are too afraid and the
conservatives specifically are too afraid to talk about this hot topic because, you know,
I don't want to be called names. I don't care. Call me whatever names you want and
end of the day. I want, you know, prosperity, security, safety, right? That is what important
and freedom. I should never forget freedom. And we are the only party who's supporting
that. And also I'm doing a personal pledge. I haven't put it on my website yet. I'm planning
to do that. I'm eager to donate anywhere from like up to $20,000 from MP salary because I
up to $20,000 is going to go to either charities working in Calgary Confederation
or, you know, help build a children's playground. So that's my pitch. And I was going to say
specifically why should they vote for you? And this last part you kind of said that, but,
you know, if you say you get the only seat in, you know, the PPC party, like why would
you be the right candidate? That's a good question. And I actually like it.
The simple reason I will be an example that can hold the Conservatives accountable,
right? Conservatives right now don't have a counterbalance to them. I can be that
kind of also like projected right now. I know the polls are all over the place,
but before that they projected the win for Conservatives was a guarantee almost.
But the problem with them, they say one thing sometimes and then don't follow or
they don't even say that. Now, if I'm there, I can hold them accountable and say,
hey, Conservatives, you promised this, you promised that, or how is it inviting 250,000
people going to help Canadians? Why are you promoting that? And if I'm there,
people will know about it. People, the media will not be able to just cut me off as easily
as they do right now while I'm just a candidate and not sitting in the, you know,
parliament. If I'm in the parliament, I will be visible. The policies of our party
will become visible and the policy failures of other parties will become visible. And this is what
will either cause the Conservatives to actually change course and become more conservative,
not just a name only, but an actual spirit, if you will, or it will show that they're a failure
and people need to start voting for us. It can be what a good example is actually
reform party in Britain. It took them seven cycles to get seats. Their first seat,
they got after seven election cycles. We only had like three cycles right now,
and I mean, we're doing pretty well comparatively. But for next election in Britain, the reform party
under Nigel Parage is looking to become a majority that are going to win the most votes.
They're projected to win because people started noticing, hey, that party actually
has British interests in mind, not, you know, other countries interests in mind.
We are the same. We have Canadian interests in mind. We're going to fight for Canadians
and we can expose the hypocrisy of other parties and we can dig into issues. Hey,
who are those people involved into interference by foreign government? Why those MPs are not
investigated? We can bring it up because without us, nobody does that. They're all comfy. They're
like their chairs, they're like their salaries. But wait, do you know how much MP makes in Canada?
150. At the moment, 209. 209. And I believe they were talking about increasing it.
Yeah, that's crazy. It's like, especially when, you know, everybody's salaries were being cut in
2020. Everybody was having to, you know, scrape through wall. The members of parliament were
all getting raises. It happened in Alberta and it happened some other places. And I was like,
this like makes no sense. But, you know, they think of, you know, people that aren't in the
government as the peasants and they can do whatever they want. Essentially. And this is why I said
right. That's why I'm eager to spend that much money and, you know, to help
with the community, whatever is needed. Okay, well, thank you so much for, you know,
sharing your time here with us and delving into a bunch of different topics. I just kind of
wanted to get to know your, you know, thoughts on the world a little bit and about, you know,
your background, you know, from where you grew up before we kind of got into, you know,
the issues and things that are going on here. So I think this was great for people to get to
know about more who you are. So thanks for coming and sharing this time and trying to
make a difference in, you know, our city, our province, our country.
Thank you very much for having me. I really appreciate that. It was a pleasure talking
learned quite a few new things and it was a very interesting conversation. Hopefully,
you know, we'll get maybe some time again. Maybe this time I'll be an MP and I'll be
telling you what we're doing to improve the country, the city, the community. So
again, I would ask people to, you know, donate, not necessarily to me,
any PPC candidate, it will be very, you know, helpful for the campaign and
together we can change the country. It takes, yes, voting is difficult. Yes, voting sometimes
can be manipulated like we saw in some previous elections in other countries, including states
and us. But when it's overwhelming, the system cannot cheat you. When it's too visible, it's
too easy, you know, when it's too easy to win, when it's visible, the support is visible.
So awesome. And if anybody does go vote and, you know, I suggest any Canadians that want to
make a difference go out to the polls as much as it's selected and not elected, you know, if the
40, 50% that choose to not vote actually went and voted. Everybody voted for the PPC party.
We had something different to give them a chance. I think that that would be ultimately
what I would like. I think that, you know, voting, you know, liberal, conservative or NDP is,
you know, voting for that unit party and nothing would ever change when it comes to this globalist,
you know, agenda. So at least the PPC party would be something different and, you know,
just to give them a chance to see if maybe they would actually come through with some of the
things that they've talked about. I want to add one more thing. Majority of our voters,
people who support us are not actually from the conservative party. A big chunk of people who
are supporting us are actually non-voters, people who never voted in the previous elections,
because they were disappointed with the way the conservative, liberal or whatever was going.
And now, like the majority of those people supporting us are from that block.
So if more people from that block join us, we can actually make a change.
So vote, even if you think it won't change anything, vote. It will. Together we can win.
Get out and vote. I don't tell people much to vote at all because of the way things were.
I actually will ran for the last federal election for the National Citizens Alliance Party.
And I got, you know, a couple hundred votes, you know, and I was battling up against, but,
you know, I don't really tell people to go out and vote, but go vote PPC. And maybe,
you know, if everybody that didn't vote actually voted for PPC, maybe we would have
something different. So thanks again for your time. May the source be with you and protection
around you during this pivotal time in history. Knowledge is power. The more knowledge we all
have collectively, the less power they have over us tomorrow. We have an Esquire,
Win Young who I think is suing the government or something. He shared some information
with me. I still got to delve into a little bit of that, but that's tomorrow at 1 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time or 10 a.m. Pacific, you know, 11 a.m. our time here in Alberta.
Let's all face Infinitv without flinching. And if they ever ask you to put on a breathing
inhibitor again, Artyom, you know what to say? My choice. No masque. Okay. Love y'all. We'll