something to share, and either wisdom, story, or logic, and it's clearly amazing to hear
all the different missing links discovered by people unique to their own journeys.
And in how they have come to discover them, together we can help to build a bigger picture
for a better future for a brighter tomorrow.
Let's stand united, let's remove the veils, and let's create a new world together,
argue that missing link.
Join Jesse Hale on the Missing Link talk show as he helps to unveil the mystery through the
unique wisdom and story of others.
Welcome, welcome, welcome.
Welcome, everybody here back to the Missing Link.
Today, we're excited to speak with someone that's a former Ontario MPP politician having
served in the Ontario Parliament for four terms and 15 years.
He was the first elected representative to speak out against the COVID
emergency lockdowns and mandates, and he was one of the original founders of the end
of the lockdown caucus along with Darren Sloan and Max Bernier.
Welcome to the Missing Link live, Brandy Hillier.
How are you doing today, brother?
I am fine and dandy in this bizarre world that we call Canada.
And yeah, it's great to be with you and nice to meet you, Jesse.
Nice to meet you as well.
It definitely seems to be like the twilight zone here.
Some people say this kind of false illusionary matrix that keeps people in
slave, but maybe you can start off with telling us about yourself and your
journey, a little bit about your background, your education, what part of
the world you grew up in, what part of the world you're in now.
If you like disclosing that information, anything, what got you into politics,
anything about yourself and your journey that you wanted to share with our
audience here today, especially if they may be hearing you here for the first time.
Well, I've, from rural eastern Ontario, Lanark County, I've been very active,
vocal and outspoken for about 25 years in the, in the realm of the public
square, let's say, both inside the swamp in Toronto at Queens Park and in the
real world as well, started another group called the Lanark Landowners and our
slogan then, and this was 25 years ago, was this land is our land, back off
government.
And, and of course, government just keeps growing and growing and the need
to fight back continues to grow as well.
I would share this, you know, I, I did run for the leadership of the
Ontario Conservative Party and like Max Bernier and Derek Sloan, who ran for
the leadership of the Federal Conservative Party, we were all kicked out of our
respective parties for various reasons, mostly to do with COVID or COVID related.
All three of us were part of the lockdown caucus, a nationwide group
of elected representatives to who opposed the COVID mandate.
And now I'm retired from the swamp and enjoying life in Lanark County, but
still speaking my mind frequently and as loudly as I can.
I lost your audio.
I guess we'll start off with this.
Ellen from Facebook says carnage stepping down and then sleeping giant
from a rumble says I just learned carnage stepping down, having been ruled
to be ineligible.
I've looked for some articles.
I heard that just as well before we started.
I can't find anything to that case, but have you heard of it?
Is this just a rumor or, you know, what do you think is going on there?
There's a lot of false rumors that circulate in the swamp.
A lot of falsehoods, even if you're not rumors that circulate in the swamp.
So, no, the county will not be ruled ineligible for to be the prime minister.
So, yeah, that's just, you know, in elections, elections become
very much a very emotional period of time for many people in Canada.
And and they transfer their optimism and their fantasies and think
that that is a reality.
But no, you can be certain that Carney will be on the ticket.
And if we're judging by all the latest polling and the shift in the polling,
we're likely to be the next prime minister again in Canada.
Speaking of optimism and fantasies, some people feel that, you know,
voting is just an illusion and the leaders are selected and not elected.
And, you know, they basically the World Economic Forum or this, you know,
global crime syndicate seems to control every single part of, you know,
both sides, Klaus Schwab bragged about all the cabinet ministers
are all part of the W.E.F.
And it seems like it doesn't matter if you vote left or right.
It seems like, you know, the bankers, the crime syndicate wins.
And you being in politics, maybe you could share your little bit of thoughts
because a lot of people choose not to vote because they feel it's all rigged anyways.
Well, if you're going, if you're looking at the established political parties,
that's completely true.
Look what they just did in the last liberal leadership race to
more classical liberal people were attempting to become leader.
Ruby Dala and Chandra Aira, you know, they,
the party took their three hundred and fifty thousand dollars
and then disqualified them before the race began.
You know, but the conservatives have done that as well.
They did that with Grant Abramsen and Joseph Borgol in their last
conservative leadership, took the money and then disqualified them.
You see it all the time in our local nominations,
where the parties will disqualify for no reason.
They can make up whatever reason they want.
And the parties completely dictate the nomination process.
So unlike in the United States, where you have an open primary system,
where the states, the individual states run the nomination process.
In Canada, it's our political parties that create the rules,
create the criteria and is the arbiter and the adjudicator of those rules.
So if they're, if you're unwanted, you will not be allowed.
And and we see this increasingly like just today, Marie Le Pen
was banned from running in the French elections.
George Esco in Romania was banned from running in the Romanian elections.
Bolsonaro in Brazil, the law fair against Trump.
You know, increasingly our globalist, globalist Western democracies
have corrupted, distorted and abused the democratic system.
We no longer have a democracy.
If you think that only the establishment parties are your choices.
You know, in Canada right now, for April 28th,
you have a choice of the Green Environmental Globalist,
the Orange Socialist Globalist,
the Blue Economic Socialist and Globalist
and the Red Socialist Globalist.
Like, like it's all the same thing.
If you're going to
legitimize these globalist established political parties.
So, you know, you either vote for independent candidates
or smaller party candidates
who are not beholden to the globalist agenda.
Otherwise, you're just participating in the theater.
Now, we have, you know, the Trudeau, you know, Castro,
whatever you want to call him.
He is, you know, obviously done a lot of horrific things,
a lot of criminal things.
He's, you know, part of the WF.
People really despise him.
So they feel that they have to vote for Blue or Conservative
because they don't want him in.
And then the other side, the Red seems,
well, we have to vote the Red.
And then it's this illusion that they have to vote
left or right, red or blue that doesn't allow other people
independence, you know, maybe even like people
like Maxine Bernier's party that didn't even get a seat
because people are so brainwashed into thinking
that they have to vote Blue in order to keep Red out
or vote Red to keep Blue out.
And there's a most of the majority of the country
has that, you know, false illusion.
Yeah, it absolutely.
You know, the but there is no left and right.
You know, you have a blue globalist or a red globalist,
you know, and you look at their policies, you know,
in the big picture, both are fully committed
that to the environmental agenda that there is a man
made climate change.
That's all bullshit and hopes.
And it's all pixie dust nonsense.
But both of those, all four of the globalist parties
all believe that they all believe in net zero
that we should move to a zero carbon footprint.
They all believe and have adopted the Paris Accords.
They all have strenuously and vigorously advocated
for open borders and rampant immigration.
You know, the, you know,
a lot of people blame this
this on the liberals and they've got a lot of blame there.
But I'll remind people, it was actually Brian Mulroney
who codified the Kenda's laws for multiculturalism.
You know, we have Trudeau who has said there is no such thing
as a Canadian identity and
but it was also Mulroney and they've all been complicit
in the same socialist policies.
And now you could argue that one may be
a little faster, one may be a little bit more aggressive,
one may be a little bit slower, but they all
promote the exact same policies.
So it's not left or right.
It's there is a false choice presented in front of people.
It's a false choice because the denominations are rigged.
It's a false choice because the leadership campaigns are rigged.
It's a false choice because the policies
are the same.
So if and we've been doing this in Canada now,
in my view, we've been doing this.
You know, I put 1968 as the
as a trigger point that I've seen in my lifetime
where Canadians adopted into this globalist socialist agenda
and became highly divided and tribalistic in
in our politics and without understanding that they're all the same.
And that is, you know,
why we see now, you know, blue or red of all
none of the political parties ever on a balanced budget.
Actually, the only time we did run a balanced budget for a period of time
was with the Liberals when the reform party was pressuring them from the right.
And that was during the Kretcher and Martin era.
But Harper never ran a balanced budget, either did Maloney.
You know, but everybody thinks that well,
conservatives will be better off at spending their money.
But they do the deficit finding just as well as the Liberals do.
Here we have Will Boone from the Facebook says,
they're all criminals and must lie no matter what
or lose everything for themselves and their families.
It seems like every single election election cycle,
they promise a whole bunch of things.
We're going to do this. We're going to cut this.
We're going to, you know, where for the people
we're going to give back to the middle class.
And then they get elected and none of it seems to come true.
And it seems like all the promises that they make during the election
seems to be a lie and they don't follow through with what they tell the people.
Well, I would. I would.
So listen, the established political parties
do not serve the public's interests.
They serve the interests of the Uber wealthy.
They've served the interests of Canada's oligarchs.
Our global elite, you know,
so people like David Thompson of Thompson Reuters,
Gailin Weston of Longblood's and Western Foods,
Wallace McCain of McCain Foods,
you know, the Demerais with Power Corporation and Seputo
and the in the Dairy Cartel.
There's a whole raft of exceptionally wealthy
individuals that the established global parties
serve. So, you know, and I would say.
Although the line is.
They are more often than not, our political parties
bribe the voters with their own money.
More than is what, you know, they may embellish
and they may disguise and and spend their messages
but, you know, most of our political parties,
you know, like they offered up free health care.
Well, there's nothing free about our health care system.
It costs us a pile of money.
But most Canadians think that
it's great to have free health care,
even though you have to wait two years to see a specialist.
You know, why do we have that?
Well, because the Canadian voter wanted it.
The Canadian voter has been very susceptible to being
bought with their own carrots.
Now, you know, the political parties
are, you know, I'm not saying they're any saints.
That's for a bloody sure that they're they are deceitful.
They are dishonest.
And you can a lot of use of a lot of other D words to describe them
and a few others.
But, you know, it is the Canadian voters
who keep going back and legitimizing
these policies to the point now
that my children have no future in this country
as compared to mine.
You know, the the cost of housing
is beyond the reach of most every millennial
or Gen X or whatever generation you want to call it.
When I bought my first house,
it was two times my yearly salary.
And I was an electrician making 25 bucks an hour.
No electrician today, you know,
tradesmen today is going to buy a home at two times your salary.
It's more likely to be seven or eight times their salary.
And and that's why we see so such
rise in homelessness, in tent cities,
mental health, depression, anxiety,
you know, the lack of gainful, meaningful employment.
You know, we we have done a very, very
terrible job in my generation
depriving our children of a meaningful,
prosperous, free future.
And it's then we do it every, you know, I wrote a post, you know,
the the country that we live in today
is the result of the votes we passed yesterday.
The country that we live in tomorrow
will be a direct reflection of the votes we cast today.
And that's that's just the way it is.
We create our own circumstances.
Our country is a direct reflection
of the people's will at the ballot box.
And and we're not in a very good spot right at the moment.
When it comes to voting, some people think, damn, if I do, damn, if I don't.
And so they have that mentality.
If I go and vote, then I'm just participating in my own enslavement.
And then if you don't vote, then you got all these people,
30, 40 percent of 50 percent of people that don't vote.
And then you get the donkeys in charge that we've been getting
from one shift to the other.
But the, you know, the global tyranny, the crime syndicate seems to always win.
So is there a solution, you know, when it comes to voting?
Because right now, you know, in the last 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and who knows how long
it seems like there hasn't been any potential proper voting solutions
that can get us away from the votes we cast yesterday to help us today.
Well, there is.
But, you know, like people also there needs to be an understanding that,
you know, voting is not just something like going out to McDonald's
and choosing if you're going to have a big Mac or a quarter pounder.
There's got to be a little deeper thought put in here.
And there's got to be a little bit more investigation and examination.
You know, this is the governance, the administration of our nation
and the laws and the taxation that we're going to be living under.
So really, we need to put some effort in it ourselves.
And I would say, you know,
we typically have somewhere about 50 percent of Canadians don't bother to vote.
And I would say to you, Jesse, the the people that I meet
that are in that category, the non-voter,
they are typically the dissatisfied.
They're the disenfranchised.
They're the angry voter.
And we need them.
That's what political parties fear, political,
the established political parties fear the dissatisfied
and angry voter coming out to the polls
because they're going to vote against these guys.
So if you're one of that 40 or 50 percent that stay at home
and who are dissatisfied,
go and vote for an independent
or a smaller party like the PPC and,
you know, and maybe you'll be surprised
that that your anger and your dissatisfaction
can be turned into something positive.
And make a difference in our world
rather than staying at home on the couch and being a silent victim.
You know, that doesn't serve anybody well.
It doesn't serve the individual well.
And it certainly doesn't serve your children or grandchildren very well.
If your
anger or dissatisfaction is not acted upon.
So do you truly think that anyone who doesn't go vote
for whatever reason that may be
because of that anger, because they think it's all rigged
and they choose not to participate,
they're actually just doing a disservice to themselves,
to their fellow countrymen, because if those 40, 50,
60 percent of people that Warpistov voted for anything,
but those four or five established political parties,
we could see a massive shift in the political landscape.
Yeah, absolutely.
You know, like that that should be obvious.
There are more votes that stay at home
than any.
Let me give you a bit of a snapshot.
In the last federal election, there was 16 million votes cast
and 12 million sat at home, right?
Justin Trudeau won with five and a half million votes.
12 million votes sat at home.
They weren't happy with the choices.
And so, you know, but clearly
12 million is a lot more than the five and a half million.
You know, and those 12 million
would have been more than both the Conservatives,
the Blue Globalist team and the Red Globalist team together.
So, you know, or equal to, you know,
but I just saw a note up on here and I want to just respond to that.
Somebody said that
I think if I saw it right, that there shouldn't be any
Liberals reelected and I'm just going to say,
you know, there should not be any incumbents
reelected in my view.
Every one of the three hundred and thirty eight in the house
have remained silent about who are the foreign agents
who are in the house.
Every one of the three hundred and thirty eight supported
the stripping away of our freedoms with mandatory vaccines,
mandatory lockdowns and quarantines.
Every one of them supported the outrageous deficit financing
that will saddle our grandchildren forever.
Every one of the three hundred and thirty eight
supported the lockdowns.
I don't believe any one, any single one of the three hundred and thirty eight
should garner a single vote, in my view, Jesse.
We have a couple of people said, you know, similar things.
How would voting PPC have any positive impact?
And then that was Lyndon or Facebook and Mike in our Facebook says,
what has the People's Party done to improve Canada so far?
Well, they have spoken out in defense of your freedom, Mike.
Isn't that enough?
Isn't that more than any other political party?
What have they done?
They have spoken out in defense of balanced budgets,
of not strangling your children and grandchildren's future.
They spoke out against forcing you,
coercing you and your family to take an unsafe and untested covid job.
I would say that's a whole hell of a lot more than what
any of the other parties have ever done.
You know, like this is, you know, are you going to expect
a party or a politician who has not been elected by the people
to make policy on your behalf?
Obviously not.
If you want to see what the PPC will do, well, then vote for them.
I can tell you, Jesse, in your audience, I know
from being inside the swamp for 15 years
that the PPC is not beholden to the wealthy oligarchs
and they are not beholden to the globalist agenda.
Right. So unlike when Galen Weston or
Wallace McCain or David Thompson, when they call up the Liberal Party
to snap, their interests are taken care of immediately.
That's not the case with the PPC.
So, you know, but if you there's the choices that people have
in this election, choose one of the existing parties
that you know have always been dishonest.
Who have always instituted socialist policies
that have always degraded our Canadian culture and identity
and expected to be different this time.
Do you think that if, you know, let's just for say the PPC party
in Max Bernier and all of a sudden you had a whole revolution
of people that didn't vote, wanted to vote, they're all going to vote
PPC and by chance they end up even getting a majority government,
you know, and then they want to change the current political
structure from this crime syndicate that's controlling things right now.
And he would actually be a threat to them, which some
of the things he says, we just had him on a few weeks ago on our show
and said that he seems to be a threat.
Do you think that they would just allow it?
Or would they maybe kill him if he actually did pose a threat
to the current, you know, criminal system that we're living in?
Well, we saw what happened in the United States
when there was a candidate who was threatening the preexisting system.
There was at least one attempt on his life.
But typically it was swarmed with law
fair on Donald Trump.
And we see that the law fair is being used very effectively against others.
But, you know, this, as I said earlier,
in the late 80s, the reform party under Preston Manning started.
It was a small, new fringe party.
It took them a couple of elections before they got a seat in the house
and it was through a by-election with the debt grade was the first reform candidate elected.
But and even though they never formed government,
they they had enough seats that they they even pressured
the liberal party to run balanced budgets.
Like, can you imagine?
Can you imagine the liberal party running a balanced budget?
So, you know, people, a lot of people in Canada
don't fully appreciate or understand the nuances of a parliamentary system.
The ability for one person to filibuster
and disrupt and frustrate the government's agenda is fairly substantial.
I did it many times in the Ontario Parliament.
You know, and the more people that you have in your coalition
then the more effective at pressure and leverage
that you can apply to the government.
What we see here, this is just a little song and dance
with the Conservatives and the liberals.
There is no meaningful opposition from either one of them when when they trade places.
And there is no meaningful difference in governance
when they trade places in the leadership role.
So it should be obvious to any rational, deductive thinking individual
that we have, like I said, in my and I make this fairly distinct
you know, over the last 55 years or so since Pierre Trudeau
we have adopted a globalist agenda with these two political parties
and and they're they're happy to do this little facade
and and for whatever reason many Canadian voters are either too cowardly
or too uninformed to understand their role in a democracy
and making it work for them rather than allowing it to work for the wealthy.
How much hope do you have that Canadians could wake up in the next month?
Or was it going to take the next election?
Is it going to take some act of God like what do you think
you know could actually happen for people to wake up out of the spell they're under
and maybe, you know, kind of pound the rattle the cages
that we're enslaved in and say, hey, we don't want this anymore.
Well, listen, we like again, if we look at my time frame,
if my time frame is correct, we have been subverting the education
of Canadians for at least 55 years.
We have indoctrinated Canadians into believing that
obedience and consent are more valuable than critical thinking
and and expressing yourself.
You know, most Canadians have a very, very rudimentary
understanding of our history and our knowledge.
So this is just going to take a while to fix this.
But Jesse, you don't fix Rome overnight.
Just as you didn't build Rome overnight.
Like Canadians have to look at and say, OK,
you know, can we make can we make a beachhead somewhere?
Like we didn't we didn't win the Second World War with just one battle.
You know, neither the First World War or any war.
But I do hope that Canadians do
begin to understand that this election
is very unique in this way because of Trump
in the in the south of us.
Canada is now a well, I would say it is a new Ukraine.
Canada is a proxy battlefield in this election is a proxy war
between the world globalists like with the WF, the EU, China
and their war against Donald Trump and Donald Trump's war against them.
And Canada is the battleground right now.
And if we're not cautious, if we don't wake up,
we will see our country as devastated
economically as Ukraine has been devastated.
We, you know, I'm not suggesting for a moment
it will be a military altercation.
But this is an economic war in Canada is the new Ukraine.
And if you think Pierre Polyev
is going to be a champion
or if you think that Carney is going to be a champion,
well, they're champions for the globalist.
And that's why they, you know, this this phone is, you know,
this fraudulent trade war, Jesse,
that both Carney and Polyev have been able to
delude Canadians into believing that this is a team can approach.
This fraudulent trade war is
Donald Trump fighting against the globalists
and saying I am going to reshore my manufacturing to Canada.
I am going to rebuild the United States
into a industrial manufacturing powerhouse.
We're going to have our supply chains secured.
We're going to have our borders secured.
We're going to be able to defend ourselves
and we're going to be able to have gainful, meaningful
and prosperous employment for the people of the United States.
And, you know, if we were if Canadian voters were actually thinking,
they might say, well, oh, holy Jesus, Randy, holy Jesus, Jesse,
maybe we should be doing the same thing here, right?
Instead of fighting this, like,
you know, but that's what we are doing.
We are fighting our, we are cutting off our nose to spite our face.
And and we're going to take,
we're going to get the big blunt end of the stick if we continue to be stupid.
Now, you mentioned, you know, America and Canada
potentially even poses a threat to America
and as crazy as that may sound with the military might that they have.
And this may be a lot more, you know, deeply entrenched
than just, you know, tariffs and them losing out on a couple billion dollars.
It seems like and there's been reports that China's been influencing,
you know, Canadian elections since the 80s.
You've been in politics and maybe wondering if you've seen any of that influence.
There's a Chinese power plant in British Columbia.
There's Chinese troops guarding that power plant.
There's some Chinese police stations.
It seems like drugs are coming in through the Vancouver ports
through China, these fentanyls or with these criminal syndicates
that Canadian governments allowing.
It seems like, you know, America seems Canada potentially
as a threat to the US because of, you know, how, you know,
all this criminal activity seems to be allowed.
And even these governments probably profit off of this criminal activity
that's happening and maybe China's takeover of Canada.
Did you see that? Do you see that?
Have you heard about that?
What's your thoughts on China's influence and that potentially
being a threat to America, why we're having this pushback now?
Canada has become a threat to the United States
under Trump's vision of the United States.
Canada was not a threat to the United States when the Biden
and when the Democrat and when the deep state globalist
had control of the US administration.
But now that Trump has it, yeah, we are a threat.
And our our collusion, there is no interference by China in Canada.
There is direct cooperation and collusion between the Canadian
political system and the Communist Chinese political system
between the Canadian oligarchs and the Chinese oligarchs.
In 1997, the RCMPC produced a report called Project Sidewinder
outlining and and enumerating all of this
collusion and cooperation between our corporate and political
appendages and the Communist Chinese corporate and political appendages.
And and of course, Sam Cooper has done a marvelous job exposing this.
The first time I saw it was, you know, the first time we got
casinos in Canada was after NDP Premier Bob Ray went to
on a junket of free free trip to China, paid by the Communist Chinese.
And he came back and he issued the casino licenses here in Ontario
to the Chinese business people.
The China Canada Business Council, that is
that has a proliferation of former
conservative and liberal cabinet ministers are intimately involved in the collusion.
We saw just this week the
the liberal candidate in Little Beijing outside of Toronto, Markham,
talked publicly about turning in the conservative member
and getting a bounty for it with the Chinese consulate.
We, you know, in my time in politics, we also saw clearly
the minister, Chan, was under investigation by ceases.
He was a liberal cabinet minister in in Ontario.
But we also saw Doug Ford, my colleagues in Doug Ford's caucus,
Vincent Key and a couple of others who were under investigation as well.
So this is throughout all our established political parties, Jesse,
throughout all our major corporate interests in our country,
throughout our casinos.
Look, you know, the TD Bank, here's a good example.
Just last year, the the TD Bank was found guilty and convicted
in the United States and paid a three point one billion dollar fine
for their cooperation and collaboration with organized crime
and the drug running and the drug cartels.
And so that was a Canadian bank
doing business in the United States and Canada,
facilitating the drug cartels from Canada into the United States.
The United States convicted them.
What happened with the crown attorney here in Canada?
Did they lay a charge against the TD Bank?
No, they didn't.
Did they lay a charge against any of the directors,
officers, presidents, officials of the TD Bank?
No, they did not.
The TD Bank
is a significant shareholder in Brookfield management.
As well as the RBC Bank, as well as the BMO Bank.
And you may have heard of Brookfield asset management
that we've got their former chairman is now going to be running.
And it's
and it was owned by some more of our Ola Garx in Canada,
the Boffman family, who are also the major fundraisers
and fund manager for the Liberal Party.
This is the incestuous relationships
between corporate Canada and our political parties
is absolutely astonishing
for if anybody in Canada would bother to take a look.
It is a very, very ugly, incestuous relationship.
And it has been for some time.
And we do pose a threat.
And that is why the Liberals and the Conservatives
are have artfully, but acceptively
convinced Canadians that this is a trade war
rather than a security
and war and a war against globalism by Trump.
Now, here we have Larry Moore from our Facebook says
all this BS goes away under the 51st state.
Canada is in probate and has now been for a month.
Assets are being liquidated.
Hopefully after the fake election, we will hear more.
Someone said earlier, you know, would we do better
by joining America?
What's your thoughts on that Trump saying he wants Canada?
You know, people in Canada are so, you know,
pissed off about the current political system
that some people would even, you know,
open to the idea of that.
And then others are like, well, we get this free healthcare.
I would never want to join.
We would lose our free healthcare.
And there's other people that wouldn't.
But is this potentially a possibility
that Canada could become the 51st state of America?
Well, I'm going to say there's going to be two outcomes
in the medium term.
And that is either Trump wins the globalist war
and Canada becomes a once again a free market,
classical liberal freedom oriented society
under free market principles
and rejects globalism,
or it will be taken over by the United States.
And maybe as a 51st state, maybe not.
Maybe as equal partners and citizens, maybe not.
The United States is not going to allow a security threat
or an economic threat on their northern border, right?
That's period case closed.
So it will be dealt with.
We can either choose to amend and alter our ways, Jesse,
and reestablish Canada as to what it once was,
a free democratic sovereign nation.
Or we will be joined as second class citizens
with the United States.
Or we might have this one other option
where provinces such as Alberta and Saskatchewan,
maybe others hold referendums
and split off from Canada
and join as full, equal,
51st, 52nd, 53rd states of the Union.
So, you know, we...
That's...
I see that is what our choices are going to be.
But until we get there,
we...
If we continue with this belligerent approach to Trump
and the United States and this hanging on
and grasping to the globalist agenda,
then we are going to suffer mightily, economically,
from that process until the eventuality does happen.
That was my next question was going to be,
I'm in Alberta and I've been hearing talks
about potentially Alberta joining America.
I know Daniel Smith went to go to Mar-a-Lago,
went to go talk to Trump, having these meetings.
Is that potentially...
I know Quebec has wanted to separate from Canada
for a long time.
Could Canada be separated into different...
Quebec beyond its own, Alberta, join America?
Like, could there be...
Canada, could it be spread out?
I don't know how you call that.
Is that a possibility that could happen to this country?
Well, listen, my...
The last province to join confederation was only 1949, Jesse.
And that was done by a referendum.
The people of Newfoundland and Labrador had a referendum
and they joined Canada.
We just divided our largest land mass
and created two new jurisdictions
out of the Northwest Territories just a few years ago.
Each and every one of our provinces came into confederations
through some expression of self-determination
of the people in those areas.
The Red River settlement became a province,
the origins of Manitoba,
through the self-determination and expression
of Louis Riala Nematé.
Now, there was also some rebellions
that went along with it as well,
but they wanted equal rights.
They didn't want to be treated and subjected
to different and as second-class citizens.
So, you know, and Alberta has a statute on its books right now
for referendums.
The federal parliament introduced a piece of legislation
back during the Charter Town and Meach Lake Accords
called the Clarity Act,
which gave the legislative framework in the process
for a province to leave this country.
And then the Supreme Court upheld
and validated that as a proper process
for a province to leave confederation.
The question has to be clear.
The majority has to be clear,
but it's already identified how to leave.
And, you know, and I think, you know,
in Canada we have been in a state of constitutional paralysis
since that Meach Lake Accord, you know.
We have been so fearful of amending our constitution
to protect the freedoms of Canadians
for fear of breakup and whatnot.
We have become a very dysfunctional society,
this very dysfunctional nation
as a result of our constitutional paralysis.
So I'm also somewhat optimistic and somewhat hopeful
that the Trump's initiatives,
Trump's discussions may spur Canadians on
into having a true, forthright, honest,
constitutional discussion
and reform those elements that have been so detrimental.
And, you know, things like it is absolutely preposterous,
in my view, Jesse,
that the federal government or another province
can prohibit and preclude Alberta
from exporting its resources and goods and services.
Like that is, the intention and objective of confederation
was to amplify the economic activity of our provinces,
not to preclude and prevent one province
from allowing another province to do well.
So, you know, and same with the energy,
these pipelines and all these different things,
that is not the role of, for example,
Ontario or Quebec to decide and say to Alberta,
no, you can't ship your energy to for refining
on the East Coast, it's just absurd.
You know, in WWE wrestling used to be
WWEF wrestling, they have, always they have a heel.
And that heel is someone who's the disruptor,
the agitator, but they're still working on the same team.
But it just looks like they're against it.
Now, is there a possibility that Trump is just
that global crime syndicate's heel,
that it looks like he's against all of this,
but he's maybe potentially getting all the patriots to think,
yes, look, we've got Trump on our side,
but he's doing a lot of things that are part of that criminal syndicate.
He's got people around him, that's the swamp.
He implemented, you know, Operation Warp Speed,
which, you know, obviously you spoke out against it,
that was completely him and still brags about Operation Warp Speed
and look how many people that, you know,
has been injured and or killed on it.
You know, Hussein Saswami just put either $20 billion or $50 billion
for the digital servers.
We've got the Oracle, which is a CIA asset that Larry Ellison,
he's, you know, implementing digital IDs.
Like it seems like, you know, whatever is going on
and people are still choosing, look it, look,
we've got some people on our side,
but everything that they're doing is working towards more enslavement
and couldn't maybe he be the same type of heel like in WWE wrestling,
but still working on the same criminal syndicate side.
So we often use analogies and metaphors
to help explain things that we don't understand, Jesse.
Like that's normal and it's a good practice.
It helps us to convey ideas that are complicated.
So Donald Trump has done some very unique things
like what he's done with USAID,
what he's done with putting RFK in at HHS,
and, you know, a whole raft of things.
Are there some things that are disliked?
Yeah, absolutely.
But so I'm going to try to explain it to you and your audience,
and I'm going to try to explain just from my little podium
that I had for 15 years in Ontario politics,
which is very, very minuscule and minor
as compared to the office of the White House.
Okay.
But in Ontario politics, we always had to make sure
we were not creating too many enemies all at once
if we wanted to stay in office, if we wanted to stay in power.
So you'd always be having this great influx of competing
and conflicting interests wanting the laws changed
for their benefit or improving or changing the regulations
to increase profits for either for another industry.
And what you wanted to do is not create too many enemies
all at once, right?
You wouldn't want to get all the teachers' unions
against you all at once and all the trade unions
against you all at once.
Yeah, because you knew you were going to be in trouble
if you got everybody mad at you all at once.
So this is, I think, what you're seeing at play with Trump.
He's taken on a number of enemies, a number of battles,
but he can't take them all on at once.
And the other part of this, which I'll try to explain,
is the thing in politics, what we can say,
let's contrast it with Canadian politics.
In Canadian politics, we have, all of our political parties
refuse even to investigate or have an inquiry
or have a discussion about their role
and what happened during COVID.
In the American Congress and Senate,
there's been a number of testimonies
and a number of investigations, and it's cleared out.
We know that COVID was not from some bat in a wet market.
It was fully the result of taxpayer funded,
U.S. taxpayer funded gain of function research
from the Department of Defense, Tony Fauci and others.
We know that the entire censorship of the dissenting
opinions was by the U.S. state through USAID.
Well, there was also some Canadian components.
David Thompson of Thompson Neuroiders was quite involved,
but was funded by the U.S.
So what I believe Trump is trying to do,
what we won't do here, is trying to fix
what the real problems that created COVID
and the profiteers who were involved in it
without having too much dirt come back on him.
Because he's got culpability as well.
His operation warp speed.
I believe, if you read all the books
and the biographies and the memoirs of that,
I think it's true that Trump was subverted
and undermined by the deep state
and they duped or bamboozled him
into going with operation warp speed.
But he knows he's got culpability there
and he's trying to fix things
without him looking like the bad guy.
USAID has obviously been in the media.
Trump's exposing this, Doge,
all this stopping all this funding,
which is going on, which is a great thing.
And anybody against it is obviously
on the wrong team, it seems,
because who doesn't want this corruption rooted,
this money being funded through all these agencies?
What do you know about Canada having something similar
where they're funding these different countries?
I'd heard about gender studies in Africa,
$50 million and all these insane things.
How much Canadian taxpayer money goes outside of the country
that has zero effect or benefit to the people inside of Canada?
The American deep state is much more...
although there's a very substantive domestic component to it,
they were also very much
very outward and foreign focused as well.
So things like the Voice of America
and Voice of Free Europe
and their 46 biolabs in tiny little Ukraine
where we have two.
So their foreign expenditures far exceed ours,
but don't for a moment think that our waste
and taxpayers' monies,
I would say as a percentage of our public budgets
is far in excess of what they've uncovered in the US.
A lot of people don't realize that
we have a $2.2, $2.3 trillion GDP in this country, Jesse.
Over 50% of it, $1.2 trillion is public sector expenditures,
government expenditures.
Over 50% of every dollar spent in this country
is by government.
So yeah, you know, when you look at the...
I believe the American...
and I may be off by a slight bit on this,
but the American government percentage
of their GDP public expenditure,
I believe is in about 15 or 20%
where we're well over 50.
So...
And that's including the American military.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, you know, like you try,
like I spent many years on the Finance Committee
and the Public Accounts Committee.
It is very difficult for anybody to see the force
through the trees of public expenditures
in this province, in this country.
It is carefully and craftily organized
to obscure what our governments are doing
with the money that they take from us.
I'm not sure where you stand,
you know, kind of spiritually or religiously,
but it seems like government is the beast
that scriptures were warning about.
It seems like it keeps feeding and growing and feeding,
and it seems like maybe that is the beast
that, you know, we were being warned about
thousands of years ago,
and it seems like that's kind of playing out
in modern-day society with the way the government
seemed to be infiltrating
every single aspect of everyone's life.
Well, I would...
Our governments...
Well, listen,
anybody in a position of power or authority
should never be trusted, right?
Ever.
You know, and that's why our system,
any American system,
we're constructed to have robust checks
and balances and accountability functions
in our system of government,
because we knew, you know, our forefathers knew,
you know, don't bloody trust people with power, right?
And that's why you'd have an independent judiciary.
You'd have an independent legislative branch
from the executive branch.
You'd have a free press to keep an eye on things.
So...
But we have, as a society,
have become very lazy,
both in the physical interactions
with our government,
but also lazy intellectually
in understanding what our government is doing.
And...
And, you know,
the government is an...
is a out-of-control machine
in Monster
that is feeding on
and off of the Canadian taxpayers.
And it's...
That's what it is,
but it's, you know, we...
And I'll go back to 1968
with the Omnibus Justice Bill,
which really set Canada on a different course
and set the future
in a manner that disparaged
and dismissed our Christian heritage,
our Christian values.
We got rid of things that we...
that I used to do as a child in school
that seen the Lord's Prayer
and singing God Save the Queen
and Ocanda every morning.
But these were done at the behest
of the public as well.
It was in large part.
Canadians have rejected that,
not only Christian values,
but, you know, a moral code
that's associated with it.
And, you know, now to the point
where we're celebrating and applauding
in promoting mutilation of children
to impuberty blockers
and gender dysphoria
and public displays of nudity
and fetishes and perversions
called Pride Parade.
So, you know, but, you know...
and I just give that as an example, Jesse,
that, you know, when you take a look
at a video clip of a Pride Parade,
you will see Canadian moms and dads
with their children out at these things.
So, is government corrupt?
Absolutely. Damn right it is.
Is Canadian culture corrupt?
Damn right it is as well.
How much of that 50% of the GDP expenditures in Canada
do you think is actually necessary to run the government?
You know, do you think it could be down to 10% or 15%
and, you know, like, do you think that
is like an actual viable number
and the rest of it is being criminally stolen
from this country?
Well, it's a result of our adoption
of socialist policies.
Okay, if you're going to give people
free daycare, that's going to constantly money.
It's got to come from somewhere.
The government's got to take it out of my pocket
to redistribute to somebody else's pockets.
If you want to have free healthcare,
well, okay, that money's got to come out of my pocket
and it's going to be spent by the government.
So, you know, when I started my career
back when I was 19 and left high school
and bought a house and started a business,
the public expenditures were about 15% of our GDP.
So, you know, but, you know, just to give an example,
you know, like, it wasn't an onerous amount,
but I think I had to pay 30 bucks every quarter.
So, for OHIP back then when I finished school
and, you know, and not only in 1960,
I think in Ontario it was 1966 or 1967
we came in with OHIP to begin that.
Before that, everybody just paid out of pocket
for their own doctors.
And it wasn't, you know, like,
I want to share this story with you
and your audience to give people
a bit of a flavor.
My dad was a TV repairman,
had his own small business fixing TVs and stereos
at that time,
who had grew up in a family with non-in-children, right?
The last child was born in 1966.
On a television repairman's wages,
my mom went to the hospital
and delivered nine children
and my dad TV repair wages could pay for that, right?
They had to pay for childbirth
in my early days.
You know, and we used to have the doctor
come and do house calls
and you had to pay him.
But in my, obviously,
with nine kids, my mom stayed at home.
But a single family income as a tradesman,
you know, fixing TVs,
you could afford a home,
you could afford a car,
you could afford to have nine children.
And, you know,
what's that tell you today?
You know, how many,
have we made this country better?
Really?
Or have we made it bloody worse?
It seems like that because I haven't even heard of a TV repairman
in many, many years.
I didn't even know those jobs still exist
because we seem to have such a disposable, you know, system.
You get a TV, you don't get a fix,
you just throw it out and buy a new one.
And it seems like that's the type of mentality,
this consumerism, buy, buy, buy.
And, you know, they build things,
if it's got a five-year warranty,
it breaks in five years and five months.
It seems like everything in this model of consumerism,
you know, is that mentality
and they don't even build anything to last anymore
or even have a repairman to fix a TV
if you did have something broken.
Yeah.
Well, you know, people your age won't realize,
we used to have television manufacturing plants
here in Ontario, down in Kitchener,
here in Prescott, Ontario.
We used to have a couple of big ones over in Montreal.
You know, we used to produce,
we had one of the world's largest tractor manufacturers,
Massey Ferguson here in Canada.
You know, so, but if the voter is going to demand
that the government provide for you, right?
And whether it's providing you daycare
or providing you healthcare
or providing you pensions
and providing you whatever,
it's got to come from somebody else's pocket, right?
Including your own.
And it's not like they take a dollar out of your pocket, Jesse,
and then move a dollar over to my pocket.
In that interaction between your dollar leaving your pocket,
about 75 cents of it is going to be lost
in the administration of the state.
And that dollar that left your pocket,
I might get 25 cents of it.
Now, what do you feel is going to happen
when they replace actual dollars with digital money?
It seems like if you have a $10 bill
and you pay for something,
it's still worth $10 and they give it to somebody
and it's still worth $10
and that $10 is still $10 besides the deflationary value of it.
But if you have digital money
and you have to pay for something
and they take their cut and then that money's moved
and they take their cut,
you have five or six or 10 or 30 transactions later,
that $10 bill is maybe only worth $2 now
because all of these cuts are being taken out of it.
Do you think that that's going to change things
when they want to replace actual physical money
with just digital assets?
Well, if we move to digital currency,
that is the end of freedom period.
There will be no more freedom
if there is digital currency
or if it is only digital currency
and I would say to everybody listening to this
or who might listen to it,
whenever you get the opportunity,
use cash,
because I don't think it will be a government edict.
It'll be the convenience that people will
drive paper currency into extinction.
But I may be wrong there.
But digital currency is a great danger,
but the other bigger danger
has been the financialization of the western world
and this again is where we get into
with the globalization as well, Jesse.
Back in 71 when the U.S. government
no longer backed up its currency with gold
and there was no longer any underlying
commodity to exchange those paper dollar bills for.
It allowed for us to go wild
in the markets,
allowed us to hyperinflate assets
using things like derivatives and hedge funds
and the many, many, the shorts
and all the tools to create
what appeared to be wealth
where it was actually just debt and inflation.
So the digital currencies,
if they happen, it will be,
I think, one of the ways to reconcile
this corrupted and distorted
financialization of the markets,
but it'll come at a heavy cost of our freedom.
And that's another part of what this global war is,
is that Trump is so keenly aware of Jesse
and that many Canadian voters aren't aware of,
is Trump, he stated this
and his administration has stated this,
one of the greatest threats that they see
is the rise of the BRICS alliance
and the BRICS countries
trading between themselves
without the need of using the US dollar.
The dollar is in jeopardy
of eventually losing its reserve status.
This will be a tremendous blow to the United States
if it happens.
It means all the dollars held,
the hundreds of trillions of US dollars
held offshore as foreign reserves
will come back into the United States
and hyperinflate the US currency.
So Trump, this is why you see Trump
has modified, substantially modified
and rightly so his relationship with Putin
Putin was a driving factor in the BRICS alliance
and the de-dollarization of international trade
away from the US dollar.
So Trump is trying to blunt that attack
on the US currency.
Although Putin is part of the BRICS alliance,
he is not a globalist.
So it's going to be interesting on how that plays out
but that is again another significant element
that is playing out in the battleground
called Canada's general election
in this globalist war against Trump.
Mark Carney had once he, I don't know when soon as he got sworn in
or I'm sure was around that time,
he said he was going to stop the carbon tax,
which obviously made a lot of people happy
because it's more of a carbon scam than it is a tax
but maybe that was one way to get voters back
onto their side.
If they did stop the carbon tax you know
and they eliminated it which that's a big reason
why things have increased in price for everyone.
How do you think that would roll back prices for things?
Say gas did come down because whatever that
10, 20, 30 cent carbon tax is on there
but say you go out to eat I don't know
it was five years ago you could go out to eat
and have a meal for less than 10 bucks a person.
Now it's at 20.
Do you think that these places, these businesses
are going to roll back their prices
or is this, you know, once they start asking
for more and people are paying more,
you know I just don't see people
even if they eliminate the carbon tax
them rolling back prices on things
and it seems like things are just going to
get more expensive for people.
Hello.
Well listen, am I frozen?
I can hear you but your screen is just frozen
but I can still hear you perfectly.
Okay, so you know Karnia said himself
that he would be just, it wouldn't be
a permanent end to the carbon tax
and it just was only the retail version
of the retail element of the carbon tax.
There's still all the other built-in
at the wholesale and the production end
as well which nobody has ever talked about
that side of it.
So at best it would be a temporary relief
but no, the government is saying
that they are going to be spending more
and more money so obviously they have
to continue to increase taxation levels.
Now what do you know about this carbon
because it seems like we need carbon,
plants feed on carbon,
they're making this big thing against carbon,
this war on carbon and it's like
we're made out of carbon, plants eat carbon.
It's like the war on carbon seems to be a war on us
but if you take Canada as a whole
it would take I think it was,
I don't know it was 500 billion trees
to consume the carbon that we produce
but we have like 500 trillion trees.
We've got like 10 times more trees
than we need to consume the carbon
so we're actually already carbon,
we're consuming more carbon than we actually put out
and it seems like we're the second highest taxed
carbon tax scam on earth behind France.
France is number one, we're second highest carbon tax
but yet we're actually consuming more carbon
than Canadians of the 40 million people are putting out
so something doesn't seem right in the state of Denmark here
or in the state of Canada.
Well listen, the whole environmental agenda
is an attack on the human being, right?
As well as like carbon is a necessary component
for life on earth
and there is also the very phrase
fossil fuels is a misnomer and a falsehood.
The earth continues to produce energy
in the form of oil and coal
and natural gas constantly.
Our energy does not come from
old dinosaur bones, Jesse.
Like this is how the western world
has been captured by these phrases
which are total falsehoods
and this is why they come up with these phrases
that we're going to be ending,
we're going to run out of oil.
Well that's total nonsense
and let me just give you a little bit
of a flavor of my lifetime.
I'm a little bit older than you.
So when I was a young child
the threat that we had was the coming ice age
and I remember going to bed
scared and having nightmares of the coming ice age
we would not be able to keep warm
because of the coming ice age.
We also went through the hole in the ozone,
the acid rain, the population bomb,
the killer bees.
I can't begin to count and enumerate
all of the alarmist doomsday.
Y2K was another one.
The planes were going to fall out of the sky
and the elevators were going to drop to the basement.
And then as an adult I woke up
and we were into global warming
from that nightmares of the coming ice age.
This is wholly bullshit
and it's alarmism.
It allows government to keep people
in a state of fear.
It allows government to grow
and it's all a hoax
just as Chicken Little found out
in the nursery rhyme book
when we were little kids of,
if you ever read Chicken Little
or any penny,
just another hoax like COVID.
Now, the United Nations declaration
to give back the land to the indigenous people
is being done through something called UNDRIP
where it seems they want to push people
off of their land
and the reparations for the Native Americans,
we stole all their land
and this is a way for people,
them to legally, I guess,
get people from their farms
off of their land in the hopes
that the Natives are going to benefit
on getting this land back.
But I don't think the colonists
have really done well by the Native Americans
since they've came over here.
I think they've screwed them over
in every single form in history
that they could think of
and it seems like some people are on board
about wanting to take land
from current owners,
give it to the indigenous
where one of their clauses in UNDRIP
says, well, we could change this
decree at any time.
What do you know about UNDRIP?
What do you think of UNDRIP
and do you think places like Vancouver
have already put it in?
How do you think that that's going to be
received throughout the rest of Canada?
So there's a couple of things here
that I'll try to explain.
And first off,
the entire settlement of Canada
in our relationship with First Nations
has been,
essentially, and for the most part,
very cordial,
very professional.
There was no battle
of the little bighorn in Canada.
There was no Indian wars
in Canada, Jesse.
All of our Native
indigenous peoples
entered into treaties
without warfare
in the settlement
of this country.
That's not to say that there wasn't
errors and that there wasn't
mistakes, but
we have always had a very
friendly
and good
and mutually respectful
relationship with the indigenous,
even though some people,
I have read many
of the treaties in Canada.
I've read many of the memoirs
and the diaries of those people
who participated
in the
treaty signings.
So I start
my discussion there.
And again, without,
for a moment's suggestion, it was perfect.
But the
UNDRIP is more
tied in with the environmental
agenda and
the
there's another project
in North America from the
environmentalists and from the globalists
and that is called the Wild Lands
Project.
I don't know if you've heard of that,
but that is
an attempt, an idea,
a project
to re-wild
North America.
You know, part of
the globalists,
one of the key
keystones to the globalist
agenda and
the keystones to
for it to go forward
is urbanization
of the population
and that's why you'll
hear things like 15-minute cities, etc.
The
governments
require and need
people
off the lands where they can
be independent and
self-reliant and they need them
ever more clustered in
greater density
housing and homes
and cities for them
to be ever more reliant
and dependent on government
for their well-being.
So that is
the real impetus
of UNDRIP.
It's not to save the Indians.
It's not to
atone
for past sins.
This is
an attempt to further
the globalist agenda,
the urbanization
and the dependence of people on
government.
We're still going to go around
a half an hour. You need a little break.
Are you good?
I'll be back in a moment.
I just wanted to welcome
everybody here from all of our
different platforms.
We've got around 400 people
live with us right now.
We've got a lot of people from
Randy's
Twitter as well as
Randy's Facebook.
We're the missing link live
on Facebook.
We're the missing link live on
YouTube.
We're the missing link J.
It's the missing link live but
if you want to find us on Twitter
it's the missing link J.
We're also the missing link live on
Rumble.
We also get uploaded to Bitshoot,
Telegram, Odyssey,
Brighton and the Dollar Vigilante TV
show.
TV picked up our show as well.
So we're just trying to get this
out to as many people as possible.
This is our
thousand and fifteenth interview
that we've done in the four years since
we've started the program. We first
kind of focused a lot on
the doctors in 2021
that were being censored.
We've interviewed over a hundred doctors
now that speak out
against the medical tyranny
that we all face.
So you can go back in a thousand
interviews and check out all kinds
of different people.
We've interviewed
lawyers and authors
and politicians
and activists,
spiritualists, contactees
and many different
like I said over a hundred doctors that speak out
against the medical tyranny.
So please find us.
We're obviously not promoted in the algorithms
because we speak out as much as possible.
And we also
are doing real journalist work here
where we're interviewing everybody
from every side of the fence that we
can. If we have some people
that think Trump is
humanity's saviour and others
that think he come on here that think
he's a Jesuit
Zionist puppet. So
not everybody, every show may be for you
but we're just trying to
bring everybody's
perspective and opinions
to our show and we don't
tell anybody what to think. You do that
on your own. We're just presenting you
with as much information so you
can make informed decisions
that's best for you
and your family during this pivotal
time in history.
Doug Ford, what's your
thoughts on him?
Wasn't he a crack cat or a crack cat brother
or like what the heck is going
on with Ontario? I'm in Alberta
and so I just hear
different things but
he's been quite outspoken about
this Trump or there is
Trump wanting to stop their crack flow to
Ontario or what's going on and why
is he so upset
and what's your thoughts on him?
Well, Ford is no different
than Trudeau
or Polly Ev
or
you know
leaders are not
chosen by their parties for
their
for their high
intellect
and knowledge Jesse
they're selected because they
might be able to win
and
Doug Ford has become
beholden
to the same wealthy
oligarchs
you know the
Ontario Conservative Party is beholden just as the
federal
Conservative and Liberal Parties are beholden
the same with the Alberta UCP
it is the wealthy
in those jurisdictions who
the party serves
so everybody thought
before that
Doug Ford was just some real
nice friendly guy
maybe he was like his brother
Rob who he isn't
or
and
you know he didn't know anything about
the parliamentary system he didn't know
anything about politics
but he was selected
leader
and then he would have been led around
by the nose
by the party
the same way
that
Polly Ev is being led around the nose
and
you know I think with
Karnie
you know
there's no doubt he
is part
of
the
ruling elite so
he won't be completely led but he
he wants to be in that same
environment anyway
do they all essentially have
handlers and they're
groomed for these positions
do a lot of these people
that come to
the head of you know
premiers, you know
prime ministers, even mayors
are they essentially
all groomed for the positions and get the funding
from this criminal syndicate
in order to
continue putting into place
their system of enslavement
that would be one way
of describing it
there is a
pretty
you know
look at Karnie
there's a pretty good example
and Trudeau
that was a pretty
significant long term
grooming if you like
or apprenticeship
before they got there
and again
Trudeau wasn't selected
because of his high intellectual
and knowledge base
you know he had a good last name
a name that was
recognizable and somebody that
who would do what
he was told to do
you know
Polly Eves a little bit different
he came to Ottawa
around
2002 I believe it was
when I first met him
and
but he had aspirations
to be
prime minister
he was an ambitious young man
had never worked in his life
left Alberta
came to the west end of Ottawa
and won a seat
and has been perfecting
his political
theatrics
ever since
and yeah
he
he knows
what he has to do
or what he had to do
in order to be allowed to become
the leader of the Conservative Party
and
yeah
that's the way
politics work see
that's why
at the beginning of the show
we talked about
Dala and Chandra
it would be Dala and Chandra
Joseph Borgol
they're outsiders
they're not allowed inside
I'll tell you
an interesting story about my nomination
just as
but I'm going to
restate this again
Jesse in the United States
they have
an open primary system
so that
the party doesn't
control the primary system
that's why they can
have a Donald Trump there
and
because the parties control the nomination system here
it's why we can't
have a Trump here
and I would say to you
we've got
four established political parties
the greens
the orange the blues and the reds
and that's what we have
we have four voices
in our House of Commons
of 338 members
but we only have four voices
in the United States
Congress
they have
525
senators and congressmen
who are largely
independent
many of them independent minded
so
although they only come from two parties
they actually have about
525 parties
represented in the Congress
and the Senate
compared to our four
in a practical
sense
that's why you see people like
Thomas Massey who can stand
against them all
and you see this
all the time
in the United States
where our
party discipline
and allegiance is enforced
vigorously
but I did want to share you this little
story if you don't mind
and it was my own nomination
and this goes back to 2007
and I had been quite active
in the Landowners Association
I was very
high visibility
well known public figure
in Ontario at the time
and also very polarizing
with my
back off government
campaign
and also
some would say
radical
but the organization that
built the Landowners Association
was
at the time we had 15,000
members
paid up members
plus a
very
broad and substantive
base throughout rural Ontario
and when I
when after I left the Landowners
and I was thinking what I was going to do
in this nomination
in Lanark came up for the Conservative Party
and I said
well you know I might give that a go
and I
announced well I'm going to seek the nomination
and
I had the senior
member
of the Conservative Party
in Ontario
in the caucus chair
who I knew
Frank Police
he phoned me up one day
and he said Randy
I hear that you want to run for the
Conservative nomination in Lanark
and I said yeah Frank
because I knew Frank
and he said well you know
we really like you at the Conservative Party
we think you're a grand fellow Randy
you're a stand up guy
and we really really like you
but we think you could
serve the party better if you didn't
run as a candidate
and
he said you know
and I said well Frank I said
yeah no I really
want to run I think this would be good
I think I've got something to say
and
I can stand up and be a strong
advocate for the people of Lanark
and
he said no Randy you know
he said listen
we can set you up with
a really really well pain
nice job
you'll still be influential in the
party
we'll take care of you
you won't have to worry about
money you won't have to worry
about there'll be no heavy lifting
it'll all be inside work
and you'll have lots of influence
and
and we'd rather you not run
and I said Frank
you know I'm not
doing this because I need a dollar
or need a job I can go back and be an
electrician if I want
you know
and
but I had
so so
I ran and I won
and they did everything else they moved the
nomination meetings around and they did
all kinds of things that jerk me around
to try to get me to lose and whatnot
but I won
the reason why
they had to let me
is because of that organization
they knew
if they disqualified me from
the nomination race
they would potentially lose
30
members in rural
Ontario and that was a danger that
was just too great
for the Conservative Party
to risk
so they allowed me
to run
and then they tried everything
to
to make me lose or to
prevent me from winning
but
but that's you know
Kerry Lake did an
interesting story about that as well
who's now in the Trump Administration
she was offered substantial money
by the GOP
not to run in Arizona
for the governorship
and this is
this is
parties will do whatever
it takes to make sure
that they've got a bloody well
well trained
seal and parrot
who is sitting
in the seat
who calls himself anointed representative
if I'm
hearing your story correctly
you're actually
saying that
they would have rather
you lost your own party
tried to get you to lose
than have someone
in
winning even though it's
their party because
you're not controlled by them
they would they tried to get
you to lose they would rather lose
a seat than have someone
elected that's not
you know basically one of their
you know whipping boys
absolutely no they
they did
you know I was into so many battles
with that
party in that first campaign
it was just
astonishing
but yeah
they would
have much preferred
if I had lost
once they couldn't prevent me from
getting the nomination
that's crazy and
what does that make you feel about
the other part of what you said is
that they tried to convince you not to run
by offering you jobs
and never have to worry about
money like doesn't that
just show you what type of
corrupt beast that we're
up against where they can
just hand out money and jobs
and cash to anybody that they
want to keep silent
or not be a part of the
machine
you know
the corruption in politics
is very sophisticated
it's very smooth
it's very skillful
you know this is
this is
not like
brown paper bags and whatnot
it's a
the manipulation is done
has been perfected
over the
well centuries I guess
but
so it
you know so that was my very
first interaction
with the party in becoming
an elected member
there was this
exposure to the corruption
but
it took a number of years
of constant
vigilance
in constant
observation
in constant inquiry
to actually find out
the extent
of the corruption or
to the extent that I found out
so let me share one other
story with you
this happened a couple of years later
after I'm
in office now
and I'm the critic for
labor
and I get this
I won't mention the actual
name of the industry
but this industry group came to me
and they said
you know Randy you know you're the
critic for labor we really want
the conservative party
to advance a piece
of legislation that will protect
our industry
that will create a regulatory
college for our
industry so anybody
who wants to do
business in this industry will have
to be a member of the regulatory
college
so this
so this would be like similar to
the college of physicians and surgeons
you know a regulatory
body that doctors
have to
be involved in and who can
issue the licenses and also
exact penalties
and punishment as we saw
during COVID but this was not
for doctors this was just some other
before that period of time
non-regulated
industry
and I said well that's bullshit
I said I'm not
going to advance that bill
like there's no bloody
need for your
industry to be regulated
and to have a college and to have
some overlord
looking over in the ability
to remove somebody's
license to practice
and earn a living
so I said no I was
diplomatic but I was
pretty assertive
and then
the
later that night the thing was
the chief of staff
for the leader came down to me
see me and said you know Randy
they
they just
withdrew a hundred thousand dollars in funding
to the party because you went
advance that bill on their behalf
or they've threatened
to remove a hundred thousand dollars in funding
and
so
it wasn't that this industry group
and lobbyists were
giving me the money Jesse
they were giving it
to the party
unbeknownst to me
the only reason
I became aware
of that skull dougory
is because the chief of staff
told me
that
the donation was being
withdrawn in the hopes
that I would change my mind
right
and of course I said no
I'm not changing my mind
and of course
this is highly illegal
you are not allowed
to
advance legislation
for money
and you know
it is illegal
but
they were skirting the law by giving the money
to the
party rather than to me
but
now I'm going to finish off the story
a couple of months later
Christine Elliott, my colleague
in the
conservative caucus who would go on to become
the health minister during Covid
in Ontario
advanced that
labour bill
that I would not
so I suspect
the party did get the money
maybe
some others got
a piece of the graft as well
so
this is to learn
the extent
the depth
the breadth of corruption
in politics
is a very
you have to
it takes a long time to learn that
and
a lot of people never get
to see what the corruption is
at all
that's crazy and
great story thanks for sharing because
I'm sure that happens to
most if not all of
you know party members that
want to maybe
think a different way
and they put pressure on them that way
look if you don't do this
our party is going to lose half a million dollars
or if you don't vote this way
and that's kind of indirectly
getting swaying their votes
it's more sophisticated than that Jesse
most members are never
alert or
aware of what's going on
wow
the party will say
you know Randy
you know here's this stakeholder
with this industry group
we want you to take care
make sure that they're
that you're attentive to them
make sure that
whatever they need you
that they can
you know they're big supporters
of the party make sure that you
always have time to speak with them
when the lobbyist
calls you up and wants to take you out
to
the fancy restaurants
or take you out to the
ballgame
make sure you can
have some time to go out to
see the Maple Leafs
or the Blue Jays and go to Barbarian
Steakhouse
with the industry
and the lobbyist
and Jesse I'm going to say to you
in
your audience should understand
this as well
at the provincial level and I think it's
very likely to be very
similar at the federal level
I would say about 90%
of all
the legislation that ever gets
introduced in a
provincial parliament
is at the behest of
an industry group
right and
there's money attached
to every one of them
what I don't get
is where they make a bill
and
it's like 600 pages
you know
in depth
and they slide in
all of these other things
while they focus and they tell everybody
this is what the bill is but
yet they slip in other
things into it
that people never talk about aren't aware about
like does this happen
frequently as well
so budget
the omnibus budget bills
have become a slippery
slippery and devious
way to do this
you know a budget bill
in its initial
creations
and iterations
was a
you know a budget bill
this is what the government's
intended expenditures
are for the next year
this is where
this is how many taxes we're going to collect
this is what the
how much we're going to spend on the military
how much we're going to spend on building roads etc
but
it's become a very
devious way to slide in
all these
schedules or schedules
into
you know one of the great ones
that was recently
was we found out
during the Jody Wilson-Raybould
affair that
the deferred
prosecutions
legislation
was slipped into
an omnibus budget
bill
nobody
when you're getting into these bills
of 600 pages and whatnot
and you're told it's a budget bill
and most members don't bother
reading any legislation anyway
they don't see any value in it
they much prefer just to have the party
tell them what is in
the legislation rather than
independently reading it
or investigating
so these really
scary devious
nefarious
changes in our legislation
it comes in often
through these the guys
budget bill these days
yeah
now we had an
interesting comment
I
just trying to find it to pull up
it was from
phoenix in our
rumble channel says
what is there to actually
stop the provinces to do
what is in their own best
interest can the feds actually
enforce whatever
rules they make up
I seriously don't get it
and that's from phoenix 13
in our rumble channel
well I'm not sure but I'll take a stab
at it but maybe you might want to
clarify that like
we have a constitution
each province has a constitution
and it's encapsulated and incorporated
into the
the federal constitution
it's the
constitution act of 1982
lays out
the what
each province is sovereign
in
and therefore the province
is the crown
they are sovereign
in the area of property rights
of civil rights
of health
and education
and various things
the provinces are
the crown in same with land
and the feds
are also
have sovereign jurisdictions
over
the military
and over the currency
and monetary policy
in
foreign affairs
so in those
spheres
the feds cannot tell
the provinces what to do in health
for example or education
any more
than the province could tell the feds
what to do with the military
but here's the slight
of hand that happens
as well
is
I don't know
if you're old enough to remember a number of years back
during the Kretchen era
Jesse there was the
Kretchen came in with what was called
the Canada Health Act
I'm 51
so I'm not as young as
I'm not as young as
I'm younger than I look
you are
so anyway
what
Kretchen did
was said to the provinces
we want to intrude
into your sovereign jurisdiction
of health care
and make it illegal
for
anybody
any service provider
who
provides OHIP
or socialized
health care
will not be allowed to also do
private
health care delivery
it's either you're in
or you're out
because up until that time
doctors and various
health care providers could
be both inside the socialized system
or outside
and Kretchen said
as a bonus for
doing this
we've got 10 billion
dollars on the table that we're going
to give to you the provinces
and of course
the provinces
like a dog with a bone said
okay well that's a lot of gravy
10 billion dollars
I'll give up my
sovereign
constitutional jurisdiction
on health care
in this matter
to the feds
and will allow the feds to
legislate this component of health care
and will take their money
and
the feds have also done that with education
they've also done with immigration
immigration is an interesting one Jesse
because that is a shared
our constitution
for Phoenix
our constitution
recognizes immigration
as a shared jurisdiction
between the provinces
and the credit and the feds
and
so what the feds have done
to all provinces
was the
the
I saw that big
comment come up and took me out
sorry about that
I try not to put on the big
comments
they're too big I don't like to put them up
because I don't like to cover things up
what was I just talking about
now
immigration
so
other than
Quebec maintains
that shared jurisdiction
with the feds
and Quebec
determines the criteria like you have to
French speaking
has to be one of your languages to be an immigrant
there
and various things
but all the other provinces have advocated
that immigration
jurisdiction to the feds
in exchange again for
money
for services such as
English as a second language
for Somalian
cultural centers
and
Muslim
community centers
and a whole host of
various social programs
created for immigrants
the provinces have said
just give us the money
and we will allow you
Mr. Federal Government
decide how many people
you allow into our provinces
but
each and every province could say
no
we don't want
immigrants this year
we've got too many
we can't house them
they're depressing our wages
there's inflating our labor supply
depressing wages
bringing down our standards of living
too many people
are in homeless shelters
in tent cities
so let's not have
any more immigrants for a period of time
each and every province could do that
but they wouldn't get the money from the feds
what do you know about the privy council
so there's been a lot
of talk about the privy council
every member
every person who has ever
served in cabinet
or once you
serve in cabinet
you're a member of the privy council
right
it's an honor
it's an initiation
do you go in a ceremony
do you have to sign your blood oath
what does this mean
anybody that's in the cabinet
automatically is now in the privy council
so there is
an oath is a cabinet minister
for cabinet
secrecy
and that's very much
entrenched
in our laws and the recognition
of our laws that
cabinet documents
can't be compelled to be
except in very
limited circumstances
can't be disclosed by the courts
so
and you can understand
an element of that
you would want to have
forthright in frank
and honest discussions
in a cabinet meeting
but there is
because again
we're in a constitutional monarchy
and I
have my issues with that as well
you know
you swear your
allegiance to the crown
and I believe we should be swearing
our allegiance to our constitution
and to the people
of this nation rather than
to the crown
but you know
the privy council on its own
you know there is that
that
that oath that you take
and it is to the crown
but it's
you know one of the most
outspoken critical
people
of our governments
in my lifetime
was a member of the privy council
Paul Hellyer
that name
brings a bell to you
but he was a privy councilor
he was the oldest
privy councilor
in the commonwealth
he died
during Covid
I spoke to him
last I spoke to him I believe was
2021
and he was 90 some years of age
at the time
but he was
over his career
a very ardent
and critical
of
both the Libbles
and the Conservatives
and he had been
a member of both
you know so it's
the privy council
in of itself
is not
that big of a deal
I think the bigger deal is
swearing
for all elected members
to swear
an oath of allegiance to the
Constitution and to the people that
they represent
how do we get out of being a
constitutional monarchy and become
a constitutional republic
maybe how we're supposed to be
well let's go back
to the earlier initial we talked
about
we've been in a constitutional
paralysis
or since Meach Lake
you know and
I don't think
you know we're too
we're too fearful Jesse
we're too hesitant
to even
talk about anything in our Constitution
at the moment so
and as long as you know
the Canadian voters keep voting in the
globalist parties
like this is they don't mind
you know I think
Trump's
actions
could also
lead to
some constitutional reform here
if not
well you know if not
provinces becoming
members of the United States
of the American Union
I don't know but
unless and until people
drive this politically
haven't
forbid
how can we get to
a constitutional republic
if we can't even
you know
operate
and function the way the
current constitution reads with
with jurisdiction over the
provinces
what does
what does the crown
mean to you because
we hear the RCMP
swear allegiance to the crown
we hear
politicians swear allegiance to the crown
the bar the British
accredited regency
lawyers swear allegiance to the crown
we've had someone come on here
saying that the crown is the people
some people think the crown is
you know the monarchy
I think there was a case
in
Alberta stone child
he was elected for
a seat
in
his little town and he ran on
he was going to vote no against the GST
no I'm going to vote no against
the GST I'm going to vote no against
the GST and then
he gets elected by a small town
and I believe it was maybe the
Mulrooney time
and he went with party
line and voted yes
for the GST his
town sued him
took him to court
and said you know this guy
lied to us we
said he was not going to vote for the GST
and in an open court
the judge said
in his ruling that
no elected
member of any
government in Canada
is beholden to its constituents
its loyalty is to the crown
so what the heck is this crown
so
the crown is an abstract
concept and
you know
and
how should I explain this
you know
the crown
is
intended to be
the
the fount
of all wisdom
and benevolence
that the crown is there
to
ensure their subjects
are
treated well
and wisely
like
you know obviously that's
not true
but that is the basis
of that's the architecture
so
you're swearing this
allegiance to this ideal
that
the crown would never
act in a
manner that was not
in accordance with
the
best interests
of the subjects
but
you know
that's wholly
nonsensical
these days
it means you're
in actual
fact
what it is is you are
swearing your
obedience
to whoever the leader
of the government is
okay so in
effect you're swearing
allegiance to
Justin Trudeau
or Doug Ford
and
and these guys are not
they're not very benevolent
and they're certainly not
all seeing and
all knowing and full of wisdom
by any stretch
of the matter
so
that's again I think we should
you know
reinforce that symbolism
that
we swear allegiance to the constitution
the highest law in the land
does Canada have a constitution
that's legitimate
and being adhered to
well it's legitimate
it's been
elements of
certainly been distorted
you know
many of our jurists
have adopted
a interpretation
called the living tree
doctrine
rather than textualism
in the United States
the prevailing
concept is
textualism that you
you read the law
the way it was written in its
plain
language understanding
of the words
where in Canada
most of our jurists
believe that
the document is
ideals
written down
but that are wholly
it can be wholly amended
and modified
to the norms
that they believe
are present
in the state
that's why
the weaknesses
that we saw during COVID
where
you know
these freedoms of assembly
speech expression
mobility
are
inalienable
but
and that are only
can be infringed upon
in a
in a manner that
is demonstrably
consistent with
a free and fair democracy
and that became to be known
as well
anything will do
you know
if the government says
there's a pandemic
they don't have to prove it
they don't have to prove
that the vaccine
is effective
or safe
just the government says so
so the courts
have ruled that that will
well that's demonstrably
justifiable
where in the states
you know
quite a bit different
same with under free speech
under gun ownership laws
so many different things
that we would be
we would be well served as Canadians
to
adopt both some of the
elements of the U.S.
Constitution in regards
to personal liberties
and freedoms
as well as
laying out the law
that it is
to be interpreted
under the doctrine
of textualism
rather than the living free
what's your thoughts
on the nuclear crown
king chuck the turd
and why
Donald Trump was
heard saying
that you know he wanted to go talk to him
about potentially joining the
commonwealth I was like
I would that was one of the last
things I thought I'd ever hear
and you know
what do you think that that's all about
so listen
I met
king charles a number of years ago
when he was in king
I've never
held him in the
highest of regard
you know he's a nice fella
a very personable fella
and he's an intelligent fella
but
ideologically
philosophically
the guy's
an immature idiot
probably
socially as well
you know
I think what Trump was
playing there it wasn't
joining the commonwealth
and becoming a
subject to the king
you know we have a number of members
of
in the commonwealth
who are associate members
and
India
is an
associate member
they are not
a
constitutional monarchy
so
you know and there's a number of
countries like that
and there's been
a significant
interest
as well
to
to further
elevate the
the angle sphere
so
you know that's
you know
and listen the UK
had been
up until recently
you know
and for a long time
a very strong ally
with the Americans
just as we had been
but
the relationships are changing
under
these days with globalism and with
Trump at the helm
so
I actually took it as possibly
that
saying join the commonwealth meaning
I'm going to make a deal for Canada
who's in the commonwealth
maybe the owners of Canada
you know the monarchy
and I thought maybe that had
some kind of code language of
you know we want Canada and I want to
go make a deal on joining the commonwealth
by taking Canada
so Jesse this is where we
run into all kinds of things
you know
a great many of Canadians
have a very
limited
knowledge
of our constitution
as I said earlier in the show
very limited knowledge of our
our history
and that's you know
not being disparaging
I think I'm just stating what is
well it's an obvious fact
from my
involvement
in the public
public life for 25
years
so
and our system is also
more confusing
it's not as cut and dried as the American
system like
we don't vote for our executive
we don't vote for our prime minister
the U.S. has a
a very clear cut
you vote for your president
and you also vote for your
congressman and for your senate
you know
where we just vote for this
electoral district
and depending
on how many people get elected from each party
in those electoral districts
we craft out
our executive branch out of that
so it's
it's
it's not as easy for
people to
to understand it takes a little bit more time
to get knowledge
about it
there's a great
great message from Michael
the constitutional
is meant to constrain
politicians
it's meant to constrain
government not people
and
but we get into
all these other little
distortions that
Canada doesn't really have a
constitution and that we're really
the
subjects of king check
and
the west minister
statute of 31
nullifies
this and
we're in probate knowledge
other nonsensical
and absurd
commentary
it's
and it's
mostly to do because
the west minister
parliamentary system is a little bit more difficult
to understand
and realize as well
as all of the
contortions and distortions
that we've done to it
over the years
such as
abrogating the provincial
jurisdictions
and also abrogating
our own
sovereignty through
adoption of policies
and
in proposals
by super national
institutions like the UN
and
abdicating our authority
to the WHO
so this is where it becomes
very
discompobulated
for
the average lay person
who just wants to go to work
and make a living
and
raise his family
and doesn't have the time
to
delve into all this
it gets discompobulated
for many people
we have
sleeping giant in our rumble channel
you know feels that
Queen Ramana was
on February 3rd
at the trucker convoy and burnt the flag
and it was some
thing that they've excluded out of
the testimonies and thinks it's such a big deal
have you heard of Queen Ramana
and did you hear about her burning the flag
and any thoughts on
what she plays a role in any of the stuff
that's going on
this is a complete example
of what I was talking to you about Jesse
you know you have these
outlandish
absurd
you know Queen Dildo
this little
woman from the Philippines
comes on the scene
and announces that
Queen Dildo is now the commander
and chief of
the Canadian military and the actual
Queen of Canada
like
I met her and her crowd down in Ottawa
and I was just
astonished
that
there could be anybody in this country
who could be so bloody stupid
as to
believe that Queen Dildo
is really the
the Queen of Canada
but you know this is
we get the same thing with the
with the free man on the land
and the sovereign citizen
and the
and all this hocus pocus
nonsensical
bullshit
and what it is is people
who don't know much about anything
but have
read something that they didn't understand
and goes out
and then tells people that
everything
that you know to be true about the country
has been wrong
because they
are wrong
yeah
anyway
I use some pejorative
terms there for
the hell if I'll ever
call somebody who calls themselves
a Queen
in Canada
I'll refer
to them in a very pejorative manner
and I just wanted
so sleeping giant says
why is Randy calling her Dildo
so her name is Queen Romana
Didula or something
so I think it's just he's just making fun
and saying Queen
for anybody who hasn't heard that name
if people are wondering why is he saying Queen Dildo
alright so because her last name
is I think Didula or something
so I think that's just a play on
play on words or whatever
we're going to have to
write things up soon though
yeah right now last question
what's the flag behind you
the coat of arms what does that represent
why do you have that background in behind you
are you really
asking me that question
yeah
you don't know what that flag is
no
until 1966
that was the flag of Canada
the red incident
so it changed
to the pot leaf I mean the maple leaf
yeah
so and it remains the
flag of Ontario
okay
yeah I'm again Alberta boy
I've never seen
the Ontario flag
but that this so the Ontario flag
used to be the flag
of Canada it remained the flag
of Ontario so we always
referred to it as the red ensign
but there would be
and there was a number of provinces that flew the red ensign
but they would
change some of the elements
in the crest
on the right hand side
to
signify that specific province
but that is the red ensign
for which was Canada's
national flag
from 1867 until
whatever
66 or 65 I forget now
when we
adopted
the liberal
colors
and painted
our oceans red instead
of blue on our flag
and we have
your links posted at the bother
scrolling at the bottom you got Randy Hillier.com
and your randyhilliersubstack.com
what do Bermuda Ukraine
and Canada's comments please
tell us what they can find on your website
where they can find you
if you know a lot of people say
why isn't he running for Prime Minister
we need you to put your hat in there
how can people find you where can they
find you and
I'm putting
up a couple
links right at the moment
in the private chat
and
I know you asked me to do this
earlier
and I'm sorry
I didn't do it earlier
but
there's a few of them
and then I'll put one other one
and
that is
this one here
and that's a few links
I'm also on telegram
in
various other ones but those are
my main accounts
and
what can people find there
they can find everything that I
talk about and I talk about a lot of different
things
at no more lockdowns as well
I also
have a
200 year old cabin that I
rent out
called Scattle Butt Lodge
if you go on
the website no more lockdowns
you'll see
my camp
and I rent that out
as well as
the
I'm still engaged in the courts and I still
have a legal defense
fun there that people can contribute to
and
it's at the camp where I do a lot of my Scattle Butt Lodge series
as well as my
podcast series
called Canada User's Guide
and Owners Manual
and
I'm also involved with the Ontario Party
and
here in Ontario
and
although I don't have any official
role with the PPC
I am a very
strong and vocal
supporter of the PPC
final words of wisdom
any inspiration anything that you can
share with our audience
before we wrap this up here today
if you don't like
what's happening
in your community
if you don't like
what's happening in your province
if you don't like what's happening
with the future of your children
if you don't like
what's happening in our country
fix it
right
and don't
you know
this idea
that's what a Canadian is
is somebody who is resilient
but who faces
adversary
adverse situations
and fixes
the bloody goddamn thing
and not
whine and snivel
and complain about it
so
and yeah that's
a good one and
if you're going to get engaged
to fixings
learn and be knowledgeable
about what it is that you want to fix
awesome
well thank you so much for taking this time
here with us today it was an honor
to speak with you here and have you on our show
so thanks again
you've been an inspiration to a lot of people
and love how you just speak your mind
and you don't bend over
for this political beast
that seems to want to
take everyone from behind
so thank you again
I hope
your audience enjoyed it
it was informative
and
people can reach out to me
my contact information
is on all those places
my email
address is info
at randyhillier.com
and
let's
work to make our country
a better place
and thank you for your
efforts as well Jesse
you're very very welcome
well knowledge is power
the more knowledge we all have
collectively the less power they have over us
so let's all face infinity without flinching
for one love
one heart one life
namaste everybody and if they ever ask you
to put on a breathing inhibitor again Randy
you know what to say
no masque
never did it before I'm not going to start now
awesome love y'all
we'll see you next time we see you back here
on the missing link tomorrow
we've got at
10 p.m. Eastern
8 p.m. Pacific we've got
Steve Bergevin coming back for a second time
he grew up in a secret
Freemason family
and he speaks firmly
against them and all of what's going on
so he's always a fascinating
interview here that's tomorrow
evening love y'all we'll see you next time
we see you back here on the missing link
thanks again Randy bye now
bye bye