White Coat Waste Investigations have also exposed Trump NIH officials numerous false
claims that they stopped funding Beagle testing and have prompted bi-partisan congressional
calls for action.
Taxpayers are so upset about the NIH's deception, they're flooding Secretary Kennedy's
phone lines.
Instead of thoughtfully responding to public concerns about NIH-funded Beagle abuse
yesterday, HHS defiantly changed one of its phone messages to play a recording saying,
quote, thank you for calling Domino's Pizza, end quote, before sending taxpayers to voicemail.
Torturing puppies with our tax dollars isn't funny, but people at HHS apparently think it is.
We find one another, and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the day.
Wednesday, March 18, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Now, a very focused show today, as the title suggests.
I have a few things I want to start with, but that clip, I caught wind of that maybe 10 minutes
before I went live.
Part of me wanted just to put this off and make sure we made a point of that as well in this show.
But I think it's good that we focus on the point that we're discussing today because of how much
that's bubbling back up in the conversation.
And you guys know all of this, if you follow the show for a very long time, follow James Corbett,
Ben Swann, a number of people that have broken this down around where ISIS and Al Qaeda truly
originate from, from which the funding and arming and actions and foreign policy that drove to its creation
and literal creation, like in the sense of like byproduct actions, but also what they did deliberately.
But this clip, I was going to start with a clip that I played before that relates to the topic.
But I played it to start because I felt like it's worth hearing twice.
We're going to play that and a few other things to start.
But as I said, the main focus today and it relates to the ongoing Iran war.
And we're going to cover some updates around.
And like I said, we weren't largely covering yesterday.
Today, I did include some of the different actions that have taken place.
So you guys can be more up to date on some of those that took place today.
But if there's a reason I included it today, but largely the idea of as the title suggests, right?
The open secret that it is James Corbett has a similar title that goes back a long way.
And I think it's important to sort of nod to these things that it's been there your entire life.
And I'm going to go through some very fine too.
Like a lot of this we've covered over the years.
You know, I'm not going to rehash every part of it.
But what you're going to see today is the source material you can re-investigate
if it's something we've covered extensively in the past,
but going through very detail-oriented points.
Old, you know, old corporate, mainstream corporate articles,
also different more investigatory articles, breaking down the same conversation.
The real origins of what these elements, these groups, where they came from,
what actions caused their growth, what actions stoked their growth and were they deliberate.
And then at what point that became clear and then how clearly you can see that these
U.S. and Israel predominantly, but Western governments we could discuss,
continued to work with them.
I mean, just to start out with the frustration that we even have to keep talking about this
that we literally have Jolani in Syria.
That's why I made fun of those pictures in the image today.
How absurd it is that we can't be honest about that, even though it's self-evident.
It's a guy that they told you was a terrorist because he was.
He was part of Al-Qaeda, al-Nusra.
He ultimately was turned into a clean-cut, you know, suit-wearing president for Syria.
And when that took place, and we'll go through this in the show today,
when he was put in that position, the image of the State Department $10 million bounty,
that was up at least, I think it was about a week afterward.
And that was simultaneous.
And yet, so you can see on the State Department website that he is a terrorist.
They're calling one anyway.
And now here he is, they're telling you he's the president.
You know, it's insulting to our intelligence.
And that's what I think the show is important for today because yet again,
we're hearing the, I guess, Iran is ISIS or Hamas is ISIS and Hamas is Iran.
Or, you know, however they're trying to mold this together,
and it's just embarrassing.
And my ultimate point when you come down to, like, the media side of it
is these are people I think by and large who know that they're lying to you.
Now, that's just my opinion.
I mean, I'm sure a huge part of the conversation are people that just don't realize they're wrong.
But what I'm talking about are the deliberate deceivers out there
who are trying for obvious reasons to paint Iran as the bad guy.
And today we'll show, and that's not to say good guy, bad guy, from my perspective,
but because I see all governments in a very similar category,
but simply to state that what they're claiming about Iran is just not true
in most every possible way.
But ultimately then making the case through the information we're going to highlight today
that Iran was never really the culprit in what they've been painting.
Now, whether you think Iran is everything they've ever said they were
is sort of irrelevant to the point we're making.
And the idea that you can clearly show that Iran is not funding or even associated with ISIS,
but that you can see that in every possible location it has been the U.S. and Israel.
And in fact, avoiding going after ISIS or al-Qaeda or their offshoots
and aiming at Shiites and Iran.
And it's very clear when you understand this.
Now, to the few opening points we're going to get to before we go through all of that
and end with some vocal points around Iran
and actually end with a really interesting and I think important for the framing of media
where the current mainstream alternative media is with what we're dealing with
and the constant, constant punches that are going,
that are falling on the team's sport Republican MAGA type people
who are still trying to find ways to blend and support Trump
and show you how it is I don't think ever going to stop until we are fully, you know,
digest and acknowledge in what these people have always been.
Now, to start I want to say one thing that I almost already forgot again
that I keep forgetting I want to shout out to somebody who sent a letter to us
and really just to everybody I don't do this enough
because it's just so much always going on every day
and honestly I've had this thing sitting here for four days
and I keep forgetting to just say it because I wanted to
and that's just to make the point that even what I want to
I still seem to forget with all the things being set up and organizing
but I want to make sure I'm thinking, you know,
in general any of you out there that send the most amazing letters
and regularly donate and, you know, many of you in the chat right now
and it just it means as always the world to me we wouldn't exist without you
and I just really want to stress how much it actually
I mean for those of you that do reach out, you know
because we write everything back in a handwritten letter
at least the ones that we can get to are the ones that we receive
and that can't always be everything but that's what we do
we don't respond unless it is a handwritten letter from us
and that we get a ton, a ton of stuff
but my point saying all that is that I'm never able to get to all of it
so I hope you all know how much it means to me
and I want to give a special shout out to Drew
who sent me a letter that just retouched me, you know
it was very it was impactful
and I want to make a point about what Drew said in the letter
which was ultimately and it's, you know, which I appreciate
which is ultimately stressing that the people in there
average people have the ability to gift
I guess up to and I can't, I'm not sure if it's even accurate
it's what they said in the letter but up to $18,000
tax-free, it sort of reminds me of a
Shawshank redemption but for if you catch the
you catch the connection to the part of the movie
I'm referencing without saying it but
that ultimately the suggesting that people out there
who want to support T-Lab can do so
and I just really appreciate that as well as just the long letter
of just expressing how much our work has meant
and you know it just matters to me
and I wanted to make a point to say that
and hopefully that just kind of spreads to everybody else out there
that has sent things that just mean the world to me
so beside after that note let's get started with
the, well technically I wanted to make a point about
a quick point about the Epstein thing
and then I'll reference that video that we played
and just because these all interconnect for me
and these ultimate points to start including the clip
we just played which we'll see again in a second about
the ongoing testing on Beagles despite all of the claim
through this is during Trump's administration
despite all of the outrage which rightly so
I know about what Fauci was doing
that all of this speaks to a larger point
of not just that we're being lied to
and we I think everybody is seeing that
like I was telling you six months ago a year ago
and I meant it I wasn't just guessing I meant it
I saw it I could have been wrong but clearly we were not
so the point is that I think this is all changing
in front of us to understand that the lying is still
step one understand acknowledge that problem
but then we have to recognize that it speaks to
something much larger and it's not just Trump's
administration if that's where you think this is leaning
our government left and right Biden and Trump
Obama and Bush has been doing the same thing
my entire life I've been calling it out the same way
my entire career I'm just glad that people are
finally starting to recognize those problems
and of course I could all be wrong that's always
possible but I think the consistency speaks
for itself and I'm hoping that average people
who are watching this and are now seeing it
keep looking and watch as we continue into
the next administration and beyond and the
continual and the same criticisms apply
regardless of the left and right paradigm and
the people who do not do that become more
and more and more cartoonish and more
and more and more obviously dishonest
you know who I'm talking about and they are
transparent today but all that's to say that
what we're highlighting here is not just about
partisan stuff it's about recognizing that
this is something that's happening to this
country and it's not one side or the other
it's not you know or that we see it happening
but we have to trust in Trump to make sure
we can see our way through which is kind of
what you're getting from even people calling
out what Israel's doing it's wild
but all that does connect to the origin point
we're highlighting today as well which is of the
creation of these extremist groups which are
largely I think a product of what Israel
created in the world but I could be wrong with that
ultimately you can prove quite literally that
the US government has funded armed and moved
them around and say you know it's tons of stuff
will cover and I think that very much connects
to what is ultimately happening here why are
being lied to why are they using a two-party
paradigm to keep us yelling at ourselves
while all these things happen around us it's all
kind of the same answer different agendas
different angles but control guys now
this clip this is a just a clip that you
can watch of course with Katie Miller just
weird isn't it that you got these like
weird extensions of the public it's
totally if you if it's like it's as if
Obama's wife or Melania which is also
happening in the midst of this stepped out
and started doing their own shows which
they're kind of doing today it's weird
that's that's direct connection to the
political sphere it's not like they're
it's like pretending like boxing CNN are
totally not obviously politically
motivated they used to pretend that remember
that remember that when they pretended like
they were fair and balanced or for like half
a second Fox pretended they were an independent
platform it's just they're just throwing
what they can't the wall guys it's so obvious
so that's just to make the point about how
weird it is that this is Miller with
why Miller's wife extension where she
just out there pushing the same talking
points and it gets all you know crowded
into by all the partisans who want to
support the team and it's just lazy
recycling of the same talking points but
what comes out in this conversation that
shadow of Ezra points out even though
they're largely partisan they still a lot
of people are still very unhappy about the
Epstein files and the way they haven't
done it what they're supposed to deputy
attorney Todd Blanche admits they are no
longer interested in investigating
Epstein's international child trafficking
now it's like the fifth time they've
accentuated this point and it still
seems to be a shock point for some people
they told you there's no more coming
that's that they should go to prison
right now as far as I'm concerned and that's
not because of some what I think may be
in there they broke the law with the
transparency act this is what I'm always
talking about don't miss them and what I
do care about what else is in there
what else it may show we all should
the missing pages that we don't see and
what that means with what we're seeing
care about that hope for it call it
out but make sure we don't miss the
fact that this administration just broke
the law with the transparency act
they did not follow it massies called it
out they covered up information they
redacted names they shouldn't have they
withheld in the communications between
bonding cash and others within the
conversation all of these are crimes I
don't care if it's considered a slap on
the wrist or not see it through that's
a crime they broke it call them out let
them be charged for whether Biden or
Trump or left or right it's amazing
how simple that is but you're going to
get your arguments that may feel like
logic in the moment where they go but
they didn't do it when Obama did that and
you know and yep you're probably right
I want to both get in trouble or rather
be held accountable for crimes we're not
speaking in juvenile terms like they do
every day in this political sphere
he dismissed pizza gate as fully debunked
and said it was not be pursued
now same kind of idea if you want to
talk about what that really was and I
can also argue that the general
mainstream conversation a mainstream
alternative which kind of did exist then
to it was pizza gate was turned into a
ridiculous cartoon that was meant to be
the words in the email which were very
relevant but not even remotely the only
and most important thing and turned it
into something ridiculous the idea
behind it though very real as we're all
seeing today as it very much still connects
as Ben Swan came out and they made a great
point about but it's not they even the
name was turned into something ridiculous
because of the pizza place in the shooting
all of this was a manipulation but
either way it's all done it's all over
no it's not these things are very
obvious what about Zoro ranch Todd Blanche
what about the affidavit sign
saying trumpet raped a woman that no one's
investigated I mean all of these things and
I'm not saying the amount to absolute slam
dunks but Zoro ranch is the most important
that I can see you got people in New
Mexico in the government saying no one's
even touched this she said in 2019 now
saying it again in 2026 bodies were
buried they said they got they said
they got videos and evidence and all this
stuff nope it's over no more he also
denied the existence of Epstein's client
list claiming he doesn't even know what that
refers to you see this is insulting to
your intelligence look you can play this
game where there's not some single page
that's got all the nobody even argued
that other than ridiculous out of touch
people that either lied or didn't
understand what the point was about
we're talking about the list however you
want to catalog it all of the people
that they worked with put it down put
it on a draw a disk drive if you want
to make it out to be some kind of
single page Epstein had posted on his
wall is to make fun of you and they know
that but we don't even know what you mean
by that nope no more nothing coming
Blanche added that Epstein had no ties to
any foreign governments yep that's
insanely stupid or espionage activity
except it's literally proven proven
now whether it was an agent
that you could debate that all day long and I
would too because I don't think it's proven
I think so but whether he worked with intelligence
has been publicly admitted
by just about everybody but here he is
telling Katie Miller through his control
platform that though all over in hopes
that that's what will be carried by the
partisan team sport players
yeah he reports directly to Pambani of course
just a normal day in the broken promises
world that the other that the
Gunther Eagle ones and catchers and Benny
Johnson's and Joan will all we'll get to
Jones in a minute on his weird waffle but
mark my words as he continues to
support Trump watch even today
but as they all try to make this seem
like a win somehow now back to this
clip in the same conversation of winning
I'm act I'm this is
not just insulting
it is cool and it's also
I mean what it shows you to cut it in very
quick point they frame this rightly so
as torture as
evil
and then they kept doing it
I mean I don't even know I don't even
think I need to say anything else if
you haven't seen the clip we're going to play it right now
this is the most insane thing you'll see on twitter today says Holden
Trump's NIH spent
126 million dollars according
to this person speaking to congress on
Fauci Arab puppy torture experiments
since RFK junior took office when
maha flooded HHS phones yesterday
they got sent to voicemail with a message that said
thank you for calling Domino's Pizza
that's how in his response that's how
HHS officials are responding to maha
supporters demanding the reforms that they
voted for they're laughing
in your faces white coat waste has spent
the last year exposing trumps NIH
for lying about shutting down
Fauci Arab eagle experiments
I mean you just can't make fun
of this you can't dismiss this you made
a huge case rightly so about why
that was inhuman something
that only evil democrats do
and then you just kept doing
it you kept funding it
but shouldn't surprise anybody who's
barely paying attention who is
not trapped by the team sport game
because they're all the same thing and
whatever this is like my point about NED
or USAID or the narratives
and woke it's all about getting its
means to an end they use what they think
we care about to achieve their political
ends these likely largely sociopaths
and we need to be real about that
look at their actions look it up
what it means look at what they do every day
guys it's not hard to recognize where we are
but you get the typical average person
here's you say that and goes oh here we go
these conspiracy theorists as you know
as half the time what they're actually engaging with
are things that we were telling you 30 years ago
or whatever you know back then or today
for me 10 years ago NIH leaders
claimed over and over and of course before I move forward
let's not forget that on this platform
speaking for myself we do not
say things that unless
I'm clear that it's my opinion that we're not
verified with evidence now of course
that could turn out to be false but you go back
and look at our track record on this platform
to the very day that I started when I barely
knew what I was doing and I promise
you it'll be hard for you to find
an example where we said something that was
like blatantly incorrect but
the point is you go back to what I was barely starting
and I'm sure you'll find an example
because I didn't have the same
passion about it I did my point
that was do it you'll be hard pressed to find
something especially since the daily wrap-up
going forward I think that's worth saying
it's not that's demonstrating our value
for you guys that we continue to be integrity
based fact based in report where we know
we can prove NIH leaders
claimed over and over that they're phasing out
these barbaric experiments on puppies and that funding
for them was already approved before they came into office
now as I said this is what he's reporting
so like that every ultimate
point if you argue he's lying then you
should prove that if you think that's the case
I have seen him continue to call these things out
he's doing his research on it you want to call it out
call it out I want to bet you that Donald Trump
and the rest of his team are going to flatly say not true
and no one will care to look into it
we all know what these groups are
now here's the clip oh I forgot I haven't played the clip
for those that haven't seen it we started with this here it is
Trump NIH
white coat waste investigations
have also exposed Trump
NIH officials
numerous false claims
that they stopped funding Beagle testing
and have prompted bipartisan congressional calls
for action
taxpayers are so upset
about the NIH's deception they're flooding
Secretary Kennedy's phone lines
instead of thoughtfully responding
to public concerns about NIH funded
Beagle abuse yesterday
HHS defiantly
changed one of its phone messages to play
recording saying quote
thank you for calling Domino's pizza
end quote before
sending taxpayers to voicemail
torturing puppies with our tax dollars
isn't funny but people at
HHS apparently think it is
of course you know you could argue
any number of things and I actually think this is worth
pointing out because you have to realize
a lot of the people in these government positions
are what were
you know look at the Hangsack
look at Cache Patel
these are people that are wildly
out of their deafening positions
so they're people that are put there because they're going to do what they're told
because they're easily manipulatable
and are easy to cow into position
and are overwhelmingly
happy to have the power that they have in that position
that's what I believe so my point is
is you could take it even further down
their assistant deputy you know the people beneath
them and are even more so that
right my point is these are average people
that was the doge people that Elon brought in
I'm not talking about smart versus not smart some of those kids are
very very smart in their specialized fields
but they're still just kids online
who are younger young adults
let's say or teenagers or you know however you want
to frame it because some of them were 19 or whatever
but in this case just people who are
you know let's just say normal versus like
internal politics and like the
you know like veteran politicians or whatever
and so what I think is interesting
is that you have a lot of the examples
of people who
like what I'm getting at is the call
like the calls coming in
they might think well that's just a bunch of Democrats
who want to make this look bad for us or whatever
right or all the all the protesters
are just paid people that are Democrats
who hate us well I'm only to bet you
some of it's probably that but
are you guessing are you
unwilling to consider that there are people like
myself included not partisan who would be
out there protesting if it would be who care about
the fact that you're breaking the law so realize
that there's a lot of these people that are within that
who have been convinced sort of like my Trump
might have been convinced that 90% of
Americans believed in what he was doing
I don't know for sure
I find it hard to believe but it seems like that's what
the reporting is telling you so there might be a lot of people
in the administration who just are
convinced that anything that goes against
what they think they're doing and that
Trump told them they should do is only Democrats
who don't believe in us because everyone trusts us
like Trump said so I'm just
I'm getting at that like the idea that you put
a message on there that says welcome to Domino's
and that that would be taken as anything other than
an insult to any American in particular
people that support Maha
is only in a world where you would think
that the only person would ever call would be somebody
who's not on your side and these are people
in the government now that's hypothetical obviously
I can't speak to their minds but it's worth
thinking about that in the large sense of how these things
operate I think right now especially from
the mindset which we're going to get into more today
a little bit of Israel capturing this
government on all sides that their people
are being put in place that
are buying the lies that's why you almost get
these arguments of people in Congress who don't even
seem to understand the things that most independent
media are very well versed on or a Scott
Horton could just rip people apart he's
good at what he does he's very smart now I'm
not saying the opposite what I mean though is that
he can step into these field of people who are
claiming to have you know knowledge about Iran
and like high level military
access and just runs over the top of them
and they don't even know what they're doing
bringing up the claims of like I said Jake
Sullivan in Al Qaeda or
rather I'm not sure I mentioned it on this show
but Hillary Clinton claims
or Jake Sullivan and WikiLeaks claims
saying Al Qaeda is on our side
I mean I can mention something like that I bet you
90% of this chat knows what that is
WikiLeaks the whole thing you bring this up
in the circle of like in Congress and they're like
what what what leaks what and
whether they know WikiLeaks or not it's like they don't
understand these things it's kind of mind-blowing
I think that speaks to the fact that these are
people who aren't really in charge
they may think they are we're thinking about
now on other points of that same direction
here's Thomas Massie pointing out
that the debt passed $39 trillion
today take a look
at how long ago that was even in the billions
and it might it'll scare you
this is obviously
not sustainable and
I think this is by design
I mean how I mean we were talking
like billions people were like oh my god
$39 trillion at some
point again I should play that video of like the money
that'll just it just blows your mind
that go at the most it goes to like
10 million and it ends up like the video
shows you what it would visually look like it's like
500 football fields like we
can't even imagine what this would be
39 trillion means nothing to people
and I think that's the point because it's so far
beyond what our mind can even grasp
$87,000 a second
why war
is real foreign policy
I mean even other allies too
by the way but clearly the amount that's dumping
out of here just to support what they're doing
while they're killing people is worth mentioning
he also says the
recent treasury report says the debt is $38
trillion almost $39
but that was the debt two days ago
the debt badge I built
uses dead reckoning to calculate
the debt today at the very
second that's why he said it's past $39 trillion
on top of that
Speaker Johnson comes out and says a plan
it is to move a
clean extension
of FISA
you know the thing they all criticize
when the Democrats did and then in turn
the things that the Democrats criticize when the Republicans
used it and they all just hand off the baton
and keep using it and have their rationale
and we the artisans don't call
it out not really the same thing over and over
Massey's been calling it out the entire time
it expires in April 19th and we're looking
at that deadline hoping that we can
get a clean authorization for 18 months
yeah why not you know just
illegal spying on Americans this is what we do
right guys hashtag winning
why can't we call
this out well because people that don't are dishonest
or don't understand that this is a big deal
sure as hell most of them seem to call
it out when it was pointed to when it was about
Democrats using it why can't we paste that together
why don't I always he asked why don't
I always vote with the party of Washington DC
that's what he criticized for of why doesn't
he support the team even though he has a
track record far more in line with the
Republicans he says exhibit a the party is
about to extend spying on Americans without
a warrant by voting to reauthorize
unconstitutional fives of 702 program
as well as the fact that they're already kind
of doing that with ice so it just builds
into the situation this is never never this
has been there for such a long time people
just act like it's not a big deal until they
want to make the other side look like the bad guy
on top of that a pack Massey
writes should be required to register as an agent
of a foreign government under farah you know
the same thing that JFK was trying to do with a pack
before it was called that and then got killed and it
didn't happen very real story if you don't remember
that because even us citizens are meant
to be subject to farah a pack and closely
associated that these have spent over
six million dollars to influence just
his election alone
directly it's directly in the interest of
Israel's agenda that's publicly stated
also as we told you yesterday or
day before yesterday oh by the way
apology for not getting to the show yesterday
I did I mentioned on a wake up but I had
a little bit of a family thing yesterday
wasn't really able to get to it but
ultimately plan still is as we said to
continue through this week so stay
tuned but
Donald Trump just signed the executive order to
create task force eliminate fraud
you know doge otherwise
what it was called and they failed at that or
rather didn't fail they lied to you about what
happened and that's very easy to see how
and we're talking about right now more
spending bigger government every basic
promise they made is the opposite but don't
worry he's going to start a new program to
spend money on this new program that will
end up probably costing more money but he
says convicted frosters Trump has pardoned
this year you if you don't
take a second to look these up
it's insane to me how clear this is and these
are people that are they call they call them
political prosecution okay maybe I wouldn't
even disagree with that but they still broke
the law and you can find countless examples
I should say countless I think at least three
that I can remember where people were pardoned
by Trump and then broke the law again
about the jail and people that for example
defrauded Americans during COVID-19 under
the guise of fear about COVID these are
you're gonna pardon these people so it's
just a game guys and it's just one more kick
down the road to make you think something's happening
I hope I'm wrong I'd like to see fraud go away
I'd like to see corruption go away but I'm
pretty sure fronting fraudster corrupted
or I said that wrong corrupt fraudsters
are not going to be the ones to do it
now Trump offers don't access
or access to donor excuse me to national
security briefings and this is where we're
going to bring this into I think the
larger point I want you to think about
how in the world this possibly makes sense
now this is being like
this is actually to start with this point we'll show you
what they said in Congress I'm not familiar
with what that is guys this is
widely acknowledged it was quite
literally an email sent down I mean this is
something that has gone this is
very very consistent with what Trump
has been doing the entire time the profiteering
the selling access it's exactly what he
is and it's an email directly sent from
there it's been it's gone around the
entire conversation Trump offered now
you could argue here's the only air in the
conversation that he didn't necessarily mean
real national security briefings
that means he's taking advantage of people
either way you could argue but he listed
it as as I'll play the clip for you
unfiltered
and so this is and I want you to
ask yourself whether this is just whoever
which means they're selling out to the highest bidder which means it's
national security
top secret whatever you want to call it doesn't have to be
top secret but information that's supposed to be secret like
things in their secret meetings but yeah
you know you want to buy in Saudi Arabia come on in
Israel you want to buy it well that's
a joke really because I think they already have access to this
information but it's about selling access
to information that they keep secret even from
you here's what they said in congress
I want to point out something that was
released about six days ago this is a
fundraising
email
from the president from the president
in the united states and in this email here
where there's multiple links
to donate money
it says
as a national security briefing
member you'll receive
my private
national security briefings
so right there you know if you want to try to defend him
you could argue he just means
he'll give you first access to things he'll tell everybody
yeah fine you can assume
all you want what it says
very clearly is unfiltered national security briefings
you know the idea that we're
supposed to like willfully
assume into the direction of what makes it not a bad
thing when he just says things is insane
obviously we shouldn't do that because it very well
could be exactly what it sounds like that's just
people trying to cover for their person
or their leader whatever their don't counter
signal leader we hear cat turds they all the time
director gabbard or director
Radcliffe do you think
the public should be able to
supporters of the president should be able to
pay and receive his
private national security briefings
I assume these are briefings
director Radcliffe that you provide to the president
that is now going to be provided
to somebody who makes a
regardless of what that I don't know that
document is
but regardless of what it says it didn't happen
although this is new
I mean do you know it's certainly possible since
I mean it's
it's certainly possible you didn't see it
but I find it hard to believe
it was a very very very publicized
story you know and the fact that it's even being brought up
shows you that doesn't mean question it like always
but this is what we tend to do
you know I'm not sure I don't I don't
respect that well it's it's
what I would do is but how about we well they probably
would say no but the point is let's discuss
this it's something that happened let's not just
push it off and come back because they never
actually revisit these things all while follow up
a week later I never see that happen
I'm telling you is that the Hatch
Act would prevent me from
a political role from engaging in that I'm
not aware that anything like that happened
this says unfiltered updates
so
Director Gabbard do you have any comment
on whether unfiltered updates
of private national security briefings
should be made to individuals
that donate to the president
I'm not I'm not familiar with that
document and
it's been made very public six days
ago
we'll we'll get you a copy
here because I agree with you director
director Radcliffe that
the Hatch Act should prohibit
this type of conduct
right I mean it's just the same little thing
if no one said anything they would just do it and
if you push back they'll just lie and be like well
no it was you know you know they'll they'll
say whatever they need to like are we even
equippling about the fact that this
administration has been caught lying kind of
I mean more blatantly and more like
cartoonishly than any administration I've seen
that's not to say that they haven't lied as much
but these people just seem to be very bad
about it they lie very obviously
and just kind of run with the nevermind
or look away I disagree that's not true
you know and so here we are I don't know
about that it's a small point
I mean it's not really but in the sense of
what else is going on but I think it's important to think
about what does that mean who has access as our
country simply being sold out to the highest
bidder I I think that's been
the case for quite a long time
now there's a lot of this blind support
but what I want you to see is two things
in this part one that there's a lot of support
still even for people that should know better
but also even they
are clearly
changing their tune Kevin Sorbo has been
like a diehard ardent
blind supporter of Trump
I mean and look my gut and I
I can't even know why I would say this because I have no
idea I don't know who Kevin is I've never met him
but just kind of looking at like his movies
and what he says out loud
I feel like he's a person a good person
that's being tricked into thinking Trump is doing
what he thinks is the right thing
genuinely but it's like a
blind guess into the end of the end of nowhere
because I don't know who he is but my point saying that
is because I think a lot of people out there
are just played by all of this
that he wants to believe Trump is the Christian
who cares about people and wants to change the world
for the better but pretty sure doing genocide
and murdering children in schools is not
the way that goes and Christians shouldn't support that
but I you know people people find
their ways to see things the way they want to
the narrative we're told is that's not what happened it was a wrong
they buy it even though you can prove that's not true
right but he said Trump
just said that Ilan Omar married her brother
and that they have proof that she's here
illegally Trump said that
I don't need to play this they've said this thing
they've said that in tons of other things a thousand
times we have evidence Pelosi did
X Y and Z Obama's going to prison he's the trees
in his care Miller Trump all of them
now in most cases
I agree they're they're
criminals and should go to jail
just as much as I think Trump should
so I support it put him in jail charging with a crime
my point is it will never happen
I hope so hope I'm wrong
in this case how many times
how many times can
they hype with no follow through
about her being deported because
she's here illegally about a Pelosi
in January 6th again most these
cases all argue there's something there
Obama
Social Security theft doze all the
crime you said you found not a single
person not even to mention the Epstein
files
but how many people how many times can they hype with
no follow through before Kevin or any of them
stop shilling for him apparently at
least one more time because he says well get
on it then okay so right there
okay well get on it Kevin says so
in a week in a month in a year
will Kevin stand up and go you broke
your promise probably not
I hope so I hope everyone's changing but from
what I've seen thus far these people just
kick it on down the road how many times
can you tell all these people go to prison and then not happen
until you go well there they're lying to me
or they don't care
right I mean guys this
is just a basic understanding of what's going on
you got to wake up to this I'd love
to see somebody like this suddenly start going you know
what I see him for what he is now I'm sorry
ever did you know that's what a lot of people
right now are doing
clint Russell says I do believe
this is what Trump said I do believe I shall play this first
it was I forgot I was going to include this one
but it's the same kind of point but it's about
Trump saying something about Cuba which is just
insane this is about whether people think he's
suddenly changed he hasn't
this is who he's always been
I do believe I'll be the
honor of having the honor
of
taking Cuba
that's a big honor taking Cuba
taking Cuba in some form
yeah taking Cuba I mean
whether I free it
take it
really you know right because you
typically take it and then you free take it
free it take it whatever
I think I could do anything I want with it
you want another two of them of course
because that's a good follow no you know free it
maybe you know but whatever whatever the f I
want shut up you know it's like
how do people not see who this
person is that's just small
he's always pounding his chest about
things that half the time don't even happen and
usually he's being driven by somebody controlling him I would
argue but either way I could do what I want
I'll take it baby free it you know Cuba
I'll bill be an honor
you can almost hear Lindsey Graham having
you know I'll be too crude but the point
is it's ridiculous to pretend
that this is in any
this is a crime are you
are you arguing there's a legal rationale this
international law does not matter when Trump decides
something anymore okay again I always
make this point if you're of the mind that it shouldn't
matter at all then just make that case stop
hiding behind mom's skirts and pretending
like this is you fighting for the freedom
and Constitution but then we don't care about it when we want our
things right if you think it's okay to
take Cuba or take Greenland you're fighting for that
then you do not care about
the law and maybe you think that's the
way it should work that's my point then make that argument
don't stand by those things and go
America Liberty Constitution
because you don't believe those things or worse you
don't even understand what they mean
the honor
of having the honor
of taking Cuba
so I said
to Clint who said Trump has 100%
lost his mind funny though
right seems how
he did the same things before
I guess just he didn't see that
or I guess was not able to
or didn't want to admit that it was happening before
I mean what are we talking about
Trump is just because you know narrative is what seems
to blind people to what's really going on did he not
do all he did in Syria did he not
like we can go down the list it's
just another extension of the same US
government foreign policy with a little bit different
flair this time it's just right on track
Iran Syria
Lebanon the whole that Cuba
just everything
my point is this is no different
than what he was doing before it's just
extension it's the extension it's ramped up
the agenda has continued and I said
this is the exact same man we tried
to warn you about Clint in 2025
remember that we tried to warn everybody
this is what's going to happen we're going to go war with Iran
Israel is going to take over there we said
all of this to a T and still
in this moment we're not the ones being recognized
for being that it's the ones like this to step
over the top of us and go this thing that I lied about before
they are so be it this
is the broken nature of this media sphere I
am of the mind that more honest people out there
able to see the long-term reality and that's all I
care about I don't care about dishonest media
players I care about in honest people
who want to go where they can find the facts
and you know you still can find facts
for people that with a waffle around
it and jump side day but you but I think
consistency is what matters I'm not even
saying dishonest I'd like to believe this is
genuinely people starting to change their minds like I said about Tucker
nonetheless it is important to point
out we all tried to do
this I mean Derek says it to him directly because we did
he was we go by him got called
blackpilled purity test the whole thing
wild to me that some act like
Trump's suddenly changed that is the
new narrative right now going on pierce
Morgan mag is dead Trump I don't know who
Trump is now why do you think
that's happening maybe because they genuinely think it
that's one of the possibilities
but my point is he's not really different
it's the same they just aligns were
crossed but he's the same point so why would that happen
well I argue it's because you're this is
what the the system does when the
system is losing it
it's a release valve
okay fine look everyone now sees Israel
is what they're doing we can't get away from now so
how do we frame it so we gain
how do we control that narrative how we
control release well we do
this we suddenly go everything's
different Trump's all over who he was and then watch
as it suddenly becomes oh it was all planned
and Trump brought you back in which is what Jones is doing
we see Israel's overtaking the country
we know it now it's all there but we're fighting
from within and we're gonna it's a freedom and the
globalists are trying to fight us but they're losing it's
like the same thing sorry I'm getting
off track but I'm just like it's important to see
how broken this is
he has always been this person
and the evidence is overwhelmingly clear
two-party illusion
same thing this is Rudy
I'm not familiar with he says is everyone on this
administration being blackmailed what happened
Pete what do you mean
what happened yes he before got in this position
said what he knew you wanted no more war
freedom liberty Democrats bad
then got in the position and here we are
because guys that's politics
101 and I'd like to believe that we all know that
even the partisan players
so why is it suddenly that
Hexeth oh my god what happened to him
he did the same thing they all do or
that earlier point maybe it's because they
believe that this is just somehow different this time
right these guys are the real ones they're gonna be
on my side we do that's how these people do
it they convince themselves that somehow it's
different these are the ones that are gonna fight for me
Whitney said Hexeth number two Steve
Feinberg is actually running the Pentagon
Hexeth is just the Fox and Friends figurehead
look up Feinberg and Cerberus
and you'll see what I mean she wrote an article about it
so if you want to think about what might have
changed it didn't happen the last year
didn't happen in the last four years
this is an important inflection
point now I believe this is still at a
point you might argue it was already going on if you
understand the overlap in the bankruptcy
conversation but nonetheless and to be
clear what I'm talking about here is Israel
Zionism influence but you could take the take it
however you wish is that this was Trump in
2015 you could make many of these
points about what they said and you could just argue
they were selling you the narrative you wanted to hear
but I do believe something shifted over the years
I know why you're not gonna support man you
know for the podcast he's speaking at the
Republican Jewish coalition
you've seen him talk about this
very location and you know the last
so many years and it's a very different
tone and a very different person so here
he is 2015 or is it
2015
and why they don't support him at the
Republican Jewish coalition I know why you're
not gonna support me and you know you're not
gonna support me because I don't want your money
he raised 125 million dollars
which means he's controlled totally
totally
well doesn't that matter that Trump thought that 125
million meant you were controlled seeing as how
200 million was given to him by
Adelson alone by his own metric
does not mean he's controlled
controlled by the people that gave him the money
totally totally controlled
by the people that gave him the money
that's why you don't want to give me money okay but
that's okay you want to control your own
politician that's fine good but I will
think about that folks think don't worry
about it's fine
that's just the way it works though right
guys because that's what he thinks that's what
he said after this too
what's really important to me is the
United States and making it
great again
making it great again
right that's all that matters
is that really matters maybe it did at that
point maybe he and this is what a lot of
people actually considered and I myself
still consider maybe he genuinely
wanted to step into great again my theme
is make America great again
that was weird I thought that stopped
already well anyway I just kept playing
but the point is that maybe he did
maybe he was out there going I'm gonna
step into this political field because I'm
rich and I know what I'm doing and I can do
everything I'm that good that's how he thinks
about himself and he steps into this and then
early conversations he got the JFK
talk or whatever you want to call it that
the power system was like checkpoint
that's not who that's not how this game
is played and let me demonstrate what will
happen if you don't you know and you
could call that crazy you can disagree
with it maybe I'm wrong maybe that's not
how the world works but you can consider
that clearly something has changed since
then first of all this is
Mary Maddison
her condition West Bank annexation
he was desperate for her cash $200
million by that same logic
but so here back to the point
as we showed you before 2015 well here
is now this is actually his last
this well this is a combination here
is Donald Trump post
being in politics
you know the biggest change I've
seen in Congress is Israel
literally owned Congress you
understand that 10 years ago 15 years
ago and it was so powerful
it was so powerful and I think
you know exactly what I what I'm
saying they had such power
Israel had such power and rightfully
over Congress
rightfully there's just
no way you can ignore that rightfully
they're right now you could argue he meant because
they paid the most and I'm telling
you guys that is that's how these people
because that's how it actually works money
means influence in their lives and in
politics that's the reality of the
world and so what he's trying to say is
that or you could argue it means that it's
Israel doing it just because it's Israel
either way it's the same point it's a
mechanism the fact is it's influencing
our government and they believe that's
supposed to be the way it is that's
what he just said here he is telling
you that he's going to remove the
Jew haters from the country now as I've
always said what he what regardless of
what you think he means it's an idea
it's an idea in this country
you're supposed to be able to think and whatever you want including
things that are hateful including things that are
other people disagree with that's the whole point of free
speech and ideological freedom
but also let's realize what they mean when
they say Jew haters is likely people
overlap with it the very least that support
Palestine or people that call out Israel's
crimes myself included I'm literally
working alongside tons of Jewish people
to call out what Israel is doing and
plenty of marches we've been alongside like
we've talked about because it's about
the ideology in regard
to like the Zionism influence and not the
idea of the religion we've talked about this
extensively but there is an overlap and
even those Jewish people orthodox otherwise
we'll tell you that and then tell you they don't
support Zionism for that very reason
my point though is this is what he said after
you heard him before going don't pay me
because you'll want to control me here's what he said after
that money came flying through we will
remove the jihadist
sympathizers and Jew haters
we're going to remove the Jew haters
who do nothing to help
our country that it's simple
it's simple I mean again to make the point
you could argue that they genuinely just
means people who are rationally hate Jewish people
is it a crime
is it a rationally crime is a crime to
irrationally hate Muslims or Christians or a
person that's wearing a red shirt no no it's not
because you can irrationally hate whatever you want
we can also call you irrational hateful
bigoted whatever
but it's not a crime unless you you know
commit a crime but apparently not anymore
in the free speech administration you know it's
it's always been this obvious he
didn't change other than
my point being that whenever this influence
started but not suddenly last
yesterday or last year
you know what happened to him I don't even recognize him anymore
is what I've heard a thousand times over
the last three days
and I simply said how it started how
it's going well here just since I'll just hear
it again after we just played those it's very short
I know why you're not going to support me and
you know you're not going to support me because I don't
want your money he raised
$125 million which means
he's controlled totally totally
controlled by the people that gave him the money
that's why you don't want to give me money okay but that's
okay you want to control your own politician
that's fine good I will
think about that folks think don't worry
about what's really important to me
is the United States
and making it great again my theme is
make America great again
right after Israel first or
Iran and al-arzeria and Iraq you know
you know after that maybe we'll get to it
shut up
that's what I feel we're dealing with
but so here
is I'll include this for you that's always
an important one
this is the long thread of
his last run this is 2024
of just the many many many
many times that he came out and said
many variations of the same thing
and many many times on his own campaign trail
as you can see by the podium where he had both
Israel and American flags and I don't know why
that wasn't a problem for anybody why does that make
sense if it was an American and a Chinese flag
why would you not think that was weird whether or not
it was at a Chinese event
and many of them were not by the way it just some Jewish
Republican coalition these so many of them were at
regular events and Mary Madison was there
they put Israeli flags behind them
running for president
this is wild to me
I added this last second as I saw this
Karen I'll leave it put this out I'm just
talking about this and this is of course
CNN so let that actually flavor this even
more exactly in the two-party illusion perspective
she says CNN and this is
what they're saying on the clip MAGA GOP
view of Trump approve is
approve is 100%
he's mistyped that but it says if you
are a member of MAGA in the GOP
which what does that even mean does that
mean what Trump says which means you just blindly
go with whatever Trump does well that makes sense
MAGA is not what Trump says that's why
tons of major MAGA influencers are like
that's not reality that's why he turned
on Megan and and Tucker and that doesn't
mean good verse bad just recognize that's happening
if you approve of Donald Trump
0%
say that is approve
0
he's the 97 to 72 dolphins
such a joke I mean guys this is just
sad do you realize
I make this point in any context for
especially in polls or in
it's never
ever 100%
when you get a 100% result there's
something there was a mistake from science
from polls from studies
it doesn't happen that's insane
especially with the political
situation that we're in where you're doing
things that have never been more unpopular
all I'm saying is this is just that
obvious they
were they're losing so badly that
100% it's
exactly what I expect from the situation
and it's CNN doing it
now what's interesting I think CNN is trying
to do this from perspective of that's how bad
they are but it's the same point
it's the system convincing the people
they need to convince which is the Republicans
to continue to supporting the
globalist agenda that they're running through right now
how this is how stupid they think we
actually are or how stupid leave it is
apparently by saying 100% is totally
makes sense
just why it's wild to me
now let's get into the bulk of the point today
David can't put this out
about a daily wire reporter
if you can call him that blocked him
so he can't retweet it but she called
ISIS Iranian backed
which is just another point to add to the larger conversation
but my point was I've been seeing this bubble up
for a while now
the idea that somehow that Iran
it was involved in 9-11 or that Iran
is ISIS or that Iran supports
ISIS or however they want to
it's entirely verifiably
ideologically stupid and proven wrong
but it doesn't matter though because they'll just
and the real question is whether
Bre knows that
whether she is conscious of that
or actually thinks that's the case
despite all of the evidence
because you have to understand there is not
proof that that's the case
all you get is the U.S.
guy said and he's a national security expert
or the Iranian expert who's lived in the U.S.
his entire life totally no and that's what happens
every single time in these conversations
I've literally proven this to you over the years
Robert makes this case every time
that all of these experts all the Iranian experts
the Hamas expert they're people that in many cases
have never even been to those countries
because all they do is and they really are
experts with their experts on the propaganda
about Iran so he says
that they you know can't
he can't share it because they blocked him of course
but they're pushing this again
so
we just had a great interview by the way
with Kabor Kalmasi and literally titled
the true origins of ISIS al-Qaeda and the Iranian
sleeper cell threat which is clearly
being manufactured and it's obviously
a false flag concern that
it's not the same as saying that it's not possible
if they're Iranian sleeper cells I understand
that's always the possibility the reality
is that they're manufacturing things like they do
and he talks about this exact point
so let's start with an article from the diplomat
from 2014
tons of stuff to get to Iran didn't
create ISIS we did
August 31st 2014
now it says it may be convenient
for dissidents and opponents of the current
Iranian regime and it's important to remember this is
2014 we're going to go kind of chronologically
through most of it it may be convenient for dissidents
and opponents of the current Iranian regime
to blame Iran for the rise of ISIS
but history tells us a different story
I'll also point out this article and many of them
by the way are very much of the mind
one you know that Iran's
government is just a borderline
terroristic but not ISIS which is the point
in most of them which almost makes it more
powerful I'll break down
why I don't believe that's the reality I have
many times before in regard to what they claim
they are they are a government and I don't support
governments and I think governments are capable and
Iran's government has been proven to commit
crimes against their people just like any government has
but it's not the same as saying that what
they just called Iran is the truth or that
they're throwing gay people off their building
they've been manufacturing these things for a long time
now that's not the same as saying that's never
happened today that's not the reality
it's just not and we can prove
that but they'll recycle the same
old talking points like
what being gay in Iran
you know how we look into what happens in
Israel before you make that allegation and also
then come back and realize that that allegation is
entirely baseless for what currently happens
today in the larger sense of the claim
but there are examples you could make
but the point is that in these articles
they're going to make the case that you know they're
brutally suppressing their people for example
which my point is there's
much more nuance than that
but even these people will tell you that
they are not ISIS and in fact have fought ISIS
which kind of belies the point in a way
but it starts out by simply saying
it may be convenient for people to want to frame it
like that but it's just not the truth
the US, Western Europe and their regional allies
in fact bear most of the responsibility
for the rise of extremist groups
like ISIS now this largely
frames it as you know their like
adventurism in the areas which alone
is enough to make that case
and you'll see what I mean by that but it's more
than that especially that it continued to be
used, funded
as even Mohammed Salman
from Saudi Arabia publicly said
that they had
basically used these groups but
many of them they lost control of them
now take it for what you will, I can't verify his statement
because he just said it out loud at a
conference but I point to it many times
and it also made the argument
that many of these leaders aren't even religious
and that speaks to the point we're always making
that it's an abuse to manipulation
through religion to manipulate extremists
but the real extremists are the people like the
Zionist atheists who are driving
people into the ground but continuing
the US invasion of Iraq
in 2003 which Britain
notably supported was a strategic
disaster and also
think about that right now with being compared
to Iran it's exactly the same thing and I mean
literally possibly even worse to be honest
contrary to speculation at the time
Saddam Hussein's secular
bathist regime
prevented a al-Qaeda from operating in Iraq
think about this now now this is important
for many reasons because
we're talking about the bath party which was
predominant well let's just put it like
I get people pushed back
about the numbers
but you can prove that it was a large portion
that were Christians in this inner circle
around Saddam Hussein
that doesn't make sense to you it's because
you've been misled all these years let's also remember
and that is again same thing doesn't mean good guy
just means that they lied about that
and it has to flavor how you see these people
remember Saddam Hussein was an ally of the United States
until he suddenly wasn't until he was
useful not useful for them anymore
or became a problem because he was not falling
direction however you want to look at it
remember he was armed with chemical weapons to be used
against Iran
and there's all these different background points
my point in this is to understand that Saddam Hussein
was not the exact
the way that they framed him at the very least
there was a major Christian population in Iraq and until they did what they did
and that got largely destroyed
and that because
of that and that group
they were preventing al-Qaeda from operating in Iraq
even though the argument is they are the terrorists
right or they're the ones were creating them
working for them
Iraq has had also been supported by the West
before 1991 Gulf War
as a counterbalance against the revolutionary Islamic Republic
during the Iran-Iraq war
so as always
even if you want to argue it's of good intentions
what we're talking about is the U.S. government
supporting
the groups we're talking about
because they needed to use them against the group
they thought they needed to fight now
if you can prove this as far back as you want to go
that the idea of the U.S. going after Iran
was because of Israel
and then in this case
they're talking about them standing against
like basically in Iraq that they supported them
in the rise against it because Iran was the focus
and so all this time later
let's just say that was the only thing they did
well then that group became the very things
we're talking about
so you could argue it was clumsy
I disagree that that's what it was
I mean it was by design in my mind
but it still means they're responsible
this is the mojideen argument
Afghanistan it's what they do
and of course then you could play the points about how commonly they do this
I'll play that clip again today at some point
the idea of how they create these groups
in order to keep these countries at bay
now it goes on to say
the U.S. led invasion changed all
of the dynamics that we just discussed
of Iraq the Iraq war toppled Saddam
destabilized the country
which of course is their responsibility
the idea was we'd go in there and free everybody
they'd welcome us as heroes we all know that's not how that went
and I hope we now understand that they never even
planned for that they clearly
did not care and very much so
like the chaos because that's easier to control
easier to exploit it's every country
we've ever I make this joke I guess
all the time I mean guys they're batting
zero you understand that right every country they want to liberate
can we not just stand back
and go that one failed that one failed
that one failed that one failed and every one of
worse worse chaos destruction
killing civilians slave markets
yeah at what point do you go
oh I guess that's the design
obviously that the problem is people
even if you don't think that then why don't we
just go hey why don't you take a seat
let's just stop saving people for a minute
because you clearly can't do it
but the idea is it wasn't by accident guys
the Iraq war toppled Saddam
destabilized the country and led to a wave
of sectarian bloodshed right the very
thing that they told you they were trying to fight
but created that
not saying bastion
freedom and democracy before but it's the same
with you know Libya is a better example
because it was very much so a place
they pretended it was not free education
free health care highest quality of life
in all of Africa or I think it was at least on
the top three and they
took him they made him get rid of his
nukes by claiming that would end it and then killed
him because he got rid of him a lesson for everybody
it says it also made Iraq a safe haven
and recruiting ground for Al Qaeda
now in this case
again you could argue that was just
a vacuum as they always
like to say which is not
it's not impossible but of course what we're talking
about in that situation is if they remove a power
when there's really nothing else to replace it
it kind of ends up any but in most
these cases Iraq Syria well the
government was still there so the idea would be the
government would just come back in and take control
they wouldn't be a bad but see they created this
by removing the government then opening the door
and then creating the very thing that led to
the creation of ISIS and Al Qaeda
so again you could blame them for being clumsy
or not caring or you could argue
as I am and I think the evidence shows
that this was a plan
you created this but either way
I think at some point if you think it was by accident
they then recognize the usefulness
of manipulating these groups but I want to
argue again that I think this was by design
I think it was creating the circumstances
for this very point and this whether you
want to talk about Brzezinski and the
Balkanization of the Middle East in the 70s
or you want to get into the more inner dynamics
you know I mean talking about Turkey with Syria
there's lots of different dynamics to get into
but in this case just understand that this is
very easy to see that they did
this and created the circumstances
at the very least that led to the creation
of these groups Al Qaeda in Iraq and again
at this point let's also not forget that this
group stems from the people they funded
in Afghanistan so already
you've got multiple connections they funded the
Mujahdeen to fight the Soviet Union and then
it became these groups I argue
even that was somewhat by design but you
can decide for yourself so then Iraq and
then they create another opening and
they blood in there same point
it's the same point that happened with Syria
they flooded in Syria but vote Turkey and
from Iraq from all over
now it says Al Qaeda in Iraq ISIS's
forerunner was founded in
April 2004 AQI
Al Qaeda in Iraq conducted
brutal attacks on Shia civilians
Iranians
or the you know the ideological
connections not necessarily Iranians but that's their
ideology and mosques
in hopes of sparking a broader sectarian conflict
ISIS
attacked Shia and
mosques
think about that for a second and of course
you could always make it male they wanted to create division
maybe or maybe it's because
they were not working for what you thought they were
and were aimed at Muslim culture and Christians
the entire time
which is pretty much what's been happening guys we'll get
to the fact that they've never attacked Israel
now it continues
Iran where was I
in hopes of sparking Iran naturally supported
of course the Shia militias
who fought extremists like Al Qaeda
both to expand its influence in Iraq
and protected Shia comrades
Iran cultivated ties with at the time
the Milwaukee government as well which will be
relevant in a second what's interesting though
Iran of course supports the Shia militias
right they're ideologically it'd be like
it's exactly like
Trump claiming he wants to support the Christians in Nigeria
whether he means it or not it's the sentiment
right so in this case
why are we arguing that that means they then
control they certainly could just control them
but I've always made this
case you can call them proxies if you understand
what it means it doesn't mean that they are
puppeteering them I don't think that's the case
what we're talking about is
people militias PMU
what it what became Hezbollah these are groups
that are popular uprising supporting for the
people of their countries who are supported
by Iran and they may
sell weapons and exchange just like the US does
with all of its allies what they want you to
pretend it is is Iran
Iran in these countries
you you know literally on the
ground pretending to be something else creating
destabilize it you know what that is that's
literally textbook Israel US policy
that's the whole point you understand
lie that accuse them of that which you are guilty
and if you actually look
you won't find a single example of Iran
doing that that's why they need to
constantly point to those three groups
Hezbollah hooties all they can do
and then cite the thousands
that were killed when US illegally invaded Iraq
and they defended it that's all
we're talking about guys and as I've always
said look at the group they're claiming let's
just say as always that everything they
ever said about all three of those
groups is true hypothetically
just for the sake of conversation let's pretend
it's all true take that
and compare it to only what you can prove
prove what us
in Israel or individually have done over
the years night and day
but think about that for a second
because it's only and most
of what they say about these groups are false
it's just unbelievable
what we can accept today
Iran cultivated ties with the
Milwaukee government oh and then it says
al-Qaeda both to expand its influence in Iraq
and protect Shia comrades
Iran basically they were fighting
al-Qaeda and that this is very clearly
documented when the US
helped to establish Iraq's government
after of course it destroyed the entire country
it consistently supported
Milwaukee at the time so at this point you have
common
ground you have Iran supporting that group
and you have the US supporting that group
it consistently supported Milwaukee
the US government even going as far as
to assist in Milwaukee's persecution
of dissidents and civil
society activists because you know freedom
right the US was probably
more instrumental than Iran in cementing
Milwaukee's power in Iraq now
when Milwaukee's troops stormed
Sunni protest camps so Sunni being
you know the divide
between Sunni and Shia the other ideological
divide and largely
Saudi Arabia right that's the Wahhabi
Sunni mindset which is the foundation
for almost every part we're talking about
in regard to the Sunni side so
al-Qaeda ISIS al-Nustra
right so the point is that
you can find the direct connection to their ideology
right back to one of their chief allies
like that's not enough to recognize what we're talking
about but keep making the list
added to the points right so
if everyone of them ties back to their chief ally
and why would it be Iran that's the one
because they just say it out loud and people
scream it too it's not true
so by the time
when Milwaukee troops stormed the Sunni camps
in 2013 they were armed with
US made weapons
this you know whether this
like you could pretend that that point may just be that
Milwaukee decided to do that the point is always
is these group they're just dumping weapons in groups
that they later called terrorists they do not
have screw they don't care about any of it
they don't have integrity they don't have principles
they don't care about what they're doing
I'm saying that because of their long history
of demonstrating that to us
by the time the US and western Europe finally decided
Milwaukee was enough of a liability
after you know killings and all the things they've done
to push out of government fertile ground
already existed for an ISIS
led Sunni insurgency
in western Iraq
Sunni not Shiite
not Iranian ideology Sunni like Wahhabi
Arabian
so think about this in that context
that they are the ones that ultimately removed the government
that they were previously supporting
which Iran at least was as they wrote
consistently supported him
or it were uncultivated ties rather
that's the way they frame it
in order to protect the Shiites
so not even necessarily on their side
but he was in power so he wanted to make sure
they wanted to make sure that their people were safe
that's how he's framing it
so as it says
it was already for an ISIS
Sunni insurgency
now the Syrian story is even more important
now all this because she missed the simple point
and we're going to get more in depth in some of these articles
they created the
setup for why that became the reality in Iraq
which they've
utilized ever since
the Syrian story is even more important
in 2011 the Assad regime
and this is what they write
violently suppressed peaceful protesters
that's not true
again
I always want you to challenge these things
especially if you disagree and if you do
please send me something and maybe I'll change my mind
but I want you to understand that I don't say things like this
unless I feel it's proven
the reality of this has been shown
the only reason it wouldn't be brought up today
is because I've talked about it a thousand times
is that in the case of that
or Ukraine for example
as they admitted themselves on record
they planned this
they shot the protesters
blamed it on Assad and that's not to say Assad couldn't do that
or isn't capable of it
but he didn't do that and he didn't gas the people they lied about
because that was proven as well look at Aramate's work
and plenty of others
nailed to the wall or Robert Fisk
for crying out loud like literally broke down
how they manufacture these illusions
so I'm just pointing out that this is
he states that they even still think that these groups
are extremist or
violently killing their own people but will still argue
that they're not ISIS
just I think that even makes it more powerful
but it's just not true
and of all of them you can quite literally prove
that this is what they set up in Syria to create
the situation for
overthrowing Assad or at least trying to over the next
20 years or however long that well yeah
basically and then of course
now they have a
ridiculously enough a terrorist running Syria
that's not like that doesn't prove it to everybody
in 2011
they claimed they violently suppressed the protesters
now this civil society movement
rapidly transformed into
an armed uprising against the Syrian government
now here's the point
even though this was done from the outside
you had genuine Syrians
who in many cases didn't agree with their government
that were protesting that's always
the case usually in these situations
like in Iran though what happened
very quickly especially since they're on guard for it
is that it became very widely discussed and acknowledged
even by the unions that were supporting their protest
that it got turned into something different
and that's why they all left and it became just
mass people on the streets bombing through shooting
and being literally armed by the
US and Israel as they openly admitted actually
in this recent discussion and planning
the past oh and don't forget they armed the Kurds
which is happening inside the country
it's all happening but so in this case
almost right there they
basically they've suppressed where it was
the civil society movement rapidly transformed into
an armed uprising well I disagree with the way
they're framing that it's I think what we're talking about is that the
people are protesting and then what you had was
the as they're going to mention right down here
you know free Syrian army or the oh no
that um I'm forget the names now
been a while since we got into all the different
acronyms and you know remember how many times
they changed the names and ultimately we're talking
about offshoots of Al Qaeda Vanessa
Bailey and I talked about this I enter on for many different interviews
the point though is these groups they work with
in Syria not the ones fighting on the side
side but the ones on the US supported side that
they pretended for the free army fighting for Syria
there they were the moderate rebels they were
the very people that got proven to be Al Qaeda
in Syria
and so they
started the uprising and it says
why in the early stages of the war
this is interesting Saudi Arabia
Qatar and Turkey began
funneling arms into
opposition forces you see so this was not organic
immediately and this is
always the case guys we're seeing and
you know and arguably as much as they're pushing
they're pointing at Turkey Vanessa doesn't think
and plenty of others argue that that's not even close to what's
going to happen that there's more alignment there than
otherwise but it's certainly possible because they do
have disagreements but either way in this case
you have the Sunni Saudi Arabia
you know they're arming the people that they later
point to as the civil uprising
well that's not the reality since it was started
with a false flag and they literally dumped
these weapons in there with these terrorists they brought
in from other locations from from Iraq
from other and Turkey and
created this whole situation
and seeing an opportunity
to destabilize a key ally
excuse me of Iran and Hezbollah
their geopolitical foes
as the civil war
deepened extremist groups joined the fight
they also
became the beneficiaries of large amounts of
arms and funding from America's regional allies
which is the same conversation just
more involved than just you know
filtered in so all
we're talking about is you have the U.S.
Axis with Israel through their allies
dumping weapons into the people on the ground
to create the revolution that they point to
and then dumping in all the terrorists they could
find and then calling that a civil war
Saudi Arabia, Qatar
and Turkey knowingly
funded extremist groups including
Jabhat al-Nusra
al-Qaeda's official affiliate in Syria
right this is Jilani
guys that's the whole point
Jabhat al-Nusra quickly became one of the most
effective and influential rebel groups
fighting against the Syrian government
Nusra this is a terrorist organization
that was called that even by the people
that supported it at the time
some on Nusra elements have also merged
into ISIS
it's not fair to say the same thing
but for the purpose of the conversation
it's the same thing right it's the same
element we're discussing
the U.S. ordered non-lethal aid
to the Syrian rebels
so please remember those are terrorists
we're talking about that it was even admitted by
the Obama administration that these moderate rebels
were more extreme than we thought or whatever they tried to say
it was obvious
and eventually covertly
armed them as we all know
going so far as to operate a training camp
for rebels in northern Jordan
you getting this they were training terrorists
al-Qaeda's on our side in Syria
al-Bama said we're training ISIL forces
I mean actually I think I even have that
let me see real quick
yep there it is
this is the exact conversation
as I've said before this aspect of our
strategy was moving too slowly
it was moving too slowly
but the fall of Ramadi has galvanized
the Iraqi government
so with the additional steps I ordered last month
we're speeding up training of ISIL forces
including volunteers from Sunni tribes
in Anbar government
so with the additional steps I ordered last month
we're speeding up training of
ISIL forces
that's ISIS in the Levant
that's what we're talking about
and Sunni tribes
it's the same conversation
my point is that you can do this yourself
all the stuff is out there
and like I'm going to get to in a minute
showing John McCain for example
and when he was there and then finding the email
that says that we're basically pointing out
why in 2012 that they were already
on their side
it's just easy to see
now again you could decide that there are variations
of the same terrorist groups in ISIS al-Qaeda
but we're talking about extremist
kind of people that they always tell you they're fighting
and they have always been working with them
that's the reality to come to
here and to understand where we actually are
we need to get past this to see what's going on
non-lethal aid
to the Syrian rebels
eventually armed them
I think that was probably from the beginning
and as I just said training ISIL forces
and it says when the Obama administration
asked Congress for 500 million dollars
to train and equip moderate rebels
the Pentagon testified that it anticipated
difficulties finding
moderate fighters to train an arm
but that didn't stop them
because they didn't even want moderate anything
they wanted the extremist to throw at Syria
because that's what they do
in plain English this means that they don't really exist
that's what the article is saying
meaning moderate anything in this conversation
with ISIS's victories
in Iraq and the US
strategy of fueling the fire
in Syria without allowing either side
to win is finally revealing
its inherent contradictions
and keeping it destabilized
like this that's the important part
and realizing that the victories in Iraq
I mean just like with Afghanistan
you create situation and just pull back
and let it become chaos
so then you can use that chaos to justify further action
now it's much more complicated than that
but that's the point to understand
in this part of the conversation
the US and its allies destabilized Iraq
and Syria in turn
creating safe havens for extremists that previously
did not exist
US allies provided the material support
that allowed ISIS and groups like it
to become threats to the entire region
despite lacking
any substantial popular base in Syria
or Iraq
I mean I don't know how you can misunderstand that
this is just this article's framing
but all of this stuff is textbook
you could read this on anything discussing the background
it is not unreasonable
for Iran has both to fight against these groups
which murder and enslave Shia
and other religious minorities
right?
you could argue there's still terrorist groups
but the point is that it's not
their terrorist because they support these groups
or vice versa that because
Iran supports them therefore their terrorist
it's just not the reality
their actions conceivably fall under one of the west's
favorite principles
of international law when they care to pretend
it exists
the duty to protect
which means by their logic Iran has every right to step in and protect these groups
Iran has been the most
serious foreign force
fighting against ISIS from the very beginning
one of the easiest parts to prove in fact
which is just why everything is so cartoonish
Iran is the most
they write viable regional partner
for a temporary pragmatic alliance
against ISIS this is 2014
Iran and its regional allies
are not the cause of ISIS's rapid and brutal rise
extremist groups like ISIS and
Jabal al-Musra have been consistently
aided
consistently aided by
disastrous western
interventions in the Middle East
and the influence of regional actors
like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel
I'll add and the fact that it wasn't just
destabilizing actions by accident it was creating
these for the outcomes that we
still see playing out today
I mean I didn't even get into ISIS K
I'm not going to talk about it today but remember my entire point
I'll bring up one of the articles that to me is the extension
of the of maintaining
this whole thing
maybe this
the point of that you know my discussion was
ultimately
I'll
I'll try to find something included that
ISIS K is
essentially not real
the point being that it's a
I guess if we're saying none of them really are
that it's always a construct created using
other extremists that they call
moderates or rebels
but on top of that the point is that
ISIS K seems to be an extension to today
that might not even exist
in the sense that other than the idea
and the framing of it that they just carry out whenever they decide
just a thought and I think the evidence is actually
pretty sound of what they're claiming it is
and not and the reality doesn't seem to be there
but if it's always been a construct
why even why even need some kind of like
base or location just claim
it's a thing and then when you do something point
to that that's what I think we're talking about
but it says extremist groups like ISIS and Al Mulsar
have been consistently aided by their interventions
responsibility for the rise of ISIS
isn't much of a mystery the west and its allies
just have a look in the mirror
it's a good article
now I'll also include as always
the excellent work done by James Corbett
which I think by it I mean if I wanted to
truly just walk away with no question
of your mind I should have just played this entire thing
but we've done it before in fact
we literally have the watch along that we did with Corbett
of all three parts and Brock and Brock as well
where we just kind of we watch it
we jump in here and there make comments
and this is I think important to watch
in addition to just the actual content
which is very powerful and it's called
false flags the secret history of Al Qaeda
and it's the same conversation
undeniably so the reality
of the receipts and the money and the tracker
and what it shows you of how they created
these things going back well before the conversation
we're having today or I could also include
which by the way
it I'll show you this in a second makes me verify
which brings to a weird page but Ben Swan's
documentary there's the link it's included
2015 which if I'm not too long
I may just play it out to the end it's like 12 minutes
Ben's Ben Swan truth of media
the origin of ISIS
now why is this on a
age verify
that doesn't make me do that for any other videos I can watch
like people being killed on this thing from bombings
and stuff but check this out you want to know why
ISIS was created by the United States verify your age
and look what it makes you do
selfies credit cards IDs
what why would this need to be done if I'm
logged in have an account
because you don't want me to see the content
you disagree
I think it's wild
we'll play it if we have time at the end
now here's an article from
2014 same time frame right
Iran sends troops into Iraq
to aid fight against ISIS militants
we realize this is the same
conversation we're having in the right like just
general point about why Iran
was there in the first place and why Soleimani was there
fighting ISIS and
defending the illegal invasion of Iraq
and even the
the Guardian making it very clear
2014
June here's one December
2014 even more clear guess what
even the Pentagon said so
Iranian Air Force bombs ISIS targets
in Iraq says Pentagon
so whether it's talking to Drew
from Daily Mail or that was not true
what's your name Brie from Daily Mail or excuse me
yeah or no Daily Wire
or any of the rest of the ridiculous people
out there currently claiming that Iran is ISIS
it's just sad
your own government has made this clear in the past
when it suited them
here is another follow up this is from
the the defense post
Iran claims 700
drone strikes against ISIS in Syria
2018 you can question the amount
but the point is clear track record
of them attacking bombing and fighting
around ISIS very simple
here's BBC
Kasim Soleimani why his killing is good
news for the Islamic State
why because he was fighting them more than anybody
and this is even BBC
by the way this is 2020
I'll also include my interview with James Corbett on this
I was pretty far ahead of this story for a lot of reasons
and that's why James had me on
James had me on
January 6 2020
Ryan Christian on the assassination of Soleimani
very important watch
now 2017
and this is really interesting to me because this was written by
the late Kamini
the one that they just assassinated while he was in a meeting to discuss
peace
America
quote created ISIS
now what's important to understand is if you only
saw this article you may think oh I get it now
these people are just parroting Iran's propaganda
what they always try to do
nope sorry what he's pointing to is the same
documents that Americans were calling out years
before this ever came out
what he references is documents
that can prove this because you can guys
this is not because
Iran said so and then I ended up in my
it's because the documents showed it
because you can see James Corbett's documentary
or Ben's where it breaks down the actions they took
and why it was very clear
but keeping that in mind America created
ISIS he says and it's war on the group is a
lie says Iran supreme leader
so ask whether that may have played a factor
Iran supreme leader Ayatollah Ali
Kamini on Monday and this is 2017
accused the US of creating the Islamic
state ISIS and called
us war on jihad is a lie
he says quote you the United States and your agents
are the source of instability in the Middle
East who created Islamic state
he asks he clearly is pointing to the fact
that it was the US and also remember what he's calling
out right here is the US government not Americans
at large as always
the claim of forming a coalition against
Dias ISIS is a lie he says
of course Americans are the
against are against an
uncontained ISIS
meaning that they want to make sure it's controlled in their
way but but if anyone would want
to truly destroy it they
the Americans will counter them as they've seen
before
he says we are facing a proxy warfare
in the region as a new trick by the arrogant
powers against the Islamic Republic
and they just turned it into the reverse
right we're claiming that people that rise up to fight
what they're doing are the proxies funded by Iran
we possess documents and information
showing the direct support of the US imperialist
for this highly disgusting movement
ISIS in the region
which has destroyed Islamic countries and created a wave
of massacres and clashes as we showed you earlier
bombing mosques so understand
you can argue that there's overlap on both
but realize with where
what we just what we just went over there's more to get into
and then that they now
and then try to just say that
ISIS is Iran
so how do you make sense of that
I mean you could argue like the point is that
question at all
but that lie seems to make this even more clear
doesn't it if we can out of all of it
very clearly prove beyond a shadow of a doubt
that that's that they've been fighting them over the years
that their ideology is different that they're far more aligned with
Sunnis and even Israel
then why would they so they come out and they go
but they are ISIS well that that's just lazy
and it's because that's what they desperately need
and that alone should show you
that they're lying about this whole situation
that doesn't mean every other thing they've ever said about is a lie
but you should be asking that
and in fact I argue it largely is
here is the crescent international
and this is more about the overlap of Israel
and ISIS but also Hamas
because let's not forget the order they say
ISIS is Hamas, Hamas is ISIS
and then what do they say
well Hamas is Iran okay so it's very easy to see
what they're actually trying to insinuate that Iran
is ISIS or that Iran does all of this
and if Hamas is ISIS they at least support ISIS
it's not true
now let's also not forget as I'll point to in a second
about the overlap of Hamas and Israel
but in this case the article is
ISIS, Hamas and Zionism
enemies or allies
and the real thing is about
specifically whether Israel
is more connected to ISIS
long-term strategy
is what motivates both ISIS
and the Zionists he writes
same with this article like I said before
you read this it's very critical
of some of the groups that you may think we're trying to
defend I guess
and it says all is fair in love and war
so torturing and killing civilians
is the order of the day
it is all about land
and this is important because what he's framing is both
ISIS not Hamas but ISIS
and Zionists
and he's saying it is all about land
so both are aggressively
expansionist
ethnic cleansing and racism based on
spurious historical readings are necessary
at the same time
both are movements demanding
strict adherence
and willingness for self-sacrifice
the ISIS fantasy
is the same as the Zionist
foreign policy
guys now that's his opinion
but really think about that
with what we're discussing today and all the things
we're showing you to prove that they're not connected to Iran
think about what this may mean
with what we started with there
in fact here I'll play a couple clips before we continue on this
to make this point and play the clip
I mentioned before since it's important to see the
arming of these groups and how they actually do this
oh maybe I'll wait on that one but this one I was going to start with
and this is guys this is just a sentiment
in fact it doesn't prove anything
but I find it interesting
and it speaks to how far this is you know the
people asking these questions from this long go
and the idea of ISIS or what
Mossad is actually called
I find it interesting it's on c-span
tell the story about how you try to find out what the
what they call the Mossad when they deal with
publicly
I thought it was a reasonable question but the trouble is
you can't pick up the phone book there's no
Langley in Israel and you can look up
CIA or in our case the Mossad
we thought we should ask
what shall we call it in English
which can translate the Hebrew words as I said
the Mossad is instituted but when they write a letter
to their friends in the CIA
or the British intelligence what do they call themselves
it took a while it was a matter of asking the
Prime Minister's spokesman
the best you could do because officially
the Mossad is under the Prime Minister's office
and I think he sort of wondered why you want to know
and all that so we explained
and he came up with the Israeli
secret intelligence service
and if it were to have initials it would be
ISIS
just simple words like that
interestingly enough kind of a British model
you know like I said it's just a data point
I find that fascinating and
it would be a little bit on the nose wouldn't it
but there's arguments about
why that's necessary but it's
factual based today like you know what we can prove
but consider that there may be a reason
of why that would be the case
I'll play the other one a second actually when we get to the end of the segment
you've seen it from the nation just the point about
why they fund these groups and why they need
to keep these countries destabilized
so continuing
that they're both the same
Zionism, ISIS, as this person argues
aggressively expansionist, ethnic cleansing
racism based on spurious historical
readings at the same time both are movements
demanding strict adherence
the ISIS fantasy is the same as the
Zionist foreign policy just replace
Jew with Muslim
that is Wahhabi Salafi
that's the Wahhabi Sunni discussion
at least the Zionists aren't picky about
who they call a Jew
but think about what he's saying right there that's what he wrote by the way
but the idea
because they are we're talking about the same kind of
extremist ideology that needs to be
considered because that's the whole point today
now you don't you can argue they're not literally
the same thing
but that seems like a valid point to consider
why would Israel promote Hamas it writes
because let's remember they have and I think we'll play some of these next
ISIS is a spin-off
of the U.S. back to Mahushedin
and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan in the 1980s
so it's very common knowledge
but yet you talk to a military
Pentagon they act like what do you mean
I don't know what you're talking about because they know these things are not supposed to be acknowledged
intent on undermining the secular
Soviet-backed regime in Afghanistan
the U.S. government funded these extremists for that purpose
likewise it says
Hamas was founded in 1987
with the tacit approval of Israel
that is true with the intention of undermining the secular
Palestinian resistance
now the point you made there is I've always covered
it's it's not
there's an argument that needs to be
you know there's a debate rather
about the full
like created from whole-clothed conversation
and I don't think that's what happened as I've said before
I think it's clear that there was a group
there was there was an entity that existed
and then you can see that they decided
in their own discussions to use that group
my point is what they then
got turned into through that time frame
Israel created that
that's clear
I mean that that's the funding that the
the creation as they're highlighting here and others will get into
is using them whether they knew
that or not and I argue
that there wasn't even full control
even at that point but over all the years
it changed funding
manipulation and eventually killing people
and people grew up and younger people joined
and the group changed
all the way until October 7
and you can even argue even then as many do
that that was all coordinated and it's because they funded them
that's not what I think makes sense
the evidence doesn't seem to support that but it's certainly possible
the point though is to consider
a religious acknowledge that
Israel did fund
and influence Hamas and that matters
especially if we're going to criticize people
Hamas is the worst thing in the world
then why they fund them and the reality is
I'll play the clips again is in order to create
the divide just like they're doing to us
in this country right now in regard to the
left-right paradigm or even creating groups they want to point to
they're literally Antifa
and left
domestic terrorists lefties or whatever they're trying to create
it's the same kind of idea
now it says the
likewise it says just as the US
washed its hands of al-Qaeda when they stopped
following the US script
when Hamas showed itself as an effective
resistance movement he writes
and a competent governing party
Israel switched to persecuting it
tacitly defending the palestinian authority
things were catching up to Israel
he writes it had the its wayward
Hamas now and now a terrifying
if not particularly competent
more extremist Islamic group on this doorstep
now I don't fully agree with the framing
but to read again and to frame it
he says just as the US
washed its hands of al-Qaeda now I don't agree with that
I guess if you want to argue
the Mujahideen in Afghanistan
that they ultimately said screw it
which they did I argue and but even then
I argue there was more planning that went into how that
could eventually be used again still you could argue
they just kind of dropped them and moved on
but I do not believe they watched their hands
of al-Qaeda I think once they became al-Qaeda
that was a group being used sort of like
funding I mean I'll bring that up right
now not that it's relevant today other than
the general point
oops that's not the one
oh it's a
what is that
CIA
there it is oh that's right
not just Oz off that's how I remember it
the point in this one is to realize
that the CIA as well as
you know you can get into the other groups that were involved
over the years documents
you can prove which by the way it was already
popping up I should just grab that too
right there
project aerodynamic 1966
as the document posted but it's from
before that documents
proved the CIA has been cultivating
fascism in Ukraine since at least 1948
so let's understand this is a tactic
it's a plan so when they funded the Mujahideen
it was a model
and that was well after this and they had been funding
these groups which literally are today
the Oz off movement that's
the whole point so it's an extension of the same
game they create these groups in order
to destabilize and control
that's the entire point and so what we're
talking about in this is the same idea and that
look they like the Kurds for example
different kind of point but it's group they've used
but then they just they don't see a use
they just drop them and leave they do not care
just like these groups too sometimes
but the point is still to understand why they got created
and how rather why
and how they were used so I'll play this clip here
for this very point of why they do this with these groups
Brzezinski was the
strategist for Jimmy Carter
and convinced Jimmy Carter to say
look the Russians are dominating
Afghanistan with a
civilian secular government
let's create al-Qaeda let's
back Osama bin Laden and give his supporters
weapons to begin fighting
the Russians and we can
pull a coup d'etat there and
the Russians will fight back and then we'll say the Russians
invaded and it worked Saudi Arabia
made a deal with America that
they would push the Wahhabi
extremists the al-Qaeda
the most right
wing wing of Islamic
parties and it worked essentially
al-Qaeda is a contract
army for the United States
well the same thing was happening
in in Russia what
Brzezinski wrote was that
America's faced with a possibility
of not being able to rule the world
unilaterally any country's
economic ability to be
self-sufficient means
potential
military power and in
order to prevent any country
from threatening America militarily
you have to prevent it from developing
economically the American
nightmare Brzezinski wrote was
that Russia would get together with Germany
and with Western Europe creating
Russian raw materials German
industry and somehow finally
Russia would become westernized
America
under Brzezinski's strategy
said this would be a disaster because if Russia
is westernized if it becomes
democratic if
Europe and Russia are prosperous
then we cannot control them anymore
and they will have no reason to be NATO
we've got to stop Russia and the
place to stop this Russian
European conglomeration
is to split it right at
the border down Ukraine
let's do in Ukraine what
we did in Afghanistan
let's back the crazies
well most of them are
the former neo-nazi groups
that have been so
prominent that fly the Nazi flag
important to think about right
just so it's basic reality that's been going
on a very long time
so to finish this paragraph
when Hamas showed itself as an effective
resistance movement
and competent governing party
Israel switched to persecuting it
now the question is, is that what happened
I think there is a level
of that transition that clearly took place
but I've always argued even going to post
October 7th or before that there was still
influence there maybe an individual maybe
more just money it has an effect
and it goes on to say Israel
switched to persecuting it tacitly defending the Palestinian
authority which was an argument just to shift into
a group that was another element to use
as a counterbalance and ultimately is now
had demonized them but it became another element
they manipulated things were catching up
it says it has wayward Hamas now terrifying
if not particular competent more extreme
Islamist group on its doorstep
well remember this is still a group that they're involved with
in the first place
so continuing
from 972 magazine
also 19
2014 excuse me
no Hamas isn't ISIS
ISIS isn't Hamas
it's just an extension of the same point where they're trying to claim this
in the same time frame
972 magazine is an Israeli platform
anyone who isn't a show for Israel
can see through Netanyahu's new slogan
remember this is 2014
we're not even at post October 7th right now
it says Hamas is ISIS ISIS is Hamas
it's such a
crude attempt to brainwash people he writes
to put the most horrifying image
in their minds and associate it with Gaza
thereby cleansing Israel of those images
of Gaza's agony
because remember 2014 was it
operation was it iron shield
or one of the last operations
which guys you could qualify as a genocide
if you understand what they were doing
but of course we're quibbling about an obvious one today
so let's just call them war crimes
but objectively like very clearly killed hundreds
of innocent people
so
to ignore what they were doing to make it more
about they're so bad this is okay it's what they
tried to do now it's what they're doing right now
it says like he's been doing his whole career
Netanyahu is insulting
people's intelligence treating them
like children selling them the war with a
short little sing song slogan
they can all remember
and remember they're telling you Hamas is
Iran right that Iran's the one
even though that doesn't make any sense
the point
is that clearly if you're going to make
the case well we just very
very much outlined why that's not the case
they were in fact fighting them but
ignore that since you know
the point is that they want to try to
over here conflate these things is the same
thing that it should matter that we if we can
debunk one and both apply but
they're the ones lying around in the first place
so let's continue
he gets away with it
because people won't challenge this idiocy
for fear they'll be accused of defending Hamas
very simple right it's the same thing
it did today or a solid
apologist or whatever it's the same kind of sentiment that floods
through the incredibly
stupid highly regarded mainstream
people because I mean it's or just
shockingly dishonest because
the same thing and the same sentiment
you just like to support the terrorists
and whatever it's just it's so frustrating
that what happens every time just to be
clear he writes I know very well
that Hamas is a brutal dictatorial
organization he writes the term is
Lamo fascist is indeed descriptive of
its character so in that limited sense
it's the same as ISIS now
I disagree with the general point I'm not
saying good guy bad guy but I don't actually don't think
and it's funny because he goes on to make the same
argument essentially but he says
take his point as for the sake of this conversation
consider them the same thing but
as he goes on to say it's just not the case
but the difference between Hamas and ISIS in
the degree of their brutality
and in the strength in their strength
is so great as to be a qualitative
difference it says
Hamas is not slaughtering and be heading
and crucifying people by the thousands
funny how you would hear differently from
Israel and the United States it's not
committing gang rape seems wildly
relevant seeing as how so many years later
they made that allegation it's not
massacring people because they practice a different
religion well that's interesting they're not
by the way or a different variant
of their own religion or because
they belong to a different ethnic group
all of which you're seeing happen through Israel
United States and the people they support
look at Saudi Arabia Hamas
like ISIS is persecuting
minorities Netanyahu says over the
weekend this 2014 but there are
churches in Gaza right
we've talked about this Christians attend them freely
it's provable there is
a seat in the Gaza legislature reserved
for a Christian that's
night and day from what the way
ISIS treats Christians isn't it
except Gaza's a flat place now
but realize the same
point how can you
tell me that that's the case when you
don't even see the same thing happening in Israel
in Gaza like the idea
of Christians the way they treat them
in Israel is self-evident it's publicly
discussed by reverence
but we but the Christian right ignores
it needs to say something to you
the reality is that you can call Gaza
whatever you want or rather Hamas as
brutal but you have to acknowledge that
they will rule the loud churches
allowed free attendance which
you can prove even post
October 7th when Israeli politicians
were trying to call it out and say there's no
churches they publicly got exposed
because one of the people I think was LBC
wasn't any I guess and said look I just
talked to the reverent there are people right now
in those churches she goes well whatever I let's
change the subject just moves on they're all
like that guys and I mean the art
diehard dishonest scientists
who are trying to destroy Gaza
it says about Hamas's executions
in recent days of some 25 suspected
collaborators which as always
I thought the case you could argue
is people that they didn't know or the innocent
people they caught the reality is we know
and have already seen what the U.S.
did in Israel do to people they call
collaborators or they call whatever
they want to call their enemies
do I even need to go into it all the examples
of people they've done in Israeli prisons
what the U.S. did in Guantanamo
when many of them are proven later to not
even be the people they thought they were
I mean guys it's obvious that's something
justify any of it because you see I never
play that game if it's wrong it's wrong
I don't care what your side is coming from
in this case though the point is to say
that they have 25 collaborators they killed
and you think that makes them terrorists
well then at least apply that same logic
to overhear where they do it all the time
and recognize where they could very well
be people that did this because they're being funded
by the U.S. and Israel and very well or not
innocent people being caught
think of it recognize the possibilities
is the only point it's a sickening reminder
of this organization's ruthlessness
it says but the fact is that the
pre-state Zionist underground
so he's arguing look at the bad things
Hamas is doing
but the fact that the
pre-state of Zionism the Lehigh
Urgun parties
whose military leader was Yitzhak
Shimer executed many
suspected Jewish collaborators
I make this point all the time
the Zionist killed
Jewish people who pushed back
they the Jewish people that were alongside
the Palestinians in a large set that this has been covered
I mean
it's so I hate always having to qualify
these things are so obvious and so there's
U.N. documents and just written down
things from Zionists that they
were critical the Jewish people in the
location were like this is not Judaism what are you doing
we don't support this and many of them got killed
but you know it's all about saving the Jewish
people from Zionism's perspective
it's just not the truth if you understand the history
both Lehigh and Urgun led by
Menachin Beggin who by the way is a
horrifying person one
of the worst that you want to look up some of the stuff they've discussed
it'll keep you up at night and I'll give you some
examples in a second by the way because it was written
by Harris he also deliberately
bombed crowds of civilians
hid behind their own civilian population
human shields
and had maximist
maximalist territorial goals
this is in Israeli platform talking about the foundation
of Zionism the Urgun
and Lehigh the progenitors of
Likud which is Netanyahu's party
practiced what could be called
Judaism
Judaism excuse me and minus the religious
fundamentalism could be compared
to Hamas
what do you mean minus it's the same exact
thing but it says but like Hamas
they could not be compared to
ISIS
now it says if Netanyahu really believed
Hamas is ISIS would he have
sent a delegation to negotiate with Hamas
and offer it concessions in Cairo
probably not would he have reached
a ceasefire agreement with Hamas after operation
pillar of defense in 2012
if Hamas is ISIS would a senior
Israeli defense forces of the officer have told
this to Britain's financial times
in March of 2014
today we can describe Hamas as a much more
restrained much more
responsible organization
than it used to be a decade or two
decades ago this all
in light of their statehood experience
this has made them much more responsible
much more cautious
funny how that worked out until they
no longer felt that was working for them
and then they just started to use them again in justifications
at this time this is the overlap of the funding guys
I'll play those in a second
and if Netanyahu thought Hamas is ISIS
with his goal in the current war
at least until now have been leaving Hamas severely
weakened but still strong enough
to go running Gaza
until keeping it out of
and keeping it out of the hands of ISIS's
globally honest allies
I mean think about it if your argument at the time is ISIS is Hamas
then
like they're saying there was a point at which Hamas was
weakened and they allowed them to keep running
Gaza why wouldn't you
you can either argue that you could argue they thought
that they didn't want to take all their responsibility
then that simply means that they're willing
to work with terrorists at the very least
but realize it's because they always were
whether here or there or anywhere else
and they do not actually
have the designs they claim they did
and overall this part as well
they're telling you we describe them as restrained
but they're different
and at the end of the day all of this speaks to the reality
that they're working they're allowing them to exist
while going after Shias, Iran
other elements and
you know in Lebanon but this being allowed
like I've always pointed out in Yemen
in the Saudi Arabian controlled area
why do I keep telling you they've got an area of Al Qaeda
that's just always existed in fact gotten larger
that's not connected any water locations
that's just within their area and somehow
seems to prosper
I'm sure you could piece that together
continues but for all those differences
the decisive one between Hamas
and ISIS of course is that Hamas
represents a nation under foreign
rule says the Israeli platform
which means Hamas is fighting
a war of self-defense against
Israel yep
it's objectively clear it's international
law it's been documented my entire life
but of course once the October 7th
happened our lives took over the entirety
of the Western media apparatus because
I mean ask yourself why that is
I mean I don't have to tell you if the entirety
of the web apparatus lied to you about
beheaded babies left or right
and I lied about every other lie
and does that mean they're all that bad at their jobs
or does it mean that there's some element
you can decide what that element is that influences
the entirety of our media apparatus
it's just one plus one equals two it's not hard
to recognize that because they tell you that
that means racism somehow even though
I didn't even mention what we're talking about in fact
you know what I think it's Zionism and not Judaism
it scares people away from
acknowledging these things and then people grow
up in their media spheres and don't it's like
a bubble they draw around certain conversations
they just don't even know they're there anymore
honest people won't do that
but for all the differences
Hamas is fighting a war of self-defense
against Israel it's a legally occupied territory
which means they have the legal right to arm resistance
regardless of whether they were ever attacked
that in post occupation
that is international law Geneva
conventions and it goes on to say ISIS
is trying to take over a nation
or nations that are
beset by civil war now think about it
for a second what ones were they always trying to go after
well that's strange
it's every country Israel
wants what a weird overlap I guess
that's just coincidence trying to take over
these nations which we know
they are beset by civil war so ISIS
being the most murderous totalitarian
and feared of any of the factions is fighting a war of aggression
his point is very
different than Hamas compare ISIS
compare he says ISIS is a threat to take
over all of Iraq maybe later Syria
Hamas isn't a threat to take over
a blade of grass in Israel
you see
they turned this into it because and they're not fighting
ISIS in the groups their point they're fighting the groups
they want you to think are the bad guys
it's a construct and they'll tell you
at this time it wasn't even the reality it never was
the case they never wanted to doesn't matter
and there's one more answer he writes to Netanyahu's
attempt to justify the war by equating
Hamas with ISIS it is
the Palestinian Authority or rather
is the Palestinian Authority ISIS too
well according to their arguments they're all
terrorists right he says is
Maumoud Abbas also ISIS now as as
Robert's artfully crap
showing you they're just they are
a controlled entity that Israel
uses to to kind of
you know shuck off its responsibilities but they work for
Israel very clear
and that's the whole idea they shifted
into a new proxy group that's
the whole point when they arguably lost some
kind of the influence or whatever you want to call it
the PA became the thing that's the same
dynamic
that's what he's saying are the ISIS too
if Netanyahu can't deal with Hamas
why couldn't he deal with the PA
because they're saying well we can't do it because they're bad guys
what about the PA right it's all
they're lost in their own lies
if Hamas is the problem why does Israel
maintain a military dictatorship over
the West Bank
see how easy it is to break this down
where the PA has worked with the IDF
and Shin Bet for the last decade
to shut Hamas down
well they do it because
it's about controlling territory as I think everybody
is seeing today for Netanyahu
ISIS is a red herring he writes
and so is Hamas Netanyahu
is fighting in Gaza to defend the occupation
and we would
fight to defend it against any Palestinian
challenger or he would
this is 2014 it's true
then it's true now it's always been the case
there was just a constant never ending
propaganda campaign from
Israel from this point from
their entire career life their existence
2014 later it just
got more and more and more and more and more and more
and more people got replaced more politicians got
put there here we are where we know
these things and you can prove them but
people don't even understand
now for the
point about Hamas in case you don't forget
or case you forgot in case I haven't mentioned it recently
the idea is quite obvious
like I said I've explained it I think it's not
about saying the outright control them or
outright created them from nothing
but there was without question
influence and you can debate to what
degree
Mossad chief visited Doha urged Cutter to
continue Hamas financial aid
it's very clear that's a rats that's 2020
here's the clip I often play
this is the former prime minister simply telling
you that yes we gave them money in order to keep
Palestinians divided I just don't know how
you can ignore some of this stuff consider
they're lying sure but acknowledge it
so are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu
deliberately boosted Hamas
to try to prevent a Palestinian state
we are sure he deliberately
systematically even
even told on record
whoever wants to avoid
the threat
of a two-state solution
has to support my policy
of paying protection money
to the Hamas so what
we did with the
this guy's the former head of Shin Bet
permission of our prime minister
is to
let Cutter
to transfer
a huge amount of money in cash
probably more than
1.4
billion dollar by doing it
we increase the power of Hamas
we did everything
in order to make sure that Hamas
will go on controlling Gaza
so I think that's pretty clear and
oh you can also by the way point to
the tweet put out by Haaretz
on October 9
two days after October 7
quoting Netanyahu saying anyone
who wants to thwart the establishment
of a Palestinian state
you know the very thing that they pretended they wanted the entire time
has to support
bolstering Hamas
the group they tell you is terrorist organization
which means support them
and transferring money to Hamas
quote this is part of our strategy
isn't it I mean this is my point is always
you can have this quoted directly from the Likud meeting
by Haaretz
and yet we get called crazy for even
pointing to that
it's because the hype was there from the very beginning
like the rape conversation like you could barely get a word
in edgewise it was pearl clutching
and screaming because that's what wins the
day when it's emotional
well here's Haaretz Hamas and the Urgun
how dare I compare
the two because we were just talking
about that right like the idea that these groups
are worse objectively from when
anything you see Hamas doing despite the lies about it
for all those suffering from
voluntary amnesia here is just a few
of the Urgun highlights
now I'm not going to read all of them but I'll give you some
and you can read the article for yourself
it says we will find whoever prepared this explosive device
we'll get to whoever is behind them
and we will settle accounts with these terrorists
says the Israeli Government
Benjamin Netanyahu speaking about something
and this was April 28 16
at a conference of the 85th
anniversary of the establishment of years
to the founding of the Urgun
so what was became Zionism
the pre-state underground
militia led by
Menachem Begin
unfortunately Netanyahu neglected to specify
you know which terrorists he meant
that's the Israeli platform making a joke
about whether he was talking about Urgun or Hamas
and it says the ones
whose 85th birthday he was celebrating
or the ones who blew up a bus earlier that day
of course assuming that was actually who did it
and not some Assad operation
or somebody they funded through Hamas
but how could I dare to compare them
that's because people are outraged
some Israelis, Zionists rather
were going how dare you
but it says by way of jogging the memory
of Arns and everyone else
suffering from voluntary amnesia
below is a tiny sample
a drop in the enormous
bucket of praiseworthy deeds
praiseworthy should be in quotes
carried out by the heroes of the Urgun
and Lehi the militia once
led by Yitzhak Shamir and known
as the Stern gang
all are from approved
revisionist sources which if you don't know what
that means Israel literally has
an entity that like make sure
certain information never gets out through the media
like a constant actual sensor
the literal ministry of truth
and so my point is even this is allowed
because I think they're proud of this stuff
you take it for what you will
now there's videos where you can watch them brag
about this people just tend to pretend like
either the translations or falls
or you're you know whatever like they just ignore
it because it's you but you can watch them
these old guys like joking about
raping women in fact this one
will include
only because
it is the
one that was really well it
went made the rounds and this was this
clip of this guy who was from
I believe it was Lehi
party saying
and remember this right in the beginning of October 7th
October 13th
Israel drove this guy around speaking to IDF
literally telling them
their families, their mothers, their children
this is October 23rd
and publicly put out
that's who we're talking about
this is an old monster who's still alive
who is raping and killing and they're bragging
about it and then went around to the IDF
and said do it this time
rape and murder and kill the children
that's what he literally says you can watch it all for yourself
so as Dan writes
Ezra Yachen was
a member of the Lehi that's this guy the
Zionist terrorist group that twice attempted to
ally with Nazi Germany
provably documented by Wikipedia
by literally by Heretz by the way I'll show you in a second
on January 11th
I mean he just reads the reality of it
that they twice tried to align themselves
with Nazi Germany
if that doesn't make sense to you then maybe you should
look into the reality of the history and stop listening to people like Benjamin Netanyahu
Dan Cohen is a Jewish person
himself in case that matters more to you
here is the
Heretz article
Zionist malicious efforts to recruit Nazis
in fight against the British are revealed
this is an article from 2023
and it's discussing that exact point
that the Lehi party tried to recruit
rather align itself with both the Nazi party
and Stalin by the way
because they wanted their own fascist government
that's literally the terms that they used
all of this is on the record even from Israeli platform
but we're all crazy apparently
so the point
is that this
is the guy or the party we're discussing
and all this is on the record
so these are some of the things that those people
and some of the videos you'll see where they're kind of casually discussing it
are talking about
November 14th 1937
Ergun gunman in Jerusalem
carried out a shooting attack
killing two Arab pedestrians in Rahiba
later snipers
fires at an Arab bus
killing the pre-passengers and wounding aid
bravo Ergun
now these are actual entries
that are now allowed to be discussed
like entries documenting what the Ergun and Lehi were doing
and saying
as they wrote these are the
praise worthy deeds that they're highlighting
for the first time but not the last
the Ergun throws a bomb
into an Arab cafe with middling results
one person killed six wounded
1938
1938 July
a series of terror attacks on pedestrians
in Jaffa Tel Aviv in Jerusalem
my point is this is in Jerusalem
so these are by their people
guys and this is the reality is what I'm constantly pointing out
these are false flag dynamics like you can see
with the British the same things they did
they bombed the British, they blamed it on other people
bombs and shootings, the buses
the results improve they write
11 Arabs die, 22 are wounded
civilians we're talking about
the Ergun in 1938
Ergun plants an explosive device in Hafea
open air market out of political motivations
the device comprised a few metal milk cans
stuff with explosives and nails
same thing to do today
cans for children
July 1938 a similar device in the Arab
Shuk is in Jerusalem
Ted dead 31 injured
same thing this keeps going explosive devices killed
killed Arabs cheering it on
this is an Israeli platform
writing about why
Ergun
is comparable
and I argue much much much worse
than what they're pointing to as a mosque
goes on a long time
now
to bring this forward to today
in case you thought this was some kind of an old thing
here's herettes, here's the article
when you leave Israel
and enter Gaza you are God
that's a quote
inside the minds of IDF soldiers
who commit war crimes
just casual that's
2024 that's in the midst of the ongoing genocide
and he says from herettes in Israel
this is the chief commercial
officer for whatever this is
UN diplomat
a description of an IDF commander
murdering a four-year-old
for fun
it's the truth I've gone over this already
casually just
written about it because they're bad
they're all terrorists
that is the mindset of the leading
lukud party that is driving this
into their people's minds
okay
2016
ISIS in Israel on the Golan Heights
now remember this is the place that Trump gave them
illegally which has a vast
huge portion of water that Syria needed
and also the elevated area
from which now they bomb down onto Syria
and control strategically
the Yarmouk Valley is run by ISIS
and left alone by Israel
2016
firstly it says
why has ISIS not attacked Israel
it's a good question
a country they have sworn to destroy
or so we're told
I mean that alone should be a question that shakes you
okay so we're being told that it's all about
killing the Jews and then what you do is attack
Muslims and Christians
maybe there's something to that
and maybe we can stand back and recognize
I don't know that they've apologized for bombing them
well I'm jumping ahead just a touch
we'll get to that
but the reality of that one question
why have they not attacked the people that we're talking about
why have they not attacked inside
I don't know the United States
in no way am I even remotely saying that I want that to happen
don't pretend that's what I meant
the truth is though if you want to talk about 9-11
then you are lost in this conversation because the evidence
does not support what you're probably thinking
or that somehow connects to Iran is probably where you're going to go
firstly it says
why have they not attacked Israel
a country they've sworn to destroy
similarly oh and the point is
from this base which is literally on the border
of Israel that's the golden heights
before it was given to them by Trump
and before
Assad
and his government is the one that removed them
so at this point in time in 2017
you've got an ISIS group that's literally
on the border
of Israel
now I'm actually of the mind this is a group that they were working with
and that's why that exists but either way
similarly why has the IDF
not attacked this small and weak group
of extremists on their border
again I think they were cultivating at this time
the answers to such questions show the truth behind
the rhetoric all actors use in this conflict
now the Yarmouk
martyrs brigade the YMB is what we're talking about
so remember the reference to the acronym
the group started off relatively
moderate they say
with a close alliance to the Free Syrian Army
okay well then let's make sure we realize
totally not moderate then the game is about
the moderate this is these are the same people
we're talking about the same groups will come back to
the McCain met in Syria
that these are the groups that
literally were shown to be al-Qaeda
and I'll make that clear to you in a second
but so just for the point the article is written
then they argued they were not they were not
and it's a fact of the Free Syrian Army
we know what these groups are at this point right
these are the al-Qaeda elements
they used to throw against Assad
they wanted to believe where the rebels
fighting back we already went over this very clearly
now it says
and the point was the group started off
with alliances to them
the YMB in 2015
began implementing Islamist reforms
okay interesting so remember
the timing here and where they are and
what I believe was the influence from Israel
and again that they're right on their border
knowing that they're there
coveting the Golan Heights in general
and yet they're going to allow them to grow
into the very thing you're fighting
it says change the name of its department even
translating to the regional
name for ISIS
look at that the group
even changed their logo to incorporate the ISIS flag
by the end of 2015
the YMB became a subgroup
of ISIS only a stones
throw away from Israel literally at the border
the YMB alliance
means that ISIS now shares a border
with Israel at this time
yet they have not acted on this
in one of al-Baghdadi's speeches
before he was allegedly killed for the 17th time
I think it was eight I guess
but who knows I've even still killed right now
he discussed Israel I mean
in case you don't know that by the way the same thing I
even like I even said with like considering that
possibility with Khomeini
how many times and it's different point by the way
because I think with Baghdadi or
Osama Laden how many times they said that
these are assets guys that's the point
and Baghdadi was being used as we're getting into today
they said they killed him like five or six
different times and the last one that just
that's what Charlie got him and then
he hasn't popped up again
but there were times where there was years where he out
and then he popped up again and maybe that was the lie
the point is to think
about that in that context of how they use
these ideas these boogeymen
and James Corb makes an excellent point about that
in regard to his al-Qaeda
documentary about Salman Laden
but it says in one of Baghdadi's speeches he discusses
Israel and it says he went
he went that on to say that with the help
of Allah we ISIS are getting
closer to you Israel every day
right but it's
puzzling is it not since they were literally
on the border
armed groups of fighters right next door to Israel
to get any closer would mean they would be
literally inside of Israel
so why is ISIS not followed through on those
come on guys I think we can all piece together
why now in the article
they at least give you one of the possibilities
that maybe they just weren't able to actually
win maybe they were recognizing
they couldn't win I don't believe for a second
that's what we're talking about especially since what they tell you
is these are irrational lunatics who want to kill themselves
to kill anybody and kill a Jew right
so but let's make that though but they need to
get stronger to kill themselves for that
come on the reality
here I think is quite obvious
you have a group that they claim they're fighting that's
ISIS the guys that literally publicly
change their name in their flag and are
on the border of Israel
and then Baghdadi
says we're getting you next
right we're getting there closer
to you I just it's it's
insane guys this is a group that I
can prove and you can prove if you watch
this show or do your diligence
that are have an origin point of what
they did in the area we're going to get even more into it next couple articles
and so it's
incredible to me that we can see that
and yet they and
have them being built and cultivated
on their border and then stand up and go we're
going to get to you and then not recognize how
clear that is but at this time there
was less evidence I guess but even that needs
to that's why this article was written why does that
make sense
in 2013
the YMB kidnapped some
20 Filipino United Nations peacekeepers I remember
that they held them
for two weeks before releasing them
however the YMB
kidnapped these peacekeepers from inside
Israeli occupied
territories huh
okay while YMB
was only loosely affiliated with
ISIS in 2013 there have been no
repercussions for an Islamic militant group
infiltrating in Israeli buffer
zone and kidnapping
UN peacekeepers which I
think we all know what they think about UN
peacekeepers in general or UN at all
and so what you have to understand
is that you have a group that I'm pretty clearly
can show you are influenced funded connected
to these groups who they want to pretend that
they're fighting who has never invaded it was right
there and yet they then are allowed to go
into Israeli controlled territory and take
UN peacekeepers and take them and then
nothing
can you even imagine what they'd be saying if it came in
and took somebody from you know a Jewish person from
Israel or anything they could use to create
the sentiment this is obvious to me
especially since they know what the UN
peacekeepers will ultimately do
is expose what they're doing
because that's the ultimate point here we're talking about
locations even with serious territory
where Israel has been breaking the law
and that's why these peacekeepers are usually sent
in so they just like they did today
and continue to do got them out of the way
that's what I believe
my opinion
and it goes on to say
Israel has shown in the past its willingness
to attack groups on its borders
that it perceives as a threat
but for some weird reason they didn't do it
with a group that invaded its territory and stole
what is supposed to be protected UN entities
in Israel territory
doesn't that make Israel look weak
yes it would but see it doesn't matter
because they don't even want you to know what happened I don't think
not in the way that it is actually being seen
or should be rather
Israel has during the Syria war
authorized airstrikes in Syria multiple times
we saw that we've covered them
Israel bombed in a Syria countless times
these airstrikes however have aimed
have aimed not
at ISIS
nor al-Nusra
or other Sunni jihadist groups
you know the entirety of the whole al-Qaida ISIS conversation
these strikes however were overwhelmingly
targeted at Shia
affiliated groups
by the way many of what they claim are connected to Hezbollah
but really just talking about like
groups like the PMU
which today, you know
if we get to the point about Joe Kent
the idea of this conversation being that they were
like the idea was always told you
about what these groups were
it's to say that these are
Iranian proxies and then claim that they're controlled
like that
so what you're talking about is that like the Iraq government
is controlled by Iran but yet
is the US occupying Iraq
it's you're missing a few
very important connected parts and all that
it is that we can prove that they have
very clearly been funding the groups they use
to create the chaos in these areas
but you can show that like the PMU for example
is just an extension of the Iraq
military that is
funded by Iraq that I told
you this so many times over the years that at that time was being
funded by the US and there we go the PMU
is Iran I'm like well you guys are literally
funding them right now anyway that's all to say
that there's this weird narrative being floated about
all this that I think is meant to sort of water
down the point
Israel has
bombed Syria many times
but only going after
Shiites instead of
the very group they tell you they're all fighting
Israel in September 2014 also
shot down a Syrian Air Force fighter jet
for stringing into go on airspace
you're willing to shoot down a jet of Syrians that
potentially sparking some kind of conflict
but you're not willing to bomb the ISIS group
that you're cultivating on your border
and it says Israel has shown during
its Syrian war
that it is willing to attack those who threaten its
territorial integrity but apparently
not when it's ISIS
the article writes the YMB
has entered Israeli held territory
yet there's been no reported conflict
between the two groups funny how that works
in fact there have been reports from
foreign policy magazine
and you've seen these claiming
that far from fighting the militias
that are ISIS as we just verified
in the Golan Heights
Israel has in fact been providing health care
now you see these are the things that you get
like the mainstream sometime this thing
pop into the conversation right like this one
that a lot of people talked about
exclusive Israel is
tending to wounded Syrian rebels
ah but we know now that's not what they were
but you see these things fail to connect
for the Normie mainstream broadcaster
that says or they don't care or want to know
well let's go again let's go back to this
really important right so what we
very clearly identified here
according to even US
ah documentation
is that the YMB
and really just publicly
changed itself it's
its name it's flag to ISIS
that's on the record right so that's the group
we're talking about that's the group in the
Golan Heights that
Israel went and gave treatment to
at the time they called it the rebels
moderate rebels they were not
they were quite literally ISIS
such I mean these are the
these momentary point that's enough right there
period for you to understand that they were
not truly fighting them but what I'm
painting is much bigger that they're actually
working with arming and you know our
ultimate the proxies but at the end of the day
that should be enough here's Jerusalem post
Netanyahu visits the IDF
field's hospital for Syrians
they tried to frame it at the time
as like helping the innocent people
it all came out as it says
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
excuse me Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday
visited a Golan Heights field hospital that treats
Syria's wounded
and the timing? 2014
like it's easy to connect these dots right now
because all of it's out there
so back to the article this is 2017 pointing
back so we know
that happened and it says quote we don't
do any vetting or
check where they are from
or which group they are fighting for
or whether they are civilians
says Colonel Peter Lerner
of the Israeli military
why would that be so you're fighting
terrorism but you don't care to check whether the ones
you're treating are the very terrorists you're trying to fight
that's just stupid guys
that means that they are I mean
you could argue that they just didn't check but what would
that mean if they didn't check that means they don't
want to know I argue they didn't care to
check because they knew who they were
it says there seems to be a very different
treatment for rebel groups on the south
of Golan Heights border then for those on the north
contradictions
but why would Israel
which authorized multiple bombings on Syrian
militant groups on the Assad side
take such a relaxed
view towards ISIS on the doorstep
you know the answer
Israel is focused not on ISIS and
Sunni groups but
on the Shia groups in Syria
again the funding of Hamas
I mean you can find common ground
you should question all of this
even
question the source material but realize that the body
of evidence is very clear
and if you look to the other side of the argument
you really have a bunch of statements and narratives
based on
your clout what group you come from
what news group you work for
that you're a former president or an expert on Iran
but I'm showing you source material
and evidence and reporting and
all of this you can verify for yourself
where was I here so it says
Israel is focused not on ISIS and Sunni groups
but on Shia groups in Syria
right there is enough to show you that
Israel's airstrikes have hit Assad's Shia
back regime and Hezbollah
not ISIS or al-Nusra
correspondence between
then secretary of state Hillary Clinton
and political advisor Jacob Sullivan
about Israel's
aims in the region tried to rationalize
why Israel ignores
ISIS it says
in 2012
at the start of the conflict Sullivan said
that there was quote a positive side
to the civil war in Syria
this so-called positive side
to a war that has cost some
400,000 lives and this was only
at 2017 was that
quote if the Assad regime topples
Iran would lose its only ally
in the Middle East and would be isolated
great so we're willing to destroy an entire country
kill a lot of people just so we can maybe
weaken the group that ended up not actually being weakened
that's the kind
of people we're talking about
that consciously
make the decision to do things like this
like with Iran right now not for any
hopeful
altruistic agenda but because they want to
get what they want and they will kill
as Madeline Albright told you
500,000 children and they definitely
think it's worth it that was on the record
for crying out loud
this would please Israel it says
which under the Netanyahu government
has fixated on the perceived
threat of Iran
a war which destabilizes Iran's ally Assad
would benefit Israel's interests
this Machiavellian belief
could explain why ISIS is not focused on
the Iranian-backed Shia militias
are the biggest concern for Israel not extremist
groups such as ISIS yeah you could argue
that they'll get to them next or you could
just realize how obvious it is that they were
never fighting in the first place
despite all of this the YMB
or the Yarmouk Valley
at this time was still
run by ISIS left alone by
Israel until
the Assad government took them out
that you could look it up for yourself
now the point is that then what happened was
Trump gave them the Golan Heights which they then
occupied anyway which kind of shows you
what this was all about in the first place
my opinion
now here's the document they referenced you can read it for yourself
coming from
Jacob Sullivan to Hillary Clinton
and it just breaks down everything we were just discussing
now even more than that though
which I believe oh we'll get to in a second
it's time well
I'll show you the other email from WikiLeaks
that shows you what they said but again here's
these you can check them out Israel's tending to the terrorists
that we now prove have
everyone has proven that these were not
smarter rebels
here is a
disinfo site I thought it was interesting what they said
but it says ISIS never
attacked Israel nor the other way around
now they're denying that but they just argue
this is them like debunking that it was because
of ISIS
whatever you want to frame it as like they weren't fighting
them so it says why does ISIS
never attack the state of Israel
or the other way around this is weird it says
since the Islamic State emerged in
2006 and started a global crusade with terror attacks
all over the world it seems that it did not
employ too much effort in harassing Israel
astute observation
it is striking that the state entity
most hated in the Muslim world
has been practically ignored
or avoided by those
who proclaim themselves as the most
radical violent Islamists in the world it is weird isn't it
the ones they tell you were only
I want to kill all the Jews but then they
actively avoid and never actually attack
the state of the Jew it's funny right
of course that's what Zionism tells you it is
but this is a different point but it says does this mean
that the state of Israel created encouraged
cooperated somehow with the creation of ISIS
certainly should make you ask that question
since the evidence shows that but it says
it would be reckless to give an unequivocal answer
to this question that's fair but here's the response
response conspiracy theory
it's very
sound you know and listen to what they say about
this it's so funny if you can spear you you could
even read and agree with everything they write
you right here and then be
a smart person to realize that
you could still argue this and that would still
be the case it's just it's because
you're supposed to say conspiracy theory
which doesn't even mean anything it's that's not
a response but here's what they write only
since October 2023
Israel has
thwarted several Islamic
state related terrorist plots it's actually
a gross misrepresentation but it says at least
nine according to jihadist
terrorism expert Aaron Y. Zelen
which I'm sure you can deduce where that
expertise comes from and it says the Islamic
state organization attacked Israel
from Sinai in several in several
occasions notably
2015 2017 now
you could go into this yourself and find out
that most of these were things that you can't
really tie back other than you know like
what I often talk about like rockets falling where
they claim some there is a coordinated
effort to frame things and
in fact many times just outright fake
that things happen a certain way I'm not saying
that these here but recognize they're so
often lying about the way things went
down what I'm going to show you here is the fact
that in 2017 one of the examples
that you can actually prove even though they say
nine that's not even close to reality
is that it happened or at least you saw
some kind of exchange
and even as newsweek reports
ISIS fighters
regret attacking Israel
and have apologized
that's according to the Israeli
former defense minister
in 2017
so here they are going
fake news because they did it and defended
even though ISIS came out was like
whoopsie our mistake we didn't mean to
bomb Israel like the fact that that ever
even actually happened or that he said it
whether it did or not
that's enough right there
how would that even make sense that's over
the top and it says in March
2024 the Islamic State spokesperson called
its supporters to carry out attacks against
Israel which didn't happen
sure they love to go we're getting Israel
like you heard a second ago we're getting to you next
and didn't do it
among other objectives this is Israel's also
attacking is attacked Islamic State bases
and militants in 2015 and 2018 carrying
out dozens of covert air strikes oh oh
you mean you mean fighting the Assad
government yeah not the same thing guys
this is very clear so again
you can agree with every single part of this and then still
acknowledge the evidence that shows you that they are
in fact working alongside these groups or
literally giving a medical treatment
however you want to look at it
but even they will acknowledge how weird it
is that it's never been you know
the law the what we've seen elsewhere
and the minimal cases
you can find they'll apologize for
or they'll lie about what actually happened
this one's interesting
Jerusalem Post
and this is what we're saying they were
saying at the time 2017
report ISIS
Israel temporary allies
against Iran
that's a real post
a real headline from the Jerusalem
post which they've changed now
right for obvious reasons
ISIS Israel temporary allies
against Iran I mean guys it's very clear
you know exactly what this means
because they're not fighting ISIS
they're fighting Iran so
ISIS in Israel become allies because they're fighting
Iran but why would that even really make
sense if they've always told you they're fighting
ISIS and that ISIS is Iran
because it's schizophrenic it's
ridiculous but that's everything Trump's
doing today I'm sure you can understand
why I said it that way
a new report suggests that in
the narrow area of confronting Iran's
presence in Syria ISIS
and Israel's interest may temporary
converge which is in a way makes them allies
work yourself into a pretzel to somehow
make that make sense but in the
era of ISIS as a state
it says but in the era after
ISIS as a state has fallen
so what you're talking about is Syria
because they argue
it's like they're saying today Iran's been defeated
but we're still ongoing that wasn't the case
the time but it says when Israel's new
main concern in Iran's presence is
Syria is Iran's
presence in Syria and its attempts to
smuggle game changing weapons through
Syria as well good God
both ISIS and Israel may be
targeting the same Iranians
it's just a it's a
it's a ridiculous way to simply make the argument that
we're working together which no matter why
it happens shows you that they're not actually
fighting them and second that they're not actually
fighting Iran if ISIS is Iran
as they tell you it's just
laugh worthy stupid
also recognize that the game changing weapon
you're talking about allies selling weapons
which is just like another Tuesday for
every other government unless you're Iran
then that was 2014
right but we have
clear evidence that they were working with these
groups moderate rebels
well case you forgot here's the archive
of Hillary Clinton's emails that WikiLeaks
showed and let's not forget they've never
been shown to be have WikiLeaks
has a pristine track record
of showing you information that has been shown
to be correct February
2012 2012
al-Qaeda
is on our side in Syria
2012 so that means
two years before they're talking
about what we just showed you they already were told
through Israel that al-Qaeda was on their side
and then that's why they're
later trying to make the arguments well we're
lying for and judge let's not forget how many
times over the years even US politicians have
casually floated the idea that you know
maybe we'll make a deal with ISIS maybe
al-Qaeda will work with us there's a reason
for that it was always
this was a group they were now you could argue
this is the US fighting out that Israel
was working with this group and they're
going okay good they're working with us or
this is just him informing Clinton or whatever
else it is that this has always been the reality
oh and by the way here's John McCain
visiting those same rebels in 2013
one year later after
where you just told al-Qaeda is on our
side in Syria and what have we already
made clear that that group is the moderate
rebels that's who it is that's what we're
talking about well guess what that's these
guys right here
John McCain goes and meets with the very people
that we know and it all spins I mean this is
not hard to understand you could also make
the same point of McCain and Lindsey Graham
going to meet the Oz off movement in Ukraine
before they did all this this is how dumb
they think we are that we can't piece this
together or frankly they just don't care
that we see it
here is Craig Murray
breaking down for you this reality
that's one of many journalists you should listen to
that's been telling you this entire
I mean if you haven't
if you haven't looked into his work you need to
especially right now with what he's been covering
about Lebanon or at least as he was covering
because he's been calling that out well before
became the focal point now telling you they were
violating ceasefire telling you they were
killing civilians telling you they were occupying territory
but no one's listening now it's just part of
the ongoing war which makes no sense
other than it's what Israel wants
there is no doubt
that the so-called rebel forces
attacking the government in Syria
are creatures of the United States
and of Israel
there's been congressional
testimony
in the United States
openly
that the United States
had spent
more than half a billion dollars
on the
Syrian rebel forces
and that was some years ago
it's gone up since then
Israel has provided
medical and other support facilities to them
perfectly openly
the United States
yesterday
was attacking from the air
forces coming from Iraq
to try to help
by the way this is not extremely
this is not old but it's not like from the last couple of weeks
so I forget the exact date but just recognize that
it's before what we're dealing with right now
the government of Syria
while Israel
was attacking the links between
Syria and Lebanon again with
bombing from the air
and the forces facing the rebels
the Syrian Arab army
the national army of Syria
has been bombed relentlessly
by Israel for more than a year
so there's no doubt whatsoever
that the rebels are backed by
the CIA
and backed by
Israel
the same group
so if you need one more of that a point
one more personally, Craig Murray and his excellent research
telling you the same point
the ones meeting with John McCain
the ones that Israel is giving treatment to
every point we're making
these are the terrorist organizations
that is the Jewari, al-Qaeda, al-Nusra
this is the same conversation
you know what I mean
if you need to stop and go back and re-watch all that
do it because it's important to make sure
that this all connects in your mind
that what we're talking about are the same groups
right to this very point
and now they're just trying to spin this into about it
because it's always been about Iran
and Israel's religious war
and that's what's happening here
it's an attempt
by the Americans and the Israelis
aided by the Turks
to overthrow
the regime in Damascus
in order
to block assistance
flowing through Syria
to Lebanon
which ultimately is about
the Iranian conversation as well
especially one because they'll tell you that it is Iran
it's not but also because it's the
focus of what Israel is trying to accomplish
whether it's greater Israel
or just trying to eliminate the people that they see as adversarial
to I guess them controlling their lives
but what's also recognized how ridiculous it is
that we can be at a point today
where you have provable examples
I mean to the point where Netanyahu publicly
says it out loud
Haaretz covers what's wrong with that
how Israel started
Israel trained and armed an ISIS
linked Ghazan militia
I mean again if you haven't heard about this
this is objectively clear
this has been openly discussed in the Knesset
where it got brought up
you're working with ISIS linked elements and he goes what's wrong with that
if that sounds crazy to you
you should recognize what we're talking about today
because in their inner circle
in Hebrew where much doesn't translate over to the
blind people who don't want to see what's going on
in the western press
is that they'll say these things very publicly
they'll discuss the fact that international law does not bind us
in the world
I cover this stuff often
people dismiss it as crazy
I don't know why it's open there
I can show you a video of Netanyahu telling you these things
they'll still go
um
Israel and Bible, whatever it is
openly
how Israel trained these militias
this is the Ghazan humanitarian foundation
these are ISIS elements
and he's open about that
so again if you want to pretend
it's because of some current reality
it doesn't change the fact they're working with the very things
they tell you they're fighting
while going after Iran who is not
working with these groups
here's an example of
this was from 2024
I bring this up all the time because I think it's such an important thing to think about
this was
January 7, 2024
one of the previous examples of their hostility
growing towards Iran
and ISIS claimed responsibility
for the deadliest attack in Iran
since 1979
that alone should make you go wait what
that doesn't make sense what we're hearing didn't you just tell us
Iran is ISIS are you telling us right now
that they are backed by whatever
okay how many times exactly do we
need to see
ISIS the very group they're pointing to
attack the enemies of Israel whether Iran
or otherwise when they're at the peak
of hostile rhetoric with Israel
before we understand what we're
actually seeing and then go right
back to them calling it Iran or Amas
is ISIS after it's just it's insane
it's clear what this is
if ISIS can be driven to attack
Iran in the midst of Israel
heated conversations that ISIS is working for
Israel or at least influenced
by what they're doing
kind of simple to see we also talked
about Syria as we made the image
today this is October December
2024 after
Jolani and Israel took over
Syria just you know despite the US
using US servicemen
to throw it to
carry out everything they did in that country
all the horrible things they carried out all the
missing children all the faked attacks
and the American people that died
and then Israel got to take it over
do I need to make any more examples
of what the US government's doing
for another country America first
on top of that
as they further occupied Syria
you could prove they were western backed
ISIS patch wearing
people wandering around as I say
every time grab the image do a verse
image shirts this is literally from Syria
post they're over taking it with a proud
ISIS patch with number one
driving down the street you also have examples
of another ISIS patch wearing guy who was
literally executing all the whites on the ground
Christians all the whites
killing everybody they didn't like
that is the kind of people they support because
they are easy to manipulate
and here's actually case you didn't see
the image from today
the reason I use this and made the joke about it was
I think because
this is oh here I'll grab this too case you
since we're talking about Jolani case you
haven't seen this and I'm sure most of you have
I might even have it in there somewhere this was
the post that was on the state
I mean I have the actual state department link
where this is on there so this is verifiable
the US government put this out about
Jolani the guy who's currently
the leader actually I do have this up there I forgot
I'll play the clip where Trump says he put him there
they realize that this says $10 million
bounty as I said in the very beginning
this was up on their
site after
for at least so many days he was put in president's
position how do you even make sense of
that they just don't care guys
they literally don't care
so that's the whole point what we're discussing here is
that that's who they're working with and always have been
so as DD geopolitics
points out the US wants to activate
Algilani and his ISIS gang to
fight Hezbollah in Lebanon we actually told
you this already it's been being reported floated
the very least the US has urged
Syria to consider
which they'll do what they're told I imagine to deploy
forces in Lebanon
illegally in Lebanon why would the US
government be asking a
new Syrian terrorist organization
they put as the government to illegally
go into Lebanon
that's not even part of the Iran because this
they don't care there's no boundaries
law I mean imagine if you had
an entity they were fighting in Mexico
they just turned around was like well we're going to take
Florida we're going to take Texas we're going to turn around
take some South American country because we're
just going to defend ourselves do you think any
these people would be acting like that just made sense because
you know they said bad guy
how do we not make fun of how dumb this is
it's all just because they go those are bad guys
what they're doing is illegal anyway
even if they're terrorists
it's funny how we just go past these things
and pretend like it's okay because we're the ones
its supremacy is what it really
comes down to
exclusive US
encourages Syrian action against Hezbollah
is that not exactly
like them they tell proxies invading our
country what do you think that is
what do you think the Kurds are in Iran it's what
they're doing it's what they've always done and they accuse everybody else
of doing which is certainly possible
but I use this image for the show today
because I wanted to make a point so here's the cane
but
they don't even try to hide what they're doing like it's
that lazy
Muhammad all Trump Lonnie this one is Muhammad
all Netanyahu Lonnie like just
it's a joke obviously but the point is it's like it's just
so brazen and obvious and they know
we see it they don't care it seems
of course right here well said I already showed you
here's what Trump had to say
maybe it's hubris because
it's clearly Israel that made this all happen
but he wants to own it even though he must
know or maybe even doesn't which is even more
alarming that this guy is exactly you know
why I know he knows because Loomer screamed about it
terrorism
Muslims we hate Muslims right and Jones will tell you at the end
of the show today get the Muslims kill them all basically
bomb them all the point is that he
still comes out and goes yeah I put him there
he's doing a great job
can say is that
the president of Syria who I
essentially put there
is doing a phenomenal job he's a rough guy
he's not a choir boy
a choir boy couldn't do it
but Syria is coming together
really coming together well
you could probably argue right there that they
convince Trump that well it's a dangerous place
and there's mean people there so what we need
for the moment is somebody who can actually deal
with that and then we'll transition back to somebody better
maybe maybe he's that easy to fool
you know what I mean like that's what I'm always talking about
like here you're so smart Mr. Trump
here's the only two options I know you have to pick because no one else
can and there's 95
other options and that's either one they want I mean that's how
this game is played against people that can be manipulated
especially somebody who's full of his own
you know he's so
high on his own opinion of what he's possible
the whole thing about Iran is what we were told
question it but I believe it
in this case here's Scott Horton
Jelani killed
US troops in Iraq war too he did
very I mean easy
to document we covered this last time we went over it
he pledged his allegiance to the
butchers of New York City and yes
his Syrian al Qaeda regime
is involved in systematic kidnapping
rape forced marriage
but I guess it's all okay when our guys do those things
but we can claim that's what's happening over there
and not prove it and we'll kill people for that
America first he says no
Israel instead
wake up
here's what John Bolton once he doesn't think it's happening
just to show you the insanity
of what we're actually guiding despite how he's not
in the administration this is the same mindset
it's the Israel
neocon globalist mindset
well the United States and Israel have
knocked out so many people at the top
working their way down the list as it were
is there not a danger that eventually
they'll have to be talks with somebody
but there won't be anybody with any authority
left in Tehran
and they may be more extreme than the people
at the top in other words
who in the end is Donald Trump going to talk to
well I think
the way the regime
will collapse is that the
disagreements among whoever
remains in the leadership will spread
and what he means by that
by the way is that's what they're aggressively
trying to create
like the reality
has been over the years they clearly are
in a unit against what they're trying to do
but what they're likely tried to do in Venezuela
last time and failed and I guess in some way
succeeded in
kidnapping Maduro
but what I think he's arguing my opinion
is that they're in there with their intelligence
their cloak and dagger manipulations
trying to create divisions
and in fact
they probably have other assets in there
they're using them to create little false fly whatever
so what he's really saying is we are
destabilizing the country
we're going to cause rifts amongst them
and then once we do that as he's going to tell you
we'll put people we want in there
hashtag democracy
they will just collapse because
so many of them will say this ship is going
down and we don't want to go down with it
I think one more thing
because that's how they are
that they are so
driven by their own opportunism and profiteering
that they recognize that okay well
principles be damned
constitution America for who cares
I'm going to make sure I get mine
that's how these people are
and in fact that's how they always have been
they don't care about any of the things they want you to think about
in my opinion they scream what they
you want to hear I hope
I mean right now the MAGA movement is coming to terms with that
but think about
what he's saying and what they're actually doing we're making
a mistake though and not working more with
the opposition providing them with resources
assistance weapons
weapons if they wanted
and to help them break
away chunks of the regime
in for example the regular army
and what do you think happens to the Iranian people
during all of this especially since
you guys are targeting their civilian locations
let's be clear
there's not some casuals like they
are hiding in the school or the bomb
hit there and fell off and it's just part of war
no they're bombing schools hospitals
just like every other war
Israel's ever been involved in and you can listen
to the experts across the board even the
everyone will tell you that because it's happened every
single time every single time
that the higher doctrine mowing the lawn
is their actual policy and that means
kill everything they'll tell
you that if you look into their own policy
the revolutionary guard but the conventional
military that might come
over to the opposition because they know
what bad shape the country is in
and it would be and that's probably them hoping
that by saying this on a show they might hear
it and convince them that's actually what's happening
it's pretty clear I think that's not the reality
the regular army that could
restore order and you know
coming out of this you wouldn't have
Jeffersonian Democrats running the country
you'd have a military government
which hopefully would have the sense
to allow the people of Iran
space to figure out what
let's just install a military junta and just cross
our fingers and just hope it works out
you literally hear what he just said
you understand this is such an
irrationally violence driven
he this is guy this is like
Lindsey Graham in Cuba he's been drooling
over Iran being toppled his entire career
probably driven by lobbying and whoever else is influencing
him but at the end of the day
it doesn't matter as long as we get that guy out
there now you may even think he truly believes
they're just that dangerous so it's worth
the it was worth it as Madeline
Kane said well just worth five hundred
thousand children because they were so bad
well look at what happened clearly
that's not the reality he was not as bad
as they claimed he wasn't a good guy but the
reality was they created this situation to
drive in what they wanted and in the
second they got what they wanted they
cut and run they leave it Libya
Iraq Syria who cares
and this is where we are again
military judge and what he mentioned there
is true their own assessment told them
if they took community out you're probably going to get someone
worse whether sure or not the point is
they didn't care and Trump lied
about all of it or even worse he was lied
to and he's too dumb to know he's being manipulated
it's pretty alarming
here in
Congress
now we're going to get into the next part of this
conversation and get into Joe Kent and some other things
but this connects to what we're just saying
we're going to get into the wrong side of this
which is obviously still very relevant to the larger point
of why we just discussed that
as patriotic blonde points out
the Colorado Senator Michael Brennet point asked
who you warned Trump that if Israel
assassinated supreme leader that somebody
worse would be in the position the way he responds is very
telling now we already covered this this is
very provably AC the CIA
represented
assessment
was very clear and by the way is not a new
one but that's I've seen that more than once
and so for him to answer this way like I said earlier
I'm not familiar with that document
you know what they're doing
it's an effort to not contradict what Trump is saying
I know
center I know director Radcliffe
that I am that you
warned president Trump that if
that if Israel assassinated
the supreme leader the
RRGC would replace him
with would potentially a
harder line puppet in fact
by the way few points I want to make but
that is real would
see me so here's what's interesting to me this is a little
slip or other inside you realize
this is well before the actions were taking
place because the assessment came out
before he took out community
or Israel did so you understand
what he just said there is that right the intelligence
community well aware
that Israel was probably going to bomber on was
telling Trump well if they do that they're going to
worse and then what did you hear from
Rubio well we knew it was going to bomb so we had to
bomb first because they were going to bother and then Trump
even came to that point at the end even though he lied about it
first we had to because you know
Israel as
always that proves it's not an imminent threat
so they're trapped by that logic and clearly
if there's any legal reality here
they'll go to jail for that probably not based
on how broken this all is but that they
knew that Israel would do that
all I'm showing here is the timeline that
this was weeks likely
before they got here and they were
already trying to show it if Israel's going
to do this because Israel has always
been driving this now
to play it from the beginning he calls it a
puppet
I'm not even sure how to take this whether he's just
framing it because he heard but realize
what he's saying right there
that there'll be a new puppet in Iran
what does that even mean who's the puppet
aren't we being told Iran is the puppeteer
that Iran is the one manipulating proxies
in other countries so if what he's saying
is there'll be a new person in the position that's a
puppet who exactly
is the puppeteer
I know center
I know direct Radcliffe
that you
warned President Trump
that if Israel
assassinated the supreme leader
the RRGC would replace
him with potentially
a harder lined puppet
harder lined puppet
now what the assessment said was a harder
lined leader like someone from the harder
more extreme part of their government
but a puppet
in fact
in fact I think what was clear
is that the likelihood was
that it would be a hard lined puppet
do you disagree with that characterization
of the intelligence
to that specific question
what we knew
was first of all
I guess I have to address up front
so much
of what you related in there
the difference between political rhetoric
versus not political rhetoric
I'm quoting the president of the United States
political rhetoric
it's a publicly
discussed assessment that your
department put forward
it's crazy to me
it's the same thing we're going to do in Gabbard in a second
where they're just unwitly doomed
you know why
because Trump is watching and he will punish
you for challenging what he said
you all know that
if it's crazy anybody even tries to pretend it's not what we're all watching
but a puppet
what does he mean
I'm almost not
I don't even see how that perfectly fits in
that's interesting to me
but you could argue they may believe
that they already have control
that maybe the person they have in place
or maybe they knew that when they killed them
or maybe they thought when they killed them
that one of the people they already controlled would be in place
but they might be extreme
sort of like the ones they work with in al-Qaeda
it's interesting to think about
I don't think that's what's happening
the only way I could think that makes
or he just said it because
that's what the terms they're mixing up
I don't even know but it's worth remembering
if this becomes relevant down the line
a harder line puppet
because that would suggest that the US, Israel
or some other force is puppeteering them
it's not Hamas, Houthis, Hezbollah
ISIS al-Qaeda because they're telling you
Iran is the one funding
and manipulating those groups
maybe it's meaningless, maybe you misspoke
something tells me that there's more to that
and of course Radcliffe just going
whatever, I don't know
that's political rhetoric
that we told you that that would happen
now
the point is that Kent, Joe Kent and others
whatever you think about Joe
is relevant to the point in fact
that he came out for whatever reason
and told you what we all know
that this was not eminent
now maybe he supports bombing Iran
what you're getting from the partisan media
is the usual flailing
instead of addressing the point
it's about attacking the person
here's what he did when he was 17
what a monster, maybe
what does it do with what he just said
it's always how this works
some of them are relevant to the larger picture
but you're getting a lot of attacks
about who he is and what he said before
and really the ones that
might be relevant are things he said about Iran before
but how does it in any way change
like you guys all tell me
what if he just changes mind
that's also possible
to me it's about the sentiment
and the fact that he resigned in order to say it
and that you know and that I can literally
prove that it's true
that's what matters to me
that rest of it might be relevant down the line
if he ends up being a larger point
and all this but he's resigned
so what I want to get into here is the claim
and then what we hear from Gabbard
and the idea that this was undeniably
an illegally started war
and that's like we already showed you
because Israel's been gunning for this
and Trump was their opportunity
and that's why Lebanon was brought into it
with no justification and just
because they're taking advantage of the situation
top counter-terrorism official
Kent resigns over Trump around war
we'll get into what Trump said about him
which is just kind of crazy
that before he was always a great guy super smart
and then because he challenges you
like I was just saying about what Gabbard and them know
he was a loser
he was the worst guy he was really bad on this stuff
which everyone points out then why did you
put him there
or Mr. Trump as we all know
is it just because he challenged you
and now you call him a loser because you're a child apparently
but it says Joe Kent
the director of national counter-terrorism center
announced his resignation on Tuesday
citing his concerns about the justification
for the military strikes in Iran you see
different than saying
not terrorism or saying we shouldn't bomb them
or shouldn't take them out or it's simply saying
because you can look into his opinions he seems to be pretty gung-ho
about going after terrorism
and that he's simply pointing out
that the way we did it was illegal
we can disagree
maybe people out there genuinely think
Iran's government should be taken out
but want it to be done through Congress
want to get a declaration and do it the right way
that's the way it should be done
so think about that
but it says
saying that he cannot in good conscience
back the Trump administration's war
he's somebody on their team
understand Iran posed no
imminent threat to our nation
simply true, verifiably so
and it is clear that we started this war
due to pressure from Israel this is what's bothering everybody
now here again
is where I think the true point is
the Charlie Kirk point if you will
what we're dealing with in this country is
even within the team's work partisanship
the growing awareness that ruins it all
that Israel is the one
driving the policy and so you get people like this
who are
you could argue for sake of conversation are just die hard
team sport Republicans
who want to take out every terrorist
they don't care about the law, you know whatever
deport everybody we don't like
but if they feel that Israel is the one doing it
to the detriment of Americans
that we can't allow that because that's not America first
very interesting to think about
now that's one way to look at it
there's a thousand ways you can frame this
but in my point I think is that he says
can't in good conscience support this
not that it doesn't support Trump's agendas
it says again no threat
Iran pose no threat to the nation
and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure
from Israel and it's powerful American
lobby
exactly what happened so everyone's
spinning out about this makes the point even more
clear here's what he posted with his
you know his document
statement after much reflection I've decided
to resign from my position as this
director of national counter-terrorism center
I cannot in good conscience support the
ongoing war in Iran Iran pose no imminent
threat to our nation and it's clear
same thing because of Israel
and then here's what Derek said and I
appreciate this he says good now
the one thing you got wrong is that Trump
was never a peace candidate which he says here
and this is my point from before about
what happened how he suddenly changed
well as Derek and I and the rest
of us in the IMA have been saying
well before 2024 that was
never the case they lied
it was a propaganda same
thing when he says he
dropped more bombs than Obama
in his first year in office true
he dropped the the largest
non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan and he didn't
even order it as we can prove he bombed
Syria's Syrian based on a
false flag easily that if I
able he helped Saudi Arabia star of
Yemen still to this very day by the way
not to mention Maduro bombing of boats
giving more money to Ukraine and
and to and to Israel
to kill Gazans but yes
good on you for this move we both agree
with that but it's worth pointing out that these
things are it's this weird wishy-washy
partisan game that's kind of why I framed it like that
he may believe all of that but still
has the integrity enough to acknowledge
that what they did with Iran was illegal
I'm surprised that's not for some people
it seems like that point just doesn't connect
I don't know why I mean I guess
I would argue because the year in that middle ground
that doesn't really have anything you truly care about
it's a team thing because at the point
you either care about the principle or you don't
and I think that's what that's probably most people
here's what Trump said
actually here's the I forgot to grab this one too
let me play this one
this is what Trump said in
2022
and I'll play the one he said recently
Trump on Joe Kent in 2022
but uh
I'd like to introduce Joe to say a few words
a very incredible guy
and with a tremendous future in my
opinion right now he's only
thinking about Congress
and maybe he'll be there for a number
of years and we don't know what's going to happen
but I think this man has a tremendous
future very special
person thank you very much come on over Joe
well thank you so much Mr. President
thank you so much Don Jr. and Kimberly
and thank all of you for being out here
this is absolutely amazing
funny how that works out right
how often you can have these people
who are the best ever who suddenly are the worst ever
the moment they just disagree mildly
with Trump again guys it takes
it's a special kind of juvenile person
that can't acknowledge how
obvious all this is
but you could also make the same
argument that he lied about him right there
because he was on his side it's the same point
whichever way you look at it you can't you know
it's not like he just suddenly changed everything
he was he just disagreed with
Trump and in fact he's pointing out the
one thing you're not supposed to point out
I think that's the whole point now here's
what he says today
it's a good
thing that he's out because he said that
Iran was not a threat
Iran would
no he said not an eminent threat Trump
as you damn well know there's a threat
every country realize what
a threat Iran was the question is whether or not
they wanted to do something about it
oh yeah so just so eminent
though is the difference not just the threat
the missiles or threats everyone's got missiles you're all threats
all we really just did right there is
double is in confirm
that there wasn't an eminent threat that's the only point
and on top of that though
Iran said very clearly and we'll get two more examples
in a second that they had no intentions of
bombing and in fact even warned them what they
would do if they attacked first all on
the record by the way they Trump just
doesn't think you're smart enough to look into any of this stuff
and many people many of the
greatest military scholars are saying
for you is that name one
Trump name one of these military scholars
that are agreeing with you they don't exist it's not
true it's just ridiculous how we can't
all be honest about that he just you know casually
lists off things that are all that support what
he wants you to think is happening
president should have taken out Iran because
they wanted a nuclear weapon
not true not by any sense of anybody's information
other than what Israel tells Trump literally
they were if we
didn't do the attack or if I go
a step further if I didn't terminate
the Iran nuclear deal
given to us one of the worst deals ever
made by Barack Hussein Obama remember
when they said Boeing 757
over there loaded with cash
yeah their cash the cash you see is from them
illegally yeah very simple easy to look up
hundreds of millions of
dollars you would have been very happy
this was a wonderful they said
hundreds of million people forget
that does anybody remember we all do
Trump and it wasn't it was you go lie about it
over and over now you can argue that they shouldn't
be allowed to have their money because they're terrorists but
that's also kind of silly it's their money
you stole and returned or whatever
reason that that's the reality and on top
of the fact that they've never done what you're saying
now once
right you remember
hundreds of millions of dollars
in a right Rob
you were there you remember out there buddy
is there even somebody sitting right there probably not
that's how time this is
Boeing 757 I think that
two of them loaded they took the seats
out and they put cash
what's funny is maybe like it doesn't
with that just there's your unnecessary
points added but how much you want to bet
that's probably not even true I'm just kind of
joking right now but you know he just does this
maybe even two maybe with 75 planes
I'm not sure maybe they took all the
seats they turned him into tanks you know just he does this
every time and half of it
turns out to just be casual lies
I don't even understand why you would do that
why would you lie about the I'm
saying I know this one is but we know he's done this
why do you lie about unnecessary
things I don't even understand that
and it was so much that
there wasn't a bank in Virginia, Maryland
or D.C. that had
any money left they stripped him of
now realize where this started
and this is all he does what
does any of this have to do with the point
Iran was not a threat
joking around the threat
so suddenly being told that you
gave the money that Obama so the point
turns into Obama sucks and that's
supposed to somehow make us think that they were a threat
why would that make that happen why this
is just him reeling
he's suddenly going to start telling you why he stole the
election and why Obama is going to go to jail
it's just the same old rhetoric
Iran was
took the seats out almost
as ransom that's
not going to happen with Trump
and nobody ever did anything
about nobody ever said anything
you mean literally everybody talks about it forever though
I guess you forgot that
can you imagine if I did that so
they've been a threat for a long time
see how that worked out so funny how you just
totally didn't make any argument at all that was about
a threat you just rambled on about Obama giving
money and how that was there or how they
gave the money and the seats were out too plain
yeah see a threat I told you
why don't people laugh at this person
but they've really been a threat
if I didn't terminate
Obama's horrible deal
that he made the Iran nuclear deal
you would have had a nuclear war
incorrect
four years ago
you would have had you would have had
nuclear holocaust
and you would have had it again
if we didn't bomb the site
apparently again right so your nuclear holocaust
we all die and then it happens again and we all die
a second time because that makes sense
so when somebody
is working with us that says
they didn't think Iran was a threat
we don't want those people
you don't want people who have opinions
you want people who completely follow whatever
you tell them to do because that's what intelligent
people do right that's what
when Trump told you before right when Trump
said look I'm gonna bring in the best people
around me because I don't know everything
I don't have all the opinions I'm gonna bring in the smart
people to tell me and then he goes
you don't agree with me get out of my administration
because that makes sense right the best people
to tell me the things that I don't like so I fire them
an honest
person can see this
hypocrite can see I mean
right now a lot of people are pointing to him saying
just one example how your
energy bills would be 50% less
why am I presidency?
not true didn't happen
you can argue we tried and failed but the point is
every one of these things and you get the same
Benny Johnson Jones types out there just lying
through their teeth about how it's all going to come through
maybe I disagree
but all you're getting right here is the reality
the flagrant hypocrisy
whereas we're here
this one
and there are some people I guess I would say that
but they're not smart because
they didn't think Iran was a threat
we don't want people
we don't want those people
so you mean you don't want people who have opinions that disagree with you
so that means you want
people who aren't the best people in the conversation
you want people who are on your side
that's called team sport politics
that's exactly why this administration
is barely keeping its head above
water
because and there are some people I guess I would say that
but they're not smart people
or they're not savvy people
oh right right you're not smart
or savvy if you say that
the Iran cover it wasn't
if you say the provable reality
if you say what Colt Gabbard told us
if you say what the IAEA told us
if you say what Rubio and you
both basically said without saying it
then you're a stupid person that's not savvy
it's like when he told you
if you think that shutting down the internet
is a free speech issue then you're a dumb person
well it is and it's actually
really free speech so we're dumb for being correct
or if you say burning the flag
is constitutionally loud
then you're a stupid person as he literally said
even though that's the truth
I mean I don't know how many times
we can look at something like that and walk away
going oh he's just
speaking off the cuff or whatever
he's just being stupid or dishonest or manipulated
and if you think it's about Trump alone
you're not paying attention
Biden is frankly worse in many ways
Obama Bush it's just an extension of the same
game
so Scott Horton points out
well first actually
Josh Gottheimer says Joe Kent
resigning and immediately pivoting to blame
Israel for everything
is as predictable as it is on Sirius
oh really you know and
understand this is being presented with no evidence
to counter the point
everything we covered today shows you unequivocally
always that Israel is playing a part in this
that's exactly the case
what he just told you
what Rubio told you
what Trump told you
is that Israel was the reason that this had to happen
that's exactly what they said
and so Joe Kent comes out and says Israel drove this
into reality and now he's racist for saying what
Trump said
this is counterintuitive
as I said schizophrenic
this is why certain people just kind of
they act like they don't maybe I just don't understand
it's just too complicated I'm just going to listen to
the people that I like what did he say okay that's
what I'm going to agree with they do that on purpose
you're smarter than they let you
that they want you to think this is not some kind
of deep inside understanding he's just
wrong he's just lying
because probably paid through lobbying
for a lot of reasons to lie about any number
of things pharmaceuticals Israel
you know that's what they do they are
sell-outs either way the point is
he's wrong scapegoating
Israel isn't just tired anti-semitic trope
and there it is it's
anti-american to point out that Israel
manipulated Trump these guys
if you don't see by now these people are
this is not in my mind stupidity this is
blatant covering
for everything we're talking about
why do you think that exists
it says this guy is ties with white
supremacist and has panther okay
here we go let's just
go ahead and say it's true I haven't even looked
into it why does that even matter
in regard to
his claim are you all I get it because
he's he's a white supremacist
therefore he hates Jews except for the
fact that they was literally overlapping
the larger conversation today that you can show
more supremacist extremist perspectives
from Zionism and in Israel
than press about anything we're talking about
and also show that they provably connect with
fund work with the extremist Nazi
white supremacist units in this country
that are elements of the alzav movement
and literally fund them in here
just just for one example
since people always will want to ignore these
things this is haratz yet again
this one's 2018
writes groups demand
Israel stop arming neo-nazis
in Ukraine that suddenly
makes no sense to you it's because you don't understand
the situation and it's very surface level
if you care to look and the reality was
the alzav movement
these are Nazis neo-nazis extremist
the very thing they claim
they're fighting and they're funding them because that's
what's going on guys that's the whole conversation
patriot front the whole thing
that doesn't mean that there's no realist like
genuine organic extremist
but it's that they've used them our entire lives
so his point is well because he has ties
to something they claim is and you know
look look into it
if you care to look into it
I don't think it even has relevance to the point of whether this was an imminent threat
but if you want to
maybe if I look into it and you'll probably find out
it's less definitive as they want to make out
but either way
you're talking about that that makes him somehow anti-israel
which doesn't really make sense when you understand
Zionism
Ken's reduction of Iran to Israel's fault
isn't leadership it's big in a deflection
well guess what he's resigned so he's not even
in the government anymore man you guys are spinning out
because this is the truth
and it's not about racism or Judaism
it's about the fact that we already know Israel drove this
because you guys literally told us that
I mean this is just embarrassing
isn't it but people like Josh don't care
they're gonna make themselves look that stupid
to defend Zionism
which they'll turn into me being racist even though
it's literally not even we're talking about and I've made that explicitly clear
but here's an even better response
Mike says
Iran is the greatest state sponsor
Parismen the world
wow that's that's compelling right
very very fact-based oriented
this is just that this is like Hamas
ISIS ISIS Hamas it's the same kind of
dumb thing it's not true
we literally just showed you that on top of that
even if you want to argue they're funded by
Iran look at what they're doing
in the world Israel the United States
they're funding groups extremism all over the world
and then you can prove that's not even what Iran is doing
so this is just lazy
maybe he believes it maybe he doesn't
I don't know let's see what is he
180,000
sits in tanks and thinks now very smart
so here's what Tulsi Gabbard had to say
and this gets into the same point of the conversation
I find this to be very important because this is new
so we played the old one
in fact I'll just bring up the
the Newsweek article because I played the clip many times
we're Gabbard on the record
in 2025 said
they're not building a nuclear weapon
I have the IAEA post from
2025 that says the same that
proves to you that the 60% that Witkoff mentioned
was within their safeguard agreement
I'll even go over the JCPOA point that I referenced
and in fact that was correct about it being
36 by the way I was proud of that it is all there
and they knew it they weren't breaking the rules
right up into this very moment
despite what they all lied about which has to show
you that they have to lie about it then they must know
that it's not happening
so here's Gabbard coming back
this is March 1st, 2026
and you can't I mean
I find this to be unequivocal the way that she responds
and the way that she refuses to
when it matters
Dr. Gabbard I'd like to reground this
in your core responsibilities
under the law
you are responsible for providing national intelligence
to the president correct
yes and to the heads of executive branch departments
and agencies yes yes
and to the chairman of the joint chiefs
and senior military commanders
across the IC yes
and to the senate and the house
and relevant committees correct
and the law states that the national intelligence
you provide to congress quote
should be timely objective
and independent of political considerations correct
yes and you noted in your opening statement
you're here fulfilling a statutory responsibility
and that your testimony quote
represents the IC's
assessment of threats correct
that opening statement
as submitted to the committee
in advance of this hearing stated that
as a result of last summer's air strikes
quote
Iran's nuclear enrichment program
was obliterated and quote correct
that's right and is that in fact
the assessment of the intelligence community
yes so the assessment of the intelligence
community is that Iran's
nuclear enrichment program was obliterated
by last summer's air strikes yes
and the opening statement you submitted
to the committee last night also stated
quote there has been no effort
since then to try to rebuild
their enrichment capability and quote
correct that's right and that's the assessment
of the intelligence community yes
the White House
now that was important as I've been telling
you but it was also widely reported
at least by people that
cared about the facts which were that the one
the whole argument being obliterated
was not factually correct because it wasn't
entirely obliterated but what they did
was take out the enrichment facility
that's been proven that's IAA
IAA everybody involved
which by the way means I told you
that even if they were
doing what they're claiming they would not have
the facility or rather if they were wanted to do
what they were claiming they wouldn't have the facility needed
to actually do the enrichment let alone
as I'll play Scott Horton in a minute
something he said back in 2025 which is well said
that there's many as I've been
telling you as well there's many other steps
involved they're all just trying to play on
people on the lack the
point that most people don't understand these things
by design because they're not
things that most people need to understand
but the point here
is he was saying try to rebuild their enrichment
capability and quote correct
that's right one more
far there we go in the opening statement you submitted
the committee last night also stated quote
there has been no effort since then
to try to rebuild their enrichment
capability and quote correct
that's right so the point is that clearly
they didn't even try according to the
US intelligence assessment
so we know they did it they can't
build it again they haven't even tried to build it back
so there's no world in which it's possible according to
US intelligence that they would even be close
let alone even trying or trying to let alone
be close to what they're claiming
that's the assessment of the intelligence
community yes
the White House stated on March 1st
of this year that this war was launched
and was quote
a military campaign to eliminate
the imminent nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime and quote
that's a statement from the White House
quote the imminent nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime
was it the assessment
of the intelligence community that there was
an imminent nuclear threat posed by the
Iranian regime
the intelligence community
assessed that Iran maintained
the intention to rebuild
and to continue to grow their nuclear
enrichment capability
but right there because he rightly gets
tries to make the point further
I think right there alone was enough
if you're telling me that they
can maintain the intention
to do so but you're also just
clearly acknowledging that there is
no enrichment facility well then by definition
there is no imminent threat
nuclear imminent threat
and also you can prove there was no imminent threat
in general because nothing was happening
but there was provably based on those statements
and she being the representation of the entire
intelligence community
no nuclear imminent threat like Trump
like he just read and they said
that's easy but it gets
more clear it gets clearer the way that she continues
the intelligence community assessed that Iran
maintained the intention
to rebuild and to continue to grow
their nuclear enrichment capability
every country in the world has the right to do it by the way
the assessment of the intelligence community
that there was a quote imminent nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime yes or no
senator the only person who
can determine what is and is not
an imminent threat is the president
false this is the worldwide this is the
worldwide threats hearing where you present
to congress national intelligence
timely objective and independent of
political considerations you've stated
today that the intelligence community's
assessment is that iran's nuclear
enrichment program was obliterated
and that quote there had been no
efforts since then to try to rebuild
their enrichment capability was it
the intelligence community's assessment
that nevertheless
despite this obliteration
there was a quote imminent nuclear threat
posed by the Iranian regime yes or no
it is not the intelligence
community's responsibility to determine
what is and is not an imminent threat
okay here's the problem
no it is precisely that he received
it is precise now before
I'll finish the point that they're
losing people trying to lose people in
it's out here's an important
understand this the one he's going to make
very clear right now based on her own
statements and quotes exactly
yes it is the I there her
responsibility to present the threat
assessment that's literally the statement
that's hard that's the the framing of
the of the hearing and exactly
what her job is now you could also
say though it's Donald Trump's position
as the president to then take that
information and then decide if it's
eminent but that's not what he's asking
but that is a fair point to make that from
Trump's perspective or any president
that it is their prerogative to decide
what that intelligence means and how it should be carried out
that is how that operates that's not
what he's asking though and she refuses
to answer he's asking is it your
assessment from the IC before yes it's
his prerogative we get that but did
you come to the conclusion that it was
an eminent threat the answers no based on
everything she said and the facts that we have
she refuses to say it
you don't need to think hard
to understand what that means it's pretty clear
I mean look she he already stepped when
she came out and disagree with him last time
he literally threw under the bus and said I don't care what she thinks
like on the record and then
excluded her from many meetings including
Venezuela and others as the DNI
that's insane
that's why she's playing ball I think
anyway to determine what is
and is not an imminent threat okay that is up here
here's the problem no it is it is
precisely that he receives it is
precisely your responsibility
to determine what constitutes
a threat to the United States this is
the worldwide threats hearing
where
as you noted in your opening
testimony quote
you represent the IC's
assessment of threats
I mean it's very simple right so you
represent the assessment of the threat
but from the IC's perspective the intelligent
community that's it
you are here
to represent the IC's
assessment of threats
that's a quote from your own opening
statement and so my question
is as you're here to present the IC's
assessment of threats
was it the assessment of the intelligence
community very simple that as the White House
claimed on March 1st
there was a quote imminent nuclear
threat posed by the Iranian regime
yes or no once again senator
the intelligence community has
provided the inputs
that make up this annual threat assessment
right there exactly right there
she was refusing to say it because that's what she just said
we gave the assessment but you're refusing to say
what the assessment said you're just letting it drift
with whatever Trump claims it looks like
and we know they're being dishonest but either way
you could acknowledge what the assessment was
but you know that it will contradict what Trump is saying
this is just politics
and it's bad there's people's lives in the line
American soldiers are being killed
Iranian civilians are being killed
and Israeli civilians
actually
in the chat let me know last I checked
there was only the one person who had been hurt not killed
but I forget if that went further
but again the whole point was
that Israel and the US are lying about
how many are being killed but regardless the point
is this is where these things
lead to civilians being killed
and she's refusing
refusing
it is the nature of the imminent threat
that the president has to make
that determination based on a collection
and volume of information
intelligence that he is provided with
you're here to be timely objective
and independent of political
considerations exactly what I'm doing
no you're evading a question
because to provide a candid
response to the committee would
contradict a statement
from the White House
I'm checking this real quick just to see so we can get some
general insight
so it says generally
about 14 to 20 have been killed
but again
we should question all this including what
Iran claims is being killed in Iran
now we're going to get to a point in a second that is
going to speak to more of why
just in that general point there's more skepticism
for me and it's not because I don't think Iran is
not capable of doing that and we've talked about that already
we'll come back in a second though so I think
this is really important
obviously there was no imminent threat
by every piece of evidence
that we have and she just refuses to say it
which shows you where we really are right now
and that she's probably even afraid to say that
now here
Gabbard comes out because of that exchange
and says well I think so anyway
Donald Trump was overwhelmingly elected
by the American people to be our president, commander
and chief as our which you know this is
people disagree with that but it's not even
relevant to me about whether or not they're
breaking the law right and it says as our
commander in chief he is responsible for determining
what is and is not an imminent threat
well yeah that's not inaccurate
but it says and whether or not to take action
correct as he deems necessary yeah
I agree with that the president but he's
also responsible for the fallout the outcome
which he then shucks off to people around him as usual
the office of the director of national intelligence
is responsible for helping coordinate
and integrate all intelligence to
provide the president and commander chief with
the best information available to inform his decision
so are you actually pretending right now
Gabbard that you break you gave him a bunch
of scattered data points and he just
sits down and puts it all together for himself
like he's even capable of that quite
frankly that's just bad
that's what you have to do to make
these things make sense we all know as
literally as he made just artfully
pointed out in the con in that hearing
right there that it's literally your job
per the hearing per your job
description to assess the threat
and present your assessment of the
threat exactly not not give him
the data points that could be used to do
that I just am so embarrassed
by where we are right now after carefully
reviewing all the information before him Trump
concluded that's what she's trying to pretend
that the terrorist regime
in Iran the very group that she right before
all this was telling you would forever wars
no more invasion the terrorist Islamist
regime are you serious
impose an eminent threat and he took action
and as everyone
wants to call him out
Patrick Henson no Tulsi Ron's not a
terrorist state you know
check back to his work he's he does good work
there another sell out of course again
this this should have been obvious for years
now she's always been a warhawk
when it comes to radical Islam
all of the people who fell for
all the people you fell
for as part of the Trump coalition are sellouts
Gabbard with global leader
CFR correct jam RFK junior
Zionist silent on glyphosate on and on
when will people realize politics
is a rig game and no one gets into the
system at a level without being controlled
here as
you heard a second ago I'll play just the short clip
again is what Trump said about the deal and I think
it's actually really important because not only
is this incredibly false and maybe he believes
it which is even more alarming but it just
speaks to the
the way that they're always going to play this to
make it look like the group that's in
fact not breaking the law is the
villain in the conversation
if I didn't
terminate Obama's
horrible deal that he made the Iran nuclear deal
you would have had a nuclear war
four years ago
you would have had you would have had
nuclear holocaust
and you would have had it again
if we didn't bomb the site
laughing at how dumb that is right that's like
saying being you know anyway I said it before
that's just him that's his off the cuff
which speaks to intelligence in my mind
when somebody is working with us
that says they didn't think Iran
was a threat
we don't want those people because
so here's another way to look at this too
so he stands up and goes that's not an imminent threat
now clearly he did this in these discussions
he didn't just jump out and announce this
he clearly tried to bring this
to people's attention and so the point
is instead of having that conversation
you know he he finds you just ignore
it you don't want that you push him out because
he disagrees which is what we keep seeing
so what it shows you again is you're
not willing to consider other people's opinions at the
very least there was no opportunity to actually
have the conversation of maybe why that's
the case I you know but you know
my opinion I'm just trying to be objective I think it's quite obvious
that there wasn't even an opening for that
this is Israel's war
and Trump signed on for it there's really no other conversation
they've been exposed for that kind of
tunnel vision mindset with everything
they're doing
so let's talk about this deal as we
brought up a lot we covered a lot
when that was in the midst of happening
with most of these things we were
in the weeds telling you article 36
we can prove right there that they're allowed
to do it but that nowhere
was in the main conversation and barely in the main
and to even this day
people still don't even understand what these things mean
and I said this
what he just said is utterly ridiculous
seeing as how it was the US government
under Trump that violated the agreement
by unilaterally pulling out of the JCPOA
the Iran deal and thereby
legally allowing
increase in Richmond which the deal
specifically outlined in the event the US
broke the deal so let's talk about that
as I've shown you many many many times
here is the I spent a while since I brought up
the document which is what we do on this show
source material the joint
comprehensive plan of action otherwise known
as the Iran deal
I was actually surprised I got it right because I kept
going well I think 36 and that's what it was
36 right here
I actually haven't highlighted but I can read it right here
okay so this is specifically
under the dispute resolution mechanism which is
exactly the point if
Iran believed and I remember this is
signed on to by the US government by everybody
else involved as well including Iran if
Iran believed that any or all
of the
E3 and EU plus three of the different groups involved
like us being one of them
if they believe that they were not meeting
their commitments under the JCPOA
Iran could refer the issue to the
joint commission which they did all of this
is documented they went to them and said this
is not you know the US pulled out the US
is sanctioning us again all of this was
literally documented it'll show you in a second
so if you read the rest of this
middle part it simply says if that
doesn't go anywhere you know the commission
has 15 days to resolve it if they don't
you know it goes on like that and it says
if that doesn't if the
if it wasn't resolved then
after that you have 30 days process
if the issue is not resolved
and the commission would consider the opinion
of the advisory board for no man five days
like it's a whole process right to cut to the chase
the simple reality is
it says
if the issue still has not been resolved
like so after all the kind of engagement
which by the way again is important to hear
Iran did it all
Iran brought all of this to the right people
and to frame them as like the evil terrorists
trying to secret by it's just insane
because you can see and that's why nobody wanted to talk about it at the time
because they were the ones going to the UN
they were the ones going to these places trying
to get this Congress look they're breaking the deal
and as usual the influence
of Israel made it so people ignored it
if the issue after all of this stuff
they did which they did still has not been resolved
to the satisfaction
of the complaining participant in this
case of Ron because at this point the U.S.
had unilaterally pulled out
and I'll show you at the bottom it was explicitly stated that
if they do that they can
go back on the agreement essentially
within the deal
it says and if they have been resolved
and if the complaining party deems the issue
to constitute significant non-performance
which everyone else agreed with by the way
then
that participant could
treat the unresolved issue
as grounds to
cease performing its commitments under the
JCPOA which in this case was to not enrich
uranium
rather to a certain degree and it says or
in whole or in part
and or notify the UN Security Council
which it did that it believes the issue constitutes
significant non-performance
then lastly and this is under 37
that was all 36
article 37 at the very end it says
and you can read all of this if you want the
moment to moment specifics of how it should go
Iran has stated
and this is all agreed to by the U.S. government as well
if sanctions are reinstated
which Trump did
in whole or in part
Iran will treat that as grounds
to cease performing its commitments
under this agreement
in whole or in part
so the bottom line is not only did Trump
unilaterally pull out of the agreement
which gave them the right as they just stated
to go back on those agreements which
by the way they didn't just brush into
making they just slowly increase their enrichment
to make that point and use it as a bartering
tool to try for a long
time to force the U.S. back into the
agreement so understand the only one violating
the deal that Trump was claiming around was
breaking was the U.S. government
by everyone other than the U.S. government
in Israel because they're all the point was
they're secretly making nuclear bombs they weren't
and even back then if you remember
Trump went from that to well ballistic
missiles the same way he did this time
because they're just jumping from
narrative to narrative so the bottom
line is then they also sanctioned them
and so they had provable examples from the deal
that allowed them to slowly increase enrichment
now eventually they just was so long
past where the deal just became defunct
and now there's other agreements which were
point to in regard to the IAA which
Iran is still to this point adhering
to it's just
incredible that we have to point this stuff out all
the dishonest people out there all the
mainstream alternative liars and the people
that are just you know holy crap this is
the greatest war ever because hashtag freedom
it's embarrassing
now you want to hear someone who knows what they're talking
about here's Scott Horton and he's breaking down
you know in a very good kind of breakdown
adding things that I didn't include that
I've been telling you for years that this
is exactly the point
trust the Iranian regime
as far as you could throw them
when it comes to potentially
creating a bomb
it
by the way even just starting with that like
so Pierce Morgan sentiment is you know why would you
trust the further you could throw them why like
do you have any engagement with the Iranian
government Pierce or are you just blindly
taking with the U.S. government that lies
our entire lives says about the regime
they want to overthrow you know that's
Pierce for you you know it's funny to me
it doesn't come down to trust at all
and I beg the rest of the panel's forgiveness
I'll try to stay quiet later on in the hour
here and let y'all talk but just real quick
so you understand we had a deal
in 2015 under
which Iran exported
every bit of their enriched uranium
stockpile to France who would
then turn it into fuel rods and then
ship it back to Iran to use in their
reactor they now
the nuclear reactor produces plutonium
waste but they don't have the facility
required to reprocess plutonium
to get all the impurities out
to make weapons fuel so
guys that's a different point than what we're currently
talking about today which I argue still
I believe still exists but the point was about
the enrichment facility that was been destroyed recently
which means they can't enrich when he's talking about something different
which shows you that even then
they weren't able to do the very the way
basically to sum it up quickly the way that
they were framing it that in a week or a month
they'll have a bomb like he's proving and it was going
to further that that's not the reality
rather he's stating that and the point is
you can prove that and it's clear
that the evidence was always there in the U.N.
documents I
you know it's
people just choose to listen to what Netanyahu said
even though he's been caught lying our entire lives
produces plutonium waste
but they don't have the facility required
to reprocess plutonium
to get all the impurities out
to make weapons fuel so they
had no plutonium root to the bomb
the Russians would come and get the plutonium
out of their reactor when it was full
and time every couple years or whatever
now their uranium root to the bomb
because they were exporting every bit
of their enriched uranium out of the country
was they
have this arbitrary
timeline
breakout period they call it the breakout
point that it would take them
one year if they decided
to withdraw from the treaty kick the
inspectors out of the country and begin
to enrich weapons great uranium
it would take them a year to have enough to make
one bomb with now the new report
that came out said that on top of that would take them another
couple of years to have an actual warhead
ready to do anything with it and I'm sorry
this complicated but I know people can follow on this
if you know anything about the history here
let me explain real quick now that
the Nagasaki bomb was
a implosion bomb
a plutonium implosion bomb
which is the type of bomb that can be
miniaturized and fit to
a missile but
the Hiroshima bomb was a simple
gun type nuke a uranium nuke
which is a humongous thing
Iran could never fit
that on a missile or deliver it to
Israel or the United States in a million
years and so if they had
a single gun type nuke or two
it would essentially be to test off
a demonstration round in the desert
to show that they have one but still would
not make them an offensive threat to
anyone and as the CIA conclude
in 07 they abandon all research
into a weapons program even bothering
to look into it in 03 when America
got rid of Saddam Hussein for them now
it was funny to me all of this is
easily verifiable what he was just claiming
that we're saying there before was that
hypothetically first of all they're not doing
it because the evidence shows that but
hypothetically is saying should they have
the desire that they would be in this position
where the one they would make would be so gigantic
that it wouldn't even be useful and the girl
was clearly the Israel supporter just rolling
her eyes and going oh my god like he just said
they have a bomb we don't care but he didn't
though his point was they don't we can prove that
but even within the hypothetical it wouldn't even be possible
as she rolls her eyes you know it's just
this game that anything any
possible thing because Iran so evil
bad guy has to be taken out because
they're so evil all that's based on claims
that are usually false by people who are actually
committing crimes in the world and it's not
to say Iran has not is not
capable of I'm when I'm doing that I'm
only talking about the allegations from Israel United States
it matters and if you want to
look into it they've been lied about their
our entire lives but if you
want to get into the reality of the government yes listen
to Iranian people they've discussed the
actions their government have done and there are things
that you can prove but most of what
you're hearing from our governments have been
completely manufactured and
again let's just even say you disagree with that
you can stand back and look at Syria
and Iraq and Ukraine
and on and on and on and
literally prove that our governments created
these fault these operations
to justify what they want
it's not new guys it's been happening
I mean as long as I've
been doing this this has been the reality
it's always about creating
the justification to get what you
want and so
the fact that they've had
now I'm sorry get to the your
point Donald Trump left the treaty
or the the agreement in
2018 now peers it's
complicated but according to the agreement
Iran is allowed to stop
abiding by some of the restrictions in it
if America breaks our side
of the deal they actually are still within
the larger agreement
even while ceasing to abide by some
parts of it yes exactly and see
that's hard for some people to wrap their mind around
but it's exactly the case and I was yelling
this and get people you know the same thing
people like the girl oh you guys are so stupid
that's just that doesn't make sense
it does in fact it's explicitly stated
within the agreement that they're allowed
to do a thing that you guys all point to
as a crime should Trump do what he did
like if you're going to pretend that's not
the case then explain why
it did you know because
all they do is say oh well Iran was doing
the one breaking it first that was their argument at the time
nobody presented evidence for that
as usual now that
60% enriched uranium stockpile
that they built up is clearly just as
it was in the Obama years
is clearly simply a card
to play in negotiations
to deal away that uranium is there
to give up if they can get
America to back down and lift the sanctions
that's which by the way let's not forget was
what the foreign minister of Oman told us
just happened that Iran was
agreeing to hand over this agreeing
to hand over the material to stop enriching
entirely and the next day
is real bomb them that's
all in the record all it is that they wanted
to make weapons grade uranium they could
have made weapons grade uranium they weren't
doing that they're getting closer because it's
a card to play in negotiations and now
to your and one closer meaning increased
enrichment percentage which as he already
pointed out is one in the step in
many to actually get to having a
usable bomb let alone one that's small enough to put
on a ballistic missile last
point and then I swear I'll stop and you made
this point nothing changed
Tulsi Gabbard the director of national intelligence
says nothing changed they did not break
out toward a nuclear weapon there was
no cost to spelly here even if you
accepted the premise that there's no
like justifications restart the war could launch
a preemptive war to prevent them from getting
a nuke which is a whole other argument but even
if you accept that premise nothing had changed
in Iran other than the
the timeline the arbitrary timeline
of Trump's demand had expired and you
hear Trump and the rest of the Hawks
trying to conflate having a nuclear
program at all with being
on the verge of achieving a nuclear weapons
capability and this is what George W
Bush called short handing it in other
words they just imply a bunch of lies
because they can't explain what they mean
and realize this isn't around the time of like a
12-day war point which is you know a
precursor to where we are now
so again
I've brought this up many times I still
think it's very relevant this is from
the international atomic energy agency the
director general and cites the 60 percent
claim that Whitcoff used to lie to you
still it's amazing to me how I can
point this out and I haven't seen this
in literally any other show not mainstream
I make some alternative not all the big time
even imagine that why because Whitcoff
is not supposed to be countered I guess
the point is it says I this is the director general
as stated in my most recent report to
the to the agencies board
of the IAA Iran's uranium
stockpiles remain under safeguards
in accordance with their deals with their
safeguard agreement and then
says that the 400 plus that's 64
65 Whitcoff was mentioning in the
stockpile is enriched to 60 percent
and that is within the safeguard agreement
it's very simple and as well as always
at the end it says they can guarantee
through their watertight inspections that Iran
is not and will not make a nuclear bomb
things like this matter don't they
now Mario Nafal
comes in and says what the hell this is
Tulsi Gabbard simply saying
that Russia I think let me see if I have
it yeah I do here's this clip just very quickly
however the intelligence community
assesses that Russia China
North Korea Iran and Pakistan have
been researching and developing an array
of novel advanced or traditional
missile delivery systems
with nuclear and conventional payloads
that okay so just so it's clear
that doesn't mean nuclear bombs
it could what it means is technology
that could deliver a nuclear payload
on a ballistic missile that's what
they're claiming Iran that's what all of them
are doing it's not a crime by the way
to have I mean it will there are
conversations to be had about their
but the realistic the intercontinental ballistic
missile agreements but none of them
follow it as far as I can tell the U.S.
is a lie about it so at the end of the day
the point is that every government has the right
to have their own missiles and defense and so on
so what I'm pointing out here is first
that she says this right that they have them
Pakistan have been researching and developing
an array of novel advanced
or traditional missile delivery systems
with nuclear and conventional payloads
that put our homeland within range
okay and
why is that a big deal
well because these are bad guys and
they're aimed at okay well here's the important part
as Mario goes what the hell
is going on why didn't she just say
well guess what this has been basic
fundamental information that I've known my entire
life or you know whatever like
you like the eye does anybody confused
about Russia having new ballistic
missiles and nuclear capability or China
or North Korea Iran
is incorrect since the information we just showed
you is not even remotely the case but of course
in fact let me let me did she say that one
and
Pakistan have been researching
so again the point is what
that's why I made that clear
all she's saying is they're researching
the types of ballistic missiles
that can carry war like
new like warheads one of which will be nuclear
that's the technology we're talking about if you look
into it it's not unique to what the end
of the day all she really said is stuff that's
publicly available that's not a crime
and she kind of folds in Iran in there and
that's the statement that was later used to claim
that but then you saw the what followed
you saw the engagement where it was very
clear that the assessment they knew was
that they did not my point
though what the hell is going on
what is that they can hit the US becoming a threat
like are you serious is this guy
an actual like the new media
that we're now clutching our pearls at something
that everybody knows that these people
have missiles and stuff
is it just now a big dangerous deal to point
out that they have them because Tulsi said so
out loud she's just reading a basic
statement of understanding but according to the new
media it's a bombshell or
because they want you to freak out about it I don't know
or they want to bury Iran in the middle of it so it slips
in and it's a lie probably that one
either way I'm just so exhausted
with the ridiculous new media
so
here's Caroline leave it
in response to joke joke Kent coming out
and saying there was no imminent threat
here's what she wrote
there are many false claims in this letter
but let me address one specifically
that Iran pose no imminent threat which was
the only one that matters seeing as how it's the only
thing you were saying to keep you out of jail
if there's any actual accountability what
there probably won't be but if it wasn't
an imminent threat this was an illegal war
which by the way every president my life has done
but they should all go to jail if we have anything
that means anything this is
the same false claim the Democrats and some of the
liberal media have been repeating over and over
false claim I mean
we just went through this but what's just so embarrassing
Trump said you
attacked first you said
he had a feeling literally
he had the feel they thought they would
respond that's in no stretch
of the imagination eminent anything
and then we know they've been stretching it
to be like well they're working on nuclear
stuff eventually so maybe or
47 years of eminent threat this is
just desperate and of course
they shove her out there to look stupid because they don't
want to do it as president Trump has clearly
and explicitly stated yeah clearly he
has strong and compelling evidence that you
guys don't want to show us though right
this back there trust me
this evidence was compiled from any sources
oh you mean the DNI report we just talked
about where she just told you that that's not the case
but Trump decided anyway yes
and it says
Trump would never make the decision to deploy military
assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum
didn't Gabbard literally just say
that that you get the information you gave him
and then he's the one that decided that's the
case or I guess you could argue they were in the room
with him but the point is what she's trying to
insinuate is that it was the intelligence assessment
that guided his decision not that they
handed him scattered data points and he
pieced it together to make the eminent threat
Iran is the is the world
leading states but I'm just so tired of this
not only does the evidence not
back that up even if everything you say is true
it's just flatly not the
case based on everything we know even
based on US intelligence assessments that I've
shown you over the years about the proxies
about everything the Iranian regime
is evil that's it
evil right no crimes
no invasions no regime changes
no bomb nothing but evil because
Israel doesn't like their they want their territory
that that's what it's about
it's proudly killed American
proudly killed you mean when you were legally invading Iraq
that's it guys that's the only point
US government illegally invaded
Iraq Salmanian Iranians supported
Iraq in resisting the illegal invasion
simple they know that
that's the best they can do wage war
against our country what
are you are you now
genuinely trying to conflate this with 9-11
I bet you that's what she's doing and openly threatens
us all the way
threatens us all the way up to your
illegal actions against Iran is that what she just said
yes it is openly threatened
you mean like Trump does to everybody who blinks
at him this is so stupid
all the way up to the launch of what we attacked
them without justification
that's how you explain why it was not an imminent
threat or was an imminent threat seriously
Iran was aggressively expanding their
their missiles right with everyone can do
that you guys are doing too that's not eminent
anything this is bad this is bad
the regime aimed those missiles at
like everyone does everywhere
what are you talking about ultimate
goal nuclear weapons despite
the facts though despite everything we know
and all of what our intelligence told us and what
everybody in IAA said
no but just but they had them though trust me
I mean I don't even this is just
worthless let's go to the point that matters
here which is funny to me
so she says
no eminent threat the whole thing is a rambling
nonsensical argument that doesn't even make
arguments in fact half the time
to argue that it was not
eminent
okay well let's check out what leave it had to say
on the 12th
Caroline leave it
arguing with Caroline leave it here it is
the this post and it was
ABC news saying that there was a threat to California
from Iran right
this post and story should be immediately
retracted why because
it's false information it says to be
clear
no such threat from
Iran or
to our homeland exists
wasn't that funny
wait a minute but so you could argue if she said
no such threat from Iran you could have argued
she meant this specific type of threat
what she said no such threat
from Iran to our homeland exists
and it never did
to our homeland so there is
no threat to our homeland from Iran
you can't misunderstand that
then because Trump made her
apparently she comes out and says there's no
eminent threat or there was for sure
an eminent threat but you literally
just said there was no eminent threat
on the 12th of March
I mean guys
this is the dumbest thing I've ever seen
I am critical of government I always
have been but this is a step above
or under I guess
it's insane these people
are the most embarrassing
things I've ever seen this government and think
about that statement with how
we talk I mean this is just crazy
and then there are people who want to make it
about left first right I mean for crying out loud
how many times to say it or look back
and how we criticize Biden it's not that
and you damn well know it if that's the
best you can do you're already losing
but here's what circle
or Cirque C said about
or said about what she said which is just
artfully done so I read some of it
but this it's just it's this is perfect
so she goes it was clear
perfectly clear what Trump was trying to do right
and you go yeah everything's perfectly clear
right Iran could not be allowed
to get a nuclear weapon which
they have been months away from for well
over a decade also
Trump is the only president who could have kept
us out of war with Iran as
he himself repeatedly told us
so we destroyed their nuclear capabilities
which Tulsi said they didn't have in 2025
then we attacked them last
month because Israel was going to attack them
because they were months away from
developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed
the nuclear capabilities and then that would then lead
Iran to attack American bases as
they you could add with possibly a nuke that doesn't
exist because that's what Rubio said
Iran has never posed a threat to the United
States but we had to attack
them first not because of Israel but because
they pose an imminent threat to the United States
it's just like this exactly
what she's doing and it says fortunately
we have won the war already
which was not a war though but a special
operation in Iran now several
times in the last two weeks it's
basically over but might not be over for
some time because we already won
we also don't need anyone to help out of
the Strait of Hormuz which we knew they would
close which is why we didn't prepare
and we now need allies to help soon
what are you guys not understanding
I mean it's so it's always shouldn't even be
laughed at it's so alarming that this is
what's actually happening but
don't laugh you're gonna cry I guess you know
I mean think about how dumb this all is
how and this is one sentence
Iran has never posed a threat to the United
States as she says right there but we had
to attack them first because of the threat
to the United States they posed
oh god it's so crazy and then
here's Wyatt Reed making a very important
point that comes directly from the UN Security Council
nine days before
the US Israeli sneak attack
Iran publicly warned
if it was attacked
quote all bases
facilities and assets of the hostile
force in the region would constitute legitimate
targets because they would that's leaked
that's the international law here's
the letter they sent to the UN so think about this
the UN whatever you think
about it you've got is Iran
who they want you to believe the terrorist organization
going to the UN to present evidence about
why Israel is about to attack them
or the United States and that should they
that they have to respond in the way they did
and even though they know that they did
it anyway and then even went on to claim
that the response they told you they would carry out
legally was demonstration of how
their terrorists how I mean
that is such a bad
what's a better way to frame it that is
it's like the soft morrick
it's just badly
prepared badly formed
or by design
to make the US look this bad
I mean that's the only two things that truly make the
most sense to me I don't know how you mean
why would you have this and then
still carry out the plan
that would then cause the thing you would then need to
claim that it is a terrorist act
when you can go here they just said they would do this
it's just
beyond the pale
here's Trump
as you just heard
power look look what happened
in the last two weeks
they weren't supposed to go after all these other
countries despite the fact
that they told you they would and announced it to the
UN and even presented a data document
do you think does he not
know that I mean that's almost more alarming
that he's been so completely insulated by
this is as what
Steve calls
the
now I'm forgetting it
Chippod Luba bubble or something like that
like just speaking to like the internal
Zionist Israeli politics
influencing him from the
religious perspective of the Zionist influence
over the it's obviously
a part of this understanding
the reality of Zionism we've discussed
endlessly but the idea that he's
so insulated by this as everyone seems to
be acknowledging at this point that he doesn't
even know that or he's just lying
to you they weren't allowed
to do the thing like what even kindergarten
happened in the last
two weeks they weren't supposed
to go after all these other countries in the
Middle East those missiles
were set to go after them
so again at my point last
time we played this he starts by saying
they weren't supposed to but then says they were
aimed at those locations why would
that mean they weren't supposed to if they were
aimed at the places that they
they were supposed to attack Qatar the missile was aimed at
Qatar does that make sense it doesn't
because they were aimed at Qatar so anybody with a brain
is going to go that might be where they attack right
in addition to that they told you they would
which is right there I just showed you it continues
they hit
Qatar Saudi Arabia
UAE
Bahrain Kuwait
why does he say nobody expected that weird
we were shocked
okay nobody expected
that so you start by saying they weren't supposed
to you send then say they were aimed
at them and then say nobody expected that
other than that they were
aimed at them right and then other
than the fact that they told you they would
if you did this now you could argue
that Trump didn't know about that somehow which would
mean his own team kept it from him
which kind of makes sense when you understand what's happening
if you believe he's being insulated
like manipulated and that is what we're talking
about or I think your only other
logical discussion point or
consideration is that Trump is part
of this and working for something other than
American interests honestly I don't even
care at this point as long as we recognize
where this is coming from I just want people
to see it because guys this is so obvious
where we are
now back to the point again this you could
look it up you could check it this is so wild
to me and I didn't even know about this until
I saw Wyatt Reed share it
how was that possible right I mean I
look for this stuff it's just it's
we're being manipulated everywhere now
here isn't just another clip that Steve showed me
where he's in this this this is
crazier than usual because it's not the next day
this is the same
in this one case a minute later
he contradicts what he just said
I'm not even trying to talk about
like being senile I don't even know
it could be that but I think it's worse than that
I think it's just the way that he is
that he just is so willfully dishonest
about whatever he needs to say in the moment
that he doesn't even realize he's contradicting what he just said
and don't take that as worse
than anybody before they're all the same to me but he's just
I guess worse at delivering the lies
but it says
Trump was not convinced has not
convinced himself about his own strategy on Iran
if we have
a needed help they won't
be there for us I've just known that for a
long period of time we have some that
are really enthusiastic they're coming
already this is a need
so you can't see it for the podcast but so
it's like this is 1254 versus
1255 need would be
one of the big boys
if we need
their mindboats or if we need
anything any piece of
apparatus that they may have because of
a situation that they have
they should be jumping
to help us we want them to come
and help us with 1219
the straight
1256 we don't need
anybody so
we have to understand that so this is different questions
right so somebody asked him in 1219
and he says
one thing and then later when it's about him trying to
look tough we don't need anybody probably
not going to come and these are some of these are
small examples but the bigger point is just about
contradicting the sentiments about what you're doing
the plan just like all of them were doing
it's a war it's not a war I mean you still
have like conservative podcasters
determined to not call it a war
what a childish thing to do
obviously is a war it's just
that is just the typical team sport politics
that you'll die on that hill
and then probably later admit it anyway
and claim you never said it like it's just sad
we're the strongest nation in the world
we have the strongest military by far
in the world we don't need them
let's not forget by the way and I
talked about this a lot I mentioned on last
show with aim wake up as well but just in case you missed it
I'm still seeing I mean even
right now in corporate media
they're still claiming that the straight
is closed it's not
now this is actually a really important distinction
you could it's very much restricted
that's very obvious
I checked I've done this every time I've been live
when we're talking about this but you can
literally prove guys that there is traffic
so by definition it is not
closed it's definitely
restricted but this is why this is so important
when they started this
I believe Trump was told they would do that
probably to drive him to think it would be
an easy open and shut game they're going to close
the straight the whole world will turn against them
it'll be boom open and shut and he fell for it
or he didn't care it was a part of it
your decision
the point though is that they didn't do that
just like I told you they lied about
tanks rolling into Kiev in the first
day because it's one about setting the narrative
they want you to believe in two that I think they project
what they think will happen what they do
in this case they didn't do this
the reports of
minds look at how that nobody talked about that
I don't believe it was ever even happening they have
in the past I know they can and would
but I don't believe they did because Iran's playing the long
game they recognize that should they have done
that the whole world would indeed be angry
with that so what they did
and this is a recent statement but they did this in the beginning
they threatened they floated things and people
were worried so it did restrict
and it did affect the US government and in the early
parts of it people were mad Americans
at Trump because of gas prices
so they played it well but then they were clear
look Hormuz open
the straight of Hormuz is open to most
it is closed only to enemies now
what's funny about that is that didn't even come
across the corporate media why would
that be so what they said
you can prove it why wouldn't see it in
Fox the report why I think because all of them are
continuing to lie and say it's shut because
that's the talking point they're supposed to relay
not one or the other but the government guys
all of it in the media apparatus as they use
to reach you and however they can
major alternative CNN Fox news
when it matters they all drive the same points
so in this case it's not
closed so they're only attacking
if they are they were and by the way there was
a recent argument then a claim of them bombing
one of these tankers I've been following up with it
but the point I we should very
much be questioning whether or not that is
Israel doing it I'll make this case in a second
it certainly could be Iran and it would even
make sense other than the fact that
a tanker unless we're talking about
by the Israel's logic that that means
the fuel for their weapons which is not
how it's ten tends to work in the past
but that they would I would argue that's
not a legal military target
so I would criticize no matter
who does it including the fact that there are
civilians on those ships that has to matter
to everybody if you care about the law or simply
human life my point though that's
to say that I don't think that's actually being done by
them it wouldn't make sense to me but it's certainly possible
in this case the reason they're doing
this is because it's about setting the
tone of letting anybody else
come through as long as you don't push its support
Israel United States which is actually
really savvy way to play this because it's a very
important thing and then
suddenly the US and Israel are desperate to convince
the world that it's always shut because they need
to turn so all you end up happening is having the
US and Israel hurt dramatically
by this process and everybody else trying to
like right now Japan
Australia last I checked even the UK
has basically said we don't want to get involved
with your straight that
says something guys it shows me that this
was always set up to lie to you to keep you
of the mind that they were affecting you
not Trump but Iran and that didn't work
check it every day you'll see that it's very much still active
there is a lot of traffic
now in the early days they said 94%
shut down I just don't even know if that was true
in the beginning but it's pretty clear there was
some restriction
now did you politics points out what the
foreign minister of Amman said
or actually was this the one
oh wait no this is a different one this is
this is according to the Guardian Britain's
national security advisor Jonathan Powell
attended the final US Iran talks in Geneva
and believed Tehran's
nuclear proposal was significant enough
to keep diplomacy on track and avoid
escalation sources said
progress had been made and that the
Iranian offer was unexpectedly substantial
same thing that the foreign minister of
Amman said
quote we regarded Whitcoff
and Kushner as Israeli
assets that dragged a president
into a war he wants
to get out of
think about this and how this
right now more than anybody people in this
country are are trying to
avoid the reality of what we're currently
dealing with the report also
highlights concerns about the US negotiating
team led by Kushner and
Whitcoff both closely linked to Israel
one diplomat with knowledge of the talks
told the Guardian quote we and I just
read we regarded them as Israeli
assets dragging
Trump into this war critics noted the lack
of a deduct the dedicated
US tactic to a technical
team and Whitcoff relying on the IAA
chief or expertise
but he didn't though seeing as how we lied
about what was actually stated I just showed you
that now it says shortly after the talks
the US and Israel launch strikes on Iran
but we know why because they offered to give up
their entire program to canned over
the enriched uranium
it's all very clear not the foreign minister
of Amman right there and now you even have
a
British asset telling
you that's what he thought
this is the whole point guys that this
is the infiltration now
in regard to bombings
here is just and and
English pointing out the US is rarely
attacks and Iranian retaliatory strikes
have continued this is up to today
it says with missiles and drone incidents
reported from Lebanon and Israel to Iraq and the
Gulf countries the past 24 hours so I mean
all this continued argument of just Iran is
diminished it doesn't seem to be the reality
based on what we can see
but we can verifiably show that the US
and Israel have burned through most of their interceptors
that's a public conversation so it
this is the long game as they said and they were
clearly lying about surrendering
to their countries they've been lying about everything
which has to show you that there's a sense of weakness there
here is a
just democracy now as a March 18th
kind of ongoing headline
Israel kills Iran intelligence minister
says Israel could be
but if there's assassinating people
over the place now realize guys we're talking
about in many cases things that are technically in most
cases in the past not considered
military targets intelligence might
be more on the line but when you're killing for example
Khomeini that's
the best way to overlap that would be
to claim like Iran
assassinated the Pope
then what would you would everybody stand up
and go yeah that makes sense you know the war
no that's what Americans
did because they don't understand or they've been
driven to extremist perspectives
about people on the side of the world but this
is these are crimes guys especially since
there is no legal declaration of war
or war powers allowance or
authorization of military use but
Iran
continues to launch retaliatory strikes against Gulf
countries I want to get into this in a second
I there's this to me it's 50-50
very much possible
likely even if these countries are continuing
to support the US and Israel which I think
some of them are but the question becomes
are some of them doing so or some of them aren't
which I think we can see and then if
they're being bombed that doesn't make sense to me
from Iran's strategic position it just doesn't make sense
other than you to go well they're just a
maniacs it's never a logical argument
even if they are just it's an assumption
but in this case we're going to get into
why I think there might be more going on but
Israel launches air strikes on central Beirut
continue to bomb Lebanon
it bombs an entire high rise full of civilians
publicly covered by just about everybody
because again this is not Gaza
there's people filming there's international
entities there's UN they can see it
and they don't care guys they just took down
an entire building
I was just watching the clip the other day
Iran's parliament speaker says Strait of Hormuz
won't return to its pre-war status
you see my point and that doesn't mean
it's closed because it is not what they're saying
is we will continue to do this because
of what the US and Israel doing and we're only going to
affect those that side against us with
their illegal war
so I think this is a well-played tactic
and they're desperate to make the world think that it's
shut down entirely because they need you to feel
that Iran is against you
UN warrants 45 million people at risk
of acute hunger due to their war in Iran
here we go again you think this
is an accident this is a tactic it's
what they do and you can go on you know
there's other headings and I think important part
was just about Iran
now here is frustratingly enough
what Fox News allowed to be stated
and I just can't even believe that
anybody thinks that this is
this is a blind partisan
or rather just whatever side this is a supporting
of the narrative
I mean this is the equivalent of saying that
executing children is okay because it
if the you know I'll let it play speak for itself
and this remember these people that we're talking
about this woman like these are people that are
actively fighting from a US perspective
for a US control Iran perspective
for the Shah which is
what not what Iranians want
who are talking to
Iranians in Iran saying you know
they're they're most afraid of the bombs
stopping because if the bombs stop
they believe the United States might be done
think about that
the bomb so first of all
we're not talking about adjacent accidental things
we're talking about targeting schools
and hospitals on the record
the Minab I mean despite the same as always
despite the screaming
lying Zionist manipulators
and the blind partisan supporters
every single data point has
unequivocally proven including
US intelligence that they bomb out school
even Hegseth gave you a map showing you
that was the target whether Israel
gave it to him or not they did this
they lied about it and we all know it
then Zionists try to give you fake images
they showed you an image where it wasn't from the location
they claimed and that's what they're still pointing to
and that was even fact-checked by Twitter
so just my point is recognized they're bombing
schools and hospitals
and other civilian locations I just showed you
a building full of people and I mean
for crying out loud guys they bombed the middle of Tehran
that's packed more than New York City
so understand
if you're of the mind that these are Iranians
that are going yes kill all the civilians
because I'm fighting for Iran
that's insane
this is the same point they make if you want to pretend
that you have Republicans let's say fighting against
people that have overtaken the country right
you've got the MAGA team fighting against Democrats
that have overtaken the country and
then they start bombing
their side the MAGA side they start
bombing locations that kill Republicans
and they go no it's okay though because we're fighting for freedom
just keep killing us because we want to take over the Democrat
does that make sense
does it only make sense when you pretend they're just
weird Iranians and they're don't understand
living in caves whatever you want to lie to yourself about
the reality is that they don't
want to kill civilians because that's insane
so what you're trying to make the case of
is that they cheer this on because they just
want them to keep taking over
you mean like every other country they've done that too
and utterly destroyed the everything of
any type of civilian life
and you think they don't know that I mean this is a stupid
as them claiming 100% of the team
supports this they're just lying
guys and it's so obvious and it really
speaks to the level of desperation
it has to absolutely and when they have
the moment to tweet they're most afraid
of the bombs stopping because if the bombs
stop they believe the United States might be
done absolutely and when they have the moment
to tweet they're tweeting and saying please
don't stop because the worst thing that
could happen to us is if you leave this regime
in place which means who is going to pay
the price we the Iranian people are they're going to
torture us more they're going to kill us they're
going to throw us in prison you've got to finish
the job they are celebrating every time a bomb
goes on just it's just disgusting like she can
barely even she can't even having taken a breath
feel free to look into all of you guys it's just
wild to me how clear it is right now
the vast majority of the Iranian
people that's being discussed by corporate
media not just left by the way
and isn't that doesn't make it the truth
it's the truth because you can prove it
and then you appoint to these people
like Pallavi or
what's her name
you know just the people that they're
pretending represent the Iranian people
and you can literally prove that they don't
even their own intelligence will show that but it
doesn't matter because Fox said because we want
the bomb to the bomb stop then that means
we're not with the US might not have won
you mean the same US that is starving their
population for years has been sanctioning
them into the ground they know that they've
talked about it they've had
what Americans seem to be able to buy
partisans will continue
to blow me away and I think it's
some of them as always remember I think
the vast majority are well-seeing beyond this but there
are some that seem to be able to buy this stuff
yeah it's just how low can they
sing you know it's just disgusting now
let's not forget by the way this guy that's in that clip
it's weird how this is the case
why this guy would even be in that clip
on Fox news talking about why Iranians
need to be bombed
this isn't Israeli this is an Israeli
intelligence asset
who was this is the Gideon program
right the guy who literally and
I say that because he's literally former
former Israeli military the
point is when this
came out in Melania called for
the AI system to prevent crimes before
they happen that's this guy
the AI system that flags threats before
the next attack
you've seen a connection why would this
guy even be in that conversation
well cutter refinery
attacked as well as Iran missile strikes
sparks fire now
this is a carryover but the point
still the same as it says as
the strikes spark fire
I want you to ask a question about
this now this makes sense
because I think right now especially
if cutter was continuing to support the US government
which it seems that they are and Israel
that this would be a continued as they said
target them and on top of that that
the targeting of these the the oil
which by the way Israel started by
bombing these across the country as well as the
US bombing them in the water
the prices went up so you could see
Iran arguably doing this to continue
that hurt what they're doing
and or
it was a continuation of what Israel already
continue to do it either one makes sense to me
and we should question all of it
but this is what I want you to remember and we just talked about this
that this has been widely reported
and this is the WION
like it was the Chinese platform there's been plenty
of different there I think guardian covered as well
is Iran being framed
Abbas so the one of the
is where Iranian
government entities
claims the US is using what they call
Lucas drones that match
there's their Shahid drones
perfectly to attack Arab
nations so a false flag
the foreign minister Abbas
our got got she claims that
US is using reverse engineered Lucas
drones now look
that is obviously something they do we know
this Israel brags about this
but whether it's happening now we should question
because it's not something we should assume
but knowing it's possible
we should be asking is what we're seeing
something that they're doing to blame it on
Iran and then the question should be
is this in their interest with where
they're at would it be in the interest
of Iran to do something that would turn the world
against them no
doesn't mean they wouldn't do it but like with Syria we know
how this works so in this case
Iranian
barrage kills at least three
Palestinians in the West Bank
I call BS
I do not believe that
I don't think that makes any sense in any special
imagination why would they even be bombing the
West Bank now of course you could argue it was a mistake
or they did it because they're just crazy
all possible but really
at the end of the day this does not
make sense especially as Israel is
literally continuing to take
this this adds to what the Israel
government is trying to do and they've done
this before where they're in the middle of other things
they use that to justify destroying something else
they claim it was a missile they take it over they've done this
before but question it
it very well could just be Iran or an accident
or anything else but I don't believe
this I believe we're talking about attacks
using their drones or whatever else to blame it
I just don't believe that Iran would
not because they're not capable but not
this would doesn't make any sense
they're on arguably the side
of people resisting what Israel is doing
and especially when you're talking about the Palestinian people
and the West Bank would be barmed to what end
why would that benefit them
it clearly benefits Israel so
who benefits is quite obvious
but we just need to be questioning this
I think that's important right now
now last few points here
you might have seen this
we talked about the boots on the ground that everyone's like
no they're just Middle East you idiots
you guys don't know what we're talking about well guess what
Pete Sessions I believe that
that what these 2,500 Marines
would be is to secure
the island oh okay so
the island Trump just bombed so quite
literally boots on the ground we knew
that already but if you're out there still trying to pretend
like they didn't just violate yet on the promise
you're wrong because here they are
the island is not my opinion boots on the
ground in combat circumstances
because you know it's not in the cities
guys I mean come on
so what now boots on the ground don't count
if it's on the shoreline I mean what are you talking about
these are desperate people
trying to convince you that this is not what exactly
it looks like don't trust your lying eyes
right that's just my response to that
we just not this stupid
here's what Trump just said
about the Lebanon part of this
which guys
you're in Trump's position
why in the world would you just casually
extend your support
to another illegal war
regardless of whether you think you can rationalize
or lie about there's no
US interest whatsoever
and he just kind of make he doesn't even really
and he just kind of says well like the Lebanese family
I talked to it's terrible what's going on over there
so you just tacitly support
exactly what Israel's doing wherever they do it
no matter what and that's America first
and in fact it's quite
literally hurting your agenda
but you do it anyway speak for itself
guys and as I said this is starting to
feel like a humiliation ritual
real is expected to
expand its ground offensive in southern
Lebanon to go after Hezbollah have you
discussed that with Israeli leaders
and does the United States support
a potential Israeli invasion of Lebanon
yeah I know I did and
I know though
yeah yeah I did you know whatever
just a casual response of an illegal act
this guy's contrived you know
my opinion I don't believe somebody would
that's a silly thing to say
when you know what's going on in the world
I don't believe he's able
to do certain things and I doesn't mean in any way
that I'm removing accountability from him
quite the opposite but when it comes to Israel
whether it's Epstein files or whatever else
I definitely think there's something pulling
these strings but it could just be that he agrees
with the agenda well as a problem
it's been a problem for a long time
I mean the legally
occupied Lebanon that they've been killing and using
white phosphorus and it's been roundly
recovered by the UN that Greg Murray has
continually showed yeah it's been a problem
for a really long time
in what way you know what Hezbollah
which is the popular uprising supported
by Lebanese people because of what you've
continued to do to the country
and it's a certain
area because I was with the other night
a person whose parents
live in Lebanon this is a very substantial
part so if you want to talk about being manipulated
you could simply argue that somebody goes here Trump
talk to this one Lebanese guy that says everything's crazy
and trust Israel and that apparently does it for him
Loomer said never one supports you
oh everyone supports me like that seems how this works
the last person to yell something in his ear
is what he thinks out loud
I mean for crying out loud
very well maybe that one
Lebanese family has wildly suffered
and Lebanese government or Hezbollah
largely probably Hezbollah is the point
because Lebanese government's different conversation
in regard to US and Israel but either way
maybe they did maybe they
let's just go ahead and say yes they probably murder their family
I'm not saying I believe that
my point is what would that change
about the legalities
of illegally invading Lebanon
and why would that one story be enough to make you justify
doing something like that
even if you feel it's justified
shouldn't that be another act of war
should it rather declaration
shouldn't there be another eminent threat
doesn't matter that never mattered to them
person wealthy person
whose parents live in Lebanon I said
really how do you live in Lebanon
your parents are living
they live there
and over the years they've gotten used to the fact
that it's being bombed
are you serious is this guy that tone deaf
you mean bombed by Israel
that's exactly what's happening
so you're saying that you can't believe
they live in their own country because Israel
makes it hell for them that's not what he's actually
trying to say but that's what he just said
but they explained to me that it's
really a different section of Lebanon
it's a section where Hezbollah
is and they get used
to it I guess I don't know what you're trying to do
so wait you just now you're telling me that Hezbollah
is bombing itself
you get this guy can't be this stupid
I think he talks off the cuff a lot
and makes himself look I mean that's just
bad like just be clear
he just said they live in the area with Hezbollah
and that's why they're being bombed all the time
so you're either saying Israel's bombing
where civilians are which we already know
or you're insinuating that Hezbollah's bombing itself
whatever
who cares about facts just yell out things
and say support Israel apparently that's America
first today
I mean people live in Ukraine
you would think they wouldn't live in Ukraine
but they live in Ukraine
you mean their country
because you guys created this terrorist organization
that's been contained I mean come on
I mean the statement
of just saying that they I can't believe
they live there
it just blows me away I don't even know
how to articulate how insane that is
that's the same thing about Syria I can't even live there anymore
because of you man
I don't know that I do that
but they live in Ukraine they live in Ukraine
because you're a billionaire and you can just do whatever you want
move wherever you want that must be nice
Hezbollah is a big problem
and they're rapidly being eliminated
oh great
so he's clearly okay and evolved and supports it
that's a crime guys
is there a legal justification is there an act of war
is there a declaration or just you just did literally
Israel's currently invading Lebanon
and that's apparently no big deal
to any of this corporate media
apparently even to the adversarial democrat media
or democrats who all support this
but they hate him though
and their deep state pedophiles who were going to destroy another what
but they're like oh good job Trump keep going
because we support this but next time we're going to get you
dumb
so just really quickly I'm not even going to get into
I just want to include this for you
because this is still rapidly being talked about
and I mean I get the interest the curiosity
I still don't think there's evidence
other than what with its subjective
and this to be clear as always about Netanyahu being killed
I've never said that it's
I mean in fact I've said every time it's certainly
likely even but I do
not think it's been verified and I would say that
right up until the moment till it's literally proven to us
because I don't think it's been proven
you know it's not it's not about me
guessing right to look like I was always right
like these ridiculous mainstream alternatives do
and are usually wrong it's about the
reality that the evidence does not prove
this right now so I'll include this yet
again this is a count saying Benjamin Netanyahu
died on the 9th which just that kind
of certainty without evidence
should be a red flag but either way
what they're trying to insinuate is that
when Trump walked out of this meeting
which by the way if you watch this full thing
it was it was a ceremony
and they left there was no
there was no pre like it wasn't assumed
that he would stop and have a conference it wasn't
even that and so they frame this as Trump
wandering out which everyone thought was so
weird and then they come back around and go
Benjamin Netanyahu died on the 9th and that's why
he walked out so funny this is all Q&
on stuff even if it turns out to be correct
they didn't know that right now and I can prove
that unless they have information that
they're not showing you which why then
would the why would they not show you the thing
that would prove that they know the right thing
ahead of time so in this case this is
what's going around as of yesterday
I'm not saying prove that he's alive it could
also be fake as always but here's a new
video of it from his account on the 17th
of him and
Huckabee
so
if this is fake well then Mike Huckabee
knowingly played this role or at least
he would see a video of himself and know it wasn't
him and they didn't say anything so you
will find out eventually I mean right now
the evidence seems to suggest that there's
something amiss with the AI video and
what we think doesn't happen there's a
thousand possibilities
and this is him saying crossing names off the
list is good you're talking about
murdering people
this just and of course doing it with Americans
is better yeah of course because you can
shuck off the responsibility to them now
I'll give you the pieces people are pointing
to this is one of them where they
they claim that his coat pocket
warbles which I see it to right here
as a point at which his pocket
acts funny like Ray Rose hand goes in
right there
roll on let it go in
now whatever I mean you can watch for yourself
there's a point I didn't see it though it's a clip
where it just looks like the pocket moves funny
yeah maybe it's a I
this was put out in order to say
response to the rumors that he was dead
like guys it could be that he's dead and
they're covering it up certainly it also could
be that they for some reason want you to think that
right I mean
think just think it through let's not assume
I think there's a lot of people out there pushing this
fact for some reason it makes me skeptical
but when it we when we know for sure
I'll tell you that I think we know for sure
and so also the video of the
AI hands this is freeze frame
than one of the ones they claim shows is
I agree that looks funny there's I've seen
one of them in fact I've seen one by the way
that has been altered it's not from this video
so you know just there's something very strange going on
around this but it doesn't mean it's not the case
just question everything and don't claim
it when you don't know it now
and like I said if more comes out
trust me I will talk about that because it's a big deal
and it will show that they lied to us
I want to get I want to finish with this I'm not going to play as much
as I was going to before but this is just with everything
we talked about today
you you need to see this
and this is not just about Joan
it's about the bigger point about the
mainstream alternative and this effort
to constantly drive you back
in to the same thing
that is being exposed every single day
now we talked about this one as well
and this is the same idea Trump tells
the supporters you must worship the never
Trump or neocon Mark Levin
and my point was simply that I remember you calling us
Blackfield for telling you exactly what is now
happening would happen right
and I bet despite what we're currently
seeing and what you're saying that you will carry on
supporting him which this was on
the 16th and this video
on the 17th sure so makes that
clear but we'll see as it goes forward
now what I want you to hear in this is not just that he's
trying to in a weird way convince
you to keep supporting Trump even as he tells
you he's controlled by Israel I guess
but it's that he's actually admitting that
in this very thing and he's
kind of waffled around before he's
saying that you Israel is
rather a foreign power which he's
insinuating I think he does say is really once but
it's funny a foreign power in is
controlling this administration now just
think about this
this is the person and many of them were telling
you when Trump was about to be elected that
the only choice to save the world
from the globalists who he somehow
still paints as Trump
fighting the globalist while he's controlled by
a foreign power I'm going to play it
but what I want you to think about is that then
when they were being fighting to get you to
support Trump you have to understand that
everything he's talking about in here was already
well known even some things
you can quite literally prove we knew then
so why did they
push you to support him
and as I said watch
I hope I'm wrong but watch as whatever they
do here and tap dance about how
that they ultimately come to the point of still
supporting the team and still
supporting Trump and voting in the mid
terms and getting more patriots in the team
and despite knowing that our
government's apparently occupied by Israel
like how you think that makes sense
we're occupied by Israel but go and vote
for the team
I mean guys this is just painful
one because people are by it they want
to hear anything that makes
it all feel like it's not as bad as it might be
he says must watch
Joe Kent resigned to publicly spotlight
the fact that Israel has successfully
conducted a coup
then you see what I'm saying like
we're talking about things in Israel
influencing policy
now I could argue I believe that they've completely taken control
do you think he has evidence of a
literal coup d'etat that took place in this country
probably not
now I wouldn't even disagree with the sentiment but
it's about evidence improving things
and this is the same thing I do every time
now that it's something that everyone's becoming
comfortable talking about he leaps over
the top and goes cruel coup we're war three
even though just before
he was laughing at how dumb we were because we were
trying to tell you when it wasn't easy to say
as Steve says the dangerous dangerous first the
safe dangerous it's what they do
where they operate and it says
now in control of the Trump White House
he's telling you that Israel's in control
of the White House but yet somehow
we need to keep supporting the team
Alex Jones lays out the facts by giving
historical content all he's doing is convincing
you it's important like a previous news
story Walter
Walter
she's like I can't even say his name
basically the past discussing the idea of
Vietnam it's really irrelevant
he's just trying to make this feel like a big
moment even though it is but in a way that
somehow keeps you supporting the team
and calls for all Americans to
peacefully take action
to restore our nation's sovereignty
what does that mean
does that mean over to the Trump administration
oh no no no totally not exactly
the opposite but somehow by peacefully
you know and I'm in no way am I suggesting violence
my point is he's doing that to be careful
because there's going to be some January 6th suggestion
before but peacefully take action
to restore our nation's sovereignty
if Israel's taken over the White House
the only one that means is to
change the power structure
but you just watch
oh by the way one last thing let's not forget
that right before we got here
right before we got here
and this is actually really important before you watch this
what was he telling you
he said
that they would all go to jail
in fact down here in
2024 he says
here's Joan suggesting that
Trump is going to prosecute Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Fauci
and Hillary
and as long as we do this and keep Trump alive
we can stop this
there he is saying oh big big action's coming down
for Obama and Pelosi and James Coney
yep like I told you the time
nope because I wasn't ridiculous I looked at the evidence
and I told you right then there's no way
this is going to happen
big big big and you know why those that's what he says
that's not true so coming back to the point
now now that that hasn't come to fruition
all the different things and claims
and how we're going to save the world and stop globalism
oh but now Trump's controlled by something we told you
in the first place but now let's get into
the how we fix it part
National Center
right under Gabbard
how this is so important
I'm about to say so people understand
how the head of the counterterrorism national center
right under Gabbard
how big what he did
was
to strongly get Trump back on course
but wait a minute didn't you
just literally say Trump was
controlled
the White House control oh the white the Trump
White House okay maybe he means everyone's around him
and Trump's the one fighting for it
that's how he starts or at least it's not technically
it's a clip from the middle to play a second but
peacefully take action
against a resource sovereignty but
that Joe Kent statement that Trump called
a loser is him
getting Trump back on track
guys the mental gymnastics is
hard to watch
basically say there's been an Israeli coup over foreign policy
now they're trying to get domestic control
the Republican party and since the
American people this is all
out in the open
so imagine how big this
is compared to Walter Cronkite coming out
60 years ago and saying
basically we've lost the war
the Pentagon knows it internally they're coming
what do you mean imagine how big it is compared to that
what does that even mean what's the relevance of going look at this
major story from before now imagine
how important this is compared to that
I don't even know why that makes
sense you're just trying to beef up the importance
just make the case here's the thing this is important
I don't even understand what he's trying to do
bring up and then Daniel Ellsberg
who was just a high-level analyst coming out
and saying he's seen all the real intelligence
that it was just a big win it would make money
in a war game and we couldn't win it
without nuking
North Vietnam
imagine how big that was
in the Vietnam War and then remember
Dr. David Kelly who right before
the Iraq war in
2003 was their head analyst
and he was getting ready to go public
and already leaked that it was all a fraud in the line
and so they murdered him
that's how important this is
yeah the guy who Trump called a loser
and said the worst person and they're all attacking him
and now he's a monster and look
and we said before
but that's the guy who's saving everything
which I'm not even disagreeing with the fact that he did the right thing
clearly you know I agree with that
first of all also recognize that this
just a scattered
you know rambling details
much of which is wildly subjective and opinionated
that you will not be able to verify for yourself
one because he never gives you source material
but two because most of it's made up
and a joke
I just mean in the general sense of like the
the globalist take it over inside sources
blah blah blah not the Walter Cronkite part
okay and stature is even
more high profile a bigger deal
than dr. David Kelly
say that we are okay get to the point like this
has just been mostly telling you why it's just like
a little disagree a little
we're talking about life and death
we're talking about war
and murder and chaos and genocide
like these things are real this is intense
this is not the time to
politely disagree
I understand that we're you know
but we a little disagree a little bit it's like
I don't know one side
has made the worst decision anybody's ever
made and got us into World War 3
so I guess that's Trump side
right I mean that's pretty clear
so it's fun but we're World War 3 again
you know but you know my argument
about the reality of the
the metrics in
regard to previous wars but it's just funny
how many times can they tell you we're
World War 3 are about to get World War 3
like it's my point is not that there's not
a valid case we made about where the world is
but that this platform will use that term
every other day about whatever they want to hype
just I think it's interesting
even though we're probably closer at this point
than we have been before but that's the point
to make that they called everything World War 3
going back years ago
so it's meaningless it's like the word any semi to that
meaningless
deliberately for no particular
reason I think it's
okay to be a little bit like intense
about this I think it's actually necessary I
think actually
it's a strategy to lull us into
complacency by just like we'll just
calm down let's just approach this calmly
it's like the guy with the knife
at your neck going well let's just relax
a little let's not need to freak out
it's like no you have a knife to our neck it's okay
it's okay to in this analogy the Trump
administration has a knife to your neck
apparently freak out but of course
if you freak out somebody with a knife to your neck
you might die so we have to freak out in a
controlled fashion if you understand
what you get the way this is actually going
he's saying let's not
really get crazy with the Trump administration
like yeah they're crazy they're about to kill you but
you know we they might if you if you
jerk too fast and called about too much
they might kill you know but
support the Trump administration
it gets better I'm saying but I'm not black
killed in the slightest yeah ice I
but don't worry guys I'm not
claiming we're screwed everything Trump
no hashtag winning don't worry
and
being more intense I'm using more
you know deliberately provocative language
because we have them on the run
now whoa whoa whoa hold on
you have a knife to our neck
we're about we're overtaken by Israel
but we have them on the run
hmm okay
I'd like to let's keep going
was the time to double down
oh double down okay so again if you the
only way you can understand that is
double down on the team
okay I'm not reading the
tea leaps here this is exactly what they're saying
double down so you start by claiming
that it's crazy and the world war
three and they tricked us but
doubled down
got it play the game
keep support the team hashtag winning
trust the plan now is not the time to
like the last thing I want to do is
to put across the idea that like God's
all hope is lost and we've been
betrayed and they've won and
they being what the Democrats
I guess that's the only way you can read
this broken you know the left right
I guess but
all hope is lost we've lost well
you've been lied to about every single thing they've done
every single I mean what
have they actually accomplished even the immigration point
most Republicans are wildly unhappy
about the number that they put forward
so I'd love to hear where in any way
this is not another complete I mean that's the point
though but don't worry I'm on your side still
we still love Trump and everything we're still winning
and it's all great that's just a pandering
effort to your audience which shows
a level of audience capture which is exactly
what you deal with when you lie to people and push parts
just now this to be clear I'm not
there's plenty of stuff Harrison does that I agree with
that's typically how this platform is gone and I'm
not even arguing through all but we saw this work
with Owen Schreuer who admitted that he was
manipulate he did manipulate the show and he did
force him to say things afterward
or everybody else who talked about going back to
Cooper or or
David Knight or or
Reese or every one of them have a
screamingly angry opinion or rather just
that they're exactly what we tell you
they are they lie they manipulate
they deceive they're partisan manipulate
it's it's everything we've always told you and
everyone has ever left them has told you that
but yeah let's keep pretending like it's not
but my point is say is that it's about
the general sentiment of the platform and I think
explicitly driven by by
Alex Jones
but here I think what you're going to see too
when Jones gets cut into a show it's almost
you can almost see it on his face and again
Owen told you this it's constantly how this
works you are there for him you're not your
own person in this platform you know we can
do anything about it that's not it at all
you know because we have them on the run
now is the time to double down
now is not the time
to like the last thing I want to do
is to put across the idea that like oh
it's the all hope is lost
and we've been betrayed and they've won
and you know we can't do anything about
it that's not it at all
you know in this on the battlefield of
the information war their line is wavering
now we send in the cavalry
what are we talking
about so
I'd like to believe it doesn't mean wrong
I'm pretty sure that's not the case but so what's the cavalry
charge you the only thing you could think
of as Democrats versus Republicans and so
why does this make sense in the midst of what's
going on are not the Republicans the one
you just told us are manipulated by
Israel and that they're controlling foreign
policy and it's Trump's administration but now
we need to help work with them to
fight whatever the other side is that you're framing
the globalist I guess even though this is a
globalist organization
agenda that we are watching play out
I don't even know how you can make
sense I'd love to be in this room to be like whoa
hold on who who are you talking
who you're supporting and what side are you taking
I mean if you're the only way to take it is
you're now siding with the Israeli controlled
administration right
that's how this works they're
freaking out they're scrambling they're trying
to figure out how to pull victory
out of the jaws of defeat they who
in a total Iran again
I mean you can consider that but that would mean
that you're now starting with the idea that you support
the ongoing illegal war with Iran even though
we just got told that we tricked into the war
with Israel and they're controlling the
administration I mean there's really no way you can
spin this without this being ridiculous quagmire
they're trying to figure out how to end it quickly
while also trying to figure out how to
make up for all of what we've lost so far
they're scrambling I also want to point out
that this has been a bunch of like
like it's just
a sprawling thing that doesn't even
you could honestly argue that you don't even know exactly
what he's talking about it's just this kind of weird
argument about don't get too sad but we're losing
but don't worry because we're still on your side
and you know it's weird to me it's weird
they're disorganized
they're routing
we run them down
that's the play now that's what we have to do now
double down run them down but we're
occupied that's where we have to push
now there has never been a greater
opportunity for both exposure
and removal of the poisonous
foreign influences that have strangled
our country whoa okay so there's
never been a better opportunity so you're
citing and doubling down with who the Democrats
are I what are you
I do not understand how
you can make these arguments without making
the case that you are saying
continue to side with
at the very least a part
of this administration that has to be Trump
in order to help fight away
the foreign influence
that is concurrently that
administration conducting a war that you told us
or rather drones did was tricked
into by Israel
so how what
what constitutes the continual support
I don't
see the war Trump's telling you to continue
the war so I don't understand how this makes
sense this is a blind effort to say support
the team but not really because they're
bad but we're being tricked but keep
keep doubling down like I'm gonna keep going
guys this is hard this is
an opportunity not a crisis
and it sucks that it got us
to this point and I would
have loved to be sitting here today
reminiscing on the last year of victory
I'd love to be sitting here going another
hundred thousand deportations today look
at that and James Comey has another
broadcast from prison
where he's been sent for the crimes he committed
when we get to the news guys where's the news
well the point is as you
would have known if you cared to look at the facts from
day one or watch the last American
vagabond that was never going to happen
even though it should because I agree
Comey should be in prison because he's a criminal
but they did it on purpose
and somebody who's intelligent could see that
because it was set up that way and the people
that quit because they told the Trump
administration that there was nothing there
they put somebody else in place and they got removed
and it never happened I'm going to
bet you Bolton won't happen either because
it's still up in the air but Leticia James, Comey
they've been dismissed they won't even talk about
anymore I'd love to be sitting here telling you about
how we won but the point is that's not
where we are because none
of the things they promised to happen
how can we not be honest about that
how can we even argue or even
like flirt with the idea
of doubling down if
that's where we are as he just said
that's just
blind support guys that's insane to me
but that didn't happen did it none of that
happened and so here we
are a year later at warthoron
no deep state
convictions very few
deportations I'm not downplaying the good things
that Trump has done oh yeah which ones of those
I mean yeah you could argue there's
some things you agree with but how are you going to ignore
literally every argument every
main thing the wars the increased
spending the larger government
stargate vaccines covid shots
but you know I'm not downplaying all the wonderful
things that he's done this is just a pandering
statement to people that were going oh I
thought you were hitting Trump but as long as you
clearly blindly support him then we're going to keep listening
that's not a good that's not
that's that's not that is a
you know it's propaganda
but if we don't get a handle on this thing
now it's only going to get worse
Alex Jones what do you mean
a handle on it though like now Alex Jones cuts in
but a handle on what
there was no real sentiment there
was this kind of
meandering argument about doing things
what we need to against the team
you know it there where was the I'd love for
someone to break down for me the exact thing he meant
for us to do right there
it's basically like just keep supporting
don't ask why don't we think too hard into it
but we're we're in we're occupied
and if we support still and double down
we can fight that occupation off I guess
because that makes sense but here's Jones to come in and make it all
make sense joins us from the road
are we ready to go to Alex live now
Alex welcome to the show sir how are you
yeah and I'm sure Harrison had a choice
about that didn't he
Harrison you're absolutely right
we should all be white-pilled because
the global awakening is here
wait right about what
so just to be clear he made it very clear right there
we all should be white-pilled
because the globalist awakening is here
after what he just said we're occupied by Israel
he hasn't met the promises
but we're globalism bad we're winning
I mean I've just blown away by
I mean I feel like even Alex could do
a like a lie to you better than this
or whatever you want to call it
James Comey is another person
from the road
from the road are we ready to go to Alex live now
Alex welcome to the show sir
how are you
Harrison you're absolutely right
we should all be white-pilled
because the global awakening is here
we should be realist about
different political movements we put in to do our bidding
are not always going to fall all the way through
oh got it got it
so you are essentially
saying that the people that we put in positions
that we all control just didn't really
follow through with what we liked
but we're occupied by Israel
so I've got some very historic parallels
this is so important what I'm about to say
not really
so people understand how the head of the counterterrorism
national center
how big
what he did was
he should strongly get Trump back on course
I don't understand what if Trump is right now
saying you're a loser
nobody supports you you're the worst person for that job
and clearly
actively
passionately telling people to support the war in Iran
how does this look like
what he just said this is blind
support you are shilling
for Trump and convincing people that what he did
which I agree is the right thing
is driving Trump
in the right direction
there's nothing to make that make sense there's no evidence about that in fact
everything shows you the opposite
and remember he starts
with this he posted it saying
Israel occupies the White House
to basically say there's been an Israeli coup
over foreign policy
now they're trying to get domestic control of the Republican party
and since the American people
this is all out in the open
he must be watching T-Lab from a year ago
or
Adam Green from five years ago
you know what I mean by the way Adam has been calling out Alex Jones
his entire time doing this
doing his show because of things like this
so imagine how big
this is compared to Walter Cronkite
coming out 60 years ago
basically we lost the war
so it's big it's important because that was important
that's why this is important that doesn't make sense
the Pentagon knows it internally they're covering up
and then Daniel Ellsberg
who was just a high level analyst coming out
and saying he's seen all the real intelligence
that it was just a big way to make money in a war game
and we couldn't win it without New Key
yes we get it
imagine how big that was
in the Vietnam War
and then remember Dr. David Kelly
who right before the
or in two thousand
and so they murdered him
so first I'm going to go to a clip
of Walter Cronkite
then
we'll go back
to Daniel Ellsberg so that's our record
the Pentagon Papers
and then I want to put up there
this is your show you're Harrison
you're like you know okay
yes these things happen in Vietnam and there was
and this happened it was a big deal
this is happening too
completely unrelated
totally different thing
right we're talking about in one case the ongoing
Vietnam War that they refuse to end
and allow people to die for
in this case we're talking about Israel manipulating
the US government into a war
now there's parallels you could make
but why would Walter Cronkite statements make
he's just trying to like give himself gravitas
I think it's just weird
I think I put for Dr. David Kelly
he just searched his name and it all comes up about
in the weapons inspector
seems now
asked Wilson to basically
break down the Pentagon
lied to everyone and when we post this
to X later
I'm going to ask Wilson to post the full
at least the first five minutes Walter Cronkite
newscast in there
so people can get the full context of that
then Daniel Ellsberg comes out and confirms
he'd already been leaking information
official Pentagon reports this is going on
now instead of us having to be in Vietnam
for many many years before
the truth came out
the Office of National Intelligence 16 other agencies
including the one that can't
edit up Leviton combat veteran
and the block straight or most
and the whole thing will go from bad to worse
so we'll say Bush
George W.2
2.0 that
all this is lies this is really propaganda
and the block straight or most
and the whole thing will go from bad to worse
so don't do it
and this is what they were telling Trump
and
again this the
the sentiment was they'll do this it'll be over
and so we saw that
unfold and they still did it
and now how many days are we
leaving Trump administration
yes into this now
Harrison
well it's we're coming up on three weeks
we're in the third week
yeah so
I mean it started March
March 1st so what is today
today's the 17th
that's 17 days into this
now they're saying at least September
yeah which was also another lie
right
two weeks to flatten the curve oh excuse me
that's another one third or four weeks
far more than six weeks
oh no now September oh maybe till next year
which is what Israel's saying
are we getting to the point where you go
Trump deceived us he lied
or he didn't he's not following through
never never first it was going to be four days
long it's about regime change
and just because we
brave of you Alex very brave of you to say
what we were all saying before and now you're
feeling it's safe to say it out loud
just because we hate the Islamists
doesn't mean when we walk right into a neocon trap
do we have more you see just because we all hate Muslims
doesn't mean we fall for this trap too
what those here are less
since 2001 we have
15 times in the west on average
okay so so this is the globalist plan
Muslims globalism this
as Trump is creating a new global disorder
this is how they operate
Israel you made
the 20 minute documentary that's got 20 million views
Israel's what?
you should re-hear that the other third hour today
oh yeah just post the video
we post the text also just post the documentary
at the end where it's hundreds
of times Israel saying we're going to suck
the American empire dry will be the new center
of the world with Israel's superpower
okay so here's the thing
this is what I was saying earlier that's something
that he that's something from before
so understand explain for me why you
can express that you know that
that you know Israel had designs to take
over the world and control the US
government you know despite that being publicly
available information should you care to look
but that you knew this then
is the point and you're acknowledging it now
so why Alex Jones did you tell us to vote for
Trump
why as he stood up and told you
that I support Israel no matter what and I
thought why why you tried to gaslight us
into doing so and called us black pilled
and then immediately this is
the same old thing
if he knew that then why would that be
the case because that was his job
in my mind and now it's about trying
to water this down to the point to where we
we know you all see it so we have to give you something
we have to go yeah yeah we see the bad thing
but watch as we fold this in
clumsily to you got to keep supporting
Trump
stuff
anybody saying that Israel's behind
this be censored or arrested
exactly which is what Trump supports as I've
shown you a thousand times but he'll never point
that out and then now we play the club yesterday
where he says very clearly
the same thing we use
with pagers and violence we need to do that
people domestically now in states
I mean you're saying like it's almost like
he's just scrabbling rambling off
things that we've been explicitly showing you a source
material for years
right there he's talking about the example of using
the massage
literally telling you they booby trap things
all over the country we know this we've been telling
you forever and yet he's only
just now rambling all this off
in one long sentiment while he's driving
on Harrison show as if it's somehow
something he broke down
while still telling you to support Donald
Trump this is megalomania
everybody knows I've never been just
an anti-Israel guy
I do a lot of predatory stuff like a lot of other big powerful groups
the Chinese you name it I just oppose it
but now Israel sees the Democrats falling apart
oh yeah they're really trying to enter the power vacuum
oh got it okay
so weirdly enough it's totally not the Republicans
it's it's the Democrats who are falling
apart which I apparently I didn't see that
and they're rushing in to take control of the
Democrat side so for Republican
guys vote Republican so again Daniel
Ellsberg will put that on screen the Pentagon
chai purses high-level analysts
that was the end of it when that finally came out
you still get any notes on how to frame this
you're live dude on his show
him and president and Dr. David Kelly
they weren't about to let that happen
so they killed him
I remember I've interviewed Ellsberg before
a higher level stature and background
his wife dying a gold star family
they're gonna have real trouble like you said
even I see him so here's what I'm telling everybody
we continue to expose Democrats
open borders pedophilia
whoa okay so continue to expose Democrats
open border pedophilia okay
so far I'm not seeing how this connects to Israel
controlling the White House nuclear war with Russia
they're even worse but
the Democrats became
so anti-Israel because that's what they promote at the universities
you know the same Israel he's telling you is illegally occupying
our White House
but they're so anti-Israel they're just disgusting
but a lot of leftist Jews
came over to put their money in Trump
but they're Israel first and so
right like we were telling you and you called us blackpilled
right I don't want to blow up Israel
I want to blow up the Muslims I want to run our own country
we're gonna have real trouble like you said
even I see him so here's what I'm telling everybody
we continue to expose Democrats
open borders pedophilia nuclear war with Russia
they're even worse
but the Democrat nuclear war with Russia by the way
while your Israel's literally threatened nuclear war right now
what a clown
Democrats became so anti-Israel
because that's what they promote at the universities
but a lot of leftist Jews came over to put their money
wait a minute why would so what they promote at the universities
while these people are like 50, 60, 70 years old
somehow influence how they think now
or are you saying that it was all the way back then
somehow you know I mean it's just these things don't make
sense like of course I agree
I argue that there's a political
I agree with the general point of what these schools were doing
and teaching not the point but it's this idea
that somehow that that's this straight line
from the thing I was talking about to what they're
currently doing it's just lazy and there's no
thing it's if there's a thousand steps in between
and the truth is it's not one side of the paradigm
it's obviously our entire government
and anybody who's not ridiculously dishonest
can already see that plenty Republicans
have been calling this out for a long time
he's big he's like grudgingly
catching up to make it as always
to make it look like he was
always doing this mark my word
you're going to hear it Alex was right about this
for like a year from now as if it was somehow
always saying this is always how this goes
and it's not about him in particular but he is
a very important and clear example because he's
one of the largest influencing platforms
he has a larger audience than most of the
mainstream platforms so he's the mainstream
media if you're talking about the most
influence on people that we're trying to reach
it's someone like this so just like we would
break down why Fox is lying it's the same
point I'm saying that because people tend to try
to make this about some kind of a personal thing
it's about per it's about media
and deception and now this guy has
been deceiving people my entire life
in Trump but there is real first
and so I don't want to blow up Israel
blow up the Muslims I don't want to blow up
Israel I want to blow up the Muslims
which I believe is what he said
I was just making sure like if you could
see maybe don't in there but well first
and so I don't want to blow up Israel
blow up the Muslims
just don't worry
clarify yeah we all hate Muslims that's
clear just what
is going on like how is that the
reassuring sentiment
I want to run our own country
we have to point out what's happened
run our own country yeah well let's work toward that
what yes obviously
Trump has gone full neocon
oh
let's support him
he says you must follow his world view
at this point 100% he's saying this will make us lose
in midterms it's out of control
but as Kent said we got to put a lot of pressure
on Trump turn back now before it's too late
oh is that what he said
the one he called a loser and is now
literally going at him like nuclear
style to try to undermine him as a person
but yeah he's getting him right back on track
I mean there's no way you could take this without
realizing where this is going you already
sense it it's already about getting Trump back
on track that sentiment alone shows you
that we're not going Trump is a bad guy
Trump lied to us Trump's occupied by Israel
if Trump is occupied by Israel or his
White House is how do you get him
back on track without exposing that
they're all corrupt
this is a really humanitarian thing he's
done and
and I bet money gathers ready to go
out general Flynn's no fan of the
mollus but he is all about us run our own
sovereignty of America
all about us running our own sovereignty
that's like saying all about being alive
it's just of course
it's but it's it's a sin the idea that
we are sovereign is not like we're fighting
to get there or in the reality you could
argue that but the sentiment should be not
that we're you know it's just a weird thing
to say that I'm all about you know
having freedom
just as if it's some kind of passing fad
this is weird take out the mollus that's one thing
but don't sleepwalk
us into this situation I'm gonna say this
everybody should be white
build to wait for a long time
there's a red pilling worldwide on his tears
record levels what
how can you go from we're occupied by a
foreign power to somehow we're winning
I just like
really this is like this is uncomfortable like I
feel almost so bad for him and so the global
can play their old games and be above the
law the court public opinion they're being destroyed
all they are are they
by destroy do you mean building a new global
order of you know peace board
with multiple foreign countries involved
literally a tangation as the UN
called it a tangential UN Security Council
or his two billion dollar proposal for a
new WHO or any number of examples
the literal network state technocratic agenda
of re or nor I mean everything
happening in front of us or the fact that he's
currently invading and occupying multiple
countries at the same time with Israel
but apparently the global is losing
around the run their systems are falling
apart oh half the Broadway's
over trillion bucks has been cut
oh yeah fraud and abuse is that
why he started a new thing to do that
tomorrow it's just ridiculous
no it's not Jones where are you pulling
this from higher spending bigger
government period the amount of fraud is
off the chain but
that's just we're supposed to say that right
we're lower money and lower costs and everything's
winning half time a lot of good
we just have to look at it
but major pressure on treporee's bad oh
yeah pressure on treporee's abuse
over trillion bucks has been cut
a lot of good still be done by Trump
a lot of good still be done by Trump don't
worry bad bad bad bad but don't worry
there's a lot of good things happening I
won't say them now but a lot of good
I mean you get the point
I'm just this is just
effing incredible to me that this has
ever considered something worthy of your
attention at all it's just
first of all again it's just a bunch of
scattered points there's nothing is there
source material I doubt it and I shouldn't
never but this is just
wild to me and this last point is it
this is the last part we just have to
look at it but major pressure on treporee's
bad support the good appointments where it's
good okay so again
the appointments where it's good meaning the
controlled occupied Israel White House
as he just posted
how can you support the appointments
within an Israel controlled White House Alex Jones
unless you're insinuating that
somehow even though it's occupied that Trump is
secretly within fighting for your side oh I
finally get it this is the new way to
turn it into the rebels by the deep state
because even though you're in the troll white house in control
every government you know that you have the most power you
can hold in this situation you still love
to frame yourselves is like the adversarial
rebel fighting against the power
so I guess you found a way to make that look that
way even though it's ridiculous and hard to believe
that somehow it trumps the insider fighting
against the Israel controlled White House that he allowed
to happen that he brought in
hashtag
build up towards the midterms to get more
better patriots more in the government
more people like Ed Martin
in the Justice Department in the future
go back and vote in the system
that he just told you brought in an occupied
White House because didn't we vote these people in
yes we did
or if you believe that's how this works
you know Ed Martin doing a great job
everything he did anyway
wow
that is hard guys that mean I've just
you know and I put this out often now
look this is again what it says this is the video
he posted
the fact that Israel
has successfully conducted a
coup that means they
control the power structure
and is now in control
of the White House
but go back and vote
support his next appointments
meaning
Mark Wayne moron over there who has
barely tie his shoes but apparently is gonna
I mean guys I don't even I
have a whole thing lined up I feel like I don't even
need to this guy is so
objectively ridiculous he's a
juvenile type person the way he responds he can
barely speak clearly and at the end of the day
this is the new known
but yeah but support that's what he says
support the new appointments so you mean
the Israel controlled White House who clearly
would then influence the appointments we should
support that because hashtag the team right
Alice Jones lays out the facts by giving
historical context
look at the thing Cronkite did we're that
we're cool we're doing it right now
and calls for all Americans to peacefully
take action to restore nation's
sovereignty and by supporting
the next appointment would that be the way to support
the new sovereignty that will come
fill it in Jones I'm still curious
how this works out well
as well as I said the
day before I seem to remember many of us
who tried to warn Americans about exactly
where we currently are that you're now finding
safe to call out and you instead called us
blackpilled and said it was a purity test
while driving people to blindly support Trump
and again while you seem to have known
what Israel's designs were and I said
and I bet despite this post
you'll carry on doing just that
which was that Trump's trying to commit political
suicide to hand Congress over to the Democrats
the next day you just saw
it support Trump and the team
so I guess I was right
and I just for
time since it's you know it was only 12 minutes
but it were well well over what I planned
today but I recommend you watch Ben's
documentary about ISIS
I mean it's it's an Al Qaeda
it's very very clear he goes over the whole
discussion right truth in media
the origin of ISIS and how
obvious it is
lastly oh that's what I just added
so that just to end with that in general
I mean I'll probably I'll just play a little bit to start
and then we'll wrap up we're almost five hours
anyway so you know what do you guys think
should I play it anyway first person to
respond we're already we're already
four hours 45 minutes don't think
it's gonna make that much of a difference
but we'll wrap up here in general
thank you for tuning in today guys
I think this is all
you know just more obvious
than I've ever seen it which is which is a good
thing you know like we're at a point where this
is that clear and it's not this is again
this is if you were to bump
run across somebody would never even heard
of politics and you showed him this information
they'd be like well obviously at least I believe
so I think this is self-evident so
it's important that we
engage it like that like I've been
saying to acknowledge the obvious reality
that for example Isis and Al Qaeda are
very much influenced if not controlled
by the US and Israel that's a fact it's easily
proven as we just did
I mean just be clear
I went over tons of stuff today that I hadn't covered in the past
there's tons of stuff that we didn't
include today just adds to the larger
point but as I said in the beginning
watch James Corbett's documentary watch
what we're gonna play right now guys I think it's very
clear and it will show you not only
is this the reality but that they know
that
arguably even the Jones of the world know that
and yet you still see the same
petitioning you for support
see that for what it is
thank you for tuning in
I love you all as always
question everything
come to your own conclusions
stay vigilant
and
it is the most important
story in the country the next major war
for the United States is with Isis
what media and politicians
are not telling you the truth about
where Isis came from
who created them and why before
one more dollar is spent one more
American life lost
you need to know the truth
the truth
the first step toward truth
is to be informed
the name Isis is one that
every American knows by now the biggest
threat to our national security since Al Qaeda
right they are a brutal
savage group known for public
beheadings and mass executions
they are the face of the new war
on terror right now the
US military is conducting airstrikes in Syria
in a supposed attempt to take out
Isis targets meanwhile
the White House and military leaders are
talking about possible boots on the ground
in Iraq again
only three years after the war in Iraq
was declared over
in fact this war
according to former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
could last for decades
we're looking at
kind of a 30 year war
kind of history here
so who exactly is
Isis and where do they come from
it's entirely a creation
of the United States' behavior in Iraq
that's how we got to where we are
because of war because of occupation
because of torture
for answers we traveled
to Los Angeles to meet with Angela Keaton
the founder of antiwar.com
we destabilized and wrecked Iraq
I mean it caused it to
fail miserably and that's entirely
the responsibility of the United States government
there's no one else at fault there
I mean as horrible as Saddam Hussein was
there was you know Iraq
was not unstable it was a functioning
country as much as those sorts of things go
and it was not a particularly horrible hellhole
if you were a religious minority
to understand where Isis comes from
you have to understand two storylines
the first is what Keaton just said
when the U.S. first went into
Iraq we blew the country apart
we destroyed the government
Saddam Hussein destroyed infrastructure
and most importantly left behind
a power vacuum
one that would have never have existed
had Hussein not been
overthrown by the U.S. government
Daniel McAdams with the Ron Paul Institute
says this is an historical fact
that media just won't discuss
all of this has to do with
U.S. action in the region
which destroyed the infrastructure
which destroyed Iraqi society
which destroyed the government
you had a lot of people who lived under Saddam Hussein
who may not have been as happy
as Larks nevertheless
they were living somewhat normal lives
the U.S. put a government in power
in Baghdad that all of a sudden
was their enemies
that treated them very, very badly
Now that is the easy part of the story
the U.S. created conditions in Iraq
where Isis could get it start
but here's the other storyline that you have to understand
that even with Saddam gone
Isis still couldn't have risen to power
had it not been
for what happened next
Isis actually began
as a small insurgent group in Iraq
in 2006
they had no money
no real ability to recruit
but they did work to create very limited problems
for the U.S. military
it wasn't until 2009
that Isis shifted its focus from Iraq
where it was largely unsuccessful
in developing a foothold
and focused on the civil war in Syria
even there
Isis struggled to gain any foothold
because the two largest groups fighting against
President Bashar al-Assad
were al-Nusra Front
al-Qaeda and the Free Syrian Army
then came a pivotal moment
that most Americans aren't even aware of
in June of 2013
a northern general
for the Free Syrian Army
spoke out on al-Jazeera Qatar
and stated that if international forces
did not send weapons
the rebels attempting to overthrow
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
would lose their war
in just one month
well only months before
I had personally confronted President Obama
about why the U.S. was covertly
funding those Syrian rebels
and yet there's some concern about the U.S. funding
the Syrian opposition
when there are a lot of reports that al-Qaeda
is kind of heading up that opposition
how do you justify the two
well I share that concern
and so what we've done
is to say we will provide
non-lethal assistance
to Syrian opposition
leadership that are committed to
a political transition
committed to a
an observance of human rights
we're not going to
just dive in
and get involved with a civil war
that in fact
involves some
elements of people who are genuinely trying to get a better life
but also involve some folks
who would over the long term do
the United States harm
so even as the president acted as if
he was being careful
politicians like Senator John McCain
demanded action
so it's a totally unfair and unbalanced fight
and now the rebels
are the freedom fighters
the Syrian National Army
are being
beaten every place
around Syria because of the overwhelming
firepower and airpower
is really the deciding factor
so you've got to take their
airpower out of it
you've got to have a safe zone where they can
operate, train and equip
and we've got to turn this thing around
so what happened?
well within just a matter of weeks of that Syrian general
making his plea for international help
the US, the Saudis
Jordan, Qatar, Turkey and Israel
began providing weapons
and training and money
to the so-called rebel free Syrian Army
by September of 2013
American media outlets including CNN
and the Washington Post were reporting that
CIA funded weapons
have begun flowing to Syrian rebels
the weapons were not American made
but funded and organized
by the CIA
the artillery was described as light weapons
some anti-tank weapons and ammunition
but where it all fell apart
weapons that the US
insisted would be used by
freedom fighters would be
in less than one year in the hands of
ISIS fighters
so where were these fighters coming from?
actually
from the free Syrian Army
the group that John McCain insisted
would help the US to overthrow Assad
that same group actually
giving weapons, selling weapons
and sending fighters
to join with this new group
called the Islamic State
it was in June of 2014
when suddenly
after being a no-name group
in Syria that ISIS
emerged heavily armed
and trained by US
and coalition special forces
making a dramatic entrance by crossing back
over the Syrian border into Iraq
capturing Mosul
and much of the northern part of the country
one of the most important facts
that mainstream media ignores time and time again
is that ISIS
was able to grow so fast
because of all the US military equipment
they were able to seize
equipment that our military left
in Iraq
truckloads of humvees, tanks and weaponry
that instead of taking or destroying
the US government
simply decided to leave behind
even when the US government
knew that ISIS fighters were capturing
that equipment for crying out loud
these guys were posting pictures of themselves
driving and standing on
US military equipment
making video of themselves with it
we did nothing
why?
how is it that the US had no idea
that this threat was coming
how many billions did we spend
maybe 100 billion on the
total intelligence community budget
over the year
how is it that they had no idea
if this was such a threat
as John McCain and Lindsey Graham
were fond of reminding us
how is it that it was missed so
unbelievably so egregiously
over the past few months the US government
who acted like they had never even heard of ISIS
suddenly with the help of media
has turned the Islamic State
into the new focus of the war on terror
now as ISIS has continued its rise
recruitment is exploding
and the group is becoming stunningly
wealthy
ISIS is the best funded
terrorist group in the world
they make some 2 million dollars a day
selling oil much of it
to Turkey
interestingly enough
and if you look at the US response to this
the US response to ISIS
becoming extremely rich by selling
oil and undercutting the competition
is to blow up the oil fields
which to me makes no sense you're blowing up the infrastructure
it happens to be in Syria
so you might think that there is
another motive there
but why wouldn't you the US sanctions
anything that moves when it's angry
why can't you sanction the banks that are helping
finance these deals
why can't you sanction the oil companies
that are participating in this
why do you blow up the oil fields
it's a great question
and here are some other questions that defy logic
when you start looking for answers
why is the US sending 500
million dollars to the free Syrian army
to fight ISIS
when the FSA is one of the biggest suppliers
of fighters and weapons
to ISIS
why are we sending new and more powerful weapons
to the FSA like anti aircraft missiles
weapons that we know
will end up in the hands of ISIS
ISIS of course is going to now have
anti aircraft missiles provided
by the US and the Saudis
the Saudis
are getting them from the Chinese though now
so there can be plausible deniability
because inevitably these sweethearts
in the sweetheart rebel groups in Syria
are going to start shooting down
if they have the ability
passenger jets
and then we're going to want the plausible deniability
no no no it's the Chinese weaponry
as if it's going to make any difference
well there are so many questions that we could ask
but let's just cut to the chase here
because what you need to know about this
is that ISIS
is not the creation
of American inaction
which is what the media is going to tell you
no they are the product
of direct action
first the action of creating a power
vacuum in Iraq
and secondly, arming violent jihadists
hoping they would overthrow a leader
in a neighboring Middle Eastern country
McAdams says the US government
is a victim
of its own insane policies
well I think the US
is really a hostage
to its own regime change philosophy
you know the US
is very good at blowing things up
and destroying societies
but it is very very bad at putting them back together
is that true
well you decide
fact, our government armed Osama bin Laden
and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan
and created al-Qaeda
fact, our government
we helped supply Saddam Hussein
chemical weapons for him to use against Iran
in 1980
and then overthrew him in
2003
fact, our government trained
rebel fighters in Syria
who have become the group today
known as ISIS or the Islamic state
we have watched them commit
every violent atrocity
that you can imagine
to people living in Iraq and Syria
and now we want American
taxpayers to fund
a 30 year war against them
no, it's not the US
government being held hostage
by these crazy policies, it's the American people
and it's time that we reject
the destruction of people groups around the world
for the sake of foreign policy
that makes so called defense contractors
rich and perpetuates
violence, death and destruction
of entire people groups
because humanity
is greater than politics