Israel's nuclear capability in terms of weapons I can't comment on on on that specific question
You'd have to refer to the Israelis on that does Israel have nuclear weapons
I'm not prepared to comment on that
You're not prepared to comment on it. It's a very basic question we are with an ally
Conducting a war against Iran this war continues to escalate tell us something
As Congress was the oversight body
What is Israel's nuclear capability in terms of weapons? I can't comment on on on on that specific question
You'd have to refer to the Israelis on that
Does that mean you don't know I can't comment on that sir
You're the main person in charge of knowing this and understanding it
Will you not give us an answer? I don't understand why this issue is so taboo when it's a basic question and
We're in a war alongside Israel against Iran
We're dealing with the potential for nuclear fallout and you won't answer this basic question
Well, again, it would be outside of my purview
As the arms control non-proliferation under secretary to discuss that specific question
Sir, that is a dereliction of duty
It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality
Through our journey from there to here we find one another and ourselves
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last
We gaze onward in reflection of the day
You
Welcome to the daily wrap-up
Wednesday March 25th 2026 think for thank you for joining me today or 2026. I'll make sure I said that correctly
Thank you for joining me today
Pretty much an entire follow-up from yesterday's show
There was a few of the things that I was deciding we were good to whether or not to get into
Topics that I'm sure you're seeing go
I'm gonna get to the mall tomorrow and not even to go over them to start today
I'll be doing a show tomorrow so we can catch up on some of the stuff that I pushed off
More so a lot of the things that I tend to cover in the beginning that I think are important
Just to make sure you don't miss in passing
But today I decided just to kind of follow up on this one point of the story that I think is really important
Like I said yesterday and and even more because of it how it developed
Now if you've been watching the last two three shows
You've seen the way this is developed and now most people don't stay that it tuned in to the day to day
Now that that's just the reality. I've learned that over the years as much as I find that confounding
I mean, I shouldn't say that and we all I can remember back when I was at a point when I wasn't doing this
The bottom line is most people don't stay tapped in to the day-to-day
So they get the headlines they get the kind of framing which that's how they often manipulate people because the corporate
Media is very much a part of that game where they know it or not the editorial board the way that they kind of control the flow
Well, like I saw Rod doing a great job every day showing you how the New York Times is just using language
Manipulating the way you view one story versus the other even though it's the same action depends on who carries it out
They frame it differently. It's very simple
But so my point though is that is if you follow these over the few days
It doesn't make any sense and I think that's what a lot of people are starting to really come to you know
Acknowledge even if they support Trump that you're seeing with his rhetoric
Where what either he's trying to be confusing which you know, you could make me argue that that's a tactic
That's a political tactic even though it's very frustrating and insulting to the people who are supposed to be you know
He's lying to everybody
But you could argue that's a tactic and even argue it's because of political manipulation and that's just the way the world is
I would even understand that argument
The point though is that you have to acknowledge that we're being misled
Even if it's a tactic and what we're seeing is a continual misrepresentation
And it says one thing the next day it changes and then it changes a third way the next day
And then maybe goes back to the beginning and it just keeps doing this every topic you pick in regard to this discussion
I think it's a really important thing to notice this conversation flow going from you know
I could go back many steps from the way it started the illegal actions right the claims within the original ceasefire
Offer from Trump through Italy that Iran denied. They said flatly. No, then it turned then Trump angered by that
I argued turned out and said only absolute surrender and then like a day later started talking about peace talks again
And it's you know, and you could argue he changes mine every day
But then we get into the conversation of this and then in there a very important conversation starting being had by most people
It seems acknowledging that Israel seems to be dictating the war and hopefully when you look into that
You start to realize it's a lot more than just this war
But either way it's becoming a very important conversation
Nothing other than Israel's government having control over policy like a lot of governments try to do everywhere in the world
So it shouldn't even be that hard to act your mind around
Then we get into the point of this alleged defector
Which is something that this is a word that has been used but weirdly enough. It's sort of it
Well should make it simple people understand Trump argue put forward. He was discussing
potential at peace talks weren't really used
but an end to the war and
speaking with somebody who was not Kamini son and
Not the current leadership, but somebody who was high up in there highly respected and then you know
About the transition to new power and so that's to be clear not the Iranian current leadership
That's what he said over the last couple of days and then of course the point wasn't we're gonna read through all this
I'm just trying to give you a you know start point is that then we got the point where he said
You know what I'm gonna obliterate all of your power structures and infrastructure
if you don't do this within so many days and then ultimately that time came and that's where you got this
Interesting new person speaking to us conversation you if you watched you got the sense that I doubt this very very
Seriously for many reasons which we'll go through all this again in case this isn't lining up for you and and and what we continued to see
Since then is Trump then and this is just last 24 hours deal with the Iranian government
So that has to mean something and it's is it possible. He's doing both of those things simultaneously
Of course it is but when you get into the details
Again, not the headlines, but the details the intern the day that day
You know that in between not every 24 hours, but moment moment kind of conversations
You start to see that there's more to the story and I think it's important to recognize that if he's now dealing with the Iranian leadership
That he just told you were worthless and have no power and Jesse Watter said they're all hiding in separate places with their phones
All scared and hiding in the woods and whatever they're telling you but now they're dealing with them
Or they're entirely obliterated and they're so weak and they can't even stand up and no one was happening
But we're gonna give them a deal
But they're terrorists and they shouldn't be there at all because they're killing everyone in the world
But we're gonna make a ceasefire agreement to let them stay in power even though they're about to die
I mean a child can see that this doesn't line up now to assume what it means is
Irresponsible it's not the right path even though I think it's kind of easy to see where the most likely path goes
We should wait to prove it
But what I'm saying is there's a moment right there where you can't deny that there's dishonesty happening
So what is it driving it is it Israel manipulating Trump?
Is it Trump becoming aware? He's being manipulated and changing direction
Is this all of them in line with a larger play? Is it about something larger than just Iran?
We should always be asking these questions and we're gonna address all of this throughout the show today now
It's likely going to be
So much shorter. I'm not gonna promise that because who knows where the conversation takes us
But I imagine this will be shorter than usual. That's a guess
But it's only one real point. We're gonna get into one real general, you know
Aim for today's show. I actually wanted to start with
An article week that this point seems to have kind of gotten buried and
Now is becoming a lot more relevant as we're gonna end with the discussions of potential troops ground troops and and what that means
With all of this conversation is included
But let's not forget this conversation
that Mike Preisner
activist
independent media and
Works with with bet he's a veteran himself and he works with veterans
excuse me and
He was the one that reported through his sources and people he spoke with and his own coalition who speaks to a lot of veterans
That they were being deployed boots on the ground. They were being told this and in fact or rather excuse me
I take one step back. They were told of a training mission and that was the kind of the story as the headline reads reports of US
Service been deployed under a guise of training which as I said then and you I don't think there any you know
The military probably lies to people all the time including their own people or feels they don't have an obligation to tell them
That's not the point though. It's about why you know, they're supposed to be honoring the servicemen and they're tricking them and going to war
Then once it was, you know, I'll become aware that they were not a training mission
It's there's the reporting was that it was boots on the ground now. That wasn't definitively about Iran
But like I said the rest the last so many reports that you're deploying boot, you know
Personnel in the Middle East while you're clearly engaging in this war against run and that's boots on the ground guys
That's what that is. They've deployed. They're in warfare. There is killing going on
There's bombings and we know that there are people that were already engaged
Whether Kurds or people we talked about from the very beginning that have been going on a long time before we got to this point
But if they were already deploying people then we should factor that into the conversation
I think that's important to see not just because that means war but because of when they were doing that and then what their
claiming is happening since
Seems to again belie the point that it undermines what they claim they're trying to accomplish
Whether it's the lies of diplomacy when all they want is destruction, which is pretty much what always happens
And that's not my opinion. It's outcome. It's observed observation and outcome. You can see what they're doing
or
You know, there's a lot of factors you could include but I think at the end of the day it does open the door to
There's bigger a bigger story than just what they're presenting to us
And then of course Graham Trump is resetting the world
Which is another important point that we're a part that I was gonna start with today
But we'll get into more tomorrow Palantir stuff and new
Developments in that direction of technocracy and and you know the invasiveness of this technological
You know apparatus, I guess it's not just Palantir
But yeah, we'll get to that more tomorrow
But the idea of how that connects with the larger global conversation and him Graham literally telling you he's resetting
The world while talking about Iran and you know, there's more to this
But keeping in mind this deployment and the conversation around it and the manipulation of our own troops March 8th, 2026
So also the show we just had the day before on the 23rd
Iran Iranian revolution yet again exposes Israeli plot now
This came from reporting that was from within Israelis is real
Inner circle as well as the United States government and the reality was that Netanyahu was speaking to his own people and saying
Trump's gonna stop this thing
Let's make we have to keep pushing this and many other points that show you that it's not and of course those could be lies
Always consider that the reality though is every other one before this had proven to have been manipulated by them
Like this already was like our coverage and everyone else has already shown
The point is that on top of that it was because the the part that became even more clear was that Netanyahu was driving this
No, and at least arguing or the reporting was arguing that he was doing it against what Trump was trying to accomplish
Now that doesn't my mind give Trump a pass on anything because he's clearly been an active player in this
But I do think like I said yesterday that there's a parts of both of this
I think it's clear as I was showing you Dan Cohen saying yesterday
Like it's kind of absurd to claim that Trump was not outwardly publicly telling you he was gonna do this
so saying he was forced into this doesn't that that seems like a
Pass for people who want to pretend Trump's not responsible
But you can also clearly point out that Israel has always been and is still in many ways
Manipulating the US government and maybe with their knowledge
Maybe blackmail something like that or lies or you know many different things
And I think both are happening as I think I've gone through very clearly
And I think it's important not to you know draw a line in the sand to pretend
It's one of the other when none of us really know for sure
question these things but that the ultimate revolution that they claim started this the protest were
Exposed as another plot that they were building. That's the main part of the article
We discussed in on the 23rd was that they were coaxing building this and it's admitted to what and I'm not even talking about arming
The currents or admitting from both sides of the US and Israel governments. They were arming the people
They claim they were trying to help fight pro it'll protest their government
That's that's just an illegal insurgency
But on top of that that it was clear they were trying to create this for a really long time as
according to Israeli
Personnel and media and ultimately failed and now it was reported that we're looking back well clearly the Iranian people are not just
Flowing through the streets calling for the US to keep bombing
They don't support this and they admitted that from Israeli media and so the reality is they lied to you just like every other time
Now yesterday we talked about and that first part of this
That was that like I said yesterday we talked about Palantir AI now is the core US military system
We're gonna get more of that tomorrow the second part of it was doubts about Trump's alleged Iran negotiator deep in
So this has been an evolving conversation
So this brings us to today where and I'll start with an article that kind of gives you a brief
kind of overview of the last so many days
But this already on the 24th
We were already feeling that this and that might kind of joke image here was
It's clearly at somebody not who I don't feel it's an Iranian or genuinely speaking for the Iranian people
Who was in negotiation with trump and I was getting the sense that maybe trump doesn't know that
Just a thought and the idea being that you know, he gave him a present which I didn't mention at the beginning
Which how does that line up with you now engaging with the Iranian government?
Which is happening and then the Iranans government turning that down. We'll get into all of this
But then ultimately there's possibilities here that is real is I was speaking with Robert this morning about this that is real is
fronting and playing as some kind of an Iranian to trick trump
Right or that it is an Iranian but it doesn't represent the Iranian people or what if it's the what's the Shah?
I mean, wouldn't that actually make sense because trump and the rest of them have been telling you that he's the leader
So when he starts speaking to the Shah because no one in Iran will talk to him
And they just pretend like that the agreement is that not I mean you see how perfectly that lines up
But I that's just one of the many thoughts
And then they pretend like they have some kind of agency because he's the leader right they would play
They did it with Guaido. It's the same kind of tactic the difference here is they have even less support than they did in venezuela
So from that point
Let's start with an article from robert that came out today
And I think he did an excellent job on this this image just cracks me up
this is just basically just trump underwater is the is the idea and
Iranian ships kind of surrounding him and then an anchor is rarely anchor holding him down
It's kind of like a perfect analogy for a rather, you know symbolism for where we are
The title is strategic failure trump's contradictory Iran strategy unravels
And he does a great job breaking this down
And there's new parts from today that are in this but really it's still sound based on the logic
The only difference is what I mentioned on the new plans being proposed
So the interesting part here is that not just the immediacy like the last so many days
But the entire strategy as experts, whatever you want to me think that means whether state department fake information experts or
Experts in the actual information or just people who are students of all of this
Have been telling you for a long time that this is inconsistent or you know, for example, here's a small point
The cia and intelligence told trump that this was not going to work that it doing this would not actually
Decapitate the leader and so did pretty much everybody else except israel and who did you listen to israel
Assuming he made that decision and was out. Maybe it was outside of his choice
But there was a lot of those kind of examples where it seems that he's been putting forward a narrative that contradicts the actual reality
The facts on the ground
Or what seems to be the most logical or what's in the interest of americans
And so they've been putting forward a lot of these narratives that are now coming to pass and contradicting itself
And showing you that either he is lost
So just desperately lying or he's not aware of what's really going on. I'm not sure what's more alarming
US president donald trump appears to be continually backtracking and or contradicting himself on his various announcements regarding iran
While his rhetoric attempts to project dominance
The administration's actions reflect a state of crisis and suggest that it is being forced to back down
Which is pretty much what iran is pushing
Like that's what I said yesterday too is it's almost like it doesn't seem like a wise tactic for them
Because he clearly seems to be trying to find a way around out the knot if to get away from this is my opinion
And so for iran to come out and poke him in the eye and call him a loser
Which would they put that video out and to basically make a big point about how you're backing down you're losing
As much as I agree. It seems like that would drive somebody like trump to just irrationally do the opposite
That's just how low opinion I have of people in government
But I think this is kind of a you know the obvious reality of what the facts show right now
And again, we went over yesterday the reality of the interceptors and the drones and how despite them's in again
Those kind of points where they just will yell they're completely defeated
They have no means to do what they have been doing all day by the way or you know today
Where they were bombing and yesterday in ways that demonstrate that they're
Increasing their volume
And so they're just they're proving that these people are lying about them
Now if the u.s. Has to lie about their abilities that are the means that they or if they said that it is a lie
That are the means that they didn't know that was the case which suggests
They don't really know what's going on or that they lied about it suggesting
They had to because they're not in a good position
That seems to be most logical
But there's a lot of those and so we have seen the reality now
And the evidence is showing that they are in this for the long game
And that they can essentially and definitely
Continue to cause these problems for specifically the u.s. In israel and the strain of vermouth is the factor
We keep talking about there and it's not closed down as we'll get into it is restricted heavily
mostly through threats
And I think through the us in israel convincing everybody else that they're in danger by trying even though iran's saying it's only the us in israel
by effect and I would argue by the us in media framing it that way has a
Dramatically decreased the tankers that are going through
Mostly just iranian tankers but even today they I guess they just let somebody through and they're basically saying look
We're not restricting anybody but these people
So it's kind of a mirage and I think that's important to hear
But all of that to say is that they could take further action and that doing that is a game
It's a tactic they're playing and putting a room israel in the u.s. In a very bad position
After issuing a 48 hour ultimatum to the islamic republic of iran demanding that it reopen the strait
And that this is over the last three days
Or face strikes on their energy infrastructure, which again, let's be clear was a crime or would be
There's no legal justification to strike their infrastructure just because you're hindering his ability to
You know claim he's successful and you know oil sales and oil prices that are hurting his personal agenda
So they said if you don't do this what we want, we will commit those war crimes
Which is there's no question. Okay targeting infrastructure for civilians is a crime
So you could argue he didn't mean it wasn't intending to do it
But it's still a threat of a war crime
And it says and despite the strait only ever being restricted to the us is us israel and their cobaligerants
Which is the legal term from an international law standpoint means people who are alongside them committing the war
Trump appeared to be backing down on monday
Suddenly now again
This is the 48 hour period where he was saying look, you know, we're you better
You better step down and he's done that many times and then not followed through
So now it was cut like hours before that 48 hour window was going to come down
Iran was just publicly laughing at them from the very beginning of when he said that clear
They weren't going to stop or we're going to capitulate
and it says
Suddenly after this point the president began claiming that he was conducting
Negotiations with a defector from Iran from Tehran and that a deal was within reach in five days
Which there's a very clear point people are making today about the timing of the markets
And just arbitrarily aiming at the end of the market point. I mean I'll just show you right now
Chris martin's and points this out if nobody gets goes to jail for this
We've entered the everyman for himself stage of the empire decline
Traders placed 580 million dollars in oil bets ahead of trump's social media posts on iran talks
Now there's more if you read into this the reality seems to be and this is what many financial people are saying
Is that you can very clearly see that there's people who have inside knowledge about things
He's about to do and then make actions based on things that he's about to do
And then many people are simply responding to what he's saying on social media as well
But there is inside levels to this and so what we're basically finding out is this whole
Weird five-day window seems to be specifically about manipulating the oil prices, which some people think that's it
I think there's more to it
But if that was it that means that the whole thing a defector was a made-up story
Just just to get a little bit of relief and artificially so which is only going to make it spring back war in my opinion
But everything they're doing is artificial in the way they're trying to lower these prices
Which is why it springs back every time they do it as of right now as I checked it went down a little bit
Then it went back over 100 could be different right now
And again, I'm like Brent crude. There's many there's different versions, but just for the point
It's it's higher than it should be
And
It says, uh, where was I that he um even stated that Tehran had agreed to concessions that would reopen the Persian Gulf again
They're not agreeing to that. That's just clear. They've made that and I'll get into their statement statement as of the last time
I checked which is like
What you said means nothing
We have our statements
We're not going to back down until you give up until you basically stop conducting your illegal wars and stop bombing people for no reason
You know, you can disagree with the framing
Whatever you think they've drawn their line and they're not even they don't like we don't want to talk
Here's what we demand if you don't want to do that, then we're going to keep doing this and we're going to only restrict you in the straight
That's where we're at
So having them claiming they have concessions to reopen it. That's these are
I mean unless it comes to pass and you find out there was somebody randomly behind the
Somebody we didn't know about speaking who has the ability to make all this happen
This seems like an outright lie
Whether they're speaking with somebody or not the claim for example, if they agree to have no nuclear weapons
well
Or a way to frame this is him just kind of
Intentionally misframing what actually went down. For example, they've always said they don't have a nuclear weapons
They've always said they're not seeking it. The evidence has always backed that up
Now, of course, you could argue that they have a secret one or they're being lied to
The evidence doesn't show that not from the u.s. government not from the ia
Only israel is the one lying about that in the us as well. So the point
Where was that?
Shoot I just lost it. Um
Ah, I just completely lost my point. I was good. It was there's a post that I was going to show
Well, the the nuclear point. God, I'm going to forget that entirely. That's so frustrating
Well, the well where I was leaving off
He stated that Tehran had agreed that two concessions that would reopen the purge and gulf
It wasn't obviously closed or restricted. God, there's a point I was making there
Sometimes I wish I could just rewind because as you guys know well if we walk this show regularly
My mind jumps from point to point and ultimately sometimes I drop it when I'm trying to go back to the other one
Well, I'm sure I've gone over the nuclear point many times there
But ultimately the idea was the lie about the nuclear technology
I think it's pretty clear all the evidence shows that but the idea. Oh, that's what it was
Thank God the point about, you know, he they promised they're going to get rid of the nuclear technology
So if you're going to say that
Are you saying that they're still doing what they've always done and framing that as oh, they finally agreed because I'm a master deal maker
I think that may be the real possibility here or it's simply that they didn't say anything
And he's just saying what the current reality is that we actually know is what I got to happen
And acting like the deal was done because we are there even though that was always where we already were
That seems like a very desperate play if that's the reality
Now it says Iran's foreign ministry spokesman spokesperson
Esmiel Baghe quickly rejected the u.s. leaders claims asserting that no negotiations had taken place
And that Iran's position regarding the straight up promos and conditions to end the imposed war has not changed
Now that was them speaking up about a pro's deal
And then later the media asked and he insinuated that it was somebody else
Iranian officials then began offering that their analysis that the white house has changed in tone
Was a deception aimed at making a retreat from Tehran's threats
To attack Iran's electrical infrastructure while preparing for a possible ground offensive involving boots on the ground
Now here's an interesting point by the way
My I theorized about this being a possibility before I saw anybody else talk
Which is pretty much always what that show is about like because I'm not out there reading everybody else's comments before I go
On my show. I'm looking at source material. I'm just giving you what I think often that can I lose
I miss things because I'm not reading everybody else's commentary
But either way I think it keeps it fresh and objective and not trying to make it what anybody else is saying
But the the point here
preparing for possible ground offensive of boots on the ground
This aligns with facts on the ground that western corporate media have failed to highlight
Not only were 2,500 marines sent on their on their way to the persian gulf
But estimates suggest that up to 5,000 could arrive in the region by friday a frequently discussed target
Of any ground operation has been Iran's karg island. Damn it for some reason my mind is just jumping all over the place today
Our officials have begun offering analysis. The white house has changed in tone was a deception aimed at making a retreat from trump's threats
What was that?
Well preparing for a possible ground invasion
Well either way one of the things important to point out is that what we're talking about is that
They're in a position of weakness and that Donald trump ultimately
decided to back away from the
Crimes that were threatened
In order to try to get their concession, but you know either way what we're seeing is that them
creating a situation where they're
Calling their bluff and I think that's really important because trump has continued to be caught with doing that
But so in this case the 5,000 is the combination of 3,000 or 2,500 and 3,000 troops that they are now kind of combining
Now that again is not like a definitive boots on the ground to ron
But we're talking about an action that is the same point in regard to the middle east war that we're talking about
Attacks on ron civilian energy sector is a dangerous gamble Robert points out
And I think this is really important because this speaks to the kind of dishonesty we're dealing with here that they've been telling us this entire time
This is going to be a one-off three days for you know
Well four to six weeks is this time frame they're pointing to but they kept telling you it's going to be over so fast
Now this point is about the threats of power structures
But it's the same point with everything else or rather power infrastructure
Is that they will threaten a lot of things
They will bluster a lot of things and a lot of this comes from nonsense
Now in this case had they gone through with this which is the point of the bluff
Is that it is objectively something that would have been just a quagmire and would have responded with something that would have utterly destroyed
Far more in response from what ron would do to us
In compared to what
They would have could have done to ron power plants are difficult
He writes robert to destroy and would require multiple ways of concentrated attacks to take offline
Which would be the point right ron has over 400 power plants in total
Including some 150 major ones its largest site the
Damavan combined cycle power plant supplies only 3.7 to 4 percent of the country's total electricity needs
Even if the u.s. In israel managed to destroy it
Which would demand significant firepower
Given that te ron's infrastructure is hardened for war again the point of them planning for this
The iranian retaliation would ultimately follow
Now by comparison israel only has five major power stations more than just five but five major power stations
It's largest the orat reben plant in hadira provides roughly 20 percent of the israel's total power needs
Taking it out would cause a far greater catastrophe
The gulf states also have a much smaller number of power plants
iran for example of iran for example
relies on only a few and these countries consume around five times more electricity than
Per capita than iran
So if you missed the point the idea is simply that that should they have done this
It would have been it would have taken a lot of effort a lot of very expensive munitions to maybe take it offline
And remember they planned for this and insulated these things and then they would have responded
I mean, maybe I would still argue that my point is before from yesterday
Is even if they did it first and iran responds with civilian infrastructure
It's a crime either way and all that would do is basically make what they did justifiable
Because then later looking back. Well, they both did the crime, you know
I would argue that their the right response would be to not do that
But you know that's there we're being driven into a direction where it's like well
There's no a thing you can do and they do it then you have to or you're going to lose and I don't I don't agree with that
but
Because you know you lose more than just
You know you lose everything if you end up becoming what they are to maybe win that war but
The problem is that that in the the strategy is that if they responded they would be able to strike easier
And take out more potential electricity
Effectively hurting far more people than what they did to them
And have shown clearly with the last 12-day war point in everything sense that they have the ability to get through their defenses
And so this seemed like just bad calculus
But I think at the end of the day they weren't really going to do it or israel was going to drive it
Knowing that this would be something that would largely hurt more of the u.s
It looked like the other were in other words
He writes iran is a far less vulnerable than the u.s allies to attacks on energy infrastructure
In addition to threatening retaliation against power plants on the other side
The islamic republic also warned that it could if it wanted to target water desalination facilities
Again iran relies on desalination facilities for only a tiny fraction of its water needs low single digits
In fact while gulf states like cutter and kuwait depend on it for 90 of more of their needs
So their vulnerability is obvious
And so they have that ability should they want to to press that but the question is will they
And I doubt they will if it's not done first or if at all really and that's not my opinion
It's demonstrated by their restraint over all of this time
One of the point that I was going to add
Is and we're going to I'll get to it at the end actually but there's an interesting
I think just about the energy stuff
It's obvious to point out
That there there we've a lot of us have been covering the transition
And I mean not even just like what I'm talking about today with this obvious addition to it
But going back before the great reset, you know infrastructure issues
Lockdowns right and that lockdowns in regard to covet right but now a lot of people are suddenly talking about and rightly so to
certain degrees
energy lockdowns
So if you if you're interested in this topic, I recommend you look to somebody like jason basler or if people in the i may my personal opinion
Nonetheless, or I should not nonetheless, but in addition to that the point is that this is an this is a real thing
And they're very clearly in my mind tried to transition society into some new form of governance new form of structure
So I think that necessitates the collapse of the current system to justify the new one
So one of the thoughts and this should hope just for the moment just
Disconnect this from the current conversation is that ultimately we're talking about the effort to try to drive us into accepting
What is something that many of us don't actually want and that's just a larger point to just any of these things
Whether it's less control less freedom, you know
And so in this case a system of like the new technocratic
15 minute city dynamic digital everything like that's what they're building
So the question is is this in any way related to that point?
And because right now what we're seeing is the we talk
Steve and I talked about the the international energy agency, which is separate
Not the same as the atomic energy agency and they put out a document discussing why we need to restrict and pull back on
Energy because of the iran war
So let's not miss the point that that's not even debatable
That is an illegal war started by the us in israel that is having
Byproducts that restrict what you can do in your lives
And what is the us government left and right and the media left and right telling you taking on the chin for
Hitting going after iran
Just like with the ukraine that all the republicans made fun of then are now going taking on the chin for ukraine
You know iran israel
So it's in the ultimate point is that I think we can see how these things might connect
And that this very well could be part of a larger strategy to destroy oil infrastructure and energy infrastructure
And even more so you should question whether that all of these people might be involved with some larger global play
Now it's a hard thing for people to drop their minds around I get it
I would even argue with what we're looking at that seems less likely than than the inner dynamic for many reasons
But that's just my opinion based on limited information
Because I think both are clearly happening the question is
One is that it was is this driving you there is that by design and then would iran be a part of that manipulation
Now again, we'll talk
I'm just going to point that out at the end with a really great article discussing that
And I think it's worth your time to consider that even if it's not something you think is the reality
Because that's how you should think about this
It's not always one or one or you know all or nothing or one or the other sometimes
It's a mixed bag
And so right now you get that kind of light where people are saying
No, it's all part of the global thing and you're falling into the trap of the inside of the maybe maybe
But considering both of those views or all of the views is the right way to go. It's the right way to look at this
so
In other words, Iran is far less vulnerable to these type of attacks
So had they have done this it would have been a very very bad move for them
And still I think israel might drive this into reality
Again, Iran relies on
Well, I said that earlier far less whether especially with the water
They need 90 of the needs from those things that they could bomb
Iran only gets, you know low single digits from what they you know, they've they've
Built themselves in a direction that insulates them from these kind of attacks
Now here's the the post by the way of just or the video of of
Aragachi the foreign minister of Iran openly saying no the hormones is open
It's open for everybody
It's closed for zionists and what he says in there is you know, the the enemies the people attacking us in this war
And and maybe he's lying about that but as as I've shown you before I don't think I have enough today
There's tons of traffic going through there now what I did like more so today than in previous days
There's very very little if not any traffic in regard to tankers
And I think that's indicative of the fact that they're
I think it's from the propaganda side of the west media is convincing people everywhere that there's a threat
When there's no indication of that whatsoever other than what they're claiming they're actually saying
Yeah, and I think that's important to think about because it wins the last time Iran
Sunk or attack, you know outside of the the limpid mind back and forth the manipulation that very much was a manipulation from trump and bolton last time
As gas prices steadily rose he then announced back to the story trump then announced that he that the war was in effect over somehow
Right, even though we're in the middle of a potential negotiation to do that very thing
You said because this might end the war and then somehow before that is even complete
If it's over anyway
And again, I don't know why that's not weak like desperate like that shows something that's that's like saying they surrendered when they bombed and
The other uh middle east elements didn't respond Iran
They bombed them and they didn't respond and they said okay
Well, if you if you keep if you stop helping them, we'll stop bombing you and then they continue to bomb the us in israel
And trump framed that as surrender
I mean that I don't know what you call that other than desperate weakness misrepresentation
If you're strong, you don't need to do that
and it says a a
The war being over is obviously a blatant falsehood apparently designed to temporarily lower gas prices later
He called on everyone from nato allies to rivals like china to help ensure the free flow of tankers through the persian gulf
Which remember nobody wanted to help not their allies not australia not japan even the uk last i check said
We're looking for other viable alternatives because as robber eddy points out
That's a dangerous situation
And if they join this then they're now cobalt adherents as ironically sees it as and they at the chitos choke point
Can simply just lob missiles at them should they want to now question is will they
But see they're not willing to put themselves in that position for something that I think whether they say it out loud or not
Is very clearly a war of aggression
First he said nato would help
Then claimed the us did not even need its allies before labeling nato cowards for refusing to offer their naval vessels for a mission
To break the restrictions imposed on the strainer for moose
subsequently the idea merged
Of using us ground forces to seize iranian territory
Specifically karg island which i'm thinking is a clear part of the possibility of whatever gift we're talking about that he was given
Or maybe he wants you to think he was given that so they can just seize it
But robert addresses that in this discussion about how dangerous that would be because of how easily they would be a target there
senator lindsay graham who
Reportedly holds sway over the president's decision making has lobbied hard for this
Option a more heavily favored a move heavily favored of course by the israeli lobby
When recently challenged on the viability of deploying ground troops to karg island during a fox news interview senator graham
Asserted it could be done and referred to the
Referred the host to the battle of ewo jima in world war two
Which was roundly criticized because it was as he writes
Notoriously bloody like one of the worst in memory and around 26,000 us service members and not necessarily the numbers
But it was apparently just a brutal battle
Sparking backlash against the republican senator because you know we're being told no wars
No moves around limited strikes, you know and now we're at the point where we're like just the it's great
Keep parrying it to like the word one of the worst battles in world war two
That's not even mission creep. That's just that's just I don't even know what you call that
Even assuming the u.s. Military succeeding in capturing karg island or any other island iranian island
It would not change the reality in the Persian Gulf at best
Trump could claim a symbolic victory while his soldiers faced constant drone and missile fire
And it really would be symbolic because I mean you could argue that they might be able to gain something from it
Oil and otherwise, but if you're being bombed and they're able to
I mean I guess at best you could you could turn that into sort of you being the victim in the situation
But that'd be a hard sell for where we are
Moreover seizing an island he writes would not magically remove the u.s. Israeli restrictions placed on these straight over moves
Right, they would continue to do what they were already doing
So it wouldn't ultimately accomplish anything other than maybe gaining control over the oil resources right there
Iran can still target ships, which is not nothing right, but again bombing would stop that
Iran can still target ships with missiles and drones from the mainland
Simply sinking a few vessels should they want to
With with mines or otherwise it would physically block the passage
But remember these are things that have long been threatened and stated like from the u.s.
Claiming they'll always do this should we do anything and there's been so many examples where they've had the opportunity in this case
A legal opportunity to respond in the ways they've always claimed that they desperately want to and they did not
Another potential factor is the future involvement of Egypt which shows signs of being pressured to participate
if Cairo does uh does eventually involve itself Iran or um the
Ansarala movement which the
State department has labeled the Houthi rebels as rubber points out to as as always they give them a name that's supposed to make them seem like
You know the rebel terrorists as opposed to the Ansarala movement, which is largely supported by the people of Yemen
But it says if it eventually does involve itself Iran or
The Ansarala movement could block the Suez canal
So remember the point here for the other side of this if you go around the landmass and up the
That's the Suez canal with Egypt and going over to the other you know the other body of water and so
That's why they've always wanted to control both the ferretiform moose and the bottom end of straight
They've been basically
Committing genocide to just maybe control those areas and why they overthrew and placed a puppet in Egypt
Which is cc, which is a very public and very easy to understand story. And so now
They have control over that through Egypt
But the point is because they do not have control over the Houthis the Ansarala movement and the bottom end up straight
That they could eventually decide to try to block the Suez canal
Another key global trade checkpoint the Egyptian economy is already suffering as a result of the war
And its crisis could deepen if its force forced by its Gulf Arab and Israeli us allies to make itself a factor on their side
Now think about this Egypt is suffering from the war, you know a lot of them are now
Why isn't everybody in the world right now?
And I think they actually are turning around and going why do we keep doing this?
Why are we allowing these belligerents to constantly hurt us?
And it's not even just these governments. I don't think care about their people
They are hurting from this their interests are being hurt
And then also the peoples of these areas
Now it says no option available to the u.s. President will get him out of this strategic check
He's put himself in meanwhile Iran's oil production has skyrocketed. I find this crazy by the way
Reaching a 46 year high right now
At the same time prices for goods inside of Iran
have decreased
That should really bother the american republicans who are arguing that this is somehow that you know hashtag winning
With iran's with the war on iran their prices have gone down because the country has halted exports as a precautionary measure and
They've removed sanctions on their oil
Which is as I think it was more money than so the argument
I think glenn greenwald pointed out which again the 1.7 billion dollars. They're talking about that were given back to you
That was money that was stolen from iran. It's very easy to look up
So the claim that they just gave the money return. That's a lie
But you could still argue you don't think they should have given it to them. But it's their money they stole
So the point though is the the oil money
That they've gained just from the removing of the sanctions, which is theirs anyway, by the way
I guess it's somewhere around 14 billion
So take a second and think about how insane that is to argue of all this time
1.7 and that changed everything and you're giving them 14 billion. Why because they shot themselves in the foot with this situation
Everyone knew this would happen. Everyone knew that they had this potential
Everyone knew that they had their missiles stay aimed at all of these elements that were used were working with the u.s
Government and then they act like they didn't know trump goes. Whoo. They weren't supposed to do that. Well, yeah
They knew you knew they were
So that's what make that's one of the parts that makes me question whether there's something else going on here
These are developments that are not weakening
But instead strengthening the iranian government
Every escalatory threat from the u.s has been met with iran counter threats and so far tyran has not bluffed
Meaning that they followed through with what they said they would do
Unlike the other parts of this discussion the results have fully been truly astonishing now right there by the way
Things statements like that should never be taken for anything other than a simply simply
addressing the fact
Not iran's the greatest or pro iran or this guy
I don't support any governments and I think all of them are potentially
Will eventually lead to this exact kind of point if left to their own devices
I'm only saying that because it's very important especially for new people to the show because regardless of what the numbers show
We're growing every day and reaching new people
And so it's important to hear that
That he's about addressing the facts even if that fact is something
I don't want to see or don't agree with or it's still the fact as I see it
I could be wrong right, but that's the reality
They have not bluffed they have followed through with everything they said and what the u.s
Government Israel continue to do is blatantly get caught lying. That's just the reality
Now it says the results have been truly astonishing the u.s
Not only rushed to lift sanctions on muskow
Because we're just not talking about that
It's sort of like the guido thing where we just stop we just they just you know
Guido is the only legal president then just suddenly they just move on because oh
We need is we need to work with maduro now because he's got things we need it just shows you that they have their feckless
They have no principles
Especially of what you were to be told that they're all monster terrorists
But now we're going to let them profit because we did this to ourselves. I guess
But not only muskow but has even begun to remove sanctions from ronnie and oil though
Pack though packaged by the trump administration as strategic five-dimensional chess
These moves appear to be clear acts of desperation
Truly nothing is working out for donald trump. He is now figuring out why no other president dared to launch a direct war against ron
By the way as robert rightly told you now again, it's maybe still early for some people
Maybe it'll flesh out the way you think it would but robert has for years told you that this is how this would go
And I do believe he's right about how it's going
He said, you know that they've he's figuring out why no other president has gone this path before him despite
Their strong ties and that's a gentle way to say that to the israel lobby
It was not due to a lack of support for israel in the past
But rather an understanding that such a conflict would wreck the u.s economy and likely their presidencies
Now either trump doesn't care about that. He's not able to make say no
Or he was manipulated into thinking this was somehow going to be his most important point of his legacy
Although there is no conclusive public evidence to support the theory
Enough evidence exists from within the documents from the epstein files alone to support the notion
Not prove but support the notion that the u.s president has been compromised by israeli intelligence
Now I agree. I I've argued you could quite literally prove that there is influence
Demonstrate demonstrable
But whether he's controlled that's that's a strong word
And I I argue you can point out examples where trump seems to kind of go his own
Maybe sees that he's being kind of manipulated doesn't call it out
Which shows you the influence I argue if I'm right about that but ultimately still kind of buffs it stops it
I think that shows you some level of awareness. That's all my opinion, but I think the evidence is quite clear
I think everyone's coming to terms with that at minima me writes
This is what the fbi source concluded in 2020 report the link there for you to check out
The only other explanation for launching this war is that the entire trump administration is criminally incompetent
well said
So going from that forward
This is what hegseth just said
Think about where we are right now
Like and and again that they're now dealing with we'll get to I mean that's what we're that's the main point for today
Is the trump administration offers a 15 point ceasefire plan not to some lone defector somewhere
But to the iranian government he just got done telling you are not important art and control and we shouldn't talk to them
And then they do this
Which either tells you he's not even in control of this or he just lied for some reason or he didn't he said the truth
Then and then desperation drove him to this now. I don't know but you have to acknowledge how stupid this is
So in midst of all this this is what we keep getting from these people
I'll end with a point too later about kelly or leave it saying something similar
This hegseth comes out and says never has a modern military been so rapidly and historically obliterated
Again obliterated is very specific. In fact, I uh, I had that somewhere in here. Let's see
Yes obliterated
Destroyed so thoroughly as to be unrecognizable or imperceptible like doesn't exist. That's what it means made
in
Allegible or imperceptible by erasing or bringing away like it's gone
It doesn't exist. Not that it's just broken up and destroyed. No obliter. There's meaning to these words
So what's funny to me is using it because trump is but so if you're gonna tell us that this has been obliterated
Then how are they bombing right now? Why haven't you rolled in and taken over because that's not what's happening
Defeated from day one. He says with overwhelming firepower
Again, if you're not paying attention and I don't even think hegseth is even aware of this
But pretty much everybody with knowledge of this
Whether pro-state department information or not was saying look, it's not even debatable. Iran is very aware that they're going to lose
They they were not even trying to really fight the the air war
They knew that would happen. They dug in and they're fighting the long war. They said that before this even started
So you can't I can't even call it a lie since they said it before we got here and now they're literally doing it
And the experts are speaking up again even from within us discussions are saying it's clear that they're not giving up and it's clear
They're not weak like they're being told we're being told
boasts about military success defeated from day one
Historically never have they been so obliterated. Okay
So here's what trump said yesterday and this is super important to get into before we talk about this article
Which just goes over the large, you know, the last two three days of the defector conversation
Here's what he said and I think the end of it is the most important
Well, I'm probably just going to skip to that for the most part about where he said he was given a gift
Right and that it was a demonstration that showed him that this guy was real
And then the next day he's making a deal with Iran or trying to and they declined it
Other question you haven't been here in a while
Well in Iran, um
Can you give us any more sense of who exactly
In Iran it is either
Yeah, we had I hate to say this in front of these young
People they're not children. They've I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me even though they are sort of children
Right, they'll always be your children
but uh, I hate
By the way, somebody was saying yesterday that there might be like a little a group of kids that are like younger people
That were right over there on the wall. Yes, because yesterday remember
I that wasn't what we were talking about but I just caught that was like
What did he just say was he pointing it at bondy is like it just it was weird
But if that would explain it for those that watched yesterday's show that a guest right over there
There might be but look into it. I'd find it interesting if there wasn't I still
You know, all of them seem to be having little gaffes all over the place. But that aside
Just say it but
We killed all their leadership
And then they met to choose new leaders and we killed all of them
And now we have a new group and we can easily do that
But let's see how they turn out. It's we have really
regime change, you know, this is a change in the regime
Because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that
Created all those problems. So this was I think we can say Jason. This is regime change, right?
I don't trust anybody. I don't trust you. I mean, that's only because I know you
I think it's important to point out again right there, right that I mean again
If we're not being that letting partisan narratives influences
But just if you've never seen the people in your life and you walk into this room
You would hear him hear him saying that and you would go
Oh, okay
So he's suggesting that that they that they're that's over right that that they've met their goals kind of
Right that well, they're out of the way and we got him out of the way and all the people that were bad
Why would you say that if the point was that we're going to go take those ones out too?
It just it feels like he's trying to give himself a potential lean for an out
That's what a lot of people recognize as well as the fact that you just casually discuss
Well, let's see if they will we can kill them too, but let's see how it works out
But let's keep pretending
This is some kind of rawn picking democracy situation where you're going to let them
Give them some legion see and then we'll just bomb them too because just casual murder and war crimes is just where we're at today
But uh, if I didn't know you I'd probably have more trust
But uh, I don't trust anyone. Why do you why do you say that?
Why do you say what makes you try do you think I trust them or trust them?
Because they're gonna make a deal they're gonna make a deal they did something yesterday
Isn't that funny though? I don't trust them, but they're gonna make a deal
So you know that
How do you know that hasn't happened yet? Right? So that means at some level you're trusting what they tell you
Right words have meaning
That was amazing actually they gave us a present
And the president arrived today
It was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money
And I'm not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant
Prize
And they gave it to us and they said they were going to give it so that meant one thing to me would deal with the right people
No, it wasn't nuclear related. It was oil and gas related
And it was a very nice thing they did but what it showed me is that we're dealing with the right people because you know, you don't know because
The leadership was killed all gone
Khomeini all gone
As the expression goes except not though since his son is in power right and
Everyone knew who he was before this and despite him claiming that they killed multiple layers
This was the next person. It's just it's just funny to me
Now they have to bluster and everyone can tell they're lying if we're not children the past supreme leader
and then the new supreme leader was
Racked up at a minimum racked up pretty good
and everyone else was gone
And then many of the people in the third tier are gone
But we're dealing with a group of people that I think turned out and and the
The present the gift they made to us was very significant and they said they were going to do it and it happened
And they're the only ones that could have done it Jennifer
Only ones that could have done it right so what that shows me like I said yesterday
Which is important for what we're going to talk about is that he is essentially saying if it's the truth that
Something they said I'm going to do this
and doing this
Will prove to you that I'm genuine
That means that's that's that's what that framing was right there
And they did the only one that could have done it and so they did it
So it's for sure and so that is definitely a level of trust by the way
Besides despite him wanting to be all like I'm strong and I'm not afraid of anything
I don't trust anybody but I trust you know, it's just what he does but
Clearly that would suggest that they were dealing with somebody
Whether it was somebody in ron or somebody pretending to be Iranian or are these lying about it entirely to make you think he's dealing with somebody
Today changes that entire point
So what was he given something?
If not, why would he lie about that?
And and what if it was what are we talking about is what kind of oil related present or gift or prize?
Are we talking about to me that makes it feel like it's something like the island we're talking about or something like that
So let's get into the rest of this
So here's an article
Originally from yahoo news, but this of some reason that website was acting funny
So it's on this platform as well. Iran launches new strikes denies Trump's claim of very strong talks
And it's from yesterday. Here's what happened on on the 25th day of the war
Iran miss Iranian missiles and drones continued to strike Israel
Now, that's really important right of the gate guys because what it shows you is right there
They were not just diminished and weak and failing and obliterated at the very least and very clearly as everyone's highlighted
Have continued to increase and made sure that the way they conducted their strikes demonstrated
They were not weak, but in fact the opposite showing or at the very least they held back a whole bunch of
You know salables of missiles just to be able to pretend that they have a lot
You know, you could think that way
It's worth asking those questions
But my point is that tomorrow and the next day and they keep showing you this they keep
Demonstrating that they are not you know that they are far from weak and failing and obliterated
Now it says
Fired missiles and drones continue to strike Israel and it says Iraq
Bahrain and Kuwait now I'm interested by this
Because I haven't been able to suss this out
I don't think there's more in this we'll get to but the general point is don't forget
Actually, I think I've got this right here
Even Reuters reported Patriot missile involved in the last Bahrain blast was likely us operated. That's from Reuters media
So and let's forget that's not forget this one in march 22nd
The drone point where it was shown that the israel-us elements could basically conduct drone strikes and make it look like it was ron
And ron made it clear that they were not going to be attacking these locations
Should they not be involved and as far as I can tell they have not claimed at the very least any
Of the attacks on these groups since the last
series of attacks when they got the
Qatari
Major 1.1 billion dollars deletion in a lot of different locations
That doesn't mean they haven't clearly they couldn't just lying about or maybe they did because they thought they were continuing to help
Which some of them are my point though is that I haven't seen that be claimed by them and they claim that they haven't
So it's worth considering especially with the the brain point where we know that the
Or is the reporting shows that it was likely us operated
But they blamed Iran anyway that it might not be them bombing his locations because whose interest is it to drive
Essentially the u.s. Government to spin out and go to crazy war against everybody or israel has been trying to make this happen our entire lives
And they're clearly involved with this. It's not a secret. It's not some conspiracy theory
He's literally standing next to him pointing at things and jump and Trump seems to be jumping at it
Now Kuwait again was the location he just seen he just claimed accidentally shot down three u.s. Ship the u.s. Plains
accidentally
with three u.s. Munitions
I called the s. I don't that's that's very odd to me
Funny how those are the locations and iraq by the way, which is a place that are illegally occupying and host the
Uh pmu elements and as well as the iranian current elements that you could argue are adversarial
Right to even Iran in some cases the point though is that these are locations
That don't really make sense to me not in the way that it's being done
But it does make sense in the way that you want to make it look like iran for certain reasons
Just question at all
And it says even after president trump claimed the u.s. And iran had launched very very strong talks
Acclaimed iran has denied now seeking to uh speaking to reporters during an oval office appearance later tuesday
Which is what we discussed yesterday trump nonetheless repeated his claim that the other side would like to make a deal
So at this point we were going okay
Is he talking about this defector as there's some other group is and he was suggesting that they're really in charge and it's all kind of
Maybe right and so then that's what i'm interested on the overlap to today
It says quote they're talking to us and they're making sense trump said
So maybe they were maybe he was talking to somebody not from iran and thought it was
In the new york times reported late tuesday that the u.s. Had sent iran a 15 point plan which we'll show you in a second
Which they immediately denied or rather just turned down
To end the war
So this is as of today
Two officials briefed on the diplomacy
The and now it's it's public reporting they even the 15 points that they offered okay now says the officials said the plan
Which reportedly addresses maritime routes as well as iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles had been delivered by pakistan
Never remember what iran was saying before which is why it already went down the way it did
They've been doing this the entire time trying to send around to the people and they're just ignoring them
At least that's what they say
Or you know the very least just not just not responding. We're not engaging
We've set the table with what we said because you drove us here. We were trying to engage
We were showing restraint and you kept bombing us during diplomacy. So we're done
That's essentially what they're claiming anyway, and so they've been claiming they're ignoring all of these secondary
Messages
And so one thing i wonder is whether that's what trump is dealing with right now where they're sort of like sending these
Conversations and acting like that's what's happening now. It says the us and iran have sent conflicting signals about possible talks
Now to me that's not really accurate
That's coming from sort of a us perspective on the conversation
Pretty much every source i can see that has any standing in iran has been very clear that this is not happening
Even the person who isreal claimed they were talking with that's an important way to hear that too because uh
Uh gall right as a gallibof who is the for a speaker a speaker of islamic republic the parliament
He's the one that they were pointing to in the beginning saying he was the one he might be speaking to now israeli officials
Reported to central u.s media that he was the one who was going to meet with trump
He spoke up and said nope not happening doesn't mean he's maybe just hiding it right but that's important to hear
So when they say the possible talks iran has sent conflicting signals
It says trump threatened to hit and obliterate iran's power plans within 48 hours unless the islamic republic agreed to fully open the
Straight which we talked about the 48 hours came to pass
But on monday morning roughly 12 hours before it was to become the deadline
Trump said he had delayed his strikes on iran energy infrastructure for five days
Claiming that the us and tehran had launched very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total
Resolution of our hostilities in the middle east which iran just said was not true
It is unclear who the us is talking to or what might come of such conversations according to new york times and everybody else
Asked about the possibility white house press secretary caroline levitt said in a statement that quote
These are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the us will not negotiate through the press
Yeah, of course
Even though they will literally tell you things they shouldn't when they want you to think a certain thing
Half the time those things are untrue. This is just one of the most dishonest. Well, you know
Just think it over like from caroline levitt's perspective, they are always this but they lie about literally everything. That's their job
I shouldn't even say literally but you know
They lie about almost everything they present to you because their job is to
Manage the way you view these things and today especially in this like cartoon falling empire
We're in everything's a lie because they have to bluster even though things they don't have to it seems
But so the point is we won't negotiate to the press. It's not even what do you mean negotiate to the press?
You're not you guys are now failing to even give it the the the internal
Intelligence community in congress. You're not even giving them insight and there's a part about that. We'll point to they're complaining
No one's even telling us what's going on people who are like people like clearance who are inside the circle
I think that speaks volumes where we are again guys. I wonder whether trump is even the one in charge of what's happening
There's so many reasons why that's very possible today
I mean in regard to like the military actions and the actual decision making
And I mean look taking a step back
Let's not forget that trump even said in his first administration
Which is demonstrating that already in this administration that he said he gave the the military leaders the ability to make these decisions without his input
That's let's very easy to look up
And I think that's a very alarming point to hear with where we are right now
Where hexeth is a very clear religious Zionist and where his influence may be driven for something else or any other point we could make
Meanwhile, the Israeli prime minister Netanyahu said his forces would continue of course to strike Iran and Lebanon
Because that makes perfect sense, right?
We're in a joint war and we're in the middle of a negotiation
And so we're going to keep bombing though until until you yes
It does make sense actually because Israel's done it every single time and they know that which is why they're not even pretending
This is real from Iran's perspective
We will preserve our vital interest in every situation
Which means we'll continue to illegally bomb both these locations
We'll continue to illegally steal and occupy rape and torture and that's what they're doing guys right now
These aren't just hyperbolic statements every time they're they are doing that in Lebanon right now every word
I just said they are literally bombing schools and hospitals in every location
I'd like to think we can come to terms with this today seeing us how it's so widely reported
So is the war about to end or not they write here's everything you need to know to make sense of what's happening in the Middle East
Now it says a new barrage of Iranian strikes
Yesterday showed that the regime is still capable of inflicting damage on its golf neighbors. Most people pointed out too that the the
Amount and and the timing showed you that they were not diminished like they claimed
But either way they just told us they were completely done. They have nothing. They're completely defeated and then they kept striking
A volley of six Iranian ballistic missiles killed they tell you six Kurdish fighters and wounded 30 others
According to the government of Iraq's semi-autonomous Kurdish region
Now and it's interesting seeing as how what they're doing with the Kurds in Iran might well make that logical to the sense of
You know what they see that as an element that's representing
The u.s. Government's interest against them
Now it says in this is why this is why I question all of this in beran and iranian missile
They claim killed him a rock and contractor working for an emirati armed forces and injured five emirati service members
And and okay, you could argue if we're talking about service members that they might have seen them as a military target
And if they were service members and based on their involvement with the war they would
By everyone's logic be considered military target
But I think there's something more to this and it says and the Kuwaiti army said on social media
It had based multiple drone and missile attacks
Interesting groups, right? So first of all there are elements in in iraq that might that might make sense
But there let's not forget
There's also I think even more so people that are the PMU for example that they tell you are iranian proxies
And so now they're bombing these locations on top of that they run
We just showed you we're being told that us elements are the ones reported by Reuters actually in controller operating the strikes that are hitting this location
In this example
So when another one hits something that seems to be you know a random contractor
Maybe we should ask whether that's not iran or the Kuwait conversation
We were just told they accidentally shot down three us planes with us munitions
I think there's more happening here on top of all that and it's not about
Just decidedly blaming or israel. It's not what i'm doing. In fact, like I keep saying it's just as likely iran
But recognizing that israel has the ability to use drones that they can make look like ron
And I would be willing to argue the exact reverse
Think of both to consider both of those now also stand back and consider the
precedent
And past actions and which groups continue to show that they are willing to do these and which groups continue to show restraint
Of course that batters
You can always don't they're just you know, I can always go I can keep going further
I think it's important to play that game for some people
But you know, maybe they're doing that to lie to you
It's like but that is the right way to think about these things
Now it says speaking to reporters in florida trump insisted
On monday that we are in the throes of a real possibility of making a deal
The same deal that you just literally murdered them while they were discussing, right?
And it and it says and that ron once won very badly
This is while they're literally laughing at him while he keeps saying that
Quote if I were a betting man, I bet for it. He says but again, I'm not guaranteeing anything
When pressed for details trump said that his middle east and boys, of course wittkoff and kuschner
Had launched very very strong talks. So right there is an obvious point. Maybe they're lying to him
Maybe they are deceiving him like they just did according to everybody including trump's own people
And trump even said well, that's what kuschner told me
Right, wouldn't you think he's smart enough to go? Maybe they're misleading me this time if that's what happened last time
And it says on sunday with a respected ronnie and leader
So again to be clear the one who he will not name that was the defector conversation
He's telling you that kuschner and wittkoff are the ones who spoke to him
Very suspect he did say that it was not iran's new eye total. That's important because today they're dealing with them
Seems to belie this whole conversation
Talks would continue on monday trump said with the major points of agreement now says as for some terms of a possible deal
The president said that the us would demand an end to iran's nuclear capabilities
Which don't exist and they already agreed to that in the jcpoa the last time and have already agreed this time
And i'll show you this yet again
Actually, this person dylan williams i'm familiar with but he posted this which i think is important and i'll also include this
Which one was it the uh
Oh, it's just god some of those for some reason i'm just
Things dropping out of my mind today this point this this was the main point
There was something i was going to add to it
But this one is the as i've often pointed out for you
dylan says iran agreed and it's the post from trump saying
I don't want to say in advance, but they've agreed and but i'm going to do it
But they've agreed to never have nuclear weapons. Yeah, like they already did right like they already have like tulsi gabbard
Told you they didn't have like everybody everywhere other than israel has told you they're not even seeking and the evidence backs that up
But it says iran agreed to that exact point
In the very first paragraph of the original ron deal that donald trump because israel drove him to or suggest or manipulated him into
Unilaterally pulled out of this is the same plan. I just showed you we're at article 36
It explicitly says that should anyone and it was aimed at the u.s. Government knowing
As we can see they always do if any of them unilaterally pull out of the deal
They have the right to continue to reach uranium within safeguards. That's the point same thing with the current point today
The wittkoff lied about the 60 percent as the iae as the international atomic energy agency will tell you that you can read for yourself
That was within their safeguards. I've included this every time
And I just think it's important to know how vividly how obviously wittkoff was lying to everybody
Knowing he's lying and then even tried to play it off that he's just not that smart when it comes to this technology
Then why would he be in this position?
Uranium stockpiles remain under safeguards in accordance with iran's comprehensive agreement
That's the 60 percent the 425 kilograms. This is from the director general themselves at the end of 2025
Now
As for terms of the possible deal the president said that he would demand an end to their nuclear capabilities
But it's important to hear that over and over guys. That's not where they currently are and I think that trump believes
If rather the most likely my mind right now if this is not something he thinks he's dealing with
This is sort of a play as think robert was leaning towards as well of simply going
Well, they just agreed to not have weapons and and I did that
I'm the one that made this happen
And then just kind of going forward as if they made that happen knowing that that's where they already are
And so even if ron goes, oh, no, that's a lie. We didn't do here. We're not agreeing to anything
He's going to go all they just don't admit it and we already made the deal, you know hypothetically
I that's just one lane I can see but you can see where that might make sense
Right that ultimately you you act like you reach the deal that they've always been at
And that's a weakness that's because you know, you lost and you want to make it framed as if you got what you wanted
They've done this many times already
And he goes we want to see no nuclear bomb no nuclear weapon not even close to it
No, that's where they already are and you guys have already created the situation to drive them further away from that actually
Oh wait, it was my spot. Here we go
Trump also said it would be easy for the us to retrieve a ron stockpile of enriched uranium
If oh, that's what it was. I'm glad I remembered that and really just so you to read it if you haven't already
Because it's really important to see the timing on this
remember
the like literally the day before they bombed this stuff the
The foreign minister of oman came out and said they were willing to give up their entire stockpile
They were they agreed to no nuclear bomb just like the last agreement and the one before that
And I mean, of course, you could always go there lying, but that's not what they're even saying
Trump keeps claiming they just won't agree to it, but they literally did so right there you have to understand
That's either wittkoff and jerry just lying to somebody who is incapable of looking at the most basic details
Kind of makes sense
Or trump knows he's lying to you because the reality is it's been there the entire time
And then again, he said nope, they they're going to give it up
They're going to agree to the deal and he said peace is actually within reach if they just let it happen
Then they bombed them just like every other time that this is actually that's one of the most important points in this
So that's why when he says no more nuclear weapons
And what we and he says that we'll go go in and get the uranium. Well, that's what they agreed to before you bomb them
That's off the table now because you bomb them and that's what they're saying
If we have a deal with them, we're going to take we're going to going down and we'll take it ourselves. He says
Now I argue that's an opening from probably the strategic perspective to justify an invasion
Should they claim we have to go in and take it even though they offered it freely before you bomb them
Quote they want peace trump said they've agreed. They will not have a nuclear weapon like just the repetition the incessant non-stop bs
Asked tuesday if he trusts the iranians his administration claims to be talking to trump alluded to a gift as we just
Showed you the video that signal. They were dealing with the right people
So apparently dealing today is with the wrong people
But that totally makes sense because the right people was the special gift
But today you're dealing with the kamini in iran and how does that make sense? Why would you deal with the wrong people?
They gave us a present the president arrived today. You just you just saw it. That was a very big present
I'm not going to tell you what it was, but I'll tell you what it was or kind of
He goes on to say the president what goes on to say the article the president went on to say the gift was oil related
Now it says tyron appeared to reject trump's claim that the two countries were making progress
Toward ending the war which is now in its fourth week on social media
The speaker of iran's parliament denied the direct talks had taken place quote no negotiations have been held with the us
Now that was kalaboff the person they said they were speaking to and we showed you that as well
The paper added however that there have been initiative
Initiatives by regional countries to de-escalate tensions
So the element of this is trump could be simply pretending
He's the one making something happen when what we're talking about is
Pakistan or somebody else trying to drive this to de-escalate this
Not to a place where there's any kind of an actual agreement, but just where there's no more
You know murder taking place and is real is the one that will relentlessly keep going
They've made that clear as I just showed you they're going to keep bombing regardless
You can't miss how obvious that is narrative aside. That's always the case
prior to trumps remarks about a deal and again schools civilians like
Objectively it's on the ground people are filming that you can watch these things
I mean even ap and and what was it like ctv or the
The canadian platform they just hope they casually report their bombing apartment buildings
It says if it doesn't even matter anymore
Prior to trumps remarks about a deal iranian foreign minister aragachi acknowledged that he talked by phone with his turkish counterpart
Over the weekend turkey has previously served as an intermediary
So now I'm wondering on you know one of the many possibilities
Is that whether or not this is you know turkey or pakistan or somebody talking to them?
And him just trying to kind of glom onto that because he knows they're losing
Iran's semi-official news agency tesneem
Uh, which is close to the country's paramilitary
The the revolution guard the military elements also insisted that no direct talks had taken place
Even though quote this is important because they're acknowledging that's other part of it
Even though messages have been sent to iran by some mediators
So they're saying we we're getting those we're just not engaging with it
it characterized trumps comments as psychological warfare and claimed
The tactic would not help the straight up or moose return to pre-war conditions or bring calm to the energy markets
Various iranian news agencies also sought to portray trump as backing down in the face of threats to us targets
In a video comment statement on monday net nyahu said he had spoken to trump
Who told him that the us might be able to leverage us his rarely military achievements to quote
Realize the objectives of the war in agreement with iran
as net nyahu
Right spoken to trump told him that they might be able to leverage their achievements
To realize objectives like think that through
Especially with what seems to actually be happening. It's almost as if they're saying we're gonna
You know like take for example hypothetically carg island and say that we're gonna seize that
Right, we're gonna take advantage and use the leverage of our achievements to realize the objectives of the war
And then end as if that's sort of like the agreement that was made. I mean there's all this is hypothetical
But you can I mean we know who these people are if you've been watching with what they're doing right now in multiple countries
There's something there
But net nyahu said that israel would continue to strike iran and lebanon in the meantime, of course because that's totally normal
When you're amidst of potential negotiations, it's totally not israel later said it was not part of any possible talks between the us and iran as it cut her
So israel is flatly just going we don't even care you you run out of know what's going on
Now I don't actually believe that I think that whatever's happening israel is well aware of every part of it
egypt's foreign ministry said in a statement that it had been making constant efforts to
End communications with all concerning parties in recent days to avoid reaching the point of no return
So egypt pakistan turkey
It seems like they're just trying to stop this from spinning out of control knowing that israel is hell bent on making that happen
And you understand turkey has made that clear many times over the years
You know despite the more weird relationship that's actually going on there
He's been very critical of them
An egyptian official told the associate of press that washington and tehran exchanged messages over the weekend through egypt turkey and pakistan
But that's an egyptian official
Iran's denying that they're saying we got him, but we're not returning any information
This is the top priority right now the official said i think they would be trying to drive that to happen
Maybe even with good attentions
kirstar from from the british prime minister kirstar were told senior lawmakers on monday that his government was aware of talks between the
U.s and iran of course
He just means what trump is claiming is happening and that the priority was to achieve a negotiated agreement which puts tight
Conditions on iran particularly in relation to nuclear weapons. Just tired. It's just tiring outcome
Just there's just lie after lie after lie
When we get into the actual 15 points they put forward it's only going to make this more ridiculous
unrealistic
Stocks and bonds climbed on monday after trump said the us had started productive talks to end the war
Which many people argue with the entire point of what might have been a lie
The price of brent crude and the international oil benchmark briefly dropped from 114 dollars
Do you ever a point when they were telling us over 100 could maybe collapse the world economy?
And it went back down to 96 which is way higher than it was before
So this is a this is a game a losing game and it's just to try to get momentary wins
Seems very ill advised
Then it rose to roughly 100 because that's what I keep telling you and it's it's it's a it's a game of kind of back and forth
But what they're doing seems to be guaranteeing it's going to keep going up. Which is what everyone seems to be saying
I mean, what was it? I think it was uh, was it cutter or somebody else said it was going to go up to like 150
Like that that's just estimation, but it's not a good thing
Yeah, and that rose back up after iran denied but the most that they were even having conversations on tuesday
Today oil prices resumed their rise as I've been telling you and stocks fell in the absence of any concrete developments toward peace
The philippines declared a national emergency
Saying that high oil prices were threatening energy security
So there's that point again
Some places Sri Lanka and others
Despite the iea saying it was you know suggestions
There are places like
Sri Lanka that are making it mandatory
literal
Energy lockdowns as we read on and wake up the idea of saying, you know, if you have an odd license plate, you can only drive on these days
Guys, this is
I mean right now I'm willing to bet you that you're going to find examples of this starting to roll out through this administration
Even though that is identical to the point that we all fought against during kovat 19
I hope i'm wrong
But watch because clearly guys, this is something that they are actually involved in and it's not just I mean the
smart city freedom city gaza, you know network state
Digital tokens digital control and they're building that that's trump's administration right now
He presented his global board of peace to the Davos to the un
He's you know all the same stuff we talk about the point is that this is that the
energy lockdown is a part of this potential the worry that it leads to
I do the similar tactics, but to some kind of a global control structure
oil and gas prices have skyrocketed in recent weeks
Because iran has effectively closed the strait of promos now. I disagree with that
Effectively is better than saying they closed because it's not closed. But remember the point is that they threatened
Early on and then made it clear many times over by the way that they're only doing this to israel the us and people that are helping them
Now maybe that just suggests that everyone's afraid to go through because they're all being manipulated by israel the united states
Either way they've been clear about that
And I there's examples of other tankers going through and I just think it's important to realize that it may just be the
Us and israel sort of gaslighting everybody to not let it happen because that's what they wanted from the beginning
To claim they shut it down and to manipulate the world opinion
The us state department issued a worldwide security alert on sunday urging americans abroad to exercise an increased caution
After recent threats from iranian officials and affiliated groups
Which again guys, this is this is so funny to me
Actually, I'll read this too. We'll go over both of these
Oh, it's the last part anyway
On friday a top iranian military spokesman
We were told
Threatened to pursue us and israeli officials beyond active conflict zones from from now on based on the information
We have about you even parks recreational areas and tourist destinations anywhere in the world will no longer be safe for you
Now there is a statement that was made
Of course, the context makes it a lot different which is typical from your corporate media
Who wants you to think iran is just going we're gonna kill anybody
Or anywhere. No, that's what israel and u.s. You're claiming and they do by the way
We'll come back to that real quickly, but sir remember the point is that
Alert iran may kill americans around the world. Okay. Well, when's the last time that happened? What do you think?
Let's find out
Or was that
When's the last time iranian government killed an american outside of a response to a us israel attack
Which clearly makes a difference doesn't it if they're bombed they respond to a us base in rakh, for example
Which is pretty much most of what they're going to talk about down here. Well, the most recent confirmed case they claim
It was november 2022. Now understand this is the confirmed case and this is anywhere
In november 2022 is the last time you're and they're going to put out a worldwide threat that we're going to go
Just kill random americans. Why because you're that's not what iran does guys
despite all the propaganda and what it says and the operation involved specific intelligence gathering and recruitment of operated
Operatives against a perceived spy
Now, of course, maybe they're wrong. Maybe maybe it's iran's terrorism. They killed america. That's how they covered it
You can consider that for yourself
But I hope you can also consider that us government very much does can conduct clandestinal operations in foreign governments all the time
And if they were caught then they're treated like a that the us government would kill somebody
That's that's treason or rather not treason, but whatever the term would be for outside spy
So my point is that even this case has the layer that it says well, they there was a spy
Okay, but then september 2022
Iranian even that though guys is not iran killing an american wandering through some foreign country
That's very different. Okay, and this one is iranian forces launched rocket and drone strikes into iraqi kurdistan
Right. Remember this story killing a u.s citizen
The u.s condemned this as an unjustified violation
Well, the reality as we widely covered was it was actually a iranian person in a kurdish a kurdish iranian
Who lived in the kurdish area in iraq?
And yes, he had u.s citizenship but worked for the state department and was aligned with the u.s government
And the point becomes
Very different than killing a random american now it is to me american as an american whether born in the country or not
But it does make a difference for the conversation when we're talking about today
If you're talking about a person who lives somewhere else who happens to have citizenship versus somebody who is
An american born in this country who they see as representing the american culture
That's the point you can make in that conversation either way
We're talking about here is an example of somebody associated with the u.s government who is illegally occupying iraq
And now you can still call it a crime if you want
But the point is that's a little bit different, isn't it?
And that's the only two examples they can come up with before that pre 2020 mostly attributed to other proxies
They claim as iran which are not
And this is what they want you to be fearful of don't iran they kill you this is hyperbolic
This is fear mongering. It's propaganda
And then let's address the top iranian spokesman and we'll come back to this
Now this actually i'm not familiar with the the person's sub stack, but this is something i found this came across
Seymour rocks is their
sub stack
Fake news says iran threatened to attack tourist sites worldwide now if you check out every
Single left or right western topic western platform. You will get this kind of statement and check this out guys
Of course new york post is just one of the worst today. Iran makes chilling threat to target
tourist sites
Oh, is that what they did first of all, even if you take the first statement, which was inaccurate
They're claiming to target
You know us officials in places around the world not just target tourist sites
These are such disgusting people who are deliberately trying to manipulate you as spring break kicks off
And then of course you get the jesse water types and the jones and the rest and all hyperbolically scream about
That's what they do
So you can read this if you want she goes over the article i'm going to show you
I think it's worth pointing out somebody who called us out
I think rightly so because you could look this up for the actual quote because that matters to me
Now i'm not going to say that maybe iran's going to do that. Maybe that was their intention
The statement is not what they said though
This is the this for press tv which press tv has the interest of flavoring things the way any other platform does
But recognize that it's a perspective
It's more from the what iranian is looking at versus what the us and government is in this case
The statement is accurate assassination of iran officials commanders expose enemies desperation
Here's the point
The spokesman the general they're talking about the general staff of the iranian armed forces
Says excuse me the spokesman for the general staff of the iranian armed forces says the us and israel are conducting acts of terror
Against the country's officials. They are they're not even hiding that they just claim they're all terrorism
So therefore well, that's even if you claim terrorism that doesn't make it
No, you these are non-military targets. Kamini was a non-military target. They don't care
They've assassinated military scientists countless times and the west praises it. It's horrible objective crimes in this case
Is we're really conducting these attacks on officials commanders
But people like military personnel, that's considered military target
But not like the president for example would not be well, I guess that's a different point
I you could argue the commander-in-chief would apply
But let's just take a senator for example
Technically, that's not considered military target now not because of the enemy's power
But because of their desperation they argue that they're just assassinating anyone they can get a hold of
We know that it's happening
Anyone dying that is just a very dishonest person because israel's admitting it
It says he added that iranian officials are living like people
Which at least you could see videos of they could be lying about that
But what do you get from the hegsest the rest? They're they're in their secret bunkers
And they're terrified and they're hiding and well, I see plenty of evidence to counter that but again question it
What they're saying is iranian officials are living like people unlike the criminal israeli and american officials
Who then you get the same thing in reverse?
Who are hiding in shelters and underground facilities due to their lack of ability in the face of the resistance of the brave iranian nation?
Now look, let's be very clear about this in regard to us person
They would the last time you saw any american politician wandering freely through a big open crowd
I don't think you're going to see that because they know how reviled they are on top of that
The underground what do you think benjamin net and yahoo and everybody this is a documented reality
They're always in their shelters. Well, helive is the open shield how human shield that they've admitted to
There it's right underneath that
Important so but again, whether you agree with the framing or not the commander emphasize that the cowardly us and israeli officials and commanders
So commanders
Along with malicious pilots troops are under surveillance of the iranian forces
So too are the in reverse we know that and it goes on to say who are quote firmly determined to continue
crushing attacks against enemies
He goes on to say further that the based on information available to iran
Recreational areas tourist destinations and leisure centers around the world would no longer be safe for enemies
So clearly a little bit different than we're going to target tourist locations clearly
But then even taking what the first point said
The really what it seems to be suggesting is we're targeting military personnel, but I would still add
In locations that are not militarily active. So those would still be a crime
Context right also being objective and pointing out the reality whatever side you think people are on
But the point is it's not what they're saying, right?
The idea that they're targeting tourist sites is just to get you to think iran everything is terrorism
Why would you need to lie about stuff like that if they're as bad as you guys all say?
on top of that even even the
aol article says
That you've promised to target
You know, basically target
Just officials outside of certain conflict zones. It's not really the way they said that did they
Now really even further if you read the sentiment in the entire article
His point is you guys are doing this to us. So we may very well end up targeting you there
What he what he said was we're watching you and we know where you are
No, that's the fact guys read it for yourself
But it's disgusting, isn't it as we know israel the us are deliberately doing it without even trying to hide it
They're simply saying we could do that and we're watching you and it gets turned into this kind of hyperbolic nonsense by
propaganda platforms
Now lastly, this is just interesting. Iran says as of yesterday
non-hostile ships can pass through straight of her moves as I was just saying
Iran has agreed to allow non-hostile vessels now. I believe that's what they've already done
But just to emphasize the point to reiterate the point not just only this group of that group
But anybody who is not hostile to us can go through israel in the u.s. We're trying to make sure nobody sees that
I'm convinced they need people to feel like they're restricting their actions, too
Now
Here again is the callable person who has said no negotiations
Just make sure you see that and says that you know based basically the quagmire other which the u.s. Israel trapped
These are all the points I was referencing within that
And here we are to the 15 point plan so trump administration offers after all of that 15 point ceasefire plan today
After claiming he had a secret person
He was talking to that it was totally not the iranian government because they're not even exist
They're not even that's why I played the first part of that. We killed them all right, but now we're making a deal with them
I just don't think that makes sense other than if they're somehow doing both simultaneously
That's certainly possible. I guess
Whereas what it says the plan was submitted to iran by intermediaries from pakistan
So you see that's why that point was important
So around it all pakistan turkey, it looks like they were trying to create some kind of conversation
Now if you have you heard me already say it just the point is that they've already denied this guys
And that shows you continually if they even one are not this weak thing
They're just can roll over and take over because they wouldn't be continually offering a deal that they know
They're going to turn down while lying about some of those secret deal if that's the case
But so pakistan is the one that presented it who was who who have offered to host renewed negotiations
Between washington and tiran which there's no reason why they would do that because they've been tricked and lied every single time
They've done it
According to a person
The person speaking to them is the one that said pakistan put that forward
Spoke on a condition of anonymity
It says the new york times was the first report that the plan had been delivered to iranian officials now. That's important
Like it's making it clear more than once that we're talking about the current government
The pentagon is also in the process of deploying two marine units that will add about 5 000 marines
And thousands of sailors to the region
Yeah, so much for the not with no new wars boots in the ground and long past
Just like we all told you would happen
Because we were paying attention
Israeli officials who have been advocating for president donald trump who continue to continue to the war against iran were surprised
They write by the submission of a ceasefire plan
Now what's interesting is i'm getting different reports from that and in some cases you have officials claiming they support it
But what they're reporting is that the officials israeli officials claim
They were like taken off guards surprised by the fact that trump put forward a plan if that's the case
I argue it speaks to
More of the awareness of the dual agendas here or at the very least that he feels even if they're on the same agenda
That is real plays him or the u.s. Government often
My opinion, but if that's the case it does speak to some kind of a you know a schism right there
Now it says iran has denied any negotiations are taking place now
This is again like yesterday they were denying the claim of any kind of a negotiation now today on top of it
They're still saying look we're not negotiating
We're not in a place and i
It's important to hear what they've set up until now not just that we're taking a pause
They stood up and made it very clear. We have been doing it before
We show restraint we show compassion or whatever you want to claim and these are things they've said
And them every time we have an opening for peace you guys take advantage you bomb us you violate your agreements
You have nothing sacred so why are we going to keep pretending you're going to deal with us?
Donald trump lies to us every time that's essentially paraphrasing what they said
Iran remains highly suspicious of the united states
Which as even a people report twice under the trump administration has attacked during high level diplomatic talks
It's actually more than that seeing as how they've done it in the past
They've done it twice in this administration
You could even include lebanon and salamone if you want to understand how this actually plays in
So that's just what they do guys. This is a policy. It's not an accident
Including with the february 28 strikes that started the current war
That's why that oman article is important because that very day he was saying we're going to do this
They agreed to give up everything and then that's why israel rushed to bomb the country. It seems
So going forward
Here is the wi on platform trump sends 15 point plan piece
Point plan piece plan translation from no nuclear
No nuclear weapon to end of sanctions. So here's what they actually put forward
This is just embarrassing guys. I mean honestly, it makes me think that this has been designed to not happen
The new york times quoting unnamed officials now again, there's an element of that
This may not be you know, this is what got put out, but it could be something different
In fact, we know the administration, especially trumps has done that in the past
Like deliberately to get people to jump at the wrong thing for example
but here's what's being reported as the
Unnamed official releasing said the united states sent the 15 point plan to iran through pakistan
Which is confirmed by the reporting israeli
um channel 12 said that trump was proposing a one month ceasefire
A 15 point framework sent by trump reportedly
one month ceasefire
Dismantle all nuclear capabilities
Which means civilian too by the way and they might agree to that but i doubt they will
No pursuit of nuclear weapons already been there like that's already been met
They've never they agreed to it three times already and the evidence shows they were not
And all uranium enrichment again, that's the same as nuclear capabilities. Uranium richman is used for civilian programs
And by the way, they did so i could even i mean
nuclear capabilities
Maybe i don't want to speak i'm not an expert on the topic
I wonder if there's an opening there without enrichment, but let's just say for second conversation
They have agreed to give up their enrichment, which means the no civilian civilian program
I would argue and so they did they just agreed to that now. I argue they're not going to now
Why would they do it again?
But they did already number five transfer all nuclear material to the ia. Yeah, they agreed to this already
That's what the former minister of alman was already saying or at least to another counterpart that they would
Downgrade it or get rid of it or really both to get you downgrade what they currently have and then basically export it out and get rid of it all
close
Not natanz and basically their nuclear sites, which you know see these are all this is what i guess trump was trying to
Was saying that one two and three are all nuclear side. Well, these things are not going to be like these are unjustifiable
for obvious reasons
unrestricted a
International atomic energy agency inspections now that's always been the case that has been the reality since the jcpoa even after these broken deals
Now i would maybe say unrestricted now, but at one point that's what the reality was
Abandoned regional proxies
I mean come on. This is just ridiculous. So now, you know, this is the same thing you're doing with gaza and hamas
So you can't have any allies because we're not talking about proxies here
We're talking about groups that they're allied with and so right now that's already met because they don't have these proxies
As best as the evidence shows to me
So all you're really saying is stop having any association with people you assume. That's just an effort to
isolate these groups
Halt funding and arming of proxies. Well, okay again
Like let's let right now the evidence doesn't show that that's the case other than weapons
trade of you know
Anything allies like us allies do with other people
weapon sales
support
That's different than a proxy guys a proxy for example is what you're seeing with the Kurds
Where they just basically dump everything in their hands and then direct them on what to do in Iran. That's what they're doing
The point though is how do you prove something that might not be happening?
But if it is happening
Why they're the ones that they mean right like for example, they make a deal in gaza or any other deal
And they just they they go they're lying and don't take the word for it. So why were they there?
Keep straight up from moose open. Well, that's already happening. Of course, they mean for them
Limit missile program later. I don't even know what that means later
But this again could be some kind of a truncated version that maybe we'll come back to that
They're not going to give up their ability to defend themselves
Defense only military forces. Well, if you're talking about missile program
Limit it well, all you're going to end up doing is give me they're in a position where they can be taken over easily
And that's exactly what happened with libya
Miss defense only military forces is just unreasonable unrealistic
And of course what you're ultimately talking about anything could be used as the weapon guys. It's just a game lift all sanctions
So what are we talking about?
Are we talking about lifting sanctions on Iran? This is a point that trump sent forward
So trump is asking them to lift sanctions. I mean, it's an interesting point. Then it says support
Bush Bushier nuclear energy and snapback sanctions at the end of the day guys
All of this has been discussed over and over and over
It's a ridiculous time to put this forward based on what they just did and that shows weakness
I mean think about this again. He just said that these people are gone
No one's in power. They don't even know what's going on. They're all hiding in their bunkers
That's why we're speaking with this guy who's high up and he's the real and then today you do this
either not in control
Or desperately spinning out
Here's what they said
US very close to meeting main goals in Iran while Iran is going. No, thank you
That's how do you not see that as weakness now?
If this ends up where they're lying and this all comes to pass the way he said it would
Well, then that's what will report when it comes to pass right now the evidence doesn't suggest that the evidence clearly shows
the like for example
What we just showed you in regard to the back and forth
Trump is being caught saying things that you could prove aren't true now as I said that may mean something or it may mean something else
What I think it clearly suggests is that you're yeah, if you have to lie about that then you're in a weak position
That's always been clearly. I've stated my opinion
My point though is that you know anything could change tomorrow
I just think that it's unlikely that's going to go that direction
But if it does what it would probably suggest
Would be that this was something that they were trying to maneuver because there was like with uh, assyria or venezuela
And that makes sense that you're hiding the transition, but let's be real
It's a crime
The whole thing everything they're doing and this ultimately means that they're surreptitiously doing it anyway to lie and again
Lying about a deal to get what they want. It's what they do
Iran dismisses the ceasefire plan, which is what I mean
I don't know why and again
I think the us knew this would happen because they already told him that
Iran on Wednesday dismissed the american plan to pause the war issuing its own counter proposal. I'll show you that next
And then launched more strikes on on israel and they claim gulf arab countries again
I'm not sure if I can verify that seeing us out there have not seen me to claim those
But it says iran issued its own plan via state tv which includes a halt to killing of its officials
Means to make sure no other wars waged against it
Which you know, do you really think israel is ever going to give anything up?
Reparations for the war, which they'll never do the end to the hostilities and iran's exercise of sovereignty over the trade for moose
Now reparations for the war
Can you imagine what a future administration would say if trump gave them money just like they're trying to make it about
Obama, it's just they're not I don't think this is going to happen
Iran says no negotiations will take place
Until their five conditions are met and this is what they already were saying before this
Iran also says it will end the war at a time of its own choosing
And only if the conditions are met that it has set forward
Now this is the um
Kibisi letter and just gives you the five conditions and then we'll read it directly from one of the platforms or two of them in fact
Iran has officially rejected the u.s. Proposal
And their conditions include one immediate end to attacks and assassinations on iran
Puts it's a crazy. They have to even say that seeing as how they're all crimes and the world should do something about that
Or at least just acknowledge that objectively
Establish of establishment of concrete guarantees
Against future u.s. Attacks, which why you know, what is that going to be?
Liars telling you they promise
I don't know why you know, but at least they're putting it there clear determination of guaranteed payment for war damages
I just doubt they'll ever do that
An international recognition of iran's authority over the strait of formus, which it's the reality guys
It's like any other thing. It's like the u.s. And it's like suez canal and it's the same point
They just go bad guy and then I don't want you know, we don't agree
Not they're prerogative
And end to the war across all fronts including for all iranian proxies in the region now
That's how this is being framed. That's not what iran is saying
We now wait a response from the u.s. What they're really saying is an end to all the war across all fronts and anything leaven on
See any of them gaza ha was they're not going to do that is real will refuse
Iran rejects u.s. Proposal lays out five conditions for any of the war
Iran has responded negatively to american proposal aimed at ending the ongoing imposed war insisting that it will only occur
on Tehran's own terms and their timeline
The official with knowledge of the details of the proposal speaking exclusively to press tv today said iran will not allow
U.s. President Donald trump and it's important to dictate the timing of the war's end
So at least it feels like they think they're in a position of power, right
And if trump clearly is trying to draw this to an end and maybe even lying about things
It seems to speak about weakness
But again, this is all breeding the wall right on the wall
It's harder to know for sure or the rather the tea leaves. I guess is they might way to say that the point
Is it
They're they're saying we're not going to let you wrap this up
Because what they think is this is them
You know
Confronting their weakness like basically threat threat threat. We didn't follow through we didn't believe you and so now trump is being forced to walk
It back but can't say that so he has to frame it as somehow him having a success because that's a weak people do
Quote iran will end the war when it decides to do so
And when its own conditions are met the official said
Emphasizing Tehran's resolve to continue its defense and inflict heavy blows on the enemy until its demands are fulfilled
Which by the way those demands were not being demanded until the u.s. Government in israel illegally started this war
They were being discussed right there was conversations
But they're the ones that drove this to an ultimatum all or nothing standpoint
But now watch as they carry on blaming iran for that
Every time according to the to the official washington has been pursuing negotiations through various diplomatic channels
Putting forward proposals that iran views as excessive and disconnected from reality
That's my point. That's been not just these last two, but continually. They've been just going we're not we're done with this
I've been telling you that
The official drew parallels with two previous rounds of negotiations held in the spring and winter of 2025
Characterizing them as deceptive
Yeah, that's that's a soft word so you can tell they literally murdered people in the negotiations in both instances
The official stressed the united states had no genuine intention to engage in meaningful dialogue
And subsequently carried out military aggression against iran. Isn't it funny how you get this framing?
Where is this anywhere else in the conversation? No, don't believe that you shouldn't make that shouldn't then turn
It shouldn't create the thought that then press tv is always the truth or that they're the right one
It's not the case
But just realize that there's a you know, there's a perspective you're getting from iranian people and iranian media
There's nowhere else in the conversation
They're just going look we're done. This is so obvious that we are not but again
It could be bluster. They could be fronting that kind of strength
To me it doesn't seem likely
Tehran has therefore categorized likely that they're front. They're bluffing. It seems that this is the reality
Tehran has therefore categorized the latest overture
Which was delivered via friendly regional intermediary as a ploy to heighten tensions and it responded negatively
Now again, think about this. Why would they through an immediate intermediary send this plan?
To a group they just told you is irrelevant while allegedly dealing with they somebody that's told you was actually in charge
I just don't see how that possibly lines up the official outline five specific conditions under which iran would agree to end the war
Which we already read for you
The official further noted that these stipulations are in addition to demands
Previously presented by Tehran during the second round of negotiations in geneva
Which took place just days before the us and israel carried out a fresh round of aggression on february 28 starting this whole legal war
Or continuing it really when you understand how it's always been going
But that's very important here
So that's saying just these five but everything else we've been demanding and that's where you put us
That's where you have driven this too
Iran has communicated to all intermediaries acting in good faith that the ceasefire is contingent upon the acceptance of its conditions
That's it
No negotiations. They say quote will be held prior to that
The official stressed reiterating that the commute the continuation of iran's defense operations
Because I mean if anyone's trying to frame this is anything other than that
This is not a russia ukraine thing guys. This is very clear
They have not been I mean at this point now they're there I would art
I mean, yeah, no, there are cases I can see right now where they were they're
initiating attacks
But point though though is this is a war of defense from their war of aggression
And clearly as they've already demonstrated this would stop if they stop
You may disagree with that
But I would bet anything that that's the way it would go because they've done it before
And every action they do seems to suggest that exact reality
The difference though is it now is we're only us are on their back foot
Not just kind of momentarily but because of where they put themselves straight up removes the whole thing
It says the end of the war will occur
When iran decides it should end not when trump envisions its conclusion
That's very important and I'm guarantee you that is driving him crazy
They put out this video of like a lego little lego video with actually a pretty catchy song calling him a loser
And it's I guarantee it got in my opinion is that that stuff really bothers him because and my point as well is that's a very
I think a bad move because it's probably going to drive him to act irrationally and that's probably not in their interest
Iran wants lebanon
Included in any ceasefire now. That's super important. You know why because Israel is not going to give that up
I was that's a reason that I made it important to make this to include that
They just kind of absorbed lebanon into this current motion knowing that that doesn't even line up with their narrative despite that
You know lebanon is wrong or whatever they're claiming
But realize guys that the lebanese government is largely on the side of their agenda
And there's lots of people in this country. And so you're effectively bombing the country, which is
Even at least half on your side to a degree or you know, there's a there's a nuance there
But they're just bombing indiscriminately bombing people's homes
But that's the same when they bomb syria and bomb
Even government buildings and the government there goes, we don't care
This is fine because they're working with them and those are the terrorists they put there just like every other place
They work with but aran correctly is making this case
That we're not when we do a ceasefire not like with gaza
We this all has to stop because it's all part of the same conversation. We all know that
I just think that's going to very clearly cause a problem for the negotiations
Which is probably what they're trying to accomplish knowing that they're not really truly engaging with this
Now to wrap up here. There's some points that we just need to see with all we just went through
The absurdity of what you're about to hear
I just it just it
Heals in comparison to anything I've ever seen like it gets worse every day
And I think it's not just because they're just especially bad liars. I do think that I mean kjp
We probably want the worst to be honest, but nonetheless
It's it's the situation they're in
Right, it's it's the or not unless but you know in addition to it's the situation they're in
It's only got it's
Like I've said before when you're when you're lying about everything eventually you're going to contradict something you've lied about before
But imagine being in this position where you all you do is lie
And now on top of that the government narrative and everything around it is you just you are going to make yourself look like a fool
And speaking of fools here's eric dowdy
Just going breaking news whatever caroline said like earlier in the day
So it's not breaking news confirms that aran is literally begging
President trump for a deal
And for the war to stop
As always
These people deserve ridicule by just it's embarrassing
The kind of ones even if that ends up being the truth. This is a journalist
Does not blindly report what the government says they want people to think
That's just stupid guys. That's just that's just bash not intelligent anything
Especially with how often they've lied to us over the years
But then even if that's the case look at what we're dealing with right now
What indication anywhere is there that either begging trump for a deal not even trump is saying that
First of all his very
Needed to feel very badly came from this alleged single person yesterday
Then today they send a 15 point plan that iran immediately denies
And then they kind of continue to go. So how does that look like begging for a deal eric?
Now this gets even more embarrassing when you listen to carolin leave it
This continues
Unabated from the outset president trump in the department of war estimated
It would take approximately four to six weeks to achieve this critical mission
25 days in the greatest military the world has ever known is ahead of schedule and performing exceptionally
Is it just cringy?
Because look the real thing is
There's nobody in the conversation that's like that's all that this is people who are proud
To to gloat or over to to overdo the there like they just want to support the team
You know like the idea is I don't think anybody anywhere even her actually thinks that's the reality
But they've just gotten so comfortable with what we're supposed to overdo it
Isn't that what we all do?
Isn't that what trump wants from us? They just constantly push out the biggest most that's what trump does every single time
He opens his mouth
You even if you're in the number one position it becomes not just that we're the leader
But we're the leader of all leaders that have ever led in the history of leaders
It's just dumb and everybody knows it
I don't know why we don't laugh about that and I mean
There's plenty of things that I think we're way worse about biden
But this is especially bad for him
And it's just something that has become obnoxious for most people who are just tired of pretending like it's not obvious
And this is our government's where we are today
And so what she's saying is you know the most power of a mill now the us government has very clearly spent the most on its military
But the real question and what we're very clearly coming to terms with today
Is that the representation of being the most powerful militarily is not necessarily what
The us is doing today or rather what they've invested in like
We have been manipulated like the fact that we've got like 11 all the the aircraft carriers
War has changed as everyone is now coming to terms with as rubio told you their drones and what they're building
They're gonna eventually surpass us. Yeah, but let's spend 30 million more dollars on a single jet
You know, it's it's it's clear that we have been dragged into this military industrial complex
That's kind of lumbering into this technocratic complex. It's all the same conversation
They'll just keep spending money on things they want you to invest in that don't interest americans at all
Because it's about the system. How long have I told you this country rather as always this government
Runs on the blood of other governments other nations. I can't get that right today
The point is clearly they're not us the government's doing it. But what they're doing is running on the blood of other nations the peoples
How do we not see this?
This country this government and the country because the government's the one running to the ground would ultimately collapse
Should the war industry stop?
I don't know why we can't see that so all of this is in any historical point
This is this is a dying empire and everyone's starting to call that out
That doesn't mean the american people or what says bills a civilization we can create you know create
It's this government that we're talking about
The outset president trump and the department of war estimated it would take approximately four to six weeks to achieve this critical mission
25 days in the greatest military the world has ever known is ahead of schedule and performing exceptionally
Day by day the iranian regime is being crippled and their ability to threaten the united states and our allies is being
Significantly weakened. Oh weakened. I didn't trump say it was obliterated didn't hegseth say on day one
They were obliterated he did
So maybe you guys should get on the same page about your terms and understand what's really happening
And even what she just said is objectively not true every day. They're showing you that's not the reality
But they just keep saying it
I don't know what you call that other than weakness or I guess being misinformed by your allies is possible
Their ambitions of building a nuclear weapon have also been crushed to an even see my point
Even greater degree. Oh an even greater degree. Oh see because she just can't get past the fact that we were it was obliterated
And anyone saying otherwise is fake news and now well now it's back and now it's even more obliterated
Then it was ever obliterated in the history of obliteration
Keep going doing great. Then they were in operation midnight hammer in june when it was obliterated 2025
That's why you're beginning to see the regime look for an exit ramp. They recognize they are being crushed
Their ability to attack american and ally forces as well as their ability to defend their own territory is dwindling
I mean, look aside from the last point which
This they included that for a point of reason to say, you know, we're that's what they keep going
We're on our jets are controlling the airspace again. That was a given. They didn't even really fight against that
And that's a that's a superiority for sure
But that's not going to win the war unless the point is to just non-stop carpet bomb every single thing
Which is kind of where they're leaning into and kind of what israel's doing
The point though is that they have dug into this and planned for this exact kind of thing
The genocide included by the way, and that's nobody's fault other than the us and israel
But just think about what she is saying. They're desperate for a deal. This is not represented anywhere in the conversation
Literally hour by hour
following president trump june 2025
That's why you're beginning to see the regime look for an exit ramp. They recognize and that that's demonstrated by
Trump offering a plan that they flatly deny twice
Because that just perfectly makes sense being crushed their ability to attack american and ally forces
As well as their ability to defend their own territory is dwindling dwindling. Okay, but yeah
Defending maybe but not in the sense of what we're talking about on the ground because they are effectively largely defending
But their ability to attack they keep trying to sell you on the idea that there's dwindle losing every day
Even the corporate media is admitting. That's just not true. That's why they keep lying
You know the answer. I mean there's the most logical answer anyway weakness
Literally hour by hour
Following president trump's powerful threat on saturday evening. It was made clear to the united states that iran wanted to talk
Oh, yeah
Is powerful threat that they laughed at they've literally laughed at you guys they sent videos now again
You could argue that's bluster and even behind the scenes. Maybe they're cowering and wanting a deal. That's possible
I I don't know why we would take it to face value and again the physical reality does not back that up
President trump is willing to listen as president trump announced on monday
The united states has been engaged over the last three days in productive conversations
Which led the president to temporarily instruct the department of war to postpone plan strikes against iranian power plants
And oh crimes by the way massive crimes
But what she just talked about was that supposed secret defector point
But that's not what we're dealing with today
So I kind of get the sense
They're just trying to mash those things together and hope that we don't catch on the energy infrastructure only
But yeah, here's eric whole we did it we won they're over they're losing and tomorrow
It'll be something else and whatever they said was breaking news
Obliterated is very clear as I said before destroyed so thoroughly as to be unrecognizable imperceptible. It means it is gone
Not a say, you know annihilation is a good now and
A synonym
It just means it's it's completely ceases to exist and so you can't again
You could make it more, you know being too specific, but those are words he used its words. He's repeatedly stressed
And then used again and the blitter and then they're bombing when we obliterated them and then they're bombing
You know, it's like it's just we have to laugh at how dumb that is
Well, exactly and then here is an even more ridiculous thing that she just said
But it trump dud is not bluff and he is prepared to unleash hell
Iran should not miscalculate again their last mix miscalculation cost them their senior leadership
Their navy their air force and their air defense system
Any violence beyond this point will be because the iranian regime refused to understand
They have already been defeated and refused to come to a deal
Oh, okay. I guess they just they're not aware
They they're stop firing your rockets Iran. You've already stopped the ability to fire them
Didn't you hear that demi you learned that you're not capable of doing the thing that you're doing right now
Stop you've lost already
I just don't understand where they think this is going
You know, you could genuinely argue this is just incompetence and somehow they are winning and they just don't know
How to relay that to you kind of would make sense
but my god
And also just take note of her like literally reading line to line and like stumbling her words
These people are off their balance guys. We have to be able to see that
I just think this is I mean the ideal they got to play that again force and their air defense system
Any violence beyond this point will be because the iranian regime refused to understand they have already been defeated
Yeah, you've already you've already lost
Makes sense right as demonstrated by their repeated attacks as demonstrated by their continued deals returned to you
As demonstrated by your continued a capitulation to them
I just think this is crazy. I you know, I all I'm trying to highlight today is the
Obviousness of where it all points
I was clear in the beginning that I don't think this is definitive at all
But I think it's very clear where most of this is leaning now to end in general the idea of where this is going to go
It seems as Nathan points out we went from no more wars to fox news showing where us troops are going to invade Iran
That's what they're showing guys
I mean, it's they're just normalizing this this is this is important to see this is where it's going
They're trying to get you okay with this possibility take it on the chin, right? It's what they're actually saying
Okay gas prices are going up. It's okay. We you know got it. It's okay to stop the nuclear bomb
That's not what's happening
True stream media says this is like a test to see how far people who have been propagandized their entire lives
Can be driven to support their own demise
Gleam Greenwald
Bombing somewhere and then waiting for rescue workers to and first responders to show up to also bomb them is called a double tap
We've talked about this for a long time. It happened a lot in south in Yemen, Saudi Arabia
It happened a lot in Syria. It happened a lot in Gaza and we covered and you know, gee, can you find the correlation there?
It's it's one of the worst in my mind war crimes what you're doing
Is you are bombing a location in fact, have you seen a
I'm forget the name of the movie now
Anyway, the point is, you know bomb a location
with the intention of drawing in
the medical workers
And then you really bomb them
They do this this I mean
Israel has policy names for these things like the De Hire doctrine or mowing the lawn or they do they've literally write down
Why this is supposed it's about maximizing the psychological terror
It's about the harm to children and women. I mean they write about these things
In this case us drones and this is from 13 years ago. This is just glenn speaking with the guardian
us drone strike target
Strikes target rescuers in pakistan and the west stays silent
reports
From the 25th from Tehran that us and israel struck a rescue site while rescue workers were trying to clear the rubble from the site
Previously struck by us and israel
Now these are reports
But if you understand that they have I mean my entire life every war they've ever been involved in either one of them
They have done this
Verifiably as that's why that's why glenn is showing you this because it is something that has done
They've done before and it's happening again
That's the people we're dealing with here guys. That's who they are
Now if you haven't seen this effective april 20th
As steve pointed out interestingly doing this on the I guess the you know kind of an unofficial cannabis holiday
The us army is increasing the maximum enlistment age from 34
to 42
And eliminating waiver requirements for a single conviction of marijuana
interesting
Well, see because how that's not the idea that that's ever most most states in this country have already agreed that it should be recreational
Like they're like giving you something that they should have already done legally a long time ago
But the point about that is not even giving you anything. We're only saying we just want to conviction will ignore
We'll still convict you for care of cannabis though
How dumb that is
But they're in look think how insane this is you're increasing it by eight years
right
I mean you are literally
I mean that if you understand what this means by the way, this is like the select service point
You are saying that people can now be drafted up until they're 42 years old
It always from a former member it used to be something like
um
Oh, well, I mean this does say enlistment age
But understand that that does overlap with the the idea of if if and when a draft is to come to play
That's when that that's where that comes from the point though
Is that it used to be something like 25 or long it's because of the obvious point
Now you got 42 year olds going to war that doesn't seem like it makes much sense for most average 42 year olds
But either way, what do you think this suggests?
Was this is just the peace president?
Is this what winning looks like or is this the obvious implication that we may be going to the very war?
You all swore would never happen if we voted for trump
that
dave de camp also points out
That or rather mayor lee hill points out that the house republican who chairs the arm service committee after a classified wrong briefing
Said the trump admin is not giving congress enough information about plans for the u.s. troop to middle east
So that's what i was saying earlier that i think i said intelligence, but it's the arm services committee
Classified briefings was there they're supposed to be informed about what's going on
Because otherwise you just have executive branch that we're going to ever at once which guess what guys
That's where we have been for a long time mic rogers just out of a classified briefing on ron said the pentagon isn't providing enough information
about the administration's plans in the middle east in particular
troop movements
We want to know more about what's going on what the options are and why they're being considered he told reporters
And we're just not getting enough answers on those questions
Dave de camp says seems significant
Yeah, you know why because why is they're literally talking about deployment right now
Fox notes is talking about where they're going to go in ron and as i've been telling you
There are already elements that have been deployed. They told you this already in fact
But we know the Kurds are there we know that there was elements of this long before this including intelligence
in this case
If we haven't come to terms with the fact that this is actually happening
Everything you were promised has been lied about
Yeah, you could be talking to people that voted for biden
You could talk to people that voted for trump for obama or bush the same point applies
Guy should say everything but the point is that these people are always giving you what they think you want to hear
And they always seem to be aiming in the same direction until we can come to terms with that
This will continue to be the case
The u.s. Is deploying thousands of marines to the middle east. Here's what they could be used for
Nobody supports this guys not even there. I mean other than the team sport players and you know people in pay to say so
Most republicans are adamantly against this including the war itself
As ryan grimp points out israeli media now reporting that net and yahoo expects a ceasefire announcement from trump this saturday
Translation ground invasion coming this weekend
Now it's kind of a joke
but not
Because this is what happens every time. That's what iran's telling you every time. They mean well
Let's come meet for a negotiation and they bomb them in lebanon's meet for negotiation. They kill kamini
Let's come on. Come on. Solani. Let's talk about p. So it's what they offered him and they bombed him in the iraq airport
It's what they do. It's not an accident
So
If you turn those be correct
Be important to talk about
Lastly two things i want you to think about on the way out
brian is really just this one for the most part of brian bearletic
Post to this this put this post out the quote blame israel strategy
Is part of years of u.s. Policy making regarding a united states war on ron
Now this is very much worth your time and he's really referencing the witchpat the persia document. We've covered a lot
What's important about this is there are elements that you can hear that you can see this
But just because it's written down from one think tank or plenty about the idea of how to frame this as israel's fault
Does not necessarily mean that that's that israel is not influencing if not controlling u.s. Policy it could
But what he really gets at is it's sort of the other way around that israel's us proxy
And a lot of people make that argument look in my mind either way you look at it. It's the same issue
Different but the same problem we're dealing with right
So I think it's still nonetheless worth hearing this and considering this
You know what I think I think the evidence is pretty clear
But it's worth considering with maybe i'm missing something
I maybe there's a different way to look at it and consider whether or not this is like i've been talking about
This is why i'm often trying to point out that demonstrating our value the objectivity we offer because very few do that
That it's possible right that this is what you know the the idea that israel tricked trump
It was just to get people the out to say we knew trump was not the one and that's what glenn beck is doing
That's what alex jones is doing right surprise surprise
so
Think about that and consider whether or not this might be a double-edged sword
Maybe it's one way or the other my mind is I think it's a little bit of both like I've said before
But I think you can clearly argue that there's love elements of this that show
And let's even sort of like this you could argue that israel is able to basically control us policy
But that they think tanks will still sit around and go look we can do this and then basically
Suggest that it's or israel and even that's not even that's not even inaccurate
You see my point, but there's a lot of ways you could look at it
All i'm saying is consider a different opinion and what brian is putting forward is is evidence-based and and worth your time to consider
and this is just people talking about the
You know where they perceive him being sort of missing the boat when it comes to the technocratic perspective
And I that you could consider that
I think it's important to consider the opinion regardless because it opens your mind to another way to look at things which is always in your interest
Being able to consider
Other opinions without fully adopting them is just simply a sign of intelligence
Now this one is something else somebody said to me
Straight theater is what it's called. Now. I'm not really familiar with the sub stack
But it's an interesting read and I do think it's worth your time
And all what it really gets into and I'll just read the opening. This was not a war
It was a restructuring exercise carried out under the cover of one
The us has done this before manufacture or accelerated crisis let the disruption clear the board
Then move in as the stable expensive alternative
Goal of tonkin or ak wmd's ukraine the pattern isn't new
What's new is the scale of the commercial infrastructure that was already waiting to absorb the outcome
Energy infrastructure was repositioned trade corridors were reset proxy liabilities were burned off
Market share was redistributed and the region's financial architecture was quietly re-engineered
While the public drowned in spectacle
The violence supplied the legal political and insurance rationale for outcomes already mapped in in filings planned documents
And funding commitments years before the first fake missile was launched
They call it a war. It was a business deal and they were all in on it now
I very much think it is worth your time to think about this
But as I just said
The idea for example that the you know before the fake missile was launched, you know
This exact opinion could be the the truth and there could also be a real war or just real missiles people dying
Like we talk about false flags could mean faked or it could mean
Actual people dying, but it's still just it's a manipulated situation. You're blaming it on somebody else
Those people do not have qualms about killing innocent people guys
But also the idea that everyone was in on it, right? Maybe like I said at the beginning
It's certainly possible like with cova 19
We did get that insight that this is some kind of coordinated plan
But it's hard for me to remind around with everything we're seeing happen with what's being done by isreal
Like maybe this is the plan is reels the anomaly causing this to be a problem
So many ways you could look at it
All I want you to be able to consider is that this very well
May be something larger than just an ongoing war
Maybe even to the point to where it's all lack the dog and it's about the like I've been talking about
Reimagining of society the re-engineering of where this all goes
But as I said to end I do think there's middle little both
And I think that what you're seeing is very much what she's talking about
The planned out elements of how this would go
But I do still think that just like always there's internal divides. There are different agendas
There are people that maybe care more about their personnel the than than not and you there are differences
So consider both because I very much do think that what we're seeing is a transition
But I do think that the war is real
I think that there are people dying and I think that there are different agendas at play
And as Whitney would point out that there are different global agendas
There are different elements that ultimately want to control your life
They want to control your life your family your direction surveil you but they disagree on how to end up
Whether or maybe a religious science perspective or it's a technocratic perspective
Or maybe those are the same thing you can decide
But consider it
Because so many people out there want you to just take a side
Choose a discussion and just follow through
It's not in your interest
Question everything consider all possibilities because that argument is very sound
But you know, you could argue there's just parts that are added to it
So thank you for tuning in guys, you know, this is what we do here, right?
This is why you guys come here
It's why we continue to do this because there's so much out there that is trying to kind of trap you in these
ideological bubbles and false information front, you know, like basically
Algorithmically control the way you see things and just kind of trap you in these little false logic bubbles
Don't fall for it, right as long as you're willing to stand back and consider everything
Everything with an open mind
Even if you ultimately come back to the same point where you disagree with it, but openly consider it
Then they won't be able to trap you
We'll fall for it here and there
But if you keep doing it, you'll see it and you'll pull back and you will fall away from it
You will eventually stop falling for it in the first place. I would argue but
Just keep pushing because I believe strongly that we're watching this change and what we're watching play out
And I just mean from like I was right there more so an american perspective
That this is something that they're spinning out around like they're losing that control that shows us that we're having influence in the conversation
And I don't obviously want there to be
Negative consequences. I don't want people to be hurt. I don't want this to cause economic collapse
But it may be the reality regardless, unfortunately
I hope not and but if it is that's because of the people that we're trying to stop
The answer is not to let those broken people keep doing the problem because they've trapped us in the problem
Right, that's the same logic as trump and israel and whatever else that well
He had to fight from within to stop them from doing the worst thing
So the art the answer was to let them keep doing the thing
No guys, that's never the answer
never
I know you know that
Thank you for tuning in
I love you all as always question everything come to your own conclusions
Stay vigilant