WEBVTT

00:00.400 --> 00:08.440
Hey, Larkin Rose here. The way people talk says a lot about how they think and how they perceive reality and

00:09.160 --> 00:15.500
the language and vocabulary that most people use when it comes to law and

00:16.120 --> 00:17.520
political authority

00:18.120 --> 00:20.980
shows a profoundly bound and

00:21.480 --> 00:22.460
subjugated mindset.

00:22.840 --> 00:25.780
Now one particular example of that is how the word

00:25.780 --> 00:29.600
allowed is used by believers in government.

00:30.140 --> 00:36.180
You're not allowed to own that firearm. You're not allowed to possess that substance.

00:36.420 --> 00:39.960
You're not allowed in the country without the proper paperwork.

00:40.620 --> 00:44.000
You're not allowed to build that without a government permit.

00:44.640 --> 00:52.280
That's the way children talk and think when it comes to what their parents allow them to do.

00:52.900 --> 00:54.900
But what does it literally mean?

00:55.780 --> 01:01.020
Sometimes it's even expressed as you can't do that. It's against the law.

01:01.520 --> 01:04.540
But lots of people do things that are against the law.

01:04.720 --> 01:10.180
So to say that people can't do illegal things is obviously inaccurate.

01:10.960 --> 01:16.700
When the average person says you can't do that or you're not allowed to do that,

01:17.140 --> 01:21.540
it literally means that the politicians have issued

01:22.180 --> 01:24.560
formal and official threats

01:24.560 --> 01:29.980
to send armed enforcers after anyone who does a certain thing.

01:30.580 --> 01:32.900
Now if you're out there robbing and assaulting others,

01:33.160 --> 01:39.020
I'm all in favor of someone stopping you by force if necessary, whether he has a badge or not.

01:39.500 --> 01:45.540
But the vast majority of laws have nothing to do with stopping actual aggressors.

01:45.620 --> 01:49.620
Mostly they're just arbitrary commands issued by control freaks.

01:50.500 --> 01:56.100
But notice how the difference in thought comes out as a difference in language.

01:56.600 --> 02:02.920
If a local street gang or mafia style crime syndicate in some city

02:03.540 --> 02:08.460
started beating up anyone caught outside after midnight, for example,

02:09.180 --> 02:16.640
lots of people living in that city might change their behaviors and not go out after midnight just out of self-preservation.

02:17.480 --> 02:22.120
But they wouldn't talk as if they are the bad guy if they disobey.

02:22.580 --> 02:29.080
If you went out after midnight, no one else would condemn you as an immoral criminal

02:29.080 --> 02:33.420
and lawbreaker for disobeying the gang thugs.

02:34.040 --> 02:39.540
They might say you were stupid and risked nasty things happening to you.

02:39.800 --> 02:43.840
But they wouldn't talk as if you were somehow the bad guy in the situation.

02:44.280 --> 02:48.460
But when the gang of thugs called government does such things,

02:48.880 --> 02:53.940
lots of people will view you as the bad guy for disobeying.

02:54.580 --> 02:58.800
When they say you can't do that or you're not allowed to do that,

02:59.180 --> 03:04.920
they don't just mean that disobedience is dangerous. They mean it is morally wrong

03:05.820 --> 03:12.360
because they have been trained their whole life to view obedience to authority as a virtue.

03:12.960 --> 03:19.420
So they think and talk and act like well-trained subjects of a ruling class

03:20.200 --> 03:28.200
because that's exactly what they are. They even often feel pride in how well they obey and pay

03:28.200 --> 03:35.940
tribute to political parasites, proudly wearing the label of law abiding taxpayer

03:36.700 --> 03:41.020
as if that makes them a good person, which it doesn't.

03:41.680 --> 03:49.080
So when, for example, stories come out about some people destroying flock cameras to resist the

03:49.080 --> 03:56.760
Orwellian surveillance state nonsense, some well-trained subjects jump to be first to condemn

03:56.760 --> 04:04.640
those scoff law vandals because you're not allowed to do that. And it's against the law.

04:05.240 --> 04:10.860
So the Karens are thinking and acting like house slaves, literally.

04:11.600 --> 04:16.320
If you haven't seen my video about that, I will include the link in the description below.

04:16.780 --> 04:23.320
But there is another allowed that is relevant here. Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.

04:23.500 --> 04:30.260
Constitution, the federal government is not allowed to spy on people, track them,

04:30.260 --> 04:35.560
invade their privacy, do searches and seizures and so on and so forth without probable cause.

04:36.280 --> 04:43.000
But what does allowed mean in that context? Absolutely nothing.

04:43.960 --> 04:49.660
Some ink on parchment says they're not supposed to do that, but so what?

04:50.520 --> 04:57.660
What is the enforcement mechanism of that supposed prohibition? There isn't one.

04:58.340 --> 05:06.660
Yeah, you can beg judges after the fact, who are appointed by and paid by the same politicians

05:06.660 --> 05:13.360
pushing the authoritarian crap. You can petition them to please retroactively say that the feds

05:13.360 --> 05:22.180
can't do what they did. But if they do it anyway, then what? Now, if you get caught doing what

05:22.180 --> 05:30.220
the law says you're not allowed to do, expect men with guns to show up to punish you, rob you,

05:30.420 --> 05:37.780
cage you, maybe kill you if you resist. If politicians do things that they're not constitutionally

05:37.780 --> 05:46.680
allowed to do, what happens to them? Nothing. And what do well-trained subjects

05:47.640 --> 05:55.480
think should happen to the politicians or their enforcers for doing things they're not allowed to do?

05:56.320 --> 06:05.200
Nothing. If the authorities don't punish themselves, which is a silly thing to expect or hope for,

06:06.040 --> 06:12.060
then what do obedient law-abiding taxpayers think should even happen?

06:12.840 --> 06:20.920
Revolution? Illegal resistance? Violence or otherwise? No. Most people would say, oh,

06:21.000 --> 06:27.020
we can't do that. So what should happen when they do things they're not allowed to do,

06:27.280 --> 06:35.920
which they do constantly? People who think that political authority is real and legitimate are

06:35.920 --> 06:44.440
necessarily and automatically mental slaves. They believe that government has the right

06:44.960 --> 06:51.420
to rule them and all the other mere peasants, and that the mere peasants should never take the

06:51.420 --> 06:59.500
law into their own hands by disobeying and resisting or by acting as criminals, traders,

06:59.500 --> 07:06.960
and terrorists by not meekly putting up with whatever abuse of authoritarian crap those in power

07:06.960 --> 07:12.880
decide to inflict upon them. And of course, it means nothing to say that someone isn't allowed

07:12.880 --> 07:20.240
to do something if no one can stop them and if there are no adverse consequences to them doing it.

07:20.980 --> 07:27.960
Sadly, even many of those who object to and protest about and sometimes even resist

07:27.960 --> 07:36.120
authoritarian injustice, many of them still often think and speak inside the statist paradigm,

07:36.600 --> 07:44.140
when a cop illegally detained someone, an educated citizen might say, you can't

07:44.140 --> 07:50.600
detain me without probable cause to think I've committed a crime? Well, yes, he can,

07:51.360 --> 07:58.060
as demonstrated by the fact that he just did. You can say that he wasn't supposed to,

07:58.420 --> 08:03.380
according to some document that he ignores, has probably never read,

08:03.740 --> 08:08.860
is too stupid to understand, obviously doesn't care about, and will almost certainly

08:08.860 --> 08:15.180
never be punished for violating. But here comes the really uncomfortable part for

08:15.180 --> 08:24.700
well-trained subjects. If a badge wearing thug obviously ignores the law, the very law that

08:24.700 --> 08:30.360
supposedly gives him his authority, what do you have the right to do about it?

08:31.160 --> 08:38.840
He wasn't allowed to do that. He can't do that. The law says so. Okay, but they

08:38.840 --> 08:47.660
violate their own laws constantly. So now what? Mind about it? Hope that his gang is going to

08:47.660 --> 08:56.900
investigate him and punish him? Good luck with that. And you know that even if a cop is completely

08:56.900 --> 09:03.940
breaking the law, the badge wearers are absolutely going to escalate their use of violence until

09:03.940 --> 09:10.840
they get their way. They're literally trained to do exactly that. Keep calling in more and more

09:10.840 --> 09:20.740
of their fellow gang members until you submit and comply or die. Even if it's complying with

09:20.740 --> 09:29.820
completely illegal actions or demands, things they're not allowed to do, only they obviously are

09:29.820 --> 09:37.700
by definition allowed to do those things since they do them constantly and get away with it.

09:38.420 --> 09:45.820
So setting aside their bullshit laws, which are mostly arbitrary crap anyway, and which they

09:45.820 --> 09:53.800
never know and never actually obey themselves, what would you have the moral right to do

09:53.800 --> 10:01.740
if they're doing what they're not allowed to do? Even if you still believe that political authority

10:01.740 --> 10:11.360
is real and legitimate, which it's not, if the law enforcers are being law breakers,

10:11.940 --> 10:20.080
are you obligated to just let them get away with that? Are you obliged to allow yourself to be

10:20.080 --> 10:30.380
illegally victimized? And cops love to say, kick it up with the judge. In other words, just let us

10:30.380 --> 10:38.300
mistreat and abuse you and later ask some other authority to retroactively say that we weren't

10:38.300 --> 10:45.000
supposed to do that to you, as if that would fix or undo anything. Now as a practical matter,

10:45.000 --> 10:50.880
you may very well choose to passively allow the injustice to happen to you,

10:51.260 --> 10:56.700
just so the power happy and trigger happy cops don't just murder you for resisting.

10:57.600 --> 11:04.800
But do you have any moral obligation to just let them do what they're theoretically not even

11:04.800 --> 11:17.240
allowed to do? If not, what's the alternative? Ask them nicely to stop, or make them stop by any

11:17.240 --> 11:25.280
means necessary, even if that requires defensive force, even if that requires deadly force.

11:26.890 --> 11:34.540
Am I saying that mere peasants would sometimes be morally justified in shooting law enforcers?

11:35.540 --> 11:45.200
Absolutely, I am saying exactly that. By the way, the founding fathers said exactly that,

11:45.400 --> 11:52.940
and they did exactly that, and they wrote the Second Amendment specifically so the people would

11:52.940 --> 12:01.340
forever retain the ability to do exactly that. Even the US Supreme Court has recognized that

12:01.340 --> 12:08.040
people sometimes have the right to do exactly that, even within their own bogus legal system.

12:09.100 --> 12:17.380
In the case of John Bad Elk vs. United States, where someone forcibly resisted an illegal arrest,

12:18.020 --> 12:24.880
the Supreme Court said this, quote, where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder,

12:25.060 --> 12:30.540
which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very

12:30.540 --> 12:35.520
different eyes upon the transaction when the officer had the right to make the arrest,

12:35.940 --> 12:41.400
from what it does if the officer had no such right. What might be murder in the first case

12:41.400 --> 12:46.600
might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense

12:46.600 --> 12:53.800
had been committed, end quote. Whether you like hearing it or not, cops are quite literally

12:55.600 --> 13:02.680
allowed to stop you for no good reason, to detain you, harass and interrogate you without just cause,

13:03.600 --> 13:09.640
to behave like power-happy sadistic jerks, abuse you, lie about the law, lie about the facts,

13:10.080 --> 13:16.060
lie about what they just did to you. That keeps happening to people over and over again,

13:16.560 --> 13:23.240
so by definition the cops continue to be allowed to do all those things regardless

13:23.240 --> 13:30.820
of what any legislation or constitution might say about it. Now, when the people decide to stop

13:31.320 --> 13:40.440
allowing that, and they make it stop themselves, not by whining or protesting or voting,

13:40.980 --> 13:50.280
but by resisting by any means necessary, that is the only time that cops actually won't be

13:50.280 --> 13:58.480
allowed to behave like power-happy tyrants. Until then it's just slaves begging the master

13:58.480 --> 14:05.560
to be nicer, which doesn't have a great track record of success. In the words of Frederick Douglass,

14:05.820 --> 14:12.880
quote, power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just

14:12.880 --> 14:19.360
what any people will quietly submit to, and you have found out the exact measure of injustice

14:19.360 --> 14:26.520
and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with

14:26.520 --> 14:33.860
either words or blows or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of

14:33.860 --> 14:40.140
those whom they oppress, end quote. To put that in a more modern and more blunt vernacular,

14:41.080 --> 14:46.900
unless and until some people start shooting more of these crooked power-happy assholes

14:46.900 --> 14:52.620
when they're breaking their own laws, expect the authoritarian abuse to continue.

14:53.800 --> 15:00.180
And if you are shocked and offended by that obvious description of reality,

15:00.860 --> 15:09.500
which centuries of history show all too well, then you are still mentally subjugated and bound.

15:10.840 --> 15:21.520
And you should probably read this book so that you stop thinking and acting like someone else's

15:21.520 --> 15:22.180
livestock.

