Hello, I'm Larkin Rose. Do you sometimes wonder whether you might be a statist bootlicker?
If so, I have just what you need. I have devised a test, a surefire way to determine with 100% accuracy whether you are a bootlicking statist.
Imagine the following scenario. One person owns a home somewhere, some other person goes up to him and says,
Hey, I noticed your shrubs in your lawn and stuff could maybe use some work. Would you like to hire me?
I do construction and I have handyman skills and I do landscaping.
If you would like to pay me to do some work for you, I would be happy to do that.
And the property owner says, Sure, actually, I do need some work done. I'd be happy to pay you for that.
That's the scenario. So the first question in the bootlicker test is given that scenario, nobody's threatened or harmed anybody.
It's just two people decided to voluntarily trade. Do you think an appropriate response is to send in thugs with guns to kidnap either one of those people?
If you say, Yes, you're just a psychopath. If you say, No, that wouldn't be justified. What are you talking about?
Then you're a sane human being. If your response is, would the politicians say it was okay? Ding, ding, you're a bootlicker.
Because that's what it means to support immigration control and having the politicians have the final say in who can be on the property of the guy with the house who wants the other person there doing work for him.
But the politicians haven't given him a piece of paper. So you want him arrested and deported because you're a bootlicker.
But wait, there's more because you may still be a bootlicker, even if you didn't want that particular example of armed thugs invading and interfering.
So the scenario continues that guy did some good work and the guy of the house is going, That's a good job. Here's your pay. Yay.
And the guy who got paid for doing work, they both agreed on, he keeps the money himself.
Do you think in that scenario, it's justified to send in thugs with guns to punish either side?
If you say yes, you're a psychopath. If you say no, that was all voluntary. What are you talking about? Of course, that wouldn't be okay.
Then you're a sane human being. But if you say, did the politicians approve, you're a bootlicking statist.
Because most Democrats believe that if you voluntarily trade and don't give a cut to the ruling class in the form of taxes at whatever level the politicians demand,
then they have the right to steal your stuff or steal your house or eventually put you in a cage because they're bootlickers too.
But we're not quite done yet because that guy, having worked hard all day and earned his pay, he goes home, sits down in front of the TV and lights up a joint.
In that scenario, do you think it's okay to send in a gang of armed thugs to drag that guy away and put him in a cage?
If you say yes, you're a psychopath. If you say no, you're a sane human being.
If you say, well, did he have the permission to the politicians, you're a bootlicking statist.
And the political right does a whole lot of that trying to interfere violently with people's habits.
And they think, well, if you had a substance or a plant without the politicians permission, if the master didn't say you were allowed to,
then they are enforcing the law that I should put you on a cage for years because they're bootlicking idiots.
But wait, because in our scenario, one more thing happens.
That same guy who worked hard, earned some money, sat down, watched TV, smoked a joint,
he also possesses a firearm with which to be able to defend his family.
He's never threatened anybody. He's never shot anybody or harmed anybody with it.
He merely possesses the means to forcibly defend his family and his neighbors if it comes to that.
Given that scenario, do you believe it's okay and justified and a good thing for armed thugs to barge in,
point guns at him, drag him away and put him in a cage?
If you say yes, you're a psychopath. If you say no, well, you're a sane human being.
If you say, did he have the politicians permission to have that, ding, ding, you're a bootlicking statist.
As is everyone on the left who cheers for gun control being enforced against nonviolent people for possessing certain pieces of machinery.
So yes, there are right-leaning bootlickers and there are left-leaning bootlickers,
and at the end of the day there's no real fundamental difference between them because they both agree
that you shouldn't be allowed to do anything unless you have the permission of political psychopaths.
And that's just friggin' pathetic.
And what's more pathetic is that both sides of the bootlicker spectrum can somehow see the evil when the other side does it.
Can somehow see that's not okay, that's not sane, that's not civilized.
You're cheering for violence to be used against nonviolent people.
Then they go into the voting box and they vote for somebody to initiate violence against nonviolent people in a way that they like.
Because every voter is a bootlicker and every voter is an absolute stinking hypocrite.
And unless and until you are willing to let other people live in freedom,
even if they don't spend their money the way you might want them to,
even if they have habits you don't approve of, even if they have a lifestyle you don't approve of,
until you're willing to live and let live,
and instead you're just whining for the ruling class to try to violently impose your values and preferences on the other people,
you're not only gonna be a bootlicker,
you're also gonna be a victim of the fascist monstrosity that appears as a result of so many people including you being bootlickers.
And what you're gonna do, because it's what all bootlickers always do,
you're gonna righteously object when the other side's bootlicking results in you being victimized,
and then you're gonna cheer when your side's bootlicking victimizes somebody else.
And that will continue forever until you get your head out of your butt,
stop advocating the violent enslavement of mankind, stop being a bootlicker,
and actually advocate freedom and peaceful coexistence,
which requires you to give up statism and become a voluntarist.
And if you've never heard that term, look it up.
Or you can read my book called The Most Dangerous Superstition.
So many bootlickers.