It's hard to see what more you could get at this point. As I say, you walk away and a critic
could say, well, yes, we know you're physically capable of dropping bombs. Nobody needed that
demonstration. You could do that and that could harm the conventional capabilities of Iran,
but you have not installed a regime that you could be assured would never conceivably
have a nuclear weapon. It's still quite conceivable. You have an even more hostile regime now. So it's
hard to walk away from that and say, we're better off than we were before. And not to mention,
by all accounts other than Whitcov and Kushner, it seems to me by all accounts, if you're
concerned about nuclear weapons in the possession of Iran, there was a pretty good deal developing
on the table, such that the Omani representative who was helping facilitate the talks went and
talked to JD Vance, try to explain to him what was going on, that it looked like it was a genuine
breakthrough. You can say a lot of things about Iran. Oh, well, they can't be trusted to keep this
or that. But really, which is the side that can't be trusted?