Liberals hate ICE because they think it's about border policy.
It's not why I hate ICE.
I hate ICE because while we were all arguing about politics,
they were importing the software from Gaza's genocide.
Talking about a company called Paragon Solutions,
they make a spyware called Graphite
that was used to track and target Palestinians in real time.
They took that exact same technology, rebranded it as Immigration OS,
and then sold it to ICE to use on us.
This is no longer about stopping illegal immigrants.
This is about creating a digital prison for every American citizen.
They're using the same digital twin technology
that mapped every single person, car, and building in Gaza
to create a live real-time map of your neighborhood,
your phone, your car, you.
The goal has never been about security.
The goal is total control.
And this is the foundational system for the New World Order.
It's the B system everyone talks about,
but it's not a prophecy.
It's a product.
It's already here.
They tested it on Gaza.
They saw how perfectly the AI could automate targeting,
how it could remove human conscience from the equation,
and just follow the code.
They saw that it worked.
Now they're rolling it out on us.
So don't talk to me about left or right.
It's bullshit.
This is about a system of technological control
that's so vast, so complete,
that it makes all of our political opinions completely irrelevant.
So while we're fighting over bullshit and politics,
they've brought the AI that they built for war back to us.
It starts with a simple question
and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here,
we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours
breaks free from our last,
we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Tuesday, March 24th, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Quite a bit to get to today.
Plenty more to get to or last the week
for those that didn't catch yesterday's show.
Planted to go full week today,
all the way until the end of the week.
If we can make that happen, that's the plan.
Lots to catch up on, consecutive conversations.
And so really today, I want to make sure we continue
to follow up on, as the title highlighted,
the conversation of the alleged negotiator
that Trump is talking to.
I actually find this story to be more important
than many may feel that it is.
It's not just about a lie in my opinion.
I think this potentially ties into a lot of other,
you know, the way that I see this being played.
This is based on my opinion and the way I see this,
you know, based on the facts,
rather of what we're seeing,
what we can prove, but the fact is,
nobody out there truly knows all the ins and outs
of everybody's intentions and what's going on.
So with what we can prove,
the way I think this is leaning,
I think that this is an important point
of where we're now seeing whether or not
this is something that is,
like the conversation around whether Trump
is being played, for example.
And there's an interesting conversation
being had about that right now.
I actually invited Dan Cohen on just today,
so see if he gets back and we're all busy,
but ultimately to discuss the point
about whether or not Trump is controlled by Israel,
whether he is being played
or whether he wants to go after Iran.
And my point was, I mean,
I see it clearly somewhere in the middle.
I think Trump clearly was aggressive,
like moment after he got elected,
he turned to say, Iran, Iran, and pointed to,
and Vance and all the rest,
they started really hyping the idea of Iran,
even though the team didn't want that.
And so, but then we get to this point,
and it's, so my point is,
it's clear that Trump wanted that
or at least claim to, but then we get into it,
of course, and there's parts that seem
that Israel was playing just the U.S. government.
And I think that Trump maybe, it's all hypothesis,
but the point is there is a level, I believe,
my opinion that Trump is the U.S. government,
rather is being manipulated
around a lot of different war fronts.
And that's not just like a ploy
of making him think something's happened when it's not,
but coercion, blackmail,
all sorts of stuff that I believe is happening.
So both of those things exist in this conversation,
in my opinion.
So I think it needs to be that kind of nuanced perspective,
that it's not all one or all the other.
I think that's really important for that
and a lot of other conversations
that have Israel as a part of it,
and really others as well,
but as it pertains to today's conversation.
And I made the image today, as you might have seen.
And what's funny is that there,
you tend to get a framing,
especially by people who decide to pretend
that nothing about Israel is ever true
that we're talking about,
that, you know, you look at the titles,
look at things,
and just assume based on what you're pointing to,
though, here we go again, they're talking about Israel.
It's really interesting to me,
one, the point is obviously,
that the image today was meant to insinuate
that Trump is talking to somebody other
than somebody in Iran,
meant to just be funny.
I obviously don't think it's literally Netanyahu,
but who knows.
The point though,
is that it's interesting to me.
Very, plenty of people,
as plenty of people that you guys,
that we've overlapped with,
people that we've talked to,
worked with,
there's plenty of things going on today
where there's a lot of people you guys can see.
Hopefully if you've been paying attention
the entire time that any of us have been doing this
and watched the evolution
of conversations and opinions,
and watched when suddenly October 7th forward,
a lot of people had a very different turn.
And I don't mean like dishonestly necessarily,
I think there's part of that within all of this,
but ultimately that there is an obvious change.
Like just to jump to the main point,
is it, how is it possible today
that anybody,
honest, objective, even remotely,
can stand back and act like people
are obsessed with Israel?
Now of course there are,
that does exist,
there are people obsessed with any number of things.
Obviously that's been there,
it's still there today.
Whether Israel or Jews or Muslims or whatever else.
Funny how both those two groups point to each other,
as always there's the binary.
But the point though is that with where we're at today,
with Israel verbally, proudly saying what they're doing
and telling you Zionism is a major part of this,
our own government telling the military
it's a religious war for Armageddon.
And then somebody turns and say,
would we criticize Israel,
not Jewish people,
but Israel's government that that's somehow
incorrect or that we're over focused
or we just can't stop talking about Israel,
it's actually wild to me.
And I get in some cases that I feel that some of these people
just don't see it,
which I don't even know how that's possible.
That the other option is that this is a choice
for whatever reason.
We've talked about a lot of the funding discussions,
but it's important that we stand back
and realize whatever the motivation,
that this is not something
that is inappropriate to be discussing,
any number of these things.
Whether or not Israel is influencing the government
is the same as saying
whether or not China is influencing the government.
Why one is decidedly inappropriate or racist
or you're only, you know, you get the point.
It doesn't make sense,
especially when there's a mountain of facts
to back up what we're talking about.
But see the reason this is important,
the general sense of this
is because what we're going to get into today,
like plenty of the stuff we've been discussing
extensively, well before October 7th
and a lot more since then for obvious reasons,
is the conversation of whether
multitude of factors of driving what they're
with the Iran war,
but whether Israel is influencing
the US government's direction.
And that is a very important part of the conversation.
But see, like all that I just said
was to build to the point that
we're now going okay, Israel is doing this.
And people go, oh, here we go again.
Just the very same,
you know, I related to something similarly
when I see, you know, people that in the Republican
are rather just partisan conversation,
who rightly so picked up
on all the ridiculousness of the woke direction
and the absurdities of it
and the dangerous parts of it.
And it just been a psychological operation
that a lot of it was.
But then, and, you know,
clearly there were issues there,
but then kind of went way too far,
sort of like with COVID-19
where people like stopped washing their hands
because, well, that's everything's wrong.
Well, no, there was a balance here
that a lot of people in that point
started ultimately feeling like, oh, you know,
you watch a TV show
and there's a black person that walks out
and they go, oh, here we go.
It's like, well, wait a minute though,
that is real.
And there are, but yes, there is overcompensation.
So we have to be careful of those kind of traps,
those mental traps that create the situation
where we otherwise,
things that we'd otherwise absorb and discuss
and talk about, we deflect, we push away
because I've been told
that that's not supposed to be the thing or whatever.
Question everything.
Consider all possibilities.
So today, what we're going to get into
obviously is the wrong negotiating point,
but we're going to start with some important stuff
that I think is not getting as much attention as it deserves.
One is the interesting thing
that I'm sure you guys have seen
from Elon's court case.
And we all should be aware
that there is political manipulation,
there is political persecution.
I myself have dealt with lawfare,
but we should also consider
whether that's not the case, 50-50, equal,
not just what side seems to make the most sense.
And so we'll go into what I think
is very, very valid, are very valid allegations
and then the consideration
of whether there might have been
an unfair situation from where to place.
And then talk about a more important conversation
around the SEC and the SEC enforcement,
the, what was it again?
It was the enforcement chief,
the one that recently resigned.
In protest, well, I guess technically just resigned,
but what's now coming out
is that this person was very frustrated
in the effort to investigate
specifically businesses
that swirled around Trump's family and Elon Musk.
One of them being World Liberty Financial,
who is largely funded back
by a person who was accused
of massive fraud connected to Elon Musk.
Funny how it all works together.
And of course it could all be
a bunch of political lies.
But with all that we see
and all that we can prove,
I'm flatly,
reality is it does not appear to be at all
because these people are breaking the law
everywhere I can look,
but we should consider every time
whether there is more of a lie
around these things or not.
But the point being
is that this is an indication
of where this country is going,
where our government is driving us
left and right,
and that it's just lawless.
And then whether or not that itself
is being driven by something else.
But we'll also talk about
some points of round partisanship
that I think is just important not to miss,
but a part about Palantir
and the AI military fusion.
And we've been calling this out
for a very long time.
And remember the people who told you
not to care about this
and how continually
all encompassing this story
it's not just war,
it's not just surveillance,
it's not just control,
it's the whole damn thing.
Guys, we need to understand
how serious this is
and it's not even just Palantir,
but it's one of the points
that makes this easy to see.
And then how they're right now
involved in a multi-state,
multi-national state,
nation, if I can speak correctly,
genocide.
Using their AI to commit genocide
in real time,
while they're now using this
to try the core AI of our military.
And a lot of other points
we'll get to around Iran
that I didn't mention,
but points that are relevant
to larger conversation.
So I want to actually start
by pointing out
something that Elton Morrow
sent me.
I haven't got a chance
to go through it all,
but I'm going to,
after this,
try to set up an interview with her,
she has been dealing
with something on her farm.
So if you remember, correct,
if you remember,
she moved to a farm,
put her mouth where her mouth is,
like a lot of us are trying to do.
And now is dealing
with an issue,
this is kind of a really important
point of bringing all of this
together.
We'll get into this
when I talk to her.
Now it's coming to her.
Now they're trying to build
a 5G massive tower
right on her neighbor's property.
And apparently,
the ins and outs of it,
there's not only
is she going through the science
and showing,
they're basically claiming
it's going to have no effect
on anything.
And you can literally prove
that the opposite
does not do that justice.
That is a flat out lie
and they just hide
from the information.
And this is happening
under the Maha direction,
right?
It's rolling out
and it's an important story
that she's trying to fight.
So I wanted to help
give her attention for that.
Make sure you check it out.
It'll be in the show notes
at the top
and I'll try to get her
on to talk about this.
But just think about that.
You know, you're moving away
to try to get away
and this is going to
change the face of the earth
if we allow this to continue.
And it shouldn't matter
that some of us don't want that.
In a world where we pretend
that we have influence
over our government,
it certainly should.
Now in regard to fraud,
you might have seen this.
This is a case,
Courthouse News reported
and plenty of others.
San Francisco jury finds
Elon Musk defrauded
Twitter investors
during $44 billion takeover.
Now, it's worth reading.
We've talked about this already.
It largely stems around
the way he was acting
during the sale,
which was pretty crazy
if you want to be honest about it.
He was, you know,
the argument
and now the court has found
that they're correct
was that he was lying
and manipulating
and basically tried to make
an allegation
which is interesting, by the way,
about bots on Twitter.
And I'm of the mind
that it was kind of
a misrepresentation.
We know there are bots
that are just overwhelmingly
on this platform,
but we, I hope we can all
put partisanship aside
and very clearly acknowledge
this platform is
way worse than it's ever been.
Aggressively worse,
whether it's bots, suppression,
and some of it's a little bit
more soft-handed
and manipulative,
but it's way worse.
Aside from the team sport
politics screamers
that have a very, very clear agenda.
The point though
is that they,
the argument is
he misrepresented the situation
and then used that
to lower the price
and then even then
they had to like
sue him to get him to buy it.
It was very weird
the way this all went down.
The overall story,
if you want to read through it,
is that he manipulated the process
they found he defrauded them.
I think that's important, guys.
And if you're just going to dismiss
this because you're in Elon's side,
well, you're not an honest person.
That may well be the case.
They well,
they might have just
completely lied about him
and trapped it,
but then find the evidence of that.
Make the case.
If you read through this
and you remember how this went down,
the only dispute is whether he,
like this will go forward.
He's claiming he's going to dispute it.
So we'll talk about it when it happens.
But the idea that people choose the side
before they even know the facts
is what partisanship does.
Now, this is actually the smaller part to me.
I'm very,
I love the mind that this is literally
how Elon Musk and Trump, by the way,
does business.
I think they praise this kind of manipulation.
I mean, I don't even say I think
you can read their books.
You can look at their statements online.
They praise this kind of manipulation
whether you think this happened or not.
In this case, you can look,
or rather in other cases,
you can look at Elon's practices about,
I mean, look at,
I mean, damn your Cybertruck
or even the Tesla or his space hatch rockets.
And you realize you can clearly look back
and prove that he,
and I'm going to be,
I can,
I will be the first person to promote
in certain circumstances
the whole fake it till you make it business mentality.
Because sometimes you just got to go for it, right?
But he does this in a way
that's sort of defrauding people
where he goes,
this thing's perfect and great and ready.
And you find out later,
it was like bare bones patched together
and they weren't even close,
but got funding because they claimed it was
and stuff like that.
Who, maybe you think that's the way it should work.
I don't.
I think that's bad practice.
I think that's dishonesty.
I think that's the kind of thing
we should all generally argue is,
what's the best word for it?
Disrespectful.
I get these things,
it's funny that even dishonesty
from people like Stephen Miller is weak.
Oh, you're just a weak person
for caring about people.
Like that's the way they frame this today,
that caring whether somebody has integrity
and is honest and practices things with morals.
And that's just all weak Democrat stuff,
apparently.
Not according to most of humanity,
by the way,
in case we haven't gotten there yet,
but SEC announces Enforcement Division
Director Judge Margaret A. Ryan
has resigned from the agency.
Now, this is important.
Now, this is just the article from the SEC
where it basically goes,
everything's great.
We're moving forward and we're perfect,
you know, as usual.
But Reuters had some different information to add to this,
but I want to include it
in case you wanted to type through what they said.
US SEC's ex enforcement chief
clashed with bosses over Trump cases
before leaving.
And it says,
the US Securities and Exchange Commission's
top enforcement official,
who left abruptly last week,
has clashed with agency leaders
over the direction of its enforcement program,
including the handling of cases
with ties to Donald Trump and his family,
according to three people
familiar with the matter.
SEC Enforcement Division Director Margaret Ryan
resigned last Monday,
which by the way,
let's look back just over the last year
plus and look at how many people,
just like the last time,
are fleeing and fired and moving on.
This is not normal.
And it's actually even specifically more intense
with Trump's in power.
I'm not even sure exactly why that is,
other than I think the obvious points.
Because I mean, I've seen something similar,
but it's every time.
His last administration was the same.
People get fired,
they're the best person in the world,
and then they're fired or people leave
because they recognize,
in this case, recognize corruption,
recognize they're being forced
or told to do things
that compromise their principles.
Who cares, right?
Because the team is what
plenty of people are actually pushing.
I don't believe that's even
what most Republicans think.
Or Democrats.
Or any partisans.
The team's sport players
are these cartoonish versions
of what they want people
to think the situation is like.
I'm convinced of that today.
So in this case,
the point I was making is that,
you know, you can see the examples
of many other people in positions
that have done the same thing.
Or for example,
the person who quit claiming
that Israel was literally,
remember, I'll just play it real quick.
This is actually a relevant time
to play this clip,
even though he played it many times before.
This is from the State Department.
This guy resigned.
Why?
Because they let Israel
cover up the rape of a child.
We have to condemn the atrocities
that happen every day
to Palestinians in the West Bank.
You mentioned sexual violence.
I was part of the human rights
vetting process
for arms going to Israel.
And a charity
called Defensive Children
International Palestine
drew our attention
at the State Department
to the sexual assault,
actually the rape
of a 13-year-old boy
that occurred in an Israeli prison
in the Mosque of Bia in Jerusalem.
We examined these allegations.
We believe they were credible.
We put them to the government of Israel.
And do you know what happened the next day?
The IDF went into the DCIP offices
and removed all their computers
and declared them a terrorist entity.
I think it is vital
that atrocities not happen to anyone,
not sexual violations,
not any kind of gross violation
of human rights.
We are looking at a situation
where there is so much de-humanification.
Very clear.
Right?
And so that's one of many examples
of people in the US government
that resign in protest
and many, many more than usual
over the last so many years,
Biden and Trump specifically.
I think we know why
if we're paying attention.
We're watching this very clear,
rapid dissolving
of what we ever,
at least what we pretend we are
and I believe in many cases
what we have been.
So continuing.
Her resignation email
seen by Reuters
this first time they're reporting
this inside part of it
did not say why she was leaving.
Now, Ryan declined to comment
when reached by phone.
Two of the people said
Ryan wanted to be more aggressive
in pursuing charges for fraud
and other misconduct,
including cases that touch
the president's circle.
But faced resistance from SEC chair,
Paul Atkins, insider, right?
This is my point.
This is the whole idea
of having the team sport players.
You know, like the ridiculous
Mark Wayne person
we're going to talk about a second
just briefly
because it's not even worth a time,
but amazing squeaks by eight to seven.
Rand Paul did vote no.
I'm glad to see that
since he was pushing back so much.
But I'm plenty points to make on that.
But the idea being, right,
that they bring people in
that are team players
in positions that are supposed to be,
you know, not, you know,
basically in a way adversarial
to the executive,
like an investigatory position.
You know, that's like Bondi
that that person rightly made that point
that you are working for the White House.
That's not how this is supposed to be.
They don't care.
So this is what you're going to get.
And this is a dumber, worse version of Noam,
if you can believe that.
That's how this is going to play out.
But the point is they Atkins,
in this case from the SEC,
is the one that sort of pushed back on this.
And I think because this person
was another tapped person
for this kind of situation.
And this goes left and right.
This is always how this goes.
It's about trying to create a situation
where you can hold the line.
I've just never seen it this clumsy,
this obvious,
and this all encompassing
than this administration.
I really think that's more of an indictment
of the continual declapse of our government
than just Trump himself.
But it continues to say,
and other top Republican political appointees
said the same.
White House spokespeople
did not immediately respond for comment, as usual.
One case that sparked tension
involved cryptocurrency entrepreneur Justin Sun.
A major backer of the Trump family's
World Liberty financial venture,
which is just a textbook pumping dump.
But if we're going to be honest about it
and clearly has continued to be used
in a lot of very manipulative ways behind the scenes.
And so this person, Sun,
is also connected to Elon Musk.
And it says in another involved,
Tesla boss Elon Musk,
a big donor to Trump's campaign
who briefly served as a president's
special advisor,
the two people said.
Now, those are separate things, by the way.
The other involved, Elon Musk,
a big donor to Trump's campaign.
Those are the separate cases
that some part just interesting.
The point, though,
is that these are things
that were being investigated.
And things, by the way,
that I think are pretty evident,
right? That there was clear,
at the very least,
that there was a lot of criticism
because it was, you know,
the kind of conflicts of interest
we're not used to seeing so brazenly.
The tensions between Ryan and the
top SEC officials,
which have not previously been reported,
were ongoing and shed light
about how this went down.
And the point is that there was a shift
in the way this actually operates.
And this is what I'm seeing everywhere.
A consolidation.
In this case,
under Trump's second administration,
the chair and commissioners
have sought more control.
I mean, it's not hard to understand why.
It's not like that Mr. Person
is on their side
and ultimately just does not tell the line
so they can kick the side
and somebody else comes into play
and that it tightens the line
and it tightens the line
and eventually get people who realize,
well, either I do what I'm told,
whether or not I agree with it
or I don't, I get removed.
And I sure want the power in the paycheck.
That's the kind of people you get.
Are we not?
Is that not obvious?
I can't wait to let you watch
what we showed this morning of Miller
telling you that this is the example
of a meritocracy.
Some of the dumbest
and most unqualified people
I've ever seen in these positions.
It's just gaslighting, guys.
It's what it is.
That's desperation
when you can see how clear this is.
And it says basically,
under the Trump's second administration,
they sought more control,
revoking enforcement staff authority
to open formal probes
and requiring they seek commissioners' approval.
So all you did was cut them out of the legs
at the knees.
You said, this is her job
to be the enforcement part.
And they basically said,
nope, you have to go through us
to start the investigation.
I mean, that is clearly
about trying to control
what they're investigating.
And why would that be?
Because they're breaking the law.
That's pretty obvious.
And I think in ways that are actually
the US government has always broke the law
my entire life,
whether it's foreign policy or against us.
This is special.
This is specific to just them
enriching themselves,
which again is kind of what we always see.
But this is a special level, guys.
My opinion,
but I think that's pretty what we're all seeing.
And I think that's why this was more focused on.
Now it says, and this is actually really interesting,
in an internal meeting last year,
she criticized defense attorneys,
Ryan's the one who resigned,
including a person named Brad Bondi,
a Paul Hastings partner
who was also Atkins former counselor.
For what she saw as attempts
to go above career staff's heads
on enforcement matters,
two of the sources told them,
approaching top SEC officials
about enforcement cases is,
however, permissible in certain circumstances.
Bondi, who is Attorney General Pam Bondi's brother,
surprise, surprise,
did not respond to Reuters questions
sent by email and text message.
A Paul Hastings spokesperson did not
immediately respond to emails.
Now that may be nothing,
but I just find it a little bit interesting
that Bondi's brother is the one
that happens to be involved
with a case where she's investigating fraud.
When we can see how much other fraud,
you know, oh no,
and it looks like you're shockingly breaking the law
with all these fraud things.
We'll kick you over to a new thing
and pretend like we ignore who you are now.
Nome's not even here anymore.
Let's ignore the fact that she just stole
million dollars from the American people
in two different circumstances
to a company that no one's ever heard of
that doesn't have a name or a location,
but, you know, now she's got a new job,
so shut up.
Guess that's it, guys.
Isn't it interesting how Congress
or Democrats who were told
their adversarial to Trump
that hate him will do anything to bring him down
just don't continue to go after Nome?
Isn't that funny?
Funny how that always works out
every single time, left or right.
I'm sure you're,
I'm laying it on pretty thick.
I hope you're getting the point.
The idea here, guys, is that it's weird to me
that he's involved,
but that's just an interesting point to a point,
an interesting place to make that point.
But I feel like there's something to that.
Like there's more,
but either way,
the fraud is off the chain in this administration.
Now, it says among the cases
that three of the people familiar
with the tensions said
were a source of frustration for Ryan,
the one who resigned,
was an SEC settlement disclosed this month
to resolve charges
that the Watch Dogs' previous Democratic leadership
brought against Sun,
the one who's involved with World Liberty Financial.
In 2023, the SEC sued the crypto entrepreneur
and three of his companies,
alleging Sun generated more than $31 million
through fraudulent trades.
In a deal negotiated by Brad Bondi
and other lawyers,
one of the Sun's companies
paid $10 million to settle the fraud charges.
Though it did not admit or deny the SEC's findings,
agency dismissed other related charges.
So, aside from all the narrative,
a potentially Sun gave the government $10 million
and the charges went away.
Am I misreading that?
Sure.
This is why I always laugh about this,
like Wells Fargo.
Our government goes,
you broke the law,
gave us a million dollars
and no one goes to jail
and we call that justice.
No, that's a payoff, ladies and gentlemen.
If you jaywalk in certain places,
if you think about how crazy
the application of law is in this case,
if you're rich and famous
and wealthy and influential,
you don't ever really get held accountable.
Poor people go to jail,
rich people get lawyers
or if they even need them.
This is just important to think about.
And by the way,
something I actually didn't say,
which I'm glad I remembered,
which was the whole point of this post
and of Elon Musk's connection to it,
was think about this.
I'm sure you've already made
this connection in your mind, right?
But Elon Musk is being found guilty
of defrauding Twitter investors.
And this, ladies and gentlemen,
is the man leading the effort
to remove fraud in our government.
I mean, it's just insulting
to our intelligence.
Of course, be objective.
Maybe that you think this isn't the case.
Look into it.
I think it's pretty obvious.
But isn't that interesting, right?
So these are the people that are
removing fraud, the criminals.
The most obvious example of criminals
or fraudsters I've ever seen
are the ones removing these things
from our government.
No, no, that's quite the opposite
if you're just not completely blind
to partisanship.
My opinion, of course.
The agency dismissed the other related charges.
So, son, in Biden's administration, guys,
Biden's administration,
at a time when we're being told
this is the Democrats going after everybody,
Trump, because of his last administration, right?
But this is connected to Trump.
And I mean, even right now, the point is,
they still, I mean, it's just,
I want to make sure we understand
there's a thousand ways that they,
I mean, on top of the fact
that we're being told they lie about it
all the time.
So if they're just making things up
to go after him,
why do they continue to ignore
the things that are very provable
and do nothing but go after the ones
that aren't there?
Because it's not supposed to go
anywhere, in my opinion.
Like with Clinton,
like with James Comey,
like with Lattice James,
like with everybody else,
left or right.
Where's Obama?
Why is he in Pelosi in jail?
I'm sure we can piece this together.
He paid $10 million and
Biden's administration let it go,
including all of the very serious
crimes that he was involved in.
Separately, you know, fraud,
I should say, make sure it's clear,
financial crimes.
Separately, March court filings
show that the SEC is in pox with Musk
to settle charges that he waited
too long to disclose in 2022.
Now, this is interestingly
an overlap with the same sort of case.
To settle charges that he waited
too long to disclose in 2022
that he had amassed a large stake
in Twitter,
which he later bought and renamed X.
Now, the point is that
there was all this stuff
he was doing behind the scenes
to very clearly manipulate the situation.
And that's why he just got
ruled guilty for fraud, right?
And so in this case,
this is a part of that
that adds to this story.
So right now, the SEC is working
with him to settle these charges
while he just got found guilty of fraud.
Clearly, this is a weaponized
situation of our government,
left and right.
It's not about left versus right.
It's about the government versus
everything else.
And it's very clear.
I think him taking over Twitter
was part of a larger
actual intelligence operation,
my opinion.
And I think that's why
this was made to be the reality.
That allowed Musk to buy
more shares at artificially low prices.
That's one of the cases.
That's one of the allegations
of the fraud case.
The agency filed the charges
a week before Trump took power
in January last year.
Nothing's happened, though.
Isn't that interesting?
But, but clearly,
she was trying to do things
and she got frustrated and resigned.
Over here, he's getting found guilty
for fraud in a similar case,
but from a state,
from a state,
from, you know,
from a court in San Francisco.
During a March 4th court hearing,
the details of which were first
reported by the Financial Times,
a lawyer for Musk said
those talks were with officials
above the SEC staff working on the case.
That's in the transcript.
So Musk literally admitted
what this story is reporting,
that they were basically being allowed
to go around the enforcement arm
to work with people like Atkins,
who are clearly in line
with Trump's agenda,
and Elon Musk, I argue, got a pass.
Now it says,
while it is common for the agency
to settle litigation out of court,
it has strong cases
against both Sun and Musk,
and a good chance
of winning tougher penalties
in court,
according to security lawyers
who have been tracking
the proceedings,
but nothing's happening.
And she resigned,
I think, in frustration
based on the reality
that clearly
that she's not able to do her job.
I think that's really important,
guys,
and I think this relates
to a much larger situation.
We're just getting
little crack through the door
insights in what's really happening.
I think that's going to become
more important as this goes forward.
Now, in other examples
from, you know,
just partisanship conversation
and just dishonesty and fraud,
this is actually,
I actually think stories like this
that just drift out of the media
because clearly,
the people who tried to,
like, shout you down
from talking about it
don't want you talking about this.
You know, remember the idea
that our government killed
two Americans
in the middle of the street
for literally nothing,
like, they lied about them
in broad daylight
in front of everybody,
the cash and bondy,
all of them,
Noam got up
and blatantly misled you
about what happened
and then got called out for it
in front of court,
in front of Congress
and yet the
Matt Walsh's and Kroker's
all the rest of them
are just still lying to you.
They're still outright telling you
that a radical leftist shot
drummer was the shooter
in any one of these cases,
whether we're talking about Butler,
whether we're talking about,
the point is that
these things have not been fleshed out.
You realize Robinson has not even been,
he hasn't even gone
through court process yet.
For them to claim that
he is the guy,
you could argue,
think that based on the evidence,
the evidence doesn't even
really back that up
and they would be the ones to say that
if the situation was reversed,
but the idea is clearly
that until he's found guilty,
you can't say that
and these so-called journalists
are out there screaming that
and the left part is what kills me
because still to this day,
there is no definitive evidence
that he was one way or the other
and you can ask Grock,
you can look it up,
you can look at the original post,
you can look at what he says online,
it's very clearly subjective.
So when Matt Walsh and others
want to keep saying that,
that's a choice.
They know they're being subjective,
that's their opinion,
they frame it as fact
because they have an agenda.
That can't even be opinion, guys.
That's just the basic reality.
So back to this,
Minnesota is now suing
the Trump administration
why?
To get access to the evidence
in the killing of Alex Pretty
and Renee Good,
both of the American citizens
who were murdered in the street
because they stopped them
because there's never really
been an investigation
from anything other than
whatever the hell
Cash Patel was doing,
probably hanging out
with people on the side.
This is insane to me
because not only is this
a problem that they killed
American citizens,
obviously,
and what ICE is doing,
but that they aggressively
stopped any real investigation.
They weren't able to go to the scene,
they didn't do any evidence,
everybody other than
the executive branch people.
It was just beyond the pale.
You care
if you actually have
integrity and principles,
this should bother
the hell out of you.
Oh, and by the way,
this, you know,
what right now you have
Trump and Peg Seth
trying to frame everything
and doing somehow
some religiously guided thing
while they commit genocide
of murder people
on top of that
telling their own military
that it's the end times
that doing this for Armageddon,
which is so obviously
religious Zionism
that makes me sick.
This is what Trump put out
in Memphis.
Make this one for Jesus,
Trump says
when talking about
the SAVE Act.
Now, I just had to point this
out like as a Christian myself
and I do,
I've been important to me
to not get into the religious
perspectives
when it comes to facts
and reporting facts.
And I'm not going to do that now.
My point though
is that from just speaking
as a Christian
or just really anybody who,
I mean,
obviously doesn't have to be
religious out there.
Just somebody who cares about
principles
or, you know, integrity.
The idea that you're going to
say pass a bill,
a piece of legislation
that plenty of Christians out
there who are left or right
disagree with
because that's the truth.
I'm one of them.
I disagree.
Obviously, I think the SAVE Act
is about digital idea manipulation
as a key pointing out.
You don't need real ID
compliance to get what they
want from this bill.
So they're tricking you guys.
So the point
is that for him to come out
and say, do this for Jesus.
I mean, doesn't that just sound
insulting to you?
That Donald Trump, who,
by the way,
if you care to look barely
is not really religious at all.
He was previously a Democrat.
These people lie to you.
But the point is
they want you to think
there's something
because that's what you want to hear.
But for him to just sit there,
this is what he does.
He thinks, OK,
this we need to pass this, right?
Who are we talking to?
Republicans.
What should I say
to make them want to do this?
Oh, I don't know.
Do it for God.
Go go have fun with your crypto, guys.
It's the same sentiment.
He's saying whatever he thinks
you need to hear
to get the thing done.
Why would you do it for God?
Why would you pass a piece of legislation
that has to do with voter ID for God?
Doesn't that seem petty
and manipulative?
It should because it's disgusting.
Not whether you're religious or not.
It's abuse of what he knows you care about.
For something, by the way,
that is manipulative
and many would argue
associates with the idea of the beast.
This is the mark of the beast.
But who cares, right?
Maybe that should make it
for specifically the religious perspective.
Think a little bit deeper
on what you think
he's trying to convince
you it's about.
On top of that,
here's what Hegceth just actually said.
We negotiate with bombs, he says.
He claims to be a Christian, Ryan writes,
but has zero value for human lives.
This idiot will be the fall guy
for this war.
I happen to agree,
but he is too stupid to see it.
Here's what he said.
Pose with and destroy the enemy
as viciously as possible
from moment one.
And that's why we see ourselves
as part of this negotiation as well.
We negotiate with bombs.
You have a choice
as we loiter over the top of Tehran
as the president talked about,
about your future.
President has made it clear
that you will not have a nuclear weapon.
The War Department agrees
our job is to ensure that.
Right, right.
The thing that they don't
and their evidence shows that
and their own intelligence told them that
and blah, blah, blah, which
everyone with a brain
is already very fully digested.
Doesn't matter though.
I'll just keep lying.
And his point is well taken.
I don't care whether you think
they're terrorists or not.
If you're a Christian,
if you're religious,
if you believe that there's
the sanctity of life,
then you don't just casually discuss
the idea of negotiating with bombs.
That's terrorist speak, guys.
That's who you're looking at.
Because if you've ever really wanted
to stand back and understand
what terrorism looks like,
it's always been right there.
If you truly understand how this works.
But of course,
that might be a little too extreme
for some of the people that are,
you know,
whatever.
I'm going to make a joke about it.
But the idea is that
we need to stop being so,
when there's something like I've talked
about, like the funding of ISIS
and Al Qaeda,
that we can quite literally prove.
Just because other people have yet
to digest that
or refuse to accept that
or like whether it's Zionism
and certain people in the conversation
who just can't seem to come to the
reality
or won't allow themselves
to be honest about it,
we shouldn't have to tap down
tap dance around
their willful ignorance.
We should just be obvious about it.
If we can't see by now
what they have done
our entire lives
and you could even compare that
to what they claim
Iran has always done
and it's night and day.
You could compare it
to what they claim
ISIS has done.
Think about that for a second.
Everything they claim
they've ever done
compared that to what the U.S.
government alone has done
in our lives,
it is un,
there's no parallel.
This is just,
this is why when you really look
at the war up there,
millions upon millions of people
have been killed.
But I digress.
Drive people away
because the facts are too uncomfortable.
The point is,
negotiate with bombs
is not what you would argue
as a Christian perspective.
That has to matter
for people who are claiming
that this is, you know,
whatever, guided by,
especially those people claiming
this is about
some kind of religious war.
Well, you're on the wrong side
if that's the case
and I don't even mean
that you should be on Iran's side
that just that this
is not what you think it is.
And realize Iran's not claiming
they're fighting religious war.
Maybe they think that
but that's not what they're saying.
I'll include this as always
if you want to
read more about the SAVE Act
Now, Thomas Massey also put this out.
There's a lot of these stories
that drift into the background
like as Jason rightly pointed out
the other day
that East Palestine,
you know, no one talks about it anymore.
They're still suffering.
Same with Conyers, Georgia,
by the way,
and all the stories we've covered
matter.
And I'm only doing that
to make a point.
I know you guys care
and I know that
I actually think the majority does
but the point is
that there are people out there
who feign the concern
and can't pretend
to be fighting for you
and out there in the trenches
of the media
who are just aggressively
either lost or dishonest.
He points out,
I believe FBI arrested the wrong person
in the January 6th pipe bomb case.
What we already talked about this,
this is clearly a manipulated story.
Cash Patel
appears to be arresting an innocent person
for, I guess,
to look like he's doing something.
Analysis indicates
stark physical differences
between coal and the hoodie suspect
including the matter of walking,
manner of walking,
body shape, features,
eyesight, shoe size,
neck length,
mannerisms,
but you know,
they got a guy,
hooray, we win.
The point clearly is
that this came out before
the gate was very,
the studies were showing
it was like 96%
matched to somebody
worked for Capitol Police.
And then this comes out.
Now, you could read it more.
We've talked about this already.
Glazed media, Brian Coles,
juniors, physical presence,
posture, mannerisms
are not matched
for FBI's hoodie,
clad, pipe, arm, suspect.
March 23rd.
And that doesn't matter though.
They're gonna,
this guy is being taken.
Now, it's important to read this.
I might go through this again
in the show.
I just want to make this a passing point.
But it feels yet again
like they're taking advantage of somebody.
And usually that'd be
that's somebody with limited capacity.
That's how this tends to go.
That's so disgusting
when you understand what they're doing.
Like they,
like this story, for example,
which I've brought up many times.
And this,
this goes back to the free thought project.
Parents catch FBI and plot
to force mentally ill son
to be a rat wing terrorist.
It's a very real story.
And it's exactly what it sounds like.
Literally caught.
It's just disgusting
how this continues to be the reality.
Now, he also points out
this is about the point
that Trump's administration
is currently like everyone else before him
including his last one
not initiating,
but re-upping, I guess.
I'm missing the term,
I'm missing the term I'm looking for.
But re-upping on the FISA warrants.
Continuing to kick that can down the road.
Even as he points out
the hypocrisy is off the chain.
He said,
I'll continue to support
the valid constitutional position
that Trump,
Jordan and Vance have all expressed strongly
in the past
when they could yell about Democrats being bad.
No FISA re-authorization.
That's the word I was looking for
without warrant requirements.
And guess what they say?
No, we disagree.
We want to be able to spy on you no matter what.
Because bad Democrats or whatever
because I guess that's
people are dumb enough to fall for that.
Go ahead and do the bad illegal thing
as long as you only aim at that guy.
Guess what?
They'll aim at you too
or the next administration will do the same.
And we have to be able to realize that.
But Trump kill FISA.
It was illegally used against me and many others.
And now they're using it against you.
Now, this is not a joke.
That's very clear.
Mike Johnson already said
we're going to reauthorize it.
How in the world can we not be clear about this?
How can you look at them all saying
including two from Trump?
Two of them.
And now they're supporting it
because it's a tool they want to use.
These people are all the same thing.
It's about time we realized that.
Now here is an example of
Kashpatel being told to talk up Trump.
And I think this is important.
And I'll play the next one from the point Miller
or the point with Miller about meritocracy.
But it just, as he writes,
straight up North Korea vibes.
I mean, we know this is what this has turned into.
That's why Mark Wayne is a perfect addition
because he will toe the line
about whatever Trump says,
even if it contradicts what he said 30 seconds ago
because that's who these people are.
So Miller goes off about how great Trump is
because he always does,
even as he's puffing and rolling his eyes
while Trump speaks 30 seconds before that.
And then he turns and goes,
what does he say?
Mr. Kash, let's see if you could top that.
Like literally goes,
go ahead, talk about how great I am
is what Trump does.
Now you can argue with the joke,
but we know it's not
based on how we can see all the engagement
and how these people walk on eggshells
to try to not avoid irritating Trump
even when they're on the right.
Work that President Trump is doing,
not only in Memphis,
not only in Washington, D.C.,
but all over the country,
ultimately, it will save
and is saving tens of thousands
of American lives.
Incorrect.
It is.
I'll use that word again.
What President Trump has done
on border security and public safety
is a national miracle
that will be studied
not only for generations.
Of course it will or not at all.
And that's we'll laugh about this going forward.
But the idea that you're literally trying
to say that his polls,
I mean, that's the same as saying
these shots have saved 10 million lives.
There's no way you could ever even verify that.
You're talking about you,
you've stopped something from happening
and therefore that has saved all these lives.
Maybe.
I mean, the facts are very clear
that they've lied about these numbers from day one.
That's not to say the same
as that we should not, we should,
you know, the idea is
there's a middle ground on all these
that enforce the law.
Of course, if we're forced to live
within the state of society,
but the point is that
that's not what they're doing.
And they're lying about what they want you to think
in order to get small minded people
in a position where they agree
with whatever he screams out.
This is a very dangerous man.
He's probably one of the most alarming people
in this entire administration.
I just realized what he's saying there.
We saved all these lives
with all of our aggressive policies
that killed Americans,
that drove us to war,
that created a police state,
that's created a national surveillance state
that allowed Israel to have access
to all of our personal information.
Yeah, but it's great though,
because Trump's amazing, apparently.
Oh, and by the way,
while double crossing you on every single promise
he made,
even immigration according to core Republicans,
because the numbers aren't even close.
But go ahead, Miller, tell us how great this.
For centuries to come.
Thank you, President Trump.
Thank you, Steve.
So, Cash, see if you can top that.
I don't know.
That's a tough one, Cash.
What a minute.
That is tough.
You know, Mr. President,
you realize how belittling that is?
I mean, that trumps the emperor in the room.
He turned, go, Cash, your turn.
Let's see if you can do better than that.
Joke or not, that means you see Cash
as a child in the room.
You know you have to,
you know you can admit this
if you're not partisan.
That's a demeaning thing to do.
And then Cash goes on and, you know,
you're so great, Trump.
You're the greatest.
That's what they're doing.
It's, it's, it's cringey, guys.
Left or right, up down, it's just disgusting.
It's, it's any of our government doing this
to any of our government.
It's gross.
As I look around,
I don't know.
That's a tough one, Cash.
That is tough.
You know, Mr. President,
as I look around this venue,
I see and I'm reminded again
why we have the greatest warriors
on God's green earth.
The men and women serving in uniform.
The men and women serving and wearing the badge
and law enforcement, our police,
our sheriffs around the state of Tennessee.
I'm reminded that Americans exist
to protect this country day in and day out
and they've done it like we've done it here.
We exist to protect this country?
I mean, I hope you could really
think about that statement.
He's just trying to sound like the rest of them
and of course steps in it like always.
We're not, we don't exist to protect the company.
He means, by the way, the government is what he means.
That's how they see all this.
But even if you think he doesn't,
we don't exist to do anything for that.
The way we believe this is supposed to operate
is we exist to make our own choices,
that we exist to go in the direction
that we want to, including if that means
going somewhere else in the world.
But according to him,
we exist to defend this country.
That is the only, that is only from a mindset
where we serve the power structure,
which apparently a lot of people even believe
is synonymous with the Constitution.
But what we didn't have was you.
We didn't have a commander in chief who backed me out
and they've done it like we've done it here.
But what we didn't have was you.
We didn't have a commander in chief who backed the blue,
who resourced the blue, who funded the military,
who did whatever it takes.
Trump is looking at him.
This isn't, doesn't this make you sick?
I don't care if it was Biden and Blinken.
I mean, it's just weird, guys.
Go ahead, Cash, talk at me
and tell me how great I am.
This is just embarrassing.
Not even just North Korea vibes.
It's just, it's like, it's like, what's funny is,
at least in North Korea, and I shouldn't even say at least,
it's just, it almost, it's almost like it's very clear
that they all know it's just a show.
In the sense of like he's just, you know,
doing it because I'm in power,
whereas this feels more weird and like uncomfortable,
whereas like we're totally not forced,
but I'm going to do it anyway
because I'm such a pandering, you know, that's what it is.
These people are just sidling up next to power
and just in a, I can't think of the right word,
but that's the real important way to see this
is that you're watching the decline of the Zenpire
with people just grabbing for what they can take
and shoving their pockets full of whatever's yours.
To safeguard every single life,
and here in Memphis, Tennessee,
you have put on a show for the world.
You have allowed us to go out there
and capture gangbangers, rapists, murderers, drug dealers.
Yeah, you know, and American citizens who aren't guilty
and innocent people did nothing wrong,
which is by the way, the vast majority
of the things you mentioned there.
But yeah, maybe one rapist and a murderer, too.
I'm sure that's possible.
Sure, that actually happened.
But, you know, it totally matters to me
that what you're doing within that,
even with the rapist and murderer,
is breaking the law to do it.
Doesn't that matter to anybody?
Apparently not.
But you get the point.
Now, here is Miller in that same setting
telling you how, what a meritocracy it is.
Again, in a position literally sitting
next to some of the stupidest people
I've ever seen in politics,
Bondi is right there.
Kashpatel are not Dan anymore, but right there.
They're sitting right down the line.
These people are not qualified for their positions.
That's even, Trump has derided them.
And even people in high level Republican talking,
you know, podcasters and influencers and media
are the ones now saying,
these people better start doing something
that are going to be thrown at the bus.
And he wants to sit there and tell you
that it's the best administration
in the history of our government.
Now, I'm not going to say that,
like, what it means to be better
than another corrupt war mongering corrupt,
you know, war criminal administration.
That's hard to say.
What I do know is these people
are some of the most incompetent, unqualified,
even if they're all criminals too.
That has to matter to me.
And this is just hard to watch.
Nobody could have ever predicted
such an achievement would be possible.
The second thing I want to thank President Trump for
is assembling the greatest national security
and public safety team in American history.
Because President Trump believes
in merit incompetence
and people who get things done.
Did he just say merit incompetence by accident?
Get things done.
So, you look around the table of competence
and people who get in merit incompetence.
Merit incompetence.
Pretty sure that's not the way
you're supposed to say that.
So, maybe he just said what he really thinks
that these people are all a bunch of morons.
And he did it great, Trump.
That's what I think the reality is,
genuinely, that this is being done to us.
This person is obviously, like objectively,
acting in the interest of another agenda.
And I do think there's multiple things
to point out right there.
But the obvious connection is how all of these people,
in regard to Trump's administration,
are outwardly publicly telling you that they're Zionists.
Now, why that suddenly doesn't matter
because I'm racist apparently, is beyond me.
Fine, pretend that I'm racist.
If it allows you to ignore the point.
But Zionism exists, right?
Yep, yeah, we know that.
Okay, now they're telling you this is for Zionism, right?
Yes, okay.
And Zionism, they tell you, represents everything Israel does, right?
Okay.
And then when I go, Zionism is involved.
They go, you're racist.
What now?
Should I run through that again?
Or doesn't that show you the whole point?
It really should.
And so my point is, these people will tell you,
Hegseth, percent, they'll tell you that.
And then we understand that this is being driven
from a religious Zionism point,
which is discussing the end times.
And they just told their military,
this is for Armageddon.
My point again is people out there
who are trying to claim obsessed with this.
How can you possibly make that argument
with what we can prove today?
You got to start making note of these people.
People who get things done.
So you look around the table of who President Trump
chose for these jobs.
You start with Rob or Gatti or Pam or Pete and Cash.
Pam and Cash.
Terry, the whole entire team,
what President Trump put together,
has never been rivaled in history.
That's in history.
Okay, now we went beyond the U.S. government,
never been rivaled in history.
We're going to pretend that there's never been
a grouping of people in politics
that have been better than them,
and more competent, better liars even.
In every possible way, the answer is yes.
A hundred times over.
I mean, you could throw a stone
and hit a grouping of people
to be better than these people right here.
How you get things done.
He chooses people based on their skill,
their competence, their ability,
their determination, their dedication,
and their loyalty.
Yes, their blind loyalty.
That's the one thing he said that's correct.
Blind loyalty to whatever Trump says today
is the agenda, even if that changes by tomorrow.
That's the truth.
Anybody who's not blind can already see that.
And again, in case you're just tuned in,
if you somehow assume that I'm only doing this
because I hate Trump, you're wrong.
Biden was just as ridiculous.
It's only gotten worse,
and it's gotten worse every time.
From Trump to Biden, it got worse.
From Biden to Trump, it's getting worse.
The same thing as you look back.
The point is that it's all the same.
And that is always what throws people for a loop
because they feel like they can make it
about you suddenly being a Democrat
and you just have Trump's range of syndrome.
But then when you make it clear that it's a bigger picture,
that's why people just don't really even call us out anymore.
Not really.
Not the ones that like work.
The reality is that this is difficult to be.
The only argument you get from people like that
or that you are just the other side,
you see it every day.
All the liberals and crying, you're,
you know, you're wrong or whatever.
You have no argument when you start to make it
about the two-party illusion
because they're manipulators guys in many cases anyway.
So on top of that, he's the most meritocracy-based government
and then they confirm Mark Wayne Mullen
literally to lead the Homeland Security Department.
Now, I was going to do this before I had him all lined up
and I ended up just getting into something else
and I don't find this person to be really relevant
other than the fact that he's in a very influential position.
But as I, I think we've acknowledged
he's not the one making the decisions.
So, you know, but who knows?
I think the important part though
is for you at least to see the kind of,
the quality, the caliber of person that we're talking about.
If you could for one second pretend
that this is the most deserving person for this position,
I mean, I just, you're not a serious person,
you know, and this is where we are today.
So that happened, right?
And they did, I think it was eight to seven.
He barely made it through.
So here's a clip of when he genuinely stood up
and tried to fight somebody in Congress.
Which this is my point today.
There are people who proudly tell you
why this is how they, why they want him there.
These are children.
And I'm not saying that because you think, you know,
I, I'm trying to be an adult
and I'm trying to be too serious.
It's about the fact that that's a ridiculous thing to do.
If you really, your response to somebody
is to stand up and literally try to fight them
in front of the entire, in front of the American people.
That means you have no argument.
That means you are an infant and a juvenile person
and very petty and small.
But this is what everybody else
in this government seems to be like.
Or the vast majority of them I would argue.
Watch this guys.
I was, I couldn't believe this is actually what went down.
Now the point is this guy, he's talking to,
apparently they had a little back and forth online.
And so this guy comes into Congress
and Mark, Mark Wayne literally says,
when he begins his discussion,
starts by basically calling him out,
going, oh, you're real tough guy, huh?
Well, now we're here.
What are you going to do?
I'm not making that up.
It's insane.
Like, I think what he wanted was for the guy to,
to back down because we're not dumb enough
to get into fight in Congress.
And then he would pretend that they all see he's to,
he backed down because I'm the strong one.
That's what he was trying to do.
And then he, well, I'll let it play for itself.
I mean, it's just, it's incredible.
And guy, there is probably 17 videos that I could play
of this guy making an utter fool of himself.
Like incorrectly speaking about things,
saying like not being,
speaking with improper grammar,
or just being, just being a dumb person.
And very clearly uneducated
when it comes to what he needs to know
for this position.
I was here in the last time,
him and I kind of had a back and forth.
Appreciate your demeanor today.
It's quite different.
But after you left here,
you got pretty excited about the keyboard.
In fact, you-
About the keyboard.
He treated me one, two, three, four-
He printed these out.
Five times.
And let me read what the last one said.
So just to be clear, by the way,
this has never really nothing to do
with why this guy's here.
So he decides to take taxpayer time
that you guys are funding
to just settle a petty squabble
between somebody he had online
because we live in the era
of social media governance, guys.
These are children.
These are people that are literally...
That's like Trump.
That's like Peg Seth
and caring more about memes
or literally Dan and Cash
being exposed for caring more
about how they would play this back and forth on Twitter
than how they would investigate the crime
they were playing back and forth on Twitter.
That's a real story.
Said, greedy CEO who pretends
like he's self-made.
Sir, I wish you was in the truck with me
when I was building my plumbing company myself
and my wife was running the office
because I sure remember working pretty hard.
Yeah, this is really happening.
We're off-topic
and now he's just airing out
his irritated, petty grievances
about why the guy misrepresented him.
The smallness of this can't be overstated.
We're in long hours.
Pretends like he's self-made.
What a clown.
You are a clown.
Always has been.
Always will be.
Quit the tough guy act
in these Senate hearings.
Now, get this.
He gets called out for the tough guy act
and so his response is to
play out the tough guy act?
You know where to find me?
Any place, any time, cowboy.
Sir, this is a time.
This is a place.
Wow.
You want to run your mouth?
We can be two consenting adults.
We can finish it here.
Okay, that's fine.
Perfect.
You want to do it now?
I'd love to do it right now.
Well, stand your butt up, then.
You stand your butt up.
Oh, hold on.
Oh, stop it.
Look at that part.
Is that your solution every public?
No, no.
Sit down.
Okay.
You know, you're a United States Senator.
Sit down.
Actively.
Oh, okay.
Sit down, please.
All right.
Can I respond, Mr.
You know, just to be clear,
the way I read this is that this guy
played the hell out of Mark Wayne.
Now, or you could argue that he just
responded after this that made it
look that way.
That's possible, too.
But it seems to me that this guy
was trying to get a rise out of him
in order to make him think that was the case
and all he meant, all it'll play
that was just goes, well, I just meant
for us to talk it out.
And so you got Mark Wayne to literally stand up
and actually he was going to fight somebody
in Congress, which ultimately made him
look like a fool.
Hold it.
If we can't, no, I have the mic.
I'm sorry.
This is what he said.
You'll have your time.
Okay.
Can I respond?
Oh, no, you can't.
This is a hearing.
And God knows the American people have
enough of contempt, but Congress,
let's not make it worse.
I don't like drugs and police.
You, I don't like you,
because you just described yourself.
Oh, you know, shorter clip.
You have the mic.
Yeah.
You have time.
All right.
Your statement.
Well, it's probably for the better.
I probably would have ended up watching
more than I wanted to.
But there, so that was just the quick part
where he stands up.
What happens is ultimately it goes on.
Bernie Sanders makes this whole thing about
let's, you know, your, you know, let's,
let's act art, you know, decorum and the whole thing.
And then he literally goes right back to it.
Right after that.
And it goes, you know, and then you tweeted this
and Bernie has to say something like three more times
and he just keeps going.
And then the point is when he basically puts
him to it, he goes, you know,
what would you mean by stand up?
And he goes, well, I thought we could talk
or talk it out.
And then Mark didn't even really know what to say.
You know, and it just, it just really shows
you the kind of like, I just can't believe
we're at a place where I have to explain
why that kind of response, whether you feel
justified or not.
Look, guys, there's plenty of examples
where, whether justified or not,
but in many cases I would argue
you would like to believe it's justified.
I would respond.
The point is we all have moments
where we respond, where people,
where we feel we're insulted or in this
many cases, you know, your, your family
are being threatened or something.
And I would not hesitate for a second
to stand up and defend myself.
I have in the past.
And maybe like what I was kind of
saying there confusingly is I'm sure
there's a case where I might even
emotionally respond inappropriately.
The point is that in a circumstance
like this, one where you know that
that won't really happen, first of all,
that you're fronting because you know
that nobody in this room is going
to let it happen.
It's like holding your friend's arm
in front of you and trying to fight
somebody.
It's clear that you knew that wouldn't
go on.
The point though is that this is not
a respectable thing to do in any
circumstance like this.
Whether adult or not, I would,
I would argue children would know
better than that.
And this is where we're being driven
to the smallest petty lowest common
denominator.
That's alarming to me, guys.
This is the kind of person that is
being shoved in front of us.
This country is being degraded
by that kind of action.
How is that happening?
I don't believe that you're being
voted in these positions.
This country is being destroyed.
My opinion, clearly.
Now, in that very vain thought,
because this is what this very group
of people and the one before it is
bringing into reality because we
realize this has been going on long
before this administration,
Palantir AI helped,
according to Jason Baster,
posted this on the 24th,
Palantir AI helped detect,
prioritize, and strike 1,000-plus
targets in Iran in just the first
24 hours.
And as he rightly points out,
which was the same day where
175 children were killed
when an all-girls school was hit
by a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile,
which they lied about.
Remember that?
Where they lied, and they said,
no, it was not, or Trump said,
well, a lot of people have
Tomahawks, and he was wrong,
by the way.
What he said was wrong.
And the point is, then it came
back around.
U.S. intelligence and even reports
from multiple platforms said,
yep, that was a U.S. missile.
Yep, it looks like it was U.S.
It still could have been Israel,
by the way.
In fact, that's what makes the
most sense to me,
or the idea that what,
remember, the maps that Hegseth
showed.
I highly doubt he would show
that if he realized
that's what that showed.
The map that he showed
are the bombing patterns
put the school right in the red
part of one of their bombings.
We know where this is coming
from.
The intelligence is coming
from Palantir.
It's coming from Israel.
So you could argue they
whoops, you made a mistake,
or you could argue that this
is how this is being engineered.
Both make sense,
but the future of war he
writes is now outsourcing
life and death decisions
to algorithms built by
defense contractors.
There's more he could have
added to that
about what Palantir seems
to be involved in,
what they're very clearly
doing,
but this is just a basic point.
That is what they're doing
at the most benign sense
of the conversation.
We're outsourcing these
actions,
which, by the way,
this is why included these
are already happening
without human engagement.
This is the same point.
We got people trying
to shout this back,
but it's now the reality
is this is Palantir
in working in Israel
with Gaza,
or in the genocide in Gaza.
We'll grab that.
Oh, wait, it was there.
I've shown this plenty of times,
but just so you guys can see it
for the point,
in case you guys didn't realize
that they had created
a strategic partnership
with Israel
in the midst of the genocide.
By the way,
same kind of thing.
Most of the people you'll find
that will tell you
that we're overlooking this
or obsessed with this
will also tell you
there's no genocide happening
and also tell you
that no one's being starved
to death
and also tell you
that Israel
totally didn't get caught
raping people in their prisons,
that they're then praised
on live TV
and then the policy
was actually pointed to,
you know,
they'll tell you
that's all fake news,
apparently,
not a joke,
but a partnership
in the height of the genocide.
And that's what this is,
Hapsora and Lavender.
And if you read these
from the Israeli platform,
972,
they'll tell you
that these people are being
driven to make choices
without engagement,
to trust the AI.
So they claim
human involvement
because somebody's blindly
sitting there pressing
the button every 20 seconds.
And what they tell you
is they're driven
to get the most
in a shorter period of time,
which means they're being driven
to not engage
and think it through
but to trust the AI.
It's what they'll tell you.
So yeah, they'll lie
and say there's human engagement,
but that's not actually what's happening.
And now,
this is where it's heading.
Oh, and I'll include the show
of what we did
about the school,
girl's school,
which is verifiable at this point.
And don't forget
all the Zionists
that tried to pretend
it wasn't Iran
or it was another country
or it was actually in Afghanistan,
whatever lie you absorbed
and it was shared
by all the people
we make fun of every time,
all the sorters
and John Johnson's
they're all
all sharing a variation
of the lie
that we can prove was a lie.
But now it comes here.
Pentagon to adopt
Palantir AI
as core U.S. military system.
Now, this is actually not even new.
It's already essentially
de facto been the reality
as they'll even tell you
in this article
as we've been calling out
long before this administration.
But the point
and Jason himself
Derek and Whitney
and all the rest of us,
the point is
that this is now becoming official.
And that's the that's the main point
is that this is now becoming
the like this is part
of your government.
And if we can prove
which we can
that there's invasive parts
of this part that work
for the interests
of foreign governments
or the reality that this is
I mean, all the points
we've covered
it would take so long
to go over.
In fact, this is probably
one of the best ones
as always.
Derek's article
about the welcome
to the Palantir
World Order
I think it was 2024
now 2025 April
and showing you
that I'm just outlining
where we are now
and even then
half this wasn't happening
and now here's
here we are.
So this is an important article
showing you
what we've already
largely reported.
Palantir's Maven
artificial intelligence system
will now become
an official program of record.
Deputy Secretary of Defense
Steve Feinberg,
of course,
the person who seems
to really run the Pentagon
said in a letter
to Pentagon leaders
a move that locks in
long term use of
Palantir's weapons
targeting technology
across the US military.
Now, we're going to come to a point
in a minute.
I think actually pretty close here.
Oh, no, actually, it's way down here.
Hmm.
Maybe I'll jump to that for a second.
But we're going to come back
to the point about
these clips we often point out
right about
booby trapping devices
all over the world
as Mossad,
ex-Mossad had told us
or the pager attack
and the reality
that we're talking about
the open admission
of Israel
booby trapping technology
they work with.
That alone
should be enough
to be aware weary
of how this overlaps
but then we know
that we have
the examples of these things
overlapping
and we should be worried
about how that plays out.
We're going to come to a story today
about
Russia discovering
a bunch of shoes
that were sent from Ukraine
that had bombs in them
that their soldiers
were going to wear
if they hadn't caught it
and we'll get to the overlap
of Ukraine and Israel
if that makes sense to you.
My point though
is that this is alarming
that this is now something
that is going to be ultimately
the AI will be, you know,
this is not like the
like before you would talk
about military personnel
and then, you know,
whatever information they were using
but this is becoming where AI
is the decision maker.
Yes, they're telling you
that there's people involved
but as we showed you
that's going to become
less and less important
or already being driven out of it.
So the question then is
who is potentially able
to manipulate the AI?
That's already been answered for you.
And it says
in the March 9th letter
to senior Pentagon leaders
and U.S. military commanders
Feinberg said
in betting
Palantir's Maven smart system
would provide war fighters
quote with the latest tools
necessary to detect
deter and dominate
our adversaries in all domains
including at home.
And the point is
as we get into
this is the control grid guys
of course always framed
as the other and the bad guy
and but this is home already
it's already here
ice and the rest of it
if this is the same program
and this is what
Captain of the rest of us
have highlighted
as the building out
of this control grid
and you can disagree with that
but we're here now
this wasn't happening
all these different parts
whether ice or Gotham
these things weren't truly happening
that way
and we're watching this system
click into place
I'm not asking you to blindly trust us
look at the information
but recognize how objectively
clear it is
that these things are happening
I just have to be real about that
otherwise I mean who knows
maybe we'll end up in
where you think it's helped us all
maybe that's the case
I certainly hope so
I just want people to know
what's happening
so we can make decisions
based on the the truth
and not the partisan
just you know deflection
or division
the decision is expected
to go into effect
by the close of the current fiscal year
which ends in September
according to the letter
which it was reviewed by Reuters
and has not been previously reported
MAVEN is a command
and control software platform
that analyzes battlefield data
and identifies targets
it is already
the primary AI operating system
for the U.S. military
which has carried out
thousands of targeted strikes
against Iran
which has been killing civilians
in crazy amounts
that they're basically admitting that
at this point
just doing
just kind of going with the casual argument
of well you know they were in the places
where we were told were military targets
or it's normalizing the idea
that AI decides
and whatever happens is justified
and here we are
they're telling you
as Jason just did
this was used
that was the school they bombed
and so this is now the main primary
yes
designating MAVEN
as a program of record
will streamline its adoption
across all arms of the military
and provide stable long-term funding
great for Palantir by the way
so the reality
is that if we were worried about
like multiple points
whether it's the Palantir point
or just the conversation
of the disconnect
between the executive branch
and the military
doesn't this open that door a little bit further
if we're worried
which we already are seeing
that there are actions being taken
that don't connect with what Trump is doing
that maybe this is another example of that
this is sort of a technological coup
if you will
the memo ordered oversight of MAVEN
will be moved
from the now
and this is actually really alarming to me too
the memo ordered oversight of this program
to be moved from the national geospatial
intelligence agency
to the Pentagon's chief digital artificial office
intelligence office within 30 days
same with the SEC
same with this that's consolidating control
and this is not in the interest of accountability guys
they're just controlling this
and it's tight to the executive branch
that's what they're doing
future contracting with Palantir
will be handled by the army
told you
in its imperative
it is imperative
that we invest now he says
and with focus to deepen the integration
of artificial intelligence across the joint force
and establish AI enabled decision making
as the cornerstone of our strategy
Feinberg wrote
so just certainly wish we all could have been on this a long time ago
Feinberg order
Feinberg's order was a significant win for Palantir
which has landed a growing stream of contracts
with the U.S. government
you know that small thing
that Democrats don't like we were told
including a deal announced last summer
with the U.S. army
worth up to $10 billion
those awards have helped double the company's stock price
in the last year
lifting its market value to nearly $360 billion
Maven can rapidly analyze huge amounts of data
from satellites drones
radars sensors
intelligence reports and use AI
to automatically identify potential threats
or targets
like enemies
military vehicles
buildings and weapon stockpiles
or you know rogue Americans
Palantir says its software does not make
lethal decisions
and humans remain responsible
of course it's not to give perfect targets
Feinberg in fact
that's the token argument
as we can read in their own discussions of these things
not only I mean it comes down to the person using it
and the Israeli government has been driving this
in a use that is
in may it's made to make the
human part of this
irrelevant
that it's just you just go with it
you trust the system
and the system knows
it's like what we said a long time ago
that they told you that this would be making decisions
Eric Schmidt
made this literal point
Whitney and I talked about this
that it will get to a point to where AI is making decisions
that we may find immoral
but it will know better
that's exactly what he said years ago
here we are
in May 2025
the Pentagon increased the contract ceiling
to $1.3 billion
one potential complication
in deeper Maven adoption
is the software's use of
Anthropic
Anthropic Made Clawed
their AI tool
Reuters
Reuters previously reported on this
Anthropic was recently deemed a supply chain risk by the Pentagon
amid a month's long spat over safety guardrails
and if you forget
it's because they said
we will not allow autonomous weapons
and we will not allow
what was it
now I'm blanking on it
we're not in the chat
but that's that's the main one
there was two things
and and it's insane
that we could argue that that is somehow
what was that
there's no oversight
or the point was things that we all care about
that everyone in the world is concerned about
and and that's all they said
and the Pentagon said no
so there's only one way to take that
that means they clearly want
autonomous weapons
which is the opposite of what Palantir just said
meaning that they can make the decision without human involvement
and that's what Anthropic tried to make their line about
and the US said no
you can't misunderstand this
and what's crazy about it
is they then pushed back
and called them a supply chain risk
and then went on to use them in the bombings of Iran
and so what it seems as they said
basically that it seems that
amid the spat that ultimately they've got
they've gained ground
and that seems because I
I think they just given in
trying to see if anybody
human oversight was what I
that's the one I pointed out
but that's the main point
there was two things they said
and they just refused
and now they're still using it
now think about this guys
it's a reason that they needed these things
they're they're building out the future system of this
and they needed these parts
and they're willing to threaten and lie
coerce
anything anybody
oh yeah and these were the
Palantir articles
and then of course we have
I showed you this one back in
oh wait you know what
this might be a new one actually
that's crazy
I thought this was the old one
I showed you
so this is actually the update it looks like
this is from March 23rd
look at that
I actually thought this was from like a month ago
that they basically
this has been ongoing conversation
for the UK
I just grabbed it to make the point
that in the UK
Palantir is invading everything there too
and people are very concerned about it
within the government
or rather at least feigning concern
and now you got members of parliament
urging the UK government to halt the contract
giving Palantir FCA data access
this this is just an
this is a takeover
and this is what it looks like guys
and JD Vance
is now hosting a fundraising dinner
at Palantir co-founder
Jo Lonsdale's home
in Austin
according to the invitation that went out
with tickets priced at $50,000 to $100,000 per couple
the ardent Zionist Lonsdale has long advocated regime change
in Iran
and is currently supportive of the war
they just it's you can't miss this
if you're either blind
like willfully ignoring all of this
and I'm not I'm not trying to say anything
other than exactly what is at
what we can read in the headlines
what Palantir says is happening
it concerns me
it also concerns me what I believe the real agenda is
but just the surface level claims
this is alarming guys
I don't know why we can't acknowledge that
in certain circles
now to the Iran point of this
we discussed this in the 20 this was yesterday
Iranian revolution yet again exposed as a really plot
now that's important
because this was very clearly
the every time I've seen this before
it's been shown to be an artificial response
usually started with something real
but then just manipulated
and that has now come out explicitly clear
the most important parts are coming from
Netanyahu's own inner circle
where the reality is that they were talking
about how we have to get this done
because Trump might end the war
so all that has to show you is that
that means Israel is getting what it wants
and it's manipulating the other side of it
now that doesn't mean Trump doesn't want this
that was my point from earlier
I believe he's very much in line with a lot of this
maybe the parts where he sees his own legacy
you know who knows
but there's also I think a part
where Netanyahu is playing him
now even if they like let's say they sat down
and greed let's go after Iran
here's how we'll do it
I argue based on history
Israel would still find ways to screw him over
and find ways to benefit themselves
at the expense of them
because that's what they seem to do
it's about demonstrating control
or you know showing weakness for them
I think that's always happening
and I often pointed out where Trump
that happens and they never call it out
so I think it's somewhere in the middle
now we also talked about the alleged negotiation
now that's what we're going to largely finish with here
before that
more perfect union posted this
and I thought this was interesting
only 20 percent 27 percent of Americans
according to this platform
agree with Trump's war on Iran
I think it's actually far less than that
but on TV what you'll see left and right
important to think about that left and right
you'll get one expert after another
coming on to say war good
support this go after Iran
turns out most of those so-called experts
as Robert has always pointed out
are just from a few think tanks
many of most of which have never been to Iran
most of which are so-called experts
but on the information the U.S. government
claims is about Iran
and most of that's false
and most of them don't even seem to know that
half the time but you can decide that part
and she says most of these think tanks
get funding from the military industrial complex
and I'll add and it's clear
and you can look it up for yourself
like the foundation for defensive democracies
funded by Israel
and many Zionist groups
turn on the news in the last few weeks
you've probably noticed a trend
this is a regime that needs to go
want this regime gone
take Iran off the map
there has to be some force on the ground
the United States and Israel must be prepared
to fight for an extended period of time
everywhere you look whether it's ABC
CNN Fox News or even the late show is Stephen Colbert
the case I don't think has been made
do the American people as I think it can be made
foreign policy experts are all insisting on one thing
the war in Iran is mostly good
and it must go on
this is all a bit jarring
considering that only 27 percent of Americans
agree with the war
and yet you almost never hear a dissenting voice
and that's as true on ABC as it is on Fox News
every single time
and I really hope this can break through
for somebody today who needs to hear it
that this is the same thing every time
every war left and right
as far back as you want to look guys
and it's the same thing right now
I know people really really want to believe
that this is for the right reasons
as always I hope that I'm wrong about that
but I don't know how that's possible
with what we're watching
since this is an objectively illegal war
but the end of the day
it's the same situation
and what you're seeing is blind
non-partisan support for the war agenda
and for what Israel is driving this country to do
because those are the same thing
who are these experts
and why are they so different from the rest of us
well it's no accident that the majority of the experts
you're hearing from work at think tanks
a kind of non-profit that may sound independent
but which often sustains itself
by taking money from large corporations
like weapons manufacturers
and not just a little money
weapons manufacturers are funneling millions
into think tanks
and coincidentally the experts that work there
tend to push pro-war narratives in the media
and take the Hudson Institute
since 2019 they've taken over four million dollars
from military contractors
contractors that make hand over fist cash
anytime a bomb is dropped
one of the institute's largest donors
Northrop Grumman is raking in the cash
as their two billion dollar B2 bombers
are being used right now to bomb Iran
and RTX is another huge donor to Hudson
they produce tomahawk missiles
the same ones the U.S. just dropped
on an Iranian elementary school
that killed 168 mostly school-aged children
the Atlantic Council is another think tank
you're likely seeing everywhere right now
they also happen to take more weapons money
than basically anyone else in Washington
and last year they put out this interesting report
calling for the United States to purchase
more FAD and SM3 missiles to fight Iran
and guess what we're doing this year
we're using those same missiles right now
to bomb Iran
right you have to I think this speaks for itself
but in case you're not realizing that
this means that they knew this would happen
or at the very least that they expected it to happen
so let's be clear about that imminent threat
that didn't exist okay
oh and surprise surprise
the companies that produce those weapons
RTX and Lockheed Martin
have gifted the Atlantic Council
over a million dollars since 2019
and these are just two of the think tanks
that Dane publicly shared their funding
approximately 40 percent of America's think tanks
are dark money organizations
meaning they don't disclose their donors at all
the foundation for defensive democracies
is one of these dark money tank tanks
and they've been calling for regime change in Iran for years
it's one of the most obvious cutouts
I mean it's basically like in this not
if you take time to look into it
it's it's it's pretty commonly known
this is a Zionist Zionist influenced
Israel influenced platform
but you could argue I mean that
to be clear again like we were talking about a second ago
that's not some secret conspiracy theory
it's objective it's on the surface
you can look at who's involved
you can see that
now whether you think that means something or not
is that's the different question
it's obvious that influence is there
like it's saying it's obvious that the US influences the USAID
obvious right that's that's not something to be denied
but people do because they don't want you to look
vast the surface when it comes to certain groups and certain topics
and we can only guess as to why
oh and the best part is their experts appear before Congress
more than almost any other think tank in Washington
and we have no idea where their funding comes from
I think what's so astonishing to me
is how many of these same groups
pushed for the war in Iraq
what's interesting is this is a very mainstreamy type platform
right but and I think that people like that
are afraid to call it Israel for obvious reasons
to look into it for yourself
it's not hard to see
but either way her points are correct
that's that this is a a dark money thing
that's influencing this war that they've always wanted
I'm sure you can connect those dots
and don't assume is what I'm saying but
look into it prove it
then when public opinion changed
they all suddenly pretended like they never did
the foundation for defense of democracies
went so far as to delete their support
for the Iraq war from their website
but don't worry I'm sure this time it will be totally different
you can recognize that guys
why would they do that
because they don't want you to recognize
that they've always been advocating for war
for the American people against a country
that they want you to go to war with
and this is you know it's the same congress
like the the post by the way
that the US government put out on the White House
page about the 992 Americans
they claim Iran's in their long-term war on America
have killed even though 90% of it was Hamas,
Hezbollah, Al-Qaeda
and the examples of Iran were largely in Iraq
when they were illegally invading Iraq
you know the nuance of course
and 992 I'm pretty sure
even that the number they claim is not thousands
as they've been saying or millions as Trump says
facts matter don't they
but the reality being that this group
is very clearly
or well the point I made is that
they're the ones that put that list out
that Trump just used
that's just a point that I want to include
and that just shows you they're just parroting
what that group was saying before
but it's very clear to see
where that influence comes from
and then I would argue this platform would be
wary of making that point wary
here is a
a sub-substack post from Ken Klippenstein
that I thought was interesting
that speaks to the kind of growing
control over not just media
but like satellite imagery
and like what what he calls the
little brother in the big brother of conversation
now it's the Pentagon has quietly dictated
to spy satellite companies
one which we've referenced many times in the past
one that was utilized pretty manipulatively
during the Ukraine war
maxar technologies which is again
same kind of point
it's pretty easily
it's recognized as basically a CIA cutout
which doesn't mean that everything it does
is always one thing
but it's influence
that is there
should it be needed is the main point
same thing with the other platform
we just mentioned
but in this case
we've referenced with that clip we played about
where in Bucha
I think they got caught
dragging the body in and so on
these things were
that maxar was the one that lied about that
and got caught lying about
where these things were taking place
in this case though
he's when he's talking about is that kind of company
but many others as well
including Palantir
and and things like
Starlink and Elon Musk companies
but it says did
the Pentagon has quietly dictated to spy
satellite companies
what to say about the Iran war
exercising censorship over
what the American public is allowed to know
that should bother people who care about
the free flow of information
from private companies
military sources tell me Ken
that the level of secrecy
surrounding the specifics
of the Iran war is unprecedented
which I think we know why
with barely any data
being released about the level of bombing
the targets being attacked
or the assessed effects
even after the fact
because I understand
the previous part of it
we're going to do this tomorrow
doesn't make much sense in the wars
but after the fact
they're still not giving you the information
about how and when
where and who and how
like things that wouldn't even affect
their strategy
I think we know why
just like Israel and Gaza
or other wars you could discuss
where they were afraid to show you
what they were really doing
whether involved Israel
or the United States or not
it's obvious to see
how that if it was happening
they would cover the flow of information
just because they're doing that
doesn't then prove that they're breaking the law
but we can prove they're doing that
in many other examples
but the idea of the way that they're doing this
I think suggests that they know
that we are going to see things
they don't want us to
of course the typical argument is
well we know the media is going to lie
so we don't want to give you the opportunity
which is just
they all do
and they always will
that's not the
that that is not an appropriate answer
because it does this first of all
not your
you're not the idea that you can
censor this flow of information
to hide what you're doing
just speaks to the
dishonesty of you
not the fact that the media will lie about you
but it's also free speech
but it's the same thing with like
the democrats and nice
where we they're going to attack them
and there's no evidence of what they
claim in that larger sense
but even if they did
well they can be charged with a crime
the answer is not to break the law
in response to them
allegedly breaking the law
easy to play people who believe in
partisanship
now the Trump administration is trying
to further control what private
companies say
in a behind the scenes effort
not been previously reported
oh it says
Iran's war has unprecedented
the specific surrounding in the secrecy
with barely any data being released
about the level of bombing
as the American and Israeli bombing
of Iran commenced on February 28
the military promptly issued guidance
to satellite operators
of what quote
language in terms to avoid
when describing damage caused by Iran
to American bases in the Middle East
according to a copy of the guidance
looked leaked to Ken
which means
as they'll say right here
they said okay when they attack a
base like ours
then make sure you don't
say that it was attacked
make sure you free him in a way
that doesn't make it look like
we actually are losing
or at the very least like we got hit
but you could frame it as
so we don't look like we're losing
because that very much applies
to what I think is happening
but even if you argue they're winning
entirely
they're still making sure you don't
know that they actually got one
through
as we'll make a point in a minute
about the U.S. is Lincoln
and the allegations
and the absurdity of what they
seem to be putting forward
I mean are we really of the mind
are they genuinely trying to argue
that it's like impossible for Iran
to hit or strike a tanker
that they argue they already have
or that you know it's a weird
thing to happen
we'll come back to that
it says the guidance includes
the following examples of what to
say and what not to say
so in that kind of example
that they would do something
they did and the response would be
to say the to frame it in a way
that doesn't look like
they actually got hit
so dishonesty guys
saying it says avoid language
that implies battle damage
assessment
or operational conclusions
one slide produced the U.S.
Space Force says
it says it goes on to warn
against using phrases
like target destroyed
target eliminated
structure right or improper
inoperable
it says basically
you could image shows
the structure largely collapsed
with debris covering the footprint
just ways that make it sound
more watered down
while the Pentagon
guidance to the commercial
companies is framed as an advisory
the companies comply
because they're contracting
relationships with the government
make them afraid to bite the hand
that feeds them
especially under Trump
as a result private companies
are increasingly becoming a
controlled and auxiliary
little little brother
to the U.S. intelligence
machine
and this is a trend I reported on
last year he writes
Space Force has issued the guidance
that he obtained to virtually all
commercial satellite companies
in the form of written requests
this includes not just
companies in the classified space
but even those that work
on the collection and dissemination
of public
open source materials
that inform the news media
which means that this is what I talk
about with the propaganda multiplier
and like Reuters and AP
and how that's what most Fox and CNN
they just repeat what they get from those
same thing that we do in some ways
not repeated but get the flow of
information from those same groups
and then I'll use a lot more sources
than mainstream does
and so the case
where was I
yeah so what that ultimately that
means that from even Fox and CNN level
that they that's what I mean is
half the time I don't even think
they're aware that they're being
misled not that they would care
but that they're already breaking
down the source
before it even reaches them
to water down what being said
this is just control of information
this is not what we pretend
we are
but in any ways what this
government has always been
open source
while there's a case to be made
it says that they the companies
should fight it
almost everyone makes the vast
majority of their revenue
from the government contracts
in this industry
after an after hand thropic
nobody's interested in putting up a
fight
you know why
they made this very clear
we will destroy you
even if we end up being charged
or even if it's obviously corrupt
what we're doing
we'll do it because we want to
we believe it's important for
the AI against China
or whatever their narrative is
while they reap the benefits
at this destruction of our country
it says I think it's also
another layer of trying to make
things about the war seem less
bad than they are
obviously
since February
and thropic has refused to allow
its AI model clod
to be used for certain missions
involving mass domestic
serve that's what it was
the mass surveillance of Americans
and autonomous weapons
and the US government said
no that's too far
we need both those things
that's what they said
and yet we're quibbling
about whether they're doing that
the pentagon in response
has threatened to invoke
the defense production act
so basically as I've said
production martial law
forcing their hand
as a private company
totally not fascism at all
pentagon pressure
or communism
or what a same
same overarching idea
government
can centralize to control you
and they're not the same thing
mind you but
the points are very similar
when you come to that idea
pentagon pressure has already
yielded results
it says
planet labs is one of the
largest commercial
satellite imaging companies
in the world
and has blocked public access
to imagery of the entire
Iran war theater
by imposing a 96 hour delay
when it started
because the government told them
to or advised
then extending it to a 14 day
blackout on march 10th
the company claims
the decision was its own
made after consulting
military intelligence experts
okay
so a open source
rather public commercial
satellite imaging
where you can go
to get access to information
the government won't want you
to see
not because it's a crime
just because they don't want
you to know what's going on
they were asked
and we know what that meant
based on what we just read
and they complied
and they're censoring
that information
now why would that be
would they want you to see
how much they're destroying
this kind of soft censorship
is not unique to
Trump's administration
nor is it partisan
phenomenon
I'm glad he said that
whether it is artificial
intelligence
cybersecurity
unmanned vehicles
and now remote sensing satellites
you know the control grid
being built around us
corporations have grown
so powerful that
they are starting to rival
nation states
in terms of resources
guys that ship has sailed
that's a long
he's right
but that was there
a long time ago
and we should have been
fighting it then
we can still fight it now
but little brother is happy
to co-operate with big brother
I think it's very important
with where we are
bottom line
they're lying to you
what's going on
from the highest levels
of information
now as Dan Cohen
rightly pointed out
and I think it's important
thought as I said earlier
I'm fortunately
citing Michael Tracy
somebody who I think is
worth criticism
and making sure you question
what he's putting forward
and I will grab this
actually since we
had this interview with him
which I really do
think is a good interview
he came on
and I think I've had
more than one with him
I believe
and we discussed
the manufactured
Middle East plight
and the Zionism linchpin
as a Jewish person himself
he's calling exactly
out what I'm talking about
when it comes to the
issue of Zionism
that is not the same thing
as Judaism
same thing though
by the way it's interesting
how people like that
will try to make it out
they're being racist
and then somehow try to
spin themselves
into a pretzel
to make the argument
somehow fit
for somebody like that
but the end of the day
the argument here
he says to claim
that Israel compelled Trump
to attack Iran
requires a lobotomy
regular social media
consumption
or large piles of cash
sent via thousands of
shell counts
on stripe paypal
substack etc
now I get the feel
I get where
that sentiment comes from
because
it's obvious
from a just fact based
perspective
that Trump was all about this
right
and he's not right
he's not wrong to point that
out
it's clear
that he was in line with this
right
and so I feel like it is
like I said early
that it was a way to get
to try to give him the pass
and I still think that applies
but more and more evidence
has come around
that makes me think
that there is obviously
a level of coercion
manipulation
even if Trump was in line
with this larger agenda
right for example
I'm all he was all about
the trick and the lie
to make this all happen
and then we got
didn't realize
or maybe was lied about
whether they would go after
oil facilities
right
think about that
and so now Trump's going
okay now this is hurting me
at home
even though we could lie
though we could lie
then into supporting a war
but their gas prices
are being affected
right so I can see a world
in which that suddenly
became an issue
even though they agree
with the war
all hypothetical
I'm just trying to make
a hypothetical example
where you can see a sudden
division
and then you can recognize
that they might be Israel
that played them
or tricked them
or I think it goes back
to the beginning of it
and I do believe
that there was a level
of manipulation here
even though they were in line
with the larger agenda
but that's what I said
right here
it's an important
point to flesh out
I feel it's some of the both
it's clear that Trump
was all about
basically what I said
saying that you know
but feel that it's clear
that Israel is playing him
but more accurately
the U.S. government
in many ways
so hopefully he reaches out
I'd like to get him
on for the review
anyway because I think
his work is great
but so keeping this in mind
the larger point
right about
whether or not
there's both
in play
whether Trump is in many ways
being you know
played
with certain points
and then whether he is
in fully involved
or in line with this agenda
now this is another
another article
from the New York Times
from the 21st
I think this is more revealing
for the opposite reason
of last time
and we this is why
you just in any sense
whether it's me
or any platform
you can't trust a source
you have to question it
right you can
you can get you know
get to a point
where you feel that sources
are more consistent
but you gotta
always question it
no matter who it is
no matter where it comes from
question it
and consider all possibilities
and that's the same point
because that lost
Arkley did
I think was great
not because the New York Times
is great
but because the information
that was being used
for whatever reason
was something that was
coming out that platform
and there's all sorts of
reasons even sometimes
that people just want to
put out the right thing
and it somehow happens
and to the day
never trust these platforms
because there's a lot of
manipulation that takes place
and this is interesting to me
Trump is hiding the truth
about the Iran war
right
and I believe that is
100% accurate
but now look at the way
that they spend this
it says
from his first announcement
of the attack on Iran
on February 28th
President Trump has issued
a stream of falsehoods
about the war
I agree
he has said Iran
wants to engage in negotiations
though its government
shows no sign of it
I mean that's how they start this
you mean aside from
constantly being in the
I mean this
you have to laugh at this
because whoever this is
the editorial board
of the entire New York Times
apparently
how embarrassing
that you're going to tell me
that you don't know
like you could argue
that they weren't necessarily
truly wanting to
but that's speaking to intent
if you do that
you're not a journalist
but you're a propagandist
which is kind of the point
but the reality
is that they were constantly
meeting for negotiations
for crying out loud
they literally met
and had a deal
that Trump violated
and then since then
even though he's been the one
that's constantly been the one
the disruptor
they met with him numerous times
then they bombed them
then they met with them again
multiple times
and they bombed again
and now they're going
we don't want them you know
and this is how they frame that
so you just have to realize
what a deliberately dishonest
or just shockingly
unaware
kind of statement that is
so what I'm trying to show you
and we'll keep going on this
is that what we're
they're giving you a point
that's accurate
Trump is lying about what's going on
in many ways you can prove that
not in every single point
but in many ways
and then they turn this around
but and you know
you could also argue I'm wrong
that maybe Iran
is the biggest evil you know
terrorist in the world
and that also Trump's lying
that's also possible
what I think I can show you here
is that that's not the larger case
about the way they're lying about this
is pretty easy to prove
but also Trump is misleading you
about certain things
and this article I argue
is meant to create a circumstance
where you ignore
that Trump is lying
for what interest
for the war to continue
or at the very least
to get what they want from it
and I think that is that
Israel wants this to be
complete destruction of Iran
even if that means
battering the US government
till it's gone
or the country
until it's just estimated
to get that
but think as we go forward
I think you'll see this more
so again
he said Iran wants to negotiate
but there's no sign of it
which is so obviously not true
he has claimed that the United States
destroyed a hundred percent
of their military capability
which that's not what they
well I guess you could argue
recently he's been saying that
so fair enough
but I think what they meant was
the ongoing
like the earlier parts
of their military
nuclear capacity
which wasn't true also
but they did destroy
the New York City Facility
which is why the lies about
nukes even being continuing
even though it wasn't happened
the first place
are also lies
according to all the facts
including their own intelligence
blah blah blah
but in this case
he has been arguing
he's destroyed every single part
of them
and that's provably not true
in fact we'll get into the
reality of
how they seem to be proving them
you know
the increase in their attacks
and it says
when Tehran continues
to inflict damage
throughout the region
which is true
right up until today
or rather until the last
bombing exchange
which might still be happening
amongst the Israel bombings
but there's an interesting
void right now
in the reporting
so it's hard to know
in regard to what Trump is doing
but it says
he has said
the war is almost complete
even as he calls in
reinforcements
from around the globe
lying is standard behavior
for Mr. Trump
of course
and yep
I agree
just like Biden
or Obama
or Bush
yep
I agree
Iran's murderous government
does indeed present a threat
okay
right
so this is the kind of argument
like to what
in what way
if they pose a threat
then so too
does every government
everywhere
the idea that you want to pretend
they pose a unique threat
to anybody
beyond the simple reality
that they could
use military force
against anybody they want
like any other government could
is irrational
and it's based on lies
built by a government
that's done that
their entire
my entire life
criminal activities
terrorism
bombing
destruction
occupation
colonialism
authoritarianism
and yet
to say that
they are clearly a threat
is just building into this idea
the threat
if it was a threat
click on the link
nuclear bombs
and terrorism
it's just not true
Ron's murderous government
doesn't need to present a threat
they write
to its own people
to its region
and global stability
are you kidding me
like this is the New York Times
their entire editorial board
we need to understand
how wrong this statement is
you could argue that
they're a government
that could do all the same things
that our government can do
and we should
obviously be aware of that
and obviously call it out
when they break the law
but this idea
that they're this massive
nebulous threat to the world
that we must stop
is just
painfully wrong guys
and it's
and let's just put it this way too
left to their own devices
with no
with
you know
in a vacuum
they probably would end up that way
because I believe
most governments
end up that way over time
because
what we're seeing in this country
happens
where
bad people gravitate to power
and it slowly changes
because people become apathetic
today
the obvious reality
of a threat to its own people
the region of global stability
are the very people claiming
they're fighting that
Mr. Trump
could make a fast
a fact-based argument
for confronting the regime now
especially to prevent it
from renicing its neighbors
and above all
from developing a nuclear weapon
we are skeptical
but we acknowledge
there's a case to be made
that's what they just wrote
you're starting off by claiming
he's lying about everything
but then you still
go yeah
but Iran war
and bad stuff
and go after Iran
we all agree Iran bad
we all agree
nukes are bad
we all agree on that
do that
but Trump's lying
that's the gist of their article
so go for the war
do what Israel wants
there lie about the nukes
lie about terrorism
but Trump lies about things
within that
I just can't even believe
this is where we are
this is the same as all of our
government
all supporting Iran war
and yet we pretend
there's some kind of division
taking place
Mr. Trump is not making it
instead
he has
he has lied about the reasons
for the war
and about its progress
and it appears him
to disguise his poor planning
and his war
is questionable basis
the war that you just
logically argued
should have happened
but yet he shouldn't have done
it the way you just
I mean it's
so counterintuitive
it's all about trying to
create the idea
that they just hate Trump
no matter what
which is essentially what
they're doing
and then you get the
situation where people who
see that
argue that if you blindly
just hate Trump
then everything you're
saying must be false
and therefore
a work
or rather
weirdly enough
the same time
Iran war still good
but lying about Trump
means he's doing it
for the right reasons
like you're basically creating
a situation where everybody
supports the ongoing war
and that's not whatever
like
I don't think I've ever seen
a more unpopular war
in this country
this is what this is what
this is their
article
Trump is hiding the truth
about the Iran war
which essentially argues
that the war should continue
we are taken guys
I mean it's just
overwhelming
now to the point about
the so-called negotiation
now back to this
remember this is what for
this is what got
most of the reach
the images were in fact old
but down here
where he says
you know that they were old
and you know
hours later
after gotten called up for it
claimed to use them
just as a fill in
interestingly
he followed up later
under this
even after this guy
who he claims
was the one going to
meet him
speaks up and says
no negotiations have been
held
and that Israel is trapping you
that's what he just said
but that could be his cover
right
the point is
he follows up later
and says
the Islamic regime
cannot hide the fact
that it's engaged
in indirect negotiations
despite publicly denying them
nor can it conceal
over the bottom line
doesn't mean false
doesn't mean wrong
doesn't mean he's incorrect
but that clearly
he's coming from a place
where Iran that guy
and we have to call
Iran
and that
flavors people's opinions
it can anyway
so all that being said
this the report was
widely shared
millions of views on this
claiming that this guy
um his name was
Galibath
I guess
he's in the Iranian government
that was this thing right there
he is the speaker of
the Islamic Republic of Iran
in the parliament
and claiming that he was going
to meet with Trump
or somebody
a representative of them
and that Israel
allowed the plane to leave
now people dispute
a lot of this
very well maybe in the case
but let's go through this
because what I believe is
that there's more evidence
that's been added to this
that really does start to
make this even more
suspect
one way or the other
it seems
like where this stands
we'll go through that
either that this is something
where Trump is being manipulated
and believes it's happening
and you'll see what I mean
in this little moment
with his recent statements
where it makes it clear
that he's been convinced
this person is real
if what he's saying is
that is genuine
or he could be lying right
and I wonder whether
that's somebody else
in there
playing that role
but again
one of the possibilities
is he's genuinely speaking
with somebody within Iran
but there's so much evidence
that challenges
that being possible
for a lot of reasons
some of which we'll go over
right now
now here are just a couple
of articles from mainstream
Van Hollen
yes a democrat
it shouldn't matter
one way or the other
question whatever
politician says
question them
because they all lie to you
but also consider it
Trump is lying
about talks with Iranians
here's what he says
he said Monday
that president
Trump is lying
about holding talks
with Iranian officials
now this is specifically
about this alleged
five-day pause
and the
negotiate
and we'll get into
his current statements
up today
he says quote
we know he's lying
when he says
that the Iranians
are talking with us
and they're lying
and they're about to
give Trump
everything he wants
yes that's a lie
he said that very flatly
also Monday
the president said
that US envoys
Steve Whitcoff
and Jared Kushner
spoke with their
Iranian counterparts
you know the ones
that just publicly
told all of us
that they're not doing that
and also that
the diplomats involved
has all told us
that Steve and Jared
are basically representing
over Israel
that's public statements
within the team of diplomats
so
we should question
whether this is actually
happening
when these people
I mean Trump's the one
that basically threw them
out of the bus
and said
that's what Jared told me
so we can clearly
see a disconnect
where he seems to be
taking at face value
what people who are not
honest are telling him
it says
but the president
declined to say
to whom they spoke with
saying you do not
want to get him killed
as I joked about yesterday
I mean think
about how stupid this is
I mean okay this
is either one of those
one of the most
painfully stupid moves
I've ever seen
or he's trying to sell you
that on the idea
he's talking to it
because realize
he stands up and goes
you know they
who you talking to
is there's
the defector and Ron
he goes well
I'm not going to tell you
I don't want to get him killed
so what you just did
essentially is admit
that you are speaking
with somebody
in Iran's government
or somebody within
the situation
which then
Iran knows
they can see these things
they saw what you said
so you are actually
claiming you just admitted
publicly
to a person you're
negotiating with
about defecting from Iran
before you finish negotiations
again
I actually can see a world
in which Trump would be
that stupid
just to be like
I'm the one in control
look you know
pounding his chest
going look at how great I am
I'm the one that got the deal
knowing that that
or that's not being aware
that that might
get him killed
just the statement
of the fact
that you might
think about that
which honestly
if I have to pick a sigh
I'm leaning more towards
that that
for that reason
doesn't line up
that he says that
to make you think
that's happening
or because somebody else
is telling him
he's speaking with somebody
and he's actually not
it's all hypothetical
it's all we can do
when we get no information
from the government
that goes on to say
also Monday the president said
where was I
we're dealing with a man
who I believe is the most
respected
and the leader
Trump said
now
I had an interesting thought
about this
what if
now aside from what I just said
like these are other
different because
for this point especially
aside from what I just said
what if
he's just literally talking
to the Shah
what if he's literally talking to
Rajavi
from the MEK
both of which
that we have been told
by Trump and others
that those are the likely
leaders
he's kind of made fun
of the prince
but that doesn't change
things in the past
he made fun of delci too
the point is that
if he was talking
to one of these people
maybe let's just say
first of all
he knows
he's talking to the Shah
because
Iran does want to talk to him
so he goes to the Shah
who they claim
as the leader
and says we'll make a deal
with you
and then presents that
to the world
as if he's making a deal
with the Iranian government
because he tells you
that's the Iranian government
you see my point
that seems like one of the
likely possibilities
or
Rajavi in the same way
and then
once they just keep bombing
and killing
or whatever they end up
doing
they just try to force that in
now
or
he's talking to one of them
and isn't aware
he's talking to one of them
and that's where you come
into the
other elements being played
all these are different
possible thoughts
I think it is worth
considering things like this
now as he said
we're dealing with a man
who I believe
is the most respected
and he goes on to
Axios reported Monday
citing an Israeli official
that Whitcoff and Kushner
were in touch
with Muhammad
Bagheer
Galabith
or Galaboff
the speaker of the Iranian parliament
okay
so here's where this gets even
more interesting
that's at that's
the hill
telling you
that an Israeli official
yesterday
publicly stated
that they were speaking
with this guy
who came out and said
that that wasn't happening
on Monday
no negotiations have been held
with the U.S.
and fake news is used
to manipulate the financial
and oil markets
and escape the quagmire
in which the U.S.
and Israel are trapped
so again
either he's lying
because he wants to hide
the fact that he doesn't want
to get killed
or if that's the way
you think it'll happen
that's possible
but I think it's interesting
that Israel as usual
seems to be the middle person
in the conversation
and they're telling you
it's a guy
who
just said it didn't do it
interesting
which only to me
adds more doubt
to whether they're ever
even talking to this guy
or talking to anybody
or you know
one of the variations
of what I just talked about
says however
as they write
he on Monday denied
negotiations
oil prices fell
stocks surged on Monday
of course
because
Trump said these things
announced the five-day pause
now what's interesting
what goes put Van Halen said
that oil and gas prices
will increase
they will
these are all inorganic
moves guys
they're manipulating
things by dumping oil
that shouldn't be
and when they refill their
response
I mean this will come to a
point where there will be
a increase
unless they stop what they're
doing
all they're doing is giving
you
they did this
it went down
and it's already back up a
bunch
I mean who knows
they went down again
but that's not a last check
but it is continually
staying at a higher level
than it was before
and the only reason
it's not skyrocketing
is because they're
manipulating the prices
so you feel better
in but doing it in ways
that almost seem to guarantee
that there's going to be
a problem
like everything else
they're doing
they're just short-sighted
and aiming for
right now it seems so obvious
that Trump is so aggressively
results-oriented
and it doesn't even matter
about the consequences
just show me that I'm
give me what I want to see
that's that's all he does
in my opinion anyway
but so what's interesting though
the oil prices and stocks
fell on surge on Monday
after the five-day pause
is the bombing
well I'll point out a second
I think right here
but a lot of the reporting
we're claiming this was
sort of a five-day pause
in hostilities
now as he actually said
and it will make clear
in some of these articles
that it was more about a pause
on specifically
the threats on the
which by the way
would be illegal attacks
in addition to an
ongoing illegal war
on energy facilities
but when you look at the way
it went down
it was largely reported
in a lot of ways
in the first day
as sort of like a pause
of hostilities
so what's important to see
is that they very much
did continue
and but two things
they continue bombing
in general
both Israel and the United States
which I thought was relevant
but let's just say
you want to make it out
to be only oil
and energy things
Israel kept bombing those things
is still bombing them right now
that's very relevant
now next
we're going to get into the
independent
are Trump's peace talks
with Iran
fake news
this was today
Donald Trump has been accused
of creating fake news
in an attempt to soothe
financial markets
after he hit a pause
on striking Iran's
energy infrastructure
and announced that the US
was having productive
discussions with Tehran
on ending the war
and what I think is
interesting about this
article
and maybe I will play a video
that I wasn't going to
about
you could look at this
one of two ways
either you Iran
is trying to
frustrate Trump
with making
and frustrate
angry
like making fun of him
in ways
to drive some kind
of a response
you know
or you know
you could look at
a lot of ways I think
but what I'm interested
in is whether or not
this is suggestive of
in this case
either Trump
failing
or the government
the US government losing
in this regard
and essentially
essentially trying to
make it look like
they're the ones
that created a stop to it
so they don't look
like they lost
or the opposite
in the sense that
this is Iran
trying to
front very hard
about how
much they're winning
behind that
now I think the evidence
backs up the first part
but you can decide
now I'll show you
what I mean by that
and I'll play that clip
I was talking about
all it's saying is
that he basically
lied about all this
in order to
create that illusion
that it wasn't him
kind of losing
in his objectives
he told reporters
Iran wanted to make a deal
you know despite
everywhere else
them saying
wasn't true
and up until that point
Trump saying
he wouldn't make a deal
without total surrender
and then says this
and he claimed
US envoy Steve Woodcoff
and his son Jared Kushner
of Southern law
had held talks
with an Iranian leader
on Sunday
but that's not actually
what we know
there's inconsistent
reporting across
the platforms
that's also relevant
UK Prime Minister
Keir Starmer indicated
that he was aware of talks
without giving
further details
speaker from
speaking from
Memphis, Tennessee
on Monday
the president said
quote
we were planning tomorrow
on shooting down
some of their power plants
shooting down
some of their power plants
it's worth making fun of
if you ask my opinion
we're gonna hold that up
hopefully
we won't have to do that
well yeah good
because those would be crimes
no way around it guys
those are not
military targets
and even Iran
was only claiming
to do it back
if they did it first
either way
even if they didn't response
I would still argue
that's a crime
for Iran or anybody
and I'd like to believe
that if you're trying to do it
in a way that shows
you're not the same as them
that you wouldn't fall to that level
but either way
it would
the war started
with their illegal actions
so whatever happens
is because of what they're doing
but the end of the day
they're the ones
openly threatening
in the midst of a point
right now
that would be a crime
and under any law
and he's just
openly using that threat
but then goes
but we're not gonna do it
because they made a deal
which doesn't seem to be the truth
quote
we are now having
really good discussions
he says
they started last night
but then again
he just said in another video
that he did it three days ago
even before
like it's
he does this
when he's off the cuff
he's inconsistent across the board
says we are now
having really good conversations
they started last night
a little bit before the night
before that
I think they're really good
they want peace
they agreed
they will not have a nuclear weapon
which again guys
they already did that
first of all
they never did
they first second of all
they agreed with the JCPOA
third of all
they already agreed
before you started this war
that they wouldn't have the bombs
and they would give up their
enriched material
as we're going to show you
yet again in a second
they that was all publicly
discussed
because the former minister
Roman came out
and said it
and then you could see the
information
and then they bombed
before that could actually take place
so
when they make it
when he's claiming today
which he is aggressively now
that they told us
they promised
they won't have the weapon
that's not true
because they wouldn't do that
seeing as how the evidence
is not there
and they already agreed to it
unless the point is
they said
if there even is a conversation
taking place
that they said
yes
again
yes
we already told you that
and then Trump simply frames that as
they finally conceded
which is very like him
and you know it
if you're being honest
in response
I mean it's the same as saying
they all surrendered
when all they did was
tell their
Middle East counterparts to say
don't keep bombing
or we'll bomb you again
and he called that surrender
I mean how else can you read this
it's desperate
in response
Iranian state television
showed a TV banner
which read
quote
US president backs down
following Iran's firm warning
now to me
that's them playing back at his game
because that's what he does every time
but in this case
if they're accurate
or if what I'm saying
turns out to be the case
which is that there was no negotiation
then they're right
which probably drove him crazy
right
but even if there is an ongoing
conversation
that would still probably frustrate him
because that's all he cares about
as far as I could tell
it's just the perception
despite Monday's claim
by Mr. Trump
that the war in Iran
could soon come to a close
Israel launched new attacks on Tehran
saying it was targeting infrastructure
like literally what Trump just said
he would pause
they publicly said they were targeting
that's not by accident
and they're doing it today too
explosions were heard in multiple locations
so yes those are war crimes
like every other thing they seem to do
but they're targeting illegal
non-military things
and saying so
because Trump said he was pausing
if you haven't paying attention
you don't know what I mean by that guys
it's what they do every time
and it's demonstrating
to anybody paying attention
that they're in control
and that Trump doesn't call it out
don't you think he right now
would be like hey
I'm in control
what are you doing
you're ruining my agreement
no
he doesn't even speak up
professor
Maziar Ghayabi
the director of the center
for Persian and Iranian studies
at the University of Exeter
said quote
the offer of five days
to reach a deal
by U.S. President Donald Trump
has provided relief to financial markets
however
while the U.S. President
announced diplomatic communication
with the Iranian counterpart
if that's real
the Israeli Air Force
carried out extensive bombing
of Iranian infrastructure
yep
the objectives of the United States
and Israel appear to differ
even though they call it a joint war
and even though it's clear
one is driving the bus
with Tel Aviv preparing
for a prolonged conflict
but they've been saying that
they've made it clear
they've got bombings planned out
for the next month
and it says so far
has had only limited
material impact
compared to the
that experienced by
the GCC countries and U.S. bases
quote
the key question
is whether the U.S. administration
will be able
to disentangle itself
from Israeli strategy
or whether it will be drawn into
a prolonged war
with global repercussions
as well as domestic unpopularity
due to Israel's military offensive
based on precedence
it is unlikely Israel will restrain
from the current strategy
unless there is strong U.S. pressure
which is currently lacking
you have to understand
this
a decade ago
would have been called
exactly the same kind of anti-Semitism
that you're
that you know
more obvious observations
are being called today
my point is that
this would have never likely
been on most of these platforms
that they would have just ignored
entirely
but now this has become the norm
because it is real
it's always been there
but you have created this
awareness
you by caring about the truth
have driven this fact
into people's minds
the same fact
that you can easily prove
that plenty of people are telling
you you're obsessed with talking about
and completely racist
now
just like I said
I the same kind of thing from yesterday
just simply going through this
and showing you
the same kind of idea
that ultimately
despite what Trump said
I mean I
you can read all included
that they did continue to bomb
that both the U.S.
and joint U.S. Israeli strikes
have continued
so I want you to hear that
not only Israel
right not Israel was targeting
infrastructure regardless
but that the U.S.
government involved
with their joint strikes
were also doing so
even though Trump just said
they paused that
you have to see what that is
that's U.S. military personnel
carrying out an attack
that Trump
the commander-in-chief
told you yesterday
weren't going to be happening
but are continuing
because well they're apparently
working alongside Israel
do I even explain that
now here's what Trump said
I'm blown away by this
to be honest
because I
my mind is that this speaks
to something else
just my opinion
here's what he said
this app
they shot down three planes
with our missiles
they happen to be our planes
but the pilots made it
can you imagine the pilots
making it
the pilots are always coming
and they said
there was a Patriots
we're not going to escape Patriots
and they got out of there
pretty quick beat right
pretty amazing that
they got out
the three pilots lived
to find
in fact they're flying today
yeah
the Kuwaitis
made a mistake
they thought
they thought they were firing at
the enemy
the enemy with the big
US symbol
on the side of the jet
right
as the expression goes
friendly fire
oh yeah
but the pilots are great
they're flying today
we give them apparently
because
one and then two and then three
oh now we see
now we can tell
that they're obviously US planes
or maybe not
maybe there's more to the story
it was foggy
I don't know
pretty amazing
when you think of it
yeah
President Trump
on a human level
how hopeful are you that
this peace deal will work out
I guess
we'll get into this in a second
the next response
but you know
just case you didn't hear in the beginning
a little mishap
they shot down three planes
with our missiles
they have to be our planes
but the pilots made it
can you imagine
the pilots making it
the pilots are always coming
right
so let's just casually drift
into the next part of the
conversation
yeah that's real guys
I actually had to check
to make sure this wasn't AI
a little mishap
they shot down
three planes with our missiles
Kuwaitis
he claims Kuwaiti
shut down three
US planes by accident
which of course
certainly possible
for anybody
but shouldn't we be asking
because of where we are
with all this
that there might be
something else happening
I mean there's so many
ways you can consider this
and you should ask
all these different questions
because it's clear
that they're always
like with the flow of
information about
general things
from satellite imagery
they just don't want
you to see what's going on
they're gas sliding
you at everything
and really that's
really that's
US war is my entire life
that's not unique
but the point
is that
right now
with where we are
we should ask
whether this was
something else
or you know
here's a simple point
maybe that was Iran
maybe Iran
literally just shot
down US planes
and even though
they could use that
to marshal up support
they don't want to
seem weak
they don't want to
look like they're losing
and they've been telling
you that Iran's a neft
they fired everything
they don't know
how they're done
they don't have
any munitions anymore
then that would make
him look like a liar
right
I mean that's
one of the possibilities
which would be very
likely almost
but then you could ask
whether somebody else
like I believe right now
we can clearly see
that Israel has been taking
shots at things
that trying to cause
more chaos
whether it's oil facilities
whether it's
allies
they want to think
we're attacked by Iran
I mean the
the recent base
what was it called
it was a hyphen name
what was the name of the base
the point
James Lee
did a good clip
about that
which the evidence
seems pretty clear
that it
it does not appear
to have been Iran
this seems to have been
a false flag attempt
now I'm wondering whether
this is where I'm
interested in this
more than
more than usual
is that if
Trump is being played
and he's starting to
recognize that
which I think is a real
thing we should consider
that doesn't mean he
again he was clearly
in line
wanted this to happen
but then also
doesn't want to be played
and so if there's
that level of understanding
Zionism
or whatever else
like Charlie
the Charlie Kirk point
as I call it
then maybe
he's starting to see that
like Tucker Carlson
if that's real
but question
whether it's all a lie
right
my point is
if he is seeing that
maybe he started to go
okay
I see the game you're playing
and so instead of going
Iran
they go oh that was this
or ignore it
move on
knowing that
that was Israel
trying to force their hand
in fact
that happened during
Biden's administration
where it was almost
borderline admitted to
that that was just Israel
that they were just
that that's what they
wanted to accomplish
it was clear they were
trying to drive
the action of the
US government
so in this case
was this
something else happening here
whether Kuwaitis
or something else
using US missiles
bombing three
US planes
and then just claiming
it was a whoopsie
I just don't buy that
quite frankly
that feels hard
throughout my mind around
three US jets
expensive
Patriot missiles
and just to move on
it was an accident
I don't know maybe
yeah I mean
okay good example
some of the in the chat
says Iran hacked missiles
that's possible too
right
we should
the idea
the way he presents this
just doesn't feel
plausible to me
but
you can consider for yourself
but the idea that
they're shooting down
if that is the case
their own planes
doesn't speak well
to where they're going
right now
now here's what
Eric Dowdy shared
and we'll get into the
ongoing conversations
up today
about the negotiation
it's just
I always have to laugh
at these people
it's just hard
I mean
I think I even posted
something down here
oh no it wasn't on this one
the
here I'll go ahead and post
as you guys can see it
we made fun of this
this morning
on a wake up
somebody this
I forget it was
even I think it was
somebody in our telegram
chat
made this
this this
image
based on what I jokingly
called them
off the cuff
in the recent show
which is the
red light holy crap guys
which is exactly
actually
for the
one of the rare times
he doesn't say holy crap
but he has today already
but it's just kind of funny
to me
but so
that's what these
these guys are
just these
kind of hyperbolic
shock at the thing
he said
whatever
you know
in this case
President Trump has
reportedly splintered
the Iranian regime
and they're desperate
to make a deal
panicked behind the scenes
okay
you know come on
so what we get is
Trump says these things
and this is the
red light
breaking news
this is 7 p.m. bud
this was going on all day
but you know
I guess you woke up
and had to use the red light
once
breaking
the bottom line
is that this is just
the hyperbolic framing
of whatever the team says
which might be true
but don't for one second
pretend these are journalists
then
he goes on to just kind of
quote what
this very very childish
person has to say
now this is Jesse Waters
who again
you can't call this
journalism
this is a repetition
of the talking points
which is what CNN
Fox News
corporate media
mainstream alternative
it's what they do
in large ways
but listen to this
I will pause it
there's some points
I want to laugh about here
but this is what you're framing
as the news
the update the report
I mean
how often
do we need to see
Fox or CNN
shamelessly lie
for their team
before we stand back
and go they
you know
obviously the point is
that honest people
who are not blinded
by partisanship
remember that
people who are not
just choose to
ignore their team's
version of those things
I did with the Iranians
they think the Iranians
are telling the truth
and Trump's just making it all
up
okay so he cut into a point
where
they're siding with the
Iranians
which is not the same as
saying
I believe Trump is lying
so essentially it's always
you're with them
or you're with us
that's the kind of dumb
you know ignorance
it's the not dumb
it kind of ignorance
you get
from this kind of reporting
which is
you're with us
or you're with the enemy
which there's
plenty of more choices than that
which is that
maybe you don't agree with Iran
what they're doing
maybe you want them
to be overthrown
but you can also acknowledge
that Trump is lying
right
or consider that
not in Jesse's world
you either
support Iran
or you support Trump
and so in this point
it's about the fact
that there's a lot of
suggestion evidence
to show that there's
doubt here
and people are going
maybe he's not
speaking with somebody
and so what he's saying
is they're choosing
to side with them
well we can't
prove what Trump is saying
so all you're really
saying is
choose to blindly
trust Trump
instead of blindly trusting Iran
okay
well you're blindly trusting
regardless
so but that's what they want
you to end up doing
is sort of going
well they're so bad
that you got to kind of
side with this less bad
oh okay
so the lefts are of evils
in your one-point
decision-making process
and everything else
in your entire life
just always go with
the lesser of bad
because that's American
culture apparently today
think how stupid that is
they think the Iranians
are telling the truth
and Trump's just making
it all up
which is certainly
possible and has happened
plenty of times
but you know
don't ever consider that
possibility
because bad guy Iran
these are the same Iranians
who last week
claimed they sunk
one of our carriers
the same Iranians
you mean you know
so an report
that came out about them
firing on
not sinking
a ship
because that's what happened
they lied about their
new program and
oh yeah
the missile program
or the
nuclear program
all the things that
are not verified
have been lied about
with the US government
but Jesse Waters
blindly states
what the state department
says because you know
adversarial
independent media
right guys
but here's the main thing
or the
literally the first thing
so this is what's important
to stand
now yes
what you'll find
is a lot of
manipulative media
who may very well be
Iranian media
or people who are
pretending to be
like we get from a lot of the
you know
MES
MIA
MEMRI
or Israel
Nubesad
or CIA
type back
or you know
voice of America
it's just just
overwhelmed with
fake Iranian experts
the point
is this is that to see
news agency
that reported on the day
this happened
Iran hits
US aircraft carrier
okay so what they reported
was
the aircraft carrier
Abraham Lincoln
which could be a lie
which has approached
340 kilometers from Iran's
maritime borders
in the sea of Oman
in a bid to manage
the Strait of Hormuz
was hit by drones
of the Iranian
Islamic Revolutionary Guard
now
why is that even hard
like
that is the most
basically
yes that's possible
if anyone's claiming
that's just not
possible
because we're so great
it's just a child
yes Iran has
the capability to very much
get past US defenses
they've demonstrated that
a thousand times
or Israel
so this weird response
that they just didn't hit
this or sink it
because somebody online
claimed they sunk it
on top of that
because people lie
in online media
it's not what they said
it says the spokesman
added the ship
rapidly fled
with the destroyers
and is now
a thousand miles away
oh
oh okay so
Jesse was wrong
about what they said
I'm shocked
civilians they slaughtered
ensue last week
claimed they sunk one of our
carriers
did they
they lied about their new
program and
okay so you know
just the casual lying
and it's not about even
casual lying
about you this guy doesn't
even care
I bet he has a talking list
or a talking point list
of what Republicans
are supposed to be saying
they didn't lie about
I mean I can go down the
list but I'm not going to
waste your time
I just think it's important
to recognize that
these kind of people
these is not journalism
this is repetition of
propaganda
and frankly
because it's so lazy
it's not even good
propaganda
how many civilians
they slaughtered
maybe Iran's trying to
look tough
to keep their population
in line
or maybe
let's just blindly
assume about what makes
them look bad
maybe they killed
millions of people
like the U.S.
government that Israel
have
or maybe they shot people
you were invading
the country with
or maybe there's somewhere
in the middle
and killed people
like every government
does
but let's just keep guessing
Jesse
because that's what
good journalists do
right
maybe since they're all
hiding
with no cell phones
are they
or is that what the
State Department says
who's been long wrong
about everything my
entire life
or deliberately
misled us
our entire lives
but he'll trust him
because he knows
they don't know
who's talking to who
oh do they
whom you mean
but you know
who we talking about
who doesn't know
who they're talking to
that what the
CIA tells us
or what Trump is claiming
you know
after they do the things
every day that they
keep telling us
they're not capable of
doing
it's just exhausting
having to ever
pretend
like these people
are worthy of
your respected attention
the gay
I had told us
MIA
the CIA
I mean this idea
maybe gay
who knows
I mean this
crazy idea
are we actually
of the mind
that we can't
put together
the possibility
that they might
just make up a story
like that
in order to try to
try to
to try to insult them
try to make them upset
to try to
make certain people
in our conversation
hate them for wrong
really
or maybe he's gay
who cares
the fact that
they make that a point
shows you
how small they are
he thinks he's wounded
and he might not
even know he's in charge
we haven't seen
proof of life
okay
so you murder them
and continue to tell us
that you're murdering
everybody else behind them
level two
and level three
Trump says
we murdered them too
and then go
but he won't even
show his face
maybe he's
to maybe because
you guys
you're
killing everybody
without any kind
of legal justification
I mean
it's painful
and you could
are out the
like back to the point
about the gay thing
well that's
because they
lie about what Iran
does to gay people
every single day
now there's examples
you could point out
just like you can
see in Israel
by the way
but it's not what
they claim
like most things
they say about Iran
that's probably why
they do that
to make it seem like
hypocrisy I guess
but why would we believe
what they have to say
about their adversaries
it's just stupid
and while he's on an
IV drip
the republican guards
consolidating power
but some ran
what does that even mean
mean
as if it's like
now it's like a rogue
government
like military control
maybe
but like
why are we listening
to what this guy
has to say about things
he's been wrong about
his entire life
I don't know why
this makes sense
anybody woods
and haven't been seen since
literally
the head of Iran's militia
escaped into a forest
and pitched a tent
so
so our state department
tells us
so the CIA claims
right the argument
that he was killed
seems to be reality
but this whole construct
about I mean
maybe I just don't know
why we give creams
to these claims
I mean what difference
does it make
what if he was going
in the forest
to conduct an operation
and you killed him
would that make it
less relevant
or are you just
trying desperately
to make it seem
like they're so
scared
and they're fleeing
into the woods
and making tents and fires
and I guess that's just
extra details for no reason
sure
maybe you should question it
maybe you should
ask when a liar
starts giving too many
details that maybe
there's a reason for that
at the end of the day
they lie about everything
and what we need to
recognize is that
what they keep saying
about Iran and their abilities
out of very easy
provable level
are not true
now that doesn't mean
that Iran's winning the war
maybe they are feeling
maybe they are desperately
fleeing and about to lose
but they're also lying
about a lot of what's
going on
that's easy to prove
we need to see that
and usually when you're lying
it speaks to something else
but that's why
as T-Lab always will
we're remaining objective
until we can prove something
ordinary Iranians spotted them
making a fire
so we're told
Gulf Mossad
so we're told
and the IDF
and yeah
guess who that came from
that came from
Mossad
took him out with a missile strike
reports say Iran's
security forces are on the run
oh reports
can you guess where
that came from
the Iranian regime
is in chaos
this is Hitler's bunker
Hitler's dead
all right
we'll hear you
this is my house
Goreng is dead
the most of what you're seeing
are lone wolf activities
Trump can't even say who
you mean the lone wolf
activities that you guys
tried to pretend
you were hiding from us
and then tried to scare
everybody with
that was I mean
why
negotiating with
it's too risky
I don't want him to be killed
yeah okay
now we're gonna
insult your intelligence
but pretending like
we think Iran doesn't see
this
and it's
didn't somehow
explode your secret
squirrel discussion
that I just
don't know why that
I mean again
that has got to be
either the stupidest
thing I've ever seen
or it shows you
they're making this up
I don't know why
they do that
but come on
I mean we can't
I mean
am I wrong
you think Iran's
not gonna see this
and then go oh
so you're
is it you
every lineup
we're checking
all your pockets
like or whatever
you're
that just seems
ridiculous to me
hey I don't want him
to be killed
Mr. President
you deployed
nobody wants to be that
nobody wants that job
right now
you know
nobody's exactly
looking forward to be
you mean
other than the one
that had taken it
or
the fact that
you could
are you
you know
you can see
the support
they have in the country
that is one of
the easiest things
to actually see
that doesn't mean
they're
don't have
groups that
don't support them
in fact
that's every country
you can look at
this country
and see that
the vast majority
the Americans
do not support
the presidency
that's actually
provable right now
so based on that
logic
perhaps we'll be able to
solve that problem
Trump's announcing
he's negotiating
with the Iranians
makes what's left
of the regime
not really trust each other
oh yeah
that's a nice
nice assumption
to wrap it all up
right
I'm gonna go ahead
and speak
intellectual
about what they feel
when Trump says
things about
what might be happening
great journals
from Jesse
you're knocking it
out of the park
so
of course Eric goes
and who
what he just said
we're so great
holy crap
we're breaking
everything
so
lied about that
and like everything else
again
this is the guy
that they're telling you
he's speaking with
that Israel said
they're speaking with
who has said
that's not happening
but again
if he really was
being spoken with
he's probably going
shut up
is you're gonna get me
killed
like or whatever
you that
that wouldn't
I mean
let's be real about this
that he might get killed
is not unique
to a terrorist organization
our government
would call that treason
and literally kill somebody
especially this government
most governments in the world
would argue that
catching a spy
or a
defector who is committing treason
that's
I mean
I'm never advocating
for the death of anybody
the point is
that's what they would argue
is the
is the punishment
so
don't let them convince you
that just because
that might happen
if it does
that is somehow
uniquely
terroristic
but
he says it's not happening
like the Iran government says
Trump says
the US is talking
with an Iranian leader
an official is calling it
fake news
now it says
they
the Trump told reporters
Iran wants to make a deal
and he claims
the US envoy
Whitcoff and
Kushner
told him
that's the case
he did not say who it was
but said the US
has not talked to the supreme leader
so that means
literally they're talking
or you know
that's obviously the
the
point is that
he's talking to somebody
other than the current leader
but
you know
this is where it comes down
to the idea of the claim
where they put forward
of democracy
so you keep telling us
you have assassinated
extra leaders
but Trump is the one
that said once
Kamini was gone
first of all
that that would be the end
of it
and clearly they knew
that wasn't true
they lied to us all
about that
or as they lied to Trump
about that
then he said
whoever's next
and I think someone good
and then Israel
kept attacking them
so then he just kind of
pretended that was his plan too
I don't know why
most people can't see that
how Trump will come out
and say
the first point
or Trump offering a ceasefire
on day two
and then getting
chastised by Israel
or the State Department
anyway
and they pulled back
but the point clearly
is that you can see
many examples
of who is in charge
who's driving the bus here
because if he came out
which he did
and made and suggested
that the person behind him
might be a little bit
better
and then
after Israel kept bombing
whoever
and Israel is the one
that said
we're going to keep
bombing whoever's in power
clearly showing you
that they'd have no interest
in any kind of
semblance of government
they want to take over
while Trump wants to pretend
what he wants
is just to give them
the Iranian people's will
you can prove to yourself
with their actions
and statements
that that's never been
on the table
and they all know that
so you're either
out there
like they're
the grouping in this
in my opinion
are people who know
very well
that all they want
is control and power
and they who don't
care about what the Iranian
people go through
and people that have
been convinced
because they can't see
the obvious
that that's what they're
trying to do
and then everybody else
who can see
what's happening
Iran denied talks
that have been held
as you just said
here's the actual tweet
from like we showed you
now it says
Trump said
if a deal is reached
the U.S. would move
to take Iran's
enriched uranium
we're still doing this
which is critical
to the disruptive
to its disputed
nuclear program
Iran has adamantly
refused such demands
in the past
insisting it has the right
to enrich uranium
for peaceful purposes
by the way
or for nuclear weapons
like every government
in the world
but
the point
as you know well
is that this was
already discussed
first of all
like we said
the evidence
going back as far as
that shows you
they have never been
doing that
this administration's
own intelligence
said the same
Tulsi Gabbard
pointed out
everything
the State Department says
the International Atomic Energy
Agency says
at the end of the year
they are within their safeguards
I'll show you in a second again
then
so
understand that
that was the case before
or even the JCPOA
the Iran deal before that
where Iran was
meeting those requirements
until Trump unilaterally
pulled out
because Iran
Israel convinced him to
either again
lying back then
telling them
they're making nukes
and they were not
and because
Trump pulled out
is why that started to
happen because it was
Article 36
from within the JCPOA
that allowed that to happen
within the deal
and then they pointed to
that movement
as the violation
I mean you can't
you almost
can't
I almost say the opposite
let's say you can't make this up
but you can quite
literally see
how they made this up
it's like it's
it's
it's only
baking on the fact
that people don't know
the most basic
things of these agreements
so all that then
comes to this point
where they now
allege
they claim
they're in negotiations
which we knew
they were already
planning to bomb them
that's already come out
they were already
arming the Kurds
they were already
arming the protesters
on the ground
as they publicly told you
both Assad
and US intelligence
and people in
Trump's administration
were arming the protesters
I can't believe they said that
the Kurds
and Israel told you
they planned the date
well before they had that
last meeting
for their alleged peace
so they lied to them
and so the point is
what they agreed on
the day before they bombed
as the
foreign minister of Oman says
peace within reach
as Iran agrees
to no
nuclear stockpile
so the main parts of this
yeah it's not that much
I'll read it really quickly
is that
and then the fact that
they agreed to get rid
of all of their
of its uranium
Iran agreed during
indirect talks
with the United States
to never stockpile
in its uranium
it says
and of course
you can call them liars
but that's where you come
back to the
international atomic
energy agency
which I'll show you
again in a second
that makes it very clear
that there's a water tight
undeniable system
and we will make sure
they don't
and they knew that
that's what Trump
exploded with the last deal
so it says
AP steals within our reach
if we just allow diplomacy
the space it needs
he says
that night they bombed them
quote
if the ultimate objective
is to ensure forever
that Iran cannot have
a nuclear bomb
it's not
because that's not really
what they care about
they're using that
as a tool to get to them
but they don't want them
to have it
obviously because
that they did
they wouldn't do
what they're doing
right now
but ultimately realize
that's not the real
guiding point
is the justification
to get what they want
and it says
if the ultimate objective
is to stop the nuclear bomb
well
he says
I think we have cracked that
problem
through these negotiations
by agreeing on a very
important breakthrough
that has never been achieved
any time before
he says quote
the single most important
achievement
and that's
that's the part
about giving up their
in restaurant
in radium they have
in addition
to not stockpiling anymore
he says
the single most important
achievement
I believe is the agreement
that Iran will
never ever
have a nuclear material
okay
so here's Trump today
going
they finally agreed
like today
saying that that's what
the secret negotiator
told him
but that was the
already agreement guys
so is Trump being lied to
by Kushner
yes we know that
is he being lied to
by Whitcoff
we know that
the question is
whether he knows
that they're being misled
or is part of that lie
or I guess
that's the same thing
whether he's part of the lie
or whether he's being
misled
because you can argue
that they're all part of this
lying about them
enough no intention to do it
or you can argue
Trump thought
they would have an agreement
and he thought they were
making nuclear bombs
and he's been lied to
either is possible
and again
for the date this is
February 28th
the night
ultimately that night
they bombed them
it says
now we are talking about
zero stockpiling
and that is very very important
because if you can't
stockpile material
that's enriched
then you have no way
to make an actual bomb
he says there would be
also be
quote
full and comprehensive
verification by the IAEA
Oman's top diplomat
also said
Iran would degrade
its current stockpile
of nuclear material
to the lowest possible level
so that it would convert it
to fuel
and fuel would be reversible
meaning they would
downgrade
or export
all of their material
that's what he said
in the interview
you can watch right here
and it says
this is something new
completely new
it really makes
the enrichment argument
less relevant
because now we're talking
about zero stockpiling
Iran on the record
agreed to that
and agreed to have
the IAEA confirm that
as far as I can tell
and as far as
everybody will
there's no way
to circumvent that
as I said down here
and as it said
in contradiction
to what Whitcoff lied about
he says
this is the director general
as stated
end of 2025
in my most recent report
based on the inspections
of Iran's facilities
that their uranium stockpiles
remain under safeguards
in accordance
with Iran's
comprehensive safeguard agreements
and he references
literally the enriched uranium
at 60 percent
the 400 plus kilograms
that Whitcoff claimed
they bragged about
that remains
within their safeguards
meaning that they
that was allowed
so why do you lie about that
well because Whitcoff
is clearly working
for something
other than U.S. interest
or the truth
so the point again
is that they already
had that agreement
on February 28th
to no nuclear weapon
which is what they claim
they want
and not only
no more enriched uranium
but to give up
what they currently have
and that night
they bombed them
you really can't misunderstand this
so
Trump says
if a deal was reached
with this phantom negotiator
apparently
that they would move
to take their uranium
so what they already
agreed to
that Israel stopped
right
which is crucial
to its disputed
nuclear program
Iran has adamantly
refused these demands
in the past
but has agreed now
in regard to the
giving up of the stockpile
because their argument
is correct
they have a legal right
for the
just from the energy
perspective
that's very valuable to them
both for their own use of energy
and also for any
number of other purposes
not for military
can be
sure
but so does every other government
Trump threatened
over the weekend
to obliterate
Iran's power plants
unless the country
releases the stranglehold
that was the last
before we got here
the deadline
would have expired
late Monday
right so
in the midst of that moment
which we knew
he was blustering about
he pretends to be in a
negotiation
I think
the five-day extension
was subject to the success
of the ongoing meetings
and discussions
speaking later in Tennessee
Trump said his administration
has been negotiating for
a long time with Iran
you see how that works
it went from just the night
before to
you know it's
off the cuff
they want peace
Trump said
they've been
agreed
they will not have a nuclear
weapon
you know etc etc
but we'll see
what's that even mean
and he said there
because that's just like
he's just going through
talking points
he said there's
very good chance
the deal will be reached
this week
crediting
his threat to blow up
their power plants
literally
because I threatened to
commit war crimes
and then
didn't follow through
apparently that scare
I mean
that doesn't even make sense
in the wake of Trump's
turnaround
Iran's semi-official
farce
and
as Tasnim news agencies
portrayed the American
president
as
backing down
which I'm sure
bothered him
honestly
I think it's kind of a bad
tactic for them
because what if he really
was backing down
what if he really was
recognizing Israel's
playing him
and then you poke him
in the eye
and that you turn him
into the person
who's going to burn
your house down
for no reason
other than you insulted
him
that's Trump
he will
I would literally argue
he would destroy
his own legacy
just to make sure that you
he didn't look like
he backed down
that's who he seems
to be to me
seems like a bad tactic
I to be honest
like I feel like that's a
you know
and like I said earlier
maybe it means
suggest that they are
failing
but it says quote
since the start of the war
messages have been sent
to Tehran
by some mediators
but Iran's clear response
has been that
it will continue
its defense
until
the required level
deterrence is chief
meaning they're no longer
threatening us
with everything they have
with this kind of
psychological warfare
neither the state of Hormuz
will
will stay a few weeks
when we return
to pre-war conditions
nor will calm return
to the energy markets
and lastly it says
and again
all of this
started with their
illegal actions
Israel
United States
with no air
in that conversation
Israel launched
new attacks Monday
on Tehran
saying it was
targeted infrastructure
targeting infrastructure
explosions were heard
in multiple locations
it wasn't immediately clear
what had been hit
Israel is also
battling the Iranian
linked Hezbollah
which isn't
it's just an ally
they're literally conducting
a secondary war
and in Lebanon
because they covet
their territory
it's always been the case
you can go back to
before
the Hezbollah existed
and they were already
bombing
what the you know
their reports of
killing 60 Arabs in Lebanon
or bombing locations
and
they've always been doing this
in recent days
Israel has hit
apartment buildings
in Beirut
you know
like downtown
New York
or you know
San Francisco
and bomb bridges
over the Latani River
this is
CTV News
casually reporting
massive war crimes
they're bombing
apartment buildings
and no one's even
it's as if they've created
this carve out
where Israel
just does
whatever it wants
it's always been that way
but now we're
almost we're
meeting it
before it used to be
don't report on it
or claim it was
something else
now it's just
yeah they killed children
shut up
it's Israel
don't don't care about it
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu
said Israel will continue
to strike Iran
and Lebanon
even as U.S.
considers a ceasefire
that's what he just said
is that anybody confused
about that?
we don't care
what Trump does
we are the ones in control
in control
the UN peacekeeping force
in southern Lebanon
unifil
has reported
for what the
15th time
they bombed
a UN
headquarters location
it happens every time
authorities say
Israeli strikes
have killed more
than a thousand people
in Lebanon
and displaced
more than one million
people
but that's just another
another Tuesday
another Wednesday
no big deal
Iran's death toll
has surpassed
1500
but I guess that's just no big deal
right?
I guess it's just what
that's war
we're told
by the warmongers
who pushed us into this
with lies
now as I said
it's clear
that they already had all this
they already had
what Trump claims
he's about to get
so keep that in mind
here's
and here's
Gunther Egelman
like the rest of them
Trump confirmed
Iran agreed
to what nobody else
could convince them to do
Trump reports
that Iran has bent the knee
and agreed to never possess
nuclear weapons
these guys are just
clowns man
they're clowns
first of all
as I just said
that was never the reality
based on the US government's
own assessments
and remember
that doesn't matter
the point though
I think at the end of the day
is that
Trump is now trying to
create the illusion
that what was already
the static reality
is what he somehow
managed to force into play
to me
that speaks to
that they are in a bad
position
and he's just trying to
find a way to make it
look like he's already won
that's why they announced
victory in the middle of
already in the midst
of an ongoing war
they've agreed
we'll never have
nuclear weapons
they've agreed to that
again
this phantom negotiator
we're told
so what we're hearing
like before
is that Trump is discussing
well they'll have to
deploy troops
to seize the uranium
that
they already told you
they would give up
they made that point before
but realize how
constructed this is
based on things they
were already getting
and again
the international
atomic energy agency
telling you
that they were not
reaching that level
and again
like I said
at the very bottom
it says the IAA
can guarantee
through a water
tight inspection system
that nuclear weapons
will not be developed in Iran
they don't care about
any of this guys
it's about using
the claim of that
now here's what Trump said
DD geopolitics
shared this
and this is about
oh this is basically
the claim that
Gunther was just bragging
about
same point
even though
we just told you
the evidence
doesn't back this up
turning point
to make you want
to pursue a ceasefire
a few days ago
you know
you said you wanted
to continue bombing Iran
now you want to pursue
peace talks
was there something that
talking to us
in the talking sense
right
and that's the thing that
people are
you know
like
argument is he saying
she said
why case it was low for you
you just said you
you know
like you said
we're gonna bomb
until complete surrender
well it's very different
than suddenly
well that you know
that's not unless
they talk to me
because they were
already talking to you
so he
claims that
now they're talking to me
but they already were
and now they said
something again
that we already knew
they offered
so again
this is my point
just right here
you can already recognize
this either means
that Trump is being
misled by somebody around him
maybe Israel
or he's lying to you
about this back and forth
and that's not about the
alleged negotiator
that's about just
generally about what Iran
was doing before
he's lying about that
we have to be able to see
that guys
so that speaks to something
you can decide
what that is
and remember it all starts
with they cannot have
a nuclear weapon
just you know
I said yesterday
what they said
what are the top 10
I said well
number one two and three is
they can't have a
nuclear weapon
that's just dumb
it's it's well
well here put the
you know
what an
accentuate the point
why not make it one through five
it's meaningless
it's just doesn't
it's just meaningless
it's and that all it shows
is he's trying to really stress
the idea that I made sure
I did I'm the one
I made sure they would not have it
they didn't before
they don't want it now
but it's just stupid
and they're not going to
have a nuclear weapon
and we're talking about that
and I don't want to say
in advance
but they've agreed
they will never have a nuclear weapon
they've agreed to
he got to love how he does that
I don't want to say in advance
but I'm going to say in advance
so you do though
so you want it to
and you say
you're now telling us
they've promised not to
you see my point though guys
now let's just say this goes forward
let's just say
like everything backs down
and it all goes forward
and then they just started
admitting to you
yeah they don't have a weapon
that that
it's because of me
even though that's not true
because they never did
and they don't want one
I you know it doesn't
and this is
is real clearly
it's not going to be okay with that
that's the secondary factor
is even if he did that
Israel is going to make sure this continues
and that's very clear
to anybody paying attention
the point simply though
is that this is just
like I said
one way or the other
it's very clear that he's
misleading you about
the reality of the situation
here's another clip
and this is
this was the one about the presence
this is interesting
now this one
I think is the most revealing
and it's about the very end of this clip
well what he says essentially
is that they gave
they presented him
with a very special presence
and I just
there's something about this
that feels very off
this is why I'm leaning more
towards in this point
that if this is the direction of it
that somebody
another actor in the conversation
is playing him
another question
you haven't been here in a while
well on Iran
can you give us any
more sense of who exactly
in Iran it is either
what kind of person
another person speaking with
yeah we had
I hate to say this
in front of these young
people
they're not children
I spoke to most of them
they sound like adults to me
even though they are sort of children
they'll always be your children
but I hate to say it
but we killed all their leadership
well on Iran
hold on I want to hear that again
can you give us any
more sense of who exactly
in Iran it is either
what kind of person
another person speaking with
yeah we had
I hate to say this
in front of these young
people
they're not children
they've
I spoke to most of them
they sound like adults to me
even though they are sort of
I hate to say it
would God be
sure if you're speaking with
yeah we had
I hate to say this
in front of these young
people
they're not children
I spoke to most of them
they sound like adults to me
what the
what is he even saying
right there
I can't believe I didn't catch that
earlier
I don't I shouldn't even
waste time on this
but this is just
I just do something
weird about this
listen to what he says
he's talking about
the people next to him
he's talking about
Mark Wayne
and Bondi sitting right there
or whoever he's pointing to
exactly
you know
and they basically said
who's talking to Iran
Whitcoff Cushner
which is what he said
Ron it is either
Whitcoff or Cushner
or whoever he's speaking with
yeah we had
I hate to say this
look I hate
look
I hate to say this
this in front of these young
in front of these young
and he points to the media
and then Mark Wayne and Bondi
people
they're not children
they're
I spoke to most of them
they sound like adults
what are you talking about
you mean the adults
right there next to you
you spoke to them
and they sounded like adults
he must be losing his mind
I don't I mean that's come on
let's be real
that's that's weird
I didn't catch that before
that doesn't even make sense guys
unless I mean
tell me if I'm missing something
he points to them
right
points to them at the left
and he says
love speaking with
yeah we had
I hate to say this
in front of these young
people
they're not children
they've
I spoke to most of them
they sound like adults to me
even though they are sort of
children right
they're low
they're sort of
children
he's literally pointing at Mark Wayne
he's so patronizing
I mean that's why can't I honestly
can't believe that
I can't believe nobody called that
out maybe
maybe they did
I just didn't see it
always be your children
they're always be your children
when you just reference them
okay I'm gonna I gotta let this go
that's
that's weird man
I mean I don't I try to avoid
like the
oh he's going senile
because that's always over used
oh they tripped up the stairs
and it's like oh and
there are usually points to me
they are old
but tell me what on that
it's just weird man
okay let's get past it
but I hate to say it but
we killed all their leadership
and why is that the next statement
after what you just said
it's just so weird
and then they met to choose new
leaders and we killed all of them
Israel did is the point
because he right then had said
we're waiting to see what they
put and then they killed them
and then they bombed again
and that's not even how that
really went
they didn't bomb the level
they bombed Kamini
and this is the person who's
after him
that this is the way it went down
they bombed a lot of other people too
but after the bombing
this is who the person who came in
they're just trying to make it sound
like extra powerful
like this is why do you need to lie
about something like that
now we have a new group
and we can easily do that but
oh you can easily kill them too
you know just casually
that's not right guys
let's see how they turn out
it's
okay so let's see
let's let's give him time
you know if we don't like him
we'll just kill him
you have to realize that's
literally what he just said
all their leadership
and then they met to choose new leaders
and we killed all of them
and now we have a new group
and we can easily do that
but let's see how they turn out
let's see
we'll give it time
you really maybe kill them
if we don't like them
because that's freedom and democracy
I'm really regime change
you know this is a change in the regime
because you know the very thing
that they told you was
totally not the objective
until they told you it was the objective
and now they haven't done it really
but they said but they've changed a little bit
so it's regime change
so I win right
I'm the one I win right
leaders are all very different
than the ones that we started off with
that created all those problems
so this was I think we can say Jason
this is regime change
oh yeah yeah it's if we did it
mission accomplished guys
we did it
hooray
and it's because the guy is different
you know it's literally the
the next person in line
and we were told the whole thing
would be different
and we're going to save the world
but we kind of we're done right
but we're going to keep going
though because he's a terrorist
make sense of that
because that's where this
this is where it goes
well you know we're going to see
but Israel right now is trying to murder him
because he's there with a bad guy we're told
these people are just this bad at it
I really want to stress that
it's dishonesty and corruption
but they're also just really bad at this
this guy I don't know why people let him
just ramble
he screws himself over
but again
doesn't seem to change anything
so maybe I'm wrong
I don't trust anybody
I don't trust you
that's only because I know you
but if I didn't know you
I'd probably have more trust
but I don't trust anyone
why do you why do you say that
why do you say what makes you try
do you think I trust them
I don't trust them
because they're going to make a deal
they're going to make a deal
they did something yesterday
that was amazing actually
they here we go
gave us a present
okay
and the president arrived today
oh arrived today
okay that's not the same as saying
that this was handed to him
from somebody you're speaking with
or that he can confirm
that that's the case
there was a very big present
worth a tremendous amount of money
hmm
you know it's paying right
that that seems to win him over
here's a plane
here's a nice watch
here's money and stuff
that's what seems to influence him
and I'm not going to tell you
what that present is
but it was a very significant
prize
and they gave it to us
and they said they were going to give it
so that meant one thing to me
would deal with the right people
oh okay
so they capitulated
so as long as you get what you want
and they do what you're told
they are told
he's just speaking to things
they're not really supposed to verbalize
they don't want powerful leaders
they don't want people who want to run
their countries
they want people who will bow to them
they want people who will do what's
best for what he wants
what he calls us interest
because that's how they do this
but that's what he just said
we want people
and that's what he said
well if they don't like him
we'll just kill him
all right
don't see where everybody doesn't give me one
we'll just remove her
but democracy
they literally just don't even try anymore
uh prize
and they gave it to us
and they said they were going to give it
so that meant
one thing to me would deal with the right people
no it wasn't nuclear related
it was oil and gas related
oh oil and gas related
I love how they just work these things
out of him
like he's like
I'm not going to tell you anything
and this is chief
part of me because he think he wants to
say it
but oil and gas related
huh
very expensive prize
I wonder if he's going to claim
they now control
Carg Island
you know
or something like that
which is kind of where I think
but the end of the day
the real question is
who is he talking about here
and okay
so you're telling me that they gave you
something that's very valuable
that somehow the Iranian leadership
wouldn't recognize was no longer
theirs or in control
or
I mean
there's so many openings to this
it just
we will find out
some point
this is going to conclude
is going to be some kind of an endpoint
and either they'll be in control or not
and we'll know what's going on
and I think that this will
if it fades away
with some kind of like
just we're there and we did it
that will tell you everything
and it was a very nice thing they did
but
what it showed me is that we're dealing
with the right people
because you know you don't know because
the leadership was killed all gone
it's just that's just not true by the way
but they just love to do that
I mean all gone
as the expression goes
the past supreme leader
as the leadership was killed all gone
Khomeini all gone
as the expression goes
the past supreme leader
what
yeah this guy's struggling man
and then the new supreme leader was
racked up at a minimum racked up pretty good
and everyone else was gone
and then
many of the people in the third tier are gone
but we're dealing with a group of people that I think
turned out and and the
sorry by the way to make you sit
through all this nonsense
that's about what he says right here
the present the gift they made to us
was very significant
and
they said they were going to do it
and it happened
and they're the only ones that could have done it
Jennifer
there it is
you get what I'm
to get what that said
so
it's just a thought
but think about what he just said there
and play one more time real quick
it's very significant
and they said they were going to do it
and it happened
and they're the only ones that could have done it
Jennifer
okay so what he just made clear
is that somebody offered something
basically what it seems to be to
prove that this is genuine
and that he said well they said they would do it
they did it
and they're the only ones that could have done it
so therefore that it happened
now I know it's real
which would suggest that he didn't know that before
or might not have
but either way
doesn't that seem to stage stands to reason
that somebody else could be playing that role
or that there could be somebody else in that position
it's not really in charge of Iran
or any number of factors at play
or he's making the whole thing up
any one of these things feel far more likely
than the fact that they're literally about to
take over Iran by dealing with one random defector
who somehow has power over everything
well that you know
I mean
obviously it could just be that they're telling you the truth
that this is all they're destroyed
and they're about to win
if it happens
well then we'll talk about that
but understand
it is never the wrong thing to question
what power tells you was happening
especially since your entire life shows you that you should
but it's not just what we're doing
we're not just being contrarian
the evidence clearly points
well let's put it this way
let's just say it turns out
where that's what he said was true
we can still prove they lied to you about every part of it
and that's maybe just because they wanted to keep you in the dark
but we're still right in going
they're lying to you
which I think suggests that they're whole
they're lying about the whole thing
that's kind of my point
and I know you see it
as always it's about being objective as possible
especially for the new people to the show
and I think what's really important here
is that right that last part
and everything else he said in between
it suggests an opening for something
somebody playing him
now obviously I believe Israel is the most obvious culprit
about trying to drive this in a position
that causes what they want
usually the expense of American interests
so as I said
we'll see where this continues to go
there's no more clip here we'll play
and as D.D. geopolitics says
completely unhinged
will kill all their leadership
and then they may meet to choose new leaders
and we killed all of them
and the last one here
oh actually this is not the last one
I think that's coming up
yeah right there
but so this drop site news reports this today
Tehran mocks Donald Trump's claim of a gift
with a missile strike video
there's no need for audio
it's just like a missile sound
but they basically just show a missile strike
like that
and that's what's posted like in response to it
and it says
Ron Media published footage of what it said
was its first successful ground-to-ground
missile strike
directed at U.S. base
which counter which you know
contradicts what they claim
they're capable of right now
and says describing it as a gift
we sent to Trump
the framing appears to directly mock
Trump's Oval Office remarks
where he claimed
Iran had given the U.S. a present
a very big present
a very significant prize
bars news setting an Iranian army statement
said the strike targeted a key U.S.
position in the airport
which is a military target
now the point
is that he's saying that
and they're responding
but that could be because they want to
or they don't know
they're talking with somebody
that's always possible
but what I think this gets at
is their actual capabilities
and what we'll get to in a second here
one of these next posts
is a framing of it
that I think is worth considering
that this is
and it's evidence-based
but as always
there could be more to the story
first this is what Trump said
on the 22nd
now yes this is a
Zionist journalist
and rather just Israeli
is the right way to frame that
and wonder whether they might be
part of the lie
just like U.S. media
would be for U.S. arguments
right consider that
but here's what she's claiming
Trump said to him
to her
on the 22nd
and factor the same
with what he's telling you is
happening now
is this is in the middle of this
this is in the middle
of what they were claiming was
happening
allegedly were in this moment
where he's supposed to be
speaking with somebody
and it says
because that's his time frame
right
he said three days
and so in the middle of that
he says
you'll find out what's going to
happen
they will cave into what
is you're going to find out soon
about whether they'll cave into
the ultimatum
it's going to be very good
today
total decimation of Iran
he says
it's going to work out very good
he's going about NATO countries
they're
oh that's not the relevant part
just you know
they're doing
they're not doing anything
total decimation of Iran
does not seem even remotely
similar to what he's
telling you is happening
and this is why he's supposed
to be in the middle of this
conversation
come on
but he could just be
blustering
like he does
now Trump
interestingly
today
in the midst of us being
we're being told
that we're just about to be
you know
we're in the midst of this
negotiation
Israel is still currently
bombing infrastructure
in many cases
with U.S. support
even as he tells you
they're not doing that
and here's what he
actually just said
we've won this
with this war has been won
the only one that likes
to keep it going
is the fake news
I mean the New York Times
you read the New York Times
it's like
we're not winning a war
where they have no
Navy and they have no
Air Force and they have no
nothing
well yes but there
this is a different war
as Iran has been discussing
for a long time
that's the truth guys
now yes he's not wrong
about some of the things
he's saying
there's
there's some nuance to it
but they knew this
you have to remember
that this was discussed
before this started
especially since
remember on the 28th
they put this forward
saying in the U.N.
if you attack us
clearly knowing what
they were going to do
that we will bomb
these locations
showing you one
they were not going to
bomb first
two there was no imminent
threat
and three
that they told you
they were going to respond
to the legal targets
which response to your
illegal acts
and that they turned around
and go look at what they're
doing their terrorists
it's just lazy
right but so this point
then they have no nothing
the reality of the actual
warfare
Iran said
in the beginning
that they prepared
for this different warfare
that's why we saw the
missile locations move
and so on
but this was
and what did Rubio tell
you right in the beginning
that we saw them
building their drones
and other things
and we had to stop that
because they would be eventually
insurmountable
well that's where they're
currently are
those are the very same drones
they're using to circumvent
what they claim
they have enough to stop
I think it's pretty clear
that they're wrong
about Iran's capabilities
now
now that who knows
how to end up
but he wants you to believe
that we did just over
because he's being fed
that by people who want
by people like Hexas
who need his approval
who need desperately
for him to go good job
hey you're doing a good job
and do whatever
just as long as I feel
like I'm winning
and I can tell people
I'm winning
you'll be doing
that's I think the reality
now if this goes awry
and Pete Hexas is shown
to not be the one in charge
well they're probably going to get fired
and we literally have planes
flying over Tehran
and other parts of their country
which was already accepted
as an immediate reality
like before it started
that once this starts
they'll get air superiority
that was very like
publicly
and I mean you can look this up
there's public conversations
that the so-called experts
and others
just in a kind of waxing intellectual
before we got here
what largely saying that
yes that'll be right away
and yet they made it out
to be some unprecedented success
because they needed a win
that was Hexas
that was Netanyahu
but it was already well aware
that that would be an immediate thing
because there was not an effort
to fight in that realm
that's the point
Okay
they can't do a thing about it
for instance
if I want to take down
that power plant
that very big powerful power
you know that
war crime
they can't do a thing about it
yeah you're right
yeah but here's the thing
because there's arguably
consequences
you see the thing is guys
anybody can commit a war crime
anybody
any government
no matter how small
any individual
can decide to get a bomb
and do something
that kills a lot of innocent people
under the guise of some government
political action
those are war crimes
it's not difficult to do that
he's acting like it's somehow
how I could bother anything I want
well so could anybody ultimately
in certain circumstances
the point is just because
you're able to
it's not the point
the point is that you doing so
would be a crime
the very thing that you claim
you're trying to stop in the world
no more war is all peace
but you're gonna just
we can just casually bomb
these things should we want to
he is the problem here
just like Biden the rest
but the point is anybody
in this position doing this
is the problem
whether Netanyahu
or Iran's government
this is the problem
and I believe the world
is becoming like
uncomfortably aware
with that
ubiquitous reality
because we don't honestly
I think we it's a hard thing
I don't know where the path is
I don't know how we get around
everything being in this position
all of our governments
and all of this
but we should try
otherwise we're just
resigned to just let it go in
direction that nobody seems to want
guys
it's like take me
that's all they can do
and yet if you read the New York Times
you watch ABC fake news
or NBC fake news
or Fox fake news
or CNN fake news
you'd say
it's a close battle
it's not a close battle
well let's talk about that
and again at some point
I mean why okay
if we're being told
that you've decimated them
and you're just absolutely in control
is there anybody in the room
who believes anybody
anywhere listening to this
that believes that Trump
of all people would then
just make a deal
does that not that
doesn't that like
belie everything he's
ever written about
everything about position
you know maneuvering from
position of strength
right now
if he's saying the truth
you're going to believe
that he would just back out
and let them control everything
or at the very least
do I mean
look at what they've done
everywhere else
don't Trump
if given the opportunity
to absolutely take control
would absolutely take control
and you damn well know it
so just it's just lazy
to argue that somehow
that that's the case
it's just about what he
wants people to think guys
and here
is what
Rosemary Kalanek has to say
not familiar with the work
but I think this is an important
thing to consider
and just the evidence
of the the reality
of the circumstances
make these points for her
as she says
wars reveal information
about countries
relative military capabilities
and interests
that's one of the most
important insights
from the bar
the bargaining model of war
Iran believed before the war
that fighting the U.S.
would strengthen
its bargaining position
and they were correct
the war has revealed
that Iran wouldn't topple
after community's death
like they claimed
that Iran is
highly resolved
and it can inflict damage
across the Gulf at low cost
indefinitely
which is being widely shown
to this very day
despite the lies
coming from the administration
it revealed that Iran
look just to be clear on that guys
that the world can see that
there's no hiding
the fact that they're doing this
and getting successful attacks
the only thing that's happening
is they're just going
that you know
I guess just lying about it
and then interestingly
the same fake news media
that he claims is
misrepresenting it
often pull those punches for him
you see because it's both
like the New York Times article
I just showed you
but like Trump's a big liar
but they're advocating
for the war to continue
it's how this tends to work
now it says
it revealed that Iran
can gain massive leverage
and perhaps even
collect tolls
from controlling ships
the straight and foremost
remember the only one
that I can see that doesn't do that
if you haven't seen that point
it's wild to me
every straight that you're thinking
the ones the U.S. control
locations they control
the straight of
you know
the Suez canal
the Panama
they all charge
lots of money for ships
you know what location doesn't
and hasn't
the straight of her moose in Iran
it just speaks for itself
and now they're trying to dictate
the control through this
only for people that are attacking them
not everybody else
like they've been claiming
from the beginning
by contrast it says
the war has hurt U.S.
and Israeli bargaining power
compared to where it was
before Geneva talks in February
that means we'll get worse terms
now than if we'd accepted
Iran's proposal then
so if Americans are thinking
from an American perspective
but not just Trump and Israel
you would have gotten a better situation
than versus where Israel's
driven this country now
that's her opinion anyway
but I agree
she says why is the U.S.
in Israel position worse
decapitation strikes failed
to induce Iran to surrender
always an unlikely prospect
according to just about everybody
and even the CIA
said the same thing
and they ignored it
and listened to what Israel told them
that's on record
nullifying the U.S.
in Israeli theory of victory on day three
no new plausibility
since then
right no new
theory of how victory will emerge
it's despite still claiming a couple of weeks
and it's doubtful one will emerge
that hurts the U.S. position
the world can see that
anybody who's not a blind follower
has already come to terms with that
Trump has proven highly sensitive
to oil marketing
market swings
and even removed sanctions
which is true
on Iranian oil
I've got that somewhere in here
wherever whatever it was
somewhere maybe not
I'm thought I did
we'll come back to it
the point is that they did
remove sanctions
which is just ridiculous
the idea that you're
you're attacking them
and you're hurting on the evil terrorist
but we're going to give them money
because we put ourselves in a bad position
you just it's just it's just embarrassing guys
and they try to act like it's somehow
a calculated move
they always intended it
because they're they're just
that's that's embarrassing
that shows you that this is not going
the way they thought it would
now isn't the same as saying they're losing
but that's it could mean that
now they remove sanctions on Iranian oil
as Edward Fishman noted Iran gained
more sanctions relief
from closing hormones
than any diplomatic means
including the JCPOA
the just the disruption to oil markets
and Trump's concern about them
also hurts the U.S. position
it says now that their war has bogged
down into an attrition battle
where Iran can impose costs
with cheap means
like drones
and missiles
and Israeli interceptors seem to be running low
which is true
the U.S. and Israel are on the losing end
of the damage and casualties curve
costs and casualties will get worse
not better over time
as Iran told you from day one
we're in this for the long game
and yet Trump and Netanyahu
tried to screen day one
within day two day three
and make all the points they could
because that's what they do every time
and Iran sat back and let them do it
and told you we're not in this
to get these immediate wins
we're in this for the long haul
and I think they're showing that
that further hurts the U.S. Israeli bargaining leverage
and again the idea of these drones
we're talking like $50,000 to millions of dollars
over and over and over and over
Trump is now considering frankly
as she writes
foolhardedly military gambits
potentially to seize Kargh
which is what I argue we're talking about right there
my opinion
islands and Hormuz or perhaps
the highly enriched uranium
trapped somewhere under rebel in Iran
which again does exist
but the reality is this not something they would even
I don't think even logically
or justifiably go in for
because it wouldn't be worth the effort I think
these would be significant escalations
to put U.S. boots on the ground
which I argue is already happening
is probably going to happen still
more so
none are likely to end the war
and all would likely cause U.S. casualties
in the business lingo
Trump's BATNA best alternative
to a negotiated agreement
is always worse
or is way worse
not least because of the shadows of Afghanistan
U.S. forces being surged into the Middle East
which by the way I just briefly showed you
we'll end with more troops are being sent
are comparable to what George W. Bush used
to invade Afghanistan in the autumn of 2001
what started out as a limited mission
to topple the Taliban
and capture Osama bin Laden
who instead escaped through Tora Bora mountains
or if you believe the way that went down
and not realize that
as a person working with the U.S. government
devolved into a ground campaign
that eventually ballooned
to over 100k U.S. troops in 2011
the clear imperative here
is for Trump to de-escalate
credibility costs be damned
this is why I think this is where we're at
like one of the logical possibilities
anyway
that they're starting to see
and again that's why I inserted
that maybe Trump is realizing
he's being played
or even lying
the way that they're starting to see
that this is not going to work out
and if they don't stop now
that the long run will hurt them more
that does make a lot of sense
with just the base
everything she's saying you could verify
but ultimately
some of the parts that people dispute
but ultimately there's most of the
engagement with the interceptors and the drones
it's all very clearly understood
and
he might be willing to make himself look bad
in order to stop the worst outcome
and that but see right now
that makes sense
but the argument that he's trying to go
we made a deal with somebody
who agreed to the way it really is right now
think about that
and they go we did it
it's over the deal's done
and they walk away and they
Ron goes they lied
and he's all they just don't admit it
they just realized
I bet you we see a world without what happened
I still argue Israel wouldn't let it happen
but that's what she's arguing
in a sense
that this war is existential for Iran
but not for the United States
Iran will keep fighting with cheap means
like drones
and it will eventually outlast the U.S.
just like the Taliban did in Afghanistan
that
or Iran could fracture into chaos
creating refugee flows
and breeding terrorism for decades to come
well
again
you could take that as an indictment of Iran
or just at these locations
because of outside forces
always drive to that
like with Syria
and it's not because of Syria in particular
it's because of what they flooded the area with
but either way
same argument
that if you
you create chaos
that you
the people that strive
that thrive on chaos
will seek out the chaos
and you know exactly what I'm talking about
terrorism isn't an existential threat to the United States
but we should be
shouldn't be creating it for conditions for it
Trump doesn't like backing down
but that is what needs to happen here
and stat
before ill-fated escalation leads to more needless deaths
now it's her opinion
I think it's interesting and worth considering
now lastly quickly
you might have seen this
I thought this was interesting for a few reasons
I still can't see
tell whether this is necessarily connected
or just kind of adjacent to
but so this random account puts out
I haven't seen them before
says a Saudi X account
reportedly posted it
and I can't confirm that it's necessarily Saudi
but posted a specific threat
targeting
the Motiva refinery in Port Arthur
just it looks like it was two hours before the explosion
had this facility
so I didn't know this at the time
I couldn't verify it
it was just a random thing
I looked up the tweet
I wasn't able to find it
and in case you don't know what this is
this is the
this has been going around
this is a facility in Texas
on the 23rd that had explosion and fire
and it's of course interesting
really related to the oil conversation
and you wonder whether this is being done to us
it's hard not to see the correlation
especially when Israel's bombing them
and hurting the prices
and things that Trump didn't want to happen
so you wonder whether this is another thing
that's supposed to create the chaos
or a claim which a lot of partisans did
that Iran did it
even though that's not what the evidence seems to back up
now here's what he wrote
within a week
the largest gas refinery in the United States
Motiva Enterprises in the city of Port Arthur, Texas
on the U.S. Gulf Coast will be destroyed
which it was destroyed
but save the tweet he says
okay so I looked into this
here's his account
with you know basically scrubbed
now I this is interesting the way this went down
so this of all the other things we tend to say
this is one used in fact to this
Grockens don't lie to you
but there's I would argue nothing more
able to look into the internal dynamics of Twitter than Grock
so I simply said
with it I quoted exactly what it said
that's it
and said give me the link to
this account saying that
and it said here's the direct link to the post
but it says the exact wording of your query doesn't appear verbatim
now it's not the same post
it says something and it's interesting
because what the what this goes on to show
is that he essentially deleted a whole bunch of stuff
and then on the same day went and posted a bunch of
somewhat abstract similar type posts
I think it was designed to hide what he said
even if it was just like a
guess that he doesn't want to think about
but what you'll find the account it's very pro-Israel
it's very pro it's exactly what you'd expect
talking about Israeli Mossad and bombing things
you look for yourself it's exactly what you'd expect
so I said was it deleted
I'm asking about this statement not the one they suggested
Grock says no the post you asked about was not deleted
here's the exact post but it says that wrong statement
not what I was asking
so I responded saying no no the post I asked about
was that deleted and it says again
no the post you said was not deleted and again
cites the wrong text
I wonder always whether this is you know
something they've been engineered to ignore
and stuff like that because we know that's happened
Idlan's been caught doing that
in fact it just happened again that I didn't even
talk about recently
where I was asking something else and it was like
no the Houthis didn't bomb something and I'm like
okay that's South Africa all over again
that's that's the platform being told
to lie about things in my opinion
no because that did happen with South Africa
I remember people said like what's the baseball score today
it was like there's no genocide on Africa
or that there is was the point
they wanted you to think that and the evidence
showed the opposite
but it was telling you that when you asked about
the weather because and then later basically admitted
that Idlan tweaked it to do that
or that just to answer and then it made it
kind of have a problem
now back to the point I responded saying
no the text I asked about
not the tweet you keep showing
the text I asked about was that posted and deleted
and it says yes
so I'm going wow that was difficult to get to
that very clear question right and it says yes
the exact it's very clear the exact text you quoted
and listed off
was posted by this account on March 23rd
at approximately 545
it says it was posted roughly 45 to 90 minutes
before the refinery explosion occurred
the account then immediately deleted that specific post
now just because it could also be wrong
that's the problem with these ridiculous things
they're using today
and how it's going to dictate our lives in the future
in the same way
the person behind it
but this does appear to be the reality
based on post based on what this says
me following up other research
and it simply says so yes the specific post
with the text you asked about was real was posted
and was deleted shortly afterward
that's pretty damn interesting to me
only because what we're talking about is this post
telling you that this was going to be bombed
and then hours later it was on fire
that's pretty damn interesting to me
so the real question becomes was there for knowledge here
was this something other
and was it just not meant to happen
you could decide
I just like to connect those dots and find out this was real
the timing is hard to miss right now
now on that note
here's what Laura Loomer put out today
soon there will be a massive Islamic terror attack
in America and the perpetrators will likely have
financial ties to podcasters
and those who are sowing discord
for foreign nations in America
that sure seems convenient
think of it all of a sudden it's like
this new thing and ties to Ryan or whatever
which don't exist because it's not the case
but that would be something
or more likely somebody more influential
but something like that
like she probably tried to lob it at Tucker
because they seem to hate each other
but the point is
how in the world would she possibly know that
she goes I predict there will be many casualties
let me clear by the way
this is not how a prediction looks
it's far too specific
there'll be an Islamic attack in America
and the perpetrators will likely have financial ties
to podcasters who sowing discord for America
okay I'll predict there will be many casualties
and only then will it maybe set in
that people have been conned into supporting a terrorist
Syop
no she's not talking about Israel
you'd be surprised
to distract you from the threat of Islam
while the enemy plotted to destroy our country
should you be concerned about Islam
possibly extreme levels of it causing problems
yeah should you be concerned about
Judaism extreme levels of it causing problems
yeah you should
should you be concerned about extreme levels of Christianity
maybe causing yes you should
should you listen to somebody who tells you
only one of those things in the world
could possibly cause problems
no well yes
and then you should call a ridiculous for saying so
consider everybody question everything
the reality
to make it about one only religion is just
there's no logic to it
it doesn't make sense
there's plenty of people who practice
you know like people who live their lives
who don't go to church
or don't go to synagogue
or don't go that's the reality
there's plenty of those people who call them
calls Christians who call themselves Jews
who call themselves Muslims
that's most of the population
then you got the orthodox versions
and within that
it's not even close to the things they're
pointing to
that's the truth
whether it's any of them to be real
then you can get into the more extreme levels of it
the extreme religious Zionism
the extreme Muslim terrorism
the extreme
every one of these levels Christianity
in history has done the exact same things
and just so tired of having to pretend
like people like this
are worth consideration
but it's because I do know that there are
some honest people out there that do seem
to fall for this stuff
I don't know why
but it happens
and so what she's literally saying is
it will be 10 times worse than 9-11
funny how we've heard that exact sentiment
from people in Israel
from Netanyahu
Trump
and it says and it's going to be traced
right back to the woke Reich
in some way
the woke right
of course
I like from the right
arguing that that's sort of what
the right wing
Nazi elements tied to Muslims
or what are you saying right there
or the woke Democrats
right
who are calling Nazis out
yeah you're dumb
okay that's just stupid
but either way
the point here guys
is about trying to create the sentiment
that bad things are coming
this person is so obviously
anti-american
it's alarming to me
how clear that is
and if you want to look deeper
and understand that
you know
like Tim Poole says
everything's civil war
and Alex Jones says
everything's World War III
Laura Lume rightly
always not rightly
continues to say
everything is 9-11
and threaten people
that 9-11 is coming
9-11 is coming
9-11 over and over and over and over
if you don't see the common thread
I don't know how much more clear I can make that
these people are guiding this direction
and not necessarily the action happening
but the emotional turmoil
to drive certain action
now lastly
Russia discovers hundreds of booby trap
boot insoles
rigged with explosives
to blow soldiers' legs off
now this could be a random story
it could be tied to a number of things
but maybe it's connected
and I think it's worth knowing it's going on
Russia has impounded hundreds of booby trap
boot insoles
intended for Vladimir Putin's foot soldiers
say the federal security service
the heated insoles
that are used in cold weather
were rigged with enough explosives
to blow victims' limbs off
kind of sound familiar huh
Russian counterintelligence
blames the Ukrainian
secret services
for a ploy to maim their soldiers
the insoles were a consignment
of humanitarian aid
it also that also sounds like somebody we know doesn't it
but anyway it says
they detained man from Tajikistan
was a courier for the explosive insoles
and the FSB
so simple point
this could very well just be
lunatics in Ukraine
to carry this out
but then of course you have to make sure you understand
that that's been funded and armed
and grown by the U.S. and Israel
over very long period of time
include the article discussing the CIA document
that discusses
how they armed and funded
fascist elements in Ukraine
to throw against the Soviet Union
just like the Mojideen Afghanistan
that became ISIS in al-Qaeda
you know
the the usual practice of these governments
and realize they've been doing it
for a very long time
either way
my point is they'd be responsible
for the lunatics that are doing this
but the real point is to ask
whether or not this is connected
other things going on today
and so it's worth drawing the parallel right
here's what uh
oh this was just added a lot
this is what the Russian platform says
the Ukrainian special services
camouflage explosives
as household items
the press warned
according to the information
the explosives were previously disguised
as electric stoves
mania
manicure instruments
beauty products
perfume kits
power banks
speakers
religious icons
church utensils
car parts
you know
normal stuff
for normal people
likely not even used by military
and doesn't that sound very familiar
it should
because the U.S. government and Israel
have been doing this our entire lives
now
what's important to see
is that there is a very very clear connection
sort of like it
the IDF training people in this country
they go back to even the Osloff movement
quite literally the group
that we're talking about
doing this in Russia
who were literally trained
by and armed by Israel
even in 2018
Haaretz covered that
rights activists were screaming
about why Israel's army neo-nazis
you don't know
if that seems strange to you
then you're not paying attention
because this is more the norm
than everything you're told
very easy to prove
then here's another article
Times of Israel 2022
no other option
Israeli ex-commandos
said to secretly train
Ukrainian civilians
that was when they tried to make it
out to be
they were getting ready for the
invasion of Russia
which didn't ultimately happen
the way they claimed it did
now this goes to
2020-2014
Israeli training Ukrainian forces
here's electronic defauda
2022
mercenaries in Ukraine
think Israeli government
you know the Nazis
literally
thanking them for training them
this is from Middle East transparent
this is interesting
that goes into the bigger picture
today
local spies with lethal gear
how Israel and Ukraine
reinvented covert action
that's December 2025
a potent new fusion
of old-style human spycraft
with cutting-edge technology
is having a big impact
on high-stakes conflict
right
so drones
bombings
exactly like they're talking about
now here's where those videos
come into play
because you know
who is bragging
about doing things just like this
you know just as well as I do
that ultimately
oh wait hold on
I have to grab it
here's the
I'll play them in the
bit reverse image
the reverse way as usual
so this is the
former Mossad head
telling you
that where they do things like this
they booby-trap electronics
everywhere
is there any surprises in Gaza
surprises
yeah
like the intelligence surprises
pages walkie-talkies
do you know how many equipment
I mean treated equipment
that we have in these countries
you can't do not
I do
you mean I do
you mean booby-trapped equipment
not only booby-trapped
and spying
manipulated equipment
all right
spying and potentially booby-trapped
which countries you're talking about
in all the countries that you can imagine
all countries that you can imagine
okay
so
in any country it's possible
let alone one that they're
literally training their
neo-nazi fascist elements
to use against the people
that they want to throw them at
apparently
so that's the obvious one as well
that they're anywhere
but also the fact that they
quite literally did this Lebanon
and let it circulate for years
which hurt maimed and killed
mostly women and children
how did you convince
Hezbollah to buy this
well obviously
they didn't know that
they were buying this from Israel
who did they buy it from
or I think they were buying it from
we have
an incredible array of possibilities
of creating foreign companies
that have no weight
being traced back to Israel
shell companies over
shell companies who affect
the supply chain to our favor
we create a pretend world
we are a global production company
we write the screenplay
we're the directors
we're the producers
we're the main actors
the world is our stage
yet otherwise known as
a very very very easily
identifiable crime
you're committing crimes
just very publicly admitted
that we commit crimes
in every country around the world
and manipulate their supply chains
for our favor
and she's like
you're cool
hashtag freedom
like think about sitting in the
interview
and there's this
age old journalist
and literally being told
what you've always called
terrorism and going cool
that's basically what she did
they framed it
like it was some kind of tech
savvy action
I mean guys it's so
obvious that that is what
they've always called that
and that's where it's
always come from
that's what this stems back to
I mean truly
I mean we'll take it
one step further to understand
the stem point
I mean certainly the Zionists
have used it
and brought it in fact
to the area
terrorism as we know it today
the planting of bombs
and marketplaces
and so on and so forth
was in fact introduced
into the Middle East
by the Zionists
in the 20s
but the net result
of Zionist terrorism
and violence in the
first third of the 20th century
has brought forth
to my mind the
anomaly
the horrific
and unacceptable status
in the Middle East today
of the state of Israel
which is in fact
an armed garrison state
which now exports
more arms
and distributes violence
all around the world
vastly disproportionate
to its size
I mean in that respect
I think it's a
it's a horrible cycle
of violence
but in it all
I think the Palestinian
is the victim
is no question about that
so lastly here
back to the lot
ending
points after that
I mean the general
idea of just how clear
that there is an
ongoing effort
to drive this into
everywhere it seems
but
Trump faces
oh this was the
sanctions part
I just
I guess I forgot to
move it over there
but it had next
to the
the oil discussion
one of the most consistent
behemoth
complaints about Obama
Glenn says
was he released funds
of 1.7 billion
dollars to Iran
that they think
Obama gifted to them
rather than release
their funds
that we stole
but whatever
it's just so
frustrating
how many
ridiculously
incorrect
and willfully
stupid people
there are
that seem to control
the conversation
he's right by the way
I've said it
every single time
they didn't
it's not like
it's pro-Iran
it's just
the simple reality
they stole that money
from Iran
for whatever reason
like you think about it
if you're going to
tell us that
they're all evil
terrorists
then why wouldn't
you just own that
why wouldn't you just
say we took it
because they're terrorists
and then he gave it
back to them
it's like they can't
even be
because they just
always lied about that
I mean they literally
just said they did that
with Venezuela
but here they still tell you
that they just
gave them back
gave them money
because they need to make it
look like
Obama bad guy
for their little
internal game
they didn't do that
they'd be stole it
from Iran
and it says
Trump's lifting of
sanctions on Iran
this week
could generate
14 billion
dollars for Iran
so you're all
worked up about them
giving back money
that you stole from them
he's going to give them
14 billion dollars
to make sure that
they don't lose
what they're going to get
like this is just
not about what they
claim it is guys
if you're at least
they have nothing
means anything to them
here's what
general McMaster had to say
and this very clearly
just like
Furkan points out
they're literally trying
to ignite world war three
to protect Israel
general isn't Iran's
potential control
of the state of
poor moods
wasn't that the most
obvious car
she met the street
by the way
or they had to play here
why is it that it seems
that the U.S. was not
prepared for this
well we actually
were prepared for it
I don't know where
this narrative came out
that it was a big surprise
I mean
I can tell you
because they said that
funny how that works out
right
because they lied
about that
when that first happened
because they needed to
make a different narrative
because of other lies
they told
that's what happened
there was numerous
examples that came
from their own people
that made this argument
we never expected that
Trump says
then later tells you
they aimed at it
and we plan for it
they just lie guys
and now whether
that was the truth
of the lie
which one
who knows
the point is
they said that
to sell a lie
in the moment
so it's
whether he knows it
or not
you know
I don't know
where that came from
we were prepared
well because they lied
to us about that
that's usually
the case
you know we do an
annual exercise
with up to 30 countries
and about the closure
of the state
straight-of-form moves
and how to reopen it
remember I think
Trump says something like
they're not allowed
to do that
or like nobody told
they weren't supposed
to do that
or he said that
like this is silly
somebody clearly fed
him wrong information
and so what
you're seeing
in the campaign now
and I think this is
really important to
understand
is a continuation
of of the
the joint
you know the combined
force of the U.S.
and Israel
prioritizing
the missile
and the drone
capabilities
including their manufacturing
capabilities
including their ability
to reconstitute
their their missiles
and drones
with support from
Russia and China
there are a couple of ships
sailing right now
with solid fuel from China
I don't think
they're going to make it
to Iran
oh okay so
just a casual
admission of crime
why not
are they not allowed
to go there
is it a crime
for them to trade
resources with their allies
I guess only one
of the U.S. claims that
like it's clear
that they're suggesting
they're taking action
against these things
if you saw the IDF
in the last 24 or 48 hours
striking ships
in the Caspian Sea
in the far north
of Iran
because
Russia was smuggling
drones
into Iran
to reconstitute
their capabilities
that's great
great so
what he's basically saying
is that Israel is
bombing Russia
and China
because that's not a big
deal at all
and ultimately
to you know
isn't it funny
how Russia can blink
and
Jones will
scream World War 3
but you have
Trump
bombing
or rather Israel
with Trump
bombing is
two other nuclear powers
at the same time
and you know
nobody seems to be
screaming about that
you know
at the end of the day
guys
I think this
this is the final point
about Israel
side of this
is they're going to
drive this
wherever they want to
Trump
will just
fall in line
and make it sound
like that's
what he always wanted
he's done it
over and over
I honestly think
it's just because
he's just not
it's not in him
to admit
that he got drawn
into it
this is just alarming
how where we are
it's very clear
that this is
against what
he promised all of you
at the very least
again
Pentagon reveals
or lastly anyway
Pentagon reveals
attacks in Latin America
are just the beginning
with Operation
total extermination
Trump's threats
against Cuba
expect more strikes
in the region
because why not
you know
let's just
go after all
the illegal wars
because we said
none
hashtag peace president
you got to start
being honest
about this guys
and Pentagon
prepares to send
3,000 more troops
to the Middle East
to
base it
and that's actually
the wrong point
there was a
the one they posted this
right there
to assist
with operations in Iran
that is what they're saying
so
you guys can keep playing
this tiptoe
dancer
you know
whatever you want to call it
the mental gymnastics
these are troops deployed
for what's going on in Iran
that's group
that's boots on the ground
it doesn't have to be
literally in the one
location you're talking about
because even Israel is
telling you
this is a multi regional war
there already are
anyway
especially if they're
arming Kurds
especially if they're
they're just
keep growing
if you cared about this
if you want to
if you if you were angry
about the Iran war
you got to start taking a stand
now lastly
I'll leave you with a point
that I just saw my phone
actually
that I'll end up getting into
later
but it just speaks to
what I was saying earlier
and
to be clear
it's a report
so I haven't looked into it
yet
but this is from
it says
Janine Pirro deputy
admits
DOJ has nothing on
your own pal
undercutting Trump
claim of criminality
and that's from the report
now again
even if that ends up
not being the reality
I'm willing to bet you
that's the case right now
because of every other
one of them
he screams about
drone power
because he wants to
create the enemy
the other
and then
the reality is
they never had real
intention to do it
because
there is no case
now that's very different
than saying
they're not criminals
you know what I think
you look at the
you know the
classic examples
they have everything
they need
they just don't
really want to do it
time we start being
honest about this
because nothing is ever
going to change
if we keep going
through the same motions
so I'll leave you there
tonight
got plenty more to get in
tomorrow
thank you for tuning in
this platform
doesn't exist without you
so if you can support
the last American
backbone
there's plenty ways
to do so below
we'll keep going
thank you for all being here
I love you all
as always
question everything
come to your own
conclusions
stay vigilant
this starts
and it's
it's really fascinating
to go back
it starts in 1996
with Netanyahu
who wrote a book
called Fighting Terrorism
and the thesis of the book
is quite straightforward
and very dangerous
he says you know
there are there's Hamas
there's Hezbollah
they oppose Israel
it's not good for us
to fight them directly
yet that won't work
what we need to do
is topple the governments
that back them
so what we need
is regime change
throughout the Middle East
and he actually gave
a long list of seven countries
that included
Syria
Libya
Iraq
Iran
Somalia
Sudan
and Lebanon
and systematically
the United States
has done
Netanyahu's bidding
for almost 30 years now
going to war
with every one of them
except for the big one
that Netanyahu
so much longs for
which is the war
directly
between the United States
and Iran