Folks, I'm going to talk about the continued persecution of doctors, in particular Dr David
Cartland and Dr Billy Ralph. Doctors are being erased, not for harming patients but for speaking
at. It's been six years since Covid began. I'm not even sure how long it's supposedly
been over now, I mean has it even ended? One day it was everything and the next day
it vanished, replaced by the Ukraine war. Remember that? But one thing has not ended and that is the
persecution of doctors. Here in the United Kingdom and Ireland doctors are still being investigated,
dragged through tribunals, suspended, erased and financially ruined. And when they go to
these tribunals, trust me when I say they are kangaroo courts, they are exactly like the
Soviet era showcase trials. In this article I'm focusing on two doctors, Dr David Cartland
and Dr Billy Ralph. But there are many more. If I were to cover them all, this wouldn't be an
article, this wouldn't be a short podcast, it would be a book. And with time, something else
has become clear. Many of these doctors are being vindicated. Let's talk about David Cartland
from doctor to simply unemployable. So let's be absolutely clear about what's happened to Dr David
Cartland. Many of you may remember that he was one of the earliest doctors to speak out against
the Covid madness. You know, we've had Dr Sam White and we know what's happened to him,
Dr Muhammad Adeel, we know what happened to him and then there's Dr David Cartland,
one of the most prominent doctors, anti-Covid, pandemic, dissident doctors you can think of.
He's got a very large X profile and he's been speaking out against the nonsense for years now.
But he wasn't just struck off by the GMC. You know, that's the ultimate weapon, by the way,
that the regulatory bodies hold over the doctors. If you disappear, we're going to strip you
of your title and of your ability to practice medicine and ultimately we're going to rub you
of your livelihood. Now that's one of the reasons why I left the GMC. I saw the playbook. I had
interviewed so many doctors from around the world from lots of different regulatory bodies,
but they're all being treated the exact same way. And I thought, I can't stay in the system.
So the noose around my neck, I removed it and handed it back. But it's not just that,
that's not the only sanctioned punishment that's been placed on David Cartland.
He's now also been placed on both the adult and the children's barred list by the disclosure
and barring service, which is commonly known in the United Kingdom as the DBS system.
Just in case people outside of the UK don't know what this is, whenever you go for a job,
whenever you apply for a job, they do a DBS check on you. And it's to check that you've
got no criminal record, that you're fit to be an employee, that you're not some pedophile or rapist
or murderer. And this ban that's on David Cartland is an indefinite ban. And let me be clear, a ban
in their own words means it would prevent David from continuing to work or applying in any role
which involves healthcare or the care of others. But it's even more than that. In other words,
his career has not just been taken from him, he's just been made
unemployable. And it actually goes beyond medicine. Because of that DBS decision,
even roles that are completely unrelated to clinical care have been taken away from him,
even voluntary roles. David loved refereeing football matches. It was one of his
mental releases. It was how he stayed psychologically healthy, despite all of the
nightmare that was going around him. And actually it turned out he was very good at it.
And he was being promoted rapidly was going up to the ranks and refereeing. But the football
association, again known as the FA here in the UK, has prevented him from refereeing even at
amateur level. So the one thing that gave him pleasure in life, a release from the madness,
they've even robbed that from him. And why you might ask, well, not because the children
are playing football. These are adult matches. No, because children might be present around the pitch
or in the audience spectators watching. And he's on the pitch. And remember, he's not actually done
anything to children. I'm going to come back to that in a second. Because you see, there are no
patient complaints against him. The whole case which led to his dismissal from the GMC and
being struck off centres around social media conduct, basically what he posted online,
what he posted on X, what he posted on Twitter. So he's lost his ability to practice medicine,
his career, his livelihood, not even recreational things like refereeing, because of his online
social media activity. He has been made persona non grata, because of what he's expressed his
views. Let's go back to what the GMC said. So they said, well, we've dismissed him and struck him off
because of his social media conduct, the language that he used, the tone that he used, and allegations
of harassment and dishonesty. These allegations are strongly disputed by David.
But here's the most revealing line in the entire document provided by the MPTS and GMC.
Your personally held beliefs have infiltrated your work.
So you're not allowed to have your own beliefs?
Really? So the MPTS, being the Medical Tribunal Service, part of the GMC regulatory system,
the Kangaroo Court, they're behind all of this. So he wasn't done on clinical incompetence
or patient harm, but his beliefs. They acknowledge his right to free speech,
but then punish him for exercising it. This was never about patient care. This is about expression.
This was about going against the mainstream held views, which in turn were dictated to
by philanthropists who controlled the who, the UN, the media, the universities who've
hored themselves out for the research grants, big pharma, the government politicians and public
health bodies. That's what it's about. And that, I want to talk about something that they always
bring in. It's called bringing the profession into dispute. And I explored this in detail in
my article about Dr. Sam White. And if you read my substack, you'll see the link to that
because this phrase sounds reasonable until you realize what it actually means.
It doesn't mean harming patients. It doesn't mean incompetence. In fact, what they actually mean
by bringing the profession into dispute is challenging authority, questioning policy,
and speaking uncomfortable truths. You're not allowed to do that.
You're not allowed to do that. You're not allowed to step out of line.
In other words, damaging reputation of the profession, which sometimes is necessary,
by the way. And reputation isn't true. And it's certainly not patient care.
And I think I've repeated that several times in my podcast. So Sam White case is not the only one
where he was done for bringing the profession into dispute. It's used a lot by a lot of
medical regulatory bodies around the world. It's a tagline used again and again.
And I'll come back to that in a second. So the problem is thought crime and the process is the
punishment. And I've also written about that was one of my earliest substacks. The process is
the punishment and the thought crime. Because what we are witnessing isn't just punishment
for outcomes. It's punishment for just simply thinking, critically thinking, questioning,
for speaking, and for dissenting. And the investigation itself is often the punishment.
You know, in my case, I was suspended for five months. You can't earn any money. You can't
provide for yourself. Your business just goes down the pan. And it's the same with all these
doctors. The stress, the uncertainty, the financial destruction, the reputational damage,
not being able to see or treat your patients, all the stress dealing with the legal correspondence.
And often, regardless of the stress, you know, you know, regardless of the outcome,
the damage is done. Like it's done. And this is the part that no one wants to talk about.
Coordinated harassment. I've publicly and privately disagreed with David's approach.
I've told him not to engage with the trolls online, especially in X,
watch and mind his language. Don't get down to their level. And I told him to step away and
even leave the GMC, as I eventually did, because I saw the GMC for what it was. And like all medical
bodies and regulatory bodies are essentially a noose around the neck of all doctors.
And these trolls online aren't just harmless people. No, no, no. They're organized.
They're like a pack of rules. They are coordinated. And in many cases, they appear to be linked
to state propagandist structures and other institutions. In my own experience,
I saw individuals openly discussing targets and targeting doctors. I saw a post like,
we've got David. Now, now next it's going to be Doc Malick. Oh, I've reported Doc Malick to Spire
Hospital. You know, stuff like that all the time. I became a target. And when I was suspended,
they celebrated. And when I asked for, you know, the information request to my own data
to see what was going on by the GMC and the medical private medical hospitals, you know,
I saw that in their private hospital GMC correspondence, they're including posts from,
you know, the ex post and they had screenshots of them. And one of them is Johnny C. Holmes.
So if you don't know, Johnny C. Holmes was a famous American porn star.
I mean, they're literally openly mocking me. He's dead, by the way,
quite a long time ago. So Johnny C. Holmes complained about me and the private medical hospitals
used that as evidence against me. A dead American porn star. Right. And there are networks of
individuals, many of whom appear to be aligned with or influenced by units such as the 77th Brigade,
which is actually part of the British army. It's involved in information warfare and
psychological operations. And I know people are going to be uncomfortable hearing this.
But these tactics were used domestically against their own population.
Doctors like Sam White, Muhammad Adil, David Cartland and myself were targeted.
And I don't talk about Jane Donahan, Sarah Myhill and McCloskey, Jared Waters. I mean,
it goes on and on and on. And then they finished David Cartland, they finished him off.
As if striking him off, the GMC medical register wasn't enough. As if destroying
his career was not enough. The DBS has ensured he can never rebuild. They acknowledged the impact
on his career, on his livelihood, on his mental health. And they still call it proportionate.
This isn't regulation. This is erasure. This is just destroying you.
Let's talk about Billy Ralph, same system, same outcome.
He's a GP based in Ireland and is under the jurisdiction of the Irish Medical
Council, not the General Medical Council. But to be honest, it makes no difference.
They all act and behave the same way because they're all getting the same marching orders.
And according to a substack written by Louise Rosengrave, which I'm going to link in my
substack, you know, the case, the medical case, the council case against him opened
in March this year. It started this week. In fact, I've spoken to Billy about it.
And their concerns were his public commentary on Ireland's COVID response,
not patient harm or clinical negligence. And the article says that he's facing seven
allegations that the council claims his social media commentary was inappropriate
and or key words, guys, back to this again, undermined public health guidelines.
That word undermined. What is striking is that in this case, as reported,
appears to rest overwhelmingly on his speech, his free speech.
There's no complainant in the case now. There's no, there's no, no one's harmed,
no nothing. The inquiry solely focuses on his activity, Billy's activity on X and his writings
for Cassandra Voices. And apparently the book of evidence runs to almost six and a half thousand
pages, including around 1800 pages documenting his post on X about COVID, iRomectin and
COVID vaccines. And if you have a quick glance at his post, you can't do anything but cheer
morning and applaud him because he was spot on. He was right. And at the same time, it also includes
650 pages of positive testimonials from patients gathered over his 30 year career as a GP.
The article that I've just referenced by Louise sets out several of the statements that are
now effectively being put in the dock. Let's have a look at some of them. And these are,
by the way, why don't I just mention that he's criticizing Billy's criticizing the
national public health emergency team, which is the Irish government advisory body
that led the COVID response. So the shorthand is NPHET. I don't know how you pronounce that,
N-FET, maybe N-FET. So I'm just going to call it N-FET. Okay, the Irish government's
response, the advisory body that led the response to COVID. And this is what Billy said.
The pandemic is over. N-FET lacked the expertise to analyze current data. And the key thing is
October 2020, he wrote this. He also said N-FET are a liability also from October 2020. Remember
the people doing the lockdowns, recommending the lockdowns, the masking, the social distancing,
the things that destroyed our economies, our societies, the welfare of our children,
added the disease burden to society, destroyed small and medium-sized businesses. It goes on and on and
on, right? Yeah, he's right. And no change in deaths. So lockdown is a complete waste of time,
of people's time. Again, he said this November 2020. He also wrote in July 21,
there is no public health emergency, no need for mass vaccinations, no need for coercive
population control measures. There is a dire need for Irish people to wake up and take back their freedom.
Clap. God bless Billy Ralph. Spot on. And then in August 2021, he wrote health services would
be overwhelmed if everyone wasn't vaccinated. Not true. Vaccinate the vulnerable, everyone else
gets a cold. That's the kind of opinions being used against him. Now I don't agree
with the last thing. I think no one should get vaccinated. No one should get vaccinated.
And they're using that against him. This is the kind of opinions they're using, by the way.
I mean, apart from that vulnerable vaccine thing, everything he said was spot on.
And I believe now, with the test of time in hindsight, it's obvious, blatantly obvious,
that what David Cartland and Billy Ralph have said is spot on. And they were not wrong about
criticising the government COVID response, the lockdowns, the masking, the social distancing,
the vaccine harms, they were spot on. And yeah, it's easy to say that with the benefit of hindsight.
But the truth is, even then, it was obvious if you just looked and saw and were not influenced by
the propaganda and the mind control. But today, now in 2026, I mean, come on, it's obvious
that they were right. So what exactly are the allegations again? So again, Louise talks about
this, she says, Irish Medical Council will argue that through Billy's criticism of the COVID response,
he's acted contrary to sections 20 and 44 of the Guide to Professional Conduct and Ethics for
Registered Medical Practitioners. I'm sorry, I thought professional meant having integrity,
having morals, conducting yourself in a certain way. I'd argued that the majority
of doctors are anything but professional. I would argue that David Cartland and Billy Ralph
are the real professionals. But they're in the dock. They've been punished because
they're going against the guidelines for professional conduct. You can't make this up.
The council position is that his posts were not in accordance with those sections and that the content
was inappropriate and wait for it, undermined public health guidelines. In other words, yet again,
the core accusation is not that he harmed a patient, not that he was wrong,
but that he publicly challenged the official line, undermined that key word.
And the extraordinary detail of this case is there is no complainant. Did I mention that?
So the original complainant, which these investigations need to be triggered by someone,
well, someone did in July 2021, but they're no longer in the current book of evidence
and they appear to have been withdrawn. So if the original complainant has withdrawn,
why is there a case against Billy Ralph? Why is the Irish Medical Council going for him?
So this is really the medical establishment hunting down Billy Ralph and trying to crucify him.
And of the 25 references, the only witness available to the inquiry is the Irish Medical
Council's own expert witness whose report contains 25 references to posts by Dr. Ralph,
but 11 of which fall outside the period of investigation identified by the council itself,
which is 2020 to 2022. There are serious questions about the fairness and coherence of the so-called
process. But like I said, this is a kangaroo court, what do you expect?
And from all the stories that I've heard from various doctors from around the world,
their evidence bundles have not been submitted. The witnesses have not been able to produce
their own, sorry, the doctors have not been able to produce their own witnesses.
It's like going into a boxing ring with your hands tied behind your back and your eyes blindfolded.
That's what it's like going into these medical tribunals. And Dr. Ralph also challenged the
meaning of the phrase undermining public health kindness and asked for the actual definition.
And he sent me a text today and said, you know, they admitted that the court admitted that
they didn't have an official definition and they were only using the word undermined as
it's commonly used. The exact wording for Billy was this, we pinned them down on a
definition of undermining and they had to admit there wasn't any. So they had to revert to common
use of the word. There you go. So what does undermining actually mean? It means no patient
complaints, no clinical failings, no obvious injured party. But the doctors dragged before
his regulator because he criticised the public health bodies, the government narrative,
question lockdowns, spoke about ivermectin, challenged mass vaccinations and refused to
stay inside the boundaries of approved opinion. This is why I say this is all about thought crime.
This is why I say the process is the punishment. This is why what is happening to Billy Ralph
and what has happened to David Cartland and Sam White and all the other doctors
is matters far beyond Ireland, the UK. It affects every patient everywhere in the world
where they are being treated by a doctor who is licensed and registered and working under the
noose of the system. Because what it means, I mean undermining the medical profession
on the surface sounds reasonable, okay? On the surface. But when you really examine it closely,
it becomes having far more dangerous. Even within legal and professional circles,
there's growing concern that these regulators are stepping beyond protecting patients
and are simply policing behaviour and opinion. Because what does it actually mean? Remember,
it's not, doesn't mean harming patients, it doesn't mean incompetence. It means you've
done something to embarrass the profession, challenge authority, speaking out of turn,
questioning the government. That's what it means.
Damaging reputation. But reputation is not the same as the truth. And this idea that you
undermine the medical profession, because this is what's important, because it means if your
professional judgment conflicts with official messaging, stay silent.
It means truth is subordinate to narrative. It means your duty is no longer to the patient.
It is to the system. And again, if you go back to Dr Sam White's judgment, they said,
you know, for bringing the medical profession into dispute and potentially patient harm.
Well, the two are not always aligned. What is best for the patient is not always
what is best for the medical profession. What is best for the patient is not always
what is best for the public health messaging. What is best for the patient is not always what
is best for government. History has shown us that. And actually, sometimes, as in the recent
years, what's best for the patient is speaking out against the medical profession,
is undermining the medical profession, is undermining doctors and the public health body
and the government. And make no mistake, this is a warning. This isn't just about David
Cartland. This isn't about Billy Ralph. This is a message to every single doctor,
the 300,000 in the UK, the thousands in Ireland, the millions across the world.
This is saying, you know, be quiet, stay in line, do not question,
do not challenge or this is going to be you next. You want to hear the uncomfortable truth?
It's this, if the majority of doctors stood up, this would have ended. If even 5% of doctors stood
up and said, you know what, this is garbage. Lockdown is garbage. Masking is garbage. All
this is unscientific. We're not complying with this. Just 5%. 5% of doctors said, no,
nothing, it would have ended everything. Ended everything.
But they didn't. Because to see what happens to those who do and they're cowardly,
and they, yeah, they're thinking not about first do no harm. They're thinking about first
do no harm to my reputation, my career, my license, my registration, my income,
my pension, my holidays, my fancy car. Yeah, oh, first do no harm to the patient,
as long as I'm following the guidelines. Yep, that's it. That's great.
That's not ethical. You know, I've heard of some doctors who now start to speak out
and they're retired and they go, oh, yes, yes, well, that's great that you're speaking out
now, but you've got nothing to lose. Great. You've got your pension, you've had your career,
how many doctors in the middle of their career said, you know what, this is wrong.
This is wrong. I'm willing to put everything on the line to speak up for the patient,
for informed consent, for medical ethics, and because the right thing to do, how many doctors?
300,000 in the UK, how many doctors?
Pin drop silence. It's embarrassing.
Folks, I'd really like it if you could support David and his family. I mean, they're a tough patch,
okay? If you've read this far, you'll understand or listened to the podcast as far,
you'll understand this is not just about one doctor, but right now, there's a man and his
family facing the very real consequences of this system. He's lost his career,
he's lost his income, he's lost his ability to work in the fields he trained in and dedicated
his life to, and the impact on his life, his mental wellbeing, his family, and his marriage
have been profound. You may not agree with everything he said or how he said it, I certainly don't,
but what has happened to him goes far beyond fair or proportionate.
So if you feel compelled to, please can you support David directly at givesendgo.com
forward slash Dr. Dave, DAVE Cartland, all one word. I've set it up. It wasn't his idea.
I insisted and any contribution, no matter how small, will help him and his family begin to rebuild.
And folks, there's a final thing I want to say.
The GMC persecution is real. Between 2018 to 2022, there were 27 doctors who died,
basically during an investigation. Five of them were verified suicides.
And one in three doctors who are investigated by the GMC admit to having suicidal thoughts.
Dr. Billy Ralph tried to take his life in July 2022. It was a serious attempt. He was an ITU.
David Cartland has attempted to take his life. What they do to these doctors is
it's cruel beyond belief. I had a flavor of it. I had a flavor of it. They destroyed my career,
you know, my very well paid salary. Now I'm a podcaster, but I love it. I'm living my true
authentic life. But it costs a lot. It costs a lot. It costs a lot. It's tough on the marriage.
It's tough on the family. You lose all your friends. It can be very lonely.
But doctors like Dave Cartland, Sam White, Billy Ralph, Jerry Waters, myself,
we're doing what we're doing because we care about all of you. We care about humanity.
We care about how you get treated by your doctors. We care about how your children
are going to get treated. We care about the evil that's going on in this world and want to do something
about it. So I'll give you this final thought. And I don't say this lightly. This system is not
about protecting patients. It's about protecting itself, controlling dissent. It's protecting
the establishment, protecting the government line, protecting big pharma. And unless that is
recognized, it will continue because the truth is simple. If you cannot question authority,
you're not practicing medicine. You're just serving authority.
Okay, folks, on a happy note, I've launched my retreat. I think we've sold just over
30 of the tickets for June. Please check out my website, docmalic.com. It's under events.
I'd love you guys to join me in June where we can just have fun and eat great food and laugh
and not cage yourselves and pretend to fit in with other people or
censor ourselves or walk on eggshells where you can just be and play and laugh.
I think I need it just as much as you guys. I just want to be like the retreats last year.
I just loved because I was surrounded by people who were just beautiful. Like I found my tribe.
So if you want to find your tribe, book a slot, join me on the retreat. We're going to have a blast.
All right, folks, lots of love. Bye-bye. I am a Malik. I'm a private
civilian protected by the Geneva Convention. My sub-stack, social media posts and podcasts
are my personal experiences, observations and opinions. This information is for educational
purposes only. Although I am a doctor, I am not your doctor and I am not providing medical or
legal advice to you or to the wider public. I'm not licensed or registered with the GMC or any
other licensing board. The responsibility for the interpretation due diligence and use of the
information from my sub-stack and my podcast lies with you, the viewer and or listener.
Please do your research and use your your discernment. It is not my intention to harass,
intimidate, offend, defame, conspire, blackmail, coerce or cause anxiety, alarm or distress to any
man or woman and the information presented here is done so with peaceful and honourable intentions.
Enjoy, folks.