Just a minute
I'm coming
Just a minute
Hello everybody, this is legal man. Welcome to the show. This can be a good episode
I'm going to continue the series on the ratification and talk about some proposed changes to the Constitution itself
That I believe the fact that they aren't there
Exposed the fact that there was never any legitimate dispute or debate about the Constitution
Because these changes are so obvious and they would just completely and totally
Flip the script and keep the government under control
And for people who don't know me I'm a lawyer I've practiced for more than 35 years in America's most trusted and beloved lawyer
Because I tell people the truth and the truth is that I was a constitutional conservative a believer in the entire
fairy tale about the founding and the
Constitution the three co-equal branches and the brilliance and the liberty protection and blah blah blah
For years and years and years I ran around like an idiot defending it promoting it and then about 25 years ago
I got the internet and in fairly short order sort of figuring out. It's all just a complete scam
It's a con it's a grift to keep me on a tax-paying plantation and when I figured that out
I became self-certified as a master practitioner and I don't need
constitutional conservatives anymore
I've also given myself a lifetime achievement award for the hundreds and hundreds of timeless podcasts
I've made explain the way this system actually works
I gave myself the presidential medal of freedom for playing mr. Jones in Jones plantation
And I've given myself a Nobel Peace Prize for helping to bring the world together playing Natty in
Barnum world and I love having fake credentials and accolades like that because the whole systems are complete fraud
They force people to memorize official them and then to regurgitate and if you don't do that properly
Then you can't get a lifetime achievement award or presidential medal of freedom or a license or a certification
And they shut you down everybody saw that during COVID when certain doctors nurses and professionals
Attempted to speak up and explain the truth to people
Well, they just tried to crush him destroy him professionally by using that exact same officialdom system
And so I like to make fun of it and mock it so that people can hopefully catch on to it
Because if people can't see the absurdity of having a government sitting in the position of trying to decide who's an expert or not an expert
Who's a professional who's not a professional if you can't see how absurd that is then I can't help you
You're so lost in the maze
Okay, enough about all that. Let's go ahead and get this show going
So I want to continue my series on the ratification
We're getting very close to the end now
It originally started as I was going to do a series on the anti-federalist because I thought that might be interesting
And then I spent a bunch of time reading them more closely trying to think about how I could ever
Put that into a show and determine that they really aren't something I could do a series about
Even though they were right and they had a lot of good ideas the writings themselves were just they're unusable and
Outside of excerpts. They're just
It doesn't work
And so when I decided not to do that and I decided to do this one on the ratification
I'm really glad I did because I've just found so many interesting things and
Exposed such an incredibly deep fraud that literally is totally and completely covered up
The idea that the constitutional convention was anything like we're told and that we got the Constitution
Anyway, like we're told and that there was anything legitimate about any of it is just utterly ludicrous
When you examine some of the things like I have just objectively
And I did not start out to try to prove any of that
I just started uncovering it when I started looking into the things that are missing and the things that are there and
the difference between those two just it's
There's no way to make sense of it unless it's clear that the whole thing was a
Inside job and they knew how it was going to turn out and I think that's pretty obvious
There's so many things that stand out about it such as the fact that there's absolutely no
Accommodation made for the fact that what if all 13 don't agree
There's no accommodation made for that and that's preposterous and absurd any lawyer
Involved would say that's impossible and the fact that it's no part of any
Historical narrative that there was a concern that they wouldn't all join it because then what would happen legally with all the assets and the land
And now there's nothing
There's no accommodation made for transferring the stuff over. There's no accommodation for anything in there and
the
language in the Constitution itself is so
Absurd when you start looking at it and the Articles Confederation
Were so easily
amended to start addressing these problems that they claim existed and when you look into it
you see that the problems didn't really even exist and that they constantly claim and even if they did I did that whole show
Just showing people that it really isn't that difficult to fix them
It's just not that difficult and that you don't need this entirely new government and the federalist papers and Madison's notes
The whole thing is just it's just a concoction the fact that
Washington's Journal is blank a man so interested in his own
Image and yet he's completely blank when he's talking about the Constitutional Convention
There's no newspaper articles the idea of secrecy to their own principles who were the states they represented the whole thing is ludicrous on its face
There aren't really any drafts or anything else that came out of it
The few scraps of paper we do have they all were released like 30 years later
Allegedly turned in by George Washington at the time. Okay, like Epstein's list. I take it
There's just absolutely no proof about any of this stuff and nobody who sought to prove it
Whatever be able to carry the day
That's the problem and that's why it has to be totally untouched and so what I want to do today is
Say that even if we had all of this things
Allegedly occurring with this great debate going on and everything else and even if we were going to get stuck with this utterly ridiculous
Barnum statement full of shit
Document called the Constitution that everybody worships because they're just told over and over and over again how great it is
They're never actually reading the document and examining it and taking it apart like a lawyer
They're just looking at it through these rose colored glasses like it's this incredible savior of our entire freedom machine
And there's just no truth to any of that
But even if we were going to get it there would have been things included in the Constitution
I'm going to go through some of these amendments that should be in there that of course they wouldn't be amendments
They should have been originally included
But they aren't and the fact that maybe you could accept the fact that they aren't all included
Maybe but certainly that there are none of the following types of things that I'm suggesting in there is
Absolutely again proof positive that the whole thing was just an absolute inside scam and a con job
Just of the highest order and the idea that the document is so fantastic is absurd because the foundational
Principle that the Constitution is presented through is this idea that we have to create this federal government
That is somehow
Checked and balanced so that it treats people well and its own power can be controlled and
this entire concept
Stems from the idea really the mistaken constant premise that there isn't something already set up to do that
Which is the state's interest and the people's interest
What they've done is present this concept that the government the federal government somehow checks itself
With all these different co-equal branches. They're not co-equal anyway
Because the Congress can remove the president and the Congress can eliminate all the courts except for one and the Congress gets to control
the jurisdiction that the courts have
Outside of the incredibly limited exclusive jurisdiction, which would be basically no cases each year in the court
That's listed in the Constitution. So they aren't all co-equal anyway
They were never intended to be co-equal and the whole concept is absurd
But there's all these different arguments about what was going on and what supposedly was going on these great compromises that were made
But we don't actually have any evidence for any of this except for
Madison's notes which didn't come out for 50 years and then the federalist papers
Which were written by these same interested parties these same con men who were running the show
Pretending that all of this stuff was simply just happening and that it wasn't just an orchestrated scam. That's all and so
What I want to do is let's suggest a few things that should be in the Constitution
If the situation was anything like we were told which is the Articles Confederation had been passed
Everybody was living on them for years
We'd worked for Britain and then they came up to have this thing where they were going to make some amendments
But then within the first week or ten days it all switched over to no amendments
Just the Virginia plan and replace the entire government. Okay with no real
Objection by anybody. It's just a moronic story on its face
but
Even if it was there why in the world when they create the Senate which is basically the state's
Representation and under the Artists Confederation. There was only the states all the states had one vote in
The Congress and under the Artists Confederation. They all got one vote
Okay
and you could send up to seven guys the state could send up to seven people but only one vote and
The beauty of it was that they could pull them back anytime and put other people up there because these people up there in
Congress were basically the state's representative in effect the lawyer that the state sent to
Represent them and vote on their behalf and vote as their proxy. That's what they were
Well, that's what the Senate supposedly is and then you have the grand compromise with the House of Representatives shit
Okay
Well, the senators are not chosen in the same way that they were chosen under the Artists Confederation
Because they aren't capable of simply pulling them back anytime. They have this six-year term
That they run on. Well, this is idiotic. This is makes no sense at all
Why would this be an improvement? Even if you want to go 100% over this Constitution? Give the government its new power and all this other shit
Okay, well the senators all need to be the exact same thing. You want to have two senators from each state
I don't know how it makes any damn difference. I'd have two or one if you have two or one
Your and your senators are splitting if the state doesn't want to split its vote
Then they just pull them back and give them a vote
Why don't I give them ten votes if you're gonna have like that give them ten give them fifty give them a hundred
It makes no sense. Each state was supposed to have a choice inside of the Senate
And yet they dream this thing up with all of this
overlapping
Election time so that nobody can ever change the Senate the states can't even control the Senate because you're only getting
one of your senators elected
Periodically and they're six years and they're staggered
And so even if there's a huge issue the best you can ever do is turn over a third of the Senate
Well, this is idiotic
There's no reason at all that the senators shouldn't have been the exact same type of representative that existed under the
Art of Confederation and the fact that there's no arguing about it
The fact is no explanation for any of it this fact that they have this idea that the Senate needs to be
Stayed and this and controlled and oh a contemplative body and all this other shit. Why would the states agree to this?
Why would you want a situation where you have a lawyer and
You appoint the lawyer to represent you and then you can't do anything about that lawyer no matter how off the rails
He goes for six years
Nobody would take this you can fire your lawyer anytime you send him up there
He's not doing exactly what you want you fire him you bring him back
But that's not the way it's set up for senators
See so that's right there the fact that there's no discussion about it the fact that there's no
arguing about it the states there was no
Objection about it that it just flew right through with all these
Anonymous approvals right away within a few months that just shows you it's complete shit because anybody was actually thinking about it
Would just say well look if we're gonna have senators
Which is the equivalent of what we have in the Art of Confederation
Then they need to be elected so-called nominated sent up there by the state house of each state in the exact same way
And they need to be able to be pulled back
All you hear about today is this nonsense about term limits
Well, there's no term limit in any of these things of course in the original
Constitution and the only way to get term limits is the constitutional amendment
Otherwise you can't do anything about it, but term limits don't help you term limits simply incentivize the people up there being crooked
That's all much faster. That's all they
Incentivize the entire thing being a far more
rapid
Corruption because you only have a limited amount of time
The thing you need is recall and the way the Art of Confederation was set up the recall was automatic
It didn't even have anything to do with the federal government
They had nothing to do with the federal government
The states had a representative up there and they could pull them back and change them out anytime they wanted
And the federal government had nothing to do with it and then the Senate system
Completely and totally destroyed all of that and basically wiped out the ability of the states to really have any representation up there
and this is of course again not possible if there was
Legitimately going any dispute about it and at a very minimum. We should have all sorts of legitimate
Discussion around this issue. This is no possible way a lawyer representing the state
At the convention would give on a point like this. This makes no sense at all. There's no reason at all to do it
There's literally no reason at all to do it
So the fact that that's not there to me just is proof-positive that
There was never any legitimate arguing about any of this that the Constitutional Convention did not occur like they claim
Because it's impossible that this would have been missed and the fact that it wasn't raised immediately as a severe objection
to the document making it impossible any state to ever approve it is just
It speaks for itself in my opinion and the way it's explained away doesn't make any sense because
They direct everybody distract everybody and deflect everybody into this idea of this great compromise
About how the small states wanted to keep it as one vote and then the larger states didn't think that was fair
They needed more representation for the people and they had this so-called great compromise
This is supposedly the thing. Well, of course forget the fact that we have literally no
Information about this for all practical purposes. There's nothing forget Madison's notes 50 years later
Forget the shit that was turned over by Washington supposedly and not been published for 30 years
That's not actual information or proof of anything people. There's nothing going on at the time in the
Newspapers there's nothing going on anywhere. There's no people
There's no demanding it and nothing about this makes any sense the idea that just because you have more people you get more
Say, okay, why it was already set up so that whatever value you had in your state
That's what you had to pay your representative proportion of
It already was and they didn't make any change
To this such that if you have more people you have to pay more taxes out of the state to have this kind of
Allocation and proportion between direct and indirect taxes and I've showed you how all of that's been completely and totally ignored
By the 16th amendment, which they have completely and totally distorted and act as though they can now directly tax your wage
Which is a direct tax without apportioning it
So the so-called argument to have a house of representatives makes no sense
If it takes passing through both of them in order to get to the president
How are you going to get past a senate?
If the senate says no, well, there is no getting past the senate
It doesn't matter if the larger states all want it
There's in effect a veto in the senate
And that's why they had to set it up not like the artist confederation where the states could actually control it
But in this other crazy fashion where they lost all control of the senators
They lost all control of the senators
With this six-year thing that runs on and there's another reason which is that
Both the house and the senate are now actually
Going to set their own wages based upon the taxes the federal government gets well under the art of confederation
The representatives that went up to represent the state
They were all paid by the state and all of their expenses and costs everything else was borne by the state
They were from they didn't pay themselves the system
They've set up here with both the house the senate is that the lawyers you send up to represent you
You don't get to withdraw anytime and the lawyers get to decide the rules under which they get paid
And to set up all sorts of election processes to get themselves into office
Again utterly absurd and nonsensical no reason to do any of it
The way you control the federal government is by having the states
themselves be able to check the federal government
The great scam they've pulled is trying to pretend that the federal government somehow internally checks itself with these three different branches
And everybody can look around and see that that doesn't work and any lawyer
Who's simply looking at the document knew it wouldn't work. That's what the antifederalists all said
But the fact that that's no part of the conversation and that now the whole thing is this
Lens of the brilliance and the genius of the structure. That's all you ever hear about. It's just a total fraud
even if you wanted to have a so-called
representation of the number of people in the state
For each one of the states in addition to this other thing
As i've just showed you it doesn't make any sense because even if you have two of them
If it has to get past both of them, then the only one that matters is the senate
Because the states with the smaller states will just say no if they don't want it. That's it
It doesn't matter how overwhelming it passes in the house of representatives if the senate says no
And so the entire great compromise is nonsense, but on top of that
There's yet another reason that exposes the fraud. Look
Even if you want to give these states this second house by-cameral legislature and all this other stupid shit
There's absolutely no reason in the world why the state houses in each state shouldn't simply be able to
nominate and send up a representative for the senate
They send to and then they send up however many they get with regards to the house of representatives
They send that up and the people control that by voting and controlling their state house
And that's the way it really should work
But the way they've set it up
It's become completely and totally removed from that where the congressmen are not connected to the state house at all
They have their own pay their own control. They have all the franking privileges and all this other shit
They dream up they dream of these elections and then the people
Don't know who they can really vote for and then they rig these elections up and it's all out the window
If the state house was the one who simply sent up people to go represent them in the house of representatives
On behalf of the people of their state
Then
That at least would make some sense because then all you have to do is control your state house
If you control your state house and you make them do the right thing
Then you get to control your congressional representatives. That's the way real representative republics would work
Not to split it all up where you have a vote for a local guy a vote for a state guy a vote for a federal guy
They're all totally disconnected from each other. They have nothing to do each other. No
You watch one basket of eggs and you vote for the guy that represents you in the state
And you make sure he votes the right way if he doesn't you pull him out
And then you switch over your state house and you can immediately turn over everybody in the federal government
You see how that would work?
That if you didn't like what they were doing at the state house with your representation and both the house of representatives
And in the senate you didn't like what was going on with the people they were sending up there
You would simply boot out the people at the state house
And the new people would simply immediately turn over the people who are sitting in the house of representatives in the senate
And it would all be fixed immediately. That's completely and totally impossible now under this new system
But do you see the basic structure? I'm talking about
It's so fundamental
It's such a hugely important fundamental change that they made by taking it out of the house
in each one of the state
legislatures and by
Eliminating the fact that they can simply withdraw them at any time and switch them out
That's the key if the people in each state were represented in congress
By the people that they wanted
And that was through the state legislature being able to control them
Because they paid them and they can bring them back and replace them at any time
Well now the federal government is free to go do all these supposed things the federal government needs to do
But it has to do it in a manner that the states all
Agree to and the people agree to through their states
With just that simple
Construct shift that you don't have these elections
You have all the states being represented in the exact same way. You have the senate in the exact same situation
You have the united states congress all the same powers it supposedly has now
All of them you don't have to change one little thing
All you do is change out the way those people get put up there
And you revert back to the arts and federation system of the state houses
Actually sending them up there and then the state houses having full control to bring them back
They pay for them. They required to put up for their lodging
You don't create an entirely new set of independent politicians sitting in a government that's above the states
With the supremacy clause that doesn't answer the states in any form or fashion
Do people understand how simple this is that you can still have this so-called supremacy law in there
Which is absurdity. I'm not changing you're not getting rid of anything that's in there
I'm just saying that if you're going to have this construction that we have
You don't have a check and balance with the senate the house the president
And the so-called judiciary all working for the same people who answer to nobody
You have all those groups of people and they all simply answer
Ultimately to the people in the states through their own state houses
And then the people don't have to follow all these machinations. They just see we don't like what's happening
You can see how your people voted in the state and you can say no, we don't change that out
And you simply boot out the people in your own state house
And then the congress is all switched out at that same time
The senate is all switched out at that same time and you get the kind of people in there you want as it's set up
This is totally and completely impossible
And that's why I tell people all the time that the checks and balances
For all of this nonsense that they talk about
They're all in there to make sure that the people in the states can really never check or balance the federal government
That's the real goal of so-called checks and balances and it's just never discussed
She says absolutely never discussed and it's it's just hilarious to me that
Such a simple change
One is not discussed at all
Nobody ever brings it up. It's not any part of the discussion about the constitutional construction and how supposedly brilliant it is
It's just completely and totally ignored
Imagine the world
Imagine how different it would be imagine how little
Control the federal government could get with this simple change in that
Every one of the supposed structures is in place the bicameral brilliant compromise
The idea of having greater representation for larger states with more people blah blah. That's all still in there
The only difference is that the number of people sitting in the house
They get elected by the same people in the state legislatures as the senate does and the state gets more representation
The states people get more representation through this process
And the states themselves control the salaries and the states control the perks and the
Housing for each one of the members up there
They could simply buy housing up there and the people could stay up there when they were up there
And if they weren't doing a good job, they pull them back exactly like a real legal representative
The idea that you lose control of a legal representative for years at a time
It's just so asinine
And stands the entire concept so much on its head that it's hilarious to me
How much it is ignored in every single discussion of this document and our so-called government
This idea of periodic elections think of all the stuff that happens in between that people forget all about
And there's nothing you can do it's like well, what are you gonna do if we we get rid of them now
Then we get this other terrible person in there
Through this other election
Well, that wouldn't be the case if it was all just simply sent up there by the state legislatures
They could just send another conservative person up there who did that
And on top of that, they could then punish this person on their own
For all the malfeasance they engaged in and hold them personally liable for going up there as a representative and doing
Exactly the opposite of what they were sent up there to do no different than suing your own lawyer
Who goes and actually destroys your case or discloses confidential information
Or refuses to do what you've requested in fact attempts to bind you into other things
This would solve virtually all of the problems we have virtually all of them
Because the states wouldn't have to worry about the fact that it just goes on and on and on and congress just keeps
No, they just pull their guys back immediately as soon as it happened. They'd pull them back that day
Like they just go there and have a vote that week
They're pulled back and another one's sent up there and that's it
It's all over it's nothing you can do about it
And there's really only one other thing you have to do
In there in this constitution at it and that would be
Have that all laws being passed by congress they have to sunset and whether or not you want to have them sunset every two years
Or four years
I personally think they need to sunset every two years
And that's a very reasonable amount of time
To have to reanalyze if they have no problem doing that for things like tax cuts
They have them sunset out, but they don't sunset out any of this stuff
They do that gives them more power, but if you just have all the laws having to sunset every two years
And I would actually even be fine with it making every four years as long as you had this other stuff
I've just suggested in there if you had them sunset every two years or four years
And you had this ability of being able to immediately pull back and congress would simply switch over
Immediately as soon as something got passed that was shit
You'd have other congressmen go in there you could probably just get it repealed right then
And then just have it set aside but regardless you have to have some kind of sun setting so that
The stuff doesn't just run on and on and keep growing and expanding and everything else
You have to have standalone votes for each one of these things at least every two to four years
And otherwise the law simply passes out. That's it
If you only had those those little minor changes left everything else in there
Every single other thing in the constitution just think how much
Things would change think how differently things would have progressed
Think how impossible it would be for the federal government to run on and have all this insane power
It would be totally and completely impossible
But the federal government still have the supremacy they claim they needed
It would still have the ability to pass all these laws to supposedly stop all this end fighting
But have the ability to do all these things it would just have to answer to the actual people and the states themselves
That's what it would have to answer to and the way it's set up
It doesn't answer to any of them as everybody can see
As everybody can see because it's been set up to make sure it can't you've got the staggered senate
With six year terms you got the house flipping all the time time
So those guys are just simply constantly raising money and 100 subject to massive amounts of corruption
And no way to get them out once they get in
They're constantly being reelected at rates that make communist countries blush
It's preposterous even though people don't like them
Why because they're highly incentivized to bring back all of the pork to their own districts if they do
Then that's fine because the people are
Perversely disincentivized to make the thing reasonable
They're incentivized to try to get as much they can from the federal government into their own local districts
That's what they're actually incentivized to do
And the only way to stop any of that like I said is to attempt to do these kinds of things with it
And anybody who is setting this thing up and looking at it reading the constitution the way it is would see
That this is a serious problem and the fact that it's never discussed and that your holy elections are supposedly this big deal
Just shows me that it's not legitimate
It's true you could have the people's voice heard but the people's voice needs to be heard at a state level
Where they're controlling their state legislatures
That's where it needs to be done. So you can focus all your attention on to one person
And really these local elections, they should have some kind of additional controls on them
All these things have to be able to be pulled back
But again, the most important thing is that you can pull someone back
You cannot have legal representatives running around for years at a time
Even two years is ridiculous
That you don't get to remove your lawyer for two years
He's just up there to do whatever and then you may not be able to get rid of them
Or they may rig up a system where you either get to choose dei
Or you get to choose for some kind of xio war, which is the way they've set it up
So it doesn't even matter who gets up there
You could have way more controls with these simple things. I've just explained very very simple
And this doesn't even touch on another thing they should have had in there, which is two-thirds super majorities to pass things
They had that in the artist confederation. There's absolutely no good reason why they get rid of it
If you're going to then expand out and have all this control and supremacy
You at a minimum have to have a super majority inside of these systems
So that there's not constant arguing you have to
But they don't do that they do it on this little tiny limited number of things and then they expand out
The authority of the government at the federal level to pass this this incredible array of stuff and to tax directly and to
involve themselves in commerce and every kind of thing
And then they don't bring along the two-thirds super majority to pass
This is obviously a coup an attempt to acquire power
That's all it clearly is
a preposterous and absurd
obviously on his face
And yet there's almost no discussion of it the tiny number of things that require any kind of super majority in there
They're just they're never even
They never even come into play because almost nobody can get agreement on it
And the fact that you can't get agreement on it just shows there is no agreement the people don't want it
The states haven't agreed to it the people in the states aren't in general agreement about it
Trust me when you get say three quarters
Of the people in states to agree to something. There's no real arguing about it
There's no division in the country. There's nothing but you can't run a scam
With those kinds of limitations
So even just requiring the bare minimum two-thirds super majority would stop almost all the legislation
That's bullshit from getting through and if you are going to expand it out with regards to any kind of taxation any kind of
Direct commerce things like that those things needed to be even higher super majorities
But the fact that none of it's really even in there and that the way the articles of federation worked
To limit that stuff is all just passed away and ignored and they act like well
It was failing couldn't work. They couldn't get agreement
They say all these sort of things again and again and again about the supposed articles of federations failings
In order to justify why the constitution was such a fantastic advance
And those are the only ones I even want to talk about today. I've got a whole other show of
Types of changes and I'm not sure if I'll get through it in one more show or not
But you can see that if we just changed
The manner in which senators and congressmen were so call elected
And the fact that they could be immediately recalled that they were only paid by the states
That alone would
Virtually eliminate all the problems you have you then
feather in a sunset provision for all these federal laws
And some kind of additional supermajority in order to pass the stuff
And congress has been massively neutered
Massively neutered. It still has all the things that they claim they needed
Supreme this and the executive that judicial this okay get all that
It's just that it's been brought under control by the states and the people
And that's why these things are not there. That's why these things are never discussed
That's why there could never be a constitutional convention
Where you actually talked about the amendments that could actually come out that you could actually have paperwork about it
People could never be shown that because then it would become obvious that nobody was actually
Objecting to this the whole thing is a complete charade to show
This is why you could never have any of the documents
It disclosed to the people because then you see that none of this stuff was talked about it
It would just be absurd and obvious that there's no real resistance even though the states
Supposedly couldn't even agree to give the federal government the power to tax a tariff on foreign goods
A minor five percent tariff that was shut down as an amendment because Rhode Island didn't want it
And they can't agree about all these different things
But supposedly they can all agree a bunch of them unanimously and immediately to create this huge new government
Why well because you had to have this fairytale story about the way the constitutional convention went and it had to be incredibly controlled
Unbelievably controlled so no press no nothing and that's why I just don't believe it was actually happening because you can't really control all those things
You can't really control all these things unless of course they've gone back through and just literally scraped all of the press stories
And there's an entire history of what was actually going on then has been completely flipped and changed. That's also a possibility
That's also a possibility. I think it's more complicated and difficult to pull off
Then the simply not have the congress occur like they claimed and then do just backfill the whole thing
30 and 50 years later
That's much simpler to do in my opinion
But the other is a possibility that it was going on and they went along and they
Collected it all up just like the pope went around and collects everything and puts it into the Vatican library
And they don't like to just pull it up just kill people and burn all the copies
They take the one they want they throw it in their library
And then nobody can see it this they could have done something like that's possible
There also could have been a reset for all we know a mud flood. There's anything could have been happening
We have no idea. I'm all simply saying that the one thing that could not have been happening
Is the one they tell us that one does not make any sense whatsoever
Just no sense whatsoever. No set of lawyers could ever look at this document
And then agree
To the document without I mean just such strong objection to the way these people are being elected
That just it completely guts the power of the people in the states
It just runs on and creates this system of totally untouchable people for years at a time running on passing laws
And we all have to follow it just it literally makes no sense at all
Literally just makes no sense at all and yet it's passed off as this brilliant system
And now it's spread all over the world and this is why the governments all over the world don't attack
And point out the absurdity the fairytale of our so-called founding because then their own fairytale and absurdity would be exposed in that
Nobody would ever agree to a legal representative
Set up in the way that we have these legal representatives all over the world now where they go up and then for years at a time
They're basically completely untouchable and the only people who can do anything about any of them are the same crooks who are up there doing it
It's so totally upside down absurd. It really is
And I hope that's clear to people
I've really wanted to focus on just a few of them in this episode because they're so critical and they're so fundamental
And I think that when you can understand what I've been saying here that it would just become crystal clear
What a total fraud the entire thing is
Because of what a simple fix this is and that anybody involved back then would have known it because
That was the system they were using under the Articles of Federation
And to the extent you even want to have two houses to buy camel great compromise horse shit
That's fine
The state houses send them up one person for that house and then they send up a whole bunch of people for the other
And they can pull it back whenever
But of course that also exposes how silly having two of them is
It just exposes all the absurdity of it. It's just right there. It's just all just fully exposed
so
All right. Well, I think that's uh, that's all I want to say about the topic today
Like I said, I don't want to get into any of the additional types of amendments
I want to bring those up starting in another show and let people really think about how
Incredible the change would be from such simple things and the
Way it is that true
Objections and lawyers and analysis and arguing about and the federalists anti federalists and all these supposed things that went on
It's just all this stuff is missing
Just all this stuff is missing and it's just totally impossible that all of this stuff is missing
Even from this little list. I just gave you just completely impossible that all the stuff is missing and that there was a legitimate debate
It's just not you can't have all those things together. They don't make sense together. That's all
It's the dog who didn't bark and people don't see it because the constitutional scholars so-called in academia and the media
Are so completely and totally on board and completely controlled that none of these issues are ever actually honestly discussed
It's always the same narrative the artists in federation were failing. They didn't work
Everybody knew it the country was about to fall apart blah blah blah. We had to have the government wasn't strong enough
We had to have this other thing and this fantastic solution was come up with by these brilliant men who were selfless and wigs and
Nickers and they sat down and really struggled and and they created this incredible freedom machine with the three co-equal branch
It's always the same exact story and then you argue about how we as people aren't living up to this dream
And that we are failing by not controlling this government even though it's been set up so that it can't be controlled
It's set up so it can't be controlled
It's set up so you can do all this stuff and then no different than some kind of crazy narcissist
They're flipping and blaming you. They're dervowing you
They're deflecting and attacking and reversing the victim and offender
And claiming it's the people's fault for not voting hard enough and organizing it's impossible
The way it's been set up the checks and balances are so extensive and complete in this thing
Even if you win it all the supreme court takes away. You have no control
It's all ludicrous and absurd
But it's it's a very elaborate brainwashing system that they have going and like I said
I'm convinced the reason this stuff is not brought up by any of our so-called enemies
Is because then it would expose the fraud of their own governments. That's all and the fact that their own people are never represented
So so I think that's uh, that's a good place to stop
So if you want to follow me, you can I'm legal man at us crime review on twitter if you didn't know I had twitter
Thank you everybody in patreon. I hope you guys have been enjoying this series. Like I said, I've been enjoying making it
I was looking forward to making this episode and the next one
I enjoyed though. I've enjoyed all the episodes
I've made in this series frankly just because it's been so amazing to me to find out how blatant and obvious it all is
And yet how completely and totally ignored it all is it's the most
ignored blatant narrative I've ever come across like I said, even the civil war and
Every kind of historical fantasy they all have all sorts of counter narratives running out there
You can do research about and look into I've literally never found a website or a book or anything like this
Just never that talks about it. It's true
You have a couple that kind of talk about how there was a coup and this and that but they don't talk about
95% of the issues I've raised in this series. It's just
It's amazing. It's just I don't know. It's phenomenal to me that such a thing can just be hidden in plain sight
It's really amazing
So I'm so thank you to everybody in patreon who helped support this show. I really appreciate it
And uh, I'm glad people seem to be enjoying barnum world every time we go on a show
Or I should say every time andrew goes on a show because I'm not going on the shows to promote it
Not because I don't love the movie. I have other obligations
in a business
I'm just really not in a position to be able to do that but
I see every time it kind of goes on, you know, we get some more bumps and it's still just
Chugging right along and I think uh at any time it can catch fire and people seem to like it
I read some of the comments periodically. I look at the thumbs up
It's it's not like it's kind of split and again
I think that's probably attributable to the fact that the people who are currently aware of it and seeing it are people
Who are probably on our side anyway, but regardless, uh, hopefully it's opening some eyes and I
Hope again that people who help make that possible are happy about that
And beyond that I don't have anything else. Let me go ahead and wrap it up
You guys have been a great audience as usual. Everybody. Have a nice night or day wherever you are
Take care. Thank you everybody
One more time for legal man