These globalists want to squander all of America's strength, blood, and treasure, chasing monsters
and phantoms.
Ladies and gentlemen of Georgia, the golden age of America is upon us.
We are in the golden age.
This is the greatest we'll ever be.
And together with your help and the patriots all across this magnificent land, we love
our country, we will make America powerful again.
We will make America wealthy again.
We will make America healthy again.
We will make America strong again.
We will make America proud again.
We will make America safe again.
And we will make America great again.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Georgia.
Thank you.
It starts with a simple question and ends in objective reality.
Through our journey from there to here, we find one another and ourselves.
And as the next 24 hours breaks free from our last, we gaze onward in reflection of the
day.
Welcome to the Daily Wrap-Up.
Sunday, July 26, 2026.
Thank you for joining me today.
Obviously, a lot going on.
I thought today it's important that we focus on domestic and what's changing within our
country.
Something I recently highlighted quite a bit, but I really want to continue to kind
of bring the focal point not just on what ICE is doing, but what is, you know, that was
a problem that was already clearly growing within this country long before Trump, long
before ICE in the sense of today, but that has clearly gone off the edge.
And that specifically in regard to sort of this growing authoritarian, you know, whatever
you want to frame it as, something not consistent with what left or right wants to believe
our American values or what our government believes are those values.
And so I think it's important that we go, you know, not too deep, but just very
clear about what is being allowed and how that's growing throughout this, you know,
society, from an authority sense, from the enforcement arm of the government
growing throughout that part of the society.
And it's not new, as I'll show you as well.
Plenty of examples.
Jason Bassler and the Free Thought Project, Matt Agarist have been doing
this for a long time.
They have an account, Police to Police, I believe it's 2.0.
There's plenty of examples you can go through on that account alone, showing
you going back years, decades, how this has been something that's been allowed,
which is, you know, to some degree will be there in a society.
The problem is not simply and that you could also make an argument about what
you see in some of the partisanship where you pick one video out, you know,
racially, you know, you know, black guy attacking a white guy, white guy attacking
a black, you know, whatever angle it is and then acting like that,
that encompasses everything everywhere.
That's what all of them do.
Even if you believe that's the case, that video does not make that case, right?
But it could be the reality.
The point is that you have a lot of the dishonest nature around these things.
So it shouldn't be, here's an example of a police officer violating our rights.
Therefore, that's what all police do.
That's not sound logic.
The point would be to continue to look into it and see the prevalence, to see how long, you know,
to see the consistency of it.
And also, more importantly, to see how the power structure follows up on it,
whether they do anything about it, right?
And this is also just the prevalence and can do, you know,
how often it's happening with them choosing to ignore it,
but then also how clear it is, the good, the pretty conversation,
the people being shot in broad daylight in front of all of this country
and how they choose to acknowledge that, how they choose to deal with that,
or not at all, as it would seem.
And I really want to highlight what I think this is and where it goes.
Now, we're not going to get into, for example, why I might think that's happening.
I mean, maybe I'm sure I'll give my thoughts around things as we're going through it today,
but I don't want to focus or, you know, really get into what may be driving that
just to kind of an acknowledgement of where we are.
And this is really speaking to the people out there who are waking up from the two-party illusion.
But again, you know, we can, we can, I don't want to continue to beat the dead horse,
but can we continue to acknowledge how very clearly correct we were about the arrays,
the growing awareness from conservatives more than anything right now,
but within the two-party illusion?
Same thing we tried to scream was happening during COVID-19 with Democrats.
And yes, people are still grudgingly admitting that it wasn't as partisan as it seemed.
This is the way the game is played from power structures to keep us lost within their illusions.
Conservatives have literally turned on for, in January, this was clear.
In February, this was clear.
One point we're going to make today are the people suddenly going,
what, did he lie to us?
I want my money back.
And it's very frustrating.
Even if it's honest, you kind of just go, you know, it's like the COVID point.
And those same people made these arguments about people during that and said,
how can they not see it?
How can they not notice all of the evidence around this science that shows they're killing people?
We're going to make those same arguments about all of them putting on the tap dance
the show about how, oh my God, Trump's a different person today.
No, it's the same point.
How could you not see it?
He was the same person.
And if you're aware of that, if you watch this show,
if you're a nonpartisan objective person, that was something you knew in 2016.
And it's not about left and right or choosing sides.
It's about being honest about who we're looking at.
And the fact that how transparently clear it was that he was throwing out things
that he thought you wanted to hear.
And it just felt right because he said things that many other people never wanted to say
or never were allowed to say or just never thought would actually, you know,
they wouldn't remain in power if they did.
And I felt good in the sense of people that believed him is the point.
But few of the things I want to get into before we truly focus,
which is the main point today on ice.
And it's not even just ice, but the larger, growing authoritarian reality
of the country we live in as it calls itself a democracy,
leading the freedom push for the world when it is, I mean, objectively,
one of the most alarming places in the planet right now.
And that's not necessarily because of how extreme things are, you know,
like you can compare, for example, China's surveillance setup,
you know, authoritarian dictatorial, absolutely.
And it's at least as it appears far more alarming than what we're currently seeing.
But it's about the direction, the stated objectives of our government,
the influence from foreign powers, and the fact that they're jointly committing genocide
in front of the entire world.
We have to acknowledge what this really looks like and what this is,
a very, very carefully covered, long-term concealed, you know,
window dressing type of thing that is not, you know,
that's driving us toward the worst of humanity while pretending that it's saving us from it.
That doesn't mean it's there yet.
Doesn't even mean, you know, it's, again, I'll leave it there for you to decide
how you feel about that.
The point is not even getting into the whys and the proof.
It's about where we are.
And if you want that to be the case, and if you don't,
maybe realizing that choosing one of the sides of the same power structure
that's doing it to you is probably not the best decision.
So to leave it there to start, we're going to get into a little bit about Iran
just to get you updated because I can't not, you know,
there's plenty of people that I argue don't get the kind of just honest,
quick, you know, overview of what's happening on, you know,
most platforms out there, even the non-partisan ones.
And so I'm non-partisan ones.
And so I wanted to make sure for those of you that come to TLAV to, you know,
see through all the craziness of the Iran conversation,
I'll give you a quick update on that, hopefully quick,
because I want to make sure we focus on the one part today.
I want to also update you on a few other things around that,
like I mentioned, around the Trump issue and how it relates to the Israel conversation
and hopefully briefly to get into all of that.
So let's start first with a shout out to the recent event that we just came back from.
I just, I mean, again, I just, not to, oh, you know what?
Funny, I have to stand up. I never do this.
But I had to do this only because, I mean, I obviously could just play the video,
but that's no big deal.
I wanted to make sure that we also showed you something that just touches my heart.
Kind of the same conversation since I was talking about this at this event,
but this event and really just larger Derek's work,
I just want to very, just give him a shout out.
As I've done many times over the years, I did it this event itself.
Just, it's impressive what he does.
It is powerful. It is, it's impressive.
It is, it is profound.
And it's, if you've never been to one of his events or heard him speak,
and in particular around this kind of stuff,
going over his past experiences and how he brought himself to here
and explaining the conscious resistance and,
and talking about the activism side and talking about the political side
and how these things were just counterintuitive to each other one,
you know, and ultimately realizing that they need to be brought together.
Otherwise, we're never truly going to find a way past all this.
One of his shirts that resonates with me more than anything.
And as Derek told me at this event, actually,
it's kind of like the core message of everything,
which is that revolution without healing is a recipe for disaster.
And it's just such a profound thought because it's like right now
with them trying to drive us into the idea that we need to,
even, and I agree, even though within our own founding documents,
the people of this country have the right to remove, alter,
or change our government like we would understand in a free society.
That's not where we are because that's not the exist,
the reality of where we are if it was ever even the case.
My point though is that now you have that system sort of driving people
into the mind that we need to violently overthrow the government.
Now maybe that is the case.
Maybe you think that's the best path.
I disagree.
I don't think that, I think violence begets violence.
The point though is that I have a sneaking suspicion
that there's an effort to get us to go in that direction
for the purposes of abusing that against us.
We need to solve these problems and understand who we are before.
That is even on the table.
And I'm not talking about not pushing back, not change,
but the idea of an actual revolution
without fully understanding what we actually all,
it's like he's pointing out and creating a community.
People go, you like freedom.
I like freedom.
We'll start a community.
It all works out.
It doesn't because there's a lot more in the conversation
than just agreeing on whether or not we disagree with vaccines,
for example.
And so the, we, at this, I believe it there's a lot.
I was very impressed with his presentation as I've seen before,
but just, it just actually really touched me
and in the way that it related with people.
And I hope you will take the time to check out the activation tour
and the pyramid of power
and all the other amazing work that he does,
as well as all the outstanding work that he's done with TLAB
for the last decade plus.
But as I wrote here before I show you this book that I discussed here,
I just said such a powerful event.
And if you're unfamiliar with it, please check it out
because, you know, it might just change your life.
And I mean that.
That wasn't some lofty idea.
It's about understanding that it's not just left and right.
Right?
It's not just about who you voted for.
It's about so much more than that.
And those things matter to some degree.
It's about the full picture.
And if we really are trying to change ourselves in the world,
you know, not to use the same old, the overused sentiment,
but it really does have value.
And I'll be in the real sentiment of be the change
that you wish to see in the world is actually coming
from the larger sentiment that it may change.
If you change the tendencies within yourself,
the world, the tendencies of the world will also change.
That's actually what became paraphrased as be the change.
Very important to think about.
Now, I also have a point about bots,
but I wanted to show you guys this really quickly.
Angela was traveling recently
and ultimately ended up going in our Orwell in the Chat with us here
to where TLV first started.
Now, this picture here, as you can see,
is the El Camino de Santiago.
If you guys haven't actually heard me talk about this,
I was traveling in Spain before this was ever created.
I took this picture traveling with this,
which I remember correctly.
We're two German people and a Japanese guy
and an Australian guy who was standing next to me
and we were walking.
I don't know if you actually could hear that very well
when I turned around.
Point is, as I was traveling,
this kind of just developed in my mind.
And ultimately I came back and years passed
and ultimately ended up starting the last American Bagobon
long story to get into it all,
but the point was it started on this trail
and Barcelona is a place on that trail
where one of the core places is.
And she ultimately went to that location
and bought this book that shows all of the stuff
and all the different cathedrals.
And bottom line is she bought this book
and then made a cover for it where it says
where TLV began.
And I just thought that was so amazingly,
it touched me quite a bit.
And just this is the kind of community
that we're developing, you know,
the deeper community that goes well beyond
just pointing things out and yelling about it.
But anyway, that note, I just want to thank you
for always being an amazing part of this community
and for believing in what we do.
Touch me.
So back to the point on this.
And that's kind of the same sentiment I'm feeling
about his events and the people there,
some of the best people I've ever met in this
entire experience.
And that goes for, you know, same kind of thing
with all the people in this chat and the people
that we've met, you know,
and all the different events.
It's something special.
Now, talking about real life events,
I just thought there was a point to include this in.
Nikita Beer says, we've, from Twitter,
we've found 42,000 accounts automating replies
using chatbots and have removed them from the platform.
And he says, X's core values is providing an authentic
pulse on humanity and using AI to program,
program, programmatically, excuse me,
engage with users without a human in the loop
runs counter to our mission.
I just can't even say that without like not like,
like embarrassingly not taking them seriously.
I just think it's, that's ridiculous
from the kind of people we're dealing with.
First of all, I didn't even know about this
and I have to probably circle back to this.
Twitter's rolling out AI community notes, by the way,
which is not even that new.
It's just more being focused on a sort of
like an AI driven community notes automated service.
I argue because it's community notes
is now working against them because people are actually
seeing what they're trying to guess like them.
So they will just go AI about it,
which is always the plan.
But real world, that's what I wanted to highlight
is going to meet people and talk and understand
and put your feet in the grass, guys.
We need more of that.
It's what I do every day when I go out, you know,
it's, you have to pray from this stuff.
You have to make sure you're still grounded.
And on that note, I thought this was hilarious
as he goes, yes, we removed all the chatbots
and all the fake, and all the bots jumped in
and said, great, thank you.
I mean, therefore, I said, way, that's a good thing.
Mays is fabulous.
Nikita or CatTurk says, good job.
Max says, you need to be...
So all these people, right?
When we clean up these bots that are all still there.
I mean, do you even believe them?
I mean, you want to see my DMs that are full
of those same chatbots that have never gone away?
I'm laughing.
If you want to scroll through here, you will laugh
at all of the people who are all part of the same
kind of grifting platform left, right.
You are like, good job, Nikita.
You're saving free speech.
That's stupid.
But on that note of the inauthentic reality
of where we are, I also wanted to shout out
before we get into more stuff, by the way,
for those that have not visited the store in a while.
I want to make sure here's our website.
Here's the...
And by the way, make sure you go to the site
and not just through the mediums of the platforms
where our content is being streamed.
Here's our store, if you haven't seen it in a while.
And I just want to reiterate this
because we still need your support.
I usually say something, you know,
every other show maybe at the end.
But for those that want to continue to see this platform
and have it actually be here in the future,
find ways to support us because we do this.
We put out what we present as our products.
If you want to support us, then let us know
what it's worth, right?
That's how that works.
And so it's something we put a lot of time into.
I mean, that I put a lot of time into.
And ultimately everybody, the writers and the people
with support and content.
And at the end of the day,
there's just one way you can support us
by buying our shirts
and supporting the ideas that we're putting out.
Recently, he just added back the stickers
and everything else that are on here.
So they're a little different than were before,
but just I think they're a little cheaper as well.
Question everything, t-shirt, you know,
truth conquers all, t-shirt, they, t-shirt.
We have plenty of this stuff, guys.
Help us support the platform.
And this is Ryan Graham from Big Frog.
I mean, these are good people.
So speaking on the inauthentic and where that is,
before we get into that, the idea of Iran,
I think I want to make sure we're updated on
just the insanity of it all,
the inauthentic nature of what this is.
I mean, it really is kind of crazy,
and I've been saying this every single time,
but just to kind of briefly go through this,
I just want to highlight some of the bigger points.
There's tons that we could get into.
But as Hormuz letter, which, you know,
all of these are just stating what is going around.
Now, that doesn't mean that it's necessarily dishonest,
but, like, just remember that these things, for example,
I believe that most of these for the main two I believe
we're going to discuss come from TASD news agency,
which is not even all the time accurate.
I don't even believe it's even accurate all the time,
but what Iran says, it's media, guys.
Question at all.
And so my point saying that is that I do believe
these are accurate, but remember that most of these
are in a situation that are coming from source,
you know, material that's coming out from different,
like, in Iran, United States,
but then, secondarily, turns out to be a lie.
So it was real, but they lied about it,
if you get what I'm saying.
So just remember this question at all,
because this story has been mired in more dishonesty
than most that I've seen.
China directly rejects Trump's latest true social claim
that he told, that, that Xi told him
that China would not sell weapons to Iran
under any circumstances.
So China speaks up and says, yeah,
what Trump just said, not true.
So just to add to the stupidity of all of this,
that you now have Trump lying about what other
countries are going to do,
or China lied to Trump to make him look bad,
as there clearly at least disappears on the side of Iran
in this all, in this bigger agenda.
So really, that's the same way it's been the whole time,
either Trump's being lied to or Trump's lying,
and you have to be able to see that by now.
So if he's being lied to,
why does he continue to allow himself to be used?
I don't know.
Maybe he's not in control,
but we just have to see how silly this continues to be.
And I, and this is another one, same thing,
United States, and this is on the 25th,
Rez requested a new temporary ceasefire.
And as far as I could tell, this is what happened.
And this is after them screaming about how we're,
they were asked and Trump said,
no, because we're in control and you better not,
and all the dumb stuff that keeps happening.
And here we are.
And Trump has just recently said
they weren't going to continue bombing
because it turns out their stockpiles are wildly diminished.
You guys know all this because you watched our show months ago.
You know about this because you watched other people,
and I may, and they're honest out there
that have told you that this has been happening.
United States requested a new ceasefire with Iran
and is seeking a return to the MOU,
which Iran said is dead forever.
But who knows, maybe they'll go back on that
because they clearly do seem to want an end to this.
And it says with discussions also expected to include Yemen
and Trump seeking to make the Houthis part of it, right?
Well, remember they're the Ansarallah movement,
which is their actual name, is a group in Yemen
that has been under attack by Trump's administration,
by Biden's administration, by Obama's administration
for my entire time doing this.
And they've been starving the country.
They've been attacking the country.
They've been using terrorist attacks in the country.
Saudi Arabia has been doing the same.
So it's interesting that it's now back in the conversation.
I'm not going to focus on as much today.
But remember how long we've talked about this.
How long have we pointed to the Bab al-Mandeb straight
between, you know, the Yemen choke point
and the reality being that they needed that location,
especially if and when Iran did what?
Close down the straight up for Moose.
And here we are.
And that's not even technically the way to frame that,
accurately with where it started
and even where we are now.
Nonetheless, it's important to see
that this has been a building moment
that we've been telling you has been coming forever.
It's not a big, you know,
so again, when we get to the people going,
I'm shocked.
I can't believe we're here.
Well, they're either really stupid, really bad at this
or just never honest.
And so the truth is it was always in your face.
And now because of Yemen's involvement,
it's making this more difficult for them.
And it says Iran is highly unlikely to accept a U.S.
offer having comprehensively rejected all negotiations.
And so the point is that Iran, as far as it could tell
thus far as said no,
that may be changing behind the scenes.
But the point is that they asked and I said,
if accurate and I believe it is,
this is very embarrassing for the Trump administration,
but nothing new there.
And he'll likely lie about it.
That's how stupid this is.
And that's where we've been.
Now, day before that,
Iran has rejected a new ceasefire proposal from Trump
that Iraq Prime Minister carried to Tehran.
So first you have the discussions going on
about the lie of it, right?
They offered and we said no,
because we don't care.
Then you have the idea of Iraq being sent.
And this has been this,
now they've lied and sidestepped all of this,
but this does appear to be the reality,
imagery and everything,
where they sent through Iraq an offer
for another ceasefire proposal and they said no.
Right?
And then on top of that,
you have the idea that they're being publicly called out
for seeking these things and being turned down,
which Trump only gets more angry about.
Mental sense says Trump and Rubio claim recently
that Iran was begging for a deal.
And yet now you have two examples in a row,
three in fact, where they've said no.
So I just don't know how you can piece that together
pretending they were accurate.
And you guys know that they're lying.
Someone is begging for a ceasefire,
but it's just not Iran, he says.
Now on the 24th, I think it was technically the day before,
over to the 24th,
we saw bombings from Yemen,
the Ansaral Movement into Saudi Arabia
and a very important Ramco refinery.
Now if you guys haven't been paying attention,
I'm going to briefly show at least what Iran has claimed
that they've hit,
you have to understand that they have clearly been
consistently bombing major and important locations
with basically, I mean, there's been pushback,
but the idea, it seems as if there's not much resistance,
which either means they don't have the,
you know, the lack of munitions,
the very thing that they're pointing to Iran and claiming.
And so the ability to do this either means
that they let them bomb a very important installation
for their interests and the world,
or they weren't able to stop it.
And that makes Saudi Arabia pretty unhappy with what's going on
because they're the ones at the front line of this
being bombed while the U.S. just lets it happen.
Now I think that's very important.
Trump refuses to answer for U.S. war crimes in Iran
when asked about it directly,
blowing up civilian power plants and bridges
and whether that would be a war crime,
he simply said, I won't respond to that question.
I think that speaks volumes, guys.
Does anybody even question whether these are war crimes?
Okay, these are war crimes.
There's no way around this.
They're not even trying to pretend there's a secondary reason.
They're important.
We bombed them.
So you're a criminal.
You should be in prison.
But that was the case before he bombed bridges.
So same with Biden, by the way,
but realize how brazen, how obvious this is.
So here's Tehran Times pointing out
what the Brigadier General Mojibi said,
claiming of all the things they bombed.
Now, Daniel simply says from McAdams,
how is this possible?
Trump said they were finished without military.
And he's right because they have hit plenty of things.
So even if one of these,
I mean, you just saw the Iranaco facility, right?
So they lie as they're able to bomb.
They're able to defend.
They have ships.
Does anybody actually not know that?
I mean, it's embarrassing if you don't.
The truth is it's obvious.
And the only reason you would think otherwise
is if you somehow just blindly listen to Fox News or Trump
or anybody that repeats what he says.
So here's what you're claiming.
And this is insane to me.
I'm willing to bet you,
just based on what we've seen so far,
that this is mostly correct.
But be skeptical.
Radar air defense.
I'm not going to read all this, guys.
But this just seems to be over a 15-day period
from the July 8th to 22nd.
The damage inflicted on the U.S. military
and the region as a result of their attacks
is as follows.
Radar and air defense.
And it goes seven command and control centers,
three satellite communications,
six Patriot air defense,
three air and maritime surveillance monitoring radars,
eight early warning radar systems,
seven air missile defense radars,
three EPS radar systems,
two on and on and on,
five long range radars, two.
I mean, this goes on forever.
Support and logistics,
six fighter jets, helicopters,
storage tanks, storage bunkers,
M9 drones, six M9 drone hangers.
I mean, these things are millions of dollars
individually.
Some of these things go even beyond that.
Drone hanger, command centers,
hangers, Patriot air defense complexes.
So who's to say whether they're lying?
Right?
I'd imagine it's in their interest to beef this up.
So I wouldn't take it at face value,
but based on the history,
they've been consistently shown to be correct.
So the real question is how much are they hiding from us
and how much is this really happening
because Israel is allowing this to be the,
basically their war using U.S. interests.
Now as well,
the other U.S. government embarrassingly come out
and I don't even know
who is driving these campaigns right now.
It seems like Hague Seth and Caspital and Trump in a room,
that's what this feels like to me.
Like the bottom of the barrel stupidity.
Like you could ask a bunch of junior high kids
to make better content than this
and they say the war department doesn't miss.
I mean, think about saying that after you just got told,
like the idea is they've been sort of denying
the idea that they even hit that school,
even though we know they did,
even though I told, I recently showed you again,
Hague Seth's own map showed you where it was.
Israel told you they did this.
They bombed it,
whether they were tricked into it or not.
They murdered those children
and even Twitter,
which is now why they're going to go to an automated version of it,
says, well, you bombed a bunch of kids in this school.
So the implication being that you missed right there.
But you see, that's not the point, guys.
As Saeed Morandy points out, Saeed Muhammad Morandy,
he goes, we know the real point should be,
well, you're probably right,
even though the reality is they're not as competent
as they pretend they are.
You could take it one way or the other.
If you don't miss, well, then okay,
then you killed those children on purpose.
If you didn't, if you did miss,
I mean, the second part would be then,
or you're done reposting this because you did.
I mean, either way, guys,
the point is we know that they did this.
Everybody knows they did this.
And that's what the put that,
and they give you all flash, no substance.
How sad.
Okay, the strategic petroleum reserve,
and that's, you know,
think about both angles of this or multiple angles,
but in the case of, you know,
you have this in a lower point since what?
March 8, 1983, it says.
You have their actual munition stockpiles
lower than I think I've ever seen.
I mean, I bet you this stuff is lower
than we even know.
Charlie Bellibo points out
the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve
is now at its lowest since 1983.
Over the past five years,
we've seen a drawdown of 310 million barrels,
50% decline.
I remember this happening during COVID
where people, largely conservatives, were freaking out,
and in some cases, rightly so,
about what Biden was doing in this very regard,
this very conversation.
Now, that's not even to make the point
now they're not, because trust me,
I believe most of these conservatives
are wildly turning on him,
and rightly so,
either way, recognize how problematic this is.
Now, I don't even understand why Trump
would do any of this
if he was able to do something else.
This isn't even in his interest anymore, guys.
I think you have the same thought I do.
I'm not gonna say I know for a fact
that it's absolutely what he's, you know,
that he's under somebody else's control,
but that is obviously one of the most logical ways
to look at this.
Why would he be doing this?
Now, whether it's the larger transition
of energy conversation,
I'm just not really seeing that materialized
like people expected it to.
Myself included.
I kind of felt that was an early possibility
in all of this,
but again, how it ends will make all that difference.
You also have walls, you know,
the one who got caught, waltz,
the one caught using telemessage
in the White House,
and then he got quietly moved to an ambassador,
even though he was, you know,
but what was he again?
I'm blanking on his position.
Remember, I mean, in the chat,
what his position was on the inner circle
of the, you know, Oval Office,
and he was caught using telemessage,
which is an Israeli intelligence app
to archive signal.
All very clearly documented within this show.
Most people call it signal gate
and sidestep from the reality.
So he is on this show saying,
when asked directly,
Trump said the conflict with last weeks
were now at five months.
What will be over soon?
And he goes, well, this war
has been going on for 47 years,
and that's the same old stupid thing.
That's just to give you the background.
So you know who he is, right?
The point is 47 years.
You've heard this point.
I mean, just endlessly.
That's what you keep getting from people
that I've now pivoted from.
We don't want any more wars,
but now we have to
because it's been going on forever.
So it's a forever war.
Wait a minute.
You said there wouldn't be no more,
you know, the cycle of stupidity
when you actually walk through their,
their narratives
that they don't even understand, it seems,
but quickly in case you forgot,
I made this point briefly,
but I wanted to reiterate this.
Two great articles, by the way,
this is from Matt Agaris,
Free Thought Project 65 years ago today.
It was posted on August 19, 2018.
The CIA conspired with two
with the UK to overthrow Iran
on behalf of Big Oil.
That's Mazadek in the picture there.
The leader before who was very much pro-democracy
with pictures of himself next to the Liberty Bell.
He was trying to emulate what the
doing the problem was.
He just didn't want to bow to their interest.
He wanted freedom.
Or you can disagree with that.
Look at the history.
It's pretty clear that they wanted somebody
who would bow to what they wanted
for the, against the interest of Iranians,
which is what they got with the Shah,
which by the way, even right now,
Twitter is forcing people to,
when you hashtag Iran, it puts the Shah flag up.
Because totally that's about free speech
and truth on that platform, right?
The point is, you can clearly see in this
that this was an illegal operation.
And that was 1953, you understand.
Operation Ajax, when they overthrew Iran illegally.
Here's another article from Brandon Turbville.
The path to Persia and the ongoing plot
to destroy Iran, 2018 as well.
Both go over in depth.
This is more written.
They're both really well done.
The point is, if you're telling us this is 47 years old,
as I just recently talked about,
well, that would put it at 79, right?
Well, explain for me, if you overthrew Iran illegally in 1953
and they took it back in 79,
then why would it have only started in 79?
Basically, what you're admitting to
is that you started this.
Surprise, surprise.
Every story that ties back
to the US government's actions in the world,
you'll tend to find out they started it.
And it's not even a secret anymore, guys.
It's not some kind of biased point.
You can see if you care to look,
just like with Israel's history,
that people are uncomfortably becoming aware of now,
even though it's always been right there for you to look at.
So realize what that means.
They're trying to convince you that a war
that they told you wouldn't happen
that nobody actually wants,
that's not in our interest,
is somehow justified because they took it back.
Understand what that means about how this will never end.
Because guess what?
Let's say right now,
they end up getting what they're supposed to get,
or however you look at it,
what they get, what they get.
And the US gets the, you know, loses essentially.
Well, in their minds,
this will forever be something they need to do back
because they're children.
It's the same mindset of the Israeli government.
They will just never stop acting
like they need to one up back and forth.
And that's what that's why this right now
is some kind of a backward situation
where Trump was trying to end this
where he somehow won.
And Iran just won't let them do that.
But just remember this, guys.
53, which is not denied anymore,
was the illegal action to overthrow this country
for the interest of power structures.
Not the Iranian people.
Under the Shah, as you can look up anywhere.
I mean, literally Wikipedia, it's insane.
And they act like it was some kind of freedom for people.
Guys, the Shah and the oligarchy lived in lavish,
like the way Trump dresses up the Oval Office.
Either way, it looks anyway,
whether it was Home Depot or not.
And the point would be that everybody underneath them,
Iranians more than anybody, lived in squalor.
It was despotic.
And he was at the Slava,
I forget the name of the group, the secret police.
Full of very documented guys.
And that's why the Iranians fought back.
Now, whether what they brought after that
was what you want is irrelevant to the conversation.
We're there now.
And they want you to believe that them taking back
what was theirs is how they started this.
It's like every other place, Iraq, anywhere else.
This is how they do it.
Now, our newsletter also points out on the 26th,
an oil tanker has exploded after colliding
with an Iranian naval mine.
I found this interesting still up in the air,
especially since this is today.
Now, there's two ways to look at this, or three, really.
First of all, this could be false, right?
Either a lie or misinterpretation or whatever.
But let's just go at this like it's real.
I find this really interesting as we have been covering
as even the, I think it was the Admiral from the UK
made clear based on the evidence,
there's just no way there are minds in the straight
with what has been happening.
I stand by that because look, you can prove
even before this last shutdown again
where both of them are doing this,
there was a free flowing for a minute.
And even before that there was, it had been,
there was traffic.
Now, even before the designated route conversation,
which leaves opening an area that's not supposed to be
gone in, right?
Before that there wasn't a specific route.
There were people that were traversing the straight
even after Trump said they were mines
and there's no way you could dictate where they would go
because it was before this designated route conversation.
You had China going through, it was being allowed
to go through.
You had fishing boats, you had random people.
It just doesn't make any plausible sense
that there were random mines floating around anywhere.
But of course it could be.
I never argued they don't have them, clearly they do.
Point here though is that I think the most logical
is either that this is a lie spun
because wanting to drive the idea they did this
or even crazier a mine put in the water
by not Iran in order to make this the case,
all just hypothetical, or Iran put the mine
in an area now and hasn't before
because the US pushed them to this position.
You could decide for yourself.
It may very well be that they were there the whole time.
I just think if you're honest about this
and go through the evidence, it just doesn't make sense.
This comes as Trump claims major progress
being made in the straight,
which undermines its own point anyway
since clearly that's not the case.
On top of that, you have Ukraine chiming in
and bombing Iranian ships.
Now, while this really shows you,
they never had the mind for peace, guys.
Whether Israel made this happen or the US,
this is what we're talking about.
This is a vassal state.
This is an occupied entity.
This is literally what a proxy element looks like.
I mean, we can go back.
I mean, what's humorous about this,
as I always bring up,
is this conversation was very, very much dissected
by people like myself and plenty of others.
Long before we got to the post-October 7th timeframe.
Right before that, if you remember,
Laura Lunar jumped into this conversation about Ukraine,
about Nazis, about Oz off movement
and just did a terrible job breaking it down
but completely carved out any connection to Israel
even though this is literally basically a construct
of Western intelligence and Israeli government.
I mean, it's not basic.
It's literally what it is.
You can look at this very clear show from 2022.
Documents prove the CIA has been cultivating fascism
in Ukraine since 1948, Operation Aerodynamic.
It is provable that the CIA was doing this.
Now, the Israel overlap over the years
and I could just bring up the one obvious point.
If that comes up, was it actually?
Hold on.
There it is.
Damn it.
They used to pop right up.
Let's see.
Oh, that's what it was.
Maybe not.
Well, I guess I'll just move past it.
Oz off.
Can't type.
Let's see if this works.
Now, there it is.
I think it's important.
I bring it up every time, but I think it's important.
So the point being that, you know,
here's Israel being called out by its own people in 2018.
For what?
For arming the Oz off movement.
Can't type today, apparently.
There.
Tight evidence that the right wing Oz off militia
that they were funding and they're saying rights groups
demand Israel stop arming these neo-Nazis.
So Ukraine has been what this kind of carve out.
Now, the fact that they're bombing you Iranian ships
and killing one of their people that it turns out to,
you know, either way, they killed Iranian sailors.
So that means that that was put to the case.
Like that was Israel, the United States in my opinion.
Of course they could have acted independently.
I think we're sitting, we're driving to a place where they're
trying to kick this into another degree.
Like, you know, claiming it wasn't there, not involved.
And this is just meant to drive this into, you know,
get Iran to take action that can abuse for their benefit.
I don't think they ever had interest in designs for peace.
Now, check these out guys.
And now the point on that, obviously the connection I mentioned,
you know, now you've got Laura Loomer going to Ukraine
and giving interviews about why she's Ukraine all of a sudden
and why there's no Nazis in Ukraine.
You could literally show her own content saying that
she's such an obvious clown.
And, you know, Trump sharing her content.
It's just embarrassing, guys.
It's, everyone can see through this stuff.
Even conservatives are laughing at her at this point.
But yet there's still this weird, this is the dying empire point.
Like they've lost control, guys.
But if you want to understand the full breadth of this
and understand that it is definitely connected to Israel,
and why she tried to carve that out and hide it.
Well, it's all included.
You know, you've got people like Colomoisky,
who is the financial backer of Ozop Movement,
also Zelensky, also head of the World Jewish Congress at the time.
You know, it's just, all this stuff is very easily proven.
Now, Mint Press News also highlights in a separate point,
the U.S. military opened fire on a tanker
in the Strait of Hormuz, killing two.
And according to the report, they thought the ship
was an Iranian ship that was carrying oil
or rather a ship carrying oil.
It turned out that it was not.
And even Israel covered this.
Iran's farce says U.S. strike on tanker in Gulf kills two.
Now, it says very clearly they say the United States
believed the tanker was carrying Iranian gas.
The information I can see suggests that's not the case.
So all you have is this rational action taking place
where Trump seems to be the one,
rather the U.S. government,
maintaining exactly what he says Iran is doing.
Just like we told you in the beginning.
Now, keeping that for another conversation,
we're going to get into more of Iran,
but just realize this is going to continue to spin out
if the U.S. and Israel push it.
They're still murdering people in Lebanon.
They're targeting water infrastructure.
They're bombing ships. They're bombing bridges
and electric infrastructure.
These are the terrorists, guys.
I don't think that's hard to see at this point.
That needs to be clear.
And it doesn't mean a wrong good guy.
It just means that what they're doing is objectively wrong,
easily illegal and absolutely counter to everything
they promised you they would do.
That has to matter for something.
Now, on top of that, in Venezuela, since it overlaps,
as we've already pointed out,
but this has been going around continually,
it's important to see yet again.
We showed you this right after this conversation,
but Israel is now in Venezuela.
Surprise, surprise,
after they handpicked Delcey Rodriguez.
At this point, now, looking back,
I still stand by what I said.
Either she did all this because she knew that she didn't,
that it would only go worse.
You could argue that her position was,
well, if I stand against you,
then you're going to remove all of us
and put some Zionist in power or whatever.
Right? And so I'll just, I'll do what you say
and I'll do my best to make it work.
Or she's always been on their side.
Either one works for me. Either way, it's still the travesty.
And the reality of what we're talking about
is now Israel and the U.S. have stolen
and taken over Venezuela. That's not a war one.
That's an intelligence operation
where you did a regime change and now you steal from them.
And this is the new puppet president
that the U.S. and Israel installed.
And they're meeting with Israel.
They're stealing or they're stealing their oil.
They're, you know, all of this day. It's the same old thing we've seen.
It's exactly what Maduro told you would happen.
And on top of that, don't forget, as Element Cloud points out,
it's worth remembering that he cast his vote
in last year's presidential election.
Maduro shouted, Long live free Palestine.
Maria Corino Machado, his opponent,
said, Israel's struggle is our struggle.
Well, how is Israel to come into the country?
Build your embassies. It's the same.
You can't deny this, guys.
You have to understand how easily seen this is.
That doesn't have to mean Maduro, good guy.
It just means important for where we are.
One person was fighting for the Palestinian people,
at least he said he did, and the other one was brazenly not.
Now, State Department says
the U.S. welcomes the decision by
Delcey Rodriguez and Venezuela
to withdraw from the ICC,
almost like they're coordinating these things.
And the new Venezuelan government's partnership
on American-led efforts to dismantle
the corrupt and worthless ICC,
says the State Department.
And look, I'm no fan of international organizations
for a lot of reasons. I don't support government.
But in a sense where we do have government,
the reality of how these are supposed to work
is these are the only mechanisms that are able
at a higher level than a government.
Right? So you have a perfect example of this right now
where you have a government that's not listening
to its own people.
Congress doesn't have any ability to stop it.
The judiciary is clearly not independent.
That's the whole point for the ICC.
And so now what do you do? They're not listening to us.
They don't care what we have to say.
Now, I'm not advocating for these structures.
My point is that if we're in this position,
that's what this would be for.
For them to then say, you are no longer
acting in the interest of your people.
Or at the very least, you're breaking international law
and no one has the ability to stop you
other than these kind of institutions.
And so they're going after them.
Now you can all day long make arguments about
why these things shouldn't exist. I would agree.
But where we are, you have a group
that is doing everything they're saying.
They're literally murdering innocent people
and bombing bridges on live TV.
And that's what they're trying to dismantle this for.
The so-called court has been investigating
Nicholas Maduro they write since 2018 with no result.
Again, you could argue he's not a,
he's a government representative.
I would argue he's just like all the rest of them
when it comes down to it, if his interests are in that need.
But you can look at the evidence as I have
as people like Abby Martin has over the years.
Guys, they're lying to you. They're lying to you.
Even Code Pink came out with information that showed
that the actual electoral fraud they claimed
wasn't even actually there,
which is what we said in the beginning
when all the independent observers said the same thing.
Even their enemies, even other US,
you know, it's not even needed to say anymore.
Because the point is they moved out of the way illegally.
So even if you agree with this, wouldn't there be a process for that?
Well, no, not with you.
Not when you're the good guy with no laws to follow.
Good guy in quotes.
The ICC has instead wasted its resources
on investigating and charging persons from countries
that have competent independent judiciary system.
You mean like the US and Israel that neither do?
Israel's own people say that's not the case.
A Canadian, a very famous Canadian judge,
came out and said if this bill passes,
Israel will no longer have an independent judiciary.
That was 2018 and the bill passed a long time ago.
This is exactly the point.
When you have a system where you have people in our country
or Israel where the governments are breaking these laws
to such brazen degree and nobody even tries to stop them,
that's not an independent judiciary.
And it says this is a blatant overreach.
It's literally what their job is, by the way.
Thanks to President Trump's leadership and efforts
of brave American service members,
Maduro is now facing justice.
It's time to dismantle the ICC.
The point was Venezuela joining that call.
Daniel says the depth of depravity of the Israeli-led USA
is now clear for all to see.
They're stealing billions per week from Venezuelan people.
Again, that's not even a joke, guys.
They're just staking.
There's nothing.
They're literally taking resources from Venezuela
for their own benefit to help stave off
Trump's disaster and Israel's disaster
with what's going on straight.
Nothing is going back to the Venezuelan people.
I'm sure they see that by now.
They're stealing this money.
And as for Israel, they seek American-led efforts
to dismantle the ICC.
Here's Trump, of course, talking about
the Saudi Arabia civilian nuclear program,
which is such an insult with what they're trying to claim
they're doing in the world,
especially with one of the most obvious
authoritarian dictatorial states anywhere.
On top of the fact, the entire idea
of the terrorism problem in our world
stems back to the Wahhabi-led
Sunni religion from Saudi Arabia.
Now, it's not to say one good, one bad.
It's about their brand of terroristic mindset
that I don't even think aligns with the religion.
It's about using it as even
Mohammed Salman has alluded to,
that the people at the top of these movements
don't even believe in these religions
and they're using people underneath.
Guess what?
That's what they do, guys.
That's what Israel does.
That's what they do.
So, in this case, Saudi Arabia's allowed
to do this because they work with it.
It's an ally.
Who cares if they still chop people's heads off
and cut their hands off and, you know,
yeah, that's still happening.
The bottom line, though, is they made a deal
with Saudi Arabia to get that,
but then Trump, even though they already signed
the contract, said, wait, no,
you have to normalize with Israel first.
That's what's happening.
Despite the deal having already been signed,
he's now going, you have to normalize
the Abraham Accord normalize with Israel.
Even Saudi Arabia is probably going to do that,
but they've pushed back on even that,
even with the Allied ship.
So my point, guys, is that he,
as Daniel says, where their signatures
didn't even mean anything.
Well, that was a long time ago.
They have violated everything you could point to,
from UN resolutions to their own laws,
international law, agreements, anything.
Nothing is sacred to these people
because they claim they're the good guy.
Makes sense, right?
Here's Benjamin Netanyahu coming to meet Trump
for the 1,000th time, heading to Washington
tomorrow for an important meeting with Trump.
Is it not obviously weird that this person
just flies over to Washington every 30 seconds
to meet with, you know, like, you know,
as always jokingly do, but it's just kind of
like, you know, President of the United States
will be flying in to meet Trump.
You know, it's like, that's kind of the joke.
I don't know how you ignore this anymore.
How random, like, mayors and people
all over this country will just fly
as a routine practice to meet Israeli leadership,
and now they're, like, accusing Mom Donnie
of being too much involved with foreign politics.
I think they're all part of the lie.
I don't trust Mom Donnie more than I trust any of them.
He has plenty of chances and he falls through.
The bottom line is that these people
are not just an ally, guys.
You can see that by their own actions.
Now, Cenk Uger says, if you're a reporter
and you don't explain to your audience
that Israel was trying to buy the Michigan
Senate seat for $50 million, you're not a reporter.
If you don't explain to voters that a lobby
for a foreign country is trying to control your Senate,
you're not a journalist.
I'm not a fan of him.
I believe he's in plenty of other ways,
the same things that other people are
in the fake independent media.
But I agree with this point.
And the bottom line here is Glenn says,
what's happening in Michigan's Senate race
is not one of the most brazen extreme examples yet
of how US politics is dominated by finance
and loyalists.
All right, did I get it wrong?
Oh, I see it is.
I'm sorry.
I just ruined that point.
But it's that this is, I mean, it's funny.
He says that my mind almost goes the other direction
that it's just one of a string of normal events
that are insane and obvious.
But like, I would argue some of the other ones
we've seen are even more extreme.
His point was that this is one of the most
extreme brazen examples of how US politics
is dominated and financed by loyalists
to a foreign country, Israel.
Other than Mary Madison buying Trump,
it's hard to find something that competes with it.
I mean, this is where we've gone beyond the pale, guys.
They're just outright bribing directly
people to be in power.
They're funding them in front of you in real time,
which as I've shown you is not the way
lobbying is supposed to work.
I mean, MSNBC has called this out.
That's not to say that you should trust
the mainstream media, that it's just that obvious.
These people are not on your side.
Now, in regard to Israel's support,
it's becoming undeniably clear
that nobody supports this country.
The world around, but largely in the United States
is the point now.
He says, we're just talking about the Democrat base anymore.
We're not, they mean.
The general electorate has turned against Israel,
says CNN.
Think about that.
This is not the left issue.
It's an American issue.
Now, CNN is only calling this out because they have to.
At this point, guys, nobody is missing this anymore.
And as Caitlyn says, you're being pulled.
There's a dangerous explosion of Jew hatred
to literally cover up the fact there's actually
a very healthy explosion of Israel hatred.
I agree.
Now, here's Tucker Carlson telling you
what he thinks about should be what should be happening
to people like Trump and the administration
or any politician voting for the NDA
to merge these militaries.
Now, you know, it's crazy to me.
I agree with your point.
But what's wild is that why wouldn't he have been able
to make these points a year ago?
Four years ago.
You see, I mean, and maybe he just didn't see it.
That is possible, guys.
And I hope that that's genuine.
But I just have, you know, or the fact that he still tells you
JD Vance is the guy that wouldn't do this,
despite him literally saying that he agrees with all of this
and supporting Trump every step of the way
and gaslighting you're on all.
I mean, it just seems insane.
Nonetheless, here's what he said.
And I agree.
And it's a pretty strong point for people
who are in this movement or even kind of walking that line
because I agree and the sense that these people
are essentially treason if you really want to break it down.
The Republican Party has decided that the interest of Israel
is more important than the interest of the United States.
The Republican Party has decided that the interest of Israel
is more important than the interest of the United States.
There are a couple of exceptions,
Marjorie Taylor Green, Thomas Massey,
and they were driven out of the Republican Party.
So it tells you what the priority is.
The priority is serving Israel.
And even if I liked Israel, which I do not,
because it's committing genocide,
I think we deserve sovereignty.
So it's really that simple.
Well, I think America lost its sovereignty many years ago.
I mean, CIA and Mossad have worked together
in some cases really as one for over 60 years.
I mean, and...
Okay, same point.
I mean, that seems to sound like that, you know,
goes a long way.
I agree.
So why...
If it's that clear,
how did you only just now put this together?
You see what I mean?
Like, that's hard for me to ignore, guys.
I mean, even if you want to pretend
that he really sees it right now,
what that shows me is that he kind of always has for a while
and only just now decided to really care,
or whatever it is, you know?
So it's just I'm very skeptical
as you should be of him, of me, of anybody.
But I know you get what I'm saying,
is that if it's been that clear and that long
in 60 years and, you know,
Mossad clearly controlled,
then you could have made that case before Donald Trump
and you would have been just as right.
It's just becoming undeniable right now.
But that worries me.
It really does,
because this type of person with that level
is going to eclipse all of us doing this
in an honest way, right?
Because people will hear what we're doing.
You know, they get, you know,
somebody, a friend gives them our link
because the algorithm will never show it to them.
And suddenly they look for this content
and they get thrown Tucker Carlson.
You know, hey, maybe that'll be a good thing in the future
and I'll end up looking back going,
I'm so glad Tucker changed sides.
But I'm worried that that's not the case.
And I'm worried what it means is that people like that
are the ones that will, you know,
what I've talked about my entire life doing this,
that they will give you partial truth,
you know, like the best lies are mostly truth, right?
And so they give you what you want to hear
only so they can then turn, you know,
where it matters and be like,
oh, and then vote for JD Vance.
It's where I feel like this goes.
Of course, Mossad has fed repeatedly
disinformation lies to American policymakers
over decades, including the lie
that Iraq had weapons mass destruction.
That fundamentally came from Israel.
There's no dispute about that.
The lie that killing the Ayatollah,
the Shiite Pope would lead to
the collapse of the Iranian government.
No American intelligence agency said that.
Mossad said that.
And Netanyahu told Trump that.
So there's a long track record of the United States.
It's people, it's 350 million people
being misused by Israeli intelligence.
And what that shows you right there
is that Trump in that moment
made a conscious decision to listen
to a foreign country over his country.
I mean, I don't know how you can miss that.
So the idea that you would merge them formally
is a generational disaster.
It's also humiliating.
Of course, it says to the people of the United States,
you have no control over your own country.
You were told this is yours.
You run it. You own it.
You're a shareholder in this enterprise.
Isn't it a form of teasing, treason?
Well, it's the definition of treason.
It's the definition. This is treason.
This is acting against your own nation
on behalf of a foreign nation.
But a lot of Americans are waking up to the fact
it's not a minor problem.
It's not an ancillary problem.
It's not just something we should fix in the future.
It is the problem that led us into a war
that's ending American empire
and going to cause massive economic disruption.
Well, good. Good.
Ending American empire should be what we're all fighting for.
Or empire anywhere.
It's a funny thing to frame it at.
It's not, by the way, it's not ending American anything.
It's ending whatever is ruining American everything
or rather just the American people
and the United States people of this country.
Because America, by the way, includes more than just
the United States.
I hate the fact that it becomes American just,
you know, South America.
It's crazy.
The point is the United States is the people of this country.
So what is happening is them trying to ruin that.
And if we stop this, it would not be stopping
and ruining America.
It would be saving the people that are America
and stopping the power structures that are not,
that pretend to be.
And here in Europe.
So the idea that the Republican Party would support
a merger of U.S. and Israeli intelligence,
IDF and Pentagon.
It's the voting room.
So deranged that, you know,
you have to root for treason trials,
for Nuremberg trials at some point.
And the president could veto it.
He won't because he's a slave to Israel.
We're against genocide.
We're against book burning.
That's what we learned from the Nazi period.
And all of a sudden you wake up and we're like,
no, no, genocide is totally fine as long as Israel is doing.
In fact, it's not genocide.
In fact, if you call it genocide, you're the bad person.
What? No, no.
The person committing genocide is the bad person.
You know, it's just, it's just such a heart.
You know, we've learned these lessons before.
You know, we've done this already.
Tucker made fun of 9-11 truth people
way long into the conversation until suddenly he started talking about it
like a few years ago.
You know, it's like, it's just hard to take that seriously.
You know, the idea that you are, I mean,
what you're saying right there are things that we were screaming
to the hatred of, you know, most of the internet
way back before it was comfortable to do it.
Steve calls the dangerous dangerous, right?
He's out there doing saying the dangerous thing when it's safe to say it.
You know what I mean?
It's just hard to take that, you know,
take it with a grain of salt, guys.
That's the point.
But I think we should be very skeptical.
Now, in that same vein of conversation,
what we got was a lot of people
that, you know, fair to point out that as you guys know,
the reason the INA was created, Derek and Whitney,
myself, recognized before in 2024, before the election,
that we recognized this weird shift
that everyone can see right now, this weird shift in the media,
this weird shift in where it was going with, you know,
with the AI and technocratic direction.
And so what we started doing, we made the IMA,
and there were people that were able to see beyond partisanship,
you know, recognize the objective nature of these
rarely genocide that was taking place.
It wasn't about sides and the two-party illusions in the,
what was the other one, the, I think just, you know,
non-partisan objective kind of stuff.
The bottom line is that it was created
because we saw this coming, right?
And so we turned around and said, this is what we see.
And we think that Trump and Kamala are part
of the same problem, the same thing, you know,
whether you think they're working together or not,
it's the same thing.
And no matter which direction you go,
you'll get the same thing.
A war was going to happen whether Kamala or Trump
were in there because Israel was making that happen.
And we tried to call that out.
And that wasn't blackpilled.
That was simply acknowledging the reality
and trying to find solutions around it.
We weren't saying, give up.
We said, recognize this and then let's actually fight this
in the way that is, you know,
it's capable of actually stopping it,
not just picking a side in that same problem.
And so people like Luke Radowski and people like Alex Jones
and the rest, they called us blackpilled.
They called it a purity test.
They said, you know, that Trump was the one
that was going to say, and here we are.
And so look, again, I hope that they're changing their minds,
but the point needs to be made is that acting like right now,
we suddenly are blown away by the fact
that these people are saying something different
or doing something different.
That's a play in and of itself
because it's been clear for a long time,
as I have been showing you.
And now for them to go, was he just lying?
Oh yeah, man.
He's, I'm really, you know,
and I'll even just speak quickly to a person's point
that they made right here.
He says this dude, Luke is playing,
he's still playing like he got fooled
by a career politician 15 years
after he was at Occupy Wall Street
with fellow controlled op Tim Poole.
Trump was doing business with Epstein back then.
You must have missed it, despite it being your career.
I mean, you have to realize if you look at the old work
of this person who was calling up to party illusion,
going to these things and filming them
like an early element of that,
whether it was honest to begin with or not.
The point was he was making arguments
that he now completely compromises.
Now, who knows?
Maybe he changed his mind.
But to act like this is, you know,
somehow discovering this for the first time,
like you got tricked by a politician,
either that should be representative of the,
the, the naivety within all of this
or a willingness to fall in line when it's beneficial.
Because the truth is the old person that made the,
that we, that we used to talk,
they never would have been like,
oopsie, a politician fooled me into believing in him.
I don't buy it.
I just don't buy it.
And I said, why don't you point out all of us
who tried to warn you of exactly this happening
while you're pushing people to pick a side?
It's easy and costs you nothing
to point back and criticize right now.
I prefer we start actually calling these things out
when they can still be stopped.
And here's the video first for his comment.
It was short anyway.
Globalists want to squander all of America's strength,
blood and treasure.
Chasing monsters and phantoms overseas.
In addition, there must also be a complete commitment
to dismantling the entire globalist neocon establishment
that is perpetually dragging us into endless wars.
So is Jones now finally admitting
that he is part of the globalist agenda
as he pretends to continue to call it the globalist?
Probably not.
I mean, frankly guys, I haven't talked about it in a while,
but if you remember what we left off
with the calling out Alex Jones reality
and was just one part of the larger thing
where he was like, you know, he called,
he literally called Alex Jones by name, made fun of him
and called him whatever, called him out.
He still supports him like I told you would
and I'm willing to bet you anything
that even though he'll make comments
when you really look in, he's clearly still on his side
and very much so is going to support the direction
of the party midterms, all of them doing the same thing.
Worth noting on that guys.
We should have never gone into the Middle East.
Under my leadership, we will turn the page forever
on those foolish, stupid days of never ending wars.
We're rebuilding our military stronger than ever before
and we are not going to deplete it again
on stupid, senseless, endless wars.
World War III has never been closer than it is right now.
We need to clean house of all of the war mongers
and America last globalist in the deep state.
I am the president who delivers peace.
I was the first president in decades who didn't start a war
and the worst, most incompetent, most corrupt president
in history is going to drag us into World War III
and this horrible, horrible president
is dragging us toward World War III.
We're going to be in World War III soon.
Because I think we would have been good with Iran.
I don't want to do anything bad to Iran.
Large sections of the Middle East,
I mean, look at the death and destruction
that's taking place.
I don't want to do anything bad to Iran.
Wait, you mean the group that you call terrorist, monster,
you know, like every possible negative thing
you've ever thought to say,
that you just want to rape your women
and steal your, you know, hate democracy, hate the Jews?
But yeah, I don't want to hurt Iran.
You know, if you have any brain cells,
you can go back and look and realize
he was lying in one part of it.
You know, he lied then or he's lying now.
You can choose because these things can't make sense together.
He's been doing this even in Iran part recently
where he comes out and goes,
oh, they're not that bad.
We can make a deal.
They're good people.
And then 30 seconds later,
they're sadistical maniacs that want to...
That's, I mean, either he is just that stupid
or he thinks you're that stupid.
And none of this would have happened if I were president.
Our opponents joined with war mongers
and neocons to wage endless wars,
these wars that never end.
Together, we're fighting to secure our borders,
end the endless foreign wars
and defend the working people of America.
But the Muslim and Arab voters in Michigan
and across the country want a stop
to the endless wars that are returned
to peace in the Middle East.
That's all they want.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
I mean, those are the same people, by the way,
that he called terrorist monster,
freeloading grifters and frauds, right?
Funny how that works.
Speaking of World War III,
I'll keep you out of World War III.
What would happen if we had a war?
We won't.
Oh, me.
But you will have World War III,
I believe, without me,
but we won't have.
I will be sure
that World War III will not happen.
I'm the only one who can say it won't happen.
But I stand here today
and I'm the only candidate
who can make this promise.
I will prevent, and very easily,
World War III, very easily.
What a creep.
And it's the way he even does that.
It just makes me uncomfortable.
You know what I mean?
Like, it's just weird.
Very much so.
Okay.
And again, if you, you know,
for those that are new to this,
you need to make sure you go back
and look at our long coverage
that could expand multiple sides
and presidents.
And I believe they're, in my mind,
they're all in the same category
for different reasons in some cases.
You know, Biden's creepiness
is in a different angle for sure.
Well, maybe not
when you understand the Epstein files.
But the bottom line
is that these people
are just not what they pretend to be.
And so here,
the point is he's posting all that
and he says,
was Trump lying the whole time?
Or was he just a puppet the whole time?
Now, of course, I,
the first little point out
that there's sometimes
there's an, there's a, a, a
benefit or rather a use
to framing something
and, you know, posing the question
that often people will misunderstand
that I actually don't know.
You know, how do you not know that?
And I was like, well, I do.
I've commented on it.
My point is I'm asking that question
to get people's minds in a certain place.
So maybe that's what he's doing.
That's certainly possible.
I don't think that,
based on many other points
we'll see in a second.
But at the end of the day,
you know, it's, it's obvious
that he was lying.
What do we do?
Was he just like, well, yeah, man,
that's where we're watching that.
We can prove now that it was.
So that this would have been
what you would say before.
It was good.
You know, the point is the evidence
is that he was lying from day one.
He was lying in 2016.
And somebody has been doing this
this long should be able
to be able to understand
that politicians lie for a living.
So it's important to note
that not only does he going,
But he was pushing people
to vote for this person.
So that makes this a little bit
different, doesn't it?
So in case you forgot,
here's what Night Watch Nate
points out.
This is what he did after Trump won.
Hold on, hold on.
We got this one.
Let's go.
Careful with that computer.
Alex.
I told everybody earlier, Alex.
I'm covered.
If you and me and Gary,
the numbers guy and Luke,
if we all go Super Saiyan
at the same time,
screaming into these microphones,
that's going to seal the deal
for Trump, Alex.
Are you ready?
All right.
One, two, half.
Half.
Yeah.
Now the frogs will no longer be
gay.
We're going to end.
We're going to end chemtrails.
We are going to restore
the Republic.
How did that work out?
Frogs being gay.
Oh, so you mean like,
like endocrine,
disrupting chemicals
that are more rampant
now than ever.
Fluoride, they fought
to keep in your water.
Let's just go down the list
of all the things they were.
Yay.
Why?
Because he yelled Ron Paul.
Yep.
Didn't happen.
You know, gosh darn it,
guys.
You know,
look,
they probably believed this
stuff.
That's, you know,
I believe they're part of
we are changed.
I mean,
who knows?
But I don't believe that
Luke did.
I don't believe,
I think Alex probably knew
that these were,
that's just my opinion.
But guys,
how do we not acknowledge
this?
And this is not even about
like, let's just say they
genuinely now change their
minds.
That still makes this valid
to understand as this goes
forward,
are they going to fall for
Vance?
Are they going to fall for
the next claim?
I mean,
you know,
again,
even though I in that moment
when it happens,
I'll also be hoping that it's
genuine and questioning at
the entire time,
like I did this time.
Will they do that?
Or were they going to jump in
with the next team?
Are they going to vote for
the midterm?
Based on what the team says,
you know,
guys,
you know,
I don't need to convince
people of this.
I'm just trying to make sure
you understand that it's
not unique.
If you don't feel like
you're alone,
the whole effing country sees
this in my opinion right
now.
I am so being excited.
I know we're on YouTube
right now,
but so freaking,
I am so excited.
They will never take our freedom.
They will never take our
Republic.
1776 will live again.
Yeah.
Give us your war cry,
Alex.
Freaking things.
Already did.
Amazing, man.
This is,
this is,
this is such a relief.
There's so much.
And what they were telling
you at this time,
they did this,
right?
We had a role because
they did.
Alex played a larger role
than most anybody in this
field of getting that person
into power.
Now I'm not going to say to
Kamala would have been any
difference at the point,
guys.
It's about understanding
that this was something
we had a moment right there
where people were true.
I mean, even Trump's 2016 run,
the reason he was put there
is because people were
waking up to the light,
wanted something different.
So they gave you
something different.
Now we're going to get the
fake third party too,
which is what I've been
expecting.
That's what I believe,
but I won't,
I won't blindly assume.
I'll hope for the best,
but I'll call out what
I'm seeing.
Just got to call it out.
There's a lot of happiness
here that you could see
all around us.
And truly, man,
this has been such a hard fight.
There's been so many ups
and downs.
There's been so many times
where you're kind of like
thinking, holy cow,
things could go so bad.
Things could be just so
absolutely awful.
But now we have this ray of
hope.
We have this situation
where we get to decide
our own futures.
And that's enough.
Oh, yeah.
How's that, bud?
How do we get to decide
our own futures?
Let's just even say
Trump was exactly who
you wanted.
Do you really naively
believe that by voting
for a president
that you now get to decide
your own future?
Do you actually think
that he actually believes
that?
I don't.
Amazing feeling.
They have the House.
They have the Senate.
They have the Supreme Court.
They have the presidency.
We have independent media.
We have social media platforms.
We have everything.
What's we, the Republican Party?
Freedom?
I mean, you know, guys,
this is such a stark overlap.
You know, it's just
you can't you can't not
see this right now.
And really, we have this.
We've taken control.
Who are you talking about?
Wasn't the people, guys?
Clearly wasn't even Americans.
Yeah.
No, this is a chance
to really unify everybody.
This is a chance to really
make people understand
the full potential that
that we really have
in front of us.
I mean, I say he comes out
as a unifier.
He comes out and says
we did it.
Now's the time we come
together as America
and we work on releasing
all of the energy
sources.
No, no, he gave you
Stargate, right?
He gave you the opposite
of Maha.
He started wars.
He lied to all of you.
He sold you down the river.
He sold out to Israel
from day one, right?
The great unifier.
I mean, I just my thing, guys,
I just I don't eat.
That's not even just about
saying that's not true
and he was wrong.
It's about asking
whether he even believed
it when he said that
or whether he just gave up
and said, you know,
this is what's going to
make me money.
This is what content is
going to read.
It's not even about Luke,
guys.
It's about the reality
of the larger thing
that we keep seeing.
And if you keep falling for this,
if you keep doing the same thing,
you're going to keep
getting the same thing.
Releasing us from the bureaucracy
from all the government
in our life and allows us to
actually voting for a government
is going to get the government
out of our lives.
Yeah.
How has that worked out
historically?
Something that Luke actually
used to talk about.
Funny how things do forward
in a way that allows us to
have total freedom and
liberty from, of course,
those people that we're
putting a boot on our
throat before.
You realize Luke has had many
interviews with people like
Larkin Rose, right?
Many different people who
talk about the status
reality and why there is
no such thing.
What he's talking about
is a complete bastardization.
It is something that he,
it's, I mean, look,
I could go an old day
and make show you things
where he intellectually
and talked about, you know,
anyway, you know,
Emmett talks
correctly about things
that are
highlighting the illusion
of government,
talking about the two-party
illusion.
I don't know how in the world
you could come from that to this,
right?
And then now obviously seeing
that that's not even remotely
where it even ended up.
Like how do you even
map that arc?
What do you guys say?
Donald Trump is our Augustus
Caesar.
Hail Caesar.
Yeah.
Well, that's a little bit
more accurate than you realize,
isn't it?
Right?
Like a dictatorial,
like our Caesar.
It's so weird.
I mean, I don't even know
what that's supposed to mean,
right?
Like, except for the podcast,
like it just, he says that
and then just,
they just look around
uncomfortable.
I mean, what is that supposed
to mean?
Are you actually suggesting
that that is the reality
or is it uncomfortable
because he said it
and it's not true
or maybe because it is a little
too true?
You don't even know.
I don't even know.
So,
continuing,
as Brad Miller,
who by the way,
showed up at the event
in Nashville,
such a great guy.
If you don't remember
our interview with him,
I'll actually,
I'll grab real quick.
I think it's the first one.
Hundred First Airborne.
Resigned in protest.
They even,
well, I don't know.
I don't know if you want to be,
I was going to say something.
Maybe I should,
I said in a conversation,
but I don't know if you might
want me, it doesn't matter.
The point would be,
he resigned in protest,
nothing crazy,
just something we were
discussing when he was
at the events
and I'll leave it off.
But the point was
that he resigned in protest,
right?
And I mean,
what,
what a courageous thing to do
at a time when it wasn't
something he, you know,
in the midst of this,
as the commander, you know,
anyway,
check it out for yourself.
Hundred First Airborne
Battalion Commander
relieved of command
for refusing COVID.
Now he was relieved of command,
but he resigned from the
military in protest.
Anyway, he was there
at the event
and he posted,
some of you just
never paid attention
to who Trump really is
to Luke saying this.
Oh, and by the way,
of course, this has
1.6 million views,
most of which is being
framed as, yeah,
we agree.
What happened?
And it just,
it's an out, guys.
It's an out for people
to try to pretend
that they got fooled
because, you know,
somebody lied to us.
No, no, he was right there
in front of you the whole time.
Who lied to you
were the people
who were misrepresenting
what he was,
like this person,
like Alex Jones.
That's the point.
And I showed you
that one already.
And I,
this is another one.
So what I'm noticing
in all of this, guys,
is that there,
this was the other
one of the day before
and clearly it got
a lot of reach, right?
So 1.6 million people,
that's a viral post.
So clearly what I think
is he tried to emulate that
two more times.
That's my opinion.
But it came out
so many hours later,
posting what Thomas Massey
said, which is,
as I've already shown you,
they ask why I'm the only
Republican to vote no on
Trump's spending bills.
Well, he awarded
Pfizer contracts
worth $1.24 billion
for COVID shots.
You know how you already know
this?
Because you watch this show
as I posted down here too.
So you knew this in June
if you followed
the TLab platform.
You knew it before that
if you followed Jeffrey Tucker,
whatever you think about him,
that's not the point,
is that he posted it,
which is where I saw it.
So I think he posted it
the day before I did the show.
So clearly though,
you knew about this
month-a-month ago
if you actually
followed this kind of platform.
And that's just demonstrating
our value for you guys.
And so it's funny that he
comes out and he goes,
what the hell is Trump doing?
The journalist is blown away
by this story
that's been out for a month.
And I said,
he said, I want my money back.
We were all scammed.
Yeah, that's the truth, isn't it?
Everybody was scammed
with the person that you convinced us to vote for,
convinced others to vote for.
And I said, you scammed yourself, Luke.
It was obvious from the start
and you know it,
especially since in 2024
you all called us blackpilled
for trying to call your attention
to what you're currently claiming
is a surprise.
You get why I'm reiterating this, guys.
I mean, this is,
I find this to be relevant.
Again, here's 2026 later in the day.
Or excuse me,
July 26th, later in the day.
Mario Nothall says,
Lindsey Graham,
late Lindsey Graham says,
Trump and BB are like Roosevelt and Churchill.
You need to see this unreleased documentary.
Okay.
So the point is,
Luke says, what the hell happened?
Which got much less engagement
because it's, you know,
you did it once.
Come on, let's move past it.
You know, the point is
that this is the same kind of thing.
Like, what did we miss?
Well, everything, apparently.
Lindsey Graham?
I mean, the very guide
that you guys all said
was the worst part.
Hey, just guys,
you could prove to yourself if you care
that there's dishonesty throughout all of this.
Partisan advocation for their own benefit.
Same thing here.
JD Vance told Trump,
or Joe Rogan,
the COVID vaccine made him sicker
than he's been in 15 years.
Worse than catching COVID five separate times.
Oh, you see the manipulation in that?
Either way, Luke says,
but Trump is still paying
Pfizer for COVID vaccines.
Right.
I mean, like the thing that we are,
that you knew about,
and see, Vance is using this.
He's using this.
But so now he's framing this as
but Vance is lying to you.
Well, guess what?
Guys, you knew this from the beginning.
This is not some new hot take to realize
that they're deceiving you,
but I just think what's happening right now
is an effort to try to take control
of the way this goes.
That's what these people,
and I might even point to him in particular,
but just the mainstream alternative media,
it's what they do.
Frankly, I see this as more of somebody
who leaned into just what was easy and profitable,
but however you look at it,
the system is clearly about trying to keep you,
like, you know, keep these things.
The moment we start to see major attention on something,
the fake independent media jumps in
to drive it in a controllable direction.
That's how I view this.
Here's another example of this.
Steve Brown came out and said,
he never promised no more wars
after Mel said something that was accurate.
You're a liar and a moron.
Well, even Twitter says,
well, yeah, he literally did
and everybody knows that.
But here's the clip.
And my point is about the same kind of idea
that this,
even though this is corporate media saying it,
and that's what causes some people to go,
then it must be false.
It is in.
It's not false.
He did say it many times,
as you all know.
It's did no new wars.
That's why I didn't guarantee no war.
It's just did no new war.
It's so strange.
So much streamer stuff is happening.
I'm not even going to get into it.
I have to restart the video every time
because apparently the audio doesn't play
for the first five seconds
until I restart it.
I'm telling you guys,
I could write an entire book
about the insane things that happened
on every single electronic thing in my life.
Anyway, starting the clip again.
Insisted no new wars.
That's why I didn't guarantee no war.
I'm not going to start a war.
I'm going to stop wars.
No more wars.
No more disruptions.
We will have prosperity,
and we will have peace.
Under Trump,
we will have no more wars,
no more disruptions,
and we will have prosperity and peace for all.
I am the candidate of peace.
I am peace.
We will turn the page forever.
One of those
stupid days of never ending wars.
They never ended.
Okay.
So the point is,
Oops.
Wrong post.
Oh, that's why.
God, this whole thing.
I'm sorry. Hold on.
Get in turn.
Since I have two windows open,
I get mixed up on this sometimes.
Okay.
So obviously the point
is not just about that.
You all know that.
I mean, anybody who has brain cells
could have seen it.
I mean, you heard him say it.
He said it on the campaign trail.
This is my point.
Most conservatives who are honest,
which I believe is the majority
on either side of this,
aren't going to lie about that.
You all know he did that
because you wanted that.
And so what you get are either people
who are actually that stupid, Steve Brown,
I don't know,
or he's lying for his own agenda.
So think about what that means internally,
that you know it's not,
you know it's the truth,
but you're lying for the team.
That's the minority,
but it exists.
Or you actually don't know that somehow,
which is pretty sad,
and that shows you the kind of lack of intelligence
or awareness of the people that fall into that,
also the minority.
But Mel said, yes, he did.
Yes, he did.
Trump is a liar here,
and you are the moron.
So my point is,
like with Luke,
is how did you not see that, Steve Brown?
Are you either lying about this,
or did you somehow just not allow yourself
to see these things?
And I don't know, guys,
either way you look at it,
that's a huge part of this conversation
of the same people that have over-committed,
like the mothers who gave their children COVID shots
and refused to admit that they hurt them
because they just don't want to accept what they did.
It's always part of this.
So on Trump's side of this,
and the dishonesty around it,
this is the kind of thing that was happening
and was happening last time too.
If you didn't see this,
Trump comes out and puts out
a subcommittee on digital assets.
Not a joke.
Ethics requirements.
Aside from the fact this whole administration,
most of them anyway, omitted
or didn't even sign their ethics pledges
in the beginning.
Not that that's a leak,
like some kind of law-breaking thing,
but the point was they all chose
to ignore the reality of their ethics,
which we can see on plain display
as they all profiteer through the administration.
It also means they could be working for foreign powers,
and we wouldn't know it,
which is what one guy said in the beginning.
Seems pretty much on the nose, doesn't it?
But in this case,
ethics pledges or ethics requirements
for digital assets.
History will remember
Senator Cynthia Loomis writes,
this is the moment a president chose
a higher standard of ethics.
God, these people are so ridiculous.
Then the law required of him,
this agreement bans all federal officials,
including the president,
from issuing sponsoring digital assets.
I mean, you all know where this is going.
As even Twitter said,
which is why they're going automated,
President Trump and Melania
literally launched their own coins.
And it's more than just those two guys.
They had the rug pull on like
three or four different kinds,
World Limit Financial, Trump, Melania.
They're all rug pulls, guys.
They're literally a fraction
of what they started with.
They made billions of dollars
off of their own supporters.
And so the point is,
now they pass it,
as somebody says down here.
So he passes the law
after he makes all of his money,
typical.
That's the kind of people
that they're all defending, right?
Or the fact that national debt
is now, as it says,
Trump said he would eliminate
the national debt when it stood
at $19 trillion.
Now it's over almost $40 trillion.
And here's Caroline Leavitt.
See, the Trump economy
is doing better than the media
wants to admit.
I mean, it's people like Alex Jones
and the rest that allow people
not to see this, guys.
Okay?
You also have this alarming reality,
which by the way,
is hard for many people to see this
even if they're seeing everything else,
because you've been trained
so aggressively to hate the other side.
The same reason so many Democrats
have a hard time seeing
the bigger picture
when it comes to being told
that they think Trump supporters are.
Because the game is keeping you locked in
on this illusory enemy
that they've largely created anyway.
I don't believe MAGA
that what they claim MAGA is
represents most conservatives.
I don't think what they claim
Democrats are represents most liberals.
I don't.
I think you can easily prove that today.
Look at COVID-19.
Look at Israel.
Look at what's happening right now
in MAGA world
if you're actually paying attention.
Most conservatives who I argue
are the real MAGA
who want to make this country great again,
who feel Trump didn't deliver,
that's the majority
and they're calling him out.
The ones still going MAGA
who believe in Trump
and even though he didn't deliver
are the fake people
and there's still a lot of them.
In this case,
as you already saw,
this is the article about it,
the Trump administration's global campaign
against radical left terrorism
is built on a national security memo,
which you know,
7, what is it?
National NSPM 7.
It marks a major conceptual shift
in the U.S. counter-terrorism policy
departing from approaches
that primarily targeted
foreign threats.
Yeah, because you are the one
focused on now.
As the ice point comes into play,
we're talking about them
turning this in
and focusing on Americans,
which has always been the case
if you understand,
you know, what we've been talking
about over the years,
now this has always been turning in,
they've written documents about it.
And of course, radical left,
some of them will think good,
go after Democrats
until it's turned against you,
just like happened recently.
Like if you're on the other side of it,
right, you're talking about
go after the trucker convoy,
get those Nazis
and then turns right around,
and now the whole system is aimed at you.
You already see that.
Now the Republicans,
I'm sure you could piece it together.
Next time a Democrat comes into play
or if you actually understand
that it's the same either way,
the system will be used against you too.
And oops,
and this is a post coming from
State Department.
Ken Cliftonstein shared it.
State Department officials call
for a pre-crime approach
to combat far left terrorists
to prevent plots before they happen.
Direct quote.
This shouldn't be news to you.
Whitney's been talking about
this her entire career,
myself, Derek.
They have been pushing towards pre-crime
since Trump's first administration.
Long before that, in fact,
Bill Barr was the one
who brought it to fruition.
Now we're on, you know,
technocratic levels,
medical pre-crime.
I just talked about the idea
of what I believe leads into that.
And that is that overlap
with the new sort of
gain of function direction
that I believe is the,
you know, my opinion,
by the way,
make sure you check it out.
Be skeptical.
I'll include this as well.
Trump's new gain of function,
which is some sort of virus
that infects bacteria
and then causes, you know,
it's insane, guys.
And it's exactly,
I went through peer-reviewed studies
that make the same case.
This is just as problematic
as gain of function
because it's the same idea.
There's a slight deviation
from the definition.
And so my point is
that becomes something
that overlaps with the DARPA program
that claims to be able
to detect whether or not
you've got some internal bio-thing
going on
and they'll lock you down
before you can be a threat.
That's real, guys.
So it all comes to the same point,
however they want to use it.
So my point is, as Melanie says,
this is looking,
is just locking up political enemies
and violating their fourth, fifth,
and 14th Amendment rights.
That's what fascist governments do.
But guys, they didn't commit the crime.
They haven't done anything yet.
There's no way you can be okay with this.
If you believe in what Trump claimed
he was fighting for,
the Constitution,
American rights, liberty, free speech.
Excuse me.
Now a couple other quick points
in case you didn't see this.
Cadabra dogs and drones.
This is from April, 2026.
Record show scope of search at Zorro Ranch.
Now I wanted to quickly follow up on this
because this is one of the other things
that all of the ones that were screaming like them
about Epstein files,
who seemingly don't care about that now,
or I guess are now suddenly circling back around
saying, did Trump lie to us?
Maybe all of a sudden
they'll start pointing it out.
Which is that this was done a long time ago.
Right?
And it says, FBI emails in the Epstein files
released so far by the State Department
that is show federal investigators
doubted there was evidence left,
left at the ranch,
only weeks after Epstein's death.
Quote, from the FBI, 2019,
at this time we don't believe
there are items still located
in the residence
that would be of value to the investigation.
Still, you know the English language.
We know the evidence that came out.
That's why they were there.
This is Trump's administration at the time.
That's because they got,
the evidence came through the,
it went through,
I believe it originally went to a right wing
media podcast or radio host.
He then related to the government of New Mexico
and they had documented videos of abuse
and they had evidence of people that were buried.
They got barely any attention.
Now it got called out then again in 2019
to look into it.
Nothing happened.
And they said that their items,
they don't believe they're still there.
So bringing it to today,
well, guess what?
The New Mexico government is still trying to investigate
whether it's political or not.
Trump and the team won't let them.
Neither were Biden.
But what I think is important is that
Cash Patel and the rest want you to believe
that they did this investigation
and there's no evidence.
There's nothing to look into.
It's over.
But if you're telling me
that you knew they were once there
and you've yet to actually follow up
with investigation,
which means look for any residual evidence
which they have not done outside of New Mexico
from a state level,
then you know you're hiding something.
And it says,
but an unverified anonymous tip
released as part of the federal document dump
alleged the bodies of two girls
were buried somewhere in the hills
of Zora Ranch.
New Mexico Justice Department conducted a search
of this property in April
and which a specialized canine unit
that's trained in detecting human remains.
The agency declined to comment on the outcome of the search
and just called one component of the ongoing investigation.
So as far as I could tell,
there's allegations they found bodies,
but that evidence I can't back up.
And here is the follow-up on July 15th.
Nearly five months after New Mexico Attorney General
asked the State Department to unredact files
tied to Epstein, Attorney General Raul Torres
in New Mexico said federal officials
are now making it clear they will not cooperate.
I don't know how anybody can misunderstand this.
And it says,
Toro said the U.S. Attorney's Office
for Southern District of New York,
the office assigned to handling the Epstein files
told his office by phone
that it will not support their investigation.
In 2019, the federal prosecutors asked Torres,
his predecessor, to pause his investigation
into the ranch to avoid interfering with federal proceedings.
Think about that.
So in 2019, when they actually were sniffing around for bodies,
they had them stop.
Now it comes back around and they say,
don't even do it.
So the point is they never actually finished this investigation.
Quote, I think it's a tragedy and a real stain
on the Justice Department,
not really when you understand what they're actually like,
that it has gone on this long
without real accountability for the crimes that occurred
at Zora Ranch.
Just a quick little brief into there, guys.
We already showed you this,
but this is the situation we're in.
Again, Trump will have you believe
that we're in the Golden Age.
What do you think?
The Golden Age of...
So ladies and gentlemen of Georgia,
the Golden Age of America is upon us.
We are in the Golden Age.
This is the greatest we'll ever be.
And together with your help
and the patriots all across this magnificent land,
we love our country,
we will make America powerful again.
We will make...
You saw this already.
The point is that, you know,
do you really think that this is the Golden Age?
Is that what you think?
You know, I just don't know why anybody...
I mean, this...
I don't think anybody thinks that.
Even the people who support him are still going,
well, we'll get there.
And as somebody's pointing out,
205th time we've entered the Golden Age since 2024.
Brooke Jackson rightly points out
how many COVID criminals have been brought to justice.
Zero? Got it.
What a shame that department keeps letting them go.
I'll include Brooke Jackson's interview with T-Lab.
Oh, actually, here's the archive.
That's perfect.
We've had four interviews with our belief.
Don't forget T-Lab was the very first platform
to interview her live about her massive lawsuit
against Ventavia and Pfizer.
One of the many things that I think are worthy of praise
for this platform that barely people acknowledge
sort of like the amazing Art of Urquhart interview
that Taylor did,
that we put a lot of time and resources into,
that was just pretty much, in my opinion,
the absolute best piece of work,
highlighting that focal point of the actual internal...
From one of the leading cardiologists, you know.
It's a powerful piece
that, if we were talking to Carlson,
would probably change the world.
You know, that's how that works.
Realize how artificial that tends to be.
And again, that's nothing more than,
as I keep pointing out, guys, demonstrating our value.
If you go and look for yourself,
you realize how powerful this stuff is.
On this, Sam Tripoli writes,
I see way more conservatives calling out Trump
than I ever saw progressive calling out Obama,
Clinton, Biden, or Biden combined.
Now, who's to say that that's accurate?
I don't know.
I don't know how we can even find a way
to, like, prove those metrics.
But I agree in a way...
The point that I want to highlight
is even if it's not true,
what I think this shows is that right now,
there's a huge effort to try to gaslight people
into not seeing what's happening.
And I mean, left and right, guys.
They want you to believe that if you're,
oh, every MAGA supports Trump,
and that's why they're so disgusting,
or whatever the blind feeling is
for the partisan other side.
And then you've got people on the other side
are being convinced to stay with Trump
because, well, you're the only crazy one.
Don't be a Democrat.
And the truth is, if you're standing back
beyond the partisanship, I agree with him.
It's insane, this overflow at the actual event with Derek.
There was somebody who was talking about the,
like a support group for people leaving MAGA.
And she was, like, talking to me afterward about,
she was, like, just die hard
like the people I keep talking about.
Flags in their trucks going to protests,
like literally getting into fights.
And now we're like,
I wouldn't spit on Trump if he was burning.
And that's saying everyone in his inner circle,
everyone that they know is, like, never again.
Trump not, you know, and now I'm going to bet you
most of them will vote for another Republican,
probably go to Vance.
But they see it right now.
We need to capitalize on that.
And this is what I think is,
I mean, I thought, I think largely
that was happening from Democrat side
to probably a smaller degree during COVID.
Hard to prove.
I think this is obvious right now
more than it's ever been.
And you can even argue that the reason
there's such an overwhelming obviousness of it
is because of where we are,
that I'd like to believe you would continue
that awareness into the next Democrat
or whatever else.
But I agree.
I just think we need to acknowledge that.
Now, getting into the secret police side of this.
And some of this stuff is just so incredibly unnerving, guys.
Like, really, kind of the stuff that sits with you.
And this goes back long before ICE
and some of the cases will show you.
But what I want to highlight here is that what,
you know, that we've had this problem,
like the police violence issue in this country
has been on display for a really long time.
And it's comparatively to other countries,
you know, like just let's just say Western country,
it's just you can't hide this.
And the UK is going in the same direction.
And so what's important to see is that ICE
has only just exacerbated that,
has made it way worse.
ICE and the rampant lawlessness that's been allowed
by this administration has spun this out
to something that is, I mean,
I've never seen something like this,
like in this country.
Yeah, I've never seen it get like this.
And it's just this, like, I would say,
my argument would be this is not even all by design.
Like, now you have random people from local police
to, you know, across the spectrum
who are just acting with rampant lawlessness
because that's what this bleeds into our society.
So this is the recent show we had.
ICE has gone full-blown secret police.
Now, here's a clip.
First to start with a couple of follow-ups
from the last ones we discussed.
This one is about Salgado Arraro,
remember the claim?
Remember the arguments?
ICE claimed that he had drugs in his van.
Well, the lab results came back and guess what?
That was false.
So how many times can we go through this same cycle
where they just brazenly lie and their own documents,
the court reveals that they lied to everybody?
And then, well, in some cases, that person is still dead.
In many cases, that person is still deported.
In some cases, that person still lost
whatever they took from them
or got, you know, abused their rights,
locked them up for a weekend,
whether they're American citizen or not.
I know, you know, I'm again,
I've the belief that this is something
that's almost impossible for people to ignore.
But there are just, there's an artificial overlay
to a lot of this that allows people to feel like
you're the only one that sees it.
I don't believe that.
Salgado, they said falsely that there were drugs in his van.
This is a guy who got up every day for decades
and busted his butt to provide for his family.
And this administration lies and says he had drugs in his van.
The DA yesterday told us he thought once the lab results came back,
that lie would be disproven.
We learned late last night, early this morning,
the lab results are back.
No drugs in the car.
It is disgusting what this administration
is doing to families like this.
Now, I mean, think about that, you know,
like the idea, what he's saying is that they knew.
So they didn't know for sure, right?
But they thought, because they were doubting them,
because ICE keeps lying and sure enough,
and this is the point, like with Iran and Trump,
you could only have so many continuous obvious lies in a row
before the next one goes, okay,
Trump's probably lying this time, just like every other time.
But you should still go, but we can't know that for sure.
But it's just, it's not illogical to look at the precedent,
to use that to guide your choice,
but we should never assume.
So in this case, the point is, you know,
who's to say they're lying?
But historically, ICE has been lying nearly ubiquitous.
So we should probably go, they might be lying this time.
And it turns out, guess what? They lie.
And these are people, I mean, they're shooting people, guys.
Innocent people, Americans and otherwise,
arresting people who are here legally under the guise
that somehow they got it from Biden,
therefore it shouldn't be honored.
It's just, it's, what it's doing is creating an allowance
that will be used in a thousand different directions
when they want to.
And yeah, guys, it'll be aimed at you too,
the moment that it needs to be,
whether Republican or Democrat or aware of the illusion,
that's what's coming.
That's what's already here.
Now, I'm going to include this for you.
I'm not going to go into it in depth
only because it's still, in my opinion, up in the air.
This is the full video.
And this is specifically of, what was his name again?
It's right here.
Shoot, hold on. I just had, I just,
I'm not going to go into it in depth.
I pulled down some of this stuff,
but I'm going to come back to it.
Hey, serious? It's so stupid.
Let's see.
Cory Ruiz.
Okay, so the point
is that what we're talking about is an example again
where somebody was, was, was basically attacked by the cops.
And this is under the under, you know, whatever the allegation is,
the argument is that they were trying to arrest him.
He had a knife.
That's the argument.
And that that's why he ended up getting shot three times in the head
in point-point length range, which I'm sure you've seen.
What I want to argue is if you go through this and look for yourself,
I mean, this is, this one's the clearest that I've seen.
I don't think this makes sense.
I think what we can see in this based on the logic,
and I could easily be wrong because I mean,
this is still limited information.
The argument everywhere you look is the add a knife,
that the cops yelled knife, that they claimed that they have a picture of it.
Well, okay, remember what we're talking about here.
These are people like, whether police or ICE,
we're in a very weird moment where it's just become kind of normal,
which by the way, again, if you actually been doing this
like for your free thought project, it's been normal your whole life.
It's police will lie to suit their interests.
And I'm going to make that case very clear today.
Not everyone never assumed that some of them are good fighting for the right things.
Like Derek talks about cops that actually leaked to him video
of them investigating him back when he was simply just protesting,
which was not a crime.
And that's a cop that actually cared enough about his rights
to be able to risk his career to send it to him.
They exist guys, less and less, I would argue,
because they enforce on themselves.
My point though is that based on what I can tell,
the only evidence we really have is the allegation from them
that claim that it's there and some fuzzy picture zoomed in
of a knife on the ground that I can't see anywhere in the video.
And then if you actually watch my logic of this,
and so what they're saying is that right about here,
well, I mean, anyway, I'm not going to go through,
they claim he had a knife and this guy is holding his hand.
But so what you can notice is that well before they yell the word knife,
they have both of his hands locked, right?
And so either one of two things is the case,
either he somehow did have a knife and I don't know how you pull
a butcher knife like that out of your pocket.
That seems actually worth thinking about.
But the point would be that they yell knife,
but he's got his arm and he's got his other arm.
So either he already dropped it, right?
Or he didn't, at this point where you can see
is that he held his arm until ultimately he fell on the ground
and they shot him three times in the head, point blank.
And up right there.
And on top of that, the argument being that if the knife was
on the ground that this would, I mean, even arguably by,
even police are saying that that's not even justified
based on the circumstances if you had it.
You could make a debate about that.
The point being though that this seems questionable that he even had one.
And there are people out there saying it,
but I'm not going to say that's the case because I don't know.
But I think I'm going to make sure we follow up on this
and we find out because I'm sure it will come out
because I'm looking right now and that was the last thing.
Here's the, this picture of a knife.
You want to show me where that is on this picture?
Maybe it's behind his foot. I don't know.
But that over there, that's not it. Those are sunglasses.
But from what I can tell, I don't see a knife on the ground.
So who knows?
I don't want to include it.
So make sure you guys check it out.
We'll be probably following up on this.
But I just want to include it because we recently talked about it.
Now let's get into examples that are going to make you question
whether they might be lying about that and rightly so.
First of all, just a small example that's still insane.
I shouldn't even call it small, but it's not lethal in this case.
And this ice prevented a man from self-deporting on July 11.
And this is all documented.
It's from, it's from court.
So it's come out in court.
He had a June 11th deadline.
He asked ice to let him leave
and had a one-way plane ticket for June 10th.
Then ice re-detained him because he missed the deadline.
Now here's what, here, the clarification from Aaron.
He says, immigration judge grants him voluntary departure
saying he must leave by June 11.
Now that buys a plane ticket for June 10th,
ice asked to release him so he can board.
Ice says, no.
Right? OK, so he's held in attention.
As he's in attention, they're telling him he has to voluntarily deport.
He has the plane ticket for the 10th.
They choose to hold him till the 11th.
See what I'm saying?
Then charge him with fail to deport.
Or depart.
It's all documented.
So just I want you to see the gross dishonesty
within this administration,
or rather just this, this with ice in particular,
is that you knew what you did was create the justification
to charge him with a crime.
Because if you're wanting him to volunteer to deport,
that means he wasn't currently in violation of anything.
Somebody that is, like in many cases,
somebody that is a, you know, like a visa is declined.
Bottom line is that you made it happen
to where you could make this escalated.
You could have just let him leave.
But you didn't.
You chose to hold him until he violated the thing
you could use against him.
You ask yourself why?
Again, that's a small example in the context
of what we're talking about today.
But that's choosing to create context illegally.
Southwest flight attendant detained by ice
at Nashville International Airport.
Flight attendant was detained by ice earlier this month,
according to agency in the union
that represents the carrier flight attendants.
Meteor representatives for the union,
which represents more than 21,000 flight attendants,
could not share more beyond the initial statement.
Where was it?
This was highlighted.
Hold on.
Shoot.
Well, I feel I don't want to have to parse through it right now.
The point, again, was you're talking about somebody
who was detained for, you know,
in an airport with no real, no real process.
And this is what I want to highlight in all this,
is you have people that are showing up.
Airports seemingly pretty consistently right now.
I think there's a reason for that.
And grabbing people with no process,
no identification, no warrants.
And I'm going to make a bigger case about that today
about what I was worried about last time.
So in this case, we talked about Holman saying,
just comply.
Right?
If you don't get shot, just comply.
What's the problem?
Well, I'll tell you what the problem is.
Women are getting raped by people pretending to be ice.
I've been calling this out since the beginning,
and apparently that's not a big deal to all the people
that want to pretend like they're fighting for Americans.
You have American women, men being abused, robbed,
shot, because you are telling people to comply.
So criminals go perfect.
I'll go buy a $5 ice vest off of Amazon
and then pretend that we are ice and people.
And guess what, guys, like I showed you last time
at Las Vegas, they were dressed in white hoodies
and black panties.
They look like a bunch of kids.
And it turned out apparently they were ice
because ice owned it and said they followed up
and arrested them later.
How do we know what that is?
How do we not know that's not human trafficking
pretending to be ice?
On top of it, it doesn't even matter
because they're legally obligated to show you who they are,
what their name is, what their badge number,
to show you a warrant.
But here's Holman being asked about the people that were shot
and asked if he even knows what's going on with that
as the person in charge of this part.
And he doesn't have any idea
or he doesn't care to even answer.
Specifically, what happened to the officers involved
in the Texas and Maine shootings?
Have they been reassigned,
placed on administrative leave?
What's their status?
I don't know specifically.
You haven't been involved with investigations,
but it'd be policy
that they'd be put on administrative leave
during the shooting investigation.
That's the policy.
They aren't.
They never are.
Do you get moved to another place,
like Bovino and the rest?
The borders are involved in this.
You don't know for sure if they have been?
No.
Ice has an acting director, Dave Venturella,
and they report to Mark Wayne on the secretary.
I, you know,
I've said from the day when I won't comment on investigation,
but I can tell you, you know,
I haven't specifically tracked these cases,
but I can tell you per policy.
Yeah, they don't care.
Killing Americans, they don't care.
To put on administrative leave, pending the investigation,
pending, you know, sworn statements, internal affairs interviews.
Does anybody even believe for a second
that this guy would be honest with you?
That if it came down to something that he knew
was a problem for Trump, that he would just go,
yeah, Trump did that.
I mean, really ask yourself that.
And I don't think anybody who's being honest themselves
is going to pretend like Holman would not brazenly
or any of them would not choose to lie to your face,
even if it was against American interest,
because it would hurt Trump.
We've all seen that already.
And it's not different than previous governments left and right.
It's just acknowledge it now.
These people have been chosen because they hold the line
and people that don't get pushed aside.
You all know that.
You've all seen it.
So as Tennessee Holler says,
a lawless authoritarian goon squad
whose only directive is racial profiling.
Now, I don't believe it's only racial profiling,
but I believe that's a huge driving factor
because that's what they've been told to do,
which is a crime in and of itself.
But here's the point again, another example.
Right? So here's a woman who is screaming
in an airport for someone to help them
because who knows, maybe there's a bunch of
random human traffickers arresting a woman
claiming to be ICE because they're not identifying themselves.
They don't have any identification.
Like last time, what they did when people came around,
they got up and walked away, left their handcuffs,
hanging from one of the guys' wrists.
I mean, just from a policy standpoint,
I mean, nothing.
Guys, these people, guys, rampant lawlessness.
And there's some cursing.
Heads up.
Somebody!
No!
Guys, please!
And you please help me.
No! No!
No, they're fucking ICE.
I'm from Ukraine.
Please, somebody.
You're fucking choking me!
She said this from Ukraine.
And of course, maybe that's the case.
Maybe she's an illegal alien and they're arresting her
because she used to be deported.
That's not the point here.
There are valid actions within immigration enforcement.
The point is that...
How do we know as individuals?
You gotta stop. Stop. Let me go.
How would you even know that for sure?
Let me go.
Because they're not doing what they're doing.
You gotta stop. Stop. Let me go.
Let me go.
Oh, yeah, it's ICE.
Yeah, it's ICE. We just gotta let them finish.
I guess we'll assume that.
That's where we are.
Now, if it doesn't matter to you that they're breaking the law
with what they're doing, then what are we even talking about?
So why wouldn't they just walk up and break your leg
and take you at the same time? Because why not, right?
If they're breaking the law, they're breaking the law.
Does it matter to you if they're fine?
At the end of the day, guys, they're required to do these things
and they're not, which opens the door for abuse.
I don't understand why anybody who's not a dishonest player
is advocating for this, supporting any of this,
other than the ones that just don't know what's happening
because they're choosing to ignore it.
As Jesus freaking Congress points out,
the Ukrainian woman being physically restrained, playing clothes,
in a video she's terrified, begging them to talk to her,
begging the people around her to help her,
and we're all just expected to believe that they're ICE.
Even though they aren't clearly identifying themselves,
they aren't explaining what's happening,
they aren't showing any proof,
they're just men in plain clothes trying to physically take a terrified woman.
How is that not insane to people?
And there are Republicans who support this
and, by the way, it's not just Republicans, by the way.
It's not, you could, outside the paradigm.
There are people who support this for any number of reasons,
but there are people who support this
or the same people who spent weeks exploiting the murder of others,
in any case, like Elon Musk, for example,
who will exploit examples where things like this are happening
in the context that they want to call it out
but then exploit it and say this is okay.
This is what I think is really important.
And this is another report.
I've shown you so many of these, it pains me.
Men posted ICE agents and detained and assaulted a woman.
I said it's insane to me how little attention this gets.
Not at all, the first example.
I've pointed this out many times since ICE tyranny began.
The only reason this is possible is because ICE is being allowed
to violate your rights, its own policies, and the law.
It's as simple as that.
11, a warning from state police in the FBI
after a group of men posing as ICE agents, they say,
pulled over a driver in Clackamas County, detained,
and then assaulted them.
Catherine Cook spoke with community members,
and Catherine, it sounds like this might not be the first time.
No, David, and they fear this will keep happening
as long as actual ICE agents conceal their identities
and refuse to show warrants and other arrest documentation.
On this dusty stretch of...
Now, what's interesting to me is right there,
you're gonna get people from an aggressive partisan mindset
who just don't realize why they're being played,
who are gonna jump in and go, you know,
that Democrats trying to convict you,
we have to stop, well, it doesn't even matter.
Let's just even say you're right.
Does it not matter to that individual of speaking directly to you
that they're breaking the law to do this?
If your argument is, well, they have to,
because Democrats might, X, Y, and Z,
you've already lost.
The Democrats who are doing X, Y, and Z, arrest them,
call them out. They're the ones breaking the law
if they're doing that, and if you're doing the thing
you're doing to circumvent it, then you are too.
The answer is never to break the law in response, guys.
That's the excuse they give you, and usually when you look back,
there wasn't even a crime to begin with
that justified them breaking the law. They use it.
It's sort of like the FBI who will leak things to the news
for the news to say, then they point to the news saying it
as justification to continue their investigation.
Look it up. It happens all the time.
And it's just a cycle of nonsense,
and they use you guys.
But just already think about that.
Think about how insane that is, right?
Broad day bandits in the middle of nowhere,
you know, just like pulling you over in the street
acting like they're police officers.
And even police officers I've shown you examples of
have fallen for this, because they're being told
to be completely reverent to, you know,
I says that they get to do that.
I mean, think about what will overlap.
Like think about the larger sense.
Think about like international espionage
and the idea of abusing this,
to be able to come in and grab whoever you want.
Human trafficking?
I mean, it's almost as if the group covering up
the Epstein files have created a situation
where exactly that,
what's ripe for abuse, for that,
is now being blown open.
Welcome international human trafficking groups
or come in and grab whoever you want,
pretend your eyes and nobody will even say a word about it
because they're covering up for their own agendas.
Police say the men forced them out of their car,
searched them, held them in their SUV,
and assaulted them before finally letting them go.
This is the kind of attacks that we were afraid
would actually happen.
We know that when ICE roams the streets
without any kind of identification,
any kind of accountability,
that's the message you're sending to people
that this kind of stuff is okay.
Reena Lopez is president of Pecun,
Oregon's farm worker union.
She says community members have spoken
of similar incidents involving ICE impersonators.
She's grateful police are investigating this case
and alerting the public.
And anyone...
And they're getting pushback, guys,
even like a local entity trying to look into this,
like from a top-down federal point,
they're covering for themselves.
And that includes trying to hide that this byproduct's
happening, which they've been doing.
Which means they could care less that Americans
are suffering because of their agenda,
which in fact is actually making Americans suffer.
Can put on a mask and refuse to identify themselves
and claim that they're ICE.
And these types of incidents are only going to intensify
if they are approached by someone who claims to be an ICE agent.
Remember that you have rights.
In Woodburn, community members like...
But you see this is the problem, right?
Is that then ICE agents right now don't care
and there's no mechanism through our government
that cares to follow up,
who cares to hold them accountable
for not caring about your rights.
Which means the administration from the top-down
doesn't care about your rights,
which by the way you should have seen a long time ago.
Luke and anybody else, same with Biden,
same with any of the rest of them.
It's just important to see that, right?
So the point I'm making is that yes,
this is the case.
You do have rights and you should stand up for them.
Just be aware that there's risk there.
Act accordingly.
Make your choices accordingly.
Whatever you think that is.
Like I guess for example,
a larger note more broad.
I keep seeing examples where people are...
Like if you're about to be arrested in a normal sense,
like again, I don't even want to say this since
who knows if maybe...
Like if you have a normal context
where you have police going,
I'm here's my identification.
I want to arrest you.
The last thing anybody should do is start struggling.
Unless you believe that there's some kind of non-just situation
or that you're being human traffic,
they're lying,
my point is that we know today.
I hate even saying that because in many cases
there's a reasonable place to do that.
Even when it's police understand if you're in the wrong.
Kicking in your front door, for example,
and they're in your home.
The courts have ruled roundly with that.
My point is that today they don't care.
That if you do that,
they'll use force against you,
even if they know they're wrong.
So I'm just saying take that into consideration
because a lot of these cases we see end up going to that level
because they know they've got the rights to resist,
but then ultimately they get killed the street.
So the point would be is if ultimately you get taken to jail,
you could potentially make a case against them unjustly,
you know, violating your rights, for example.
But make your own decisions, guys.
That's how this has to go.
Understand where we are.
Make your decisions accordingly.
Luis, want their neighbors to remain calm and informed.
He said stay alert and look for exact information
and stay respectful of the laws.
We have the right to remain silent.
Organizations like Portland Immigrant Rights Coalition
send volunteers to authenticate ICE activity
for those who call their hotline.
Now realize on that same point he made,
like look, if you want one piece of advice
that I'll always stand by,
don't answer, be silent, like he just said.
I mean, you look up on YouTube the millions of lawyers
that will tell you ex-police officers
that will tell you one golden rule,
never answer questions for cops.
Never.
You have the right to stay quiet.
They'll literally tell you that.
And then act like that right is why they think you're guilty
because these are criminals.
The point is get a lawyer.
They'll use everything they can against you in that moment
and videos I'm going to show you right now
that will go over that.
And it's not about being disrespectful, guys.
It is your right for them to pretend
that it makes you look guilty.
They're abusing your rights.
Choose to be quiet
because you know that anything can be used again.
They'll literally, Miranda rights will tell you that
and then they'll go on to make you feel guilty for doing that.
Stay silent.
In a statement to KGW,
Perk condemned the incident
and said the victim's family reached out to them last week.
Quote,
the reality is there is very little visible difference
between ICE kidnapping someone
and armed criminals kidnapping someone.
ICE is deliberately exploiting a legal grey zone
where people aren't sure if they can call 9-1-1
to report violent traffic assaults
from unmarked people acting like police.
My advice on that,
if you see this happening
and you don't know for sure their ICE,
call the police.
Not that that's likely even going to do anything,
but complicate their situation.
Call the police.
Hopefully they get there while something's happening
and say these people are trying to kidnap that person.
They'll probably go on ICE
and then at least that then gets cleared up, right?
Make sure you know that.
But even then,
I mean, I shouldn't even,
I'm kind of making a point right there.
The last thing I ever want to do
if I'm going to be real honest
is involve the authorities.
It's just going to be real.
That's, I think,
almost in any circumstance.
But again, I don't even like to get into stuff like that
because you don't just follow my direct,
do what you think is right.
I will make my decisions in the moment
that may be different than what I would see.
We all have to guide ourselves based on the,
what we think is right for us in the moment,
based on our principles and our integrity.
I'm saying the point I'm saying that for
is to realize that doing so might actually
allow some accountability
because some of these people in local police
are actually good people.
But again, if I'm in that situation,
the last thing I'm going to do is call the police.
I just don't believe that that's going to help you,
but I digress.
This is a human rights issue
endangering all Oregonians.
Police say if you're unsure
whether a traffic stop is legitimate,
consider stopping in a well-lit area
or spot where there are several people present.
Right, yeah.
And this is the point I make all the time about
on the highway, right?
This is the law.
And you can look it up.
If you're driving and you feel unsafe,
the law says you can find a spot,
you feel safe.
They're flashing their lights
and there are 45 cars behind you.
If you don't feel safe
and you don't, you can find a place that does.
Now they'll try to argue that you,
you know, you drive for 20 miles.
Maybe they'll make a case out of that.
The point though is that in this case today,
if you drive, let's just say two more minutes
to somewhere this lit, they will,
we all know they will charge you with evading arrest.
The law doesn't matter to these people, guys.
These, in fact, most of them
don't even understand the law,
police or otherwise.
And that's what I want to get into next
because this is insane.
The level of local police that don't even,
that are at the point,
I mean, just take one clear example
that's consistent today,
arguing that, you know what?
If we're, you know, we just pulled you over
because we want to make sure you're okay.
Or you have a, you know, we look suspicious.
Oh, by the way, step out of the car.
We want to talk to you.
No, I don't want to get out of the car.
Well, guess what?
You have to or it's obstruction.
Whoa, wait a minute.
What am I being charged with?
No, no, we're just making sure you're okay.
Well, how is it turned suddenly where I am required?
It's not.
They're breaking the law and they don't care.
Or there's some new policy
or some new memorandum.
This is what we see today that argues,
well, you know, for your safety,
your constitutional rights are all that matter.
And the reality is they're not able to say
you have to get out of the car
unless you're charging me with a crime
and detaining me for that crime.
That's the reality.
But these people don't care about that.
Or they, and actually what I would argue
is more alarming, they don't even know.
They've been told by the administrations
that want them to think they can do this,
that everything is okay because we'll support you
and guess what?
They will.
So keeping that in mind,
the idea that you're seeing women raped.
Now look, the disgusting part of this is they say
she was assaulted.
I think we can all deduce what we're talking about here.
A couple of men pulled over some women on the highway
and then raped her in the car
and then she went to the police.
What's gonna happen now?
How do they even find these people?
You know, all the rape kits that are lining all these police officers,
they go after people for cannabis.
Look it up.
Like it's just insane the reality of the world
they've created where they enforce on us for anything
and they actually don't accomplish anything.
And so, I mean, I shouldn't even make it that broad.
It's just in a by and large reality, guys.
That's where we are as they focus on nonviolent crime
and they focus on hate speech.
It's where this world is going
and it's something we need to fight.
And this is what they're posting.
White House, got a tip?
Call it in now.
Deportation, maxing.
Like they're literally on some kind of meme social campaign
and they don't even realize they're failing
or maybe they do and they don't care.
Social, and by the way, using pictures from Seacot.
Yeah.
Go-to-skills bring in the...
I mean, they don't even care, guys.
In fact, this might not even be them doing this.
Like this feels like an engineered thing
to destroy this country.
Bottom line, they're not even doing this
to the level that teams or Republicans want.
So it's all a flash, no substance.
But yeah, everyone sees you're breaking the law
so let's double down.
Like this.
I mean, so you say deportation, maxing.
At least you can argue, well, that's what they want, right?
Lethality, maxing.
And it goes, yes, two Xs.
Like it's like you have, like I said,
it's like Caspital and Bongino and Trump making memes
and they think they're, you know,
it's like the 50-something white addicts
who are in this room going, oh, that's so hip.
That's what all the kids are going to love
and we just laugh at them because they're so out of touch.
I mean, are you serious?
Lethality, maxing.
I mean, what you're doing is murdering children,
bombing civilian locations and openly saying that
and then just doubling down.
I mean, there is a tactic for this.
Like to push this almost to make it feel like it's not real.
I don't even understand.
My point is just checking is not a parody account.
Nope, yep, that's them.
Yikes.
That's insane levels, guys.
That's sociopathic levels.
That's what we're dealing with.
Now, Joe Walsh, again, very partisan,
somebody who I disagree with on tons of things,
not about his stance on, you know,
it's about the what he says here, which I agree with.
ICE is expanding, which is true, by the way,
random door-to-door searches.
This is what I'm talking about,
whether it's cars or anything else.
They have their own things, not law,
not constitutional rights,
that say they're allowed to do this
if they argue there's an immigrant,
a nice warrant, not judicial warrant,
that they sign for themselves.
They say they can kick in your door
if they believe there's an immigrant in there.
And they'll do it just to make sure.
I've already proven this to you
and they already got called out
for why that wasn't justified.
They've done it since.
They don't care.
And now there's no follow-up.
Without your consent, a valid judicial warrant
or a genuine emergency,
they do not have the right to enter.
You don't have to answer the door
or their questions.
I agree.
The point is this is changing.
They're creating a situation
where they are now allowing themselves
to violate American rights.
By the way, the same rights that illegal aliens have,
the same rights that U.S. green card holders
and visa holders have.
And if you still don't know that,
who the hell are you listening to?
Here's an example of just a random gas station situation
where people are filming ICE
and the way that they belligerently react
because people dare to film them,
which is within their rights.
Now, again, I don't care if you find it disrespectful.
I don't care if you find it to be invaded.
They're not breaking the law.
If you're filming in a public location,
even this game of obstructing or you're impeding,
well, guess what?
If they're in fact doing something
and you're getting in their way,
you could make that case.
Standing there filming them
and them saying, back up, back up,
and then you not backing up far enough,
it's not impeding.
And you all know this.
It's a game of partisanship
and recognize it's about them against Americans,
not just the Democrats you don't like.
If you actually believe that,
you're the child in the room.
It's aimed at anybody who they don't agree with.
Look at that, right there.
You're talking about a guy who's standing close, right?
The cop is standing there.
There's multiple people with cameras.
And the guy just walks up and pushes him.
What justification?
Why are you laying your hands on me?
You are the one that initiated that.
By the way, just like Freddie.
Remember that?
When he walked up and tried to engage with him
and he's the one that pushed him, sprayed him,
he slipped, they fell,
and it all happened from there.
And they still lie about that.
They called him a terrorist, guys.
He pushes his hand away.
You're reaching out and pushing me.
Just because you're an ICE officer
doesn't mean you have the legal right
to assault me for no justification.
He wasn't breaking the law.
So the guy pushes his hand away
and he didn't like that because he's a child.
And so he assaults him back,
or not back, but rushes at him and attacks him.
Because this guy's so insecure,
you're not allowed to respect my authority.
That's what we're dealing with, guys.
There's no confusing that he ran up on him
because he gave him the wrong look.
And then you do hear them?
Those are the ICE officers.
Get him! Get him!
We're talking about, these are a gang, guys.
They're a bunch of, you know,
incompetent, uninformed,
uneducated,
what's the word I'm looking for?
Like, they didn't go through the proper training.
You know, not untrained.
Well, I guess untrained, but that's the real point,
is that they grabbed whoever they could
because people, you know, they just kind of,
what was it?
Like, weeks-long process.
They skipped multiple things.
They lied to them about what was actually illegal.
They gave them this weird memorandum
and said, go by that,
even though it violated their own policies.
We talked. We covered all of this.
Get him! Get him! Get him!
Get him! Get him!
Get him! What? Why did you...
seven people tackle him to the ground
because you pushed him
and he dared to say,
don't do that and push your hand away?
Get him! Get him!
And does that look like police?
Or does that look like the military?
Because this is the military guys. This is the military on US soil enforcing US law
You know what that used to be a crime weird, huh?
I think I've been proven correct at most conservative support this not even for immigration guys
This has gone so far beyond what anybody wanted and this is the same thing I say
Take Iran for example or any other location where they come in and go
You know Iran has clear issues with their government and clear as some of them do anyway
And they're protesting and you get outside forces that go we want to fight for your freedom and save you and all they do is
Destroy their country and then bomb those same people. It's the same idea people want let's just say immigration
They wanted the illegal immigrants to be removed because yes
There was an abuse of that through Biden and Republican administrations to set this up for the problem reaction solution
Nonetheless, they said get rid of the legal aliens
They did not say bring me a police state that ruins our Constitution
That's the point and I think most conservatives
Realize that you get the Jack Paso Bix and Benny Johnson that go rah, rah
Yay America and yell for this kind of stuff as it's unconstitutional and quintessentially on American
I'm not resistant
Partly complex and just in that you block a road with
Really all black people in the area and in the video
I
Know what they're probably disrespectful they're probably calling them names, but you know what that is your right as an American
And those who want to pretend otherwise are the ones fighting against American interests
This guy
Unmarked and
And again, this is not even just about ice
It's about what is bleeding into the enforcement arm all across this country and
Like I said in the title not even remotely new guys
This has been a building problem that has only been wildly thrown in like it is spun out entirely because of what they've allowed in this administration
So speaking of police isn't interesting so there's plenty more we can go into just ice
We just talked about this and sure enough there has been a follow-up on this and I'll just give you the link
Here's the link you can read more about it
But as we showed you the clip for this woman lost her mind and is exactly what I thought now
This is the hard example for most because it really does put to the test your principal
Which was it turns out there were cops that were shot like right around this area
That's the story is apparently there was a cop that was shot and it turns out the guy was like right next to where these
Two electricians were if you remember the story there was two electricians and these cops came up and just they threw them
They had them arrested screamed their faces and they were just a couple of bystanders
So the point becomes the same it shouldn't matter whatever you fill in the blank with cops were shot
They were somebody jaywalking it doesn't change the fact that your rights are unalienable
They don't get to come and go well danger my security and just suddenly ignore your rights
But that is where we are today
But the point was that they were either afraid or whatever because they were worried some but these people were sitting down
They were calm and they just they screamed in his face. They threw him. You know, you saw the video
Confusing orders get on your back stay on your front and they I mean in some cases people get shot because they don't listen
Because they don't hear they're getting conflicting direction. Now the bottom line is
Even in a case where there's police being shot and they have a right to be concerned
We don't know what's going on
We don't know who could be the big the maybe you're one of the people that shot him, right?
Like that's what they're going to argue. It still does not change
There's no world in which they get to just violate your rights because they are concerned because they're in danger
If you disagree with that then make the argument that you believe in limited rights
I make this case in every summer every conversation we have and maybe you're right
I disagree, but maybe you're right that we're in a different place in the world
And we can't rely then make the argument stop pretending you believe in unalienable rights
Stop pretending you believe in the Constitution if you're okay with this kind of thing no matter how extreme their justification was
Here's to get into some of these really alarming examples now
We're gonna just we're gonna we're gonna get into some that are recent most of them and a couple to overlap it with that are from 2022
2018 to show you that this is not new but right now guys
There's this whole thing about you're you're obstructing if you don't get out of the car
Even though I pulled you over for no justifiable reason
That is not the case guys and if this happens to you you probably I mean hopefully you could win some money because this
Is unjustifiably unconstitutional, but maybe we're at a place where that's not even possible either
Nonetheless, this is wrong. This is illegal and what they did here deserves to be called out
Police not only no I'm recording. All right, well the reason for stopping me
When we drove by in the muse we just saw you I was a little concerned and looked like you were reaching down
Just like hide your face. We came by you're wearing a sweatshirt and 80 degree weather
You got a handicap placard up. There's people that complain in the muse about people parking in handicapped spots
Okay, so that was everything, but you'll find he continues so you're wearing a sweatshirt
I didn't look at let's just even say he's doing something illegal
It doesn't change the fact that you have literally no legal justification to pull somebody over for that kind of suspicion
That's not probable car. You were wearing a sweatshirt. You had you were ducking in your car
You're in your own car wearing your own clothes and as it turns out leaving his apartment complex, which is what it was and
Because we have suspicion and I'm sure people and rightly so I would probably agree. It's because of his skin color
But either way it doesn't even matter white black
Purple doesn't matter you have rights and these people pulled them over because they decided they have suspicion
That's it and now well, you know, you let me see your documentation for that handicap
What do you mean?
Are my being detained or not, right? Am I breaking you charging with a crime?
If you if you don't understand your rights
It will be abused by people like this and the reason the problem is that I don't think this guy understands the rights
Because what's gonna happen is getting dragged out of your car because you're
Decline to come out of your car to answer more questions about something that was an unjust stop
My handicap sticker is illegal. No, I'm only reason I said
So what was the reason for stopping me again when I was patrolling through the muse as soon as we went by you
You reached down like hid your face from us
This is more to say that if everything's all right with you if you're all good if you're everything is fine
We'll have oh good. We're making sure you're okay. I'm good. Goodbye. Have you right on your way?
Okay, I want both of your badge numbers
Can I get your insurance or registration?
At this point why so you're conducting a traffic stop because you're trying to say
I look suspicious now look you obviously like for example not giving your information
Which he's under no legal responsibility to do so you you did not have any legal right to stop me in the first place
You have no legal right to see my ID my insurance. What am I being stopped for?
Oh just to be sure I'm good then I'm good
Let's move along right that when he started to engage is what opened the door not literally but opened the
Metaphorical door theoretical door for what happens next and it's not his fault because they're abusing their power
But understand your rights guys
And when you were patrolling through where I live
Yeah, correct where you live correct, right you live in the muse
Do you live there? Yes, okay?
So you're trying to say I look suspicious walking out of my own apartment
Whether or not he actually is hiding something doesn't make it doesn't relevant guys
It is irrelevant because they did not have justification to do it in the first place
Now just be you know if you're on the side of the police in this case that then you are okay with them deciding your criminal
Whether or not they have any evidence and then going out of their way
Even if it breaks the law and violates your rights to find out and in the process of trying to find out
They might just break your arm or shoot you or you know
We'll figure it all out in the end and if you're okay with that then again
Then make your argument the proper way and say that you don't believe in the Constitution
And it's 80 degree weather
I was walking I was I would speak to your supervisor right now. Call your supervisor
No, no, no, no, I'm not just so you didn't hear that can you step out of the cars?
We can talk about this. You're not under arrest. You're not okay
So right there the fact of this then goes to them forcing him out of the car means that they don't understand the law
Or they know they're breaking out of my car
No, I don't have to get out of my I know my rights
Well, I know my rights. You're profiling me. You're racially so far. Yes, you are your supervisor gets here
I will get out the car and I'm calling masternardy next and I'm gonna speak to your teeth
Well, listen up. He's asking you politely listen. Call your supervisor and I will speak to your supervisor. Thank you
Call your supervisor and I will speak to your supervisor
You're gonna get arrested for obstruction so recap they pull you over to make sure you're okay, right?
That's what he said. You're not under arrest
He just said that and now if you don't step out of the car
You're gonna be charged with a crime of what are you obstructing an investigation of what?
You see this broken circle of logic and this is the creation of your authority of your false authority of the of the
Enforcement arm of the Empire that they decide we think you might be doing something and maybe we just want to figure it out
But then we're gonna then have the right to violate your you know violate your constitutional rights illegal search and seizure
Violate even just a general human right of free movement. We're gonna stop it all because we want to find out
So step out of the car and if you don't now you're breaking the law even though we started when you weren't breaking the law
We just want to make sure you're okay. This is gross
Abuse
Conducting a traffic stop. Okay. You're all worked up. No, no, no, no, no, no, no call your supervisor right now
No
I'm not gonna get locked up. I know my right
What I asked you for a supervisor before you ask me to get out the car by law you're supposed to call your supervisor when I
Don't have to get out the car
So you got a step out of the vehicle
Call your supervisor
So you have to come out. Call your soup. Yo, yo, call your supervisor
Bro, now you just broke my fucking door handle
Now you just broke my door handle step out of the vehicle. Where's your supervisor out of the vehicle, sir
Oh, you gotta be fucking kidding me
Yo, why are you grabbing me?
Why are you ripping my papers?
Why bro? I didn't even do anything
Yep, welcome to America, right? Well, welcome to the land of the free. We're told
Bothers me
Right, and so this new example, I'll do my best to follow up with more detail
But again, like I said, it literally doesn't matter at this point because what they said proves to you that they know
Or they don't know which is even more alarming that they're violating his rights
Here's another example you might have seen and we'll follow up with the actual report about what happened
a police officer
Angry after letting the guy go. Well, we'll read through it in fact
Pulls up to a guy at a gas station who's pumping gas and fires his tazer atom and lights him on fire
Here's how this went down
And you're gonna go to jail all I'm asking for is your license right now to identify what am I being arrested for?
You are not cooperating. We're having committed a
A misdemeanor a misdemeanor asshole, it's a $10
This intense encounter with the federal officer turns dangerous for the man behind the camera
I'm foxtain investigator Justin Lum. Let's run it back
So set of cops and you're gonna go to jail all I'm asking for is your license right now to identify
What am I being arrested for you are not cooperating we're having committed a
These wildlife vision wildlife
What a misdemeanor a misdemeanor asshole, it's a $10 and he shot him
After he called him a name. There's no confusing that right? So what was the justification will he insulted me?
So you're a child then who abuses authority when you feel shamed, right? Yeah, that's that's what happened
Now there's a very clear policy about when they're supposed to use these both with a threat
Which I'll read next or even very clearly regardless of what's happening
If there's ever the conflict because of the potential for flame issue, that's a violation of the policy regardless
It's all very easy looked up. So he didn't care. He abused it all because he felt angry
Now what would allow him to do that?
Human beings can make mistakes
But why is it seeing so rampantly common right now because it's subconsciously aware that people everywhere can take advantage
Well, there's a problem because Democrats or whatever they tell themselves. They are of the mind that they can do this
We all see it
Clarence Coyle says he was headed to catfish paradise at the Havasu National Wildlife Refuge
Where a US Fish and Wildlife Service officer was there telling him that he was trespassing
So Clarence turned around and about 20 minutes or so later
He's confronted by that same officer for his ID at a gas station
We checked out his uniform and verified that he works for US Fish and Wildlife Service
His uniform reads P. Nielsen
Now federal policy strictly warns Fish and Wildlife officers to not use electronic control devices in
Specific situations including when the subject is near flammable materials
The service tells me the taser deployment is currently under review
Which is policy and they cannot comment further watch our full report on Fox 10 Phoenix
So here is the actual article
Same one he was pointing to you right there
So see my same general point though and it says, you know, you're gonna go to jail if you don't I mean same point though, right?
I need your identification. Okay, but in this case, there's a minor
Misdemeanor trust so basically he drove into this location
Not do not choosing like drove in the cop goes. Oh, you're not supposed to be in here
You're trespassing with everybody goes. Oh, it turns around and leaves and that's that's becomes the issue
So it says what am I the guy says you're going to go to jail. I'm asking for your license right now
What are we resting for? He's your car. You're cooperating. You're not cooperating for having committed a crime
Coral says he and his friends drove through an open gate
Open gate approaching a catfish paradise or approaching catfish paradise at the Havasu National Wildlife Refuge
When we noticed an officer
He goes, you guys came through the gate. Didn't you leave now get out of here. He says, okay
And he says he got real snotty and he says, well, I'll give you a ticket now
You know, who knows maybe he was rude that doesn't justify cops abusing their power
I don't care what you want to say you can cuss in his face
You have a leaf isn't that free speech same people who want to tell you about that
Well, then tell you you get you F around like the end of the gate effort to find out applies to certain circumstances with people in authority
That's not how that works guys. Sure. You could argue they got what they deserve
But they also broke the law to do it but that see that's not how that usually goes
But it says give me a ticket. You got a trespass me first
Right meaning that the guy has to be arrested, you know the whole thing, right?
So says coral turned around and drove to the gas station. So there's a dispute right there
I would argue about whether he was like demanded to leave, you know, it doesn't appear that way, right?
And so the end of the day he gets the gas station as you saw the cop pulls up and pulls his taser
But why would that even be the case? What wouldn't you walk up and be like, you know, I mean the end of the day guys
Even if the guy drove away that is unjustified for me for I mean, obviously even two policy reasons
What continuance is and I spend five and a half hours there not a single officer anything followed
What so it says? Oh
Yeah, so after with the hospital because he caught on fire not it said he spent
Five and a half hours there not a single officer or anyone followed or write to report to question or anything
So they just ignored the whole thing
So he follows it up because he broke the law like some on fire accidentally with a taser and then there's no report filed
Nobody follows up and said what about the crime? He said he committed, right Nielsen
And it says nobody showed up at the hospital at all for any of it
The name is uniformed P. Nielsen the department policy for electric control says there if there's
Unless there's a clearly or to articulate a compelled reason to do so like shooting the taser an officer should not use those when they can
Result in direct or secondary injuries. There's no just file reason to use that right there in any context
Let alone whether it's next to a flammable location. So he chose to use this because he was irritated
This is where we are guys and he's fishing wildlife. The abuse of power is rampant right now. That was July 23
Here's an example of a random kid now. This is one from before okay
This is an older story and this is not necessarily
Any different than what we see right now is angry people who want to abuse their power
But now it's been given a go ahead a green light across the board
It feels like 20 year old lost his bike asked a cop for directions
Wasn't sure he was going walking into the place to ask for directions and apparently the cop was insulted by that
Here's how it goes
It's a little bit bad audio just what are you doing man? He was I'm just trying to get my way by my way I
Said I told he said I told you where it was two minutes ago
So the idea that he's you know lost he's in a place you're not familiar with I mean for I mean literally
I've done this before or you asked somebody for directions and then either you forget it because you think of something or you know
Whatever or you realize it didn't make sense, you know, whatever it is then you go ask somebody else
Maybe just to confirm it like is that the right direction? I mean who cares even
Why would it matter right? But he says did I just tell you that and the kid says that was you?
Who else was it the cop is clearly angry for some unknown reason
Right, so why are you in here asking the same thing?
I told you where to go
The accurate no. Yeah, that's why you in here. I was making sure make sure I did the right thing
Here the guy's trying to leave. Okay, fine. Thank you. I'm out of your way
So what in the world would you argue justifies a cop in this situation to aggressively stop somebody?
Suspicion not enough I
Told you where to go right? Yeah, so why are you in here? No? No? No? Why are you in here?
We're paying him for guys. There's no legal justification for that cops just can't stand in large cases in in my experience in large
In most cases that you don't just follow blindly
He if you're if you're doing this properly, what am I detained for then? I'm leaving unless you're charging me
I'm leaving you have no try no right to charge me with anything for asking directions after you told me
Guess what he does
The kid tries to leave
Oh
Charging for some to see a rest
What do I do
I just
This point you're now you're resisting arrest
That's how that goes based on what you don't just get to create cons the situation and then
Order me around unjustly and then claim by me not following your unjust orders that I'm somehow now resisting arrest or obstructing anything
That's what they do and this is not even remotely new guys. We've been dealing with this our entire lives
The problem though is it's gotten worse with what they've allowed right?
And so if you don't know the kid won all charged dismissed and not the police not the local individual cop
the county
You had to pay him 9.3 million dollars
I'm glad he won because he deserves to but the fact that you had to pay for it is the entire problem with this system
Here's the the report june 14 2023 jury awards 9.3 million dollars to a man wrongly arrested
My dear born officer
Funny how that's the focus right?
Or I'd rather not the focus in cases like this but
Made up stories about frauds. It does exist but it's overblown because of political agendas
You know, this is a common reality and now they got ice marching through there with new justification
Here's another example police the police
NYPD SVU v plows down crowd of people standing on the sidewalk
You might have seen this. It's not a new story
Now guess what though the police lie about it. Now. Who knows why guys?
I think it's because they just cover for themselves. This is not new. It's not unique to police
But realize with this already being something that was there what we're seeing and what's happening is making this explode
Here's what happened
But while officers are responding to
This call of a big so what you're hearing is the NYPD chief of patrol
Jeffrey B. Mattery
Relaying what happened to somebody else while they're overlapping that with the video of what actually happened
So for the podcast what you're going to see is a police car that just randomly swerves into a sidewalk and kills people
And what the NYPD officer was claiming is that he swerved to avoid hitting a car that was kerning into him never happened
It could be installing
This is responding to this call of a vehicle being stolen
We had a marked four by four
Headed northbound on westchester avenue when they got to the intersection of whole avenue
There was a vehicle
Right in front of them
The officers crossed over the double yellow line to go and see the vehicle and you can very clearly see
The cop who irrationally swerved around them now either way the bottom there was a vehicle
right in front of them
The officers crossed over the double yellow line to go around the vehicle
But the vehicle made a left-hand turn at which point
The department vehicle and the civil civilian vehicle
They clipped each other
He just told things you just watched the video guys
He's made it up like being attacked with a shovel or claiming you're being shot when you're not
Right like being shot at she had an automatic right. Nope. She didn't you lied
She sure has had had a license for it, which is what you looked up, but it was back at her house when that happened
All these are stories. We've already shown you
Point is
This is everywhere and it's only getting worse. Here's some current examples
Here is an example of what people like Elon Musk would scream out all day long. It happens in the uk
But never or of course under a democrat administration
But not now right now this is texas police officers showing up unannounced at a veteran a us veterans house
Which doesn't make it any more less important other than if you feel like it shouldn't happen more so to veterans
but you know matters for partisan perspective in the case that they're showing up to a us veterans home and
I'll let us speak for itself. Here's what he literally said. I'm not even surprised that he said it this clearly
Try that again
We're here because of the comments made online about the
Okay, so it's low. He says we're here about the comments you made online about the jewish community
Okay, so if you if did you break a law
Like look people are disgusting. There's plenty of people out there that make terrible count
Who knows if that's him or not? I don't know people have terrible things about jews terrible things about christians
Terribly on muslims all over this platform
The idea is it's free speech. That's the point
Isn't that what hillan musk tells you he's protecting?
But here are people in the administration
He's supporting or just the enforcement arm that they're all a part of left or right coming out and telling you that we're concerned
We're gonna we're gonna come up to you and investigate you for your safety
Because of things you said online. This is a sign that we've always called out about other dystopian areas in the world
It's right in front of you guys
So
What you're doing is basically soliciting you understand that right yeah means you're not welcomed here
Okay
Now you get this
Pat out right down his personal license plate information or whatever he's taking right there just a little you know
This threat it's a threatening thing what it is
We were watching you right
I didn't think I I don't care what your comments are you have a right to say them
Is that what we all pretend in this country?
Not here what they're doing guys you make comments about the jews online. They'll fucking show up at your door
And look just to the same point as always guys
You know my opinions about what this is this guy may believe it
Maybe he's being fooled by the Zionist agenda. Maybe i'm wrong. It's irrelevant
The point is he has a right to say what he wants no matter how insulting no matter how offensive to you
And that's what you get
Now again the same point is what they do
This is freedom is more a rumor says to kill every muslim that muslim shouldn't exist. No, they do not. What's the difference?
Speech this is how much control israel has over our country
Three of them
Right look at this response
For exercising my freedom of speech online. Wow. What a fucking joke
What a fucking joke
Uh highway patrol or something like that, you know, so all the different levels
show a force, okay
Can't wait to do some auditing of you boys
Bye-bye no warrant
Bye-bye
So
Very chilling
Very common
And this person at kentucky statesman just says who militarized our law enforcement agencies after 9 11? Well, it was both
Both left and right and it's continuing
So here's blue lives matter
This is a pro cop account that says we hate having to call cops out which speaks for itself. Anyway, why
Wouldn't you just call it out if they're bring what they're doing? I'll give them credit for that
But it says but when you're wrong you're wrong a midland police officer. I used to live in midland
Pepper sprayed a seated citizen inside city hall
Who is requesting paperwork?
So ask yourself why in the world this person believes this makes sense
The only thing I can think of go look there's been examples of this
That's my point that have been there
But it's so rampant and so consistent right now
The question is how is it possible in a world today with the internet and all the at large information that people like this
Believe that this is justifiable. They're being taught. That's justifiable. There's really no way around that
That is the system that tells you about free speech and freedom and democracy and liberty
That's literally teaching enforcement arm that your rights don't matter
You need to see where we are right now
It sure makes you reported don't they even though that's the rights that they're supposed to be protecting your issue
You have an issue with me or
Because it's my right as
American citizen, yes, ma'am. So I'm pretty sure they're probably asking you to leave correct. No, nobody's asking
Well, now I'm going to ask you to leave. Okay, so where do you leave the promises?
You're gonna ask me to leave for on what grounds, ma'am. Okay, if you if it was a crime, you'd better rest it
I'm just asking you to leave
Right, I might be criminally
Undeniably clear in the same things last time you're not doing anything wrong
Otherwise you'd be arrested right the basic threat
So so like the same point I you if I have a right to leave then I have a right to stay
Or the idea of the filming is a good response. I've been seeing she's like, well, you know, we have you know, basically we were supposed to film
Uh, well, I forget what they said that bottom line is your right to film as well for your protection
They say the same thing. So we're both good with it, right?
There shouldn't be any issue, right? Since we're both doing it for the same reason, you know, it's like that's how you would play that
That's
Well, let me go back on what crimes, ma'am. Okay, if you if it was a crime, you'd better rest it
I might be criminally chess
No
Right there and even the blue eyes matter calls it out. There is a policy that's driving this. There's no way around that
There's no crime. I made that clear like that should be taught better how to avoid explicitly stating they're violating your rights
It's in stupidity really you're not breaking the law. Okay. Well, there you go then move along
But now I'm requiring you to move outside
Based on what like this is an authority figure who thinks they have the authority to direct you whether or not you agree
Like you just have to comply. Otherwise you're breaking the law. That's not the law guys
That's the whole point of the way the system was put together
Which is why even though I don't agree with the state of society
I do believe the constitution is something that has had the best effect on some level of accountability
But that's it but as somebody made a great point about this
Bottom line is look at where we are. So either it failed
Or it was never designed to work. Now. I don't know. Does this really agree with that entirely?
But it's a fair point to make that's why I garg you neither what that we shouldn't be fine
Government shouldn't exist. That's my job. I
Always held that stance either way though
These are people who are now trying to push you based on their they're just
They believe they just got natural authority not based on the constitution not based on the law
But based on the idea that they wear the badge. So you have to listen to me
It's like it's canny out of
South park like that's what I feel like this is so that's where this is gone already just like the one we just saw
Now breaking the law
But I'm asking you to get up and you're not so therefore now that you're refusing now
I have to conduct force
And she's wrong. She's breaking the law filing his rights. What if I'm there? I'm gonna stand right here and wait for
You're gonna have to get up on your own. We're gonna choose for trial. Oh, you're gonna arrest me? What if I'm there?
I'm in public building
So what who are you to ask me to leave officer clearly that bothered her under what grounds?
See, you know why that bothered too because she doesn't know and you can see it
There's no reason. There's no law. She all right. She wouldn't even probably know what to cite
Okay, and what you keep getting from ones like that. Oh, you're one of those because they know they're out mad
They don't understand what even what they're being thrown at like these people are half the time citing their own policies at them
They're you know, 101 dot whatever and they they don't even know them as the police officer
That's not all of them supervisors seem to know more and more today
But you can see it. I'll play it again. She didn't like that because she doesn't know
Okay
So what who are you to ask me to leave officer clearly under what grounds?
Okay, I want your supervisor to come over here. No, we can ask for him outside
No, why would I be forced to go outside at 103 temperature? I've been waiting here for a document from the city building
Who doesn't want me?
Who work here, they don't want you to go there. Where is the complaint?
They are who's there? Okay, you're gonna get on for my hands and you'll get you out
I'm trying to do this a good way. Let's go outside and we could talk out there
I'll call my supervisor give you all the answers you want. Call him right now
To dictate these things the law doesn't then law doesn't just put on pause until you decide it should be acknowledged
That's the whole point here. She wants it to be done her way doesn't matter what the law is
And on top of that guys, we're talking about a government building here
He has a legal right to be doing what he's doing and he's not violating anything
He's not doing something against their policies. There is no justification here
Which by the way is why she's ultimately wrong as we started with
I'm I'm
Or articulating a crime or calling right now. Exactly
Look at that right there. That's huge. That's first person should never be able to wear a badge again
You're really you're you're putting your hands on me
Based on what am I being detained? No, then you've just not only just violated my rights
you broke the law you're assaulting me which is what cops will do reverse get
your hands off of me you're assaulting me you are assaulting me get your hands
off me get your hands off me you do what you feel is necessary is what she is
crazy
insane
What do you mean?
Let's come over here.
Oh yeah.
Oh.
For what?
No, no, no.
What are you doing?
For what?
Ah.
And we, you know, far past time, people just acknowledge that.
I don't believe that most Americans and even remotely agree with this.
Even the groups that are put together to literally support them are saying she broke the law, right?
Video shows him seated, speaking, without becoming violent,
ordering to leave, bottom line is she broke the law, guys.
There's no way around that.
Nobody seems to care.
I'm going to follow up on this one best I can as well.
This is brand new.
This just keeps happening.
Here's an example from before.
This guy, same thing, showed it through his house.
You're the guy.
Now, think about this in the context of the AI today,
because this is not brand new.
They show up and they say, this is the guy from the warrant.
Guess what?
They're wrong.
I'm not going to play the whole thing.
It's long, but just to quickly show you that this is what it went to violence.
Why?
Because how dare you not just blindly follow our orders?
All they had to do was confirm it,
just like ICE does today or rather ICE doesn't do today.
You're referring to identified.
No, I look 36 years old.
Born in 1916 too.
You've got a warrant for your arrest.
Oh, he's screaming.
Look, don't fight me.
Hold up.
Fool what?
His son named Harry, violation of probation.
Look, they literally grab his arm when he opens the door.
I mean, what are we talking about, guys?
You're a ****.
You got the wrong guy, asshole.
Get your hands off me.
What's your last name?
Get your ****.
What's your name?
My name is Harry.
Harry?
What?
You can't jump.
Step outside.
You're an ****.
You don't have to supervise it here now.
No, I don't.
Get a supervisor here now, you **** idiots.
Now!
Get somebody here to know what they're doing.
We'll get somebody here, but step out for a second.
Now!
We just have to verify this information and everything.
See, it's the same thing.
Read your **** information.
Check your warrant.
So, now that they're wrong, and they are, that's proven, and the point is they're saying, and
you can look at the picture of the actual guy, by the way, and the age, these are idiots.
I mean, blind order followers.
That's the whole point.
We don't even understand the laws guiding those things.
Step outside.
We just want to talk about this.
I mean, this is not just alarming.
Like, there's something eerie about this.
You know what I mean?
Like, what are you talking about?
Step outside.
I'm at my home.
I don't know what you're talking about.
You haven't even explained yourselves yet.
What the **** is happening?
You just grab my wrist and start demanding that I'm the person.
All you have to do is check.
It's Harry Desjardins.
That's what the name is.
First off, that's how it's pronounced.
Okay.
And read your warrant.
Look at the picture on your warrant.
Look at the picture.
It looks just like you.
Look at the picture on your warrant.
It looks just like you, sir.
I just'm slightly shocked by everyone.
So, you know where this goes.
Go get that.
Literally pushed him into his own front door over the bag that
could have broke his neck.
Right there.
They don't care.
1.62
I don't have an information.
I look 36 years old.
That's going to scare him up.
when he's already fight fine with no problems and go to work every buck now well I don't
have any drugs but they put a warrant out for you it's not though right they're wrong it's
not him my god the abuse of authority is beyond the pale and this is not new this has only
gotten worse you add this kind of abuse and you bring in something like ice that is where
we are right now that is what our government has allowed has done to us
here's an example of a woman standing next to cops who are arresting somebody and at this point we
should be questioning in what grounds look at the way he reacts you tell me this is justified right
you tell me why that's justified you get up and you literally shove her to the ground
she wasn't hurting she's standing and looking at what's happening probably filming that's
probably will bother them have a problem with that how dare you go you shouldn't have done that
well guess what i'm going to throw you to the ground again that's abuse of power no matter how
what
this is what a police state looks like i don't know if you've recognized that yet
or if the partisan screaming out there or enough to convince you it's not true
this is what a police state looks like
21 years old the charges against her were dropped but the cop who actually committed the
assault has not been charged same old story so she was not guilty as we all saw this one
now based on time i'm ultimately gonna have to skip some of the overlap with the
flock camera stuff we'll get into it next but really just this is the main focal point
but i was going to continue to overlap it i'll give you some points to wrap up but after
these last few examples the point was the technological tools they're using but this
part's the real focus of today here's an example of a black kid walking the street who gets treated
the same way now the same argument applies it my opinion based on the evidence is he wasn't
doing anything wrong other than maybe jay walking in response to a cop who was aggressively walking
after him by point would be though even if he did something wrong what the cop did here was
against the law it was he had no proof he had assumption he had concern he oh you're wearing
a hoodie i think you look like a bad kid watch you're going to get hit by a car here you're
going to get hit by a car here stop stop i'm asking you to stop i'm asking you to stop
i'm doing a traffic stop on traffic stop okay so first of all the point is the kid was walking
as it is followed up on the story and i'll show you the actual article
and the guy thought he looked he wearing a hoodie and it's hot outside right that's what
the same thing and says well now i'm you know basically he was following him and following
him and following him and there's more to it and then the kid just it's just gonna walk it away
so he tries to cross the street now the point is he was following him for a different reason
an assumption and then it becomes oh well you jay walked well that clearly this is what's
important to them right and then ends up doing all that he does because of that
i'm asking you to stop i'm asking you to stop i'm doing a traffic stop on
back in the car i think it was redirected to your guys this is somebody following up as the as
the representative of the family to try to contact the office to get more information
i find this to be so it what it shows you is either one of two things an awareness that
you're breaking the law and an unwillingness to cooperate with her or the fact that you've been
trained to think that there's you know this evil democrat force trying to make us look like we're
doing something wrong so you just don't answer questions or right or left or however you look at
it because that's what's happening to some people now and so even if you argue that doesn't you
still have a legal obligation to do what you're supposed to do that's like i saying democrats
are trying to hurt us therefore i'm gonna break the law that's not how that works even though
and especially said you can prove that's not even the real picture i'm sure there are people
in both sides of a paradigm that might try to break the law but isn't that your job
so you break the law you know you get the point let's just speak with uh district attorney marino
by the williams port bureau of police about a story i'm working on no comment do you know what
i'm talking about yep just to make sure the officer who is walking on the teenager around
with the hood on
isn't that weird that she immediately knew what the story she was referring to without any detail
that's pretty odd to me said he's not with williams port can you tell me who he's with is he an
official police officer is he or is he just some random guy same point with the ice
top right now we can't comment i'm gonna hang up now i can't comment i'm gonna hang up now
you tell me that feels right hey you hung up on me just now this is mary calling again i just need to
know because right now i'm identifying that guy as just a citizen i just need to confirm is he a
officer some kind of law enforcement i don't want to make stuff up so can you tell me who he is
or where he works
hello man he's wearing a police vest too all right bye
that's where we are i mean you're talking about the district attorney's office you're just gonna
blatantly ignore i mean how do you not understand what that shows you that's a circling of the
wagons of the authority like we're the adult dying empire is not an analogy guys we are watching
this thing shrivel in front of us and it's not about americans or our beliefs or our history it's about
the government that has taken control of all of that and has been driving it into the ground
you can make it about israel there's a valid point to be made you can make it about the current
structure either way this is alarming and the consistency of this tactic shows you they're
knowingly breaking the law viral video of teen stop by detective spark scrutiny in williams port
july 9th 2026 you know i mean i'm just for time in general the point is he said this was the first
his son has the first encounter of his life with police officer they said he looks suspicious
because he had his hood up and jacket on he said if you know me you know i don't play when it
comes to my kids now of course he's a father he could be lying it could be incorrect i mean who
knows but it says in the video he's conducting a traffic stop a traffic stop for somebody walking
on the street seems weird and then of course the whole point was he followed him into he
basically up you know unjustly just a berated this kid until the kid tried to cross the street
and that's what he used to go after him it says the same time this is a lesson for both of us
they need to make sure he knows how to interact with police even when he feels like he's done
nothing wrong done nothing wrong things can escalate he ended up being hand kept and
attained it says lope lope was explained uh one part i was trying to find real quick
oh his argument was he wears the hoods because he has eczema and it keeps his son up his
face who knows maybe that's true i know i've known a person like that but it could be
the lie to cover that he was you know who knows it doesn't change the reality of his
rights
yeah it says lope's reached by phone earlier said the confrontation began before
his son ever started recording he said his son had told him narcotics detectives
passed him made a u-turn and began watching him as he walked toward his
grandmother's house now he said he's tried calling him several times but he
couldn't reach him because it's not was it worked now this is all on the
record like the fact that he tried to text him said his police were
lopeless called back his son texted him his police were bothering him
he says by the time the lopeless got in touch with the detectives he said his
son was already in the back of the patrol car he said he answered his son's phone
on speaker and told him he detained his son because he wasn't stopping or
responding ha okay so that it wasn't jaywalking right so you turned this
into something it wasn't you turned his evasion of you which was unjust
full stopping or unjustified stopping in the first place into the crime and
then use the jaywalking he did to get away from you violating his rights to
turn it into he was one breaking the law it's a tactic i mean they don't care
about your rights they see it as a maneuver to get around he said the the
call was cut off when he reached his son again the team told him he'd let him go
so they let him go wait a minute see let him go so he didn't didn't jaywalk then
ah it wasn't about jaywalking at all it seems lopeless said his son and told
him he asked a series of questions about the stop including whether he had
drugs or marijuana on him along with questions about weapons he didn't have
any he's now trying to get the body camera footage
but i'm which i guarantee you they just didn't have you know whoops he was
turned off when it probably wasn't
people are upset obviously undercover county detectives conducting crimes
suppression patrol they said in an effort to suppress recent upticking gun
violence this is their explanation there's bad things happening shots were
fired over bad things and stuff and so that's why we violate your rights
that is not how that works safety does not equate to
violating rights it doesn't care what you think justifies
you know it there is no line on april 27th the man was shot and say and then
basically shots were fired between two people uh
basically that whole thing is two people were fired on four shots fired
during the morning of july 8th undercover detective reported seeing a young man
walking on the street in the general area where that happened before that's it
the detective said he was wearing a puffy jacket with his hood up that's it guys
he was a black guy on the street in a place where things happened the week before
and he had a coat on and it's hot outside so therefore he's probably a criminal
that's not if there's if that's not profiling we don't know what is guys
that's insane and you may think that's what they're supposed to do it's not
they're supposed to enforce the law not just gin up crimes based on what they
think is happening the detective havens attempted to engage with them in
conversation however you continue to walk in the way that's what happened
then you saw it from there then they made up everything else
also guess what so after this went viral and like super viral six million views on
multiple platforms like on instagram it really didn't go crazy july 15th a week
goes by the cops are angry that this went viral guess what they follow up
and charge him with jaywalking you have to understand how broken this is
they are punitive they want to punish you for making them look stupid so they
go you know what charge him with that jaywalking ticket the thing they let
him go for the first time because it wasn't what they even cared about
that's an abuse of power no matter how you spin it now here
i'm just trying to think yeah we'll end with this i think and i'll just do
some of this next time here's a clip of somebody engaging with the cop and
being disrespectful if you want to frame it like that i think it's just his
right to say what he wants the point is imagine if everybody talked to police
this way now the first point to make is that some of the police out there will
break your window if you do this we'll literally drag you out of your car for
no reason we just saw that the point though is that everybody
knew their rights and engaged with them as such you would we would not be in
this position or at least we would and we would recognize very clearly as a
collective what the problem was and we're getting there
but what i think is most important is that you can see two things one that
this guy knows his rights and is not breaking them because the cop
threatens him but two that the cop is using every possible deceptive
manipulative dishonest tool he can just to get this guy out of his car
and you watch you'll see it the cop is making things up lying about things
this is an important lesson
now why do you pull me over i'll tell you that if you roll it out
why can't you tell me now because the reason i pulled you over is you're
yelling stuff from your car so what huh so what
i'll tell you this right now to start because it makes it more clear
apparently he claimed at the end he yelled like f the police out of his car
which is his right isn't it but now you see where this is going that the cop is
angry because now and what you can almost see it on his expression
he's abusing his power to hassle this guy because the guy did something that
insulted him and you're not allowed to do that to a cop
that's how he feels it's very clear and so he creates the gins up this
justification to mess with him that's what this is
but that's why you pulled me over because i'm yelling
i don't know if you roll it out why can't you tell me now
because the reason i pulled you over is you're yelling stuff from your car
so what huh so what that's why you pulled me over because i'm yelling
i don't know if you're in need of help or anything oh i
oh great so here we are again no i'm good man fuck oh excuse me
that's the second time i've done that probably in the entire time i've
been doing this i don't know why last time was like a few weeks ago i
apologize the point is because you know i feel about it
leave right i'm okay you're wondering if i'm okay
leave i'm okay man the point is he doesn't care if you're okay
he's using that as an excuse play acting into this to god i just thought
maybe when you yelled at the police that you were in danger
did you know i don't need help thank you let me see your driver license
i don't need help okay that's your driver license what what are we talking
about so you want to make sure i'm okay i'm fine now let me see your driver's license
well that was clearly an image of manipulation well at this point you
should be done with the conversation
for being used to her signal when you made a turn of course i did you know
you can hear the sound on the dash cam too let me see let me just crack the
window let's come on and act when you're drinking it's already cracked
i can't see that well this thing it doesn't matter here
i don't wish to answer questions you have to let me know if there's a weapon in
the car do you not take the class i did they tell you you have to tell them
when you demand identification i have to display this
that's what they told me in the class that's what the law says officer wants to
take the and actually if i don't display there's really not much you can do
because there is no penalty attached to that i have to carry this if i'm carrying
this i don't answer questions okay so if you have a weapon in the car then what
what you got one on your head right so what exactly small alcohol in your breath
see now oh just move on right so you got out play the point was
oh so you got you caught me like the point in that is first there's some people
that may argue that that's a problem well one is he doesn't just know
well you uh i guess respectfully you don't understand
your own rights first of all and plenty of people in the world don't agree
even americans is what it is the moment you can disagree that we should have
the right to bear arms it is the reality of our constitution
so the point would be well if you have a gun then no i have to know well no you
don't that's not how this works if somebody is recently pointing out
if suddenly having a gun which is your legal right then makes you more of a
threat for them to enforce upon well then you don't have that right guys
so this is the game is it well i know well you have one too so we're fine
i'm filming you're filming we're good move forward so he does all that shows
you is he was playing he's maneuvering the law or rather just moving around
the law to try to abuse it against you and then you didn't work so he moves
to the next ploy no you don't how do i know because you can't i'm caring
these are you caring i don't answer questions okay so if you have a weapon in
the car then what you got one on your hip so what
do i smell alcohol in your breath no you don't how do i know
because you can't smell my breath oh really all right all right and so again
that's why it's important to start with that first part because this guy's
clearly hassling him for no reason because he yelled at him
but so i think i smell alcohol no you don't well how do i know the windows closed
oh so you just lied let's just it's brazen guys these this is the normal
cop in my lifetime experience i've met a few good ones for sure
do you feel surprised i don't think so yeah where are you coming from
uh where are you coming from you saw me what i was coming from are you done
with this i'm done with that yeah all right cool
where are you coming from i don't answer questions i've already told you
let me know when i'm free to go also what is your name what's your name
your name sheriff that's your name
sheriff right about it right there i am not familiar with the English alphabet sir
okay can i have can i have an incident number please
oh a ticket a ticket okay sir give me a favor well i have you here
okay i don't want you exiting the vehicle because you have a weapon in the
core did i exit the or i'm going to exit the vehicle i'm did i exit the vehicle
give your heads up did i exit the vehicle hey
can i you do have a dashcam right very good you can't just pull me over because
i said fuck the police i hope you realize that stupid fuck i'm sorry you
have insurance on the vehicle yeah can you show me please it doesn't come back
of course it comes back not on my system it doesn't also it's not typical behavior
for somebody to be yelling out of the vehicle
have you had anything to drink tonight is that your current address
what does it even mean typical behavior so now we're socially profiling is it
illegal to yell what are we talking about 1622 is that a question yes sir is that
your current do i do i answer questions okay i'll just assume that's incorrect
it and why would you do that right did you read my address on the driver license
didn't have an address didn't have an apartment number on your driver of course it does let me see
can you bear you already seen it i'm already complied you could see it on him he wants so
badly to make this person suffer for the fact that he's not just complying with his authority
and even worse that he's doing it in the best possible way the one that doesn't allow him to
do what he wants to do hide with that party i know but i'm just saying you didn't have a
didn't have an apartment number of course it does on your on your driver license man man man
okay i'll be right back see yeah i say that i've never met oh yeah it didn't matter because i was lying
so just you didn't do it so i'll move along here's the next ploy insane but anybody quite like you
that would uh yell at an officer doing their job but so let me end this in no finds open
i've never met somebody like you who yells at a cop you mean like so you don't exist on this
planet apparently is it there's just this reverence you're supposed to just thank you for your service
you could do that if you want not all deserve that very few in my experience
of course it does on your on your on your on your back and i say that i've never met anybody
quite like you that would uh yell at an officer doing their job but so let me understand no
may i ask a question no yeah no i have a question can you get your supervisor here please
is the stop over the stop is over you may leave all right well you said the stop is over right
okay i'm not i'm not getting out i was just dangerous i mean my opinion like i was saying
before guys this guy's obviously trying to have to hassle the cop back and he has every right to
he's not breaking the law so again that's the line guys everything else is your personal opinion
so the bottom line is though why would you push that right for all you right there some of these
police officers would have drawn their weapon on you just to make a point even because they feel
ice you probably already even shot i just want you to understand how serious that is
but at the same point he's not breaking the law you have every right to do every single thing he
just did that those are facts not even about opinion you may even disagree i mean in some cases
where i argue that's probably the most dangerous thing you can do okay there is no need to draw
your weapon man are you fucking drawing your weapon you fucker i didn't get out of the car
you told me that already yeah did i get out of the car go fuck yourself yeah right over there you came
i mean frankly i think the cop deserves that right but at the end of the day i just think
that's incredibly and dangerous right ultimately the cop pulls his weapon just to make a point
you're lucky he didn't go further than that and that's because what you did at the end there
was just to make that point there wasn't any gain from that right if you're in a position
where they're trying to invade your privacy and break the law stay in your ground hold your
rights but don't go in my opinion over the top and antagonize them for no reason
it's just not in your interest guys but he has a right to that's what matters
on top of that i want to reiterate this video that you might have seen before
what you're looking at here is a idf member who we've already shown you across this country
not everywhere but across this country idf members are in fact training police
are in fact training ice members as have been exposed by many different overlaps i believe
even the intercept is something on that in this case you have an idf member who stopped the
palestinian family and didn't get the answers they like so he literally threw a blast grenade
into the car and held the door shut you tell me this does not ring true with what we're
seeing our authority start to do in this country
hold the door shut boom there you go just walks away like nothing happened go on about your day
that guys is what at least in part is guiding where we're going
now to finish up i will come back to this you know i just recently pointed this
leak documents show the surveillance tech at icis fingertips and it is extensive it's insane
and almost all of it is completely intertwined with israeli intelligence
i'll save this for later just interesting examples of people having what's called a dress password
where icis is going give me your password even though they don't you're not legally required
to comply even though they tell you that you are and there's a dress password on some of these
d google phones where if you type in the wrong code just one time it wipes your phone clear
they're charging this guy literally charging this person with a crime think about that
for deleting your own information i mean that's the level of the police state that we're in i am
going to go into this deeper in the future i wanted to get into the flock axon thing more in depth
but i will just simply point out guys to be aware of this i'm going to talk about this probably in
the very next show but as i've been highlighting the whole flock thing regardless of whether it
was started by some sort of a artificial drive like something like uh james lee is considering
whether maybe this was something trump's administration drove to be able to pivot to axion
or axon excuse me i mean literally that's what i like that's what i just talked about this was back
on the 20th most of them most of them are now talking about this a week later a few days later
the point is the axon flock bait and switch was something we talked about because it was very
clear but doesn't mean the flock camera attacks focus criticism are is all false even if it was
on uh unorganic so what i want to highlight here is two things he has a good clip where you
check out the deflock discussion what you will notice guys flock cameras 83 of the cameras not
just flock but all of the license plate cameras in the country uh axon falls under the 83 others
it's only about two three percent and there's others in there the next closest to flock
more motorola solutions which is actually vigilant solutions donald trump bought stock in that alongside
axon so what's interesting to me is we should question whether flock itself is sort of the
manipulation but then pivoting to go well axon the focus might in fact be the manipulation
but all of it might be question all of it recognize that the license plate readers
which james says as well are the problem right that whole surveillance is the issue
and don't get trapped by the partisan games that's what we're in right now oh it's all
a big trap don't listen to it well maybe but do you care about the flock cameras i do
do you want to stop on unconstitutional surveillance i do so even if it was a trap
we're still focusing on the problem i just think it's strange that we're being like
some people being tricked into ignoring what they were fighting because they were told that
you were being meant tricked into it i just don't think even if i said it already the
bottom line is we're watching this happen and flock is 83 percent of the cameras even right
now even after the ones that have been canceled so let's recognize where we are and recognize
that flock visual solutions axon all of it unconstitutional surveillance is the problem
that's the real focus and not stop letting the narratives get in the way and on top of that
oh i include this this is the uh specifically motorola at this point that was when he bought
stock in all of that that was including motorola solutions which is the company that is running
vigilant solutions and orwell day points out that even with all the flock cameras that
have been canceled like multiple like 80 of them across the country 53 of them that have
taken over axon last i checked many of them quietly this is still a representation of the ones that
we fought the rest are all still happening the red is the font the gray have the cameras
that's where we are by and large more of a representation so realize that even if we still
have a fight and some people are acting like suddenly this is all a scyop and it's not real
or you know whatever it's confusing as vassal points out regardless of what company the company
it is this is where this goes 2026 it's only for stolen cars we already know it's not true
2028 well failure to comply with the lockdown detected see how easily that happens
and we all know it and maybe you maybe it's democrat takes control if that makes it easier
for you to understand even though it's all the same thing a lot of this will come back
to you in general more local police pushing back or allowing it to happen without justification
now you have examples where they're literally making sure the contract is under the amount that
needs to be required for a vote so that way they can do it without your vote and then I guarantee
it expands from there after they get beyond that vote you also have examples where they're
uh this is original costa messa contract was made in secret just under the amount
so they wouldn't have to be voted same thing it's happening all across the country
Catherine pointing out that Israel has access to all of this as well which you should know
if you watch this show we have more things going beyond this called flock alpha which we're
going to more it's all building around us guys putting flock cameras in the back of safety
like construction zone things to try to keep you from noticing them I'll play some of these clips
the next time people are calling out the you know what's happening we have trump labeling data
centers is military infrastructure which are we all told you was coming and is absolutely
actually the reality and you know why so we can't stop it now it's national security
but on top of that importantly to the end guess who's bombing those Iran which is interesting
right because one they go well that's not a military target but you just call the military
infrastructure so Iran is bombing them you know why because that is the problem not because
I'm saying but good Iran we're on their side I don't support any government but because Iran
recognizes that is what this country is using to build out their weapon system to build out
their Palantir Absorah Lavender and the systems they aimed at you for your control grid so it's
whether you feel like that's it they should be doing it or not this is Iran bombing it because
they know the threat of what that is to them let alone to you I just found that pretty interesting
now we have people being arrested for clapping literally for clapping because people want to
stop data centers that's what we're talking about getting arrested in a police state because
you clapped. NDAs for government around the data centers because we know that's happening
data center evidence showing you that they don't give you jobs no matter what they lie about
we've covered all of this interestingly this guy that got arrested remember we covered this
who got arrested for literally talking a second too long and trying to present documents
well it turns out this guy actually exposed that there was a falsity around this where they
were faking emails this is on top of what he got arrested for I'll go into this more
data center scandal who sent fake emails to support their data center well it turns out this guy
who literally got arrested here's the story for it is one of the people involved with exposing this
there's a reason that they're fighting these people guys because they're lying to you the
whole point of it was fake emails pretending to support the data centers when the entire community
did not they're gaslighting you guys they're gaslighting you now I'll probably end with
one of these clips I'm thinking I'll just do this one since it's a little bit of a humorous
edge to finish there was a clip coming from Tucker talking about the surveillance state coming
but here is a clip from Tim Dillon calling out the Trump administration put a little bit of
soft edge on the end of it today because it can be pretty intense but thank you for tuning in I
appreciate you all supporting this platform as I say every time guys we just we can't do this without
you right we exist because you support this platform we don't have advertisers we don't have
large corporate funders the only thing that keeps this platform going is your $1 donation
is your donation that you sent to my mailbox when you put through the accounts on this platform
that's it on you know the last American bag of on platform so if you believe in this and you want
to continue let us know what you think this is worth because we do this for free we put it out
because we believe in it we believe in you and we think the information is the most important
thing in this conversation so if you agree let us know what you think thank you for tuning in
I love you all as always question everything come to your own conclusions stay vigilant