WEBVTT

00:04.660 --> 00:08.920
Well, if you thought anything was going to go back to normal after the whole COVID crisis

00:08.920 --> 00:12.640
and those huge amounts of deficit spending and federal spending, well, it's clear now

00:13.180 --> 00:14.360
that that's not happening.

00:14.500 --> 00:17.200
That things are not going back to normal.

00:17.420 --> 00:20.260
Of course, this is what always happens when there's a crisis, right?

00:20.820 --> 00:23.400
We're told that, okay, it's the recession, it's a war.

00:23.540 --> 00:26.220
We just need to have huge deficits, huge amounts of federal spending.

00:26.260 --> 00:27.380
That'll get us through the crisis.

00:27.500 --> 00:28.460
That'll solve the problem.

00:28.940 --> 00:31.060
And then we'll go back to normal afterward.

00:31.620 --> 00:32.720
That never happens.

00:33.060 --> 00:40.200
People who are more observant observers of the federal government know that that

00:40.200 --> 00:41.020
doesn't happen.

00:41.120 --> 00:45.280
What happens is it ratchets things up to a new higher level of spending and that

00:45.280 --> 00:49.920
becomes the new baseline from which huge amounts of new deficits and spending

00:49.920 --> 00:51.340
levels occur.

00:51.980 --> 00:53.580
So what's happening right now?

00:54.260 --> 00:57.880
Well, things ain't going back to normal is what the situation is.

00:57.880 --> 00:59.340
And so let's look.

00:59.580 --> 01:01.880
We're now two months in to the new fiscal year.

01:01.880 --> 01:06.340
We just had some new data come out from the Treasury and the monthly Treasury

01:06.340 --> 01:09.420
report on spending and revenue.

01:10.040 --> 01:13.800
And we can see what the deficits are month to month.

01:13.960 --> 01:16.080
So let's look at the first two months combined.

01:16.300 --> 01:22.140
And what we see is that for 2025 fiscal year, which started on October 1st,

01:22.140 --> 01:29.540
were $624 billion in a deficit so far, one sixth of the way through the year,

01:29.960 --> 01:37.760
comparing to 2021 fiscal year, which so that was October, November of 2021,

01:39.060 --> 01:42.860
very much in the midst of that first year of COVID.

01:43.440 --> 01:48.760
That was only $429 billion for that period.

01:48.760 --> 01:54.940
And it's just been getting, there was a slight amount of retrenchment after that

01:54.940 --> 02:01.720
in 22, 23, 24, but things have only accelerated in recent years.

02:01.900 --> 02:07.220
So now over a half a trillion dollars in just this small amount of the new

02:07.220 --> 02:07.980
fiscal year.

02:08.280 --> 02:12.000
And how does that translate into a full year then if we just project out

02:12.540 --> 02:15.780
for the full 2025 fiscal year?

02:15.780 --> 02:23.380
It's looking like it's going to be something like 3.2, 3.5 trillion dollars for that period.

02:23.520 --> 02:25.580
Now, how does that compare to COVID again?

02:25.980 --> 02:28.540
So if we go back and look at the full fiscal year for 2020,

02:29.220 --> 02:33.660
so that was that was some of late 2019, which wasn't a COVID period.

02:34.200 --> 02:40.280
But it includes all of that March, April, May, all that acute COVID freakout period,

02:40.620 --> 02:43.460
the lockdowns, and we're told huge amounts of spending being necessary.

02:44.000 --> 02:48.460
That was $3.1 trillion deficit for that year.

02:48.780 --> 02:52.540
And then it was $2.7 trillion for 2021.

02:53.140 --> 02:56.180
Yeah, dropped back to 1.3 trillion, which was still far and beyond

02:56.180 --> 03:00.440
anything that had been happening during the economic expansion before that.

03:00.520 --> 03:03.380
Even Trump, who at the time I had commented on and said,

03:03.460 --> 03:08.760
look, Trump in the 2019 fiscal year, he ran up $984 billion.

03:09.200 --> 03:11.300
That was back in the 2019.

03:12.860 --> 03:14.480
And I couldn't believe that.

03:14.700 --> 03:17.900
That just seemed huge, that you would have a near trillion dollar deficit

03:17.900 --> 03:21.280
in a year that was neither a recession nor a war.

03:22.240 --> 03:24.200
But it turned out that that was just little.

03:24.380 --> 03:27.620
That was that was child's play because in the next fiscal year,

03:27.620 --> 03:29.400
which of course included a lot of Trump spending,

03:29.600 --> 03:35.140
Trump signed off on those huge mega deficits that occurred during the first year of COVID.

03:36.520 --> 03:38.520
That just shot up to over 3 trillion.

03:38.520 --> 03:43.780
So now if we're looking at being on the conservative end, around $3.1 trillion,

03:44.200 --> 03:47.660
for our current fiscal year, well, then we can just say it's worse than COVID now

03:47.660 --> 03:49.000
in terms of deficit spending.

03:49.500 --> 03:53.560
And that's pretty remarkable that they've managed to get to that level.

03:53.940 --> 03:57.140
Now, you could say, oh, well, aren't things going to change before that happens?

03:57.300 --> 04:02.400
Well, I really don't think that the Department of Government Efficiency,

04:02.780 --> 04:08.420
DOGE, is going to reign in spending a significant amount during this fiscal year,

04:08.420 --> 04:10.100
which of course just ends in September,

04:11.660 --> 04:14.580
what DOGE even have time to really make a difference.

04:15.080 --> 04:18.660
And that's assuming that they would really even be able to make a difference.

04:18.740 --> 04:22.000
Because if you're a season observer of Washington,

04:22.240 --> 04:25.300
you know that presidents have been sending down recommendations to Congress

04:25.300 --> 04:26.120
for many, many years.

04:26.280 --> 04:30.140
Congress is in charge of the budgeting process as required by the Constitution.

04:30.940 --> 04:33.160
Yeah, they get recommendations from the executive branch,

04:33.220 --> 04:35.240
which is what a DOGE recommendation would be.

04:35.600 --> 04:38.020
And they pretty much throw those recommendations at the garbage

04:38.020 --> 04:41.500
because Congress has its own constituencies.

04:41.840 --> 04:43.120
It has its own priorities.

04:43.560 --> 04:44.940
It's a totally different thing.

04:45.980 --> 04:51.720
And when you start to get down into the details of federal spending,

04:52.440 --> 04:57.700
you start to see that there's very little appetite for it, especially at the voter level.

04:57.860 --> 05:02.140
Where are these members of Congress going to hear that they want specific cuts done?

05:02.140 --> 05:06.900
Because when we look at poll after poll specifics on spending,

05:07.100 --> 05:09.180
always pretty much end up with the public saying,

05:09.340 --> 05:10.720
yeah, you should spend more.

05:11.100 --> 05:14.240
Yes, we get these polls that say, oh, in general,

05:14.280 --> 05:17.280
the public thinks that we should spend,

05:17.820 --> 05:21.120
that we should cut a lot of money from the overall budget.

05:21.300 --> 05:23.160
But then when you start to drill down and say, okay, well,

05:23.180 --> 05:24.620
should you cut money from Social Security?

05:24.720 --> 05:26.760
They always say no, like lopsidedly, right?

05:26.900 --> 05:29.120
Two to one against any significant cuts.

05:29.120 --> 05:33.160
Social Security, Medicare, even for these other poverty relief programs

05:33.640 --> 05:35.780
that many people probably think they'll never be on.

05:36.220 --> 05:37.280
Those are still popular.

05:37.400 --> 05:38.240
People don't want to cut those.

05:38.820 --> 05:42.680
Education programs, they say, if you ask, should we cut education?

05:43.120 --> 05:44.040
Should we cut health care?

05:44.460 --> 05:48.000
They always say no, lopsidedly against cuts.

05:48.300 --> 05:50.160
And then if you look at military spending,

05:50.720 --> 05:53.620
which of course is always discretionary spending for the most part,

05:54.180 --> 05:55.360
they say no there too.

05:55.360 --> 06:00.200
Maybe less than one third think that too much is being spent

06:00.200 --> 06:03.280
on the military in terms of these polls.

06:03.840 --> 06:06.660
So if Congress looks around and they look at that sort of thing,

06:07.180 --> 06:09.380
it would be political suicide in many cases

06:09.380 --> 06:11.280
to go back to your constituents and say, yes, well,

06:11.560 --> 06:15.320
in order to make good on cutting federal spending,

06:15.440 --> 06:16.500
we're going to cut Social Security.

06:16.620 --> 06:17.360
We're going to cut defense.

06:18.080 --> 06:20.780
There are, of course, huge amounts of government contractors

06:21.940 --> 06:24.500
in each congressional district.

06:24.500 --> 06:27.040
And they're not going to be in favor of that sort of thing.

06:27.060 --> 06:31.180
And then, of course, you would be crazy to go against the elderly vote

06:31.180 --> 06:34.580
and start cutting Medicare or Social Security.

06:34.680 --> 06:38.840
So it's just really hard to see where these cuts are going to happen

06:39.600 --> 06:41.300
without a major change in ideology.

06:41.640 --> 06:42.060
That's the thing.

06:42.220 --> 06:46.840
There's just not going to be one of these top down big cuts to spending.

06:47.020 --> 06:48.980
And I'm not even saying they have to cut the whole deficit,

06:49.100 --> 06:51.720
right, which of course require like $3 trillion in cuts,

06:51.740 --> 06:54.360
which is just crazy town sort of talk.

06:54.500 --> 06:55.420
In Washington.

06:55.720 --> 06:59.780
But hey, maybe just $1 trillion cut.

07:01.400 --> 07:04.200
No appetite for that from what I can see.

07:04.660 --> 07:06.360
When will that happen?

07:06.660 --> 07:08.720
It'll have to be after the public starts to see,

07:08.900 --> 07:10.540
and we can discuss that in another video,

07:11.060 --> 07:13.000
when the public starts to see the real connection

07:13.000 --> 07:16.960
between deficit spending and higher interest rates,

07:17.260 --> 07:20.100
the connection between deficit spending and price inflation,

07:20.700 --> 07:24.060
the impoverishing effects of deficit spending upon the public.

07:24.500 --> 07:25.920
The public doesn't see that yet.

07:26.080 --> 07:28.120
They still think that it's pretty much the deficit spending

07:28.120 --> 07:30.860
is something that their grandchildren can deal with later,

07:31.080 --> 07:35.640
and it's no big deal for us here in the here and now.

07:36.480 --> 07:37.340
That's a mistake.

07:38.180 --> 07:41.060
And we're going to have to see some changes in public opinion

07:41.060 --> 07:43.340
and ideology in terms of spending

07:43.340 --> 07:46.420
before we can expect any significant cuts.

07:46.580 --> 07:47.980
And until then, I think we'll just continue

07:47.980 --> 07:49.740
to see these huge deficits.

07:50.880 --> 07:53.660
They might increase decrease slightly to $2 trillion.

07:54.720 --> 07:56.480
Maybe even go down to $1 trillion.

07:56.840 --> 07:59.020
But just a few years ago, those would have been considered

07:59.020 --> 08:00.980
huge, huge deficits.

08:01.440 --> 08:03.720
And of course, they're just moving us ever faster

08:03.720 --> 08:06.720
toward $40 trillion in debt.

08:07.020 --> 08:08.600
And you have to pay interest on that.

08:09.180 --> 08:12.060
You have to deal with that in a variety of ways

08:12.060 --> 08:14.000
that affect the public and affect their ability

08:14.000 --> 08:15.580
to save and pay their bills.

08:16.060 --> 08:19.060
And there's just no sign that that's a problem politically

08:19.060 --> 08:23.420
yet for people who are running up these huge bills.

08:23.420 --> 08:25.320
So in the future, there'll be a change,

08:25.420 --> 08:27.840
but I just don't think that's on the menu for 2025.

