been listening to your podcast for a while now and I love the content and the brutal honesty.
As an attorney who fought against COVID mandates, I follow a lot of dissenting medical and legal
voices and read a lot of great stacks, but your posts and podcasts are amongst my favourite.
Thank you for all you do. LegalGlass, thank you so much for that lovely comment and thank
you for subscribing to my sub-stack. Helgi, hi Amid, all the best and lots of love from
Iceland. I've been researching all this stuff since around 2009-ish and I have to say that your podcast
is one of the best in the space so far and I fully support your change to start charging for every episode.
I didn't even know that you had to pay well before. If you're ever in Iceland, please come by
and visit me in my brewery in Hilla. Wow, well I hope I do get to visit Iceland and I'll
definitely give you a shout if I come. And Joe, I believe you're one of the few out there that
is not controlled by ego, arrogance, pride, money or coercion. It is truly humbling to discover how
much of our lives are based on lies which we failed to question. And to everyone else who's signed up
and become a supporter on Spotify and on sub-stack, I just want to say thank you so much and welcome!
You're part of a wonderful tribe and you keep this show alive and I'm most grateful. Okay,
let's get into the show. You are listening to the Doc Malik podcast. This show is 100%
independent and fully funded by listeners like yourself. So, if you wish to support Ahmed in
all that he is doing, then please subscribe to his channel on Spotify or his sub-stack.
Or simply buy him a coffee with a one-off donation, links to which can be found at
DocMalik.com. Now, let's get on with the show.
To myself. Everything. I taught myself everything.
All right. Okay, listen, let's get into this. Genocide in a suit. So,
lovely documentary. Absolutely brilliant. And I'm going to make sure all my listeners and readers
get to watch it and credit to you. Congratulations. You wrote it. You directed it. You made it.
Fantastic, Janice. And initially, people might read that and go genocide in a suit.
Oh, what are they talking about? Are they talking about some genocide in Israel and Gaza?
And I'm like, no, no, no. It's not about that, is it? It's about the sophisticated art of
how genocide is done through bureaucracy and middle management and legalese and technocratic
language. But you can expand on that. Why did you call it genocide in a suit?
Well, exactly because it's done by bureaucrats. It's not done by gunmen. It's not done by
some villains. They are ordinary people in suits which look lawful. It looks very correct, very
polite, no hatred. It looks very professional. And still, it's a genocide. It can be genocide.
All right. Absolutely. And I think that's it, isn't it? They use language that makes it sound
like they're doing a good thing when actually it's the complete opposite. It's an inversion of that.
But you know, right at the beginning, I think the film is almost made into
sweet, isn't it? You give the example of the different stages of genocide during COVID,
because that was a recent example. It's a very good example. And then you talk about the situation
in Latvia. And then you're talking about the global situation we're in. Am I right? That's how
you've broken it up, isn't it? Well, I believe that the genocide, which is
being enforced in Latvia, the same pattern is unfolding in every country, basically almost in
every country. I'm just using Latvia as an example, as a case study, because I cannot use a different
country because it's my country and now how it is. And so other people, why it should be
interesting for everyone, because the same patterns are emerging wherever you are.
It's just that we have different names or different institutions, maybe, but all the rest is the
same, I believe so, almost everywhere. I agree. I mean, listen, Janice, when I watch your
documentary on what they were saying about what's happening in Latvia, I was like,
oh, my God, that's here. That's here in the United Kingdom. And I know we're the same continent,
Europe, but Latvia is a long way away. It's down the Baltic Eastern end. And
and it's shocking. You're like, wow, that's literally happening here. And we're told we
have all these global crises, like global climate change and global pandemics and global
war and terror and global money laundering. But the only global issue that I see is
turning like in the past, you had like one or two countries or blocks of countries that,
you know, we're doing that now it's everywhere. Like there's nowhere to run to.
Yes, I think it's very important for people to understand that, like, we know that like
communists and fascists are like tyrants, yes, and did the crimes against humanity. So we should
understand and should acknowledge that also globalists are no, not better.
They are exactly the same. It's just that how they do it is more sophisticated. It's more
they're more hypocritical hypocrites, right? And that's why it's less evident for a
normal citizen. And what I believe and what is my hope that my documentary will
help to see these patterns, to see these structures, how they operate. And once you
see them, you cannot unsee them. And so you would, I hope people will better understand how
this actually how we are actually everyone right now living in a genocide society, which
is no better, no better than fascism. Absolutely. Well, can you, can you, let's go down. You
know, remember, you talked about the different stages of genocide, like nine, nine or 10 or
whatever. And, you know, from classification onwards, can you just break that down and
explain that to everybody? Yes. So firstly, this stages of genocide, this is a concept not
developed by me. It's developed by Gregory Stanton, who is an American genocide scholar, a lawyer.
And he is the founder and long term president of NGO, which is called Genocide Watch. You can
look it up and internet genocide watch. So, and he's, and Gregory Stanton, he is not a rebel.
He is, he is former United States State Department official. And also he has been
a United Nations expert. So basically he's a, a Mac inside the system. Let's, let's put it
clearly. Right. And he has developed this, this, this model and this model consists of
10 stages. What people usually, when they hear the term genocide, right, they,
they believe that it's only the ninth stage as you show, showing now in the extermination
that this is the, this is how they understand genocide. But can you imagine it's only the
ninth stage? Before that, there are eight silent stages, which, which are kind of invisible.
And, and so my documentary, I'm analyzing particularly those eight silent stages. And
which is also the aim of the Stanton's model. It is to, to understand, to, to warn people about
genocide when it is not already, because when it's the ninth stage, it's already too late.
We must recognize genocide in the earliest stages and the earlier we recognize that
the more likely, likely it is that we can stop it. Right. And
yes, and people also tend to think that maybe the genocide like is a crime, a crime against humanity,
that it's something very brutal, very bloody and very tragic. But in reality, it's very, it's,
it's legal. You know, it's that that's the main, the main point of genocide that it is legal,
bureaucratic and very normal. There's no nothing extraordinary happening during, especially during
these eight silent stages. It's very normalized. And it's even doesn't require hate.
You believe something crazy, some crime or something. No, there's at the earliest stages,
there's even no hatred. So everything is very normalized, very legal, very bureaucratic, very
professional. That's what exactly what happened during the COVID rate,
especially in the very beginning. And basically, all the, especially all the
globalist crimes, they're very normalized. They're very bureaucratic, legal. There's
nothing goes outside the legal framework, right? At least the domestic, the lower level legal framework.
So I was going to say, can you just give examples of each one of those stages then?
Because you did that beautifully in your documentary, like, you know, so that people
understand what do you mean by that? And I know what you mean, like when, when you think of
genocide, you think of like, you know, Rwanda and the Barundis and, you know, the Houtis
and the Tutsis and Houtis and whatever, you know, that kind of stuff where people are machetes and
they're chopping them up, or you're thinking of guys and bombs going off everywhere and people
hate them and they're like, one side hates another and one takes turns. But what you're
describing is that genocide can happen. I mean, it's democide when the government does it.
But it's very clinical. It's very sanitized. There's no emotion, it's dispassionate.
It's just, it's like, you know, corporate, it's just, it's just, that's what happens. It's the
process. We're going to go ahead and do this. And there's, there is no anger, shouting, hatred,
slogans. It's just, it's just business. Yes. Exactly. And that's what people mostly do not
recognize. And that's why they think they're not in the genocide. But they actually, we are.
Because genocide is never like, it's not an accident, or it's not something with what happens overnight.
It's a process. It's a planned process, which is, which develops in stages.
And, yes. I was going to say, before you start going down the list, classification,
symbolization, discrimination, all that kind of stuff. Can you define it? What is genocide?
Yeah. Well, genocide is when a specific, when society is divided into specific groups,
like for example, vaccinated, not vaccinated, then one nationality, different nationality,
it actually completely does not matter how they are divided. There can be only very creative
divided. And then one group is basically executed. And execution is not
immediate killing. But it can also be depriving of rights and
persecution. And all kind of this pressure, all kind of government pressure that government
can do against this specific group of people. And it can be also like, for example,
I show in the documentary that it can also not only be ethnic as we have used to, it can be also,
for example, foreign corporations against our population who are living, for example,
in Latvia, like small enterprises, family, business and all this. These are also two groups. So
really, those two groups can be put in very different positions in very different segments.
So, and the main thing is that, that law, people believe that law maybe can prevent genocide,
but genocide is often legal. That's absurd. That that's the absurd of genocide, that this is already,
the genocide is already put into the law under, especially under domestic law, maybe the Constitution
or something is above it. But when a policeman or somebody is like arresting you, they are not
following, most likely the Constitution, they're following some kind of a procedure or some kind
of a rule, what they are, what they understand, which says something. So, yes, that's okay. So,
okay, I'm going to really want you to go down this list, because it's very important.
But so my understanding after watching your documentary was that what I've taken away is
in my head, I thought genocide was something that was done, one ethnic group to another ethnic
group, one race of people to another race of people, although I hate saying that because I
believe there's only one race, the human race. And then I also thought it was something that
was temporarily done very quickly. People are genocided like very quickly, you're killed,
you're gassed, you're murdered, you're injected, you know, whatever. What I've taken away
from your documentary is that actually genocide is the targeting of a group of people,
singling them out, depriving them of their rights, their freedoms, and killing them.
And that killing process can be done very slowly. I mean, it can be done over decades.
It doesn't have to be done in days and weeks. You could be killed, poisoned,
your life force drained from you over a very long period of time.
So you know, that's where I've taken it. And it's not just governments and armed groups or
partisan groups. It's corporations, it's governments, it's NGOs, it's super national
bodies. It's an attack basically on humanity and groups of humanity. And that's what I
took away from it. Does that sound reasonable? It's exactly what it is. It's exactly what it is
because the speed of the killing doesn't make it basically the legal difference of the killing.
If you kill somebody fast or slow, it does not diminish the responsibility of that, right?
Okay, so you want me to go through those 10 stages? Please, please, let's talk about
classification and maybe use COVID as an example of like, what do you mean by classification?
Okay, so basically classification, this is us versus them. So as we already indicated that
society is divided into two groups. And why is it done? Because classification
simplifies the governance, right? It turns complex individuals into manageable categories.
And very important that this is no hatred. Yes, it's no hatred. It's just like an
administrative tool, right? So, and that's what we already saw, like vaccinated and vaccinated
you're not like you're not Ahmad, you're simply unvaccinated, for example. And you're put into a
manageable category. And this is basically the first step, the first stage of genocide that,
for example, during the, what people now, at least of course, as you will say that history, we're
not sure yet about our history. I'm very, very agree. But what people usually know is that the
the genocide against the Jews, the Hitler and all this stuff. And there was this ethnic division
like Germans and Jews, right? So, but this is not only it. It's also vaccinated, not vaccinated.
And we can use and find many other reasons how to divide people
by color of the skin and so on. So after the first stage, then comes the second stage
which is symbolization. And yes, and also the symbolization allows this policy, this legal framework
to target groups without naming individuals like certificates, yes, vaccine certificate,
status code. And from a person, you become like, like a QR code, you're no more Ahmad,
you're just the QR code which you are showing, whether you can enter a shop or you cannot,
or you can receive or you can continue to work or you cannot. And yes, and I believe that during
the COVID, the QR code, the vaccination certificate was that symbol, the same symbol which was the
bit star of David against the Jews. And exactly the same symbol was used. So perfectly fits the
second step, all the common scenario. And after the symbolization comes the third
stage, discrimination, yes. And discrimination is legalized exclusion. So once encoded into those
rules, it no longer feels personal, right? Discrimination doesn't always say you're forbidden.
It says you no longer qualify. And nobody is, again, there's no hate, just everyone follows
the rules. This is the idea of the modern genocide, of the modern discrimination.
It's not that somebody is like throwing stones at you. No. Nobody is even being impolite of you.
Everything is very, very polite. It's just that you don't qualify. Sorry, that's the system.
And this is discrimination. This is genocide. Because the result is the same, even that the form
is different or more polite. Maybe like today's nowadays genocide form is more polite, more kind.
Not so rude. But it does not make it legal. It does not make it not genocide. It's still
genocide. So, for example, during the COVID, people were excluded from employment, right?
Not because of their performance, but because of their status. They were unvaccinated. So they
did not have the right to work in Latvia. More than 60,000 people were fired because of that.
And we have a population of 1.8 million. So it's a very many people, actually.
And also access maybe to services, very necessary services also become conditional,
according to your status. So you're not qualified. You can't get these services. Sorry.
So this is how this discrimination works. And the tragic thing, the tragic thing is that
once this discrimination is normalized through law, through policy, the persecution no longer
looks exceptional. It looks just procedure, just admins, it's like administrative process.
Yes. And it's very normalized, actually. It doesn't look extraordinary.
And by understanding this principle, people should understand that it doesn't matter. There's
maybe they are currently maybe in different areas of supply, right? So and after that comes
the humanization. And the humanization is also not like you're like, for example, I don't know,
some microchip is by force put under your skin or something like this. Not at all. Not at all.
Maybe today, as you said, it's clinical, it's not it's not emotional, because people then become
like risk, they become risks, costs, or non-compliant units, we can call them. This is what they
have, the humanization is. They are, for example, you're, you're not described as
individual, but you are described as a risk, because you're not vaccinated, you are a risk, right?
So this is the way how people are being dehumanized. Or people, somebody maybe is treated as a
transmission mechanism. You transmit a disease. So you're dehumanized by this mechanism.
And, and so that's the matter of language. And language
shifts from people to compliance. And clinical language, that's a very good word you said,
clinical language replaces human language. So we have adverse events, right?
Negative outcomes or disinformation risk factors. And, and people just get lost
by the under this term, under these terms. And there's no rough words. There's no screaming.
Yes. There's no panic. There's just very cold language, very cold professional language. And
this is how the humanization works in, in genocide. And we all, we all went through that
very, very clearly during the COVID time, we can remember that, right?
That was what we were, what was happening. So the economic nation today,
it doesn't even sound cruel. It sounds professional. And, and once people are used to those risks,
to those vectors and costs, and, and then excluding those risks and excluding those
costs or, or however you put them, then this no longer feels violence, you know,
it feels simply management. It's just management of the risks. And this is, this is how this
dehumanization is today. So it's, it's quite frightening because it's very normalized.
And we, nobody is like putting under chains or, or, or, or in some super harsh
situation, but the outcome is the same, right? The outcome of the genocide is the same,
independent on how you get there.
Do you know what, it's a wonderful description. Sorry for interrupting, but it's, it's like the,
the people who are carrying out the genocide aren't human anymore. They've lost their humanity.
It's almost like robotics. It's like a computer. It's something that's cold, calculated,
algorithmic, managerial, just executing, you know, orders.
And this is the genius of actually the genius of the system, how, how you can,
how you can make dehumanization without evident violence, without actually just
turn people into risk factors, and then you eliminate the risk factors.
And of course, you need a very huge media
baggage to be able to implement that all. But this is what they have, what they are doing.
I just thought of another thing. It's like they turn on the emotion when they want to.
So for example, to get the classification, they ramp up the emotion. Those dirty anti-vaxxers,
those stupid anti-vaxxers, those misogynistic anti-vaxxers, those racist white supremacist
anti-vaxxers, you know, those, those, you know, in, in, in, in the, in the Nazi era,
I mean, I don't know what they said about the Jews, the dirty Jews, the rats or whatever,
in Gaza, and, and, you know, the Israelis are calling them subhuman, amalek, the Palestinians are,
are less than animals, you know, so they use, they use emotion at the beginning to, to,
to classify people. But then they dial it right down when they've got the things going,
then it suddenly all becomes very unemotional, very, very, very, like I said, clinical.
Yes. Yes. Exactly. The same pattern, exactly the same pattern, just different country,
different situation and different division. Because now in like in Gaza, they're talking
about the Board of Peace and they're at the WEF, Davos meeting, and they're, they're talking about
rebuilding Gaza. And there's no mention of the people who've suffered. It's just like,
this is the real estate. This is how much property we've got. We're going to build
in these phases. This is investment opportunities. It's just like, it's just a sales pitch.
It's so clinical. It's so, it's so detached. It's like a property pitch. It's just investments,
money, profit. There's nothing about lives lost, widows, orphans, you know, amputations,
you know, all the misery, the death of the culture and everything. No, no, it's all just
cold business talk. Exactly. That's, that's what nowadays genocide is.
So, continuing with the fifth stage, which is called organization. So, in history,
we know that, that there were gunmen and there, there were gas chambers and all this stuff.
But today's genocide, we, we have departments, legal, medical, technical and all kind of departments.
And they are, they are doing, each department is doing a small task. And I want to stress that
they're doing a lawful task, not illegal task and very small and very legal task. And it's not
violence by those departments. It's just coordination between them. And, and, and if you take a single
department, so no single department is causing any harm. If we, if you look at each single
department separately, but they all together, they make this harm actually inevitable.
And, and the, and each department is, as I particularly love this saying is just doing their
job. You know, this is the, this is the
how it is that, that everybody is just doing their job and the outcome is genocide.
And, and, and that's how not, how nowadays genocide actually is produced because tasks are broken into
narrow professional roles, you know, and, and everybody can say we are only a small part of the
process. And so when nobody sees the full picture, and nobody is reliable of the whole picture,
at least those who are implementing it, of course, maybe only few at the top, maybe understand and
see the big picture. And, and this is the way how then systems replace judgment and,
and some algorithms that make decisions, and people just like approve those decisions.
And in that case, even a mistake, it's just a system problem or system issue.
It's not a human problem. And very often this
accountability is deludes like in technology, like in this technological processes.
It's, it's, it's a, and that's why those who designed those decisions, they never face the
consequences. Sorry, you're saying. Yeah. So, yes. What, what do you want to say?
So I was going to say, I've heard this, exactly this. I was witness to Jay Battacheri in a hall
that I went to saying, and I see Dr. Yosemite Hodger, Oh, these are well intentioned people,
you know, the system failed us, you know, it's just inefficiency mistakes were made, blah, blah,
blah. And there's no accountability. And I mean, I don't know about you, you know, I disagree with
that. There is a human being or a group of human beings who are responsible for all of this and all
for, for every genocide. You can't just blame it on the system. Yes, there are systems in
place that allow it to happen. But even those systems were engineered in a way to allow that to
happen. Am I right? Hi, everybody, little interruption to remind you that I offer a consultation
service. If you want to navigate the sick care system, if you've got an acute illness that
you're dealing with, or even a chronic illness that you need to shake off and recover from
or reverse, if you want to get a second opinion, you want some advice, knowing what
questions to ask of your doctor, I'm here for you. I have a unique position having been a
mainstream doctor and surgeon for 25 years, but also someone who understands the alternative
health care system. And I'm telling you, there's mindfuels in both. Sometimes it can be so confusing
knowing which way to turn and what's right and what's not right, because there's so much
conflicting noise and advice. So I'm practicing medicine as one truly should be,
which is empowering and educating the patient to be their own doctor. I'm offering consultations
where I empower you with wisdom and knowledge so that you ask better questions and you can find
solutions that are typically concealed or hidden from you by the mainstream doctors.
I believe in medical ethics and I believe in informed consent. I have no other agenda.
I practice first, do no harm to the patient. So if this resonates with you, please visit
my web doc malik.com where you can see the booking page and read all the reviews from
past patients that I've been able to help. And while you're there, check out my website
because there's a shop section with affiliate links to products that my family and I use.
These are all wonderful companies. They're all aligned with our values and these products
are not things that I would not be recommending if they were genuinely not brilliant, such as
sea green supplements, sauna and nudem skincare, et cetera, et cetera. So do check out my affiliate
page. It's another way that you can support the show. And another thing you can do is just share
my content. And if you haven't already, follow my channel and leave a review if you can on
Spotify or Apple podcast. Okay, folks, that's enough of me. Back to the show. Thank you so
much. Lots of love. Absolutely. But I'm not talking now about
actually the reliability of the genocide. I'm now describing how so people could recognize
the fact the fifth stage organization, which doesn't look, which doesn't look like something
bad at all. It looks just corporate corporate structure, professional language, and the
normal work process. But of course, even even if there's no intent, even if there's no
intent, you're just doing your job. But you should have foreseen the consequence and you
should have like as a professional question, for example, you're maybe you're just
vaccinating somebody just you're maybe a nurse vaccinating somebody. And if you
you can also be actually code accountable for genocide legally. It's very possible.
Even a nurse who did the vaccination, because, you know, and we have a very good example for
that. In Nuremberg, what was the most famous phrase everyone said, I was just following orders,
right? So I was not doing anything bad. That's that's like I was following law that or procedure.
And despite from that, despite of that, there still is accountability for them.
And that's what we are. That's what I want to stress out.
What. But the point is that to recognize the organization, the fifth stage of genocide.
Well, as as I described it, this organization doesn't require hatred, just requires coordination.
And this looks very normal. And I encourage just people to to see it in their to see it
on the pattern of covid and how we live through that.
And how we actually all experienced that.
And now we if I can now talk about the sixth stage, which is polarization, because now we are
getting more and more closer to the ninth stage with it, which is extermination.
And so the genocide by each stage becomes more and more visible.
And the sixth stage polarization, this is about preventing questioning, actually.
And this was very, very visible during the covid. Yes.
So I just want to show you something. You've sparked my memory.
Sorry for interrupting, but I just want to quickly show you something.
So in the UK, I don't know what it was like in Latvia. We had these daily briefings.
This was Chris Witte, the chief medical officer. This is Boris Johnson, the prime minister.
This is Ian Valance or Patrick Valance. I can remember Patrick Valance, maybe.
And he was the chief science officer. And like they're all wearing suits.
They're all standing there dictating the science, the covid policies.
And this is what you mean. The genocide isn't committed by people with guns and army fatigues.
It is literally people in suits. Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. People in suits.
And so what is polarization in the sixth stage? It's about preventing questioning.
It's very important because it turns moral doubt, which is logical doubt, and it turns it into
social betrayal. Like when the environment is polarized,
it's like saying, even I'm not sure it sounds like disloyalty.
And silence after that, then it's much safer than curiosity, right? So you better stay silent.
Don't become curious. This is how polarization
looks in genocide. And it's when this disagreement, it stops being about ideas.
And it actually becomes about loyalty, right? So asking question is no longer neutral.
It's interpreted as taking the wrong side, basically. So why are you doing this? You're against us?
Yes? I want to give a real world example of that. You're absolutely right because the
polarization, when it's committed, is then also reinforced and amplified by the average person.
It's no longer the people in the suits who are doing this. It becomes like a contagion, a virus,
where everybody now is polarizing and acting in this way. So in the UK, we have doctors,
lots of doctors, 300,000 doctors. And there's a private Facebook group called the On Call Room.
And it's got 30,000, 40,000 doctors on it. Private. Only doctors can enter it. You have
to give your registration number and blah, blah, blah. And everything that's said there and done
there can only be kept there. You can't discuss it anywhere else. And my wife got me to join that
group because she wanted to convince me that the vaccinations were good and that I was being
crazy. And I'm a doctor as well. So I joined this group. And all I saw was groupthink,
cultish-like groupthink. And there was one case that I remember looking at and thinking,
oh my God, this is horrendous. There was a doctor, a female doctor who said to the group,
hey, everybody, because what you would do is you would always ask questions or post things or,
you know, they were also very, very juvenile, like stupid sexual innuendos,
dick jokes and all that kind of stuff. And I thought, man, your doctors like,
seriously, grow up. But one of these, one of these female doctors posted this following,
hey, everybody, I just want everybody's advice and opinions about something.
I've had COVID already and recovered. I took the first COVID shot, but I had a severe reaction
to it. I've now discovered after trying for several years that I'm now pregnant,
should I have the second shot? Now, to me, it was obvious three, three things. She's had COVID,
got better. So she's immune. She's had one shot of COVID and she had a severe reaction. So
bloody hell. And now she's pregnant. The answer is, you don't need the shot. Just,
you're going to be fine, right? Hundreds of doctors piled in. Why are you asking this
question? What's wrong with you? You sound like an anti-vaxxer. You should be grateful that you're
getting a second shot. It was insanity. It was like, you are not allowed to question how
dare you? What is wrong with you? And then she wrote, okay, thanks. Sorry, folks. I was just
getting a little bit nervous and oh, you've reassured me. I'm so grateful. Thank you,
everybody. What the hell, dude? Yes, exactly. In Latvia, even one doctor was brutally
pushed out of a conference during the conference because he was asking about,
are there any conflict of interest to those people who are presenting vaccines?
And it was a loud case here. Oh, wow. Well, if you can find that doctor and connect to me,
that'd be great. Love to speak to that doctor. Yes, I will find out whether he knows English.
But I know him very good. I can call him, yes. Please. Okay, carry on.
And yes, that's what you said that, for example, in this professional environment,
you know, this agreement, which is normal. It's normal that you have, for example,
professional disagreement, for example, also about those vaccines. But it is reframed
as a moral failure, right? So basically, you're not wrong. You become dangerous.
You're not professionally wrong. You become like dangerous. You're like framed like dangerous.
And that's what happens. And that is the polarization, how it happens. And in this case,
of course, silence becomes safer than honesty, right? And people do not speak even if they see problems,
not because they agree, but just because they are afraid to be like on the wrong side, right?
And that's what is happening. And yes, and once polarized,
arguments are no longer answered. They are really punished. And in last year, we had a case when
a doctor was even, his certificate, his doctor's certificate was canceled because of a Facebook post.
And even crazier, he was even in this Facebook post, he did not even
say his own opinion. He clearly just said what a third person, he just wrote what a third person said,
and he clearly showed it in his Facebook post. And because of that, he was removed his
license as a doctor. And what is even more crazier, that my own father,
who is the president of the doctor's association, he also took part in this crime.
And as he actually, it's a very tough and sad thing for me, but this is how it actually is.
Yeah, I'm sorry to hear that. I'm sorry to hear that.
Yeah, so in this polarization situation, people, doctors and everyone, they're basically
if they speak, they must signal belonging, not express what they think, right? That's what is the
result, what they want the result of that to be. And actually, of course,
this this this polarization, it doesn't convince anyone. It just
trains and makes people to stay silent, right? So no questioning. Questioning is punishable,
right? You are deprived your license or you are removed from media, from social media,
you're censored or you're, you're fined or whatever the consequences are. But
that way, you are made not to ask questions and not to and you are forced to agree, basically.
And we all went through that. We all went through that. Me, myself, I got fines from
government in 2001, about 40,000 euros together. For what?
For, for example, for speaking at an event. And the formulation was like that. For example,
for speaking at an event, yes, which where we were speaking against mandates and all this.
Oh, wow. Yeah. Let's just stop for the list for a second. We haven't got to preparation yet,
have we? No, the next one. Yeah, yeah. So can I quickly ask you something? What is your
background? What is it you do? Are you allowed to talk about it? Yes. So I'm a lawyer myself,
my bioeducation, I'm a lawyer and MBA. So I have a company which is producing water. This
is my business, what I'm doing. And my company during the COVID was, so they could not attack
my arguments, you know, because they simply could not find any counter arguments for them.
But they were attacking my company and my, well, my water. And they,
all the supermarket chains in our country and all other, many other shops refused
selling my water because of what just I was saying. That was, that's the situation how it was.
And when you say you're selling water, are you talking about bottled water, distilled water,
like what kind of water? Clean water? It's bottled and it usually goes with those
refillable bottles, those large five gallon bottles, you know. And we have all kind of,
all kind of volumes or all kind of bottles. And I'm sure with your legal lawyer background,
that must have really helped you see through all the garbage, all the nonsense, and then argue
your case against this. Yes, that's why my videos, because I've made hundreds of videos
during the COVID time, but I did it only in our Latvian local language. They did not go
anywhere international because I was, I was just doing them in our language. And yes, I basically,
I like, I think I totally, and they were at the beginning, they're very popular actually,
because they, because at the very beginning, there was even no censorship yet in place. It
but then, and I really, they were very popular because, and they could not
make any counter arguments for that. They could not debunk me, basically. And instead of debunking,
they just attacked me, attacked my company and did what, like removing me from the shelves of
shops. And that's what they did. And that's why I have, like, very real consequences of
saying my opinion here. Dude, you know what, God bless you. And so our next thing I'd say to
you, Janice, is that, you know, so you've lost income and revenue. Have you managed to get
that back now? Well, the good thing is that we are still operating. But no, I have not managed to
get that back at all. Basically, still at the very moment, all those, all the shopping
market chains in Latvia, like Rimi, Maxim and also others, they are still supporting this
genocide which is happening. So they are not, we are still not at the phase of
understanding. We are, and we are the phase of, which will be the 10 stage we'll later
talk about, which is denied. Okay, okay, let's go through the list again. So are we going to go
to preparation now? Is that the next one? Yes. All right, let's talk about that. Stage
number seven. So tell me about preparation. So yeah, preparation, it happens through policy,
again, through law, legal frameworks, and emergency protocols, right? So and they use such words as
temporary, right, temporary, exceptional emergency, or, and everything is for safety.
Yes, nothing is for, for your harm, everything is for your safety. And that's, that's how
they prepare this ground to use emergency powers, temporary regulations, right?
And that's how they are removing your rights by these, by, by implementing those,
those legal frameworks they have made. And, and, and again, people in those frameworks, in those
legal frameworks are sorted into some kind of categories like you, for example, during the
COVID, you were tested, you were not tested, vaccinated, not vaccinated, you, you, when you were
even vaccinated in 19 days, you were already, you did not have a certificate and so on and so on.
So there were many different categories how they were sorting you. And,
and also, they invented all kind of data tracking technology and infrastructure, like
they were even, in Latvia, there was even an app where you could see with, with, maybe if you have
been in contact with some, some vaccinated, infected and so on. And that's, that's, that's the,
that's the preparation. So they, they make, they create this app, yes, and they
make it to make it, they popular, popularize it, they, they invest the time and money into that.
And of course, they, and one of the, actually, the greatest, most evident crimes on which
everything was built on during the COVID was the PCR test. Yes, because PCR test was a complete fraud,
like a complete fraud, because even the, the, the, the inventor of the PCR method was Kerry Mullis,
and he was accidentally or not, but he died in 2019, like a year before the, the
the COVID started, right. And then he particularly said that the, this test cannot be used to, to,
to under, to test somebody, whether he's, has an infectious disease, disease or not,
because all this testing is based on cycles. It's called cyclation or how many cycles.
The method is so that if you run the, run it on like 35 cycles, then, then there is like,
there is a probability of about 20% that your result will be positive, but you are actually not
positive. And if you run it, for example, only nine cycles, then, yes, then the method becomes
more likely that only the, the real infected are, are, are found, right. And, and they, when I was
personally calling our Latvian state agents, agency who was responsible of testing and who were
like every morning they were telling how many were infected and so on. So they did not even understand
the principle of the, this method and how the cycle work. They even could not tell me how,
how many cycles or how many cycles are they running those tests. And, and, and,
and the main idea in this, in the, and actually all the, all the fake story, it, all the COVID, all the,
I would say, pandemic, basically, it was based on this fake test. If there was no, that this test,
there would, there were no basis for even anything, right. And this was the test was,
were, on, on what everything like, you know, if you take the test out, all the card
collapses totally. It's all built on the test. And it's very easy to debunk the test. It's,
it's, it's super easy. It's anyone who understands the, a little bit of how the PCR
mechanism works. Because what they are testing, they're, they're not, they're not finding,
are you, are you actively infected? They're, they're, they're just looking for a DNA sample
in you. Yes. And the DNA sample stays long, long after you have been ill, you have been
infected, you have been ill, you are now well, but still the DNA sample may stay there for a long time.
Absolutely. I mean, it's very convenient that Carrie Mullis died just before the pandemic.
So convenient. And like you said, 80 to 90% false positive rate. And it's not even this,
then just the false positive rate. They were telling everybody to test multiple times
throughout the week. And each test was registered as an individual case, rather than being linked
in group to a individual. So instead of saying this one person has had five tests, you know,
and it's tested positive, you know, once, they would say there's been five tests in a week,
that's five cases that are positive, even though it actually only was regarding one person.
And they used this case, you know, positive cases, even though it was exaggerated false positive
and representing many times just the one person to inflate the idea that there was this pandemic,
this bloody pandemic. Yes, that's, that's, that's a very evident fraud. And those people,
for example, who worked in the laboratories and who were doing all that, there's no way they can
say that they didn't understand that they did not know. They just did not speak up, they just
did not speak. That was the only thing. And during the COVID times, I even called on a
telephone conversation, our, our head of our COVID laboratory, who also, who also, I'm not sure
in English, I would, I would be able to, to tell there's a term which is, which is infectious
and infected. Because, you know, there's, I'm not sure in, if I'm not telling it correctly,
but the idea is that, for example, I was asking, does the test say, are you infectious or are you
infected? Because there's a huge difference in that infectious means that you are actively able to
pass the disease to somebody else, right? And infected means that you're simply carrying the
DNA code, which may be no, no, no risk to others at all, right? And he, in a, in a secret phone
conversation, he said to me, yes, but the COVID test does not tell if you are infectious, meaning
that it does not tell if you can make somebody else sick. It just tells whether you're carrying
the DNA code. And that's, that's, that's, that's the whole story, basically, of how the fake,
fake COVID narrative was made possible. And, and during this polarization, what is also
interesting, sorry, the preparation, yes, we're not in preparation. They also use like
language, they, like, they like soften the language, you know, they use like
temporary measures, like they use like, they do, they do a thing, doing everything for safety, yes,
like, of, like, of being very cautious and very, very kind and very worried about the
health of people. And that's how they, they pack it, how that's how, how in, in the stage of
preparation and genocide is actually evolving exactly by very normalized soft language,
not by screaming and rude words and very polite. So,
so that's, that's, basically, I think, so, and I think what you mean, if you don't mind me
summarizing preparation is that they use euphemisms to cloak their real intentions. So
they refer, you know, such as referring to their goals, like ethnic cleansing, purification, counter
terrorism, you know, they're not going to say, you know, we're going to kill you,
don't talk like that. But, you know, there is, there is a gentle increase also of inflammatory
language. And yeah, yeah, it's not good. Anyway, carry on. So what's the next stage,
persecution? Exactly. So,
so persecution, as everything during the genocide, it's also legal. So it's not something illegal.
It's legal. It's according to the law there. It's actually enforced by this procedure, not by
hatred. It's just following the law. And people aren't prosecuted by, by mobs or some, some,
some kind of criminals. They are simply restricted by law, by systems, by procedures.
For example, like bank freezes your account. Right. It's not that somebody
did very politely and they usually say, I'm sorry, mister, but your account is not available.
It's very kind, very welcoming, very polite, but it does not make it, not genocide.
It's genocide. It's just the form is different. And or employer, if you're employee, the contract
is suspended because you did not use, you have spoken up to us. You said something you should have.
It's your story, right? Can I give an example? Can I give an example? So when the hospital director,
my local private hospital that I'd been at for like 10 years, where most of my private
practice was 80%, he rang me and said, hi, I'm at how are you doing? I mean, oh, it's okay.
Everything all right, Fraser? What can I do? Six o'clock at night. My kids are like running
around like crazy. They're hungry. I'm trying to make dinner for them. Wife is at work.
Yeah, I just want to tell you, I just want to tell you, we're suspending you.
I'm like, sorry, what? Yeah, you're not, you're not going to be able to access any
patient records. And you're not led to enter the hospital policies. And, you know, just while
we're doing the investigation, you know, have you got have you got anything to ask me any questions?
And I'm like, yeah, what the hell did I do wrong? Oh, you, you know, fail to refer us and tell us
about a GMC investigation. GMC is the medical regulation body. I was like, I haven't been
investigated by the GMC. Oh, yes, you were. I went, no, no, I wasn't. How do you know I
have because I wrote to the GMC and they said there's no investigation or complaint.
Well, we need to look into this. And, you know, have you got anything to say? I was like, yeah,
this is nonsense. What do you mean? Like, you're just suspending me. Am I going to be coming to
a meeting? Can I provide any information? Nope, no, we're going to conduct this
investigation and we will get back to you. Are you otherwise okay? Is there anything we
can do to help you? And I'm like, you've literally just stopped me from seeing my patients
operating on my patients. I can't make any money. I'm you've just literally pulled the rug from
beneath my feet. My whole world is collapsing. My head is swimming. And you're asking me if
I'm okay. No, of course, I'm not backing okay. And then it was just like, well, it was nice
speaking to you, Amid. You know, yeah, we'll get back to you. If there's anything else we
can do to help you, just let me know. Am I anything like stop suspending me and let me
see my patients? What are you talking about? You know, I mean, literally like that with a
smile, like I could see his face. Okay, nice talking to you, Amid. Have a nice evening.
What the fuck? You've just ruined my life. And you're like, have a nice evening.
Yes. I think this is what you're talking about.
Yes, no gunman. Just policy.
It was literally, it was literally, you know, you've breached our practicing privileges. I
went, I haven't, I have not been under any investigation by the GMC. Well, that's what
we need to decide, you know, because it looks on the face of it, you've breached the, you know,
practicing privileges. And I'm like, there's no patient. There's no nothing. I haven't done
anything wrong. I haven't killed anybody. I'm like, what are you talking about?
This perceived breach of protocol, which I haven't, by the way, but they just used it as pretext.
Tell me if a smile is like your career's ended, but if I can help you, let me know.
And this, it's really, in essence, this is punishment, right? But officially it's not
called punishment, right? So they, that's, that's how this system affects this punishment, but they
simply just call it by different name. And every, every, every normal common sense person understands
that this, but how this punishment really operates. And this is very, it's great. It's
amazing hypocrisy. It's amazing. And it's actually unbelievable how something like this
is possible in democracy. I hope that already most of the people who are watching
will be watching, will understand that we are not living in democracy, just
living in some, in a, in a system which is called democracy, which is not democracy, just called
democracy. So, and the thing is, they hide, the people hide behind faceless names, titles,
institutions. So I've just, I've just been kicked in the balls by one hospital. And then
three weeks later, four weeks later, another hospital said to me, oh, we've suspended you
because you've had a guest on your show and we think you might be anti-semitic.
And I said, I never said anything anti-semitic. And they said, well, we have to do an
investigation for, for patient safety and the staff safety. I went, hold on one second. I've
been working for years as a doctor. No patients unsafe for me. I've treated Jews,
Christians, atheists, Muslims, Buddha. I don't give a damn who you are and what your
background is. Like, what are you talking about? And I work with people with all
backgrounds. It's like, no, for the safety of the staff and the public, we need to
investigate you. And you're not allowed in the hospital. You're denied access to everything.
And we're going to carry out this investigation. And only at the end of the
investigation will you be allowed to return. And guess what? I wasn't invited to any
meeting. I wasn't invited to provide any evidence. I had no say in anything. And it
was all like, oh, but it's, you know, it's just, we have to do the procedure. We have
to do an internal review. You know, there'll be a meeting and a panel and no name. I'm not
given any name. It's just, and these are anonymous complaints, not the public, not the
patients. And five months, six months almost, it took to conclude the
investigation. And at the end, they said, you know, you're not anti-semitic. And
none of your podcasts are anti-semitic. But six months, I've been kicked out of one hospital,
where I've got 80% of my practice. 20% of my other practice, I've been now denied working
there for six months. How can you make a living? How can you make any money if you're
not even allowed to enter the building? And the process is a punishment. And again,
it was like, do you need to speak to anybody about your mental health? Are you okay?
Can we support you? You're just like, you've just shot a bullet into my heart, and you're
asking me if I want paracetamol. I mean, what the f***, like, are you listening to yourself?
Are you okay? I know this might be upsetting to you. So if there's anything else, we can
to help if you've got any questions. And then anytime you ask a real question, like a genuine
question, there's no answer. They don't want to, they don't want to answer any of your
questions. They just say that because it makes them sound good, but they don't actually mean it.
It's all just bullshit and lies. This is how the persecution looks in the,
not during fascism, but during globalism, which is now. Folks, if you've enjoyed this conversation,
please share it with someone who needs to hear it. This podcast survives because of listeners
like you. If you want to hear the second half of this podcast, then please consider
becoming a paid subscriber to continue supporting independent conversations.
And if you want personalized support for your own health, or those are your loved ones,
then book a consultation. It's available at duckmalic.com. Thanks for being part of this journey.
Recognize the pattern. If you can see it here, you can stop it anywhere.
Most of us think of genocide as the moment of mass killing, which is only the ninth stage,
the one that is loud, brutal, and impossible to ignore. But long before that, there are eight
other stages, quiet, calculated, and often hidden behind the mask of law. Sometimes they
even arrive wrapped as something good, presented as being in the public interest.
Genocide doesn't always come with guns or gas chambers. In the 21st century, it wears a suit
and speaks the language of public safety, sustainable development, or crisis response.
To build back better. Latvia, a small Baltic nation and member of the European Union,
is no exception. It is a warning. Because what happened here is happening everywhere.
What are the eight silent stages of genocide before extermination?
They are bureaucratic, legally correct, gradual, and often carried out with the silent consent
of society. Is it possible that right now, even in the country I call home, a genocide
is unfolding against us? Is genocide only a chapter in history books? Or is it today's
reality? Would you recognize it if it unfolded right before your eyes,
hidden in legal clauses, government reforms, or beautiful promises? Perhaps without knowing it,
we have already given our consent, obediently, quietly. Because we've grown used to accepting
what the media tells us without questioning it and calling it our own opinion. Latvia,
small on the map, yet in recent years sinking deep into the swamp. A nation that has lived
through occupation, through the so-called independence, and now faces something far
more insidious. A genocide in a suit. Its size does not diminish the weight of its suffering.
The pain endured here speaks to people everywhere. Latvia stands as both a home
and a warning. And if one looks closely at what has happened here,
similar patterns may be unfolding where you live. Genocide doesn't erupt overnight, it follows a
pattern. One so predictable that if we learn to recognize it, we can see it unfolding long
before the extermination begins. Gregory Stanton is an American lawyer and internationally
recognized human rights expert who founded the Organization Genocide Watch and developed one
of the most widely used genocide classification models in the world. Human rights specialists
globally use this model to identify and stop genocide before it reaches the final stage.
Stanton warns, genocide is not only the immediate killing of people, it can be a long,
bureaucratically masked, legally correct, and psychologically sophisticated process.
According to Stanton's theory, genocide does not happen suddenly. It is a systematic
process with nine sequential stages. The last stage, extermination,
is well known from history books. But before that, there are eight silent stages that prepare the
ground. How we can encourage and potentially think about mandatory vaccination.
In this documentary, I use my home country as a case study to show how the stages of genocide
unfold in practice across three coordinated fronts. First, the imposition of mass vaccination
through coercion. Second, the systematic economic dismantling of the local population. Third,
the comprehensive poisoning of the environment, air, water, soil, food, and even cognition
itself, executed through legally compliant mechanisms without responsibility, oversight,
or consequence. Each of these is a different face of the same system, control disguised as progress.
This is how modern genocide wears a suit. In 2020, the world was paralyzed. Out of fear
of the virus, people traded away their rights for safety. Governments suspended human rights,
seized control, and all those responsible for upholding the Constitution remain silent.
In Latvia, one of the most sophisticated stages of genocide began, coercion to use
experimental medicines through blackmail. We will now examine whether the term genocide can be
applied to the events of the COVID era, according to Gregory Stanton's stages of genocide.
The first stage of genocide is classification, the deliberate division of society into us and
them. Governments around the world, including the Latvian government, split the population
into two groups, vaccinated and unvaccinated, creating a feeling of opposing camps. People
will be sorted, so to speak, or separated, those who are vaccinated and who are not.
This was the first stage of genocide. The second stage of genocide is symbolization.
This is the targeted marking of a group with visible identifiers.
In fascist Germany, Jews had to wear the yellow star of David and were banned from certain public
spaces. Parks, theaters, public transportation. In 21st century Latvia, the same was done,
only with a different symbol, the digital vaccination certificate. If you did not
have this symbol, you were banned from public places, entering shops, traveling and receiving
health care. The QR code became the mark that determined who was the right citizen and who was
dangerous to society. In Latvia, as in fascist Germany, this symbol effectively made the
unwanted group visible, isolatable and oppressible. The digital certificate was the most visible
symbol of genocide. The third stage of genocide is discrimination, restricting or
removing the rights of a specific group. In Latvia, the unvaccinated were denied constitutional
rights to work, to receive medical care, to assemble, and to express their dissenting,
critical opinions. The government did this to force everyone to use what later turned out
to be an ineffective, untested and unsafe drug. The fourth stage of genocide is dehumanization,
humiliating, demonizing and portraying the target group as inferior, undesirable or dangerous.
Latvian media regularly described the unvaccinated as uneducated, irresponsible,
and a threat to society. Banks blacklisted the most vocal unvaccinated individuals who dare
to speak publicly, equating them with terrorists. Refusing vaccination became the pretext for
genocide supporters to boycott the businesses of the unvaccinated and push to drive them out of
society entirely. The fifth stage of genocide according to Stanton is organization, the structured
methodical preparation of genocide at the level of state institutions. In Latvia, this was done
by creating special commissions and operational groups that coordinated the introduction and
enforcement of restrictions. The vaccines will have gone through the same safety path as the
vaccines used until now. Vaccines are safe and effective. Judges who are meant to serve as
an independent branch of power in practice stopped applying human rights laws that carried
greater legal weight than the emergency regulations. At the door, everyone who comes in is checked with
the phone and only the ones having the green certificate are let in. That's it. The sixth
stage of genocide is polarization, the deliberate division of society and the incitement of
hatred. In Latvia's public media and in politicians statements, rhetoric was constantly
maintained that split families, friendships and workplace relationships. Public discourse
was dominated by shaming, intimidation, spreading panic and sowing hatred towards those who refuse
to use experimental drugs. People who have died from COVID will not have Christmas, of course.
What about masks? I think there are a lot of people in America who are confused about
whether they should be wearing a mask. Well, that's interesting. You know, what is the
downside of wearing a mask? I mean, it's got to be tough. You know, you have to wear pants.
Did you notice the tactic our self-proclaimed public health expert Mr. Bill Gates is using?
It's called the straw man fallacy, twisting a real question into a weaker version,
then attacking that instead. The trick creates the illusion of victory while the true point
is left untouched. The seventh stage is preparation, the administrative setup of the
genocide process, including the creation of laws, regulations and registries.
In Latvia, various registries were created, lists for mandatory vaccination,
as well as new restrictive regulations aimed at blackmailing and punishing those who refuse
to use experimental drugs or publicly express opposition to their use. A testing regime was
introduced that allowed the infection numbers to be artificially inflated on a massive scale.
Panic to panic is created by these false positive PCR tests. 89% until 94% of those PCR tests are
false positive. Latvian doctors without analysis or criticism adopted the World Health Organization's
recommended artificial ventilation protocols, which later proved deadly. Specific
manufacturers' medicines were procured and promoted as the only acceptable treatment,
thereby condemning the right to choose alternative drugs and methods.
Listen to how the Latvian Minister of Health explains the very laws and regulations he
himself imposed. Reporter asks, if the vaccination certificate has expired, you can
continue to work, be employed. For example, an employee can spend seven to eight hours at
his workplace, but he is not allowed to run into the shopping center for 10 minutes to
grab a few things. Where is the logic? What the health minister answers, I think that one
of the things that the pandemic period shows is that the use of term logic has become
very subjective, and the logics that can be applied are very different.
Wasn't it Orwell who wrote that lies are truth, war is peace, and freedom is slavery?
Now the Latvian health minister adds a new twist, there is logic and then there is COVID logic.
The eighth stage is persecution, the systematic intimidation, repression, and emotional or
economic abuse of the target group. In Latvia, the unvaccinated were deprived of the right to
work and fine for exercising basic human rights, such as breathing freely without masks,
gathering to express opposing opinions, or entering a shop without a QR code.
The government carried out violent arrests, reprisals, the use of electric shock devices
and physical coercion.
The ninth stage is extermination, the mass physical or psychological destruction of people.
This is the final most tragic stage of genocide, which often takes place in full view of all,
but can only be prevented by stopping the earlier stages in time.
In Nazi Germany, people were herded into gas chambers and killed. Today, genocide looks
more civilized. People line up for it themselves, rolling up their sleeves to receive the shot.
They call it voluntary, but is it really voluntary?
The nation has been brought to its knees. This is humiliation.
Are you getting vaccinated because of work? Yesterday, I got a call.
Honestly, it's hard to speak without using strong words.
There is no choice. In truth, there is no choice.
If I don't get vaccinated, I can't work. We have to work, feed our children,
pay the mortgage. That's how it is. I work for a state institution.
Everything that's happening now is genocide against the people. If the government can't
call it by another name, then I don't know what else to call it. It's genocide,
a mass destruction of the nation. Do you trust the vaccine? No, absolutely not.
I'm forced to get vaccinated just to survive, to be allowed into stores,
to keep my job because we were told clearly that we would lose our jobs otherwise.
So I have no choice but to take the vaccine and take the risk.
These are not the words of rebels or radicals. They are the voices of people who simply wanted
to live, work, and feed their families. But in a system that calls coercion, care,
survival becomes conditional, and people quickly learn that staying alive now
requires compliance. This did not stop the government from deliberately spreading lies
that the vaccine was safe and effective. These drugs were forced on people through threats
and blackmail. What makes this crime deliberate? The vaccine was never even tested for its ability
to stop transmission. On October 10th, 2022, Pfizer executive Jeanine Small admitted before
the European Parliament that this was the case. Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested
on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?
Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanisation before it entered the
market? No. We had to really move at the speed of science. Yet officials and media
worldwide told us the exact opposite every single day. It is safe and effective against COVID-19.
This is a safe and effective vaccine. That these are safe and effective products.
It's safe and that it's effective. At the vaccines, that they are safe and effective.
Safe and effective coronavirus vaccine. The vaccine is safe and effective.
That this this vaccine is safe and effective. The vaccine is safe and effective! Pfizer's
take experimental vaccines on the false premise
that they stopped transmission when in fact they did not.
But the truth is even more alarming.
Governments knew that the vaccines
neither stopped transmission nor were proven safe.
On November 20th, 2020, the European Union
signed its centralized vaccine procurement contract
with Pfizer.
Annex I, Article I, Clause 4 states,
the participating member state acknowledges
that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine
are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects
of the vaccine that are not currently known.
In other words, Pfizer and our elected officials
formally acknowledged and knew that there was never
any basis to claim the vaccine was either effective or safe.
All EU governments knew the truth
about its effectiveness and safety,
yet deliberately lied to their people.
It is safe and effective against COVID-19.
This is a safe and effective vaccine.
But there is another fact that reveals
the depth of corruption.
The European Union signed the contract with Pfizer
on November 20th, 2020,
weeks before the vaccine was even authorized.
Only on December 21st, 2020,
did the European Medicines Agency
and the European Commission grant Pfizer conditional approval,
the EU's version of emergency use authorization.
So the deal was struck before the product
was legally cleared.
Governments had already committed billions
even while admitting in the contract itself
that long-term safety and efficacy were unknown.
The narrative was settled first, the approval came later.
Ask yourself, would you buy a drug for your entire family
if the manufacturer openly admitted
we don't know if it is effective or safe?
Would you spend everything you had on a product
that wasn't even registered yet?
And would any of your loved ones
trusted after you explained what you had done?
The European Commission never explained.
They made the contract confidential instead.
Objectively and honestly,
these officials should have told the public
that they had signed a contract with the manufacturer,
clearly stating that the vaccine's effectiveness
and safety were unknown.
That negative side effects were possible
and that each person should decide for themselves
whether to take that risk.
Instead, state officials did the opposite.
They purchased the product in massive quantities,
promoted it aggressively,
and attributed to it properties
that the product itself as explicitly acknowledged
did not have.
Worse still, these officials agreed
to grant Pfizer complete immunity from any liability
if the vaccines later proved unsafe or ineffective.
In other words, Pfizer and our elected officials
formally acknowledged and knew
that there was never any basis
to claim the vaccine was either effective or safe.
All EU governments knew the truth
about its effectiveness and safety,
yet deliberately lied to their people.
It is safe and effective against COVID-19.
This is a safe and effective vaccine.
Such a sharp increase in mortality
immediately after the forced introduction
of the experimental drug indicates
that the final ninth stage of genocide,
extermination, had effectively been reached.
In fascist Germany, the destruction of victims
was loud and public.
This time in Latvia and worldwide genocide was quiet.
People died silently after being forced
to take the experimental mRNA drug.
Of course, it's no longer a surprise,
but just look how Latvia's Minister of Health
runs away when asked about his personal responsibility.
Daniel, hello.
Are you ready to take personal responsibility
for the vaccination?
As a politician, I'm responsible for everything.
Please let me work.
Are you ready to take personal responsibility?
I am ready.
I have proved it by taking this position.
Please, please let me work.
How will your personal responsibility look like?
Daniel, how will it look like?
Are you personally ready to pay
for all the vaccine and force reactions
to all the families?
Five years after we were forced to take the vaccines,
the truth finally surfaces.
Not from rumors or speculation,
but from an official source.
The U.S. Health Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,
now publicly confirms the vaccines did not protect
and they caused death.
The Pfizer vaccine, when it came out,
it had a higher, all-cause mortality.
So more people died in the placebo group.
I mean, more people died in the vaccine group
than in the placebo group.
I had 20,000 people who got the vaccine,
20,000 who didn't.
And after six months, they looked at it
and there was 23% more deaths in the vaccinated group
from all causes than in the placebo group.
And the efficacy was kind of dubious because...
Well, yeah.
There was only two people who died from COVID
in the placebo group.
And there was one person who died from COVID
in the vaccine group and that's the whole data set
they were looking at.
And so they said, you remember,
they were saying the vaccine is 100% effective?
Well, that's why they were saying it
because there was two is 100% of one, right?
100% larger than one.
So that's what they had,
but what they were telling the American people
is 100% effective.
And that's when people heard that,
they thought if you get the vaccine, you can't get COVID,
which of course now we realize,
now everybody realizes it was wrong
because everybody got COVID
whether they got the vaccine or not.
The COVID shots have negative efficacy after six months.
Tell me how a shot with negative efficacy
is saving lives
and it has the worst side effect profile
of any vaccine in human history.
So how exactly is a vaccine
with the worst side effects and negative efficacy
saving lives?
That's a preposterous claim.
A large scale study from Japan
covering 18 million people revealed a chilling truth.
Each additional dose of the mRNA COVID vaccine
increased the risk of death.
90 to 120 days after vaccination,
mortality among the vaccinated
was four and a half times higher
than among the unvaccinated.
In April, the JMA Journal,
the official publication
of the Japan Medical Association
confirmed a significant rise in excess deaths
across 2022 and 2023.
This is not speculation.
It is a peer reviewed scientific study
based on data from 18 million people.
One of the most comprehensive analyses
of vaccine safety ever published.
To understand how modern genocide
hides behind laws and medicine,
we must listen to those who have witnessed it before.
Holocaust survivor Vera Sharov
exposes the same patterns repeating.
She reminds us that when governments and corporations
unite under the banner of public health,
humanity itself becomes the experiment
in which people are sacrificed like guinea pigs
for the greater good.
This was calculated.
This was formulated.
This was focused grouped.
This was articulated.
This was manufactured.
This was falsified.
This was coerced.
This was inflicted.
This was denied.
We were terrorized.
We were isolated.
We were gaslit.
We were dehumanized.
We were wounded.
Some of us were killed.
Don't let them get away with it.
I believe that we are in the midst
of one of the greatest crimes in human history.
Criminal trials, I would welcome that.
You're comparing the COVID-19 vaccine to the Holocaust.
The state, however you define that,
the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barrick
at the University of North Carolina,
created a weaponized virus, correct?
Gain a function research.
They contracted it out to China
and it caused a pandemic around the world
once it was released.
The government created a weaponized virus
that then got out and caused a global pandemic.
When are we gonna have accountability for that?
For more than 30 years,
Latvia has been living under another form
of systemic destruction,
one that doesn't fill hospital wards
or make headlines overnight,
yet is just as lethal over time.
This is economic genocide,
the deliberate dismantling of a nation's ability
to provide for itself,
forcing a huge amount of people to leave their home country
and pass their market share and capital
to foreign corporations.
In theory, Latvia's tax system is fair.
In practice, it's a machine designed
to crush the local population.
The tax system is presented as fair and equal,
but in reality the tax burden is radically different.
Workers pay up to 80% of their income in taxes and fees.
Local businesses face tax burden
from 15 to 80% of turnover.
Meanwhile, foreign corporations have tax burden
only a few percent,
all perfectly legal because the system was built this way.
In 2024, RIMI, Latvia's dominant supermarket chain,
had just 3.9% tax burden.
Another supermarket chain, Maxima, had 4.8% tax burden.
Swedbank pays less than 1%.
This isn't a market economy.
It's an engineered transfer of wealth and power.
Stanton's nine stages of genocide
fit Latvia's economic destruction
with chilling precision, classification.
Society is divided into locals and foreign corporations.
The rules in the playing field are never the same for both sides.
How much tax does RIMI pay?
3.9%.
That's the tax burden on turnover.
But for local restaurants, the tax burden is 25%.
Even up to 50%.
How can this be?
Good question.
How can this be?
According to official data,
in annually, Latvia loses approximately 3.1 billion euros
in tax revenue because of major tax incentives,
equivalent to nearly a quarter of all tax collections.
A concrete example of how this unequal system works
can be seen in RIMI,
the largest supermarket chain in Latvia.
In 2017, the Latvian government approved
RIMI's Logistics Center project in Riga
as an eligible investment.
With this status came special privileges.
A corporate income tax discount
worth up to 6.4 million euros.
That's 25% off the company's long-term investment costs,
calculated on a project worth over 25 million euros.
For a multinational corporation,
this is just smart business.
But for local shopkeepers and small producers
who pay full tax, face inspections,
and have no access to such schemes,
it is another nail in the coffin.
RIMI's response to receiving state-backed investment
was to cut local products and brands from its shelves,
replacing them with hundreds of its own private label goods.
This is how classification works in economic genocide.
One set of rules for global corporations,
another for the locals struggling to survive.
Corrupt politicians excuse themselves
by claiming that small businesses
simply have weak lobbies.
The foreign investor lobby is very strong in all these areas.
The banking sector, trade, and many others,
as a result of which such amendments
have not been able to be put forward
through Parliament so far.
Corrupt politicians admit it openly.
The foreign lobby is so powerful
that Latvian politicians
have no chance to think about their own people.
Instead, all their time is spent serving the interests
and enriching the owners of foreign corporations.
The question is, what do you want?
Do you want to have small cafes on the street or not?
Do you want to have more small shops in Latvia
or is it all just RIMI and Maxima?
Your policy also follows from what the goal is.
I'm a bookkeeper.
I work with many small clients
and I see every day how they struggle.
There is a huge tax burden for small businesses.
I know several of them myself.
If they try to pay all the taxes,
they can't do it at all.
So the tax burden is too high.
Symbolization.
The local entrepreneur is branded as unpromising,
inefficient, or unable to meet European standards
while foreign investors are given the image
of visionaries and saviors.
How can there be fair competition
when the tax burden is so radically different?
This question has been raised many times
during state revenue service audits,
but auditors don't care.
In fact, they do worse.
They lecture small business owners.
If you don't know how to do business like RIMI,
then shut down or go get a job at RIMI.
Yes, they say it openly.
The Coordination Council for large
and strategically significant investment projects
chaired by Prime Minister boasts,
we have successfully doubled investor attention
in Latvia over the past year,
leading to a significant increase in investment volumes.
This success, they say, is the result of government efforts
to cut red tape, simplify tax policies,
and provide state support for investments,
innovation, and workforce development.
All these privileges go to powerful foreign investors
while local people are pushed into deeper poverty.
The next stage of the economic genocide is discrimination.
The system then enforces the divide.
Locals face crushing taxes,
up to 80% of income or turnover,
while foreign corporations pay token amounts,
often the total tax burden,
less than 5% of the turnover.
80% is a huge enslaving tax burden.
Let's break down exactly how it is formed.
You work for an employer,
and for example, you've earned 1,000 euros.
The employer is ready to pay you this amount.
It is your hard-earned money.
But in reality, you only receive 550 euros
because the rest is taken in various fees,
contributions, and taxes.
The first tax burden alone is about 45%,
but that is not all.
You also pay around 15% more in other charges.
For example, property tax,
excise taxes, and fuel prices,
which are driven mostly by taxes,
rather than the product itself.
On top of that comes the road tax,
electricity tax, and dozens of others.
Almost every government office finds a way
to extract something from you
whenever you need their services.
Today, our government has already introduced
more than 100 different taxes and fees
under various names.
So after these payments,
your tax burden rises by another 15%,
reaching about 60% in total.
But even that is not the end.
For nearly every product or service you buy,
you must also pay value-added tax,
which in Latvia is 21%.
Adding this on top,
the total tax burden climbs to nearly 80%.
We caught the finance minister on the street
to ask why the tax burden is so unfair.
He doesn't say it's a mistake.
He answers that it's general tax policy.
Banks, acting under government instruction,
weaponize the so-called law
on the prevention of money laundering
and terrorism and proliferation financing.
In theory, it's meant to fight crime.
In practice, it's used to treat ordinary citizens
like potential terrorists,
demanding endless documents and explanations
for even the smallest transactions.
People are interrogated over a few euros.
The mother of children is shopping online
on the world's largest marketplace,
Amazon, with a turnover of more than 30 billion.
If I'm not mistaken.
There, she wants to buy educational materials
for her children
and a unicorn print swimmering for a miner.
The Latvian bank's swed bank,
which is a resident bank in Latvia,
refuses this transaction,
claiming it is a suspicious transaction
very likely related to terrorism
and a threat to the state of Latvia.
The total value of this suspicious transaction
was about 30 euros.
While multinational corporations move millions
without anyone daring to investigate or prosecute them,
the law becomes not a shield for society,
but a sword aimed at its own people,
selectively enforced to protect the powerful
and punish the powerless.
Dehumanization.
Small businesses are portrayed as fraudsters,
tax dodgers, or relics of the past.
Here is an article in a Latvian mainstream portal.
The headline says that the state revenue service
has started chasing mushroom and berry sellers
along the roadsides.
This shows how the state's administrative resources
are being directed toward destroying
the local people of Latvia, driving them into poverty.
One member of parliament even went so far
as to call all Latvians living in rural areas dishonest.
If the people living in these rural regions
became honest in every aspect,
then perhaps there would be a chance for development.
Maybe even for something as simple as a store.
The state revenue service asks me,
how did you find the company from which you bought the printer?
Why did you buy that printer?
A huge amount of time is wasted on correspondence
with the tax authority.
And by law, we even have to calculate labor taxes
on the time spent writing these replies
about buying a printer.
Meanwhile, foreign companies are celebrated
as drivers of growth and pillars of the economy.
Organization, state agencies, banks, and regulatory bodies
are used to systematically exhaust
and eliminate local competition through endless audits,
account closures, and bureaucratic traps.
About a month ago, I was sitting and having coffee
with a major taxpayer, a local Latvian citizen
and company owner, whose business holds not the largest,
but the second largest share of the entire market
in his sector in Latvia.
And he told me this,
I set up a company in Finland for a very simple reason,
because in Finland, I can make bank transfers.
Here I have to speak in censored words,
better that way, right?
The brutes from the state revenue service mocked and mocked,
carried out audit after audit on order
until the company was shut down.
For the past three years, I've had a business in Estonia
and honestly, it's like paradise.
I invite all Latvians to move to Estonia.
If you work normally there, nobody bothers you.
There was a time when I would punch those
who said this country.
I used to say our country,
but now I myself say this country.
Polarization, the media fuels public resentment,
convincing society that local producers
are incompetent or dishonest,
while foreign capital is the only path to progress.
In recent years, there was a notable case in Latvia,
the bankruptcy of the small local restaurant Kinfield.
The company was essentially forced to shut down
for one simple reason.
It tried to pay all of its taxes in Latvia.
Look at how blatantly a member of parliament polarizes,
describing a local restaurant owned by a young woman
as ordinary and bad example,
while calling KFC and McDonald's
unique and innovative restaurant concepts.
An example, Kinfield.
In my opinion, this is not a good example.
Why is it not a good example?
Because it is not a unique product.
It has nothing to do with innovation.
If, for instance, we had another KFC or another McDonald's,
well, that would be a significantly different matter.
Unbelievable.
Local restaurant dismissed by the member of parliament
as nothing special, not innovative,
while praising KFC and McDonald's as if they were.
This shows just how deep the foreign lobby's influence runs.
What he cannot grasp is that in Latvia,
no strong international company can ever be born.
Because small businesses here face a tax burden
up to 50 times heavier than the one
carried by global corporations
with powerful foreign backers.
What should the tax burden look like?
Let's take Poland as an example.
In Poland, agricultural businesses pay no taxes at all.
A 0% rate on income up to 12,000 euros.
From 12,000 euros to 20,000 euros, the rate is just 2%.
And gradually, step by step,
a small business can grow into a large one.
The same principles should be applied in Latvia.
What remains for the small entrepreneur
after paying taxes is nothing more than a hole in a bagel.
We must support our entrepreneurs,
and we must never allow such a policy to continue.
Preparation.
The government adopts laws and standards so burdensome
that small enterprises cannot possibly comply.
Farmers and shop owners are pushed into dependency
on subsidies just to survive.
And the final push before leaving the country
is given by politicians who openly declare
that small business in Latvia should be shut down.
A business that cannot pay all its taxes,
unfortunately, has no right to exist.
For people who are themselves small entrepreneurs,
it is absolutely clear that in Latvia,
it is impossible for small business to pay all the taxes.
That is why, in the view of corrupt politicians
under foreign lobby influence and dishonest media,
small business has no right to exist.
And these are the consequences.
People are forced to leave their homeland in massive numbers.
Persecution.
Those who resist or speak out, face fines,
license cancellations, targeted inspections,
and public shaming until they either close their businesses
or leave the country.
They came and blocked the accounts
without any explanation, without any official decision.
Together with my lawyer,
we immediately rushed to the state revenue service.
There sits their arrogant lawyer,
openly laughing in our faces.
I had it all recorded.
She laughed and said,
yes, we block accounts like this all over Latvia.
No decision is needed.
I said, how can it not be needed?
I want to appeal the account freeze.
And she sneered loudly.
Wasn't it enough that we told you verbally?
That's how it happens here.
No, nirts, pilna balsi.
Finally, the market, resources, and political influence
are fully captured by foreign capital.
Over 400,000 people,
roughly a quarter of Latvia's population,
have left the country.
Of my classmates, 60 to 70% now live abroad.
They have left and have no intention of coming back.
Here, people can only afford minimum wages.
Walking down the street is hard.
Living day by day is hard
when you see the conditioned people are in.
Most of my friends are abroad,
and when I visit them and ask,
they say they don't want to come back at all.
I could say I have no friends left for my school days.
So many have left abroad.
The countryside itself feels empty,
as if it has died out.
Villages are empty, small shops shuttered,
and the nation's economic sovereignty erased.
The ultimate form of control is not over one nation,
one culture, or one political opposition.
It is control over every living being on the planet.
Geoengineering bypasses political borders,
ethnic divisions, and national laws.
It is war on a planetary scale,
carried out without declaring war.
Across Latvia and across the world,
airplanes trace silent white lines across the sky.
Officially, they are contrails,
but behind these streaks lie deliberate,
global, militarily coordinated, and covert programs.
These operations happen without public consent,
without scientific transparency,
and without any accountability.
Geoengineering manipulates clouds,
rainfall, and sunlight itself.
It alters the composition of the air we breathe,
the water we drink, and the soil that grows our food.
This is no longer theory.
Thousands of independent scientists,
journalists, and whistleblowers have sounded the alarm.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,
serving as the U.S. Secretary of Health,
has publicly named DARPA,
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,
as a key player in these operations.
My biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections
that are continuously peppered on us every day.
Bromium, aluminum, strontium, it's sprayed in our skies.
All day long.
And I know you've talked to Dane Wiggington about this.
He seems to be one of the experts in the field.
Is there a question?
Yes, how do we stop it?
That is not happening in my agency.
We don't do that.
It's done, we think, by DARPA.
And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel.
Yes, sir.
You know, those materials are put in the jet fuel.
I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it.
We're bringing on somebody who's going to think
only about that, find out who's doing it
and holding them accountable.
That means the involvement of military structures
in geoengineering is no longer a theory.
It is an admission.
This is no longer speculation.
This is no longer a conspiracy theory.
This is now an official statement
from a member of the United States government,
an official acknowledgment of one of the greatest
crimes against humanity ever conceived.
When governments themselves confirmed
what was once dismissed as fiction,
the world can no longer pretend not to know.
The skies above us are being weaponized,
in secret, without consent,
and under the banner of public good.
This is the moment when denial ends.
When governments admit to poisoning the skies,
it becomes clear genocide no longer wears a uniform.
It wears a suit.
In 1962, long before the public heard terms like geoengineering,
the idea was already being spoken openly,
not in secret labs, but on a university stage in Texas
by a man destined to become president.
And now United States Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson
stood before graduating students
and declared that same vision.
A world where satellites map every cloud
and weather itself can be shaped, steered, and controlled.
Then he delivered the line that still echoes today.
He who controls the weather will control the world.
It lays the verdict in the foundation
for the development of a weather satellite
that will permit man to determine
the world's cloud layer,
and ultimately to control the weather.
And he who controls the weather will control the world.
And here is the detailed history rarely lingers on.
The man who warned that he who controls the weather
will control the world became president
of the United States within hours
of John F. Kennedy's assassination.
Sworn in on Air Force One the very same day.
Before the word chem trail existed,
before anyone thought to call it a conspiracy,
the United States was already producing educational films
explaining how to see clouds, divert storms,
and dampen hurricanes.
This 1959 Disney film wasn't classified,
it was public relations.
A friendly reminder that nature
would soon follow human command.
Today that film sounds less like optimism
and more like a confession hidden in plain sight.
The hurricane is predicted to take.
These artificial clouds will block the sun
from evaporating more water to feed the hurricane.
The reports coming into the control center
indicate that the diversionary cloud seeding
over Kansas is now creating a flood danger.
Specially equipped robot aircraft are dispatched immediately
to release a high concentration
of cloud seeding material into the fringes of the storm.
Heavier seeding from the ground
also helps to subdue the rain
by spreading it over a wider area.
The controller calls for another view of the hurricane
which has now moved closer to the coast.
If this was the public facing technology of 1959,
if school children were casually shown
how hurricanes could be steered and rain redistributed,
then what does the classified version look like in 2025?
What tools exist now
after 66 years of funding, secrecy,
and military advancement?
What are they quietly doing now, above our heads,
without a Disney narrator to explain it?
Most likely the development of Chemtrail
and geoengineering technologies
has followed the same trajectory
as every other military and atmospheric system,
from crude and visible to refined
and increasingly invisible.
Some earlier interventions may still create visible patterns
under certain atmospheric conditions,
but modern upgraded geoengineering methods
now operate at particle sizes and dispersion scales
the human eye cannot detect.
Stratospheric aerosol injections,
cloud micro-physics manipulation,
and marine cloud brightening
can all be deployed with techniques that leave little
and sometimes nothing visible in the sky.
And the more advanced the technology becomes,
the less we can rely on our eyes to detect it.
That is the point.
Today's atmosphere can be engineered
without producing any obvious trace at all.
Let that sink in.
The frontier of geoengineering
may already be operating beyond human sight.
If intelligent beings ever visited Earth,
they wouldn't need advanced instruments
to assess our condition.
One glance would be enough,
a species poisoning its own habitat,
methodically, elegantly, almost ritualistically,
while insisting that everything is fine.
We poison the air we breathe, the water we drink,
the food we eat, the medicine we trust,
and the very mind we use to understand the world.
And we do it so quietly, so bureaucratically,
that most people don't even notice.
This isn't chaos, this is policy.
Intimate form of poisoning begins on our plates.
Crops are sprayed with chemicals designed to kill,
not one chemical, hundreds, layered, combined,
interacting in ways no regulatory agency
has ever actually tested.
Glyphosate in the fields, atrazine in the rivers,
neonicotinoids killing the soil life beneath our feet.
Animals raised in factory farms
are pumped full of antibiotics,
not because they're sick,
but because the conditions are so unnatural
that they would die without them.
Those antibiotics then pass into the meat,
into the soil, into the water, into our children,
fueling antibiotic resistance
that threatens the entire medical system.
The seeds themselves are engineered to be dependent,
sterile hybrids, chemical dependent varieties,
patents replacing nature.
Farmers no longer own their harvest, corporations do.
And when the food finally reaches the processing stage,
the assault becomes almost artistic,
artificial colors, synthetic flavors,
preservatives, emulsifiers, stabilizers,
thousands of chemical additives
never meant for human biology.
High fructose corn syrup rewires metabolism.
Cheap seed oils ignite chronic inflammation,
trans fats clog arteries.
Ultra processed foods hijack dopamine pathways
more efficiently than some street drugs.
This isn't nutrition.
It's a slow motion experiment in mass chemical exposure
and the population is the study group.
The attack does not stop at the dinner table.
It follows us into our lungs.
Industrial pollution, diesel exhaust,
volatile organic compounds, micro plastics in the air,
invisible particles small enough to pass through the lungs,
enter the bloodstream and reach the brain.
Inside our homes, the air is often worse.
Synthetic fragrances, plastic off-gassing,
mold spores, chemical cleaners, flame retardant dust.
This exposure is constant, unavoidable, normalized.
We breathe it, animals breathe it, children breathe it.
Breathing used to be simple, now it's an act of faith.
Water, once the planet's great purifier,
now carries our collective waste.
The oceans are filled with plastic,
not only bottles, but particles so small
they slip through filters, enter fish,
enter humans, enter unborn babies.
Nanoplastics have been found in blood, lungs,
placentas, and even brain tissue.
Municipal systems add chemicals in the name of safety.
Fluoride, still contested.
Chlorine, necessary but forming carcinogenic byproducts.
Pharmaceutical residues, anti-depressants,
birth control hormones, antibiotics,
all passing through wastewater
into rivers and drinking supplies.
And then there are the pipes themselves.
Old cities deliver water laced with lead.
New cities deliver water flowing through plastic systems
that leach micro-particles.
Water was once our teacher in purity.
Now it's a mirror reflecting our negligence.
Beyond what we eat, drink, and breathe
lies a new frontier, the world of invisible frequencies.
Never in human history have we been surrounded
by this many artificial signals.
Radio, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 4G, 5G,
thousands of satellite beams crossing the sky,
towers rise beside playgrounds,
routers pulse beside beds,
phones radiate in pockets against skulls
on nightstands inches from sleeping children.
No long-term global safety studies,
no public consent, just deployment.
We live in a permanently electrified soup
of microwave radiation, untested, unregulated,
and inescapable.
Future generations will ask
how an entire civilization rolled this out
without a single precautionary conversation.
The answer is simple,
because convenience sells faster than science.
And then there is the system that was supposed to protect us.
Hospitals have become part of a medical-industrial complex
where treatment can be more profitable than prevention,
where chronic disease is a business model,
where pharmaceutical companies shape demand
through marketing, incentives, and influence,
weakening the doctor-patient relationship.
Drugs with devastating side effects
are pushed aggressively,
some are withdrawn years later,
but only after destroying lives.
Entire populations have been caught
in waves of pharmaceutical dependency,
not through criminal cartels,
but through corporate strategies,
regulatory capture, and sales targets.
Preventable deaths in hospitals
now rank among the leading causes of death
in developed countries.
Medical error has become systemic.
This is not healing.
This is dependency disguised as care.
But the most dangerous poisons
are not swallowed or inhaled.
They are absorbed through the eyes and ears.
For the first time in history,
a small group of corporations
controls almost all global information,
what we read, what we see,
what we are allowed to know.
Not by censorship alone,
but through algorithms that shape reality quietly,
invisibly, constantly.
Social media platforms engineer addiction with precision.
Endless scrolling rewires the brain.
Notifications trigger dopamine cycles.
Data profiles predict our fears and desires
better than we do.
Mainstream media manufactures narratives.
Fact checkers neutralize dissent.
Censorship masquerades as safety.
Public opinion is no longer organic.
It is engineered.
And this is the genius of the system.
When you control the mind,
you don't need chains.
People police each other.
People censor themselves.
People defend the very structures that exploit them.
That is the deepest poison of all.
Look at each of these domains separately
and you see problems.
Look at them together and you see a system.
A system that poisons the food,
the air, the water, the medicine in the mind.
A system that weakens populations slowly,
subtly, predictably.
A system so normalized that most people defend it.
No gas chambers, no firing squads,
no armies marching through villages,
just policies, just experts,
just institutions, just quiet harm
delivered through everyday life.
This is not genocide with rifles.
This is genocide with guidelines.
Genocide with certificates.
Genocide with compliance forms.
Genocide in a suit.
A logical question arises when we see such a targeted
and coordinated policy of destruction against the people.
Who is organizing it?
The answer lies within the structure of global finance
and international power.
Three of the world's most influential investment funds,
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street,
control more than 90% of all companies listed
on the S&P 500,
the 500 largest publicly traded corporations
in the United States.
Together, they manage over 20 trillion euros,
more than the combined budgets
of every government on earth.
They are not merely financial players,
they set the direction of global politics,
shape media narratives, control the pharmaceutical
industry and dictate economic models
applied almost everywhere,
especially in small nations like Latvia.
British medical doctor, Tess Laurie,
once a consultant to the World Health Organization,
now exposes how this system of control,
the modern genocide, truly operates.
Our governments are not in control of policy
right now, of health policy,
and it's really important to understand this.
Our governments are enforcing policies
that come from policy distributors
like the World Health Organization,
the United Nations, the World Bank.
But they are, the World Health Organization
is not making its policies either.
The policies are coming from these so-called think tanks
that think on behalf of the corporations.
So they think that the policy makers are
organizations like the World Economic Forum,
Chatham House, the Council of Foreign Relations,
the Rockefeller Foundation, the Club of Rome.
These organizations are thinking for our governments.
Years before COVID,
a major policy-shaping institution
had already incorporated a pandemic scenario
into its planning, openly.
The Rockefeller Foundation published it in 2010.
Yes, you heard that right, 2010.
Here's a direct excerpt from the chapter titled,
Lockstep.
The pandemic that the world had been anticipating
for years finally hit.
Even the most pandemic-prepared nations
were quickly overwhelmed
as the virus spread around the world.
During the pandemic, national leaders flexed their authority,
imposing airtight rules and restrictions
from mandatory masks to body temperature checks
at the entrances of train stations and supermarkets.
Many people later wondered,
how could governments across the entire world
react in almost exactly the same way?
Now you know why.
Latvia's government integrated into these global structures
through banks, international institutions,
investment treaties, and lobbying networks
acts as a local executor of global directives.
The result, centralized, systematic pressure
on the nation's health, freedom, family values,
economy, and environment.
Unlike the fascists or communists
who impose their ideology openly
with flags, slogans, and tanks,
the globalists operate in secrecy
with cunning precision and staggering hypocrisy.
They capture minds through media,
buy governments with financial leverage,
and rewrite laws through corporate lobbying.
When people talk about genocide,
they imagine a villain, a mastermind,
a cabal in shadows pulling the strings.
And yes, there are architects of this system,
cold, calculating, ruthless.
But here is the truth no one wants to say out loud.
They are not the only force.
The other force is us.
Yes, you, me, the ordinary citizen,
because no tyranny survives on brutality alone.
It survives on cooperation, on obedience, on silence,
on millions of small psychological choices
people make every day when they see something wrong
and do nothing.
Genocide in a suit is not powered
only by the globalists who design it.
It is powered by the minds that accept it,
justify it, and sometimes even defend it.
And that is the most uncomfortable truth of all.
The system needs our psychology
more than it needs its power.
If the mind submits, the body follows.
And the system wins without lifting a finger.
In the famous Ash experiment,
the setup was deceptively simple.
Three people sat in a room, a bell rang,
and everyone stood up.
The bell rang again and everyone sat down.
Then came the real participant, the next person.
He wasn't paid to play along.
He wasn't told this was an experiment.
He simply joined the group.
The bell rang, everyone stood up, so did he.
The bell rang again, everyone sat down, so did he.
What he didn't know was this.
The bell was no longer connected to anything.
There was no rule, no instruction, no reason.
Yet when the bell rang, three out of four participants
continued to stand up and sit down.
Not because it made sense, not because it was required,
but because everyone else did it.
Not believing felt safer than questioning.
Standing out felt more dangerous than obeying.
This is the first psychological tool of modern control.
Make obedience collective and people will obey without force.
Replace the bell with a regulation,
a mandate, a social rule, a narrative.
If everyone stands up, who am I to stay seated?
At that moment, behavior replaces thought.
Compliance replaces truth.
In obedience, no longer needs explanation.
The second mechanism comes from Stanley Milgram.
Participants were told to administer electric shocks
to a stranger in another room.
They heard screams, begging, silence.
But the man in the white lab coat simply said,
the experiment requires you to continue,
and people continued.
Two thirds of them delivered what they believed
were lethal shocks, not because they were evil,
but because an authority figure told them to.
Milgram proved a brutal truth.
Ordinary people will commit extraordinary harm
when they believe responsibility belongs to someone else.
Cup.
That's wrong, 225 volts.
He's in a lot of pain.
Continue, please.
But he's not comfortable.
We must continue to the end of the experiment.
The lower lights are a lot less to go on
until he's learnt the words correctly.
That's wrong, 240 volts.
This is how modern systems operate.
Experts in suits issue orders.
Bureau crats follow protocols.
Citizens obey rules they never questioned.
No one feels responsible.
Everyone feels justified, and the harm multiplies.
The third mechanism is called Stockholm syndrome.
It is not a mystery, it is a survival strategy.
When a person is trapped in a hostile system
they cannot escape,
the mind slowly begins to identify with the captor.
It becomes safer to agree than to resist.
Safer to praise than to question.
Safer to say, I'm fine, then I'm being crushed.
We are sometimes asked, can it be without value added tax?
We say no, that would undermine our moral standards.
VAT has to be paid, and we can't do it any other way.
Honestly, I don't even know how it would work,
and I don't want to know.
This is why modern citizens proudly defend
the very systems that exploit them.
Why people who can barely survive under taxation say,
I pay everything, I am the good one.
It is not virtue, it is trauma.
Because admitting the truth,
this system is designed so I cannot survive,
is emotionally unbearable.
So the mind invents a story, I am honest,
I am moral, I am loyal.
In reality, this is not loyalty,
it is psychological captivity.
There is a moment every small business owner knows,
the numbers don't add up, the work is endless,
the money is not enough, the system is impossible.
But saying it out loud feels like failure,
so the mind invents a heroic version.
I'm a good citizen, I pay everything,
I'm doing the right thing.
Ego becomes anesthesia,
self-deception becomes painkiller.
Reality is too painful,
so people build moral monuments on top of their chains.
When reality is unbearable,
the mind switches to positive illusion mode.
I create my own reality, everything is possible.
You just need the right mindset.
Think positive, the universe will fix it.
These phrases are not evil,
they are shields.
Because the alternative would be too heavy.
I work 12 hours a day and I still can't survive.
The system is rigged against me.
I am drowning, but I must pretend I'm thriving.
The mind chooses illusion because illusion hurts less.
And eventually, people stop fighting,
even after the cage is open.
This is known as learned helplessness,
one of the darkest psychological mechanisms
ever identified.
When an animal is subjected to unpredictable punishment,
shocks, stress, pain,
and no amount of effort changes the outcome,
it eventually stops trying.
Even when the cage door is opened, it does not move.
Humans behave the same way.
When citizens spend years battling bureaucracy,
years drowning in debt,
years being punished simply for surviving,
they stop believing that change is possible.
They stop resisting.
They stop questioning.
They stop hoping.
They don't say, I'm oppressed.
They say, this is just how things are.
Nothing can change.
That is an apathy that is conditioning.
Put these psychological mechanisms together
and you get a population that defends the system
that exploits them, obeys without being asked,
repeats the majority's lie,
and feels moral pride in their own suffering.
This is why silent genocide works,
not with violence, but with psychology.
A population that rejects its own perception
is already conquered.
A population that obeys authority
without question is already controlled.
A population that justifies harm
and feels helpless is already enslaved.
No chains are necessary.
The prison is internal.
240 volts.
People will police themselves.
They will shame dissent.
They will attack truth-tellers.
They will defend their captors.
They will call their chains responsibility.
They will call their submission morality.
Continue, please.
He's not comfortable.
He must continue to be an experimenter.
This is the deeper cause of silent genocide.
A population whose psychology has been trained to comply.
Because once the mind submits, the body follows.
Society follows.
History follows.
And the genocide in a suit continues.
Not because the system is powerful,
but because people have been trained
to stand up when the bell rings,
to sit down when it rings again
and never ask why the bell is ringing at all.
When a population has been conditioned this way,
one last mechanism takes control.
Up to this point, we have examined
the eight silent stages of genocide.
The stages that prepare the ground
quietly, legally, methodically.
In the ninth stage, extermination,
the only stage most people ever recognize.
For most, extermination is where genocide ends.
But according to Gregory Stanton, it does not.
There is a 10th stage.
It is called denial.
And this is the stage we are living in now.
The ninth stage is not finished.
Extermination is still unfolding.
And at the same time, the 10th stage,
denial, is already fully active.
Denial does not arrive decades later in history books.
It operates in real time.
It sounds like we followed the science.
Responsibility dissolved into procedure.
It sounds like correlation is not causation.
Used not to investigate, but to end the conversation.
It looks like excess deaths acknowledged,
but never explained.
It looks like decisions made collectively,
so no one is accountable.
It looks like the quiet insistence
that it's time to move on.
Governments dismiss inconvenient facts.
Institutions launder language.
Officials insist nothing unusual occurred.
Media looks away.
And ordinary people choose not to see
what is directly in front of them.
Evidence is minimized.
Responsibility is diffused.
Questions are treated as threats.
This is the 10th stage of genocide.
Denial.
Not after the crime is over,
but while it is still happening.
And when denial succeeds,
the crime does not need to stop.
It only needs to be forgotten.
This is how conquest looks in the 21st century.
Invisible, profitable, and legal.
Fascists burned books.
Globalists erased voices
with algorithms and media control.
Communists confiscated property.
Globalists drive people into debt
until they sell it themselves.
Fascists built concentration camps.
Globalists confined the non-compliant
with vaccine certificates and digital IDs.
Communists forced people into collective farms.
Globalists forced them into lifetime debt
and financial submission.
Fascists shut down newspapers.
Globalists own nearly every major media platform.
Communists hunted opposition with the secret police.
Globalists do it with censorship,
reputational destruction, and banking blacklists.
Fascists banned free-spirited education.
Globalists rewrite curricula, distort history,
erase gender, and erode family values.
Communists closed churches.
Globalists replace faith
with technocratic trust in science.
Fascists ordered doctors to serve the regime.
Globalists silenced doctors
with the threat of losing their license or their career.
Communists relocated entire populations.
Globalists create the conditions
where people flee their own homeland by choice.
The methods have changed.
The slogans have changed.
But the outcome is the same.
The destruction of human freedom, dignity, and life itself.
And still, people vote for the very parties
that carry out these policies, genocide parties,
simply because most cannot even recognize
the genocide being waged against them.
Genocide happens when people remain silent,
when people are afraid, when they have lost hope,
or when they are simply too tired to resist.
Genocide is not just a moral wrong.
It is one of the gravest crimes against humanity.
Under international law, anyone who plans, commits,
or supports genocide is criminally liable
with no statute of limitations.
From Nuremberg to Rwanda, justice has no expiry date.
And one day, the names of those responsible will be spoken.
Not in whispers, but in courtrooms.
Genocide enters our lives quietly
through laws, bureaucracy, media silence,
and the illusion of democracy.
But no law can turn injustice into justice.
No law can make betrayal honorable.
No law can make silence an excuse.
Genocide can be legal.
Only the people can stop it.
Stopping it begins with recognition, with truth,
with the courage to call things by their real names,
with the vision to see that behind these destructive decisions
are living human beings, families, language, land,
children, and our very sense of identity.
If we remain silent, we allow it.
If we stand up, it ends.
A nation that recognizes genocide
is a nation that is reborn.
It is time to understand.
We are living under globalist terror,
not with tanks and guns, but with crushing debt,
censorship algorithms, and forced technocracy
disguised as noble slogans of democracy.
Modern democracy has become a wolf in sheep's clothing,
a different form for the same old goal
that once humiliated our ancestors
under the communist fist and the fascist boot.
They spoke different languages and waved different flags.
But their aim was the same, to subjugate people,
to suppress nations, to seize resources, to erase freedom.
None of these regimes is better than the other.
They all hate what they cannot control.
Life, truth, and a people who refuse to bow.
Perhaps the right question is no longer
whether genocide is happening here.
The question is, will we stop it?
Reject the lies.
Expose the truth.
Stop the slaughter.
Help the harmed.
Forgive the truly repentant.
Identify the crimes.
Name the crime.
You can argue that they are to blame.
Allow themselves to be contained inside your mind.
Hold the key.
Step into freedom.