Just a minute
I'm coming
Just a minute
Hello everybody, this is legal man. Welcome to show. This is gonna be a good episode
I'm going to make kind of an epilogue to my ratification series. This is part one
There will be a part two and I just want to talk about something that came up with regards to the way the
Constitution is referenced
Always conflating the Bill of Rights with the Constitution as though they're one single document
Or as though they were created by the same men and it's just absolutely not the case and for people who don't know me
I'm a lawyer practice for more than 35 years. I'm America's most trusted beloved lawyer
Because I tell people truth and the truth is I was a constitutional conservative for years and years and years
I believed all the same stupid shit that I've blown apart now
But I believed it all ran around defending it supporting it pretending like the document was amazing and the founders were brilliant
Liberty seekers and all this other crap. I did that for years and years and then about 25 years ago
I got the internet and in fairly short order. I started figuring out that that's a complete scam
It's a grift to keep me on a tax-paying plantation
I want to figure that out
I became self-certified as a master practitioner and I don't need constitutional conservatism anymore
I've also given myself a lifetime achievement award for the hundreds and hundreds of timeless podcasts
I've made explaining the way the system actually works. I got a presidential medal of freedom for playing mr
Jones in Jones Plantation and I got a
Nobel Peace Prize for helping to bring the world together when I played Natty in Bartom world
And I love having these ridiculous fake awards and credentials because that entire system is a control system
You see what they do is they force people to memorize officialdom and regurgitate it
And if you don't do that properly then you can't get licensed or certified or get a lifetime achievement award
And the catch is that all the officialdom is a huge pack of lies
And so the way they get people to just regurgitate lies and memorize lies and imagine that the lies are true
Is by having all the experts have to speak nothing but lies in order to be credentialed
And everybody saw that during coveted when certain doctors nurses and academics attempted to speak up tell the truth
Well, they tried to go after them professionally and ruin them destroy them shut them down
Why because you can't speak the truth because the system can't withstand any truth
It can't withstand anybody scrutinizing it because it's just built on just a huge pack of lies
And so they have this system and so I like to make fun of that system and mock it in the attempt
To try to help people understand it and see through it
And then maybe we have a chance of course through years of making podcasts and interacting with the public
It's become clear to me that we aren't ever going to get the people we need
But at least a few people who are searching can at least find some helpful information
And that's why this information is out there. So
All right, enough about all that. Let's go ahead and get this show going
So I want to make a show today. It's kind of an epilogue or maybe a post script to the ratification series
I did I had to look up epilogue to make sure that it even kind of applied. I think it does it's
It's something in between a post script and an epilogue
it's
Really just an idea that came to me as a result of hearing some of these
crazy different sort of videos one of which i'm going to make a show about and
You know, it's always the same thing with this whole constitution
brilliance
The founders the miracle of philadelphia the fantastic rights we got and all this other stuff
it's always there and
I had a thought about it and I got up one morning last weekend and I was doing some nosing around on the internet about it
And I determined that I've never really addressed this issue at all because I'd never really thought about it in these terms
And even though I've talked all around it
I'd never actually seen the connection between the way they talk about the constitution
And when they talk about the constitution
They mean the constitution
And the bill of rights
That's always pushed together as one thing. It's true that you'll get some technical thing in there about how the bill of rights were
You know the states insisted or they'll make some mention of it and then we got the bill of rights
But most of the time they're just shoved together
As one thing the constitution the bill of rights as though that's
This thing that our fantastic founders gave us
And after having done that long ratification series
It became clear to me as I thought about it that this is a very subtle but
unbelievably important and critically powerful piece of propaganda
To mush these things together
Because I was thinking what rights are there
That the constitution gave us and protected us with
And the answer is none
If you look at the actual constitution what actually came out of philadelphia
It has nothing to do with those bill of rights. I mean nothing at all
The constitution as it stands as a document doesn't protect anybody's rights whatsoever
The teeny little bit of rights it does protect
They only need protecting from the federal government
Because this new giant government was being formed
In place of the government that already existed that they were
Illegally and without any legitimate authority shoving through
But this point that the constitution is not the constitution that protects our rights
It's not this is an incredibly important feature of this propaganda scandal
And as I went through the thing and was looking at different ways to check it and see if I could find any
Citals and people talking about it. I came across some stuff with chat gpt
And this entire area this idea that the constitution is not the constitution and the bill of rights that protects you people's rights
Is really never discussed. I couldn't find any
Citations to it. I couldn't find any references to it. It's true
That they do distinguish them as far as the way it actually happened
But that's just quickly discussed and then all again the rest of the time they constantly conflate
The idea that the constitution is the constitution of the bill of rights
And it's really interesting to me because I tried to go through and find any actual rights that were being protected
By the constitution and there's just nothing in there. You'll hear people talking about the fantastic constitution
and the way the constitution is this kind of written document this genius of
Enlightenment to protect the people and liberties and all this other shit you hear it endlessly
And of course the way it works is they talk about the declaration of independence
All men are created equal and then they basically imply that we got this constitution to create a government to protect these fantastic rights
But none of that's true. See none of that is true at all
The document as presented by the holy founders it left everything out all of that was completely left out
In fact, it had to be forced in and the men in Philadelphia not only didn't put it in
They actually fought against it
They fought against it in the holy federalist papers
So when you hear these discussions all the time about the constitution protecting rights and individual liberty and all this
Shit which the con cons and everybody else just drones on about endlessly
You have to remember that that's not true at all
The document as it exists does nothing but create a gigantic federal government
That supposedly checks itself in this fantasy fashion
And of course I've discussed that at length the way the document doesn't work doesn't do anything they say
But this is a much subtler point. I think in my opinion
And I think it'll also become clear if you think back about the way
Even a health felter talked about it where it did this to protect the liberty and all this other shit
The constitution does none of those things people act like the bill of rights is part of the constitution. It's not
It's not part of the constitution. It's true that it supposedly later became part of the constitution as an amendment
But it's not part of the constitution that they created in philadelphia this miracle the founders worked on
In fact the founders fought against this and in the federalist papers. They said all sorts of things about that
They argued that the bill of rights wasn't necessary because the new government had limited powers imagine if we didn't have the bill of rights
If the federalists had carried the day they were running around acting like the federalists of these people who were fighting for liberty and freedom and
Montesquieu and fucking lock and all this
Individual this and that that's all shit
They argued that the constitution itself was so limited the way the federal government was created that it wasn't necessary
Even though they had stuck in all these barnum statements about necessary and proper to commerce clause and general welfare
And all this other miscellaneous shit in this massive taxing authority the ability to create this huge military
All the things I went through in that ratification series and showed you the way the articles of confederation worked
and of course the
Entire propaganda about the ratification
Is that we had to have this government protect our rights?
Of course you heard that in the helfelder and you're going to hear it in other ones
I'm going to play a few more clips not in this show, but in a totally separate show
Which was what sort of triggered me thinking about it
The federalists also argued that the structure of government itself will protect the liberty
That somehow the separation of powers and checks and balances and all this shit would somehow protect liberty
Well, they talk about this thing that no one person could ever be in charge of this
And they have to be checked and all this other shit
They leave out the fact that the way the constitution structured
There's two parties the government and the people they act like the government has three different parts
That are somehow at odds with each other. They aren't they all work together
So the government is the one thing the one entity that was in fact
Empowered to do all of it and anybody can see that's exactly what ends up happening in practice
This is exactly what the anti federalists said that you can't have it like this
The fucking federalists are the ones that argue we don't need any of these additional protections for liberty
And they insisted that somehow this separation of powers and made up checks and balances nonsense would be a safeguard
And then they also argued that the people themselves are the guardians of liberty
Well, the idea that somehow these elected officials can can somehow do something
Well, I've blown that apart a million different ways. So a spoon or showing your vote of shit. It doesn't work
You can't do anything with them. They don't have recall
They pulled the recall portions out of the arms of confederation when they wrote the constitution
That's where the real protection is they did all those different things in the constitution that they shouldn't have done
They made the federal government itself
Superior to the state governments. There's no reason the world the state governments would have ever agreed to this
There was absolutely not one single conflict going on where the states were challenging the federal government's powers
Under the articles of confederation
And there's absolutely nothing you can do to check the federal government. Everybody sees that in the civil war
Not only have they outlawed even discussing doing about it the only entity that's allowed to so-called
Check the federal government is the federal government itself
And if the states try to do it, they just bring the entire military in
What the anti-federalists said I think one of the best sort of
Summations of it was in the very first brutus essay and it said that the powers of congress are so extensive
And so undefined that there is no security for the liberty of the people
This constitution if established will totally annihilate the state governments
And place all power in the hands of a few men at the seat of government
Is that not exactly what the constitution actually does? Yes, it is it's exactly what the constitution does
And to talk about it in terms of protecting liberty and limiting government is laughable
Every single thing you ever hear about any of that is about the amendments
There are literally no
New rights protected you will hear people talk about it in these terms like helfelder and levin and all these
These fucking jokers it's on every side though. It's the liberals. It's everybody
They talk about rights being protected equal this and equal that and all men are created equal
They take that declaration of independence language
And then they take the
Intro to the constitution all we the people do this and that in order form a more perfect governed blah blah established this
That and then they break something out that doesn't do anything like what they just said and what they just said
Is in no way binding in any form or fashion
The only rights I can really find that are even in there that are supposedly being protected
Our habeas corpus. Well, you don't need that under the art of the confederation because they weren't doing it
The federal government doing that's left the states
Exposed facto laws there were no exposed facto laws being passed under the art of confederation
Neither could there be and the states themselves were the ones who were going to enforce any of this stuff
So they could always veto that shed
No titles of nobility. What a fucking joke the art of confederation you could have whoever you wanted in there
Wouldn't have mattered and trial by jury in criminal cases
Well, again, you don't have the art of confederation wasn't creating this massive
Behemoth of a federal government that was going to be running around trying everybody now
They have a department of justice created after the civil war once the states could no longer fight back
Running around suing people civilly criminally in a thousand different ways with absolutely
No consequence to them these federal judges who are completely out of control the congress totally out of control full on corruption everywhere
Nothing happens to any of them. See the constitution doesn't protect any of your rights
All of those rights already existed. They all existed in the state governments. They all had constitutions themselves
And I remember at health elder talking about how all while you have to have this to protect this now, dude
The state governments all protected them
They all protected them
It's so ridiculous
This idea we needed this federal government this constitution was drawn up in philadelphia to protect that's not true
She has fundamentally not true
Not only all those reasons i've given in the ratification series showing you that the way they got the
Document itself was laughable, but the document itself
Forget all the problems i pointed out. It doesn't fit in any way with protecting
people
It doesn't protect them at all
We needed the ninth and tenth amendments just to be sure and guess what the federal government has totally and completely ignored the
Ninth and tenth amendments just completely and totally ignored them
This part of the scam is so subtle yet so important
See they teach the history and the founding of this country as though you have this declaration of independence language
And then you have a government that was formed the constitution
To so-called uphold these ideals and protect the individuals and that is run together
endlessly
In every kind of movie and tv show and i don't think i'll get to it today, but i've got a bunch of examples to show people that
It's just all shoved together and that's why people imagine that the constitution protects freedoms. It doesn't
See it doesn't protect anything at all when it comes to the people and
Yet another hilarious thing they do is they constantly cite
The declaration of independence language about all men and created equal life liberty pursuit of happiness all this
inspirational aspirational moral horseshit
Revolutionary sounding stuff they put that in the declaration of independence
And then they leave out the fact that jefferson opposed the constitution
So they use jefferson's language about that then they leave out the fact that he opposed the constitution
He was an anti-federalist of course he got back on board later
And i'll get into some of that because he was just a man who recognized
Pragmatism what can you do?
What can you do? It's just like today. What are you going to do about the federal government once they won?
Once you realize they have all this power and all this money and they're just going to come arrest you
What are you going to do? There's nothing you can do
but the way the con works is
They teach this language that sounds so wonderful about how all men are created equal and then they immediately talk about the
Constitution fulfilling that ideal the system of government that enshrined those rights
And made them real and all this other shit. They talk about that endlessly
They always leave out the articles in federation and that's why and that's one of the reasons
I wanted to do that long ratification series and that's it was an important piece
It's not that i've never noticed that it's just that this way they conflate the constitution and the bill of rights is
So important because the constitution doesn't do anything whatsoever to enshrine any of those rights
But they teach it declaration of independence language
Constitution to protect all that no mention of the
articles in federation at all none whatsoever
No mention of the fact that declaration of independence is a completely different document that has literally no valid
binding legal effect under the constitution
None whatsoever and that the constitution as proposed by the holy founders was written in philadelphia
Well, how could they have all these discussions about natural rights and the ability to protect people and all this other shit
Like we're told at the constitutional convention, which i've now showed is just a total lie
There's absolutely no part of it actually occurred and then
Have a constitution that comes out that doesn't protect individual rights in any form or fashion
That the people themselves had to stand up object and say we're not even going to ratify this piece of shit
Even with their absurd system they had of steamrolling everybody. They still had to do it
They still had to
Give in and give these amendments, which then of course were immediately written out by the courts whenever they cared to
Whenever they cared to
They've actually used the first ten amendments as a sword
For the federal government to take control of state governments when the bill of rights
Was never intended to apply the states in any form or fashion and everybody knew that prior to the civil war
But once the civil war was fought it was over
Once the civil war was over that was it
Then they started this incorporation document started applying the first ten amendments
To the states themselves so that the federal government could once again start controlling everything from a centralized position
And
Jefferson wasn't even in the country when the constitution
Was written when this holy constitutional convention was convened, which it wasn't anyway
They were just supposed to go amend the articles of confederation. He wasn't even the country
He was in france. He had a lot of the back and forth with hamilton or
Some in one of these so-called holy founders
And he just talked about how the fact that he didn't trust this centralized federal government at all
And that he insisted on explicit protections that there are no actual protections for the individuals
And he wanted actual state control
He wanted the original artisan federation. There was nothing in there that makes any sense about expanding it out
I've showed you that again and again and again
I mean once he got into power once jefferson rally. Well, this is a done deal. Well, whatever
Let's at least get the first ten amendments get something in there
And then he just immediately joined government himself
Became president first became vice president all this other shit
Secretariat state or some other thing which as soon as he gets in there
He does the entire louisiana purchase which is laughably unconstitutional everybody knew it
I mean just think how important that is think
How few people have the slightest idea of anything i just said think how they teach it
Think what a total deception that is
Think how important that is because you think about the constitution. What do you immediately think you think of the founders
What do you think then you think of philadelphia and writing the constitution and all this
Amazing revolutionary shit with the equal protection and the declaration and all men created equal and all this other shit
Literally no part of that's in the constitution
No part of it whatsoever
And they actually
Continue this unbelievable fraud
By one step further they actually have put the declaration of independence into the u.s. Code which i've also brought up before
So they give this impression
That it's an organic law of the united states which is what they say specifically in there
It's right in the beginning of us code one
The declaration of independence
Makes it sound so foundational. Well, it's perfectly with this entire
Propaganda narrative about how the constitution was the culmination of this incredible
Enlightenment of protecting individuals that's completely the opposite
It was a coup that completely dislodged a government which was the art of the federation
Which was supposed to exist perpetually which is what it said inside the document
And wasn't supposed to be amended unless everybody agreed they just ignored all of that and shoved through this thing
With all this governmental power with these sort of vague discussions about how well it was a work and it's failing
Well, I've gone over that in detail in that series
But the impression lingers it remains because it's reinforced all the time the constitution means protection of liberty
And the first thing to do is they'll start talking about freedom of religion and speech and the search and seizure
None of that shits in the constitution, dude
None of it
They put that declaration of independence at the very start of the code
And then they have the audacity to outlaw doing
Anything in there in the declaration of independence or even discussing it. So the government that supposedly protects human rights
Has outlawed doing what the entire government was supposedly founded upon
Which was this universal principle that the individuals themselves have these rights given from god and whenever the problem rises
They have an absolute right to overthrow the government
And of course the courts back all of that up and convict people all the time
Of some kind of seditious plot to overthrow the government
You see in fact these mag idiots everywhere who are constantly talking about it. They post it all the time
All the time they post shit about all seditious conspiracy and attempt to overthrow it and all this treason and all this other shit
Well, I don't understand if the most fundamental organic law of this country
Which is the very first thing in the very first chapter of the very first code one of the u.s
Code is that the people have this independent right that comes from god and nobody can ever take it away
And there's certainly no government can and in fact the people have a duty and obligation to overthrow it
Whenever it does this how in the hell can that same government have outlawed it even discussing it
And how can a court that swears to uphold the constitution ever make sense of this?
Well, the constitution has nothing to do with this
It doesn't have anything to do with that and the declaration of independence is not a law of any sort
That's why
And every level of education teaches this lie
Every single level of education all the way through law school completely and totally
covers this shit up and just teaches this
odd strange very subtle way of having people believe that
The constitution itself
Somehow is there to protect people's rights
And it is unbelievable to me because it's so preposterous
If you just look at it you can see that there's nothing in there and any time you ask for any examples
They will start giving you stuff from the bill of rights
And the bill of rights was no part of the constitution
And in fact the same people who wrote the constitution are the people who objected to the bill of rights
So the people who objected to all these individual rights claiming they're already protected by this piece of shit document
They'd written in secret and we got the notes from 50 years later were the ones who were standing against it
It really be impossible to have a system that was much more upside down than what we have
It's funny to me it's it's hilarious to me and I looked up some of these examples that they use to teach people
And they have something called the Center for American Cytics
And it's a it supposedly teaches principles of this American Republic
And I'm sure Prager U has the same kind of garbage and I've got a couple of funny things
I'm going to make a show out of at least one of them for sure on this topic
But the thing they teach
Is that the U.S. Constitution creates a practical structure and rules for protecting the basic rights of all Americans
This is one of the standard things they teach in this American civics kind of the university
And in fact they even have a question I found in a quiz that says what does the constitution do
And it gives you a choice of answers
Sets up a government defines the parts and powers of the government protects basic rights of Americans
Those are supposedly the correct answers protect
Basic rights of Americans
Center for American Civics
Does that not sound exactly like everything you hear no part of that's true
That is a complete and total
Misrepresentation of the document the only way you get there is by conflating two totally separate things
The writing of the constitution by our holy founders and then the forcing on those men
Of the bill of rights in order to try to get some kind of limited protections for the people
And yet they act like the founders and their brilliance and wisdom
Gave us this anyone who listens to the constitutional conservatives will hear this shit
Anyone who listens to liberals will hear this same shit. This is what they agree on just like they agree on the civil war
That it was about slavery and it had to do this was bad and evil and blah blah and the government had to step in
All of a sudden just to complete fucking lives
Here's another thing they said at that same institution the constitution creates a former government
We have a federal republic the u.s. Constitution supreme law the land
Establishing the federal government defining government's powers and protecting the basic rights of all americans
It doesn't protect the basic rights of any americans
It created a complete fucking coup and a massive federal government and it doesn't protect any
Even though the idea that the constitution
With the bill of rights does okay, there's no statement that the constitution
That as it was originally ratified did not do that
He remember took two more years to get the other one through
And that was after they were fighting about it. It became obvious. They were never going to get it fully ratified
They didn't have the bill of rights
I just think how absurdly uh
Misrepresentative that is misleading intentionally so see intentionally so because
Again, I don't think I'll get to it in this in fact. I know I won't get to it in this episode
But I had a lot of chats with chat gpt
And it turns out that arrow area is one of the most closely curated areas in the entire set of chat gpt
Information they never want to give you information and when I do that episode
You're going to see how funny it is how chat gpt will lock down and not tell you this
But there are other things I looked at as far as teaching tools
This is something called open stacks, which is uh us history textbooks very very commonly used
And in the sort of opening introductory chapter on the constitution
It says that we the people secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves in our posterity
This is the the language in the preamble. That's not part of it in another section
It talks about how the constitution guaranteed a right to vote for some citizens with the 14th amendment
Okay. Well, that's again. That's literally a hundred years afterwards
And as usual the preamble is talked about how it's used to secure this liberty
Which of course is always tied back to this we the people from the declaration of independence
Here's another one I found which was the asu civic literacy curriculum
And it's under the systems of government section. It says the constitution uses three basic techniques to guarantee liberty
It doesn't use any of them first federalism divides power
It doesn't use that we had the article from federation. It already was there
Second the separation of powers checks and balances again
This is a complete misstatement all the powers in the hands of one entity the federal government
There's no such thing as a check and balance a separation of power
Separation of power comes between two different types of governments two different entities
The holy enlightenment makes that very clear that one man can't be entrusted. Okay
So they did entrust in effect one man the u.s. Government
All three branches are being paid by the same taxes
And the last thing it says and there's third
Constitutional rights, especially in the bill of rights 14th amendment article 1 and section 9 and 10
Individual liberties no government can infringe. Well, the articles of confederation
Didn't have a government strong enough at the federal level to do that stuff
They weren't going to be able to infringe anybody the way it was set up. Those were real checks and balances
None of these bills of rights or the constitution
These aren't constitutional rights that were set up. These are rights that were insisted on in order to check the
Constitution colliam constitutional rights is just hilarious to me. It's just a very clever way. They do it
They merge all together this federalism separation of powers constitutional rights as though the constitution did something to guarantee liberty
And it didn't do anything to guarantee liberty
It did the exact opposite
It did the exact opposite. That's what's so
Funny to me and when I realized wow, this is such a seriously important
type of brainwashing that's being used because
It's everywhere. It's so insanely everywhere that there's a meme that runs around all the time
That says that the constitution that formed our government gives us the right to overthrow it
Say that all the time they talk about how our own constitution that formed our government
Gives us the right to overthrow it. That's how
totally and completely brainwashed people are by this very subtle conflation of
The idea of the bill of rights with the constitution
And the founders and how it was created back to the Declaration of Independence to protect all these rights
When they skip over the articles of confederation
That's how it works
That's the scam and that's why it's so heavily protected
It's so incredibly heavily protected. It's mind bending the
Discussion I had with chat gbt, which I'm going to do a show about
Had all these different things I was getting these weird answers
And that was when I first started looking into just trying to do really just noodling around trying to find a little bit of information about
You know, who else talks about this because again, I've never seen anybody talking about this
This was another area and the reason I decided to make this epilogue
Of this entire ratification process, which is never
Disgust
Nobody has ever done a series like I did. Nobody has ever talked about it
I've looked for 25 years on the internet for every kind of different conspiracy and
Miscellaneous thing and spoon arrest this and that nobody covers this
Nobody covers this conflation and how important it is
To absolutely 100 brainwash tie the people's thoughts of the constitution to protecting your rights
Protecting the rights of people they talk about it all the time anybody who just thinks about it for a moment
Well realize all the different times you've heard this of the different people that call in from shows
Every kind of tv show every kind of movie entertainment and in fact next time I'm going to go through some of the examples that I had
And pulled up and had chat gbt pull up some of these different examples from movies and television shows
About the way they impressed this stuff on people and how they
Brainwash the people with this concept so that nobody ever catches on that hold it the constitution screwed us
It didn't protect jack shit this idea that it was some kind of amazing document from the enlightenment era to protect individuals is laughable
Every structural thing it put in there with regards to so-called keeping the government limited
Obviously none of them work. They obviously don't work with the largest government the world's ever seen
How can a document like that be the route from which the largest government ever existed has sprung
The federal government literally controls any and every part of your life it cares to it just takes it all over
You have no rights against it the courts themselves just eliminate them whenever they care to
Literally every part of it stood on its head
But still the people can't see it because the brainwashing always with the brainwash
We had the declaration of independence
We had the right to life liberty to pursue the happiness all men are created equal and it was an aspirational thing
It wasn't perfect, but it still protected rights greater than anybody had ever had bullshit
The people had all these rights protected in their state governments
The federal constitution came in and trampled all that shit and the people even the little resistances
They were able to put up. They understood that this was hugely dangerous
What was going on instead all of that has been completely whitewashed and rewritten as every side continues to produce
The same exact kind of propaganda around they totally completely circle the wagons close ranks whatever else you want to say
About defending the constitution being this amazing miracle document
Written during the enlightenment in order to protect individuals and everything else
Yet when you see that that's not the case now again
The blindfold comes off and you see the nature of the very insidious brainwash that's gone on about that document
The document all the constitution meaning the constitution and the bill of rights
Uh, those are completely separate documents that are just as different as the declaration of independence and the constitution are
They stand in opposition to each other
The bill of rights is a check an attempted check a desperate last minute check to try to
Check the federal government that the constitution was creating
This is insane behemoth that was just going to run on and control everybody's lives
Which of course is exactly what it went on and did and all of those rights you have every single one of them
Just been eviscerated the second amendment. There's a thousand different regulations around your first amendment. Good luck
Your right to seek a redress of grievances against the government all completely gone
They dreamed up all this different miscellaneous shit sovereign immunity and everything else
The declaration of independence the right to stand up to the government all completely gone all the rights that matter
They're all just gone people
They completely abuse you with an income tax. They have no right to enforce
They have a department of justice with thousands of lawyers running or harassing you
filing bullshit cases no consequence at all to them the federal government does whatever they want
It's not a document that protects individual liberty. It never was
You don't even have to make an argument about well, you we think is this no read the document
They will try to read the document with the second set of documents
Which is the bill of rights, which was a totally separate set of documents that was designed to try to check
The insanity that had just been created
And it didn't work anyway, but they want credit for it
I defy anyone to find a discussion
That's a discussion about the founding of this country that doesn't conflate those two and talk about the founders
Protecting liberty and everything else with the implication that the bill of rights was somehow part of our founding
I defy you to find one
Nobody ever tells the truth about this
They can't and like I said in the next episode on this epilogue
I'm going to get into that conversation. I had with chat gpt and you'll see
That it's so heavily curated and now you know why
And honestly, I was really surprised when I woke up one morning and realized well, you know, I never really thought about that
But that is a huge issue and I started noodling around in there because it's really a very subtle piece of propaganda
But it's critical absolutely critical to the overall story
They tell and anybody can look around and see the way the united states constitution has talked about
Anybody any politician
Anybody any celebrity they'll get onto twitter everybody talks about the freedom of liberty and all this shit that it created
It didn't do any of those things
It really literally didn't do any of it literally did the opposite
It literally did the opposite
Which is always the case. This is why I have that 179 club
It's every single thing I ever look into it's always the same. It's 179 degrees off
They're as close to 180 degrees as they ever can be on every one of these narratives because every single narrative is just alive because the entire system
Is just such an incredible pack of lives
It's just a way for a very small group of people to brainwash the mobs and then to run them like tax cattle
So they can just do whatever the hell they want and anybody can look around and see that's the case
Anybody can look around and see that's the case
I've told people in again and again about the income tax that you're not even allowed to argue about it
If you try and even bring up perfectly legitimate questions
It's just immediately labeled as a frivolous claim
The government will never have to respond to it in any kind of substantive fashion
And you will be sanctioned and that's it the case will be dismissed
And you'll be lucky not to have to pay some kind of fine
And if you're a lawyer you're probably going to get uh
Your license yanked if you file in federal court you won't be able to file in federal court anymore
So don't tell me about the freedom machine
It's not there
it's not there
so
So I wanted to make that show and like I said, this is the epilogue. It's kind of part one
I think it's probably going to have two parts. That's what it's going to do
I think I'll be able to wrap it all up the next one
And I wanted to bring this out and I hope people think about it and I would love to hear
Some examples that actually do talk about the constitution in an honest fashion and don't conflate it with the bill of rights
And don't conflate it with the declaration of independence
I would love to because I haven't found any and when I started thinking about every single interaction
I ever think about hearing and remembering
It's always the same and honestly
I used to fight against the idea that the constitution it didn't protect your rights
It didn't do shit. Well, not because I wasn't thinking of only the constitution
I was even conflating in my own mind
But I was also going that next step because I know that the bill of rights also doesn't protect jack shit
So in my mind, I was doing that. I wasn't distinguishing them
But to me it's such a stronger argument to simply point out that the constitution
Doesn't have the bill of rights. That's a separate document that was presented to protect people from the constitution
Uh
I'm telling you there's never any end. There's no bottom to the lies that the people live among. There's just none. So
All right, well, that's all I wanted to say about that today because it will take much too long
In order to get into any other topics on this and I will do that
Like I said in the part two of this epilogue
Or post script, whatever you want to call it
So if you want to follow me, you can I'm legal man at us crime review on twitter if you didn't know I had twitter
Thank you everybody in patreon
I hope you've enjoyed this whole elucidation of the ratification. It really that whole thing
I decided to do about the anti-federalist just ballooned into something that was
Really quite surprising even to me and this was yet another surprise that came up
That was just percolating in my mind for
A couple of months and then just kind of clarified and came together and crystallized
So thank you to everybody in patreon. I hope you enjoy the show
Thank you for kicking a little bit of coin into the quash empire make it worth my time to even bother making it
Otherwise, I would just be telling my friends about this stuff and that's it
Oh and uh, hopefully people are still enjoying barnum world looks like
We got some type of a hat tip from the 10 foil hat podcast last time
I looked it was gathering about a thousand people a day again
So, you know it just keeps percolating like that at some point
It's going to have some kind of viral event. It will if it just keeps doing that kind of thing
So I hope people enjoy that. I really enjoy that movie
It's uh, it's a little hardcore
But I think it was necessarily so and there's enough humor in there that I think it's fine
I look at the comments periodically and the over overwhelming number of them are very very positive people enjoy the movie
So thank you to everybody who made that possible. I hope you guys are glad you did ship some money and make that happen
And beyond that, I don't have anything else. I'm gonna go ahead and wrap it up
You guys have been a great audience as usual. Everybody. Have a nice night today wherever you are
Take care. Thank you everybody
Get to take your serves away