It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality through our journey from
there to here. We find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Tuesday, June 9th, 2026. Thank you for joining me today. A lot going on right as we're going live.
There's bombings taking place in Iran for the United States, Israel and the ongoing illegal war
that it is. So we're going to be talking about that today. There's going to be things happening as
we're live. So feel free to chime in the chat and let me know if there's anything happening that we
should be talking about. But there's a lot of other things I want to talk about today as well.
That'll be the latter half. Kind of potentially give it a little bit of time to develop and see
if anything happens beyond what I have lined up for today. But some of the things I wanted to
get to you on top of the interesting back and forth over the last couple of days with Israel
and Iran, United States and Iran. And then the today, the alleged Apache helicopter or excuse
me, the allegation that the Apache helicopter was shot down by Iran. It's an interesting
conversation because even coming from US information and intelligence, the suggestion
is one of two things, either that it wasn't, it was a mechanical issue or that they actually
ran into the drone. What I can find is that it's coming from Donald Trump and his administration
making the argument that it was something that it was an attack. I'm not sure if this is something
and we'll get into my opinions about it all. The facts, of course, which are important, make
it clear where I'm giving you my opinions. But I think it's very interesting that it
appears to be sort of a false flag of opportunity, if you will, sort of whether it could,
it could have just been something where there was an accident that took place or some kind of
action that was not authorized, that this is how they cover that. But I'm not even sure if I
think that lines up with what Trump's current interests are. But it's interesting to get into
to see where we currently are with, I mean, in the midst of the conversation of Americans
becoming fully aware that Israel at the very least is influencing policy, which I've been saying
for a very long time. And you get a lot of this dishonest framing as if we're saying Israel
controls everything and controls the world. I mean, I've never made that argument.
Is it possible? Of course. I honestly don't even think that it goes to an entire all or
nothing kind of conversation, but that's how people will try to undermine the growing
awareness of another country having influence over American policy, because they don't
have an interest in you knowing that. But we're going to talk about a couple of other
things to start that I think are interesting and important. One is what we've talked
about quite a lot has to do with Matthew Crookes or excuse me, Thomas Matthew Crookes
and Butler and an interview that I'm suddenly blanking on his name, Silva just had with
Tucker Carlson. And it's a lot of important information in there. I'm probably going to
touch on the parts of it, but I wanted to make sure we heard at least some of the
statements you made and be critical like we should from any claim, from anybody,
but asking ourselves what this means, especially for those that are still finding ways to
believe in this government and Donald Trump in the moment in particular.
It's pretty unnerving. I mean, to understand how much they could be lying about at such a
grand scale and have pretty much everybody see it and have something like Tucker
Carlson point to it, and we still don't really see much change. And then I actually
want to make sure we also highlight a great article Derek Bros put out today
about another example of the Trump administration. I don't even know what you
would call it turning on its own people, even though many of them don't seem to
care, but I argue the majority does. And this has to do with fluoride or any
number of Maha discussions. Food dies and COVID-19 vaccines. But yet again, we have
an example of Donald Trump's administration pushing back against something they told
you they would fight for. And that's even confusing the way I said that, but
ultimately stopping the change, the awareness of fluoride and what it's
doing to our bodies and our children's IQs and they even with the information
that came out, they're pushing back to essentially keep fluoride in your
water. It's pretty disgusting. I want to make sure we point to the U.S.
liberty discussion, even though we've had it many times. I do want to make
sure we hear what Massey had to say and and discuss what that means in the
current context and some AI infiltration kind of stuff and a
quick note to a discussion we will have coming up. But then the rest of this
we're going to get into what's happening in the Middle East and the
interesting deceptive nature of all of it and the many different moving parts
around it. And I think it's, I genuinely think that there's stuff
happening that Donald Trump. All right. We'll see if everybody's still here.
Let's see. I got to check everything and make sure we're still moving here. That was
interesting. Let me know in the chat if you can hear me. Let me know if
everything's okay. Actually, let me double check my audio settings here.
Yep. It's none of them. There we go. Good, good. Give me a second to get
everything set back up and we'll get right back to it. Get back in the right
place. All right. Now, one thing I wish, by the way, for what, you know,
there is a there's a storm ongoing, but you know, in the life of T-Lab, that's
just the way this works. We just, you know, get shoved off the platform here and
there, whatever it was. What I wish sometimes is if there was an issue
like this that there could be like a like a fill in like some like music that
would start playing like, you know, if you have a million dollars in a
studio and get funded by mainstream media, you could do those things.
But it'd be nice if we had something on StreamYard where it could like insert
music or something like that. But let me just make sure everything gets, uh,
yeah, audio was wrong for a second because it was the the wrong setting
because it had to restart itself. So let me know in the chat, make sure it
looks like YouTube one isn't resetting, but I think we're good.
But I'm going to do really quickly, ladies and gentlemen, is play
something just so I can reset up the, I have to get my video set back
up and everything ready and we'll get right back to it.
Honestly, I was really just kind of getting started. So we haven't really
got into everything just yet. I'm good. It looks like everything's
refreshing. Good. Good. All right. Let me, let me play something really
quickly just to get started and then we'll get the videos back up and
we'll get right into starting with, uh, Derek Rose's article on that note,
by the way, though, if something like that happens, I just like you guys
did just hang tight. Hopefully you won't have to, what I, what I worry
about is sometimes that happens. It's sort of like chops off the
live stream and have to restart something new. But if you guys
hang out, hopefully I can come right back to the same stream in the
future. Just considering that. All right. So let me play this and
I'll be right back guys from the president's office in the
White House in Washington DC. We present an address by the
president of the United States Dwight D Eisenhower in holding
scientific research and discovery in respect as we
should. We must also be alert to the equal and
opposite danger that public policy could itself become the
captive of a scientific technological elite. Well, I
picked the wrong clip since that's a very short one, but
that's good enough. We got to make sure I didn't hear
something else. Okay. I got up the main part that we can get
going on and I can come back to the videos. So back to where
we were in general. I want to come back to that. I was
making sure that loaded. We're going to talk about Derek's
article here in a second. But in just in case we had
anything else that I wanted to get into off the bat here,
me reorganize this really quickly. So guys, again,
especially the podcast listening tomorrow, I'm just kind of
we're I'm doing things in the background right now,
juggling everything to get it all back into place. So
sorry if I'm taking a second to get this moving. All right.
So overall, what I was basically just saying, I
think was the different points we're going to talk
about today and the interesting nature of what's
happening in regard to foreign policy. And I think
the last thing I was saying was sort of the
Donald Trump, you know, isn't even aware himself
of some of these things that I think are happening.
And I find that very revealing. And even the point
about the Butler interesting point we're going
to talk about the insane, you know, the idea
that we can be aware of something was one thing
I think I already said, and have it be so very
obvious and discussed at such a high level. And
yet nonetheless, it is from the controlling level
acted like it's completely false, even from the
side that would usually be against, I guess,
Donald Trump or the left right paradigm kind
of illusory thing. But I think it's
interesting that we can see this kind of
stuff coming out and nothing's really been
resolved about crooks or the autopsy or any
of this stuff. And the people who would usually
be the most resistant, the most aggressive
about calling it out are the ones that
aren't really saying anything. And I find
that very telling as always. But before we
get to that part, which will be the next one,
I wanted to highlight this just for you
guys to see. And I really do think this is
astounding. Federal court overturns historic
fluoride ruling as Trump admin fights to
keep fluoride in water. It's exactly how
we framed it last time. They knew this
was dangerous. And instead of doing
something about it like they told you
was their mandate, they fought to keep
it in your water. And by the way, it's the
same thing Biden did. In fact, just for
since we had a waste of some time getting
started there, I'll probably just point
to this. Make sure you check it out.
Derek and I, I'm sure we'll talk about it.
But the larger point around this is that
you have the effort coming from them
despite the evidence to stop this.
And what's frustrating is that they're
not using information. They're not
saying, well, we disagree. We think
fluoride is okay for you. What they're
doing is saying, well, the group who
fought to expose the fact that we now
see that it's dangerous made some
procedural errors. And that's disputed
even, by the way, about whether or not
there was a scope that they went
farther. Like when they went outside
their scope, whether Judge Chen allowed
that in the original viewing of the
evidence. And so what you're getting
are people that are going, oh, there
was a basically violated procedure
and they went outside their scope
in this discussion. So we should
just shove it back to the original
part. I'll only look at evidence
after this year. And that's coming
from a group that claims to want to
fight for your health. And you're
going to let a procedural issue that
is debatable in the first place, allow
them to keep fluoride in your water.
That sounds like an obvious effort
using law and manipulation within it
and the legal system to keep you in a
position they want you in. That's not
people fighting for you. It's just
not. Now, one thing I'm going to get
into that I was possibly considering
today. We had a great discussion
this morning with Tim Hinckliffe and
this is his platform, sociable.co.
This is a really crazy topic. I'm
going to make a whole point about
this. I think I might even have him
on for an interview. But he
discussed this called digital embassies
justify the resource sucking, land
grabbing, energy consuming, water
depleting, construction of data
centers for total surveillance and
control. The idea of these digital
embassies, it's very unnerving when
you understand how at least I see
it connecting in with the
transition of governance. You have
this is sort of a connective
tissue between the actual data
center, you know, technicality side
of it with the actual enforcement
arm in a sense. And it may not be
get read the article and you get
more so of what I'm saying. But I
just wanted to give us important
work a shout out. Make sure you
check this out. Read it for yourself. I
will be talking about this again.
Whether you know whether or not we
even get into which I'm planning on
and I will a more in-depth for the
15th time discussion of AI data
centers and so on. But this one I
think is important for you to check
out. Now this is the thing I was
talking about in regard to Tucker
Carlson and the interview about
Thomas Matthew Crooks. Now this is
Ken Silva. This is his conversation
with Tucker Carlson about a lot
of things. But he gets into
specifically his research around
this and the autopsy and some
weird things that happen that
of course seem to tie back to
somebody who was tied to October
7th. You can decide that's
meaningless. It may be. But I
find this to be very interesting.
Now I included the entire
interview that you should watch.
It's important. But but I think
what's this clip that seems to
be shared by just about everybody
outside of the people that want
to ignore anything that makes Trump
look bad. This is this in this
case for the podcast. It's
Margaret Taylor Green. This
clip is pretty interesting and
revealing, I think.
Another big unanswered question I
have has to do with this seemingly
incomplete toxicology report,
which I hesitate to mention
this because I don't know the
significance of this. But the
person who wrote this report, the
medical examiner in Pittsburgh
who autopsyed Crooks, released
the body for cremation with
fragments and still inside,
insisted Zalaponi never hit him
and then either doesn't test
certain specimens from Crooks
or didn't put them in his report.
This guy is actually a dual Israeli
citizen who was in Israel
after October 7th, helping
identify the bodies there. So
you know, again, actually
Now before Tucker responds, just
in general, to think about, you
know, again, even if you don't
even think that's important,
the idea of the things they
were going over, which they go
into more in discussion in
this interview, but about
these things that are never
resolved, that the ones out
there exposing the deep state
don't seem to care about, which
is that they never fully
flesh this out. And as they
briefly mentioned here, the
idea that there are things
within the autopsy or things
that happened before the body
was cremated, that scream a
cover up. Now, what's that a
cover up of? You can decide
for yourself whether you
think there was even an
assassination attempt, which
by the way, we've been
questioning since the very
beginning, I'll show you
some of our work, not to say
that we ever knew entirely,
because we didn't. I don't
think anybody does, but I
think you can entirely
prove that there's
something that's a lion
all this, like for example,
that the way he was facing
made it literally impossible
for the location they said
he was in to be able to
hit his ear. That's basic
understanding of the angles
they were standing at.
I don't care what anybody
says, I can prove that.
And I did right at the
beginning. The point here
is that there's so much
around this that nobody
seems, well, I should say
the people that are
interested in the status
quo seem to care about
focusing on, not even
the supposed other side
that wants to go after
Trump, no matter what,
they all want this to go away.
I think that tells you
everything. Anybody that's
interested in asking
questions continually
beyond this are either
people that care about the
truth or are recognizing
that most people do
and now see they have to
lean that way while
paternism, profiteering,
whatever it is. But you
can see this group that
never seems to change
because their game is
keeping the system,
maintaining the system,
the status quo, the usual,
right? They don't want this
to shift because that's
power changing from
their hands into somebody
else's. That's how I view it
anyway. So back to the point
he's saying that this person
who helped in this absurd
like incompetent level,
you know, what again
I argue was a cover up of
information was somebody
who also was tied to October
7th who was involved
with some of the claims
that were now proven to
be false from October 7th.
I find that almost impossible
to believe unless, you know,
there's more to this.
Actually, yeah, this is in
the front page of like
the Pittsburgh Jewish
Chronicle. He's actually
pictured. He's standing next
to a guy named Chen Cuggle
who is an Israeli
and a source of a lot of
these dubious claims
about beheaded babies.
Yeah, and Goldschmidt's
standing right next to him.
I guess he volunteered
and went over there to help.
And again, I'm not he is
a dual citizen.
He is a dual citizen.
Yeah, that's correct.
And he's the medical
examiner who
did at best an incomplete
job with the autopsy.
Of the report anyway of Crooks.
Yeah, that's a hell of a nine
or 10 10 month run first career
to go from, you know,
responding to October 7th
to autopsy in Crooks.
And yeah, again, I'm not
necessarily just suggesting
anything, but because he's
such a key player,
we do need to know.
And he is not the medical
examiner that victims,
dead people in Butler
township Pennsylvania
would normally go to.
Any question?
No, not at all.
I mean, again, the excuse was
that they had more advanced
facilities, but then
they do this kind of run of
the mill autopsy
intoxicants.
So the fireman who was killed
at.
So in case you missed the
point, because this is just
quick, the real point was
what he was highlighting there.
Watch the full interview if
you want to get into the
deeper part.
I'll finish this clip,
but that obviously
they made a random
argument of why this one
person had to go to this
special location.
And then nothing special
happened.
And on top of that,
as you as you we've
already discussed, by the way,
as somebody in the chat says,
so everything already
covered by Ryan and a few
others is now going into the
alternative media through
Carlson.
Yeah, I agree.
And we should question why
that is.
But as always, like I said,
we should also keep open
in our minds that maybe
this is a genuine
transition.
I don't really believe that,
but it's objective to do
that.
It's objective to be able to
consider that it may actually
be Tucker seeing this for the
first time and changing
where he stands.
Or maybe we were always
wrong about what he's been
thinking and saying.
You know, my opinions,
it's just important to be
objective and to consider
those things.
But back to the point,
you know, that this is
yes, we've talked about this.
And yes, it's obvious that
this is something bigger.
What was the last point then?
Then what?
Not at all.
I mean, again, the excuse
was that they had more
advanced facilities,
but then they do this kind
of run of the mill
autopsy and toxicology.
So the fireman who
was killed at Butler
went to the local
medical examiner.
That's what I was thinking.
So the fireman, right?
So the person that,
you know, you argue
that this is somebody
that you're going to send
to the normal one
and you take the criminal
and you give him the extra.
It just, it doesn't
line up for me.
Thomas Crooks went
to this medical examiner,
the dual citizen.
Well, he actually,
Corey Comparatory
was taken to Allegheny
County as well.
But they've got
contradictory excuses
where they say they took
Corey there
to avoid the press
attention at the Butler
office.
And then Thomas
was supposedly sent there
for the more advanced
facilities.
So the facilities
that allowed him
to be cremated
with the fragments
still in him.
And with the evidence
still in him, yes.
But in regard to the rest
of them,
not necessarily the firemen
in case I said that
confusingly, the idea
that we're talking about
a deviation between
the people that were,
even Americans
and everybody else,
you know,
and then Thomas
Matthew Crooks
sent to this location
where they claim
it's necessary for extra,
you know,
special expertise,
especially coming
from what I was just
going through
that's something
that stands out to me.
And then obviously
they didn't do that.
And it's more of a
hiding of the evidence.
This isn't even
really about that
in this point.
It's about this
larger idea
that we can somehow
have this connection
back to somebody else
who was involved
with a major lie
that has still
spun through all of this.
I don't even know
how that can be possible.
Like the idea
that he would end up
in that location.
Why?
After he was over there.
Why?
It doesn't make any sense
unless there's
something more.
And I don't know
what that would be.
We could obviously
fill in those blanks
with what might be likely
that this is some
larger cover-up
that spans across,
you know,
I mean,
look,
with Trump
and the idea
of him being shot,
what that did
was obvious.
The idea of the
the other alleged
assassinations,
all of these
have been at least discussed
and connect back to Israel.
The idea of
Charlie Kirk.
I mean,
we can't really
decouple these things.
This is all in the same lens.
It's all in the same
kind of larger conversation.
And so to
consider that
there might have been
an overlap,
it seems obvious.
But then to find one
like that,
I just think
that's astounding.
And this is
why it's being discussed.
Whether you,
especially if you think
Tucker is not genuine,
it's because
these things
have to be let out.
They know we see this.
I just find that
to be
interesting.
I'm glad to see it.
Didn't.
List the testing of his.
Avoid the
press attention at the
Butler office.
And then.
The facilities that
cremated allowed him
to be cremated
with the fragments
still in him and
didn't
list the testing
of his hair.
Okay.
That's really,
really interesting.
Has he
and he has not
spoken to you,
this medical examiner?
No, he hasn't.
And he did testify
at an open hearing
where Clay Higgins
pressed him.
Clay Higgins,
say what you will about him,
but I think he's been
pretty good on this story.
He's the only guy
in government
who's emphasized
Aaron Zaloponi's heroics
and Higgins is trying to
press Goldschmidt
by like,
how could you possibly say
that Zaloponi
didn't hit anything
and Goldschmidt just
insisted
that the Secret Service
was the only person
who shot Crooks that day.
So the real point
for bringing this up
for me
is how in the world
you can believe
that these people
of either side really,
but in this case,
the Trump administration
are on your side
or fighting for you,
care about what you care about,
and then we'll go
and make such a huge use
this event.
Even if you think it's real,
that makes it even more crazy
and then do nothing
about any of this.
Now look,
you could argue that
Matthew Crooks was the per
Thomas,
Matthew Crooks was the person
involved,
but it's obvious
there was more than just that.
It's obvious
there's information
that's being withheld
for a thousand reasons
and that nothing happens.
Just like they don't go after
anybody,
they say allegedly
stole information,
social security information
or Minnesota fraud
or Epstein files
or any number of other things.
It's just one after another.
And yes, it's the same point,
but it's relevant.
It's relevant every single day
because these people
are not doing anything
to fight for you.
Either side, by the way,
here is Ken Silva's account.
I'll include that
so you guys can follow him.
Here's the entire interview.
Now I'll include
the different stuff
we put out about this
on the 14th.
This is July 14, 2024.
Titled Trump's assassination attempt.
Let's review the facts.
I think it's at that moment,
it seems very clear
that there's stuff to be doubted.
I mean, you know,
I don't even want to get drawn into it
for how many obvious things.
Not least of which is the fact
that you can quite literally prove
that his ear was not hit.
He didn't get plastic surgery.
There's no obvious.
Everything that's come out
by every expert I've ever heard,
even a bullet
from either of the guns
they want to pretend
going even close to his ear
would have left burn marks.
It would have left, you know,
it's just,
and they must have known this
at least looking back.
They must know
that any experts like,
yeah, we know you're lying.
It just, it's astounding.
This keeps happening.
Here is our follow-up on the 15th.
We must question.
Oh, excuse me.
This was Derek's article
following up on the 15th.
We must question the attempt
at assassination of Trump.
We have the one on the 16th.
Trump assassination attempt.
Narrative continues to unravel
as Israel intensifies
Palestine genocide.
And then this one,
I think was really the important one
where it was just,
I just, it really did make it clear.
July 18th,
evidence mounts showing official story
on Trump shooting is false.
Simple.
And it's just about basic understanding
of what they claim
versus what actually happened
and or whether you decide to
lean into one argument to the other
because you have a side,
which is what always comes down to.
Now, we also, I'll include this
we briefly pointed to,
but it's interesting to follow up on this
seeing a South Judicial Watch
came out with this on the 8th
of June, 2026 yesterday
and says FBI records reveal witness
accounts that SWAT officer
recovered remote device
from Butler shooter's pocket.
Within this was an argument
that Crooks was in contact
with the FBI before this all took place.
Now, this is what it says now
and you can decide for yourself
what this all adds up to.
Here's the actual post that's still there
of this highly redacted document
that claims that he was discussing this
with the FBI.
And it says,
the initial version of this release
published June 5th,
stated that the heavily redacted record
showed email communications
between Thomas Crooks
and a Butler County Sheriff's Office
deputy,
which excuse me,
then the report to the FBI
after further review of additional
information that had been hidden
by the FBI.
All right.
So that's, you know,
their their effort to hide that
through it.
The point, though,
is that it says
judicial watches updated the press release.
Now, that just seems confusing
the way it's even written.
But if you look into it,
it seems that judicial watch
is essentially redacted
not redacting.
I just lost the word.
So funny your mind works.
You know, pulling back their claim
there's the term for it.
You all know this.
I just said redacted.
It somehow just slipped my mind.
Damn it.
But so they are arguably saying
that's incorrect now
and everyone is pushed back.
But I don't know how I feel about this.
You know, the document is there.
And so I find it interesting
that you get this pressure
and they're forced to sort of walk
back a claim
that might make this all line up.
And historically is exactly what
you'd expect with the FBI.
So you can decide for yourself.
Retract.
Thank you.
Redacted just couldn't get out of hand.
All right.
So moving beyond that though,
I knew I think I find it to be
important and interesting.
But I just I guess the point will
make it'll become more and more
obvious and clear
as they continue to do nothing
to follow up
with what are valid, valid criticisms
and information that's never been resolved.
You know, let me think about
Charlie Kirk in the same way.
We are just going to pretend
like that ever got resolved.
They just shoved everything
out of the way, buried everything
covered over.
It's like it's like Lahaina
in the same way just bulldoze
over and cover it with that
weird nano stuff.
You know, it's like that's
everything we're dealing with.
And that doesn't mean that what
you thought was absolutely the truth.
Maybe not.
But we can see a cover up, guys.
Sometimes literally.
But before we get into a point
about USS Liberty,
which I do want to highlight,
I just want to include a couple
one more point like this
that relates both to this
what we just talked about
as well as what we're going to come
to in regard to censorship
and, you know, AI and Israel
and this effort to sort of control
the narrative.
Part of this is this partisan game.
And you know I point to this
frequently because I think it's
important to highlight
that there are people out there
who are desperately trying to
keep you lost in this narrative
and that are usually
incorrect and somehow they
continue to grow.
And I think that's a
this is a construct.
It is this very controlled
platform and everything else.
Mao and Rabani just makes a
simple point about God's sad
or how have you pronounced
this person's name
admitted a misogynist.
This guy here.
And what they do every single day
every single day
and there's a lot of people
that are starting to really call
this out like the
manipulative nature of people
like Benny Johnson
who's been caught as a plagiarizer
and a number of weird things
and ultimately is continually
posting, you know, anyway
just personal human photos
of his kids and all those
different stuff.
And I don't find it to be
genuine but that's a personal point.
In this case, I'm talking
about Johnson or Jones
or God sad or Elon Musk
or Eric out or any one of them
posting things that are
like in the moment
either they don't care to look
or they know are false.
And either even when it gets
exposed as false even by Twitter
it doesn't change the momentum
and the growth and the millions
of views and the fact that
it's promoted again later next week.
So he says since I began
monitoring monitoring Elon Musk's
pet demagogue is what he's
calling this guy
not a day has gone by
without him posting
at least one fabrication.
You could do the same thing
and I challenge you to do it
guys.
You get any one of these names
who just listed off
any of them.
And I'll show you at least
one example as it pertains
to Iran in later
but it happens every day.
And I'm not even going to say
that I think it's all
intercoordinated.
I think there's just a guiding
force that many of them
just bow to whatever you think
that is.
And that may just be
influence and money.
I don't know.
But it says in the below
GADSAD or G-A-D-S-A-A-D
I guess that's how you pronounce
that I haven't sure
someone say different
claims to be reposting
a video Muslim man.
And in fact guys
I have seen this go around
before shared by people
like James Woods for example
of an immigrant man
urinating on pork products
in a Dutch supermarket.
I've seen Elon Musk
share this exact conversation.
We've seen this guys
if you do this long enough
you see these kind of
similarly circulating
arguments.
The same memes that we see
of the same faces
same kind of thing
it becomes a mean
in and of itself.
Right?
So in case you missed
the point already
it's false.
Now it says
in the video
the video is in fact
and you can easily verify
in fact he gives you
the Reuters article
you can check for yourself
that goes before
this ever was discussed
from 2023 prank video
back to a Dutch creator
named Danny Derek's
stage name
Bertuaat.
Derek's is neither a Muslim
nor an immigrant.
He did not urinate
and the claims made
about the video
have been debunked
by multiple news organizations
and indeed by the person
who did it himself.
Even the word debunked
it always makes me
rubbed you the wrong way
and I get it
but just recognize
that this is not by
snopes
or something
this is individual
but the reality
is you can look for yourself
and you can prove to yourself
it's not what they're claiming
that should matter to you.
It says I've included the link
to a Reuters article
about the video
you can read it down below
it says either side
once has yet to master
the most basic research skills
or he's an exceptionally
gullible conspiracy theorist
or which I
are leaning towards
he's knowingly posting
fabrications on a daily basis.
At least one of these statements
must be true.
His latest book would lead
one to conclude
excuse me
all three are valid interpretations.
Sad who was has a
unique misunderstanding
of Islam and Muslims
because he lived in Lebanon
until the ripe old age of 10
uses this video to bolster
his off repeated absurdity
that there is no
is no and can be no variation
in Islam or distinction
within the within the faith
which is just
not only disgusting
incorrect and bigoted
it well it's also incorrect
trap myself.
It's just the idea that
there's you know
it's the same thing
people argue about Christians
forever it's the same thing
people make about Jewish
Congress.
It's not true
there's any number of people
from those that just get
born into a family
with the Jewish
Christian or Muslim
you know background
and then see themselves
that way
but don't really practice it
to the people that go out
there and commit crime
is based on the idea
that they think
they're fulfilling
their God's will
that's an extreme scale
okay and there's any
number of people
within all of that
and it's just
obvious
and I think they're tricking
people in the low hanging fruit
lowest common denominator
kind of situation
he says inside fantasy
world ISIS
is the only authentic version
of Islam
more importantly
unless Israel's
genocidal apartheid
rape regime
continues to enjoy
unconditional support
the West will be
overrun by Islam
Western civilization
will collapse
and everyone dies
again the point is
he shared this
he's practicing Islam
Islam immigrant
shares pisses
on a pork in Europe
whatever this random
another one of these
pseudo-profit fake accounts
or just you know
dishonest rather
it's not true
creator of this account says
it was the prank
and he's not Muslim
and he didn't piss on
whatever
the point though
is this happens every day
all the time
constantly
now here is a kind of
an overlapping point
from you know
the fake maga
which is what I would call it
not maga
because these people
didn't believe
what they framed as maga
in the first place
I still find that
incredibly simple
they sold them
the world on all these ideals
about what maga represented
and now they're not doing those
things
even if you disagree with those
things
not even they're doing them
so they're not maga
they are people pretending
to be what the bag of people
wanted
and now even the maga
people are pissed at them
now yes
there's an overlap
there's an in-between
that doesn't see it
but I just
still think that's very simple
but
he says
Hexeth
the religious Zionist
fake American
not you know
whatever you want to call it
the person who's not fighting
for American interest
while pretending
that he's there
fighting wars for our freedom
America faces
real threats from foreign
adversaries
terrorists
cyber actors
hostile intelligence services
and
the very section 702
that he swore he would stop
with the rest of their team
he says
remains one of our nation's
most effective tools for
identifying and disrupting
those threats
before they reach our shores
he says
the bipartisan senate
reauthorization
strengthens both security
I mean we all
they were saying
opposite things
right before this
but he goes on to say
Democrats are choosing
to halt action
on reauthorization
undermining
not just security
the main point is always
even twitter comes out
and goes
no man
it was both democrats
and republicans
and so all you do is
choose to focus on democrats
because you're clearly
creating a war
you're creating a division
war within the country
that almost doesn't even
exist anymore
I believe that
either way
both democrats and republicans
were voting to stop this
because I think argument
this is about
opportunism and
getting interested
you know
basically that many of these
people within this
saw an opportunity
to get people to believe
they fought for them
I'm jaded
you know that
either way
the point comes down to
that it's not the truth
he's lying about that
so certain people
even I would argue
honest people
want to pretend
that it's only democrats
who are trying
to stop the thing
who they just told you
they would stop
no matter what
because that's confusing
but he goes
MAGA
should
as soon as they got back
into power
again the fake ones
in the government
went from the
evil deep state
is interfering
in our politics
to we demand
that the NSA
and CIA
have the right
to spy on
American citizens
without warrants
he says
Pete Higgs
Pete Higgs says
give us the power
or the terrorist
will kill you
you just got to laugh
at how stupid
this all is
and I truly think
most people see it
now in case you're
you know
I could even think of
something stupid enough
to like make this
but like not stupid
this is something
we should all laugh at
and the point to include
is just to go
wow
they're gonna
they're gonna save us
with their meritocracy
by making sure
John Rich
takes a place
in our government
not somebody who
you know
that doesn't have to be
a government person
or some swamp
dweller
but there's
tons of people
for this
special envoy
for American landowners
that you know
actually know
what they're talking about
now you guys
all fight up and down
about why John Rich
knows everything
he's a commentator
who is influential
because he's wealthy
and he has
music career
that doesn't make him
aware of all the things
are insightful
about these things
I've watched
these people engage
with this stuff
these people
are political investors
that's simply
what we're talking about
now either way
the point is
you can even argue
John Rich knows
who's talking about
when it comes to land
are you gonna
try to convince me
that he's the best person
for a job
about American landowners
or is he going to
decide with what
Trump wants
even if it's not
the best for American landowners
don't even pretend
you're gonna answer
the idea is clear
these people
are siding with the team
and will attack you
if you go against the team
they'll even tell you
Massey's a bad person
for counter signaling
the team
even though Massey's
doing what they told you
they wanted in the first place
so understand
this person
like all the rest
is a yes man
whether they tell themselves
that or not
and they will continue
to do what the team wants
you know including
letting China come in
and buy land
even though they told you
that wouldn't happen
including you know
down the list
mark my words
but either way the point is
this is not
a representation of what
it would look like to do
you know any of the things
they promised
let alone a meritocracy
now last point on the team
which is embarrassing
in a lot of different ways
Luna comes out
and makes an argument
about a whistleblowers
and says my task force
will be meeting
with the White House
to discuss providing
whistleblowers
and before I can refer
they're just in case
you don't know
whistleblowers
are a people who inform
or an organization
who informs or engages
about organizations
engaging in illicit activity
so crimes
my task force
will be meeting
with the White House
to discuss providing
whistleblowers
with permanent immunity
protections
so they can safely
disclose the truth
about the programs
of the government
in aliens
UAP
phenomena
oh got it
so
what's the crime
that they're exposing
guys
it's not only
that they're trying
to play everybody
but it's like
they've got the
dumb people in front
trying to play you
and they're too dumb
to realize
that they're not going to
trick anybody
you have to understand
like that's not a whistleblower
and on top of that
these are the people
that have been attacking
every whistleblower
of any standing
that we've seen
since I've been doing this
from Julian Sange
all you listed
and those are whistleblowers
who without question
revealed crimes
of the government
but though with national
security though
so even though we make laws
that say that
if they reveal a crime
they're not going to be
you're still going to put them
in jail right
national security
but
if we want to convince you
that this story
we want to shove down
your throat
well no but
while we're drowning
in our own lies
is the truth
we're going to pretend
like we need to remove
whistleblower
or you know blocks
from them revealing
this national security
why would that even be
a whistleblower
this is a game
to make you think
that they're trying to
allow this information
and fight
for you to see
whatever they're going to
probably claim
the deep states
been hiding from you
I mean this is just sad
not only is it
not something that needs
to be given freedom
to expose
unless the government
is telling them
it's a crime
to expose things
that you need to know
about
not crimes
but it just simply is
them covering up
information
you know it's again
it just becomes
this stupid game
where they act
they frame themselves
as the ones fighting
for your freedom
fighting for your
information
while all they're really
doing is creating
a false construct
and I don't even know
if Luna
is aware of that
frankly I think
she is doesn't care
but either way
this is what
they're going to do
for you
so don't don't dare
go out there
and expose the fact
that I don't know
they're killing
civilians
or illegally fighting
against Iran
because they'll
put you in prison
even if you're
whistleblowing
but if you want to come
out and sell the narrative
about whatever
BlueBream project
they're going to do next
she'll protect you
don't worry
now on U.S.
is liberty
we've talked about this
a while ago
I just grabbed one of them
this is from 2019
or have for a while
like a lot of us have
I mean it's an important
topic
the important thing to
understand about
U.S.
is liberty
in the conversation
is that it's so
very obvious
when I talked about this
the other day
about like this
mass delusion
that we deal with
that doesn't mean
everybody
but it certainly means
a
grouping of
part of the population
that is
convinced
right
that it's
sort of like
when we talk about
like geoengineering
and you still have people
that you would otherwise
think know what's going on
who kind of
roll their eyes
and go oh here we go
you know
lock helicopters
it's like guys
this is a very real
admitted
an ongoing conversation
but something in them
as a block
who just like
grew up with the idea
that that's a
fake story
or whatever
it's the same thing
that exists around
certain topics
like the Holocaust
or whatever else
whatever your opinions
on it
we all know
that there's a weird block
around even being able
to get into details
and that usually indicates
deception
some kind of dishonesty
but the point here
is that we have
and all of the information
we have survivors
that were
that are still alive
we've got the information
from the people that were
there
and all you get are people
today
that just lied everybody
now I don't know whether
they are wrong
and don't know it
or they're choosing to deceive
you
I can't know for sure
but what's obvious is that
you've got all of our
government
and all of these people
that are clearly on a
certain side
like Crenshaw
or you know
all the rest of them
are Tom Cotton
who
out
just on the surface
will take sides
that are anti-American
while claiming
they're fighting for you
are coming out
and chastising Massey
for how dare you
for lying about
when
everyone is on his side
that it was there
you know
it's just
what that shows you
is that we're in a
really bad place
in this country
where our government
across the board
left and right
and this is what people
are starting to see
are not fighting
for American interests
you take that
for whatever you think
that means
meanwhile
we're starting to see
that Israel's
controlling people
in this government
I'm sure you can
connect those two things
and recognize
that you have
the government left
and right
maintaining this illusion
well
people like Massey
for however you want to read that
I hope it's honest
everybody else in this country
are coming to terms
with the reality of that
so
take it forward like
a year
and let's say
this just keeps going
where does that go
if every American
starts to go
we see it
and all of the government
just keeps standing
the ground
and goes
well
you're wrong
what happens
I want you to think
about that
as we're going through this
what happens
if we don't do anything
about it
nothing happens
I'm not advocating
for violence
but we have to understand
that there's a line
that needs to be crossed
and I don't mean like in a
illegal way
I just mean that we have to
we have to realize
that if we just continue to
hope that the system
enforces on the system
it's not going to happen
they're hoping that we
sit back and go well
you know we have to trust in
the system
and it's just
it's never going to happen
in my opinion
and I think we've proven that
so at the very least
we need to start
you know getting out in the
streets if you will
or doing something beyond
just pointing to it
which is what often people
claim we're doing
but we're not
I do plenty of stuff
outside of just talking about
this show
I do stuff all the time
I just don't always
broadcast it
especially since I don't want
my personal
location details
always out there
but we do need to start
doing something
because they will stand
their ground
and it will only continue
to get worse and worse
by outside powers
continuing to buy off the
people who just want
more time
so this was a show
we did in 2019
top British commander
contradicts US
says no Iranian threat
and US's liberty
false flag parallels
it's a good show
but let's start with this
and I'm going to play
Thomas Massey's clip
but we got a lot
of these people
these you know
kind of fake
independent types
like Cernovich here
who says
even if you don't see
the attack as deliberate
he goes
I've read as much as anyone
and I remain unsure
well you're an idiot then
it is a disgrace
how Republicans in Congress
have treated the survivors
they deserve to be heard
oh very very brave of you
to take that
fence sitting stance
right yeah
well we don't know
and we shouldn't question
you know the idea is
at the end of the day
it's obvious
it's very clear
all the evidence points
to one very clear thing
everyone you know
the I'll show you the
the admiral speaking about it
and how he thinks it was deliberate
you just get hide from this stuff
and this is how you argue it
right and I just simply said
you mean aside from
the numerous testimonies
of numerous survivors
you partisan fraud
so before we get to
these other clips
let's listen to what Massey
had to say
now recognize the gentleman
from Kentucky
Mr. Massey for five minutes
I request unanimous consent
to revise and extend my marks
and to
introduce other material
into the record
without objection
Mr. Speaker
it's my great honor
maybe one of the biggest honors
of my lifetime
to stand here on the floor
and do something that's
59 years overdue
to recognize the survivors
and those who gave their lives
of the on the USS Liberty
59 years ago today
when they were viciously
attacked by IDF jets
and also after that
by torpedo boats
I'm going to tell you
a little bit of their story
and by the way
there's at least a dozen of them
here today with us
I just met with them in my office
and they related this story to me
you know
it was a clear day
the USS Liberty
was one of the most technologically
sophisticated ships
in the Navy
but it was virtually unarmed
and it was sent to observe
the six-day war
going on in the Middle East
between Israel
and its neighbors
it arrived
on June 7th
and the weather was clear
the planes came out
to meet them
to investigate
and then on the next day
on June 8th
they started the day
the visibility was unlimited
the American flag
was flying proudly
on the USS Liberty
more planes came
from Israel
to surveil the boat
the ship
and they thought
they were in good shape
but what happened next
surprised them all
French Mirage jets showed up
and for 25 minutes
strafed and attacked
the USS Liberty
they shot rockets
they shot 30 millimeter cannons
into the hull
and into the ship
they even dropped napalm
on the bridge of the ship
this was an effort
to kill everybody on board
there was no
intention of taking prisoners
after the 25
grueling minutes of attack
on this virtually unarmed ship
and they thought things went over
and they could recover
the torpedo boats showed up
three torpedo boats
they launched four torpedoes
one of them hit the hull
of the USS Liberty
and killed 25 people instantly
it blew a 40 foot by 40 foot
hole in the side of this ship
they were intent on sinking it
meanwhile American flags
were waving the entire time
but they were also intent
on not having a single survivor
according to eyewitness accounts
the israelis machine gunned
the lifeboats that they put down
they machine gunned
hey guys please
if you have not heard this story
you can check this stuff for yourself
it's actually really easy to verify
almost everything he's saying
it's just that people listen
to the liars in congress
and the liars in false independent media
the firefighters who are on the deck
they were bringing the wounded
and the dead to the mess hall
to triage them
they had one doctor
who was trying to help them all
put a few stitches in
it was harrowing
and it's amazing
if not for that crew
that boat would have sunk that day
but it still wasn't over
helicopters showed up
combat helicopters
and the USS Liberty
even though their signals
were being jammed by the israelis
got a signal out
and there were ships
that tried to respond
the USS Saratoga
the USS America
sent planes
both of them sent planes
to help the USS Liberty
and something happened
that's never happened before
a ship under attack
the planes were recalled
this has never happened before
and they sat there
for 17 hours
think about that
34 dead
174 wounded
how in the world
could you possibly
try to explain this
as anything other than exactly
what it looks like
calling off the rescue
it's how long they sat there
come on
I mean these are just the surface
I mean there's so much
we're going to play at least
a couple of examples
as we played in the past
of people that Massey talked to
but people that have been
speaking out for years
who were there
who lived through it
and have their story to tell
who are American veterans
who are ignored entirely
like they don't exist
by all the people who are
outraged by Massey
speaking out about the truth
out of 294 crew members
that's over 70%
casualty rate
unheard of
the Israelis were intent
on leaving no survivor
and what about our own military
why didn't they not send anybody
for 17 hours to help these men
so what really happened
you know the official reports
say that it was a case
of mistaken identity
but if you listen to Dean Rusk
former secretary of state
Richard Helms
CIA director
Bobby Ray Enman
head of the NSA
Captain Ward Boston
who was the chief counsel
of the court of inquiry
if you listen to Admiral Moore
who served in Pearl Harbor
Midway
commanded both the Atlantic
and Pacific fleet
and was chairman
of the joint chiefs of staff
none of these distinguished men
think this was an accident
and that's important
because what you get
from the people
like Ben Shapiro
and the rest is well
US military
and Israeli government
Ted that was a fake
was an accident
just like we're hearing today
oh well good is
both the groups involved
with the cover-up
admit that there's no cover-up
that makes sense
but either way
the point is that
you're telling us that
because they said that
when everybody else
all the information
you're highlighting
and they just lie
and Ben goes well they said so
you just you gotta laugh
at the stupidity of that
from a so-called journalist
like the first thing
you do is question the authority
the power structure
the ones involved
of course
but I don't even need to explain
why Ben has a blind spot here
guys
and I'm not talking about his
religion if you think that's
what I mean
the court of inquiry
if you listen to Admiral Moore
who served in Pearl Harbor
midway
commanded both the Atlantic
and Pacific fleet
and was chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
none of these distinguished men
think this was an accident
they think it was intentional murder
by the country of Israel
either as a false flag
operation
or because they simply
didn't want anybody
observing what they were doing
that day
there's a good answer
for them in the chat
for somebody asking
what was the motive
right
I mean but again
it's
that's a good question
but it does
it's not necessary
to acknowledge that it happened
that's usually how these things
will go
is they will why would they do
that
well that's always a good question
but not knowing that
does not suddenly make the point
irrelevant
or that it happened irrelevant
right
it happened
and that's an easily provable fact
why
like he said
I argue it's most likely a cover-up
about not
not wanting this information to get out
but maybe there's a series of events
that led to this
maybe that was of another false flag
with the attempt to frame
somebody else
that's the most likely
honestly when it comes down to what
we're dealing with today
but regardless
you know just regardless
it is clearly something that happened
and as we'll get to
the people that were there
saw for themselves
well
well I've got a call to action
for everybody here
honor these individuals
quit ignoring that they exist
go to their website
ussliberty.org
support them
and while they're still alive
they need closure
let's give them closure
let's have an investigation
let's pass a resolution
honoring them
it's long overdue
and then
they can have their justice
with that
I yield back
and I ask unanimous consent
to enter into the record
a declaration of ward
boston
declaring that the
only official court of inquiry
was invalid
without objection so ordered
I yield back
the gentleman yields back
the chair now recognized
that
that what we're talking about is
you know just
no I mean
he is so
all everybody's pushing back on him
I mean it just seems like across the board
or ignoring it entirely
but yeah I mean I agree
I think the most likely reality here
is it's it's been an ongoing effort
for Israel to infiltrate
and manipulate foreign countries
it's
I know you
you can still stand back and argue
you think the United States
controls Israel
I'm open to that very real possibility
I my opinion goes the other
direction
but as I've said every time
despite people out there
constantly going you think Israel
controls the world
nope
didn't say that but I do think it's
obvious that they have large
influence over this country
but I can see a world in which
it's an inversion of the reality
to hide that fact
said that many times
but my opinion is the same
but what's obvious is that we've
seen this effort like there's
like in Gaza
or in Syria
or in Lebanon
or anywhere else
where it's about their desire for
this you know coveting that
territory
and in this case you can see a world
in which
there is an effort to get the United
States to
you know
you can even argue going back
that far that it wasn't as obvious
or rather as all encompassing
however you look at it today
that there were still people that
pushed back against that kind of
you know
the US getting drawn into a war for
a different
for a foreign power
and so the argument might have been
to blame it on Egypt
and to make people then get drawn
into a war
the US rather
into the war that was in the
interest of Israel
let's not forget
Egypt was
a regime change took place that
benefited Israel
CC you know
I mean it's not a secret to see
how this is played out
why and how it happened then is up
for you to decide
but it's just important to see
it's
not only obvious with the information
but also the fact that it's been
covered up by our entire
I mean why is Massey the first person
to ever really stand up and do that
that speaks for itself
I think that's very obvious
now here is the sacrificing liberty
document
document a documentary excuse me
that you can watch for yourself
very well done
it's just
it's incredible how obvious this
got this topic is
here is James Lee
pointing to a good clip
captain of the US is liberty
in a speech given at Arlington
National Cemetery
quote I do not believe it was a case
of a mistaken identity
and please
as always
do your due diligence
make sure it's real
it is
audio video
it's a legitimate video
but check it for yourself
like you should
he's responding to Jeremy Boring
saying no the story was not overlooked
or buried
Israel immediately informed us
the attack happened
there were numerous investigations
the captain of the US is liberty
was awarded the congressional
amount of honor
Israel apologized and paid
reparations
you know the same captain
right over there that just said
it was not he doesn't think it was an accident
and yes there's more to his speech
there's plenty more you could listen to
but the statement is the statement
it doesn't change
but based on you know
he'll go on to argue all the other
points whatever else
but he said himself
he does not think it was an accident
he says the truth is
it's just not a big story
think about saying that
it's tragic story
and no doubt
but no
isn't a big story
how even if it was one American
that got killed
how is that not a big story
the idea of an ally
accidentally bombing a fort
even if that's what you think happened
that's a huge story
34 Americans died on the US is liberty
11,363 Americans died
in the jungles of Vietnam
so now it's based on the
so let's take that game
and apply it to Gaza
how about that
oops don't like when you do that
oh no it's about the bottom
you know it's always some kind of an
abstract shifting of information
to make it look the way they want it to
the bottom line
this is a person like all the rest
trying to make this out to be
something that it's not
who either is that bad at their job
and doesn't understand
the basic information you can find
directly from like key source material
or he's a liar
or a mix of the two
you can decide
here's the very captain he was citing
for many years
I had wanted to believe
that the attack on liberty
was pure
terrible
it appears to me that it was not a pure case
of a second identity
I think that it's about time
the state of Israel
and the United States government
provide
the crew members of the liberty
and the rest of the American people
the facts
of what happened
and why it came about
that the liberty was a time
30 years ago today
here is a heart's article
and this is Israeli newspaper
yes we did it on purpose
maga ziobot
no Israel did it by mistake
followed by 10 paragraphs of
hasbar abs
just I've shown this article in the past
I believe it was actually in that
in the link we just
we just pointed to
he says but sir
and it's an American ship
nevermind
hitter
when Israel attacked the U.S. liberty
and these are
this is always what seems to happen
with herettes
like here's a good example
I should just grab that other one too
since we're since we're
looking this up
but I've made this one in the past
or plenty of other examples like this
one of these ongoing
blood libel conversations is well
the you know
they've Jews poisoned the wells
and act like that's a
you know some kind of a large
you know
point is
the argument goes back to the
scientists who quite literally
poison the wells of the
Palestinians
here's herettes
highlighting that
their own documents
from Israel
show that they
you know the quote
place the material in the wells
docks point to Israeli armies
biological warfare
so it's not a false story then
but if you want to arbitrarily
make that an argument about
somebody today without evidence
that would be
but this is not
so arguing it's based on a lie
is incorrect
now it's the same thing
that would just grab it really
quickly
I guess I can't highlight it
right there
let's see if that's in here
nope
and this is of course
insurrection barbie
just
Thomas Massey calls for an
investigation to U.S. liberty
someone tell him there's been
11
these are these are the fake
Mac of people we're talking about
so let me grab this for you
but sir
and again
the over oh yeah
see I knew I've seen it before
it's right there
never mind
hitter when Israel attacked
the U.S. liberty
the Americans have findings
that show our pilots
were aware the ship was
American
think about having this here
from herettes
the leading Israeli newspaper
citing Israeli documentation
about information
showing they knew this
and that they
like you can go through
and read this
and it will be
not
let's kind of
figure out this
by unfinished
unfinished information
but that we know this
and here's the data
here's a doctor
and yet all of our corporate
media
all the fake independent
all of the government
act like we don't know this
that is a mass delusion
or a mass cover-up
it's a little bit of both
is what I'm really saying
that there's enough people
that actually have kind of
gone along with the cover-up
for so long
that people just
act like that's the truth
I bet you half of Congress
doesn't even know
that this is the truth
and that's not some kind of
a pass on them
it's because they've allowed
their own incompetence
stupidity
to actually guide them
while other
outside forces
seem to dictate what they
do
guys that's insane
I'll include both these for you
and I could go
I could do tons of other
examples
these are just these classic
stories
they want to pretend
or fake and you know
dishonest
when it's very clearly
documented
and then you can show
the documents
somehow you're still racist
I mean it's
it's always how this goes
here James Lee
highlights another example
of if Americans knew
which you should follow
it has to do with this
very topic
and you have the larger
discussion of Israel
and what's going on
in this country
Congressman Thomas Massie
meets with some of the
survivors
of the U.S.
of Sliberty
that should matter
shouldn't it
those people live
that watched it happen
who want to testify
that they know
it wasn't an accident
but apparently not
to the ones
that always pretend
they care about veterans
and care about America
torpedo boats
that he testified
machine gun
the rafts
she's getting the life rafts
look we had uh
passed the word
to prepare to abandon ship
and so we dropped
some serviceable
life rafts
over the side
and they floated back
astern of us
and torpedo boats
approached
and did
liberty machine gun them
yeah
one other thing too
the torpedo boats
circled us
for an hour and a half
and on the stern
we had
L-E-V-E-R-T-Y
in English
right on the stern
of the ship
so how can you expect
it to be an Egyptian ship
when you can see
the American
the English word
liberty
this gentleman
is the
was the signal one
he's the one that ran
the American flag
two different American flags
up on the bridge
yeah
so it was
did one person stay in
or
tell me about
first first we had
the regular
steaming ensign
which we always flew
when we were inside of land
and the
air attack
knocked one of them down
so
Frank Brown
the quartermaster
and I
ran up to the signal bridge
and hauled up
our largest flag
holiday colors
and that was flying
during the torpedo attack
how large is it Joe
nine by 13 feet
so it's
it's easily recognized
yes
and the first one was
five by eight
the five by eight
I think it is
hello
the audio right
but you know
easily identifiable
is the point guys
and this is
Massey speaking
to the survivors
how can you even
possible
how could you
frame that
as in any
as something that it's not
think about that
from the people acting
like they're fighting
for liberty
and American interests
and the vets
and you know
the very people framing
the other side
is somehow it's
it's neither of those sides
left and right
don't care about you
whatever Massey fits into it
you can decide
but the point is
he's clearly
speaking to people
who saw it happen
who understand what
I mean
they're
the views matter
don't they
and yet they get attacked
for simply speaking out
as Lee says
it's absolutely treasonous
that 97% of members of Congress
believe a foreign
country's account
of the attack
and not the first hand
testimony of our own veterans
think about insane that is
he's I appreciate the efforts
Thomas Massey
but at this point
we're not sovereign
you can take that
from what you will
I've I've I've pointed to Joe
meters by the way
who was on a freedom flotilla
who was arrested by Israel
so you could take this
even one step further
do you have a guy
who was on the liberty
Joe meters
he was there
he watched it happen
he has spoken about
how he knows it wasn't an
accident
and then he goes on a
freedom flotilla
to bring food to starving
Gazans
now this was before
October 7th
this was 2018
and they arrived
they seized the boat
people were injured
they seized him
they took and held him
for what three days
I think or more
and not a word
the U.S. government
never said a word
everything about that
was illegal
doesn't matter
here's Israel pretending
to care about Americans
on Memorial Day
while this is happening
it's just disgusting
isn't it
and people see it guys
Americans see it
Republicans see it
Phil who is a count
you should follow
he's a survivor of
U.S. liberty
says thank you Massey
you gave the debt
of the dead of the U.S.
liberty a voice
you stood up for us
when nobody had the courage
you're a beacon of hope
and a movement
in our country
I just can't
I just can't even
wrap my mind around
how that hasn't happened
until now
I think we all know
why
here is the same guy
Phil speaking about
the U.S. liberty
with James Lee
it's just a quick clip
about the
what is it
about 30
30 seconds
we're deliberately
sent there
all the ships
were going one way
we were the only ones
going that way
Ashko and LBJ
and their cronies together
had a tight-fisted group
that said let's sink
let's get
let's get this going
is put this
problem this attack
was probably planned
a year in advance
to sink that ship
and blame it on
the Arab States
right
in this case Egypt
but the Arab States
same old thing
we're dealing with today
now as always
question him
he could be wrong
he could be mistaken
he could be
I mean anything
but
his information
over the years
and everything about this
is still backed up by the facts
his opinion
stands since he was there
but you know
just as always
question everything
but as the same
point of question
the people who have an
interest in maintaining
the status quo
here's Dan Crenshaw
who says
I've always had respect for Massey
he was always in my opinion
wrong about his approach
but he was
in what is that
the approach that
be consistent
with what Republicans
are asking for
or be consistent
with the Constitution
what exactly is your issue Dan
and that's not some kind of praise
you know my concern
about politicians
but Massey has done
both those things
easy to point to
and says
but he was standing on
heartfelt principles
and had intellectual backing
he's a nice guy
but comments like this
make me question
his authenticity
comments like
I'm gonna speak out
about what happened on this day
that's all this says
the brave crew
who died
were wounded
in an unprovoked attack
by Israel
that's what he's taken issue with
the facts
and maybe Dan Crenshaw
was too dumb to know
he's wrong
or maybe he's dishonest
maybe it's a little bit of both
he says
the US's liberty incident
is a tragic one
but it's an incident
with a clear conclusion
see this is what they do
that's even not true
it's been wildly muddy
the entire time
but the evidence is clear
he's lying
if one uses an objective
analysis of the facts
oh I see
so if you look through the lens
that we tell you to
right
the only objective facts
or what we
Israel and the United States
claim happened
that's what
that's what they're really
trying to do there
it's as I thought
Massey was capable
of objective analysis
you think about him
what they're doing
is trying to play
on the dumb people
in the room
they want you to be scared
of your own intellect
they want you to think
that oh my gosh
this guy is actually incorrect
and so I'm supposed to side
with them
because they know better
smart people don't do that
smart people will go
well I'm gonna look for myself
I'm gonna see
whether he's being objective
or he's being objective
and then when you look
sure enough
Dan's an idiot
surprise surprise
perhaps he still is
that's just a
coincidental continuation
perhaps
we are simply witnessing
another example
of the irresistible incentive
to jump on the bandwagon
of grifters
that guarantee you a special
kind of social media audience
think about somebody
like them doing that
the all the all flash
no substance
Republican kind of team
right now
and you have somebody
who's been consistently
standing up for the things
that they actually wanted
and that's him
leaning into the bandwagon
I mean
he by the way he just
I mean anyway
it's not
I don't like to get pulled
into feeling like I'm
defending a politician
but it just feels
obvious to me
and guess what
it's still being
still gathering ratings
it says
this is Twitter by the way
this was already posted
and just like the other day
enough people get in there
and lie about it
and it suddenly
starts to get re-evaluated
and but it says
Crenshaw claims
U.S. liberty
has no clear conclusion
of mistaken identity
disputed
by plenty of people
by the way
plenty of people
but so now it's
going to be
probably pulled away
how much you want to bet
but here's
Massey's excellent response
these men deserve
to be thanked and remembered
which part of my post
do you find objectionable
you just
you can't come back
I mean this guys
these guys are
losing in every possible way
I mean look
he's had
that even if you want to
look at the ratio part
which I agree
is small
it's just not
ratioing somebody on Twitter
should not ultimately
matter in the real sense
of what's happening
but it does have an insight
into what people
at least on this platform
or at least what they
want you to think is
happening
and then you consider
all those things
and what it means
and so in this case
Massey
as at least being shown to us
as the one you know
that
think of it either way
but 34,000 likes
compared to 3.8 on
his own post
what that's supposed to
mean in this platform
is that he
made
got made to look like a fool
that his own followers
agree more with Massey
than with him
that's what it's supposed to
mean
you can decide for yourself
now
in the overlap of this
right now what you have
is this aggressive push
like we're seeing
from
whatever you want to deal
with you know
there are multi-layered
parts of this
clearly this is
Zionist political organization
that's not some secret
it's not a braces point to make
they're existing
and they point to themselves
so there is a Zionist organization
that is controlling Israel
that's their own statement
that's what the Zionist
state of Israel they
okay so they
they
as an entity
politically and otherwise
are on the surface
out there trying
to influence opinions
acting you know
paying
as we'll point to in a second
producers to manipulate
American opinions
manipulating social media
platforms to say
what they think is
what they want you to think
or you could argue
what they think is correct
that should matter to
everybody
even if they have the best of
intentions
because what it means is they
want to manipulate
your opinion
to align with theirs
that's not supposed to be
what we agree with in this
country
now of course then you could
open that up to the other
government elements
and everything else
but I think what's
driving us more than
anything is that
not necessarily some
Jewish alone agenda
Christian Zionists exist
atheists Zionists exist
and you have to understand
that
because to try to make it
about one religion
doesn't even align with
the facts of the
conversation by the way
but it does overlap
it does exist
that's my point saying
all that is you have
this clear political agenda
that's just stemmed
right through Trump's administration
obviously but
the government really
who is trying to right now
fight back what I argue
is insurmountable
the awareness of what's
actually happening around
this conversation
but what they're going to do
is try obviously
they're not going to give up
so they're going to try
to control you through AI
they're going to try to
control you through social
media influence
and I guess it might work
for some people
I argue it's not working at all
but here's an example
Israeli AI expert
Maya and this obviously
speaks to a larger
concerning point
about just how these
chat box work
Maya Ackerman
admits that Israel
can move AI chat box
into alignment
that's her statement
so that the output
doesn't quote
honestly represent data
but instead
shows us quote
exactly what we want to see
oh my god
bombshell
we're so
for some people it might be
but we've been making
this argument from the show
because it's obvious
you can see it
if you're paying
attention on these platforms
Elon Musk is doing this
and it's now
her point is
it goes beyond
one person or one platform
but that the
Sam Altman's
Elon Musk's
and Peter Teals
are working together
for a larger control
of the
you know
the grand narrative
that may sound crazy
to people
that aren't paying attention
but if you're
if you're even
barely seeing
what's happening
you're like
yes obviously
they're all trying to do that
would be the obvious answer
but this speaks to
something much larger
when we're dealing
with an ongoing genocide
and groups who are
surreptitiously trying
to control policy
with foreign country
AI is actively being
trained
and programmed
to lie to you
like
what's going on here
because over the past two years
the AI companies
have been moving towards
alignment
so instead of the algorithms
sort of
honestly representing
what's in the data
we're finding that
these chatbots
and the text-to-image models
are increasingly showing us
exactly what the companies
want us to see
now that could be
for their political interest
that could be because
they want to make more money
or it could be because
they have a
philosophical or
prophetic perception
that aligns with something
I mean any of those would
it's the same
for me it's really
as realistically
the same concern
but there's obviously
more concerning elements
of the you know
different directions
of all that
but the ultimate point
is that you have an entity
trying to influence
your opinion
for their benefit
and your government
I argue is a
willing part of that
at the very least
is aware of that
or is just completely
taken over by
whatever this AI agenda is
but quickly for the podcast
the um
article on the screen
says how Israel
tried to use AI
to covertly sway
Americans about Gaza
that's June 5th, 2024
so let's
go ahead and pretend
it's not
absolutely happening
all the time
about every topic
we're dealing with
that involves Israel
and us to see
okay
so it's becoming
intentional
which means that
instead of trying
to control the whole world
and trying to somehow
manage what's happening
in this big blob
of Wikipedia
and social media
we can go directly
to the companies
with clear technical
and advocacy solutions
for the first time
there is a path
to correcting
the digital world
that's the American
Jewish Council
I believe
so
they're just making it
clear
you know
of course
you know
somebody might
some people might go
oh good
we can help stop
climate change
or whatever
whatever broken
perception you have
on how manipulating
people's opinions
somehow works
for the greater good
but it's
what she's ultimately
saying is sort of
almost a positive
right
well we have
all these
dangerously anti-Semitic
people
or whatever the thing is
from that council
that's what they
generally are getting into
and
and highlighting that
we can just go
hey
Palantir
Twitter
or we know
whatever else
I say Palantir
from a larger element of it
you know
the
something above the platforms
well let's just say
Twitter
TikTok
whatever else
we want you to
lean this way
or even let's say
the chatbots
more specifically
you know
Grock
whatever else
we want you to
drive them in this
direction
is it
anybody that's using it
for an academic sense
like to see
what Grock is
and what it does
or unfortunately
using it to
dictate their research
which you shouldn't be
doing
you see these things
you see
that it's trying to
nudge you in
certain directions
well I would argue
you do if you're
trying to look for it
you might not see it
if you're letting it
dictate your research
but see
right now
we're
Whitney
and
Derek
and I
and the rest of
IMA
we were talking about
this on the last
discussion
and
floating with the idea
of putting out
sort of a pledge
and
and it
completely
but the last case
you didn't see it
actually
now that I'm realizing it
I still need to post that
that happened
when I was
in the midst of like
being in California
and traveling for my dad
we did an IMA panel
Corbett hosted it
it was an interesting one
about AI
and different things
and I still need to post that
I'm remembering right now
but either way
the point is
that we discussed that
and got into these
kind of
the nuance of where it all
is and
Brock and Corbett
were ones discussing
that they were using
in some cases AI
created
or just ones they find
a line of images
I've talked about that too
in regard to this
copyright lawsuits
or just the idea that
you set
you end up using things
that you find
that end up being that
you're not even aware of
that but either way
the point is
there's a
I argue a difference
when it comes to that
and sure people may
disagree
what I argue to
what largely everyone
agreed with
in the conversation
was that
if you're using
grok
or AI
or these different chat bots
to
to research
to provide answers for you
even if you then
ultimately go back
and like double check them
it opens the window
for them to manipulate
the way that you see things
now I can see a benefit
in going like
find this abstract thing
that I'm not able to find
and then
going out of your way
to sort of find
the actual thing
and going right to that
not letting grok
feed you the information
or whatever platform
what are they
open sea
or deep
whatever the ones are
but it's interesting
right because
anyway I'm getting off on a
tangent
the point is that
people can ultimately
get manipulated
in ways they don't even
recognize
by providing you
what they say
is the full picture
not giving you all of it
or giving you
select portions
of certain things
and so it's really
important
so the pledge we're
talking about
is sort of putting
something out saying
as the IMA
as a group
we collectively
will pledge
that we are not
letting AI
dictate our content
we're not saying
write this article
for us
we're not saying
you know
give me these paragraphs
or break down
these videos for me
that we're not
doing any of that
at least that's
what we all agreed to
I'm sure
you know we
question us all
we should
but it's important to see
that that's something
that's going to be happening
and
we were discussing
like a premium
you know
like that
people might start
to put more of a premium
on
genuine content
that's not
manufactured by AI
or influenced by it
but anyway
back to this point
what she's highlighting
is the way
that Grock
and the rest of them
can do that
and now we're seeing them
admit
that they can stand
back behind the scenes
and be like
let's make sure
that anytime somebody
ask this
or
ask these larger ideas
that we
nudge them
towards what we think
or what we think
is for the best
and so if you're out there
searching
well
Grock has an
a mandate
if you will
or whatever the rest of them
are
that seems to be the most
prominent for most people
to kind of
selectively keep you
in these channels
that you don't even
realize are there
and you look back
after a certain point
and you
don't even recognize
your work anymore
and it's just
it's so obvious
and so
this
is happening
right now
this comes
Israel's invested
six million dollars
in to make chat
GPT
more pro-Israel
pretty sure
they already know
that
Twitter and Grock
is there
so I think
that's just
more of the same picture
Glenn Greenwald points out
the planet's most fanatical
loyal
Israel loyalists
now own
and control
or are about to
Paramount
CBS
TikTok
Warner Brothers
CNN
all acquired
in the last two years
by Netanyahu's close friend
Larry Ellison
right as public support
for Israel
the United States
and the West
collapses
now
Barry Weiss
it seems was
removed from
the
what was it again
whatever she was just on
60 minutes
I think
or whatever it was
which is interesting
and then they came out
and made a statement
about how they were
manipulating content
surprise surprise
but now it looks like
arguably by New York Post
saying that she's going to
oversee CNN
isn't that interesting
the same CNN
is supposed to be
adversarial to Trump
but at the same time
they completely
align when it comes to the
view of Israel
you know
when it matters for the
system
as usual
but Glenn's point
is just simply highlighting
the consolidation of influence
whether you think
it's Zionism
Israel Jewish
Muslim whatever
that's important to see
that is a controlling
narrative point
and the AI is only going to
make it worse
Glenn also points out
the Israel government
said
has said explicitly
that they see
social media control
as their most important war
we've talked about this
especially in the
United States
and
we'll use a combination
of censorship
and buying up platforms
and influencers
like they did with
TikTok and CBS
to reprogram Americans
this comes from
Nick Cleveland Stout
Israeli government
has hired
Daniel Rosenberg
the producer of
Spike Lee's
Inside Man
on a $900,000 contract
to produce pro-Israel
not movies and documents
but social media content
to influence
you as public opinion
did you think for one second
that's going to be stated
as sponsored influence content
or somehow framed
as Israel paid for this
I think you'd be wrong
that's my opinion anyway
I think what is supposed
to be framed as
I doubt this was even
supposed to be acknowledged
was genuine media content
to people that have opinions
but they're paying for it
that's
that's I argue
that's half of the current
new media
Rosenberg's firm
Piros is set to hire a director
and hold casting
for on-camera talent
now
whether this comes out
as some sort of project
that's like framed
as we paid for this
movie we made
or something that's produced
as sort of a
you know
like like you get this
kind of report
and then it
you never hear about it again
and then find out 10 years later
that that big thing
you saw that was
this big organic event
turned out to be the thing
they popped
you know
they paid for
that happens
and it's happened a lot in fact
but either way
know that this is happening
there's an agenda
to influence your opinion
very aggressively
and for reasons
just like this guys
we talked about this on the third
the new national defense
authorization act
further integrates
the US and Israeli militaries
now
the one thing
there's been a lot of good
coverage on this
from
even people that are in the
you know
somewhat mainstream
independent media
but my point though
is that you
the one thing that gets
failed
that that is
repeatedly failing
or rather
that has been
the people that are doing
those reports are failing on
I would argue
is not highlighting
that this is not some new
event
it's already been happening
I don't need to do it again
the the next show
we did right here includes
that information
but it shows you going back
and this one as well
years
even further
of the conf
the the
conflation of these two topics
right
of arguing that IDF
and the US military
are the same thing
when it comes to
the benefits and resources
arguing
or into the
288th congress
having a
already having an
intelligence sort of
blending
bill that came out
now you've got the senate
part of it
which we showed you already
and you've got the
national defense
authorization act part of it
both of which are
the same kind of thing
one's more intelligence
focused
but these already exist
I just have to really
stress that again
because even if these fail
of all five of the bills
that are now getting
focused on just fail
I hope they do
that doesn't stop
the influence
they already have
this is just
I think
you know
one last effort
or even an effort
to get us to think
that it failed
either way
it is clear that
Americans are seeing
that Israel's
influencing policy
Ron Paul
the notorious section
224 of the
national defense
authorization act
has survived
the first attempt
to strike it down
that's on the 8th
yesterday
so there's been some attempts
I argue
faux attempts
to stop it
it didn't work
so it's still there
the provision
which integrates
the Israeli military
into our own
national security apparatus
will remain in the bill
as it moves
out of the house
armed services committee
will Americans
be forced
to mortgage their sovereignty
on behalf of
a foreign country
one that cannot
stop spying on us
it's so nice to see
somebody like
Ron Paul
you know
like this
it's just
this is not
some fringe concept
anymore
and I know you guys
know that
but this is always for the group
that's just
you know maybe just caught the show
and it's going like
wow these are racist people
or whatever
it's not fringe
and maybe you don't think that
but you know
either way
these are things that are
happening on the surface
from a high level
political discussion
we're talking about
the obvious nature of
section 224
so to somehow turn around
and argue
it's like racist
or bigoted
or whatever
it's just
it's such a
disingenuous opinion
I don't know how anybody
can actually argue
that this is not exactly
what we're pointing to
unless you
unless you only hear
Jewish person
when we talk about Israel
which is probably
what is happening
in somebody's minds
but yet then
when we point to things
Israel does
as Jewish people
doing something
not me
but others
that becomes racist
even though you just
argued that
we were
even it's just
this circle of nonsense
the point is that
what we're talking about
is the Israeli government
influencing
what the military
does in this country
or controlling it
and it's
literally what it says
right there
and that should
matter to everybody
Nick Cleveland Stout
points to the responsible
statecraft article
entitled WAPO op-ed
of course
backs
the Section 224
omits
authors direct
Israel stake
shocking
it's a WAPO
being a group that is
are we're supposed to think
is adversarial
to the current administration
but is supporting
their agenda
as usual
the Washington Post
publishes an opinion piece
defending Section 224
the integration
of Israeli military tech
without disclosing
the author is a founder
of the 1948 venture
is a venture capital firm
that invests
in Israel defense startups
or
that it's Netanyahu's plan
that's literally written out
as such
can't make this up
now here's John Kirchau
saying
Israel sent hundreds of spies
into the U.S. defense contractors
to steal
F-35 avionics
one of a thousand examples
we could make
but apparently this doesn't matter
but he's referencing this
in the context of 224
saying well
if they
now that they have this 224
they won't need to do
these things anymore
simply showing you
the group that's been stealing
and manipulating
and sub diffusion
all the things they're doing now
has just simply been
written into the reality
how many times
we made that point
that what Ron Paul has made
over the years
that the government will see
so we'll go hey
stop spying on Americans
or stop propagandizing
as Americans
propagandizing Americans
that's the Smith-Mont Agri
okay and they go well
we hear you
so you don't like that
okay
so we'll do the Smith-Mont
Modernization Act
what does that do
well it makes that legal
so there's no problem then
right so
it's not illegal anymore
so we can spy on you
doesn't that solve the problem
clearly they
you know I'm trying to make it
facetious
they know what we wanted
they know we don't want them
to do that
so what they do is
they make you think
they're doing that
but what they do is
put it into law
same thing that's happening here
even though it's kind of
already happening
the idea is that
they've been doing this forever
but now the government
that's been stolen from
is going to go
it's okay
we'll just fold you in
because they're no longer
your government
we were developing
the F-35
the state of the arch
most sophisticated
blah blah blah
fighter jet
which nobody likes
the F-35
the Israelis
were the first ones
to come to us
and they said
we want this new F-35
and we said
okay
we'll give it to you first
we're going to call it
the F-35i
for Israel
and we're going to degrade
the avionics
just barely
just in case
God forbid
one of them gets shot down
and the Russians
or the Chinese get it
they're not going to have our
our topmost secrets
the Israelis said
nope not good enough
we want the F-35
as is
as you have it
we want the same one you have
in the meantime
at the same time
the Emirates came to us
and they said
we want this F-35
and we said
okay
we'll sell it to you
we're going to
call it the F-35i
for Emirates
and we're going to degrade
the avionics
just a little bit
so God forbid
if you know
you're in a dogfight
over Iran
and one gets shot down
that the
that the Chinese
or the Russians
don't get it
they said
fine we'll take it
these
Israelis
sent out
hundreds of spies
all across America
in our defense contractors
to steal that
2% of the avionics
that we wouldn't give them
well with the
national defense
authorization act of 2027
they don't need the
spies to steal it
because we're just going to
fork it over
just hand it over to them
here you go
I just think that's insane
it's it speaks for itself
it shows you that
even though they've been
doing that
the government has been
so degraded
and so manipulated
and so infiltrated
that they're now just
allowing it publicly
now we followed up
obviously on this conversation
from the 7th
the obvious Israeli
infiltration of the
US government
is now acceptable
to acknowledge
that's the point
not that we're okay with it
but the reality being
that now
for whatever reason
the system is going
okay we can talk about it
whether because
that's just too far gone
I think that's kind of
probably the case
whatever it is
I just took the play
on this classic image
of Netanyahu
because it's clearly
all of it
which tends to box out
people that might want to
you know
there's so many people
out there that would
like agree with
almost everything we say
if we frame it
only about one side of the other
you know
if confounding that is
like if I just made this
about how
right now
like Trump's the only one
certain people
that would love to
believe the Democrats
are not the problem
would flock to the content
but we're honest about it
as always
it's not one side of the other
you know anyway
so in this case
here's Murray Rothbard
I'm not familiar
but he simply highlights
this I was seeing
Janice Girls
been talking about this a lot
and it's very relevant
she's the first person
I saw talk about it
Congress isn't just debating
aid Israel anymore
that's the old fight
the new fight is
whether the US
quietly embeds Israel
into our defense tech
intelligence
sharing weapons
development and
military industrial supply chain
now this
like I said
I just including it
because you can read
the different bills
we've talked about all these
all of them are important
and you should try to stop these
but like I said
this is just an extension
of what's already happening
but go through these
so you can understand
what we're talking about
but I do agree
the game is about
trying to make it look like
remember when Netanyahu
kept coming out
and he did again
just recently going
we don't want to take
your aid anymore
we want to be self-efficient
all they were doing
was building up to this point
to where they could argue
that's what this amounted to
to where now
we're going to stop giving them aid
we'll know you're just going to
put it under a different
heading
to where we don't get to vote on it
we don't get to see it
and you are going to get
far more than they're getting now
that's what's been admitted
by most everybody involved in this
other than those who are trying
to lie to you about it
here's Jesse Waters
talking with JD Vance
I almost don't even know
how to frame this
that you have Jesse Waters
like I'm almost wondering
whether this is sort of like
a joke clip
like where they're kind of like
framing this as the question
that neither of them agree with
but either way
it's still on his show
on Box News
he brings this up with JD Vance
and says
Israel was just caught
spying on the Pentagon
the thing that Trump and the rest
and everybody denies
the leavens of the world
go you're such a liar
Shapiro says
everyone's denied it
don't you believe the governments
that we used to call out
that this is such a tax
but
that he brings it up
and says that they were caught
spying on Americans
and asked whether or not
that's okay like
and they kind of just like
jokingly talk about it
do you realize how insane that is
like watch for yourself
there's other points
we want to get into
so we'll talk about both
but they're
this this will segue with Iran
and these other conversations
how concerned are you
about Israel spying on the United
States and freelancing in Lebanon
see like the way they're
smiling I'm like
is there I mean
were they kind of like
acting like we all know
that's not true
I kind of get the sense
that's even what Fox does
and Jesse Waters
more than anybody
is that he has this like
smug indifference
that he applies to things
that he wants people to
subconsciously like ignore
because you can't deny this
it's obvious
but that's you know
anyway you get the point
so here's how he responds
well look I think
obviously the Israelis and I
or excuse me the Israelis
in the United States
we have a lot of shared interest
but we also have some
situations where our interest
diverged and I think
where the president has been
very clear here
is that while Israel
obviously has some objectives
that is it has
the United States
is main objective in Iran
is to ensure that Iran
does not have a nuclear weapon
and we've actually
thanks to what's happened
over the last few months
but really over the last
year and a half
we've created the space
necessary where the president
okay wait just just to
reset the table
did he not just ask him
about whether or not
it's okay that Israel spies
on Americans
this is your answer
well you know
we have different interests
and you know
things are different
than we open the space
for the deal
how does that not get like
that's it
why wouldn't he be like
well let me explain
why it's not what you think
or let me explain like
they're just
it's almost like I said
right in the beginning
that this is like
by design
imploding
that this is them
and through Israel's manipulation
of them
through this government
just the absolute
collect
how does that act
how is that the right response
to act like
it's almost to pretend
like he didn't even
ask the question
doesn't that then
in anybody without
with two brain cells
rubbed together
open the door to
whoa wait a minute
so you're not denying that
you're acknowledging
that it's okay
because you have different
interests
that so Israel
could spy on Americans
apparently
believes
and I think that he's right
that we can get
the long-term settlement
to Iran's nuclear deal
now Israel may like that
they may not like that
but fundamentally
we think this is in the best
interest of the United States
of America
so we're going to keep on
pursuing it
because that's what
the president
of the United States
was elected to do
that's what we have to do
in order to properly
serve the American people
no no yeah
so you mean
keep doing the thing
that you swore you wouldn't do
just a little clarification
but you know
you just you lie
that's what they do
but still we're at a point
where the answer
the question
the answer to his question
is not even in there
it's just well we have a deal
that we want to make and
those disagreements
so it's okay
do you think the Iranians
are trying to play us
at the negotiating table
that's it
no follow-up
well I think Jesse
everybody's always
trying to play everybody
I think the president's
attitude on
something they never used
to acknowledge
but now it's just too
obvious
like they have to sort of
normalize the fact that
you can see Israel
screwing Trump
over all the time
so you know
it's just the way
politics work
I agree
but they never used to
allow that to be known
you know
but just really quickly again
like the idea
about Israel
spying on the United States
and freelancing in Lebanon
that's his question
well look I think
obviously the Israelis and I
or excuse me
the Israelis in the United
States
we have a lot of shared
interest
thanks to what's happened
is to
the objective
and it has been very clear
I had the spot wrong
excuse me
the Israelis in the United
States
we have
the president has been
very clear here
is that while
Israel obviously
has some objectives
that is
it has
the United States
is main objective
in Iran
is to ensure
that Iran
does not have
a nuclear weapon
point is
Vance is okay
with Netanyahu
his government spying
on Americans
he didn't even
acknowledge that question
that seems alarming to me
and we've actually
thanks to what's happened
over the last few months
but really
over the last year and a
half
we've created
the space
necessary
where the president
believes
and I think that he's
right
that we can get the
long-term settlement
to Iran's
nuclear deal
you mean like
the jcpo
jcpoa
that was already
accomplished
that you guys
violated
or the Trump did
or you know
the space
to make the deal
by what
by constantly getting
screwed over
by constantly looking
like a fool
like constantly lying
about what you're
doing
the only things that
have been happening
consistently
is you guys
acting like you're
in control
and being shown
to not be
over and over
and over and over
Iran's been
in the same position
since April
and they continue to
make that point
we're going to get into
the back and forth
bombings right now
but think about
what he's saying
with what we know
is happening right now
you just got to laugh
at how these people
must like
you must
I wonder what the
turmoil must be
unless this is the
design
for people like vans
to stand up and go
damn it
you know
I look like a fool
every day
or maybe they're
sociopaths
and don't care
I don't know
but right now
they're bombing
each other
or at least
there's back and forth
going on
and what he's
saying
is contradictory
to the reality
now Israel may like
that they may not
like that
but fundamentally
we think this is in
the best interest of
the United States
of America
so we're going to
keep on pursuing it
because that's
what the president
United States
was elected to do
that's what we
have to do
in order to properly
serve the American
people
that's why he's lost
Tucker
and plenty of others
and yet you're
going to pretend
that this is
the mandate
that Americans want
nobody believes
that right now
do you think the
Iranians are
trying to play us
at the negotiating
table
well I think
Jesse
everybody's always
trying to play
everybody
I think the president's
attitude on this
is
we have to verify
of course
one of the most
important things
to whether this
ultimate settlement
is a success
is not what the
Iranians
write on the paper
but whether they
actually comply
with some of the
the requirements
of the settlement
that we come up to
now here's
what's funny
about this
it's obviously
possible
even within
exactly with
what I think is
happening
that every time
Iran
tells them
that they're
going to agree
with what
Trump says
like think about
that for a second
even though
they know
they're not
going to
and that just
that just speaks
to the
naivety of this team
but my point
is always has been
you can clearly
look back and see
right
you can see
Iran has said
this is all we're
going to accept
and nothing else
is going to count
then you get narratives
like we just
got today
and yesterday
even though
they're bombing each other
that Trump says
we're so close
and we want a deal
and Iran said
x y and z
and then
you go forward
a couple of days
and you look back
and clearly that
wasn't true
because Iran
didn't change their stance
so within that though
even though
that's all true
you could argue
that when they finally
came to them
somebody gave the
wrong information
to Trump's team
and Trump because
they just
oh my god
we're almost there
we did it
it's about to be a deal
and they're over there
laughing that
took the bait yet again
I could see that
absolutely
and it still would mean
that at the end of the day
Iran hasn't changed
what they're actually
demanding
they're just
playing them for fools
by letting them
put that out there
I don't know if I
think that's the most likely
honestly I still stand with
I just can't believe
Trump's team
can't make up a different lie
that's what seems to be
the most likely
Occam's razor
you know
all things considered
equal
the simplest explanation
tends to be the
correct one
that's what I'm
leaning towards
but I just wanted to
point that out
because I haven't said
that before
that it's
obviously possible
consistently feeding them
the wrong answer
at the peak moment
and they just
buy it every time
consider that
I think it's very important
and this is one of the
big differences
you always hear people
talk about the
Obama deal
and what went wrong with it
the number one thing
that went wrong
with the Obama deal
Jesse
is that there was not a
proper inspections
regime
false
just quickly
go back and forth on this
but you know
this is what they
always do
right
so there wasn't a proper
inspection regime
on the Obama deal
well firstly
you can just ask
Rock
since this is the
partisan argument
that's easy to prove
and there's probably people
that would ignore
anything other than the
like the point is
this is an example
where I use this to say
look at what the
Republican narrative is
knowing Rock is going to
deceive and manipulate
where it can
and so that might reach
people who want to
only believe what
Republicans are saying
about the narrative
we could also just go to
the actual source material
which is what I did first
to understand that
there's an obvious
documented
we've covered this
a thousand times before
by the way
but just in case
that's what they
want to listen to
yes the JCPOA
included a robust
inspections
and verification regime
literally what he said
didn't exist
that's the joint
comprehensive plan of action
the Iran deal
the one that they broke
last time
it had continuous monitoring
it had access to
declared nuclear sites
it had complimentary access
to additional sites
it had monitoring
of the full supply chain
and had verification limits
which verified
that it maintained
3.67 percent
but you know
facts
facts don't matter
to these absolute clowns
but let's go back to the point
sure that the Iranians
could
there was not a
proper inspections regime
to ensure that the Iranians
could never build
a nuclear weapon
of course they could have
lied
and the IAEA could have lied
and everybody else could have
been fooled
but the evidence
doesn't back any of that up
so you could argue it's possible
sure anything's possible
but that's not what happened
based on the facts
and it's not what happened
based on what Iran said
what the previous administration
said
even what Tulsi Gabbard said
but hey
she got pushed out
so yes doesn't matter
and that's one of the big
differences between
what happened then
and what the president
of the United States
would get to
assuming we're ultimately
able to make a deal
oh right
you mean the thing
that they agreed to in the 28
that you bombed them for
right
all this is easy to prove
they already agreed
to what they want them
to agree to now
they're not going to do that
again in my opinion
unless the U.S.
gives them tons of things
that they either
don't show anybody
and Iran might even agree
to let that slide
so they can actually see
an end to this
but it still ends up
in their benefit
my point is
if the money
will get to in a second
there's floated things
going around right now
that I can't verify
but I do see a world
in which Trump
so desperately wants
to stop his
hemorrhaging
in this conversation
would give them things
he wouldn't want you to
know about
money for example
money that they stole from Iran
yes just like the Obama
conversation
despite their lies
so I don't assume that
ever anybody's acting
in good faith
obviously we've been very
involved in these
negotiations Jesse
we're
not really
you've had an example
where Vance went to Islamabad
nine times out of 10
we're talking about
Pakistani mediators
handing things to
the people that didn't
relay them to them
they just can't
they're such small people
that they need to make it
seem like they're
always in the middle
of everything
like that's Trump for you
like I was just
laughing about this today
where somebody made an
argument that people
booed him at New York
who cares by the way
and they're such small
like
insecure people
that he has to post
something about him
at a thing in New York
and says king of New York
on the White House
accounts on Twitter
that's not just because
he felt like that
it's because he's responding
to the allegation
that people don't
like him in New York
this is the president
of the United States
we're dealing with
children
small petty children
guys
it's all these people
we're going to take
the attitude of
accomplish the president's
mission
but verify
over the long term
that the Iranians
are keeping there
into the bargain
it's a tall order
it's what we were
already doing
before
and even in the middle
between all of this
the independent
the international
atomic energy agency
was already agreeing
to observe what they were
doing
they just didn't have
any caps on their
enrichment
but they were still
held at 60 percent
because of the
intermediate agreement
with the international
atomic energy agency
as I've shown
a thousand times
so they had
anything they're
arguing about
was already in existence
and they blew it up
with their
literal bombs
but it's one
that the president
has put us
in a good position
to achieve
because let's be honest
Jesse
the Iranians
don't want this
award to continue
it's not in their
best interest
and I think
they're coming to the
table
putting some real things
on the table
nope
this is what's so sad
again
how many times I can
say it
you can clearly
look back and prove
that they're
lying about that
right this moment
you can now prove that
because
same thing
what are they putting
on the table
can you guess
they want control of the
straight
they want the total dynamic
they want money
and they want this
yep the same things
they were asking in April
brand new things
and the Vance team
and the rest of them
are just lying to you
because they need to look
like they're in control
that's my opinion
obviously
but
how many times
are we going to hear
the same dance
the same narrative
the same song
how many times
can they keep putting this
of course going to
verify it
but if we get to this
deal
it's going to be a
home run one
for the American people
yeah I'm sure it is
just trust the plan
guys it'll all work out
and Jesse Waters
dutifully follows along
because that's
what his job is
all caps
two red lights
that's how you know
it's important
guys
here is
all I just conclude
by the way
just for those
that know the reference
I was making
here's the actual
international
atomic energy
agency post
from June 20th
2025
that shows you
that the things
they were pointing to
claiming Iran
was screaming
about their
bragging about their
enriched uranium
was literally
something that was
within their agreement
it was uranium
stockpiles
that remained
under the safeguards
in accordance
with Iran's agreement
with them
and that was the 60%
the 400 kilograms
or a thousand pounds
and then of course
the White House
went on and publicly
lied about this
to 60 minutes
it's just
insane
where we are guys
now
Daniel McAdams
points to
Mar-o-Nopoul
towing the line
as he always does
in regard to
the Iran conversation
and Trump
being angry at Netanyahu
just doesn't stop
Narfall came out
and said
Trump told Israel
to stand down
and the message
came through Fox News
this is on the 7th
mind you
we know what actually
happened
it is the 9th
and we can see
what's going on
so
and the idea
that any of this
that Trump is in any way
adversarial
outside of him being used
and probably being mad
about that
but the idea is
adversarial in the sense
that he's actually
pushing back on the agenda
from what I can see
Trump was either
aligned with it
or is incapable
or unwilling
to push back
in regard to
Israel and Netanyahu's agenda
he'll publicly say things
but I think
behind the scenes
is something different
in this case
we keep hearing
what the Brock Ravid
article
you effing
and you lunatic
and then he went on
to support him
and what you find out
is behind the scenes
they lied about
the entire conversation
according to Israeli media
that it was not even about
what they said
it was about
no cussing took place
it was frustration
with the
deviation of the social media
posts
but god forbid
the shocking
that they lied to you
about this
Daniel McAdams
calls out
Mario Anafal
and says
why do you
constantly amplify
his fake news
are you
on Barak Ravid's payroll
seriously
I don't understand
why otherwise
intelligent people
like Larry Johnson
and Doug McGregor
continue to go on
your show
Mario Anafal
it's clearly
pro-regime manipulation
I happen to agree
but they're all
just out there going
it's it's clear
that they're divided
and guess who came in
just like I expected him to
Trump's pissed at Netanyahu
says Alex Jones
I said this guy will
never stop gaslighting you
this is
this was on the 8th
the next day
where the argument
was to try to get you
to think that
Trump was not on the
same team with Netanyahu
and then what he do
as we are on the 9th
he completely sided with
Netanyahu
as he always does
but here's the third time
Alex Jones tells you
who's right
that he knew
that they would separate
and didn't happen
here
Glenn Greenwald
points out
he goes I almost feel
sorry for Trump
this was on the 7th
for when he feels a need to yell
that Netanyahu is not my boss
the whole you know
sheet that
that was the lady
doth protest too much
kind of example
Trump announced on April 18th
that he prohibited Israel
from bombing Lebanon
they laughed
and they bombed the next day
every single time
including right now
because right now
we're going to show you
on the 6th the 7th
and the 8th and the 9th
Israel's been bombing
in Lebanon
and what happened
in that little middle part
Trump said
Israel said they wouldn't
and we told them to stop
it doesn't matter
and here he says
Trump wants to deal with Iran
but is petrified of Israel's
lobby rage
now I don't agree with that
you can decide
that's what Glenn is arguing
that that's
what is guiding it
but here's the main point
Trump tells
financial times
Israel would have no choice
but to accept
whatever the deal is
that he agrees to
does anybody believe that
he says
he won't have any choice
I call the shots
he doesn't call the shots
that's an actual quote
I call the shots
he doesn't call shots
that's
that's really cringey guys
that's Trump
literally doing what Glenn is
saying going
I am in control
Netanyahu doesn't tell me
what then he cut
then the next thing that
happens is Netanyahu
ignores what he was told
and they do it anyway
and Trump
tuck tails and follows
Netanyahu
so
Janice girl says
well Trump and Netanyahu
cause play a fight
and the likes of Alex Jones
continue to play into that
for whatever reason
either stupidity
or dishonesty
leaked deployment orders
show the U.S.
has quietly deployed
the 82nd airborne
paratroopers
to Israel
with mission to seize
Karg Island
and carve out
coastal territory
inside of Iran
and this is actually
an article from
Ken Clippenstein
entitled exclusive
U.S.
Israeli deploy
secretly deployed
paratroopers to Israel
it says while the Pentagon
announced that the 82nd
airborne
which remember that
by the way
it comes up again
in a second
but the 82nd airborne
was deployed to the
to the Middle East
in March
it concealed a key detail
I'm sure you could guess
it why
some of those paratroopers
were heading to Israel
as revealed
in an army deployment order
that Ken has obtained
the military source
involved in war planning
tells me the deployment
is tied to new U.S.
Israeli joint contingency plans
completed since February
foreseizing
Karg Island
and carving out coastal
territory inside of Iran
that's been floated
more than once
it says by keeping the
deployment quiet
the Pentagon headed off
public debate
over a joint U.S.
Israeli operation
inside of Iran
so the point is about one
the ongoing
Iran agenda
the deployment of American
soldiers to the ground
which is already happening
if you're paying attention
both through
I mean any number of examples
in regard to the people
that were there beforehand
that the deployment of weapons
to the Kurds
all these different examples
or just literal deployment
on the ground
that it's all being lied
about
the idea is that
this is showing you that
not only is that ongoing
and that despite the lies
that Trump is leaning into this
at the expense of Americans
when not a single Israeli
is on the ground
doing any of this
but then also
they were being lied to
about the cosplay of them
disagreeing
because all of this is happening
as this is
theaters playing out
we also
it brings to mind the report
that we came out on March 8th
reports of U.S.
servicemen deployed
under the guise of training
remember that
I just think it's interesting
that maybe this result
more than that
more than we know has been
happening
and it's about something
much darker I think
now
on the overlap of Iran
and the White House
and the ongoing
whatever you want to call this
there needs to be a new word
made up for the absurdity
of what Trump is doing
with this repetitive lie thing
it's weird
so the White House
on June 8 says
both rather
Trump on true social
which then becomes
the White House post on Twitter
says both sides
Israel and Iran
are looking to do an immediate
ceasefire
final negotiations on peace
are proceeding
subject to ignorance
or stupidity getting in its way
the blockade will remain in place
which by the way
is an ongoing violation
of the original
ceasefire
they say is still maintaining
that's just the dumbest thing
in the world
and in full force
in effect
until a final deal is reached
so is the bombing of Lebanon
which never stopped either
things should move quickly
thank you for your attention
it's like the 95th time
you said something like that
the idea that both
first of all
that Israel and Iran
are going to grow up
with the ceasefire
which includes Lebanon
as everyone's going to need
to point out
and that Trump agreed to
before Netanyahu told him
it wouldn't anymore
all on the record
the idea that you can't just
make up a different argument
for this
so they said
make up a different lie
alter it a bit
it doesn't make the same old
statement unless of course
it is what he was saying
and then Iran is tricking them
and they just keep falling for it
which is pretty embarrassing
but either way
what happened
right after this
it's not a ceasefire
the idea clearly shows
that both Iran and Israel
are not actually leaning
in the direction he's pointing to
so what's happening
is he lying to you
for the interest of oil
money trends
I don't know
but it's getting very stale
and everyone's aware of it
right now
so here is the anti-war article
about this on the 8th
written by Dave DeKamp
Trump says Iran and Israel
must stop shooting
after they exchange strikes
so this is the post right here
they must stop shooting
okay so this is on the 8th
so we just saw what he was saying
before
so then all of a sudden
we get some little scurvy
so right away
it becomes clear
well technically there's
the comments beforehand
and afterward
but the point is
he's been saying this for the last
I don't know
months now
and after it was the similar kind
of idea
that you know
he's told them to stop
the last week
he's been telling you
that Israel was told
to stop bombing Lebanon
so we have this exchange
where there was
back and forth
President Trump said Monday
that Iran and Israel must stop
shooting
comments that came after Israel
bombed Iran
following Iranian strikes
on northern Israel
in response to Israel strikes
and Beirut suburbs
pretty easy to see this
of course
all of it stems back
to the illegal war
that they started
with no justification
so it's not really hard
to see this
but you understand
that Israel bombed
multiple suburban
main downtown areas
and this continues to happen
so and that
and that
we we saw what happened
that was not
based on anything
and Iran
bombed back
now of course
what we get
is this back and forth
right where
Israel bombed Iran
following Iran strikes
in response to what they did
Israel and Iran
must immediately stop shooting
he said
Israel long strikes
on several Iranian cities
after Trump said
that he told Israeli Prime Minister
Netanyahu
to stop
Iranian strikes
on northern Israel
Israel long strikes
on Iranian cities
after Trump told them to stop
he says quote
I'm going to call BB right now
and tell him not to retaliate
he did
by the way
each of them had their fun
Israel had its strikes
and Iran had its strikes
and we need another one
or we don't need another one
this is of course
according to Barak Reveed
which you should be laughing
about right now
because he keeps giving you
false information
rather he tells you
what they want you to hear
but understand
that this is not
what we're
what we're dealing with
is Israel bombing
civilian locations
now almost every one of the
examples they've shown
like the airport
which is still disputed
by the way
or the
we've gone over the tanker
from the very beginning
that was ultimately seemed
to be a drone
that was put up by Israel
there's plenty of examples
we've covered
is that ultimately
what they do is bomb
these civilian locations
for maximum pain
which we'll go ahead
and show you in a second
openly saying
bomb the suburbs
Govir
plenty of rest
but that's not
what Ron is doing
now I'm not going to say
that they're incapable of doing
that and I've shown you
examples that I argue
are violations of the law
but this is
start this is
you know
the U.S. and Israel
bombing bridges
and
electric
bridges and
power power plants
and so on
anybody in the world
would seemingly
like the governments we deal with
would not
balk for a second
and responding to the same thing
doesn't make it not a crime
any of them doing
it should be held to the same
standard
but understand how this started
that's the only point
but so what we're dealing with
here is them telling you
that this was supposed to stop
and Israel carried on bombing
anyway
in Lebanon
and Iran
both is the same point
The Wall Street Journal reported
that when Trump spoke
with Netanyahu on Sunday
and it became clear
the Israeli leader wouldn't call off
his plans to strike Iran
despite Trump telling him not to
Trump asked him to keep it limited
now what does that show you right there
right that Trump says he's in control
I call the shots he screams
and then when he goes
don't do that
and they go
no
he goes fine fine
just keep it limited
pretty easy to see the power structure
right there
the two leaders spoke again on Monday
and Netanyahu later said
publicly that he would not launch
further attacks
but he's continued to bomb Lebanon
and if you understand
it's been clear from the very beginning
Iran has made it stated
it's part of this
no matter what either of you could do to say
no matter
the same thing with Israel and the United States
if Trump decides to go
we're done
and Israel keeps bombing
they still see the U.S. is involved
or vice versa
so it doesn't matter
they just keep deviating from what they say
they have made the statement
and they've stood by it
and so that means that Lebanon being bombed
is part of this
the blockade being still there
is part of this
the matters
because that shows you no matter
what they want to bend in the narrative
that they're still violating
that what they claim is their ceasefire
that's never really existed
now it says the two leaders spoke again
now it says the U.S. tried to distance itself
from Israel's strikes on Beirut
but sources told the journal
that Israel informed the U.S.
of the planned attack ahead of time
and the U.S. also helped intercept
Iranian missiles
meaning
they lied to everybody
surprise surprise
following the Israeli attacks on Iran
which wounded at least 15 people
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
said that it targeted air bases
in northern Israel
and Iran's central military command
the Katzam al-Anbiya
later announced that it was halting
military operations against Israel
so Israel bombs 15 civilian downtown
you know I shouldn't say
I think
I don't want to misquote the exact locations
especially since a lot of it's still up in the air
but
many of them civilian locations
and Iran targets
the
what was it again the uh
just lost it in the place
oh it didn't list it out
should just air bases
now we should question whether that's the case
Israel lying back and forth
Iran lying it's all possible
but what we continue to see is them
targeting civilian locations
the U.S. government
targeting civilian locations
when they bomb Iran
not secret it's not Gaza
it says though it commanded
warned that it would respond to
Israel attacks in southern Lebanon
which continued on Monday
still a violation
Netanyahu said in a statement
that Israeli attacks on Iran
were halted for now
so at this point
essentially Iran stopped bombing
and then Israel stopped bombing
after the back and forth
that Trump told not to do
and since then they've been
attacking Gaza and bombing Lebanon
that's how it's continued
Netanyahu said in a statement
that they at the moment
they're holding fire
because after we struck the terror
regime in Tehran
it ceased attacking us
not how that actually went it seems
but it says in the event
that the terror regime in Iran
makes the mistake of resuming attacks on us
we will respond with overwhelming force
the Israeli leaders suggested
in the same statement
that Israel won't halt attacks
in Lebanon
saying we continue to destroy
all of Hezbollah's terror infrastructure
and by that they mean
the civilian locations that they covet
so Ryan Graham points to Jeremy Scahill
on the eighth
saying Iran has announced the end
of its current wave of
retaliatory strikes against Israel
Trump again claims
negotiations are proceeding
doesn't seem to be the reality
Iran has maintained it is open
to a deal and says
Trump it it is Trump
who has prevented it
the past three weeks
it's the same point
as I've been saying
it's not they're not
at least as I perceive this
and as the continuation of it
stays the same
is that ultimately they still demand
the same exact things
which is what he's highlighting here
the same stuff
and so it's not that they're open for
well I guess it is fair to say
open to a deal
but open to the only deal
that's on the table
their deal
that's the right way to frame that
it seems
and that could always change
based on a number of things
but based on where we are
and where it's been looking back
they're not open to some new additions
they're not open to anything they have to add
they're open to accepting
of the deal they want
or they're not talking about it
that's post-april
that's what we've talked about
and so in the same point
when Trump says they're ongoing
with negotiations
it seems to be the same lie to me
and that's why
they've been saying it's them
they've been preventing this
for three weeks
because they know what we're demanding
they know we're not budging
and they keep playing this game
now since the current focus
for Iran centers
on two primary issues
scale points out
ending the Israeli aggression
against Lebanon
as we've been telling you
and unfreezing Iranian assets
as a condition for any deal
now we'll point this
an argument going around
that that's happening
but what's interesting to me
why that would be
I doubt Trump's going to do that
on a public way
and in the front of the deal
I just I find hard to believe
with all they've been saying
about Obama
and the money they gave
even though that was money
stolen from Iran
and they've been lying to them
the entire time
about what actually happened
Trump doing the same thing
is just absurdly funny
and I said the same thing before
if it gets to this point
how interesting would that be
and of course they'll frame it
as something different
even though
they're lying about Obama
and it's the same deal guys
they as the government
stole money from Iran
now they're just simply
giving it back
if that's how this works
now the current focus
on the two issues
ending the aggression
on Lebanon
so they have to stop
the bombing of Lebanon
and Iran has not budged on that
since they haven't
there is no deal
seems pretty simple to me
Iranian military suggested today
that regarding Lebanon
this on the 8th
that the red line
is not just halting Israeli attacks
on Beirut
it's so consistent about this
but ending the attacks
on the entire south
or the entirety of Lebanon
so not just stop the bombing here
but stop your ongoing occupation
and bombing of Lebanon
Israel's not going to do that
the Iranian military said today
if the aggressors and evils continue
including in southern Lebanon
much more severe
and crushing measures
will be on the way
Iran
and now this very well may be
why they just said
bomb them
or that Israel decided that
because it's pretty damn obvious
that no matter what they try to
wiggle around in
that they're not going to budge
and Israel is not going to budge
as Iran also said
that the continuation
the condition
for any memorandum of understanding
with Trump in the U.S.
a substantial amount
of its assets
must be repatriated
that's the point
Trump keeps insisting
that he will not do this
even though there's been floated
assess like
internal arguments
from anonymous sources
that this is something they're considering
take that for what you will
it could be nothing
if there is progress on these issues
excuse me Iran
has said it is open to resuming
the negotiations
on
an ongoing memorandum of understanding
and again
it's the same point
they're saying
that if we get this done
those first discussion points
and same thing
with the negotiation
on the nuclear stuff
they're saying that
that's not even going to be
on the table until once
we get past this first stage
and we see a month of nothing
that's what that's what they were saying
so that's that's what I believe
this amounts to
is that we're not
we're only going to even get into
the conversation of negotiation
once this is passed
like we established
the toll the the straight
and the control and the money
that seems to be the main things
they're putting forward
the ball remains in Trump's court
they say
and Ron still believes
it holds significant leverage
it clearly does
again I don't know how you can
miss that
based on the ongoing
reality of the situation
you can look back and see
and it's clear that
they're not budging
at the very least
that they believe
that they have leverage
Trump keeps deluding himself
into believing
Iran will capitulate
do you believe that
I don't know
it matters
it depends on whether you think
Trump actually believes
the narrative
that's hard to sell me on
I mean I think it's pretty
obvious that he has knowledge
that others don't
and that he can see
what Israel's doing
so I don't know
I just don't believe that
I don't I believe that
Trump is trying to convince
people that he has leverage
and he wants to
make it look that way
when it ends
I don't believe it's the case
Trump keeps deluding himself
into believing
they will capitulate
the reality has been
clear for weeks
a deal will only happen
if Trump makes concessions
on Iran's core demands
100% agree with that
without a doubt
Trump people are trying to
find a way to hide
these potential concessions
and explore secret
tracks to meet
Iran's conditions
while preserving
this fictitious victory narrative
exactly
and I'll even
I'll even argue that Iran
would literally
let him pretend he won
to get what they want
because they don't
it seems they don't care
about the framed narrative
as much as these
sociopathic children do
that's not to say
good bad guy
it just shows you
I would I would frame it as
you know better
politicians
which is not a compliment
but you see the difference
right these people are
like it's the same frame of
like Putin
and the way he's conducted
himself in regard to other
foreign policy
he is a politician
he is a masterful politician
and again
that's not a compliment
he just it's
it's the way that
they're able to manipulate
people and make you feel
like they're not doing
something wrong
these guys are just
terrible at this
I sometimes think
that's by design
Iran and Israel must
stop shooting
well they didn't do that
ambassador from Israel
says Iran fired 11
ballistic missiles at
Israel today
this is on the 7th
each one of those
missiles can level
an entire neighborhood
and kill hundreds
did they
ah you're making our point
for us
all said and done as of
right now
last I checked
and it's you know
hard to know for exact
about 24
I think it was 25 people
have been killed
according to their narrative
from what Iran has done
bombing in Israel
25
now that shouldn't be ignored
anybody being killed matters
but what I'm trying to
highlight here
and again
that
when you look into it
that's 24 IDF members
what we're really talking
about
at the end of the day
what we're seeing
is Iran
even as they're bombing
into areas that are
literally human
shield dynamics
like Tel Aviv for example
have only killed 25 people
most of which are talking
or IDF
which is most of Israel anyway
on the reverse situation
you've got thousands of people
that have been killed
in Tehran
in Beirut
doesn't that show you something
and now all they want to do
is make it out to be
we're the victims
because we bombed you
illegally and you responded
in
with restraint
in targeted locations
like you pretend you're doing
now you could even argue
that doesn't mean that they're good
it just means that they recognize
that there's again
smart politicians
smart military tactics
you don't want the world
to think you're a chaotic
you don't want the world
to think you're a terrorist
so you make sure you do the thing
that
that accomplishes your agenda
but makes you look like
you're the better side
I think Putin's been doing that for years
either way
take it for what you will
that is the
this is the aggressor
framing themselves as the victim
no self-respecting country in the world
would tolerate such an attack
and neither was
well thank you for making our point
why would
why would Iran
let you bomb them
with no justification
and not respond
Rubio just did the same thing
his own argument
made the case for why Iran
had the right to respond
now it says Israel
is now targeting
Iranian surface-to-surface
missile launch sites
as well as infrastructure facilities
relating to the energy sector
oh you know
and a lot of civilian
buildings
and hospitals
and nurseries
yeah just like every other time
they bombed this country
the people of Lebanon
have rejected Iran's proxy
though we're talking about
is the occupied Lebanese
government
will play a clip for a second
Hezbollah
and have told Iran
to get out of the country
it is just
the lies they spin are embarrassing
if Hezbollah fires at Israel
its command centers
will be hit
this it has nothing to do with Iran
oh it does
it does nothing with Iran
does it even though
you've been telling us for years
that Iran controls this group
I mean didn't you just say
Iran's proxy
but yet somehow it has
nothing to do with Iran
good luck working that out
like this is what it looks like
to be lying about everything guys
in your same tweet
you have to contradict your own statements
the idea
they've been telling you
it's the same point
and that's why it matters
to focus on Lebanon
but now they don't want you
to connect them
because they know it's connected
and they don't want you to
stop one versus the other
they want to keep murdering
people in Lebanon
to their hearts delight
it's not and people see it
just absolutely disgusting
it says
everyone has had enough
of this maniacal
Iranian regime
wow
just read some of the comments
it's just people are just
fed up with these people
Wyatt Reed
highlights
Neftali Bennett
former Israeli Prime Minister
who says
I think Trump certainly respects
the fact that we're an independent
country
we were attacked last night
by dozens of Iranian
ballistic missiles
unprovoked
he says
we did nothing to provoke
this attack by Iran
did anybody actually
I mean even people who are
against Iran
unless you're just a dumb person
or a dishonest person
you're going to go
but that's not true
I think
you know
yeah Iran bad guy
but come on guys
like we know that's not true
but see this is my point
is that you're only going to get
this weird category of people
that you might as well come out
and say the aliens attack
that day because who cares
as long as it's Iran bad guy
the narrative doesn't matter
for these people
and anybody else
there is a middle overlap there
but I would argue the vast
majority of people are like
well that's just not
what just happened
even their narratives
make sure you know
that's not what just happened
doesn't matter though
but it goes in this is
why it reads speaking
even in a country
where lying is encouraged
and those who don't
cheat or mislead others
are considered suckers
that's a real thing
how you pronounce it
I think it's Frayrim
this is an absurd fabrication
he says
let's recap
Iran spent the past week
and this is just like before
the 28th when Iran
went to the UN
and said
they're about to bomb us
it'll be unjustified
and if they did
is we're going to respond
to the countries
that are global insurance
it's all on the record
I've already shown it to you
and yet they bombed them
unjustifiably
and then they turned around
and go look at what Iran
just did
they're terrorists
by bombing these countries
even though they went to the UN
and made the case
for why that was
their legal response
did the US do that?
no
guys they didn't do that
even in a country
where lying is encouraged
this is an absurd fabrication
Iran spent the past week
telling Israel
it would strike the northern
settlements
if
Daia was attacked
so what we're saying is
Iran was going
if you bombed the locations
Israel
I just read for you
as the ambassador was saying
is threatening
it was
or continues to threaten
we will respond
over and over
Israel attacked that location
Iran responds
exactly the way it said it would
I mean you could
map this out for yourself
this obviously wasn't the first time
Iran
warned Israel
against attacking Lebanon
that's Lebanon by the way
on April 8th
Tehran said
Tel Aviv would regret
its continued attacks
in Lebanon
so the point is to understand
this from Iran's perspective
is the same conversation
now it is
whether you agree with that or not
but it's not even about that
it's about the fact
that they've laid that table
very clearly
if this happens
this stops
even if Israel goes
we don't agree
it's irrelevant
we know that Iran
will not let deal happen
if they keep on Lebanon
they've made it very clear
so then when Trump comes around
it goes we're so close
everyone's on the same page
you know he's lying
because we know this is happening
it says
wind the clock back even further
and you'll recall
on April 2024
Israel carried out
an unprovoked attack
on the Iranian consulate
in Damascus
in Syria
killing 16 people
including a Quds force commander
and his deputy
in June 2025
Israel sabotaged
U.S.-Iran negotiations
and started the 12-day war
when it launched
sneak attacks on Iran
killing dozens of generals
and nuclear scientists
in February 2026
Israel and the U.S.
once again
treacherously attacked Iran
interrupting diplomatic talks
with decapitation strikes
assassinating the head of state
and murdering 120
some argue 170 elementary school girls
oh and this is
again the 28th
that was the day they said
they were just about to make the deal
that they keep selling you Iran
will never give
and they made
they agreed
Oman's foreign minister said it
on that
meet the press
meet interview
if we just give it time
we did it already
and they bombed him that night
it says to any rational observer
all of these are obvious provocations
but for Israelis
who claim they are God's chosen people
and biblically exempt from
treating the rest of us as humans
it's just business as usual
Daniel Davis Deepdive says
evidence suggests
that Israeli claims
which they did claim as always
that all missiles from Iran
were intercepted overnight
it's on the 8th
we're not accurate
surprise surprise
he says what a shock
something Israel reported
turns out to be false
and this is the examples
of the blasts and fires
from the bombing of the locations
Netanyahu on the 8th
interestingly enough
comes out and says that by
bombing Iran
they somehow prevented
a nuclear attack
I mean you just got to understand
the
what's that word for it
you know it's unstable
like their narrative is just kind of
like it's like building on sand
they're so desperate to make this
make sense
no one's buying these narratives
because the facts don't back up
what they're saying
so they just have to yell out
like they were going to bomb the world
if we didn't do what we did last night
and some people like
all of the usual suspects
pointed to it and said
oh my god we just got saved
for nuclear attack
didn't happen
there's no evidence of it
there's no evidence that they have
the capability
doesn't matter
but Netanyahu sure as hell
put it out there
overnight Israel carried out
historic strikes
to prevent a nuclear attack on Israel
remember
this was why he rationalized
that it wasn't a
unprovoked attack
we were defending against
Iran's getting ready
to bomb us with nuclear weapons
they just make this up
every single time
is it possible
of course it is
but realize that
every other part of the story
you know all the things
they need to be there
to make that make sense
have already been proven
to not be the reality
this is a low hanging fruit
argument for people
that just need something
to push them over the edge
interestingly
as we've been seeing
every step of the way
it turns out there's actually
more collaboration behind the
scenes with Netanyahu and Trump
and the allowance
of what Israel does
that Trump pretends to be
against
as the dust settles
Saigar points out
it seems that Trump soft green
lit the Israeli attack on Iran
and then further depleted
US military interceptors
to defend attacks on Israel
now this is his statement
but it is largely what the
evidence shows
Robert by the way
is working on something
right now
that I'm probably going to put out
tomorrow around
you know the potential responses
that are happening
that are in the potential in the
future
Brian Barrowluck
as to this saying
US claims of not involved
in Israel strikes on Iran are
false
now this is opinion
but I really I agree strongly
with this and the continued
point
reference to
which path to Persia
which is an important document
that you should read
we've gone over
100 times on the show
Israel doesn't exist
militarily without
constant and complete
US support
I agree
every plane bomb
shred of intel
comes from the US
just like with Ukraine
now that's one of the reasons
why some would argue
that it's actually the US
that ultimately controls Israel
and in some ways
you can argue they do
but it's it's a
it's more about
you know
either way
the point is
as long as you're
considering
one of those dynamics
I believe you're
on the right path here
because that's what
we're dealing with
whatever those two things
are doing
whatever
whichever side is pushing
the other
or whichever side is
leading the other
it's
both of them involved
with what we're watching
but it's worth considering
that it really is
because you can see a world in which
that's the reality
and then all of this
is a construct
to make you think
it's the other way around
I could totally see it
see that
US policy papers
have described in detail
how use
how to use
Israel to wage
war on Iran
it is
we've gone over that
exact part in this document
on
and maintain plausible
deniability
or I could reference again
the clip from the
Washington Institute
where they literally say
that's how you
can start a war
with Iran
if you're still following
for this propaganda
you probably aren't
interested in the truth
he says
that's worth considering
guys
my opinion
is that I think it
if it is a
balance
I think the scales are
tip toward the
Israel influencing
more of the US
than the other way around
but it could very well be
both
of different types of things
on military side
it's more this way
on
you know
in Congress
it's this way
I you question it
for yourselves
but
we can't deny the obvious
influence
or rather
you know
coordination
on these agendas
between the two
I think it's obvious
that you can see
Israel influencing
a lot of this
right now with Trump
now but is that
a construct
to make you think the wrong
thing
certainly ask that question
here
Manchil sit points out
as something that's important
with Yemen
that adds to this
but the rules of engagement
are changing
in regard to how Iran
responded
the past 18 hours
have been very interesting
this is on the 8th
Iran re-entered the war
with Israel
just to defend Lebanon
so that's the real point
is they bombed Lebanon
like they've been telling
you the violation
and
over the last so many weeks
it's been sort of building
that look
we're not going to let this
continue
and so this was the change
before this
they hadn't responded
by bombing Israel
unless Israel bombed Iran
which by the way
speaks for the larger
point we're always making
they're not out there
just unilaterally bombing
that's the US and Israel
everywhere
Iran has been restrained
going back a long way
that doesn't mean good guy
just means the obvious
factual statement
of what's been happening
but the point is
and by saying that
by the way
it's not implying
the opposite either
I'm just pointing out
that by stating a fact
doesn't mean
anything you may assume
around it
but
them responding
shows a change in their engagement
which is that
they're not just going to wait
for them to be attacked first
in regard to specifically
Iran proper
but that they will attack
Israel occupied Palestine
if they bomb Lebanon
or the few other factors
that are included
and I argue that include some
you know Gaza
Yemen
I'm not saying I know that for a fact
but I would argue they see that
as the same larger conversation
in fact they've said that
but as of right now
it seems to only apply to Lebanon
and Israel
or Lebanon Iran excuse me
now
they did this to defend Lebanon
but we also saw Yemen
enter the war
that's kind of what I was going
with that is that I think that's
I don't think that's by accident
I think this is coordinated
and you could argue that means
that Iran controls these things
it's that's it
it's an overly simplified
and I argue incorrect view
could be
but I think it's obvious
that we're talking about groups
that are just allied with this
and are all fighting against
the same occupying element
and so either way
Yemen and rather the
Ansarallah movement
the Khouty movement
has risen
to stand up against it
Israel now
and they were doing this before
with Gaza
they've re-entered this
and do
sort of blocking off
or restricting their flow
through the bottom end
up straight
how long have we been talking
about this
US asks for an immediate ceasefire
now that's not how Trump is
going to frame that
right
but as this is all happening
what do we get
Trump
going wherever it's going to be
a ceasefire
we promise
we're still doing it
so if you just continue to look
back you're going to see
Trump pushing ceasefire
while Iran goes
give us this deal
or we're going to keep going
so what you see is
Trump at his point of weakness
you just I mean
unless that's what they want you
to think and it's not true
it's what it shows
Iran promises a response
if any axis member is attacked
so we'll see how that goes
that would mean Gaza
that would mean any of the people
that they're defending
so Menchil Sit also points out
the Yemenis this is just the
map of it to show you
and here's the actual post
they put out
the Yemenis
Ansarallah
targeting Tel Aviv this morning
the Yemenis decided to ban
Israeli navigation
in the Red Sea
the next escalation
if the US gets involved
will be a ban on US ships
and ally ships
so remember
just this is a good
glad the map is here
for those that have been seeing
we talk about this for a long
time right
this is the cradle for Moose
and that is where
Iran has restricted the US
and people fighting against them
and Trump has sort of
muddy those waters
no pun intended
to argue mines
or insurance issues
and that's caused
most everybody else to be
tentative
the truth is
it wasn't ever shut down
to anybody other than the US
and Israel
the mines
according to even admirals
in the UK
are a lie right now
doesn't mean they can't do it
but they haven't done it now
by so many other examples
this basic deductive logic
China's own ships
have been going through
there to Iran
even with the false blockade
rather the
incompetent blockade
it is there
and there's been
I mean anyway
I've made this point many times
it is an argument created
to make it look like
it's shut down
for their interest
in my opinion
but over here
on the other side
there
that's the straight up for Moose
you've got the bobble
man demonstrate
and they've been trying to occupy
Yemen for a long time
to control it
so they control that waterway
and they've been failing
but so now
Yemen is stepping up
and here is why
they've been trying to control
it this whole time
and shutting them down
from that location point
now this
is going to be a big deal
if they can effectively do this
because it's going to stop them
they're going to
they're realistically
going to have to go all the way
around the Horn of Africa
to get anything around that point
that's a huge deal
if they can effectively stop it
I argue they're going to call
terrorists
it's not the reality
in any sense
in fact yet again
we're talking about
something that
like you could look at this
in the same way
that like
it's not to say that
it's necessarily legal for Yemen
to stop everybody
they want going through there
but that the U.S. government
has done
effectively similar things
in numerous locations in the world
more than once
both would be illegal
is the point
so you're at a point now
where you're being
bombed and occupied
and targeted
and you know
you're
they're going to lash out
just like with Gaza though guys
I think it's pretty easy
to see which side stands
on the side of what's
you know
whatever you want to call it
so fighting for the oppressed
is what I would call it
treat
the Parsi points this out
and I do
this is the same point
but sort of his
framing of this
the magnitude of what just happened
may take some time to sink in
this is the first time Iran has
struck Israel
after Israel struck
another country's territory
but not Iran
this means that the battle lines
have been moved
Iran's deterrence
had already been restored
to the sense
that Israel knew
that any strike on it
would be responded to
but now Iran has proven
that it will respond
to Israel strikes on Lebanon
this is the first time in decades
that a regional power
has the means
capacity
and willingness
to put hard power
against Israeli military maneuvers
or aggression
against a third party
and you wrote a substack
if you want to read it
whether you're supported or not
you can't deny that point
it's obviously a change
drop site news
highlights what Iran said
on the 8th
and this just backs up
the larger point
that we're discussing
not to say you should
trust what Iran says
or how they see it
but what it's showing you
is what Iran is stating
their stances
and that means something
in the back and forth
of the narrative
of Trump saying
they're all fighting
for a ceasefire
the point is that
they're telling you
they know
Israel and Trump
and the United States
government are not
honest about this
they know that
they're not really
fighting for a deal
they know this
it says
the foreign minister
of Iran says
no one in the region
believes that
the Zionist regime
Israel
carries out
any action
without prior coordination
and cooperation
with the United States
the consequences
of any escalation
will also fall on Washington
and that's important
same with Lebanon
they said
if you bomb Lebanon
I don't care what you guys say
it's still part of this agreement
and it'll count as a violation
or you know
we'll as now see bomb
as we'll now see it
as bombing us
and we'll respond
same thing Iran has said
no matter what you do
Trump
because they sense
Trump's going to try to
kind of wiggle his way out of this
then ultimately
if it continues
no matter who is doing it
you are still responsible
now you could take
what they're saying there
as the exact framing
as that they see the U.S.
as the guiding force
maybe they do
quote
the U.S. State Department
has explicitly stated
that the main reason
for imposing this war on Iran
was supposed to
was support
for the Zionist regime
Israel
that has been
the official American position
furthermore
despite the claims of U.S. officials
we know that
CENTCOM is fully coordinating
and cooperating
with the Zionist regime
on both offensive
and offensive operations
meaning
that just because Trump's
pretends
and maybe Trump's not even aware
just because he pretends
like that's not what they want
or he tells them to stop
that there's been numerous examples
that have come out and said
despite what Trump
yelled out on social media
that he was behind the scenes
going go ahead and do it
I support you
we all know this happens
and so at least they're saying
that's what they believe
is that no matter what
it's there behind
coordinating these actions
and giving you a different thing
out front
the idea that the Zionist regime
does not even listen to the United States
and acts independently of American wishes
or seeks to humiliate U.S. officials
through its actions
is something that can always be debated
that's interesting
so they're basically like
what I'm saying is that
maybe it is
that you have Israel
trying to destroy
or influence
or is in control
and they're going well
that's debate on
that's interesting
the United States bears
responsibility as a party
to the April 8 ceasefire
understanding
whether whatever happens in the region
whether the U.S. itself
violates the ceasefire
by attacking Iranian commercial ships
or targeting southern parts
of the of the country
both of which they've done
or whether violations are carried out
through the Zionist regime
in Lebanon
with U.S. complicity
the direct responsibility
of the United States is clear
and the consequences of any escalation
will also fall on Washington
meaning that if Israel does this
you're going to be included
I think that's exactly
what a rational stance would be
based on what we've seen
now
well last part was the
commercial ships
and the blockade
and all the different points
what keeps happening
is that you have
their blockade on Iranian ports
and so then you have commercial ships
not military ships
that are simply just coming in
to Iranian ports
and they act like that's somehow legal
that they can disarm those ships
and stop them
in reverse you have examples of them
you know there's only
there's only military targets
being hit in most of the circumstance
so Trump has simply allowed himself
to target in non-military targets
because Iran may benefit from it
during this process
and you're going to say
their actions are illegal
when they're controlling the waterways
that they have strategic control over
and they are letting ships through
that are not fighting them
and you create your secondary blockade
and stop commercial ships
that have no military
I mean you just can't go
it's never been more clear
that they don't care about anything
and there's the
again I argue these people are just bad
at doing it in a way
that previous politicians have done
which makes it look like
they're not doing what
they're obviously doing
who knows why
now Trump says today
this is where we get into the
current reality of this
with the helicopter
and the Apache
and all the different examples
now
all of that being seen is important
because look at where we are
before we get into this
Apache helicopter point
it is undeniably clear
that they are floundering
Israel's going to go in
because they know that ultimately
it seems to be the U.S. Americans
are taking the brunt of the issue
so Israel's going to keep going
because why not
if they keep bombing Lebanon
and then they get you know
it's obvious that they had
that intention to begin with
it's obvious they don't care
about anybody
but their agenda
and so in the midst of all this
you have this Apache helicopter
that suddenly something happens to
now I see it one of two ways
this was either created
to give the air of justification
for something that Israel was
going to do
and that Trump had no say in
or however you want to read it
they were going to attack
and so they had to make it look like
they weren't just choosing to
right
or this was a
I guess one of three
or this was something that was
sort of happened
and that it didn't utilize
and within that you could argue
this was something that was done
like so sort of a drone
was flown into the Apache
by let's say a Iranian drone
that's driven by Israel
and then suddenly Trump
then uses that
thinks he has to respond
however you look at this
we're getting to the details
you'll see why this is really fishy
so Trump says this
I have just been informed
by our great military
again that's the great military
led by the religious Zionist
known as Hexeth
that last night the Iranians
shot down one of our
highly sophisticated Apache helicopters
while patrolling over the Strait
now it's funny that he says it
like that would not even his own
military is saying that
right now it's being investigated
that maybe it was that
and if it if it is it's that the
drone shot it
not that it was some
the way he's making it sound
it's sort of like that was shot
down by Iran from the ground
and it says there were two pilots
involved both are safe and injured
nevertheless the United States
must of necessity
must respond as attack
and they have
so here's the associated press
Trump says U.S. must respond
after Iran downed U.S. Army
helicopter Army helicopter
near Strait
don't you love title
as even their report goes on to say
that we don't know
but of course it's not Trump says
oh I guess technically it does start
with Trump says
but the way the sentence goes
usually Trump says at the after
part
but you know that yes I guess it's
kind of a moot point
but the idea would usually that
would be at the end
to make sure we know that this is
his statement
but Trump says U.S. must respond
is the way that that would be
read and then after Iran downed
U.S. helicopter
as if it happened
these may be small points of
some people but this is
deliberate
assault rod for example knows
very well how these are used
these headlines are manipulated
to make certain points
anyway
June 9th
President Trump blamed Iran
for downing a U.S. Army
helicopter at Apache
near the Strait of Hormuz
on Tuesday
again so we're told anyway
and said the United States
must respond to the attack
nevertheless the United States
must have necessity respond
now as of right now
as far as I could tell
I don't think we have the names
of these these two pilots
and I'm willing to bet you
we never get their names
have we ever found out
what that alleged
rescued pilot was
you know that AI picture
that Abbott put out from Texas
I don't think they exist
or they let him die
and they don't want you to know that
either way
we've never gotten those names
I feel like this might be
the same thing
it means out that they died
they don't want you to know that
or they just literally made it up
now that's just a thought
I mean we'll see where it goes
but let's wait and see
and if we don't get their names
we'll have to fall up on that
the helicopter went down
as the Middle East
was still reeling after Iran
and Israel exchanged fire
the previous day
in the biggest blow yet
to the strained ceasefire
how embarrassing
in the Iran War
Iranian state television
reported that Tuesday
that the Israeli attacks
killed at least two members
of the country's air defense
units
oh wait
this wasn't the wrong spot
oh it's the next one actually
so this was simply
just a highlight
make sure I didn't miss that
hold on
it is much longer
in the other report
a drone boat rescued them
I'm going to get into that next
so yeah
I guess this
I didn't even need to include
this one technically
this one has more information
but I remember why I did it in
general
so that one was more about
the actual attack
Wall Street Journal frames
this interestingly
drone boat rescues crew
of down to patchy helicopter
what's
it's it's talking about
an AI drone boat
and makes this whole case
and really it starts with
the focus that
this has never had before
an AI drone boat
rescue these pilots
and weirdly seems to focus
on like this new idea
of using AI drones
and AI stuff
worth noting I think
but anyway
here's what it says
the military is
investigating whether
whether the Apache
was shot down
by Iranian forces
according to U.S. officials
that's right now
while Trump is yelling
that we know it was shot down
the rescue marks
an operational first
for the vessel
which are part
of the Navy's
artificial intelligence
and drone task force
that is designed
to widen
U.S. military
capabilities
in the Middle East
the mission
also demonstrates
the dangers
of operating in the region
where Iran is shot down
U.S. drones
and targeted American aircraft
throughout the war
oh you mean the one
they're illegally bombing them
and invading their territory
might want to include that
little caveat
and the subsequent ceasefire
it says elite troops
from the 82nd
airborne division
oh you mean the same ones
that
Ken Klippenstein
was telling us
were previously deployed
to Israel
that seems relevant
so here we are
on the ninth today
elite troops
from the 82nd airborne
that were secretly
shuttled into Israel before
which arrived in the region
after the start of the war
in Iran this spring
contributed the rescue mission
so weirdly enough
you've got this special group
that was moved into Israel
secretly
who just so happened to be
the group that was there
to rescue these people
I find that to be strange
I find it to be strange
that it was about an AI rescue
mission
and now it becomes
sort of like the perils
of Iran and bad guy stuff
and why we need
more AI drones
is what this article is
sort of doing
and it literally starts
with that
as the main point
of the article
it's little titled
about that
as if the secondary story
is the rebel cop
being shot down
and Americans being at risk
so it says the drone boat
involved falls
under task force 59
which harnesses
uncrewed boats
and other drones
powered by AI
I'm telling you
it literally goes on
about this
this is the focal point
now it says
in Ukraine
the country's military
has dispatched these vessels
to target Russia's Black Sea Fleet
I just thought it was funny
I'm like oh you mean
the Nazis you support
those guys
yeah that's no big deal
over there
our Nazi friends
are using the boats
that we give them
this is funny how
casually that gets included
it's obvious
what that group is
the Azov movement
just controlling this
the country of Ukraine
but
the point here guys
I still feel like
I missed something
in that first article
there's a point about it
being a collision
maybe I read it right there
hmm
I feel like there's
something else I'm missing
in this
let me make sure I didn't do
something else here
I mean you got the gist of it
I just always do this
where I feel like
I want to make sure
it's not an important point
that I'm missing
so the gist of the point
just to relay what I know
is the the facts of the case
this point
is that what we're talking about
is the dispute
between whether or not
and I'm gonna
it's probably like
in one of these right here
as I always do
but the dispute
is whether or not
this actually was something
that was a
malfunction
which even by the way
Trey and Fox News
will tell you today
I'll play that clip in a second
that it could be a malfunction
it could be that
this is something
that was attacked
and it could be
this is something
they ran into
which is what's
largely being reported
by U.S. information
which is this
something a drone
ran into the plane
that's what is being reported
by U.S. officials
so why then how then
would it be considered
to be a shot
if it was something
you could argue this
was ran into them
like a suicide drone
that might make sense
but that we should question
where that's coming from
and secondarily
why it would even be
in their interest
to do this right now
not that they're being
attacked by this helicopter
but rather just that
it was over there
and they just shot it down
for no reason
of course you could argue
that it's because
they were being bombed
by U.S. and Israel
that would make sense
something about it
just doesn't line up for me
I feel like
this is the excuse
being manufactured
to justify what they
wanted to do
Ken
oh just back to this point
82nd Airborne Division
so again this is a group
that was secretly brought
to Israel
right and he says
this was in March
and now suddenly
they just happen to be
the group that's there
to get them
now maybe it's because
they're close
or closer
there were ships
that were there right
I don't know
something about that
just rings hollow to me
or that there's some kind
of a coordinated thing
happening here
this is and again
the Airborne Division
is the one about
the quick reaction force
you know so this one
just feels like it's sort of
constructed this way
now take it for what you will
Said Muhammad Randy
Professor of English Literature
and sort of a
spokesman at the moment
for the Iranian side
at least I was framing it
for the record
Iran did not shoot down
the helicopter he says
and Trump is lying
but the Islamic Republic
is more than prepared
to teach the Epstein
Coalition a lesson
now here is what the guy
what's the name
Trey had to say on Fox News
Trey Yinxed
of course Nick Sorder says
breaking
Trump says they did this
and we believe Trump
no matter what
because that's what journalists do
and then the video
he shows you says the opposite
I just find that hilarious
maybe he didn't even watch it
here's what Trey had to say
US Apache helicopter
went down
near the Strait of Hormuz
on Monday
now President Trump
says the crew members
are doing fine
and we are still gathering
more information
on what took place
it's not clear
if the gunship
went down
due to enemy fire
or a mechanical issue
this does come as
the ceasefire with Iran
is holding again
as the region braces
for what comes next
President Trump spoke
after attending Game 3
of the NBA finals
between the Knicks and Spurs
he indicated that negotiations
toward a deal are ongoing
and we
by the way
I find it strange
that he's talking
in this weird cadence
like it's some pre-recorded
interview
but he's speaking to the people
in the interview
or speaking to the people
on Fox News
he's talking to them
so they go hey
tell us what the story
and the way he talks
it just feels artificial
it's the old dying media
kind of concept
the way
you know
I've done it before
like the way that they
they you know level
the way that they talk
things they do
it's like this weird kind of
like media thing they do
and I just find strange
that he's
I'm showing this thing right now
but he's on this field
he's talking to people
in that room
and the way he's talking
I don't know
I just find it artificial
that's how they are
on what took place
it's not clear
if the gunship
went down
due to enemy fire
or a mechanical issue
this does come as
the ceasefire with Iran
is holding again
as the region braces
for what comes next
President Trump spoke
after attending Game 3
of the NBA finals
between the Knicks and Spurs
he indicated that negotiations
toward a deal are ongoing
and we could have a better idea
of where things stand
in the days ahead
the president also discussed
his call with Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
after the exchange of fire
over the weekend
see the fire
we had a very good conversation
and he was hit
and he hit back
and I can't blame him for that
but he was hit
he hit back
and now they've called it
quits so they're gonna
just leave each other alone
for a minute of the week
or something
okay I want a clown
and they hit back
yeah so
so basically the exact thing
that you told him not to do
but you can't blame him for that
I call the shots
don't do that
ah you can't blame him for it
this just seems ineffectual
if you ask me
and the idea that you're kind of
like laughing off the idea
that oh maybe another week or so
like it's almost like
you know no one believes
what you're saying
or that they don't believe
they're actually gonna
have a ceasefire
it's just kind of gross
like it's almost
he tries to kind of
do this in a way
that makes him seem like
he's aloof
like I'm not involved
I'm commenting on what
they're dealing with
it works for some people
but it just it shows you
you're failing
right you know that
you're in this agenda
it's your agenda
and you're kind of like
brushing it off
on somebody else
that's not what leaders do
after president
Trump called on
Israel and Iran
to stop shooting
both sides agreed
since then
Israel has continued
to operate against
Iran backed Hezbollah
in Lebanon
so they didn't agree then
in case you misunderstood that
launching new strikes
overnight
and issuing
fresh evacuation orders
this morning
Prime Minister Netanyahu
addressed his country overnight
with a message for Hezbollah
in the past 24 hours
Iran and Hezbollah
tried to impose
a new equation on us
this equation is intolerable
and unacceptable to me
they thought they could fire
from Lebanese
and Iranian territory
at Israel
okay so
nothing has changed
it is Hezbollah and Lebanon
fighting for their
to push off the occupier
you have Iran
who's maintained
their same situation
but this
and act like
there's some kind of new thing
they've imposed
you mean the exact same thing
that we brought up last time
that this is one and the same
and if you bomb them
it counts as the same conversation
I mean you just
Netanyahu knows
they just had this conversation
and yet he stands up
and just yells out the thing
that contradicts
what they were just doing
because all of the Zionists
who are on his side
are going to go
that's true
and if you say that
you're a racist
and people cower
truth is
most people see this already
because you guys
just shoved it down our throats
that this is not
the same conversation
they were allowed to keep
bombing Lebanon
then Trump had an agreement
with them
and they said
it's okay
we'll stop bombing Lebanon
and then Netanyahu said
I'm not going to do that
then Trump said
I didn't say that
and it all kept going
around and around we go
and yet now you're going to
stand there and act like
this is some new equation
that they suddenly care
that you're bombing Lebanon
guys nobody's this stupid
I take it back
plenty of people are this stupid
but most people are not this stupid
and that we would not act
that did not happen
and that will not happen
with questions about
if the ceasefire
could be broken again
international attention
remains on the straight of
Hormuz
where the U.S. naval blockade
of Iranian ports
is expected to continue
right
the port
the blockade
of their their ports
that
civilian ships
come and go from
Trump says U.S. forces
disabled
an unladen to oil
tanker in the Gulf of Oman
on Monday
after it tried
to breach the blockade
why is that legal
is that a military target
no
it's a it's a tanker
okay so you're arguing
well we don't want them
to have oil
because they can use that
so then why not just stop them
from getting food
because you know food
will help them continue to
fight the war
is that not the same logic
it is
and they're
doing that anyway
that's what their sanctions are
majorly
you know
largely meant to do
stop medicine and food
and what they need
but you have to understand
by blocking these ships
and by the way
attacking
that civilian ship
to stop them from actually
being able to go on the port
that's piracy
that's terrorism
that's what they're pointing
and everyone else doing
in most cases
they're not even actually
doing that
take Yemen for example
and the
and on Cyril movement
and how many times they called them
terrorists and pirates
and what they were doing
was stopping them
from breaking the law
didn't steal anything
didn't sink a ship
didn't kill anybody
after all the times
they were firing on
those Israeli ships
they didn't sink one
they didn't take one down
they didn't steal one
they didn't kill anybody
think about crazy that is
because they're choosing not to
it's restraint
and they mean what they have to say
at least in those moments
and now you have them
acting like
that's what they're doing
and FA-18 Super Hornet
from the USS Abraham Lincoln
fired a precision munition
into the ships
engineering
and steering rooms
since the blockade
went into effect
134 vessels
have been turned around
and seven disabled
now realize the difference
is we're talking about ships
that were bringing military things
to Israel
to continue the genocide
right now look
there was examples of
different ships that were coming
that they're
let's just even say that were
what was the example
that let's just say
weren't military purposes
well in that same context
that would be a crime
committed by the
Ansaral movement
but in the same reality
you can understand
why they would try to stop them
as they're conducting an illegal war
and murdering their families
doesn't make it any less illegal
right that's the only way
to honestly frame those things
it's clear how often this happens
so here
is a couple
a quick deviation
actually that some new information
that came up
while I was starting the show
we're going to come back to this
and go back to
the Lebanon discussion
but as we were getting ready
I saw this taking place
now people
let me know in the chat
if there's anything else that's
happened
beyond this
I guess because I know
this was happening like
right as I was going live
US and Iran zero in on
four nuclear issue in talks
I don't buy this for a second
just to come right out of the gate
I don't believe this
I think this is the
another version of the same
Barak Ravide Trump
you know
cycle of the same story
the same lie over and over
we'll go through it in a second
we also have the example of
this was the US command
coming out hours ago
openly telling you
that they were going to conduct strikes
what they're now doing
and now
US says it's begun strikes against Iran
that's happening as of right now
after all that we just talked about
all that we were hearing
doesn't that seem ridiculous
it should
now
this was first
the night earlier
the US zeroes in on these talks
like they really want you to think
that we're somehow
just about to make the agreement
and it says
in the days before
the latest flare-ups of violence
in the Middle East
you know the illegal war
they're conducting
President Trump's aides
were negotiating with
Tehran
on four major elements
that's not even true
we're talking about people
who are relaying messages
through a mediator
last time I checked
and we're acting like his
okay let's just pretend
like that's what that is
four major elements
on the nuclear agreement
that the US officials
compend would grind the program
to a halt
for 15 years
it's just tiresome
right because of two things
are happening
you got the US government
arguing
that they're not only
close to a deal
which we just saw
now that they're bombing
is not the case
two
that Tehran
is even negotiating
their nuclear agreement
right now
far as I could tell
they're not
last scale said
the same thing
that's not even on the table
until after they get
past these first three points
and so for them to come out
and say they're even
discussing it
this is the New York Times
in my opinion
repeating what liars
are telling them
who knows why
it's what they do
then going on to say
that what that agreement
might do
based on lies
they're telling you
in my opinion
is that it might end up
being a 15-year
halt to the program
and then now you get
people online
I'm seeing people
like I think it was
Mark Michael Flynn
and others going
they better not do this
and now it's circulating
that Trump might give them a deal
oh Trump's about to make a deal
for 15 years
to stop the nuclear program
and now they're bombing each other
it seems like nonsense to me
and the reality
doesn't make any sense
and understand that
even if it was happening
that the agreement
was already in place before this
they were already agreeing
to give it up entirely
not 15 years entirely
and they bombed them
I'm going to make the point
every time
it says the negotiations
according to the US officials
and diplomats
who have been briefed on the condition
or confidential talks
relayed information
from liars
that have been lying to you the entire time
have gone considerably
beyond discussions
about reopening the Strait
which the Iranians
have all but shut down
or not
but what's funny to me
is that the
US officials
who have lied about everything
have talked to us
on a condition of anonymity
about confidential talks
that we can't verify
that they claim
have gone beyond the Strait
talk about great reporting
at the end of the day
we can see that's not happening
and it's the idea
of the Strait was a precursor
to even getting into those talks
according to everything Iran's been saying
the result is what American officials
describe it continues
as the hazy outlines of an accord
we're just about to get there
Trump yells
assuming the Islamic Republic
a revolutionary guard
core
and hard-line Iranian politicians
do not overrule Iran's chief negotiator
or torpedo the much more detailed talks
the United States has proposed
in Switzerland
I just
you know I just don't understand
if whether this person has an agenda
to lie
which is obviously a huge part of it
or it's like they just are trapped
in this like fake news bubble
that they don't realize they're in
that they're the experts on Iran
but that expert
like the information they're experts on
none of it's true
but they don't know that
it's like these US experts on Iran
they're based on
State Department talking points
my point is that ultimately
what you're highlighting here
is just a complete fabrication
based on the narrative of what they say
this is what Iran is
and what they're doing
not necessarily that there's not hard
liners that might overrule
that that's happening in this country
but at the end of the day
the idea that you're talking about
this like some kind of an ongoing deal
that the hardliners are just stopping
before Trump can get it done
and again this is the adversarial media
hardly
now this of course is the archive
and it for some reason
every version of it
blocks off the rest of it
or doesn't give you entirely
or stop you from seeing it
but I'll show you right here
this is what's happening
in all these archives these days guys
I don't know how they're able to do
this but they effectively can stop it
from the archive side
same with Wayback Machine
some of them work
some of them ultimately end up
it doesn't matter
but it's included for you
if you want to if you want to read it
so this was happening earlier
where Dave DeCamp was saying
the notable difference here
is that they're coming out
before they're doing it
and saying we're about to strike them
so he argued that would probably
mean that it's going to be a
larger attack
I guess we'll see as it goes
forward till tomorrow
but he's right
this is different
you normally they come
like after the fact
because as Trump always point out
why would we broadcast what we're going to do
aha
that's what you should think about
this might also indicate
that there's some sort of a coordinated
back and forth
which has happened before
not where I'm leaning at the moment
but the fact that they're broadcasting
it when Trump tells you
they never would do that
seems to suggest that Iran
not be aware that it's about to happen
just a possible thought
now the US says Iran begun
has begun strikes against Iran
or the US has begun strikes against Iran
now it says the US military said
Tuesday has begun strikes
against the Iran
against Iran
following the crash
of a US Army Apache helicopter
off the coast of Oman
I bet you this is where that part was
that I was looking for
that US
President Donald Trump blamed on Iran
in a statement posted on two social media
the US Central Command said
the strikes would be a proportional response
to unjustified Iranian aggression
think about that
even if it was
your this is a war that you started
based on no justified
it's you know
it's just hypocritical
as always
it comes after Trump blamed Iran
for downing the helicopter
and vowed the US would respond
seems pretty convenient
if you ask me
Iran state media reported that
explosions were heard
on the Iranian island
in the Strait of Hormuz
interesting
then we just get done talking about
Karg Island
with the same 80 second airborne
that was supposed to be preparing
for that possible operation
who just so happened to be in the same
location to rescue the down
helicopter
if that same group goes on to take
Karg Island
I think that'll give us our answer
the Apache helicopter
here it is I think
that crashed went down
after colliding with an Iranian
drone
this is what I do
I knew this was in here
but I thought it was in the other
in the other category
so what did
and this is a US official
who spoke on the condition of
anonymity to discuss
the ongoing investigation
now that could mean it's a lie
but what I've been seeing mostly
in this dynamic
is that you're getting the person
in the situation
that for whatever reason
thinks they want to put the truth
out there
and I'm only saying this
because that's what's ended up
happening
not that I would assume that every
time
what we keep seeing is this
because you should never take the
condition of anonymity thing
it mean from my opinion
it means it's something you
should note
but it becomes meaningless
because they could not even
exist for all we know
but what I've been seeing
is that you get that person
that comes out after Trump
yelled something and goes
but here's what's actually
happening
but I don't want to say anything
because I'll get attacked for it
and then we question it
and then a few days later
you look back and it goes
well they were right
and so here is an example
of that maybe right
where you have somebody in
the administration that's going
well it wasn't actually an attack
it was actually a drone
that ran into the helicopter
don't say I said anything
no just consider it
I find that to be very relevant
because what that would mean
is either something that
they ran into
and then made all this up
to cover up their clumsiness
that's one possibility
or it was something that was
driven into
this helicopter
so that they would think
it was Iran
or maybe Iran did it
to take the helicopter down
because they're bombing them
I mean anyone of those things
would make sense to me
but I get
my sense in all of it
as you see from the show
today
is that this is something
that was sort of manufactured
or at the very least like
like I said before
like a false flag of opportunity
right we're in a moment
where we need this to go a certain way
so let's just blame Iran and move on
even though there's no investigation
or rather they're still investigating
to find out what actually happened
don't we get
are we tired of this
Trump grabbing that
or Biden or whoever else
and going China did it
or whatever
before we have any evidence
and then later finding out
that wasn't even the full picture
it happens all the time
it says it wasn't clear
whether the collision was intentional
and officials statements
only said the crash
was under investigation
but yet Trump
yelled out his narrative anyway
doesn't that seem
suspicious in its own right
soon after Trump made his accusation
Iran's foreign minister
said in a social media post
that the strait is
thousands of miles away
from the US shores
making the obvious point
why would this be a defensive attack
in the first place
and why would you be
hovering around Iran shores
foreign forces in proximity
to our territory
are at constant risk
on account of their own human
excuse me
hiccups today
though their own human errors
playing accidents
as in
PLAIN
or at least that's what they wrote
or potentially being caught in crossfire
to reduce risk
best solution is for them to leave
exactly
because the end of the day
they're the reason this is happening
now human errors
he puts it for a reason
I find that relevant
it could be
that's what he wants you to think
or could be that
that's what actually happened
and they know that
and so this is sort of that
ongoing game
I don't know
I think that was it
so that's where we are
now again
let me know if there's something
that's happened beyond this
but this last I checked
they're bombing
some locations in Iran
or some areas in the straight
you know something within this field of war
related to Iran
like not in Iraq
and claiming the PMU is Iran
right this is the U.S.
arguably striking Iran
after that happened
and this is right as
Donald Trump is yelling
about how we're just about
make a deal again
silly isn't it
now
folks are reporting about
$3 billion in cash
being sent to Iran
by Trump
haven't confirmed this
if right now
that's what I can tell
it's a narrative going around
that might be true
and I've seen them
develop into truth in the past
but it's just a claim
circulating on Twitter
and true
Trump and his team
have acknowledged this might be
or I shouldn't say team
but there's been examples
from within his circle
that have acknowledged
this might be something
in the future
that was on the table
this is virtually no one
is clarifying
this is the point
I want you to hear
with if you know
whether or not it's happening
it might happen
and virtually no one is
clarifying
that the money that Trump
and Obama before him
gave and released
is part of a $100 billion
of Iranian assets
that were seized
illegally
due to US
and EU sanctions
after 79
so after they took the
country away from Zionist
and US occupying forces
so they stole the money from
just like they stole
from Venezuela
like they stole from Bolivia
like they stole from anybody
so they do
it doesn't help to keep people
ignorant of facts
and cause them to freak out
that US taxpayer money
is being sent
so what she's doing
is trying to alleviate
the people that are screaming
about how
you know Trump's going to use
our taxpayer dollars
to give to Iran for his war
it's not what's happening
but there's so many
weird narratives around this
because the truth is
that they lied about Obama
doing it in the first place
that's not support of Obama
it's just the truth of what happened
and now they might
get forced in the same position
I find that humorous
but either way
it's a it's a
Iranian money they stole
and overall it shows
a weakness of this position
but it it
here's Megatron
just simply saying
and it comes from Israeli media
so consider that as well
that maybe that's the lie
Israeli media has been known to do that
but so the point
is that it's questionable
right now
now maybe since I've been live
it's developed further
I'll follow up the next show
we'll see whether
it actually is happening
now back to Lebanon
and to finish up today
because you remember
this was the point of them
saying that you know
Lebanon was the violation
and so on
Trump says Israel barred
from bobbing Lebanon
April 17th
enough is enough
he says
right
not hold on
not take a pause
barred
from bombing Lebanon
we all went through this
already
but just to refresh your memory
okay
and then what they do
they carried on bombing Lebanon
here
June 1st
and there was numerous examples
in between each of these
by the way
but June 1st
Trump says
Hasbo and Israel have to agree
to stop all shooting
well they did
until Israel kept bombing Lebanon
and this easily
we've proven this
because they said
we're not going to stop
we have to keep fighting for this
and that
it wasn't that they had to
respond to Hasbo
guys it's obvious
what keeps happening
here's an example on June 6th
Israeli strike
kills three Lebanese soldiers
oh yeah
not Hasbo guys
Lebanese soldiers
who are supposed to be
on the side of the group
that they're fighting with
ah but you see
they lie about everything
they just want to take the
territory
and they'll kill everybody
women
children
dogs
they've made this clear
they lied
so here they are on the 6th
when Trump is going
they're not going to do that
anymore
bombing Lebanon
and killing
the very side they pretend
they're on
Israel's on its own side
that should be clear by now
here is April
excuse me
June 7th
the next day
Israel
meet military
says it hit Hezbollah
and Beirut suburbs
okay
we hit Hezbollah
and all those sub-civilian
parking lots
and civilian
hospitals
and apartment buildings
obviously
and so yeah
again the point was just
that here they are
bombing Lebanon on the 7th
here's the 8th
Lebanon says
Israeli strikes
kill at least 14
as attacks persist
despite Iranian threat
that is June 8th
and that was
meaning that there's
they're Iran will respond
now this is the night today
right this the point is
yesterday
the day before that
and of course right now
so no matter what you're
hearing
Trump says
they're going to stop
because I asked
they're barred from doing that
we're you know
we're going to take a
but doesn't matter
Israel doesn't care
and it does what it's
going to do anyway
maybe that's what
factoring into
Trump's discovery
his thought process
well they're like
like Rubio told you
right in the beginning
that they knew
Iran or Israel
was going to bomb Iran
and they thought
that might mean Iran
would use nukes
and so they then
acted first
it may be very well
that they were played
with their own stupidity
their own lack of
understanding of the
situation
but either way
Israel was gonna
so we had to
well there you go
and so here we go
in general
seeing that
Israel is going to do
what it wants
and it's going to
drag the U.S. down
today
Israel has just
issued an evacuation
order
for the entirety
of the biblical city
of tear
no more safe zones
no more fake ceasefire
no more good cop
bad cop routine
between Trump
and Netanyahu
Israeli ethnic cleansing
and its full effect
every time
what right do they have
to make people
evacuate from their own
homes in a country
that is not theirs
I can answer that for you
none
but they don't care
Trump and the rest
and in the international
community
turn a blind eye
drop site news
highlights
this is further in the day
9 a.m. today
Israel terror continues
another carpet bombing
campaign
as Israeli warplanes
started their daily attacks
on southern Lebanon
they didn't even
blink and
they didn't even
take a beat guys
they just went
immediately back
to bombing
as much of this
territory as possible
and Gaza too by the way
not bombing as much as
possible
but there are
efforts against Gaza
right now
they've they've stopped
aid from going in yet again
we'll get to in a second
today by destroying
residential areas
in the entrance
of tear city
residential locations
every time
this is not Gaza
people can see it
drop site news
Israeli attacks in Lebanon
killed 29 people
wounded 133 others
just in the last 24 hours
you know the time when
Trump said they were
supposed to attack Lebanon
the toll from Israeli attacks
since March 2nd
has risen to 3,666 killed
and over 11,000 wounded
Israel continued its attacks
on Tuesday
killing at least 15 people
and killing 9
28 wounded
or killing at least 15
in including 9 killed
and 28 wounded
in this neighborhood
is this Israel also issued
dip displaced
displacement orders
for these areas
including historic Christian
quarter
but of course they
know no cry out
from the Alex Jones
and Betty Johnson's
fake Christians of the world
who scream about
how they are fighting
for Christianity in the West
and then ignore
when Israel targets
Christianity and the West
Lebanese civil defense
and two rescuers
are wounded
in the double tap strike
as happens every time
they bomb something
and then they bomb
when the healthcare
workers show up
this is every day guys
ask Gaza in Syria
it happens all over
here is a little further
about 20 minutes later
Israel intensified its attacks
on southern Lebanon
city of tear
on Tuesday killing at least 17
this person has been
following the stuff on the
ground
this is from
earlier in the day
but this is just a simple
statement made by
the president of Lebanon
he said
this is what
Wyatt Reed framed it as
he said there's no
there is one specific state
that's quote
destroying the country
for the sake of its own
interests
Lebanon
and it's not Iran
but based
because Lebanon
has a US
Saudi installed
puppet
which they do
instead of an actual
president
we're not allowed
to hear who
that is
now this starts
with an interview
with CNN here
and the president of
Lebanon goes on
to reference Iran
to start the conversation
but then goes on
to make a statement
that I and I agree
I get the sense
that he's almost
trying to put out
the statement
that this is
what they're doing
either way
Iran is not doing
what they're claiming
they're not
but they're not bombing
all the locations
that they're said
it's important
to understand that
so what he's saying
here seems to reference
what Israel is doing
in Lebanon
that's interesting to think
about
because what he's
not talking about
what he's saying
is Iran's doing this
and we're fighting Iran
but then goes on
to make a statement
about all the things
happening in Lebanon
but Iran is not bombing
all over Lebanon
so you'll see
what I mean
now listen to this
and I'll reference
again at the end
would you say
to the Iranians
and the patrons
of Hezbollah
we seek
good relationship
with Iran
based on
a mutual respect
non-interference
but you remember
Lebanon
is a sovereign state
it has a sovereign government
you want to talk to us
you're most welcome
it's not true
by the way
neither is Iraq
neither is Syria
and any places
where they've literally
done a regime change
and put someone in power
for their own interests
not in Honduras
not anything
not in El Salvador
right
it's just not the case
that's not the point though
it's what he says next
but you know
you know not interfere
if you're ready to help us
you're most welcome
but you're not allowed
to interfere
into the internal affairs
there is a huge difference
between helping us
or interfering
into our internal affairs
our interests
maybe do not coincide
with your interests
the people of Lebanon
are paying the price
the people of Lebanon
are being killed
their houses
or homes
they are being destroyed
to serve your interests
so
so who's doing that
I mean at the very least
you have to argue that
he's saying that
Iran being there
is why Israel's murdering our people
Iran's not bombing
civilian homes in Lebanon
so you
there's no way to misunderstand that
I found that really interesting
I think he's
even though he frames this as Iran
I think he's going to get
punished for this by Israel
either way
he's simply saying
it's like the whole point
about like
stop hitting yourself
kind of thing
with you know
there you're
somehow saying
it's Iran's fault
that Israel's bombing
civilians in Lebanon
how does that even possibly
make sense
are being destroyed
to serve
Lebanon are being killed
their houses
or homes
they are being destroyed
to serve your interests
not to serve the
interests of the country
it's about time
to realize this reality
you're not allowed
to interfere
into our internal affairs
other countries
are trying to help us
but you are not trying
to help us
you are destroying the country
for the sake
of your own interest
well
well I mean
obviously it's being taken
as he's talking about
Iran
because how he starts
but why
why
why it made an interesting
point
you know
he's simply saying
there's only one country
that's
it's not Iran
I mean you could argue
Hezbollah is doing that
in a different sense
that's not Iran
despite what they say
but even Hezbollah
is not bombing
civilian homes
in Lebanon
so there's only
he's basically framing
what Israel's doing
in Lebanon
but then saying
what they got to
stuff
I find that to be
very clear
personally
like that there's
there's almost like
a cry for help
if you will
I mean
right now
you must know
Lebanese people
do not see them
as
like
by and large
I'm not going to
speak for every person
in Lebanon
but from what I understand
it's a pretty
understood thing
just like it
isn't Iraq
or anywhere else
that that's not
really representative
of you
that's an outside force
that is taking
control of your government
Americans are starting
to see the same thing
here
she
this is the same person
Courtney
I forgot
what is it
Bunaw images
war correspondent
she says
I just heard
the BBC radio
say that the Israeli
army was attacking
Hezbollah
targets
yesterday
and they platform
someone
belowviating
about how Iran
is occupying
Lebanon
as a frontline
journalist on the ground
for the last
18 months
she says
I would like to
reiterate
I have not seen
any Iranian
occupation bases
in Lebanon
I have not seen
any children killed
here by the Iranian
bombs
I haven't seen
the IRGC
massacring
entire families
on a daily basis
the IRGC has
not shot at me
or killed dozens
of my colleagues
in targeting attacks
Iran
has not been systematically
murdering healthcare workers
over 130
in Lebanon alone
Israel
has violently
invaded and occupied Lebanon
the flag flying over the base
it all came as an Israeli flag
not an Iranian flag
picture below
it's not hard to understand this guys
the Lebanese ministry of health
yesterday reported that
3,613 civilians have been killed
11,000 have been wounded
by Israeli attacks
since March 13th
important to understand that
right
so here
and just with the point of being
it's actually Iran
that's occupying them
babies
not true
and to further add
here's Ben Gavir
who just said
bomb the suburb
that's how you make them suffer
here's what he just said
Israeli minister calls
for the kidnapping
of Lebanese women and children
to break their morale
Israeli national security minister
Ben Gavir
urged the political security cabinet
to abduct and imprison
Lebanese women and children
as a psychological warfare tactic
guys
they understand this
it's not some fringe thing
it's him not being afraid
to be what they all are doing
behind the scenes
when it comes to the
dark parts of Zionism
that's not to say everybody's
of the same mind
there's been Zionists in this
cabinet that have pushed back
on some of the harder things
but still are okay
with killing Palestinians
you have to understand that
this is if you go back to the
history
you go back to the Lehi
and Ergun
and understand what these pins
they still give today represent
they proudly point to the
these dark things they did
that's not a secret guys
and I've gone over this
extensively
the guy they had going around
in the beginning
that was speaking to IDF
was saying go out there
and kill the women and children
it was all on record
so here
he's openly saying
go get them and make them suffer
that's what you can understand
is actually one of their tactics
whether it's mowing the lawn
or any different things they do
that's what their game is
and so he just doesn't
he's not afraid to say it
and many of them are getting mad
because he's making that very obvious
now it says
during a high level
ministerial meeting
of reviewing expanded
military calculations
Ben Kabir demanded
to tell him abandoned
conventional strategy
and explicitly target
social and familial core
of Lebanese resistance network
I argue that's already
what they do quite frankly
but as Zachary Foster
who has a PhD
in Palestinian history
from Princeton says
steal Erwin and children
is the new Zionism
you can't make this up anymore
now
to finish
I guess beside these last few
points about Gaza
Rami Abdul
the assistant professor of law
and finance
chairman of the
Euromed Human Rights Group
says in Gaza
Israel burned both people
and land
with white phosphorus
while much of the world
looked away
during the day
in broad daylight
so you can't argue it's a signal
you can't argue it's
it's illegal
now
it's used on people
which melt their skin off
but it's also used
in agricultural areas
because it makes the land
almost impossible
to continue to use
so he says
today
the same scenes
are unfolding in Lebanon
surprise surprise
before the eyes of the world
yet meaningful action
remains absent
videos collected
by the New York Times
show how the Israeli military
deployed a munition
that can be extremely harmful
over populated areas
oh you mean
white phosphorus
I guess you forgot
how that word goes
New York Times
either way
if
let's just even pretend
that you don't
you don't believe this
well
it doesn't matter
because it's been documented
for decades
going back a long way
Israel does this
the US government does this
in fact they often
rationalized it
even depleted uranium munitions
because the others guys
did so
or whatever
half the time it's not even true
but then that makes you just
as terroristic
as the group you claim
you're fighting doesn't it
January 2009
Amnesty International
Israel occupied
Palestinian territories
Israel's use of
white phosphorus
against Gaza civilians
quote
clear
and undeniable
oh yeah
nothing happened
because that's the world
we're in right now
Rain of Fire 2009
Israel's unlawful use
of white phosphorus in Gaza
yeah nothing happened
here is Beth Selim
the Israeli human rights
group
calls for a Gaza white
phosphorus pro
why
because they're being caught
using white phosphorus
October 12th
2023
totally didn't start
on October 7th
white phosphorus
used in Gaza
and Lebanon
used in populated areas
posed grave risks to civilians
I mean because these are
photographed
over populated
civilian areas
like Beirut
here is October 12th
different story
used again
Israel appears to use
white phosphorus in Gaza
2023
here is October 31st
that's three examples
and it's more than that
by the way
just in October
post-October 7th
evidence of Israeli's
unlawful use of
white phosphorus
in southern Lebanon
realize
we're talking about
like post-October 7th
but in Lebanon
that shouldn't be shocking
anybody paying attention
but for those who somehow
still think it's separate
it's not
and this is a show
we did on November 3rd
2023
which discussed
Israel's use of white phosphorus
on a UN school
wasn't even the first time
by the way
here is a
Washington Post article
from December 11th 2023
Israel used
US-supplied white phosphorus
in Lebanon attack
not the same one
it's happened more than one
surprise surprise
here is even the times of Israel
from June 5th 2024
tons of examples
in between that by the way
Israel using white phosphorus
on residential buildings
in Lebanon
says the human rights watch
over
you just can't stop it guys
it's all I mean
we can
I shouldn't say it like that
I mean the sense that
I didn't even see the right words
you just can't
what they're doing
is in your face
they want you to see it
I argue
because at the end of the day
it's about some sort of
you know
the point is
knowing they can do this
knowing
like this is my point
about Israel coming back
and showing you
and yelling the thing
that they know
some of us will see
that contradicts
what the propaganda says in the U.S.
they understand that
there's they know
some of us will see it
and why would that be
does that seem to like
let the cat of the bag
well there's a level of this
that's about demonstrating
the control over you
it's every day
if we can't see that
by now
where we can have examples
of them raping people
in the prisons
and of bombing
everything
starvation
torture
everything
killing their own people
as they come
with their hands up
going please don't shoot me
and they shoot
three IDF members
because they were taken
I mean
or rather
excuse me
not IDF members
well technically
previously
but Jewish people
that were taken by
Hamas
see if that
oh there it is right there
in case you don't remember
what this topic is
hostages
shot by IDF
who put SOS
written in food
on a blanket
I just can't get past
how obvious all of this is
these were Jewish members
that were taken from Israel
who were kidnapped
or I guess in this case
I believe they were
all IDF members
so they were
you know
prisoners of war
either way
they were
either let out
or got out
and they went out there
we're speaking in Hebrew
going we're hostages
don't shoot us
they killed one of them
right then
two of them ran behind the
corner
and they were yelling
please don't shoot us
where and they came out
and they shot
both of them too
guys it's
even saying it out loud
it seems like it's
easily identifiable
it's written in this
BBC article
and plenty of others
hostages were shot by IDF
put an SOS sign
written with leftover food
the idea that they literally
waited it was like minutes
they were waiting going
please come back out
and then murdered them
that's what Hannibal
directed looks like
either way
the larger point guys
is it's in your face
it always has been
and you know that
but so does everybody else
and it doesn't stop
you can't miss that
crop site news
Israel has closed all crossings
into Gaza
and halted the entry
of humanitarian aid
following Iran's
retaliatory strikes on Israel
oh so they stop bombing Iran
but they just choose
to start arbitrarily
suffocating and starving
and torturing
and raping the Palestinians
because why not
yes that's what Israel does
Israel has imposed
a similar blanket closures
during previous periods
of regional escalation
including immediately
after the outbreak of war
in late February
well as we just heard
and as why I was pointing to it
they made it clear
that this was included
at least I thought it was clear
so here we are again
where they say
well you can't bomb Gaza
you can't starve Gaza
just like you can't bomb Lebanon
and they're going to make this
another dynamic
where they have to debate it
and it's going to continue
I'm not saying I hope that
or I think
but and that's what will happen
if that's the way that goes
so Ryan Grim adds
in the same breath
Israel says it's unfair for Iran
to defend Hezbollah
because those are different conflicts
and then takes out its anger
on humanitarian orgs
delivering aid to Gaza
that's what terrorism looks like
now a larger report
you might have seen
Israel has killed 978 Palestinians
and launched more than 1,400 air strikes
in Gaza
since the ceasefire started
super we even have to say that out loud
Israeli forces have carried out
at least 3,189 ceasefire violations
across Gaza
since they agreed
to supposedly have a ceasefire
that's how that's just
it's insane guys
everyone knows that
because it's not secret
but it's not a violation
because it's a fragile ceasefire
apparently that Trump says
means they can fire
but not Gaza
not Palestinians
but Israel could bomb and stuff
and it's still a fragile ceasefire
because that's the place
in the world we're in apparently
no that's just dumb guys
Sarah Abdallah points out
that Israel settlers
are now currently burning
Taipei and occupied Palestine
right now
the village has stood
for a thousand years
a place where Jesus once walked
home to the oldest
living Christian community
in the world
and not a peep
from western mainstream media
not a peep from the
Benny Johnson's of the world
who's screened about
why they're defending
the Christian world
and then ignore
when Christianity gets
attacked by Israel
it's not about one religion
of the other
I'm just highlighting
the hypocrisy of these
fake people
the truth guys
is about defending anybody
who's being oppressed
and attacked
and raped and tortured
and everything else
we're dealing with
you should have the
humanity in you
to stand up for anybody
that's suffering like that
on the end of the day guys
it's it's never been
more clear
so I'll leave it there for today
thank you for tuning in
get it out there
get this in front of people
have these conversations
around the dinner table
with your friends
just get it out there
I know it can be uncomfortable
but the point is
that if you care
I mean it's your choice obviously
but if you want to do that
and you care about the information
find the time to talk about people you care
or with people you care about
it matters
more than ever
I argue
but thank you for tuning in guys
thank you for the support
I love you all
as always
question everything
come to your own conclusions
stay vigilant