It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the Daily Wrap Up.
Monday, March 16th, 2026, thank you for joining me today.
I have a limited time frame today, still about a couple hours, just so you can set the table before we start.
I'll be recording with Propaganda and Co.
After this, not sure if that's live.
If that's out there, maybe tune in, jump in the comments, say hello.
Start for the delay to start there.
I don't want to get into it right now, but there's something weird going on with Rockfin as you guys may have seen.
Not that that platform is necessarily on the side of independent media today.
Very clearly has been shown to disregard a lot of people on that platform, straight up censored people.
So in no way is that a platform that I really support today.
Nonetheless, it is a platform that we utilize like YouTube and the rest.
And it turns out a huge portion of our library is just not there anymore.
Interestingly focused around certain content, but that could just be a coincidence.
Now I reached out, no one's responding.
The reason I'm bringing this up today, I wasn't planning on it is before I went live,
there was a lot of weird errors going on with the starting.
Then all of a sudden the whole thing went blank and I had to like open a private browser.
It was very weird.
I'm just wondering if there's something going on there.
Just want to put on the record in case something comes up later down the line.
Very strange, but you know, I think everybody is trying to work this out for themselves as this goes in this direction.
Is it going to get worse, going to get better?
Rockman's clearly taken the direction to go away from independent medium.
I understand why, but handling it the right way is important.
Now today, what I'm largely going to be talking about with the time that I have,
and if I don't get to some of the stuff at the end, we'll be talking about it tomorrow.
But largely updates on Iran, what's going on with the ongoing war
and how that interconnects with a lot of different points.
And you know, this is going to be, as I said recently continually,
we're going to update as we continue to see how this goes forward.
Not always every single, you know, attack and response and missile.
And because most of that, by the way, is it's hard to know what you can verify
when it's in the midst of an ongoing war because both sides always lie.
I'm saying that because there's a lot of people out there who want the moment to moment reporting.
You're not going to get that here in regard to who bombed and how they responded
unless they find it relevant.
And as always, it sounds what I think is going to be most important for you.
But I'm going to include a lot that I want to start with today
that I think is relevant for just what we're always talking about.
And the dishonesty around this administration, like our government in general,
to make clear, but what's important to see as I titled today
is not just the growing awareness of the two-party illusion
and how, you know, whether they, people want to vote again next time
or they want to choose a side again next time,
right in this moment, the awareness is very easy to see.
And also around Israel's influence on this government.
And for those that want to immediately try to make that about something other than exactly what I just said,
then that's a choice for people to deviate, to deflect, to disregard, to be dishonest.
In this case, Israel's government's committing crimes.
Whether you think that's connected to their religion,
whether you think it's connected to one person or another, you can decide that.
But for anybody to pretend like we can't see what they're doing
is just disgustingly dishonest.
The war crimes, the ongoing genocide, the history, the long history,
the origin point to today, which we'll end with today, regardless of time,
a great video talking about Zionism.
And what it really is and the ongoing reality of how that's, people are becoming aware of that
and the increasing push to make people who call out the political organization that it is
and what they're doing racist, despite that not really even making sense
when you understand what we're actually talking about.
And even if you may think that I misunderstand that it is Judaism, Ryan,
well, I don't think that.
So how in the world would it be called, you know,
this gets into the weird territory of like inadvertent racism
or somehow I'm raised even though I don't think that.
To me, it's all about the intent.
People can be inadvertently in a number of things,
but it matters to me what they mean to be,
and it should matter to everybody else as well.
But all of this, that point to be made, or that point to be said about right now
and how it's clear with the Iran war that Israel's government is,
I mean, at this point, dictating the actions being taken,
which is not that big of a bombshell for those that understand
what we've already been talking about over the years,
but in this case, just Iran's war, the war on Iran
and what they've been trying to accomplish and the actions taken thus far.
But going back, if you really start to look at what we've been highlighting
and what you're maybe just seeing for the first time,
you'll see those markers everywhere else.
You'll see in the Obama administration,
you'll see in the Bush administration, you will see this.
And it's not just about one thing or one group,
but these things are there and you have to be honest about that.
So what it matters for today is this,
and I'm not going to make a hard point about this today,
but we've already touched on it a lot.
And there are some points where it connects to the Zionism part of the conversation
where this is, I mean, they told you, it's a religious war.
Iran's not saying that.
Shiites aren't saying that.
Hexeth is saying that.
Rubio is saying that.
Graham is saying that.
Left and right, we're ultimately getting these same points
and all of them seem to support the Israeli Zionist religious agenda.
And that's driving the U.S. actions on the ground.
That's killing American servicemen for Israel's war.
And from what I can see, from what I'm seeing,
more than anything Republicans are starting to see that.
And this is where it becomes hard for certain people to make this choice.
There's the Charlie Kirk point to this conversation.
If you get my meaning, there's a very clear awakening happening,
even with those people who I would argue are otherwise dishonest for partisanship,
who are starting to see that Zionism has flipped its way in
and is manipulating their group.
And maybe we'd even disagree on every single thing other than that,
but they'll still go, I see what Zionism is doing.
And they might then work this out to make it seem in their mind that
Trump had to or Zionism did it.
Well, you know, maybe, but you can understand if you look at everything else
that Trump is a player in this game, guys.
But that's a different conversation for this point,
but to understand how this all continues
and why it's so important for us to call this out now.
Before the next, I mean, midterm presidential election,
whatever you think might change the few.
We need to be on the same page now before we get into the next
political chaos situation.
I mean, every moment we see these things.
No, as I rambled open today,
I want to make sure we get into this right now
because I want to make sure we get into some of the bulk of the show today
before we run out of time.
So if you see me nearing close to 8.30 Central Time
and I'm still going, please comment in the chat and let me know.
But I got my arm set.
So let's get into this.
So I want to start today with a point about,
I guess, just dishonesty, two-party illusion stuff, as we often do.
You know, just some of the different things we see that I think are important to
make sure you see, for any number of reasons.
One of these are the absurdity of what they're...
I mean, I would categorize this under the heading of deflection.
But, you know, it's easy to do that.
That's a distraction, deflection.
Look over there, which I think is almost always part of, you know,
whatever the big story happening, that's part of the story.
That's happening.
I see it everywhere.
But it's not only that in some cases, right?
But in this case, hey, we're announcing a new thing
that sounds mysteriously exactly like Doge.
But it's brand new.
And it's going to change everything.
I mean, imagine the desperation of trying to re-initiate the thing
that you failed in doing with a slightly different framing.
I mean, not even...
Other than it be called Doge, it's identical to what he's talking about.
I'll play it for you.
I'll read it for you anyway.
And so they're discussing this new thing
that we're all going to champion.
And JD Vance apparently is going to be involved.
And it just kills me that this...
Like, okay, let's just say they do this
and it starts to actually make positive effects.
I think that's good.
I don't care how it happens.
I want these things.
I want the actual fraud and the actual corruption.
But from people who are showing you that they're lying
every single day, people who are involved with corruption,
people who are pardoning, people who are literal criminals,
then it's kind of hard to take it a face value
that they want to end fraud and corruption, right?
It's kind of silly, but that's how partisans play this game.
It's about their side versus the other.
Nothing else seems to matter.
I'm of the mind that they rapidly diminishing perspective.
Happening soon.
President Trump will soon sign, excuse me,
an executive order this afternoon in the Oval Office
alongside bans to officially establish and launch
a fraud task force.
A whole of government effort to hunt down and prosecute.
Sounds familiar?
Massive waste, fraud and abuse of ripping off American taxpayers.
You know, aside from the 75 people,
well, I don't know, like 15 people that Trump has pardoned
for, I mean, literally that.
I literally defrauding American people COVID-19.
You know, whatever.
I shouldn't even need to go any further.
That's how ridiculous that is.
And everybody knows about that.
There's just people that jump in and go,
it was political persecution.
Well, maybe, probably.
He also broke the law, though.
That matters to me in regard to the people they pardoned.
I could go down the list.
I mean, some of these people have even gotten caught again
and went back to jail.
It's just ridiculous.
And before you jump down my throat,
that's not unique to Trump.
Guys, Biden was just as corrupt.
Quote, this is another promise made and kept
by promised by President Trump.
He announces this and this is leave it.
He announced this in the State of the Union address
and announced that Vice President
will be overseeing this task force.
This is really going to establish a whole
of government effort to fight fraud
at both the state and federal level.
So this feels like we're just using this moment,
this narrative to get further involved
in local state discussions where it pertains
to maybe ICE or whatever else or any number of things.
Or the idea that a whole of government,
anything right now where we can see who's driving
the whole of government direction should be
a little bit concerning with what Palantir's doing,
with what the AI direction is doing,
with the lack of constitutional rights,
or rather, they're caring about them.
You know, all that aside, this should be alarming
with what we know we are.
But just the main point,
I said, yeah, that's called Doge.
We did this.
And it turned out to be one huge bait and switch.
Everybody can see that.
I mean, there's only people that are like pretending
it didn't really happen and those who acknowledge it.
Because we're here now and none of that stuff happened.
More government spending, bigger government.
I mean, in fact, you can literally look into
what they were doing and see that it was all about
AI data control, merging things for the AI data systems,
gaining Israel access, Palantir.
All of this happened during that time frame.
And now you've got Amy Gleason just sidling up
next to the digital ID discussion
because that's what it always was.
Digital services turned into Doge.
Now, apparently that's just same Doge, I guess,
but she's over there talking about wearables
with RFK Junior.
And now they're starting a new one,
which guess what?
Guys will cost more money, more taxpayer dollars
for the lowering of more spending.
It's counterintuitive.
And then it's, and I continued by saying,
as many of us warned at the time in the beginning of this,
not because we were psychic, but because we were skeptical.
And every moment that we saw it go worse and worse,
we kept going, because that's what I worried about.
Here we are.
And of course, it was to hide massive AI data grabs
and the building of a new surveillance grid.
But sure, let's trust the plan trademark
because I'm sure he's not lying this time.
I'll also include a article Derek wrote
with the debate down at the bottom
of a debate with him and Naomi Wolf.
Now you might have seen this building.
I think this is just relevant to include
for many different reasons
because it's just a lesson in old media versus new media.
Actually, I shouldn't say a lesson.
That's the wrong way to frame that,
but it's a lesson in bad debate tactics.
It's a lesson in dishonesty.
It blew me away.
I mean, I had a very partisan opinion
of her over the years, how she sided next to Jones
as an info wars and was very...
I mean, you look at her timeline,
she's retweeting some of the most egregiously manipulative
Israeli propagandists.
Eolokobi or, you know, Elon Levy,
like people that are...
I can't even think of words grand enough
to how bad and obvious they are,
like been caught lying a thousand times
and sharing those things about Iran
and sharing those things about whatever they say.
So you can decide whether dishonest or just blind
or partisan, but these are people
that are showing themselves to be stuck
in an old thing or still being dishonest
for a larger reason as far as I'm concerned.
You can disagree with my framing.
Watch this and I don't think you'll be able to.
Exposing the Iran war hype lessons
from a one-sided debate with Naomi Wolf.
I'll leave it at that.
You form your own opinions about this.
It's very hard.
Every possible strong and every possible fallacy.
I mean, I don't even want to go into it
because I'll talk about it for 10 minutes
because it's just...
It's so crazy to me how quickly this showed,
you know, almost a deliberate effort
to treat him like he's a child
or to ignore basic fundamentals
of how debates process or, you know, on and on and on.
And it was all rooted in
Iran war good and bombing needs to happen
because bad guy Iran.
That's essentially the argument.
You can watch it for yourself
if you think I'm being too critical.
Now on the Iran part,
because I want to make sure we get into this
right in the beginning
before we get into save act, digital ID,
plenty of other connected points,
is just to understand that this is so...
I mean, what is it now?
Weeks?
First of all,
way past the,
well, I guess War Powers Act, who cares, right?
Right back in that same old spin
where you had all people going,
but Obama didn't do it,
but Bush didn't do it.
And then guess what?
Okay, now it's not happening.
And oh, now we'll just move forward.
Right.
Like I said,
those of you going,
but they didn't do it.
Is that because you wanted it
to continue happening?
Apparently so
because you let him do it too.
Like why would the logic be
to criticize the people
trying to stop the bad thing
because they failed to call it out before?
Why would the logic be to do that
instead of going,
okay, well, you're a hypocrite,
but we can all agree this is bad
because the people doing that
inside there are children,
or at least acting juvenile
because it's not about
even what they claim they want.
It's about a team sport game.
I think everyone is seeing this
at this point.
And so the reality of this
is that we're so quickly,
like this just basically start,
well, again, you know
that this goes back decades.
Operation Ajax, even before,
the point though
is that in the normie perspective,
this just started,
and the estimated cost
of the war on Iran
has already surpassed
estimated $21 billion.
I mean, even the conservative ones
are saying $11 billion.
No war, no more spending.
And guess what?
You get extra of both.
Hashtag winning.
And I mean, look,
if you want to argue
that this is necessary
for the freedom of the world,
then make your case.
Some people are making that argument.
You're going to have a hard time
selling anybody with a brain
on why that makes sense
while you're committing genocide
and while Iran's doing
none of the things
you claim they're doing.
But either way,
you don't get these honest arguments.
You don't get the real,
well, this needs that.
You get the argument of,
well, they're terrorists
and they're invading everywhere
and they're in funding everything
that's terroristic in the world.
These are blatantly false claims.
But on top of that,
with $21 billion
estimated to be spent on top,
spent on top of everything else,
shocker for Donald Trump
as U.S. Treasury budget deficit
off to one of the worst
starts in history.
What Americans need to know,
and you can read this for yourself.
In February,
it jumped to $308 billion.
I mean, it's on border.
It's one of the worst starts in history.
It's the best way to frame it.
Now, you could argue it's necessary.
You could argue it's because
we're doing this, X, Y, and Z.
And when this happens later,
this will go back down.
It's always the same argument.
They'll go up,
but then it'll go back down
because freedom, whatever.
Maybe.
But I don't like these hypothetical
next step.
Look at, deal with what's in front of you
and the facts at hand
and whether they're honest,
whether they've said what they've done.
Excuse me, I can't talk right now.
Whether they've done what they've said
or whether they've deviated.
To my point, this is not at all
what we were promised.
What a conservative thought would happen.
Now, maybe, you know,
a month from now, a year from now,
it's better than ever.
And you can look back and go,
see, I told you, I hope so.
I hope so because that would mean
that this is not going in a bad direction,
at least in, I guess,
American financial sense,
but engage with it right now.
And you have to be honest
that this is going in the wrong direction.
Now, Donald Trump's administration
announced a coalition to escort ships
through the Strait of Formuse.
Now, this is a really important point
because, as you know,
we've been talking about this a lot
just because it was weird to me, right?
And I'm going to come back to this in general
because it's the same thing I've been showing you.
At first, it was sort of like,
well, it doesn't appear to be shut down at all.
But everyone, like, instantaneously reported,
I'll say this right now, by the way,
Katharine Austin-Fitz has more of an opinion.
And I'll point to our IMA panel in a second.
One about this all being connected
to a greater control grade kind of global direction,
which I agree with.
But she also argues more so that it could at least
could be that Iran is involved with all of that.
And I think that is very much worth considering
just like anything like COVID-19.
We should consider whether we're all be...
That's much harder for the average person
to wrap their mind around.
But truth is truth.
If you believe that's the case,
then make your argument.
I think the facts do back that up to a degree.
But that's just...
That's important to think about
because that could be one of the factors here.
Now, I'm more leaning toward
that there another government
that would be willing to do everything
the U.S. government is doing
just don't have the current influence and power to do so.
But at the moment,
they're not exactly what the U.S. government frames them as.
And it just comes down to the truth.
They're not doing what they're claiming.
They're not as extreme as they claim in many ways,
but in bad, plenty alarming to me.
And just from a status perspective,
I think all of them are bad.
But anyway, the point that's...
I guess the nuance from how I look at this
and why that's relevant to this
is that I first thought,
towards her opinion,
why would everybody say it's closed?
And why wouldn't they stand up and scream about that?
Like, well, you're lying about that.
And maybe they didn't, I missed it.
But I thought that spoke maybe
to some larger coordination.
Now, as it came around and developed,
and I thought, I argued, well, it seems
they're not closing the straight.
They're just basically through rhetoric
and threats hindering it.
Like rather doing ultimately nothing as far...
Even the minds turned out
to be ultimately a fake story.
That's happened before
and it wouldn't surprise me if they're currently there,
but I haven't been able to verify that.
And it ultimately was like a one-day story
and I haven't seen it again.
So my point, though, is that
I get the mind that this is Iran
using the narrative to effect what...
And they're doing well, by the way,
to have the different companies
associated with Israel and the United States
more tentative, lose money
because they don't want to do so,
worry about getting...
And really, there's nothing happening.
So then it came to the point
where Iran basically said, look, we're not...
We're only stopping people who are enemies.
Now, that came out a couple of days ago,
but it's still being discussed as if it was closed.
All the mainstream media, all the mainstream alternative,
basically closed straight, closed down, affecting world trade.
Now, here's what I think,
because clearly you can see that's not the case.
Now, it has been restricted, again,
based on saying, we'll bomb things
and then having that just by effect
stop people from coming through.
But also, it seems that they are directly claiming
we're not going to let Israel, U.S.
and I guess the kind of unknown,
if you're still part of their team,
you may be targeted kind of mindset,
which is they're prerogative at this point.
But so that makes me think
that this is about trying to use that to hurt the U.S. government
and Israel and their allies
by the restriction of that trade and flow,
but not by doing it in a way that restricts anybody else
if they know they can go through it.
So now you've got Trump and everybody else
trying to make the argument that it's been closed
because that makes the world turn against Iran.
But if it's not closed
and effectively through crafty narratives,
they've convinced Trump or the rest of them
to at least act that way,
well, you've got plenty of ships passing through.
So other countries who are not necessarily
in the side right now are going,
well, I'm getting through just fine.
So I'm not going to do anything about it.
Now we're going to get into them pushing back
on Trump calling for them to help people through the trade.
Now why would they do that
if it's only the enemies who are being restricted
and the world can see that they're actively doing things
that are against the law, genocide.
So Wall Street Journal reported
that he's announcing a coalition.
Now that's a very friendly way to frame that.
It seems as if you have no...
Basically the U.K. seems to be flirting with the idea.
Now that might have changed over the last so many hours,
but last I checked,
most of them are bucking the whole program,
saying that we were looking for other paths
or whatever the word he used.
We're looking for other solutions,
but most of them said no.
In fact, said one of them,
I'll read you in a second,
said we will not be bullied by the United States,
which is exactly what the world is beginning to recognize
who may have not caught on yet
to Trump's tactics,
strong armed tactics to the extreme.
So this is making it sound like
we're starting a friendly thing to work together
if this is Trump going,
please bail me out of what I just got us in,
ultimately because it seems that they are
not doing as well as they're claiming.
And Israel's the one that drove them here.
And you could either argue Trump did it
because he didn't have a choice
because he is in line with the agenda
or he's now realizing he was played.
Either way, it puts us in the same position
when it comes to the outcome, I think.
Now here's the Guardian.
Trump draws backlash.
Trump draws backlash for comment on a war.
Maybe we shouldn't even be there.
Now this is such an interesting statement.
Oh, I didn't want to add one more thing, by the way,
because of time and a few other things today.
Some of this stuff may be like mildly out of,
like just as what I normally do when I prep the show
is I'll bring up pretty much everything
that I think I want to look at articles
I'll read through and highlight
and kind of get my mind in the organization.
And then I'll organize it in different categories.
Sometimes that takes a while, right?
And so today because of time,
some of it might not be exactly organized the way
I want to just keep that in mind.
Not that that is that important.
So Trump draws backlash for comment on a run war.
Maybe we shouldn't even be there.
Now think about saying this right now.
To me, this is the same old sort of like,
I'm just like an independent observer.
Trump, like I'm not really making decisions.
I'm not the, I just, I don't know.
Maybe we, you know, why don't, like it's,
as if he acts like he's commenting on something
from the side, right?
Shouldn't even be there?
I mean, people have got rightly upset about this.
Family members of servicemen that have been killed.
Well, what are you talking about?
We should, maybe we shouldn't even be there.
Like it's a, like a game.
Like this, this is what people have come to see
that it's, whether you think this is him
framing it like it's just kind of a passive thing,
like wishy washy, a game,
or he's doing this, which is more what I'm leaning towards
to sort of give himself an out.
See, like right now he knows this knife's edge.
Well, I can't be too clear about Israel controlling this
because then I look weak,
or then it shows that Israel is controlling
this US government.
But I can also kind of touch that a little bit.
Just barely lean into it to make people think
that I'm not able to make,
it's not my fault.
It's their fault.
If you don't think this calculus is happening
behind the scenes, I'm telling you guys,
these people know the world sees it.
And I think that right now it's about playing the,
the game of like chicken, essentially,
of who ends up holding the bag.
That's how these people operate.
Donald Trump drew a backlash on Sunday
for suggesting US efforts to protect
the Strait of Hormuz were unnecessary.
And that maybe, quote,
we shouldn't even be there at all.
Now, what he's talking about is the US
government, essentially, or the military
helping with the,
basically helping ships to the Strait
that hasn't started yet, as I understand it.
But the idea that we're going to be doing that,
now remember, there is a ship down there
on the other side of the territorial waters
inside the Strait, but not on a wrong side.
And if it is going to go through there
ultimately, like so here, let me show you this again.
That right here,
you get close enough.
Oh, it's not showing it for some reason.
Well, basically there's, you know,
you're halfway through this waterway
on the side towards Iran.
Well, that's considered their regional water.
And then you got the line that begins
on the other side of the mass,
which would be considered the regional waters
of the UAE and different locations over here.
Now, as you can see, there is US ships.
There are, excuse me.
I thought, well, is, I think there's one
inside, as it were,
like inside the Strait area.
But oh, here, this will show what I think.
Come on screen.
There we go.
So this, there.
The USS Michael Murphy is inside.
You know, it's beyond the Strait.
Oh, there it goes.
So you see those little lines right there?
So essentially on this side of the line,
that's considered, you know, that's like, you know,
if you're on the coast of the United States,
that's their regional water.
It's like their controlled area.
And then this middle area would arguably be open.
And then what's near here is considered theirs.
That's why they're over here,
technically international waters right there.
But the point being is that Iran is controlling this
by threatening this little choke point, essentially.
So, and saying that we shouldn't even be there
in regard to helping people pass through that.
Now, the argument is that we need to do that.
It doesn't seem to be the case for anybody other than Israel
and the United States.
It's sort of like what happened with the Houthis
and their shipping, where they tried to make this big issue
about what they were doing.
And, you know, it got a lot of talk
but the Houthis basically won that exchange
because everybody recognized
that there was a genocide taking place
and the Houthis were not stealing.
They weren't actually killing or bombing
or sinking any ships.
They were in wild displays of restraint,
bombing to stop it, and then letting them go.
The ship didn't sink.
They didn't steal anything.
They didn't kill anybody.
And yet, and that happened multiple times.
And yet they're pirates.
Well, you guys commit genocide
and steal and bomb people with no bomb ships
without even caring to, you know,
it's crazy that the overlap there.
So in this case, they're arguing
that we need to continue to help them through,
because Iran's going to bomb them.
I haven't seen the indication of that.
And most of them are saying, ultimately, no.
But that was shifting because nobody wants to help
by saying, well, we should even be the ones.
It should be all of you guys.
The president made the contradictory comment
to reporters in Air Force One
after pleading with European and NATO allies
to enter the war.
NATO basically being the United States anyway,
which is kind of,
I don't, maybe he doesn't understand that,
enter the war in Iran
to help the U.S. secure the strait
amid the largest oil supply disruption in history.
And why is that?
Because of their illegal war.
Simple.
It's exactly why we've talked about this for a decade
about the Bob-O-Man up straight, about Yemen,
because this was always coming, guys.
Always coming.
How many times have we had this conversation?
This was always coming,
because Israel told you it was coming
and told you the U.S. would do it.
And here we are.
I mean, it's wild that we,
I mean, that's why I kind of laughed about it before
when people were like,
oh my God, they predicted the Iran war.
It's like, come on, guys.
A three-year-old could have predicted this
because it's been told,
it's been said a thousand times all over,
you know, as far as I've been doing this,
as long as I've been doing this.
But the idea that it's that clear,
and then yet now it's not still engaged with in the corporate,
it's just very crazy.
And so the point was they knew this was going to happen
because Israel's always been wanting it.
So they've been trying to find ways
to control the other ways, other waterways.
This is the Bob-O-Man up straight,
which arguably they do not control,
because they've yet to actually take over Yemen.
And that's why that was happening, guys.
And so at least one part of the conversation,
and so here we are,
where they always do this happen.
And now imagine Trump and them claiming
like, why we didn't know they would do that,
or we didn't expect him to bomb the other countries.
It either shows a shocking lack of, I guess,
understanding of the basics of the situation,
or he's just saying that to frame it as them being belligerent.
We'll get to that in a second.
It says, really, I'm demanding that these countries
come in and protect their own territory
because it's their territory.
So then that means what he's ultimately saying is then,
Oman, UAE, you guys have to get in there
and do something, which, okay,
now that creates an interesting point
where since the last time Iran basically
will Trump embarrassingly claim they surrendered,
Iran said, look, they bombed all these countries,
all of which they were bases or fueling or weaponry,
which makes them belligerent by every single possible
tentative international law,
rather just understanding international law.
And they bombed them, they never responded,
and then they stopped.
They said, look, we'll stop bombing you
if you guys stop helping them with this war.
Trump said they surrendered, which is so embarrassing.
But so now that's where they're at,
where these countries are basically in the middle,
technically on the side of Israel and the United States
because of everything they're doing, their policy,
not the peoples, the installed governments.
But so here we are.
Well, now they're basically saying,
well, you have to go do something,
and I doubt they're going to
because then that creates situation
where they will be targeted by Iran.
And legally so, by the way,
they should come and they should help us protect it.
You could make the case
that maybe we shouldn't even be there at all.
Well, you're damn right.
But see, that's not what he meant to say.
He means it as if we shouldn't have to be the one that does it.
You shouldn't be there at all
is something you probably need to think about now.
The reality of what he said, meaning something else,
is more real than you, more true than you realize.
Why is the U.S. government there at all?
Other side of the world,
as they criticize other places from, you know,
the idea, just narratives
about how they might support something
on the other side of the world.
It's so embarrassing where we're at today,
where the world is long since understood this,
but the difference of the change today
is that Americans are starting to understand this.
That's what I believe.
So continuing.
Trump received criticism.
Oh, I'm glad I didn't skip this part.
It says they should come and help protect us.
That we shouldn't be there at all because we don't need it,
he says.
Ah, and what does he mean by it?
This is very revealing to me.
Oil.
We have a lot of oil, he says.
We're the number one producer anywhere in the world.
Two times.
Okay.
Well, so it's not just about the flow of oil,
but clearly he's letting, I mean, we know that it's not a secret,
but there's a lot more on the table than just the flow of oil,
but he cares about that because American gas prices
and, you know, he's very, very, you know,
I guess the framing of success oriented,
but he says we're the number one oil producer anywhere
in the world times two.
Now, if you look into this,
you'll find that this is argued to be accurate.
I mean, technically it is currently accurate,
but here's what's interesting.
The reason I say technically,
if you think about this on a longer scale
and look, looking like you could do this
in a couple of different places,
Venezuela alone has the largest, way larger,
even the Saudi Arabia,
the largest unrealized, untapped oil resources in the world.
You don't think that's a factor of why they're trying.
I mean, look, he even did,
even Delci Rodriguez,
that was the origin of the first point, oil.
He knew that because they were aiming at Iran.
They knew this was coming.
And we already know that because Israel said that
because it's been admitted.
They planned this with the Kurds a month before.
We know all this stuff.
If you're following independent media,
you know all this.
It's funny to watch the mainstream
alternative grapple with either trying to lie
or not even know what they're doing.
But how important is that?
The point was though,
so think about Venezuela.
So if the United States,
if other countries helping them,
hadn't continued to sanction,
suppress and keep them from developing
my entire life, in fact, you go back.
I mean, I've never seen a point
which they weren't threatening Venezuela.
Had they not done that,
you could argue that they might have been able to develop.
And this is that same point about why they keep countries
in Africa and elsewhere under their foot
because if they were to develop,
they could grow to a place
to where they could actually have some ability
to have a military and exert their own will.
That doesn't even mean bad guy, you understand?
Terrorism would just mean,
in fact, the point is the opposite.
Terrorists they can work with.
What they want is,
they don't want people who can become strong
and independent and have some kind of a democracy
because they have the ability to actually push back
or representative government
or whatever you want to call it.
I'm going to play that as a clip
in a second to make this point.
But the Venezuela thing,
if they had not done that,
Venezuela could arguably have the largest
over anybody oil production in the world.
And there's plenty of nuanced points to that
and the real point is
whether they're able to effectively do it
because there's more than just being able to drill it
but that's the whole point, isn't it?
It's development, industrial
and they've made sure to stop this country
from getting anywhere,
keeping it under its thumb so it could be abused.
So now that he's screaming that,
you could argue it's at least in that position
because of what they've done elsewhere.
But either way, there's still a lot of oil to be seen.
Let me play this clip really quickly
to make the point that I was just saying there
about keeping these countries in a position
where they cannot become self-independent,
not rely on other countries
and it's exactly what Trump claims
he wants to happen to the United States.
And this is about funding al-Qaeda,
funding the Ukrainian-Nazi elements
or any number of things you're talking about
in order to keep these states controllable.
What they've always done.
Now the difference?
Iran thought back.
Brzezinski was the strategist for Jimmy Carter
and convinced Jimmy Carter to say,
look the Russians are dominating Afghanistan
with a civilian secular government
and let's create al-Qaeda.
Let's back Osama bin Laden
and give his supporters weapons
to begin fighting the Russians
and we can pull a coup d'etat there
and the Russians will fight back
and then we'll say the Russians invaded
and it worked.
Saudi Arabia made a deal with America
that they would push the Wahhabi extremists,
the al-Qaeda, the most right wing
wing of Islamic parties
and it worked.
Essentially al-Qaeda is a contract army
for the United States.
Well the same thing was happening in Russia.
What Brzezinski wrote was that
America is faced with a possibility
of not being able to rule the world unilaterally.
Any country's economic ability
to be self-sufficient means
potential military power
and in order to prevent any country
from threatening America militarily
you have to prevent it from developing economically.
The American nightmare Brzezinski wrote
was that Russia would get together
with Germany and with Western Europe
creating Russian raw materials
German industry and somehow finally
Russia would become westernized.
America under Brzezinski's strategy
said this would be a disaster
because if Russia is westernized
if it becomes democratic
if Europe and Russia are prosperous
then we cannot control them anymore
and they will have no reason to be NATO.
We've got to stop Russia
and the place to stop this Russian-European
conglomeration is to split it
right at the border down Ukraine.
Let's do in Ukraine what we did in Afghanistan.
Let's back the crazies.
Well most of them are the former
neo-Nazi groups that have been
so prominent that fly the Nazi.
Fly the fly the fly.
That's very important.
Now what's important to understand is the model
that they've continued.
The same model from getting responses
to claim them as the aggressor
to proxy elements.
This is what they do and this is why they accuse everybody
of that which they're guilty.
They're just as likely involved with similar tactics
but when they claim it I look
and I can't prove it.
What I can prove is that this is what they do
and history shows that.
The idea of creating that situation
in order to keep people under your thumb
under the guise of fighting for freedom and liberty
like these are villainous people guys.
That doesn't mean that everybody
manipulated by what they're doing
is aware of that.
Now interestingly a point that I'll get to at the end
when I play a clip about to go out the show today
you know it makes a similar point
you know that this is what I'm trying to say
about partisanship today about independent media
it doesn't mean you should
people should be devoid of responsibility
for their actions because they've been tricked
like I say with Trump they're still responsible
but they're changes a little bit of it
but just be aware that there's a lot of people that don't realize
are aware that they're being played
and believe that they're acting with good intention
it's like military personnel going out
and fighting for you know the war in Iraq
then come back and go my god
I had no idea what I was doing
the same things happening with the Iran conversation
but you see when they left
they had in their mind that they were fighting for you
for freedom for liberty and you know even if you
you know the point is I've always said this over the years
it is honorable
respect I mean it you
those people deserve your respect
because of the intention that's like I said in beginning
right they believe they were doing it for you
selflessly and then the question
is when they then find out do they then change
their actions well Brad Miller for example
local per I've interviewed him more than once
he I greatly respect the man
he stood by his principles right but that's
that's what's important so coming back to this
Trump received criticism in the early stages
of the US and Israel's three week war
in Iran for failing to convey
clear reasons for launching military strikes
he has made a number of antithetical
statement sense including telling the UK
which he called a once great ally
just you know this is my
point about the type of tactics
why do you think that's like
that's not that's either bully tactics
or whatever you want to call it you don't do
the mindset is do that to then kind of
force them back into position because
30 seconds later he's asking them to do something
why would they if you just basically were insulted
because it's just it's this is how they
operate guys because they're changing the way the world
runs or more so
showing you the way it's really run this entire
time and we now have an opportunity to
really change it
it says
he has made a number of antithetical
statements saying that it's
help was not needed the UK
in operation epic fury well clearly
that's not the case now his comments on Sunday
with his comment on Sunday was similarly
questioned in an immediate backlash
on social media from critics who accused him
of starting an unnecessary war
then demanding others step in and help him out
help him end it and let's not forget
this kid they got this got such a
small it's important because
the timing but it got such a small
amount of coverage the only I mean outside
of my reporting and a few other independent media
the only person I saw site this with Dave
Smith in a back and forth
and I think it was on a Pierce Morgan show
but it what I verified it myself
after the immediate action here
Donald Trump reached out and
tried to convey a ceasefire
deal through his Italy counterparts
and around flatly
denied of the client and
they've been saying this since then we have
no reason to make a deal with you while you continue
to do what you're doing that's what I've been saying the entire time
up until now it seems like they just were
trying to make this work through the normal processes
and you or you could argue
that there's something else happening there that we can't see
but again all the evidence shows
you that versus what they're doing you know
the idea oh they're just an evil villainous group
back there doing something secret we can't see because
Trump said is a little bit naive
certainly possible the facts are what matter
but this is you know it's
the whole thing continues
to be more and more like absurd
clownish like just on its face
that people continue to act like this is not the
most clear thing we've ever seen
and this is what he continues to do like I'll get into
in a second the idea that he can like just
talk his way out of the next action
well Iran said no they
flatly turned down that ceasefire and since then
that's when things have seen continually
you know you get the lies about this or the lie
about that or we're stronger than ever they've been
only defeated these things aren't true
now that doesn't mean the opposite is true
but why would they lie about these things
you know make it makes you wonder and then you get into the actual
data of the evidence and it shows
that it's look if you're based
on what we can see in this my estimate
it seems pretty clear that the U.S. is in a very bad
position whether it's because of the over
the used munitions or because
you know ultimately that Iran
has been planning for this because of this circumstance
for a very long time and the drone
point I mean you can go through this for very
for many different tactical points
but what's interesting to me is that the claim
is well Iran's clearly losing because they're
not firing their missiles as much well run came out
in the beginning and said ultimately that we're
measured this is a long-term war now that
could have been a lie to cover that but that's not
what the data seems to show for me
so the fact that they offered that was denied
it shows you right out of the gate that something
was not something was amiss and don't forget
Israel spoke up
this was also covered publicly and said
why are you talking to a wrong without us
and Trump's administration said we won't do it again
you know paraphrasing but that's what happened
and so it continues to show
that Israel is dictating these policies
and I and my
question is whether Trump is becoming aware
of that or he's okay with it or not able
to change it
it says on one post referred to the families
of the 13 U.S. servicemen and guys
we know it's much more than that just like it always has
in the past they lie about this
I can't say how much unfortunately
I believe it's more families
of 13 U.S. servicemembers killed in the conflict
as of Sunday and how they might react to
the presidents shouldn't even be their suggestion
now again he's talking about the straight but
it's the same general point Trump was
speaking on the same day as he
reversed his earlier position
over outside assistance and stepped up
pressure on a raft of other countries
to become involved in defending the straight
which again guys my point
that's why that was so relevant to me
there's no need to defend the straight
if only you guys are being targeted
why would the rest of these countries do that
and then risk themselves being targeted as well
see the point? I feel like Iran
has crafted this very well I think
if I'm reading it correctly
it says Australia, France and Japan are among
the countries that have said they have no plans
to send warships
Australia, France, Japan these are major
like hardcore
asset or allies if not
vassal states if you will
and they're saying no but that just could be
outwardly we'll see what actually happens
that's interesting to me
Keir Starmer the UK Prime Minister said on Monday
that he was working with European allies
this is what it was a viable plan
to reopen the straight which by the way is not
closed see my point but insisted the country
will not be drawn into a wider war
now you have to ask yourself
they are their agendas and it's pretty clear
what really drives this to me
but just like Trump is grappling
with what the US people want so too
to these countries they know how unpopular this is
the whole world knows how unpopular this is
they don't want to be seen to support
they all need to at least be seen
to have the majority support of their peoples
then maybe you think that's what actually guides
their people into power you can decide but in the day
either way you look at it they need that
and so if people don't want it they're not going to come out and go
got you Trump we'll jump into this
and take all the butt you know that's not going to happen
at least not
cordially or like casually
they'll have to be convinced
coerced threatened
I think terrorists may come into play who knows
guys Xavier Bettle
Luxembourg's deputy prime minister
has said his
country would not give in to blackmail
from the US now that's very revealing
I mean we could
you could argue that he's just I guess
two things that they perceive it as
blackmail and they're wrong you could argue that this
is only one group out of
the entire conversation that Trump did blackmail
or you could you know be logical
talk him's razor and stand back
and go well that's probably how he's engaging with
all of them and that's why it's going this way
and that's why most of them are not happy and this is just the one
that said you know what we're not going to be blackmailed
would suggest that they're trying desperately
to get them to do it against their will
and blackmail
are Epstein files I don't know
maybe it's Israel doing it I genuinely
ask these questions and know it's funny to me
I shouldn't even say funny but just kind of interesting
that
we're at a point today we're asking that question
to like the most average per like
people that have never heard this
the average person who's only tuned on
on Twitter they go you know what
that makes sense that's crazy
it's great it's positive that's my point
is that people are now understanding not just that
they should be asking these other questions
but these questions are not crazy it's not
hyperbole asking whether
or not Israel maybe using the Epstein files to course
countries into these positions is actually
more logical than damn near everything people are saying
in the mainstream field today
it's just crazy to me isn't it I think that's
worth thinking about now
last part here
it says Trump suggested that the US
effort to secure the straight was for the
benefit of other countries and see
this is why I started with that excuse me
started with that it's about trying to convince everybody
dishonestly it seems that everyone's
equally affected I think that was
day one report that's why everybody
lockstep was like the streets closed
it wasn't because that's what they
expected right it's sort of like the Ukraine
war situation and again this is actually really important
to think about when the Ukraine war started
what did we tell you well there were reports
long before this that they had plans for
an insurer not
insurrection but insurgency
which means that their local
entities fighting from within essentially
and so the end of the day when
Russia started and I told
you on day one you got main reports
across the board they're rolling into Kiev
well they didn't do that
and this wasn't some fringional plot we're
talking about Fox and CNN why
because that was what the reporting was supposed
to be they expected Russia to rush in
and take everything so they could then have their
ongoing forever insurgency just like
before that's how I read that and Israel
with the you the Ozov movement
and all the different radical elements they've been funding
the CIA with project aerodynamic
going back like 1947
before they've been building a fascist entity
just like they funded the Mujahideen in Afghanistan
to fight Russia Soviet Union before
my point though is that they expect
these things and they act as if they
respond they move their agendas based
on the assumption that they do what we do
and apparently that's not the case
I find that very revealing now doesn't mean
good guy bad guy but it means
tactful versus you know
belligerent and clumsy if you will
it's almost like if we do it
no he said that Trump suggested the U.S. effort
secure the straight was the benefit of other countries
it is not it's almost like
we do it for and again the point was that they
expected Iran to do that expected
them to mine and break it down
but Iran is tactful right
that they're clearly intelligent the way that they conduct
their militarily intelligent
in the sense where they thought this
through this is my opinion and they said well
that's what they want from us if we shut the straight down
entirely they'll tell the world and it will
be correct that we're hindering everybody
else's they didn't do that
again be clear this is completely the way I
read this I could be way off but
you see what I'm talking about this feels like it makes sense
and again why the entire media left
and right who's supposed to be against Trump all
you reported the same it dealt
you know excuse me my throat
keeps clogging up but you know why in my
opinion at least why what my opinion is
he says it's almost like we do it for habit
that's a weird statement
but we also do it for some very good
allies that we have in the Middle East
okay we
do it for habit
what are you talking about right there do what
hypothetically
engaged with some kind of protection mechanism
for ships in the Strait of Hormuz
how is that habit when's the last time that happened
you see my point see this guy
often speaks off the cuff and he shows you things
he's not supposed to habit is
military
adventurism
authoritarianism they're they're
constant colonials what they're doing in the world yes
it's habit they respond with military action
because that's what they do
in an interview with the Financial Times on Sunday
his tone was more menacing warning
that NATO faces a very bad future
if it did not assist us in protecting the Strait
I mean where are we right now
NATO you know I mean like
it's just and like I actually don't even believe
that that's even a fit like if you don't think
that the U.S. has a very clear influence
over the NATO ultimately
it's what initiated the war on terror
global military
dynamic of attack one attack all was only ever
once used in this circumstance
after 911 to this to me
I feel like this is more theater to be quite honest
now you stuff points out
imagine having the world's largest Navy
by far starting a war of choice
that hurts the globe
and could have been easily avoided then
asking your much smaller allies who you
have habitually insulted to bail
you out genius
this is France Germany Japan Australia
have reportedly rejected escorting these tankers
through
now as I said in this is their direct report
statement from them and take it for what you will
they could be lying Hormuz open
to most Iran says this is a new article
closed only to enemies
Iran allows limited oil transit
amid war
now I like my point is always
has been that this like if this was restricted
to anything other
than Israel the U.S. and anything considered
a legal belligerent I would criticize
it from what I can see that's not
what's happening so I don't see a point
at which this becomes against the law
their their territorial waters
right and of course
that would apply to anybody in those waters regarding
that side but course you go around the other side
but they're restricting
U.S. and Israel and they're arguably
in a war footing with them despite neither of them
declaring war so if you're going to claim
over here that you have the right to bomb them because
when you haven't declared war then the static
reality is that you guys are defective de facto war
and so that means that your ships are targets
even though I argue the same thing
that the U.S. is conducting an illegal war
now from Iran's perspective I'm not
privy to their dynamics of whether I
I don't think the government cares what the people think
in regard to whether they can initiate war which you should think about
in this country pretend that we do
and they still don't care
exactly what Tila was reporting the entire time
and I said you know well
because we have eyes because you can see that
there were ships coming through I found that so strange
but it's because
I think ultimately it's about creating
the idea that Iran is attacking everybody
and that shows desperation to me
now again in case you didn't see before
here is just the full map
with all the ships that we can see
this is
general I mean essentially live
it's a real real time map there's the time right there
universal time but yeah I mean look
you know I mean you can zoom back out and look at
like the general traffic now could just because
of the smaller spot but it looks pretty
traffic-y to me but ultimately
it is by everyone's account restricted
trade and so on
and I think they played this very smart
now the U.S.
after this this is just
I mean this just kind of speaks to
you know
I'm going to think of a good analogy like these people could
literally do the most embarrassing clumsy
thing you've ever seen they would stand up
and act like they just made up a
cool new you know
parkour move or something
my point is that they do things like this
and it's just like does anybody
believe that like this is
it's cringy is the right word for it
the U.S. is allowing Iranian
oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz says
Soros backed Zionist percent
funny how the right now people going the
Soros
what is it
what was it no so anyway people that are
like Soros this or BlackRock that
but then people on the side
never call it out
when it's rumble or their people in Trump's
cabinet or that flurry think is like his right
hand man at this point but you know anyway I digress
the point about this
is that
are they so right now
they're asking for help support to get any
ships through which means they don't have
control and everybody knows that
and yet to come out and go over allowing them
it's we're just choosing
not to stop them
that's desperate guys that's desperate
that's embarrassing because they don't
have control around the one that clearly
has the control over the situation in the
Strait of Hormuz and they just need to make it
look like what it is allowing
Ron to have their own free access
and that's looking somehow like that's their decision
you really believe that they would allow
that I mean it's just it's it is sad
it's a sad state guys these people
are I mean either
desperate to make themselves look like they're not
ineffectual Zionist controlled people
or they're just think we're that stupid
or you know you could think of other things
I think behind the curtain Trump's escalation trap
this is Axios
and this one was
today
the Iran war now entering
week three is the first time
Trump's style has made it impossible for him
to easily talk or improvise his way out
why it matters they write Trump could wind up
trap between his Caprice and
the realities of war he
expects a quick clear victory but unlike
tariffs that can be swiftly imposed and rescinded
the war's outcome is beyond
unilateral control and fix quick
fixes and Iran gets a say
as they already did when they turned down
his ceasefire offer
to help break
the Persian Gulf oil jam
is working to break the
oil jam they say but in doing so
he risked getting caught in an escalation trap
which
I argue exactly how Israel set this up
where a stronger force is incentivized
to keep attacking to demonstrate dominance
amid diminishing returns I mean is that not
exactly who these people are
who cares about who we're killing or whether it commits
us to wars we don't want or whether
nobody supports this we can't just look
weak
I mean if you like that should not we just
don't even laugh worthy that's terrifying
because that's who these people are
standing up there pounding their chest and acting like
we're strong and it's just a sign of weakness
guys and it's very much showing to
people right now
to incentivize to keep
attacking regardless of the military
incentive or whether it's in your
benefit because well dominance
you know might makes right
a senior Trump administration official practically
admitted as much telling Axios
Mark Caputo Axios
is Mark Caputo the Iranians f-ing around
with the straight makes Trump
makes Trump
dig in more essentially
so again
this is where you come into the idea that like
if anybody like if I knew that
if people who barely understand
if you I mean the idea was always
that this is what Iran would do I'm
surprised they haven't done it in the past
12-day war or even plenty of other examples before
so they knew it guys and yet
his argument is that because they did the thing
we always knew that that made him dig in more to a
thing he claims he doesn't want
otherwise or aside from every other time he
speaks out loud about why it's the best thing in the world and everybody
wanted or why he wants it but then comes over here and says
we don't want war it's insane what's happening
it's schizophrenic
but so I felt insulted so I had
to kill people that's that's the very government thing
to do state of play Israel wants
regime change in Iran and more dramatic military
destruction as it weighs an invasion
of Lebanon I can't even believe
like first of all this shows
you the growth the what
we have done as independent media or any of you
out there supporting this to change the
conversation why Zionism is being
talked about why Israel is being called out
but the fact that they're even mentioning Lebanon
because realize guys
weighing an invasion guys they've been
occupying Lebanon my entire
like I mean when was it
we're giving the date exactly of when southern Lebanon
was officially occupied because I can't remember exactly
up top my head but a long time
and they have continued to bomb them despite
ceasefires well before
October 7 right now like a thousands of
times after October 7
so just when it says
weighing an invasion is so frustrating to me
because Axios knows well
anybody knows who cares to look at the facts that
that's already happening when you realize this was
posted today over the last week I could
show you that they're occupying areas you think
they don't know that so it shows you a willful
deception right there but at least
they're mentioning it which I'm not giving them credit for
I'm saying that's because of you
BB Netanyahu has shown several times that
when it comes to Iran he has the ability
to convince Trump to take his side
crazy right even that passive small
like benign way of writing
that you never would have seen something
like that that would have been called anti-Semitic
and it probably is right now by all the
Zionist screaming about why they shouldn't say that
you're claiming Jews control the government
no that's not what they said they said Netanyahu
has influence over Trump because
he does and even mainstream
media is being forced to call it out
forced to call it out because they can't
lose every shred of credibility
which they're already about to do averaging
we're watching averaging out the
timelines mentioned by Trump and his aides
it's fair to assume
the administration expected an intense
military operation lasting about four to six
weeks weirdly timed right
around the war powers act argument
that's just funny to
me how they've you know that's the
they didn't happen so technically they're not bound
by that which just makes it generally legal
and Congress doesn't care but
that's what they were aiming for but the point is it's
clearly going to go longer than that unless
Israel-U.S. stop
so that makes April 1st
day 33 of the war
a real gut check moment
but in Washington and in capitals around the
world officials are preparing for a much
longer crisis now before I move past that
the real point of this is not because of anything
they claim legally binds them it's because of what
Americans were promised well if you can't
see by now that they haven't kept any of the promises
Trump or Biden or anybody else and
I don't know how to help you I mean we should be aware
that that's likely not going to matter maybe
they stopped before that for whatever reason they decide
but it will not be in my mind because they care
what you think or because you don't want
to continue I don't think they care otherwise
this wouldn't be happening the first place
so when it gets there I'll argue this will
continue but just recognize that this was
you know it's not about
whether he's
the base wants this
or not it's about what Israel wants which is kind
of a larger point for today but in Washington
and in capitals around the world officials
are preparing for a much longer crisis because
everyone can see it Axios
is Barak Ravid who is a very clear
Zionist influencer tells us
he's heard from three different
people in the administration
and in allied countries who believe
the instability in the Middle East and the
U.S. involvement could continue until September
even if the war
shifts to a low intensity conflict
Israel's told journalists
it plans to at least three more
weeks of attacks on thousands of additional
targets I mean think about that
to what end what are we talking about if this was
some kind of a coercive action to get some kind of
an outcome then why would they
where we got weeks planned ahead all
that shows you is Israel always planned this
as we knew and they just have their targets
they planned it doesn't matter what else happens
we're gonna right now they feel they've got
the opening that's why they're beginning to
ramping up and publicly so
the illegal actions in Lebanon
and by the way never stop
what they're doing in Gaza this is simply
I think Netanyahu's last effort he thinks he's
gonna get this done great Israel
whatever you think is driving it so in this case
we've got three weeks more
which puts you well over what Trump said would happen
and that's what their plan is so how much you want to
bet that's exactly where this goes and probably longer
because Israel's decided that
Trump doesn't have a say that's what it looks like
and you may argue he will try to
but let's wait and see what happens
this will be an important point for people that are on that fence
does he try to stop it or not
you know he do know he knows you don't want this to happen
multiple targets well they've been bombing schools
and hospitals and guys if you understand this by now
this is not Gaza
people can lie they lie all the
I mean I've seen more lies on the Republican
side of the MAGA conversation rather the fake MAGA
patriot side on Twitter more than I've
ever seen in this last couple of weeks
it's insane and that's coming from me
covering the stuff I guys it's crazy
what they're doing right now blatant whole cloth
just outright lies to get you distracted
to lie about people being killed
it's all over the place
I was gonna say one more thing and I just lost it
but anyway the point is clearly
it's it's a special
time for what's going on I think this is kind
of the fruition of what they're trying to accomplish
I was going somewhere with that there's another point but
I mean yes somebody mentioned to the chat
I mean I'm not going to get into it today just because
it's it's on I mean as far as I'm concerned
it's an unverified claim that Netanyahu
was killed I mean
at the end of the day it's always two things
for me when anybody any human being
I don't believe it's it's right for
us whether religious or not
to rejoice in people being killed I just
don't think that's the right thing to do however
I think the world will be a better place with somebody like Netanyahu
who doesn't exist now without being said
I don't think the evidence backs up that he's been killed
I've seen all the same things I've seen
I mean I saw that weird AI thing when
it came out like five days ago whenever it was
I thought okay well that could be any number
of things they could be doing it to
you know for some other weird manipulative propaganda
reason they could be doing it to make it look like he was
killed they could be doing it because he was tired
you know who knows guys or he could be because
he was killed but what's interesting
is that a lot you know look there's
tons of people out there that I would I almost I
want to say that I well I just I would
expected people to wait for more evidence from
the caliber of people talking about it and
I'm surprised in fact now look I we can
talk about the hypothetical and we maybe this maybe
that but I've seen a lot of weird over focus
on this when there doesn't seem to be enough
evidence to verify it's happening
there's been videos put out but yes they could fake
that too right but so where I'm at is I don't
know that's the honest response we don't know
there's evidence suggest it might be the case
but it's not fleshed out and if you guys have
more information please tell me because that's
an important story and it will show you as
I do think is the case that Iran is not
in the on its back foot like they're trying to
claim
now it says the president said Sunday in a phone
call with the Financial Times Ed loose
we've essentially
decimated Iran he just they just keep doing
this no look I'm not like I said before
if I have a hard time even verifying
this but doesn't surprise me and I'm going to
go ahead and argue that the case probably
likely is based on the evidence that they've
sunk tons of Iranian Navy ships
but I think they expected that in fact
there's been reports of that in that this
was always about the home basically
tightening whatever the
frame the phrase a batten the hatches or
whatever you know just tightening down
and defending the way that they are and
the long game as they said right from the
beginning and look that's why Rubio said
right then and I think they
regret saying this now that it was because
and this was after they said or Israel
attack first and they changed their narrative then
they switched back to it now we'll get
there in a second but the idea that well
they have drones and stuff and they're
doing it and I said then I said well
what's why why is that so you're literally
saying because they're doing something that
everyone can do in a legal fashion
we have to stop that because we don't want
them so you're going to illegally bomb them
because they're doing something that they
can legally because that might make them
stronger than you what does that show you
that they're the bad guy in the situation
doesn't I'm not even say good guy versus
bad guy but in this case what they're
doing is wrong or they're doing is evil
and that's what they said so my point
then is about the idea
of their capabilities
when it comes to the drone conversation
and that's when it came out early
$50,000 drone being taken down
by million dollar equipment and
they took down their eyes and cutter they took down
many locations they're not admitting to
from what I can tell from people like Douglas McGregor
for example that Iran is you could
even argue potentially winning this war
I'm not gonna say I can tell that I think the evidence
is still hard to read right now
but decimating Iran
is simply not true and that's what's so hard
because it could be that they're winning
but why would he have to lie about that
why wouldn't he just come out and say we're winning
you know it's gotta be we obliterated them
I love you I love you says totally obliterated
well that's like that's redundant obliterated
means obliterated just funny
but he's just trying to accentuate how
completely destroyed well didn't he say
he obliterated their nuclear facilities then
kind of walk that back
they have no Navy no anti-aircraft
no Air Force everything is gone
the only thing they can do
is make a little trouble by putting a mine
in the water which appears to not even be what's actually happening
but see why would he focus on that when he could
have said drones right because drones they don't
want you to think about I don't think not in the moment where they might be
losing the mines they want you to think
about because they want people to think they're shutting down the straight
and that they're terrorists let's not forget this
happened with Bolton the
limpid mines because they made that up
we know that they were exposed for it
so I've said before
I believe they do have the ability and the
means to put those in the water I don't think they
are now and last time they got lied about
to everybody goes a nuisance
but nuisance but the nuisance
can cause problems
he just can't his ego
can't allow it to be presented as something
that might even be something like even
suggesting it might be something difficult to stop
he can't even do that and oh I'm
so strong and then I could beat him anything
no matter what it's just always what he is
it's hyperbole on hyperbole it's embarrassing
and it's I've never seen
that like not like that
that's just a tactical of his own or rather just a trait
that I think is embarrassing Anna Kelly
the White House's principal deputy set press
secretary emphasized to us that operation epic
theory is the result of months
and months
of meticulous planning now here's what's funny
to me you know why this is coming around
because now they're being criticized for
bumbling into this without being prepared
how often do I say this where they lie about
everything they'll contradict previous lie
what was the narrative like 20 seconds
ago well they were going
to attack and we had to respond but Israel
was going to do or rather Iran is going to do something and so we had
to respond
okay so it wasn't planned then it wasn't a long
term plan to invade Iran it wasn't a long
term plan to arm the Kurds to invade from the ground
it wasn't a long term plan I mean guys Israel
admitted that you guys were discussing you had already
chosen a day while you were still
in the midst of your negotiations after which
you made the meat in that room and you killed
them under the guise of diplomacy
but so now now
apparently months of
planning because clearly we were ready
and we were prepared well then it was an illegal war
we already know that though
with ample options provided to the president
who took all of his top officials views into
account as he made the final decision right and
what they mean by that is Israel presented him
two very clear plans both of which helped Israel
they said you're so smart Trump you pick the best
one and he goes that one oh you
did the best choice and that's everything they
want I mean I'm joking in a way
but that's how you play somebody with ego
who thinks he's the mastermind of everything
everyone around I mean if you have somebody like him
who's genuinely listening to somebody like Laura Loomer
that speaks alone
by itself shows you
what we're dealing with Trump could pull out
tomorrow it says but the Iranians
could keep the straight of Hormuz closed
and push oil prices so high that America would have
to re-engage that's an interesting point
right because what he's what they're saying
is it's not closed is they could
just maintain the pressure which will
have an effect on their ability to go through
the area which will affect their
decisions their financial issue
situation
and
that's not going to affect I mean they could do it in a way
if they did it right even helping with the
Yemenis
to where they effectively hurt only
Israel in the United States anybody helping them
and I don't know why anybody else would want to
chat risk that same situation
and so that would force them to have to then go back
to militarily engaging based on
I mean you know embarrassing that would be
I think they're thinking about this now
we can't do that because we probably
forced back into it and that would not only
expose everything we're doing but it would
also show that we're weak
and they can't abide that clearly
even though it's the case most of the times
Trump has grown accustomed to doing what he wants
and then quickly improvising if such things
go south that's a very generous way of
framing that he's accustomed to doing what he wants
and then when everything's go when things spin
out and go ridiculous because nothing's really thought through
well then he just yells something
different yells a different narrative
claims it was all the same we did it and we won
even though they lost you know that that's what he's used
to and I'm surprised that worked ever
propaganda
but that's not the case when Iran can just go
well we're still involved says but this time
some in his inner circle have what one official
called buyers remorse
fear growing fears that attacking
Iran was a mistake
crazy way to frame a
source close to the
administration said some key officials around
Trump were reluctant or wanted more
time meaning when this was being
bullied by Israel they were like whoa
like let's make sure we're retic so these
these statements suggest and they belied the earlier
statements we want more time we gotta make
sure we're prepared for this it says he
ended up saying and this has been quoted by
a lot of different people you could argue it still
misrepresent like I guarantee if it hurts
Trump he'll claim it's false anyway he's
claimed things are false more times than I can
count that turned out to be true
he ended up saying quote I just
want to do it the source said
he grossly overestimated
his ability to topple the regime short
of sending in ground troops
the source and I guarantee that was Israel
right there going we got you will do it you're the
strongest we got the best you Iran so weak
right now we killed nobody's like that's the whole
point guys whether we killed the bird or
rather the um 12th day war
and our obliteration of the nuclear facilities
they're so weak they can't even say they've
been doing that their entire lives seemingly never
been true but maybe Trump bought it
the source said Trump was high on his own
supply after last summer's
quick strikes in Iran and January's
abduction of venezuelan president Nicholas
Maduro he saw multiple decisive
quick victories with extraordinary military
competence again that's a very ridiculous
way to frame whatever that what they did
does not demonstrate anything other than
the ability to force your way into
whatever you want
Trump's war of choice certainly looks like
a military success so far they write
really
I mean what I think about
that framing with what we know is happening
right now like we you could argue that
based on the fact that you bomb things
and sunk their ships maybe that's the case
but there's really like to argue
that this has been a success in what
way
you could are you a wash at
best because they've hurt the U.S.
in just as many ways they bomb their installations
they've took it I mean taken out billion
dollar installations so a
success I mean that's a I can actually
shock that they even they would frame with
what they've wrote written this article
written Iran's missile and drone launchers
have greatly decreased indicating
it's running out of weapons or the ability
to fire it why would that be the indication
I mean we know they've been preparing for
this I mean my entire life
and of course maybe maybe
then you could argue yes that could be
the indication that because they've slowed
down even though they told you they were
going to do that that could be because
they don't have the ability to but we
just saw them over the last many multiple days
shoot have massive ramp-ups
of of bombings
major including the largest attack they've done
so far well that doesn't seem to suggest that
they're getting getting weaker
and really it just means I think that they're
planning this in a long game and they don't need
to be firing all of their expensive missiles
when they can be doing what they're doing with the drones
and effectively you could argue succeeding
some officials close to him had hoped
he'd be able to show some quick gains
and declare victory because that's
what we're doing we want already it's over
because that's embarrassing
now it's not apparent how he do that convincingly
well yeah we're seeing that as
Barak reported the U.S. doesn't have clear enough
lines of communication with the Iranian regime
to make a deal that's sure to stick
interesting that the
person that the ravine says that
because they did
and in fact they do
but the difference as this inside
side reporter seems to know is that they're not
allowed to do it anymore because Israel told
them to stop now who knows if they're
following those rules but that did happen
publicly and it was pretty embarrassing
so as daily Beast writes an insider
tells Axios Trump was grossly overestimated
his abilities as we just read and I
simply said this is what you get when you surround
yourself with profiteering incompetent
yes men while of course listening to cartoons
like Laura Loomer I mean what else do you
expect guys do you think that's going to give
you the best advice you think that's a meritocracy
it's just funny you know
we you guys were calling that out 20 seconds
ago maybe you should start doing you know I should take it back
because I think most of them are but it's
pretty embarrassing to put these people in positions
like a salon owner or these Fox news
hosts or people that want to just hang out with all the
cool kids in their mind these are
these are people that are being used and played
and manipulated I don't mean by Trump
now this is interesting to me
that we this is this is
not new by the way
but it's just important to make sure we see the evolution
of this because we haven't had the thing has been
like a week since I've actually touched on this point
how this started
Rubio comes out
and says as we know
the president made the decision because we knew
an Israeli action
we knew that that would precipitate
an attack against American forces
so we knew Israel's going to attack and he even
floated the idea of them new using nukes
and
that we had to do it first and so everybody said whoa
okay so Israel
either whether through manipulation or not
was able to coerce you into that
action and I stood back and said look
this is being jumped on by tons of Republicans
to make the case see we told you Trump didn't
do it on purpose because they were trying to defend the
we didn't want to go to war point
but the argument then was Israel controlling
policy I said aha exactly
fine you can claim Trump's innocent
there's plenty of other examples to make that clear he's not
the reality is we're all now coming
to the truth that Israel whether
coercion or manipulation or blackmail or whatever
else is able to do this
and frankly I think it's obvious that the rubios
and you know grams of the world are
bull I don't even think you need to pay them
I think they're ardent supporters of this
religious Zionist agenda either way
here's what Trump said
and it just shows you how this spun around
well I mean just as this was what he said first
then he got contradicted
Trump came out and basically said and this is just
the video Rubio walks back to comments after
Trump contradicts him basically said well no
no you know that wasn't the case we are the
ones that attacked and the whole thing right so
here's where it ends up essentially even though
right now you already have sort of a different
narrative too they just they say
what everything to say in the moment that's
what he does but here's what he said
Trump
happened all very quickly we
thought and I thought
maybe more so than most I could ask Marco
but I thought we were
going to have a situation
where we were going to be attacked
they were getting ready to attack
Israel they were getting ready
to attack others so I guess that was
the case though ignore the thing I said in
between well now we're back to this point
like we don't have a memory you're seeing that right now
a lot of those missiles that are hitting
and those are stationary those were aimed there
for a long period of time at these other countries
yep you know why because they have us bases
because they're helping them arm and refuel and that makes
them illegal belligerence of the war which all of
them know maybe he doesn't that's embarrassing
we out doesn't matter though the reality is clear
they keep trying to make the point that look
at see look at what they're bombing we told you
they were criminal terrorists
I mean guys that that only
will work for the dumbest person in the room
how do you see that but desperate I don't know
so I think I was right about that we attacked
first and if we didn't it could have been
you know look we're really
decimating them they're being
decimated oh yeah yeah clearly
we hit that first yeah we got it
same thing I said last time
but first as I wrote here
now Trump says what Trump recently denied
how ridiculous all this is
American servicemen are dying to fight
Israel's war again well Israel commits
a multi-nation genocide with US government
support anyone defending this is not
fighting for American interests this is
Israel first I mean that's not even
debatable guys that's exactly what's
happening how is this in any way you
could argue that this might be in the US
security interest I disagree
but it's not even remotely America
first especially since the America first
team not the
not the government but conservatives
don't want that
so I should know but Trump says I'm
MAGA MAGA is me and that's causing more
people to go whoa okay well then I was wrong
about all of this I support the country
right not not whatever Trump says is the
country that day that's my point
I think most people are honest they're
just being played
now I know this this is
the one this is from before this on March
4th if accurate the point was
so he says we attacked first just don't
forget this point right which means
as I've said before in case you didn't hear it there's only
three legal realities for why this
would be considered a legal war
congressional approval which never
needed to happen which means congress is an EFT
an authorization for use military
force like in the rack war which they
do not have or under the war powers
act which is the only other possible option if
they have an eminent attack
which they told you they attacked first guys so
there's no world in which this makes sense
they can't claim it's the eminent for 47 years
there is and even now it's come out even
more so showing you that there is zero
evidence that Iran was in any way going to attack
and Iran came out and said that of course they could
be lying and said there's no no world
we're going to attack you so
either way guys you could argue that they
sought for that they've never even tried to prove
that and the evidence they put out shows
you that it wasn't eminent rather that
Israel might attack and that was the point and
still Iran might respond afterward
so they trapped themselves by their ridiculous
narratives because if they if rubio
was correct and this is what Trump is now
repairing that means that Israel was
going to attack and they knew around respond
so they had to attack first
how in what world would that be an eminent
strikes right guys this is so basic
and they were dealing with dishonest
people and people willing to call it out
that's all this is
so that makes this in a legal war
no matter what
under the constitution
now you may disagree with that then fine make the case
of why the constitution doesn't matter anymore
I don't think that's where you're going with it though
if you want to make the case then I'll listen
break it down with evidence I'll probably
disagree but do not pretend this is somehow
justified because bronze bad
but because 47 years it doesn't change
the legal reality
of course Kelly and leave it says well the president
feeling very sound logic
which then very quickly changes it from
sound intelligence to that he thought
which is just embarrassing
that's bad guys
now here's a good clip that
Brett and circus put together I believe he did
he said he tagged me and put it on his account
he says if you don't know why we're at war with
Iran you've clearly forgotten about October 7th
he we knew that there was
going to be an Israeli action we knew
that that would precipitate an attack against American forces
and we knew that if we didn't
preemptively go after them before they launched
those attacks we would suffer higher
casualties and perhaps
forget October 7th don't forget all
of the things that have happened over the years
all all caused
by these people so they are among
the most evil people ever on earth
they cut babies heads off
they chop women in half
what they did take a look at October 7th
to go up which they will
they'll also come down they'll come down
very fast and we will have gotten rid of a
major major cancer
on the face of the earth we will
take it out of cancer
don't forget October 7th
they chop women in half
whatever on earth
they cut babies heads off
I mean can you
this is a really actually important
thing to think about
what do you think is going on right there
there's only a few ways
you could possibly view this
do you think Trump is just somehow
magically not aware that that story
has been debunked by even Israeli media
that didn't happen
the lies about the rape
conversation as the woman that they used
for that campaign with the blood on the back of her
grey pants literally is now free
and that didn't happen
she publicly said that or the many other examples
of them lying but that's not even this point
the point here is about the beheaded babies
guys that came out everywhere
the UN exposed that everybody
and then Biden said it and we went
oh my god did he just say that over and over
babies on the clothes line babies in an oven
these were lies proven
in every possible angle of the conversation
that's not opinion I mean directly
proven that they came out and admitted that
even the guy who originally said it turned
he said well it could have been emotional maybe I was
misunderstanding that's where that ended up
all this time later
do you think Trump doesn't know that
or is he just choosing to lie
because that's what Israel wants
I mean Netanyahu still says that
even though we all know it's a false story
why is he and now but understand we're not talking
about Hamas we're talking about
Iran who is not Hamas
I mean it's just insane that we're even pretending
despite the funding coming from
the Israel side if you want to make that
I mean it's just embarrassing but think
about how crazy that is that he's currently
making the argument that somehow
Iran was involved with something that never even happened
in Gaza and that's why this all needs to happen
seriously
ask yourself whether this is him not aware
which is I don't know what's more alarming
or whether he's forced to do this
all caused by these people
I mean listen to all that again
I mean this is just beyond the pale guys
saying that everything in the world is because of Iran
it's just insane
it's going to be an Israeli empty place
don't forget October 7th
don't forget all of the things
that have happened over the years
all caused by these people
these people Iran or does he mean Shiites
or does he mean Iranians as people
either way it's a lie guys it's just not true
I mean first of all if you want to talk about
any number of things like you saw all the events
what 9-11 well they're suing that's what
hobbyism that's not Shiites thought Iran
and you guys tried to blame it on Iran
even the New York Times had to break down why that was
blatantly false and then you moved away from it
even after this recent point you had some Zionist
trying to make the case again but it fell flat
because it's just not true
I mean it's just insane to me
talk about any other event you want to discuss
in what way is Iran
ever ever proven to be regarded
connected to any of this stuff
that's not the same as saying good guy bad guy
just simply the truth
and he is either lying to you
or not actually aware of that again I'm not even sure
what's more alarming that he's just completely
out of like this bumbling guy
who thinks he's in charge which means they have
complete control or somebody who's being coerced
I honestly don't know
they are among the most evil people
ever ordered they cut baby's
heads off they chop women in half
when they did take a look
at October 7th to go up
talking about Israel then you'd be correct
they say well
they'll also come down they'll come down very fast
and we will have gotten rid of a major
major cancer
by the face of the earth
okay so case is unclear and this is not new
he's talking about getting rid of the I guess the Iranian government
we can pretend he doesn't just mean all of Iran
even though every single US war
has always been about all of the country
all the peoples complete destruction
but you know this time will be different guys
but
I mean so what are we talking about
removing the cancer so what does that show you
was this about defending
US interest was this about defending
Israel no this is about taking
on the chin
to stop the bad guy doesn't that
sound awfully familiar to what they
democrats told us about Ukraine
it's funny how nothing do under the sun
but see I'm sure people who don't want to see it
will stomp their feet and plug their ears and ignore it
and it's different this time Ryan you understand
it's not though
we will take it out of cancer
you know don't forget October 7th
we were already in November
when we sat with the prime minister
in a very small forum
this is March 5th, 2026
this is again we reported this already
but this is I'm actually glad
that you put this together this is the actual
clip of him saying this where he told you
we planned this
a week before meaning that while they were
pretending to be negotiations they had planned this
and of course if you really understand it
I don't honestly think they were ever truly
engaged with negotiations
I think it was like with Gaza and it was always
about setting them up for the best outcome
which as businessman Trump
you know devoid of emotion it seems
or human nature ultimately is always
in that position bomb salamone whatever gives
us the win
where they are too they are
you know don't forget October 7th
we were already in November
when we sat with the prime minister
in a very small forum and the prime
minister set a goal to eliminate the how many
regime in November
in November
right which we told you
and of course they didn't do that right
again I mean you know it's funny
how interesting would it be for all of a sudden
to find out the community was never killed
there's nothing to back that up I just think that's an interesting thought
as you know if they were being
played to that degree that would be pretty
an impactful thing to happen but
yeah evidence shows clearly that they killed him
along with a lot of other people
but what happened
that they did they topple
and collapse because he was the only evil
no it wasn't even the reality
of guys I mean it's it's insane to look at
what he's done and the arguments about him
and look at what Israel is doing right now
look at what Netanyahu is doing look at what Trump is doing
look at what their religious extremist
advisors are doing you know whatever you want to call it
and it pales in comparison
it's just the reality and just I'm just
we should not be afraid to be real
about this anymore about the US and Israel funding
al-Qaeda and ISIS and how it's always been the
reality how I just played the
clip and you know of somebody
an intellectual discussing that or I forget his name
off the top of my head it was for the nation interview
the point is it's not because he says it's true
but it's just a casual recitation of
what we already know is the reality we can prove
these things which gotta be real about it
we gotta stop pretending like this you know what
it is is engaging with this hyperbolic sort
of pearl clutching partisan mainstream
alternative media that just always acts like
you're not allowed to say certain things
everywhere you look now as
to that very point Scott Horton telling you
as it is no more BS
about this war being waged to hurt
China or any other rationalization
it's just it's the liqud
that's NetGyau's political party
they've seized control of the imperial regime
simple as that
I happen to agree
you can decide for yourself question it guys
demand evidence prove it
I think this is very easy to do so
disclose TV now case you're watching for the first time
this is not something we'll get back to
we've discussed this a thousand times
I've done entire shows breaking down that exact point
to a T
and I'll probably do it again soon
disclose TV Trump on a run war
he's literally just said this I had
an obligation to do this
I didn't want to
I call an excursion
I didn't want to make this journey
what kind of a weird statement is that
now I honestly think that this is
again sort of like what the way he plays this
you know like almost like a wink
wink secret you know
to the people that read into everything he says
and assume whatever they want out of it to give the best
out cuts like that's the Q thing
is that ultimately this is
him basically suggesting
I mean if I'm reading it correctly
and you could just be a weird statement he put out
but that he had like he was forced
obligated here's what he said
he's hiding his hands down there looks like
I don't think so but it'll be said
wait let's
can we wrap this war up this week
yeah sure
can we yeah sure
I don't think so though
I don't think so but it'll be said
what a ridiculous answer see and he do see
clearly knows what he did yeah sure why not
maybe cool whatever
what a ridiculous answer
he's asking a point blank question about whether you think
and the answer is I could maybe
that's what that's one of the many possibilities
that's just that's a that's a weird answer
it's clearly meant to give the impression that it will
be done soon even though you know it won't be
and that's why he has to get will it well probably not
having left it there you'd have MAGA reporting
across the board he said a week and be over in a week
because we know for sure it's and I'm only
talking about the fringe partisan teams
for players which I think is a
rapidly diminishing number
won't be alone
and we're gonna have a much safer world when it's
wrapped up oh really
are you gonna continue stop invading
countries based on illegal justifications well probably
not so no we won't change
be wrapped up soon
we're gonna have a much safer world
I had a
I didn't repeat that he just said it again because we
did this I didn't want to
I called it
I had an obligation to do this I didn't
want to I called it
excursion he sounds like he's slurring
by the way just an objective
observation it sounds like he's tired
just for slurring or something
he is dealing with a lot of stuff
so wouldn't surprise me not trying to suggest that he's
you know it's just funny me the guy is old
by the way it's funny how we have to like dance around
these points with these guys everyone's like no
it's he's fit health no matter what
or he's the most seen out guy in the room you know it's
kind of both for these people I think they're all struggling
but obligation now you could argue we just meant
I'm obligated to do the right thing
you could try to argue that
good time selling that to anybody with a brain
but it's worth pointing out
obligated I'm obligated
yeah I think it's worth considering
in the larger picture with what we see
that the ultimately is
whether it's the Rothschild buying him out
and owning him for a long time ago with his bankruptcies
or whether it's Israel and blackmail
and Epstein who knows
worth considering here's Philip Geraldi
citing the Guardian
Trump Iran airstrike decision to be guided
by Jared Kushner and Steve Wittkopf's
advice that's an older article
so look think of where we are now
and Trump basically going well
you know Kushner said
which is so
embarrassing
blaming on somebody else
I mean this is like a fire in a theater point
wouldn't it be
as the president regardless of what Jared said
wouldn't it be your obligation
to you know vet the information
to look at it for yourself to come to your own conclusions
apparently not not for the president
now whether that happened or not
I don't think it's even within I think this is about manipulation
and blaming Jared was his way to get out of it
looking like he made the mistake
again my real opinion is that he's not
even a I think Israel is calling the shots
in a real sense I've been saying this
for a long time that doesn't have to mean some kind of secret
you know this is on the surface
you could even just literally make it a lobbying
if you wanted to but I think it's much more nefarious than that
my point is it's very self-evident
guys it's right on the surface
and you've gotten people on the highest level
the conversation outright saying it and yet we point
to it and we're still called racist it's insane
Wittkopf and Kushner reportedly met with
Trump prior to the start of the war as we just
heard from Israeli
cats November we knew that
they were arming the Kurds like a month before that
or before they bombed actually
and he says and urged him
to act against Iran so on the record
you got Wittkopf and Kushner
both clear Zionist clear Israel supporters
urging him to go out of Iran
citing the clearly false intelligence
provided by Israelis
regarding the eminence of nuclear
developments and by Iranians
it's false it's very easy
to verify that based on the evidence we have
as I've always said you could argue there's some
secret bomb they have that nobody can prove
certainly possible but if all
we have to engage with is the evidence which is all
we should be doing shows you that they lie
about everything the Israelis
the US government and the and what you
can prove shows you that not only they not have it
that they've done it's a religious
thought where they do not want to do it because it
violates their beliefs
so maybe you can even argue that if you
turned it into what they want to that then
they'll eventually have nuclear weapons because
they don't have the similar qualms it's interesting
to think of it like that but either way
the point is that you can see how
this is being manipulated
so if you're uncomfortable with considering
the Israeli influence point because somehow
someone convinced you that was racist ask yourself
whether you can see a world in which Jared
because of his allegiances because of what
he believes because maybe he thinks this is
what's best for America is influencing Trump
and then by default that's Israel through
him influencing Trump and it's not that hard to see
but people just don't
want to let themselves hear it
now here's Trump in 2008
telling you that Bush should be impeached
why because they brought you to war
with a bunch of lies
I agree Trump
it's good logic maybe we should apply it today
Nancy Pelosi
the speaker
well you know when she first
got in and was named speaker
I met her and I'm very impressed by her
I think she's a very impressive person
I like her a lot
was that
huh? just funny to me
these people don't believe in anything
they just say whatever they say
it's just so funny to me just in case you missed it
Pelosi is a great she's very talented
she's very intelligent
it's just so funny to me
not what he's saying now and of course
she's much older
same politics guys
what do you believe do you think he just
is an entire world DJ
they sell you what they need to
so you believe them
speaker
well you know when she first
got in and was named speaker
I met her and I'm very impressed by her
I think she's a very impressive person
I like her a lot
I was surprised that
she didn't do more in terms
of Bush and going after Bush
it was almost
it just seemed like she was going to really
look to impeach Bush and get him out of
office which personally I think would have
been a wonderful thing
for the war
because of the conduct
he got us into the war with lies
and
look at the trouble
Bill Clinton got into
with something that was
totally unimportant
and they tried to impeach him which was nonsense
and yet Bush got us into
this horrible war with lies
that's funny someone in the chat saying
that's not real these days who knows
who knows the amount of
possibility of deep fakes in AI
follow up with that Wild Rose let me know
if you talk about this clip just for the record
by the way if that is the case
he has said this exact sentiment more than once
he's made it very clear in the past that
ultimately you know
the Iraq war we relied to
in his run up to his first administration
he was saying that across every
debate right but anyway just
for the just want to point it out since someone in the chat made that argument
lies by lying
by saying that had weapons of mass destruction
by saying all sorts of things
that turned out not to be true
so the point
is that is the case
they did lie
not all of it and Trump has called that out many times
so what's the difference right now
you could argue he's not lying about these things but guess what
that's already been shown to be the case
about numerous examples of all of this
but to me that's not even the point
that's not about whether they lied it's about the legalities of the war
and so what the point he's arguing is they lied about the threat
to initiate the war
how is that not exactly what's happening right now it's identical to the situation
which is why that is being played
because there's no consistency of logic
there's no principles it is
we called it out then because that's what I think we wanted to hear
because he wanted to frame himself in a certain position
or maybe that's what he actually thinks but today doesn't matter
because what Israel wants Israel gets
now here's an article from the New Republic
Trump went to war with Iran because Jared Kushner is a fool
now I agree with the influence
but I don't know if I agree with the framing
that this is sort of them not understanding
the nuclear conversation
I don't buy that for a second but I'll show you what I mean
several nuclear experts have raised
questions about the disastrous duos
technical understanding of Iranian enrichment
after they presented an assessment of Iran's
research reactor
that made no sense
MSNOW reported Monday
now what's more likely that these two people
have been put in the position
without knowing the details of how to engage
with the nuclear conversation
that's certainly possible with the
incompetence we see today
or is it more likely that they chose to
misrepresent the reality of it because that was in the
interest of Israel
you could decide both are very possible
it mixes up
different elements of the nuclear program
and their potential proliferation capabilities
one of the experts says
research reactors are not capable of doing enrichment
of a uranium whether for civil
or military purposes
so in addition to the point that I'll briefly make again
about the lie he made about the 60%
enrichment
I shouldn't say the lie but the lie about whether they were bragging about it
because 60% was well within their safeguards
according to the director general
of the IAEA
but on top of that remember
that the enrichment facility
was one of the main places that was proven to actually
have been bombed and destroyed
and so they can't technically
even do that right now
so on top of the lie this is
why he lied about it knowing that they weren't going to be able to change it
for the time being he used the number they had
which was not a crime in order to make it sound like
that's the case but on top of that they're claiming
that they even mixed up these certain elements
basically saying
the research reactors weren't even capable of doing it
anyway kind of the same point I think
and so ultimately the experts are saying
based on what they're saying these people don't know what they're talking about
but I argue they were doing this deliberately
Whitcoff and Kushner chose not
to have nuclear technical experts present
during the negotiations
I wonder why that sounds deliberate to me
when you're in a technical nuclear conversation
ahead of Trump's military campaign in the Middle East
Whitcoff claimed that Iran had amassed
460 kilograms of uranium
at 60% enrichment he did
now that wasn't the point
it was that he said that then went on to make the allegation
that they bragged about it
that they did so knowing they were violating the
sea agreement that was a
whole cloth lie
now again you could argue that he was misinformed by
somebody else another actor
in the conversation either way I'll show you
why that's not true that it is
60 at 4
265 was what it was at 60%
is within their
safeguard agreement as of right now I'll show you in a second
enough to potentially make 11 bombs
within a few weeks yeah aha except for the fact
that's not even remotely the reality when it
comes to have to increase the enrichment above 90
then create the material needed to make the bomb
then make the bomb but the whole point is
that you need the enrichment facility to even do
it in the first place which they do not have
they know all this however
during negotiations Iranians offered to turn
over the uranium aha a
fourth point to it the Middle East diplomat
told MS now never realized
these diplomats from all sides
of the conversation came out right afterward and
accused Whitcoff deliberately or rather
explicitly of deliberately
misrepresenting what happened
the Iranian told Whitcoff
that Kushner that
and Kushner that they'd only started
enriching uranium which is the truth by the way
which rather what the evidence shows
after Trump withdrew from the
Iran nuclear deal the JCPOA
the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
and as I've said every single time
and I had so many repetitive
conversations about this because when this was in the news
they just kept lying about it like everything else we do
and the reality was
that in the JCPOA I believe it was article
36 it said very clearly that should the
US government because they knew
they were going to do this unilaterally
pull out of the deal that they were allowed to
enrich to a certain point until they force them
back into compliance they never
did so in effect the agreement became
no one boy to just kind of just became defunct
and from
that point forward there was no legal you know
but here's the difference there were still
engagement with the IEA and Iran and they
have maintained those safeguard agreements
so there's really nothing going on other than
them hyping things that people don't understand
or just outright lying about it
and then the Iranians told
Whitcoff and Custer that they'd only started enriching
uranium after he withdrew a senior
Trump official confirmed the Iranians quote
talked about turning over material
to us as we told you before
but talks ended can you guess when
abruptly when the United States
and Israel launched an attack which as
we've been already told by other diplomats that they
launched the attack after the agreement was about
to be made the old the foreign minister
of Oman came out and before
the attack was going man this is about to happen
we've got good agreements and then that night they bombed
and his argument later was they did
this because the deal seemed like it was possible
doesn't that sound familiar to every
situation we saw during Gaza it
it should because it's exactly the same tactic
they never wanted this they never wanted
an agreement they never wanted a deal
based on their actions that becomes pretty clear
so they on top of everything who were about
offering to turn it over because
this is what Oman said right or the foreign minister
Oman he said they were finally
willing to put on the table zero
enrichment all of it
and what he say what they would hand it over
they would downgrade that's what he said
and then they attacked I mean this just
can't get more clear guys sadly enough
our show is going to get buried by the algorithm
and people will only see it if they already
likely understand what's going on that's how
this works today and the other everybody else
is corralled into one of the ridiculous
mainstream alternative shows that only give you
a fraction of the truth and barely get into
the details
now for those who don't remember very quickly
end of 2025 the
international atomic energy agency the
group that the US and Israel would point to
in regard to investigating Iran
director general came out and said
specifically about
the 60%
as stated in my most recent
report
based on inspections conducted at the
relevant facilities in Iran
Iran's uranium stockpiles
remain under safeguards
in accordance with Iran's comprehensive
safeguard agreement
simple and he goes on to make it clear
you may recall that more than 400 kilograms
of this stockpile
is enriched to 60%
which if you understand how English language
works that is within safeguards
so Whitcoff came out and deliberately
lied on Fox news and they gobbled it up
because they don't do their due diligence and that's how this works today
and the reality is as he says again
that at the bottom is
the I
can indeed guarantee through watertight inspection system
that nuclear weapons will not be developed in Iran
and that's why Israel said screw that
we're going to lose bomb them
that's what I think I mean in fact I think that's very
clear by the evidence
now Trump claims as of today
Iran had plans to
take over the Middle East
and eliminate Israel
come on I mean this is just
what point do you stand back and just go come
on at the it's over
the history
as even Tucker told you wins the last Shiite
terrorist attack I don't that didn't
never happen in this country
the idea that Iran has any indication of any of this
bombings anything taking over the
Middle East eliminating Israel
because it's just over the top for
every piece of evidence now on the other side
of the conversation what do you think Israel's
doing Lebanon Gaza
Syria Egypt
I mean that's the great they're taking over
the Middle East that's explicitly what their actual
goal is that's the great rizrael project
and they have outwardly stated
they want to eliminate Iran so it's
just insane that we can't be honest about this
but I think we know why because these people
are part of the agenda
simple Iran had
plans of taking over the entire Middle East
and completely obliterating Israel even
using the same term isn't that funny
just like Iran itself those plans are now
dead oh another
news Iran just bomb multiple locations by the way
so yeah they're totally obliterated
wild
now
we're getting close to the time here but I want to make sure
we get to a few more points now if I will
mention the points about the SAVE Act
SAVE Act if we have to we'll discuss it more
tomorrow because I believe right now they're in the midst
of these debates and potential filibusters
which I'm not sure if it's happening or not but
here's what Trump just said and I think this
is worth pointing out around the Iran conversation
and the bombings
now again this can speak to either
shocking incompetence and being uneducated
in the situation or rather insulated by
other dishonest people and just other morons
or he's just trying
to lie to you to make it sound like what they
did was illegal or just was
representative of some kind of maniacal
perspective
as opposed to being the legal response
that international law says is completely
within their response meaning that they
can attack belligerence when you
initiate an illegal war or a legal war
for that matter here's what he said
power
look what happened
in the last two weeks
they weren't supposed to go after all these
other countries in the Middle East
except that's quite literally what they threatened
and quite literally what we all talked about
and quite literally what any expert was telling you was
on the table but listen to Trump
because that's what the smart people do
those missiles were set
to go after them
so they hit
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE
Bahrain
Kuwait
nobody expected that
we were shocked
no you weren't man so this is incredible
here's what's crazy
did you hear what he just said and this is how he played
I think this is just ridiculous I think he's being clumsy
you just said
that they were aimed they were positioned at these locations
why?
because they know they're working with you
they know you're refueling they know you're arming
they know you've got bases there
that seems pretty simple just like you were aimed
at their locations okay then
the next sentence is we were surprised
we were shocked
why would they do the thing that they were aimed
at doing and said they were going to do
that seems crazy
guys you have to be honest about that
that's either him just losing his footing
or I mean that's just
the argument is ultimately that it's supposed to be
look at how crazy these terrorists are
they're bombing everybody because they just don't care
well you basically sold
that narrative out of that you made it clear
that wasn't true by the way you started this
but listen again
and power
look what happened
in the last two weeks
they weren't supposed to go after all these other countries
in the Middle East they weren't supposed to
like at some kind of kindergarten classroom
that wasn't allowed
I was informed that they weren't going to do that
what kind of person is this
that's insane for him to even say that
those missiles were
set to go after them
okay
so those two sentences seem to contradict each other
well okay well so you just they were set
okay but they weren't supposed to
whatever that means
but again we all knew this
the legal realities there they were aimed at it
like he just said
so wouldn't the logical thing be that they might do that
like they said they would and were aimed at
if we do something yes
so they hit
Qatar Saudi Arabia
UAE
Bahrain Kuwait
nobody expected that
now how do you make sense of those two statements
other than that being aimed at them
guys this is propaganda
and he's just delivering it poorly
these are narratives that have been constructed
that are independent of the facts
that his people will then correct
leave it will go here's what he meant
here's how this actually connects let me rearrange it all for you
and that's what he was trying to say
whatever at the end of the day
this exposes itself
as Justin Amash rightly says
we're governed by complete morons
now I
I highly agree with that
whether or not this is him
like confused about why they would do it
and just a bad political or
he's lying in a bad way
either way that's exactly what's happening right here
now let's not forget by the way
for those that have already
this has been fallen by the wayside
because the conversation is directed elsewhere
2,200 Marines
and I believe it's more than that based on the reality
as how it started as well as the fact that they lie to us about everything
headed to the Middle East
we have reports from Pryzner
about people being deployed weeks ago
boots on the ground we have plenty this is
by every definition
of the term boots on the ground since this is now in the theater of war
that they're deploying them to
if the argument was just not in Iran
well that's just a different the idea is this is war
right they tried it was not a war
yeah it's obvious a war because they called it a war
it is a war by every definition
won't be boots on the ground limited strikes
nope they continue to bomb in Israel planning
for weeks weeks out months out so
no okay now we're going to deploy to the ground
it's just this embarrassing mission creep that's not even a mission creep
because it happens like 30 seconds after
they sell you the lie
but Marine guys I said this in the beginning
there were people on the ground regardless
intelligence and otherwise I think that's always
the case my opinion
but on top of that they armed and
and gave
resources to the protesters if you want
to call them that I don't mean the real protesters I mean
the people that they put in there that was
admitted by Mossad admitted by Pompeo admitted by
P I think even Trump said something like that
then you have the example of the Kurds
which we now know they've been doing for months
and the reality being they've been no longer years
in the regard to Kurds in general
and it came out that they had planned that so that's
an invasion guys that is an ink
that is using an insurgency group to manipulate
the country and destabilize them
and try to overthrow the government that's a that's war
that's insurgency that's invasion
everything he said wasn't going to happen
and now deploying Marines to the ground
and as
main account said
which I actually just caught me
off and laughed like crazy when I saw this only
because it's just kind of a funny overlap and framing
but I agree with the kind of the point
and what I think he means or at least what I mean when I say
MAGA in this sense
are the people out there who are pretending to care about
this I see most conservatives out
there calling this out in my opinion like honest
ones but he says Hexeth no boots on the ground
MAGA America first Hexeth
2500 Marines to the Middle East
then she goes and here's MAGA
this is so ridiculous
for those of the podcast it's some girl
crying as she does some kind of weird dance
move for tiktok it's just like it's just perfect
where the world is right now
you know the lie and rigorous then MAGA
oh you know it's like it's just kind of like move on
upset but you know kind of not worrying
about it like it's just so perfect
and this is what we're dealing with guys
I don't believe it's the majority but they're very influential manipulators out there
who are just keeping this drifting in the direction
of what apparently is real ones whether they know that or not
now reports have come
out that I think
are starting to show the discrepancy between the narrative
and what's actually happening where Hexeth
says Iran's leaders are desperately hiding
underground in their tunnels and what rats
do cowards
I guarantee you he might even think
that it's being fed to him through Israel it could be
the truth but there's been tons of evidence
coming out showing for example Iranians
president just marching walking through the streets
shaking hands
no security guards but of course that could be all coordinated
it could be a lie
but it's interesting the same thing
Assad used to do same thing Maduro used to do
and now I'm starting to think
maybe not and you know I'm just kind of
facetious I don't think that's ever been the reality I think these people
have large support in their populations
because they push back against states that have been stealing
from their countries their entire lives doesn't mean everybody
maybe a 5050 point is
it's not the same as we're seeing I mean
when you see American politicians do that
you won't today I'll tell you that right now
now
Trump comes out and says after there was massive massive
support in Iran which again I've said this
in the beginning I still think it's provable right now
the vast majority of Iranians
support anything other than what Israel and the US
are doing
Trump claims a crowd in Iran
praising the new Ayatollah and protesting
his war is totally AI generated but
New York Times debunked it apparently
saying it's a true image I don't care if
New York Times has to say frankly I think you can prove it for yourself
but they lie guys what they do
is what they do
here on top of that you have this example
oh hold on I lose that here we go
Ken Silva points out
well you've seen this Tucker Carlson
back in 2024 this somebody criticizing him
says he claimed
that the assassination attempts
from Iran they claim on Trump which has never
really been fleshed out was
massage essentially and he made fun
of him saying there's no evidence to back it up well maybe there wasn't
I disagree I think there's plenty of evidence
but New York Times on top
of that is corroborated suckers reporting that the
Iranian assassination conspiracy theories originated
from Israel now that still doesn't mean
it's not the reality but you have to
consider with the government that lies about everything
that's ever done that ultimately they're making this
up to course Trump into a certain position to go
after Iran right or maybe they work
together to do it but then here's
the article you read it Hegseth's claim about killing
a would-be assassin creates mystery
very kind way of saying there's nothing to back it up
and it looks like they're lying
Israel's intelligence gathered the original
information that Iran was plotting to kill
Mr. Trump and passed it to the United States
come on guys leading you by the nose
if you can't see how often they do this
and on top of that guy the
I mean how about even the recent examples which I'll
probably go into more tomorrow the
re rising anti-Muslim sentiment
or at least they're trying to make it look like that
I don't believe most of this country is
following but you get these extreme
crazy people on this on this platform
like a loomer who are driving this
and my point is that you got these
you know there are five different
Islamic terror attacks over the last couple
of weeks what are you talking about
like the idea that somebody carries out a violent attack
and therefore because they're Muslim therefore
that's a terror that's insane and on top
of the fact that they keep doing this with anybody
they claim or ignoring it this
left right media they both do the same thing
the guy in Texas I mean it certainly
could be some kind of an attack based
on some ideology but why does that make it
terrorism in every possible definition
of the term that's not even close to what terrorism means
the idea is that it could
be that right it could be the guys crazy
it could be that he's angry with the short store
owner it could be that like it looks like one
of them was Kate the case that is
that Israel the US murdered his family in Lebanon
and he's upset about that doesn't
make it justified but in his mind it does
but sure let's make that all Islamic
terrorism or just blow back
or people who are crazy but see this is what
they do and Israel stokes
those flames and pays their ridiculous
people it's the same cycle
Katelyn Johnstone highlighting this person says
for 47 years Iran has paid for
almost every terrorist attack did he just hear Trump
lie about that that's where they just pair it
what they're told
every terrorist attack in the region for 47
years he says
they have been at war for 47 years
and she rightly goes this talking point
is so funny because I've never once heard
anyone say America
has been at war for 47 years with Iran until
this war just started
it's just like a it's just a line
started mindlessly bleeding a few days ago
I would I think I would have heard about
a decades long war before March
2026 so I appreciate
regardless of whether you agree with everything she says
it's just it's a perfect framing because it's just
it's dumb it's a logical
now it's fun if you want to read through the back
and forth it's funny he goes you're utterly clueless
on the topic of the evil Iranian regime
and she says show me a tweet dating
you're before this you know he basically goes
you're crazy you don't talk about I just
responded going well then show it
follow up show the tweet that you claim is
there it's not it's just funny to me
now
Afshan Rafzani
going underground has a good
breakdown of what
I get you I mean there's a lot you could always go a step further back
but arguably what really started this
post-operation
Ajax invasion control
and how and the response
now history you aren't taught he says
now we've covered this tons
both written articles
shows we've covered on this
but he says the coup and I recommend you watch his show
he does good work on a lot of different things
the coup against Iran's Prime Minister Mohammed Mazadek
by the CIA
and MI6 in 1953
now as I've said many times over the years
and this is when he in some ways goes on to break down
he was
very pro whatever you want to call democracy
right like I said he
famous pictures of him next to the Liberty Bell
he traveled because he he cared about this
he outwardly claimed that he cared
about these kind of societies
now that's not what the U.S.
and Israel want like I played that clip for you
they want people they can manipulate and coerce
using bribes
sexual blackmail look around
look who they're working with right now
so the point is that this person was amenable
but not rather open
but not willing to completely as I
as the evidence I think shows
completely hand over control so he was removed
operation Ajax and they put the shah
in place who if you want to look into
the any of the evidence you can even ask
rock and they'll tell you exactly this
it was a despotic regime for the vast
majority of people outside of the inner circle
of the oligarchs from the U.S. Israel
and Iran that's the shah group
most Iranians were
starving most people were suffering
it's and there was human rights abuses restrictions
it's like El Salvador they go freedom
and everything's great and they're restricting human rights
and they're putting people in prison without charge that's the reality
funny how the U.S. freedom
government is working with all those kind of people
Saudi Arabia is our best ally Israel is our chief ally
funny how we just
can't piece that together now since Mosul
duck had pursued nationalist policies
now whatever you want to think about what nationalism is
the point is about focusing on Iran
and doing it with the interest of Iranians
funny how that's something that they're now fighting
but put in place a globalist dictator
shah
but anti-globalism
it's funny how counterintuitive
all these partisans are right now
Mosul duck had pursued nationalist policies
and was widely popular having nationalized
Iran's oil to stop British exploitation
of Iran's natural resources
Winston Churchill considered Iranian oil to be
Britain's funny how that works
and of course what do you think happened when the shah took over
well they sold out immediately
to western interest
which by the way left Iranians suffering
at the same point to this very day
look at Venezuela, look at Bolivia
look at every other country, Libya
there could be every one of them guys
contrary to the U.S. and U.K.'s claims
to promote democracy and freedom around the world
the U.S. and U.K. back the shah of Iran
Mohammed Rezapalavi
to overthrow Mosul duck and return Iran
to authoritarianism
while being a complaint
complaint, excuse me, leader
that followed Washington's and London's orders
approvably after the coup
Iran's oil was once again privatized
and divided up among the U.K. and U.S.
and some European countries through a new oil consortium
in 1954. Now you guys, you can look at this for yourself
that nowhere translated the Iranian people
why would that be what Iranians want
to sell out their interest to benefit western
oligarchs, it's not the reality
rather of what Iranians want
40% of the shares went to the British
oil company BP, five American oil companies
had significant stakes in the consortium
the dictatorship of Palavi
enforced by the ruthless sabbat which you should look into
we briefly touched on recently
just horrifying stuff, this is what they support
for western oil companies to steal Iran's oil
triggered such anger
from Iranian population, the very population
they claim want this again
that it led to the revolution in 1979
which gave birth to the Islamic Republic of Iran
which arguably would not even be here today
had they let Mosul duck continue
in the direction he was going in
which again, that's to that clip
they don't want them to be democratic
and self reliant because that would then
create military power that they might have to face someday
it's just, it really is
horrible, the roots of the war on Iran today
are the MI6 and CIA's
attack on Iranian democracy in 53
but the US and Israel claim to be
perpetuating
that's weird, perpetuate
destabilizing a disastrous war
on to advance democracy
and freedom, that's what they claim anyway
history shows they are lying
oh it's perpetuating, I'm an idiot
I got perpetuating
in my mind and for some reason couldn't get it out
finding how the mind works, perpetrating
so you know, doing this to them, clearly
it's what happens when you read for four hours straight
it says to destabilizing a disastrous war
it's just, it's very important to understand
the history
and why you need to understand what they're doing
it's not new
alright, where are we here
on time, so here I'm going to just do
a couple more things and we're going to wrap up here
so I can prepare for the next interview we're doing
but we'll get into more of this tomorrow
another war crime on Iran
Israel bombing a UN
excuse me, a UN fact-finding mission
located another
bombing location
that during the 12-day war
Israel bombed and it was a war crime
and now the UN mission has kind of flushed it out
not that it should surprise you guys
it's what they do everywhere
even Harrison Smith
an info wars reporter, rightly calling out
the idea
that as Cruz here says
the last five decades Iran has killed nearly a thousand Americans
and this is why I keep telling you that even Trump
tried to casually act like it might have been millions
that's just bad propaganda
the number is always the same
because only thing they're talking about is when they illegally invaded Iraq
and Iran with Soleimani
defended it
that's it
and yes, Americans died because of the US government
and Israel's belligerent war in Iraq
that was based on lies just like today that even Trump told you
so when they say a thousand Americans
well, those are Americans that were killed
because of the illegal actions of the US and Israel, period
and even Harrison Smith will say
things that have killed more Americans than Iran
in the last 50 years
powered lawn mower accidents, 3,200
bee stings, 3,900
falling out of bed, 10,300
Mexico, around 4,000 Americans
murdered in Mexico
Sackler family, 500,000
but yeah, let's keep claiming that this
based on your illegal actions is even meaningful
in the larger conversation
Ann Coulter
people seem to be misunderstanding what she's saying here
and I don't support I think she's
I mean, let's be clear, she is a hardcore
right now she seems to be calling out Trump
like a lot of them I think they're all just
not profiteering but
what's funny
I'm just blanking on this
the one I keep discussing that I somehow can't remember right now
the idea that we need to give them a motive
to do the right thing
and so what I think is a lot of them are starting to recognize
that they gain more from saying what we all talk about
or you know who knows maybe like
I said earlier what's up maybe they're finally
coming around and seeing it we should actually hope for that
my point saying all that
is recognized like a lot of them like Derek's been calling out
anomaly you know because he's out there making points that we agree
like Trump's doing the wrong thing
and that's good but let's recognize
they were screaming how bad we were for trying to
call this out before we got here now that
can't go on forever we have to eventually just like
hope that they're calling it out that's why I'm sharing
like Harris or whatever else
because I think it's important regardless of what's who's
saying it that if it's correct we show it we talk about
it wherever I see it first but recognize
that they were until recently going
yay Trump America first freedom we're saving
the world and now with Iran
because that was a huge line for a lot of people they're calling
it out but here's what she says and people seem to
be misunderstanding this as being sort of a pro
action I but you tell
what you think the article is
does Trump risk turning America to road state
we just discussed this the other day basically
admitting that nobody wants this and what they're
doing is a crime
he says she says suppose Iran
hypothetically dispatched operatives
to Mexico where from
the Texas border they fired a missile
on an American base and
unintentionally but carelessly
demolished a nearby American school
killing 175 people well where you know that the
min-op school was not careless it was not an
accident it was targeted as we were shown
likely by Israel's intelligence given to
his US government and they're just incompetent
but who knows so that's where she's trying to
give you an analogy for so let's just remove
the unintentionally but carelessly I don't
agree with that at all but sake of conversation
suppose Iran did this
and dispatched to Mexico and then bomb
the US school accidentally or not
she goes what if they then blew up fuel depots
in the United States
showering a chemical rain on residents all over
the United States then struck homes
schools clinics
as they have been doing in Iran
as Iran's leader warned
that death, fire and fury would so
pulverize America that it could never be
rebuilt as Trump said about Iran
in that case she rightly points out
President Trump and all of us
would howl
at outrageous attacks on innocent civilians
and we'd be right
she's correct
I think that's an important thing to think about now
whether she's doing it because she sees an opportunist
that's what I was thinking the word I couldn't remember
whether it's opportunism
or that she genuinely now sees it at this point
in this moment I don't really care
it's about the reality that even
people like Ann Coulter or whoever else
major supporters are going whoa
maybe they're just finally
seeing it maybe like I said but the reality
guys is that this is showing
you that if this was reversed even
from their perspective then yes everybody
would be going that's a crime so why can't
Iran do that right why can't
Iran and their government their people
stand up and go look at what you just did you just murdered
175 children you just come
Israel's bombing relentlessly
civilian locations
and they lie about it now you have to either recognize
that that means Donald Trump has no control
of the situation or he's a part of it
I'm sure there's a middle ground in there but at this point
those are the most
it behooves us to recognize
where that falls
because if it's somewhere in the middle those things still multiply
in my mind
so this is important for the false flag point
and then with the time I think I'm going to play
a couple clips a clip from Whitney and then talk
about the save act to finish but this is just
another statement that I brought this up myself
this is a possibility
but the Iran Foreign Minister the Americans
have built a drone similar to the shihad
the shahid excuse me
drone called the Lucas
which is completely identical and through it
targets in Arab countries are
attacked it is possible
that Israel's behind the attacks on civilian
targets in Arab countries to damage
these countries relations with Iran I
argued a possible point
so far we have not targeted
any civilian residential areas in the
regions now that could be a lie
in fact you can
let's just say first it was an accident and they
bombed a building and they didn't mean to well that would be
an easy way to lie your way out of it which I would expect
all of them to do now let's say they chose
to bomb them maybe because they knew
person US or Israeli personnel were there
yet they bombed it knowing civilians were there
that would be an easy way to avoid
accountability for killing those civilians because
in no world is that a legal target no matter what
Israel says then you
could consider that maybe they just did it because they're
bombing civilians and don't care so either way
you look at it I can see a world which they
would lie about this to avoid that accountability
but the evidence is what matters
there's no track record the history does not show you that
Israel is caught doing this in
other fields of war in Gaza in
Syria they do this is what they do and
so consider that this is because I don't see
an interest why Iran would do this
I don't see the benefit to them doesn't
mean it wouldn't happen but who benefits is always
the most important question follow the money
who benefits now here
it's about considering whether or not this is not going
to get worse with these attacks and why
they keep hinting at the drone worry
just consider that as we go forward
and be skeptical
now what we're going to get into in the next
show it one just recognize that Lebanon
is spinning it's it's
insane what they're doing they're pushing people out
of the south telling them they have to
evacuate which is not their legal right
to do and just because they
want to claim that somehow is like the humane thing to do
well this is an illegal war they have no
legal right to be engaging let alone bombing
but look how great they are by telling
them to move and then bombing them anyway
bombing them where they go it's just
it's disgusting the way they frame it as somehow
humanitarian while they know they're
cheering on the death these people and on
top of that they're continuing to tell you that
they're never going to stop doing this oh it's also important
to recognize as the largest Christian country
in the Middle East don't you think that
Christians in America first Christian
is Christ is K don't you think that should matter to
those people some of it does
even sky news is now calling
it out they've killed people in Lebanon that's
sky news for crying out loud let
Israel says Lebanese displaced won't return
until its own citizens are safe
imagine if that okay this is like Mexico
going we're taking taxes and we're not going to let you have
it back until we feel we're okay with situation
what do you think Trump would do let
alone whether he would be okay with that
it's also just simply illegal but
Israel doesn't have to care about international law
like they've told you their entire lives
Israel is not bound by international law
I was hoping that would pop up
there's an article by Monde Weiss
there it is
I'll include this because it cites direct
Knesset
documents from the Israeli government openly stating
verbatim that we do not we are
not bound by international law so why
should we care anywhere else you can read it
it gets dismissed because that platforms
okay well ignore look at the
documents it says verbatim but you know
people ignore what they want to
drop site news they're using white phosphorus
in Lebanon yet again it's not new here's
2023 white phosphorus in Gaza Lebanon
Israel's doing it
cats again vows and this is about Gaza
Israel will never fully redraw
from Gaza Strip that was 2025
why is that not important
you mean the place you were going to liberate and free everybody
well we're never leaving like we told you that was the
case that's cats well they're saying
the same thing about Lebanon the same thing about Syria
guess what because it was always the plan
now
Glenn Greenwald
it's been obvious for months now that the second
Trump term serves Netanyahu Palantir
Jared Kushner Ben Shapiro Lindsey Graham
corporatist power K Street sleaze
and Mark Levin
meaning the second Trump term is fully shaped
by the exact factions Trump vowed
to vanquish
time to be honest about it he's literally
selling access to his national security
briefings
isn't that a crime
it's just incredible where we are
I think that's just a cover quite frankly
I'll play this clip I had a great
discussion with Whitney Webb she co-hosted
the Daily Wrap Up which she might be doing more
going forward but we'll be doing a show
which she discussed in this episode
we'll be doing a show for unlimited hangout Derek
and I discussing some of the written articles
some more collaboration coming your way but a great
discussion here on the 13th about a lot of
different things including her recent article
overlapping or discussing Epstein smuggling
network and how it connects to
a lot of different things as a part we understand
but I'll play this clip
and I think it was in there
include the IMA discussion that we
just we talked about where Catherine and a
lot of us discuss how this really does connect
largely to the control grid in a larger
position now the save act point
I'll get to more tomorrow I'm not sure
if they're going to be doing this filibuster thing they plan
it seems like they try to walk it back but overall
the reality is I agree with this
sentiment even phrase a same-day
voting paper ballots photo IDs like everywhere
else in the world if you can't get the first
two at least okay I think nobody's just agree
with that I mean I shouldn't say that you could
disagree with anything but the logic is there
that's I don't know why we would disagree with that
the point though as I continue to point out
for people is that you do not need
I don't think I over here real ID
compliant ID which is what it will
technically it's updated to now simply just
saying because this is the new version
they went back and forth but same point
a form of identification issued consistent
with the requirements of real ID act of
2005 that's what that means real
ID compliant identification
is not needed to protect
voting it's just not you're using
the desire to enforce the law to trick
Republicans into supporting back door digital
ID remove the real ID
aspect of the bill and you get the exact
same outcome call it out
guys now this has become the save America
act is the same point they just added more on to
it so I'm not even trying to look it's not about
anything other than that one point you do not
need real ID compliant identification
or real ID anything or ID
2020 involved at all
to achieve this end you just don't
so ask yourself why that's the case
it's probably multifaceted I believe there's a lot more
going on here
now we'll get into more of this at the end now
I'm actually what was going to end with a clip from JD
and this one too I'm going to play it
we'll go on all this tomorrow I think I'm going to end
with this clip for Whitney I think it's more powerful
but you guys already know the reality of what's
going on in this country from this what we do
in the show this is only going to make it more
clear and a kind of larger technocratic
influence of the cabinet discussion
but as always Whitney nails it down
we will get into more tomorrow
more of the save act overlap with the
technological side of it twitter
tweet on musk autentics
and how these how these connect what's happening
AI data centers exploding all over
the country while people aren't paying attention
a insider from
Palantir literally saying I'm an ex
Palantir executive and it's a factually
correct that Palantir intend to take over
the US government while heavily funding
the effort many of my ex colleagues are now
installed in the US apparatus
there's a reason the C-suite Palantir has
blocked me that's a person who used
to work as an executive for Palantir
we'll go into this more tomorrow
keeping that in mind and the Zionism connections
of the influence on this government will leave
you with the clip from Whitney web and our recent discussion
thank you for tuning in today guys
I appreciate you all I love you all
as always question everything
come to your own conclusions
stay vigilant
do you feel like a lot of this is going is this
just another administration profiteering
or do you feel there's a larger agenda in kind of
what's happening right now you mean where
the Trump administration is taking us
well I think the best summary
of it is to look at
the big tech
Silicon Valley oligarchs that
installed themselves in very insidious ways
in the covers
of power via this administration
and probably
the best thing you can do to learn about
them is to buy Ian Davis's
new book the technocratic
dark state or you know borrow
a copy from someone else who bought it
or it is the best
most forensic breakdown
of those people and what their interests are
and what they are doing
and you can read some of Ian Davis's articles
about
aspects of that for example he did
an amazing investigation into
the city states
sort of this
idea of the network state and all of that
and how it's just as bad
as the globalist global governance
that a lot of people and
right leaning a conspiracy
quote-unquote conspiracy
world are worried about you know
it's that on steroids and is being marketed
to those people
as the solution
and a lot of these people are over transhumanist
I mean they call themselves techno
optimist again sort of
play on that same thing we were just talking about
in the Trump era where like we're the optimist
and boy the negative
Nancy's feel good with us
they'll just make you feel bad
and it's all about feeling not about facts
yeah so
I mean there's obviously a lot of other
agendas at play too but I think obviously
it's pretty clear that in the Trump administration
there's going to be some type of
big switcheroo
economically
and we will see the rise of
you know stable coins
the bitcoin dollar system as laid out by
Mark Goodwin back in 2021
but
I mean that has definitely
played out and so
I think you know a lot of that
stuff with digital currency
is going to advance
and then we're going to be herded further into sort of
this techno feudal reality
and then at the same time you have
these other aspects of the Trump
administration at work
that have this
very deep set
feeling about eschatology
like you know there's an overlap
actually if you look at people like Peter Thiel
who's the person who basically
created JD Vance in a lab
and
his obsession with the antichrist
and all of this stuff a lot of these people
are obsessed with in times things
there's been plenty of
people pointing out recently
how this has influenced likely
the current war with Iran
so you know there's obviously a lot of different
angles to talk about
but basically you know this is not
fighting against global
governance and global tyranny
this is going to be a furtherance
of the same thing that every
administration whether democratic
or republican has advanced
since 9-11 and obviously
before that too but it's they sped
it up
you know the type of gradualism that
they practice increase significantly
after that point
and the goal was to create
you know an AI powered
surveillance state
that is authoritarian in nature
and neo feudal
economically and the vast majority
of us are meant to be
serfs
or rather if you want to use the
you all know a Harari phrasing we will become
the exploited because it's better
than being expendable
so you know
Trump works for bankers
big surprise they all
work for bankers
and these
banker cronies
what they do is they steal your money
and they use
your tax dollars to build your prison
so I mean that's
I don't really anticipate seeing
anything beyond that
at this point
and so people that have been going back looking
either at my work on Epstein
or work on other stuff and being like wow she was so early
like okay if you thought
if I have this track record now
I've like working for 10 years
and I've been early on multiple big stories
maybe you should
look at what I'm talking about now
and like not just me obviously
but what a lot of people are talking about now
that we're right on a lot of those things too