You look at this guy and you're like, who are you? Seriously? Who are you? What is this?
It's actually scary. It's actually disturbing. You are a demonic force. You are a liar. You are
diabolical. You are a traitor. President Trump is the most courageous commander-in-chief in
modern American history. There is no question about this. What he just did is the bravest
move by a president of the United States of my lifetime, bar none without a doubt.
That's it. That's all you got left, President Trump. You got Ben Shapiro and Randy Fine and Ted Cruz
and Lindsey Graham. Just Laura Loomer. You got just a cast of high prestige,
very moral, deeply principled people are in your corner. That's what you got left. Great
decision. You just look at Trump and you're filled with disgust. You look at him. He's a
totally diminished figure. Watching him on Friday declare this war in his sad little hat,
no tie with a black curtain. He's 80 years old. He doesn't even care. He's at a ceremony today
pinning a medal on a soldier, slurring his words, stumbling over his speech. You look at this guy
and you're like, who are you? Seriously, who are you? What is this? It's actually scary.
It's actually disturbing. You look at Trump and it's like, I don't know you. I don't know who
you are. I don't know what you are. You are demonic. You are a demonic force.
And what's really freaky is now he's always talking about going to heaven. I'm not going to heaven.
Yeah, I think you might be right about that because you are a demonic force. You are a liar.
You are diabolical. You are a traitor. No, I'm not going to pretend that Trump has lost
all of his support. But I got to say, when I'm watching them do these press conferences or
just any sort of news piece or news hit, it's as if he's a shell of himself.
It genuinely doesn't seem as if he's got whatever that magic that he had for a lot of years. And
despite the fact that I wasn't his biggest fan, he had it. He lost it over the past year. It's
gone. It's so obvious if you just look at him the way he talks, the fact that he's basically
cordoned himself off from all of his critics. And he's literally after the bombing campaign began.
One of the first calls he made was to Laura Loomer, Laura Loomer, who could not find
something wrong with Trump's decision making. If he were to drop a nuke on Las Vegas,
I mean, she would never criticize this guy. That's who he now has in the media sphere
that he's talking to. Laura Loomer. Operation Epic Fury will continue and the president and
his administration are getting sick and tired of the woke right. And they're far violations.
They're low hacked violations. And I have a feeling that we're going to see the hammer drop
pretty hard on Tucker Carlson and Macon Kelly and others very soon. Because these people are
saboteurs. They are operatives. They are trying to sabotage President Trump and the MAGA
movement. And for our own national security, we can't allow for these people to continue.
I mean, look, they have a First Amendment right to say it, but eventually they need to
be held accountable, whether legally accountable or they need to be forced to register with Farah.
I mean, this is how inverted the world has become that you have people who are
pretty clearly on foreign payrolls. Now accusing Tucker Carlson and Macon Kelly,
basically two of the maybe five or 10 media people on the right wing that are so popular,
they actually don't have to sell out that actually produce that have such an immense audience that
they don't have to say things they don't believe in to maintain that audience that they get to
actually have dissenting viewpoints. They don't actually have to carry water for whatever
administration's in power. Yeah, they're the people that now have to register under Farah.
Not Laura Loomer. No, no, no. Tucker Carlson and Macon Kelly, they are violating Farah. I mean,
but here's the good news. We do have other people in Trump's cabinet that are being a
little bit too forthright, actually. There absolutely was an imminent threat. And the
imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked and we believed they would be
attacked, that they would immediately come after us. And we were not going to sit there
and absorb a blow before we responded because the Department of War assessed that if we waited for
them to hit us first after they were attacked and by someone else Israel attacked them,
they hit us first and we waited for them to hit us. We would suffer more casualties and more deaths.
We went proactively in a defensive way to prevent them from inflicting higher damage.
Have we not done so? There would have been hearings on Capitol Hill about how we knew that
this was going to happen and we didn't act preemptively to prevent more casualties.
That was the sound bite heard around the world. That was one of the first times in my lifetime
where it has been admitted so overtly that in fact, the tail is wagging the dock. That in fact,
Israel, this small country the size of New Jersey that everybody says doesn't have much power and
certainly doesn't control our government. Well, they are the ones that dictated how this war
was carried out and when it began. And Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State,
said it explicitly. Now, many in the White House have come out and said that's not accurate and
they're blah, blah, blah. Yeah, that's exactly accurate. That's exactly how it played out.
Just to reiterate and clarify the point he's making there, we have military bases
all throughout the Middle East. Why do we have those military bases in the Middle East?
Well, it's obviously for some of our own purposes when it comes to global trade and
things of that nature, but it's largely, being honest, it's largely about defending Israel
and Israeli interests. So what Marco Rubio is saying there pretty explicitly is that
Israel says jump and we say how high, sir. And this is obviously jarring for people who are
not already kind of aware of this dynamic that think that in fact, yes, Israel is just our
aircraft carrier in the Middle East, as John McCain and others have described it.
When in truth, it doesn't appear to be exactly that. And how does it? It appears to be much more
fraught, much more subservient, much more dominatrix-y. Rubio didn't just have that one screw
up. He also said this. They are producing by some estimates over 100 of these missiles a month.
Compare that to the six or seven interceptors that can be built a month. They can build
a hundred of these a month, not to mention the thousands of one-way attack drones that they also
have. So while it's obviously true that the United States is a far superior military might
compared to Iran, the reality is, is that when it comes to hometown defense and when it comes to
insurgencies, it's a totally different dynamic. Just as Afghanistan and Iraq were totally outmanned,
it was it didn't exactly go smoothly. Now did it? So it's the same dynamic that we're
looking at in Iran, only difference being that it's actually a much more serious and legitimate
military. It's also a much larger, more populous country with 90 million people. And yeah, it's
probably not going to go any better than those other two examples. And it's not just me feeling
this way. This is Eric Prince, the founder of Blackwater, who had this to say to Steve Bannon.
Because I know the president respects your opinion. If you had a chance to talk to
the president today, what would be Eric Prince's recommendations to the commander-in-chief?
Don't ever contemplate ground troops in Iran.
You think that's even a possibility?
I didn't think this was a possibility today. Over the last couple of days, Steve,
I didn't really think that he was going to do it.
Well, that's exactly right. I didn't think that this was likely to happen. And now that
it has, I have to consider that maybe it is possible that Trump is crazy enough to actually put
troops on the ground. But I want to rewind back to that point that Marco Rubio made.
He's saying that they can produce 100 of their own missiles for every six or seven
interceptor missiles that the US and Israel produces. The math ain't mathen, as they say.
It is inevitable that they can overwhelm us because the production capacity is too high.
We don't have production capacity. So much so. This is true. There is, in fact, a movement right
now to try and acquire interceptor missiles from Ukraine, another one of our proxies.
We're now going hat in hand after giving hundreds of billions of dollars for their war against
Russia. We're now saying, hey, can we have some of your missiles as if they're not actively in
an existential war themselves? I mean, it's just mind blowing how unbelievably naive
this government is and every government in my lifetime has been about the Middle East.
And they've just put us right back in the thick of it again. I am more fearful than ever
after this briefing that we may be putting boots on the ground and that
troops from the United States may be necessary to accomplish
objectives that the administration seems to have. But I also am no more clear on what the
priorities are going to be of the administration going forward, whether it is destroying the
nuclear capacity of Iran or simply the missiles or regime change or stopping terrorist
activities. Now, mind you, I don't agree with Senator Blumenthal on basically anything and
the Senate is filled with scumbags. They had an opportunity to force a war powers resolution
and they voted against it. So they are essentially keeping their hands clean. Well,
in fact, they're soaked in blood just like the Trump administration. So these people are
cowards, but it doesn't change the fact that it's not just him. It's not just the Democrats
who are saying this. You also have congressional reps on the Republican side, obviously
Massey saying it, but also Tim Burchett is saying it. They don't have any clarity as to
what we're actually doing here. They really don't know what the mission is. The mission has evolved
from, OK, we're going to just prevent Iran from producing a nuclear weapon, which was obviously
laughable given that the IAEA has already said that they weren't producing one given that
our own intelligence reports, according to Tulsi Gabbard earlier last year, said the same
thing. Don't let those little details bother you. Then after we obliterated their nuclear
facilities and the tons and elsewhere, we've now evolved our negotiating stance or our demands,
I should say to them having no ballistic missile capacity either. So essentially we're saying that
Iran, a nation of 90 million people can have no defense whatsoever. Coming from the same camp
who has said ad nauseum for years now, Israel has a right to defend itself. Well, does Iran not have a
right? Apparently not. That was the negotiating offer ultimatum that was given to the Iranians
before the decapitation strikes began, which tells you everything you need to know that this war
was obligatory. This war was chosen prior to those negotiations even occurring because
there's no one in their right mind that would expect the Iranians to ever accept a deal
that says, hey, trust us. Sure, we were in peace negotiations with you just eight months ago and
you decided to decapitation strike us then. But now we're going to agree to your terms
and get rid of our entire ballistic arsenal on top of our nuclear program, which wasn't
actually producing a nuclear weapon. We're just going to get rid of everything so that Israel,
who has been at war with six fucking countries over the past three years,
can just do whatever they want to us at their will. I'm sure that that was a reasonable ask to
be made if you aren't thinking at all, which the obvious conclusion you ought to be coming to
is that, in fact, that was the plan all along. This war was granted. It was a given,
and in my opinion, it was obviously decided even before Trump won back the White House.
This was going to happen no matter what, but that didn't stop J.D. Vance from telling Tim Dillon
in 2024 this. So obviously, you know, Israel has the right to defend itself, but America's
interest is sometimes going to be distinct. Like sometimes we're going to have overlapping
interests and sometimes we're going to have distinct interests. And our interest, I think
very much is in not going to war with Iran, right? It would be huge distraction of resources.
It would be massively expensive to our country. They've pursued the pathway that has prolonged
the war as long as possible, which is bad for Israel. And they seem to be sort of
sleepwalking us into war with Iran. It's like the dumbest of all possible worlds.
So J.D. Vance on the campaign trail going to war in Iran would be hugely against our
interests. And we have very distinct interests that are occasionally separate from Israel.
No, we fucking do not ever when it comes to foreign policy. We do not have any distinct
interests. And honestly, when it comes to domestic policy, given the hate speech laws and things
that we pass and the fact that immigration enforcement seems to be targeted primarily
towards people who are critical of Israel, it starts to feel as if, yeah, we don't have
much autonomy or sovereignty when it comes to domestic policymaking, either not just foreign
policy or warmaking policy. And I'm not the only one that's noticed this. Our military veterans
actually have kind of caught on over the past couple decades. Israel is the reason for this war.
America does not want to fight this war for Israel. Let's go. Come on. Let's go.
America does not want to stop its sons and daughters to war for Israel. Your ability
to name that shows you have lived it as leaders. This is wrong. And nobody wants to fight as a
Marine and stand up for America. Sir, thank you for your service.
The Senator broke his hand.
United States Marine veteran Sergeant Brian McKinnis saying very loudly and very clearly
that no one wants to fight for Israel right before his left arm is broken in half.
And in fact, his arm was broken in part thanks to Capitol Police, as well as
Tim Sheehy, a United States Senator, federal level Senator out of the state of Montana,
who is dragging him very violently out of that room. And I just got to say,
despite the fact that it's, I mean, that video is tragic beyond words.
The primary takeaway I have aside from that is that I have never seen anything
more symbolic or poetic, such a tight encapsulation that describes so perfectly
exactly what our government is structured to do, what our foreign policy is,
that our own warfighters, a man who could have his arm pinned in a door as he's screaming,
no one wants to fight for Israel. And you could have a United States Senator
dragging him the opposite direction and have his arm snap in half and the United
States Marine doesn't bat a fucking eye.
His arm is broken in half and he is unfazed entirely. That is a level of dedication.
That is a warfighter. Those are the men that you ought to actually respect.
So those are the men that our politicians pretend to respect.
They think that they are tricking you by pretending to respect them as they send them
to fight wars for a country that is not our own. Now, in our 24-7, 365 news cycle
and TikTok mindset where no one seems to be able to pay attention to anything for any
extended period of time, I hope that a moment like that, as powerful as it is,
can actually stick with people, that it might actually open their eyes to the dynamic that
we've been describing for so long. That A, we are not defending this country with these wars
in the Middle East. And B, our soldiers, to a large extent, are not on board with this behavior.
So if you're going to say, I back the troops, how about you listen to the troops?
How about you actually hear what the military veterans have to say?
Because almost to a man, the ones that I knew, sure, many of them still love their service,
they still love this country. But they almost all have recognized, after serving multiple tours
in Afghanistan or Iraq or both, that in fact they did not go to fight to defend this country.
Ask them if they believe that they were toppling Saddam or going after the Taliban
because of 9-11. Ask them. Ask them if they still believe that. Because I can assure you,
many of them enlisted for that very purpose, only to find out that they had been deceived.
And what makes this so doubly tragic is that it's that exact dynamic, it's that exact energy,
that ethos that gave rise to the MAGA America First movement. That so many on the right wing
who had been bloodthirsty, warmongering zealots throughout the 2000s came to their senses,
that they realized that they had been deceived, only to now have their guy, their hero,
who was put in specifically to remedy this dynamic, to stop the endless wars in the
Middle East on behalf of a country that is not our own, are now being duped yet again
to go fight a yet even more potentially disastrous war in Iran, a neighbor not too far away from the
prior disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's like we're living in Doomsday Groundhog Day,
and you can either come to terms with that reality or you can continue to tune in to
man-children like this. The president's decision here is extraordinary. It's known as Operation
Epic Fury, which I gotta say is just awesome. The operation names from the administration,
top notch, Midnight Hammer was great last year, Operation Epic Fury. Yeah, man. Epic Fury.
I mean, these people are toddlers. We're dealing with toddlers. I just want to make it very clear.
They will, they will present themselves as holier than now that they're superior to
my camp. They're certainly, they would never dain it themselves lowly enough to have to
bait someone like Dave Smith after running from him consistently for years on end.
And this is, this is the level of intellectual analysis into their foreign policy dictates
that the name sounds cool. Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury. Oh, wow. I mean, this is like,
it's literally like a kid with the like watching a Marvel movie. Like, do you know this is real
life? Do you understand that like Americans are and have been and will continue to die
for this war? I guess it's not really relevant to you because you don't even perceive them to be
your countrymen, do you? Because in fact, this is a war explicitly per the Secretary of State
on behalf of Israel. And it's interesting, the Venn diagram of people who support this war
seems to be exclusively people who have prioritized and stood with Israel,
despite their egregious behavior over the past few years, which reminds me
of why I think that Charlie Kirk may have been taken out. We are just going to take out the Ayatollah.
Oh, really? What comes next? What comes after regime change? Might be, oh, well, we need a small
number of US troops to support the new regime. We have seen this play before regime change.
You have no idea how this is going to work out. You have no idea. There's something big
that Americans keep forgetting about behind the news cycles, behind the tariff wars, the conflicts,
the ice raids, all of that. There's an uncomfortable truth that we all need to admit.
We are at nearly $39 trillion in national debt. It'll hit $40 trillion by the end of this year.
That's over $355,000 per US taxpayer. So I want you to ask yourself,
are you truly protected by this epic disaster? If not, I want you to reach out to my
partners over at Goldco. Goldco is the number one gold and silver company in the business,
and thousands of Americans are using Goldco to hedge their risks. So get your free 2026
gold and silver kit and learn how you could get 10% in bonus gold or silver while supplies last.
Go to ClintLikesGold.com. That's ClintLikesGold.com. One more time. ClintLikesGold.com. What comes
next? Great question, Charlie Kirk. I wish you were here today to continue to ask it,
but it doesn't really matter to the people who are now running your organization,
skin-suding your own worldview as if you were just some hardcore neocon. When in truth, you spent
years, both publicly and privately, trying to prevent this very war. But you're not here to
say what you might think. So I guess we'll just have to take the reframing of your position
according to the Charlie Kirk show, a show with your name on it, that it seems to be
backing up President Trump regardless of how counter it was to your opinions, both publicly and
privately. For the last two years, Pierce, for the first time really in my lifetime and maybe in
American history, the Warhawks have had to come debate us. It's a new reality now,
like Ted Cruz was trying to tweet at me the other day. Now that the media has been
decentralized and the corporate media is destroyed, they actually have to come in and
have the argument. And we have so consistently destroyed you guys over the last two years that
this is like the propaganda put out about the elections in Iran.
Got it. Yeah, you destroyed us. Yeah.
Again, he's killed us on that one.
Stop interrupting, Pierce. He can't let me make the point. This is now a pro-Palestinian
country. That's how bad you guys have lost the argument. So you guys are all giddy now
because you got your war, even though the American people are totally against it.
Just wait, dude.
Obviously, Dave is right. The non-interventionists have totally dominated all of the debates
when it came to Israel-Palestine. The same dynamic is going to happen again with this war,
despite the fact that we're now actively fighting it. No, we're not rooting for America
to lose. We're not rooting for Americans to die. We're rooting for us to not make
this catastrophic mistake. We're trying to get you out of the car. You're drunk,
hand us the keys, as Dave was saying. But of course, Shapiro doesn't hear that.
He goes this direction with his analysis. He had on Dave Smith. Apparently, his job is never to
tell jokes, but to instead give poorly informed foreign policy takes. And also to hate America.
Here we go. The IDF is the worst terrorist organization in the region. Let's get real.
The United States of America is arguably the worst terrorist organization in the world.
If you want to look over the last 25 years, how many innocent civilians we've slaughtered,
you're getting us into the neocon- Yeah, that's right. It turns out how many
times you appear on Joe Rogan's show, or how many times you hide behind your title of
comedian who holds the Guinness Book of World Records for fewest jokes told, or how many times
you spew purile analogies that demonstrate nothing but unbelievable willful ignorance of the nature
of war. I'm sorry, but you hate the country if you say America is the worst terrorist
organization in the world. You just do. To make that argument, you have to deliberately
obscure the difference between actual terrorists who actually are seeking deliberately to kill
innocent people in the name of politics, not collateral damage deliberately seeking to
kill innocent people and nation states who are seeking to avoid civilian casualties.
Now, instead of contending with Shapiro's non-arguments and ad hominems against Dave,
which by the way, Dave would falcon flatline Ben Shapiro in a debate, flatline him. It would be
hilarious. And I hope one day it'll happen, even though it will never happen because Ben
Shapiro knows that everything I'm saying right now is correct. He cannot beat Dave Smith in a debate.
It would be over for his career. That's how serious it is. But instead of
handling the actual arguments he does make, which there's very few and far between,
I'll let Dave handle that. And instead, I'll just challenge one contention he made. Now,
he's very upset that Dave said that if anything, the United States has committed the most
terrorism over the past couple of decades. Well, he's saying his argument or his counter
argument is that no, we don't conflate collateral damage with actual terrorism targeting civilians.
Let's just look at the footage. Let's look at the footage in Iran. You tell me if civilians aren't
dying in this. That's right, Dave Smith. How dare you conflate that with terrorism? Sure,
it's just bombing a downtown area with God knows how many civilians being obliterated in
that process. And let's not also consider the fact that according to the IDF's own figures,
somewhere between 40,000 and 50,000 civilians died in Gaza over the past two and a half years.
But no, they weren't targeting them though. So it's totally acceptable. Totally different thing.
Totally, totally different. Now, do you think if you lived in Tehran or if you lived in Gaza,
it would feel different than some suicide bomber running into, you know, downtown New York City?
Like no, it would feel pretty similar actually. In fact, it would be probably far more
concerning, especially when you have our head of the Department of War talking like this.
Flying over Tehran, flying over Iran, flying over their capital, flying over the IRGC,
Iranian leaders looking up and seeing only US and Israeli air power every minute of every day
until we decide it's over. And Iran will be able to do nothing about it.
B-2s, B-52s, B-1s, Predator drones, fighters, controlling the skies, picking targets,
death and destruction from the sky all day long. We're playing for keeps.
It goes on to say, this is not a fair fight. It's not supposed to be a fair fight. And we
are punching them while they are down, which is exactly the way it's supposed to be. Wow.
Tough talk. I mean, look, I'll admit, when there's a war, especially a war of defense,
that's how you ought to fight. You ought to fight to win. But when you have chosen a war,
and you are in fact the aggressor in a war talking about how you're going to be day and night,
just basically obliterating them, it doesn't sound very courageous, doesn't sound very
patriotic. It doesn't sound very much like it's in defense of this nation. And the reason it
doesn't sound like any of those things is because it's not any of those things.
No, it says Marco Rubio did not claim Israel dragged Donald Trump into a war, but he did though. But
he actually, he did. They just, it's just embarrassing to admit that you're all literal
traitors. Like that's treason. Like Trump, Rubio, like I'm not even joking. This is treason.
There should be treason trials. I mean, this could literally lead to World War three. And these
people did this literally at the behest of and for the sake of Israel. And that's not our country.
So these are, these are treasonous actors. We have been betrayed. Okay.
Preach it Harrison Smith. Absolutely love that guy. He's absolutely right. I mean,
this is like, definitional treason. You're sacrificing our blood and treasure
on behalf of a country that is not our own. Like what's more egregious than that?
But the good news is that they have a much better plan than they did in Iraq or Afghanistan or Libya
or Syria. They're going to arm the moderate rebels. Where have we heard that before?
Like all of those countries, which is how you know this is a CIA war.
And it's big. A U.S. official telling Fox thousands of Iraqi Kurds have launched a ground
offensive in Iran. So after destroying their country, Iraq, we're going to be
arming the moderate rebels, the Kurds to invade Iran. That's going to be how we circumvent the
necessity for American boots on the ground, even though you and I know that almost certainly
we have special forces or special operators that are on the ground currently trying to
topple the regime in Iran. But no, don't worry, we're not going to go full ground
invasion. We're going to arm the moderate Kurds to handle it. It worked out great in Syria,
so I'm sure this will be just a flawless plan once again. I mean, with a name like Epic Fury,
how could it go bad, right? And while most thinking people in this country are realizing
that this is a disastrous mistake in the making, you've got coverage like this coming out of Fox
News to indoctrinate the hard line Trump supporters into thinking that all is right with the
United States by design, that you do not want to reach the United States. But you also said
it would be necessary as a defensive vehicle that you could if necessary. So to be clear,
are you committing that Iran is not and will not build missiles that would have the capability
to reach the United States? I can confirm, yes. Sir, if that's a red line for you,
why is attacking U.S. military bases abroad justified?
But because they are attacking us. They are U.S. military installations, facilities,
bases who are attacking us, we are under attack. Why don't you recognize this fact?
We are under the attack by U.S., by U.S. forces in the region. So we have every right
to defend ourselves. My mistake. That question was so unbelievably stupid.
I just assumed it was Fox News. I take it back. That was NBC News.
Larry Ellison, save your money. You don't need to buy corporate media in this country.
They're all bought and paid for by the military industrial complex. You don't need to.
You don't need to purchase them. You can stop spending your money.
They're going to carry water for these wars regardless. Oh, my Lord.
He's going, this is a spokesman for Iran. And he's like, yeah, look,
yes, we have a ballistic missile arsenal to defend ourselves from the Israelis,
obviously. But we have limited the range so that it cannot reach America.
I can tell you that. And they go, well, then why are you shooting at American bases
in the Middle East? The ones that are firing at you currently.
I mean, this is the level of coverage. But don't get it twisted.
It's not just corporate news or right wing news that's just totally filled with nonsense.
This is the type of garbage that Rachel Maddow is pushing.
And so why did Donald Trump just start this war? Why is this happening?
Que bono, right? Who benefits? You know, cutter.
The country that just gave Donald Trump a really, really nice $400 million plane,
really a gilded flying palace for his own use, both during the presidency,
during his presidency and after Trump plans to take that plane with him and keep using it
after he leaves office, if he ever leaves office. And you remember the United Arab Emirates
famous for recently structuring a totally pointless crypto financial transaction
so that $2 billion of it would be stuffed into the Trump family's otherwise worthless
brand new crypto financial firm. And of course, you remember the Saudis
who stuffed another $2 billion into the pockets of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner.
So that's the left wing portrayal, the alleged left wing portrayal of this war
that it is on behalf of Qatar, not Israel, Qatar. So when I say that we live under a controlled
media environment, I mean it very explicitly. And I do not mean in a partisan fashion.
It is not a partisan fashion in the left-right partisan. It is so obvious that there is
divide and conquer strategies that also are misdirects from the true culprit,
the true, like the thing that would be unifying, the thing that when you see a United States Marine
have his arm broken, literally seconds after shouting out, nobody wants to fight for Israel
and then his arm snaps. That's the type of unifying thing that they don't want you talking
about because they want you focused on Trump, Trump good or Trump bad, not Israel ever,
not war ever. And if you dare focus on these wars, then you better be in support of them
or else you don't support the troops, like the troops who shout out, we don't want this war.
You see the dynamic that they're creating? You see the dichotomy? You see the mind fuckery?
But nevertheless, for those that are paying attention, that are thinking for themselves,
I hope this can be a unifying moment. For instance, this Marine veteran who had his
arm broken, he is hard left, Green Party running, I think for the Congress in North Carolina under
the Green Party. He's married to a Muslim woman. He says the Palestinian. He also cries out later
on, you know, free Palestine River to the sea, like this guy is lefty. There's no doubt about it.
He and I disagree on economics and probably domestic policy on a lot of different levels,
but we ought to be able to unify on this one topic that we don't want to fight wars for foreign
countries ever again. And that is literally all we've done my entire fucking life. He knows it.
I know it. You know it. And it's time that we kind of set some of our personal differences aside
and at least unify on that issue. And to that end, Nick Fuentes has been saying that he wants to
get his followers or at least himself is going to go out and vote for Democrats in the midterms.
Look, I'm not going to tell you what to who to vote for. I don't think it's a personal decision.
I'll tell you, there's nothing you can do to get me to vote for the Democrats.
But at this junction, there's really nothing you can get me to do to vote for the Republicans
either. Just being honest. And yes, the Democrats are still worse, but I just don't see any
significant difference at the highest levels when it comes to foreign policy or financial
circumstances. The fact that we're going bankrupt, the fact that we're morally bankrupt.
These are dynamics that are bipartisan in nature. And I personally cannot bring myself to vote for
that level of evil, whichever direction or whichever offer I choose to go with.
So instead, I'm going to pour my energy into things that I think are valuable like
well, reading the Bible and trying to get Thomas Massey to run for president.
And also making sure that Thomas Massey wins his reelection this upcoming cycle.
So while I disagree with Nick Fuentes and I will not be voting for the Democrats in the midterms,
I do agree with his sentiment though that these people absolutely deserve to lose.
In fact, they must lose. You cannot hold on to power if you just spend years saying that
the Iraq war was a mistake, Afghanistan war was a mistake, global war on terror was a mistake,
that all of these were a mistake and then go and do the exact same thing, but on steroids.
Sorry, you can't get power after that. You cannot maintain power after that. You can't
maintain power after you say we're going to close the border and do mass deportations and
then not. You can't hold on to power when you say we're going to make sure that there's
full disclosure of the Epstein files and their big prosecutions. We're going to purge the swamp,
the deep state. We're getting rid of it and then become the deep state and then say,
vote for me. The Democrats are too dangerous. No, you're both too dangerous. You both not only
should none of you be in power. All of you should be in prison for real, like not hyperbole,
not being melodramatic, just being honest. You are taking the blood and treasure of this country.
You're taking the future, my children's future, all of our children's future and you are squandering
it on behalf of a foreign country. You deserve to go to prison for that. That is not being
overly dramatic or emotional. Look at me. There is no emotion here other than rage.
I'm just telling it like it is. You deserve to be in prison forever. All of you. And that includes
the congressional representatives and the senators who have advocated their duty to
require a vote before things like this happen. And they won't even do a vote
after things like this happen. They all should be in prison. And that's my pitch for the
midterms. I'm not voting for you, but I'd be happy to put you behind bars. If you enjoyed this
episode, please do it with a like button, subscribe and share it around. I'm sure it'll
be very algo friendly, given the things that I had to say today. But it's from the heart
and it's the truth. And that's all I really care about. Love you guys. Peace.
Someone mentioned, hey, you should go on with Liberty Lockdown. I said,
I don't know that I've ever heard of that guy. I went and watched him. I thought,
how have I not heard of this guy? The guy's dope. I mean, he's great on air.
I would love to go on with him, but he's phenomenal. I'd love to go on with that dude.