Lust auf Burger, Pizza, Sushi, Falafel, Döner, Bolls, Chicken, Rahmen.
Bivers mit Volt!
Bestell dein Lieblingsessen mit Volt und sicher dir bis zu 20 Euro Willkommensrabatt.
Ein paar Volt App-Down-Loaden, Lieblingsessen bestellen und bis zu 20 Euro auf deine ersten beiden Bestellungen sparen.
2 x 10 Euro Rabatt, gültig bis zum 1. 2. 26, Mindestbestellwert von 15 Euro,
gilt nur für Neugundinnen und die ersten 2 Lieferbestellungen.
Es gelten die AGB.
Ich werde das sagen. Ich werde einen Testschallender machen.
Ich werde ihn mitnehmen.
Wir finden nichts, aber Nikotin und Alkohol.
Und sehr viel Alkohol, viel Nikotin.
Kandace, ich möchte sagen, dass du das nicht fängst.
Das sieht aus wie Adderall-Fueled Schizophrenia.
Ja, es ist sicherlich eine Form von Psychosis.
Das war mein erstes Mal.
Du kannst fast nicht sogar die Verwaltung haben.
Das ist wirklich nur Psychosis.
Du kannst es in den Augen sehen.
Sie ist total seriös.
Sie ist total authentisch.
Sie glaubt in was sie sagt.
Und das ist die verrückte Sache, die ich jemals gehört habe.
Kandace Owens hat Adderall-Fueled Schizophrenia.
Und das kommt aus der gleichen Figur,
der dieses zu Joe Roger gesagt hat.
Wenn du thousands von Jahren zurückgehst,
Merlin, der Archtypel,
oder diese Magischen,
oder diese Wiesen,
werden die Träger in diesen Tempeln
und die Paläne, diese Crystal Balls,
die nicht wirklich Crystal Balls sind.
Es ist das psychische Fokus
der internationalen Konnexion.
Während die Träger in den Augen schauen,
können sie dann die Zukunft sehen
und verstehen, was passiert,
um die Tempeln des Planeten zu geben.
Ich habe es gesagt.
Ich liebe Alex.
Aber
an diesem Punkt
bin ich ziemlich überzeugt,
dass er die meisten mit Kandace Owens verabschiedet ist,
weil er einfach
auf seinem Korner ist.
Wie er seinen Korner hat.
Gang-Warfare, essentiell.
Und ich habe es gesagt 1.000 times.
Ich bin nicht in den
Dream-Szenarien,
die Kandace seems to take on
an extraordinary
Merit,
or extraordinary Value in ihrer Investigation.
Ich bin sehr viel
in der
Physikale.
Ich glaube in der Physikale Evidence.
Ich glaube in
der Kontradiktorien-Testimone,
die ein Eibra raised.
Das might require you to dig a little bit deeper
and we've got
a really important one today.
And that's regarding TPUSA.
Turning Point's Chief Security Person,
talking about the day
that Charlie Kirk was murdered.
I point out the massive contradiction,
where he says
they were not allowed to fly drones.
Then I show the interview with Frank Turek
where he says he was watching drone footage
with Charlie Kirk.
This part is breaking news
because I'm not aware this has ever been discussed.
The lawyer in this letter says the following.
There was no discrepancy.
UVU prohibited Turning Point USA
from flying drones for security purposes during the event,
but did allow a Turning Point USA
media production drone
to briefly fly over the location
before the event
to collect limited B-roll footage.
First of all,
how could this be defamatory
if I had no idea
about any of this?
Second,
I find this explanation absurd.
So, Alex and Nick,
which have been very critical of Candace Owens,
they both deal with security issues
often, as you know,
both of them have been
attacked at different points.
Nick very famously
about a year ago.
So, this is not
something that's outside of their understanding
or outside of their purview.
So, I want to ask them.
I'm going to put this question in their camp
because they're so critical of Candace Owens.
You tell me
why that makes any sense.
You tell me why
a high-level political pundit
who's going to a college campus
of which you know
that there will be serious security threats.
The college campus
allows for
the media team
to fly a drone
to get B-roll,
essentially just
overhead shots of the crowd.
But they refuse to allow
the security detail
to fly a surveillance drone
to make sure that there are no threats
on the roof
from which a lethal round
is then fired.
Is that not odd to you?
Does that not rub you the wrong way?
Do you not go,
hm, that does seem off?
So, set aside
the more far-fetched claims
that Candace has made
and just deal with that.
Just deal with what is actually meaningful here
and I think that's extraordinarily meaningful.
Moreover, it's meaningful because
if you are a high-level security team
which Charlie Kirk's team
does appear to have been
lots of military veterans,
guys that had decades of experience,
you would think that they'd be
more than equipped to deal
with a college campus event like this,
particularly given that they've done it countless times
with Charlie Kirk
as their protectee.
And yet,
when they are told,
sure,
you can fly a drone
for B-roll
from the media team,
but the security team
cannot keep a drone up
during the actual event
in which we are trying to keep our protectee alive.
You say,
okay?
You say no problem?
Really?
I think that's odd.
I would say that it's unbelievable,
but there's been so much weirdness with this case
that at this point it is believable.
It's just bizarre.
Like, why would you not go to the campus
overseer and say, hey,
we'll just fly a drone
during the event for security purposes
and not worry about the B-roll.
Can we prioritize
our protectee's security
as opposed to the media production side of this event?
Seeing as that's probably more important,
apparently not.
Apparently they didn't think that that was necessary.
And the great irony in all this is that
the only reason we know this
is because TPUSA
sent a cease and desist letter to Wolves and Finance,
the guy who just did that video,
basically telling him to back off,
that he got a bunch of things wrong
and he's got to be quiet, essentially.
Now, I haven't dug deep enough to know
how accurate his reporting was,
so I'm not going to go to the mat
defending his evidence
or lack thereof.
But I will say,
I don't think it's really helping your case.
I don't think it's helping your street cred
or your reputation
if you're going to start
sending cease and desist letters to YouTubers.
I assume Candice will be next
and I hope I won't be
seeing as I haven't made any claims
about TPUSA.
I've literally just covered this case
and said what I think is weird
and what I think is often
what I think is right
and what I, you know,
just a genuine inquiry.
But it certainly doesn't scream transparency now, does it?
It certainly doesn't make you feel content
that this organization
is being totally transparent
and allowing for a full investigation,
not just from the officials,
the legal officials,
but also the internet.
Like, do you want to know
who took out your boss?
I would hope so.
And if not,
well, then
prepare for additional questions to be asked.
Speaking of transparency issues
when it comes to the prosecution of Tyler Robinson,
you now have the judge
essentially critiquing the videographers
that are at one of the court hearings
in which they filmed Tyler Robinson
and were able to read his lips
whether or not that was accurate.
I don't know,
but he says that that violated their rules
about not having a camera
on Tyler Robinson during the case,
which now makes me fear
that he's going to call
for the cameras
to be removed entirely.
I do find that,
and I'm not a lipreader,
so I don't know what the standard is for lipreading,
but I do note that nine seconds
in that first clip,
one could see his lips moving
and it is a significant time for,
as it relates to this particular issue.
It wasn't a passing shot.
It was focused on these two persons
and so I find that
the decorum order
to no visual recording is permitted
of a person's lips
so as to be decipherable by a lipreader,
I find that that has been violated.
So when we actually get to a real trial,
we may not be able to watch it,
which would be a tragedy,
because I don't think anybody
is going to trust the outcome of this trial
if we don't have full transparency,
if we can't actually see
what's transpiring in the courtroom.
So let's hope that's not how this plays out.
We've got one other new bit of information
when it comes to the Charlie Kirk case
and this was anonymous kind of testimony
from an alleged relative of Lance Twiggs,
the guy-friend-girlfriend of Tyler Robinson.
I mean, both of them are super smart.
I mean, Lance was,
I do know that and I remember,
you know, he was a,
I don't know, concert pianist,
like his talent for piano music
was off the charts, like not normal.
And that's kind of what I've heard about Tyler,
is that he was just so smart and so.
And it's just a shame that these kids,
that had so much potential and so,
such a bright future.
There's text messages between Tyler and Lance,
where they're texting after the event.
A lot of people find them unusual.
The world that they were in,
like this gaming world,
like that was a normal way that
they kind of spoke,
that this wasn't an abnormal,
the way they spoke wasn't abnormal.
So this alleged relative of Lance Twiggs says,
no, there's nothing weird about these text messages
because that's how gamers talk,
which makes you think,
I mean, if you know how gamers talk,
that means that it's a provocative humor,
probably some racist stuff thrown in there,
maybe threats of violence that are playful
or maybe serious, but whatever.
She seems to think that the text messages
between Twiggs and Robinson,
were in that vein,
which means she's never read them
because this is actually what they were saying.
Robinson, delete this exchange.
Robinson, my dad wants photos of the rifle.
He says, grandpa wants to know who has what.
The feds released a photo of the rifle
and is very unique.
He's calling me right now, not answering.
Robinson, since Trump got into office,
my dad has been pretty die hard Maga.
I'm gonna turn myself in willingly.
One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff.
You are all I worry about, love.
I'm much more worried about you.
Don't talk to the media, please.
Don't take any interviews or make any comments.
If any police ask you questions,
ask for a lawyer and stay silent, et cetera, et cetera.
He then talks about, you know,
vehicle and says other weird phrases
that kind of put people off.
But it's clear to me that she has no idea,
none as to what these messages
actually consisted of
or is able to verify the legitimacy of them
based off of her defense of them being real,
is that while they were in Discord chats gaming
and so there's nothing really off about it.
Two dudes saying, hey, my love and all that.
Yeah, not normal in the gaming world, actually, ma'am.
There have been a lot of questions about where Lance is now,
whether he's in the FBI Protection Program.
It's been a big mystery.
He kind of has disappeared.
Yeah, my understanding was for the first few weeks
because there were so many threats
against his family and him.
My understanding is they did have a little bit of FBI detail
and they kind of moved around a little bit,
but they're not anymore.
He's with his family.
Will he still cooperate with the investigation
from what you know?
I don't know.
When I first found out about how he was taken in
and taught to by the police,
I know that they said that he was very cooperative,
but they had to go get him and bring him in.
He didn't voluntarily go in and say,
hey, I heard about this and I have some knowledge.
He had to go in, then he handed things over
when they asked for him,
but he didn't give up any information until he had to.
Now, after her defense of the text messages,
I take everything this lady has to say with a grain of salt.
However, that is pretty big breaking news
if she is correct and I have read reports elsewhere
that claim that Lance Twiggs, his boyfriend,
had a FBI detail security, essentially.
And I also read elsewhere that it was four.
So he had a team of four FBI agents
that were just pulled off of his security detail
about a week ago.
And I find that very, very concerning.
Why would we be expending that level of resources
to defend a guy who was the significant other of Tyler Robinson?
I want you to really think about this one
because you may be thinking, oh, well, maybe that's normal.
No, no, that's definitely not normal.
A four-man security detail implies
that this guy is an asset of some sort.
And then we don't even know for sure
that he's going to be testifying against Tyler Robinson.
And if you are protecting him to that level,
it implies he is going to testify,
in which case, okay, maybe the security detail is justified.
However, you pull the security detail after four months,
anybody else feeling like there's something off about that?
Because I certainly do.
That doesn't make any sense to me.
And I'll tell you what it looks like to me,
or what it makes me suspect,
is that Lance Twiggs was in fact an asset of theirs prior.
His relative is essentially saying,
he has no intention of cooperating.
He just talked to them basically against his will.
However, they then go to the end of the earth defending this guy.
But then they stop the security detail.
Well, he would still obviously be in jeopardy.
If he was in jeopardy over the past four months,
he's still in jeopardy.
So what changed there?
That doesn't make any sense.
And it kind of makes you wonder
if he was on their radar prior,
when these weirdos are communicating in Discord
or Group Chats
and saying all sorts of strange stuff.
Perhaps they were entrapped.
Perhaps that's kind of the key to unlocking this case.
Now, I'm not making any allegations.
I don't know that for a fact.
I'm just saying,
there's a lot of strangeness with the fact
that you would have a four-man FBI security detail
on the boyfriend of a assassination suspect.
Very, very strange.
And honestly, as strange as that was,
it doesn't get much stranger than this.
Apparently, there was a movie
that was being GoFundMe funded,
CrowdSource funded,
about a decade ago
that was going to be about an assassination plot
and Erica was going to be in it.
And this was before,
I think it was before she even had ever met Charlie
and certainly before they were married.
So I'm not saying it means anything.
I'm just saying, what the hell?
Like, there's so many,
so many strange storylines
in this entire story.
I don't know what to make of it.
It sure would be nice if we could get
honest answers from, I don't know,
everyone involved.
His wife, T.P.U.S.A.
Twigs.
I mean, whoever was in the orbit
of this story on that day,
it would be great
if we could actually get some transparency
as to what people were saying to one another,
what transpired,
what other footage might exist out there.
It just seems as if we need a heck
of a lot more help before we're going to figure out
or be content with the prosecution
of Tyler Robinson.
And speaking of,
a lot of people keep saying,
Clint, we need more shows from you.
I'm like, look,
I am not going to flood the zone
covering a story without new information.
I'm not going to do the daily thing.
I think that that has diluted
this investigation.
I think that Candice Owens show
like 20% of the episodes
are of significant value
when it comes to this investigation.
The rest are kind of fluff
or painting with too broad a brush
that I think ultimately tarnishes
legitimate inquiry into this.
So I'm not going to participate in that.
I am only going to cover things
when I think that they are meaningful,
when there are new information,
when there's things that actually jump out at me
as being an angle
that no one else has talked about
and that's what I'm doing here.
So I will say though,
once the trial starts,
oh, you betcha.
Yeah, I'll be covering it daily
because that's when we will actually get to hear
from the people involved in this.
When we will actually get testimony,
when we actually get evidence,
that will be the time where I'm going to lock in
because I still very much care about this case.
I just don't want to flood the zone
with junk science and guessing.
I don't think it helps anybody.
There are some really important things
that are happening that we don't have to guess about.
So let's talk about that for a second.
Is that your account?
I refuse to answer questions
without my lawyer present.
So I really don't know how to answer that question.
Okay, like I said,
this is freedom of speech.
This is in America, right?
And I agree with you 100%.
We're not talking to the right person.
We want to go see who the right person is.
Okay, how can I help you?
So pretty much it's just a statement
that was made as far as, you know,
I'll remember it later.
The guy who consistently calls
for the death of all Palestinians
tried to shut down a theater
for showing a movie that hurt his feelings
and refuses to stand up
for the LGBTQ community in any way.
Even leaves a room
when they bow and unrelated matters.
Wants you to know that you are all welcome.
Clown face, clown face, clown face.
Three days ago.
I'm not going to answer
whether that's me or not.
Okay, the concerning part
and not concerning
for the person who's posting it.
We're just trying to prevent
somebody else getting agitated
or agreeing with the statement.
Now this one hits
very close to home for me.
This is a woman in Miami
approached at her home
by Miami PD.
At first I thought it was the FBI
because I just assumed that local PD
wouldn't be investigating social media posts.
But nope, I was wrong.
This is my backyard
and this is a woman saying something
that is almost identical to things I've said countless times.
She says the guy who consistently calls
for the death of all Palestinians
tried to shut down a theater
for showing a movie that hurt his feelings.
And she goes on to talk about other stuff.
But you get the point.
I cannot believe
that this is happening in my own town,
my own city.
I immediately tweeted that
Governor Ron DeSantis
obviously did not get a response
despite it going fairly viral.
And it's just, I mean
I think we're all thinking the same thing, right?
Are we British?
Did I wake up in a red coat today?
Am I British now?
I don't have any good accents
actually, come to think of it.
But man.
And I'm pretty sure she's referencing Randy Fein
or some other Floridian Politician.
But it's just, it's amazing to me
that these cops
after the entire lockdown era
granted the lockdowns weren't
nearly as vicious in Florida
but after the lockdown era
after J6
and everything else that we've gone through
as a people, as a country.
They still take their marching orders.
They're still, these are American
cops going door to door
talking to people about
what they say on the internet.
And just to be very clear
what this woman said wasn't
a call for violence.
It wasn't even close, it didn't even approach that.
In fact, she's pointing out the hypocrisy
of American politicians.
Her representatives
who are so hypocritical
when it comes to the issue of Gaza.
Basically what she's saying is
this is her politician, her representative
who's constantly calling for the death of the Palestinians
simultaneously saying
that you can't have a movie
about the plight of the Palestinians
because it hurts his feelings.
Like, that's a totally
rational justifiable
claim to make.
It's not threatening,
it's not violent in nature,
there's literally nothing wrong with it.
It is as crystal clear
protected First Amendment
speech as you will ever come across.
And this is exactly
where we are headed.
And this is exactly what the
IHRA definition of anti-Semitism
leads us down the path to.
And this is exactly why
despite the fact that James Lindsay
and others like to call my
cadre of people the woke right
they are the woke right.
No one
in my camp is calling
for hate speech laws.
No one in my camp is calling
for extra protections
under the law for people
that look like me or have my religion.
I'm not doing any of that, literally none of it.
In fact, I'm calling for the exact opposite.
I want no one to have that.
But this is
the woke right.
This is the right wing version
of woke. This is the right wing version
of a protected class.
And we all know which class makes
their exception, whereas
LGBTQ whatever
as this lady's complaining about.
That's the class that they want protected
is Jewish or Israeli.
And what's the very obvious counter
argument? How about
no protected classes? How about
we're all Americans? How about
if you violate my rights
that means that you violated my right.
How about if you commit a
crime against me? You committed
a crime against me. Or anybody
else, regardless of how they look
or what they worship or anything else.
That's so obviously the American
perspective on these things and yet
it is increasingly the minority
perspective and that, ladies and gentlemen
is something we should be concerned about.
And I guess I shouldn't be surprised
that Ron DeSantis didn't respond
given that this was him
not that long ago.
When you say from the river to the sea
you are chanting
in favor of a second holocaust.
That's what that means.
Now, I do think
some of these students are just ignorant.
I don't think they understand
even what they're talking about.
You hear some of them talking about
in the occupation
of Palestine.
And I just think they need a little history lesson.
There has never been
a Palestinian Arab state.
I don't know if you guys have noticed
but gold has absolutely skyrocketed
this past year.
Along with basically every other precious
metal. Silver has gone absolutely
crazy. If you've been watching Liberty
Lockdown for any period of time
you already know why.
It's economic uncertainty
here in the markets. Global chaos
you name it. And that's why people look
for safe haven assets.
That's exactly why I partnered
with a company like Goldco.
It's not just everyday hardworking people
who are looking for protection for their assets.
It's central banks and billionaires too.
In fact, they are stockpiling gold and silver.
So, I think it's a worthwhile endeavor
to try and protect your assets
just as I've done by
at least looking into precious metals.
Goldco specializes in helping people
protect their savings with real assets, gold and silver
and they make it very simple.
Just go to ClintLikesGold.com
you'll get a free 2026
gold and silver kit and you could qualify
for up to 10% in free bonus
silver or gold, but only
while supplies last.
Head over to ClintLikesGold.com
again that's ClintLikesGold.com
Thank you again to Goldco.
I can't tell you how badly I want to
live in a country
or in a time
where our politicians
are not, especially
local level politicians, state level politicians
are not commenting
on foreign matters
whatsoever.
But there is one area
of the world
that every American politician
all the way down to the fucking dog catcher
has to have an opinion
and that's Israel
every single time.
And unfortunately, the opinion
is always slanted in one direction
as evidenced by
Pam Bondi
who was introduced by Miriam Adelson
just yesterday.
She brings moral clarity
resolve
and an unwavering
commitment
to justice
to this critical fight.
Please welcome
my friend
the 87th
Attorney General
of the United States
Pamela Bondi.
Miriam Adelson
top donor
Trump
top goal in life
defense
uplifting
Israel
Pam Bondi
Attorney General
the number one priority
of this DOJ
has been fighting anti-Semitism
to which I say
Miriam
excuse me man
there are a lot of fucking problems
in this country
like I don't know if you noticed but
Donald Trump was almost assassinated
the J6
created a bio weapon
released it on us
forced us to get something that
didn't actually protect us from it
and endangered us
the FBI entrapped the Whitmer folks
the FBI entrapped J6 folks
the FBI entrapped
as many Trump supporters as they could
possibly get their hands on
oh and also the FBI framed
the sitting president for treason
this is the guy who you
funded to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars
multiple campaigns in a row
so
why are you applauding her
why are you applauding Pam Bondi
and the attorney general's office
of prioritizing
anti-Semitism
so who gave the order to flag records
related to President Trump
to flag
records for President Trump
to flag any records which included his name
I'm not going to discuss anything
about that with you senator
eventually you're going to have to answer for your
conduct in this and you won't do it today
but eventually you will
I yield Mr. Chairman
when we have all of these other issues
all of these other issues
and you have zero concern with any of them
because your only concern
only
is Israel
that is
deeply deeply unhealthy
now it's not unhealthy
for Miriam Adelson to feel that way
it's her life
feel however you want it's her money
send it to whoever you want I really don't care
what's unhealthy though
is that we have a laundry list
of politicians who all feel the same way
or at least parrot it and then
act that way in governance
they carry out these policies
they create hate speech laws
in defense of one protected class
while simultaneously
lamenting hate speech
laws and all of this other woke nonsense
when it came to these other protected classes
where all of the sane rational Americans
are saying to themselves I just
want equal treatment
under the law regardless of who you are
what you look like, what religion
whatever it shouldn't be relevant
but
according to Miriam Adelson
that's why she loves Pam Bondi
and there's been an exactly zero
deep state people arrested
under her tenure of over a year now
I have said to people when they asked me
if this capital crumbled to the ground
the one thing
that would remain
is our commitment to our aid
and I don't even call it
our cooperation
with Israel
that's fundamental
so that was the speaker of the house
Nancy Pelosi in 2018
saying that
even if the capital were to crumble
the last thing that would go
would still be our aid, our defense
of Israel
this is the same exact conference
that you saw Miriam Adelson
and Pam Bondi talking at just yesterday
so it's been eight years
and not a damn thing's changed
it's the exact same paradigm
the exact same
and it's a bipartisan paradigm
very important to recognize that
Democrats and Republicans
exact same rhetoric
not a coincidence, these people don't agree on fucking anything
if you were to say
the sky is blue
the Democrats yell it's pink
that's just how it works
so
you gotta ask yourself
how is it that they all come to the same conclusion
they hate each other
they disagree on everything
but on this though
black step
you had Ben Shapiro and Gavin Newsom
sitting down with one another yesterday
talking about whether or not
Israel Palestine was a genocide
they both agreed
it wasn't shocking
and this is the crazy thing
for Gavin Newsom
it would be incredibly popular
for him to come out and say
yes, I opposed it
genocide or ethnic cleansing
or whatever term he wants to apply to it
I oppose it wholeheartedly
in fact so much so I would stop aid to Israel
over this in discretion
now he would lose Ben Shapiro
that's for sure
but he would gain a massive voting base
but you know what
he can't be the nominee
if he says that
because all of the pro-israel box
will fizzle
and fade away
so he's got to
even though he knows that in terms of the electorate
in terms of getting votes
it would be a huge win for him to see it
because the reason I'm not putting this in moral terms
is because Gavin Newsom has zero morals
he has zero
unique thoughts that are actually founded
in his own emotional calculus
or his own intelligence
it is always 100%
based off of
what advances him
in terms of power
that's it, trust me
as a California refugee
let me just tell you
if you think Gavin Newsom ever says something you agree with
just recognize the only reason he's saying it
is because it might get him
a crumb of more power
that's his entire motivation in life
but point being
even knowing that because trust me
if I know it Gavin Newsom knows it
it would be hugely beneficial for him to say that
I oppose what happened in Gaza
that's all he's got to say
nope, can't do it though
can't do it
and basically
no politicians can
because they are instantly unelectable
or in the case of MTG or Thomas Massey
they are instantly either thrown out
or put under massive pressure
it's just, it's awful
we're seeing a dramatic rise
in anti-Semitism
throughout the country
what do we do about it?
Ilan, thanks for having me
I'm glad that people recognize the commitment of this president
and the entire administration
to fighting this evil amongst us
so
I believe
that quite a bit of what we're seeing online
and in our universities
and attacks on our houses of worship
is funded by
foreign governments
and foreign evil actors
and that is definitely a focus of this administration
to trace the money
and understand who's funding it
because that's critical to stopping it
but on the law enforcement side
what we're doing is at every level
we are taking a zero tolerance
approach towards anti-Semitism
wherever we find it
it's Harmeet Dillon
another top brass over at the DOJ
under Trump
and again, she's just repeating
stopping anti-Semitism
is their top priority
why?
well, because their donors say
that's gotta be a top priority
well, now keeping in mind
it's simultaneously
just yesterday
Don Lemon of all people
was with the leader of a protest
entering a church
in Minnesota
to interrupt it
what do you think of it?
I mean this is unacceptable
it's shameful
to interrupt
a public gathering
of Christians in worship
but there are folks
I have to take care of my flock
listen, there's a constitution in the First Amendment
to freedom of speech
and freedom to assemble a protest
we're here to worship Jesus
because that's the hope of these cities
that's the hope of the world is Jesus Christ
to scream at them
because of ice raids
which, by the way
is about as crystal clear
a violation of the FACE Act
as you'll ever find
which is supposed to basically criminalize
any sort of
impedance or impediment
to entering a building originally structured
to prevent people from stopping
or blocking the entrances to abortion clinics
well, it's now being used
or it has been
extrapolated to defend
churches
so
you couldn't find a better example
of a FACE Act violation than what Don Lemon did
do you think
that Harmeet Dillon
and Pam Bondi
are going to lift a finger
to stop that or to prosecute
anybody involved with that
I'm not so sure
now, I got to be really clear too
I don't know how I feel about this
you know
they're not so sure
there's a real tendency
and I feel it too
that because of the abuse
that I've suffered that we've all suffered
over the past six years since the lockdown era
that there's a tendency
to want to just crush our opposition
and I feel it, believe me I feel it
I think about it all the time
but is that a winning strategy
does that actually improve things long term
does that improve our circumstances
the condition of our nation
does it actually improve it
and in this instance I actually think it might
and I'll explain
first off
I think that there is something to be said
for keeping holy ground holy
essentially preventing
rabble-rousers from
entering places of worship to
just
stir shit
they just go in there, they scream at them
call them Nazis and shit
these are just like Christian churchgoers
I mean it's about as
irritating as a thing
now is anybody truly harmed
I guess not but
do you want to live in a civilization where
more and more of these radicals
just enter
be it a Christian church or a synagogue
or whatever else
and if it were limited to that maybe I wouldn't have such a
I guess retaliatory approach
when it comes to analyzing this
but these are the other things that are happening
in the same past couple days
you are hurt
take it off
Nazi fuck
take it off
get your shit
I got you
get your ass up out of here
so first up we've got what appears to be an Indian-American
who had the audacity
to wear
a jacket that said freedom on it
with an American flag at a protest in Minnesota
and therefore he is obviously
in support of ICE
and obviously as an Indian-American
also
an effing Nazi
according to the people who are
forcing him to remove that and chasing him
out of the area
pretty crazy but it gets way
way worse than that
I'm going to end it there before you see
the result of the damage
that he took from those blows but
let me tell you bad
really bad just gushing blood it was terrible
I'm cutting it so that hopefully we can
keep this episode rolling
it's not just the protestors
in the church it's a confluence of all
of these things that is making me
feel as if someone's got to take a stand
and unfortunately
and I know this because
a good friend of mine is from Minnesota
you know Minnesota nice
is what it's known for
the people there are so nice
and I really do believe
even though I disagree with Gad said
on damn near everything at this point
I do agree with one aspect of his claim
which is this is essentially
toxic empathy
or suicidal empathy
that the people are so nice
that they won't even
defend themselves defend their
hometown city
state country nothing
they are so beaten down
that they cannot stand up
for themselves
and you know
there is a side of me
as a tenth amendment guy
that just says look
if the people of California don't want to stand up
for themselves or New York
or Minnesota
then just let them be overran
there is an instinct
like my libertarian instinct
decentralized
that is kind of where I come down on these things
but the truth is with federal elections
you don't really have that luxury
to just say well
sure California can let in
50 million people if they wanted to
okay well then
just recognize that through the electoral college
essentially California and their voting
which will obviously go to the Democrats
will be just a landslide
in favor of the Democrats in every federal election
not to mention all the congressional seats
that they would get
but these people wouldn't have the right to vote
until California allows them to vote
like that'll happen
it already is happening on very very very low levels
but that's the whole plan here folks
obviously
so unless you're going to have a massive
secessionary movement where like
Florida becomes its own state
which now I don't feel really comfortable about
given that they're doing these
social media
host thing
operations
but if we're going to remain the United States
well they're going to have to have a few things
that everybody abides by
and unfortunately as long as we have
federal elections it seems to me
that immigration law has to be one of them
and if the domestic population
doesn't want to cooperate
or if they want to chase around
ICE agents and honk at them and threaten
what are we to do?
are we to just accept that paradigm
and say well
the local population doesn't want it
so therefore
this state gets to have as many illegal immigrants
as they see fit
is that really going to be an acceptable
thing moving forward
I would argue probably not
are we going to allow the most loud
and violent amongst us
to ultimately dictate the terms by which
we structure our civilization moving forward
and I would say probably not a good idea
if you want lunatics
that are almost all
socialists screaming
at the top of their lungs as to
what they want to see moving forward
and we all just go well they're the loudest
in the most violent so that's what we're going to do
I would argue you're going to regret that
very very fast
you're going to regret that
and if you're still not sold
here's what Don Lemon had to say about the churchgoers
and there's a certain degree of entitlement
I think people who are
in the religious groups
like that it's not the type of Christianity
that I practice but I think that they're entitled
and that entitlement comes from
a supremacy, a white supremacy
and they think that this country was
built for them that it is a Christian country
when actually we left England because we wanted
religious freedom it's religious freedom
but only if you're a Christian and only if you're
a white male pretty much
and so yeah absolutely 100%
but it's an intimidation tactic
and you know I said I don't understand
how I've become the face of it when I was a journalist
I do understand that I'm the biggest name there
my producers were saying
I said how did I become the face of this
and my producers said Don you're a gay black man in America
so any instinct that I have to defend
Don Lemon goes out the window after that one
just being honest
I mean to describe these people as
privileged
cause they're white people at church
obviously that means they're privileged
or to say that the whole reason that you're the face
of this controversy is because oh you're the most famous
you're barely famous
you were on CNN you're basically a laughing stock
at this point I think you do less views
on YouTube than I do so
calm down with the ego thing there
and then the cherry on top of the woke Sunday
is oh I'm a gay black man
so that's obviously why we're upset with you
no Don
we're upset with you because
first amendment protections don't really
cover private property
I know really
controversial stance there
you don't have a right to come into my house
and protest
and last I checked most churches are private
property if not all
and therefore you don't have a right
to protest there you are at minimum trespassing
and at maximum
violating the face act
so do you think that Don Lemon was
in defense of Owen Schreuer
who was covering the protest on J6
and ultimately got jailed for a while
I would argue probably not
in fact I'm pretty certain Don Lemon
was not speaking out
in defense of Owen
so I'm not going to defend Don Lemon
on this one sorry
but I will say this
this situation is so complex it actually
requires additional nuance let me show you what I'm talking about
stop
hey
leave it
get out of here
no
so that's Jake Lang getting assaulted
and not okay obviously
but I will say
Jake Lang is a
right wing provocateur
I think that's a fair way to describe him
he goes to these types of events
and he basically tries to get
into violent altercations
and so far it seems to be working for him
he gets a lot of headlines
by doing so
I personally think that
doing things like that is
ultimately reckless I mean not just for himself
but I don't think it helps us
moving forward to try and bring out
the worst elements on both sides of this
just to make some sort of political point
it's not dissimilar to kind of how
Antifa behaves where
it bleeds it leads
there's no such thing as bad press
I just don't like it
but let me show you what I'm talking about
the clip I just showed you actually happened
before he was assaulted in the vehicle
it's what sparked that secondary attack
I want you to pay attention
or rewind it if you need to
go back and look at how many cameras are there
there are basically as many cameras
as there are people
and there's probably 50 people in that shot
and it looks like there's about 50 cameras
and I'm not talking like cellphones
I'm talking professional cameras
Jake Lane knows exactly what he's doing
he goes right to the heart of the media
and he basically
as a provocateur provokes
people into attacking him
now that doesn't justify them attacking him
they shouldn't be and they should be absolutely charged for assault
but I'm just saying
does that look organic to you
to be assaulted in front of 50
you know street journalists
I would argue
that didn't happen by accident
so now to the macro point
I've been building to
as many of you are already familiar
with the term cloward piven
and essentially it's a situation in which
you've been led down a path
where you have
two different choices and both of them result
in what the powers that be want you to do
and we are in one of those right now
so I want to be very clear
that while I personally think
that the illegal immigration crisis
is so important that there has to be
major deportations
for this country to have any hope of a future
that does not mean
that I am just
lockstep defender of ICE
for instance that woman that was shot a couple weeks ago
I didn't do an episode on it because
I thought it was marginal enough
of a case that I didn't really have a firm opinion on it
and I still don't really have a firm opinion on it
I think that
she made terrible terrible
miscalculations
I also think that that cop
really didn't need to fire that second and third shot
and take her life
now
it could be argued that maybe that first shot was fatal
in which case
you drive your car into somebody
even if it's unlikely to kill them
they don't know that in that instant
and they react
so anyways setting that aside
I want you to understand
the circumstances by which we got here
because I think it's really important
when you're too deep in the weeds
you got to take a step back and actually look at
how did this forest bloom
I know I'm mixing my metaphors
after the Hartzeller Act
in the I think it was the 1950s
maybe the early 60s
there was just massive amounts of immigration
that started to take hold in America
and it basically grew
exponentially and then just
in a fever pitch under Joe Biden
where it was some estimates
are between 3 and 5 million annually
so anywhere from 12
to 20 million came in
over the past 4 years
that is such a dramatic change
of the demographics in this country
that you really don't have a choice
but to react
but it didn't just start then
you had decades of this
and to be clear
this was really a bipartisan issue
for the longest time there was not a party
that was hardline
deport them all
the way the Trump-Maga movement is
even in the 2000s
the George Bush administration had a term for this
it was very popular
they talked about comprehensive immigration reform
but what it usually included
was both pathways to citizenship
plus some sort of MST
for the illegals that were already here
and it was going to be comprehensive
you were going to have immigration reform on all sides
so that the illegals that were here become citizens
or some are deported
and then you also have faster path
for immigrants to come in
and that was just 20 years ago
so the point being is that
the changing demographics in this country
the opening of the borders
or the increasingly opening of our borders
has been a bipartisan affair
for about 50 years before
the Maga-Trump movement came along
and I'm not sure at what exact point
the democrats recognized that
a majority of the first generation
illegal immigrants would come in
and vote for the democrats
but at some point they did realize that
and they said well
we're going to let in all of them
and they just stopped doing border control
and certainly that happened
effective 2020
and the circumstances that that creates
is essentially waking up one day
and not recognizing your hometown
feeling as if you're a stranger
in the state you grew up in
I felt it myself in California
I'm sure many of you have felt the same way
so here's where the cloud piven strategy comes in
you are left with two choices
you have one choice
which is to just say
well these ICE deportations
are too disruptive
and the people are just not having it
so we're just going to stop
which is kind of the Joe Rogan pathway
well there's two things that are insane
one is the targeting
of migrant workers
not cartel members
not gang members
not drug dealers
just construction workers
showing up in construction sites
raiding them
gardeners
or Palestinian students
on college campuses
or you have the alternative pathway
of saying I don't care
this is so important
we have to get rid of them
however we have to do it
and then you roll out Palantir
and big tech surveillance stuff
and then you have ICE
that's funded to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars
and you start to
basically look more and more like a paper
please police state
so either pathway
you're having diminished rights
if you don't do anything about the border
then you just have a slow
demolition of your rights through electoral politics
and ultimately the
bankrupting of your country
the diminishing of your standard of living
or you go the police state route
to get rid of the immigrants
in which case you live in a police state
and that's not much of a win either
now setting inside the fact that
Joe Rogan voted for Trump
and it's a little bit bizarre for him to think
Trump was talking about deporting like 10 or 20 million people
he thought he was just going to be deporting
gangbangers
you think there's that many gangbangers
he goes like no
so yeah there was going to be a lot of people
that were going to be deported
that you probably don't feel was necessary
but I think the bigger point is this
after
Reagan gave amnesty in the 1980s
California was lost
forever
my beautiful home state
was lost to the democrats forever
when I say it was lost to the democrats
don't take that as an endorsement of the fucking republicans
that's not what I'm doing
just saying there is an
expeditious demolition
of your way of life
when democrats are in power
there is a slightly slower demolition
of your liberties when the republicans are in power
especially at the state level
trust me when I tell you
I watched it happen in real time
California was destroyed
both by illegal immigration in the decades of democrat control
with a brief hiatus
when Arnold Schwarzenegger
was the governor
as a republican who was in fact a democrat
so it's been democrat control for 40 years
so my position is this
and it's a very complex one
I'm not going to tell you how to feel about this
or what to do
I'm just going to tell you the conclusion I've come to
for our survival's sake
supporting
as expeditious
and as civil liberties defending
a deportation regime
as can be mustered
that is what needs to happen
simultaneously
and equally as important
we should be demanding
that our civil liberties be upheld
that surveillance technology
like Palantir does not get greenlit
it is happening right now I might add
so
my protestations and my warning
about this has not worked so far
which is why I wanted to dedicate this portion of the show to it
because I think public understanding
as to what's happening
when it comes to our civil liberties
our privacy rights
the diminution of them
it's very important that we're all aware
of the game that's being played
because it's basically
a heads I win, tails you lose
type of circumstance
with I being the government
the federal government, the powers that be
I don't believe that it's an accident
that they put us in this lose-lose position
but I do believe that
of all of the bad options on offer
that is the best answer
that there does need to be deportations
but there also needs to be
serious voicing
of our concerns
when it comes to civil liberties
and rights violations
and if we can walk that razor's edge
we might get through this
and salvage what's left of our country
I do want to say
a big surprise interview
I just heard about
Josie, the redhead libertarian
I got to interview Nick Fuentes
in person
he was on IRL last night
so I wanted to give her a plug
okay let's get into some controversial stuff now
first, why are you controversial
do you hate women? should women vote?
should women shut the fuck up?
am I a baby machine?
on Tucker you called Zionist Jews
enemies of conservativism
do you believe Jewish people
have a place in America first?
what about non-whites?
and also let you know
that she handed
my phone number to Mr. Fuentes
and she says
that he wants to do it
and he's gonna be on liberty lockdown
so I don't know if he's gonna do it
but at least now we know he has my number
he didn't respond to my emails
so we'll see if it can happen
I still like Nick a lot
I still think he's a really interesting guy
but we definitely disagree when it comes to
Venezuela and a handful of other things
so I think it'd be a very interesting conversation
I think we're both
sincere about America first
and putting this country first
but I think we have
maybe significantly different prescriptions
on how to get there
so I think it'd be a very interesting conversation
so hopefully that'll happen
if you want to see that happen
make sure you subscribe
cause that will increase the likelihood
he wants to come on
hit the like button leave a comment down below
and I'll catch you guys next time
by the way sorry
I'm going to be out of town
going to Texas to do a bunch of live sporting events
with my brother and my stepdad
it's gonna be a blast
but I'm gonna be gone for 6 days
so I will see you
a week from today most likely
someone mentioned hey you should go on Liberty Lockdown
I don't know that I've ever heard of that guy
I went and watched him and I thought how have I not heard of this guy
the guy is dope
I mean he's great on air
10€ Rabatt, gültig bis zum 1.02.26
Mindestbestellwert von 15€
gilt nur für Neugundinnen und die ersten 2 Lieferbestellungen
es gelten die AGB