Just a minute
I'm coming
Just a minute
Hello everybody, this is legal man. Welcome to the show. This is gonna be a good episode
I'm going to talk about sort of during all vacation in light of all the different sort of fundamental
Frauds people are taught about this country of the consent and the beauty of this government and all this other miscellaneous stuff
And show people that none of that's actually true and try to open people's minds to the deep fraud
That the government in this country is based upon and for people who don't know me
I'm a lawyer of practice for more than 35 years
I'm America's most trusted beloved lawyer because I tell people the truth and the truth is I was a
Constitutional conservative believer
I used to run around for years and years and years
Promoting the same old con con scam about the three co-equal branches and the Liberty and the founders and all this stupid crap
I did that for years acted like a complete fool and then about 25 years ago
I got the internet and in fairly short order. I was able to figure out it's just a complete scam guys
It's a con a grift to keep me on a tax-paying plantation
I want to figure that out and became self-certified as a master practitioner and I don't need constitutional conservatives anymore
I've also given myself a lifetime achievement award for the hundreds and hundreds of timeless podcasts. I've made
Showing people the way the system actually works and when Jones Plantation the movie came out
I was so impressed with my own performance as mr. Jones
That I gave myself the presidential medal of freedom and that's the highest medal that any civilian can get and I love having fake
Accolades and awards and credentials. I keep them in a fake trophy case
I like it because I like to mock the system this entire system of awards and credentials
This is a control system
See they force people to memorize a bunch of officialdom, which is just a pack of lies and to regurgitate it
And if you don't memorize it and regurgitate it properly
Then they destroy it professionally and everybody saw that during COVID when certain doctors nurses and academics spoke up
They try to destroy them professionally shut them down
And they do that with every kind of profession from doctors to lawyers to hair cutting
They're all required to be licensed if you step out of line
They try to take your license and till people understand what an absurdity
It is to have the government sitting in the middle of that system where they get to decide who's official and who's
Credential and who can practice certain kinds of professions and jobs till people understand how absurd and upside down
That is an insane and backwards
We don't have a chance because the control system will just run on and so I like to mock it to make fun of it
So people catch on
Okay, enough about all that. Let's go ahead and get this show going
So I want to make a show today
That combines
several different things I want to try to bring them together because I talk about jury
Nullification a lot. I talk about consent a lot. I talk about all sorts of these kinds of issues and
I think it's important to
Hit on them often because there's so much brainwashing around them and there's so much
muddled thinking
Because everybody has taught to simply look past the most fundamental questions that touch on consent
We hear all the time that this government is a government with the concern of the people and that the people consented to this and that
That's the big difference between our government and all these other bad evil governments that ours has a concern of the people
but that consent is never really examined and
If you just examine some of these sort of core principal ideas that people just believe and repeat and regurgitate endless
Slogans about you see that there's really actually nothing
underpetting them except for this fraud and to see that the government rests upon and
I don't even want to get into all of this nonsense about well, you got to have something you got to have something
I like to address these issues
first getting it settled that the system we have is a fraud and
Socks and once you have that then you can argue about whether you need something or what else we might have but
We have to be able to put that thing to bed
Entirely that ours is the greatest and what's your plan and all this other stuff because
Nobody ever continuously defaults back into a horrible system. That doesn't make any sense
The system needs to be disbandled because honestly just about any system you assembled would be better than the one we have and
people can't see that because of the massive amounts of brainwashing and the
Amazing amount that's covered up with the fake money system if those didn't exist
People could see it for what it was
But there's no way to get around that so I like to talk about these fundamental issues like consent
they consent of the people is a
Fantasy where does anybody ever consent to anything that's going on and if you tell me voting then you're just falling into the trap
I just told you in what way is voting for something consent
In what way if I participate in the elections people say all the time well, then I've consented to whatever they do
No, it's not true
Because if that were true then when I didn't participate then I would not be consenting and they would have no authority over me
But the reality is whether I vote or don't vote whether I participate or don't participate
They come and stuff down my throat. Whatever it is. They claim
They have a so-called vote on and so voting is just not in any way consent to anything
It's not in any way consent anything because if it was then not voting would not be consent
And if you didn't consent then they wouldn't be able to do it to you the consent comes in a very different way
Which is to say that it's totally imaginary
See there's nothing
Valid about a vote even the so-called ratification if you want to believe that is where it comes from
It doesn't work because nobody has ever consented to the manner in which you would become ratified
You understand that and no water for any vote to be valid even the ratification vote
there has to be an agreement that the manner of
Ratification vote is something that people will be bound to and how would you ever get that could you have a vote on that?
No, because you have the exact same problem
so
You have to constantly keep going back you have to have something like with the Articles of Confederation that required
unanimous approval for
Significant changes unanimous approval
That's what you do when you have inalienable rights
Somebody else can't vote to get my right and take it away take my liberty change the entire system of government
That doesn't work
You'd have to have a unanimous vote that the people will agree that a non-unanimous vote on a topic
Will be valid, but we don't have anything like that. So as a strictly
Theoretical sense there is no consent whatsoever and there's never gonna be any consent
But even if you want to step into the realm of just practicalities
You would absolutely at a minimum need an initial vote of a super super majority of people probably
85-90% of the people
Would have to agree that they will conduct a vote with regards to ratifying a new type of government
And it's so long as a super majority of some amount is reached that they will live with that vote
That's the absolute bare minimum you have to have in order for there to be consent
Do you understand that and so saying that somehow these votes mean anything they consent to anything
It's nonsense the idea that people have consented to just a simple majority of whoever the government says is allowed to vote
And then whoever the government claims it's counted up as a vote will therefore carry the day
There's absolutely no authority for that none that doesn't have any consent to the people
if you're in a small group and you're trying to decide where to go eat and
Everyone says well, let's just take a vote
Lots of people who are in there who know they're gonna get out voted after the discussion
They may already say no, I don't want to vote because you just guys are gonna out vote me
And I don't want to do that and the option you have then is that they're welcome to conduct their vote and then to go
And eat wherever they care to but you're not obligated to participate
You're not gonna go along so everybody has to reach a different agreement
See that's what real consent looks like and the way our government structured not only do you not agree to live by the vote
The votes taken and they so-called decide that we're all going to go eat some other place
And then under our system they claim that you the person who didn't want to go has to pay
For two or three of the other people
Along with yourself through your taxation
See that no part of that makes any sense, but if you strip it all out, that's what it is and what's the basis for all of that?
The basis for all of that is this nonsense about equality, which I've made many shows about now because it's a huge pet peeve of mine
Equality as far as any kind of public conversation in this country all they're ever actually talking about is an equality of rights
Or so-called benefits they never ever talk about an equality of obligations
Consequences there's never any equality with regards to obligation and consequences none
In fact, there's not anything remotely like equality when it comes to obligations and consequences a
Huge portion of the country puts absolutely nothing into the pot
Nothing at all and then demands an equal or a greater amount out of the pot
Well, all equality has to first start with rights and obligations
Those are mirror images of each other if you have rights, then you have obligations
That's all if you're going to have an agreement between people that everybody gets to do X or Y or Z
Okay, well, what do they have to do though in order to get those rights? Oh, nothing
Oh, so I have to do this other stuff and they get it for nothing that doesn't make any sense
There's never any discussion of obligations. What your obligation is as a citizen
The way they talk about it is that your obligation is to vote
That's not an obligation. That's a supposed right
Where are the obligations all your obligations to pay your taxes?
Well, but huge portions of the population pay no taxes the bottom half pay no income tax at all
None. What about all the people who don't have been a law?
What about all the people who work for government and therefore pay no taxes? What about them?
What are their obligations? They have no obligations. They just get shit for free
that's all it is and
Until there's a discussion about that all talk about equality is nonsense because until there's a discussion about what the
Obligations of this equality
involve
All talk of equality is just another
Slogan, it's just a way to hand shit out and to make demands with absolutely no
Obligations and consequences, which is what exactly government always does and so you can see that fundamentally
It makes no sense that our system could be founded on so-called equality equality of rights with absolutely no mention of equality of obligations
No mention at all. What is it the citizens obligated to do in order to get these supposed equal rights?
What is it these people that's come here? They have no obligation whatsoever nine citizens. They have all these rights
Okay, well, what are their obligations?
Nothing, I don't get it. It doesn't make any sense. Who's gonna fulfill all the obligations? Who's gonna put the money in?
Who's gonna make sure things work?
There's absolutely no discussion of any of that. See no discussion. It's really just a way to
disguise a
Slogan that is just an empty promise of something for nothing a way to divide the people up
the people who have and you have to give up in order for the government to operate are
The people who are being very unfairly treated by the people who claim to be entitled all these different rights and
privileges
But they don't ever discuss what obligations they have many of them are simply on government dole are working for a government
Contractor are doing some other thing and getting free government money. Where does any of this come from?
Do they have the right to throw other people into debt?
Do they have that right?
Right see unless you have an obligation on the other side of it unless you have a discussion about what equal obligations would mean in
This system then all talk of equality is nonsense because it's a one-sided
Discussion that literally leaves out the most important thing which is how does the system run?
And this is why you have so much resentment everywhere because there's a whole group of people
who are carrying the entire load for the vast majority of people who are carrying none of the load and in fact are
grifters and
freeloaders
demanding so-called equal rights
It's just a very
Fundamental problem in the system and so I would say people need to
Examine that and think about how absurd that is
Then you have things like the inalienable rights that are discussed indeed
Declaration of Independence
Well, if it's an inalienable right then it can't be taken from me and that's the right to life liberty in the pursuit of happiness
well
The government takes this stuff from people all the time based upon votes alone
Your rights aren't up for vote. See your rights aren't up for vote
There's no system where you can have a right that other people can vote to take away from you all they're taking away from you at
That point is some kind of made-up privilege and
Since pretty much anything has now been swung over to this idea that if the government can just gen up
Enough supposed votes for something that therefore they're entitled to do it that makes literally no sense whatsoever
It's no system in the world can ever function
Where if one group can simply vote to take another group's money or rights or liberty or anything else
Without their permission and consent
That's somehow they could still be free because the population can just be divided up into countless other little
Divisions and majorities and minorities and piece them together and basically everybody will end up losing their rights
And all their liberty and money and that's of course the system we have now if you just think about it
The idea that somebody would ever agree that we're going to have a vote
Which I have no control over of which millions of people will be engaged in and if just a bare majority
Decide one way or another
Then they can simply come and take whatever I have
See there's no system that could ever be designed like that that would ever
Possibly defend rights or liberties
But then fact that's the exact system we have when you strip out all of the slogans and the Barnum statements
That's all that actually has to happen that the Democrats or the Liberals have to win in
Some kind of rigged-up election and then supposedly they can go in and pass laws
That can just raise my taxes take my property condemn it
Limit my ability to do something make me wear a mask
Destroy my job take my business require. I have to have a license for this or that say I can't have this gun or that gun
That they can supposedly just pass any kind of rules they want and then enforce them and that somehow
I agreed to this that there's consent to any of this
You see how that doesn't make any sense people
It has done not possible to make that make sense because it doesn't make sense
There's no amount of looking at what the founders said or anything else that can address the fundamental problem
I'm talking about
That if you have rights if you actually have a right
Then it doesn't matter how many other people vote to take it change it alter it limit it doesn't make any difference
The government has no authority to do that
You see that so the voting is irrelevant
But literally now the only thing that matters is that we're supposed to sit around and wait to see
How these other people who supposedly got elected through these other votes that also nobody ever agreed to can get in there and pass rules
Who ever agreed that Congress or any other legislative body?
Can pass laws with just 50 point one percent of the vote inside of the legislature whoever agreed to that?
Nobody ever agreed to that
Because it goes back to the exact same problem that the Constitution itself had no authority
To bind people it was undertaken during the Articles of Confederation which required unanimous approval
Well, the Constitution said it would become in force if just three-quarters of the states approved it
Well, that's a direct violation of the Articles of Confederation that they were all operating under putting aside the fact
That there had never been any agreement as to the manner of vote
Never any agreement as to that
And so you've just gotten multiple layers of fail when it comes to consent
And the reason for all this is that getting consent from the people is really almost impossible
But it would be
Significantly resolved and there'd be almost no real
dispute in the country if every single vote
Had to be by say 80% or more in order to get elected you had to get 80% in order for anything to pass
It had to get 80% everything required 80%
If that was the case if you just look at different issues any kind of polling
I don't care what the polling is it doesn't matter doesn't matter how bad and ridiculous the polling is
You get polling where you're getting in the 80% and above
You have basically complete and total
Calm in the country on the issue
Whatever gets passed on there if it's consistent with that then the people are gonna be fine
There's not gonna be any dispute
There's no system that makes any sense with freedom where other people get to tell you what to do
Without your consent once they start just making up rules. It doesn't make any sense
It's not
Possible and so I harp on this because it's an issue that's ignored by
Pretty much everybody academia media politicians government people never think about it
They simply repeat the phrases about consent of the governor vote will the people all this shit
And what they mean is these things I've just talked about that are not in fact in any way
Reasonable you can't take other people's rights by voting. It's not possible
Nobody else can consent for me. That's not possible
Nobody's given a right to consent to any of the fundamental issues that run the place
So there's no real consent of the people and so how do you solve it?
Well, as I've said one of the simplest ways would be to jack up and require
These massive supermajorities before anything could happen before anybody could get elected
Before you could have a quorum before you could pass any type of so-called law and on top of that
You would have to have a sunset provision for every one of these things that does get passed
Such that every time there's a new house or Congress whoever's elected be in the state or the federal level
That all the previous laws have to be revoted on and passed again that they all sunset
That's the only way it actually works to have true representation because what happens if the people get in there through one
And then they vote for something and then the people decide this is bullshit
That's not something we agreed to well
It sunsets and you get a whole new group of people in there who get elected and then they have to go try to
Repass it again. Well, they're not going to be able to get it passed. It's going to be a barricade
It's going to make it very difficult for government to do anything in these areas that the people aren't massively behind
See massively behind if you get a 65 percent of the people in favor, which is basically two to one
This is huge overwhelming support
That's why I say you push it up to 80 percent 85 percent when you have this many people
And you really just not going to have any problems with this stuff
You're just not going to have any problems. Of course
The other thing that's a simple thing you have to do is you have to say
Everybody just has to pay a certain amount to be in the country citizens pay one rate
And non-citizens pay another rate. It's just a simple amount and you just get a bill for it. That's it
There's nothing else if they want to put excise taxes on things. That's fine. They're welcome to but
You basically just get a head tax. That's all you get
There's no income tax based upon your ability and all this other shit
This from each according to his ability and to each according to his means
Is commie shit about taking more from certain people because it's fair is nonsense
I thought everybody was entitled the same amount of justice the same amount of protections the so fantastic protections
The country provides against the horrible evil agents that are looking to invade us. It should just be a simple bill
What possible objection is there to that on any kind of equality grounds that everybody pays the same amount if you want to have a
Bunch of kids. Well, the kids are just different people. You're responsible for that
If your wife works, that's fine. She works. She doesn't work. It doesn't really matter
You get five fucking people in your family. You got to pay five bills. That's it
Whatever the tab is you can't afford that. Okay. Well, you can't afford that. I don't understand
What do you expect us to do you get qualified down as a much lesser so-called citizen
That's all you could get other people to pay for you
You could have relatives pay for you could be charitable events that would help pay for you go make your case to them
It should be a very small amount anyway
If the government was small enough
But there's nothing unfair about forcing everybody to pay the same amount. There's no way to argue that that's not fair
The fact that some people have more so
So is it a free country? Is it about capitalism? Is that what it's about? That's what it's supposedly about
Okay. Well everybody pays the same amount
If you can't even get agreement about that what in the world makes you think that any other agreement you have
Any other law you're passing makes any sense?
It's just a complete and total abuse of the minority of people who have to shell it all out because half the people pay
No income tax the bottom half pays no income tax the top 15 20 percent is basically paying all the income tax
And it's true the income tax itself doesn't actually run the government. It's not that big a portion
But it's a huge amount of money they're taking from the people and there's literally no moral legal possible justification for it
And so these are very simple things that need to get done
What have to get done in a real system that had anything to do with true equality true consent of the people
True protection of liberty go down the list
These things would all be in place and the very fact that there's no possibility that any of them are ever
Going to be considered shows you how far we are from anything that you're told we have
See it just shows that we're nothing like the country you're told nothing like the country you run around pretending
And there's a very simple solution to all these types of things and that's jury nullification
If people understood it and could use it then this is where you would actually get consent
You would have to have jury systems where people were actually brought in to sit on juries as opposed to now
Or you can go decades and never get called to jury
Never you never can get called into a panel and of course you've got all these absurd rules that they've created
But the fundamental concept of jury nullification unless you can get unanimous agreement on something
Well, then it can't be enforced against the people
And so the very very small minorities in the country get representation on these jury panels
That's the key. See that's the key
And all these types of things if jury nullification was well understood and the people were actually educated on it
And the courts were not permitted to illegally
Deny people their fundamental rights to vote on juries against things
Specifically the legitimacy of the law and whether the law itself that they've dreamed up
Is going to be something that's enforceable if you had that
Then you wouldn't have to worry about any of these types of things all these taxation laws that were grossly unfair
Well, you wouldn't have to worry about them
You just wouldn't pay them because if they tried to charge you then there'd be people on the jury and they'd just say not guilty
There'd be no way to enforce it
They could never enforce these absurd legal tender laws that require you to use this artificial fake money they print
You just have not guilties for everything
See and if you wanted to go enforce your own contract
Because somebody wasn't paying you didn't feel like having to go into the crooked court system
You could do that
You could go enforce your own contract
And if you did what was reasonable in the circumstances you get to go to a jury
Oh, they charge you because you're a criminal because you're trying to enforce your contract outside
No, you can only go to courts what you were doing is extortion and threatening
No, I was just trying to get my money back. Well, it's it's a crime
He can't do that. Okay. All right. Well put me in front of a jury
If the jury is well instructed the people were instructed on this issue
It'd be very simple because you just go in there and tell your story. You don't need a lawyer
You just tell your story
And what would happen the jury would listen there'd be someone on there and say, yeah, that's completely reasonable
The charge from the crime is his bullshit. Those guys owed him the money. He went there to collect it
They didn't want to pay. Okay. So he took x y and z and returned. That's a very reasonable thing. He did
Okay, that's it. That's all you'd have to show prove that to one person
He's not guilty on all the other bogus charges. You're off the hook. That's it
You see this is why you can know that the politicians are not in favor of the people actually being in charge
In regards to all the blather you hear from so-called Republicans and other people who claim to want to put the power back in the people
The way you give the power back to the people is not all these ridiculous bureaucratic things
Adjusting and putting jokers in charge
It's by instructing everybody about jury nullification and by exposing the current courts that
Don't allow anyone to even talk about jury nullification. Don't let
Lawyers bring it up that strike off the jury all these different
People who might be sitting on it who don't trust the government
You adjust it by fixing that and if you fix the trial system
So that people can actually get a fair trial and that the
People who sit on the jury are instructed about what their obligation and duty is
Here to listen and decide for themselves whether this is a law that's reasonable
Whether the conduct was reasonable whether this absurd charge the government is broad is reasonable
If you instructed people that they are the people who are in charge
And this is a government of mind for the people and you have to have unanimous agreement of the people
If you did that it'd be massively cleaned up
And if you gave people true juries of their peers like they're supposedly entitled to
This would all get cleaned up very quickly
It would all get straightened out very very quickly the vast majority of these laws
They're enforcing down there drug laws and gun laws and all this made up shit these enforcement laws procedural regulatory nonsense
The only party complaining is the government those would all go away
Those would all go away
You could just ignore the laws that were shit. That's all you could just ignore them
Think how much that would change things just think
And same with these judges who refuse to put people on juries and strike them off all those judges need to go
The supreme court has only held that there was no legal obligation
To inform somebody on the jury of their right to jury nullification
It didn't say that the courts are not permitted to that lawyers aren't permitted to it was a very narrow holding and it was a split decision
And there's a huge difference between saying there's no legal obligation for the court to do it
And saying that courts have to instruct people and strike people who are on the jury that they have no right to that
That's not the same thing
Because the lawyer can simply tell them about it
A lawyer can tell them about it
And this is why I did the entire chase impeachment series because they impeached the supreme court justice
chase
Basically for failing to properly and sufficiently inform the jury of jury nullification
It's true. They didn't convict him because they lost by a couple votes
But they impeached him for that reason. So jury nullification. It's just it's not a radical thing
It's how the people actually have control of the government because the consent really is not possible
Even with supermajorities, you've got minorities that are left out
But when you get down to really just eight percent of the population
With a jury single jury on a jury of 12, it's really pretty good. There's very very very few things
Where you could get convictions that people would say well, that's outrageous. He's getting convictions
And there's almost nothing on the other side. See the thing about jury nullification is
You can't use it to abuse people with the law. It's not possible
Because all you can do is say the law which seeks to abuse people is not going to be enforced
You can't use jury nullification to go seek people to then abuse them with the justice system
See, this is very similar to the fact that the supreme court is supposedly empowered to strike down these laws to protect people
But what it actually does is simply find and justify made up laws that are clearly outside the constitution
And now the people are bound to it and jury nullification is basically the exact inverse of that
It's a system that really can't be abused. Oh murders are walk-free
Bullshit that is so ridiculous. It's such an asinine concept
It's true that there will be certain criminals who will get off. There's no doubt they will
Okay, they may get off for all sorts of reasons
But you're not going to be able to find people who want to sit on juries who let murderers and rapists people out
It's just not true. You won't find it and you still have to adjust for a fact that you need a jury of your peers
You need a jury of your peers
And of course the problem there becomes that they're importing all of these people who are not my peers and they are
Pushing these communities of people who are just permanent
government subsidy people who then sit on juries and judge people like me
And this is absurd because they're not my peers in any form or fashion not even remotely like my peers
These are people who are either unemployed or simply work for the government. Uh, that's not my peers
Those aren't my peers
And so every sort of form and fashion of the government you're told about it doesn't really actually exist
Is jury nullification a perfect solution? Is it going to solve everything? Of course not
Of course not it's not going to but it would solve
So many problems it would provide so much protection
It would open people's minds to the fundamental issues going on
And if we could just get more of it going the world would be totally different and that's why that issue is never discussed
It's never discussed politicians never talk about it. Why don't conservative politicians talk about jury nullification?
Why don't they make this a big deal? Why isn't this a number one issue for trump?
If he really wants to empower the people why?
I don't understand. It's not a matter of worrying about liberals. They can't get on there and push liberal policies on you
That's not the way jury nullification works
The government would come at you with some ridiculous policy
That's not fair
And somebody would just say well, we're not going to enforce that on people
How's it going to be the other way that they bring a charge that doesn't have a law behind it?
And the jury is out of control and forces you that's not possible
You can't use it in reverse
Jury nullification can't really be weaponized against the people. It doesn't work
It's a one-way street of saying no what the government's attempting to do isn't going to fly
Doesn't matter if it's a civil case or a criminal case. Whatever the government's trying to do
We're not getting force it
Whatever kind of bogus laws they've invented that's supposedly buying people and all these private contracts and interfere with the people
Making their own agreements. We're just they ignore those. We're going to enforce the contracts that we agree to
We're not going to strike down contracts and find them illegal and all this other shit just made up on it
We're not going to
uh, you're going to have a
group of people who are going to listen and who are going to be explained
That hey
They're the people who get to control the country and what the laws are the laws are supposed to simply be an expression
of the concern of the people
That's why jury nullification is there
If the laws don't actually represent the concern of the people
Then why would we be enforcing them? There's nothing holy about them. It doesn't make any sense. They're just made up anyway
Now, of course, I'm not even getting into the fact that no possible government could ever have the authority
Delegated to them to simply make up arbitrary rules and enforce them on people because nobody has that authority to delegate to the government
But i'm talking about having to move a thousand times less
Theoretical than that and just go on the practical side and just say if any kind of so-called conservative
Actually was interested in and making sure that the people had more power. They talk about jury nullification
They talk about the outrage that it is
The way it's currently completely and totally suppressed and the way the courts have it completely and totally destroyed that right
You cannot go down there as a lawyer and argue it. You can't you can't mention it
You can't bring it up. If the people going down for juries don't already know about it
When they go sit on those panels, they will never find out about it
If they attempt to try to tell people about it, they will kick off the panel. That's all
How can that make sense?
How can it make sense?
Look at the way they draw the juries. Look at the way they strike the juries
Look at all this stupid crazy shit that goes on in jury selection
On top of the fact that i'm not getting a jury of my peers
I'm getting a jury of this mishmash of unemployed losers that go down there and sit for those panels
None of this makes any sense people none of it's about freedom
None of it's about any of the other stuff and until people open their minds to the fact that I could literally go on all day
Exposing how the fundamental concepts you think the government's based on it's just not based on that
They don't would stand any scrutiny at all and these simple kind of fixes with the super super majorities
Would fix a huge amount of it super super majorities and jury nullification would clean up almost all the problems
Because you'd simply be free to ignore these made up rules
You wouldn't have to worry about the cops insisting on this and oh, you're not allowed to do that
Well, I am allowed to oh, they arrest you. Okay. Well, you go down there and you get not guilty
And then you go down there and sue the damn cop. Oh, you can't hold it against. Yes
Yes, we have to get rid of that the jury can do that
You can find against a cop
You can find against these different. Oh, they have immunity. No, we don't recognize the immunity
That's all we don't recognize it
If you had the people in charge
You'd see very quickly where the people are
And you'd also see very quickly that the vast majority of stuff going on where they're just bringing all these illegals in allowing them forcing them
People to live among them and paying them and everything the people could go clean that up
They could go clean that up
That's all they go out there and just get those people out of here. Oh, we got to wait for the government
Why why do we have to wait for the government to do it? Why?
Because the government tells us we have to wait for them and if you don't well, then the government coming to arrest you as a criminal
But if you have jury nullification, you got nothing to fear
Because you go out and clean it up and they try to bring charges against you
Nothing happens like all those january 6 people. They all would have been not guilty
They all would have been not guilty and of course you've got the again the problem with the peers
Sitting in washington dc and the other things but on whole the system works every single time because you just have a huge portion of population
There's at least a third of the people who totally disagree with the vast majority of shit that the government's passed
And in many areas it's much much higher
More than 50 or 60 percent because of the way the distortions work and all the different rigged up voting and who's allowed to vote
But you're always going to have at least 25 or 30 percent of the population
It's going to totally disagree with what's going on and they're sitting on the jury. They're going to vote not guilty
There's nothing to be concerned about
Government's not going to be able to do it and people just can't get their mind around this
There's so brainwashed about the only right you have is this right to vote
For these corrupt people who then go up and vote for all this shit that nobody can control with these slim
Majorities that they cobble together
And if you could understand that the structure of the system could be
Much better with very very minor changes
Okay, then you can understand that but most people won't be able to understand that and I only bring it up
Not just to show people that the system we have is a joke
But to show you the people who claim to be on your side in politics and media and academia
They're not because they don't tell you anything about these issues
They just repeat slogans
Barnum statements utter bullshit to keep you on a tax-paying plantation to keep you completely and totally confused
and
obeying
This absurd system that they've set up
That's the reality people
See, that's the reality
I just kind of wanted to touch on these kinds of things to see if people can be reminded
They need to be reminded all the time that this is not a close call
The the government we have is a complete joke. It could be fixed with very small things like this
None of these things i'm talking about require any kind of so-called constitutional amendment
None of them the supermajorities they don't require constitutional amendments. They don't
Jury nullification that certainly doesn't because you already have a constitutional right to it
The supreme court is just kind of limited it so badly and then the lower courts have massively and totally
Misunderstood it intentionally and totally and completely deceived people about what their rights are and they've shut everything down
Of course law schools of course never tell lawyers about it either
And so the system doesn't require any kind of constitutional amendment or anything else
Trump could institute it himself if trump just got up there started telling people about jury nullification and talking about the
federal bench and the state courts and he forced and shamed the other different so-called maga politicians into talking about it
You'd get people finding out very quickly and it makes perfect sense and you don't need everybody
Okay, you never get these liberal idiots. Who cares all you need is people who are supposedly
constitutional conservatives to understand the system
That's certainly half the country. All right, but you get half the country. All right. Well, you only need
One in 10 people less than that one in 12 people who sit in a jury in order for it to work
You don't have to get some massive coalition together
One day and all this other crap and organize and money. You don't need to do any of that
So if they were actually serious, that's what he would do
But they don't do it no one does it and you never hear about it
And in fact a little bit it ever does come out the constitutional conservatives as I've played shows
What they do is they poo poo it and they act like it's a way to let murders and rapists sauce that liberals want to use
It's just moronic
It's a way to protect you from the government overreach for all the reasons
I've laid out and they don't ever touch on any of these issues because
Fundamentally the system is an incredible deep fraud
It's just an incredible deep fraud and people don't really want to face that that's all
But it's a practical kind of thing
And once you kind of understand how far the reality is from the
Fairy tale that you're given once you kind of see that with the different things I've talked about
Well, you can see why the only chance we have is something like jury nullification
If we've gotten up during nullification, we might be able to get super majorities
But they're going to scream and holler and
And claim every kind of racism and other kind of ism as you try to get to that road because
Ultimately they're all together wanting to make sure the government has all this power
And that the people have never consented to and then there's not even a functional way to get the consent of the people
In any real sense at all and we certainly don't have it at this time
And so all these issues come together and the point being hopefully that you can see that the system we have is shit
And that you have to
Stop defending it and start understanding that step one is understanding that it's just a complete ridiculous con job
And then we have some very simple things that can be done that don't require constitutional amendments
And unless people are talking about those kinds of things
What they're talking about is not really legitimate. It's just window dressing
It's just rearranging the chairs on the deck of the titanic
If you don't address the fundamentals, then nothing else matters. That's all it'll all just simply go back
so
All right. Well, that's all I kind of want to say about it today
I just wanted to put a show together to remind people of that
So if you want to follow me you can i'm legal man at us crime review on twitter
Most shows don't get out to the public anyway. I want to thank everybody in patreon who supports my show
I appreciate you guys. You have a lot of integrity
I hope these kinds of shows that remind you of all the fundamental issues
Kind of make things click in your head
Because it's easy to forget what the brainwash you are exposed to all the time just the constant
Sloganeering and barnham statements that we face about the freedom and this and that and the brain dead people who all continue to
Defend it. Hopefully these shows can give you maybe some nuggets that you can
Maybe open somebody's mind with because it's the only chance we've gotten the time's just running out
So thank you everybody in patreon. I appreciate you guys
And barnham worlds coming out. I think we're going to set it for the very first weekend in june
As a premiere we looked at the last weekend in may we had some conflict type of stuff, but that's the
Memorial day weekend and travel is really a pain in the ass and it's very expensive that weekend
So I think we're going to do it on the first weekend of june
So if you want to go to that premiere start looking at that day
Start looking at that date because we're going to do it probably on that saturday night that first weekend in june
I think it's going to be great. People are going to really enjoy it. They're going to love natty
And it's going to be a very interesting movie a very interesting movie
I can't wait to actually see the whole movie, especially on the big screen
So thank you everybody who made that possible
I appreciate it and I look forward to seeing you out there if you go out there
And beyond that I don't have anything else. So let me go ahead and wrap it up
You guys have been a great audience as usual
Everybody have a nice night of day wherever you are. Take care. Thank you everybody
Thanks so much