Look at it, a world built on fantasy, synthetic emotions in the form of pills, psychological warfare in the form of advertising,
mind altering chemicals in the form of food, brainwashing seminars in the form of media,
isolated bubbles in the form of social networks.
Real? You want to talk about reality?
We haven't lived at anything remotely close to it since the turn of the century.
We turned it off, forgot the batteries, snapped on a bag of GMOs while we...
cost the remnants in the ever-expanding dumpster of the human, human branded houses,
trademarked by corporations built on bipolar numbers, jumping up and down on digital displays,
hypnotizing us into the biggest slumber mankind has ever seen.
You have to dig pretty deep, kiddo, before you can find anything real.
You live in a kingdom of...
It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Welcome to the Daily Wrap Up.
Thursday, March 26th, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, the conversation we've been having around the negotiation that Trump has claimed to have had
has taken a lot of very interesting turns moment to moment.
But my point the entire time has been that I feel we've been deceived.
And I think that's very clear.
I mean, let's not dance around what we can obviously see
and acknowledge that there's been like blatant lies that he's told.
Now, that could mean that he's playing the tactics that he likes to praise in his books and so on,
which is just dishonesty at the end of the day, but results oriented as he is.
Ultimately, the argument could be that he's trying to maneuver through this to get Iran
where he wants him to get the deal.
But if you agree with that, so be it.
But acknowledge that if while that's happening, he's lying to you.
He's lying to everybody.
And many multiple to support that, except that as it's, you know, that's the game he's playing with all the rest of them.
But when you dive through more of it as it's into today, especially,
it starts to appear as if it's almost just entirely whole cloth,
just creating a narrative out of nowhere to try to get people to feel like,
oh, maybe he is talking to somebody.
Maybe we should make a deal if he's talking.
And I find it to be desperate.
As I've been saying the entire time, but we'll go through some new points today on this on that topic
and maybe open another door to what it could possibly be
with the discussion of oil tankers being the present that he told you he was given
with the interesting part of the GPS elements showing that that didn't happen.
Okay.
So is that him lying?
Is that him being lied to, right?
Is somebody else manipulating him?
Israel?
Even Iran.
But then how would he think that happened?
That must be his inner circle that's lying to him.
And I find that to be really interesting.
And that speaks to the point of sort of how we've always wondered if he is being how manipulated, handled,
is he aware of that?
Any president and, you know, and if and or,
is that something that is, you know, playing on his hubris,
which I think is very obvious with this person to be able to manipulate him into thinking
that he's the smartest one in the room, that he's his decision will be the most important
when you can easily create a situation where whatever choice he makes in a limited view
gives them what they want.
I think that's always been a way that this country can manipulate.
But today it's especially clear with this person.
But there's a lot to get to today.
It's quite a bit we're going to talk about.
But that obvious point of the ongoing, you know,
I think just this dangerous drift this country is in with, you know,
whatever is driving Trump's decision-making process,
it's obviously getting more and more concerning for everybody, Republicans, Democrats,
those aware of it all being a joke.
And clearly it's something that is, I mean,
becoming so obvious to people that are like at the point that I'm trying to continue to
highlight through all these things is see the bigger picture,
not that the right is lying in this moment,
but that the government is playing us all through something like this.
And I think everyone, a lot of people more than usual are starting to see that
like I've been highlighting.
And right now it's becoming, OK, well,
these are the same people that we thought we were fighting.
Same war, the same technocratic governance, the same, you know,
all the same agendas are playing out in the same way.
Now again, note that a lot of us warned about that.
Then we know for sure.
But what are the, I mean, if not exactly what's happening right now
for very close, we were discussing before this was happening
that this was likely where this administration would go.
And likely no different than Kamala to be quite honest.
And that's why we're discussing how there could have been a different path
or we can hopefully continue to discuss why other options can be taken
than just falling into the same broken lesser of evils dynamic
that they falsely created for us.
But I'm glad to see that that is happening.
And noticing that no matter what we say and no matter what we think
that the thing that it just continues.
And then on top of that, that weirdly enough,
and it's not weird if you're paying attention,
it's very obvious and has been the same way for a long time.
CNN and Fox News seem to have basically the same argument.
Now the difference is CNN or Democrat media
or liberal media saying Trump is lying.
And he is, by the way, in plenty of ways and saying,
that's their big point that we could tell he's deceiving us.
But guess what's the common thread that the war should continue
and that Iran's a bad guy that we have to do it the right way,
which I would even agree with if you're just going to talk about the legal dynamic.
But this should not be happening at all.
And there is no legal dynamic with how they did this
or how they could have done this without just manufacturing it
like we played many times.
The illegal dynamics or rather the, what's the frame that you were in the game
of using covert means against the Iranians.
And that's the idea of both sides.
But sort of realize that this has been something that has been drifting
and both sides of the paradigm have always been in line with it.
Both sides of the media have always been driving it and supporting it.
And then when it happens, the group that's supposed to be adversarial
is suddenly basically cheering it on.
I just think it really exposes the long term play.
I think most people are seeing that.
Now, other than that topic, and we're going to have a lot of the points
we can get into on the straight up for moves and how that point connects to it.
And I just, the bigger point of what this connects to,
I'm going to get to some other things to start today,
which I thought were really interesting,
one of which we've discussed back in February,
which was the Israeli owned Biolab that was shut down,
which connected back to the original Biolab.
California, you've got Las Vegas.
There's a couple of different points that connect to this.
And how interesting it is that that story basically disappeared
after it turned out it was owned by an Israeli.
It didn't disappear, but it just didn't,
there was no momentum from the government perspective.
And a lot of the people who were really keeping that in view,
mostly the MAGA discussion, they just stopped talking about it,
which I think that speaks for itself.
Now, the point was about a Chinese person who was,
who was, I think, renting the, was in control of the area.
But the owner was Israeli.
Now, how that plays out, we'll get into to begin with.
This is very important and how it's,
drop site news recently covering it.
There's a new article that came out,
and I think it's important to highlight the aftermath of that.
And I think you already know where it goes,
but it's important to see.
And there's more information that came out with the new article
about what they found in his house.
Oh, it's, I think it's, it's right here.
Ori Solomon was his name.
And we talked about this last time, if you remember,
I'll show you the article we discussed it in.
And what they found there and what didn't happen
and what is probably never going to happen.
We're going to quickly point out something in the beginning
of what Derek was just doing in,
he was now at CPAC and interviewing some people.
He got an interview with, what was his name again, Bovino.
Interesting responses we'll point to.
Some good, I'm going to try to cover some,
a bunch of stuff today that are just kind of passing things
that I don't usually get into smaller points,
partisan stuff, just stuff that I'm going to pull in
because as this is technically sort of the end of my,
you know, where I'm getting to at the end of my week,
essentially, which I'm laughing myself for those
that have been seeing what I'm trying to do
and keeping the consistent work
and the consistent days of the show
and trying to take more time, like maybe one,
two days in a row to like handle my life.
My point is when I do it this many days in a row,
I've watched something happen over the weekend
that I'm going to definitely cover
and then it will sort of spin that plan out.
But my goal is to try to keep that consistent work going,
which means I'll probably be taking the next couple
of days off or at least one
and trying to pull myself out of it,
which I strongly recommend we all do,
as much as difficult.
And in fact, it's important to keep a tune to this stuff.
It's also really important to be able to break away
and not have your phone on your hip the whole time
you're supposed to not be,
which is what I had been doing for a long time,
but need to fully break away.
Put the phone in the pouch, break away, go outside,
spend at least a day completely disconnected.
Now, I'm saying all that because my point
right now is probably going to longer show.
I wanted to include a lot of the stuff that I had,
you know, maybe put aside to focus on the bigger topics
that have been happening,
some of which revolve around some things that I was going
to talk about yesterday,
which we'll get to around the,
what was it called again, the advisor,
the council on advisors on science technology.
And basically just a technocratic startup, you know,
and it's interesting to see who's involved
and it's everyone that we all thought we were fighting.
And I mean, everybody, including the Republicans
who are suddenly on the team,
just like when they were as inauguration and,
you know, it's the same,
it's how many times can we not recognize
what it shows us when the same things keep happening
or the same lies keep being told
or the same promises keep being broken.
Now a bunch of points I want to make about
what I think the partisan game is doing right now.
Like what I've been generally highlighting,
you know, the, you know,
oh my God, look at the Obama story again and again
and again, which I agree with, put him in jail.
He's a criminal. I agree.
Maybe for different reasons than you may think,
but I definitely think he's a criminal.
And I'm just probably saying that
because all of these people have committed war crimes,
all these people have lied to us over our lives.
The point though is that I never believed it was going
to happen because I don't think they actually
are adversarial in the legal sense.
I'm sure they hate each other to some degree,
but you know, what about Biden?
What about all the big claims and social security fraud
in Minnesota?
I mean, all the different things we've been told
and hyped and talked about, whether real or not.
Or Epstein files for crying out loud.
Funny how that story just doesn't exist anymore.
For us, it does.
And we'll keep talking about it.
It's not going to go away,
but the spotlight has been removed
and the mainstream alternative mainstream just pretend
like it doesn't exist.
You have to start noting that
and recognize those people and make a note of it.
Look at their work.
Look at everybody's work,
but recognize who is out there for wrong reasons
and who's deceiving.
And be Mark Zuckerberg and Larry Ellison
and Mark Andreessen and Sergey Brin.
Yeah, that's the good guy team
that's backing Trump on his technocratic venture, isn't it?
We'll also talk about a lot of the different distractions
that are coming out to push away from this.
Talk about some points on technocracy
that are building around us,
as well as a $1.25 billion aid
that was sent to Donald Trump's new board of peace.
Because he's just board of peace today, apparently.
But as much as it's all about just the ongoing warfare,
the point is that this is ultimately stealing from you.
And we'll talk about that.
I don't know why that's America first
when it's a global dynamic
or why that's not obviously globalism.
Alex Jones, the obvious reality
of how clearly everything of...
It's just embarrassing how clear it is.
And now he's taking over a billion dollars from taxpayer money
to be put into something that goes outside of this country.
He claims it'll be for Gaza,
but it's basically a slush fund
because this is not something that's accountable at all.
And we'll talk about that.
We'll talk about the over COVID-19 connection
that I think connects with the distraction conversation,
which I think is just interesting,
coming out right now after all this time
and some much larger other points will get to Iran.
And if I have time today,
I want to end with just a section
that just continues to highlight
what is continuing to happen in Gaza
and what Israel continues to do
and what it continues to be their government
and what they continue to demonstrate.
The statements like there is nobody innocent in Gaza.
There are no innocent children killed.
Every child is a terrorist when they're born.
These are coming from the mouths of people
in leading positions of Israel's government.
But we don't talk about that.
You know where you don't hear those things?
From Iran's government.
That's not to say they don't think that.
They very well could be just as vicious.
I think every government is capable of that.
The difference is over here,
you have them proudly saying this
with all of their audiences and their teams
and their piece of cheer,
you know, over here, you don't.
Doesn't mean they don't think that,
but recognize how interesting that is
with the conversation
and one side gets called out all the time.
Now let's start with Derek's point.
I wanted to make sure you guys see this
because he's going to be out there
over the next couple of days.
Interviewing people, discussing it.
You know, if we have time and it connects,
it's usually about the difference of timing of our,
you know, when I'm setting the show up
and when he's ready,
but we're going to try to do something
where he can be, you know, kind of jump in live
and just kind of give you some updates.
But half the time our hours are not overlapping.
But I'm going to play this for you really quickly.
This is what Derek just posted.
CPAC Exclusive Retiring Border Patrol Hardliner
Boveno Has No Regrets on Pretty Shooting.
Denies U.S. Citizens Detained.
Which is just insane to me.
You know, I'll play it for, I'll let it speak for itself.
We'll talk about it quickly.
We'll just think about whether this is dishonesty
or that he just doesn't know.
Hey, in the last couple of days,
newly confirmed DHS Secretary Mullen has said
he regrets statements he made
after the shooting death of Alex Pretty.
Do you regret any statements or actions
you took around those shootings in Minnesota?
Absolutely not. Absolutely not.
Every single statement was to prove.
No, it wasn't. And you could prove that.
In fact, literally everybody, including Trump's administration,
many of them admitted that those things were a little bit hyperbolic.
Not this guy. That's why he got pushed away,
because these guys are extremely radical.
No difference in most people in government positions, quite honestly.
But realize that what they said about that was proven to be false.
Terrorist and monster, everything they did.
Noam and him were some of the most egregious.
And notice how those two are not going to shove to the side.
And that's not because I think they care about the fact
that they held those opinions.
It's because they're bad at relaying it to you.
We regret no statement.
And we move forward here.
We don't capitulate the folks that hate America.
Do you think he made after the shooting death of Alex Pretty?
Do you regret any statements or actions
you took around those shootings in Minnesota?
Absolutely not. Absolutely not.
Every single statement was to prove.
We regret no statement.
And we move forward here.
We don't capitulate the folks that hate America.
We don't capitulate the folks who hate America.
What does that even mean?
So what are we talking about?
Are we now suggesting that the only thing,
the only world in which that could be possible
is that somebody who hates America lied about that?
You know, again, despite the fact that we can quite
literally prove that he was wrong in every possible way.
You see, this is the kind of rhetoric I'm talking about.
My opinion is he knows he is standing a line.
Truth for people like this,
what I would argue, borderline sociopath,
if not over the top, doesn't even factor in, guys.
It's about narrative control.
It's about what they want you to think they're supposed to be.
It's insane to me.
It's insane that we can stand,
that we don't capitulate people hate America
by asking do you regret lying
about what happened to Freddie?
Do you think you've got enough support
from the Trump administration following those days?
President Trump is the best president I've ever worked for.
You swamped creatures in that administration
that probably need to go,
but President Trump never has.
That's quite it. Okay, so I love Trump is the best.
Right, because clearly, if you don't say that,
you get dumped or, you know, negative things happen to you,
because in terms of very petty, it seems,
but some other people in the midst have to go.
Isn't it interesting?
Doesn't it continue to show you that that's the,
you know, at the same time, though,
when you talk to the team sport players
that are all screaming about how winning we are right now,
it's that everyone's the greatest of all time,
greats of greatest greats of all time.
That's what they're all screaming at, you know,
ridiculous, hyperbolic, and then no one gets fired,
and then he gets put aside.
And then they're still great forever.
Yeah, if you don't, I mean,
this is my point about where we are with this country.
There's nobody that looks at that and goes,
yeah, clearly that's completely honest.
We know they're playing their team, that they're game.
We all know that both sides do it.
Everybody really does it in some ways in their life,
but what's funny is when it comes to a head in political seriousness
and in the conversation, everyone acts like you're crazy for it.
It's a broken dynamic.
You have these dope, these ridiculous talk shows
or high level CNN Fox, whatever,
high level in the sense of how they view it.
And you'll be talking about things that we have proven years ago
that they act like are undefined or we don't know,
not even in the conversation.
These people are either some of the most uninformed,
high level journalists I've ever seen in their minds again,
or they just don't, you know, I guess they're lying
or they don't even care to look for those things,
about narrative control.
But I just wanted to think about that.
You know, the bigger point of what, you know,
all of them are doing, holding the line is the right way to frame it.
That administration that probably need to go,
but President Trump, fantastic.
He gave us, gives us a lot of support.
Good, great job for President Trump.
Isn't that just interesting, you know?
He gave us, like, gives us, gives us a lot of support.
You know, like a strange, right?
Like, oh, I can't, I might offend him if I don't suggest
that he's still giving us support,
even though that does not appear to be happening.
What happened to him was pretty embarrassing, guys.
He got stood up like he was in charge of everything,
literally made himself like a Nazi SS coat for his job,
which didn't exist, and then just got shoved to the side
because he was clearly a lunatic.
And that was embarrassing.
But see, the whole game is to act like it was somehow the plan,
you know, maybe it was, but that's, that's known to, right?
That's, that's how you fail up in this administration.
Final question.
What do you say to Americans who worry about ICE
and Border Patrol profiling or mistakenly
or otherwise stopping Americans and, you know,
detaining them, whether temporarily or otherwise?
Show me an instance where that's happened.
Do you actually love that?
Now this is a very common tactic.
Now here, the question was this main point,
because we know that's happened.
I mean, look, this is the simple thing that I posted
just underneath Derek's post,
which is the story that's one of the most prominent stories.
REITs, ready? I forget.
It's RETEs, EES.
REITs, I think it was.
He's the U.S. veteran who was working at a farm
and got arrested.
He told him he was the U.S. citizen.
They guess didn't like that he tried to say that.
Well, arrested him, even though they knew that,
held him for three days, refused to give him water.
That's all covered.
He's been on multiple interviews.
They've been forced to acknowledge that.
They just acted like he, like the story was
that he was not following orders and resisting.
It's just not true, guys,
but just like they lied about REITy and,
REITy and lied about good and lied about every other story
you could find, lied about all of them,
lied about shooting people, lied about hitting cars,
lied about stealing things.
Insane. And guess what?
That ridiculous story,
ICE and what they're doing is only growing.
We're just not watching it right now,
or rather just, you know, the focus has shifted.
And that's this Gestapo force is extremely powerful
and growing in this country with these surveillance
apparatus of technocracy bolstering it
around everything with Israel involved.
That's all exploding.
This guy can't even be honest about the fact
that this is actually happening.
This is one of many obvious
and well documented examples of Americans
being illegally detained and abused by ICE.
I've also covered this explicitly.
This one topic.
DHS lies about detaining and deporting U.S. citizens.
This was called out in the middle of Congress.
They weren't known,
embarrassingly tried to deny that,
and you could show video after video,
document after document,
court case after court case,
where it keeps happening.
Now, do you really think that he doesn't know that?
If he doesn't, that's insane.
It means they live in their own little broken bubble
and pretend that they're not actually doing
what they're doing,
which is a whole other story when you think about it.
I genuinely think that this person is just,
that's what you're supposed to say.
And so you go, oh yeah, which one?
And then what happens?
Right?
What if I was there and I said, okay, Rhys,
what is he gonna say?
Well, who, for what source?
Where from?
I don't believe it.
You really think it's gonna go, oh, okay, you're right.
So the point is to hope you don't have an answer.
So he does what he does right here,
which I'll play now,
and he goes, you know, oh, so you don't know,
that's right, because there are none, you know,
but there are, we know that.
So the question is, is he just trying to play that tactic?
Again, if you had just responded by going,
here are 17 names of people that it happened to.
Here's a document from the U.S. government
saying it happened.
He would not accept that.
We all know that.
Americans and, you know, detaining them
whether temporarily or otherwise.
Show me in the instance where that's happened.
There's plenty on social media.
No, I'm not saying who, who.
There's plenty of individuals in social media.
I don't have names in front of me.
There's current court.
Exactly, he says.
What does that mean?
Because he doesn't have a list of the people
who you've illegally detained sitting on his hip.
Exactly.
It's a, it's a tactic.
There are cases going though right now.
Okay.
Well, I guess he was trying to mumble on the way out
that those cases are going to be filled.
No, they're not.
You've lost them already.
There's many cases that have already been,
these people just don't care, guys.
Now this, this person's no longer in the position
of being in charge of the entire thing,
but he's still in a position of power.
That's concerning, guys.
So if support Derek and what he's doing,
he'll be there over the next couple of days
doing some interviews.
We might be connecting on the show.
Either way, it just supports work.
So let's continue.
The opening point here I wanted to get into
was this Israeli file app.
Now, this is an important story to briefly go over again.
Actually, the LA Times story we're going to reference
Los Angeles Times does a good job
kind of overviewing the original parts, too.
And I'll include anything that I think you need to know.
Now, this is what caught my eye
is Dropsite News reporting this
and then cites the article here.
And it says an Israeli citizen was arrested
in Las Vegas after police found a cache of weapons,
lab equipment and more than a thousand samples
of unknown liquids at a home tied to
the widening biosecurity investigation
Los Angeles Times reports.
Now, this is what we were already reporting,
including the fact that the Chinese National
was the one that was involved.
Now, I'll give you my thoughts on what this played out as
and what happened last time
and what's happening right now.
So let's read the article.
So this is coming from yesterday.
Now, Code Enforcement Officer
Jesslyn Harper discovered a clandestine
biolab in Really, California.
This is what we reported on.
Here's the actual article from February 7th.
Israeli citizen charged in the Vegas,
the Las Vegas Biolab case
as Fort Teacher Investigates Sabotage,
same time frame.
Now, what's interesting is at this time,
I was trying to, I was interesting to find out
whether there was connection to the other conversations
and I think either after the show
or in this show, we realized that that was the case.
And it's connected to the same,
the story we covered back in the,
about the, you know, the stucco wall
with like the hose sticking out of the side of the building.
And the whole conversation was,
well, how does that possibly make sense?
Because, well, they had freezers and coolers, right?
So clearly they had electricity.
So somebody in the city
knew they were using electricity,
but we're supposed to be told it was a building.
Nobody knew it was being used
with a hose sticking out of the side of the building.
I just, it didn't,
there's no way it was buyable.
It didn't believable.
It just didn't line up for me.
Somebody somewhere knew that that building
was doing what it was doing
or doing something off, you know,
off the, not off the grid,
but outside the law, if you will.
And that's not what happened.
It just kind of got dropped
into China, Chinese guy.
Okay.
And then we have the other,
this other story that came up
and it turns out they're interconnected.
And it turns out the connection, guys,
is that Ori Solomon owns the buildings.
So at this point,
you have to stand back and go,
okay, is it possible these Chinese individuals
were using his buildings
and they just used two separate buildings
as possible?
Yeah.
But it's also just as possible
that this is an organ,
whatever this all is,
is being facilitated by this Israeli man.
Now, does that mean
it's tied to the Israeli government?
No, not necessarily.
And we went over last time,
the potential connections and so on.
The point for me
is just the interesting way this story was covered.
And how this is incredibly important,
and yet it just seems to have gotten dropped
when the deeper story became noticed.
Now, since the facility was allegedly operated
by a Chinese national
involved in smuggling counterfeit COVID tests,
also interesting time and connection, right?
That this was during that timeframe
where fake COVID tests
and some of them were fake pregnancy tests
were being sold to Americans.
So the timeframe was very much the,
the Wuhan,
Trump basically directed everyone
to aim everything at China,
despite the evidence, by the way.
And the reality of the evidence
clearly suggests if it was
what he was saying,
then they're clearly both involved.
But there's more to the story.
I'm not going to go down that discussion today.
We covered it all extensively.
In fact, we were some of the earliest people
talking about that potential,
despite the fact that I think the evidence
went a very different direction.
And that's funny why you have the government
and a lot of the mainstream alternatives
swinging back around and going,
buy a lab and that's the way they created a lab
and Wuhan way after the fact
when that was where we're doing the day that started.
Worth going back through all that, by the way,
the whole story.
But to this point,
the Chinese national,
who was involved with the actual building,
not the ownership,
but the actual operation.
So we're told,
was involved with the COVID overlap.
So this could be China doing something.
It could be random Chinese people doing this
for their own interests.
And it could be this Israeli running it all.
And it also could be just like the same point
you can consider of China.
It could be Israeli government operating this
and manipulating through this same channel.
So let's go through this and consider that for yourself.
The case of a lifetime started with a putrid smell
and a green garden hose sticking out of the side
of a supposedly vacant warehouse
in California farm country.
Labels such as malaria,
COVID-19 and HIV,
labels that read blood and Ebola.
Now remember this original story.
Last I checked,
no one has ever gotten definitive information
about what they actually had.
There was,
there was, you know,
statements about what they said
and then going to the lab.
And last time I checked into it,
there was nothing on it,
not that I can find right now.
The idea being,
why would we not find out what that was?
Seems pretty weird, doesn't it?
Then went on,
her discovery blew open an elaborate criminal case
with ties to California,
Las Vegas and China.
In the sense of the people,
the investigation in Readley
found that the lab was part of an elaborate scheme
to import COVID tests from China
and pass them off as American made.
But there are some who fear the operation
was much more complex than that.
A congressional committee uncovered payments
topping $1 million made to an operator
of a Readley business from banks
in the People's Republic of China.
Now to understand what we're talking about
is banks that exist in that country,
not necessarily the government.
The way that people in this country,
especially partisans love to frame
things like that in Russia and China
is that there's no world in which
anything that exists there
can not be controlled by the government.
And that's not an unfair consideration,
especially when the same kind of points should
be made about where we live.
But that's not usually how that goes.
But just like where we live,
that's not the case ubiquitously.
And so it's the same thing there.
But so consider that all we're really talking about
is money from a bank that came from China.
So if you were hypothetically wanted to create
an operation and make it not look like it was you,
which is what every intelligence anywhere would do,
whether CIA or, you know, MI6 or Assad,
then you would,
and China is an easy little hanging fruit
when it comes to COVID-19 conversation.
But it could be China too.
That's just as much a consideration in this conversation,
especially since the two we know,
the nationalities were Chinese and Israeli.
And we're getting to that next.
The defendant in the case,
Jiaya, I think it's your Bai Zhu,
a Chinese national,
has not been charged with running an illicit pile lab.
How is that possible?
How can you have this go?
So it's not like there wasn't a lab.
That's under everybody can see that.
They took the materials.
Now, even if you want to claim
they just had a bunch of random things labeled like that.
You've told us that the building was not allowed
to be used or supposed to be unoccupied.
So how was this guy not charged with a crime?
The vials discovered in the readly were never tested.
Now, again, this is what I just,
that's what she's claiming.
I found the same.
I find that hard to believe.
I just, I don't know how,
I mean, at my point,
that's why I said it earlier,
I think they very much did test these things
and we're just not being told.
Seems kind of strange.
Like just the sense that you would argue
that they were never tested.
How in what world does that make sense?
So you're telling me you guys scooped
up a bunch of potential Ebola and COVID
and whatever else you claim is there
and you just didn't do anything.
You didn't test it.
You just did what?
Put in a bag, put an account,
put in a cabinet, threw it in the garbage.
None of that makes any sense whatsoever
for the potential that it could be
a very dangerous thing
if you believe that's possible.
But yeah, they never tested it.
Either they told us that
or they didn't because there was actually nothing.
It was, you know, something like that.
Very strange.
But for some officials,
the questions left unanswered
from the lab in Readley,
then Nevada,
two separate locations,
underscores America's vulnerability
to unregulated biohazards
that could be used by bad actors
for criminal behavior
and even terrorism.
Because this one,
this was the one from Las Vegas.
Remember, and they connect
to the same person we're about to get to.
Now it says,
and again, before we move past that,
you know, think about this,
where we're being screened at
by our own government left and right
about all of this,
about domestic terrorism,
about bioterrorism,
and then yet we have this example
and then just nothing happens,
no hype about it,
no concern, no testing.
I don't buy it.
Quote,
at worst, this investigation revealed
significant gaps
in our nation's defenses
and pathogen-related regulations
that present a grave national security risk
that could be exploited in the future.
Now there is an opening
for consideration
that the entire thing
was just to set up narrative
to point back to
when some kind of thing gets rolled out.
You know, and whether you,
that's not to say we're saying that
as an absolute,
and again, if you're out there
considering or thinking
that it's crazy conspiracy theory
to consider that a government
might conduct some kind of an operation
to manipulate,
then you just do not simply know
how the world works
and are not paying attention
over the last 30 seconds,
it seems, let alone last year,
but understand that it's possible
that this could be a scenario
that's used,
even if it was a real situation
to later, you know,
argue that there was some kind of stemming point
for something different.
The center of the CDC
determined that at least 20 potential
infectious bacterial and viral agents,
including dengue, hepatitis B, C,
herpes, simplex virus,
herpes simplex virus,
rubella virus,
and SARS coronavirus
were present in the warehouse
according to a Fresno County
Department of Public Health application.
For an abatement warrant field
in the civil court,
okay, wait a minute,
we're being told that no testing was done,
and yet the CDC claims
they determined what these things were.
Okay, well, there's an obvious gap in the story,
and it says,
and that's where the story of what was
found in Reedley Warehouse
could have ended,
except the longer zoo sat in jail,
but never charged with a legal biolab,
the bigger the case became.
Now, this is what I find interesting,
and this is why I always point out things
about like the local investigation
that seemed to be problematic
for the larger kind of engineered things.
That's all with, for example,
Derek's investigation around the Utah
sexual, the Utah investigation
around sexual abuse of children
with the ritualistic sexual abuse.
That was a major case
put forward by the Utah Sheriff's Department
with uncree-undeniable evidence.
And the point was that's something
that the federal side,
which is ultimately what they did,
it didn't really go anywhere,
always steps on,
and it happened because the local
Sheriff's Department saw the evidence,
or for example,
the case in Oregon
about the Saudi Arabia conversation,
which we've shared many times.
The local Oregon Sheriff's Department
was like,
look, Saudi Arabian people are coming
in the state,
raping women,
stealing and leaving,
and being flown back to Saudi Arabia
under diplomatic cover.
I've covered this many times.
It happens to Israel all the time.
We just talked about Tom,
what was his name?
Yeah, Ander,
I forget now,
something Anderwitz or something.
He was in Israeli,
tagged to the government,
flew in with the intention
to abuse a child sexually.
That was the meeting he set up,
and then he got caught on a sting,
and they let him fly home.
He's never been charged.
Anyway, the point was the Saudi Arabia thing
was very, it was being very widely discussed.
And it was,
it's not like it was necessarily
being like allowed and organized,
but because they're Saudi Arabian
and because they're an ally
of the United States government
and clearly care more about that
than your live or your livelihood,
they just let them fly home
and it still happens.
So considering that,
back to the point,
it says that's where the story
of what was found really
where else could have ended,
except it got bigger
when I argue the local investigation
elements started to uncover
what Ari Solomon had in his home.
Now it was dark on January 31st
when law enforcement descended
on a five bedroom tract home
in Northeast Las Vegas
that Jew had listed as collateral
for bail and called
some 400 times in the past year.
Now that's interesting to me.
That's one of the points
that stands out is showing
that there's more collaboration
than maybe Jew being used
because one of my thoughts
is simply that this is,
as we'll get into,
he's a criminal, this guy,
apparently he's millionaire,
but he's criminal,
was in Canada, Jew,
the Chinese national
and then moved to Readley
and was there ever since.
And I'm wondering
if this is sort of an operation
where this person was compromised
and then brought in
to play this role, right?
We're thinking about,
but if that's not the case,
then it's more likely
that we see them working together.
And then the fact
that he was calling it
some 400 times
seems like there's something
weird going on there.
And then the fact
that we're talking about
the listed as collateral point
means that there's more,
it's not just something he's
renting, right?
Now it says by the end,
oh wait, no going on,
it says they rolled into
the 900 block of Sugar Springs
Drive in armored vehicles
operating drones
in a robot dog.
Yeah, welcome to the technocratic world.
By the end,
police had arrested
a man named Ori Solomon.
So they went into the location
based on the Chinese national
and the information they had
and they ultimately arrested
Ori Solomon.
A 55-year-old Israeli citizen
who author or authorities say
managed the home
and another that was also
searched.
While nothing was found
in the second home,
the search on Sugar Springs Drive
proved fruitful,
police said
at the news conference.
Now investigators found
it was reported last time
a cache of weapons
and arrested him
on federal weapons charges
saying he was barred from having them
due to he was on a non-immigration visa,
which I find interestingly relevant
to the conversation today.
And they also accused him
of improperly disposing
of hazardous waste.
Okay, but wait a minute here.
So now we're talking about the fact
that in this home,
not the lab, the home,
this man had not just waste
as we'll get to,
but other dangerous things
that were in the lab.
So there's, I don't think
there's any logical way
you can disconnect him
from what's going on there.
I think that clearly shows that.
An attorney representing Solomon
did not respond for comment.
Video from news outlets
at the scene also showed investigators
spending a great deal of time
in the home's garage
where they donned respirators,
protected clothing,
and removed lab equipment.
Okay, see, it's very clear.
And more than a thousand samples
of unknown liquid.
So this is the same thing.
Okay, this is important,
I think to understand that both,
this person is the central tie.
The substances were sent to an FBI lab
in Maryland for testing,
but as far as I can tell again,
we never get to find out.
The materials according to Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department
Sheriff Kevin McMahill said
were consistent with what was
found at Reedley.
So what does that mean?
Consistent, but you're telling
we never get to find out
what that was,
what's consistent about it,
that they're liquid
or that they're dangerous Ebola?
I guess we'll have to guess.
So his attorney said
that they weren't involved
in any kind of violab,
which you know,
those things tend to be,
well, that's what he would say,
of course, if he was.
But it says,
what went on in that residence
we are unaware of?
Weird.
But Kaposi did not return an email
and phone call
seeking additional comment
from the Times.
Kaposi being the Jew's attorney.
Now it says nearly a month,
no, to what he was saying,
Jew's attorney saying,
we are not aware
of whatever was going on
inside of that residence.
Now that's important
because this overlap
becomes interesting
where what we're hearing
is that essentially it's
he's, you know,
put it for collateral,
called it,
but whether or not he was aware
of the larger point
of what was actually happening,
it matters, I think.
Nearly a month after the search,
it is still not clear
what was inside
the Las Vegas home
and what the plan was
for the materials.
I mean, we've seen these things.
These, look at these pictures.
This is the same stuff
that you had all the screen
that rightly concerned,
but hyper ball is sort of framing
from a lot of the,
you know,
limbs of Tik Tok
and all the mainstream
alternative,
you know,
fake mega patriots
who were all up in arms
rightly so because this was
a crazy story,
but then funny enough
how they stopped talking
about it
when they got to this point.
Sort of like the man
from Azerbaijan
who was actually, you know,
they claimed was a
Palestinian who's going to say,
you're going to know my name
when I come through the border.
And then it turned out
he was actually somebody
that was tied to Mossad
and that was easily proven
and then it just stopped
talking about it.
Talked about that many times.
I mean, guys,
there's no misunderstanding
what that is.
Now it says,
we recognize that
the public is seeking clarity.
What were they testing for?
What possibilities
are being considered?
Christopher Delzato,
special agent in charge
of the FBI Las Vegas,
said during a February news
conference,
in cases like this,
our process relies on
being slow and methodical.
And, okay,
I mean, think about this.
So how many months
did it possibly take
to end up revealing
what this was?
Kaposi,
zoo's attorney,
told reporters outside
of federal courtroom
in 2023,
the allegation
in the congressional report
that his client
is in an agent
of the Chinese government
is inaccurate,
but again,
probably what they would say
if that was the case,
that's the furthest thing
from the truth.
He wrote,
he's applied for asylum here
in the United States
because of the Chinese
government,
which is true,
but, you know,
easily just be a cover,
but it's another point
in the other direction
that ultimately is
trying to apply
for asylum
to get away
from the bad
Chinese government.
That's how it's being framed.
Zoo then moved to Canada
and started doing
business there,
focusing on the
cattle industry.
In 2016,
one of his businesses
was ordered by
a Canadian court
to pay $330 million
for allegedly
stealing
cattle-related technology
from a U.S.-based company.
That's the zoo guy.
It is not clear
whether the business
ever paid the judgment.
Okay,
that seems a bit odd,
isn't it?
Wouldn't you be able to find
documents that
may be most likely,
but there's,
you know,
situations in which
it could be sealed,
but that seems very strange
to me.
So not only is he
a multimillionaire
who lived in Canada,
who got caught stealing
cattle-related U.S. technology
from a U.S.-based company
and then doesn't seem
to have ever flushed out
what actually happened there,
he was ordered to serve
six months in jail
after being found
in contempt of court,
a conviction that he appealed,
but court records
didn't make clear
whether he served any time.
Now,
the House Select Committee
reports say that
Jew fled Canada
and landed in California.
Went right,
went to Reedley.
And that's where
the story continued.
So the question becomes,
with this background,
which, and let me read
this last part, actually,
it says, by 2020,
federal prosecutors
said Zou and his partner,
Wang, were operating
two companies,
Universal Meditech Inc.
and Prestige Biotech Inc.,
which we've heard
those names,
Prestige,
that sold COVID-19
pregnancy
and other types of test kids.
Remember all the money
that Trump's administration
was just dumping
and Biden,
but he started that.
We're just dumping
the money into the hands
of people for COVID tests
and for respirators
and small companies.
I mean,
I think the report
actually showed
that the vast majority of that,
through the CARES app,
wildly broken.
Everybody was abusing them.
Honestly,
I think it was a way
to dump money
in the hands of their friends.
But a lot of people
went through and did it the same
and enriched themselves
faking things like this
because they weren't
checking anything.
Now, it says,
Zou and Wang imported
hundreds of thousands
of COVID-19 test kits
from a Chinese company
that they controlled
and falsely represented
to customers
that the test kits
were made
in the United States
according to their indictment.
They illegally imported
the COVID test kits,
disguised as pregnancy tests,
which they had been approved
to import.
Approved to import.
Okay, so realize
we're talking about a Chinese
nationals
who are,
I mean,
one of them was a multi-millionaire
who got caught stealing
U.S. technology
from a U.S. company,
somehow still has
enough money
to start two new companies,
gets sent to,
goes to,
really, California,
and then starts all of this.
And again,
the common thread
over all of these two points
was the Ori Solomon Israeli,
who owned the building.
So what I just think is interesting
is that there's so many elements
of this,
like I said,
even the energy from the building.
Like, there's so many obvious
elements that shows you,
whether it's the U.S. government,
Israeli government,
or whatever else,
that something was aware of this.
Some element of authority
was allowing
and essentially covering this up.
That's what I believe,
because nothing's happened.
And it ties back to COVID,
ties back to the same kind
of fraud that we were dealing with,
and that overall,
that nobody's done anything
about these people
despite them being caught with fraud,
starting fake companies,
and the way it started seems to suggest
they could have been sort of compromised.
Or zoo, if very least.
And the full scope of what is inside
the Ridley Lab
will probably never be known.
They write.
Why?
Why does that make sense?
Harper, the code enforcement officer,
said the CDC simply declined
to test any of the material
in the warehouse,
because the vials were, quote,
not directly labeled as select agent.
Okay, so you have a possible
anthraxibola
just kind of resting on the shelf
that nobody can identify
because nobody's labeled it
and we don't know.
Does that make sense to anybody?
Does it sound like, I mean,
I gotta admit,
maybe it sounds like
the kind of incompetence
we're dealing with today,
but the reality is we're not
supposed to believe
that they would just take
an unknown substance
and just keep it somewhere
for no reason
and never find out what it was.
Either they're lying about testing it,
don't want us to know
what it is,
or there's another,
or none of this is even
happening the way they're claiming.
Am I crazy?
This is insane to me
that this is even something
that they would claim.
Just declined to test it
because nobody labeled it.
So, yeah, just throw that
possibly bull on the trash
because we're not sure.
Or I guess you could say
they incinerated it,
but there's still a level of concern.
If you don't know what it is,
I mean, are you just
suggesting that you just went
like full BSL4
and everything just to
burn substances you're not sure about?
I guess maybe that would be
the only one that would make
somewhat sense,
but the fact is,
why wouldn't they just tell you that?
You know, there's
something off about this.
In 2024,
a civil lawsuit filed
against the city of Reedley,
Zhu played down the situation
saying that the warehouse
was only being used for storage.
Well, his company waited
for a new facility in Fresno.
So again, this company, right?
So he's built,
somehow still very rich
and influential
or at least making companies,
even though we had to pay
out 30 million dollars,
if that even happened, by the way.
And what he's saying here
is he said I was just
using that for storage.
Now, consider that being possible.
What if this person
is ultimately being used
and wasn't even aware
of what they were using
the location for
and he was using it for storage
for these companies he was doing,
but he was also involved
with corrupt illegal companies
and criminal activity.
So maybe, you know,
it seems like
that either one of those
could make sense,
where this is a guy who was simply
being used for the obvious point
of his nationality
and the cover
in the sense of it
would be caught.
It's obvious where they would
aim this
or he was involved.
And this is him
lying about that.
It isn't known
how many biolabs
are operating in the United States
because there's no
monitoring system in place,
said Sam Howell.
An associate fellow
with the Technology
and National Security Program
at the Center
for a New American Security.
So you want to walk that through?
I mean, let's make sense of that,
that there's no system in place
to monitor for biolabs
after everything we've been through,
after the fact
that despite what we know,
they're still doing gain of function.
Let's not forget.
In fact, they should have grabbed that.
That's actually really important
for this conversation.
Oh, that's the wrong one.
I'm not probably,
I don't even know
what it's called now.
I remember off the top of my head.
Because the point is,
Donald Trump
and his administration
have become the leaders in the world
they claim of the safe
or the good versions of gain of function.
That's the truth.
For those that probably
don't want to believe that,
you're probably denied
if I don't grab the article,
but let me just see
if I can find it real quick.
And the point was just like
with the lie of the COVID shots
and the lie of,
I mean, everything they seem to do.
We're stopping the COVID,
and except you're not,
we'll get to that in a second
where you're quite literally
still recommending them right now.
Where you're quite literally
still making them for 2026
right now from Trump's administration.
It's insane, guys.
The point, though,
let's see.
No, that's an old one.
Is that Donald Trump's administration
claimed they were stopping
gain of function,
but he read the documentation.
It said very clearly
that we were going to
stop all the dangerous ones,
but be the world's leader
in the ones that aren't dangerous.
But that's a game.
Gain of function is the problem,
not the certain picked ones they like.
That's frustrating.
In the chat,
if you guys remember what show that was,
I can't seem to remember.
I don't think it was in 2025.
I think it was,
maybe it was.
Anyway, I'll try.
If you guys remember what it was,
put it in the chat
and I'll include it in the show notes.
That's frustrating.
What was that show called?
Anyway, back to the article.
So,
we don't have any way to monitor.
Well, obviously what we're talking about here
would be like unknown secret violence,
but what point is that there's
plenty of these things that operate
and no one's even trying to monitor them.
How does that make sense?
I don't know.
A day after the Las Vegas raid in January,
the case once again returned to Central California
where the FBI executed a search warrant
on the warehouse.
Reedley City manager Nicole Zahiba
said during the news conference in February,
Zahiba assured that
the public that all biological materials
were removed from the site years ago
and only pallets of COVID-19 tests,
pregnancy tests and boxes of paperwork remain.
Ultimately Zahiba said
officials in Reedley were quote,
not surprised there was a Vegas connection.
Really?
For two years,
Harper had warned federal agents
that there could be additional materials
in the home.
In Las Vegas,
based on details she learned
during the investigation in Reedley.
I couldn't get them to move on it,
she said.
The attitude really has been,
well, we caught the guy.
We did our part.
So do you sense the same thing I do
in this entire thing?
Come to your conclusions about it.
But with everything we just saw,
and even what she just said right there,
she's literally going,
guys, there's still dangerous things in there
and they go, ah, we got him.
It feels very October 7th
of the Israeli government going,
stop telling us about the drills
or we're going to put you in jail.
Don't point at that anymore, right?
I just think that's wild.
So we'll keep an eye on this
if anything continues to develop.
Oh, here.
Maybe she grabbed the right article.
Let's see.
Oops, hold on.
That wasn't...
Let's see.
Oh, this is the one
because I want you guys to check this out.
Oh, no.
That's just the one.
Oh, you're just posting that in the chat for them.
I see. Thank you for that.
Yeah, so if you happen to find
the one in the chat, guys,
about the one I'm talking about,
the Donald Trump's administration
essentially becoming the world,
the leaders and gain a function
and when they kind of lied about that,
I'd like to talk about that too.
Make sure we weren't...
Make sure we're done, right?
Yeah, okay.
So just to refresh as well,
I'll include this,
which is what was posted from Las Vegas locally.
The federal judge in Nevada
has ordered the release of Oris Solomon,
the property manager connected
to the suspected Las Vegas Biolab,
which is not suspected, right?
Especially now.
But as far as I can tell,
these people have never actually gotten charged.
I just find that to be quite insane,
especially with where we are in the world right now,
with all the concern of people growing awareness
of what Israel is doing around the world.
But it shouldn't just be Israel.
I'm just as concerned about this stuff.
If it's a foreign anything
doing something like this in the country concerns me.
But it obviously should matter more
when we can see what the Israeli government
is telling you they're capable of.
Committing genocide,
literally bombing schools and nurseries and hospitals
and conducting dangerous operations,
bombing, booby-trapping electronics.
It's not a secret.
These aren't even opinions.
It's provable.
So that necessarily matters
when you're talking about whether one might be more dangerous
in regard of the government involved.
I'll also include the article from February 6th,
federal judge ordered the release of,
and again, as far as I left out,
I think that's where it is of Oris Solomon.
Solomon, who was originally from Israel,
is in the country on a non-immigration visa.
Now, let's talk about some partisan stuff
that I definitely think is worth acknowledging.
Just one is first, actually,
before we get into, like, the deflection points.
Oh, actually, I take that back.
There's a couple of points I'll include here,
but I want to highlight the technocratic stuff,
and then we're going to get into, sort of,
the deflection points here.
But first is this.
Just, again, like I said,
there's some of these things I just want to include,
so you guys can see the updates we've touched on.
I just think this is kind of wild.
We're talking about this live,
speaking of the lies, for example,
and the ability for them to just wholesale lie to you,
even though we can easily prove it.
The same reference I always—
I feel like that was one of the earliest examples
from this admin,
and, again, interestingly, starting with Stephen Miller,
where he just decided to go,
we've won that case seven to zero.
A major and highly documented Supreme Court case
where they very clearly lost zero to seven.
Now, you may not agree with that.
You may not remember.
The point is, as absolute fact, that was the case.
You could print out the document.
You could watch the judge type people going,
what are they talking about?
Here's the actual ruling.
Okay.
The point is, he lied about that,
and he knew he lied about that.
It was an exercise to see if they—
and, sure enough,
all of the ones you might expect,
Nick Sorter and Gail all the way came out
and they said,
we won!
Literally, I remember Nick's doing that.
Holy crap!
Red flag!
Oh, my God!
We won seven to zero!
And I doubt Nick even cared
whether this troop didn't know,
but they lied.
They knowingly misled people,
and then they just carried to the conversation.
And to this very day,
I could bring that up,
or at least when it was still
sort of in the conversation,
a week later,
and people would still argue.
No, no, we won that.
It speaks to where we actually are right now.
Now, in this case,
same kind of thing.
Right?
And this is actually pretty—
it's interesting how they're pushing this right now.
I honestly think it's more about
drawing attention to the fact
that they're lying
to go ignore everything else, maybe,
but end of the day,
let's not forget,
Donald Trump—
and I might even have that article—
he stated this out loud.
This is why I think it's so interesting
that he does this.
Let's see if it pops up.
How does that keep happening?
Let's see.
Well, here's just the same discussion.
The point was that Donald Trump
said very, very publicly
he had to do the save act
that unless they pass this,
or until they do,
he will not sign any bills.
And that's not popping up.
So—
and easy to check for yourself.
That's the reality.
And so he said that we won't—
we're not going to sign anything
until you pass this.
And—
and by the way,
it even says right here,
you'll find out—
then when it came around
where they were holding things up
and vote—
like for the TSA example,
for example,
they just made this big case
about Democrats don't fund it.
I showed you the voting role
for that vote about funding TSA,
and it was voted no by almost—
I mean, I think by every Republican.
And they turn around and say,
the Democrats won't pay them.
Now, I'm not even joking.
If you haven't looked into this,
then what they're doing
is the same thing they do every time.
It's not unique to Republicans.
Democrats do it when they're at their turn.
They simply—
they put their foot down and say,
this is what we demand.
And you have to do that,
or we're not going to do this.
And then they choose not to,
which is their prerogative.
And then because they're the one,
Trump's administration,
holding it up,
waiting for them to do what they want,
they claim it's their fault.
It's like, you know,
you're—
stop hitting yourself
with your brother kind of a thing.
You know, it's like,
you're the one doing it to yourself.
They're the ones doing it
to the other side,
blaming them for not letting it happen.
Now, this is Fox News asking
why isn't Trump—
why isn't Trump involved
in trying to get the government—
end the government shutdown?
Here's how Johnson replies.
Speaker, it seems as though Republicans
and Democrats are talking
past one another right now.
Is the only person who could solve this,
the president of the United States,
and why isn't he involved?
Well, I think he is involved.
I mean, I know he had a group of—
He went down the plan yesterday.
Well, that's what's been reported.
Okay.
He said he voted down the plan.
He did.
That's what's been reported
with somebody says.
He brought some—
He said that in the alcohol office
that he was not pleased.
He said it in the alcohol office because he did.
So you have to understand,
like, this is how crazy this is.
Johnson is well aware that we're not stupid.
We can look at it, they know.
But the point is just a lie,
so then screaming idiots online
will carry the lie for you
and mix up the conversation
or maybe convince somebody that's the case.
With that plan.
Well, I actually have his exact quote somewhere.
I think he said that—
to paraphrase him,
I think he said he's a little skeptical
or cynical that a deal is going to come together.
What we're hearing, okay,
on our chamber is that there's discussions going on
that Democrats are demanding to break off parts of homeland
and fund it separately.
I found these articles to show you here.
It's important just so we can have it on the record
for those that, you know,
tend to not want to hear it
and so they'll ignore it until you show them.
But so this is what's important, right?
Because it's funny to watch them sit there
and deny that, right?
And here,
Donald Trump refuses to sign other bills
until SAVAC does pass.
Now, to be clear,
that's not just them mischaracterizing his statements.
That's what he said.
This was back on March 8th, right?
So that's why they just think we can't remember
after, you know, two, three weeks.
And here's another one.
Trump warned Republicans
no compromise on the DHS deal
until country-destroying dam is pushed through SAVAC.
See, they understand.
It's very clear.
He's just saying, you do this
or we're not going to let anything else happen.
And then when they don't do what they're told,
he turns around and goes,
they're not letting all these things happen.
It's just ridiculously juvenile.
And to be clear, again, like I said,
it's not just him,
but it's what he is doing right now.
Now, so if you're over there,
if you're one of the people trying to pretend
that this is different,
he's not like them or he's not like the guy.
He's the rebel fly in the deep state
and ask yourself why he's acting the exact same way.
So inside of paper,
President Trump,
I am going to sign an order
instructing the Secretary of Homeland Security,
Mark Wayne Mullen,
to immediately pay our TSA agents
in order to address this emergency situation
and to quickly stop the Democrat chaos
at the airport, Democrat chaos, right?
Because they're the ones,
no, they just have a, you know,
I don't think highly of any of these people.
I don't think they have principles,
but the reality of what they're claiming is
that they don't agree with it.
And they clearly don't.
So what you want is for them to do something
they don't agree with
and if they don't do what they don't agree with,
you're going to make sure everything else doesn't happen.
In what world is that anybody's fault but Trump's?
It just is such a silly thing we deal with
and these people are all such childish people.
The Democrat chaos, the airports,
it's not an easy thing to do,
but I'm going to do it.
Oh, because you're such a great person, Trump.
How great of you to praise yourself
and how great you are.
I think about how weird that is.
And he said it's bipolar disorder right here,
he says, doom.
But so, you know, basically,
you know, this is so funny,
radical left Democrats
and their leader crying Chuck Schumer
have made it.
I don't know.
I'm just so tired of pretending
like this person is worthy of respect
for any of them for that matter.
But the idea that you're, you know,
why do you have to speak like this?
Like it's not respectable or cool
or somehow, you know,
bucking the system to just be an idiot
to just be ridiculously juvenile
and crying Chuck Schumer,
you know, radical left Democrats.
You're being hyperbolic.
You're being inaccurate.
You're being, you know,
it's just not respectable.
People should make fun of anybody doing that.
Now, if you think that, that's fine.
But clearly he'll say things tomorrow
that mean the opposite.
It's just this person is just screaming
what I think he thinks you want to hear.
Just in a mass says Trump demands
unconstitutional warrantless surveillance
of all Americans.
That's a different post.
Speaker of the House Johnson
and Senate Majority Leader John Thune
have been working to pass a clean
extension of FISA.
Oh, he said clean, Ryan,
so you don't understand
it's going to be a good MAGA version
of the thing we've all been fighting
and hating at this entire time.
Sure, you're actually hearing that
from some people.
The point is he wants to one standard
for himself,
no spying and another for everybody else
by like crazy.
It's just like just like the fact
that it will get to a second
where he just literally admitted
that he did mail-in voting
because he's president.
He can.
So shut up.
Yes, literally just happened.
The so-called reforms made to 702
in the past are a joke.
That's why he wants a clean expansion.
They're just doing what they cleaned
with. I mean, I can bring it up
again. I just showed you
how many times they were saying,
no, it's ever no two is bad
for everybody. No matter what,
just like they said about.
Mail-in voting, but then they do it.
You just you're either knowledge
how ridiculous that is
or you're just not an honest person.
Interestingly, in regard to the idea
of spying and invasiveness,
this is what Reddit is doing,
along with everybody else,
because this government,
along with the rest of the world,
it seems are driving a world
where we don't have anonymity
and just recognize this is happening
under Trump's administration
or not necessarily indicative
of him personally or his government.
But I do believe that was driving.
That's my point is this happens
now under his.
Authority and same under
Biden's anybody else
because this is what our government
wants to be the reality,
despite him stating different things.
Reddit CEO announced
he is forcing a human verification
on the platform.
He will force users to verify
through biometrics on the device,
a third party or a government ID.
How much you want to bet
it's going to be something like
autentics.
Now, Ricardo points out
Trump just gave 13 tech
billionaires the keys
to American AI policy.
But here's a huge conflict
of interest here.
I'm shocked.
The White House just announced
the president's council
of advisors on science and technology.
Sort of sounds very
technocratic issue, doesn't it?
We're talking about a council
of technological and science advisors
to the president
who are, you know,
some of the most influential
and wealthy people on the planet.
It's almost like he's starting to
organize a very technocratic
led government with all the,
you know, I mean,
I'm obviously sort of laying it
on thick guys.
That's insanely obvious.
Now, you can argue
it's not what's happening.
But if you, like, if you just,
aside from like the narrative
or the conspiracy theory
you think it is,
what's technocracy?
Right?
It's a structure of leaders
or rather just a governing
structure led by the technical
experts.
At least how it originally
was framed.
It's actually become
more of a eugenics sort of
supremacy mindset.
But either way,
is that not what this is?
Do we not have these people?
I mean, right now you've got
people influential on Trump
that are not even
in official positions
who are seemingly influencing
more than anybody else.
As he builds a new global order
around the board of peace
and proposes a new
WHO, I mean,
everything he's doing
can't be denied
except unless you're somebody
who has pretended to call it out
for all this time
and now pretends it's not there.
But here are the people
he's talking about.
He goes, White House,
just announced this,
sounds boring, right?
But wait till you understand
what it's about.
Here's who it is.
This is insane to me.
Think about what we were all
calling out before this.
But Jones and all the rest
were all calling out
and all the people he told
you were going to go to jail,
well, guess what?
Some of them are on this list.
Who he now will find a way
to support in some
backward way, I imagine.
So the CEO of NVIDIA,
CEO of Metta, Mark Zuckerberg.
Mark Zuckerberg, right.
As Matt points out,
the day after a jury
convicts Metta of illegally
endangering children,
which happened,
I haven't reported on it,
Trump puts Mark Zuckerberg
on a panel overseeing
AI regulation.
I mean, even aside from that,
how does Mark Zuckerberg
represent what the
Democrats rather than
Republicans were telling you
America first
or fighting for the...
How is that not the
representation of what
you all told us
was the deep state?
It is, in case you're
missing the point.
That's exactly...
I mean, almost everybody
on this list would have
been somebody they would
have framed as the
insider deep state.
Yep.
And many of them, by the
way, were very much
Democrat leaders.
Now it doesn't matter
because Trump's team,
well, executive chairman
of Oracle,
because that's
Larry Ellison.
I mean, guys,
how can any Republican
with a straight face
support all of this
with what you guys have been
saying your entire time?
I mean, that's why I'm
arguing, in case you've
missed any other shows,
that the vast majority
of conservatives are very
much uncomfortable with
what's happening right now.
I've been saying that
for months well before
people were...
I mean, I've gotten
so much pushback for that.
I think it's self-evident
right now.
You guys can decide.
Mark Andreessen,
you know, the guy
who literally proposed
the idea of the
CEO-run country
and the idea of how
we need good oligarchs
to save us the bad
oligarchs
and wrote a manifesto
techno-optimist manifesto?
Totally no big deal, right?
Hashtag winning.
Sergei Brin,
Google co-founder.
I mean, my God,
I can go off an entire show.
Whitney's talked about him
in so many...
I mean, the idea
of these people
being in these positions
and not being called out
for exactly what it is
shows you how dangerous
the broken system
of our, you know,
media apparatus
around the system is.
Not the honest,
independent media,
but the people
who are corralling you
into the problem.
Safra Katz,
the Oracle CEO.
Fred
was an ERSAM
co-founder of Coinbase.
Don't forget that
the previous CTO
of Coinbase
is the person
who's aggressively driving
the whole network state agenda
and which
is the same conversation.
The reimagining
of our society
and that's what they're talking about
when you hear freedom cities,
when you hear smart cities,
when you hear
15-minute cities.
It's all the same conversation.
CEO of Orca Oklo,
the nuclear startup
that Sam Altman
chaired until last year.
No big deal.
CEO of Commonwealth Fusion Systems,
backed by NVIDIA
and Google.
All the good guys.
David Friedberg,
venture capitalist part
of the SACS Network.
The SACS Network.
Cool.
Google
former quantum
computing lead,
John Martinez.
I mean,
are we going to pretend
that this is the group
that you guys
would have picked for yourselves?
No.
Now, here's what
Trump wrote in this.
The President's
Council of Advisors
on Science and Technology,
the PCAST,
established by executive order
because that's how things
work today, right?
That's democracy,
we're told.
Brings together the national
foremost luminaries
and science and technology.
Now, to be clear,
I wouldn't argue that this
would be something that would
go through, you know,
this is Donald Trump
picking his, so different.
That's probably not
the best point to make,
but I still argue
the executive order
and the way these things
operate.
That's just how they govern
today.
And I've been saying that
for so long.
Obama, even before,
this is governance by edict,
by dictate.
That's what they're doing.
But, as I showed you,
you know, in the rest,
you can read,
I'm very worried about
what that's developing into.
And, you know,
as we'll make a point in a
second, I think might even
be right here about Doge.
I'll get to it in a second.
You know, the point is
simply just like before.
It's like, remember those
of us that were trying
to call these things out
before it came to pass,
when we might have been
able to stop it, right?
Because a lot of people
and people who maybe
just didn't see it,
who are honest, right?
That happens too,
who are just calling it
out while it's happening.
That's good, right?
But recognize that there are
so many opportunities for us
to at least try
to stop some of these things.
Like I've been screaming
about when it comes
to what I think is happening.
What I think.
But as these things come to pass,
I see, oh, damn it.
We had an opening right there.
And the same screaming people
online stop the honest people
from actually taking
advantage of that opening.
So, as the picture at
Blonde pointed out,
so Trump just announced
that he's pointing
Mark Zuckerberg,
the same guy who's censored,
banned, and shut down
our Facebook accounts.
The same guy that more Republicans
I've heard in my life,
I mean, have called this guy out
than Democrats that I've ever seen.
Dare to speak out
on the jab election fraud
when they censored you.
Science and Technology
Advisor Board, right?
This is the man who decided
that you weren't allowed
to talk about COVID-19
and Trump's the man
who started that program.
But let's all pretend
like we're winning.
What could possibly go wrong?
And as five times August
rightly points out,
next up for the
government promotion,
Bill Gates.
Probably.
I mean, I don't even think he would need it.
He's already very influential.
So is Larry Fink and all the rest of the people
who we're told are being jailed right now.
Should he be elected?
Now, as we just talked about in the last show,
Pentagon is adopting Palantir as its AI
core US system.
The US military's core system
is now going to be Palantir AI.
I mean,
remember when we told you the same point
back then?
Jones said it's a small thing.
Democrats hate.
You guys are freaking out.
You're wrong.
And every single day,
it becomes more obvious.
Hey,
we might have been able to make a point and stop this
and we still might right now stand up,
do something about it.
My point is,
if we keep listening to people who are trying to tell
you the opposite of what's quite literally happening
in front of you,
then we will miss the boat.
Here is Mark Goodwin rightly pointing out
on top of Palantir and everything else,
by the way,
immigration OS,
with the ice dynamic,
with Gotham,
with Clearview.
I mean,
every single thing we're talking about,
the overlap with Paragon Solutions,
which is a spyware company from Israel
that is one of the most criminal groups.
I mean,
been called out by everybody
for spying on journalists illegally.
I mean,
and this is all meshed together.
The dynamic of what they're doing in Israel
and that AI overlap.
I mean,
it's just wild on top of that.
And drill and Palantir
to develop software to run Trump's
Golden Dome anti-missile shield.
Fantastic.
And as he writes here,
and this is from one of their articles,
an under-reported revelation
within the recent batch of Epstein emails
released by the Department of Justice
is that Epstein
likely co-invested in Andarille
alongside Founders Fund,
via Peter Thiel,
no big deal.
Yeah,
and these are the guys that are literally
in the tightest,
closest position to the,
you know, to power.
But yeah,
but the Epstein files.
Oh, what is that again?
We don't forget about that.
Now, by the way,
on a quick side note,
I mentioned this in our last,
when Whitney just recently co-hosted
the Daily Wrap Up.
But we,
Derek and I just had a good meeting
about the show we're going to be doing,
which she announced on that show.
It'll be for,
it'll be under the banner
of Unlimited Hangout.
And essentially what we're going to be doing
at,
because essentially what we,
I a lot of times do it on the show already,
is that Derek and I will be
doing sort of a review
of the in-depth investigatory things
they put out on Unlimited Hangout.
You know,
I think twice a month is the plan so far
is that we'll basically take one of these,
you know,
because these articles are wildly in-depth,
lots of source material,
and, you know, very long.
And so the point is to kind of do a show
where we can review the information,
break it down,
have a conversation about it
between Derek and I.
I think it'll be fantastic.
And I think it'll be good to,
you know,
draw more attention to the writing content
that needs to be heard.
But on that,
again,
back to the point that,
and the reason I said it here
is because Mark Goodwin is a part of Unlimited Hangout
and he is writing with Whitney right now.
But,
how is this not alarming for people?
The all,
the so many connections to almost every single thing
Republicans were calling out before we got here.
It should be.
And again, my point is that it is.
It's just not being shown.
People are very unhappy with this.
As evidenced by some of the most large
Republican influencers in the conversation,
suddenly calling Trump out,
but yeah,
I'm totally missing the boat, right?
Andrew Palantir developing
Golden Dome Missile Shield Software,
source says.
Andrew and Palantir Technologies
are working together to develop software
for U.S. President Donald Trump's
Golden Dome anti-missile shield initiative.
Now,
my opinion of the Iron Dome,
I think has been fleshed out and proven many times over.
It does have an effect.
It does have to,
but I think it's largely,
it's like Elon Musk hyping one thing,
he patched together before it's even ready.
And then as if he never finished it,
where often I see that thing just not functional
based on what's happening.
And also I think it's used as a false flag dynamic.
And I've seen that.
I've said,
like for example,
the one reported on in the Druze location
where Israel said it was,
what was it, Syria?
And ultimately the point was
that you could prove it.
It was on video.
Their own Iron Dome shot a missile up
and landed on the field full of soccer players.
And they lied about it.
Surprise, surprise.
But my point is in Gaza, Israel,
they've done that plenty of times
where they just,
they claim something was fired
and they use it to justify something.
That's not to say that there's not
Rockers being fired in some cases.
My point though is
I feel like a lot of that has been money laundering
where this is money just dumped in there
where ultimately,
not even just this,
but a lot of ways.
The U.S. government dumps money in the hands of Israel
who then builds things
and oftentimes sells them back to the United States.
I mean, we're being scammed.
They know it's happening,
but American people don't often know it.
In this case, I wonder whether the Golden Dome
is going to be some other kind of scam.
But even if it's not,
what we're talking about here
is not just about defense, guys.
That is a surveillance dynamic.
That is literally the control grade
that we're talking about.
It says the $185 billion
Golden Dome Missile Defense Project
aims to build a space-based
shield capable of intercepting ballistic crews
and hypersonic missiles
with hundreds of companies vying for a role
in developing the shield.
$185 billion.
Yeah, that whole idea of less spending
in smaller government
or even pretending like that was the case,
he never even tried.
We'll talk about the Doge thing in a second.
Andrew and Palantir have been interested
in being a part of Golden Dome
since the inception.
In reality, I argue that wasn't interested in.
I think that was the plan
and they were involved from day one.
Reuters reported last year that the firms
were working with Elon Musk's SpaceX
on various parts of the project.
Andrew was also among companies
that were awarded half a dozen small
Golden Dome contracts in November
to build competing missile defense prototypes.
Illyria Technologies,
Startups Scale AI
and software firm Swoop Technologies
are also working on the project.
Now I briefly looked into them.
I haven't done deep dives,
but look into them
and let me know if you find
something interesting.
The price tag for the project has increased
by $10 billion
to now $185 billion
in a bid to accelerate
the key space-based capabilities.
More money.
I just don't understand
why this is what we support.
Now, Derek rightly called this out
in his article back in 2025.
In April, welcome to the Palantir World Order.
Just to yet again demonstrate the value
of how these things are important to see
before they're already being done
or before it's already built around you.
In this case, there's plenty of good stuff
in this article that he called out before.
It's even, I mean,
some of these things are still coming to pass.
Point in this one,
SpaceX, Palantir, Golden Dome over America.
Last week, Reuters reported
that Elon Musk, SpaceX, Palantir,
and Andrew Real Industries
were in the front runners
to win the contract to build Golden Dome.
I argue that was always the case.
Trump has called for America to add
a one quick point.
Remember that we got an insight into this
during the incredible incompetence
of like Bondi and Nome.
And Nome came out where, you know,
the whole no bid contract dynamic,
which was really embarrassing for her.
I think that's often what this is anyway.
They pretend they gave you some kind of illusion
of structure of like the meritocracy
that's clearly not even represented
in this conversation, never really has
in our government.
But in this case,
this was always going to go to them
is my point.
And there was no, you know,
trying to find the best person for the position.
It's about the people who are inside
connected to the right things.
My opinion.
Trump has called for America to have
a dome defense system similar to that
of the Israeli's Iron Dome.
Andrew was founded by Trump donor,
Palmer Lucky, with funding from
Palantir CEO Peter Thiel.
Funny how that just it's just a little
incestuous circle that never seems to go away.
Sources speaking to Reuters claim
that the three companies met with
officials in Trump's administration
and the Department of Defense
in recent weeks in 2025 in April
to outline their plan to build and launch
between 400 and 1,000 satellites
to direct, to detect missiles
and track their movements.
This would be combined with 200 attack
satellites with missiles and lasers
to bring down enemy missiles.
Now, certainly could be
the only thing it's doing.
But on that note,
I think it's worth considering
what he just said there
in the idea of the satellites, right?
So one, to track their movements.
So are we going to pretend like that's
only going to apply to one
it's going to be to anything they want it to apply to.
So as I said, this is going to be
the control grid. It's just like Israel's applied in the same way.
I mean, it is a surveillance dynamic on top of everything else.
It would be combined with 200
attack satellites. So it's also,
you know, not this ultimately lasers
to bring down missiles is actually applied to anything.
So I'm going to play this clip
really quickly after I read the rest of this
to show you the alarming
view of what this actually
looks like in case you haven't seen it.
Despite these sources telling Reuters that the SpaceX
group is not expected to be involved
in the weaponization of the satellites,
these plans for a golden dome would
line up with SpaceX Star Shield program,
which TLAB previously reported poses a potential
danger to privacy for people around the world.
And here's the article for that.
In late
2024, Palantir, Andrew,
SpaceX and open AI, it's just,
you know, like I said at the beginning, it's like
they're playing it as if they're different things, but the agenda
and honestly, probably even just the
like when I pointed out like open AI
and Stargate and I wondered why it wasn't
X AI and Elon, I think
it's just the same. I think they're involved
in a larger agenda. Like
Rubio and Trump, for example, clearly hate each other.
They pretend they don't and they're working together
now. Same point.
Now it says the move was the
latest effort by the technocrats to replace
the old guard of the military industrial complex.
Companies like Lockheed Martin,
Raytheon, Boeing.
Here's the article
you can't hide.
Remember this one? Elon Musk and SpaceX are helping
the intelligence build the world's largest
by satellite network. Now are we going to pretend
that they're going to put billions of dollars
into building what they literally called and this
came from the, what was it? That's
the clip I was going to play.
The National Reconnaissance Office,
which is above most and very shadowy
even amongst the shadowy groups
that we know about. And they said, what we are
trying to, what we are going to be doing.
He said
they are part of a proliferating architecture
to go off and get us reasonably
high resolution imagery of the earth at a
high speed. He goes, now you can't hide
because you're constantly being looked at.
That's what the quote was.
Now, building like this
with Elon and then suddenly just not
anymore and now we're going to use a different company.
That's not what's happening. They're either
all involved in this and it's both him and
I think the point is in a lot of ways to keep
Elon Musk's name out of this because of how bad that
went when they started. But this
this is what we know is already happening. So
explain to me how this can be there, but we're going to be doing something else.
This is
2020
and what you're seeing by those dots
if you see the video that that is
satellite. Those are starling satellites.
It's a representation of, but this is the
reality right now. 2021
2022
2023
2024
I believe it stopped before
2024
look at that
right. I mean, so this is
2024
I mean, doesn't that just give you the chill that
makes me feel claustrophobic
everyone and we're talking about, I mean, it's surveillance
the whole thing guys. This is what they've already done
and I think this is just about to build out the
the what Catherine's telling you
that what they're talking about is the control grid.
So
include that for you. It's a good article read
So on top of that, in regard to
technocracy and kind of the control grid conversation
Jason Bassler points out something else that Peter
Teal involved in. And I just
I have a hard time not connecting this with two things in my mind
with like a
almost like a Pokemon go kind of an overlap, but really
more so the COVID-19 conversation
where what did we tell you
lockdowns we talked about, well, this came from like
prisons or like
you know, for like intelligent like a
you know, dealing with terrorism and stuff like that
and then we also talked about the contact
tracing right and the and the different
wearable technology and every one of these
things tied back to something like cattle
you know
herding controlling pop prison populations
every single one of them
or CIA black hood kind of dynamics
it like going Panama. That's what we're dealing
with. That's not an opinion that was literally
that where these tactics originated from
and how they were applied before that
this
is something totally separate
Peter Teal just backed an AI system that
can herd 600,000 cows
with one tap
it's called halter
the system uses GPS collars
and behavioral science to train
cows to obey algorithmic sound
cues while tracking their vitals
location stress and compliance
makes you wonder about the push for smart
wearables
for tech farming or beta testing
pop management. Now
I'm not going to I wasn't going to get into any of it
today because I just don't I almost feel like that's exactly
what they would want but I'm sure you all saw
that weirdly cryptic nonsense that the
White House account was putting out yesterday
all these weird things that almost made me
worried I'm like being you know like weird
like shaky
images and graphic things and like weird
high-pitched sounds and stuff for like three
second videos
I kind of think they want you to go what are they
doing I guess Q people are freaking
about of course they are because
they'll read into anything they want whatever they want
I thought though was something like that
when you're thinking about like the sound behavioral
stuff because this is real stuff
and you wonder whether or not that like
like Catherine talked about or like James
Geo Donald talks about in regard to neuroscience
these things are real despite how
like unaware most people are or
how visible they are to most people like
in our lives just worth thinking
about that we're dealing with some kind of an overlap
in this but even way aside from that
just this technology and having them invest
in it I just feel like that's a little bit on the
nose
Robert Barnes points out what David
here said the Trump Pentagon official who
ousted Anthropic has a multimillion
dollar stake in one of its direct
AI competitors
according to disclosure review the corruption
is off the chain with these people and I think
it's because of their incompetence I don't think they realize how
obvious it is they think well that's what everybody
else did look at how corrupt Biden was we agree
but they did it in ways
that were at least deniable in some cases
I mean badly
right it's only further you go back
they seem to be more and more well I guess there's a little bit
of a little bit of a schism with how ridiculous
little bush was my point though is you go back
further and it was they seem like they at least presented
themselves as more respectable because that's what they
wanted to pretend to be in my mind
in this case you see them just
doing it like Trump just literally here sell my
by my new watch here's my Trump shoes
but you know he's like just insane it is
wildly corrupt the conflict
of interest is off the chain so this is
I mean what this is probably just one additional
point to all this I think it actually has more to do with
using it for their technology but now
you have an example where there they benefit
from that now I just read before I started
I haven't gone into it that ultimately I think they
just won in their case where they're the
judges ruling that the Trump administration
is not allowed to
penalize anthropic better who knows
what's gonna go and again that was only just
a headline and passing so I haven't got into it
but it says he also has steaks and other AI and robotic
companies with businesses
before the business before the Pentagon
just incredible
and yeah even Robert Barnes who's
you know I'm not sure if he's still a Trump
supporter because he's been very critical of
a lot of what they're doing but he was before
I'm glad to see people starting to call this stuff
out but he said the level of corruption is utterly
nuts it is
being allowed to even by the Democrats
because guess what no one's being arrested
this is creepy
you probably saw this
high impact flick shared this this is this
awkward moment just happened at the White House
and as David Ike says what the f the world
is utterly insane selling AI dystopia
very badly
so this is
I'll just play this first or
read this first it's funny framing
Travis says so the Trump administration
went from immigrants are taking our jobs
to an immigrant introducing a robot
who is taking our jobs got it
it's crazy
you know so what's interesting too don't forget
that Trump recently came out despite how little
attention it got for obvious reasons because
seemingly every partisan on the team's
player side is a shockingly dishonest person
he came out and literally said you know
you got to ease up on that some of these illegal
immigrants are good you know working good for here and there
I have my
points about whether what I think at all the idea
that he clearly said and drew drove
this shockingly aggressive anti-immigrant
rhetoric which is still there
about how every illegal immigrant has to be
well technically that's the case they're legally here
right so if we're even going to apply the law
what he just said challenges everything he
put forward but so too does his glyphosate
thing so too does his COVID shot thing so too
does everything he's doing if you're not lying
to yourself but it's just crazy that you
can even say that and have them still support it
but back to the point
watch this only a part of it actually
gentlemen the first lady
of the
American states
Melania Trump
isn't that weird that it would cut off the
English and just
dive here with
the
mind that these things exist
that made it weird for somebody
somebody here but the point is that
there's been cases in the past
like Elon for example or plenty where
they're
kind of fake until they make it where they put out like
Sophia for example that turned out to be a complete lie
even the original Tesla ones they put
out it was revealed later that that for earlier
one you saw well they were remote controlling
so it was more of a game they were playing they were
you know and it but it's not like they're you know they're
kind of trying to like get buzz going but they lied about
it they made it seem as if it was working
and so in this case consider that this is
not an autonomous AI dynamic
and really just them manipulating it that's why I
said I do believe though that they do have these things that can
function but just consider that you know
we're still being played some way but what's
this about right I mean isn't
this the opposite of everything that the Trump
team was talking about you know every
dynamic of this like
like I've said even the climate change stuff
from USAID even the funding of like HIV
stuff in Africa that stuff still happening
I don't know how many times I can
show people that but that's just not an honest conversation
thank you first lady Melania Trump
for inviting me to the White House
it is an honor to be
at fostering the future together's global coalition
inaugural meeting I'm figure
three a humanoid bill from the United States
inaugural meeting future together's
global coalition inaugural meeting
the global coalition inaugural meeting
you know I mean that's just
like not everything that
involves other countries is you know necessarily
even nefarious but I just think it's important
to highlight that every single thing they're
leaning into is being looked at right now
from a global dynamic everything
I mean even from an immigration
perspective of crying out loud but the whole thing
is everything is like that that has to be
acknowledged as not what you're being told
they're actually doing
figure three a humanoid bill from the
United States of America I am
grateful to be part of this historic movement
to empower children with technology and education
yeah that's what it's about right to
power children clearly
that's I mean it's just there's so many
disgusting things about the way they're applying this and
you know these are the people that are
literally in real time covering up the Epstein files
so let's pretend like that's what they really want to do
but you can watch the rest of this it's just creepy
and this is not what I think
is based even remotely supports
but as
this next post points out
so
Catherine Austin Fitz no forget by the way she had
there's a fake account out there that's pretending to be her
she says hmm Melania
pitching robots for teachers
Bridget pitching shredding the Constitution
to protect children nothing about
the prosecuted in the Epstein pedophiles though
and here's what she says and translated
for her but she's talking about the same
game they always play we believe in free
speech but certain things are
not allowed to be said so you in other words
don't support free speech got it
I do know that I am the United States
a country that I love very much
and here we are
the country of free speech but I think
that Liberty does have some rules
we have to be free
but adapt to certain codes so I believe
in these codes too many young people
are suffering and always
use oh but the children they don't care
I mean
what you're saying is that you know yet we have to
censor people's words because
bad things happen to children it's
illogical
that's up for parents to handle
you know what I mean like it's just this is
obviously about what you think it is
whether she thinks it is or not like this
when we led because you could argue she has
good intentions the government will
abuse this like it always does
they do not tell us but they
send signals very strong signals
from young people and teenagers
so it's up to us
to answer them let's answer them
all together oh yes clearly
because what they're she saying we're picking up all the
signals that are the young kids are telling us
please censor everybody
just sad
I mean the thing is they I think they're very
aware that most people are seeing through this
Aaron Day
points out if you thought NGOs
were corrupt wait until you learn about the
board of peace private army
that is used to bomb countries and pave the way
for technocracy to the Trump family and Whitco
families personally profit from
and as I said
US State Department transfers
$1.25 billion of foreign aid
of your money
for international
disasters and peacekeeping but transfers
it instead to Trump's board of peace
now what's funny is somebody's going to go well
we don't want international to well guess what
that's happening anyway so if you pretend
whether it's your ongoing supporting of the
globalist wars that are going on or
any other number of things that are still going through
USAID or NED and the same stuff is
happening like I've shown a thousand times
this is just I argue
the note that you think he's changing
from what the Democrats did
when ultimately that's not even in a material sense
happening like saying we're ending the COVID
shots and you guys went yay and then they didn't do
that at all but they said it out loud that's nice
so here is
this post oh this one was a
oh yeah that's right just mixed up on that
so here is the article this is from
some form State Department
sends $1.25 billion in foreign aid
to the board of peace I thought that was funny
I thought about there like just the timing of this
the board of peace
you know I mean like while he's literally
conducting wars as the supposed peace president
just kind of a funny but you know like
half a thousand fits is pointing out in the past about the names they're used
you know maybe nothing which coincidence
that he's board of peace and he's continuing warfare
the State Department has drawn
on funds for international disasters and
peacekeeping to transfer $1.25 billion
of American taxpayer funds
to foreign aid to Donald Trump's
board of peace I mean that might as well be going in his pocket
because he is the forever
chairman which means he could do it
every once with this they're in charge guys there's
not this is not a government this is not being voted for
he's just stealing money as far as I can tell
no matter what he does with it and it says a
and this is coming from a person familiar with the fund
the US has previously pledged
to contribute $1.25
billion to the president's new international
organization why
international organization
by the way which Trump says will rebuild
Gaza yeah yeah the genocide
that they're conducting right now and the ethnic
cleansing taking place and the illegal actions
conducted around all of this while you're illegally
bombing Iran and Lebanon and everything else and
you know ethically cleansing Syria at the same time
but you want to just take our money to be able to build
Gaza what does that even mean
another smart city that you guys have outlined for
which is exactly the opposite of what anybody supporting
you wants sure sounds like winning
of the State Department money
officials pulled $1 billion
from international disaster resistance
$200 million from peacekeeping operations
and $550 million
from international organizations and programs
the person familiar with the fund said
Trump said he will give $10 billion
to the board in total
oh good meaning 10
if you I think if you take that as
his money then you're I don't know you're paying
attention he sees this as a piggy bank clearly
either if whether you agree they're not
$1.25 billion from your doubt from your pocket
is enough more than enough or too
much but $10 billion guys
it's going to come from your guys it's going to be
government funds I believe that
now I'll include this as always just
Gaza's board of peace seeks to reimagine the
international order or how we went to the
UN and Davos and produced
and announced those
totally not globalist programs
and the
WHO is proposing for $2 billion
of your money which is by the way
more than we currently spend on the one he says
is paying too much and the fake
globalist resistance that's ushering in the globalist
plan and the network state conversation
which I think all of these things come together
if you want to take time to go through those shows it's worth your time
because all of this does amount
to what I think is happening under the guys
of freedom technocrats are slowly taking control
and other dynamics other dynamics
as well now in regard to the partisan side
of this I mean look everything
we're talking about and have been since this administration
started is you know a lot of it is
just this shock of how clear
this is the opposite again
like the same joke like running
on the idea of stopping the Democrats
COVID-19 actions and then on
day one starting a
Stargate program you know what I mean
way by that I was like oh my god this is
over these people are going to riot and then
it just didn't happen now again I argue
even then that was when a moment where a lot
of them were like the honest ones
that's just a lie too far especially
for the maha side of it but
some of them still stuck around and I think
moment by moment and lie by lie that has
continued to change
so what we're I'm going to point
out here is with the
floundering Iran war which I believe
they're losing at the very least just in
the long haul are going to lose with the way that
Iran is conducting the war and
I think that they either didn't plan for it the way
that they thought it would go or that Trump was
essentially manipulated by outside forces that
wanted to use the US like it always does to
batter against the elements they want to fight
for their benefit or you could talk
about everything I just listed off about the
health side of it about the lies of funding
about more spending and lower higher government
AI surveillance lack
of constitutional rights killing Americans in the streets
you know a really unprecedented level
of red and instead of
focusing on any of those things or even just continuing
to highlight the illegal war that
we're in you get a lot of these screaming
partisan accounts who are just doing
anything to get you to look
anywhere else here's the
smothering of examples that I think are important to see
now this one I thought was I mean a lot of
these are the same kind of thing where this account
says I'm still trying to process what just
happened the highest ranking
US intelligence official just released a smoking
gun docks proving that
Obama has underlinks committed trees in this edition
meaning Trump is right about
everything
the news is fake and deep state is
real meaning that all of us
is the conspiracy theorists were right about
the just like this one-stop shop just every
day all we're all right and we're all winning
and everything it's all coming down it's just funny
now some of them they are
they're fake news they are lying to us right there is
an unelected power structure it's not what I'm saying
but it says meaning the shadow war is real
and all the efforts over the 10 years were part
of a LARP yeah it's a quick
quick lump 10 years of thought just because
of this one statement all of it was there you know
it's it's about trying to make you
think don't listen to all the stuff
don't forget about Stargate
forget about the glyphosy forget about the wars
forget about bigger spending all the
lies it's all it's all going to work
out because this that's what it's
supposed to make it feel like right and
if you don't know actually let me play the clip
really quickly before I even read what I was going to say
just the start of it
alert the director of national intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard releasing a
bombshell report today that shows
a conspiracy by a sitting president
Barack Obama and his intel agencies
to sabotage the president
elect Donald Trump brainwash
the electorate and undermine
the legitimacy of an election
there is irrefutable evidence
that detail your president Obama
and his national security team
directed the creation of an intelligence
community assessment that
they knew was false
that's great they knew it would promote
this contrived narrative that Russia
interfered in the 2016 election
to help President Trump win
selling it to the American people as though
it were true it's a lie
Russia gate scam was a massive crime
20 CIA
and FBI officials and it turns out
that the Obama administration
doctored the intelligence
to make it look like Putin and
Trump stole the election
a month after Trump
okay it goes you know boom boom
boom just stuff that you know some of which
I think is provable
yeah Obama's a criminal guys more criminal
and he also very clearly lied about this
okay yeah we know this now what's funny about this
you might not you might have already realized
was that's not a bombshell report
that's not a breaking news I'm still
reeling from what I just experienced
kind of a post that's a post from
2025 and I said you're still
trying to process the video that's from
2025 interesting
or are you just posting this old video as
a new as as new to
desperately distract Waffling MAGA
from the reality that Trump lied to them
since this bombshell led to
zero action
I think that's quite clear
and it's funny some of these people down here are like
you're funny MAGA stronger than ever
just like evidence clearly by this
selling of an old failure as a new one
clearly so
my point in these accounts guys is these
are these are you know some of them are large I think this one was
a smaller one
but my point is this is the kind of
ongoing stuff some of these I'll show you're like million fellow
accounts like Wall Street apes but
the effort here whether it's about just this
person trying to get in get in on the game
right to become the next Nick sure you know
whatever Eric Gowderty or whatever just to
become the next person who could just put a red light
and holy crap next to whatever Trump says and earn a million
dollars on this platform right
but the or
they're just trying to sell you away from the reality
but either way my point is you're set this
these these are people in my opinion who are aware
of what's going on right they're watching because
they are Trump supporters
and so you're going to tell me that these people
aren't aware like just to make it clear
I've seen people like Wall Street apes and many
of them literally seen
uh um
Nick Sorter share this exact video
months after it came out going to Bob
Shell it's all coming down okay
again he should be in jail
these people are criminals Obama
but how long until when
nothing is happening until we go yeah
so they didn't they're either
they don't care or they lied to us
I mean what else conclude what can you what other
conclusion can you come to and then
you get them a reposting it like I keep
seeing them share that cash for tell video
saying Pelosi did this and it's all coming
down which is from like the beginning of the
administration and they keep going oh
I can't believe it it's coming down and nothing
keeps happening and I agree Pelosi should also
go to jail I'm not joking about that
I genuinely think these people are criminals
my point is that they're not doing anything
and that should awaken
honest conservatives
and recognize the account that are constantly
trying to gaslight you into thinking that
these same old videos are now happening
it's all coming down to get you to stop
looking at the failures
this person real Robert says
here it is secretary of war
Pete
confirms the world's number one sponsor
of terror is Obama and this was a little
bit different this is more relevant to the
Iran conversation but same kind of
idea is that you know what okay so now
Heg says confirms that he's a terrorist
okay why wouldn't he be in jail if that's the case
as we said
many of the Iranian military factories
and bases
that we're systematically destroying were paid for
by the pallets of American
cash would you love a Trump's just like
this is what he does or he has these new sessions
where he's basically like okay now you say something good about me
now you see something good about me stop
about stop talking about that what about the statue
which you know he was kind of joking but the point
is these kind of sessions now are sort
of like Trump is so great
and he's winning and everything's so great it's just like
it's North Korea style it's very embarrassing
so what he's
doing is watching him read this and
let's not forget the timing of this
Trump Trump just literally said
this in a recent you know what he said it before
too but he came out and just
vomited the idea of Obama and the money
and Iran and they're started this because
they're floundering and they need to stop forget the money
was stolen from Iran and they gave it back
to him it's very easy to prove I've done it many times
and so the story
is just well Obama made this all happen
and by the way made what happened
all the things that we can prove aren't real like nuclear weapons
at least in the case of Iran right now as your
evidence shows but it's just cycling
through the claims Obama
bad guy so you hate Democrats were the
right ones to blindly support understand
but then what happens when you don't arrest him
shut up Ryan we support MAGA you know
that's that's the kind of thing we're seeing right now
that Barack Obama flew
into Tehran under
the Iran deal a not yeah
the deal that actually made sure they didn't have
nuclear weapons maintaining like three percent
enrichment until Trump illegally pull out
of the deal or unilaterally outside
of the deal pulled out of it and legally
allowed them to increase it which they then turned
around and called terrorism because they're either dishonest
or unaware
or you know stupid I guess
but so the money that was part of that deal
was them giving back money they seized from Iran
very simple
and guess what they did with that money not what
they're claiming
you might call it an inconvenient truth
Iran took our money and turned it into
weapons and bunkers and ammo
okay well first of all you mean like every other guy in the world
like you guys do every day got it
and now we're
destroying those weapons and we're writing
you're writing Mr. President that grievous
wrong just look at the way
it's just weird
like these people are just like groveling
at the feet of this person and I just watched the way
Trump's responding while I was reading it and we was pointing
Mr. President that grievous those weapons
and we took our money and turned it into weapons
and bunkers and ammo
and now we're destroying those weapons
and we're writing you're writing Mr. President
that grievous wrong
and make no mistake we had to act
and our objectives are clear no nukes
no navy and
right oh no navy that's interesting
now they did actually say that toward the end
of these conversations but right in what world
can you know navy this is like a Gaza discussion
so essentially we want you to be a
a group that sits in the middle of that thing
and can't do anything but just acknowledge what
we tell you to do like in what world does that
even end up being a state that's the whole point guys
they want something that is a controllable entity
why would anybody agree
with that that's not sovereignty
so that's I mean this
we should laugh at how stupid that is
whether terrorists or not it's like so even if you think
they're all terrorists then acknowledge the deal was
never meant to be made because nobody's going
to agree to that so it's war
obviously right I mean that's the whole point
and it's also they're also lying
about Iran in case you missed that
complete dismantling of their missile program
and defense incorrect you improve that
today since they're literally still bombing
I'll show you in a second
industrial base and as
Marco pointed out that mission
and the VP as well has not changed
since day one
Trump seems really bored by this
no you know the same kind
of point okay so Obama is
he sent the money or at least you know
they're claiming
he funded terrorism you know or
everything else you said
Trump has literally said he's a traitor
he committed treason he said those words
those are very real serious words
nothing has happened
and guess what interestingly Obama's
not sued him for libel or slander either
because that's not obvious right
okay Eric Dougherty
guess what holy crap red light
it's not even a joke
it's like it's like clockwork
I swear I'll read that second so he says
TNI Tulsi Gabbard
has learned the US intelligence intercepted
Ukraine government plans to route hundreds
of millions of American tax dollars to
boost Biden's 2024 campaign
against Trump they just they just
it's a hamster for these people the same
old stories recycled over and over
now even if it's real my point is nothing
will happen but it's Biden
and the Democrats and Obama and
2020 and it's like the same recycling
elements just over and over
and then nothing happens
Gabbard is now asking the US agency
the
USAID to determine if the
plot was carried out oh you mean the
agency that you guys told us was shut down
funny how that works out I just think
it's ridiculous how every day it gets more
and more stupid I mean we know
it wasn't because we're not dumb and we showed you that
was literally absorbed by the State Department even Marco Rubio
made it clear that it would carry on
in certain ways and yet people like Eric
and the rest and Nick were like yay no more
USAID it's been shut down forever
either they were dumb or they were lying
and here we are now they're asking the
group that doesn't exist anymore whether or not that's what happened
the US tax dollars were earmarked
for Ukraine to use for clean energy
Gabbard's team even
found that the communications intercepted under
Biden were not even thoroughly
investigated
imagine that investigate and expose it all
okay
well guess what now watch
as absolutely nothing happens at all
and Eric will nonetheless carry on cheerleading
for the people allowing criminals like Biden
to not only be held to not be held accountable
my prediction
but you know you can look into the story for yourself
what I find interesting is the story
itself
is so just the news
the platform and they're the only one
anywhere reporting the story or at least having
the source material that they claim they got
access to an unredacted report
proving that
but they don't cite the report they don't link to the
report nobody else has access to the report
and only other reporting is coming from
the point thing to this report and saying that's what
they're claiming to receive a little bit odd
to me so what's happening here is the Trump
administration just dumping this unredacted
unclassified excuse me or
declassified report because it was
they declassified it they're claiming
and just gave it to them and then why wouldn't they show anybody
why wouldn't you prove that it's not classified
you I'm calling
their bluff I think this seems a little bit shifty to me
but I'm I don't know I'm I've seen
stuff from just the news that I thought was good
so overall you should question it
like anybody should me or
anybody for giving you something without source material
I just think that's fascinating to me
now it also could be that the Trump administration or somebody
else dumped one thing to their hands
they calculated or manipulated and said
don't show anybody else otherwise we won't give you
something in the future and that's called
access journalism but
I don't think I think at the end
of the day the real point is even if it is real
but you wouldn't surprise me because Biden's a criminal
nothing will happen and
I don't know why we can't see that by now with Biden
having a thousand things they could charge him with
and they're not
here's what the
SCIF said this is a
200
300,000 follower account obviously you can see
the MAGA supporter it says they were never sending
aid
every other day to Ukraine
they were laundering your tax dollars right back
to their own pockets and campaigns to rig
elections most likely and Trump
posted it look at that
US intercepted Ukraine government messages
okay so as the president
I'm sure he must know about that so that means
he's probably involved with giving him that I don't
know how else you could see that also he's posting it
which means he's aware of it so I guess
we should imagine Biden will be arrested by the end of the day right
probably not
Wall Street apes
uncovered audio
shows Anthony Fauci by the way
it's audio from a congressional
hearing so pretty sure it's public
but you know whatever and it says
Anthony Fauci talked about having every major
corporation require vaccinations and making it
as hard as possible on citizens so they're forced
to be vaccinated yeah man that's disgusting
he should be in jail right
well guess what won't happen and
Senator Rand Paul says I referred him to DOJ for prosecution
three times by the way and guess what didn't
happen going to jail he didn't get charged
nothing happened
I mean it's the same story guys I don't know why this
is not registering for well again I shouldn't
keep saying it like that with where we are I know
why it's not registering for people like this
because they're clearly not in this for the truth
at the end of the day
you either recognize that
they've never even tried to go after
these people which has to tell you what's going
on or you just keep hyping people
how long can you hype
non-action how long
can you hype these stories with nothing going on
yeah I can't
this is one I always have to bring up
same kind of point
where jones said in 2025 that we have
big big big
big things coming down
all the things coming oh by the way on a note
there's now new action
against I believe leticia james and maybe
comey but I have
the same stance just like
I was showing that they turned out to be nothing
because they had no evidence and they made up and
that doesn't mean they're not criminals I believe they're very
clearly criminals
but they dismissed them because there was nothing there
like the original lawyer told them
and so now they're coming back at it and hey
I hope they go to jail if they do I'll be happy
to say I was incorrect I do not believe
it'll happen and so this
was what he was saying about those
saying these people insiders told me
they've got things coming down and it went
nowhere and again down here
he says the news shows how in
2024 he was saying if we can just keep
treasured trouble live then we'll get
claus swabb bill gates and fouchy
hillary going to jail except now bill gates is
basically part of the administration so as Larry
think and all the rest of them haven't gone to jail
you know but
you know maybe tomorrow we'll see
but if your objective about this you would
recognize by now that it's unlikely based on
previous action
here's another one
the qi says boom
here are the fizer documents with
side effects they wanted sealed for
75 years
I said boom
here are four-year-old documents
I
guess what's that's what's going on I understand
and this is just dump after dump after
dump of people trying to shove things in
your face that are not new and have been seen
roundly but it's about trying to create the idea
that's somehow new to
I think distract people from what's
happening
here's Eric doubting
saying just in
house doge chairman
apparently it's now doge again even though they
didn't use that term when they announced it
you know with the same dose that fail or
Elon Musk you know they spent more
government government grew they lied about
they did they basically sold you out to
AI data system and Israel got access to
it yeah all that remember that
it's not a joke it's very easy to prove and I
covered it from the very beginning like I said before had
we been paying attention and listened to the independent
media in the IMA for example and said
and recognize what it was going we could
have stopped it we probably could have done
something to push back and maybe even slowed it down
but not now they have it's all that's over
that's sip has sailed like life was
safe guys that ship has sailed and they
have access to everything they've run silent the information
and this is happening
and now now as we can step up and call out the
new problems and maybe stop that from happening but
unless the Joneses and Johnson's of the world shout
you all away from seeing it or the
authorities but he says
Tim Burchett is launching his first Doge
hearing to immediately begin destroying billions
of dollars how it's gonna happen immediately
destroying billions of ways in front well that's
what you claimed happened last time Eric and you guys
all go go he let Musk is doing everything
and he's breaking it all down and you were wrong
and you lied and the same thing and Doge
got caught lying about all of it
Burchett as a national treasury says probably
over a trillion in duplication okay great
I don't agree I don't disagree
I think we're all defrauding us all the time
including Musk and probably you and said the bottom
line is I would agree that there's fraud
do you agree that something
will change I don't believe it will
I hope it does
but on that note
as Clarence Thomas the tank agent writes
well in case you didn't notice this
the national debt has now hit 40 trillion
dollars over it
and it goes up every second
and he wrote Doge didn't fail it was
never meant to reduce debt
it was meant to siphon your personal
data to Elon Musk and his friends
private businesses and got agencies
that don't like or that try to
hold them accountable it was a stunning success
actually now I might slightly frame it
differently in some of those points but largely I agree
and that's why I yes I agree it was
a success exactly what they're trying to do
and there's the point from before
100% agree with that but it's also
important to remember
those of us not just me plenty of us
out there who were trying to warn you all
about this about the deception
as it was actually happening
you know and when we actually
could have stopped it that's important
same thing now
here's just one example from 2025
the Doge deep state or the deep
Doge state excuse me
and just talking about this exact problem
and well before that right when it started
we were critical of the lies that were already happening
Wall Street apes
the money flown out of Minneapolis
airport and by fraudsters has been tracked
and used to purchase stuff
in Kenya apartments luxury homes
yes yes it's yes
this is interesting to me seeing so
this is the same conversation
that's what this is this is the same conversation
this pertains to the
largely between 2020 and 2022 for the
most part that's the reality
now I don't see very many people
getting held accountable for that now
right now is my point now
during by the administration this is not a pro-biden
point I think the justice corrupt but for
whatever reason during by its administration
people were indicted and even arrested
and charged for this
funny how that's not being talked about
as they frame it as if nothing good
oh my god look at all the stuff the Democrats did
realistically you could argue that's connection
but by administration
put them in some of them in jail
probably not the people in charge because I think they're all
scapegoats probably my point though
is pointing at this now is only
to continue to keep this
like basically incorrect framing of
what you claim is happening in Minneapolis and Minnesota
based on some Nick Shirley spin-off
into some idea that we it's
what has Trump done about it it's that's the real point
of making with all these things who has been arrested
Wall Street apes if you're claiming this is
all so provable and they're presenting the evidence which I
agree the real story is
and it goes to left and right of the conversation
and it includes immigrants and people in this
country why is nobody been arrested
for that you'd think that
would be the primary point wouldn't it
unless the game is to manipulate people
there's another one I thought somebody down here
might be the next one oh it's this one here
so here same conversation
this new clip is going around
Minnesota rep Christy Knudsen
says that they just found the state
quote turned off tracking for money
being sent overseas now this is not even a new story
but the hyperbolic
element is what she adds to it
and it says they turned it on
for two weeks saw the money leaving
and Democrats quickly shut off the tracking to allow it to
keep happening it's a very partisan
misleading framing about that
our government was absolutely involved with this
and it says I'll just play it
but as the point again
same conversation this is not even
necessarily new and as force
mommy rightly points out and
nothing will change
see anybody who's actually paying attention will be already aware
of the fact that yes we probably all
especially nonpartisan
not about left and right I want the criminals to be held
accountable these people clearly don't
I believe I've got the oh no I didn't
actually grab the clip you can watch I
play it off I pretty much read what she says right here
and it says today in the fraud committee
the Department of Human Services testified that they
haven't been tracking the IP addresses of money that's
being literally flown out of our state
where it's going
they did turn it on
that reporting for two weeks and they found out yes
a lot of those IP address were tied to overseas computers
then they quickly shut it off
now the story is essentially
what she just wrote there the rest of the framing
about some kind of like I look you know
my opinion I think these people in government are
willfully corrupt
that's not the same as saying I will assume every
single chance I get that that's exactly what's happening
is that that's not being cared that's not caring
about the truth so what I think is happening
here is a framing of this to throw it at one side
of the paradigm which really does involve the
government and about something by the way that
is already largely been addressed
and it's still happening doesn't that seem to
show you I mean didn't Massey already show
you guys that Trump's bill
or rather the Republican led bill
allowed funding to continue
to the very thing
that they all said Nick Shirley exposed
the very thing that you guys were criticizing
and then right after that
hype they they allowed the funding
Massey voted against it
and yet these people still act like the Democrats
or well then the Republicans too then right
since they allowed the funding
it's just it's logic it's honesty
oh and this is funny this is
oh I forgot about this
this is really interesting to me
so this is Grock
asking about if it's accurate
and I always like to see whether the
for actually reasons just like this
and of course never are we just blindly taking
Grock's view in fact it's always the opposite
it's always about finding something other than
Grock and like all source material
comparing them for our own opinion
but the point here is I asked it
is this accurate about what she said
just simple is it accurate and I said no
the claim in that post is not accurate
it misrepresents how tariffs work
and what the economic data shows
so far under Trump's administration
what I said okay maybe I'm missing some
maybe I didn't watch the video all the way through
and it goes on what the what gets wrong
the idea the tariffs are deflationary
oh okay so what you're seeing here
is a ridiculous answer that has nothing to do
with the actual post now of course that could be
a glitch right it could be some kind of
it just had a little problem and glitched out
or it could be what I think it is
and what I'm about to show you it is
like we saw like I often point out during
the South African genocide conversation
which was Elon got caught
because Grock exposed him
for deliberately manipulating it
to answer a certain way
that's been shown more times
I mean many times in just
the last too many years like since
this administration and what happened
as I've said before and it was looking up
it was widely covered many platforms covered it
like mainstream is somebody was saying
you know what's the weather today and it was like
there's a genocide in South Africa
so and that's when people are like
what that's ridiculous
and so now same point and I've seen this
more many times over the last couple of days
so I just okay I was curious to see what
happened so I just started a new page
asked again and I asked
is it accurate and it says no
it's not accurate it says
this is interesting it kind of conflates
the two it says it appears to be
a mismatch or repost
error the content
in that twitter post and this is what
I find most interesting so remember they all
most all these posts have like a specific
identifier number in the URL
that ID from Wall Street apes
is actually about Minnesota state
fraud being sent
overseas it says the poster
oh but about overseas
not about trump tariffs
okay which I didn't even ask the poster
or someone likely intended
a different post or graphic claiming
something like trump just announced 25%
tariffs on Canada Mexico what
that specific claim is
broadly accurate okay
so clearly in my opinion which I'm going to get to
more in a second this someone on the platform
is trying to direct the AI
to make a certain answer with certain topics
and it causes it to freak out that's what I think
is happening and it goes on
to make always point about tariffs and I simply come out
and I say why are you even talking about tariffs
and it goes I apologize
for the mix up and my previous response
and I what I want
people to understand I made a point about this the other day
this this program
has been allowed
to assume to infer
which is counterintuitive
to what it's actually claiming to do
now look I understand that a conversational
app which is what they want it to be it's not the same as
a data like a fact based
report that they you know
want to be able to engage not everybody's in this for just data
right they want some AI talk to whatever
so to do that it has to be something that can
have some conversational elements which
needs to it claims to some degree
have that which I do understand
the difference though is what you're going to see
here what I've just recently see the day is you
ask it a question
you clearly can see that it assumes what you meant
to say
you know that's not what I why would you assume
that and it goes well because this is what
I was talking about it literally says that I said
why are you even assuming or inferring and it says
because that's necessary for conversation
and like okay even if it was
innocent if you will
that is clearly showing you that
it is about you know it can be slanted based on
talking points based on who's back
there pulling the strings and this is an example
that I think
continuing it says you shared this
specific ex post which I did
and I incorrectly assumed
or conflated it with
a different viral graphic claim
see now how is that
even possible with something Elon says is all about
truth it's about getting the right
answers well why then would you let it
assume based on something other one
that's manipulative and you damn well know it
this is what the post actually says and goes on
okay what the core claim is the core
claim accurate and it says Minnesota has faced
repeated high-profile fraud
scandals yeah exactly that's what it's talking
about the same scandals we've talked about
and it says the post adds interpretive
spin which we know I already said
that and that's the reality since she's basically
turning it into her her framing of what she
thinks it is as opposed just the government being caught
in some level of fraud or somebody using
the system for that when I asked it
I and then this was interesting when it
responded
it says
in regard to the accurate clip I said
you know is it is it accurate and it
says the video clip is quoted testimony
appears genuine
now that may not mean much to you if you're not messing
with this thing the end of the point though is that
what it tends to it if you the genuine
term can simply mean well yes the video exists
so it is genuine
not necessarily that it's an accurate claim
or that the video is real it could be AI
but it's genuine it exists right and so that's
what I said I said I asked if it was accurate not
genuine and again it says you're right
I answered whether the video clip was genuine
and it says
but your original question was whether it was overall
claim is accurate and it goes on to make all
these different points I think it's really important to understand
what it's doing many many doing maybe
don't engage with it and maybe you like probably
shouldn't even you know even I question whether
sometimes this is even worth the engagement
or whether I'm doing you know it's like how we say
every time it's about it's about making these
individual choices on what we think is going to be
you know it's like using a cell phone or driving or
using it going to Starbucks if you rationalize these
things this is way worse I argue
in the sense of using it every day in fact we're
going to have an IMA thing coming up soon I think
we're going to be talking about
the the lines that are being drawn with
all this I think it's very important because there's
some of us in the you know like
I forget which one was talking about that that
made the argument in the last show about whether
this could be used for research
and my opinion is that
it's dangerous because it very clearly can then
one stop you from doing the effort yourself
and also end up sort of guiding
you in channels that aren't even accurate
so my avenue tends to be
sort of calling out the partisan view
and I'm trying to make that that's where I think
I'm going to leave it there ultimately because I think
it's dangerous to fall in the trap but my point
in saying all this is that for people that are engaging
with this like for writing stuff which
God save us that's actually exploding
right now it's important to understand
that it's being given the ability to sort of be
subjective and that's not how it's
being framed and I think that's super dangerous
now bottom line it says however
the post casual claim
shut it off or to allow the fraud to
continue goes beyond what established in the
testimony so she's just
you know playing it fast and loose with the truth because
that's what partisans do
now back to this here's what Jesse
Waters posted on March 24th
I honestly can't believe this is still happening
because you remember I mean in case you didn't follow it
the whole Nick Shirley story was basically
glommed on to the actual story of fraud
in Minnesota that was people were actually
arrested for in 2022 and
before and we went door to door
to some random you know which very well
may have been involved in fraud but I don't I never
saw anything definitive other than who going to
random doors and then just shoving him out the door
and acting like that proved they were criminals
it was kind of disgusting at the end
of the day how he's harassing random children
and guess what he goes to California
now here's Jesse Waters
here look apparently Shirley's in California
going door to door at daycares
with quotes
okay based on what because
they're it's a Democrat state
I don't understand why anybody gives these
people the kind of it I mean the
credence is this not
ridiculous of course
it could be fraud anything could be fraud but what
logic are we going on you're walking up
to door to door to daycares in California
and it says 14 kids enrolled
seven enrolled but not a single toddler found
I mean
I don't I just I can't I like
to believe that the majority of
people probably outside
of Twitter are just not this stupid are
not this willfully dishonest
or willing to just allow people
like this to act like there's credence to what
they're doing legitimacy to what they're
doing doors are being slammed because
they're screaming at you again yeah because
you're a random guy with a camera walking
up asking about children at a daycare
that's disgusting this is a creep
this gets worse 89 hospices in one
building 400 violations
okay maybe they're criminals I mean what the
game of this making it about somehow daycare
related in only California it's because
Nick Shirley's recognized a shtick he's
realized when he yells about this people go
crazy and people like Jesse Waters put
him right on Fox News and guess what he gets
a lot of money and guess what the point
is if you're following along so you're
telling me there's all this fraud
and no one's been arrested
walk me through that Jesse Waters
walk me through how this is an
important bombshell and yet nobody ever
goes to jail see that's the only real
point I'm making I'm never trying to suggest
that there's not fraud because I don't know
my point is neither does Nick Shirley but
overall I'm not convinced left right
up down people of government
especially partisans especially are
riddled with fraud
but who was arrested last time Nick
Shirley exposed all that fraud he didn't
but when's the last time as I told you
there were a bunch of people rested in
the Biden's administration but last I checked
Trump hasn't arrested a single person for
all of that hype about what happened in
Minnesota and we can't be honest
about how stupid all this is okay
well let's talk about the same kind of
interesting distraction if you will
I mean I'm sure people can disagree
and even I have a worry that there's
something more like you know like I've
always talked about that because of how
many people caught on to the last
illusion that the COVID-19 was
maybe something else will happen
I'm not even trying to fear monger it's a
logical possibility but you know like
like deliberately do something to cause
the kind of panic and maybe somebody
else who might do that
but this is Fox News
March 25th
new COVID variant
spreads across the US as the
CDC raises concerns yeah that's
that's the Trump administration CDC
same people BA32
has been detected in 25 states and has
shown guess what guys you're gonna be shocked
immune escape characteristics guess what
the vaccines is not doing it
if that's even what's really going on
a new variant of COVID-19
is spreading across the US health officials say
the variant has shown
immune escape characteristics the CDC
stated which means it has mutations
that may may help it
partially evade existing immunity
from vaccines and prior infection
just ridiculous
disabled
sure you're out there counting your blessings that you got those
75 vaccines that don't work for you right now
but it goes on oh that was it
the main point for me is
the idea that one it's happening now
when really 25 states
well that means they've been talking they've been
seeing this for not just today
right or yesterday funny how it's just
now being shoved from Fox News into our
conversation I would wonder why now
even if it's a real thing same point
to point to this is
something they know will catch attention that's my
opinion it could be maybe it's just reporting
because they think it's important
but I think it's important to highlight for the people
who want to see this is one sided conversation
that the Donald Trump CDC
the RFK CDC
under the HHS
is currently still
recommending COVID-19 shots
and they may that may not matter to some people
maybe you think that's a good thing I
think that's insane and I think it's
dangerous based especially it's dishonest
or hypocritical rather based on
what this administration was
in some places still saying
2025 2026 COVID-19
vaccine which by the way if you have been
following the show is new
and out there as I showed you
right after in fact I showed you this while
they were claiming they were stopping COVID-19
shots
and let me see I think
it was this show
yeah
and there's a I think the show before and after
this was in the same vein of conversation
Trump admin leans into self
amplifying mRNA shots under the guise
of mRNA
of ending mRNA and here's that one in case you
want to see it and well there's many
of them but this is the one that's the
that was right there, Arcturus
and this is
still being made it's still going forward
and this is the self amplifying
mRNA COVID-19 shot
and he made a point RFK Junior to
explicitly state that Arcturus would continue
in the very document that people
screamed shows you he was stopping
COVID-19 shots how stupid this is
now that shot as I
showed you then was still going on and that's
the 2025 2026 COVID-19
shot that is the
that is the mRNA that is the same shot
that we were all fighting the
Trump's administration is currently
recommending for people over six months
seems like a pretty ridiculous
thing right just simply
from the reality of what they were claiming before
and what RFK said he was
going to do ACIP
this is from health and human services this from
RFK Juniors
position
from his
an institution what
it's so funny sometimes you just can't think of it
but you know so you have just to understand
this HHS is the head of
the health dynamic in this country so you see
it would be under that and so it's important
to understand that from RFK being responsible
for overseeing all that
and so even the HHS website put this out
ACIP recommends COVID-19
immunization based on individual decision making
all how nice of them to say based on your own
decisions but they still recommended is the
point with all he told us which
is right dangerous deadly
never should be put in your body absolutely
one of the most dangerous things I've ever seen in my life
that is still causing this global population
to spin out of control and I mean like
I mean in cancers and dangerous
thing which by the way are now just blended
in the background we don't even talk about it
but if you ever taken a step back and looked at the
increase in in mortality
you just step back and look at the increase in
cancers in heart attacks micro it's
it's still going up when people just don't talk
about anymore because the mainstream alternative media
is trying to get you looking somewhere else and that
pretends to be the full conversation
crazy
so be moving on
actually two more points on distractions let me put
these in the show notes for you
on that point I just
kind of did this be funny but I definitely
think that it is relevant
for now we should definitely
be questioning this claim in general
the claim that the COVID-19 variant
is spreading especially now and especially
when being made by this administration
but I just put this in just to make the point
right that right now it's easy
to see the consideration could be that this
story itself would be sort of a break in case of emergency
oh new COVID variant will
definitely distract but maybe not
now here's many Johnson
President Trump turns
80 on the 14th he still
got it
yeah real journalism
it's just
like shameless cheerleading
but that's what that's what that's his whole
thing right and then health ranger comes in
and says when did you become a cheerleader for a
genocidal war criminal
I'm like really
like you know I'm glad he's calling him out but I'm like
I'm glad to see more people calling out these obvious
teams for politics manipulators
well let's not pretend like Benny or the rest of
the group were ever
ever doing anything other than
what you're calling out right now
he's been cheerleading since jump street man that's exactly
what he's been doing the second this
administration started so is it
that health ranger just never saw it or I mean
I don't know like I'm glad to see people
are changing their opinions on this but
there shouldn't be some kind of revisionist
view about everything just because
these people were exactly the same
thing they are now that they were when this started
and the mail in balance
thing is a traditional point to this but I think it's
insane like
of all these points I funny like I keep
talking about people that are close to me
who I've been talking
about that over the this administration many
times right how there's people and you know
close to me who are just regular
people who are not
part of an agenda they're not part of a group
they're not online media
but are still falling for these things
I think it's important because I tend to wonder
whether or not just genuine honest people
get tricked by this stuff or that
agenda and so they do in some cases which
has changed the way I report in a way
because I know that I have to tailor it
towards not just everybody saying this is lying
you know it's like which I would never do anyway
can't be that hyperbolic but the point
is that even these people
as of right now we're like
he's ruining his presidency
you know like either
he must be blackmailed by somebody like I don't believe
he would do this or whatever he's driving
it this is ruining his presidency
and these are people that are have been like
in previous conversations we're still
choosing to support him even without obvious
and bad it was and maybe
just because they wanted to support him
and hope it went the right way and now
even those people have found the line that is too far
and so this is one of those things that I just think
is embarrassing it's a smaller point in the
larger conversation but it just shows you a
utter lack of conviction guys
mail-in ballots
here's how it started
on social media about
doing away with mail-in ballots
and potentially electronic voting
can you explain on that help
well that's a very off topic just really quickly
mail-in ballots are corrupt
mail-in ballots you can never have
a real
democracy with mail-in ballots
and we as a republican
party are going to do everything possible
I agree with that by the way I think
I don't think mail-in ballots should be part of it I think it's very manipulative
like he pretends
to believe all that we get rid
of mail-in ballots we're going to start with
an executive order that's being written right now
by the best lawyers in the country
to end mail-in ballots
because they're corrupt
and
so no he's not saying
in some circumstances are bad
and should be kept for certain anomalies
or certain situations but our corrupt
bad shouldn't exist
let's not pretend that's not what he's saying it's exactly what he's saying
you know that we're the only country
in the world I believe I may be wrong
but just about the only country
in the world that uses it
because of what's happened massive fraud
all over the place the other thing we
so we're the only country that uses them because of fraud
he just speaks off the cuff
and doesn't make any sense but so it's also about
the electronic voting machines which mark my words
will be used
midterms will be used in his next election
or the next election whether I'm involved
I'm just watch guys they were you
like he made the same case and I agree with
by the way that I made the case with going back
10 years ago whether Clint Curtis
and the testimony about the fraud or anything else
about how these diabolical machines and all the rest
are literally used to manipulate us
that's part of how this game is played
we're not even actually involved in this process
as far as I'm concerned anymore
and then guess what he used him again
or rather in this last
last election process he used it again
and now my point is now while he's president
watch as they use them again in the midterms
you have to understand what that shows you
now that was then
here's now
okay so you know the same logic that plenty of Americans
also apply
you know and yes and then also some places there's fraud
right but so yeah so the idea
that it's just okay for you because you have a lodge
because I'm here and I'm busy and I don't want to
well yeah Trump so to do a lot of other people
feel that way and I want to be clear again
I don't agree with them being used at all like he
pretended he did
I don't agree with them being used at all
but he just did one because
he can
I told you sir the last few weekends
that's right and I yeah
I decided that I was going to vote
by mail-in ballot because I couldn't be there
because I had a lot of different things but you know
we had a lot of different things
great we have exceptions for mail-in ballots
you do know that right
so if you're away we have an exception
okay if you're in the military we have
an exception if you're in a business trip
we have an exception
I have a lot of exceptions I mean business trips
you know on vacation
in the military
how does he agree with that when it's not
justifying his use of it no he does not
and he's made that case
wow okay is that what Republicans agree with
but now you can just have a bunch of evil Democrats
who just pretend to be sick to use it
is how they probably frame that
you know what I mean like it's just
wildly hypocritical and the only reason he's
defending it aggressively is because he just got
copper doing it or at least it got found out
and he has to defend it
if this hadn't happened you know what his argument
you heard his argument bad no matter what
shouldn't be allowed because I'm all big and tough
when I'm not the one being exposed for hypocrisy
he's away mostly
in Washington DC so I used to mail-in ballot
but I appreciate the question because I know
I know it was so well meaning
yeah yeah see
because you know you know you got exposed
and so he's well meaning like it's an honest
question because you're being a hypocrite
and everyone else in the room seems to be just petting
you know you're doing so great Mr. Trump
you've nice shoes what time where'd you buy the shirt
you know that kind of dumb stuff you're talking about in the media
today
wild
okay
let's get into Iran
now this obviously we talked a lot about
over the last so many shows and I definitely
think this is important
for many reasons
now we're going to start with an important
point of the reality
that a lot of us have already been calling out
of what the US government is hiding now even
speaking to things like that like the dishonesty
of just you know look
you could admit a level of tactic
you know tactician or
tactics in the
situation of not wanting to expose that you've been hit
or that people have been killed
right I mean just you know
but everything you know sort of like
an emotional you could
acknowledge why that would make sense because
it gives them an up or makes them see that they're getting
you know hurting you but understand that there's a different
dynamic than just that it's that Americans are
involved and that we are promised
you know plenty of things by
governments that never care about those things but some of
them still seem people seem to believe that they're going to
follow through but the promises are there nonetheless
and
for example no new wars
or peace or whatever but then additionally once
it happens well you know no boots in the ground well
that's already happening and so my point is that you could lie
after lie after lie and so one of
them is that people aren't being killed and we know
that's not true guys
the fact that he's lying to you about Americans
being killed an award that he told you wouldn't
start is not just dishonest it's
disgusting and it's also
disrespectful to the people who are sacrificing their
lives and sitting in some cases for things they
actually think are helping people and they're wrong
by the way but my point is as I've
always said some of them just don't seem to know that
those that do I don't think it's respectful at all
or I don't think it's honorable at all but there
are some who seem to still think we're fighting
for freedom and if that's really what they think
then what they're doing is honorable my point
though is that you're being lied to
about when they go out there and die you're being
lied to about bases that are being
destroyed you're being lied to about what Iran
is actually doing when it actually affects
us interests that is
not okay and it is not
just about him tactful you know using
tactics to make the wrong it's because he's trying to
hide there that he's
being hurt that he is
being affected that their agenda might be
failing now this is the New York Times
Iran's attack forces
attacks force excuse me us troops
to work remotely
now it says this is from yesterday
Iran has bombed us bases
across the Middle East in retaliation
for the u.s. Israel war
simple right exactly
what happened it was a unilateral
illegal attack with no justification
and they responded
forcing many Americans
American troops to relocate
to hotels and office spaces throughout
the region according to military personnel
and American officials
so much they'll still deny
Trump and a little weird little click they'll lie
but this is very you mean
to be clear guys we had the satellite imagery
where was it
this is the one but there's been satellite imagery
that's come out that shows you this
blown up basis and actually I think on the
I think it's the archive that's blocking them
the it's behind
behind a paywall but the point is sometimes the archive
doesn't actually pop up all the images but there are
there are satellite imagery showing you
the bases that they destroyed
and so
they're hiding that from you
and what I think it shows in here
two things
is that the
there's a military and personnel
that are admitting that and if they're still lying
about it but on top of that that they're moving
to civilian locations
just casually saying
that now there's two things to
discuss there one which is that
that means in the minds of Israel
and the US and what they've told you
since October 7th at the very least
but more than that that makes that
a military target
it doesn't as far as I'm concerned it doesn't
the military using it makes that the
military but you know they're the ones breaking the law
now the right response if you're going to care
about international law is to
accuse them of that and then have the international community
make aware that they're using civilian locations
with civilians in the buildings to conduct
military personnel or military operations
that's a big deal that's a crime
so my point though is that because Israel
and the US are right now bombing schools and hospitals
I mean everybody everywhere can see it
despite the partisan media lying about it
because again this is not in Gaza this is not
in an open-air prison you control this is
the world that can see what you're doing
and the point is
that they might feel justified
to respond now they haven't
so far not in the way that's just you know
indiscriminately bombing these locations
despite the lies again because you can see it
but in this case as
Iran has even pointed to and then we just saw the discussion
about them claiming to target tourist locations
which is not what he actually said
what he actually said is now what I think
relates to this which is really that we know
where you are and that ultimately
we know that they're using these locations
whether they're recreational or whatever else
not the same as saying we're going to bomb them
or that you're targeting tourists which the New York
Post very dishonestly framed
but I think it's important to think about
because if they were to bomb them
that would be in the
the same thing the U.S. government is doing or really
claiming they're doing
and right now you are getting some of these allegations
now it says Iran's Islam
their IRGC has urged people
to report these new locations
as it hunts for the dispersed troops
see that's the Seattle's connect now
but yesterday we talked about them
missframing what the general had said
I think that's what they were talking about
and then that exposes a crime the U.S. government
is committing and it says you and even if
their bases were destroyed it still doesn't make it legal
for them to go and use a little public
civilian hotel U.S. military
officials say that threat is not stopping
the Pentagon from carrying out the war with Iran
which is in its fourth week
it says he then repeated
repeated what has become a common refrain
from his new briefings from Hagsath
every day every the end of everyone
apparently today will be the largest
strike package yet
now
pretty sure we can prove that's not true
but what it shows you like the idea
that they've just continued to
where I guess it wouldn't be exponential but
no because exponential things
but anyway the point is that you know if every day it's larger
I mean every day it's growing larger
that means it continues to get larger and larger
and not just you know like let's say you have 10
then it's 15 then it's 20 and that's on top
of what you did and my point is that's
that's insurmountable
or I don't believe that's even possible
I think that this point they would be already
we've already heard that they're running low on these things
and that is being shown to be the case
and yet he wants you to believe that every day is another
larger strike package that's just the
example of them like it shows you how
insecure they are you don't need
to constantly be framing it as the biggest
best thing ever that's what Trump wants
isn't that just very transparent
but either way this is even taking a face value
the idea that is every day you're bombing
more and more and more these aren't military targets
guys and he says but the or it goes on
but the relocation of troops to make
shift one official called
them alternative or sites raise
questions about Trump's administration's
preparations for the war
of course they won't address the point
of the illegality because that's not what people
who are supporting the war do
but it says there were close to 40,000
US troops in the region when the war started
which we don't talk about and Central Command
has dispersed thousands of them it's also
important to realize that guys like we've always shown you
the map of all the US bases surrounding
Iran and the troops surrounding Iran
and we're going to pretend like Iran was the aggressor
and it says some of them as far away as
Europe American military officials said
but many have remained in the Middle East
although not on their original basis
the result according to the current
at former military officials is a war that is much
harder to prosecute ah
so the indications from
people involved in knowing what's going on are
saying that it's making it difficult for the US
to conduct this war quite a bit different
than we've won already and it's over right
quote yes we have the ability to set up
ex expedient operation centers
but they're absolutely going to lose
capacity or capability
said
master sergeant Wesley J. Bryant
a retired special operations
targeted specialist in the US Air Force
he says quote you can't just put all
that equipment on top of a hotel for example
some of it's unwieldy
the US official said troops are
not working from the roofs as Feline hotels
nice follow up the point though
is that they've lost capability
but you don't books I mean it's obvious
you don't explode these bases and force them
moving hotels and act like they're going to conduct
the same war and at least
with the places that were destroyed there's more
than 13 bases guys with the point is that's a
big deal that they're not admitting
and is having an effect on what they're doing
many of the 13 military bases
in the region used by American troops
are all but uninhabitable
with the ones in Kuwait
which is next to Iran suffering perhaps
the most damage 6 US service
members were killed in a strike on Port
Shuaib Shuaib Shoeba
that destroyed the army tactical
operation center we talked about
that I believe that was
Douglas Greger it said they took the eyes
out right there very important
tactical oh wait no excuse me that's
the wrong one the one in cutter was the
early morning system that's the next paragraph
but they did get that and it's a big deal
because at 1.1 billion dollars remember
correct remember correctly it's a lot of money
and it's also important for their operations
Iranian drones and missiles
also targeted Ali Al Shaleem
air base damaging aircraft structures
and injuring personnel and camp
boo ring damaging maintenance and fuel
facilities in cutter
Iran struck all elude air base
the regional air headquarters of the
US central command damaging an early
warning radar system which again he
said they took out the eyes like it was a big deal
and it says in Bahrain
a one-way Iranian attack drone
struck communications equipment at the
headquarters of the US 5th fleet
wait I mean they don't report most any of this
at Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia
Iranian missiles and drones damaged
communications equipment and several
refueling tankers an Iranian backed
militia in Iraq launched a drone swarm
attack on an upscale
hotel in Hebrew early in the war
Iranian officials have even accused the US
of using civilians as human shields
by putting American troops in hotels
which they are I mean we just heard
that and that's what US people
are reporting so what's funny is
Iran officials were accusing of this being
called liars and now the US
elements are admitting that
and it says quote we are forced to
identify and target the Americans the
intelligence arm of the IRGC said in a
message to people in the region
therefore it's better not to shelter
them in hotels and stay away from their
locations and says despite a
punishing air campaign the Iranians
quote still retain some capability
that's from
the Dan Cain general Dan Cain
chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff
so think about this guys this is from
the Pentagon conference Trump is out
there and pegs at we one on day one
how embarrassing that is and yet
the general of the chairman
chairman the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff is saying that we're
bombing them but they still remain
keep their they have capability
now he says punishing and they still
remain to retain some I think
that's I don't think it's about some
I mean clearly they have taken
out plenty of ships they've taken out
plenty of they control the airspace
but as I keep saying if you care to
look back before this started that was
expected even by Iran to a certain
degree and so the point was they
plan for the long game as there I
think proving right now I don't
mean because it's the long game but
I mean that they're showing that
they're not diminishing that they continue to be able to strike
through and Trump keeps claiming they
won or we made a deal and then you better
make a deal but you just said they made a deal
it's it's we'll get to that in a second
it's just part of the problem for the Pentagon is
that two decades of war in Iraq and
Afghanistan war zones where the
United States quickly established air superiority
left the military with facilities and
headquarters close to the current front lines
right because they're surrounding Iran
and it says and now the war in Iran
has made all of these bases vulnerable
to the point where service members can't
really live or work there for extended periods
military official said a lack of better
planning some military official said also
reflects a miscalculation on the part of the
administration about how Iran respond now
part of this is trying to frame this is sort of like
the locations have made this hard
to live at but you have to understand
there are satellite imagery
showing bases that have been bombed and
it says the Trump administration
did not reduce staffing at American embassies
and other facilities in the region before
the war started or order departures
for non-essential government employees and
family members nor did the State Department
war on Americans to steer clear of the region
until after the war began
think about that for a second now lack of planning
maybe I mean they in a way they kind of
admitted that in the beginning
but I think maybe that was sort of a way
to hide behind that and not address
the accountability but this is
something I just want to remind myself to
look at this real quick on that point
I think it's interesting to think about
so what it said the lack of
the lack of better planning
so I
wrote this for me real quick lack of better planning reflects
a miscalculation of the party administration
about how Iran would respond the Trump
administration did not reduce staffing
it's what it wrote so the point is they would do the staffing
the embassies and other facilities in the region
they didn't like remove people or give them
warnings to move nor did the State Department
war on Americans steer clear now
based on that knowledge my thought
three things that seem most logical is either
they just didn't plan like they're saying
which possible
seems unlikely but it's possible
or
the more dark possibility is that they wanted Americans
to get killed and this may not seem
possible to some people but if you understand
this government and our history it's very it's not as possible
it's it's one of their options
and so the point here is to consider
like we said with this the ships that were brought out right
that early on people thought well they're just
sitting ducks with what's going on I think the idea
was that they did this to hope that Iran would respond
irrationally they never do it seems
but in this case
you put these things in position you didn't tell
people in the locale that they had to move
until after it started you didn't warn
the State Department all these things left people
involved with vulnerable positions
so I think the hope
was that maybe this would immediately cause that reaction
which would then guarantee support for the war
Iran's not stupid
or
they were of the mind that Iran simply
would not attack the U.S.
which undermines the whole
point of how this all started right well
we knew Iran would attack us right so
you left them in the places where you said you knew
they would attack
any of those makes sense to me
or a combination of them it just speaks to
incompetence or criminality
and a lack of concern for American
interests
now back to the article
it says
military officials say that
American that American refueling tankers
were rushed to the war with little time
to orient or practice in the region before
getting thrown into the round clock operations
I mean to me that seems like
an obvious example of lack of training or
that they didn't expect this to go the way that it went
and that might speak to Israel like
most people recognize right now even Rubio
kind of let the cat out of the bag that
Israel that
Netanyahu seems to have in my opinion
convinced Trump
that this was going to be a one and done it's going to be a few
days like I think he said they're going to block
the straight they're probably going to kill Americans
will have the whole world on our side and it'll be over
like that your legacy in trying forever
and that's not what happened and quite frankly
I think that that's what Netanyahu made sure
wouldn't happen by bombing oil infrastructure
and making sure this became a whole quagmire
which is what they've always done to the U.S.
and I guess Trump just didn't know that or
he's not able to make that choice I don't know
those are my opinions obviously
now as Ryan Rosbiani
points out the IDF
chief of staff has
warned about the
possible collapse of the
Israeli
or what it said let me actually
make sure I didn't misread that
yeah okay that's funny IDF chief of staff
warrants army could okay I'm sorry I just
misread the statement here
IDF chief of staff warrants army could collapse
into itself so he's talking about the IDF
and just to cut to the chase since I've read that funny
the point is the Haaretz is reporting that
and a lot of people just
you know you shouldn't take his word for it
because he doesn't post anything
but I want to highlight that he is correct that's where it's coming from
but what he's discussing
is based on that article as well
that Iran is simply saying like look you guys are being attacked
these bases are inhabitable and
simply saying almost as if they have a position of strength
right and then today's
reporting that they're saying that they're essentially failing
now it's interesting to me seeing as how Haaretz is reporting that
Israel losing sway over
Trump on Iran war and it says
the IDF chief
warned the army
is nearing its
limits as forces divert to other escalated
fronts and it says literally as Haaretz frames
correctly Jewish terrorism in the
West Bank because that's what it is
not a secret and it's not
only because you know the point is simply that this is
exactly what we're talking about Jewish extremists
who are burning homes down in the West Bank
and occupying territory
the reality now it's important also to recognize
and this is from a Israeli platform
the Israeli human rights group
that highlights in 2021
a regime of Jewish supremacy from the
Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea
this is apartheid now the point is always to mention
is that Zionism is not just about Judaism
Zionism manipulation of Judaism
but it does very much create that mindset just like
you can see Christian Zionist supremacists
like Pete Hegseth very clearly
point though is to recognize
that what even Haaretz
is highlighting is one that the IDF
chief is admitting that they're nearing their limits
which I think they don't I think
they've neared those limits after October 8
my point though on top of it
is that I think it might be about them trying
to act like just say basically
create the situation where the US as I predicted
in the beginning and as anybody probably saw coming
who's been paying attention is going to be
the sole one to be fighting this war and Israel
stands by and watches but then also rightly
points out what's actually being focused on
which is their extremism in the West Bank
and what everybody knows is a crime
so as Scott Horton rightly points out
trust me, Benjamin Netanyahu
and is what this person highlights nobody
in the Trump administration planned
which is one way to look at it
nobody in the administration planned
for Iran to shut the street or for Moose
now I argue the exact opposite
see this comes from a position I argue where you think
that they don't want these things to happen
because they care about people in the interest
that's not true if you've known anything about our history
you know the one thing is the government does not care
about people the point is
that they would want it to shut down
so use that as justification for what they would do
in my opinion and in fact there's
evidence to suggest that's what they planned
but he says nobody planned for that
because of where they acted right but
if the plan was to make sure they did it
you would react that way to play the idiot
right they would always rather be
look incompetent than criminal
right he says nobody planned
for the sustained missile strikes on American bases across the Gulf
again you could argue that was the plan
to make sure people got killed and you could use the justifications
nobody on top of that
the Gulf part of it excuse me not the American base
but the Gulf part of it I mean the idea
there is about
whether Iran would choose to bomb the
the elements of the Middle East and I mean I do think
there was miscalculations here to be very clear
or that Israel misled him
and it says nobody planned for an energy crisis
but again guys seriously
if you didn't think that they were aware
that this would lead to exactly that
which everyone's talked about forever I don't even know how it's possible
and it says nobody planned for Europe
to look at Washington's shrug and walk the other way
but it says nobody it turns out planned for very much at all
read the account of how
this war was decided and you are left with
one deeply uncomfortable realization
the people who launched it appear to have been
genuinely surprised by almost everything that followed
now maybe if that's because Trump
listened to Netanyahu when he was lied to
and it says the Iranians shot back
the allies didn't show up the oil prices went vertical
all of it apparently was news to them
at least they said that or you know that's what it appeared to be
he said the opposite when you asked him down the line
and said no we planned for everything
but it says which leaves two questions so obvious
they're almost embarrassing to ask
what exactly did they think was going to happen
and
did anyone in the room at any point think further ahead
than the applause
that's a really good way to frame that
I think especially with this administration
now the one I wanted to highlight
what I want to highlight here is even the way
this guy is framing this is this little
graphic says Iran threatens
second choke point
and points to the Bob Amanda straight
I mean really okay so here's what's interesting
Iran didn't threaten any of this before
they started this illegal war
and so what they were talking about
was that if you keep conducting this
illegal war against us that one of the options
we could take would be to shut your access down
to the other side of this but that's if
they continue to be like right now if the US
stopped what they were doing and Israel stopped bombing
Iran they what they would what they told you
they would continue was their ability to restrict
their access to the straight up or moose
and what was the other discussion they had about
the simple point was they would not continue
the bombing campaign the war
would stop but you see from Israel in the
US's perspective they can't allow it because
they're in a weakness position right now they
can't allow them to have that control over
just their access to a very important
waterway so this has now become
a war of you know start as a war of aggression
but it's become now a war of necessity
for the US and Israel so they're kind of trapped
I think that's interesting but to
highlight it like this just seems dishonest
to make seem like it's sort of like the evil
Iranian government you know seeking to plan
to control I just don't believe that's the way
that's the way I might view the graphic
his statement up here is not saying that
now same kind of point here
and just for time actually where are we
that's not that long
Daniel Davis points out this magazine cover
tells you all you need to know about the US
Iran war and of course it shows a hand with
an Iranian ring grabbing a
world map and holding it in his hand right
and this is this is more so the point
the other one was more of my thought it was
leaning towards this one's very clear
which I think this is important to consider
about how this is played right now or maybe
even just that these are honest people that
I would argue are missing a larger point
which is that okay
like the corporate media CNN rather
is like okay Trump's lying to you and he is
but making the story so that he's
doing this from the wrong direction
not necessarily that he shouldn't be doing it
right and that's always how the corporate
media plays this adversarial
against parts of it but we support the war
right it's always and so the same
kind of thing is that in this it makes it clear
as it says President Trump routinely says
we have won the war and obliterated
all of their capabilities
you know and of course
it says still harmors reigns closed
it is not closed and Tehran
retains a death grip on the flow
of 20% of the world's oil so
basically saying that Trump screwed us by
doing this starting a war
of aggression but then of course
the perspective remains it seems that
Iran is an evil terrorist organization
that will take over the world
I mean at some point we have to recognize
that it's not just their justifications
like why would they need to fake
create lies to go after
you know if they were the
terrorists then they wouldn't need to create all these manufactured stories
right it's like we have to start realizing
that there's more than just the
other side of the paradigm that we hate so much
but rather that the entirety of the government
has lied to us our entire lives about pretty much
everything we deal with in some ways
and it says because of that past
malpractice and diplomacy using
talks as a cover to prep for military operations
which is what they've always do
the Iranians will not listen to any proposals
to end the war right now that they do not
do not advantage them of course
because that's like that's
you know outside of the bad guy good guy framing
from anybody else that's what anybody would
do in that position and it says because of our war
of choice which is what it is or there are
other see not we but as
weather recently pointed out but they the government
not we because our
but same point but because of their
war of choice Iran now has
leverage not only over the
United States but over the global economy
in a way that would never otherwise
have been in their hands that that's true
but it says this is the bitter fruit
of foolish and arrogant policies from our country
the grave problem now however
is that we are at a moment
to we're at a moment to where rational
and sober reflection would lead us
to finding a hat in hand solution
to get the war over at any cost
as soon as possible but evidence
is growing that we're going to do the opposite
and expand our foolishness and expand the war
on the ground if the
if there is a fire burning already
in the Middle East this could turn into a flaming
come I mean I don't know maybe I just read that
with a certain frame in my mind I get the sense
that's kind of trying to frame it as you know
it's dangerous to allow Iran to have this control
a month of bombing Iran
is chief nothing will Donald Trump escalate
I mean it's more it's the image I think is what really
does that you know like it's some kind of control
structure but either way I think it's fair to
point out the over the idea
of why they you know
have created a situation that has
put them kind of like I was saying in a very
dangerous position that is now almost trapped
them in a logic they might not have won in the
first place now talk about
the deal conversation
which really is just something special
guys and this is the weirdest thing the
way that he's done this again like I said
to start I'm pretty I'm I feel like
if I like again it's all up in the air
if I had a bet on this right now I
feel like he's making the entire thing up
don't down Trump
in this recent clip
asks Steve Whitcoff for permission
which as everyone seems to have pointed out is
a very telling asks him am
I allowed to say this and he talked but you can argue
as being always deal and what I might expose
maybe because Trump always seems to well
it's almost the point isn't it Trump just seems to always
say things he shouldn't and now we ask it's interesting
but he asked about
what the gift was
that's all let him tell you for himself
the member of the story is that he was
dealing with some secret defector from Iran
and that we and they offered a gift and it's
like proof that they were really who they said they were
and that they were the only ones that could do it and it
happened and then he's oil and gas related
right well here it is
very substantial talks
going on with respect to
Iran with the right
people you know I told you about
a present right
Steve can I reveal the present
they said to show you
the fact that we're real
and solid
and we're there
we're going to let you have eight boats of
oil eight boats eight big boats of
oil this was two days ago
and they'll sail up tomorrow
that was three days ago
and
I didn't think much about it
and then I watched
the news and they said
a very good anchor actually
happen to be Fox
but I watched it
and he said
something's unusual happening there are eight
boats
that are going right up the middle
of the Homo Strait
eight big tankers
are going loaded up with oil right through
and I said well I guess
I guess they were right
and they were they were real
and I think they were Pakistani flagged
and
I said well I guess we'll deal with
the right people and actually
they then apologized
for something they said and they said
we're going to send two more boats
and we ended up being ten boats
and I hope I haven't screwed up your negotiations
but I thought it was appropriate to
say because I did talk to you
the other day by saying they're going to give us
a present
we're real
and solid
and we're there
we're going to let you have eight boats of
I mean doesn't it just feel like he's making half of this up
as he goes along
it's very strange but let's get
into the logic of this claim
they said to show you
the fact that we're real
and solid
eight boats eight big boats of oil
this was two days ago
two days and they'll sail up tomorrow
that was three days ago
and
I didn't think much about it
and then I watched
the news
he's told something
this is really important
at least the story it could all be an entire lie
that's one of the options
but he's told something
saying this will happen
I didn't think much about it
even though you told us something's happening
so you did think something about it clearly
at least you wanted us to think that something might happen
and then
you told this so it's important to understand
that Donald Trump is not speaking to anybody
Donald Trump is being told this from Whitcoff
that's undeniable at this point
Whitcoff is the one relaying information
from somebody they claim they're talking to
and he's being told that this might
happen at least within the story
so is it not one of the possibilities
that this is a lie
coming from somebody who's already been caught lying
to Trump about numerous things
that people in the inner circle of the diplomatic
conversation have said Jared Kushner
and Whitcoff are basically Israeli agents
direct quote
that's certainly possible isn't it
or that this is something that they're
playing him with
are like plenty of these different options
oh and then they said whoops we've said something wrong
and we'll give you two more okay okay
well another thing to add to this conversation
is the fact that as I know you've seen
and I'm glad I started making a big point about this
I wasn't sure if it would be as important
but the straight up vermouth
has never actually been closed
in the way they keep claiming
it just has not
it's right now all you can see all the traffic
now in regard to specifically oil tankers
it was restricted
in plenty of ways
one first of all because
I think the US government in Israel
scared everyone away from
thinking it was going to happen
Iran from the very beginning as I highlighted
said that they lobbed the threats that we all saw
on the beginning and then they made it clear
as he went on TV and he put out articles and said
this is closed to Zionists
this is closed to people who are gauging the war
against us and made a point to say
as I'll show you right now
like recently as Spain was allowed to
just go through the straight up vermouth
it's being documented because it's already
been happening before this on top of the fact
that what they're saying is look
Iran keeps telling people
this is at the UN
non-hostile ships can go through the straight
and the reason they have to keep stressing this is because the only narrative
out there is the straight is closed
and the US and Israel are scary and threatening
I argue even forcing people not to go through
my opinion
why to create this idea
that this is so restricted so back to the point
if he's telling you
then we looked and we saw 10 boats going through
well you mean aside from
the other 1000 boats that are going through
are we talking about the fact that you needed to
argue it was shut down to pretend that there was
some new thing happening
like there's all these different anomalies to it
but I think it's interesting to even frame it as closed down
when it's totally not and Iran keeps telling
people that it's not and we can see ships going through
that are not now the question also becomes
is he just pointing to
ships that were going through
like Spain and going see
like that's us winning because the deal went through
like I was thinking about yesterday
that ultimately it becomes sort of like
they agreed not to have a nuclear
weapon so with the deal worked and I won
it's over even though that was already where we
were because they didn't have a weapon and they already agreed
that the last time and the time after that
so in a way he knows he's losing so the
argument becomes let's pretend the deal
is what we already have and Iran will
deny it but I'll pretend they just don't want to admit it
or whatever all hypothetical
as it goes forward we'll find out which one
goes where but you know with the track record
this platform and a lot of the
independent media has around seeing the
writing on the wall here
so
it ends up being ten big boats of oil
well you know there's only one
small little problem with that
ultimately it turns out
Bloomberg
says those tanker tracking data that they have
shows that didn't happen
of the eight it says
tracking data since mark 23rd
shows no sign of the eight
boats full of oil that Trump says were gifted
to the United States quote
if this was some great present
you'd think both sides would want you to know
their own reasons don't you think
yeah you do well of course you could play
into it and say well maybe this was a defector
but then wouldn't the Iranian government know
that they just gave them oil somehow well
I don't know man it just doesn't really line
up does it
kind of think he's making it all up but
on top of that the
absurdity I'm kind of jumping ahead real quickly but the absurdity
of all this is that as we're in this
conversation and he's telling you I'm literally
talking to a defector from Iran and I don't
want to get him killed and then the next
day says I'm in a 15 point
plan to come ease government
okay well shit maybe
he's dealing with both of them that's a guest
possible but then it goes okay we're making
a deal and they want to do it begging me for a
deal the government not not the defector
but the government okay that seems
strange with what we're talking about and you just
publicly said you're working with a defector which you
know that they would hear so that doesn't
line up either and but then we get to the
point to where he goes the sick Iranian
leaders need to deal
oh you mean the ones that you want to make a deal
with for peace where they can continue governing
but they're sick deranged terrorists that okay but you
want you want them there still and you make a deal
okay got it and then the very next statement becomes
you better make a deal before it's too
late you better get serious but you just
said they made a deal didn't you just tell us
that you were the middle of that or didn't you say
you know you point these guys from one
second to the next what he's saying is
contradicting the thing he said before
like I've been telling you all these years
this one Trump says the US
that or us will be Iran's
worst nightmare if he doesn't agree to peace
plan you know the one that he says they
have agreed to already or
Trump cast out on the prospect of a deal
whoa whoa whoa hold on now that got out
of control really fast now it's not even
not even happen but then you just didn't
just give you a bunch of oil what
what's going on right now and then
Trump says it's up to Iran to convince
the US to end the war okay
yeah that's fun right that's that's an
exciting little turn of nonsense but
ultimately the problem is that you have a
lot of people out there who just
are paying attention don't care
not the majority of my mind I keep saying
that but a lot of people who are framed
as everyone in the conversation
so continuing yes yes he reported
holy crap red light says
Donald Trump just revealed
that the presidents or the Iranian
leaders gifted him eight points of oil
they apologized for something
and sent two more you know right because
you just blindly report that as fact
because Trump said because Trump's never
like before right literally
I mean if you guys don't remember this somebody
just made this because they said that off the cuff
I was kind of just referring to him as the red
light holy crap guys just
and they just keep keep making that
red light holy crap it's just weird to me
but that's that that's what it's supposed to be
but
the idea is
it happened we know because Trump
yelled it out loud well Trump says
Ron let ten oil ships through the street
removes as present
says Ron made the gesture to show the US
quote the fact that we're real and solid
and we're here or we're there
so at this point though
okay here's what's interesting and
I'm doing my best to be objective about this
it's kind of ridiculously obvious that he's lying
about a lot of this that's why I frame this as the
faux negotiation that very well
could be with a bro person
there very well could be some kind of deal going on
but it's still a completely broken
like he's lying to us all over
the place because in the moment for moment
point they're they're
contradicting each other but as I said
in the beginning you could argue that's his tactic to get
a good deal maybe you agree with that but the
end of the day he started this by telling
us or the point was the
element he was
talking to he didn't want to get killed not
the current government who he said was irrelevant
who shouldn't be dealt with because they're all hiding in bunkers
and then dealt within the next day which is what happened
which by the way I didn't tell you they
denied in case you didn't watch yesterday's show
he gave a 15-point plan to a community's
government to which they immediately denied
and then he said they're
thinking about it they said no we're not we're not even looking
at it it's embarrassing what's happening right now but
of course it could all be a bunch of lies the point
is that after that or before that he said the defector
guy was somebody who was secretly
working with trying to make a deal and didn't want to get him killed
and then said that he was
going to offer a present right that's how that story came around
so the so-called present
was supposedly from this not
community government person right
that's not an eyeball because that's what he said
so then today
we're being told that he's got 10
oil tankers that apparently
come from the defector or whatever you want
to call it the person not in the current government
that he's speaking with
so when we're talking about this today
I find it strange that it's kind of
broadly being framed as that came from
the Iranian government and
not in like just a broad general sense but specifically
the current community government now it says
now that may be the reality and maybe he just
lied about that secondary part for who knows why
but it says Iran made the gesture to show the U.S.
the fact that we're real we're all over here
Iran
U.S. Special Envoy Steve Whitcoff of course
a top negotiator with Iran said in
the cabinet meeting that the U.S. has had
quote multiple reach-outs
from the region and others who
want to play a role in ending the conflict
now look we've already made this clear
Pakistan
Turkey
they've been playing mediator rules for a while
or kind of like secondary rules
and Iran made it clear weeks
ago we're done
we are not dealing with you anymore every single
time we you feign negotiations and you
kill people it's not we're done we're not playing this game
anymore that's what they said who knows
if they change their mind but the point is that
they can it's been shown numerous
times they're passing they're trying to send
information to the mediators through Turkey
and Pakistan like the one they did two days
in through Italy that Iran denied
where Trump offered a ceasefire as Israel
reported and they denied it flatly
that's why he got all angry and started
killing people and then he realized he's losing
and now he's trying again it seems but the point
is that the people
that are reaching out for all this are the people
that have always been doing that and Iran is already
knowing they say we see the messages now this
is all just off the top of my head but it's stuff
that's been reported yesterday and before directly
from Iranian statements and what they're saying is
we see the messages we see what they're sending
we're we're just we're not responding
we are not engaging
and it says Whitcoff also
confirmed that the U.S. had
presented a 15-point plan
but noted it had been delivered
via Pakistan that was my point
they got it they said they saw but it
it was publicized and it's ridiculous
not only are they going we're not going to
engage anyway but you can read through it
I can give you six of those points that I can guarantee
you they're not going to agree with
so and also
it was presented to the community government
now it says Iranian state media
on Wednesday reported that Tehran rejected
the ceasefire that was presented to the
community government and submitted its own
list of conditions then in the war which is five
main conditions to which they already said
they've been wanting that demanding but it's
in addition to what they've been they said
were necessary before
now see the point is they were willing to have
an actual agreement to have a discussion like
before with the JCPOA which they upheld
that Trump removed himself from
and in this case they made it clear with
plenty of examples that they were willing to go
forward with this and they bombed them and destroyed
that so now why would they give them
concessions they're going to they want to make
that sound like they're terrorists and won't deal
except that's the exact opposite of what the reality is
so here
where they rejected the ceasefire
and submitted their own demands what they're
simply saying is not we want you to come to the table
and cock that's how Trump tried to frame that
because he seems desperate and they made it clear
we're not talking this is what we want
that's it until you give that up
this is where we are that's what they're saying
anyway to be clear that could change tomorrow
now it says quote that was
three days ago and I didn't think much
about it in regard to the statement of giving
the present
but while watching Fox news later on
he claimed that's what he just heard him say
they said something unusual is happening
there's eight boats that are going up the straight guys
this is insane
so on Fox news he happens to see
that's happening in a straight by the way
that's totally not closed down and on top of that
is anybody I would love for somebody even to show me
that Fox news report he said he watched
Fox news where's that report where's
the evidence of that report it might exist
but realize Bloomberg is telling you from the data
that that doesn't seem to be the reality
seems pretty interesting doesn't it so if
somebody could find the alleged Fox news report
he claims he watched of boats going through
I'd love to see that to be able
to add to the conversation and see what it shows us
but I'm get the sense that he made it up
or that somebody else told him that
who is lying to him
they said something unusual is happening
there's eight boats going up the straight right now
and I said well I guess they were right
and that they're real
I mean really that's all you need
somebody that you don't see
through somebody who clearly is
in you know has an
allegiance to something other than US interest
tells you that there's this is going on
and then tells you they see something happening
that justifies that it's real
I mean you're not even involved in that process
that's what I'm trying to show about everything
the military dynamic
this person seems like he's being completely
manipulated and again that's not the same as
saying he's you know like
the point of whether he was wanting to do this
seemed clear to me he was
screaming about going to war with Ron
in the beginning after the administration was
after the election
but there's also points to be made about whether he might
in addition to that be played
and maybe just because I think Israel always
seems to do that to US presidents
but just think about it
ask it don't assume
and it says
and I said yeah well I guess we're right
and I guess it's real and I think they're in the Pakistani flag
why does that make sense
so the argument then becomes that because they're the
mediator that Iran what gave them
eight boats full of oil
for them to send I mean it's not
look we could also point out that it's possible
that Iran doesn't want to be seen as weak
and capitulating but gave them the oil
in hopes that he might stop
and maybe stop Iran or excuse me
Israel that's a possibility
I can see that making sense especially
in a world where Trump is starting to see that
Israel is manipulating him
I mean right so like like hypothetically
right now this is always where it matters is what
happens right now if suddenly
Trump starts changing direction and starts
slowing this down and starts you know and
I guess calls out that Israel won't
I doubt that happens but that would seem
to suggest that there's might be a different agreement
going on between Iran and Trump and it's always what we
need to consider is that there are things that happen behind the scenes
like we talked about in the past example
where the reporting suggested that they
essentially said look we'll bomb here you bomb there
and we'll back up
and that's because both of them I think largely
Israel recognized that Iran was a more powerful
footing and they did that though and they stopped
right and I think they do that more than we
think not because they're
necessarily like on the same side but make that's
possible but because it's more about like
in that moment they both necessarily realize
they don't they you know they want to stop
and now it says
they did apologize for something they said
and we're going to send two more votes
I don't even know why that makes sense
I mean it's just again maybe there's more information
that adds to it
so again they say no
didn't happen
there's no evidence I mean you have to realize guys
that's what I'm showing you with that
boat tracking app that were the website
these things are tracked
he must realize that somebody somewhere
is going to eventually be able to prove
whether or not that happened
and then if you can prove that there were eight boats
that went through at the moment he said that or claimed
he was watching some show we should then
be able to prove one or two things or both
were they Pakistan he flagged
and if so I guess maybe three
were they full of oil and then three
was it in any way connected to Iran
we'll be able to prove all those things
to some degree and I doubt we'll get there
now this
I find interesting as well oh it's this here
actually and this is just some
I just randomly saw it looking down this guy
post this clip now it just
you guys all know this probably because you watch this
show and because you're objective and
nonpartisan but
it's so obvious to see how this guy
just kind of lies off the cuff
and you know and you may even argue it's
about like not like unimportant
things you may really this is not an important he's talking
about the amount of ships that they claim they've sunk
but with all the lies we see we should wonder
whether or not he's even singing any ships
I mean I know they have at least I think the evidence
is clear you could see that anything to be
fake but the point is that he's number seems
to change from day to day now realize
as it goes on yeah that would happen
but you'll note in the clip that they go
basically the first so many of them are the same
statement in the first three days
and the number changes
you either have to acknowledge that he's just making
that up or you know he can't
remember and he doesn't you know same kind of
point either way you look at it and I think it speaks
to exactly who he is it's gone
24 ships
in three days we've knocked out
42
Navy ships some of them very
large in three days
they have 32 ships all
32 are at the bottom of the ocean
some say right there not
three days right but he says they have 32 that's
it and they're all gone
it's on the bottom of the sea
it's almost
50 ships
okay yeah now it's 50 right so
if they only had 34 and they're all sunk it's weird
how they suddenly now have 50 that are sunk
it's just notified it's 51
the Navy is gone it's all lying
at the bottom of the ocean 46 ships
oh now it's all 36 and they're gone
can you believe it
I mean there's
no even denying that
it's just yeah you may think it's a small point
it kind of is in the larger sense of things
even though we're talking about people and ships
and major you know billions of dollars
just pretty obvious though
I think with what we're dealing with and if you think it's unique
to Trump you're not paying attention
so Brian Allen points out
Trump says I'm proposed
or Iran excuse me proposed
to make me supreme leader
now you know there's a line here guys where it's just
you know like it starts to make me wonder is he
trying to make you see this
now I don't want to get like too like QAnon
with it right we're too ridiculous
I'm not even you I'm going to use the term conspiracy
theory because that's not what that means
but realize that they're like
you start to wonder like this can't
be what he thinks is
what you'll believe what Iran saying
we want you to be the supreme leader
Donald Trump
and he didn't know they're insisting
they want to be so badly
well that's just not true
based on everything we can see
now who knows maybe tomorrow
he'll break the bombshell and show you it all comes down
and I'll happily report that
but as I always point out up until this moment
right now the facts scream something else
and all the mainstream alternative media
are not even looking at the facts
has to show you something here's what he said
so what are we talking about they random moronians
or are you talking about government now
you have to admit that there's
there are elements of this that are undeniably lies
they'll be killed by us
sadly but they're afraid to say it
because they figured they'll be killed by their own people
they're also afraid they'll be killed by us
there's never been
a head of a country that wanted that job less
what does he mean they'll be killed by us
I guess meaning that if they make a deal with you
I mean that just makes sense
I guess what he meant was that we might kill the leader
but what he seemed to say right there
was that they work with us either way
they want to make a deal so badly
but they're afraid to say it
because they figured they'll be killed by their own people
they make a deal so bad
but they can't say it because they make
they might be killed by them or us
they're also afraid they'll be killed by us
there's never been
a head of a country
that wanted that job less
than being the head of Iran
that really a clap worthy statement
Trump's personal opinion
about what he feels on the other side of the world
God we're stupid today
it just gets more ridiculous as it goes on
Trump says Iran begging to make a deal
that's today
so explain for me
how you can be saying yesterday
that they're offering a deal
right that it's happening
or that the secret guy is
or now we're dealing with Iran
but then Iran denies and turns down your deal
but then today they're begging to make a deal
now look you can argue
that there's some level of a deal going on
that's possible but for him to go they're begging
it just shows you who he is
that's obviously not true
based on the facts anyway
the evidence we can see which is all we can do
the Iranian regime is now
admitting to itself
he says that they have been
decisively defeated
they've got a disaster on their hands
they're defeated they can't make a comeback
it's just cartoonish
here's what he said
really a lot ahead of schedule
funny like you can note the moment
when he thinks I'm gonna go off the cuff
he's like you can see his finger on the page
he's literally reading the statement and just kind of
like not barely into it
and then it's like he tries to go off the cuff
and then it seems like he realizes oh I can't even think right now
so I'm just gonna go back to the page
I don't know what it is funny to notice that
we're extremely
really a lot ahead of schedule
the Iranian regime is now
admitting to itself that they have been
decisively defeated
they're saying to people
here's the ad lib see
oh yeah they're saying things to people
and they're talking and stuff
that was needed
this is a disaster
they're saying to people
decisively defeated
they're saying to people
this is a disaster
they know that's why they're talking to us
they wouldn't talk otherwise
so they're saying it to people
are they except no one knows about that
and it's not in any documents no one's saying it out loud
there's no video there's no reports
but they're saying it to people
what people are you talking about?
he's just it's not true
even if it's the actual reality of what they're thinking
they're not saying that to anybody
clearly because it's not
but he just had to say that
because he just needs to add his own little two cents
his own cent and a half
but they're talking to us because
they've got a disaster in their hands
they're defeated
they can't make a comeback
oh really yeah and meanwhile
they just bombed a lot today just in case you'd miss that
which is true
it's just ridiculous as chris martins
rightly points out
Trump says the iranian negotiators are very different
and strange these are the ones they just told you
begging for a deal and we're already making one
they are begging us to make a deal
which they should be doing since they have been
militarily obliterated wait
so you start by saying they're different and strange
and 30 seconds before this
he was saying that they're better
hurry up and make a deal or they're going to be suffering
okay and then next sentence
they're begging to make a deal
which they should be doing because they've been
you just said they were obliterated
which was zero chance of comeback
and yet they publicly state that they are looking
at our proposal wrong
you're literally contradicting your own sentiment
with this it's just this guy seems like
he's schizophrenic right now
wrong they better get serious
before it's too late
he starts by saying they're begging for a deal
then ends the very paragraph
with saying they better get serious
before it's too late
as chris rightly points out
I think we all have to admit
there's something especially stupid happening right now
stupid is not even our word
it's unprecedented
the level of whatever we call this right now
and chris says
counterpoint
the militarily obliterated country of Iran
hit
multiple military bases last night
most of which are truly obliterated
and rain missiles down upon israel
true
but you know who cares facts right
cbs or cnbc
trump says iranian negotiators better get serious
which that's the paragraph I just read for you
trump lashes out at the sick iranian
leaders that he otherwise wants to
keep in power with a peace deal because that
totally makes sense
trump says us will be iran's worst nightmare
if it doesn't agree to the peace deal
that it says they're begging for you know
because that's just normal right cast out
on the prospect of the deal that he just said
they were absolutely screaming about
and you know that it's up to them to
convince us to end the war that I'm telling you
I want to end because they're making a deal
but they have to convince me of the things that I'm telling
it just doesn't make sense guys you can make a joke
about it all day long it's very serious
because people are dying
people are literally starving to death
they're being tortured all over the world in multiple
locations that this is in this war
because it is the same war is taking place
Gaza
Syria Lebanon
all of it
now as he wrote today
toward this is 3 30 p.m.
after all the different schizophrenic statements
as per iranian government
request he writes
please let this statement serve to
represent that I am pausing the period
of energy plant destruction you know the war
crimes that those would be by 10 days
to April 6th
talks are ongoing and despite
erroneous statements by the con to the contrary
by fake news media the others are going
very well oh so you
you're absolute in
you know what the word he used is you know
shall not be moved deadline
was just moved for 10 more
days got it
these attacks on energy that would be
that was we crimes okay but this gets even
more ridiculous when you find out
that they're denying that
now this is different than some secret other
Iranian person now of course Iran can be making
this agreement and then lie about it that is possible
but what logic does that make
especially when Iran is the one saying they want
this to walk back and especially when Trump claims
that's what he wants and then you argue that you guys
come to an agreement about actually waiting
about and then they deny it
guys it's not happening I don't see
a world in which that even really makes sense unless
Israel's lying to Trump through it cough or
whatever else it might be Jeremy
Scahill says I asked a senior
Iranian official about Trump's claim Iran requested
an extension on the threat
they said Trump is not being truthful
we have not submitted any request regarding
potential U.S. attacks now that's what Jeremy says
he said somebody said to him
then the Wall Street Journal
came out and reported
citing mediators involved
with the deal which is important because they're the ones that keep calling out
Whitcoff and Jared Kushner as
Israeli assets says
Iran has not requested
a 10-day pause on strikes on its energy
plans contradicting Trump's claim
that the extension was made at Iran's request
and confirming earlier
reporting by drop site news
Jeremy Scahill this just gets ridiculous
by the second guys
so it's very clear to me that what makes the most
sense again we're reading limited
information is that Trump is so desperately
trying to frame this as
his magic deal making ability
is driving this into a
resolution
and in any other
circumstance I'm willing to bet you that Iran
would have just let it happen
because they seem to not care they let Trump pretend
he's the big tough man saving the world
but everyone seems to see through that
and in the past they've let that go
like I said after the 12th they wore
they came out the winner in that situation
despite all the lies they didn't obliterate the thing
they did get the enrichment facility
but the point is clearly that they got through a lot
to Israel and so they let it go
they let it end and they even made statements
to some effect right but because
of what they did and because they kept
pretending deals and murdering people
they're done with this now at least what they set up until now
so Trump comes out
and goes okay he wants to end it now wants to fake
some kind of a deal that makes him look like he got the deal
and Iran says that's not happening
which is probably
really pissing him off now either he's lying
about it and he's mad they're not going with it
or he believes that this is actually happening
because somebody's lying to him and now he's confused
here's
what New York the New York magazine
put out this was today
does anybody take
Trump seriously anymore
now you know their part people are going to yell
partisanship because usually that's almost always
a factor in the stuff but you know it's a real question
we should be asking not because
of partisanship or because of one thing
or because he just is to an objective
person who's not being led by politics
which rarely exists
today you just can
see that he's lying guys it's obvious
he's contradicting his statements
right so at some point people go okay
I mean even people who are
in the higher level that pretend he's not
they still know he's lying right so at some point
you just start treating him like he's not even real
he's not a serious person anymore
that's just interesting but this goes through
just kind of the recap you can read it yourself
now here is Alex Jones
coming out yesterday saying Iran
rejects the peace plan
the peace plan
you mean the plan that was
literally designed to turn them into some vassal state
with no ability to defend themselves
where Israel would 100%
take advantage of them and the US like with Libya
that's the peace plan Iran rejects
or was it the plan they tried to put forward
that they never accepted and they bombed him in the middle of
this guy's ridiculous guys
and they vowed
to keep the street of her moves closed indefinitely
you know these things because you're watching this show
because we've been continually reporting on it
because that's not true
not only do they not vowed to keep it closed
they didn't close in the first place
what they said was they will continue to restrict
their access if they continue to conduct this illegal war
and do not give them the basic concessions
they're asking which is basically no sanctions
no illegal wars no more you know
everything they're doing illegally
this is what he's putting forward guys
and of course what he gives you the token
where he pretends to be mad about
Hegseth saying we negotiate with bombs
but then still supports everything they do
because that's what honest people do right
I simply said do you ever get tired of being so
deliberately dishonest
probably not
Chris Mann points out what Sean Hannity had to say
he says Trump should not only
should only make a deal
with Iran
if they repay us
for all the cost of the bombs
I don't even have a word
strong enough
or accurate enough for what in the hell that is
so you know I mean
whether you think the war was justified
because of wrong terrorism
that you're going to literally bomb the hell out of a country
killing civilian people
you cannot deny that
and then argue that you won't stop it
until they pay for the cost of your bombing
but that then weirdly means
that they will still be there
which he says they won't allow
so this just seems like a
I think it's just kind of
honestly people like Hannity
if you want to cut to the quick of it I think is trying to give
Trump the path to whatever Trump needs
has nothing to do with the real agenda
these people are career players guys
but I'll let you listen to it yourself
a deal with Iran and
a permanent lasting end to this conflict
that would be a major win
not only for the US but for the entire world
but for a deal
to work with Iran
certain straightforward conditions must be met
one Iran must agree
to hand over all of that
60% of which uranium
oh yeah you know like they agreed to already
right like we showed you
which I'll include again which you can read for yourself
which was outlined in the deal that they blew up
when they bombed him on the 28th
he had a conversation on media right there
with Face the Nation
the Foreign Minister Oman made it clear
they agreed to give up all of their rich material
and to literally no longer even have it anymore
which they've never done before
and he said this is actually happening
we're actually going to have peace
and Israel bombed them that night
so is handy that stupid
do you think he's not capable of doing his due diligence
I don't know if he would
or if he cares to but I know he can
so ask yourself is this journalist
just ignoring the facts
or is he just lying or is he
just not aware of it
or the fact that the enriched uranium
was within the safeguards which he'll continually pretend
is not the case
which I'll include here with a little
where was it
shoot
thought I'd grab real quick
there it is I just did this so you guys could have
a one stop spot for it because I bring it up often
here's the link to the
I'll come back to it
Whitcoff's lie about 60% which is all going around
still despite how easy it is to prove
was actually within their safeguard agreements
because remember
Whitcoff claimed they bragged about it
like it was some kind of violation
like they would even do that when they're coming to a table
about some kind of an agreement
like this guy is so dis
dishonest but
the word coming to mind would be
deliberately like you know not just
kind of like ultimately
the main thing to realize
is against US interests
there's a lot of factors to include in that but
that it is something obviously hurting Americans
and our interests
and these are the people that are the meet
the between the middle man between
the conversation and Trump
they must do so
immediately
they must do it by the way
in a way
we cannot allow that material to get
into the hands of the wrong people
all of it must be turned over
before our military leaves
oh to who
to the US government
to Israeli government
totally the not wrong hands right
the only two governments that are actually
seemingly willing to use them on people for no reason
but yeah rush it out of the hands of the people
who told you they'll never do it for no
and have never been proven to do it and for religious reasons
say they'll never do it and the IEA says they never have
you know get out of their hands and rush it into the hands of the people
who are killing people right now with all those weapons
because that's the safeguard
number two
Iran must allow anywhere
any place any time
inspections not from
any globalist organization like the IAEA
that screws it up
got it always in Iran's favor
oh see okay totally not at all
by the way they've been aggressive against
Iran for a very long time
the only difference is they just never
argued that they were doing the thing that they're not doing
and he just hates that apparently
the facts you know or Tulsi Gabbard
or the previous administration or
everybody anywhere with any insight tells
you they are not doing so the evidence doesn't
back it up and how many times you can show
Israel getting caught literally one example
I remember getting caught trying to sneak
material in with the
with the IAEA inspection
and being caught in the bathroom and then
going in and testing and finding material on the
bath on the bath
in like the excuse me the
geez the toilet came talk
now that was reported that came directly
from the IAEA they said they there was
ultimately like radioactive like somebody flushed
you down the toilet
I mean this is crazy that's the kind of thing that they do
constantly try to frame Iran now
that's up the cuff don't take a word for that
but I've covered this previously and that was directly
from the I oh you could even go back to
what is it
Dr. Oman
man it's Frost Oman
I'm forgetting his name now the Japanese person
that previously was in the position
and ultimately mysteriously died
from some turbo cancer that came out of nowhere
I mean and he was critical
he was calling out Israel for claiming they were doing
I mean it's just crazy the history but anyway the point
is that you can art you can't argue
this group was somehow pro Iran they've been
very aggressive towards Iran and they've shown
data to back up what they're saying these
people are belligerent and just argue that is
the case no matter what the facts show and if you
disagree with me then you're on the other side
that's not journalism but the idea that there has
been inspections even from U.S.
entities and the U.S.
and elements we've already told you they're not doing
that what he wants is the current
elements who are very
clearly willing to lie about everything in
Israel go right along with them it's not
going to happen no they've got to be
U.S.
inspectors Iran must also
fully agree to
end its nuclear program completely
once and for all yeah so that means
their civilian level which everyone's allowed to have
included so was the other one as well but
that's not legal and they
they've always had that and by the way again
literally already argued they
would before Israel bombed them on
the 28th so this is just stupid
they must also agree
not to build out any ballistic missiles
right so no defense well there's plenty
of other things you could add but that's the whole point
just no missiles no ability to
defend yourself but that's what they've already added to this
right and it doesn't include here they've
talked about as we just read to you a second ago
no Navy just basically a
group of people stuck on land that
Israel can manipulate however they want
they must also
agree to open up the Strait of Hormuz
not closed and they must agree
to repay America
in oil for the entire cost
of this entire military operation
oh well isn't that interesting
almost like they spoke about it
and now they're reporting something that they included
that then Trump claims already happened
you see what I'm talking about
whether it even happened or not
it's almost like they're making it look like
something has been fulfilled and so he's gonna go
we did it I weirdly get
the sense that might be where this goes like almost out of
desperation but that's you know the
idea they're gonna repay you for your illegal war
is just the stupidest thing in the world but
Hannity has been a career
career war
whatever belligerent
he's a war monger he always has been
people are always screaming about why war is necessary
against people that we have no right to be involved with
like everything about this is just disgusting
from top to bottom
even if these groups were what they claim
the point is still to be made that why
we feel we have the right to do any of this anyway
but on top of that
that they're lying about them which should matter right
now here's what he said in another post
and again that I really recommend
if you haven't seen it that you understand
what this is discussing on the 28
then like literally the hours
before they bombed
illegally Iran where you said
peace was in reach that they said
they were gonna give up all of their rich material
and they had
you know you could argue they lied about it
but the ultimate point is they're now demanding it
and here's the real thing to always remember is when Trump says
they were
they wouldn't say the one
thing that mattered that they wouldn't refuse to give
up a bomb that's not true in fact
when he said that at that very moment
they were saying court we were already okay with the word
we're agreeing to give it up so again
you could argue that they think they're lying
but why would then Trump come out and say they just never
have they refused to say it
not the same thing it's clear and then now
he's coming out and saying they agreed to not have a nuclear bomb
but then refused
the ceasefire he's lying about all this
I don't see any other option at least the idea
of some you know
or either either misled or lying
would be I think a fair point
so here's what
Sean Hannity also said
which just blows my mind
tonight Sean the president has also proved
the dependence
of up to a thousand soldiers from the 82nd
airborne in the Middle East and it's believed
that if there's a necessity
to have ground forces say take
Karg Island this might be
the first step toward that contingency
then again you could argue that maybe
you know say you know I don't know
Karg Island you know whatever
I don't know that one
clearly it's
there's a point people made by the way
that it could be that that's something they want you to think
and it's a different island you know
but Robert made that case in the article
any one of these things are going to go for
will ultimately be a failing action
with what Robert argued with what they'll ultimately do in response
and I agree
but so Karg Island though is one of the thoughts I had about
whether he's talking about sort of justifying taking that
for the oil conversation
it's just another way to
apply more pressure we'll keep an eye on it but for now back to you
and the most
important aspect Kevin is obviously that
the most important aspect is to always
blindly repeat this untruthful
statement at the end of every show
will not be handing off to our children
and grandchildren a world
where radical mullahs that chant
death to America the number one state sponsor
you know unlike saying you know death
to Muslims which is totally okay which is all over
Israel and apparently the Republican Party today
that's okay though
terror has weapons of mass destruction
all is that chant death to America
the number one state sponsor of terror
number one standing because like yeah exactly
man yes yes we all repeat
those lies we got it
number one state sponsor terrorism even though you tell us
ISIS is the leading terrorism group
and they attack is Iran you know
but whatever you know or or that every other
terrorist group we can even point to is Sunni
and comes from the Wahhabist Saudi
you really but you know whatever Iran does it
because we say so because you know you
don't don't we claim they're supporting this
group which you can prove they're not Hamas
Hezbollah it's just like I'll say every
single time you take every
allegation they make and pretend it's
all true even though it's not
and compare that to what you can literally prove
even though it's way more than that of what the U.S.
has done in the world it pales in comparison
but they just do it anyway guys
leading state sponsor of
terrorism it's just lazy there is no evidence to back
that up has weapons of mass destruction
does not
here we are again WMD
we're going in to get them could potentially
create a modern-day holocaust
Oh modern-day holocaust you mean like what they're doing
in Gaza right now no no not that
just I you know these are
cartoons guys they at some point hopefully
the world will get to a place where you can look back
and just be like wow did this ever happen
like this is the this is what it
looks like at the end of a dying empire like these people
are cartoons it's just sad
I mean look like think about like
ended like 2008 for example right
what did you see you got all of the big
time super important government supported
economic economists saying
it's never been stronger than ever
and then everything collapses
that's the same point it's exactly
what we do every time or what the you know
the power structure does and half the
time those people thought they were right because
they bought in to the nonsense guys
it's like the Iran experts who are experts
on all the lies the State Department teaches them
they don't even know that they're wrong
Patrick Henningson has a good point here about
the lies from the point of the protests
you know which were already well
into this but let's not forget they lied
about Iran shooting protesters they manufactured
this by which by the way we've already
now proven in three or four different ways
from reporting from inside Netanyahu's
camp the New York Times article that covered
it the idea of them arming the Kurds
the statement of the date they made before
they got there they planned this out
they stoked the fake revolution
now realize that was that was rooted within
a real protest that
that very quickly they called out including
the union supporting it as outside forces
that have taken over it right in the beginning
as usual they try to co-op
something real it didn't work just like last
time but they just bull rush in with violence
and just yell the narrative they do it every time
and so the reality was very very clear
they just killed
people and and they said my
point was they admitted they armed them they told
you they were arming them in what
world is that not obviously a crime and
so Patrick Henningson has back backing
this up with evidence and research about
what he saw and and the reality of
it so met with
the police and saw the evidence
of the riots
and the foreign agent provocateurs
that incendiary element that was
injected into the country by
us and Israeli intelligence what
happened was terrible for the police
hundreds of police were killed many were
burned alive we saw the unredacted
evidence of that the redacted evidence
of course was meant much of it was broadcast
on Iranian national TV but you didn't see
any of that syndicated in the western
yeah wonder why isn't it also funny
that you have people who are always about
support the police who suddenly don't care
when it's just police with a different color skin
media so I can say
categorically that the narrative that
Iran massacred
thousands of its own people and these
peaceful democratic protesters is a total
fiction and I saw plenty
of evidence to that fact as well as
reams of burned buses
burned fire trucks EMS responder
vehicles that were set on fire
aside from the police that were burned alive
so there was a real agenda there
to foment instability
and unrest and then the president
Trump then taking to the air wave saying
this is your moment rise up and take over
your institutions it's obvious that was
incitement so for anyone to say that
that wasn't a classic color revolution
exactly as we saw in hams in Syria
in 2011 and in 2012
exactly as we saw in Maidan
in February 2014
and also in Libya, Serbia
Yugoslavia, the list goes on eastern Europe
Belarus we've seen this playbook
that's what happened here clearly but it was
done on a level with resourcing
that is quite breathtaking
in terms of what was spent on the media
propaganda campaigns in the west
what was spent in terms of Starlink
terminals that were smuggled into the country
every time I've been telling
you guys that it's not hard to see
Starlink, he's a military contractor
it's what it is but they always give you
the feigned what's for
we're helping humanitarian I mean there's so many
examples where people suffer in this country
isn't it funny when Biden was in power
and you have the hurricanes
they just couldn't stop talking about how no one's been
and now they just don't care
there's been disasters where no one's been helped at all
no Starlinks, no help
just such gross hypocrisy
just feigned humanitarianism whatever it is
and Starlink comes into play every time
the US is conducting an illegal war
they all are but war in general
very clearly you can see
I don't mean that by you know
take it however you want but the point is that all their
wars are clearly no congressional approval
whatever but the point is that
you're using these things as weapons of war
under a guise of humanitarianism
it's what they do
we also saw evidence of narcotics
that were being distributed
and I saw that in Syria by the way
I was really interested in that point because
how do you get people to
act completely insane and violent
we also saw this with
I think that's what the captagon
if I remember correctly was the name of the drug
tell me if I'm wrong in the chat
but that's the conversation we did talk about that
in regard to Syria where they were giving people these
amphetamines and different things
and his point there
is to drive them to be
I guess maybe immoral
like so you know drugged up and not aware
of what they're doing certainly possible
these elements as well
the police there believed there were amphetamines
similar types of drugs
and spice something called spice
these types of drugs were awesome
that's that stuff that made people like
like rip their faces off or whatever
like legitimate like the people like lost their mind
like scrape their skin off or whatever
like bath salt kind of stuff
and same thing remember I'm in the chat
if you have any more information on that it's interesting
where was that spice story from
so distributed and injected into that
so there's a lot of disaffected youth
obviously that got swept up
in the mob violence
with very skilled and well trained people
in the back lines shooting police officers
from within the crowd using
the crowd as human shields
and that's when things spun out of control
very quickly and we saw that sort of period
of about seven days of violence and instability
which the US in Israel
hoped to capitalize on but didn't
after the Iranian shut off the internet
intercepted a lot of the Starlink
transmissions were able to track
the location of some of the terminals
and quickly were able to shut down the
organizational I think element
that's the impression I got from the police
chiefs that we met in the main
municipality of Tehran
and the visual evidence that we saw as well
why is this important this narrative
the regime or the mullahs massacring
their own people that's the actual
backstop for manufacturing
consent for this war because the nuclear
conversation has fallen flat
on its face exactly
Patrick Hanningson
21st century wire just looking at
really quickly I was actually conflating that
with the with two things
it's rightly pointed out I think
was K2 like the scent the synthetic
marijuana which if you remember correctly
there was tons of like crazy stuff
people just went like lost their like
there was chemical sprayed on
excuse me and it caused people to like
lose their minds but the
ripping of the face thing is actually a real
story but that came from two things
flaka you remember that and then
the bath salts conversation I think
all this is kind of part of the same not to get
off on this tangent but this part of a similar
conversation you know it's like experimentation almost
like there's something you know you could argue
it's just people trying to trying to make
new recreational things but something tells
me if you look into the history of where
these things tend to really originate it
comes from a lot of times military stuff
you know whether like the
like the
you know acid or
what's the other one I was thinking of
you know like MK ultra kind of stuff I mean
that's a lot that's a history that you
should look into
so the point of what we just said there was
that they lied you know about the
background of that and he went and sought for himself
that's what a journalist does
Mary says I won't be lecturing on morality
or lectured on morality by the guy who had
the CIA draw up plans to kidnap and
assassinate Julian Assange
and exposing war American war crimes
at four excuse me
exposing American war crimes in Iraq
that's Mike Pompeo saying the vast majority
of Republicans oh excuse me that was
confusing for the podcast I'm all over the
place right now so Mike Pompeo said
the vast majority of Republicans understand
that Operation Epic Fury what they're doing
now was right is righteous and necessary
let's finish the job
Murray says I won't be lectured on morality
by a guy who had the CIA draw up
plans to kidnap and assassinate Julian
Assange and the CVS police highlighting
says Republicans want Trump to end the
Iran the Iranian regime change Iran's
leadership leaders to one that are pro
us 80%
I don't even think that's true
most everything I can see is based on
some select grouping of people in the
core the reality of the conservative
conversation or even just Republican GOP
I think most of them I mean they
ran on the idea of this not happening
I just don't believe that's the
reality but on top of that that you're talking about
even if it was changed them to be pro
America pro us what
how did we get here now let's be clear
that's always been what they've been doing
always
fighting for fruit companies in South America
but the point is that they framed it
as humanitarian or whatever
at least in a there for a long time
now and the idea that we're just so
casually saying let's just remove them and
put people there that we like that's
what it's always been guy but they're just doing it on its
face now and I mean that's just
destined for failure guys people this is going
to cause things to spin out and get I mean
you can even argue that the illusion
did afford some level of like the
you know the like a
feeling of normal see your piece and that's
not a good thing ultimately because
we're being lied to my point though is
that with what they're doing now it's just very
clearly
I would add though that being seeing it
is that there's an opening there
it gives us the opening to go okay
wow they're doing this we should do something
as Americans or wherever you're from
we need to stop that my point though
is that they're doing it on its face my worry is that
it's going to turn this into well that's just what we do
because there's a lot far too
many people who seem to be all kind of
pulled into that mindset today
we can't this is wrong and
what they're doing is I mean on top of that
realize that Iran's leaders and what they're doing
there's just not the truth telling you is not
true so now you're driving it based on the lies
from the very kind of oligarch
globalist that you think you're fighting
so
rod points out that they're now just copying
the onion this is the
old an onion article from a while ago net
and yahoo calls Iran strikes necessary
to prevent the war he just started
that's a joke here's the report from
March 25th senator john
kennedy on Iran the president didn't start a war
he's trying to stop a war
that's just um guys that's
stupid and obviously you said you could argue
that starting the war might have stopped a
bigger war that might see that's a
logical way to say that
I don't get it
an arbitrant
the war to reopen
the thing
closed by the war
they say Pakistani defense ministers talking about
this need the war is about trying to reopen
the straight of our moves which again
is not actually closed if you're
fine unless you're fighting Iran
it is closed for you if you're fighting Iran
what's interesting to me is that how when you
go the world are you gonna as are now
gods rightly pointing out
you start the war
illegally which
causes them to restrict the straight
and then you now frame the war
as to start open the straight like it just
obviously shows you that they're either clearly
fault failing and now you know trailing
after this or that this is just them trying
to mission creep in a way
and change the narrative but either way
they started it they created the very
thing they're now fighting as always
guys that's always what it's been look at
every other war before us
and coming to this point
again Spain has been granted
permission through the straight of our moves
which is not new I've been saying
they're making a public case of saying yes
look you can guess you're good
you guys can go through why specifically
do to their position on the war
because they've made
a statement they've made it clear we're
I forget if they've said something more severe
but the very least they're saying we're not involved
like we don't want any part of this we don't want to support what Trump
is doing but I believe they did make
some statements that were sort of like you know this
is not I don't want to
misquote it but the point was
I know they did make statements saying
that we you know we're not involved and so
because of that Iran's saying
you're good go through
which my point is the more this becomes
aware real and seen
and other governments start to recognize that they're being
misled by you know if that's really what's happening
or the very least it just starts being a
necessity because people need to get this flowing again
and Trump's plan is not working that this
is going to make Israel the US
in a terrible position
but in a way that creates the justification
for them to push this even further
but either way you look at it
Iran is playing this very artfully
Spain
granted this is even as Trump's energy
dominance policy is failing
it should be clear about that statement this is not about some kind of
you know praising Iran's government it's about the
reality that the tactics they've used
are clearly working it's the same point
about with Putin and the statements about
the way he conducts his politics he's a
he's a very very masterful politician
that's obvious
he constantly plays these people in ways
that may but that doesn't mean he's a good guy
not even remotely but that's important to see
and it's also important to highlight that the
difference from what we're staring at with Trump and them
is that they're also just as dishonest but they're also
just terrible at doing what they're doing
now this is
another article from Al Jazeera straight up from
which countries ships has Iran allowed
safe passage to now you can go through
this the simple reality is like I'm saying
I mean here's it's crazy
they keep trying to tell you that it's closed
no one can get through but India
Turkey China France Italy Spain
and really anybody not adversarial to them
right now it's pretty simple
they just really need you to think it's closed
and all of the dutiful liars out there
keep telling you that it's closed
Iran tells UN non-hostile ships
can go through
now you could argue they're lying and trying to trap people
but no there's already evidence showing
ships going through now back to that
point about Trump is he just trying to pretend that that's
what he was doing
I'm not sure
and here's an interesting point we mentioned this recently
today that this was new to me as well I wasn't
actually aware that all these different straights
Suez canal and
what was the other one that wasn't the one main one
like the Panama canal for example
or the difference ends different straights
almost every one of them in the world charge fees
for ships to go through
not that does not happen
for moves now you could argue it's because
there's basically two you know halfway
on the other side there's another landmass
that could arguably try to control it as well
but that's not the reality Iran
very clearly controls secure
in a security sense the straight of her moves
that's why they've always been trying to change
the dynamic because they knew Iran could do this
the entire for years they this is the point
so it's always been the case so
understanding that Iran has security control over
this area means that just like every one of the others
that they would have the right to
claim to have a
what is it called a fee but
a
what's it called a fee in here the
charge a toll a toll that's what it is
charge a toll for going through
now that's I'm not even saying I agree
with it or not I'm just saying as a worldwide
thing it's odd it's sort of
like missiles and everything else right Iran
can't because
Iran bad guy well that's not how that works
okay and ultimately they would have that right
and so what drops I dudes is saying
Iran's parliament is moved for toward
formalizing the plan to charge a toll
and that was actually part of one of the things
in the five points they demanded if
to make the go back to some
state of peace or rather just not
peace but you know the
security footing and the restriction
specifically for Zionist Israel
the United States from the start of her moves
they would they already made it clear they'll stop
in militarily engaging if they stop
but they said for clear they would say we're
not stopping with this because of what you just
created until you forgive us that if
that makes sense and so the point
is that one of them was
sovereignty over this control
point and it says the head of parliament
civil commission said Iran is pursuing legislation
to formalize that sovereignty and control and supervision
over the straight my point
watch it's a prediction
now watch as the usual suspects
frame this and maybe it's already
happening as either unprecedented
somehow even though it's clearly not
or an act of terrorism
even though it seems to be common practice just about everywhere else
that's just how this broken partisan
game seems to work
Caroline Leavitt comes out and says allies are lining up
behind Trump to open the straight of her
moves you know the straight that's
not closed at all well it's restricted
but closed is not at all closed
I shouldn't say closed not at all but even though
closed means closed so technically that is correct
but it's misleading it is restricted
as you all know already
but allies are lining up
but are they
well it's from the New York Post
so I imagine we can take this with a pound of salt
but if you read through it
it says over the weekend the United Arab Emirates
in Australia became the latest to join
the growing list of nations
now numbering 22 offering
their help to open the straight
now that's not the same as saying
so Trump tried to start a coalition of ships
to guide ships through which everybody denied
and last I checked they all said no
now what this seems to be
trying to claim is that they're agreeing to it
now that's not what I'm seeing right now
but if you know what happens tomorrow
or this on the 24th but where it goes right
the point to me is that they're
saying they're offering to help
not that they're going to work alongside Trump
to militarily guide ships through the straight
which is what they kind of want you to think is happening here
it says six United Kingdom
France Germany Italy Netherlands Japan
jointly declared their readiness
to contribute to appropriate
efforts to ensure as a passage
that's not the same thing
that's the same thing the UK said
no no that's dangerous we're not going to do that
but we'll seek a viable alternative
so they want you to
they want clearly Trump not to be mad
they're not helping but they don't want to do the thing he said
that's what I feel is the case here
and now this is being framed sort of like the rest of the lies we're getting
as somehow something that it's not
that's my sense on it
it says the Brits have also
agreed to let US forces use their bases
to launch attacks which by that logic
that now means they're a belligerent
and probably already were in Iran's mind
but at this point now they would be legal targets
in this ongoing military campaign
and NATO Secretary Mark
Rutts says the alliance is working out a timeline
for a joint response it says
if Iran would have the nuclear capability
together with the missile capability
and it would be a direct threat
I'm just so tired of this argument
you mean like every other government
and one that are literally committed genocide
and they're not even seeking nuclear weapons
the same old thing but this is NATO
which basically is the US government
if we understand the reality an existential threat
to Israel the region the Europe
is the stability of the world
no kidding says the totally not objective
New York Post Iranian leaders
following Tehran's launch last week
and last weekend of two missiles
at the joint US British military base
Diego Garcia a stunning 2,500 miles away
I don't know why that's a big deal
for these people it says
they range far longer than Iran's missiles were supposed to have
well they they're not arguing
they don't have that capability
they're just not demonstrating what they do have
they've kept it close to the chest for this reason
for a long time my argument that
they didn't have that was something the US kind of spun
as should they cross that line
it's a big deal and we terrorism
it's no different than any other government
as far as I could tell for the most part
different levels of reach but the point is the same
is that they have the ability or they could
you think Israel has shown you everything they're capable of right now
no
Tehran unilaterally struck out at the Gulf Nations
unilaterally
that's what this ridiculous platform just said
Tehran unilaterally struck out at the Gulf Nations
oh you mean the nations that literally bombed them first
and they responded because they were belligerents
inflicting serious damage on their key means of income
their royalties
I mean you just can't take people seriously like this
unilaterally
in what world are you operating in guys
this means this writer was
deliberately misdeceiving you for the team
that's or they somehow just don't understand
what everybody else has already seen
how embarrassing
but the point for me is the idea of this
um
attack on the base
I want to remind you of something that uh James
James Lee put out we'll play that really quickly
which I think is relevant
about this exact conversation
a few days ago we were told that two ICBMs
were fired at Diego Garcia
which is a joint US
UK military base in the southern Indian
ocean now the Israeli military
very quickly claimed that Iran
fired these missiles
and that they could soon hit Europe
including cities like Berlin, Paris and Rome
Prime Minister Netanyahu then tweeted out
quote I asked the leaders of the free
world what are you waiting for
Israel is not only fighting for itself
but fighting for all of you
but there's just one problem
Iran says they got nothing
to do with it and if you read the Wall Street Journal
reporting critically it said that
one of the missiles failed mid-flight
so it didn't even get there and the other
may or may not have been
intercepted so we really have
no idea what actually happened
the US's own intelligence indicate that
Iran lacks the capability
of firing any missiles outside of about 1200 miles
now Diego Garcia
is located in the southern Indian ocean
about 2500 miles away
from the nearest point in Iran
so something is not adding up here
okay the UK has now publicly
come out to say that there is quote
no assessment to substantiate
Israel's claim that Iran has long-range missiles
capable of hitting London
the NATO Secretary General said
they have no evidence that
Iran fired missiles at Diego Garcia
so if that's really the case that Iran
didn't fire those missiles
then the elephant in the room of course
is who did
so a few
so obviously
it's you know hypothetical
right but it's a fair point
and with everything else we're seeing
with all the weirdness around this
it's worth asking if we're being misled
now that's not to say this is the important point
that Iran's not capable of that
I kind of find that irrelevant with what I just said in the first place
not irrelevant but just
not what they're making it out to be
the question though is
you know are they and that's still fair
I would argue they I think it's worth arguing
they are but then you know
their claim and they weren't so the question is
if they aren't was that fake by them
to make that case or even if they are
was it still driven into reality
so is what US and Israel right after
they stress why that can't happen
suddenly goes oh look I told you
we proved that means they're terrorists somehow
because we told you that that thing can't happen
now that it's happening terrorism even though
it's not you see what I'm saying
it's an interesting thought worth considering that
and especially since this is something they keep
dwelling on this is what Trump just said
one missile went 2,500
miles they supposedly didn't have that
like it's a weird you know they're really trying to push this
in even though as I said
it seems largely and I think
we've been proven right you know they took
one missile went 2,500
miles they supposedly didn't have a missile
like that they had no missile with that capability
they didn't say that
you see what do you mean they're supposedly
that Israel tell you that was that some
was those the State Department Iranian experts
Israel they never claimed we don't have that
not that I can tell why would they
it's just a weird way to frame that like it's
about you know they weren't supposed to
bomb back they weren't allowed to is what
you it's like that say that video where you said
they were supposed to do that what is this
kindergarten like what do you mean there's a plan
Israel that's what it was
they thought they had a plan but they shot the now
famous Ireland
Ireland that
the UK
was very
afraid to give us because they
want to get dragged in but we don't want to
get dragged into their wars
one thing we're very disappointed
I'll say it publicly we're very disappointed
with NATO
it's just a little bit about
with NATO it's just weird
like it's just I don't know something about him it's just
sort of like it's almost always performative
I don't know it's hard to like
put a word on but it just feels
weird it's like what what are we like
what's the game being played right now you know
I mean like it's definitely not what's really happening
but here here is
one more
but actually let me play this for I just I've randomly just grabbed
this because let's watch together since
we're not too long
but late anyway but let's play this since
I was just checking out this as
I was playing his other one
here is a clip that I haven't seen yet
we'll see what James Lee has to say
and the point is it looks like
a
fake terror cell he's arguing
that ultimately it looks like the argument
actually just grab it actually real quick
here's the post
so he says he dug in
to the Islamic movement
of the people of the right hand
the Iranian backed terror cell
that has allegedly been committing attacks
against Jews in Europe this past month
and this is what he was able to find
UK intelligence
believes Iran may be behind the arson
attack on four Jewish ambulances
in north London so what do we know
about the group claiming responsibility
online the report put out by
the Israeli national center for combating
anti-Semitism and they say that this
militant group
emerged out of nowhere and had no
known operational history
before this month now
I find that to be a little bit
odd the telegraph also reported that
up until three weeks ago there
was no entry in any
counter-terrorism database
there's no telegram channel no social media
footprint and no history
once again very odd
for a supposedly very dangerous
sophisticated sleeper group
and to date the only
news organization that this new
sleeper cell
that's allegedly out to
target US and Israeli interests
worldwide has officially spoken to
is CBS
news which is the newly minted
Israeli propaganda
that is won by Barry Weiss
an Israeli massage agent
allegedly and this detail is a little
bit interesting they say that quote CBS
news spoke to the administrator of
a shop Al Yameen telegram channel
who's changed a series of messages
writing in American
English hey maybe they use chat
on top of that
it that usually indicates guys
that like you know member the white
helmets and that whole
scam
Vanessa and I many times
lab you know
pointed out how ridiculous it was that every
time they put their vests were written in
English that the things they posted
it and why would that be
if they're a Syrian organization because the propaganda
was aimed at Americans simple
as the same point with a lot of these
things it's like why would that be the case well maybe
something else or maybe it's because they just wanted to
make sure that we were the ones scammed by this
because we're the ones being told we might have sleeper
cells in the United States even though that
was I mean that story came we already
covered that reality or at the you know the reality
of that story which was basically
hyped story based on nothing other than
Israeli intelligence says or the idea
that
their original report that came out was somehow
suppressed by the Trump White House
just the whole thing felt very contrived to me
mid-press news
noted that the group had used
some language that they called
unusual for a Muslim group
specifically referring
to Palestine as
the land of Israel
but it actually gets
according to the international
terrorism they say that
the Arabic inscription beneath the
group's logo includes multiple
mistakes including the
misspelling of the word Islamic
seriously I mean they
misspelled Islamic in the logo
and there's a little bit more okay the
ICCT also found that there were
a number of inconsistencies
in their telegram account
for most the misspelling of the Arabic
channel name likely resulting
they say from an incorrect
English translation come on this is
too much man like yeah
I don't know for sure whether this
is or isn't a legit
Iranian sleeper cell organization
but let me ask you what is
more likely that
they would commit a bunch of these misspellings
and typos of a language they're
supposedly proficient in or
maybe just maybe
this is all a big sigh
I mean it's just
wild I mean
that's what I like I said that's I hadn't seen
that that's just the idea and
because that's the case make sure
you do your due diligence guys but the interesting
point
you know the I this is something that I've
heard the statement of the group and so on
but I haven't gone too deep but the point about this
is that you could have the mistakes
I mean what does that sound like to you
with what we continue to see out there
what kind of propaganda does that feel reminiscent
of the kind of flailing like
three different styles of the same argument
at the same time and you could depict which one you like
you know this is just lazy guys
and I don't understand why this
is like a genuinely don't understand why that
would be the case are they not capable
of doing it do they want you to see that at that
right I don't know that's just
I just I'm just I'm tired
and the chat I'm just incredible
where we are and how ridiculous it all is
let's not forget the age
of fifth generation warfare that's what we
are in and that's something that they've been telling
with their dancing army videos with their weird
ghost masks and like they're telling you
we're in this
drones fog false flags and political destabilization
that was a show we did on
January 2025 remember that
cyber truck blowing up in front of Trump Tower
and all the different just
sigh out there to sigh out to sigh out
ran
a bus got the
foreign minister of Iran
says the US backed
israel the US Backed Israel's Gaza
Blockade Cutting aid under
security claims Yet condemns
Iran for defending itself in this
valley video. Double standard
Israel's crimes are OK, while Iran's
defense against aggressions
is condemned international laws not a tool
of convenience now look you could argue
He's a terrorist. He could disagree with anything he has to do, but the statement is fact.
No matter what you think, you could write that anywhere you want and it would be fact.
It doesn't matter who says it. It's real. I mean, the obvious reality of that,
and what they started wasn't a war of aggression. They're illegally starving.
Everything about it, not about size. That's simply the truth.
Now, Pepe Escobar writes something important here. He says they're going for
Larek in regard to the islands. The small island from where the IRGC Navy
watches the tankers who paid the Strait of Hormuz toll and arguably where they might be
the kind of able to lob out, but there's a lot of places they could do that,
and says Kargh Island is a diversion. It's too far away.
There's option two would be Abu Musa to the west of Hormuz with the help of the UAE.
The consequence, Iran turns the UAE to dust. Now, what's important is Robert made this,
you know, the discussion about or made the point about
any of the islands and how that might work out.
Oh, she'll grab that for you in case you want to read it.
I think we can wrap up for the most part here. Robert put this out. It's a good article.
Here. It's right down here. Or it should be. What?
Oh, man. I got to get this slide updated. There's been some weird stuff going on with
the background. Well, it should be right there. Oh, well, here it is up top.
Like I've been saying, I'm just dragging my feet because there's a lot going on.
We will be updating this and revamping some stuff, not necessarily because I want to,
just because it's a long story. Things we kind of got trapped with with our old,
terrible people that work with the website stuff and are now, we have to because things
will end up starting having problems. But strategic failure. Trump's contradictory
Iran strategy unravels. And by the way, the reason I said that, by the way,
is just be aware that we're be aware that there's going to be some, you know,
visual changes and so on. But this is an important article that he does a good job
breaking down. Now you can read. Here's the one I was talking about her moose is
closed only for Zionists. That's, that's him. That's her. Gotcha.
But he gets into the point of the islands where you can read it. It's a,
it's a well, well thought out argument. And so his point again, back to Pepe
Eskibar was simply that, you know, with the UAE might would be at least in regard
to this island. Moosa, the UAE would have to help. And the consequence would be
them being turned into dust, bombed, right? Well, as it turns out, the UAE as
rejects, it says UAE rejects ceasefire with Iran demands to run full threat network,
be dismantled first. Ambassador, you know, basically just sides with the United
States publicly also reaffirms a staggering 1.4 trillion UAE investment
commitment in the United States. And as George Galloway says, they're
committing national suicide. Seems to be a common opinion. But who's to say why?
Maybe they're not in control, which is kind of what I think about these governments
right now. But either way, just recognize that this is going further.
Despite the Trump claiming we made a deal already or it's over. It was done on
day one, right? But, you know, not at all. Now here's Vance trying to
convince you that somehow these are all terrorists and that, you know, we
can't have, let them have a nuclear bomb because they might have a nuclear
bomb vest. I mean, they're grasping at straws right now, guys. And this is what
the bulwark wrote. Vance suggests Iran could have used nuclear suicide vests.
Oh, well, then you just quote it. I'll play it for yourself. I thought I had it,
I guess not. And then I'll play one after this that I think is important
that you've seen.
Let's see.
Okay. So the reason he's saying this though, and like the,
I just, it's a bad argument because the idea of a nuclear suicide vest is a
little bit, I mean, if it's even possible, which I'm sure it is today,
it's just, it's not, it goes a little bit beyond just what anybody could do
anywhere. And I just think it's an extreme with the limitations of the
enrichment, I mean, everything it just, all it's doing is trying to convince you
that these are just monster terrorists. And, you know, and that's, that's the
argument, you know, you could, you could make that argument. We can't let them
have silverware because, you know, you could just go ridiculous with their
terrorists. Therefore it all makes sense. You know, so the idea of just
the suicide vest is just to make it into some hyperbolic argument.
Why would that be the case? Well, because of terrorists. Why would they
just bomb you? Right? Because they're terrorists. Like that, that's,
there's no logic to it. And in fact, Iran has not had previous history
of doing what you're claiming. Even when you get to like the roadside bomb
conversation, they're talking about IEDs. And that's largely because of the
end. I mean, you know, it's the same story, guys, but either way, here is
if I can find it again. What was that? There we go.
Say options. I think it's important the American people know options for
what? And it's options to ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon.
You talk about people. That, you know, he starts with the options.
Like they're talking about right now, like we're deploying troops and we're
doing all these, we need options to make sure they don't have nuclear weapons.
The thing, the one thing that we all seem to know the evidence does not
suggest or that you guys know the IEA said's not there or that Gabbard
told you at the state. I mean, just ridiculous. At what point can we,
I mean, realize that what we're seeing is all of the evidence says it's
not there, but we just are going to tell you if they're anyway.
We just know what your intelligence says otherwise. Well, yeah, we don't
care what the intelligence says. Even though that's what you always tell us,
what matters, right? Well, you'll listen to Israel then. Okay, that makes
sense. So you are being played by Israel. If you play, if you look at it that
way, walk into a crowded supermarket and have a vest on and they blow up the
vest and a couple of people get killed. And that's a terrible tragedy.
What happens when what's on the vest, it's not something that can kill a
couple of people, but can kill many, many tens of thousands of people.
Well, that already exists. It's called a bomb, guys. I mean, what are you
talking about, man? Well, if you want, again, you want to make it into a
nuclear conversation. Again, it's just, this is irrational the way he's framing this.
That is the most important American national security objective that exists
for any administration at any time is you don't want the worst people in the
world to have a nuclear weapon. That's great. Because you guys are doing
this and because Israel is clearly able to have nuclear weapons and because
plenty of other countries that are far, far, far less demonstrably
dangerous based on their actions in the world than Iran have nuclear weapons.
North Korea for crying out loud. But yeah, this is what you like.
Think about that statement and then ignoring that North Korea has nuclear
weapons. It's just, these are jokes, guys. These are not serious people.
They're manipulators. And to understand that the very point of these kind of
vests and the idea of this stems from Zionism.
Well, I mean, certainly the Zionists have used it and brought it, in fact,
to the area. Terrorism, as we know it today, the planting of bombs and
marketplaces and so on and so forth was, in fact, introduced into the
Middle East by the Zionists in the 20s. But the net result of Zionist
terrorism and violence in the first third of the 20th century has brought
forth, to my mind, the anomaly, the horrific and
unacceptable status in the Middle East today of the state of Israel, which is
in fact an armed garrison state, which now exports more arms and
distributes violence all around the world, vastly disproportionate to its
size. I mean, in that respect, I think it's a horrible cycle of
violence. But in it all, I think the Palestinian is the victim. There's no
question about that.
Now, we're going to end with some points that back that up about what Israel's
doing in the world today. But first, I want to include this for you guys to
check out the idea of what they're claiming, right, the 60%
that Witkoff told you they bragged about. Well, on that point, the IAEA
Director General addressed that stating that Iran's uranium stockpiles
remained under safeguards in accordance with their safeguard agreement,
literally the 60% that he claimed right there. Here's the document. You can
read it for yourself from the Director General. That's my point, is that you
can keep yelling, they have the bomb. Well, that's not what anybody
anywhere says that is in a standing position to make that case. You
guys are just lying. And now what we're going to, this is, we're being
reported that the bombings that took place in Iran were also elements that
were dropped that were mines, claiming that they were what they say,
electromagnetic mines, I guess. Not familiar, but the point is that this
is being pretty broadly reported. So it's something you should consider.
Now, it's also possible that Iran did this to themselves. I just don't see
how that makes sense. But anybody's capable of, you know, doing something
to create a situation where you can justify that you were attacked.
My point is, though, not that they're not capable of that.
But why would that make sense right now? They're already being
illegally attacked. They don't need to create other justification.
They're using cluster munitions. They're using white phosphorus.
They already are doing all those things, right? So this is on top of that.
And the allegation is they're dropping mines in civilian locations.
I don't, it's not hard for me to believe this is happening with what
they've always done. Here's another example. And you even have them.
There's actually multiple reports from different news agencies on the
ground showing you. Like I said, you could argue Iran did it, right?
But I don't believe that just because of the logic of it,
not that they're not capable of it. Another war crime by the U.S.
military explosive packages have been dropped throughout the city.
You know, and this is my point. This is not Gaza. There's people.
There's people, phones, news, news agencies. And if you're just going to
argue that literally everybody in Iran is a lying deceiving person,
like you tried to claim about Gaza, well, you're disgusting.
And it's not true. And also, I thought you were trying to
save them, right? How's that work out? The people who run Iran are
religious fanatics, says a religious fanatic looking at who,
at what they're doing. Oh, what's that? What's that, Rubio?
Attacking embassies and hotels. Imagine what these people would do
if they had a nuclear weapon. They just can't stop.
You have to realize these three people are some of the most radical
people in the world if you really understand what's going on,
especially the two sitting by him. Like radical, like alarmingly, guys.
He is literally a religious scientist who is screaming about
Armageddon. He's telling our own military this is for the end times.
I don't know why that is not the end of the conversation.
But yeah, keep telling us, Rubio, about how Iran is bombing
civilian locations. He goes, that's what he's claiming.
Unlike them, we're hitting military targets.
U.S.-Israeli attacks have already hit 281 medical centers in 498 Iranian schools.
Widely reported, by the way, and I already reported on myself,
the very first attack they came out with the 175 murdered children.
And everyone's admitted that, essentially now.
The U.S. reporting has come out.
Hagseth put a math out that showed you that.
Even Israel blamed the United States.
But yeah, we'll keep telling us about how that's,
I mean, it's just broken, guys.
Drop site news, however, reports that Iran is striking
chemical locations where the U.S. government in Israel
are making white phosphorus.
See the difference?
Now, you could argue that there's plenty of other crimes happening.
I just don't believe that that's the reality of the way it's going down.
Not because they're not capable, but because it's,
there's no justification or rather, you know,
in their minds for why that would be in their interest.
And they don't need to do that right now.
But I could be wrong, of course, and question it.
Trump says Iran's war, Iran war to last four or five weeks,
but, you know, could go far longer.
Sure, why not?
Brian Grimm again points out,
Israeli media reporting that Netanyahu expects a ceasefire
announced this Saturday.
Translation, ground invasion comes this weekend.
I certainly hope not, but I agree with his logic.
And he follows up by saying,
source tells him that the naval special warfare teams
were also given deployment orders yesterday.
And this was on the 25th, as well as a bunch of Tier 1 operators.
That plus the 82nd Airborne deployment plus Netanyahu's obvious feint
pretending that they expect a ceasefire, which he's done many times,
suggests that all the pieces are in place for yet another ground invasion.
And what's crazy is he's probably right, guys,
because they do the same thing every time.
I guess we'll find out.
Now, to the point of where terrorism seems to stem from in the world,
let's make sure we understand this on the way out.
Okay. This is just a quick little glimpse of what they're doing in the last 24 hours.
And it's all over the world.
And it's just blatant, blatant human rights violations, crimes, torture, terrorism.
Here's Mike Huckabee though, you know, the America First Mike Huckabee,
who wants you to believe that, you know,
we just haven't programmed the youth properly to believe what Israel is.
But where does that come from?
You know, there's a difference between DOM and ignorant.
DOM is that a person cannot process information.
They just don't have the capacity.
They don't have an operating system if I put it in computer language.
Ignorance is that the data isn't there.
What we're dealing with is not an operating system problem.
It's a data problem.
We have not downloaded the proper data,
the correct, the true data into the minds of younger people.
For example, that they're not committing a genocide.
For example, that, you know, the Judaism is Zionism.
For example, that they have a right to all of the land everywhere,
as he even told Tucker Carlson.
Right? That's the right information that you need to be programmed with
in computer language, of course.
And that's what he wants for America First Trump's administration,
is for American kids to believe that Israel has the right to rule over the world.
And for Israel, I mean, this is what they're yelling out loud.
And this guy believes, I've talked about this, this guy is like a ardent Zionist,
like I was very passionate about it.
And if you haven't seen his discussion with Tucker,
I'm not even know why they allowed him to do that.
It'll blow your mind.
This is the opposite of America First and Tucker Carl called it out himself.
Then we got booted off.
Hold on.
Now I got to set everything back up again.
Get the camera back.
There we go.
Welcome to the Last American Backbond.
If you haven't been here, we get, this happens to us on every other show,
it seems, with a direct connection and fiber, but let's keep going.
Almost done anyway.
Let's see where we were.
Okay.
So, back to the point.
Mike Huckabee's explanation for why young Americans hate Israel.
We simply haven't programmed them with the youth correctly.
Now, however, they put that in quotes and that's not what he said.
So, typical.
Oh, I hate that that's happened on the plat, but everyone seems to do that these days.
Don't do it because you're, you know, making it seem that's what he said.
He didn't say that.
But that's what he meant.
And I agree with that.
But here, as the Sol Rod points out, are Western media outlets going to report this
or are they going to still pretend it's the ceasefire?
Well, guess what?
Israeli Army carries out airstrikes on tents
sheltering displaced Palestinians in Gaza Strip.
Despite the U.S.-backed ceasefire.
But remember, they don't care about that.
They're bombing Lebanon.
They're bombing Gaza.
They're also bombing Iran during a supposed point, right?
This is what they do, but realize they're bombing tents.
There's not even, there's no denying that, guys.
This is a, they're not even claiming this is some kind of operation.
They're bombing random tents full of people in a, in a,
what am I trying to, what's the word I'm looking for?
A, jeez, you know, in a place, in a refugee camp.
There it is.
I mean, it's just so crazy to me that we can't be real about what these people are.
And I'm talking about the Israeli government.
They're literally choosing to just randomly murder a bunch of people in tents.
And they're not even, they're not like, they're not talking about it.
They're not going, we just killed terrorists.
They're just, they don't, they don't, they're wanting to make sure we don't look.
They're taking advantage that we're focused somewhere else
and murdering innocent, starved people.
Yeah, and then every other day after that, by the way,
and every other day before it doesn't stop.
Here, Alan McLeod points out what Sky News is reporting.
Palestinian teenager was starved in prison before death.
Judges rule in Israel.
Oh, by the way, starved by whom?
Right? Doesn't say.
Guess we'll just have to guess.
Palestinian teenager starved in prison before death.
Judge rule.
Great, great job, Sky News.
It's sort of like New York Times and all the rest.
How it becomes some kind of like ambiguous reporting when it happens.
I mean, Israel's involved.
And also, let's realize that almost every time this happens,
they, the judge, like this, they can rule that he died in Britain.
Then no charges come out.
No one goes to jail.
Same thing here.
Zachary Foster.
UN experts demand Israel release prominent Gaza doctor
after reports of severe torture.
Yeah, that's no, that's March 25th, 2026, guys.
That's right now.
Oh, did you, did you, did you think that that was over?
Do you think they were the hostage?
No, that's not over, as Zachary Foster rightly points out.
No, no, we stopped hearing about the hostage crisis
because all of the hostages were Palestinian.
Now, the only ones that are left are Palestinians,
so they just stopped talking about it
because the only thing they ever cared about
was Israelis, apparently.
Not even the Americans that got killed and died
and never got rescued from inside of Gaza,
like we reported in the very beginning.
That, they, they apparently never left.
I showed there was a woman from Chicago,
not, not some dual citizen Americans that lived there,
not like it should matter more.
And they, they never helped.
They, they, service health did everything they could
to help the Israelis, right?
But to think about that,
the American First Administration let them die,
or rather the, either one of them really,
if you look at it, the point is that clearly,
they don't care about these Americans,
or in Trump's current, which one was it?
Yeah, no, it was this, it was the current,
this overlap from Biden to this one.
And it was the American citizen that was being held in Israel,
and nobody cared.
And tortured, lost like 50 pounds,
and just it never stops, guys.
And that's not America First, is it?
It's not, they don't care about Americans First, clearly.
Here, Israel's launching a genocide against Lebanese people
during the supposed hold on bombing,
even though it's not happening.
They literally dropped pamphlets saying
they're going to destroy Lebanon like they did Gaza.
It literally says what we're going to do is going to be like Gaza.
And that's, that's the whole,
but they dropped pamphlets guys, like Lindsey Graham,
that's the difference, they dropped pamphlets.
And half the time they dropped pamphlets that says,
we're going to bomb it in three hours over here.
And then in 40 seconds, they bomb right where they are.
Not making that up, by the way.
I've seen many examples of them literally doing that.
And that's been reported by UN, like people
who are from an international level.
I mean, this has been covered broadly.
I've covered this many, many times.
And the points they dropped these things,
like look in the very, very beginning,
what was one of the first things we saw and reported on?
Even this was from the UN.
They bombed the Egyptian crossing when they started to cross.
It's the same thing every time.
We have to be honest about that.
Mass grave at Al-Shifa, this is February 24th, 2026,
which we knew was just another one,
one of 126 mass graves holding hundreds of civilians,
victims of the genocide according to the EuroMed Human Rights Group.
This is, it's not a secret, guys.
They murdered all these people and they buried them
and then tried to cover it up.
Now that they're able to show it, people can see it.
Sarah points out, it's horrifying.
Paramedics in South Lebanon are forced to choose
between saving lives or staying alive.
Why? Because they're currently doing double taps all over the place.
Exactly what we just reported.
As Glenn Greenwell pointed out, it's been going on for decades.
They literally bombed a location full of civilians
and then when these medical people rush in, they bombed even more.
It's a tactic. It's on purpose.
It's a horrible war crime.
Here is the Israeli member of Knesset saying,
on the killing of the Palestinian family in Janine,
which just happened,
quote, there are no innocent civilians in Janine,
no innocent children.
I support IDF soldiers in every situation,
even in the cost of children or women.
Yeah, normal stuff, right?
Just the normal every day,
March 25th statements from Israeli politicians.
Every child's terrorist killed them all, normal stuff.
Here's Blake Lee showing a video we've shown before.
This guy is saying, in the maternity ward, 300 terrorists were born.
Interviewers says, well, they're children, not terrorists.
And he goes, no, they're terrorists.
They're yes, they're terrorists.
This is Amit Halavi from the Israeli Knesset.
I mean, I've played all of it for you guys
and these are very real and verifiable.
I just wanted to make sure you understand
who we're actually dealing with in case you haven't seen it.
Now, just a quick wrap up point.
Dropsite News reported that New York Times' investigation
raises serious questions about a March 6th airstrike.
Remember when HEGSET told you,
he's now bombing narco-terrorists on land?
And I talked about this.
And it's after they started the whole weird
Kristi Noem sort of Shields of America thing
and they pretended that started some kind of focus on the land.
Well, they just kept bombing ships in the water too
and they just tried to pretend like it was part of some coordinated plan.
Well, guess what?
The U.S. said it bombed a drug camp.
Turns out it was a dairy farm.
I mean, this is being widely reported, guys,
and we're innocent people, families, a dairy farm.
The target according to New York Times appears to have been
a 350-acre cattle farm of dairy farm in San Martín.
Farm workers, including a 32-year-old carpenter, Miguel,
who owns a farm.
I mean, what do you think?
Do you think they just are that stupid or that belligerently incompetent
or they just don't care or just what they get played by somebody else?
I don't get it.
We either got to start acknowledging this as people
who actually care about what we pretend we are in this country
and what we can be or I guess we just give up
because I don't know how in the world,
and you know that's not what I think,
because I don't know how we can pretend that this is not happening
in real time all around the world
and it is literally turning people against even us,
by the way, as individuals.
When you wonder or people say death to America,
why they might be feeling that way,
and even then they still make it clear,
look, we're talking about the government.
And honestly, if you want to step back from that
and realize, like Iranians, I find it strange,
even because of that,
but they seem to have a very positive opinion of Americans.
And I'd like to believe it's because of people like us
and because that's the majority from people looking in,
that there's a lot of us going,
whoa, this is, I know this is crazy.
And that's why I keep calling out
that most people are seeing through the partisanship.
Most people are beginning to question this stuff.
Time to start recognizing that, guys,
because we have an opportunity.
And this is, and clearly they're trying
to destroy that opportunity
and everything else with it
and everybody else around it, no matter what.
You know, and it's just sad
that it's so obviously influenced by the very people.
I mean, it's like, what do we need to convince people of?
That the genocide is not somehow influenced.
It's only over there that they're committing genocide.
It's only in that one location that they rape people.
Or it's so obvious what we're dealing with.
And again, I think the world has come to terms with that.
It's about whether we can do something
about the structure here that doesn't seem to care.
Never calling for violence, never.
But doing something is clearly necessary.
So thank you for tuning in today.
I, my plan will be to not work tomorrow,
but I guess we'll see what happens
with whatever goes on in the world.
But thank you for tuning in.
Appreciate your support.
I love you all.
As always, question everything.
Come to your own conclusions.
Stay vigilant.