I'm good man, it's good to talk to you again. How about yourself?
Yeah, really good. Just like you, I've had some stressful stuff that just finally got resolved.
So today's been a good weight off my shoulders kind of day for you as well.
Yeah, same here. Yeah, I had a bit of a dark cloud over my head the last couple of weeks and
but it's all resolved and all as well. So yeah, back to work.
Yeah, great for both of us. Yeah, it's great. It's funny because I was just,
I've been looking in the back of your book. I'm interviewing Eileen McCusack tomorrow.
So I've been in the back of your Fool's Wisdom book, which is awesome.
People should buy it but I'm touching up on the frequencies because I want to talk to her about
her wands are not in the four three twos and those overtones and stuff.
So I've been brushing up. But yeah, that's your book man.
You got a second one coming in the works or what?
Yeah, well, I mean, I did a second edition. You've got the first one there.
So I've got the second edition came out about a year ago and I've got other stuff in the works.
But it's essentially, I've told you this before, I'm bringing together all the sort of fruits of my creative labours.
So all my music, all my presentations, my book, my audio book, a whole bunch of other stuff.
I'm kind of bringing it together into a single package and I've actually written a new e-book to accompany that package.
And it's specifically on audio alchemy, which you know, one of the chapters in this book was on audio alchemy.
But I needed to kind of, I think write an actual dedicated book on audio alchemy to kind of complete all that.
So yeah, so I've got a small e-book like 30 odd pages on audio alchemy coming in terms of my next big book like follow up to a Fool's Wisdom.
That's probably gonna have to wait for next year.
Yeah, you've got a lot on your plate, man. Yeah, that's cool.
An audio alchemy book would be awesome, actually. I think a lot of musicians are, I think a lot of people are ready to start looking at that.
There's a lot of musicians, they're just learning how to play off of YouTube and stuff.
But just like everything, you really should understand the art behind music and where it all comes from and the frequencies and the ancient science it comes from.
You know, it is the translation of the universe, really, or the creation.
Well, this is it. So, I mean, within the 432, 440 thing, you know, the equal temperament and all this, I was looking into this today again.
And it's actually, because for most people who play music, you know, A is A, B is B, C is C, right?
They've no thought for the numbers that are hidden behind those letters and the numbers in between those letters, like in intervals and everything.
But when you really look through it all, you look at the equal temperament and the 440 Hertz tuning, there's just all these like inaccuracies and imprecisions that seem to be unnecessary.
Why are they there? Like music can be precise and it was meant to be precise because as you said, it's like as above so below, it's supposed to reflect the cosmic harmonies, the perfection of the universe and so on.
But what they've done is they've sort of tweaked the maths of music while leaving the rules of music the same.
So everyone can still just make music the same as always.
But this mathematics underneath it have been subtly shifted and it's just kind of defiled a lot of modern music in a way.
You know, even though, you know, I believe it can still be enjoyed, but it's just when you look at the frequencies behind it, it's all been, you know, offset by this little amount.
Well, it's kind of funny because I know why they did it.
Like when you when you look at old classical pieces, you know, Bach, Beethoven, Rachmaninoff, you notice that they're always in one key, right?
It's all night we're playing, you know, this whatever in C sharp minor.
And it's always the piano concertos.
What they used to do it because they weren't tempered all everyone else's instruments are fretless.
The horn players can make adjustments.
So the piano tuner would have to come out and tune the entire piano to C sharp minor, because the intervals of the fifths change when you're doing it in real frequencies, not tempered what we call it.
But in modern music, you have to play one song in A and the next songs in C and the next is in G.
So all the fifths have to be the same, you know, so your piano has to be tuned like so it's all you can switch keys.
It would almost it wouldn't sound Indian, but I think that if we had heard symphonies back then, it would sound a little different like that.
The tones would be off from what we're used to.
And the violin player, you know, like their finger would have to be here if the songs in C.
But if they retuned the guy's piano to D sharp, their violin finger would have to move like a millimeter to make their C be matched that C.
Like the C wouldn't be the same always.
So that's I think what's the problem with tempered music is it was because we switched to having to play a lot of different stuff on one piano.
But like, you know, Eileen McCusek talks about she's not really caring with her forks about 440, you know, or 432, because she's saying what about the trillions of vibrations in between them and I agree.
I think one of the biggest selling musics out there is country music because it's these slide guitars and steel guitars where they pass over all the frequencies for a brief, you know, boring.
And I think it's the moment those things start sliding over the in between frequencies that we get who like, you know, they resonate with us.
Yeah, yeah.
You know what I mean, whereas we don't get it on a piano.
Yeah.
What do you think about that?
Yeah, I mean the the key modulation.
Well, I mean, that's the justification for the tempered music, like you say.
And, you know, just come involves a bit of sacrifice, you know, you're sacrificing mathematical purity or harmonic purity for the ability to, I guess, play things in different keys from what they were originally composed in.
But like you say, I mean, if, you know, and that's handy for bands and live, you know, performers and I get it.
You know, I'm not knocking it necessarily.
But as a composer, you know, someone who make music, you know, I make music in the key and I make that song in that key.
And I wouldn't really expect someone to then remake it in a different key.
But, but, you know, yeah.
Well, I mean, the keys themselves have different feelings.
You know, there are G feels totally different than D.
But like a guy like me, you know, I'm singing four nights a week.
I have to use a capo because some nights I just can't sing it in a key.
So I just have to move it out of convenience.
But I'll tell you what's funny is my old, old drummer, Timmy in my old band, he's he was playing drums and percussion and symphonies.
And he sometimes he had to play piano too, because he was a massive like Marimba concerto like he'd performed.
And they were playing in musicals as well.
Right. So he'd do all the like Phantom of the Opera.
And he was telling me it's funny they had to use electric keyboards because he said they would tune to 440 a, you know,
standard.
And he said just throughout the night, the whole band would get a little flatter and flatter.
The singers felt like they were sharp, right?
The actor singers.
And he said, sure as shit, he'd have to keep modulating by the end of the night.
They'd all be down around 432, 433, like he said, it just naturally everyone went there, you know,
and so he had to keep modulating because everyone's like, we're sharp.
So it's like when you get a group of giant musicians together, they can feel it's not right.
You know what I mean?
Yeah. And like every instrument has to be tuned the same, right?
So that they so when they all add together, you get this kind of you get this like pyramid of harmonics, which are all sort of related.
But the way I think about it with so with 432, because the number itself, like the properties of the number are so harmonic,
like all the divisors of 432 are all musically useful numbers, and they're all powers of two and three.
And, you know, so if you take something like, well, the number 420, for example, the number 420 has more divisors than 432,
but they're not musically useful numbers, right?
So 432 has this sort of special like harmonic property and makes it like very suitable for music.
And yeah, it's like, yeah, it all breaks down into the two and the three, which are really the key numbers for music.
So you got the two is the octave and the three is the perfect fifth.
And so, yeah, there's just a lot of reasons why 432 is the perfect choice for music.
And it's all in the fresh in my head because I've been writing all about it this morning.
Well, I did an experiment once because one of my tuners, you can set it like 432 or 440, you can actually set the tuner.
So I took one of those cinematic videos online, you know, where the do they have the tone generator going up.
Yeah.
And then when it hits certain frequencies, boom, like the sand hits a shape like it'll make a geometry and then it'll go no mess.
And sure enough, I put the tuner to 432 and just let the tone, you know, go into my tuner.
And as soon as the shape changed, it was sure as shit on like an E or an F or a C or whatever.
And then when I did it on 440, it that it was still messy sand, like it didn't.
So the patterns were actually hitting when my tuner was set to 432.
Right.
The simatics on the video, you know what I mean?
Yeah, that's that's what I was meaning to say in the last the last time around was that, yeah, we've got when we have human music that's slightly detuned from the natural numbers of nature.
It's like having, you know, it's like having a singer that's singing in a slightly detuned key from the rest of the orchestra.
And, you know, more and more, I can, I can see that now.
It's like when you look at the history of music, the industry, the way it's kind of gone and everything, you know, it's like, yes, you can still have good music.
But, you know, there has, we know it's the music's been used, military intelligence, like cultural engineering, social engineering, mind control, you know, nefarious record labels and all this kind of stuff.
And, yeah, since that standard has come in, there has actually arguably been a massive deterioration in the quality of music and the way that music is used compared to how it used to be, you know, and I wonder if that is due to the fact that it has been slightly
disconnected from the natural harmonies and it was supposed to be a representation of that.
But now it's it's more like a close approximation.
But maybe notice.
Yeah, I think so. I mean, like Alex Michael, you know, our friend conspiracy music guru, he's got his soul fed you albums in 432 and people are writing constantly like they're having healing effects and stuff from it.
So, and it's like with Dr. Emoto's work, you know, you say nasty things to the water and it turns all shitty and then you say something good and it turns into crystals.
And it's the same with those cinematic tone generators like the sand's just a mess.
So if if the music you're listening to is a mess, then what are you like it's going to resonate with your water, you know, it's going to vibrate you like a simoscope.
So, you know, do you want the crystal? I think you want the crystal frequencies.
That's what I was saying earlier is I think when we hear the boring, you know, all the slide guitars and shit and like Hawaiian music and blues and country and at world music.
I think there's that brief moment when it crosses from the, you know, the dirty frequencies to the good ones where it resonates with you and you like it.
Yeah.
Even if just for a millisecond, you know what I mean? You're like, oh, that feels good.
To go there and come back. Yeah.
Yeah. I also noticed like, you know what they call an X factor pitchy.
The problem most singers have is that they're actually flat. They're not sharp.
Most singers are flat. And I think it's the same. I think it doesn't feel good to be singing in octaves of 440.
I think it just naturally feels better to want to be a little closer to, you know, E flat instead of E.
Yeah.
You know, I think that's why singers are flat. But yeah, I wanted to talk about, I don't want to talk about nuclear bombs because like you've done a lot of great stuff recently and that nukes are bullshit.
And people can check out, we'll post links to your video.
But I did want to talk about nuclear power plants. You've been crushing that and also frequencies.
Funny enough, we just have our newest children's book out to the Goons laser balloons, which is about dues.
We can talk about directed energy weapons too.
But this is like, you know, Maui and Paradise where they're lighting these towns on fire, but the trees aren't burning just the houses.
So this book is like for children to learn about Agenda 21, 2030.
So these Goons want the Toons land and they come over with laser beams and take them all out while they're sleeping.
And one little girl sees it and the town don't believe her.
They're trying to figure out how their houses are just lighting on fire from a storm, you know, in the middle of the night.
And she saw it, but they think she's crazy. So, you know, they have a town hall meeting.
So it's kind of about this girl trying to wake the town up.
Yeah, I'd like to get into children's books, man. Yeah, that's a high art.
An alchemical children's book would be great.
Yeah, yeah.
A tofer's wife is putting out some kind of cool books like that as well, man. That would be that would be super cool.
Yeah, yeah, that would be super cool.
But yeah, let's talk about nukes. I say that.
I've been trying to find that clip of Obama.
I'll put it in here. I'll edit it in it afterward.
This is a NBC News special report.
I want to be very clear.
We do not expect harmful levels of radiation to reach the West Coast, Hawaii, Alaska or U.S. territories in the Pacific.
That is the judgment of our Nuclear Regulatory Commission and many other experts.
Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and public health experts do not recommend that people in the United States take precautionary measures beyond staying informed.
And going forward, we will continue to keep the American people fully updated because I believe that you must know what I know as president.
The nuclear scare. It's not the bombs. It's the plants, right?
They're trying to get rid of nuclear energy in Fukushima.
They scared the shit out of everyone, you know, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, right?
But you've been doing a lot of research into that.
So what's going on with these nuclear power plants and the movies you were showing me?
There's some connections.
Yeah. Well, it was, you know, I wanted to just try and understand how they work because, you know, I've obviously been given the story of how they work.
That is the uranium and the atoms get split by the neutrons and, you know, chain reaction, yadda yadda.
It's the same story that, I mean, they tell the same thing to PhD nuclear physicists as they tell to people on the BBC, right?
But the difference is you get a huge, big, complex mathematical model to look at instead of just like a nice, you know, simple cartoon diagram that everyone else gets.
But it's the same story for what goes on in those reactors.
And, you know, just with all the stuff I've been looking into recently, I knew it was unsatisfactory.
You know, it's essentially an unfalsifiable story.
It's like you can't just go and get some uranium atoms and then split them, you know what I mean?
Nobody can do that. Like you can do it, I can do it.
How could we possibly check that that's what they're doing?
So I thought I need to try and understand it in alchemical terms just, you know, in terms of fire out there and water or the principles like sulfur, salt and mercury.
And, you know, I'd had this hunch that there was just not as dangerous as we'd been told.
But I still didn't fully understand what was going on there in the core.
And so I started this investigation into it and, you know, it took me to, well, this yellow cake stuff, right?
So there's this stuff called yellow cake and they call it uranium oxide.
And quite often they just call it uranium, right?
They don't even bother to call it oxide. They just call it uranium, which is not correct.
You know, if I said I was going to give you some copper, for example, and I gave you some copper oxide, you wouldn't be best pleased, right?
But they talk about uranium like it's this thing that they're putting in these reactors.
But actually it's this yellow powder called yellow cake, which they call uranium oxide.
And they put it in these little capsules, zirconium pellets, and then they put those pellets in the reactor.
And then basically through some process, the pellets are then heated and then that initiates a process where the energy is released from the yellow cake through the walls of the pellets in the form of heat.
And that heat boils the water, which, you know, creates the steam and drives the turbines.
Is this like what they call a fuel rod? That's just a lot of pellets in the rod. What's a fuel rod? Is that just a shit load of these pellets?
Yes. Yeah, I think so. Yeah. So there's fuel, fuel rods are like an assembly that the pellets will go inside of.
So you got the yellow cake inside the zirconium pellets and then they're packed in a rod.
Yeah.
And the point of the pellet is that the stuff inside it can't combust right because it's locked in this pellet so the heat can come through.
But it can't explode unless those pellets something happened to those pellets, right?
If a pellet, if it was compromised, then the fucker could blow up, right, from the heating it up.
Yeah, well, that's it.
So in alchemy, they say that heat and fire element can penetrate all things.
But if you take something like metal, like zirconium, right, you know that sound, for example, doesn't really penetrate through it very well.
Light doesn't penetrate through it.
So it's actually only heat that can get through it.
So I knew about from alchemy this thing called the secret fire, also known as pyrolysis, which is when you heat something and you initiate a heating of something which is no oxygen.
So there's no possibility that it can burn in a flame.
But it's able to transform and release the energy within it without being exposed to oxygen.
And I realized when they're inside those pellets, well, there's going to be no oxygen, right?
The yellow cake is stuffed in there and yellow cake itself, when I started looking at looking at pictures of it, I realized it looks identical to sulfur.
You know, the consistency of it, the color of it.
And I had a kind of an aha moment when that happened because sulfur is not just a chemical on the periodic table.
And alchemy sulfur is the principle of fire in matter, or solar fire in matter specifically, the fire of the sun trapped in matter.
And of course, this is what they tell you in nuclear physics.
They tell you that the sun is a nuclear reactor and that when we do nuclear reactions here where it's like the energy of the sun, right?
So I got a more kind of clarified view of things there and like, well, sulfur isn't just a chemical, it's actually the principle of energy and matter.
And what's going on in these power stations is, you know, a clever way of releasing energy from matter in a slow controlled manner, you know, that can be harnessed for electricity.
Do you, sulfur is like yellow too, it looks just like yellow cake.
Do you think they're actually using sulfur and not uranium or plutonium or whatever?
Well, I think it's just, I think we need to like just broaden our definition of what sulfur is, because, you know, they do something to it.
At least they claim to, you know, so they take the yellow cake from the pitch blend or and then it's said to go through an enrichment process to make it suitable for use.
Now, the enrichment process is basically distillation.
They separate the components of the yellow cake into like the lighter components and the heavier components.
And then it's the lighter component is what they use for the fuel.
So, you know, something may be done to it to, you know, charge it up and make it suitable for this particular type of application.
But I mean, if it looks identical, sulfur is the same color as sulfur.
It's fire in matter.
Then what else are you going to call it?
I mean, you call it yellow cake or yellow powder or something, but.
Yeah, so then they, it's kind of, it's like when Tofer makes biochar, he's doing the same thing.
You know, he's got the, he's got the stuff he's burning in a thing that's got no oxygen with intense heat on the inside.
But the stuff itself doesn't catch fire.
It just, it's like the heat releases just what you're talking about.
So basically they're heating these pellets and the zirconium or whatever the casing around it.
And because there's no oxygen inside, they're extracting the fire from the yellow cake without an actual explosion or flame or detonation.
Yeah, the idea is it would explode if it was ignited in a normal air, air, air, airy situation.
But with no air, no oxygen in there, that it's the only way the energy can get out is through the bandwidth of heat.
Because it can't escape as light.
It can't escape as sound.
No other frequency of energy can actually get out of those pellets other than just heat.
So I think it's a way of, yeah, focusing and slowly releasing the energy in the form of heat.
Yeah. And then what happens in one, at least one kind, the heat coming out of those pellets boils the water that they're in a water tank.
That steam goes up and around and hits a turbine steam travels really fast.
I saw a guy, apparently there was an old, there was actually like a steam heating system.
And I think it was maybe the world Sears Tower or John Hancock, one of the big Chicago skyscrapers.
They were way down in the basement and this guy is up on the top on the 110th floor or whatever.
And he says to them on the radio, okay, open the valve and instantly the steam was at him.
So this shit travels at the speed of sound, light, whatever, like it's fast, man.
So that turns the turbine and then that has to condense back down into water again, come around.
And then that heat will heat the pellets again.
So it kind of gets the system and they have to move cold water and I'll put a diagram of this up like over while we're talking.
But then they have to have like cold water coming through a pipe.
So because when steam hits water at an at that speed, it can cause a massive explosion.
There was a building back in 2007 in New York where it was on steam boilers and they some valve went wrong in it.
This building blew up, killed like two people, injured 20 and pieces of it ended up on the Chrysler building like 70 stories of this building blew to crap.
So when people say, oh, well, we could all have a nuclear reactor in our house and shit.
I'm like, it's not that safe because not from the radiation, but they're like, these things can explode.
We've seen, we've seen they do and can explode.
But it's not like what we see, you know, you see like Star Trek where Spock's, you know, he has to go into the nuclear reactor, you know, they have to lock a man.
He's like, I'm melting Jim, you know, it's like, we're all right, we're like scared to death of the radiation.
And that's not really what it's just key, right?
Yeah.
Well, yeah, that's it because they tell us it's neutrons.
It's neutrons that are heating the water.
But again, this is just unfalsifiable.
And it's like, if you look to nature, it's like, how do you boil water with heat?
As far as I know, I could boil water by heat, but you know, so I just think that's what it's got to be, you know, it's got to be heat coming out of those pellets rather than neutrons.
They say thermal neutrons, which is just kind of a fancy way of saying heat.
Because they said in Fukushima, they claim what happened in Fukushima was so those rods with the zirconium pellets and the yellow cake,
they're also in a water thing that keeps them from getting too hot as well.
And apparently something happened where the cold, there was like an earthquake or something.
They couldn't get the cold water into that tank where they have all the little pellets with the yellow cake.
So then what happened is the zirconium was compromised and they did melt and then the yellow cake exploded.
That's what they're saying happened there.
But it wasn't a nuclear explosion.
It was just a it wasn't nuclear.
It was just explosion that shit got oxygen and it blew up.
Yeah, that makes sense.
So if the pellets are active, they're releasing their heat, they're in the water, that's fine.
It keeps the integrity of the system.
But yeah, if then if the water was to be drained, the pellets are going to continue to release the heat, but they're not going to be receiving cooling.
And so they could start to melt and then that would be a meltdown.
And then, yeah, you could have problems.
So yeah, these things are there's problems there, but it can all be explained without radioactivity or neutrons or protons.
That's the point, right?
It's like can actually just all be explained with basic engineering and alchemy.
And with the thing with sulfur, it was a big like light bulb moment actually when I realized the thing with sulfur.
Because, you know, the claim with the atomic bombs is that it was napalm that they use napalm and mustard gas that they used.
Well, napalm is made from petroleum and petroleum contains sulfur and mustard gas is actually called sulfur mustard, right?
Because it contains sulfur.
So basically, and then start looking into that TNT contains sulfur.
And that's what they use to do the Trinity test.
Every explosive corrosive like everything that like burns are used as fuel seems to contain sulfur, right?
The principle of sulfur, if not the chemical, you know, sulfur.
But so it was just like, you know, lights going off.
It was like, of course, it has to be sulfur.
It can't be anything else.
Like it must be because that's energy in matter.
It does just make more sense.
Yeah. And that's all you need.
You just need heat.
Heat boils water, you know, then they got cold water.
I mean, the whole thing is a nuclear power plant is just a giant alchemical.
What do you call it, you know, the furnace or yeah, it's just like cold water.
It's got air.
It's got steam.
It's like, it's just an alchemical transmutation machine.
And then it spins some turbines, which create the electricity.
Yeah. Somebody was a Galen wind.
I can't remember someone said nuclear power.
It's a hell of a way to boil water.
But it's funny because, you know, like Walter Russell, I'm a big Walter Russell fan.
His second book was called Atomic Suicide.
And he was, you know, he even understood elements as not what we're told they are, but as harmonic octaves.
But he, this whole book, he's saying we're stupid for digging this stuff out of the ground that it's dangerous for us.
But is it really, you know, that's what I wanted to talk about.
Like what is radiation Galen Windsor was at lectures with like plutonium.
And he's like, you see this right here.
This is enough to have the, you know, the FDA or whoever coming shut down a 12 mile radius and he's eating it.
You know, and he's got his Geiger counter.
It's like, like, like, like, like, like so.
And he's saying it's so it's the heat, right?
Like, what's what's is this stuff dangerous?
Or is that just a scam?
Well, I think so we're told in physics that there's three types of radiation alpha, beta and gamma.
And alpha and beta are said to be particles and gamma is wave.
And now my, my take is that it's all waves.
And, you know, essentially waves of different penetration depth.
So the alpha, what they call alpha would be the close range.
When you're really up close to the source, you know, 10 centimeters, I think they say the range is.
So it's like the first 10 centimeters from the source, that's like alpha.
And then, you know, medium sort of distance that's beta.
And then further distance penetration that would be gamma.
But, you know, I think of it like, well, I think of it like sound,
but also just think of it like vibration.
So you've got the electromagnetic spectrum.
It's like if something is hot, then it has infrared.
It's emitting infrared.
If something is glowing, then it's emitting visible light.
But if something is radioactive, I think it's emitting beyond visible, you know, ultraviolet and beyond.
That's the way I would, I would interpret it because the the Geiger counter clicks when it receives frequency above a certain range.
There's certain frequency, certain threshold frequencies.
So it doesn't click invisible light, but it will click in higher frequency light.
So I think what can happen is if something, say like a nuclear reactor, it's been used for a long time,
it's been exposed to a lot of energy, a lot of heat over a long period of time.
Even after it cools down, it can still be ringing out this like high frequency light.
Even though it's lost the heat and it's not glowing, it's still got ultraviolet or x-rays or gamma rays or whatever you want to call them still spitting out like that.
That still like rings for a long time.
So again, then that's like the fire in the matter principle again.
Like you look at Chernobyl, right?
Yeah, if they go in like five miles around and they go, you know, there are Geiger counters going up.
But I showed you, there's an old lady and a man, they've been living in there since it happened.
And now other people too, their animals are running around the plants are the plants are actually growing great.
Probably because of all this fire principle going into it.
So, you know, that's the thing is they're like, you can't go in there for more than five minutes.
And you're like, these old people are growing vegetables in there since it happened.
Like, I can't even remember when that one happened.
Like, so I think a lot of it's BS, but then I don't know if we were going to be on YouTube.
So I don't know if you're allowed anymore to say Cinco G these towers, they're putting up with this frequency.
I don't want to say it if it's not allowed.
But even these smart meters on the back of house, I showed you that picture like there's a tree next to a smart meter.
And the one side of the tree is dead, like the leaves are dead and and the side not facing it aren't.
But you and I were talking about like, is that really from the heat or is that a resonance, you know,
are the frequencies cooking the water and the tree leaves and it's burning its, you know, it's dying like it's just burning up its water?
Or is it like they say the radiation is, you know, what do you think's going on there with those frequencies in that tree?
Well, yeah, the tree looked like, you know, a dead tree like in the winter or whatever, like all the leaves brown.
So it kind of, you know, we talked about it was probably microwaves because, you know, so you have again in the spectrum,
you have infrared and then microwaves are basically right next to infrared, you know, they're like neighbors.
And yeah, so we know that infrared will heat water and heat, you know, other things too.
But microwaves have this sort of unique property where they heat water, but they don't heat the air.
So if you were to just like stand around next to a smart meter, you won't feel the heat and you won't be able to measure the heat in the air.
But if there's a plant next to it, which has water in the leaves, then it could end up zapping,
essentially microwaving the water in the leaves and turning the leaves brown.
Or you, because you're 90% water or whatever they say.
So basically like it's boiling you from the inside just like a microwave oven cooks the food from the inside out.
It doesn't cook it from the outside in like a normal oven does.
So it's like, yeah, it's resonating with the water inside and then you become the heat source, the boiling water, like a nuclear furnace.
Well, yeah, you'd probably just heat up.
But of course, you know, proximity to source is very important, right?
Because you have this inverse square law where the intensity dies down like really quickly as you get further away from the source.
So I think a lot of these things, yeah, they maybe are a problem within a certain range, but outside of that range, we're probably tough enough to handle it.
Yeah, I was thinking the same, you know, like how dangerous are these Cinco G towers, you know, and I'm the same with you.
It's also like the people, you know, there's all these people get cancer living under the high tension power wires and stuff, but not everybody gets cancer.
That's the thing you would think everybody living under them would get it, but they don't.
And you and I were kind of kicking around some real crazy ideas.
You know, we were talking, they keep telling you in the spiritual movement, New Age, to raise your vibration, you got to raise your vibration.
But when you raise your vibration, you're angry, your heart's racing, you're sweating.
When you're supposed to get closer to source and God, you meditate, you lower your vibration and chill out and relax.
And, you know, just like an induction oven or microwave resonance, I think these 5G frequencies are really fast.
And they want you to raise your frequencies so you now resonate with them and phase cancel.
Then I think they could be even better weapons, you know, they want you boiling so they can help boil you.
So I'm kind of with you.
I think if you live right under one is probably you should get the hell out of there.
Or maybe it'd be better because if they stick one on your roof, but these are these waves go millimeter waves go out.
So maybe you're actually safe right under because it's shooting out away from you.
But yeah, I mean, yeah, it could be.
Yeah, yeah, the directional.
Yeah, I mean, you know, I think about it like with music.
So, you know, a speaker is a radiator, you know, a form of electromagnetic radiator radiator.
And, you know, we can listen to music through the speakers and it can sound good right inside uplifting and, you know, healing even.
But if we go close to the speaker, you know, a bunch of things start to change and it can start it can start to be too loud for our eardrums so it can cause distortion and ringing in the ears.
And also like the bass frequencies, you know, need space to like open up.
So when you get closer to the speakers, you're you don't get to feel or hear the full effect of the bass frequencies.
But the high frequencies sound louder because you're closer to the tweeters.
And so the music kind of gets spiked up, pushed up, you know, like an EQ like high, the highs get higher and the lows get turned down.
And it can actually start to be like dangerous and sound kind of annoying in that, you know, in that proximity.
Even though the music is good and it's fine for you a few meters back from the speaker or whatever.
I've still got tinnitus from 20, 20 some years ago where I did something stupid like that too with my guitar amp.
These guys were doing construction at like nine in the morning next to in the, you know, my apartment next to the wall.
So I took my big fender blues to build the looks 120 watt six to two 12 and 60s cranked everything to 10 and started ripping Hendricks at him like trying to piss them off.
Standing right behind the amp myself like a dumbass.
So the sound it just I've had ringing in my ears ever since.
So I can totally backfire to hold a whole bag.
I sure showed them.
So I could attest that it's dangerous because I'm still screwed from 20 years later.
So you think that's kind of what the radiation is.
So do you think like when these power plants go down?
Is there a dangerous amount of radiation or heat or weight?
You know, I think, yeah, I think there can be.
I was just going to say as well on that point about the music when you get closer to the source.
So, you know, these these things like these machines are smart meter, let's say, you know, they're not just emitting one frequency.
You know, there'll be a whole set of different frequencies that correspond with the different components and all that.
You know, all the different parts of it will have like a different frequency, a different sound.
And then those will all be combined into a certain wave shape.
And I think the wave shape also affects us, right?
It's like it's not just the frequency or the frequency band.
It's the combination of frequencies and the shape of the wave that comes out of it.
And you know, you know yourself, it's like if it's a really like jagged wave that doesn't have like geometry and it's sort of chaotic and jaggy, right?
That's going to, you know, it grates the brain.
It's like, you know, it doesn't sound very musical, but if it's more smooth and, you know, properly designed and everything, then it feels better.
So I think a lot of these machines, they emit like really gnarly wave shapes as well as, you know, everything else.
So it could be a combination of the wave shape, the proximity, a lot of these things.
But, you know, yeah, you definitely there's, you know, these contact microphones.
Have you seen those?
No, it's, it's pretty cool.
It's just like a little, it's just basically a copper coil.
And you can go around and put it on any of your devices and you'll hear the sound that the device is making that all the frequencies that the electronics are making.
Yeah. And it's pretty eye-opening, man.
I mean, like we had this blender in the kitchen and it's just when I, when I put the, without even turning it on, it was emitting this high frequency like sound that you could hear with the contact microphone, but you can't hear it with your ears, right?
So it takes the inaudible vibrations of the machines and makes them audible.
Go around your house with some headphones on and touch all the things.
You'll be like how much like frequencies coming out of everything.
I've got all these, like, you know, I've got photonic waves and I've got photonic shields on all my devices and my meter and the house.
So like when I, I could take a radiation meter and go up to my phone without, without a photonic shield.
And it's like, you know, this one's, but as soon as I put that on, it's just green.
So I keep all, and now they make stickers like that too, that actually works.
So I just put them on my devices.
I don't actually understand the science of how they work, but the, the meter stuff goes green.
So whatever, what, I don't, do you know how that might work?
Yeah. So I think this is the, like what I was just talking about there, the wave shape, right?
It's like, I think it's, it's a way of like conditioning the, the shape of the wave to something that's smoother and less, you know, jagged and troublesome, right?
It's like a sort of conditioning of the energy.
It doesn't eliminate the energy, but maybe smooths it out.
Yeah. Well, that's the question is like, even though it's a smoother instead of jagged wave, is it still dangerous to be sitting in front of the damn thing?
You know what I mean?
It's a photonic shield or not.
Like what's it doing inside of you over there?
We're pretty well protected on the inside, I think, but yeah, I mean, and these are low power as well.
You know, so you've got the power, the amplitude of the wave is important, not just the frequency.
We always talk about frequencies, but amplitude matters just as much, even if not more, actually, right?
It's like, you know, with the volume, right?
Matters like an annoying sound is way more annoying when it's loud than when it's quiet, you know?
I kind of wonder that, too.
Like, yeah, if these waves are just slowly agitating you and then you don't sleep, it's not as so much as the radiation or whatever,
but just what it's doing to you is making you unhealthy in other ways as a byproduct sort of thing.
I kind of wonder if that's more the real danger is being agitated like you're saying they're shooting you with waves that are not.
It's like those Emoto experiments where they tell the water, I hate you, and start playing heavy metal towards it.
You know, the water turns all mucky looking.
Yeah, subtle sort of agitation and just generally, yeah, just making it harder for you to get through life,
because you're just like, why the hell do I feel like this?
Yeah, I mean, yeah, this.
Yeah.
I thought it was fascinating, dude, what you were.
So, like, they're clearly trying to get rid of nuclear power.
We have one across the water here from Denmark and Sweden.
Barsobeck, I think it's called.
And they're trying to get rid of it, but you were you pointed out like every time one of these disasters happen,
there's like a movie about the exact same thing right before.
I saw the China syndrome.
Yeah.
Watching it or what?
It's a great movie, even though it's I haven't watched it yet.
But yeah, it was just one of those things that was like when I was start looking into I hadn't looked into Three Mile Island.
I'd looked into Chernobyl and Fukushima, but the original nuclear disaster is the Three Mile Island.
And it was just, you know, just just so happened that like 12 days before the disaster,
it was the release of a movie about a nuclear disaster.
And I thought, wait a minute.
And and then I mean, what I thought was even more funny was that like there was no fatalities,
but 140,000 people were evacuated.
Think about that.
Like nobody actually died in the accident, but 140,000 people had to leave their homes.
How crazy is that?
You know, that's the fear, the hysteria, right?
What were they running away from if nobody had died?
Do you know what I mean?
What are you actually running away from?
Well, that's what I'm saying.
They're scared shitless because we're told like the radiation is going to get you know,
like you all need to walk around in a suit.
And that China syndrome was a huge movie.
It had Jane Fonda, Jack Lemon, Michael Douglas, like it was a blockbuster movie.
It was huge.
And then like what 12 days later, one of these things blows up.
So that seemed, you know, when you, well, when you've been looking at the
conspiracies and all that as we have like that, that kind of, that kind of luck, you
know, like two, two events like that just happening side by side, you know, that was
that made me suspicious.
And then I realized that, yeah, there's basically a pattern.
So there's been obviously three major nuclear accidents, Fukushima, Chernobyl and
Three Mile Island.
And every single one of them initiated a certain chain reaction of events afterwards,
which, you know, they were all highly publicized for a start.
I mean, people still talk about midday, they're, they're talked about in the news
almost every other week, even though they were a long, long way away.
And, you know, a long time ago, I constantly put it in front of mind.
And yeah, when I started looking into the anti-nuclear movement and how that all
began, that was, that was what did it for me.
Because I always thought anti-nuclear was like a kind of grassroots, you know,
hippies just trying to protect and defend, you know, the environment from
the evils of nuclear.
But then it totally flipped.
I realized it's actually a top-down agenda.
It was like the, it's like the oligarchs, like the Venetian Party,
the East India Company, the Committee of 300, all this.
It's these people that want to cancel nuclear power.
And it's part of this whole agenda 2030 and everything else.
I mean, they want to, they want to roll back progress.
You know, they don't want us having ease of access to power, cheap
electricity, you know, all that stuff.
It's like, well, as you, as you well know, yeah, they really want to roll
us back to the fucking stone age.
Yeah, because I mean, this yellow cake, zirconium, this nuclear energy
you want to call it, or let's call it sulfuric alchemical energy.
It's really safe for the environment.
It's just boiling steam.
I mean, you might get some rain because they do release some heat up
into the sky and stuff, but it's really safe.
And that's really funny.
So they don't, because I'm 54.
So I was around for the no nukes movement, right?
So really, like you're saying they want the no nukes movement,
but they really also publicly tried to fight against them to
make it look like they didn't.
Remember, there was a stories where there were, there was a,
like a nuclear rally and then they used the first do weapons.
Actually they, they were using these sonic cannons on those
people and everyone was getting sick and one woman had a miscarriage.
So it made it look like the establishment didn't want the no nukes
movement, but like you're saying that they're behind it.
It's totally clever scam to create something and then make it
look like you're fighting against it to legitimize it.
Yeah.
I think it's kind of like the just stop oil thing that they
have now, you know, where all these like hippies like glue
themselves to the motorway, glue their faces to the motorway
so the cars can't and they're just like, just stop oil.
It's like, it makes it seem like it's this grassroots movement
of like, you know, hippies, you know, trying to protect the
environment, but it's a top down agenda and they're just
being used as useful idiots.
And it was the same.
It was the same with the anti nuclear.
They were like the beginning of the green movement pretty
much, you know, because the windmills are all bullshit too.
Like I'm totally all for the nuclear power plants and stuff.
Like I said, they're they can explode like, but the danger
isn't like you can't come into this area for 10,000 years
until the half life of the plutonium.
The danger is like it could blow up and like literally blow
people up, you know, like that's the only danger.
That is the one reason I don't think everyone should
have a nuclear reactor in their basement or something
because there's a lot of morons out there already or
they'll blow their house up, you know.
Yeah, yeah.
It's pretty clever technology.
And yeah, it's, you know, it's power and it takes
responsibility to run it properly.
But this was the thing when I actually started looking
into, so well, just to say, so after Three Mile Island,
they stopped all new nuclear power plant development in the
US for 30 years.
So that was a huge win for the anti nuclear because
there are really two things they need to do, right?
They need to stop all the new ones from being built,
but then they need to get the existing ones shut down.
So it's like a two pronged sort of attack.
They got America to stop all their new ones for 30 years.
And after Chernobyl, Russia stopped it.
They had a plan for it to expand and build all these
new ones and they're like, okay, we're not going
to do that anymore.
Instead, we're going to sort of regress and go
and implement all these new safety measures and all
our existing plants and, you know, upgrade them
to make them all safer and everything.
And then a similar thing happened in Japan after Fukushima.
They shut down 54, all 54 reactors and start investing
in all these safety checks and upgrades and everything.
And then Germany and Italy, of course, we're just like,
right, we're done.
We're not having nuclear anymore.
And then they start shutting all theirs down.
But actually, when you look around the world,
there's actually loads and loads of countries are still
building them.
It only seems to be Germany and Italy that are
actually actively rolling back.
The other countries are all just going full steam ahead.
Have you ever heard of, are these the only three
Fukushima, Three Mile Island in Chernobyl?
I wonder if there's other ones that have exploded.
We just don't hear about them because they're in like
Uzbekistan or something.
Yeah, a few people in the comments had asked me
about a few little accidents I hadn't heard of.
But obviously, they're the three main ones,
I think, that have created the public hysteria.
But there may have been some other accidents.
Someone mentioned one at a lab in the state somewhere
but I can't remember what it was now.
So then what's Japan doing?
Are they going oil and gas?
Are they trying to go windmills?
No, they only shut down their reactors temporarily.
Yeah, so they shut them down temporarily
and then invested in all this new safety upgrades
and safety protocols and everything.
But they're still running them
and they're still building new ones now.
So it was only Germany and Italy
that actually just completely canceled their whole program
as far as I know the other countries have all got them
and are still building them.
So the point was that the anti-nuclear is actually not succeeding.
I mean, it's a very long-term ambition
to shut down all the world's nuclear reactors
but it's actually not succeeding.
Yeah, that's all Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
They don't want private property, private fuel.
They don't want you having cars.
We talked about that.
They're switching you to electric cars
but there's not enough cobalt and lithium in the world
to even make the batteries for Britain, let alone the world.
But it's a bait and switch.
They're trying to get you to electric
and then, oh, by the way,
we don't have enough to make them
so you just get no cars.
Like that's probably what they're doing with the power too.
I think if they could control the nuclear,
they would be quite happy to do it
as long as they could control all of it.
You know what I mean?
But yeah, it's pretty crafty, man.
But yeah, I think it's,
aside from the explosions, it's pretty safe.
There's another kind of nuclear technology too.
I didn't, apparently there's two ways these plants can run.
I only looked at the one that does the water and steam
but have you looked into the other kind?
I'm not sure.
Someone mentioned something about it.
Is it breeder reactors?
Is that what they're called?
I don't know, yeah.
I just looked into the normal one with the tower
and the one that you see.
Yeah, me too.
I just looked at the basic one.
But yeah, there's breeder reactors.
There's another kind and the small modular ones
they're talking about now,
like one that can sit on your desktop or whatever.
So when they talk about getting rid of nuclear waste,
they've spent fuel rods, basically,
so what you're saying is they've heated the yellow cake,
the sulfur, whatever is in there,
and then it's expended, it's heat,
but it hasn't, it's not flammable.
Just like biochar, like when Tofer's making biochar.
So it's done, right?
There's no more heat.
The yellow cake has lost all its heat
and it's still inside.
So then they have to bury these somewhere.
But they put them in like these barrels
with a bit of yellow skeleton,
like a nuclear orange triangle around it.
But that's ridiculous, isn't it?
Yeah, I think they put them in like sort of concrete bunkers
and stuff like that.
And, you know, as I say,
that waste could very well be emitting invisible light.
Like I said, it's not emitting heat.
It's not glowing,
but it could be emitting ultraviolet
or beyond radiation just from what it's been through.
And that would register on the Geiger counter.
But yeah, you know, as far as I know,
I mean, they treat it like it's real nuclear waste
and they put it in a concrete container and everything.
And, you know, but I was thinking of not just that,
but like all the other stuff that people have done
based on the nuclear hypothesis,
like all the underground bunkers
that people have built to survive a nuclear war.
But you put all that effort in,
you've built like a seven-story underground bunker
for a nuclear war and then suddenly you're like,
hang on, nukes aren't real.
That's huge business, man.
Yeah, there's a lot of industry behind it.
When we were kids in the 80s,
they were making us sit under our desk,
you know, one Wednesday a month,
pretending like a nuclear bomb was gonna blow up.
And you're just like,
how the hell would I survive a nuclear blast under my desk
if the windows blew up and I'm on fire?
But those aren't real either.
They're like, you say they're just BFBs,
they're big fucking bombs.
Yeah.
But it is great because it scares the hell out of everybody.
You know, it's a great excuse to invade countries.
Oh, Iran's got, they're gonna get the bomb.
Yeah.
But like you said, like you're a nuclear physicist.
You're like actually a doctor
and you don't know how to make a bomb.
And why would they invite you to come to university
and get a doctorate nuclear physics
and then teach everyone to make the bomb if it's so hard?
I know.
And that was, I mean, like the, you know, the department
where I was as well, there was like loads of Russians,
loads of Chinese, like, you know, Arabic students.
I mean, there's people from all the countries
that are allegedly our enemies.
And, you know, I didn't think about it much at the time,
but in retrospect, I thought, well, hang on.
You know, if this is like some like secret of, you know,
these weapons, you know, there's so,
of such military importance and all that kind of stuff,
then you're gonna just invite like Russians and Chinese
and Arabs and everything to come and learn all this stuff.
It didn't make any sense, you know,
like from the sort of national security point of view.
Yeah.
And then you invite them over on scholarships.
There you go.
You can take that back to India with you.
Because that's another big one.
One of the other scams they do is they're always like,
Israel really has the bomb.
Like, you know, they're saying,
Israel says they don't have the bomb,
but they have a nuclear bomb program.
And you're like, do they though?
Does anybody, do they really, you know what I mean?
And again, they like, they expose themselves
to keep the scam going as if like,
oh, I learned this on Above Top Secret
or you know, Reddit or whatever.
But it's like, it's like,
they're just perpetrating this total myth
to make you scared of Israel
because they might have a bomb.
But they don't.
Yeah, that's what they call the Samsung option
or something.
So that basically they'll just destroy the whole world
if they have to.
Yeah.
And how many bullshit movies are there like,
Hunt for Red October
and the one with Denzel Washington
and Gene Hackman.
There's all these movies about these nuclear subs.
Yeah.
And they're clear and present danger.
There's about 50 movies about
the nuclear subs going to go rogue
and do all this and that.
It's like, is it really though?
Yeah.
Yeah, very skeptical of all that stuff now.
I mean, it's just, yeah,
we've just been fed so much propaganda.
And you know, the movies, like you say,
we didn't know we were watching propaganda.
We thought we were watching entertainment.
But then you grew up a bit and you'd watch it for a second time.
You're just like, oh my God, like this is just pure propaganda.
Well, it is great once you understand all this
because now you're not afraid.
Like, dude, we were scared shitless as kids
when we were doing those bomb tests.
And then there was this movie came out.
It was like a TV mini series called
the day after tomorrow or something like that.
We're like, there's a full on nuclear war.
And then like it, we were scared to death.
And then it's a great way for governments
to start siphoning money into like,
not even a black budget, but a,
an on the books budget for nuclear defense.
And it's like, but if you're not really building
nuclear missiles, what are you doing with all that cash?
Yeah.
Yeah, they call it the nuclear deterrent.
It's right.
It's like, they have to have nuclear bombs
in order to deter other people from having them.
I call it the nuclear detergent
because they're using it to wash money.
They're laundering money.
It's a good nuclear detergent to launder money.
Nuclear detergent.
Yeah.
But it does scare the hell out of everybody, you know,
and it also maybe it allows us to allow
our governments to do things that we wouldn't do
because we're afraid, you know,
oh, they're going to get the bombs.
So we better go in and get them.
That's just ridiculous.
Anyway, you're like, how long are these bombs
allegedly been around?
What?
They don't all have them now.
How it's like not that hard to figure out the technology.
Yeah, I know.
I mean, making a bomb, right?
So, I mean, just to let you think about how it
comes across from the point of view of a nuclear
physicist when you've been taught like,
you know, about atoms and nuclei and photons and everything,
like, you know, the idea of like creating
that in any kind of practical sense is just
so utterly confusing.
Like, say, how are you going to get your hands on some
uranium atoms?
Like, where do you get the neutrons from to
actually, you know, split the atoms with?
Like, it's just insane.
It's a crazy problem.
But if you actually look at a bomb from
an engineering perspective, then what you do is
like, you light the fuel and it goes bang.
You know what I mean?
It's actually real fucking simple.
And, you know, so it's like,
actually the bombs are not that clever.
You know, because they're like,
oh, the timing chain has to be right.
And then all the the atoms will
go in toward each other and explain, you know,
did you see that?
I tried to watch Oppenheimer.
I fell asleep twice.
Did you watch Oppenheimer?
No.
It's like three hours.
It's so freaking boring.
But, you know,
it's they're just making it seem.
Well, you know, we brought in all these specialists
like it's impossible to make this thing
and they make it seem like they're these guys
are so clever and, you know,
it took a stroke of luck and genius and really
they're just lighting crates of tea and tea
out the desert.
Guys look at there's even there's there's
footage of them stacking tea and tea crates.
And then those people were told that they were
like the control test.
But for all we know, there were two stacks of
tea and tea and they were each told the other
guy was looking at the control and the other
guy was looking at a bomb.
How do we know they didn't just, you know,
how do we know there weren't two tea and tea
crates stacked and each one thought
they were the control and the other one
was really seeing a bomb.
Yeah, there's a lot of interesting stuff
in that sort of Manhattan project,
like lore, one of the sort of gems
that I found in it was that the
they tell us that the whole like the secret
of uranium enrichment, which is like the
key secret for developing the bomb
actually came from an anonymous spy
codenamed Quantum.
So and it's like it's a really
interesting nugget of propaganda because
the, you know, the secret
to make the bomb, right? So then they
made the bomb and then they used the
bomb and then the bomb ended the war.
So it's really telling us that we all
owe everything to this guy, this
anonymous spy called Quantum, because
if he hadn't provided that one key
piece of information, there'd be no bomb
and then the war wouldn't have been
finished and we'd all be talking
German, you know. It's
quite interesting, but still
anonymous to this day, right? Still
anonymous to this day. Right, so how
they even find him? Well, you've
covered that a lot, like when you go
through history, all these people's names
just are they I saw another one recently
I was going to send you I forgot what it
was, but it was another one of these where
you're like really that's the guy's name
like come on.
Even with the enrichment, what were
you talking about before like
it's you know the cakes
and the metals and stuff like that
you were you were giving me an analogy
about flour, you know, there's not
cake and flour.
You know, you have to
talk about with the metal when
they're saying like the metals.
Yeah, yeah. So I mean, this is
again to something I realized getting into alchemy
was that in
atomic science, we
have this way of describing everything
based on its atomic structure or
whatever. So say
copper oxide, you know, we
say it's copper atoms
surrounded by oxygen atoms.
So the idea is that the copper
the atoms of copper are actually in
the powder. So even though the powder
is clearly not copper, I mean, it's
green, it doesn't conduct electricity.
You know, it's not strong.
It's not malleable. It has none of the
properties of copper, but we're told
that the copper atoms are inside the
powder sort of hidden by
oxygen atoms, let's say.
And I just
I have found it's like not I don't
think that's the correct way to think about things. I think
that, you know, the powder is
transmuted into copper.
You can take any
powder and you can transmute it into a
metal via crystal.
I think we talked
about that in our last conversation
we had last year.
You can take a white powder like potassium.
You can then purify it through
dissolving and coagulating it, make
it into a white crystal and then
keep going purified coagulate
and eventually make it into a metal.
It's a soft like metal.
But
we're told that the potassium
is in the powder.
We're told that there's potassium in bananas,
for example, right?
But there's nothing in a banana that's
even remotely like potassium,
but you can transmute a banana into
potassium, right?
Yeah, it's like
if that's even true, but yeah.
The banana doesn't have potassium
in it. Our body can turn
banana into potassium.
Yeah, through a transmutation
process. Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, through our digestion and
our body is like an alchemical
distiller.
Yeah, so I see
what you're saying. So then
with things like yellow cake and uranium oxide
then you're asking
is it right to call it
uranium when it's
not a metal.
It doesn't have any metallic properties.
It's yellow in color.
And you could argue, well
maybe yellow cake can be
transmuted into uranium, but I've never
actually seen that being done.
But yeah, so
I ended up concluding that uranium
and plutonium are just red herrings.
They're not actually
real things.
They're these kind of red herrings
that are just
there to
create this narrative
and hide the truth about what's
actually going on.
Yeah, totally.
Yeah, I can see
that too because
they also have to keep a mystique
about it if it's a scam.
If you're going to tell a lie
you have to tell or make it a big one.
Totally absurd.
So it's like
when they're doing these scams they have to have
these elaborate stories
and intrigues. There's always like an emotional
intrigue to it.
You can't have plutonium and uranium
and you can't
it's like this
they make it all mysterious and you can't
go near this waste and
really it's just a big tub of shit.
Well yeah
and with the story they tell us
you wouldn't want to go near any of that stuff
anyway.
Keep it away from me kind of thing
and
I started to really wonder if that
is part of the reason why
they came up with the whole radioactivity as dangerous
thing is actually to
hide it, not only to hide it, but to keep us away
from it so that we're not,
as normal people we're not even curious
of going and trying to get some of this stuff
because we think we're going to get
sick or killed by
even getting close to it.
Right, yeah and I think Eileen Windsor said something
like
they could be like
the mob could be burying bodies in the waste barrels
and you'd never open it.
It would be like a perfect way to
get rid of some evidence or a body
is put it in a barrel with a big nuclear
sign on it and nobody would touch it
you know the big three radiation
triangles and stuff so
yeah they could be burying
shit in those barrels too like who
knows these people are crazy like who
knows what's going on in there you know.
Totally crazy man
so what do you got coming up soon you were
showing me um yeah we were having an interesting
talk about does oxygen light
fire or yeah but
you've got a presentation you did
last year you're going to release what do you got
coming immediately in the works.
Yeah well I want to do another
presentation now following up on all this
like into what you were just talking about
there like the periodic table
the nature of substances
and you know how
substances can be transmuted one into another
and understanding the elemental
constitution of substances so
you know like in the periodic table for example
you have all these metals all these
transition metals and you know we're told
that each one is a different type of atom
with a different number of protons and neutrons and so on
but
well I've come to understand metals
is more just like mixtures of elemental
properties
that you can so by melting them down
and adding in different
metal metallic properties you can
create metals with a unique
set of properties and it's just
like blending
flavors or blending
essences
whereas you know modern physics tells us you cannot
change one type of metal into another
they're all you know
these fixed like atomic structures
but it's actually
really interesting yeah so like all the
stuff on the periodic table can all be
like broken down into elements fire, earth, air
and water
and yeah I've been going through
that and kind of doing that I was talking
about it over the summer at some of the gigs
I did over the summer but I've not yet committed it to video
so I've got a presentation
lined up there that's fascinating I'd like to see that
well I don't give it away
but I'm wondering if they're even you know the
rose they have them and if those
are also earth, air, fire
I'm wondering if there's an actual pattern to
because they always tell you have truths
yeah yeah
well yeah you have something like I mean if you take something like mercury
alright it's liquid so
you know that's going to have a high
proportion of the water element
in its constitution now that doesn't
mean that it's got H2O in it
but it has the qualities
of water right it's able to
flow like a liquid it takes the shape
of its container
you know so it's got
a watery component in it but
if you take something like iron for example
there's we have like iron
nickel and
like cobalt
very similar to iron it's like
the main difference is that
it has a silvery sheen
and it's incorruptible
right so iron is corruptible
and it doesn't have a silvery sheen
now silvery sheen comes from
silver and incorruptibility
comes from gold so
nickel is actually iron
mixed with a little bit of silver and a little bit of gold
which actually makes sense
if you think about the value of a nickel
right it's like it's the cheapest coin
that's because it's only got a tiny
amount of silver and gold in it
just enough to make it shiny
and not rust
but it's mostly just iron
right yeah right
exactly and you wouldn't have an iron coin
because yeah it would rust
but they're trying to say
that nickel is like a thing
like it's an element instead of a mix
of things they're trying to say it's an atom
yeah but it's a mixture
of the fundamental metals which
you know the ones corresponding to the luminaries
right the
iron, copper, mercury
tin
gold and silver
and I'm forgetting one
there's another one in there but you know what I'm talking about
yeah there's these seven metals
in alchemy and they're like
they hold all the
different properties and so
it's a case of if you're making a new
metal you're like what do you want
the properties of that metal to be
I mean do you want it to be malleable
you know like copper and it's
gonna need a high proportion of the water element
right but if you want it to be
rigid and unbendable then it's gonna need
a low proportion of the water element
do you want it to
ring like a bell
and it's gonna need a high proportion of the air element
because that's sonority, that's like
an air thing but if you want
it to sound like dead and not ring out at all
then I'll have a low proportion of the air element
you know it's the things like that so
So if you want it to be liquid, it'll need high water and so on and so forth.
Yeah, that's, it's just like cake, man.
It's like you want this to be a chocolate cake, you want nuts, you want to carrot cakes,
just flour with different shit in there.
So it's like, you can't pretend there's like the periodic table of cakes.
Oh, that's not vanilla, that's a chocolate cake.
You're like, it's still a vanilla cake, it just got chocolate in the flour like,
you know, so that'll be fascinating, man.
Well, we'll cut this, let's cut this now.
I don't want it to go super long because, you know, attention spans in Christmas.
So people are going to, people are going to lose their attention.
But tell us your websites to where to reach it and I'll put them in
and we'll plug your book one more time.
Tell them for Christmas, man, I can't, I can't recommend this book enough.
It's got everything in there.
So I'm in it quite often and on it.
I'll give you my books too, man.
Yeah. Yeah, I appreciate that.
You can buy it direct from my website, stevenyoung.uk.
It's also available on Amazon, but you'll probably get it quicker that way.
But yeah, I've got a, you know, I've got a sub stack and a Patreon and Telegram
and an Instagram and a YouTube channel.
But you can find all the information for that on my homepage, stevenyoung.uk.
Awesome, bro.
Yeah, and I'll stick the links on there too.
Yeah, and you and I, we've got some conferences
we're going to be speaking at together coming up in the next year.
Yeah, yeah.
Illuminate, elevate, and then we've got the one over in Dundee,
which is going to be great.
So yeah, hopefully I can come crash with you and the fam again.
I had a great time last time we were in a, yeah, we had a great time
when I came to see you. Absolutely, man.
Yeah, no, you're more than welcome.
Yeah, last time you were here in this cabin with me,
I think we smashed the bottle of whiskey, didn't we?
Smash it, but you know what I mean.
We got smashed.