WEBVTT 00:00.820 --> 00:09.620 On April Fool's Day, NASA officially launched their Artemis-2 rocket, claiming to take humans back to the moon in 2026. 00:10.480 --> 00:15.380 Going back to the moon, however, would require us having actually gone there before, 00:15.960 --> 00:22.380 which myself and many other researchers have debunked beyond any shadow of a doubt in several previous videos, 00:22.860 --> 00:27.280 showing that the original NASA moon landings were faked in a studio on Earth. 00:27.280 --> 00:33.040 So now, over 50 years later, with half a century of technological developments, 00:33.540 --> 00:38.700 Artemis-2 isn't even claiming to land on the moon like Apollo, but merely flying by. 00:39.680 --> 00:44.940 So what proof are we being given that NASA is really sending people in orbit around the moon? 00:45.560 --> 00:50.140 As usual, we are shown a rocket launch from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, 00:50.140 --> 00:57.440 which performs the same parabolic arc that every rocket, missile, and other projectiles shot into the sky does. 00:58.300 --> 01:04.420 Rather than shooting straight upwards towards the moon, which would be far more logical and look much more convincing, 01:05.060 --> 01:13.040 every rocket launch arcs from vertical to horizontal, and most you can even see beginning to arc back down to Earth before leaving view. 01:14.000 --> 01:23.100 NASA's excuse for this is that they are purposely doing this parabolic arc with all their rockets because of a super high-tech gamer gravity hack 01:23.100 --> 01:30.220 where the rockets are being caught in a gravity well that works like a slingshot to help propel them better to the moon. 01:30.680 --> 01:39.600 Yes, you heard right. The reason all these NASA rockets form a parabolic arc and look like they're about to drop into the ocean a few miles away 01:39.600 --> 01:47.360 is because going down is the best way to go up. So all the NASA nerds will look down their bifocals at you, 01:47.620 --> 01:52.120 smugly explaining what their overlords told them about gravity and slingshots, 01:52.640 --> 02:00.680 while they watch rocket after rocket launched eastwards from Fort Lauderdale, making parabolic arcs directly towards the Bermuda Triangle. 02:01.420 --> 02:08.900 Watch closely as the rocket goes from vertical to horizontal and out over the ocean away from all observer's views. 02:09.440 --> 02:14.220 In one instant, it just disappears from view completely. Where has it gone? 02:15.320 --> 02:22.200 It goes from being clearly visible to there just being nothing discernible whatsoever, like it just vanished into thin air. 02:23.300 --> 02:28.860 Strangely enough, that's the second time a flying object just vanished into thin air that day. 02:28.860 --> 02:34.140 Watch this footage from just before the Artemis II was preparing to launch 02:34.140 --> 02:39.980 and pay close attention to the airplane that flies into view from the right hand side of the screen. 02:42.260 --> 02:43.340 Where did it go? 02:44.760 --> 02:50.300 The plane just completely vanishes from view as if it disappeared behind a giant green screen. 02:51.300 --> 02:53.220 Watch it again in slow motion. 02:56.380 --> 03:03.080 Another oddity is the following footage showing these cable cars lowering from the rockets during launch. 03:03.880 --> 03:10.760 These are known as the emergency escape cable cars, allegedly used to get the astronauts out in the case of an emergency. 03:12.880 --> 03:17.960 They sure look like they're being used here at this last moment. How do we know that they're empty? 03:17.960 --> 03:24.100 The astronauts could easily have just hopped into those cable cars to be taken to the next studio 03:24.100 --> 03:27.120 where they sit in harnesses pretending to be in outer space. 03:28.180 --> 03:31.960 Did you know that NASA is the world's largest purchaser of helium? 03:32.800 --> 03:38.220 Helium is a stable and very light element used for sending balloons up into high altitude. 03:39.080 --> 03:45.360 NASA admittedly uses large amounts of helium to send up its satellites, but what about these rockets? 03:45.360 --> 03:52.020 Look at this image of the Artemis 2 live on Fox News. What does that look like to you? 03:53.120 --> 03:58.740 Honestly looking without bias, doesn't that look like a giant inflatable blow-up toy? 03:59.680 --> 04:01.400 Look at the seams and creases. 04:02.960 --> 04:09.220 Once the rocket is out of the public's view, after a couple minutes of genuine launch footage, true to form, 04:09.820 --> 04:11.620 NASA always switches to CGI. 04:11.620 --> 04:19.680 We can never get full live, unedited video focused straight ahead of the rocket or with a view focused on Earth. 04:20.460 --> 04:24.920 All we ever get is launch footage cut to CGI like this for an hour. 04:25.100 --> 04:29.680 Then whenever they're ready to restart the so-called live feed, here's what we get. 04:32.220 --> 04:38.040 Always a view with huge portions of the screen taken up by large random pieces of the craft. 04:38.040 --> 04:43.400 Then long blue screen outages lasting for minutes or sometimes hours, 04:43.860 --> 04:49.440 only to come back with another similar video of another large section of the craft in the foreground. 04:50.560 --> 04:54.880 Look at the supposed Earth in these videos. Why is it shaped like that? 04:55.720 --> 05:00.860 In every other image and video NASA releases of the Earth, it is perfectly circular. 05:01.460 --> 05:03.180 Why is it squished here? 05:03.180 --> 05:07.260 How can the Earth suddenly change shape this drastically? 05:08.700 --> 05:16.120 They always claim Earth is an oblate spheroid, but this is one of the only times I have ever seen NASA showing Earth actually looking that way. 05:17.140 --> 05:19.940 Also, where are all the satellites and stars? 05:20.940 --> 05:26.860 There should be tens of thousands of satellites floating around up there, but we never see any of them whizzing by. 05:27.600 --> 05:33.980 Another thing I guarantee we won't see is independent video from people filming with super zoom cameras 05:33.980 --> 05:39.980 capturing Artemis-2 during its slingshot around the Earth, nor during its trip around the Moon. 05:40.740 --> 05:46.240 P900 and P1000 cameras are able to zoom into the Moon with incredible detail, 05:46.780 --> 05:53.240 but I guarantee if we all train our telescopes and cameras to the Moon when Artemis-2 is supposedly passing by, 05:53.240 --> 05:58.140 not a single person will capture video of the rocket passing by the Moon. 05:58.940 --> 06:07.300 NASA has already started releasing new Earth images supposedly taken from Artemis-2, and they are just as dubious as ever. 06:08.280 --> 06:13.580 Again, they are showing us Earth as a crisp perfect circle slash sphere in these images, 06:13.800 --> 06:19.320 yet just moments earlier in their live stream, they were showing video of a clearly smushed Earth 06:19.320 --> 06:22.280 looking nothing like the pictures released shortly after. 06:23.080 --> 06:25.440 So let's take a closer look at these images. 06:26.560 --> 06:27.600 Where are all the continents? 06:28.900 --> 06:34.040 We are seeing half of the globe in this image, and there is nothing but ocean and part of Africa. 06:35.020 --> 06:42.100 We are supposed to believe that all of North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Antarctica 06:42.100 --> 06:45.200 are just hiding on the other 50% of the globe. 06:45.920 --> 06:52.600 This is just like the famous Apollo 17 image claimed to be one of the only real photographs taken by NASA. 06:53.780 --> 06:59.640 If you're going to have Africa take up 50% of your globe, the math just doesn't work for the rest. 07:00.580 --> 07:01.680 And what about the lighting? 07:02.660 --> 07:09.420 NASA says Earth is fully eclipsing the Sun in this picture, putting all of the light of the Sun on the other side of the globe. 07:09.420 --> 07:14.700 So how is the entire dark side of the Earth shown fully and brightly lit? 07:15.740 --> 07:19.740 Or how about this one, allegedly showing the Moon from Artemis 2? 07:20.780 --> 07:25.160 Why is the Moon much smaller here in outer space than it is on Earth? 07:25.940 --> 07:33.800 I have never seen the Moon that small, and yet NASA claims this picture was taken by the Artemis crew halfway from Earth to the Moon. 07:34.520 --> 07:37.280 The reality is, these are not real photographs. 07:37.280 --> 07:47.140 In fact, you can take these new images just released from NASA and run them through an advanced AI filter to check for authenticity and see for yourself. 07:48.000 --> 07:55.280 These images do not even pass AI scans for authenticity and are all coming back as confirmed CGI images. 07:56.140 --> 08:01.340 People honestly should be able to discern for themselves that these Earth images are clearly CGI. 08:01.340 --> 08:06.980 But if you don't trust your own discernment, even AI is telling you that these are not real. 08:08.060 --> 08:09.640 From chatGPT, quote, 08:10.580 --> 08:14.140 This is very likely AI generated or heavily composited. 08:14.720 --> 08:19.860 The window frame is unusually thick and irregular with soft, almost melted looking edges. 08:20.580 --> 08:23.800 Real spacecraft windows would be more engineered and consistent. 08:24.560 --> 08:27.960 The satellite outside is oddly placed and slightly stylized. 08:27.960 --> 08:31.220 Scale and lighting don't quite match orbital photography. 08:31.860 --> 08:39.340 The lighting on Earth in the interior frame feels cinematic rather than physically consistent, especially the glow and reflections. 08:40.280 --> 08:45.040 The composition is too clean and centered for typical handheld astronaut photography. 08:46.020 --> 08:51.180 Also, look at the bright hot spot of sunlight shining at one specific point of Earth. 08:51.900 --> 08:56.880 If the Sun's light is transferring through 93 million miles of space to reach the Earth, 08:56.880 --> 09:00.040 shouldn't it be lit uniformly if that was the case? 09:00.780 --> 09:04.560 Why would there be a single bright spot as if being lit locally? 09:06.060 --> 09:14.460 Watching otherwise intelligent grown adults being completely duped and stupefied by this propaganda is honestly embarrassing and pathetic. 09:15.200 --> 09:22.420 Starry eyed NASA fanboys are so excited by the prospect of living in their imagined science fiction Star Trek future 09:22.420 --> 09:25.280 that they cannot see the deception for what it is. 09:25.280 --> 09:30.600 They hear about building bases on the moon and sending humans to colonize Mars, 09:31.100 --> 09:40.680 and these ideas implanted by Hollywood then fertilized by NASA have taken such strong roots in their brains that they can no longer see the forest for the trees. 09:41.560 --> 09:52.640 For example, I watched the popular YouTuber Some Ordinary Gamers talking about his excitement about this Artemis II launch in his recent The Artemis II launch video. 09:52.640 --> 09:58.220 The crazy amount of glee and happiness this man was experiencing during the launch, 09:58.800 --> 10:01.500 his permanent smile and classy eyed wonder, 10:02.100 --> 10:06.440 accompanied by his hopes of an off-world future where humanity lives on Mars, 10:07.100 --> 10:10.200 just made me sad for how duped the masses truly are. 10:11.060 --> 10:14.800 People want to believe they're part of some great exploration of the cosmos, 10:15.320 --> 10:20.580 and NASA gives them the ability to be backseat passengers with parasocial relationships. 10:20.580 --> 10:28.520 The last thing they want to do is honestly consider the possibility that they're being lied to about the Earth and outer space. 10:29.140 --> 10:38.340 So so many never even look at the abundant evidence proving their entire world view is nothing but a patchwork of propaganda and lies.