The antithesis of communication is censorship.
And that's the fight we're in.
That's the fight we're all in,
is to be able to communicate truth,
to communicate what is actually reality
and what's actually there.
And so what we're talking about here is something
we've been uncovering for quite some time,
over the last five years,
but this is the COVID vaccine
and the censorship that the administration,
the Biden administration laid over the top of that
so the public had no idea what kind of safety issues
were coming at them when they were pushing this vaccine.
Here's the headline.
It says Biden White House edited messaging
on strokes after COVID-19 vaccinations.
Now we have a stroke issue that was being hidden.
And this is in 2022, they put out a booster
because apparently the first two shots
we were told that they stopped transmission.
We were told that everything's perfect after that.
Well, they didn't work, so then they had to do a booster
and then we went into booster mania
and you have to 10 shots for older adults in America.
But they put out this booster
and what's fascinating about this,
this is even stat news reporting at the time in 2022.
They said this,
Pfizer seeks authorization for updated COVID vaccine
without fresh clinical trial data.
So remember the days where they said,
well, you know what the first two shots,
they raise some antibodies somewhere in people's blood
which does something we don't really know.
So we're just gonna use that information
to approve this new vaccine and that's how it went.
Well, shortly after that approval,
the booster shots went out to over 50 million adults
and here is what the internal email show
compliments of Senator Ron Johnson.
And let's look at them now, we'll go right into this.
These are documents from the CDC, FDA White House.
And you can see they're going to put out
a warning to the public and they're wargaming
how this should sound.
You can see here on this document,
it says the current signal right in the middle here
is moderately elevated.
They cross that out and they change that to slightly.
Right below that, it says the statistical signal
has a moderate elevated rate ratio.
They change that to slightly.
Well, I don't know about you,
but let's look at some definitions here
because those are two different words.
Means to a certain extent,
quite, fairly, 50 million American adults.
Remember, took that shot.
Slightly, to a small degree,
not, these are two different things,
clearly downplaying,
but let's go away from the words.
Clearly changing the words, right?
Downgrading what the actual knowledge is.
And thereby, I just want to point out
when we're having this conversation,
because I know that people was like,
are we still talking about COVID?
Yeah, when, I think we should never stop talking
about moments where governments anywhere in the world
decide to murder innocent people,
which is what I want to point out is happening here.
As soon as you recognize that stroke,
which leads to death,
we've talked about other things,
whether it's myocarditis, pericarditis,
but this is stroke now that we're talking about.
And so when you decide in an internal email
to downgrade the warning on that,
what you're saying is,
and by the way, you are recommending this to,
as you said, 50 million people.
We were talking about all of America
was being told to take these vaccines,
hundreds of millions of people
when you do that,
and even if it's rare,
even if it is slight,
but at moderate,
what you're saying is,
we know people are going to die by this mandate.
They're gonna die when they read this recommendation
and think that that risk doesn't apply to them
and we are okay with that.
I want to make that clear.
It's also why I think it was Denmark
has never had a mandated vaccine program
because they said it's against our constitution
to murder innocent people,
which is what we would do
if we mandated a product that works for most people,
but for those that didn't, we killed you.
This is your government saying,
it's okay to kill some people
and they don't need to know about it.
That's how I read this right now
is we're having this conversation.
Really important because that was only
an administration that was in office four years ago.
We are not talking about the 1930s or 40s or 50s.
We're talking about yesterday.
Right, and for the people watching going,
well, let's just word,
let's just word south with that.
Let's go further into these emails.
Here's the next one, and you can look at this.
It says, this is actually hilarious
because it's in the first set.
They're talking about transparency.
Consistent to our commitment to transparency,
the CDC plan to post a statement on their website
that explains potential risk,
preliminary signal.
They change potential risk to preliminary signal
and next steps.
So from the White House.
So let me just say, everyone listening right now,
Jeff, we really just,
I want everyone to think about this.
If you read potential risk,
if you take this product,
that's what they were gonna write.
And then preliminary signal.
Which one triggers you?
Is preliminary signal even mean anything to you?
Look at this.
I mean, this is shocking stuff, Jeffrey.
There's no word salad.
This is like, I don't realize,
I don't even know what I'm reading.
Preliminary signal, potential risk understood.
Houston got that message.
And at the same time,
they're trying to really soften the blow
to the safety signal.
They have project groups with up to 15 experts,
doctors, lawyers, everybody, health experts.
Look at this internal email here.
Look at these working groups they had,
working on how to message these shots
and the issues from them.
They have a myocarditis, all ages working group,
Guillain-Barré syndrome working group,
thrombocytopenia working group.
You go to the next page here, stroke project.
There we go.
And a death project.
That's gotta be some great conversation.
Stroke and death project.
Great times, guys.
So let's go to the final one
because they also reached out to reporters
on how to messages.
They had trusted reporters.
And it says here,
in barge going briefing with Peter Marks,
great guy, we did a whole documentary on him.
And trusted reporters, Helen Branswell of STAP.
We have Washington Post reporters there.
We have AP reporters.
But then you look down here
and you go into the trusted experts.
There's Peter Hotez, among others.
These are pharmaceutical industry conflicted experts.
And their White House is bringing them in.
The CDC, the FDA is bringing them in to message this.
And you were mentioning, Dal, about Denmark,
not wanting to basically kill their citizens.
When a stroke issue comes out
right after these boosters are going into arms
in the 65 and olders,
that's the most vulnerable population
for these signals to start.
But what happens after a year or two?
Well, this is why we start seeing headlines like this.
Strokes are getting younger.
The alarming rise in stroke rates among young people.
Is this what's happening?
What we're looking at here is essentially a crime scene.
We have documents of crime scene here.
And it's not just stroke.
Let's go to a new study that just came out
looking at the best, the brightest,
our military soldiers taking two COVID shots.
They looked at this transient elevation
of NTPRO BMP after COVID-19 vaccination
in healthy adults.
This is a blood test used to detect heart failure.
It's used to detect the extent of heart damage.
They did this test on, again,
healthy military adults after two COVID shots.
This is what the researchers wrote.
Nearly 49% of half there of participants
exhibited a relative increase
exceeding 1.5 times their individual baseline.
The authors concluded in healthy adults
this COVID-19 vaccination was associated
with short-term subclinical elevation of NTPRO BMP,
particularly after the second dose
while not indicative of overt cardiovascular injury.
This biomarker response may reflect transient
myocardial stress and warrants further research, you think?
And this is what we're talking about.
You can change the food pyramid.
You can change the nutritional guidelines
for the military to get them more combat ready.
But how does that work if you're mainlining
a heart-stressing shot into them continuously
with boosters every year?
For what?
I mean, again, I mean,
Jeffrey, when we talk about the military,
these are mostly men and women
that are in that sweet spot where COVID has no effect on them.
Zero death rate, you know, under 25, 30.
I mean, in that zone, they are so healthy.
And we've talked about this on the show before.
The entire argument for vaccination
is so that they be, you know, military ready,
like ready to go at any moment.
And here you are.
If they have elevated heart issues guaranteed
and they're not ready to charge onto a battlefield today
and you are inflicting that upon them
for a cold that will not affect their heart.
I mean, the whole thing is really outrageous.
And I want to reflect on a story
you've had earlier, Jeffrey.
This is all on the back to the fact
that the administration also sat down
and recognized that natural infection
created better immunity than the vaccine in itself.
And they all decided to not tell us that
and instead mandate these shots,
recommend these shots, recommend these boosters,
and then downplay all the harms from it.
Jeffrey, mostly in my career, starting the doctors,
my work was investigating when pharmaceutical companies
like Merck did this with Vioxx,
when they finally got it into a courtroom
and you realize in their internal emails,
they were assessing how many people would die from Vioxx
and said, that's fine.
We'll put up with that
because we'll make more money than that.
We see the same thing with Johnson and Johnson
and talcum powder.
We see that with the Sackler family
when it comes to OxyCotin.
But what we're looking at here, remember,
is not a pharmaceutical company,
it's the government of the United States
that has now internal emails that are discovering
that they were hiding injuries and harms
and making a risk-reward benefit ratio for what?
A pharmaceutical company?
I mean, this shows you how entrenched
and how corrupt this government is
and what Robert Kennedy, Jr. finds himself
in the middle of trying to do something inside of there.
But this is horrific that our government would act
just like a money-grubbing pharmaceutical company
that doesn't mind paying billions.
And what happens here when you try to get paid billions?
Oh, liability protection in a courtroom that's totally rigged.
You're not gonna see any money inside of there
because the government has rigged that too.
This is horrible.
And this is why we'll never shut up about this
because the vaccine injured are continuing to line up.
And as we're said, this is evidence of a crime scene.
It's now stroke.
We know it's also myocarditis.
Here's Ron Johnson talking about
what the CDC knew and hid.
Take a look.
On February 28th, 2021, Israeli health officials
notified CDC quote of large reports of myocarditis,
particularly in young people
following the administration of the Pfizer vaccine.
Again, that's February 28th, 2021,
two and a half months after the emergency use authorization.
On April 12th, over a month later,
a DOD consultant raises concerns to CDC
and FDA officials about their ability to monitor
and track cardiac related adverse events.
The consultant notes quote,
if you do not ask, you will not see it.
But does that mean it does not exist unquote?
Around the same time in mid-April, 2021,
CDC officials discussed safety signals
for myocarditis quote for myocarditis with mRNA vaccines
based on DOD and Israeli data,
but do not take immediate steps to warn the public.
From May 17th to May 21, 2021, CDC officials discussed
whether to issue a formal health warning
called a health alert network message on myocarditis
noting that quote, providers aren't reporting
these cases to VAERS.
They knew they weren't.
They knew they existed,
they knew they weren't reporting them.
Couple days later during a May 24, 2021 vaccine safety meeting,
notes show that FDA and CDC officials asked quote,
is VAERS signaling for myocarditis now?
Question mark and are told for the age group
16 to 17 years and 18 to 24 years, yes.
Yes, they saw a safety signal in VAERS, yet.
From May 25th to May 27th,
CDC officials provide up-to-date information
on the status of the Han to Pfizer and Moderna representatives.
Not to the public, they're warning the injection
manufacturers indicating CDC's preference
to keep those companies more informed
about vaccine adverse events than the American people.
You know, they're not reporting the signals
to the public as Ron Johnson said.
They're only reporting it to the manufacturers themselves
that are getting paid for all this.
But Jeffrey, why didn't they report it to the doctors?
Because that's the point that's being made here, right?
If they just simply put out a call to all doctors,
all pediatricians, hey, there appears to be
a myocarditis signal, especially in young people.
Keep your eyes out and be sure to report
every myocarditis or pericarditis that you see
in your delivery of this vaccine.
We're trying to get to the bottom of this and see the data.
That would have changed the entire culture.
God knows what numbers we would have seen.
But what you're telling doctors is we have no signal,
signal this thing is perfectly safe
and anyone that questions it,
we're just watching their license taken away.
I mean, you literally incentivize doctors
to just bury their heads in the sand,
even if they were seeing a problem.
When you should have said we never did safety trials,
we got an emergency use authorization,
we're rushing this thing on the market,
but we are telling you doctors now,
we don't want to alarm the public,
but you need to know we have a myocarditis, pericarditis,
and they should have said the story right before it's stroke.
We need you to start looking for this
and report every version you see
because we want to see how bad is this signal,
since they'll tell you there's just so bad
at capturing it.
But no, none of that happened.
This generation will never give up this cause
and the people that have been vaccinated
and injured by this COVID shot, they need justice
and it will come.
And that's all I can say about that.
I mean, this is an extraordinary story
and we have the evidence, we have the documents
and we have the people clearly
that have been injured by this.