There's only gonna get a wall of t-shine and a breeze
Starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality
Through our journey from there to here
we find one another and ourselves
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last
we gaze onward in reflection of the day
Help your own people, help your own people
Welcome to the Daily Wrap-Up
Friday August 14th, 2026
Thank you for joining me today
Have a few updates I want to get into before we get right into the show
The obvious title explains itself
There's an important executive order that I want to discuss
I'm sure you've all seen
And what it really creates into the guise of fighting criminality
Which is pretty common for our government
And governments at large
And I'm going to talk about some of the things we discussed
Importantly around the cyber security, spyware conversation
How that connects to Trump's administration
How that ties to ICE
How that connects to the larger surveillance apparatus
And of course some updates on Iran today
But a couple of things I want to update you on to begin
I'm going to talk about in the beginning
A recent thing we just put out today
Primarily Whitney, I think she's posting it actually
She posted on Telegram today
On elsewhere tomorrow, I guess
And I think she got involved with an interview
Who wasn't able to do it
And then Derek and myself are going to be posting it today
Which is the, I guess, artificial intelligence
Transparency pledge
Now we have the IMA
Like outstanding tool that we put out there
For everybody to utilize
I'm going to talk about that in a second
And also want to update some things on recently
I talked about it with Steve on the A&M wake up
But what I've been dealing with in regard to my father
Which is why I've been a little bit absent
In what's going on
I just wanted you guys to update you
Who didn't hear it on the show about
Just very briefly
About something we talked about with my father
Was in the hospital
Who ultimately went in
Dealing with the blockage
Was kind of backed up
And ultimately had bio-building up in his stomach
And didn't know what it was
Thought it was cancer, went through this whole process
Something very common, as I understand it
Which is why they probably looked that direction
Turned out not to be what they thought it was
Long story short after months of treatment
And all the money and everything else
All they ultimately did was conduct a bypass
Around the duodenum and the pancreas area
Where basically just circumventing
What was causing the problem
And then ultimately sent him home
Now what did I tell you when we talked about it last
I said well you know me
I don't have a lot of faith in the system
Especially after we went through
And actions I've seen taken in hospitals
But ultimately I said
If he goes home and he gets better
And never has this problem again
Well this was a success
As much as I still may disagree with the way they do things
Western medicine that would have been a success
However if the problem continues
And comes back well then that's not a success
That was just some financial profit
For the industry of the medical
For the hospital
For an invasive surgery
That was not dealing with the problem
And even to this very moment
Which may shock people
People don't even believe me when I tell them this
They still to this day do not know
What's causing the problem
Now that's not that uncommon
It's crazy anyway but the point is
They're continually driving him in the direction
Of invasive surgical options
Without even knowing what the problem is
In many ways there are things that we believe
Could be taken to find out what the problem is
That they're not even trying to accomplish
And so he's back in the hospital
And they just put him through another surgery
And unfortunately it looks like
Another one is in the wings
And what they were just telling him
Is what a lot of people were telling me back in the first
Point which is now they're basically saying
Like this is your life
You know how to have a bag outside like the whole thing
Even though they sold him on the idea that the surgery
Would bring him back to his normal life
Now who knows best of intentions and all that
We still believe we're dealing with some kind of
An autoimmune issue which is even what
The doctors argued is likely
But still have yet to even look further to find out
I'm not a doctor
You know I could be missing something
But what's very frustrating about the whole thing
Is that it's something that we could have seen
We could have
Gotten around in the beginning before we got
Into multiple surgeries and the financial
Industry that goes around all of that
And only ending up with the same problem that
Continued. Now
Not to get too much into it because you know
Not everybody you know this is personal
But it's just so incredible to watch
This continue to happen and to watch the people
You know in a system we all can see
We can acknowledge, we can
Outline peer-reviewed science has covered
What we're dealing with and whether
We're talking about the surgical options and
You know look post COVID let's be real
Leading cause of death in this country is medical
Treatment it used to be three let's not pretend
It's not one after COVID-19
But let's talk about all the rest of it the shots
Themselves statins I mean you name it
It's clear that we can
We're not being
Honestly
Engaged with by the authorities
With any number of these conversations
Especially when it comes to health
Now I feel like it's relevant in general to what
We're going to talk about today but nonetheless
I just wanted to point that out for people
Because that's where we are right now and I'm
Frankly pretty terrified what's going to happen
But I'm you know we're doing our best
And he's more amenable to us because he
Has a lot of reverence for the industry
My late grandfather was a doctor
And so it's hard to get past that
But anyway if you guys have any advice
You have any thoughts I mean I'm
Rarely get back to all of it but you know
How to reach out let me know if you've got somebody
In the area that you might think may help
We're looking for a specialist now to actually get some
In-depth you know
Look at it from a perspective of possible
Vaccine injury from a possible auto
Unissue that's being ignored and all of that
But so that's what we've been dealing with in general
On that side of it now another update
I want to include which is where we're going to start
The show today which was around the IMA
Now I'm actually just going to play the thing we put out today
But I think it's very important to not just
Play this but to talk about it and understand
Where it's coming from because there's a lot of
You know and I understand that skepticism
And hesitation about anything that outlines
Some kind of a you know
We'll get into it and read it and it'll be clear
But the way to look at this
In regard to what we're going to talk about which is our IMA
Transparency pledge that I would argue
Is very clear I don't see a
World in which anybody can frame
Radical transparency
Or honesty
Ever as a bad thing
And that's important to understand
Is that we're there
Oh I'm making sure
Hold on let me double check everything is
Actually live here for a second
Make sure you guys are actually wild
No it looks like that's not playing
Isn't that interesting
Hold on let me double check
A couple of things really quickly while you guys are here
It does look like
Let me know in the chat if you guys are there
Whether or not you're seeing
The live show
I'm just checking rumble it looks like
YouTube's not playing
Okay okay we're good on the
Rumble
We're good on rumble so
I'm not sure what else isn't playing on there
But let me know in the chat if you guys are having problems
You know for those that have been watching this show
We deal with this every single time so let's just keep going
But the point is to discuss this from a point
Of where the world is going
Right we have artificial intelligence that is being
Thrust into our lives no matter what we want
Seemingly and so obviously
We get a lot of people in the community
They're saying you know there's just so much as
Become I just I don't even like the term quite
Frankly but so commonly used
AI slop everywhere
And it's obvious right in some
Cases and others it's a little bit more surreptitious
And so people are worried that there is content
Out there being created
And knowingly in the sense of
Whether I mean AI content being created
And being sold to you as it's not AI
But the problem is that's not all of it's even malicious
There may be thought they're using it to manipulate you
But there may be people out there who think
They're doing good with it and maybe they are
I have a hard time believing
In the endpoint that's where it would go but
My point is that we know that this stuff is misleading
People it's
Algorithmically channeling people into certain information
Rather than the omission of specific information
And so it ends up misguiding people
Misleading you and they become overly dependent on how
These things work and so we thought it
Was important as the IMA as
Individuals to put this forward and say
You know and highlight why we think it's important
Simply to be transparent
About the use here about your
Use of AI
Specifically chatbots large language
Model kind of stuff
And I think that's very important so
To get into that and of course like I said we're going to
Get into the other topics we mentioned actually first
What I wanted to highlight on just on this segment
In general since it overlaps with Whitney
Who we're going to talk about Derek and I recently
Recorded as I mentioned to you our first
Episode of open source
And this was originally this is why
I actually kind of soft rolled on the TOCA article
As I kind of briefly pointed to in the last show
That was going to be our original focal point
And then we decided to do it on the
Number one specific part 16
Of the sustainable development goals
Article that they wrote years ago
Because it's wildly relevant and pertains to
The global governance as clearly
Being driven by Trump's administration including
In addition to every other government
That's a part of the global apparatus
We're talking about but it was a great
Discussion my point of bringing it up for
Is that I had forgotten that it was so
Basically this is a podcast for in the minute
Hangout that Whitney's putting on
Using Derek and I as the hosts so going
Over their work and so it'll be kind of a
Routine thing where we go over larger
Articles and do our best to make it
Under an hour that's the whole point so
It's not longer than actually reading the article
At the very least that you can listen to
While you're driving but ultimately
They are going to be putting it out so
I think right now they're possibly putting
Out one more thing and the next week this will come out
Otherwise it'll be coming out in about a week
But ultimately it's going to be not immediately
That's why the so just
It'll be coming out soon look forward to it
Make sure to you know
It'll be an interesting show I'm looking forward
To Derek and I had a great time going over this
Now
2024 we announced the independent
Media alliance for those that don't know
Now I'm not going to go through all this
But the simple point was an idea
Because of the pre
Trump second administration
And kind of Israel war and all the different things
That were going on and as we talked about
We felt this really clear push to attack
People who were starting to break down
The two-party illusion people who were
Starting to call out major central parts
To the larger illusion not just within left
Or right and we got called black
Pilled and all the purity test allegations
And all the stuff we went through which are
And we were absolutely correct on everything
We outlined in this point
Now that's not to say we're right about everything
Nobody is but the reality being
That we were shown to be correct
About the aiming from this point
And why it was necessary
The fake new media
Independent alternative media being
The primary culprit
Now that is included just to point out
That this is something that the IMA is now putting forward
Now I'm going to watch this first
And actually let's just do
We're all read through this first so it's more clear
So I put this out on T-Lab
Derek put this out on his as well, Whitney
Putting on hers as well. The Independent Media Alliance
Announces an AI transparency pledge
Now in September 2024
Whitney, Ryan, Derek created
The Independent Media Alliance
A collaborative effort focused on
Promoting objective fact-based media
From a diverse team of journalists
Podcasters, writers and just as
Efforts to manipulate alternative media journalists
And their audiences kicked into high gear
In the lead up to the US presidential election
Of that same year
From the beginning the IMA's emphasis has been
On countering narratives being seated within
This alternative and quote media space
Including but not limited to as we started
With new party illusion
Support for imperial wars
Fifth generation warfare, technocratic solutions
To legitimate problems and we talked about
These things as a broad sense
Now I'm sure people disagree with
Just saying that these things are
But this was how I mean understanding
That there's a false paradigm
Is not debatable in my opinion
Doesn't mean it's all encompassing
But it's about being able to acknowledge that
Support for imperial wars is something that seems
Pretty obvious that yet is not actually
How people feel. That's a little Trump game
Right now or the fifth generation warfare
Dynamic and how it's being used against us
Through the new media and all of this stuff
Now the IMA efforts were meant to build consistency
As alternative media in the years prior
To 2024 had largely been against
Imperialism, digital tyranny
And international U.S. presidential policies
With 2024 we saw efforts to
Undermind what we believe were fundamental
Precepts of representing a real
Alternative to the mainstream media
Which has frequently manufactured consent
For war and the erosion of civil liberties
And constitutional rights
While also framing federal policies and
Elections as the preferred if not
Only solution to our collective problems
Over the last two years the IMA
Has held monthly panels and debates
Featuring alliance members and guests
With the goal of dissecting these narratives
In the hopes of providing a nuanced perspective
To our collective audiences
While the IMA has seen a positive response
To our efforts we know we can do much more
To combat the co-opting of the independent media
By well funded podcasts and
Mainstream alternative media platforms
In furtherance of this goal the IMA
Is announcing two new yet
Related efforts that seek
To provide new avenues for our collective audiences
To free their news feeds from big tech interference
In creating the IMA the criteria
We originally used to choose members
Was based on which individuals and outlets
Do not fall prey to the following narratives
Lies associated with COVID-19
The lies associated with party illusion
The lies justifying the Israeli genocide
In addition to these essential points
We have come to believe that it is necessary
To refine the criteria under which
The IMA operates
We believe that this alliance of independent
Critical thinkers and journalists should be
Refined from the above to not only include
Those original ideas but to express
More given recent developments
The new proposed IMA criteria are as follows
Members of the IMA believe that no
Government, political party, or block
Of nations represents a savior from the
Villains of the old world
Or their efforts to create a new one
This is because we recognize that the
Issues we face are largely driven
By transnational networks of oligarchs
And allied organizations
Have committed numerous
State crimes against democracy
Have manipulated our world for generations
And have attempted to infiltrate alternative
News and media in order to distract
Would-be dissidents from this reality
This same transnational network
Is driving and enabling mass
Murder across the world recently in Gaza
Lebanon and Iran
While also controlling the big tech firms
And platforms that have been weaponized
To centralize control over news
And the free flow of information
We recognize that because of this control
Of our big tech, these criminal oligarchs
Also dominate and largely control
Artificial intelligence, which is being
Weaponized against the masses and being used
To undermine true independent journalism
As a consequence, we believe
That our audiences have a right to know
What outlets are using AI for their work
And to what extent
In keeping with these revised criteria
Of the IMA as stated above, the IMA
Plans to introduce this new AI
Transparency Pledge, a commitment
To our readers and listeners that we will
Disclose if and how
We use AI, and if not
I just read that weird, if we use
AI or not, and if so, to what extent
Please read the full IMA
Transparency Pledge
Now this is ultimately the point about the
AI, but obviously you can see the relevance
Of understanding why the
Artificial intelligence element is so
Important to what we were already discussing
Now, again
To be clear, this is about simply
Choosing if to or not, it's not going
To be forced on anybody, including even the
Members of IMA, it's their choice if they want
To sign on to the pledge to be transparent
About the use of AI, and I want to
All point out more in a second, but realize
And this is not even about, there are parts
Of the members of the IMA who've already
Decided they don't want to sign on to this
And not because they don't support this
In fact, explicitly stating a hundred
Percent agree with the incentive, the point
Is there's other reasons of not wanting
To pledge to something or not wanting, or
Having a different nuance or direction
The bottom line is it's not about being
Pro or not AI in this context, it's
Context, it's about simply being
Deciding to sign a pledge to your
Audiences to be transparent with its use
Now, again, maybe the others that are
Going to decide to do their own thing
Which is, by the way, what some are
Going to do, so I just want to be clear
About that, this is not meant to be
Some kind of lined in the sand in that
Sense, now it continues, rather the
Pledge itself says the IMA recognizes
The rising threat of AI as well
As that of AI adjacent tools and their
Use of data sets harvested by
Illegal surveillance programs and other
Actors will allow for transnational
Alligarchs and would-be technocrats
The opportunity, excuse me
Would allow transnational alligarchs
And would-be technocrats the
Opportunity to manipulate public
Perception and thus reality
To a degree never before witnessed
We stand wholeheartedly opposed to the
Use of AI to cognitively diminish
The critical thinking and intellect of
Its users, something which transnational
Alligarchs and their allies have openly
Admitted to, and we are also
Opposed to the use of AI as a weapon
Of surveillance and as a primary agent
For predictive policing, i.e.
Pre-crime. We also stand firm against
The hidden externalities that will
Likely result from the rapid expansion
Of AI tools, including the destruction
Of the natural environment and essential
Resources, e.g. water supplies, as well
As the replacement of human labor
With AI and AI-powered machines
Making much of the human population
Exploidable and even expendable in the
Eyes of the Alligarchs. Journalistic
Outlets and individual journalists who choose
To partner with the IMA
With the IMA commit to disclosing
To their audiences if they forgo the use of
AI tools or if they use them
For those that choose to use AI
Outlets and journalists will disclose how
AI is used, e.g. in the
Research process, in the production of
Their written articles, emails, etc.
Whatever they decide to use it for, the point
Is if you sign this, you'll simply make it clear
To what degree and where.
By committing to this pledge, outlets are committing to
Commit complete transparency about
AI use or lack thereof.
So far here who has signed on.
Finally, we offer to any and all independent
Journalists, content creators out there,
Indimedi outlets to take this pledge
Or make your own pledge for your audiences
Regardless of any formal IMA
Affiliation.
So the bottom line is this is a tool
That we would like to put out. What you're
Going to see from me is this symbol.
It'll make it clear that there was no AI
Used in any kind. You know it's
Like the no animals harmed in this product
Like that's what you're going to find this on
Stuff that we put out to make the point.
And this is all encompassing.
Now remember we were using
Images largely because
I found it a unique tool to work
Around the copyright allegations that
Were unjust in the first place.
But because of the importance of this
And even though I don't argue that using
Images is not even a like in my
Mind, it's about the creation of content
Allowing this to think for you.
But you could argue that's a small nuance.
And so I just simply said I'm none.
I've made the decision for personal
Choice for my you know for T lab
And what for there not to be any
And everyone can make those choices for themselves.
So I've also added as Derek as well
Basically our AI policy spot
Which you'll see on the website now just to post
A similar thing and then just I really
Just posted the transparency
Section of this and simply
Posted for our T lab version
As of this date forward T lab commits
To never using AI large language models
And the creation of content of any form
Seems that's pretty simple. Now again
Should I decide to change that the simple
Reality becomes I'm just pledging to
Be transparent about that but of course
My point is I don't see a world in
Which that'll happen and this is exactly
By the way why some people just don't want to
Commit to something that they don't know in the future
Will change and I understand that so
I very I really want to stress about not
Making this to be some kind of a line in the
Sand because there's people with good intentions
That may be right same like use the internet
Of using it to fight back or you creating
AI to fight the other one I mean I don't
Want to get into that I don't agree with that
From my perspective but who's to say that
I'm right about this it's a port you know
You guys can decide for yourselves now
I'm going to play the clip of our
Discussion just so many minutes long about
Just kind of walking through this and our opinions on it
And we'll get into starting from there
The connection well a quick couple points about
Some mRNA shots coming and then we'll get into
The cyber security conversation
Hey everyone this is Derek Bros with the
Conscious Resistance Network and I'm here with
My friends and colleagues Ryan Christian of
The Last American Vagabond and Whitney Webb
Of a limited hangout and we are all part
Of the Independent Media Alliance in fact
Some of you may know that two years ago
In 2024 the three of us founded
The IMA this was part of our effort
To bring together independent journalists
Contact creators and podcasters who we
Thought had their heads on straight
When it came to the Gaza issue
The two party paradigm and of course
COVID 1984 and since that time
We've been hosting panels we've been
Bringing people together to discuss
Important issues and trying to break through narratives
That are being seated in the independent
Alternative media and it's been a great success
But today we're coming to let you know
We have a brand new initiative that we're launching
Right now called the Independent Media Alliance
AI Transparency Pledge
We're really excited about this so Ryan
Won't you tell everybody what this is all about?
Yeah we're very excited about this because
It's something we've been talking about for quite a long time
We had a couple panels where it came up
It was clearly something that was expressed in the communities
People are having a hard time telling
What is and is not artificial intelligence
Where it's been used, where people
Allowed it to think for them and so
This kind of developed, Derek really spearheaded this
To develop a pledge or to really just
Outline very specifically whether
Where, how and where you're using it
To simply be transparent about
Your use of artificial intelligence
And it's a tool really
That we wanted to put out in the community for people
To choose to use for their own communities
For their own platforms and started by the IMA
And the idea being something that you can choose
To outline on, you know, we'll have
Our own pledges we're going to post on our websites
To outline how this will be outlined
For our specific websites but the idea
Is simply just to be honest about your use
A pledge to be honest about how AI
Is or is not used in your content
And I think everybody wants that right now
So very important time to ring it out
Yeah, and I definitely agree, Ryan
I think this is really important for readers
Right to know instead of trying to rely
On like other VC funded
AI startups
Trying to distinguish stuff for people
It, we
In developing relationships
With our readers and our audience
We want to be open and transparent
And so do the other people that are signing onto this pledge
Which again is not exclusive to the IMA
Anyone can
Agree to it and develop
Their own AI use policy
On their website just to let readers
Know how they are using it
If they are using it at all
And, you know, there's no
You can't really go wrong with radical
Transparency and radical truth
I think a lot of us in the IMA
Are very committed to that
To those feelings and so
I think this is a great
Move in an
In an era where AI
You know is impersonating people
And also, you know
Trying to drown out real voices
That are trying to hold power to account
Absolutely, so wherever
You're watching this you'll see the text to the
Full IMA pledge that the three of us put together
With the help of other IMA members
And again the idea is that this is
Just pushing this out into the
Sphere of the alternative media
If you're a content creator a journalist
Podcaster and you would like to be transparent
With your audience which we hope you would
Again, whether you use AI or not
We're not telling you what to do
We're just saying how about we be transparent about this
I've already got my AI use policy
On theconsciousresistance.com
Everybody here will have the same
And if you want to be a part of that
Please do let us know or start your own pledge
Circulate the pledge, that's the idea
We just want to really get this conversation going
Because as we all know it's going to become
Increasingly difficult to determine
What is human and what is AI
And we think that's by design
And I will say everywhere that I've shared this idea
The audience you guys out there have been very receptive
It seems like you all want transparency
And you are all sick of reading
Or watching something and knowing
That was probably made with AI
But that it's not being disclosed
And so that's what this is really about
We're not trying to attack anybody who's choosing
To use AI in one way or another
We're just saying let's be open
Let's be honest about it
I'll add to that that I think
On the back of what you said there Derek
It's very important to hear that
We all three have our opinions
About how it should be
Taking an all or nothing kind of a stance
In a time where it seems important
But that's the point of this pledge
Is about just simply demonstrating to what degree you are
And not necessarily criticizing others for their stance
And so the point is that there's going to be
Varying degrees of that use
I myself have been using images lately
And my point is because of this pledge
In the direction of it I've decided to not do that anymore
But there are varying degrees out there
People that use it in ways that I argue
Aren't necessarily a violation
Of how I would argue is the most important part
To focus on which is the thinking for you
Creating content using AI
And there are people out there that may
Use AI to fight back
And so the point is simply about being clear
About how it's being used
Not necessarily criticizing those who find a way to use it
That's for individual choices out there
But I think that's important
Yeah, just one other thing to add
Before you share a little more Whitney
I think that the three of us
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong
But I think besides the general pledge about transparency
That the three of us here though
Have all committed to not using AI
In the production of our articles
And the writing of our content
For me that includes emails, social media posts
We're not using AI to produce our videos
To make music for us
All those kinds of things
That's our particular commitment here
Everybody else will have their own way
Of approaching this pledge
Yeah, I guess
Just to add more information to that
We have some people that are using
In the IMA for example
That have signed onto the pledge
And are going to have a use policy
For example use AI for spell checking
Maybe the occasional thumbnail
Things like that
But in general, regardless of
How you're using it
In my opinion and in our opinion
It's about the reader's right
To know because
This should be about the audience
Informing the audience
And it's important to inform
The audience about how we're doing our work
With this new tool
Being so widely available
And used by people
And also being used
In ways that have raised concerns
Among a lot of our shared readership
About in terms of how
People are
Using those tools
To potentially do things
That readers may not necessarily like
So this is about
Disclosing so that readers can choose
What content they're consuming based on their
Own preferences and their own opinions about AI
And a lot of readers may not
Be affected by this at all
But there are some that care
And there are some that care a little bit
And only care about certain things
So the goal again is radical transparency
About how we're using AI
And
What we
And that we think people outside
Of the IMA should also consider having
Their own
AI use policies
And that's why we've made this pledge pretty much
Open to everybody
Yeah, absolutely. So if you're hearing this
And you have a favorite content creator
Journalist Podcaster and you would like them to
Be transparent, maybe send them this video
Send them the text of the pledge
And invite them to participate in
This whatever capacity they will
Before we wrap up Whitney did you want to share
I know that you are probably the most
Faked person on the internet
Using this tool that we're all talking about
This directly impacts you in terms of
Transparency and being able to determine
When an AI is used and not used
Maybe you want to speak to that before we wrap up
Yeah, well obviously of course
The fact that it's been so heavily used
To impersonate me and associate
Me with things I've never said
And I feel like in a lot of ways
It's been used to kind of attack my credibility
And reputation that I've worked
Really hard for for like a decade
You know obviously that color
Is my opinion a little bit and I
Understand that not everyone is going to
Feel that way but personally I
Feel like I'm being pushed and I think
A lot of this broader discussion
That the pledge is sort of related
To about efforts to decide
For these different
Companies or institutions
Or sites to sort of say
What's AI generated and what isn't
Is to basically push
Humans to verify
Most likely through something
Like digital ID or something so you can
Prove it's the real you and obviously
Because I'm a big years
Long critic of digital ID
And related infrastructure
I have felt that a lot of the AI
Impersonation just like the extreme
Scale of it
Targeting me
And my content
Has been sort of used to try and push me
To verify in those
Ways which I have not
You may think that for example if you follow me
On twitter or x that I
Verified by uploading my
ID I because of my follower
Account I was given a badge so I
Didn't do that but anyway it's been
Challenging to see all of that proliferate
And you know
Feel like I'm being pushed to do
Something that compromises my
Values so the best you know all I can
Really do is let people know where to
Find you know my stuff
And not every you know a lot of people
Still get tricked by it
But ultimately all we can do is try
And have our you know
Readers and followers
Go back to the source of where our content
Is made and look
For things like an AI you know
Use policy and know that
You know I personally don't use it
In my work and if you see something
That seems AI generated including me
I did not have anything to do with it
So I guess that's one example at least
You know in my personal case of why
I feel like this pledge is important
For me personally so people
Can distinguish between a lot of this content
That is generated and also
Because YouTube is labeling content
As AI or not they know that I
Didn't have anything to do
With it or at least I can help you
Know change the percentage
Of people that know by having
It on my side.
Great yeah thank you for sharing that
Ryan do you have any other closing thoughts
Before we wrap up and get out of here for today
Just to kind of put a fine point to what
You're saying there I mean it's such an obvious
You know because right now there's a lot of concern with these
And rightly so of these kind of
Problem reacting solution situations to trick
People into calling for
Verification of AI and that's exactly
What he's highlighting is this one of these kind of ideas
And what we're hearing a lot about are these
AI or not checkers from
Mainstream elements that are misrepresenting
People as AI and so
And there's a lot of concern that this somehow is similar
The point is this is a
Effective tool against
That and I want to make you know
Really highlight why that's so important is
We're talking about being transparent
Of the use that you can then publicize
In a way that then is counteracting the ability
To then be labeled otherwise and of course
That's still going to happen and those tools from the
Corporate media and you know establishment
Are there for the very purposes of censoring
People but if we're getting ahead of it
With being transparent about it to me that's
Like the antidote to where this is going
One of the many we're going to have to find I argue
As this thing gets worse digital
Idea and everything else but that's where this comes
From is a solution to that problem that's building
Around us and again I don't see how anybody
Could find a problem with being radically transparent
Or honest and that's something that we
Strive to be so thank you
Yeah perfect all right guys
Well thank you all for being here today for joining
Us stay tuned for more updates from
The internet you are going to launch an official website
Very soon working on some other projects stay
Tune for more panels of course you can find
Ryan at thelastamericanvagabond.com
The real Ryan and you can find the real Whitney at
Unlimitedhanghelp.com and myself at
Theconsciousresistance.com
Well that's where we're going to leave it for today
And again hope to see you guys out there
And we're still here
In case that wasn't clear
For those just tuned in that was an episode
I am wearing the same coat that was from earlier
Today but you know I just felt that was
Important and I think it's really important
To address a little bit further you know in the idea
Of what we're talking about I mean what she
Pointed out it's really important as well
It's weird timing right now
All these platforms for those that are doing content
Creation, YouTube
They're now giving you an option to clay AI
Or not and so what's interesting is that this
Is clearly I argue a
Two things recognizing
That's what people want first of all
And then you know and using it against them is
Where I would see it going not that they would do that
Just for you but ultimately seeing that we're calling
For it but then you know the idea being
And this is you know call me the conspiracy theorist
People do I think it's obvious that it's not
About caring whether or not they disclose
This from a corporate level
But ultimately finding a way to use it
Like we just saw and I'm going to get into that
Right now and this is what was
Originally put forward as one of the
Concerns from some people out there
About what this you know might
Be represented as what we're doing
And that's why I think it's very important
To highlight the point which is simply
Just radical honesty
You know I use this I don't
I use to this degree
When you make it clear there's no way
That could be misframed but in this case
What people are concerned about
And this is not new this is from April 3rd
The AI detector as
Defamation machine now honestly
I thought I was going to read through this but I think
The real thing for me I mean I will do
Some of the parts to stand out but it's just simply
To understand that there are AI tools that are created
This one's called Pangram
Which just like you have
The flock cameras claiming they know that
You're you and it turns out not to be
At the very least even if it's accurate
There's an opening for inaccuracy
And some of these are 70, 60%
It's not even viable but what really
Worries me even if it's 100%
Accurate is how it can be misused
And so that's the part that gets into
Is of course kind of a
Mainstream writer and mainstream journalist
Both saying they were misrepresented
By the thing that said they were using AI
So I'm almost a little suspicious of that
In the first place you know as you get
Into it like let's break it down in two parts
Pangram or things like it
Are claiming they can review written content
And say this is so
You know this much percentage AI
To this percentage of certainty
And I mean obviously and in a general
Sense that seems like something most people
Would want but the problem is that how
That can be used like we're you know
People are concerned about to drive us to say
We need things to be verified we need
Things to be concerned digital IDs
And whatever else you have to see where that goes
From a government side now obviously
None of us are calling for government
Anything that's obviously counter
Intuitive to everything we see our entire
World view but it's about realizing
As Garak points out from a volunteer's
Perspective that you know if there's
Something they're going to be putting
Into our lives something that we should
Be doing not necessarily in the same way
But a way that we can do to get ahead
Of what they're going to do to us
And so the bottom line is that people out there
In a real sense whether or not government exists
Want something to be able to decipher
That or at the very least I shouldn't
Again not decipher it but something
A tool that can be used to
From content creator side of it
To be able to divulge that yourself
Which is why I argue this is such an obvious
Sort of tool against that
Because if we're already being transparent
About it even though they will use it anyway
It's something to be said no look I did
You know this is art it's no AI
Was used in this at all despite their claims
Now what's interesting
Is you also have the mainstream side
Wall Street Journal and a larger
Writer saying that they were
Accused of it and it was wrong
And the Wall Street Journal writer saying
And the company was claiming
They went through all kinds of Wall Street
Journal articles and writers
And it was lots of AI and I'm thinking
Myself probably I mean do we
Really even question that right now I mean
Most of these people are using stuff
Maybe not writing entire articles maybe
That too I think we know that too but
At the end of the day for information
For breaking and correcting sentences
Like things that ultimately then insert content
Manipulate the direction and so
This is what I think is so interesting so it says
Last month Mrs. Ballard was the writer
Was thrust from obscurity into notoriety
When Hatchet a her publisher announced
That she was canceling her book over
Accusations that it was generated with artificial intelligence
This comes from Panagram
Or Pangram
Who basically
Was the one that accused her of using it
But his evidence was itself authored by AI
Which clearly creates its own problem
Even if it's accurate how something
Could then be inserted into the process
To manipulate the outcome
Which is what we've seen people do in authority
Or just that it's inaccurate
Which is you know one's more deliberate
But it amounts to the same problem
Pangram's namesake product
Is an AI tool that purports to detect
AI generated content
With 99.98% accuracy
It's classified as 78.3%
Of her book
That's what the allegation was
For many passages it indicates only medium confidence
Now Mrs. Ballard told a journal reporter
That she did not personally use AI
But an acquaintance she hired
To edit the original self published
Edition did
And then she goes but please do your research
On editors before trusting them with your work
So is she lying? Is she getting caught
Using AI to write a book and ultimately
Shucking it off on her editor?
Or is that the truth? And if that's the case
Then what's the real difference to the reader
If it is the case? And so why is it
Become an allegation about a lie
When it seems you know this is all up in the air
Because who do you trust? Neither of them is the answer
You question everything
Wait for facts and if you can't find
You know you don't just pick a side
But at the end of the day I think it's clear
That we know corporate media is using these things
And that's what I'm going to get into next
And it's clear that people are using them
For some parts if not all out there
And so this becomes a point
To be made about why and this is where I agree
With Whitney and the rest of this becomes a justification
For more ability
To surveil and confirm
None of us are calling for that
Hopefully we don't want that
It says in November the University of Maryland
Issued a preprint of academic paper
Not peer reviewed
That it says that alleging that three
Freelance op-ed pieces that this
Platform
For this writer and this platform
Accepted were AI generated
Now it says this person, the writer, looked into these charges
And concluded that they were unsupported
That pan-grammets isn't reliable enough to serve
On the basis for such accusations
And I technically agree with that
And that there is strong possibility that
Other writers were manipulated
Now obviously we can see a world in which
Let's just take an administration that's rife with corruption
That was clearly misusing its power right now
Would you use something like this
To accuse people they want to
Stifle of doing that
Imagine this tool was available
When OzTurk's op-ed was going
Around about Israel genocide
They say AI, not that that's even a good example
Since it wouldn't arguably undermine
The point of the facts, but you can see
How this could be used to suppress content
That people in power wouldn't like
Or companies, if you're getting
Called out for something you did
Norfolk Southern suddenly goes, oh you lying
Whatever, you can see where this goes
Now it says pan-gramm pitches its tools
By publishing
In media organizations as a way
To protect editorial integrity
The Maryland researchers use pan-gramm
To scan
Over 250,000 newspaper articles
Including almost 45,000
Opinion pieces from this platform
The New York Times, Washington Post
They report that they found opinion articles
Quote, are 6.4 times
More likely to contain AI
Which just means, I would agree
And I wouldn't, I don't think anybody would
Embark at the idea that these writers
Are using AI to expedite their process
If not entirely
They just go, well it was my idea
I gave them the facts and they don't see a problem with that
Now I'm just speaking generally
Those that don't, that's what they would argue
We've heard this already
And it says the study includes a table
That highlights 18 op-eds among them
Are three from the journal that were supposedly AI
Now it's just my first step
Was to run the article through pan-gramm
Free scans, through the surprise
The same tool applied, the same articles produced
Different results, well doesn't that just sound like
Every AI or not thing you can find
Well, yeah it gives you a line
Maybe it gives you some level of insight
But it's not consistent, it's not 100%
So I guess a larger
A third or fourth point
Would be simply in the whole dynamic here
Maybe we're, I mean
I think this is the problem reaction solution of it
It's just not ready yet
And so they drive you into this using 74% accuracy
So we all go whoa, we want
Better accuracy instead of going
How about we don't do this at all
Just a thought, and it says
These wildly inconsistent results are enough to discredit
Any accusation based on their
And the pan-gram analysis
I agree, so you can see why that seems
A little bit wild if they would come out and do that
But that's why I started with the first part
Is that I sense that there was some AI used here
And they even go into this
It says he said, and this is just quickly
They go into deeper parts of this
One of the people they spoke to
Said he uses chat GPT
In a limited way
And it says he pastes in drafts with prompts
And it says he said he doesn't paste text from the chatbot
Back into his draft
But decides for himself which of the suggestions
To incorporate, so what are we talking about
The guy literally does AI
And then takes pieces of it and puts it in his writing
So he is using AI
That's exactly the point, but now they're quibbling
About how, but I didn't do it all with AI
Well okay, but that's not the same thing though
Is it? And so now, but see this is the problem
For people like me, is that now you're going to be
Led in some subtle ways
You might not even realize
But it says, and this is another one
Sometimes I have copied and pasted them into AI
With the prompt check for grammar, spelling, accuracy
Of statements, and this is where you get the syntax
Consistency
And it says she also had
Sometimes pasted AI output back into a draft
So another one that admitted using AI
And it says it is inaccurate
And unfair to characterized work produced
In the manner described
As AI generate, is it?
Okay, well what's the line
Are we just going 100%
Created or AI manipulate
And welcome to the reason that what we're doing
Is so important
Not because we're trying to verify anybody
Not because we're trying to set some kind of line
But because everybody everywhere
Sees the need, even corporate platforms
Who are trying to use it for their benefit
Of being able to
Rather being transparent about
AI use
And that's the point, and it's not
Not everyone's going to do that
Plenty of other platforms are going to choose to ignore it
Or maybe because they don't agree with our stance
It's okay, but our point is
You can guarantee that we will be putting it forward
No, you should question us too
Check it, you should
But the point comes down to the fact
That you can rely on the fact that we will be being transparent about it
Unlike a lot
Out there
And so that is an important way for this to go forward
And that's why Derek called another platform to do the same thing
Using the
IMA pledge or making one for yourself
Now it says the opportunity to respond
Before publishing
All three writers said they received no such communication
Which is interesting to me
Meaning that these people wrote articles about how they used AI
Without even reaching out to them going
Hey, is that true?
You know, that's a journalistic practice
And it is very clearly part of the due diligence process
But it's not necessarily required
It doesn't make you a good journalist
If you don't check with the person you're accusing of something
But it's interesting, isn't it?
And it says continuing the last parts here
I am in a position to defend my writers and myself
Of course the platform
Of course she's going to argue they didn't use AI
When it seems they did in some at least limited fashion
But she says, but Payne Graham
Has shredded the reputation of this writer
Whose book was supposed to be published
Now that's a fair point
Now you can see in the same way
Even if she did use AI and now she's lying about it
The point for me is about how it could be used in the future
Meaning, and I'm not saying that's the case
But we should question that
Is that you could come out with a, you know
Another Whitney Webb's
Another new book coming out, right?
All of a sudden they say, well, boot
You're blocked, your sensor were suppressed
Because we, you know, and accusing it of being AI
Wouldn't effectively be a very damaging thing, wouldn't it?
Even if it's false
So you can see where this can be used, guys
Now, I thought that
There's plenty of these going around, new ones as well
Very important to consider
That's why we did this in the first place
Now, I'm sure more will come around this
I know, I mean we had two panels
That ultimately didn't happen, one of which was the
AI impersonation one
Whitney was having satellite problems
And we just kind of put a pin in it because
She's the main, you know
It's basically about her being manipulated
And Catherine as well
But ultimately that will likely come around
When Whitney's ready to do that
But on top of that we're going to be planning on doing
AI panels about this pledge
The larger conversation
And just about where this goes, alright
And so look forward to that as well
Now, really quickly
I just wanted to follow up on this since we didn't get to in the last couple of days
I know you've seen, I mean
And generally some of, probably half of what you're going to see today
Is stuff that many of you already saw in passing
Because I know you guys are informed
But I'm sure there are points we can be made today
That you might not have thought about, I hope so
So let's get into it
So first a couple of follow up points on the MLR and A-Shot
If you didn't see this
Crazy on August 6, 2026
We put this out, FDA approves
mRNA flu shot
Just still insane to me, I thought Stargate was insane
You know, here we are with multiple COVID shots
New mRNA shots, self-amplifying shots
But he's fighting the vaccines
But at the end of the day guys
And of course, you know, I'm not going to get into this now
But check this out, we went into this in multiple shows
The Bacteriophane System
Which I still argue is
It's the one that went around as AI created viruses
It's what it is, but it's much more complicated than that
And I do believe it's connected with the gene function direction
As other peer-reviewed science argues
Look into it, it's included here
It's not getting the right coverage
Because it's being framed as something different
Largely in the corporate media
But on the note of the mRNA shots
One thing we talked about that I haven't
You know, again, I wanted to include the next day we talked
And I forgot actually, was this post
Because this is now going back around right now
There's being called conspiracy theorists
For being concerned about the blood
You know, the blood banks
I mean, this is not a new topic guys
This goes back to the AIDS conversation
And not because of what people would argue
But because of the painted blood supply
As Mikovits and others have talked about
And so the same kind of dynamic we're talking about here
Is the fact that they were taking blood
From people who took COVID shots
And you may not think that matters
And of course, as this one says
American Red Cross 2022
George was the only survivor of a bad accident as a teenager
His doctor said it would have been
Would have, wouldn't have been possible
Without blood donors
And this person simply says, is COVID vaccine
Of blood labeled as such?
Good question, 2022
American Red Cross famously posted this
This is 2022, they've never taken it down
And I've followed up as we'll show you many times
We don't label
Blood products as containing vaccinated
Or unvaccinated blood as the COVID-19
Vaccine does not enter the bloodstream
And poses no safety risk
Both of which have been
Unanimously shown to be false
And just quickly
I can show you at least two, three
Which I can't find the other one down there
Of studies that came out a year later
The year after that, proving that statement is false
Which you all know
SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine sequences
Or others that so specifically spike protein
Circulate in the blood up to 28 days
And some which go way beyond that guys
And these are, here's another one right here
I mean it's just wild to me, right
And I keep following up, that was a year later
This one simply says, and yet another peer-reviewed study
Finds you're wrong, how is it that we can know this
And you're still standing by that statement
Another one, and we found another one, Red Cross
Do you have the courage to find the event? Of course not
Hosting crickets, they don't care
I just find that insane
And so it's following up to the last conversation we had
Now understand guys, that the science alone
Is not, I mean there's so much evidence
That shows you the spike protein
Is continually dangerous, that the mRNA see
I mean we've gone through all of this
And the science shows you that it continues to be in your blood
So had they taken blood from somebody who got vaccinated
Within 30 days
Or more, the reality that it's likely
That there would be something in that, right
It's possible, put it that way
It's obvious that it's there, and this has happened
Before, I just want to include that
Because we had mentioned it, and it is coming back up
In the conversation, Long Claw
Commented this going
And this is another point guys, I mean
Somebody's calling out that Eli Yacoby guy
Right now, and plenty of the others
That are still allowed to do the thing
X said they were going to stop, which is just
Spam propaganda, why?
Because he's propaganding for Zionism and Israel guys
But Long Claw, my opinion
Simply goes, hey community notes, seems it's about
Time to correct this inaccurate info
Which you can prove via peer reviewed science
Is not accurate
Of course the two years later, you know
It's just, it's not there
They don't respond, why is that, why doesn't
Grock respond?
We should ask Grock at this point now, right
But the whole thing is the same, is that this
Never followed up, and I
I'm willing to bet you, well, you know
We should try with Grock and see what happens
I'm going to put this down and try that later
On that note, I thought it was important to remind you
That here's RFK Junior, whether he's
Not able to, you know
Tap twice in the desk if you're in
Whatever, if you're under duress
RFK Junior, let us know if you're not allowed to speak
The point is this was August 10, 2026
He literally came out and said
Finally a president who stands for
Medical freedom, informed consent
And gold standard science
The main thing he
Sold on the idea of gold standard
Was the saline placebo
We heard him stress that
To the ceiling
And guess what, if you didn't see
The show, the flu shot they disapproved
Used literally an older
Shot
And yet here he comes after that and says
Gold standard, I mean how can you
Be so shameless unless you're not in control
You decide, that kills me
Because you know, it's worse for me that he did
Do good work than somebody who's always been a liar
Because it's almost worse, it is
And who knows, guys
Maybe he's literally being threatened
I've said it from day one
We don't know that, we shouldn't assume it
The reality is, he's playing the game
Gold standard, I mean you can't make that
Case and then literally not do it
And then keep making the statement
Unless you're a dishonest person
Tom Fitton, John Solomon
Points out, and by the way
I'm actually, we went through this study
And I hadn't reviewed anybody's content about this
We went through the study ourselves
And broke it down for you, that's what I always do anyway
Because I prefer it that way
But I broke down the study and told you
Just on the fly, I was reading through it
Oh my gosh, look at this, paracarditis
Compare that to the amount, that's clear
And I just, I like
Seeing these things of my own volition
And then seeing it become something that's
Roundly talked about, it just shows you
That we're ahead of these things
And this one, it takes
5,000 jabs of Moderna's just approved
mRNA flu vaccine to prevent
One more hospitalization, if that's
Even accurate, I don't argue it is
Compared to the standard flu vaccine, I mean it's
Point is it's probably way, way worse than that
And so all he's highlighting is this is
You know, bad
But it says, but the new shot causes six times more
Injuries
Tom Fitton says, why did the FDA
Approve another mRNA jab
On August 7th, obviously
Because
They aren't doing what they promised
It's obvious, but I'm sure he's asking this
To get people to look at it, the point is that everybody
Sees it, here's Joseph Lopato
From Florida
And this is Recif Levy saying
The faculty at Harvard are engaging
In promoting the new
Flu vaccine
Calling out people who are, you know
Just pushing the thing that is dangerous
Like I'm not talking dangerous, excuse me
Dangerous because we think mRNA
Is dangerous, which we do
But dangerous because the study itself
Showed you that it was more dangerous
Than the one, I mean it's
The idea becomes use the other
Vaccine, so when we compare it
The damage looks like
It's not as severe compared to things that also
Caused damage, if you compare it to saline
Well, it's way more stark and we
Told you that during COVID and they just
Did it right in front of you, as Joseph
Says the same mRNA flu vaccine that caused
15 times more serious adverse events
Than the number of hospitalizations it prevented
Doctors, read the paper
Not just the abstract, remember when they
Accused us of doing that?
Which some do, but it's just
Pretty clear where this goes, now Toby Rogers
This was FDA posting on the 6th
And it says darkest day in the history of the FDA
A regulatory decision purchased
By a wealthy donor to the Republican
Party, Stephen Swarchman
I don't even think we need
To break down stuff, I mean
Is anybody confused about Trump being
A dishonest, grifting president?
It's not about left and right, it's not about
Trump first Biden, it's about the objective
Obviousness of what they're doing and calling
It out, which I think most people are seeing
And so I don't even think we need to really
Make it clear anymore, but I will when it matters
But like, you know, there's a time where I thought
We needed to really harp on the idea, look at
He's stealing from you, he's lying to you
But then, you know, January, February, March
Of 2025, we started going
Well, probably a little bit later than that
It's clear that the Republicans are turning on him
The two-party illusion is breaking down
And I think we were radically ahead of that awareness
And it's now being kind of casually accepted
As what everybody sees, remember that
Mary Tally Bowden
Old flu shot
$269.50 for a box of 10, which I still
Think is insane, the new mRNA flu shot
That kills more people
$1,407.50 on a box of 10
Thanks, Trump and RFK Junior
You're knocking it out of the park
Now, another thing to follow up on
John Fleetwood put this out on the 17th of July
Moderna injects first participant
With experimental
By the way, the other flu mRNA shot
Is investigational, it's also experimental
It's listed right on their own documentation
mRNA 4200 cancer shot
Yeah, right out of Stargate
Which is literally
Oh wait, did I not bring it up? I thought I did
There it is, which is literally
One of the first things Larry Allison of Oracle
Literally broke down for you
Is
AI created vaccines
And they are rushing forward with this
I mean, Trump literally ran
And RFK Junior on the idea of stopping these things
Now
Here it is, and make sure you read that
John's doing good work there
Moderna announces first participant dose
In phase one clinical trial
Investigational, again another way to point out
How clear it is that investigational
Which you should know means the same thing
It's an experiment, tumor targeted cancer antigen therapy
Today announced the dosing of its first
U.S. participant in phase one study
Evaluating mRNA 4200
So guys they're not, I mean it's just obvious
I'm willing to bet you when this truly comes out
That we'll find out that it's some overlap
With self-amplifying because that seems to be the direction
That they're leaning into, just my guess
Now to get into the point of the spyware
Which I think is very important
And relevant to the part we started with
About AI and transparency
We just talked about this in case you didn't see it
Palantir partners with major news organizations
To use your data that they absorb
With Palantir
And they call it actionable intelligence
In their own documentation
Now we're talking about business insider
Politico
Build
USA Today
And hundreds of underling papers
Within them locally all around the country
Just continue to find this
Insane, so carrying this forward
Something that Orwell shared with me
That goes back to a previous conversation in 2010
Just to kind of show you how long
Like here's the funny thought I had
First of all, this is October 1st, 2010
Army embeds active-duty PSYOP soldiers
At local TV stations
Now why I think this is obviously
Relevant and interesting
That it's been going on so long
But really that this is what they had
Under the guise of fighting back
Always like that
But realize that this is what had to be done
I mean this is like talking about
Going from tapping somebody's phone
To just being able to absorb the data
Out of the E3, that's where we are today
And so it's like thinking about this
Even just the one I just showed you
A Palantir
Absorbing data from the news organization
I mean it's not even hiding this anymore
This is just the escalation of
Or rather the
I guess the escalation, but the continual
The increase of how this has grown around our lives
And now we have larger
And this is where we're going to get into the next segment here
Where it's gone from just working with this for surveillance
To literally like this fascistic blend
Of these massive corporations
That are arguably almost more powerful than
The government that they're working through
And now are being given the ability to use
Their
Cyber abilities to attack people
And this is terrifying to me
I mean like truly where this goes
And I forgot to even grab this one
Because obviously this is what we're at
This is the continuation of this very point
Detachment 201
It's amazing to me how people don't know about this
Literally was, as I've recently talked about
Palantir, Meta and OpenAI being given
Colonel positions within the U.S. military
Not civilian, not white lab coats
Literal, I mean this is a real picture
That's actually them being sworn in
As colonels in the military
And then, you know
I went over the whole thing with
Brad Miller who is very
Very knowledgeable about this
And I just think it's wild to me
There's a technocracy in uniform
Literally you have Mark Andreessen getting a
Advisor position under Hegseth
I think I said lucky palm or lucky
Getting another position
They're literally becoming the government
If not already and this is just the illusory
Veil being removed
So what's happening now
As this article titles it
Trump deputizes private companies
For offensive cyber strikes
Against foreign criminals
Now you might have seen this come out
August 12th expanding capabilities
To combat transnational cyber
Enabled crime
Cyber enabled which is interesting
Open to the door just about anything
But what I think is important here
First of all remember that these EOs
As I've always pointed out
I mean it's really a suggestion in a large
Sense when it comes to the way these things
End up rolling out in a national
Even global sense
Executive orders apply to the executive
Branch Now like we just saw
With the vaccine point
Aside from the fact that there was a whole
Bunch of other holes within that
That I'm not going to get into today
I just don't believe this is even what
They care about when they're pushing other
MRA shots regardless
I think they know largely toothless
Like they're going to continue to do
As they told you before
Well then they're all going to do what they want anyway
So it's ultimately not a real change
It's just Trump stating what he says he wants
We're not really doing it
Like every other hollow promise he's done
Now look I hope I'm wrong
Even in just that one example
Because you need to break up the MMR shot
And whatever else as RFK Junior literally
Just said days before that
That he recommends the MMR shot
There's no way to say that without acknowledging
That means all three of them together
That doesn't make any sense
There's something amiss guys
So what this opens the door to
Is basically creating
Private cyber attack
Companies I guess
But like cyber attack units
That are run through companies
Now I'm going to get into what I
As of right now there's no tapped companies
But I think we know where this goes
And I'm not thinking Palantir because I don't think that's even
I mean it certainly could be
But I think we're talking more specifically
Like Israeli spyware type direction
So first this article
Tech Times
August 13th
For the first time in US history
Vetted private companies can conduct
Offensive cyber operations
Against foreign criminal networks
Now good, foreign becomes
Very broad
Especially with the definitions we're getting
From this administration
As I'll make a point in a second
The transnational
Criminal organization, the TCO
You know
Category they've created
I mean we'll get into what like
I mean guys they're accusing
People in this country of being
Simply because they're democrats
And we went through that during the focal point
Of that, so it becomes kind of
Like anything else, especially with corrupt
Governments
The ability to just
Broaden the scope and now you're a terrorist
Because you're a democrat or however they do
So the idea that it's foreign criminal networks
Becomes the purview, the prerogative
Of
Paragon solutions
Or whoever is in this role
Now it says under direct federal authorization
Meaning the US government
Is tapping private entities
And giving them the authority
Arguably, ostensibly with
Them giving the leash in the allowance
To do so, but we know where this ends up
Going in the past, but giving them federal
Authority to conduct what would normally be
A state department intelligence operation
Now it's interesting because this is like
Of a lot of this, I think just taking the veil off
I think we're already operating this way
Or they are, right, that we're talking
About these palantir types or the oracle
Types of these companies that are
Essentially contractors and basically
The way their government operates today
And the way that the current network state
Direction and the dark enlightenment
Movement and Curtis Jarvan philosophy
And Trump's entire administration are driving
Us towards this CEO run country without
The constitution, that's what they're
Literally talking about. So I feel
Like this is just one more step in that
Direction of basically blending that line
Allowing these companies to conduct
Governmental operations and again
Have already been doing so. The signing
Resolves a legal barrier that has blocked
Private sector cyber action
For decades, but it does not
But it does so by creating
A new category of authorized
Private operator that sits in
Uncharted territory under international law
The
Again, they're all national security
Was it presidential
Memorandum, you know, send the same
The whole thing is they play that game
With like the memorandum versus the direct
The action or the bottom line
Is we're talking about executive orders
Where you have one person
Signing their dictate
That people are supposed to follow. That's not how we're told
This country operates. Now as we can all see
This is not just, oh well
Because of this or because we're gridlocked
This is what it is now
Consistently from Obama
To Trump, to Biden, to Trump
It hasn't stopped guys
I mean really, to be honest
It was Bush that truly started the
Increased that degree as far as I understand
Looking back and Obama
Went crazy and was criticized by Trump
And Trump went even crazier than Biden
And now Trump's pointing back going Biden did all that
They're all doing the same thing
Pointing at the other side. That's how this game operates
Expanding capabilities
To combat transnational
Cyber-enabled crimes, what it's called
We'll go through a couple parts to stand out to me in a second
The first category
Cyber surveillance operations
Covers covert intelligence
Gathering from foreign systems
So already you're talking about companies
Who again are already involved with this as contractors
But who are then as a company
Conducting cyber operations against
Foreign state actors
Or at least they argue are the one that did something to them
Is kind of how this starts out
I'm just not open the door for any number
Of like international events or like you know
Incidents, I mean it just
I feel like it's probably my design
Or a way to say well that wasn't the US
Government that was this company and you know
You can, it's like the public-private partnership
Kind of dynamic
And how that can be abused
It says including access that would normally constitute
Unauthorized access under the
Computer fraud and abuse act
But so basically now legalizing
What would otherwise be a crime if it was done without
The government saying it was okay
Perfect way the world works right
These are crimes and all the government's doing it
So it's okay
The national security presidential memorandum
Threads that needle by framing
Participating companies as acting under
The control and oversight of the US
Government
And look at the kind of government we're dealing with
Do you have the confidence that they're going to be able
To rein in these billion dollar companies
That already act like governments
And it explicitly authorizes activity
Resulting in the manipulation
Disruption, denial or destruction
Of criminal networks
Networks information systems
Networks or infrastructure
That is not intelligence gathering
It's sabotage
Authorized by contract with the federal agency
Which is crazy
But think about this
You heard what Alex Karp said
About spraying piss on people that he didn't like
All these crazy things they say
These are petty vindictive people
So when you talk about
You could rationalize a world in which they justify
Claiming you're some kind of
Foreign element because
Trump's calling that to anybody calling out Israel
Anybody calling out what's going on
They keep telling you that
They're working with foreign elements
Democrats suddenly now you got the rationale
From these companies to attack Americans
Or at least an American website for example
And take it down under the guys
That you're working with a foreign element
And then how do you even verify that? How do you go on and say that?
They're lying about me. It's the AI type of problem
They're going to say that that's what the intelligence
Showed, national security
I mean this is a quagmire
I mean it just becomes more and more opaque
And that's what they want
All I'm saying first of all
Is that you can see the way it's abused
In the most obvious sense
Where vindictive people that we see right now
Use this against people that are not foreign actors
That simply want to pretend they are
And conflate it with the same things Trump is
But then just
The way it's used normally in and of itself
Is insane, right?
I mean it's creating a circumstance where you blur the line
Of what government is and that's exactly what they want
Per operation approval
Requirement is what they claim, right?
The government has to approve every single operation
I just highly doubt that's actually how this goes
Especially since
I don't think that they're even in control
Whatever we call the US government guys
Whether it's even there anymore
And I'm not trying to be hyperbolic
I mean let's be real about what we're watching today
There's something off and it's not
I don't think these are the people
I don't think the peat headsets of the world
And the cash patels have any idea what's going on
Let alone the ability to dictate what happens
Trump is included in that category in my opinion
Especially with what we're seeing today
But it says there is also a financial backstop
Companies may be required
As a condition of their contracts
To maintain a bond or escrow
Of at least a million dollars
So now you have this kind of weird black market
Rather a black operation slush fund
Kind of thing
So how many companies?
I mean you have a hundred of them
A hundred billion dollars sitting there
Either way who knows what that amounts to
But it's simply a fund that will be utilized
For them to conduct operations
The NSPM
Draws one explicit hard line
The dual directors
Cannot on their own authority
Approve any operation
If it is likely to result in the loss of life
Or serious injury
Or if it would rise to the level of use of force
Or armed attack under international law
Because guys clearly
They care about human life
Clearly they're concerned about international law
Right?
So I mean of course they're gonna be
We will not censor you
We will never violate your rights
And then they go on to do all of that
So it just rings hollow to have them go
We'll draw the line for when it hurts
As they're murdering people in Gaza as we speak
As they're literally starting people to death
All over the world it's obvious they don't mean that
I'm sure we can understand
One last part in this here
Or is it one? Yeah one last part
At the end it says what this means
For cybersecurity firms
For the private cybersecurity industry
The National Security Presidential Memorandum
Opens a market category
That's never legally existed before
Federally authorized
Contractually governed
Per operation offensive
Cyber services directed against
Foreign criminal networks
I mean you basically become like a mercenary
Outfit working ostensibly
For the US government
It's almost like opaque and not even
I mean exactly what I would argue they want
Now even more so exactly what you
Would argue Israel would want
To operate under
And not have to worry at all about any of those things
And just do what they want and act like they're operating
Under the auspices of the US government
But not as Israel but as a US company
That is absolutely Israel
That's what I read this as potentially
Or rather the best way to say that is
That's what I see this becoming
If not already the plan
My personal opinion
Without that last part you can see however
Regardless if you pick Palantir
Oracle it's just as problematic
I mean not even aside from the fact that
That's also Israel included but take one that doesn't
It's still something that I think will be abused
Like everything this government's ever touched
And it goes on to say
The technical firm's best position to
Participate are precisely
Those with the deepest offensive
Tradecraft who do you think
That is guys it's not even debatable
Experience penetrating surveilling
And disrupting sophisticated criminal
Infrastructure at scale
That technical profile
Overlaps substantially
With the mercenary spyware
Industry whose leading firms
Happened to be NSO group
Israel, Intellexa
Israel and their peers
Largely Israeli entities
And that's not my opinion
Have spent a decade developing exactly
Those capabilities primarily for
Government clients
Now all that's happening is you're now going to take
One of these mercenary spyware companies
Like we've talked about Pegasus
NSO, Axonis
I mean we've talked about all these
And allowing them to come out of the shadows
Like everything else we're talking about
And just operate with a government badge
I mean this is
Like I mean you know
Like everything else we're talking about
It's on the surface, it's in your face
And it's just kind of daring you to do something about it
United States
Designates eight cartels in transnational
Organizations 2025
Then I'll just make it this point before
You know, Cinelloa Cartel, Trende Rago
We have seen them be fast and loose with the accusations
Of who is in those groups
For I mean since this last administration started
So all I want to show you is when they talk about TCO
Which is what you're going to see in their
Executive order
And it's something that they've already used frivolously
To accuse other people of being a part of or working for
Then it becomes anybody they want to
Including MS-13
It says MS-13
I mean the
The absurdity of taking a group
That they lied about so brazenly
And saying this is how we're going to
You to justify action
By companies where you know
You see where this goes
Now on that note
Before we get into the executive order
I mean this is what we're getting at guys
These operational things that have been behind the scenes
That are now going to be given front-row seeds
Or rather just for you to see anyway
The Israeli election interference
And psychological operation industrial complex
I've talked about this many times
Here's the actual article from the
Guardian and plenty of other platforms
That were involved with breaking this down
Revealed the hacking
And disinformation team meddling
In elections
This guy, his name is Jorge
Admittedly works for the Israeli government
And admittedly was part
Of manipulating foreign elections
Many of which he argues were in the United States
Read it for yourself
Talks about being paid
To conduct foreign operations
Psychological social media campaigns
This is what they do guys
And this is old, three years old
So what we're seeing is this
Becoming a public operating
Entity
Generally speaking
Because right now they haven't really pointed to
Any specific entity
But this is the kind of thing that is filling the role
This is what they want
That's what's so alarming about this
Now Lucas
Lucas
Ellen Jinx
Posted this
She's security and privacy data protection
She covers I guess
I just saw this today
USA is building a state controlled
Private cyber force
It lets vetted US companies conduct
Covert access surveillance and cyberattacks
Against foreign criminal networks
Or what they claim are those
US companies will be authorized to target
Industrial control systems
And manipulate disruptive degrade
Destroy cyber controlled infrastructure
Okay well now you've got Israeli
Adjacent companies
Or maybe just companies but that's why I see this going
Who are now rationalizing doing this
And disrupting and degrading infrastructure
In I don't know Iran
After they just told us they attacked our water
Did they?
We just got another lie from about attacking
Trump or anybody else
Israel will lie like it breathes guys
And we know this
Because it's been told to us many many times over the year
Let me preface
These remarks with a never
Never ever believe
Israeli figures
I've been in the government too long
To know that the Israelis are patent
Liars
In their intelligence community
In their propaganda community certainly
And in their leadership they are
In veteran liars
Let me say that again they are liars
So
Oh
So
Very understood by people that work with them
And so the idea becomes
Well you're in this position or again
You could take Israel out of it you have a company
Who has an agenda, who has an interest
You have a foreign adversary or a
Competitor for example
Now suddenly you don't think these companies would take advantage of that situation
Many people would argue no
I argue then you don't understand the way that the world
Can and has operated
Not everybody but in the power structures
And authority and governments and adjacent
Elements it's what they do
And like people like Trump and Elon Musk
Would tell you that's the way the world works
Stephen Miller would tell you you're weak for not agreeing with that
I'm not saying I want that to be the case
I'm saying that's the way it operates
And they don't want you to see that all the time
And we should fight to change that
But it says including physical destruction
Operations likely to cause death
Serious injury amount to the use of force can't be approved
We are going through most of this
I just want to point out her calling this out
This is where I had seen her
This is what got me going on this direction of this
So I want to point that out
And I think this is important and I'll highlight some of the things I saw as well
August 12th
Again expanding capabilities
To combat transnational cyber enabled crime
Now some of the things stood out once she pointed out
Was simply as it says create, manage and maintain
The program to authorize participating companies
In case you just want to see for yourself
As defined in section F4
To conduct cyber surveillance operations
And cyber effects operations
Against foreign cyber enabled
Transnational criminal organizations
Under the control
And oversight of federal government
So you're giving government authority
To companies
I mean guys it just gets more and more clear
Now this one says require participating companies
To enter into contractual agreements
With the Department of Justice
Or the Department of Homeland Security
So now you're not just
You're literally under contract
So I mean you are the government
And I think that's already kind of the point though
Now you're not technically speaking
But I get argued that this is what this amounts to
It's like being a government contractor
Like Elon Musk, you're tangentially part
Of the government apparatus
Within 60 days of the date of this memorandum
The program executive director shall
In coordination with Homeland Security Council
Establish consensus operating procedures
For the program that ensures the federal government's
Complete oversight and control
Of participating companies' performance
So even right there you then can argue
That maybe from the other side of it
You have an opening here for the government
To start to control companies through this guys
Now what if this becomes something they argue
They need to do for national security
Sort of like in a domain
And we're just going to sort of take over
Your company's resources when it needs
I doubt that happens but it's certainly possible
And so what we're talking about is the idea
Where the government opens the door
For them to be able to have complete oversight
And control of their company's performance
Now you could argue that means
In operations of cyber attacks
But isn't that what they do in general
It just becomes a weird overlap
Again, one of the main points is the merging
Kind of the fascistic blend of these companies
And the government itself
Lastly it says any activity authorized
By the program must be conducted
A program must be conducted
Subject to the oversight, operational control
And legal authorities of the US
US government
The question is do you think that they're even capable
Of managing something like that
Or will they be played
Or are they just lying to you
So in general let's get into some of these overlapping points
Now Oracle was one I already mentioned
Derek wrote an article about this
In 2025, like most of the stuff happening right now
Oracle and the rise of the
AI surveillance state under Trump
And we talk about this and here's an example
By the way of one of those pictures
Which I'm not doing now anymore
But still argue that
Helps circumvent the copyright attacks
That we were getting unjustly
But bottom line is that this is something
Along with other companies that are using
One of I argue the potentials
For this, not less likely Oracle or Palantir
But it's possible, but more so once we get into next
But why this opens the door
Is connected for me
Is because of this
This was just going around and I think it just shows you
That these companies guys
Whether you want to argue it's infiltration
So it's like without their control
Or without their knowledge
That's part of it that does happen
You can look at something like this and understand
I mean very well this clip could
It could represent infiltration that she was sort of
Placed or put into the position to control
But maybe she's not, maybe she's the person
Who's been manipulated enough to believe
That her job is primarily
About helping Israel
Or doing things that in many cases are illegal
Or immoral or whatever else
But because they're on Israel's side
Which is just a weird thing to
Like from Palantir's perspective that's a strange
Thing to do
We all see what's going on and we see why
And especially when it becomes something that they're involved with
Whether it's genocide
Illegally surveilling American citizens
And then just shoving it down your throat
They're profiting from it
But I think there's obviously a larger agenda
This just shows you what they're capable of
And then connecting this
Your mind with these kind of companies
And what they're willing to do under what we just described
This is how they operate
Hit our website
In an Arab country
And you saw your entire screen
Filled with an Israeli flag
Which said
Not only we stand with Israel
We stand with our employees in Israel
We stand with the people of Israel
We stand with the military
Establishment
Of Israel
Now for the podcast
On the screen
In this Asushia
This is at the
Israel Alliance Committee Council
I forget the full title
Anyway it says
Oracle's Executive Chair
Safra Katz
Openly boasts about supplying
Scary technology to the Israeli military
To further its agenda in Gaza
There's a few things that we did
That I really can't talk about
To be honest
Because to advance the agenda
For the Israeli
Military
But our teams did a lot
We have some really profoundly
Scary technology at Oracle
And we
Wanted to make sure
That it was available
For the effort
Let's just say that
I was in the Kyriac
And I go in
And I meet with everyone you'd imagine I meet with
And on my way out
I run into
I don't know, five of my team
Who are all in uniform
Working
And to be honest with you
It's like my proudest moment
Oh yeah, in case you misunderstand
What she's saying is when
Oracle employees were in the IDF
No big deal
And you may not think that's a big deal
Frankly, I think it matters
Being in the US military at this point
In the middle of post-Iraq war
That matters guys because of all the things
That people were seeing the US military do
Now that's somewhat changed for other reasons
And it's getting worse again because of what's going on today
But it's obvious that people have become aware
Of exactly what they're doing
I mean you can only see so many videos
About how soldiers were raping people in Iraq
Until you realize that there's something
There's something wrong culturally with the military
Not just, you know, and of course
Which then gets framed as American people
Just like I would argue that what's going on there
Doesn't mean every Israeli
It certainly means a clear majority
Like you could argue it did during Iraq
That's the point guys, we're being propagandized
But it's important to understand
And what they're supporting
Like it's not even debatable
That you could ignore if you want to debate
About the word genocide then that's your problem
Because you're ridiculous, but at the same time
It's obvious that these are war crimes
So you're fine
Pretend it's not a genocide
You're going to tell me that that many children
300 killed in the last 300 days
Is somehow just what happens
It's just obvious these people have some kind of moral
Ambiguity or whatever you want to call it
If not complete lapse
And here she is saying
We gave this to them
My proudest day was seeing our employees
Conducting, you know, I'll leave it there
Working for the government that we're talking about
So we also on, you know, 2025
Talked about Larry Ellison and
Stargate
Talk about AI created
You know, AI created vaccines and AI created
And we also have, of course, OpenAI and SoftBank
All of which will largely, you know
OpenAI too for its own points, but specifically
Larry and SoftBank
With undeniable connections to Israel
Right into this conversation
We can see that through today
Now Whitney wrote this for TLAV in 2020
Google and Oracle to
Monitor Americans who get warp speeds
COVID-19 vaccines for up to two years
The pharmacovigilance that we never really talked about
Again, after Monsef Salawi just kind of backed away
And realized, you know, people are going
Vayres, which we showed up, right?
But it took so
Long people to argue and remember that this is
Something they were doing. They had their own database
That they were considering and it was watching
You if you took the shot and you know
We know why they did not want to talk about that
But this is how far this goes
Long before even the COVID illusion guys
But this has been an ongoing thing and they're part of this
Now on top of that
Is
Whitney Webb, excuse me
For Unlimited Hangout, wrote this
In 2021. Now recently
We talked about this and I kind of went
Largely went over it like I said
Because we were going to make it a focus
And I kind of still plan on it. So again
I'm not going to go too deep because I don't want to make it redundant
For the next one we do for them
But it's largely, we actually
We've already covered this in the past
And it very much relates to everything we're talking about
My hope though is that we can do sort of a deeper dive
On this very topic for the next open source
But she wrote this in 2021
Meet Toka, the most dangerous
Really spyware firm you've never heard of
And she talks of course about Pegasus
Which we all agree is very problematic
But her point in this is that that becomes an over focal point
That people ignore all the others
And it's very clear
That this has been, these kind of things have been working their way
Into the US government apparatus
Now I'm going to be
Following, let's just say we don't do that
I'll make sure I come back to this and go in depth
But again, we've already talked about this
And Josh actually, the champagne Josh
He has a pretty good thread on this
Breaking the step down, so I'll include that
Wait, I just highlighted that this is what she tried to warn people about
Five years ago, which is again
The largest thing we keep talking about
Had people decided to do something about it
Maybe we would be stopping this before it got there
Not as it's happening, right?
So think of that today
With everything we're talking about, let's do something now
Instead of waiting for other mainstream alternative media
To yell about it while it's already happening
Now in this case, Heretz talks about
Pegasus
And this is very important
Because, excuse me, we'll get Pegasus, but Paragon Solutions
It's one of the most obvious
One of the most known, one of the most reviled
It's like clearly been accused and caught
Of doing things that are objectively criminal
And this is the group that Trump's working with, guys
Literally with ICE, with the US government
Now this is Heretz from 2024
Israeli spyware firm
Paragon
Sold to the US
Which we've mentioned before
It becomes red lattice
But I want to really stress and highlight for you
Very clearly how these things happen
So first of all, you got a company that is
Undeniably Israeli run
That is clearly, you know, sort of like when the
APAC becomes something that's not Israeli
It's like this very flimsy
Transition from an Israeli thing
They shove an American forward
And call it a US thing
And remember, this is the post-JFK conversation
Right? That's one of the things they were trying to
Accomplish was exposing them and having them
Register under FARA before it was called APAC
Now the point in this case
Is that we have a company that was very clearly
An Israeli spyware company that was accused of
And found guilty of tons of crimes
I knew I was going to grab this one
And this is a different group, tangential
But staying point is really spyware
For a MSO group found liable for hacks
Of what's app users
I mean, this is a very, very, very public conversation
You guys know this
So what's happening here
Paragon
One of Israel's top offensive cyber companies
Has been sold to an American investment firm
Known as Red Lattice
An American cybersecurity firm
So you might argue, well, that makes it American
Well, okay, but wait a minute
Now you have a company in many cases that's
Object like, you know, smaller
That absorbs these Israeli behemoths
And they go, well, they're now, you know
And then the Israeli elements
Become the leader
It's not every case
But the ones we've highlighted
It's undeniable
It's an Israeli-run company that is pretending
To be a U.S. company
That is the article that Whitney wrote
For TLav
Called The Prince and the Spy
Which is about Comframe
And specifically Letitia Letem
Letitia Letem, I believe
Who is an Israeli spy that's her right there
Who also
Created Carbine, which by the way
Acts on, you know, we've already gone over all this
Absorbed and it's all this Israeli spy
That's what this all comes down to
These companies are Israeli-run cutouts
For Israeli intelligence, and that's what she makes clear
In this, I'll play the clip again in a minute
From what they stated publicly in case people don't know
But as she highlights as well
The article in here that highlights Israeli
Elements telling us that these are meant
To carry on Israeli intelligence operations
Now, the only reason they argue this was in
His U.S. company in regard to the Comframe article
Is because Eric Prince was the front
Even though it was created by Israel, run by
Israel, and had Israeli employees
But he was there, so U.S. company
That's how that works
So in this case, Red Lattice
I argue is the same thing
It's just a way that they've now framed their most prolific
Spyware company as a U.S. company
That's my opinion
But I think it's quite obvious
Here is one of the articles from Yahoo Finance
Red Lattice acquires Israeli spyware company
Paragon for $500 million
Red Lattice is a U.S.
Owned global defense company
Well, it's worth looking back at that
And seeing why that happened
And what the global element really comes from
This is Times of Israel 2025
Trump administration suddenly
Reinstates its contract but has really found
This spyware paymaker Paragon
Well, at this point, now we're talking about the
U.S. company
Red Lattice
And on top of that, now remember
The point of this is how we can get out of these companies
Just kind of get built into this apparatus
The larger industry
And how they just become like these background elements
But are obviously
Driving forward a larger agenda
I might as well play that clip really quickly
This is the next one we've been showing you before
I mean, we covered this a while ago
I think it was this one
I believe so
March 2026, no, it was one of those
Anyways, a while ago and it's a Grey Zone article
Is really, former Israeli spies
Now overseeing U.S.
Government cybersecurity
I mean, it's why I think this is so relevant, guys
Because this is so
On the surface
And this one I know you guys have seen many times
But of course we have to play it
We're talking about this and realize that people that haven't
Hopefully this opens some doors for them
Opens their mind to the reality
That they're so brazenly telling you
We make fake companies
And we manipulate the things around us
As the Israeli apparatus
As the Israeli intelligence
As the Israeli government
I mean, look, the U.S. Government, I guarantee
Does this around the world, we've already proven that
It's about recognizing that these things
What we're talking about today represent a very real problem
Especially now that Trump opens this door
To some private public cyber attack
Company thing that I argue
As you've already seen
Will amount to the companies we're highlighting today
I believe it will be
One of the ones we're discussing, that's my opinion
If not a palantir oracle type
I argue it's more likely a red lattice
Probably the most obvious choice
The NSO, these other
What was the other ones I was just talking about
Anyway, I don't want to get too much into the guessing game
But it's about realizing that these things
Are what they're pointing to
It's just a question of what they choose to pick
First, let's play this and we'll get into this article
What did they buy it from
Or I think they were buying it from
We have an incredible
Array of possibilities
Of creating foreign companies
That have
No way being traced back to Israel
Shell companies over shell companies
Who affect the supply chain to our favor
We create a pretend world
We are a global
Production company
We write the screenplay
With the directors, with the producers
With the main actors
The world is our stage
Did you see any surprises in Gaza?
Surprises? Like the intelligence surprises
Pages, walkie-talkies, do you know how many equipment
I mean, treated equipment that we have in these countries
You can't, you don't
I do
You mean booby-trapped equipment
Not only booby-trapped
Manipulated equipment
In which countries you're talking about
In all the countries that you can imagine
Hard to ignore, right?
Point blank
Booby-trapped equipment
Manipulated companies
Hard to miss
And really, if you ask
People like
Um
Kirikow
Oh, by the way, I believe I mispronounced his name
Somebody told me recently that it's, I forget
But you know what I'm talking about
Or plenty of others that have been, you know, like a Wilkerson
Like they will straight point blank
Tell you that this is what's happening
And we just can't seem to acknowledge that
And this is from December 3rd, 2025
Just really quickly, just to make sure you read
All of these in depth, the Pentagon
And by the way, I believe it's this one
We go through this pretty far in depth
It might have been this one, I forget
One of these in here
The Pentagon Treasury Department, DHS
And a variety of other U.S. government agencies
Have begun relying on a firm launched by
A former Israeli military intelligence
Operative to consolidate and protect their data
I mean, it's just like these stories
Just blend into each other
This is, I mean, you take everything we're dealing with
In this country, all the different points that have been changed
It seems all of them tie back to some kind of
Something like this
A company with deep ties to Israeli intelligence
Overseas cybersecurity across more than
70 U.S. government agencies
A U.S. Israeli intelligence company
Is overseeing cybersecurity
Across more than 70 U.S. government agencies
And now you're talking about working with
Other, you know, these other elements
To fight overseas in the same way
This feels like an effort to
Like whatever they're doing is now being expanded out
In, like, you know, the Israeli infiltration
Is being run through the U.S. government
Like, you know, like every other day
I think we've talked about hyperbolic, I guess
But overall, I do believe we're talking about
Something that has been going on a long time
And something that what we're seeing is, you know
Almost like the U.S. government has become some
Some sort of, you know, leap pad
Launching pad for all this around the world
Just a thought because obviously we can see this
Continue and what I find so crazy is that
Trump in particular seems to have, you know
Loves to kind of push back in little ways publicly
But when it comes down to it, never
Pushes back against what they do
Never calls out, I don't even think he mentioned
The fact that Netanyahu said, screw your God's a plan
Just move forward. Now, this goes on
This is the company they're discussing
Axonis, of course, interestingly
Axonis was founded by
Former spies in Israeli unit 8200
I mean, imagine if a bunch of former CIA agents
Created a spyware company
And that wouldn't be weird for some other
Country to use them to work on their cyber security
I just don't get why this doesn't make
Why this makes sense to anybody and it says
Which allows an operator visibility and control
Over all types and number of devices
Collects and analyzes the digital data
Of millions of U.S. federal employees
The stated aim of this company
Is to centralize IT tools to
Identify and fix security breaches
Of course, we'll centralize it and get it
All in the same place and we'll keep it secure
And what happens, like all the rest we've seen
Like the conframe point, like plenty of others
We're ultimately, they use
Israeli cyber security and then
Ultimately get hacked
And then you question, well, did they get hacked
Or was that just simply a backdoor for that very
That's the question
And historically it seems pretty consistent
Now what's interesting is they highlight this
Showing you as one of the important points
That this guy who works there
Was also working for Israeli military intelligence
Well, what's funny is it's exactly
What I'm pointing out about this guy
When it comes to fuck
He's been working, had seven years in military intelligence
And he's currently
The algorithm and systems engineer
For flock safety
Seems relevant to me
This is obvious that there's a massive thing
That's happening
This article's from June 7th, 2026
The unit that ate cyber security
From Stuxnet
To a $32 billion exit
How Israel's $8,200 became
The backbone of global cyber defense
And a critical threat
Also a well written article
There's some different points in here that I may
Frame differently
But just to give you the larger point
It's kind of the end point in the larger
The idea simply that, you know
It's both
You can't be the backbone
Of defense but also the critical threat
That underlies, rather that undermines
That very backbone
Because that's an oxymoron
This makes sense and that's what people are
I think, largely, hopefully starting to see
What other governments aren't able to do anything about
Now it says to understand
Why the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency
Just raided its closest Middle Eastern ally
As a critical counterintelligence threat
Which we discussed
And why the exploding pager operation
That maimed thousands of Hezbollah members
Was even possible
You have to follow a single thread
That runs through all of it
It starts in the Department of Energy Lab
Around 2007
Runs through a worm that escaped
Into the open internet on 2010
Escaped and ends in 2026
With Google paying $32 billion
For a four-year-old Israeli startup
Whose founders all served together
In the same military intelligence arm
Almost like there was a plan, you know
There's a lot of good information
The point is simply this
Stuxnet proved a state could weaponize code
To break the physical world
Grim beeper, which is what they
Ridiculously call the
One of the most obvious terrorist attacks
I've ever seen in my life
Where they put out a bunch of pagers for years
And then just exploded them around a bunch of civilians
That they claimed proved a state
Could weaponize the supply chain itself
Just like the clip we played
And the unit 8200 ecosystem
Proved that the human capital behind both
Could be spun into a commercial empire
So deeply woven into global infrastructure
That you cannot cleanly separate
The cyber power we rely on
From the cyber power we are warned about
In quotes
None of these three facts is new
What's new in 2026 is that they're finally
Being held in the same hand at the same time
Like we just read, that's the major EO point
By the Pentagon, by the regulators
Waving through 30 billion dollar deals
And by every SCISO
Who just realized that
Where did this technology come from
And who built it
Is no longer a marketing question
It's a threat model question
The same one Hezbollah should have asked
About his pagers
Well, now they are, right?
But ultimately, I mean this is
It shows you an infiltration of the global dynamic
I just don't know why this can't get
Called out by the majority of people
Because I know why the systems don't call it out
But my God, how do we not call this out every day?
I mean, things like this everywhere, right?
Walt's getting caught using a tele-message
Israeli intelligence app
That archives signal in the inner circle
Of the White House
Of course, that gets largely misrepresented
In his signal gate
And nobody really talks about the fact
That it was an Israeli intelligence app
That he got caught with
And he got quietly pushed aside as an ambassador
You know, normal stuff
We have Trump releasing a White House app
That has dangerous spyware
Literally Israeli spyware
Coming back under Trump's administration
This was March 29, 2026
Remember the app? We talked about it?
I mean, it's insane. How many examples we have?
Now, was this Trump knowingly trying to see this in-depth
Or was he just being used?
Don't know
This one's from 2025
Smartphones worldwide
Silently infected with Israeli spyware
This was the Intellexa
One of the companies that article argues
Is likely to be the one Trump's pointing to
Like an NSO group
Or the red lattice element
And again, Derek writing this in 2024
Meet the spyware companies preparing to unleash their tech
During Trump's second term
Saw it coming
I sure wish we could have stopped this, right?
Selbright being one we've already dealt with
Clearview AI we've already dealt with
We've already called out, already seen, penlink
More to come, unfortunately
Now, talking about Iran to finish up
I wanted to get a couple points in before we have to wrap
And ultimately what I want to highlight
Is this connection, you know, to a couple that
Well, actually, hold on a second
I think I mixed this up
Hold on, I think this goes
Here
There it is
Before we get into
Actually, I'm glad I didn't miss that
Before we get to Iran
The carryover point to this
Is obviously the surveillance side of it, right?
I forgot if I pulled this off
I've got a whole bunch that I want to go over about
Ice that we will get into
Just, I mean, guys, just like
Absolutely insane level stuff where you have
Ice members standing on people's heads
Like literally putting their entire weight on
Somebody's head on the concrete
Who's like almost unconscious
Because they're clearly just deranged people
Not every single one
But the ones that we're seeing
Vindictively spray people or whatever
They're just, I mean, it's insane what we're watching
And that's honestly as much as that's in
Just criminal
Unbelievable
It's the smallest part of the story
Because what we're talking about is this national force
That's marching around with no accountability
No warrants, no
Faceless enforcers who are being given
Israeli spyware
Who are spying on Americans, who are
Violating rights of everybody
This is from 2025
Trump gives green light for that deal
For the same, that's the same story
I just want to point out that, of course, part of it was to Ice
So Ice is using Israeli spyware
On top of everything else we're talking about
Which you already know
This is all I had this mixed up on accident
We'll come back to that, just to make a joke about it
But in case you didn't see this
This is real, by the way
And this is 404 Media put this out
Or excuse me, trying to rush
There is an article I believe they put out about it
But I meant to kind of breeze by this
And I'm just ruining it
But the point was I want to get into all this in the next show
But in case you didn't see it
Ice has these
Or they want to be buying and investing in what they call these
Shock gloves, which are real
And it says up to 20 million dollars
Which I don't believe has happened yet, but I think it's up in the air
Devices that deliver painful electric shocks
As soon as you put contact on skin
And this is not a joke
These are real
And it's a police officer
Look at that
So, I mean
There's going to be some that go good
Bad guys
Because they're complete bootlicking followers
Who don't realize that's not just bad guys
Who are being enforced on
In fact, it seems that most of them are not
That's not because there's not bad guys they could be getting
It's because that says something else, guys
But I just think it's important to realize
Now, this was just simply
Flock pitched a plan to turn Uber
And lift the drivers into roaming surveillance vehicles
With overlapping what we just talked about
With the Flock Connect to Israel
I mean, this is, this surveillance apparatus
Is everywhere
And it's clearly
Inconsistent as a light word to use
With our constitutional rights
And it's obviously being abused everywhere
The idea we know that Israeli soldiers
Serving with ICE is not a secret
We know that this is a very clear overlap
That's been highlighted, the training and everything else
ICE and the IDF, the transnational
Nexus of state control
Seven C's points out as well
ICE is infiltrated, trained and equipped
By the IDF, their national counter-terrorism seminars
Take place in Israel. He's not wrong
Here's Bavino, like we already showed you
Outwinding, that's exactly the truth
Israel
Like, you know, the nation over there
Has a lot, a lot of influence
On the Israeli government
Has a lot of influence on our politicians over here, I think
Is what he was kind of getting at
I see, yeah
And, you know, I'm not a politician
So I don't know and, you know, it's
The only things I ever had with the Israelis
Is when I was a young
Agent with Bortrak, Bortrak's tactical unit
They sent me to a
VIP security
School
And it was ran by the Israelis
So, I mean, think about that statement
He doesn't even realize, I guess, what he was saying
When you were a young recruit
So, yeah, so this has been going on a long time, guys
The ICE element
Has been going on, let me, all of this
But like what we're seeing today
Is a wild increase
So it's just important to realize
And they've been denying that forever
That's why this kid goes, oh, that is true
Because every time it comes up, it's denied
It's not a secret
What's his name, Aglera
The guy came back from Gaza
He was the veteran
He told himself, he was there, he watched it
But we know this
We have IDF coming to train police forces
Not ubiquitously, but it happens all over this country
Largely at the leadership level
But this is real
And why do you think we're seeing these tactics played out
On our streets today, guys?
It's not even a question, it's a statement
Of obvious nature
These people are being trained in the same tactics
And we're watching those tactics play out
In American streets, your rights be damned
DEF actually does work with
Border Patrol in ICE
Because I've always heard that
Well, that school is for all law enforcement
So not just ICE
Thanks for making that clear
They put it on, it was Israeli
They contracted with Israeli instructors
They had a lot of experience
And they were really good
Good from what Vivino knows
Looking at what Vivino does, how he acts
And what he operates, that's what he thinks is good
See how clear that is?
Hands off of some of the best training I've ever had
They did not eff around
So that was back
And they treat you like you're foreign terrorists
Because you disagree with their statements
You know, 2000, 2001
But I understand
2000, 2001
My God
I mean, if that was before 9-11
That says a lot
You know what people are saying? Perhaps there is
An outsized influence by Israel
But I don't know, I'm just a guy
Whatever
Maybe doesn't have any idea what's going on
But at the end of the day, guys, that's very, very revealing
Now, to wrap up
Just kind of give you a quick update
Again, you probably already know what's going on
Iran, this is as of the 10th
Today's the 14th
Iran rules out talks with Trump
Says he will wait until his term ends in 2029
Now, that's already changed
I mean, but I argue this was more of a political statement
Kind of saying, you know what, we don't need you
We'll just wait, you know, you're not relevant anymore
It's a game of propaganda, clearly
Now, I want to point this out
Z Media says if the straight remains
Closed until 2029
It will be levels of catastrophic
The world can't even begin to imagine
Which, well, yeah, obviously, if it is
I doubt that's what we're talking about
And I think that's important to think about
I mean, again, guys, is it possible? Yes
But I argue the entire world would step up to stop that
If this can, that's what Trump had planned on
That's what Israel convinced him
In my opinion was the original plan
That Iran would shut it down
They did not do that
And I keep making this point, guys
Because it's becoming even more relevant again
That they didn't shut it down
They were allowing people to go through
That were not at war with them and the media lied about that
Very provably, guys
It's like the minds and everything else we talked about
But then, of course, what happened is Trump and Netanyahu
You know, they murdered their religious leaders
They bombed their negotiating team
They tried to assassinate them a different time
Clearly they drove them to take action
That we can see today
But what my point is that only when that happened
Did you see the larger restriction
And a few different points including
To a large degree right now where they went full shutdown
Now that
Is important to see, but that's not what
It seems Iran was even close to
I mean, it's clear that's not what they wanted
It's clear that they did, I mean, they want to shut it down
Instantly if that's what they wanted, they did not
So what I think is important to highlight here
Is that the idea that they would shut it down until then
Is unrealistic if not ridiculous
Because Iran's not stupid
And they know what that will do
It'll turn the world against them when they don't
Right now it seems they've got more support than anybody
In regard to the, you know, in the dynamic
Of Israel, the US and Iran
And so I think that's worth noting
Is that this is kind of what they want you to think
Right, or really that we would assume
That Iran is some, you know, maniacal element
Not to say that's what she thinks
But just to use the point to make this point
That ultimately we have some, you know, maniacal Iranian
Thing that just wants to destroy the world for its agenda
I mean, guys, if you've been paying attention
Even momentarily, it's very
It's one of the most clear things
Of this entire situation
That Iran has been acting with restraint
That's not to say that that's who they are
That they're a good guy doing the right thing
I don't think that. I think they're governments
Who are doing what's in their best interest
Like all of them, but what's in their best interest
Clearly is to play the counterbalance
To the belligerence of the US government
But at the same time, I don't think that you can
Histories that look back, they don't operate the same way
They've been misrepresented my entire life
By this government who is committing genocide
And murdering and overtaking countries
And it doesn't mean that they're a good guy though
It's another government that's done plenty of bad things
To their people. At the end of the day
With what's going on, it's obvious
The intent is not what they're claiming it is
And they don't want to shut this down
And if it's shut down for in continuing
Periods of time going forward, it's because
Trump and his team make that happen
Because they don't want to be seen to lose
And rather, Israel does through all of them
Because it's clear they're not even able to make
These decisions. I just thought that was important
Will it stay closed if Trump doesn't comply?
I doubt it. I think it'll become a situation
Where, like we already saw, Iran
Tries to make deals with everybody else
And tries to continue to isolate
Israel and the United States, which is happening right now
It's the worst thinking about
But who knows?
You don't know what's going on. That's the point. It's all our opinion
Now, on the 10th
President Trump says, Iran's begging for a deal
Yes, we could all laugh
Because that's got to be the dumbest thing
He could have possibly said
When you know that's not true, guys
Literally, you know that's not true
Thank you, Mama
Middle Mama Sue. Anthony Aguilar was the guy
The veteran who came back from Gaza
Just posted out the chat
Holds all the cards with his uno picture
Right, how embarrassing
Well, I just want to reiterate
He's already said that before
Here's March 26th, or I could literally do like every two days
Following that
Trump says Iran's begging for a deal
Like I keep showing you over the time doing this
If that was true on March 26th
How in the world would we be here right now?
The only world that makes sense
Is that Trump has allowed that
Because he doesn't want to do the thing
He keeps telling you, that's not true
I don't even finish the sentence
That's ridiculous to think that he
Because they've gone to bomb anyway
So we'll read a belief they bombed a little bit
Just to make sure, come on guys
Like it takes a special kind of willful ignorance
To think that this is the truth
And honestly I think half the people saying this
Don't even believe it
They're either the guys that go along with whatever they say
And don't even care what the truth is
Or they know it's wrong and they're too afraid to point it out
Because that's their entire thing
August 2nd
Trump says Iran deal eminent
Remember that?
Wait a minute, it's August 14th
Didn't you just say yes because it wasn't happening
I know you know this
I'm just accentuating the point
It's really sad that people keep going along
Now as of yesterday
Iran reports no progress in restoring the interim deal
A senior Iranian source reports
That there has been absolutely no progress
In discussions with the US
Which is really what I'll show you
Is the same back channel mediator
That's always there
They're not even talking to them right now
As far as I can tell
And this is from the Reuters
And this is what Iran was saying a couple of days before that
The US must return to the interim deal
No ceasefire extension talks
Basically what Trump was hoping for
To stretch this out
They're saying you go back to the memorandum
Like they were doing at the JCPOA
Or no deal
And they held to the other one too guys
It's kind of crazy how people
Can't see the historical continuation here
So clearly I think it's obvious
At the very least believe they can
Last this out
I think if you're paying attention you know that they can
The likelihood is obvious
I'm not going to say I know what's going on behind there
But what we've already seen shows you
That it's pretty clear that they have planned for this
As they told us before
As Robert was writing about
It's pretty clear if you've been paying attention
This was always what was going to happen
Saved for some kind of extreme action
Which is certainly still possible
Hopefully not
Al Jazeera points out as of today
Iran has not decided whether to resume
Talks with the US which is quite a bit different
Than saying we're not going to right
Our gachi
Foreign minister says that according to Iranian media
Adding that cutter
And Pakistan are exchanging messages with Iran
As mediators but this does not amount to
Negotiation so basically simply saying
We're going to as I've been telling you since April
We're not talking to you
We will take your messages and if it's in our
Interest we'll respond but we're not talking to you
So that's still the same framing
So what happens is
Trump pretends that he's dealing
Because he's I guess
Whitcoff is telling them they're sending notes or whatever is ultimately happening
And then lying to you about it
I don't see how this could be going the other way
Or he's being lied to and is too afraid to admit that
I don't know maybe a mix of both
At the end of the day I bet you this continues
They continue to make a deal with Oman
And then Trump and Israel
Continue to be framed as the ones holding up
What everybody wants
And outside of weird
Like
Bombing kinetic action that shifts the conversation
I don't know what will change
And I mean like extreme levels which I'm hoping doesn't happen
Because we know where this could go
And I think honestly that seems to be the only
Different thing that could change the direction of this
Unless you know or let's be
You know think outside of the box
But just different is you know maybe we see
Some kind of radical operation for assassinations
That wipes everybody out I mean that's what
They've already tried to do so what I think
Is likely is something like that where they
Give themselves a moment to
Execute something that could change the direction
Because right now they've lost
Going through the same motions
Doesn't seem to change anything so it seems
Like a wait and see kind of thing and that's what
Trump is Iran rather
Is hoping for
Because it seems they think at the very least
I think they're right that Trump
Doesn't have all the time in the world
And Iran can last this out
On top of that you have this weird thing
Where today Bloomberg reporting
U.S. is pressing its allies
On ideological loyalty
NATO really
Ahead of what their operations in general
But the simple point is
Skip over quickly is that they're saying
Has the country shown alignment with the U.S. approach
Strong, clear, quiet
Very weird like basically saying
Do you even support of U.S. policy
And if not then we're I mean
Basically the bottom line is NATO
Was originally built on the idea that it was about
Not you know do you agree with everything
You know ostensibly anyway
But more so about the
You know post world order kind of thing
That we're now going to fight for freedom and not
You know control or never was really the truth
I argue was you know largely framing
But it still carries some different changes
But the point is that now it's about
You know you tell us that you're on our side
Or we're going to no longer
Use this to help you or we're going to push back on your agendas
Or Trump will sue you for other random
Inane things like it's what it feels like
At the end of the day demanding loyalty pledges
From your other I mean it's
It's a strange thing it shows you weakness
And it shows you an effort to drive
People and coerce people into your side
How do you not see that as them being aware
That they're not in control and that they're losing
Trump to Iran
And here's how it gets just ridiculous to wrap this up
Trump says you must pay for the deaths
And destruction that took place in Lebanon
Syria
Yemen and Gaza
Right because so obviously it's
Iran destroying these places right
I mean you see this is why you just get
They just they're off the rails guys
Nobody in the world outside of people
That would agree with whatever you say next
No matter what it is are going to agree
That Iran is destroying Lebanon
Look even if you want to pretend that
Hezbollah is Iran which it's not
Where is Hezbollah destroying Lebanon
Where is Iran
Even in any case destroying Syria
Where is Iran anywhere destroying
Yemen who the Yonsarala movement
The yet the what they call the Houthis
Is not in any way destroying Yemen
Gaza
I mean what are we even talking about at this point
And so clearly Trump is just desperately grasping
At something to keep this going
They have to pay like I think this is about trying
To extend the conversation to get them to respond
To them debate about whether they're not taking
The bait I think that's that's embarrassing
To me and it's clear that what they're
Doing is destroying all of these places for their benefit
And then asking them
To be responsible for it
It's it's revolting
To me truly so
Trump wants you to believe I'm sure I just close
Two things on accident yeah good
Trump now wants you to believe of course
It's on the 10th by the way but realize where we are
Right now that they control
The straight 100% I mean I've
At least seen him say this like 15 times
And not a once have they
Actually controlled the straight
Talk about desperate
Well it's open now
We're taking a lot of shit it's open now look
The only one that has control
Of who moves right now is the United States
Navy now maybe someone's telling
In that that's not the truth
I don't care what you're looking at you know
That's not the truth guys you can argue
That you're controlling some level of
Access to Iran's ports
But you're not controlling the straight you're just
Not because it's clear that
If that was the case this would be over didn't
You just say that's what you wanted to end the war
So it's just lazy
Guys it's just embarrassing and I don't get
Why he keeps going through the cycle I've said it every
Time we have a blockade that's been infallible
Nope other than the fact
That it's been fouled or fallible
Or you've failed or they've not stopped
Every ship that's
Ridiculous I mean guys you can literally prove
That ships have gotten past China made a whole point
About how many of them now at the end of the day
On top of that it's not even a complete
We've gone through all this
This is just him being desperate
It's a steel wall and we let
People in that we want to let in and those
People come in and they've been
Coming in and they're going out and they
We've already gotten word that they some of them
Have been paying in some way or another
Which makes sense because they've been trying to initiate
The same thing but see when you look at it
From their angle it's just extortion
There's no way around it guys Iran is trying
To manage this the passageway
As some sort of like like the rest of them
Now you can argue they're doing it for their benefit that's clear
But it is a passageway and like
All of the rest of them that's not in national waters
They have the right to do that and so it is every
Other one of them what they're doing is simply
Setting up a block before that and going
Pay us first it's just insane
Like there's just no way an honest person
Can not see this as a
Like almost like a tantrum of a child
So it's actually open now we do not
Let them go into Iran they're not
Admitted into the straight to go to Iran
But it's open for others
Now
Okay so then you go past them
And then Iran won't let you go because that's what keeps
That so it's not open
I don't he must know that
So I mean as an individual
You think this guy's on your side
Understand that this guy is talking
Right to you and he knows as a matter
Of fact that he's lying to you
And that's I mean unless he's just
So incredibly controlled
And and corralled that he has
No idea what's going on outside of what
Whitcoff shows him which I just would
I guess I would honestly
Not think is that crazy I just don't
Believe that's the case he knows he's lying to you
And I just think that's in worth noting how insulting
That would be a little bit
Complex because they will
On occasion drop a mine
We find the minds you know we've
Oh yeah show me one don't you love how he
Just evolves the story I thought you were stopping
Them I thought you were out of the minds but wait a minute
There's been ships there's times where it's open
They're lying to you guys there's really no way around
That minds exist yes
Is Ron usually before as I understand yes
Did they happen this time we must
Understand that didn't happen the same
Way Iran didn't shut the straight down because
That wasn't their objective he
Needed that because Israel promised
Him it would happen in my opinion didn't
Happen and they're still failing
Mine swept the entire straight
As you probably maybe heard maybe
It in here but but
We control the entire
Straight that you can't get through because Iran's blocking
It yeah sure lines up
Straight 100%
Now
Isis 100% about 17
Times you know or like he's won the war
About 57 times because it's
100% guys no problem
Well that's just stupid
Oh in case you didn't know straight is closed
Like literally the day he said this was
The same thing but doesn't matter right
Now here's Trump
Who I mean again speaking to the people
That still somehow find a way to support him
Here he is speaking to military personnel
And I just think this is so
Patronizing and I know he knows
He's lying guys
For like right look just understand
The gas prices have gone more than double
Since when this started that's
Anybody can look for themselves and here's
What he says about a thing that didn't
Actually happen about a thing that Iran
Wasn't actually doing and again even
Tulsi Gabbard told you that
So I just say this
So one more point actually
Doesn't it's sad how he needs to make
This point in every single public appearance
It just shows you how desperate he is
To control the narrative that he has already lost
Does anybody actually think it's about
Nuclear war anymore about about nuclear
Weapons and Iran's control
I mean he himself told you that that was destroyed
So it's just this game of stupidity
But he needs to say it because that's
The only thing he has to hold on to
For you to pay a tiny
A little bit more tiny bit for your gasoline
More than double you know just remember
You're doing it so that a very evil
Country cannot have a country really
It's the number one state sponsor
Of terror except not though because
ISIS attacks them and that's the
Number one you tell us all the time and the fact that you
Literally just called them good people that they're good
They're not bad you know it's a new regime now because
We changed it and they're good guys they want to work with us
They're begging for a deal we're going to make a deal with their great people
But now they're terrorists again because it works
For this moment right this this guy
Doesn't think we know what he said
Two seconds ago or he's
Just that desperate I mean there's only
I make the same framing every time I don't know
How people don't see that
In the world
A country really it's the number
One state sponsor of terror
In the world we don't want to have
Them have a nuclear weapon so remember
That when you have to pay a little
Bit more you're at four dollars
You realize everybody in the room knows that's not true right
They all have gas get cars they get gas
They're not stupid they all know
That's not true and yet he has the nerve
To stand there and tell them to their
Faces that it's okay to pay a little bit
More when nobody agrees with that
To stop this from happening that we don't
I mean arguably I think most people paying attention
No that's not the reality
But even if you did realize that
One remember I rather think that
Just like every other country
Iran has a right to those programs
And the idea of what he's saying is that we
Have to pay more gas to stop
The thing that they have a legal right to do
That you don't want them to do but they're not doing anyway
I mean how do you even rationalize that in the first place
Didn't you tell us this wasn't going to happen
Didn't you promise the war wasn't going to go into pass
I mean you go through this cycle and it's just
Infuriating or you
Can lie to yourself and pretend like he's telling the truth
That's what I think most people will end up doing
Like choosing between those two things
But I think you know where people are leaning
It's okay I mean it's
I'm not, I'll never apologize
I did the right thing
You'll never apologize
You've heard that before haven't you
I'll never apologize for the United States
You know after that terrorist attack on the plane
Iran's funny how that comes back around
This is who we are
Or excuse me who they are
Funny how I would even make that mistake
I don't even see them as the same thing
The government is not America
Let's never forget that
You are America
The government works for you
Or it's supposed to
Long since it's not, has changed
The reality has shifted if it was ever the case
But realize guys that they, that's
You know I mean
They are so clearly
Like as I've always said a lot recently even
You have more in common right now
With the people in Iran than you've ever had
With people in Washington DC
Even concluding all the different
You know the difference of ideology
Difference of I mean it's obvious
Look at people in Syria
Look at the people in the UK
The average people you have so much more in common
With them and the way they live their lives
Than you do with anybody in the leadership
And if you really take the time to look
You'll find that out
Now as a kind of a humorous point in this
As you might have seen
And I honestly now I'm going to get into this
In the real depth of the way people try to frame it
I just include that picture to be funny
What it appears to happen is that Trump
Kid in a catering with a right as catering
Cart in secret Air Force One
Swap to fend off Iran assassination
Threat what it appears to have been is some sort
Of secret swap where he was moved into
A different catering type plane
Or carrier in order
To hide and so they thought he was on something
Else. But to me that's
Enough it's not like this is the joke
Which I think is funny
Because it makes me
Makes fun of a person who thinks very highly of himself
That deserves to be called out for what he's doing
Trump in the podcast hiding a little
Airplane cart hiding from Iran's bombs
But the truth is more so that
I think this probably happens more often than we realize
Because they are trying to avoid
What they think are
They're literally murdering families all over the world
And so maybe they think people hate them
Crazy right? And so they try to
Make sure they're not going to be attacked
But what I think is more important than any of it
It does show it's a little embarrassing for them
I agree, but what I think is important
And one other thing is that they also left the media
On the plane that they thought might be
Bombed. I think that's wildly relevant
But the bigger part I think
Is that it simply shows you that Trump
As a president, the US government
As an entity very clearly
Thinks that Iran has the capabilities
That they keep stressing they no longer have
That's the main point for me here
He was worried he was going to get attacked
Which means they know Iran does not
It's not just petered out of all of its munitions
So they lie to you
And that means you have to consider
I mean, I would argue you should consider all the other things
They're probably lying about
And as Wyatt Reed wrote
The CIA is blaming Israel for their
Made-up threat
That left Trump hiding inside of a catering truck
The claim that Iran planned
To blow up Trump's plane
Was Israel derived, not US generated
And viewed as low confidence
That said the CIA
As telling their colleagues at the Washington Post
So Glenn Greenwald commented
Said, so if I have this right
The CIA itself understands
And is saying that Israel
Manufactures false intelligence
See how it's relevant
To make Trump fear non-existent threats
From Iran
So that he will continue to use American resources
And sacrifice service members
To fight their wars for them
Correct, what I also argue
So they're so reliant
On these Israeli spyware tools and surveillance
Which are a whole thing
We've talked about including the companies
That we just went through today, including Oracle and Palantir
Which are clearly intertwined with Israel
The point is that I think
They rely so heavily on them
That they, you know
We already saw this with the war
Israel tells him something and his own people
Say that's not true and he goes with what Israel says
Or he's not able to
Say no, either way
Doesn't that seem relevant to what we just talked about
And that's why this is just funny to think about
Because you know
They think so highly of themselves
Now
Last few clips to end with
You might have heard the kind of ongoing story
About the
USS Abraham, right?
Oh, the Lincoln
Excuse me, the point is that there's one of their
Carriers, I mean
They're lying about it
But there's people speaking out from these ships
There's been all kinds of crazy stories that I couldn't confirm
But I'm starting to think some of them are probably real
But I'm going to leave it off today
Only because I can't confirm, you know
Like deaths or whether jumping
I mean there's all kinds of stuff, but at the end of the day
It's been pretty clearly shown that they are out
Way longer than they're supposed to be
People aren't getting the food they need
And people are getting real, I mean these are people that were deployed
In many cases under false pretenses
We started with this saying they weren't going
For this purpose, right?
And you have a lot of military who do not want to be
A part of this, guys
So here's what he says when asked about that very conversation
What else do I have to say
Well, no, that ship is moving
No, they're not
Okay, so yes they are
And there's families and service people that have been saying
We're concerned about this
And so his answer when said there are families that are concerned
About what's going on, no they're not
Okay, they are
But that's fine
That ship is moving, no they're not
That ship is moving right now
Or very shortly and it's being replaced
With another very similar ship
Has the deployment gone on too long?
No, no, no
Has the deployment gone on too long?
Nearly long enough, thank you
Yeah, he loves to do that, not long enough
Because I'm that, I'm tough
And I'll push back even when it makes me look stupid
You know, he does
You don't yell the thing that you're not supposed to say
Just to make a point when that thing
Will make you lose
Make you look stupid
counters your agenda
That just makes you a child
You know what I mean? There are times when you do
To make a point about
I agree with this and I'm going to make the point
Even though you tell me it's wrong
We've talked about things like that
But in this case, what do you mean not long enough
Nobody wants that, not people you support
The only people that want this to go longer
Than it already has are Israel
The intelligence apparatus
Not anybody who supports this person
Who has put him, or you know
I shouldn't even, you know I don't think that
But the argument of how he got put
The president in the first place that people support him
Not long enough
So you win a minor point over this
Reporter who stuck it to the question
And that's how short-sighted you are
To yell that this hasn't gone long enough
When you have military watching this
Who are struggling on that ship
I mean, you have to realize guys
This guy doesn't care about anything
Other than his petty moments
Or he's just that short-sighted or
Is that senile or whatever else you want to talk about
You have to acknowledge that
Is this man fighting for America first
Or the people on that aircraft carrier
I think we know that's not the case
Or at least, I would argue that's clear
That is my opinion
Maybe he's got some grand plan that we don't see
Like I always say, it's always possible
Personally, I just think it's obvious
Last clip here
Or is it, yeah, one last clip
This is just a similar time
This is him talking about how good we're doing
Financially
And I made this point a lot
That this is what he actually frames
Like when he's saying we're doing great
Everything's up
And you know, the 401Ks
And really what he's pointing to
Is the inner circle of the oligarchy
Or just, you know, the elitists
The upper echelon, the people that see themselves as elitists
Not elite, but elitists
They believe they're better than you
But they're not
The point is that he has always framed it like this
And just not said it this way
And I think that's been clear
Because the average person is suffering
The average person is paying more for everything in their life
But you know who isn't suffering?
Wall Street
Yeah, boy
Go ahead
Go ahead, anybody?
I have a lot of things that are happening
A lot of good things
The economy is doing unbelievably
From the standpoint of Wall Street
We just set another record, as you know
Okay, great
Okay, well, is that what you think is important, guys?
Is it important to you
That Wall Street is making tons of money?
Does that translate in any meaningful way
Into your average life?
I don't mean average in that sense
But the normal life of average people
No, it does not
And in fact, that's the point I make all the time
About 401Ks
There's plenty of people that have them
But if you look at the statistics
The average people, the vast majority of Americans
Don't even have a...
They're living paycheck to paycheck
The idea that they have 401Ks
Or savings plans or retirements
Or care about the NASDAQ
Any of these things
The Dow is insane
It's disconnected from reality
Now those things clearly matter
When it comes to certain measures or metrics
But whether that amounts to people of the country
Being financially successful or happy
Is an illusion
It matters for them, for Congress
For people in power
And so that's what's so frustrating
Is whether he even knows it or not
And I think he does
He's going, you know, we care about them
Or maybe they have this, you know
Trickle-down economics broken idea
That somehow you benefit the upper class
It'll trickle down to you
It never does
It never has
History has shown that
Maybe in some cases
But not in a regular
Says not the way that they frame that
That it just all works out
And it all just...
No, it gets...
Goes the other direction
And so what he's doing is saying
Wall Street is benefiting
While all of you are suffering
One more transfer of wealth
Just like with COVID-19
In all the different ways
We're being reorganized
I believe that's damn obvious
Everything in front of us
Is being reorganized and reaching
I mean, that's what they tell us
They're reimagining our world
It's just not being as
Put on the front and surf
On the front, you know
In the surface of the conversation
Like it was during COVID-19
Like it was during the Great Reset
And there's obvious partisan reasons for that
But if you're paying attention
It's the same thing
Literally the same endpoints
Same goals, same dates
I just hope people can actually
Start to see that
So lastly to finish after this point
About how Great Wall Street is doing
Well, guess what
The US government officially
Posts its largest July
Budget deficit in history
Negative $432 billion
Yeah, but there
But the guys at Wall Street
Are making tons of money
See how much that matters
Due to the acceleration
And federal spending
A almost half a trillion
Dollars in deficit
Interest on US debt rose
$26 billion from last July's
Levels to an alarming
$118 billion for the month
That's just interest
This puts total interest expenses
For the fiscal year of 2026
Up to $1.17 trillion
As a result
Interest expense has officially surpassed
Both national defense and Medicare
Spending
In other words
The US government now spends more money
Just on interest
Which we've talked about getting here
Than it does to fund the entire US military
To provide healthcare for seniors
We cannot afford higher interest rates
I just mean
Simple point again
They're profiting
While the country
And Americans
Suffer
Just like every other war
We've been involved in
In my opinion anyway
So
I find that to be very important
Now I was
I just had it
I feel like I might
I want to end with
What was that
There's a clip that I had
I'm probably not going to be able to find it
About the money
Remember that
Showing you the different
Not that it's actually the best clip to end with
But I just thought it was relevant
The idea that we can even like fathom
What a trillion dollars is
Anybody
It's like it's not
The idea
After a certain line
It just kind of blends into the background
And that's what they've come to understand
What's 1 trillion, 10 trillion, 50 trillion
It's just debt
Don't worry about it
It matters
But I can't find it
There it is
Nice
Cool
Alright, so we'll end with this today
And it really does
I mean it accentuates the point
Of how much this is
And what it means
And how, you know, the point is that they're
You know, at the joke
We'll make it today
The fiscal conservative
It's not just about conservatives though
But today, you know
The fiscal conservatives are
You know, saving us again from the
The bottom line is that we have a situation
Where our government left and right
Pass the baton back and forth
And it just continues to get worse and worse
If a company continued to make less money
Or rather just continue to go into more debt
Consistently, it wouldn't exist anymore, guys
You'd be, you know
Anything like this
Wouldn't exist if it wasn't the government
And all they're doing is siphoning wealth from you
And, you know, on top of all that
Committing genocide
And, you know, spying on Americans
And ignoring your rights
And putting, you know, all the stuff we talk about
So it really comes down to yet again
To whether you want this to change
What do you care about?
What do you believe in?
Ask yourself these things
Now is the time to care
Because I argue there's a time in the near future
Where your life will look very different
And you'll be wondering why you didn't do something now
And, you know, I've never wanted to be hyperbolic
But I want to be very clear about this
What we're highlighting, I've said a million times
Is not my opinion
My opinion is how this, you know
How it comes together, who they utilize
And what the meaning and intent is
What they're doing is happening in real time
Right in front of you
They're literally showing you what they're doing
And they're rationalizing it with fighting China
And rationalizing it with evil bad guy terrorists
And evil, you know, and it's so clear
So it just matters about what you care about
And what you want to do about it now
Thank you for tuning in
I love you all, as always
Question everything
Come to your own conclusions
Stay vigilant