All rights reserved, we reserve all rights.
Many globe proponents either purposely, falsely, or ignorantly claim
Alex Gleason's map is a globe projection unwrapped into a two-dimensional circle
with the Fantasy Island Antarctica continent shorelines wrapped around it.
Let's put that fallacy to rest right now.
Alex Gleason was a vehement flat-earther, and in his own words, his map was not a globe projection.
It's a geocentric flat plane featuring a small and local sun.
This is the 1893 book he wrote.
Is the Bible from heaven?
Is the Earth a globe?
Completely destroying the heliocentric model using real science.
Which we'll get into in detail.
Gleason made our 24-hour sun work perfectly on his map, along with the solstices and tropics.
He states very clearly that the sun moves over our Earth, winding in and out of the tropics,
creating the solstices and seasons.
He literally drew them in the bottom left corner and bottom right corner of his map,
and wrote about them extensively from pages 317 to 329 in his book.
How can this be a globe projection for the heliocentric model when it's
depicting a geocentric sun not once, but twice?
You can't even make it make sense.
Facts are facts, and the facts say this is a map of a geocentric plane made by a flat
Earther.
Read it for yourself.
Ironically, these same people who have not even read Gleason's books and claim his map
is their globe projection stretched out in one breath, in the other breath say the flat Earth
Gleason's map is dead after the final experiment and alleged 24-hour sun.
So they contradict themselves and surrender all evidence of any logical thinking ability,
admitting they killed their own globe model.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Firstly, I appreciate and welcome the critique and challenges that I asked for in parts 1 and 2
with people claiming base altitudes, mountain ranges between azimuths, time zones, etc.
may account for the impossible sun times I exposed and questioned.
And yes, I openly admit I had not researched that possibility at the time, and now I have,
so I will show you in detail later in this film that those only strengthen my case, not weaken it.
So thank you, I have nothing to hide, only to reveal.
Also a quick shout out and apology to Level Earth Observer for unwittingly using his
VapeGate thumbnail graphic in part 1 to make fun of VapeGators when in fact his actual video behind
the thumbnail was actually challenging them as well. I'm sorry and go sub to his channel, it's excellent.
The globe model claims the Earth has a circumference of 24,901 miles around the equator,
a diameter across either side of 7,917 miles and a radius from center to edge
between 3,963 miles across the equator to 3,950 miles equator to pole due to their alleged
oblate spheroid, which we're told the Earth allegedly deviates from a perfect sphere by
only one third of 1%, which supports a spherical model in most contexts and so it will do for debunking it.
When we pull up the state engineering and surveyor profile map of the canals and locks
of the state of New York and look at the Erie Canal running from Lake Erie to the Hudson River,
we can see the surveyors elevation of the water's surface and length of each level
or distance in miles between each lock on the Erie Canal as well as the altitude of each level
above the tide water at Albany. We're interested in two places here. Lockport lock is at mile 321,
there and Rochester lock is at mile 259, there. 321 minus 259 makes that stretch 62 miles long
but Lockport's elevation above tide water at Albany is 512 feet, there and Rochester's is
only 509 feet, there showing the water down that whole 62 mile stretch only descends 3 feet from Lockport
to Rochester. If the Earth were a globe 24,901 miles in circumference and proper allowance made
for curvature, there would be a divergency from either end to end of each other of 2,562 feet 8
inches or rather the apex of the arc of that 62 miles would have to be one fourth of that
divergency meaning 640 feet of fall in both directions from the 31 mile midpoint between
them to either side 640 feet that way and 640 feet that way or rather if we lived on a globe
they would have had to have dug down 640 feet deep at the 31 mile middle point of these two locks
and then dig level from each end to meet it in the middle in order to make this canal nearly
level but they didn't do that and yet there are only three feet difference in elevation as I'll show
you why. The next longest level on the Erie Canal is between Syracuse and York Mills Syracuse is at
mile 166 there and York Mills at mile 113 there 166 minus 113 is 53 miles between them
and yet the surveyors theodolite and transit level have both ends at just under 427 feet
above tide water at Albany so there isn't even a three-foot drop here just flat as a pancake with
zero locks or gates for 53 miles there should be a divergency of over 52 miles of 1802 feet 8
inches or rather again an intervening convex apex of that arc again always one-fourth the
divergency sloping at 450 feet 8 inches between them if the earth were a sphere and 24,901
miles in circumference but no nothing flat as a pancake here too they did not have to dig down
450 feet at the 26 mile center point between the two locks and then dig level from each end to the
middle our flat level earth already did it for them long before their engineers ever came along
and since these two canals cannot exist on this globe but yet there they are provably
flat as a pancake on the ground where we live not in the sky where we don't live we can't be
on a globe whether you saw a light in the sky in Antarctica or not and therefore fantasy
island cannot exist as claimed period in fact a datum horizontal line is used in
surveying and engineering for measuring distances accurately like here where you have a ground
changing in different elevations it gives you a medium reference to make sure your lighthouse
doesn't look like the leaning tower of Pisa and fall into the water in the British house of common
standing orders i.e the law order number 55 states that when building anything plans have to show
the surface of the ground marked on it the intended level and a datum horizontal line that datum line
shall be the same throughout the whole length of the work and in the case of long projects like a
waterway cut public carriage road a railway a tram road it has to be near one of the termini
the beginning or the end in other words it's against the law to assume a curved earth
over long distance engineering projects so in order to have their cake and eat it too
as is the case in 100 mile long waterways like the Suez canal they have come up with the theory of
equipotential water and gravity to defy logic observation and physics the Suez canal is
around 100 miles long of dead level surface water from the red sea to the Mediterranean sea
and no locks or allowance was made for earth's curvature in its construction it's simply a flat
continuation from sea to shining sea geometry alert don't tune out we'll explain this simply
together let's say the blue arc from the red sea a to the Mediterranean sea e represents the 100
miles Suez canal on a globe and this is not in scale 100 miles is obviously not one eighth of
the alleged 24,900 miles of circumference on the globe model but if this were in scale
based on the alleged earth's circumference the standard 8 inches per mile squared curve
calculation over 100 miles used by navigators surveyors map makers engineers etc which yes
only works for one quarter of a circumference as it calculates drop and divergence away from you
not convergence back towards you on a circle but since that one quarter of 24,900
miles would be 6,225 miles that this formula does work for and we're only talking about the
measly 100 mile Suez canal that would put the total length of an alleged curve of the Suez
canal as having gone down from the red sea to the Mediterranean sea 6,666 feet 8 inches over 100
miles or if you prefer to flip it this way the red sea has gone down 6,666 feet 8 inches
from the Mediterranean sea but really it hasn't because geometrically straight down is the
shortest distance between two points a straight line which would actually be the green intersecting
line between them a the red sea and e the Mediterranean sea other than a yo-yo playing
card boomerang or paper airplane affected by another external so-called force like aerodynamics
if you drop something it doesn't go out away from you towards the kitchen wall
for the first half of its fall and then come back in towards your feet for the second half of the
fall it drops in a straight line from your hand point a to your feet point e so you could say
on a globe a the red sea doesn't actually drop 6,666 feet 8 inches to e the Mediterranean sea
it first goes up from a to the 50 mile yellow point b in the middle of the Suez canal and then drops
again to point e or vice versa since if you take the straight green horizontal datum line
and green point b between points a and e it is obvious yellow b is higher than green b
on the straight path between a and e or e and a so both of those green and yellow bs are on
what's called the cord or convexity of the entire 100 mile distance of alleged arc between the red
c point a and Mediterranean c point e done by taking the green horizontal datum line between them
and drawing intersecting identical angled and equidistant lines from the dead center of your
circle or alleged globes latitude and longitude zero point shown as red point z down there at
the equator as we go up what's called the vertical from the equator red z to our start point of the
Suez canal a we see that the yellow line from a to f on the vertical is perpendicular to the end of
the Suez canal measuring point e and we notice the distance between yellow b on the alleged curve
and green b on the horizontal datum line between them drawn in orange is roughly one
fourth the distance from a to f and since we know the total feet of curve over the 100 mile
alleged blue arc from the red c a to Mediterranean c e at eight inches per mile squared is 6666 feet
eight inches then one fourth of that gives us 1666 and a half feet of convexity at the 50 mile
Suez canal center yellow point b from either b to the red c a or b to the Mediterranean c e
so to make the Suez canal perfectly level for 100 miles on a globe you would have to dig down
its 50 mile midway point at yellow b to green b 1666 and a half feet and then you'd be digging
down 416 feet at points d and h one fourth of that arc between a and b or b and e but they didn't
not a single lock for 100 miles because apparently globes and water on them only
curve on basic paper geometry not in reality ironically true because there is no curve
or globe in reality so they say oh well the surface of the water is equipotential it has
roughly the same distance to the earth's center of gravity so it's not necessary to dig 1666 feet
in the middle of the Suez canal or adjust for points d or h or anything in between
but gravity is just a theory by newton reworked into another theory by einstein neither of them a fact
yet standing at point b on top of a round hill and clearly seeing your friend waving up to you
from point a down below you is reality not theory and i'm sorry if this were a hill and you
were standing over here at a and your friend was standing over here at e and you wanted to
walk straight to each other level without your legs burning from having to climb up this hill to point b
or stop yourself running down the other side you have to dig a tunnel straight through line c
yet the horizontal datum line of the Suez canal is only 26 feet below the Mediterranean
and is continued level from one seat of the other and the surface water runs level and
parallel with this datum line even a three year old child could tell you that blue curved line
is not the same as that green straight line facts are facts jack jack and jill ran straight
through a hill to fetch a pail of water jack fell down as his face smashed the mound
and jill was a flat earther after no steve water is theoretically equipotential based on theoretical
gravity theory always trumps fact but even if you allow them their ridiculous equipotential
water theory railways mountain tunnels and undersea cables are not the london and
c to d is the horizontal datum line from the level of the river tames in london at d to the
level of the mercy river in liverpool which all their elevations were measured to build the railway
this half cut cross shows liverpool mercy river there on the left and all of the
surveying elevations and hills going across to the railway midpoint at birmingham all the
way on the right compared to their horizontal datum line below h is the middle station at birmingham
with an elevation of 240 feet above their horizontal datum line below meaning they measured
it and at 240 feet above the level of the river tames just like with the suez canal but this
is a railroad track not magical gravity water if the earth were a globe then as we see here
the datum line over 180 miles would have to be the cord of the arc blue d to d to d
so the summit of the arc at birmingham would have to be 5400 feet above the horizontal datum line
denoting the trinity high watermark at london bridge over the tames but nope the engineers measure
it at 240 feet impossible on a globe yet there it is in reality not a trick of the eyes or perspective
not magic gravity water just cold hard steel ground and fact then in 1869 the uk admiralty navy
surveyed the ocean bottom from valencia on the western coast of ireland the yellow b on the right
to trinity bay and newfoundland the light blue a on the left and laid a transatlantic cable with a
steamship c to d is the green datum horizontal line their survey and steamship charts showed the
distance to be 1665 nautical miles or 1,942 standard miles to figure out how much cable
they needed the greatest depth found was here in blue at 2,422 fathoms times six gives you 14,554
feet deep the next deepest section was the red line at 14,400 feet deep while in the middle
in the orange it's only 9,600 feet deep but if the earth is a 25,000 mile spherical globe
and the Atlantic Ocean is convex with equa potential magic gravity water as they claim
then the green horizontal datum line would be a cord to the great arc of water above it in blue
the center would stand at 628,560 feet or nearly 120 miles higher than the coasts of the two
stations at trinity bay and valencia and the greatest depth would be the center of the ocean
between the two in orange where it would be 106,310 fathoms or 637,860 feet deep but nope
it was measured at only 9,600 feet deep in reality it should also be bloody obvious that the
distance of that blue line around the basketball call that the alleged globe water surface is longer
than the green line around the much smaller volleyball call that the alleged globe ocean
floor so even withstanding the elevation changes on the ocean floor below it's obvious the
distance across the ocean floor would be much shorter than the distance over the surface
but in the published report the opposite happened the steamership that laid the cable
went 1,665 miles yet laid 1,852 miles of cable impossible on a globe not a trick of the eyes
a light in the sky or magic gravity water just cold steel ocean floor cable in fact
we could sit here all day and show example after example of this but there's no need since none of
this can exist on a globe yet there they all are in reality we cannot live on a globe and since
fantasy island can only exist on the globe then again whether you saw a 24 hour light in the
sky so that's the end of that nonsense not so fast the globies say we've known the earth is a globe
since at least 1482 since we still have martin eardop fells actual globe shown for real here 62
years before the 1540 formation of the Jesuits you claim invented this model a great point
and i noticed that africa southern europe and a small bit of the middle east to western india
take up half of the entire earth on his globe so i wondered how the other three fourths of the
known earth fit on the backside of this globe so i found an antique map dealer who has the entire
thing there's the front side we saw the backside of the globe is east india into southeast asia
and indonesia up to tartaria but that's none of my business with southeast asia mapped out almost
as large as africa so the red is one half the globe the yellow is the other half of the globe
and even though southeast asia and yellow is just east of africa and red apparently if you
sail due west from africa you come right back to southeast asia across the ocean so everything in
red just doesn't exist but some guy in 1482 fit everything in blue and green on a basketball in
a metal stand and that's how they knew we live on a globe how pray tell did they map out this
globe and miss three fourths of everything on it because steve you idiot they didn't discover
the west until columbus in 1498 when he sailed for the west indies 16 years after this globe proved
there was no west indies then why did he bother sailing west just to get back to indonesia
so you need to shut up and stop claiming the ancients thought we lived on a globe
as the oldest globe we have is as recent as 1482 and was not even one third of the known earth all
the way around it you can't map an alleged globe you've never even been around to clearly see it's
wrong and impossible you can't have your cake and eat it too antarctica the coldest most savage
place on earth so remote its very existence was questioned by navigators for centuries
even after it was discovered in 1820 it remained for decades terra incognita a land unknown
really a land unknown until its discovery in 1820 that's interesting because even on this fake
1482 globe right under the tropic of capricorn it says clearly circulus antarcticus the antarctic
circle a strange name for a latitude boundary to a place that doesn't allegedly get discovered until
340 years later showing precisely where its outer latitude ring is of course there is no fantasy
ice continent drawn there but they knew the circle in fact it's also clearly mapped out
just like gleason's ice wall on the 1766 dual delisle flat earth map as terra antarcticus not
terra incognito 54 years before the alleged 1820 discovery of antarctica i wonder if we're being
lied to about history to recap parts one and two in order to propagate the jesuit heliocentric
cosmology and globe model it has to have a period of constant 24 hour sun months in late october
through early february down on fantasy island aka antarctica just as it provably does in the
northern arctic circle where people actually live and witness this reality provably in the summer months
of may through august because the alleged south tip of the globe has to point at the sun on the same
23 degree tilt angle for its summer months as the alleged north tip of the globe does on its
summer months on the globe model what happens in latitude rings stays in latitude rings even its
opposite alleged northern and southern latitude ring counterparts so let's set the groundwork
for how this globe fraud and scam work in modern days via the digital santa claus fiction known
as satellite gps or global positioning system though not a globe projection gleason's map is
still a partial projection map as it says clearly on top with instructions on the back that modern
copies do not have so very few flat earthers have seen it so when it says scientifically and
practically correct as it is it means as a longitude and time calculator as it says clearly on the top
left it does not mean that the earth geometrically looks exactly like this in this shape and proportion
from an overhead view our east west longitude system could not be developed using heavenly
luminaries for east or west navigation without clocks since they are constantly moving east to west
so you can't head in the direction of a moving object so it was developed for navigation based on
fictional fixed clock times and time zones based on a 2d rectangular grid projection
of the fictional spherical globe model at least you can find north with a compass
or north star polaris by night which never moves but try finding your way north without a compass
by polaris if it was flying over your head from north to south behind you as you tried to follow
it north you wouldn't know which way to go both circles and spheres have curved lines
that do not intersect all latitude and longitude lines at perfect 90 degrees square angles
but since the latitude and longitude system is set up that way both models have to distort
their proportions with projections to accommodate that fiction the globe does it this way glissen
had to do it this way in order to fit the world's already existing almanac latitude longitude
coordinates for all places onto this circle instead of inventing an entirely new system
and coordinates that nobody is using both the globe and glissen are using 69 regular miles per
degree of latitude from the north pole to either south pole or outer ice wall on glissen's map
so compared to almanac latitude grids glissen's continents are drawn in correct proportion length
wise from inside to out but longitudinally the globe model's longitude lines converge
closer together in distance as they head from the equator towards the theoretical south pole
and fantasy island so their southern continents are always drawn skinny and pointy to accommodate this
glissen's longitude lines have to diverge the entire way out from the north pole to
accommodate the existing fictional latitude longitude grid so a degree of longitude at
the tropic of cancer is roughly 51 miles across while that same degree at the equator is now 69 miles
across then 87 miles across at the tropic of capricorn and roughly 138 and a half miles at the
outer ice wall so his continents have to be drawn or projected fatter and wider as you go further
out or south to fit the fictional grid so they are not in proportion to their latitude
like the globe the truth of what the earth actually looks like from overhead is probably
somewhere in the middle of both models that is why you can calculate a longitude distance
this way if you have the formula or even a latitude distance in yellow this way
at 69 miles per degree but you can't just measure this way the purple line because the latitude
difference remains constant while the longitude difference is changing proportionately without
using advanced trigonometry calculations using comparative distance ratios to a fixed point
like the north pole but whereas on the diverging glissen map one longitude degree on the
tropic of capricorn is 87 miles wide on the converging globe it has to be only 63 miles wide
which does not match actual reality and that is where the digital magic of gps and google earth
comes into play those of us dinosaurs old enough remember david copperfield using magic to make
the statue of liberty disappear in real time on live tv it seemed impossible what we didn't know
was that the entire audience floor and stage with fixed cameras was slowly rotating away
from the statue while the curtain was up so when the curtain was pulled down the frame around the
curtain was no longer facing the statue of liberty that same sleight of hand magic today
is now called gps and google earth and here's how they do it remember you don't need to manipulate
the north or inside it already mirrors the globe fantasy with converging longitude lines
into the north center it's the south you have to manipulate back both long before and in the
1880s and 90s latitude circles to determine north south position of the equator were found using a
combination of solar declination tables showing the sun's visual angle at noon above the horizon
at various states on the ecliptic as it goes between the tropics of cancer to the equator
to capricorn and back along with mariners astrolabes as shown on the left backstaffs
like the davis quadrant on the right octans on the left and sextants on the right in use up until
modern gps and google earth however longitude to determine east west position was much more
difficult if not impossible as seen here on this 1683 nautical chart by montier as it cannot be
determined by astronomical observations in the sky like latitude can it required centuries of study
and invention to invent a fictional primaridian line and then a way to coordinate clocks at different
distant places using instruments like the chronometer then the telegraph and later radio
to synchronize clocks but more importantly centuries of astronomical societies nautical
societies and guilds sharing and compiling these observations and information were put into massive
nautical almanacs like these two the american ephemeris and nautical almanacs of 1889 and 1891
by the united states naval observatory over 850 pages that helped sailing vessels for centuries
get to where they wanted to go at any time of the year with most of the painstaking work already
calculated for them in 1889 all of these almanacs agreed that hammerfest norway was located at 70
degrees 45 minutes north latitude and sailors and trade ships were getting to and fro there
just fine using these almanacs but it was also known that in hammerfest norway there is a
continual 24 hour sun in their summer from may 11th to july 22nd two months and 10 days today
that can still be seen though once again the almighty accurate globe software can't agree
within two days if it starts may 12th or may 14th or if it finishes july 30th or 31st
but either way there is a 24 hour sun which means if we live on a globe there has to be
two months and 10 days or close of 24 hour sun at 70 degrees 45 minutes south latitude in their
summer months of november december and january if there isn't then we don't live on a globe
an icy fantasy island cannot exist so gleason wrote to professor j morrison of the nautical
almanac office bureau of navigation navy department in washington dc the guy in charge of these
almanacs to check if that 24 hour sun was happening at 70 degrees 45 minutes south latitude as well
morrison replied on december 21st and 22nd there are summer solstice down there at south
shetland about 70 degrees south latitude see any good map of the world the sun rises two hours
three minutes 30 seconds the sun sets nine hours 56 minutes 30 seconds a total of 19 hours
and 53 minutes as the longest continued day that's four hours and seven minutes of no sun
where its northern latitude twin counterpart hammerfest norway is having 24 hour sun on
there june 21st summer solstice morrison continues reverse the results for june 22nd at south
shetland's winter solstice and we shall have for june 21st and 22nd sun rises nine hours 56
minutes 30 seconds sun sets two hours three minutes 30 seconds total seven hours and 53
minutes as the shortest continued day that's seven hours and 53 minutes of visible sun in the sky
that it shouldn't be having since its northern twin latitude hammerfest on their december 21st
solstice is in the middle of several months of 24 hours of no sun in the sky at all with the
sun never climbing above four degrees below their horizon at their solar noon on their
december 21st winter solstice morrison finishes by stating the above results are for the sun's
upper limb meaning the very top part of the sun that is first and last to be seen coming up over
and setting over the horizon or for the very first and last rays or sunlight and are absolutely
correct these were obviously globe killers that nobody wanted to address because if you were getting
four hours and seven minutes of no sun in the sky at 70 degrees south latitude in the dead of their
summer solstice there is no way in hell on a globe that all of these coastal bases even
further north at 68 and 69 degrees south latitude could be claiming to have two plus months of 24
hours sun as was covered in parts one and two the globe model demands everything inside of that ring
would be getting more and more days of alleged 24 hours sun so if that ring has four hours of no
sun at 70 degrees none of those bases along the coast outside of that ring could possibly be
having months of 24 hours sun so it was gps and later its digital fictional counterpart google earth
to the rescue now instead of the south shetlands being at 70 degrees south latitude as the good
professor morrison assured us any good almanac or map of the world would confirm and are absolutely
correct google earth and gps now claim the south shetlands are actually at 62.5 degrees south latitude
not 70 remember one degree of latitude is 69 miles so we are to believe the incredibly detailed
almanacs at the time were mistaken by 517 miles how are all of those british spanish and chilean
mariners and scandinavian sealers getting there and back accurately from 1819 to 1993 if their
sea charts were off by 517 miles from modern gps admittedly the glober's favorite exercise is mental
gymnastics to make sense of nonsense so they will say that modern satellite globe mapping
from high above in space has made modern longitude and latitude calculation much more accurate than
centuries of combined sailing observations and calculations from the ground in other words for
morrison to say the world's maps and almanacs said the south shetlands were at 70 degrees south
latitude 517 miles south of where gps and google earth now claim they are today in other words they
thought it was down here in the green instead of up here in red nearly three extra days of sailing
each way and not noticing the giant Antarctic peninsula on or in the way that's like saying
that those almanacs were so inaccurate that they mistakenly thought san francisco back in
1889 was 517 miles south actually where san diego is today yet somehow by accident the steamer and
clipperships had been getting to san francisco perfectly without error since at least the 1840s
not missing it by 517 miles south also modern gps and google earth still have hammerfest norway
at 70 degrees 32 minutes north latitude almost exactly where the almanacs in 1889 had it
at 70 degrees 45 minutes north latitude so why isn't that now off by 517 miles as well
once again you cannot have your cake and eat it too we're to believe there are gps
satellites up in anywhere from alleged low earth orbit 2 000 kilometers away taking detailed pictures
of the shetland islands while traveling at 17 224 miles per hour to 15 435 miles per hour
which no camera shutter speed in history can do without a giant streaky blur up until the
recent sony a93 samsung s23 ultra and now the 2024 inrs scarf and not even far away enough to get
in scale the earth around it to itself or they claim they're in medium earth orbit at 20 400
kilometers away where you can allegedly at least see the earth's alleged 12 756 kilometer diameter
but in which case you can't even see the shetland islands let alone film and plot them with a camera
moving at 22 370 miles per hour or even zoom in on them to get detailed to the closest meter
but that's okay because they have geostationary satellites way out at 35 786 kilometers that
can see the whole earth and the shetland islands well not really but at least they aren't moving
well they are they're moving at 6 935 miles per hour so there not only isn't a shutter speed in
the world that can film something at 7 000 miles per hour but there isn't a zoom in the world
that could get in that close and accurate to the meter even if standing dead still don't forget
the earth is also allegedly spinning at 1000 miles per hour as well if only there were just
some tiny shred of evidence that space satellites are really just cameras attached to solar panels
and balloons flying around in regular low atmosphere but that's none of my business
anyway as we'll prove later this is just used to hide distort in disguise the actual
expanding longitude distances on the Gleason flat earth map as you go south or farther out
from the center north point of the flat earth and while it is true that the equator runs south
of the tip of india as shown here on the Gleason map of our true earth as it even does
on this ridiculous 2006 nasa copyrighted image if the north pole was really there on a globe
then the south pole would be down there and the equator meaning the equidistant latitude point
between these two would be there in red where the tropic of cancer is shown not way down there
in green that is clearly not the equidistant diameter point between the top and bottom of
this fake CGI globe circle which they distort in every image to make their reality appear to fit
on their impossible fiction they need to hide all of that massive ice wall all of that endless
ocean and all of that land outside of the equator or south by squeezing it into an area this big
which is impossible this is why every fake composite nasa releases of the earth you see
impossible things like the united states taking up half the side of the earth and bigger than
south america or even africa on other nasa fakes the 1997 globe on top is the same exact size as
the 2012 globe under it so how did the united states quadruple in size in 15 years there's
the united states let's turn it to the top of the globe now let's rotate it a quarter more so
it's in the middle of the other side of the globe now a quarter more so it's on the dead bottom of the
globe now one last rotation to bring it back where it started and there it isn't that's india china
and russia let's turn it again surely it must be back by now nope that's greenland one more
turn and the earth has gone around one and a half times it's alleged circumference and there it is
it should have passed once by already and be on the other side again but that is because they have
to add fantasy island which isn't really there now where have we seen that before ah yes there
is truly nothing new under the sun google earth is just the digital updated version of this same
nonsense back in 1482 dismantled and ready for a long sea voyage well we start the final
screening process and that's we'll get you to take your extreme cold weather jackets off
but now the andrel team gathers at christ church new zealand for the six hour flight to anartica
in a c17 cargo plane jam packed with people and gear the andrel team are taking an ice drill from
christ church new zealand to mcmurdo station off the ross ice shelf in antartica in a c17 cargo
plane just to get your bearings mcmurdo is alleged to be down there on the ross ice shelf
in the south pacific ocean where new zealand is not to be confused with the rana ice shelf
up there by the Antarctic peninsula in the south atlantic ocean where new zealand is nowhere near
so the obvious route on a globe is a straight shot south from christ church new zealand to
mcmurdo station which is allegedly around 2340 miles the c17 claims an impressive fully loaded
cruising speed of 450 knots or 518 miles per hour so it could make that distance in four and a half
hours but obviously goes slower for takeoff and landing the first question is on a six hour trip
does it take an hour and a half 45 minutes on each side or one quarter of the entire flight
time to get up to and come back down from cruising speed for takeoff and landing the second question is
if this is the shortest flight route from new zealand why did the bbc spend a ton of time and
money on graphics and a narrative about an alleged mountain range they wouldn't even pass over
to show them coming in over the Antarctic peninsula and rana ice shelf in the south
atlantic ocean to come all the way back to mcmurdo in the south pacific their flight passes over the
trans Antarctic mountains that's the Antarctic peninsula that's the rana ice shelf and that's
the south atlantic ocean which divide the continent into two regions with colossal glaciers
called ice sheets blanketing both the giant east Antarctic ice sheet is 10 times the size of
the west it's frozen firmly to bedrock high above the sea and in some places the ice towers
almost three miles into the sky why would you even mention any of that if you were supposed to take
the yellow route not their claimed red route in reality they really did this follow the yellow
brick road from christ church straight to mcmurdo and the real location of the ross ice shelf
as we'll get into with southern longitude impossibilities on the globe model some people call
it earth's freezer but scientists call Antarctica the ice Antarctica plays a fundamental role in
the way the earth functions for polar researchers Antarctica is a giant laboratory
more than one and a half times the size of the united states and home to 90 of all the ice in
the world i would definitely agree on the gleason map that the ice wall is at least 90 of all the
ice in the world and plays a fundamental role in the way the earth functions by holding in and
containing the waters of the realm but that ice wall is clearly a hell of a lot more than just one
and a half times the size of that tiny little united states when we use the tool to trace out
anywhere in the world on google earth like the united states seen in yellow around it
we can get a rough perimeter and area like here showing the united states to have a perimeter
of roughly 9361 miles and an area inside of that about 3.1 million square miles
and yet funny enough the only place on all of google earth you aren't allowed to do that
is surprise surprise fantasy island Antarctica it suddenly draws in this fictional circle
both outside of the alleged coastal area you traced in detail and even way inside where you traced
and gives you a perimeter of 11,550 miles much less than the alleged one and a half times the
united states 9361 miles short by 2,500 miles and gives you an area of five million square
miles which is 350,000 square miles more than it should be not less but how does that work and
they won't tell you if that's the fake circle they drew or the outline you did as they leave
it up to you and don't clarify clearly a deception because as we've already shown multiple times
this fantasy island cannot and does not exist and the fact that it clearly has a lie purposely
programmed into google earth software means you cannot trust it does not have the same deception
programmed into tracing southern hemisphere continents to hide their actual size as well
as we'll get into even their cover story of how it was theoretically created is ridiculous
their cool story goes the earth's polar regions are cold because their positions
at the top and bottom of the planet do not allow them to receive direct light from the sun
even though it is allegedly 93 million miles away and allegedly lights up the entire planets
all the way out to Pluto allegedly 3.7 billion miles farther away from earth but since the
earth's alleged axis is tilted at 23.5 degrees the incoming solar radiation that warms the planet
strikes them obliquely rather than vertically as a result the poles receive only 40% as much
incident radiation as equatorial regions the rest of that incident radiation goes out to Pluto
instead to us it might seem almost a stage awaiting actors
but the human drama came slowly to the icy continent
Antarctica's interior was not reached until the 20th century
why did it take so long for curious and expansionist peoples to lay claim to this wilderness
the seeds of Antarctica's inaccessibility were sown millions of years ago
yet there's your alleged globe 60 degrees south latitude Antarctic circle in red
millions of years ago in the scale and proportion supposed to be frozen due to the alleged
23.5 degree tilt of the earth blocking 60 percent of its incident solar radiation
yet one fourth of the supercontinent the entire rest of the earth as we know it
in that red circle was magically lush and green when the supercontinent
Gondwana land drifted apart to form the continents that we recognize today
now you can see it more clearly that white ring there
the last fragment piece to break apart was Australia and Antarctica which broke apart
and created the great southern ocean which encircles Antarctica today
then why is it lit up like Florida and not already frozen if it was already down there in that 60
percent deficient solar radiation zone before it allegedly broke apart
once Antarctica was surrounded completely by ocean it cut itself off from the rest of the
earth's weather patterns and as Antarctica drifted over the south pole it became cold
and could not receive warmer weather from up north and so this is really the reason
how Antarctica went into the deep freeze about 40 million years ago
this piece this piece off here and put it over here
and now you see the United States is no longer in the middle of the map
right now I did this with the major record company in New York City I think in 1970
and an older man stood up in the back of the room and said now I'll let you gone too far
I said what's your problem you can't do that with the map I said well actually you
can't he said now the United States isn't in the middle of the map anymore I said the United
States never was in the middle of the map you need to realize this depends on how you draw your map
and then I pointed this little fact around to South America is actually nine times larger
than Greenland you mean just like the Gleason map here
even though it doesn't really look like it no it is
South America is actually nine times larger than Greenland
it's crazy now according to your social studies teachers what is the equator
halfway between the North Pole and the South Pole on this map would be right about here
right and that means that Iowa has a semi-tropical climate
well you've been in Minnesota on the winter time I've been in Iowa too
it doesn't have a tropical climate so you have to then introduce a real version
of the map in general that this is the most varied map the cleaner's projection map
the sizes on this map are right the shapes are distorted look at Greenland on this map
right there see it yeah it's really tiny see how small that is right look at it on the
projection so why do they do that I don't understand why because the Pope commissioned
Mercator to map to make a map that shows the spread of Christianity
so all the countries in which there are predominantly white people are larger than those
in the southern part of the of the world halfway between the North Pole and South
the world now and this is wrong what if I told you that from here to here it's 6,400 women
but from here to here which only looks like half the size is 7,500 the continent of Africa
has been shown smaller than it actually is what I told you that Greenland was only this size
or Russia was this size the US and Canada were not small you know what this is the real map
look at Sweden, Finland and Norway they're much smaller than it for Greenland it's tiny
I received a comment from a sub in regard to their trip on the trans-Australian Railway
from Kale Gurley to Port Augusta across the Newell Arbor Desert the company itself
claims it to be only 650 miles across mapping it on Google Earth claims 1044 miles Wikipedia says
1050 miles and Google itself says 967 miles straight shot across the water or 1162 miles
driving the Route 1 how does the company think their railroad is 400 miles shorter than everyone
says it is on Gleason's map that distance would be 1520 miles across that's 358 miles more than
Google and 469 miles more than Wikipedia why can't anyone agree who is correct and how could they hide
this if Gleason is correct as they wrote I took the train across Australia's Newell Arbor Desert
and had a sleeper car which I thought was strange as the desert is not that wide at least allegedly
on the globe with converging longitude lines in the south when it got dark the train went faster
so much that I couldn't sleep so it was loud and bumpy and swaying I became scared and the
conductor said the train always speeds up at night I believe they hide the stretch desert
making the Gleason map showing correct I have talked to people crossing the Newell Arbor Desert
by car and they said it took too long planes crossing the width of Australia might not be
showing passengers their true speed whenever we drove in Western Australia it took too long and
we speeded I believe their road signs are manipulated to not show their proper distances
this is obviously just hearsay an opinion but Gleason ran into the same thing provably and
factually with actual sea charts and navigation logs from a dozen steamship captains and navigators
in the late 1800s working the steamership routes between Cape Town on the southern tip of Africa
on the right and Buenos Aires Argentina as well as Cape Horn Chile on the southern tip of
South America as we'll examine shortly in detail but Dave Weiss and I also ran into the same exact
anomaly as Gleason recently that matches every single Antarctic exploration journey on record
from the late 1500s to the mid 1900s which we'll get into when we recently interviewed a whistleblower
from a top secret multinational mining base nicknamed as Tigo somewhere in the vicinity of
McMurdo station near the Ross ice shelf deep throat was taken so we're calling this person frostbite
so I want to start out with tell Steve about your journey is in much detail as you can where you
went from on how you got to the Tigo base
so I'm like all right so I'm gonna wash and freeze my ass for I don't know like four weeks and shit
so now we get back to the uh then we got back for a little bit on orders in the base and then
we went down to Florida from Florida we caught up caught up a boat
uh we went down south got by uh I think we stopped over in Colombia then we caught another boat
then we went to Antarctica with uh McMurdo well McMurdo is on the other side by New Zealand
that's why I was going to ask if you went from New Zealand because down by the if you were down at
the tip of South America those bases are called Rothera, San Martin, Vernetsky, Mariambo so are you
saying you were close to McMurdo yeah but you took a boat from the west side of South America
or the the north or the east side from Miami you sailed down what the east coast of
or did they fly you somewhere oh uh you went down to Colombia yeah we were in port in
Kyrgyz Heta then we went to north south east west west coast of Colombia okay and then we caught another
boat there and we were on that boat for a while and we ended up at McMurdo how long were you on that
boat for like a while this is going back four years ago yeah like 10 days or something like 10
days or long 20 days like approximately oh it's probably about two weeks two weeks on a boat okay
yeah and what kind of boat was it was it was it was it was it was it moving fast or was it just
lollygaggin but they were driving the whole time basically you weren't just floating around there
having lunch exactly right okay oh you stopped at other other places in Antarctica or you mean on the way
to Antarctica okay do you stop and off at islands were you anywhere by do you know if you were
by the French Polynesian islands by any chance or Hawaii or anything like that did it seem like
you were in like the south pacific yeah I think we stopped in Hawaii then was the Philippines no yeah
Hawaii yeah Hawaii then I think the Philippines and I think there's been one more stop and then
then probably Antarctica that's out yeah because if you because are you a flat earther
uh kind of but not really okay obviously on the alleged globe on a US military boat that cruises
about 30 to 35 miles per hour from the northwest side of Columbia to McMurdo base it's literally a
straight shot dead south around the west coast of South America and the west coast of Antarctica
straight to McMurdo station allegedly 6800 miles give or take so about eight days of sailing and
half of that in the icy cold Antarctic seas it would be preposterous on a globe to instead
go that same distance northwest of Hawaii away from Antarctica instead of straight south right to it
then do that again straight west to the Philippines getting even further away from Antarctica
and then go all the way south around the total other side of Fantasy Island maybe even stopping
one more time on the way and taking at least two weeks or more but on the Gleason map that's
exactly the way to go to McMurdo from the west coast of Columbia minus the detour to the
Philippines unless you had to pick something up there on the way that the base needed which way
would you drive from Chicago to New Orleans the yellow route or the blue route steamship captains
officers and navigators were running into these same nonsensical globe distance
impossibilities back in the late 1800s when we just compare south sea steamers built in
Europe by the same class of builders and building companies as their northern sea steamer counterparts
and keep in mind as far as danger or contingencies are concerned in making these voyages in an
equal time the one preferred to the other the south Atlantic sea has the advantage over the
north Atlantic as shown on navigators charts in terms of currents rock shoals islands
windswells etc so here we'll compare the north Atlantic steamer route between New York and
south Hampton England the blue arrow to the same ships making the more favored south Atlantic routes
between the Cape of Good Hope in Cape Town South Africa to Buenos Aires Argentina shown in orange
and also between there and Cape Horn in Chile shown in yellow keep in mind sea charts are done in
nautical miles which are larger or 1.150779 times the size of a regular mile so if one
degree is 69 regular miles it's only 60 nautical miles and hence ship speeds are done in knots
which are simply nautical miles per hour not regular miles per hour so your car driving 69
miles per hour is really only driving 60 knots Google Earth is showing sure enough New York
to south Hampton England in the north Atlantic at roughly 3038 nautical miles apart pretty
identical by 22 miles to the 3060 nautical miles from this ship log from the north Docher
alloyed steamship doing the same route even despite rough head seas and swells on days two and three
and the difficulty of sailing the north Atlantic this ship made that 3060 nautical miles in six
days 17 hours and 15 minutes or just call it six days and 18 hours of actual sailing time
without the fictional time zone changes added in that put it at an average speed of 18.36 knots
or nautical miles per hour so their six days and 18 hours is right up there with the fastest
routes from these other four ships doing the exact same route in four hours less to four hours more
but always six and a half days to an hour and a half under seven days for 3060 nautical miles
no more no less showing all of these ships average 18 to 19 nautical miles per hour
so here's the first problem the globes in the late 1800s were measuring the distance
from the Cape of Good Hope in Cape Town South Africa to Buenos Aires Argentina as 60 degrees
times 60 nautical miles per degree or 3600 nautical miles google earth is now measuring that
distance as 3700 nautical miles 100 nautical miles longer than the old globes used to claim
or five and a half hours longer of needed sailing time at 18 nautical miles per hour to get there
and those old globes were putting the Cape of Good Hope to Cape Horn Chile at 3420 nautical miles
while Google Earth now claims 3601 nautical miles 160 nautical miles more or nearly
nine more hours of sailing time at 18 knots but you say yeah well GPS is more accurate than
primitive globes duh well Gleason corresponded with dozens of captains navigators and officers
working on these routes like Charles B. Brown who was the second officer on the steamships
Lockenvar and Palgrave and even the Abbey town a special high-speed merchant man class ship
built by the East Indies company for this specific route like the others brown provided his certificate
license discharge certificates and validation letters from his captains he also worked on the
steamship Compta which did these routes as well and brown submitted the charts he used on the
steamships Lockenvar Abbey town Compta and the Palgrave and is very clear the distances we
are about to discuss are in all cases work to nautical miles not regular miles problem number one
his charts from Cape town to Buenos Aires from multiple ships and years of running the route
show the distance between these two at 4560 nautical miles but Google Earth and GPS claim
it is only 3707 nautical miles you can see the little nm there when you double check that's 853
nautical miles less than the Admiralty charts and Mercator sailing charts they use to get
there like clockwork in reality and the globes of his day were worse they claim the distance
was only 3600 nautical miles 960 nautical miles less in globe theory than actually sailing reality
and experience if the globe were reality that would mean all of brown ships and years of
sailing this route would have actually started on the east coast of Africa sailed over land
somehow sailed across the ocean and then sailed over land again on the other side landing halfway
in the middle of South America even worse in blue brown's best time record between the two that he
knew of on all of the ships that he sailed was the steamship Lockenvar under captain Shelley
which made that trip in 13 days 13 hours and 45 minutes or we'll just call it 13 days and 14 hours
13 days times 24 hours per day is 312 hours plus the extra 14 hours more is 326 hours total
sailing time can you see the problem here that's the speed record the fastest he knew of for what
google earth alleges to be only 3707 nautical miles across and the old globes allege only 3600 nautical
miles divided by the 326 hours total sailing time means the fastest ship was only averaging 11 to
11.3 nautical miles per hour even though the south seas are faster to sail in yet in the north
the same exact class ships from the same builders were doing the 3060 nautical mile routes from New
York to Southampton in only six days and 12 hours and averaging 18 to 19 nautical miles per hour in
slower seas think about that a steamship takes six and a half days to travel 3060 nautical miles
from New York to Southampton hell let's call it just under seven days for the august of victoria
the fourth fastest northern ship but then in the south the fastest ship has to go only 647
measly nautical miles more to make Buenos Aires from Cape Town let's say at the slowest 18
nautical miles per hour average speed is only 35 hours longer it should be there in just under
eight and a half days but yet the record is over 13 and a half days it takes five entire days more
to travel the extra 647 nautical miles after making the first 3060 in only six and a half days
then Brown's Admiralty and Mercator sailing charts plus his actual experiential years of
sailing times show that the distance from Cape Town to Cape Horn at the bottom of South America in
Chile is five thousand seven hundred nautical miles yet because it has to lie to make the
globe longitude lines converge together at the bottom of the globe google earth is claiming that
distance is only 3601 nautical miles now off by a whopping 2099 nautical miles from actual sailing
reality not just 100 nautical miles like Buenos Aires and the old globe put that distance
at only 3420 nautical miles even shorter than the google earth fiction making a whopping difference
of 2280 nautical miles error between globe theory and actual sailing reality the obvious question is
if all of Brown's working logs and navigator maps show Cape Town to Cape Horn is really five
thousand seven hundred nautical miles long in reality that's 1140 nautical miles farther
than the 4560 nautical miles from Cape Town to Buenos Aires so how is it the steamship Abbey Town
under Captain Tullis made the 1140 nautical mile longer record trip to Cape Horn in just 13 days
and 23 hours just half a day more than the lock environment Buenos Aires over a much shorter
distance and the answer is the Abbey Town was a much faster steam ship than the lock environment
built specially by the East India government for this special trip only it was the fastest
innovative trade ship of its kind at that day in the south so it's like asking how a Nazi
Messerschmitt jet was faster than the dominant British Spitfire propeller fighter in World War
II but the real question we have to ask is if Google Earth says Cape Town to Cape Horn is
only three thousand six hundred and one nautical miles across only five hundred and forty one nautical
miles farther than it claims New York to Southampton then how is it the fastest freaking steamship
in the south the Abbey Town still took 13 days and 23 hours let's call it 14 days in the
better faster southern seas to go only five hundred and forty one nautical miles farther
than the steamships in the north were doing five hundred and forty one nautical miles less
in only six and a half to seven days at their fastest how can it take a ship six and a half to
seven days to go this far and then take seven to seven and a half days more to go just this
much farther obviously it can't on a globe with converging longitude lines as you go south
but if you live here you can see five zones of longitude and the north inside the equator
from New York to Southampton is exponentially shorter than five zones of diverging longitude
as you get further south or away from the center and towards the ice wall which explains why it
takes twice as long in reality than the globe fantasy claims that distance really is out there
even more damning because of converging longitude the old globes in yellow said Cape Town to Cape Horn
was 160 miles shorter than Cape Town to Buenos Aires brown himself said furthermore i am very
much surprised to learn from you that Cape Horn is 200 nautical miles nearer Cape Town
than Buenos Aires i don't take points when working these questions but degrees of latitude
and longitude rightly so as his own actual sailing experience in green put Cape Horn at
1140 nautical miles further than Buenos Aires not 160 nautical miles shorter brown said
and if the following latitudes and longitudes are wrong then the admiralty charts in my
possession are wrong and then gave those admiralty chart coordinates for all three
locations which we will check against google earth to bust them lying and please take notice
that the questions worked for you were done so by using mercader's sailing chart which is our
usual way of finding course and distance from point to point so going to brown's
admiralty chart coordinates for Cape Town 34 24 south 1832 east without having seconds to get
it exact google earth plots it roughly there a little off but close enough for horseshoes still
the Cape of good hope then Buenos iris at 34 30 south 58 00 west puts it there again close enough
for navigation not off by hundreds or thousands of nautical miles and seven extra days of sailing
and lastly Cape Horn at 55 59 south 67 12 west and that one is even a dead bull's eye ringer
so there was clearly nothing wrong with brown's admiralty charts if you are claiming google
earth is correct and more accurate and they pretty much match exactly so how can brown's
charts have the same exact coordinates as google earth but then brown's admiralty charts
mercader map and real-life experience work out Cape Town to Buenos iris at 4560 nautical miles
and google earth claims the same two exact coordinates are only 3707 that's 853 nautical
miles less than that or Cape Town to Cape Horn being 5700 nautical miles in reality
and google earth claiming the same exact two identical coordinates are only 3601
that's 2099 nautical miles less they should all match each other very closely but they don't
Buenos iris is supposed to be way down there well below the Tropic of Capricorn
but keeping fantasy island down there at the bottom where it is alleged to be
and resetting to do north it's now magically sticking Buenos iris just under the dead middle
equator of the sphere impossible with Antarctica still centered there in the bottom by the way
the globe theory says the earth spins west to east at just over a thousand miles per hour
or 1470 feet per second at the equator but the reason you don't jump up a foot off
the ground there for one second and end up landing four and a half football fields west of you is because
the whole air and atmosphere are moving in sync together with the alleged globe spin must be all
of those equipotential gravity bong water particles in the air but that would mean both the north
and south of the alleged globe are also spinning west to east and their atmospheres
should also be magically attached to the ground but every navigator knows about the westernly trade
winds in the north and the opposite easternly roaring forties winds in the south you can't
have your cake and eat it too it should all move together with the alleged theoretical
globe spin but it doesn't in reality but these opposite winds are exactly what you experience
on the etheric toroidal field earth we discussed in part one as you can see here when a magnet
and electric currents are used to induce a toroidal field the inside hyperbola spins in one direction
your westernly northern trade winds and the outside torus field or donut spins the opposite
direction your easternly roaring forties winds just as we see when people living on the equator
face east and timelapse star trails the ones on the left in the northern inner hyperboloid hourglass
appear to move one direction in much tighter circular shape spirals and the ones on the right
in the outer southern torus or donut appear to move the opposite direction of the ones on the
left but in much looser and wider oval shape spirals but the fixed stars travel overhead at
night from east to west across the ecliptic so on a globe which claims the west to east spinning of
the globe is what is making the fixed far away unmoving stars appear to go overhead from east
to west at night as you spin towards them then if you are living on the equator facing east
all of these stars from there should look like this going straight over you and behind you
as you spin towards and under them but as always that's not what happens in reality
and then just like their fake long distances google earth has the audacity to draw in massive
continent-sized clouds like this one running south to north from fantasy island to india
apparently made out of steel and iron to defy the atmosphere that is supposed to be flying
west to east with the globe spin and drag you along with it while you jump up in the air but not
these clouds though because they are as much of a digital fiction as fantasy island there
my contention is that google earth is somehow programmed to be absolutely accurate over very
short distances like across cities and towns in the alleged southern hemisphere but it's
clearly fudging numbers over long distances to make reality seem to fit into their fantasy
i have a theory on how they may be doing this i put the grid lines on google earth to show the
yellow tropic of capricorn keep in mind that yellow line looks curved to represent 3d around an
alleged globe but it represents a dead straight line east to west across australia at the
tropic and then did a detailed zoom in west coast to east coast measurement of the tropic
across australia but as i used the measuring tool it didn't follow the yellow tropic line
straight across as i asked it to it drew that red line south of the tropic and said 2346 miles
across same starting and ending points precisely but just as we discussed on a globe the farther
south you measure across the same longitude lines the longitude lines are converging
closer together to get shorter apart further south so that red line is shorter than the
yellow tropic line since it is measuring 100 miles south of the tropic of capricorn
but i didn't ask it to measure that red line i asked it to measure that yellow line and it
drew and measured in that red line claiming that distance is only 2346 miles across to match the
converging globe longitudes whereas gleason's map would put that yellow line distance
at 3202 miles across preposterous you say that's 36 percent larger that's exactly what captain brown
said when he learned his actual physical sailing distances were the same versus the globe distance
claims of his day and just like all the engineering projects when reality doesn't
match the globe model it's not looking good for fantasy island gleason's map itself is based on
almanac coordinates and land maps of his day and as he said and i'll show you nobody has ever been
past 78 or 80 degrees south latitude his map is stopping at 90 degrees south only because the
globe latitude longitude grid system demands there are 180 degrees of latitude down a longitude
line from the north pole to the south pole or ice wall edge that's where the system comes from
all the great ancient mariner nations came from that yellow 45 degree north circle and noticed from
that circle they all saw polaris the north star at 45 degrees altitude north in the sky every night
and all saw the sun at 45 degrees altitude at solar noon on the march 21st and september 21st
equinoxes like this so they stuck the equator ring there and then just assume that distance must
double equally since colonies out there were also charting the sun at 45 degrees north on march 21st
and september 21st equinoxes so they knew that distance to the equator was equal to the yellow
45 degree ring to the equator so they just assumed there must be one more going out
and that must be the south pole or edge of the earth even though nobody had ever even been out
there to make certain in reality the sun never leaves the ecliptic belt between the green cancer
and blue capricorn rings but the ice could go on for who knows how much farther than 90 degrees
south the concept of 90 degrees south is a newtonian physics globe theory and assumption
not a proven fact speaking of let's take a modern look at the actual flights for the bogus final
experiment itself this is their body cam footage of their flight from punta arenas airport to
union glacier you can see this is a Boeing 757 200 series by the unique bent up wing tip and those
three triangular pieces there just like here on another Boeing 757 200 series you can see from
the website here that is indeed the airplane used from punta arenas airport to union glacier
the Boeing 757 200 series is designed with an optimal cruising speed not top speed of mock 0.8
or 593 miles per hour the obvious and familiar problem is according to google earth from punta
arenas airport to union glacier is only 1876 miles yet their flight and all of the others
using that same plane take four hours and 15 minutes which would mean on a globe that plane was only
averaging 441 miles per hour when it is built to cruise at 593 miles per hour 152 miles per
hour faster obviously there is takeoff and landing to consider but there is zero reason
an airline would slow down to a turtle crawl and then take an extra hour to make a flight
it could make in just over three hours at its normal cruising speed
593 miles per hour times 4.25 hours is 2520 miles that's 644 miles maximum they should have
overshot union glacier nearly reaching the alleged south pole but take your pick allowing for slower
takeoff and landing speeds 500 miles there 400 miles there that's still too far many people
have questioned if they were 200 certain they were really brought there i have to assume they
brought gps gear and all verified each other you do have to find it strange to put a tourist
destination in a dangerous glacier range out in the middle of frickin nowhere with deadly crevasses
all around so you can't explore and if there is a medical emergency there isn't another base
around for 350 miles to helicopter airlift you to when there are 17 international bases
up there on that peninsula but here's where it gets interesting as i showed you that plane
could have flown 2520 miles in four hours and 15 minutes just at its normal cruising speed
and they can fly much faster and farther if needed but let's assume they didn't again
the Gleason map is a semi projection longitude and sun time calculator not geometrically in scale
so you can't just measure that yellow dotted line across from punta arenas airport to union
glacier and get an exact figure that latitude is constant but the longitude is constantly changing
you can't measure a third side of a triangle where one of the other sides is six inches and the second
side is changing from six inches to 12 inches along the way without advanced ratio trigonometry
and multiple other points but what you can do is take the 11.67 degrees of longitude
between the airport and union glacier and you see 11.67 longitude degrees would be 1283 miles
going straight west of the airport's latitude and 1526 miles going along union glaciers latitude
but you have to figure in the 1845 miles of latitude distance between them
but the plane doesn't fly west like this and then south like that or south like this and then west
like that it's covering both latitude and longitude at the same time or rather taking a shortcut
suddenly 2520 miles starts to look a lot more reasonable on the Gleason map
than overshooting union glacier by 400 to 644 miles again these planes can fly faster and
since we don't know how fast they actually flew I can't call it definitive but it's just one more
data set not in the globes or fantasy islands favor light in the sky or not in my opinion
if you want a real final experiment two sailing yachts take off from New Zealand at the same port
one southeast one southwest both maintaining the same average speed or as close as possible
when they get down or out to 50 south latitude the yellow ring on either model no polar seas no ice
no compass anomalies nada just smooth sailing they each carry on that bearing and will meet
each other on the other side even if either one of them gets a day or four or five of terrible
weather or winds the globe says that is 16,038 miles around 50 south latitude so they should
meet somewhere around there after only 8,019 miles the Gleason map says 50 south latitude
would be 38,804 miles around meeting over there on the other side after 19,402 miles
more than two and a quarter times as far and long to travel than the globe just like the
steamship records we just discussed and the documented Antarctic expeditions from the 1580s
to 1890s we haven't discussed yet but that's none of my business either way that's more than double
as long as each other and easy to figure out their average agreed knots per hour even taking
a cruising yacht from its usual 30 miles per hour down to a crawl at 20 miles per hour
that's 40 and a half days to meet in the middle on the Gleason map yeah exactly half that
but probably just a coincidence and only 16 and three quarters days on the globe
even with bad weather that would be definitive either way and prove or disprove Fantasy Island
speaking of there is a very curious thing that despite all of these Antarctic bases plus
more not shown here with the exception of Ruskaya there there are not nor have there ever
been any bases along this entire stretch and bulge of Fantasy Island from about 125 west longitude
down to about 165 west longitude on the globe Fantasy Island and even more 125 west to 180 west
on the Gleason map until it crosses the international date line and east west longitude divider
more curious is that while Fantasy Island has 125 to 165 west longitude bulging out into the Arctic
Ocean it's the one place on the entire ice wall around the earth that Gleason has the ice wall
indenting inwards past the 75 south latitude ring and even 80 south latitude ring away from the
not bulging out into it as we'll get into in the sunlight section but even more curious
is when we look at this same exact 125 to 165 west longitude range in the northern hemisphere
the Bering Strait and the mysterious international date line allegedly the most eastern part of
Russia and the most western part of Alaska meet at that red line divided by water with two islands
in the middle called the Bering Strait it's alleged to only be 53 miles from Russia to Alaska
there and about 20 miles from either side to the islands between them which are only a few
miles away from each other and yet the international date line runs right through
the middle of those two islands and claims there is a one day plus three hour time difference between
those few miles between those two tiny islands you can understand the 24 hours because they have
to divide the date somewhere for international commerce but where does the extra three hour
difference come from that's the difference between the red yellow and green time zones
across most of the United States so how does that work between two islands only a few miles apart
well on a globe you have to convince everyone that all of this yellow diverging or expanding
land and water outside of the equator fits equally on the bottom of a converging globe
as only this much yellow fits on its equal top of that globe so somewhere you need black magic to
make people think that this is the same size as that isn't it obvious and hope most people are too
stupid to figure it out which they are and as it turns out black magic is actually as simply
stupid as this time works based on the smooth predictable cycles of the sun between the tropics
over the sacred ecliptic s-shaped sine wave so there you go you've probably noticed they cleverly
hide this by just cutting all world maps off in half right exactly there between eastern
Russia and western alaska and keep them on opposite sides from each other and just hope you don't
ask questions like hey if the distance from eastern russia there to there and then across
to western alaska over there is only 53 miles as google earth says and even lets me measure it
here and that's new zealand down there which google earth says is 877 and a half miles long
not 53 miles and yet clearly i could turn new zealand sideways and move it up here and still
not even reached the right side of this map which shows oceans not alaska which should be
kissing it and look like it's almost touching at this scale how the hell does that work
and the answer is it doesn't that's how magic works it's not real it's just you don't bother to
think how the trick is done to make it seem real you can't insert three hours of fictional
longitudinal land that doesn't exist on top of your fake globe and then build actual physical
bases on its identical equally fictional non-existent longitudinal globe counterpart
on the bottom in scammed arctica but the real truth might be much darker than that literally
the Antarctic can also be unbelievably beautiful with refracted light causing full suns and moons
with refracted light causing full suns and moons it is a perplexing thing that aside from the alleged
amonson scott south pole base there there are no bases inside the 80 degrees south latitude ring
on either the globe model or outside of it in the blue ring area on the gleason map ice wall
which is strange because even though nobody's ever even been there to prove it the theoretical
geomagnetic south pole is alleged to be right there inside it so you would think there would
be an international scientific base there studying it but nope the closest base is voestock
outside the ring at 78 degrees 27 minutes south latitude even in the Antarctic summer months
of november through late january where there is an alleged 24 hour sun to warm the seas and both the
ross ice shelf and rana ice shelf penetrate well inside the alleged 80 degrees south latitude ring
so icebreaker ships should be able to get in there and explore in the 1875 to 1889
ninth edition of Encyclopedia Britannica when you read all of the documented south polar explorations
from 1567 to 1874 when Antarctic sea expeditions were given up completely not a single expedition
was able to get past the enormous insurpassable ice wall they all spoke about at 78 degrees 11
minutes south latitude meaning inside of the alleged 80 degree polar circle ring
even outside of 78 degrees to the Antarctic circle at 67 degrees south latitude Encyclopedia Britannica
tells us that at the same time as Dumont der Vil in 1839 commander Wilkes of the United States
expedition made a cruise to the southward and mapped a large tract of land in the latitude of
the 67 degrees south Antarctic circle for which he claimed the discovery but as a portion of it
had already been seen by Balani and the rest has since been proven not to exist the claim
has not been admitted remarkable as to this day that ring is still called the southern pole of
inaccessibility what is more curious is that out of all of these expeditions which all went in
the summer southern months for the weather there is not one single mention of any 24-hour sun
in the sky ever plenty of talk of that night the next morning the next day a few days later
but you'd think somebody would mention a 24-hour sun during these months but it's nowhere to be found
worthy earth a globe the longitude lines inside the Antarctic circle could not exceed more than
30 miles wide per degree due to convergence which times 360 degrees is only 10,800 miles around the
Antarctic circle and yet while the challenger did not openly admit it had searched for the
south pole in vain its record showed it sailed over 60,000 miles the equivalent of three
times around the alleged globe circumference at the equator never mind five and a half times
around the alleged south polar circle and cost the government over a million dollars
without being able to say that it had been fortunate enough to ascertain the existence
of any such wonderful locality but that's none of my business
and it gets even weirder and more unbelievable when we flash forward to the journals and journeys
from the alleged 1912 south pole expeditions of both the norwegian amundsen and england's
captain robert falken scott if the whole world is a stage why wouldn't arctica be any different
you think flat earth is ridiculous consider this a sextant is a navigation tool to measure
angles between the horizon and celestial bodies allowing sailors to find their exact location
the trigonometry required for a sextant only works because the three points it measures
create flat planes to each other no adjustments for curvature ever if the earth were a globe the
math wouldn't work but it does and the sextant has been used for centuries meanwhile
surveyors use laser levels over miles with zero curve correction train tracks run level for
miles airplanes fly at flight levels not arcs pilots calculate distances over a flat plane
and there are places where you can see too far where the earth's supposed curvature should
hide distant objects below the horizon and let's be real everyone knows the moon landing was fake
with a lie that big nasa has no credibility so why trust their story everything we build assumes
a flat earth to us it might seem almost a stage awaiting actors the scott party didn't seem to
have that clarity on the part of the leader of recognizing what the strengths and weaknesses
of the individual men were robert the hidden hand scott was a career royal navy officer
who made lieutenant in 1889 then immediately had a scandal where he suddenly disappeared from
all naval records for eight months then two years later while commanding a torpedo boat
he accidentally ran into ground and gets into trouble and then finds out his dad lost all the
family fortune and he has no capital and he has to support the whole extended family himself
so a promotion and the extra income became his main concern making him a perfect willing and
desperate dupe for a scythe luckily by fluke scott runs into the royal knighted sir clements
marcom president of the royal geographic society on a street in london as you do and the guy decides
to put scott in charge of commanding an expensive south polar expedition despite zero experience
as you do and before he even leaves on the first one king edward the seventh yeah there in white
template crosses gives scott a fourth member knighthood of the royal victorian order yes that's
the white knight's templar malta cross who run the world banking commerce copyright law scam
for the vatican and its holy roman appointed royal families for being a distinguished lap dog of the
monarchy and vatican but the expedition fails one guy dies half of them gets scurvy he brings
back bogus meteorological and magnetic readings that are later criticized as amateurish and
inaccurate and once again scott gets his second boat in his career run aground stuck in the ice
and needs two relief ships to come down and save him so what do they do they promote him to the rank
of captain king edward the seventh promotes him from fourth member to commander of the royal
victorian order put him in charge as the assistant director of naval intelligence
and then he's hobnobbing with queen amalia of orleans louise felipe the prince royal of
portugal sir henry keppel the commander-in-chief of the entire british fleet and even prince
hindricks of prussia and then they send the guy back for another attempt at the south pole
despite failing miserably the first time as you do meanwhile at the exact same time king
hawk on of norway seen here wearing his same knights of malta templar crosses as all the british
has hired rolled omonson to do the same and race scott to the pole but why this sudden mad rush to
reach this alleged south pole when it was already declared 35 years earlier that it didn't even
exist and was pointless and too expensive for governments to keep trying then you have copyright
law so the vatican they own all of our souls due to their unum sanctum their papal bowl
and they have a copyright on the date the place and our name so whenever you sign a contract
you have to sign your name which is they make for you when you're born that's your all caps name
your straw man you have to date it because we're on their pope greger calendar they say today
is whatever today is april 7th 2025 only on their calendar they own that fiction they own the time
and they own the place they say we live on this spinning ball so they own your name your date and
your place that's called copyright so any business or commerce you do because the whole world is on
their commerce and all commerce goes to the vatican it's not the jays everyone's trying to say
it's zionists and only one out of ten zionists are jewish the jesuit set all that up so
they they own the copyright so if we're people got the wrong jays what's that people got the wrong
jays they got the wrong jays yeah looking for the other ones it's not the jesuit either they
work for the people in charge but still so they've got the copyright if we don't live on
their spinning ball and it's not really the date they say it is they already have no more
rights and claims to our taxes and our strongman that they're out the window there it's gone so that's
another reason people don't really talk about that's how they own us is jk rowling owns harry potter i
always say it she owns the the rights to the hogwarts university know and harry potter and ron and
her money in the time so if you try to dress up like harry potter you and me and go out and
like try to make money you know pretending we're doing harry potter appearances we owe that
chick money and that's what we're doing we're going out pretending to be our all caps name on a fake
spinning ball in a fake universe that doesn't exist on a fake calendar that doesn't exist and we owe
them money because we're doing that we're making money off our name everything you've ever done
with commerce you sound you signed your name indeed and it all happens in their fake universe
they own harry potterville and that's where we are we're in a fiction and they own it
we're like characters trapped in a book that we're moving you know
so that's another reason that no one talks about and they don't want us going out there because if
we prove that we're not on the spinning space ball their whole thing collapses there too not
just their sciences but the commerce and that's what they really love is the money and control
and power before you just take my word for it ponder this if you don't have a south pole
you can't and don't live on a globe as we've just shown for nearly two hours so here you have the
norwegian and two british the three polar stars as it says on the bottom the only quote unquote proof
of any south pole showing off their globe with their hidden hands but did they really go to any
such alleged south pole it is said that one of many reasons amundson's team beat scott by a month
and suffered no casualties is because he had learned how to properly dress from the inuits
in his north polar expeditions using animal furs and boots that were warm and waterproof
but allowed breathing and no sweat yet the only alleged photographs or cartoon drawings
of amundson's team at the pole show men wearing nothing of the sort these are all the official
photographs and realize this before the kodak self-timer patented seven years later in 1918
you only had the american autopose patented in 1902 where you used a pump that would give you a
little time to run around the camera and set up before the air pressure released and snapped
to shutter scott's team only took five men to the pole himself wilson bowers oats and evans
yet there are always all five men in his pictures yet all wearing big heavy gloves and there are
never any foot tracks from the camera to the guy who would have had to have pumped the autopose
then ran to the camera put his gloves on and grabbed his prop so who took these pictures
there's even a picture of their return journey home with all five men so we are to believe they
set this pump then somehow skied 30 feet away picked up the sled ropes and all did an action pose
there are no tracks leading to the sled or where they would have had to have started
to be in that final position when that picture finally snapped
then we have loads of strange inconsistencies like many sources claiming scott's team reached
the pole january 17th when his own journal which i'll post the entire thing in the notes folder
claims they got there the next day on january 18th now wonder me this amundson's team starts
here scott's team starts here 451 miles away from each other scott's journal shows them taking
constant bearings and you can see on any of the many maps comparing them they all make these
little detours through the mountains but then they have these fairly dead straight shots toward the
pole from two completely different directions scott's journal says at noon tuesday january 16th
they are at 89 42 south latitude about 20.7 miles from the alleged pole and there's amundson's
route over there in the orange scott's team marches two hours and suddenly spot what they
thought was a cairn way off in the distance i'm going to be generous and give them 6.3
miles for two hours more than twice as far as their usual speed for that pulling a big sledge
and then they detect a black speck up straight ahead which they march to and find it was a black
flag tied to a sled nearby the remains of amundson's camp so here's the problem they are here
after the two-hour march heading straight that way by strict readings amundson's team was
coming in the opposite direction over there more than 7.3 miles away and scott's team claimed
they saw this even a half an hour earlier than that so that's eight and a half miles away so
amundson's team a month earlier would not have been straight up ahead they would have been seven
and a half to eight and a half miles east of scott and the alleged earth curvature would have
been 35 to 50 feet between them even with the quarter arc at one fourth that that is still
nine to 12 and a half feet of curve to see over or even spot that little black flag on a sled
let alone from eight and a half miles away and globes claim entire ships go over the horizon
curve at less than five miles away in fact you need an icon p 900 just to zoom in on a ship
never mind seeing a tiny flag with a naked eye or a tiny four times optical handheld telescope
you can't have your cake and eat it too this story stinks of the moon landings
I am not at all suggesting that these journeys and teams are total fictional fabrications
I'm suggesting these events may have really taken place here and certain fictional embellishments
were added later out of necessity and I'll show you why
just what if gleason was correct and scott shackleton and wilson's failed 1901 to 1904
discovery expedition was actually a real south pole attempt that had to stop at 82 south latitude
not because it wasn't intended to go any further but because it wasn't possible to go any further
and then shackleton returns on the nimrod expedition in 1907 to 1909 and allegedly gets only 97 miles
from the alleged south pole and then just turns around and walks back 750 miles without making
world history like the first man on the moon or is that a cover story it should be blatantly
obvious on a globe that whether you are norwegian english or even french like all of the early
Antarctic explorers the cheapest and quickest way to Antarctica and the alleged south pole for that
matter would be sailing straight down the atlantic ocean directly to the rana ice shelf
and a short march to the alleged south pole with no giant mountain range in the way to
not down there where they all really admittedly went it would be ludicrous for those expeditions to
spend tons of money time supplies and four extra unnecessary months sailing through the Mediterranean
Sea in the Suez Canal across the entire pacific ocean past Australia to New Zealand then go down
to the Ross ice shelf and make an even longer trek to the alleged south pole with a huge mountain
range in the way to go around yet that's exactly the way every single south polar expedition went
in history why because even the flat earthers have this wrong the impenetrable barrier aka
ice wall isn't the coast of the ice circle running around the flat earth plane of inertia
shown here in red at roughly 67 south latitude the ice wall is actually inland in the frozen icy
water barrier as captain Ross told us about at around 77 to 78 degrees south latitude shown here
in blue and between the red waterline and blue ice wall are where we find all of the
Antarctic bases around the ice shelf to this day with the exception of the alleged south pole base
which we'll get into scott said the great ice barrier was cited and its examination
recommends in 77 49 south latitude the next day the expedition obtained a latitude of 78 10 degrees
south the highest ever reached before or since along the coast as far as the eye could reach to
the eastward there was a perpendicular cliff of ice from 150 to 200 feet high perfectly level
at the top without any fissures or promontories on its seaward face captain Ross sailed along the
marvelous wall of ice eastward in 77 47 south latitude as far as 78 south latitude this barrier
was estimated to be 1000 feet thick and it was followed for 450 miles without a break
so the only place you could get on the whole damn thing without an airplane helicopter or 200
foot tall hydraulic crane which didn't exist back then was the Ross ice shelf which is here in
reality as Gleason said imagine if you can the amount of centripetal force there must be
concentrated to the center of a glober sphere to hold these mighty walls of ice and mountains of
frozen material in place whereas there is no inward north or outward southern force on the
still plane of inertia or rest in the center of a toroidal field no such proven ice wall
also exists around the entire north pole kind of funny how panjia forgot to create this ice wall
around 77 to 78 north latitude and also left the water and much of the land inside of it
unfrozen unlike its alleged south latitude ring twin fantasy island which the globe
theory just ignores because its model cannot explain or account for this but the bible does
hast thou perceived the breath of the earth the waters are hid as with a stone and the face
of the deep is frozen he has compassed the waters with bounds until day and night come to end
meaning no 24-hour sun or sun at all past 80 degrees south latitude as we'll get into
wikipedia claims the amundsen scott south pole station is at 90 south latitude
zero east latitude where it should be on a globe time and date concurs date and time however
has it listed at 89 degrees 59 minutes 51 seconds south latitude and 139 1622 east longitude you say
yeah well that's only 920 feet away and that's reasonable and i agree with that but it's the
east longitude we'll get into shortly but when you go on to google earth and put an amundsen scott
south pole station it takes you here not there where it's supposed to be but here at 85 degrees
six minutes south latitude zero west and gives you all of these pretty pictures that could be
taken anywhere at any time for all you know to assure you that's what is really there
and we'll take a good look at that sign there but weirdly compared to where google earth alleges the
geographical south pole actually is the base is just over 340 miles away northeast which is very
strange because scott and amundsen's detailed journals with daily longitude and latitude
readings alleged to have traveled roughly 850 miles from down there northwest from the direction
of the ross ice shelf and scott's whole team allegedly died on the way back there so how can
the alleged south pole base now be 340 miles farther northeast they walk 680 more miles further
roundtrip at 8 to 12 miles per day with no extra supplies and didn't notice or write in their
detailed journals that extra distance would have taken more than two months longer to travel
at that speed and 40 more supplies that they didn't bring did both teams just magically teleport
that massive extra distance wicked tardia says they began their 862 mile return journey january 19th
scott's own journal says we have turned our back now on the goal of our ambition and must face our
800 miles of solid dragging well i'm sorry but that base is 1224 miles from scott's home base
steve you idiot has it even occurred to you google earth might just be wrong uh yeah that's what this
whole film is pointing out but not in this case because the alleged globe south pole there in
blue lines should be lined up quite a bit under that protruding bump there on the left
and then well around that curve up there just left of that noticeable alleged protrusion
on the rana ice shelf there and yet google earth has the alleged south pole base in red
lined up a little above the bottom of that protruding bump on the left and right under the
beginning of the curve exiting the rana ice shelf yet they show you a sign there in their images
saying geographic south pole with two quotes from amonson and scott claiming that is exactly
where they were and yet have a picture with a star drawn exactly where google earth claims they are
in the red lines lined up a little above across from the bottom of that protrusion on the left
and under the big curve leaving the rana ice shelf exactly like the red there
whereas the actual alleged geographical south pole according to google earth should be 340 miles in the
other direction where the orange lines are lined up quite a bit below that protruding bump on the
left there and well around that curve up there just left of that noticeable alleged protrusion
on the rana ice shelf there just like the blue lines but as i've already just shown you that is
impossible if you are to take scott and amonson's journals and stories as true they would have
been nowhere near there ever the alleged geographical pole would be 340 miles in the
opposite direction of there screw your cake somebody is undeniably serving flat out whoppers
here history is a set of lies agreed upon now at this alleged amonson scott south pole base with
the sign claiming it is the geographic south pole despite being 340 miles away in the completely
wrong direction from the alleged geographic south pole where amonson and scott allegedly claimed to be
google earth assures us the elevation above sea level there is 2543 meters or 8343 feet
but scott's own alleged journal on the day they reached the alleged pole claims it to be
9,500 feet in height or 2,895.6 meters 1,157 feet or 352.6 meters higher just taller than the height
of the wilshire grand center in los angeles so none of the alleged scientist in the history
of this alleged base since 1956 have noticed they are not only in the wrong location
by 340 miles on the entirely wrong side of fantasy island but also the wrong
elevation by over the tallest skyscraper west of chicago and why is google earth putting the
base at 2,543 meters or 8,343 feet and wikipedia putting at 9,301 feet a thousand feet taller
and why is this official but obviously bogus cgi topographic map of fantasy island
showing the alleged south pole there where all of the longitude lines converge in dark to near
dark green color which is only 800 to 1,000 meters above sea level on its legend
masl means meters above sea level or 2,625 feet to 3,280 feet elevation hell let's just give
them the tallest 3,280 feet that's still 6,220 feet less than scott's journal of 9,500 feet
and 5,063 feet less than google earth claims there's how high google earth says amazon scott
south pole bases 2,543 meters there's how tall scott's own journal claims the alleged south
pole is 2,896 meters see the red you see those red heights are reserved for the very tops
of the tallest alleged mountains on fantasy island which are nowhere near the alleged
south pole there in dark green even when you triangulate where google earth claims
the amazon scott south pole base really is 340 miles too far northeast of the pole
you can see it's all dark green there as well and three times lower in elevation
than google earth claims its height to be that's the gigalits in the austrian alps
only 100 meters taller than the alleged south pole does that look like there on that never
mind five guys trying to pull this heavy loaded sled up to such an elevation in thin
air and biting cold just like all of the other numerous glaring contradictions around fantasy
island these two things have one thing in common despite similar shapes they're both just fictional
models so why is the amazon scott base lying about being at the alleged geographical south pole
while 340 miles away in the wrong direction where amazon and scott could have never possibly set foot
fancy sign or not easy because there is no south pole because we do not live on a globe
to come full circle pun intended in a weird kind of way date and time dot info accidentally
spilled the beans by giving these coordinates for the alleged amazon scott south pole station
and alleged actual geographic south pole because while on fantasy globe those coordinates are only
920 feet away and close enough for horseshoes where we may really live here it's across the
entire world from each other the globe south pole would have to be at 90 degrees south latitude
and zero degrees east or west longitude where the two split at the Greenwich meridian that's here
90 degrees south latitude is the outer edge of the ice wall map and that's zero east or west
longitude at the Greenwich meridian but date and times coordinates for the base are all the
way over here 89 59 51 south latitude is 920 feet short from the 90 degree outer line and 139 166
22 east longitude is here now you realize why before the advent of the airplane and hydraulic
crane all of those early Antarctic expeditions looking to reach 90 degrees south latitude
we're sailing 40 000 to 60 000 combined miles around this ice circle over several combined
expeditions at mostly the red ring latitude looking for a place to get in and just thinking
if we live on a globe we must just be going around this theoretical perimeter and thinking
this theoretical continent must be huge having no modern propaganda reference back then telling
them it should only be one and a half times bigger around than the United States or 11 554 miles around
so they could say hang on a second something's wrong here we've gone way too far finally in
1841 captain Ross found that place now the Ross ice shelf the only place around the entire red
circle ring at roughly 67 south latitude you could get an ice breaking ship anywhere inside
that red coastal circle and anywhere near that blue 78 degrees south latitude ring by ship and then
nobody got past that afterwards because of the huge thousand foot thick 200 foot high insurmountable
ice wall there at the blue circle yeah that one he tried there at that indent where no bases are to
this day but the ice wall stuck straight out of the water that entire stretch now you realize why
after captain Ross the early 1900s south polar expeditions were all taking these ridiculous
and senseless four month detour sailing routes all the way around the world to New Zealand
and then to the Ross ice shelf when you'd obviously just do this and go straight south on a globe
cut around the coast to the Ross ice shelf in less than half the time but which makes perfect
logical sense here east the red route as it's the quickest and only way you could sail to the
Ross ice shelf from England France or Norway and still have known and own territorial places
to stop off and resupply on the way for such a long journey or risk the much longer blue western
route all the way down the Atlantic Ocean around South America and then across the entire Pacific
Ocean with nowhere to stop for supplies as the Panama Canal shortcut through Central America
wasn't finished until 1914 two years after Scott and Amundsen's alleged final south polar expeditions
and on the red westward route you're sailing with the southern roaring 40s westerly winds
and on the blue east route you're sailing against those winds another slap in the face to
the cake eaters who falsely claim this map is a globe projection because from Norway England and
France the quickest and cheapest way to 90 degrees south latitude zero degrees east west
longitude is clearly the green route around Africa following the Greenwich meridian line which
leads right to it not the red route around the world to New Zealand and a longer hike to
pop out 920 feet away through the polar pac-man teleport but they couldn't because they
couldn't get their ships anywhere near there and the ice barrier is blocking the way even if they could
even to this day with aircraft and hydraulic cranes none of these bases there are anywhere near
the red 67.5 south latitude sea ice wall and none of them are any further than the blue
75 south latitude ring and in fact with the exception of the alleged
Emerson scott south pole base there which we've shown to be lying in thus highly suspect and
questionable already not a single base is any further outside of that blue 80 degree south
latitude ring where the alleged insurmountable ice wall is said to be there are a few that
are close and what they're all really doing out there could be a whole other film series I don't
have time to get into and while more than a third of these countries base locations make zero sense
when they are on fantasy island on a globe they all make perfect sense when you match them up to
the Gleason map the only one that left me scratching my head was this blue one from Italy
to Mariozu Kelly base the only Italian base so it should be over there but then I found out
Mariozu Kelly station is located in an extraterritorial area without any national sovereignty
so from a diplomatic point of view it falls under the territorial jurisdiction of the Italian
embassy in Wellington New Zealand and again there are no bases in that entire stretch we already
discussed that indents to the 80 degrees south latitude is it just the ice wall or is there
possibly something else stopping them but first let's debunk what it certainly isn't like these
flat earth or videos going around tiktok claiming it is the dome up above at 13 000 feet coming down
which in this is from 1958 as you can see now we're going to flip to the Antarctica and see
what the encyclopedia Britannica from 1958 before the Antarctic treaty says is there now you
won't find this in the new encyclopedias because the government's banned them false it was here
in the 1960 version as well after the Antarctic treaty of 1959 but what I want you to notice right
here is notice how it says the flights proved inland areas to be featureless in character with a
dome 13 000 feet high at about latitude 80 degrees south longitude 90 degrees east now if this
doesn't make sense to you let me show you with an image of what the flat earth map will look like
now this is what the latitude 80 degrees south would look like on a flat earth map as you can see the
dome comes down closer to you over the wall which would be about 13 000 feet now if you go
back out into the center of the earth or the north pole and try to go up to deferment we're
a little bit of calculation that's going to show this about 385 500 feet away it's really really
simple folks now if you're not familiar with any of this at all at all and you're just now new to
the oldest you can say when this guy breaks he doesn't know what he's talking about boy
in this case unfortunately he doesn't ice domes are well known in glacier morphology
it's the part of large ice sheets or ice caps that start to pile up in the accumulation zone
this is a picture of one of the many Antarctic domes Wikipedia says on large enough ice
sheets they can get up to over 9800 feet tall which is what this encyclopedia is talking about
the pilot saw a massive glacial ice dome on the ground sticking up 13 000 feet high off the ground
not a dome coming out of the sky down to 13 000 feet altitude what is interesting is where they
saw it right at about 80 degrees south latitude you can just barely make one out here just south
of union glacier what is interesting is this space here dome fuji one of the few bases just short of
the alleged 80 degrees south latitude ice wall there in blue google earth has blanked out
everything around it you can only zoom into a gray screen with google name images all over it
but as you can see it's at 77 and a half degrees south latitude and we read dome fuji or valkyrie
dome has an altitude of 3810 meters above sea level that's 12 500 feet high and is the second highest
summit or ice dome of the east Antarctic ice sheet probably second to the 13 000 foot one on the
encyclopedia that said the pilot saw at 90 degrees east longitude and represents an ice divide meaning
two separate ice sheets meeting together is that what this ice wall is is that why they won't show
anything under the image and why would everything come together there around the entire ice ring
at 80 degrees south if so gleason had some theories on this and this brings us back full circle
pun intended to the sun and the lights which started this entire film series in the first
place and is where it also shall end it is no secret that i have a more metaphysical
understanding of the earth and luminaries from my esoteric and syncretism studies over the years
than the cake eaters and flat earthers physical theories and models i will show some other ideas
of both and gleason himself had a half metaphysical half cake eater theory to appease the cake eaters
disclaimer i neither agree nor disagree with any of these theories nor claim to know for certain
what or where the luminaries really are or how they work nor claim these people know for
certain either what or where they aren't or can't be is another story on pages 318 and 319 in the
rosa crucian philosophy in questions and answers book the initiate asks can you give an idea
of the difference between heliocentric and geocentric astrology can material predictions
in this life ever be made by the sun zodiac or is that simply concerned with the spiritual side
of a person's nature answer one of the objections raised to the ancient system of astrology
is that it regards the earth as the center of the solar system in the same manner as the
ancients did and that since Copernicus showed us that the planets move around the sun a theory
by the way many people regard astrology as an exploded science a palpably provable fallacy
and in order to overcome this objection certain astrologers in modern times have invented what
is called heliocentric astrology which regards the sun as the center of our solar system and the
planets moving around it even the rosa crucians were left scratching their heads as they say in
the one breath while it is perfectly true that scientifically speaking meaning scientism or holding
a theory as true that has never been proven geocentric astrology is incorrect if we are in a
heliocentric universe in the next breath they say they still just use the positions of the planets
relative to the earth or geocentric as the center and note the various effects upon
various people at the time when such planetary influences were felt and so by experience
we have come to our present system of judgment which is therefore as true today as it ever was
the proof is in the pudding the proof of astrology is in the truth of its predictions
and no one who has honestly studied this science and has tried to test it for himself
can fail to find this truth the geocentric system is correct and takes in all sides of
man's nature not only the material manifestation but also the spiritual side the heliocentric system
on the other hand has been trumped up by people who aim to conform to science or scientism and have
no concern with the spiritual side of nature therefore it is the least satisfactory of the
two besides while those who have used the geocentric astrology for many centuries have
recorded their observations of the effects of the planets from that standpoint there is very little
of such empirical knowledge from the standpoint of the heliocentric system which we would advise the
inquirer to leave alone in plain English even though scientism claims the realm is heliocentric
it doesn't work in reality so we can't and don't use that useless rubbish
I received an email after parts one and two showing lake pukaki canterbury new zealand
at four a.m. on december fourth showing how the sun was southeast before it visually rose in the
east and then appeared to set southwest like this saying hmm all november rises south of east
and sets south of west when can i expect my apology never i bet since you have proven yourself to be
dumb as rocks can you at least not say my name ever again garbage human a bit of the pot calling
the kettle black from what i've heard but that's none of my business but you're right i'm sorry
i apologize for falsely assuming you at least understood your own globe model enough where
i didn't think i had to explain your fallacy to you like a child so i will correct my mistake now
the heliocentric globe model says the sun is allegedly 109 times larger than the earth
which looks great here but allegedly 93 million miles away from earth yet you won't find a
single cartoon drawing on the internet that shows this in scale because if the earth has a diameter
of 7926 miles then the earth must be only three times that distance or 23778 miles away from the sun
when there should be 11733 and a half of those yellow circles between if ever drawn in scale
not three of them this ancient form of black magic is called neuro graphics
programming the brain through art thou shalt not make graven images they do the same when they
draw these cartoons explaining why you can only see the top of a boat from a lighthouse point a
to a boat at point d from 20 miles away due to the earth's alleged curvature and hope you're
too stupid to notice they drew nearly one eighth of the total alleged earth curve in the 20
miles between the two objects and drew the boat and lighthouse thousands of miles too tall to scale
of the drawn curve between we all see and experience the sun's rays as fanning out in
a pyramid crepuscular like this from a local nearby light source never like this from an
109 times bigger than the earth and 11733 earth diameters farther away from it
but since you can't have your cake and eat it too you have to accept the sun's rays
must be directly spread straight and evenly over the earth from that alleged size and
distance and not crepuscular if you stick by your heliocentric globe model even though
reality shows once again otherwise it is well known and verifiable in all almanacs that the
visible light in the sky we call the sun loops between the ecliptic belt between the outer
yellow tropic of capricorn on the december 21st winter solstice into the red equator on march
21st the spring equinox then into the summer orange tropic of cancer on the june 21st summer
solstice and then back out to the red equator on the september 21st fall equinox and back out again
looping like clockwork out and in every year let's simply verify this for this guy and the
cake eaters in the comment section who don't seem to get this fact from wherever you are standing
your zenith is leaning back cricking your neck and looking directly above you at 90 degrees to
see a heavenly luminary like the sun your altitude is what degree or angle between your
horizon zero degrees straight across and your zenith straight above your head you see the
heavenly luminary like the sun your azimuth is just pointing your compass to the north there drawing
360 degrees in a circle around you and seeing how many degrees clockwise around that circle the
heavenly luminary you are looking at is relative to north so from where this guy is standing
he is seeing the sun at 45 degrees altitude halfway between looking straight up in the sky at
his zenith directly above his head and looking straight out at his horizon across the flat ground
and his compass says north is there so the sun is where the red arrow ends 135 degrees east of
north clockwise around the 360 degrees circle around him that's his azimuth pretty simple
so if the light we call the sun crosses over the tropic of capricorn on the december 21st
winter solstice everyone living directly under it should have to lean back and prick their neck up
to their 90 degrees zenith to see the sun straight overhead at their solar noon and the same with the
people living on the tropic of cancer on their june 21st summer solstice and the same with the
people living on the equator twice a year on both march 21st and september 21st equinoxes
as the sun passes over them between the tropics so the tropic of capricorn is at 23 2609 south
latitude and here is ruby vail australia at 23 2509 south latitude just about 30 odd miles only north
of the tropic of capricorn and sure enough on their december 21st winter solstice at their
solar noon there you can see that the sun is at 90 degrees zenith right above their head as it should
be and the reason the sun is at 180 degrees south azimuth is because they are 30 odd miles north
of the tropic of capricorn so they have to turn around and face 180 degrees opposite their north
compass bearing and then look up 90 degrees because the sun is actually 30 odd miles south of them
as it travels overhead not any further south than that as the cake eaters claim or the altitude
would be less than 90 degrees zenith if they had to look out at a farther away angle than
straight over their heads the inner or northern tropic of cancer is at 23 2609 north latitude here
we have ujjayin india at 23 1855 north latitude so about seven or eight miles south of the
tropic of cancer so pretty much dead smack underneath it and on it and sure enough here on
the June 21st summer solstice in ujjayin at their solar noon the sun is at 90 degrees zenith just
above their head as it should be and zero degrees north for their azimuth because they are just
dead south of the tropic of cancer so they have to look north seven miles and then straight up
over their head and lastly obviously the equator is zero latitude and here we have in zamalike
africa just two miles north of the equator at 00149 north and sure enough on the March 21st
equinox at solar noon 90 degrees zenith above their head zero degrees azimuth and remember
this has to match the September 21st equinox and sure enough 90 degrees zenith right above their
head zero degrees north azimuth i will even go back to ruby vail australia before and after
the December 21st winter solstice and show you from December 1st through the 17th you can see the
altitude angle in the sky at solar noon keeps rising or getting higher in the sky
meaning the sun is coming from the north equator and getting closer and closer in south latitude
to them each day hence looking higher and higher in the sky to see it then boom it sits there at
90 degrees zenith right above their heads from December 18th to the 25th and then starts to go back
down again in altitude meaning back north towards the equator again not more south
again cake eater himself rightly said in parts one and two what happens in latitude stays in
latitude every single place on that latitude all the way around the earth is the exact same
daylight on that day meaning on each of these latitude lines on the days i just showed you
or any latitude lines in between them on any day in between them everyone living under that same
latitude line or on it has to have the light in the sky called the sun go directly over their head
at 90 degrees zenith on that day if these guys have to look straight up to see the sun in
November or early December then so do these guys and so do these guys the same goes for anyone else
on any same latitude line the sun is passing over on any given day so here's what cake eater doesn't
understand at lake pukaki new zealand on December 4th the sun's rising and setting angles are
relative to the sun's position at lake pukaki solar noon where people there point a compass to
do north and they'll know it's solar noon when the sun is directly between them and the north pole
on their compass needle those angles are not relative to lake pukaki's geographical location
on the ground itself it does not mean the visual sun was straight overhead lake pukaki
at 90 degrees zenith on December 4th and literally came from the southeast below
new zealand's latitude line and set southwest below new zealand's latitude line as this blatant
neuro graphic falsely misleads the unthinking person by design i'll prove it on December 4th
the sun has not yet made its way down to the tropic of capricorn line two weeks later
it is still a little north of it where the red zones are here is swacup moon namibia
just slightly south of where the sun should be crossing over directly overhead on December 4th
at 22 40 35 south latitude and sure enough on December 4th the solar noon azimuth is zero
north just north of them barely and the altitude for solar noon is 89.6 zenith just slightly north
of above their heads later that same exact day the sun passes just north of Rio de Janeiro at 22
54 35 south latitude as you can see December 4th solar noon zero degrees north of it at 89.4 degrees
north of them not quite zenith overhead what happens in latitude stays in latitude the sun
cannot pass over Lake Pukaki way down here on December 4th as this neuro graphic claims
and then magically teleport north and pass over australia swacup mooned and Rio later that same
exact day while impossibly setting southwest of Lake Pukaki at the exact same time and it doesn't
head cake eater simply bothered to open the rest of the day between the red sunrise and
sunset times and directions he'd see on December 4th at Lake Pukaki solar noon the sun azimuth
was north of Lake Pukaki as it should be and its altitude angle in the sky was way up north of Lake
Pukaki and lower in the sky at only 68 degrees north not 90 degrees azimuth straight above their
head here right where it should be and has to be on its way across that latitude line with the
others but obviously what he's really confused about as a globey is this how is the sun rising
at azimuth 120 degrees east southeast and setting azimuth 237 degrees west southwest one of many
combined reasons for this is because those angles have nothing to do with Lake Pukaki's geographical
location on the ground because the visual sun is nowhere near Lake Pukaki at solar noon on December
4th as I've shown it's over 1472 miles north of it north of even the tropic of Capricorn
they have partly to do with the rise and set angles relative to where the sun is at Pukaki
solar noon which is way up here in latitude where it has to be nowhere near Lake Pukaki
on the ground make note December 4th 550 a.m sunrise 129 p.m solar noon 909 p.m sunset
well there's Lake Pukaki New Zealand the sun is here at their 129 p.m solar noon and when the sun
sets for them at 909 p.m on December 4th the sun is provably up here just north of the
Capricorn and just east of Madagascar nowhere near west southwest of Lake Pukaki New Zealand
and then they have their night and then when the sun is finally here still north of the
Tropic of Capricorn and just off the west coast of South America is when it rises at
550 a.m the next day for Lake Pukaki again nowhere near east southeast of New Zealand
imagine the mental gymnastics it takes to claim that on the same day everyone on this
orange line is provably seeing their solar noon sun at 90 degrees zenith right above their heads
the sun really actually rose southeast of Lake Pukaki New Zealand shot up to the Tropic of Capricorn
to give everyone in Australia their zenith solar noon shot way back down here to give New Zealand
their south southwest sunset before slamming on the brakes shooting way back up here so Africa
can have its zenith solar noon then shot way down south of Angt Artica so that Rothera
four degrees longitude west of Vernadsky could have its 210 a.m sunrise in UTC plus three time zone
first loops backward so it can give Vernadsky and its UTC plus three time zone sunrise second
despite being 120 miles east of Rothera then shoots all the way up here so Rio and everyone on
that line in South America can have their 90 degrees zenith solar noons slams on the brakes
at New Zealand sunrise then shoots way down south so it can rise southeast of Lake Pukaki New Zealand
the next day and do it again well if the sun allegedly moves because the earth spins towards it
to follow that absurd path every day the earth would have to constantly wobble violently south
to north north to south stop spinning several times go backward once a day and we'd all
be dead from non-stop cataclysmic tidal waves then they hit you with some really strange cake
eater logic and say it's the earth's 23 degree tilt that is causing it at least they acknowledge
the sun moving between the tropical ecliptic belt but while in the one breath they alleged the
sun is 109 times larger than the earth 93 million miles away and its rays are direct
in the other breath those rays magically concentrate in a narrow belt in the middle
and spread out over a wider area at the top and bottom and so in september and march when the
earth is on the side of the alleged orbit that narrow belt shines right over the equator and
that's why those people see the sun 90 degrees zenith straight overhead but not everyone else
though from the same 93 million miles away also with direct rays but then in june the tilt is facing
the sun and the narrow area hits above the equator at the northern tropic of cancer and in december
or january when the earth is on the other side of the alleged orbit the tilt makes the narrow
belt hit below the equator and the tropic of capricorn but let's double check that
remember tilt the alleged globe any way you want any degree you want latitude lines like the tropics
and equator always run exactly east to west not northeast to southwest etc because they claim
to draw them in alignment to the alleged spin direction not the alleged tilt direction an
equator means exactly halfway between the farthest north and farthest south on both models
well let's start with lake bukkake new zealand december 4th with this alleged narrow direct
sunbelt rising in the southeast of new zealand in the morning and setting in the west southwest
after sunset the yellow tilted vertical line along the alleged earth tilt is due geographic
north south longitude the orange is the tropic of cancer red in the middle of the equator and at the
bottom green the tropic of capricorn and we know the sun is right there just north of capricorn
and just west of south america on december 4th at new zealand's 5 50 a.m sunrise so new zealand
better damn well come around this turn north of that for that to be rising southeast of lake
bukkake at least here or higher and then it better damn well make its way down this yellow crooked
line to have that sun 1472 miles north of it at lake bukkake's 119 p.m solar noon or the globe
has a big problem let's mark it and see
houston the globe has a big problem that's new zealand right there in the yellow circle southeast
of australia over scammed arctica let's back it up new zealand had to rotate in at at least
our red marker arrow or higher north to make the sun southeast of it at its sunrise
but it came in way too far south of where it had to and obviously this doesn't work on the globe model
and we have a bigger problem as it rotates around to its 909 p.m sunset time when the sun is just
east of madagascar there way west northwest of new zealand not setting west southwest
but the final globe death blow comes next because even the globe acknowledges that the sun is even
more north all the way up on the equator for both the september 21st and march 21st equinoxes
which cake eater didn't bother to check but i did as i showed you already with nanzama lege
africa literally just under seven miles north of the equator having a 90 degrees zenith solar
noon straight up over their heads on both september 21st here and march 21st here proving the
visual light we call the sun is indeed traveling across the equator latitude line both equinox
days lake pukaki on those two days delivers the absolute death blow to the globe here you can see
lake pukaki new zealand on the september 21st equinox at their solar noon sees the sun at only
45 degrees north altitude halfway between their north horizon on the ground and their zenith straight
up ahead hence so visually low in the sky confirming it is indeed way up north of them
over the equator but if you notice here on september 21st before actual visual sunrise in the north
the sun still approaches them from south southeast and east to southeast and then leaves after
visual sunset at west southwest and south southwest and here again on the march 21st equinox the exact
same solar noon is still at 45 degrees altitude zero degrees north azimuth way up north on the
equator but still approaches before sunrise from south southeast and east southeast and it leaves
after sunset at west southwest and south southwest let's note again march 21st sunrise time 742 a.m
solar noon six hours later at 146 in the afternoon sunset 749 p.m so now you're supposed to swallow
the globe whopper that though the sun is provably all the way up here on the equator both
september 21st and march 21st at a much later 742 a.m sunrise because the sun is much farther north
somehow this sun is also still approaching new zealand from south southeast of it but still
somehow ends up 45 degrees angular north of it at lake bukkake's solar noon on march 21st
that means now new zealand better rotate around this ball at at least this high or higher
at its 742 a.m sunrise to have that equatorial sun south southeast of it and better hurry its ass
all the way down this yellow arrow in only six hours later to have its solar noon 46 degrees
altitude north of there i'll put the spot marker up
sorry new zealand is clearly way too far southwest of the equatorial sun for that sun to be approaching
it from the southeast on the failed globe model the sun would clearly be northeast on a globe
tilt or no tilt latitude lines run due east west parallel to each other and perpendicular and
relative to geographical north and obviously to claim later that same night with the sun now
provably up over the equator at lake bukkake's 749 p.m sunset that sun is somehow magically south
southwest of new zealand is so ludicrous it beggars belief it would clearly be setting
northwest of new zealand if we lived on a globe but those southern sunrise and sunset angles to
solar noon are very real and very provable despite being impossible on a globe so we cannot live
on a globe and fantasy island therefore cannot exist of course there will be panic-stricken
cake eaters who claim the earth tilt should not be this way but rather this way falsely thinking
this solves their impossibility dilemma that would mean the sun on the june 21 summer solstice
would have to be 90 degrees azimuth straight overhead the people living on the southern
tropic of capricorn in southern south america and northern australia and we know for a fact
their southern summer is in december and january not june and july and florida
and the people living on the northern tropic of cancer would have to be having their summer
in december and january instead of june and july which is provably the opposite in reality
sorry cake eaters your globe does not work this does however work on both the physical flat earth
model and the metaphysical etheric earth toroidal model on the flat earth east and west are not
straight lines like on a globe they curve in a circle around the plane from either direction
of where the observer is so relative to the solar noon sun position for lake bukkake new zealand there
the sun is doing this curving around the same east west latitude line from lake bukkake solar noon
to their sunset whereas on a globe's east to west coordinates it would look like this
but on the flat earth north just means closer to the north pole in a latitude ring
than from where it started or where you are observing from so you may falsely say well if lake bukkake
is here and the north pole is that way and their sunset is also kind of that same way isn't that
northwest of them no because north means a latitude circle inside of that yellow circle
closer to the north pole which the sun never does the sunset point is still on the same exact
yellow west latitude circle as where it was at their solar noon even though it looks northwest
to us looking down relative to facing the north pole from there so that green line between lake
bukkake solar noon and sunset represents true northwest because anywhere on that yellow line
between is still just plain old west and what is the opposite of north obviously south so if
that green line is northwest of lake bukkake solar noon it is clear that position zero is
right on the green northwest line and position one the purple arrow is farther away from the green
northwest line from solar noon position zero and then position four the light blue line
is even farther away from the north green line than both of those and since the yellow line is
due west and the green line is north and the opposite of north to south anyone can see that
even though the sun is traveling due west around that yellow circle position four has to be southwest
of position zero and one relative to position zero or solar noon because it is the farthest
opposite of the north green line that's position four northwest that's southwest
away from north that's how the sun moves from zero north solar noon to west southwest of
new zealand sunset while still giving everyone in madagascar in south africa on a latitude ring
inside of new zealand or north of new zealand a 90 degrees zenith solar noon straight overhead
later that same exact day and that is how that same sun can come around north of new zealand
on the inside yellow northern latitude ring over rio de gianero in south america at 90 degrees
zenith solar noon straight over their latin heads while new zealand is having their
night time but then when it gets to hear new zealand's next day sunrise be coming at new zealand
from the east southeast because relative to their solar noon that green line is northeast of them
and that yellow line the sun is traveling around is clearly coming at their solar noon intersect
from further away from that green line or southeast of it between hours three and four
and sure as shit curves back towards the green line to end up north of them at their next day's
solar noon just like this you not so much of course i already explained this in the beginning
of part one for those with eyes to see and brains that still function but because new zealand there
in red is south or on an outside latitude ring farther out from the north than the ecliptic belt
that the sun never leaves in yellow no matter what day of the year their solar noon will always
be due north of them on a compass whether the sun is here december 21st or way up here
june 21st the closest the sun will ever be to them on any given day in that yellow belt
is here due north it will never go behind them where they have to turn around behind them to
what we are falsely programmed to think of as south on a compass to see their solar noon
the rising sun is not coming from a northern latitude ring inside that red circle closer
to the north pole than at new zealand solar noon and it is not setting in a latitude ring in that
red circle closer to the north pole than new zealand solar noon so it can't get any more
north or from new zealand than its closest solar noon point there so angrily speaking it is coming
from the opposite southeast of due north solar noon peaking in due north at solar noon and
setting in the opposite farthest southwest of closest north solar noon our globe indoctrination
makes us think of south as just one direction on the globe if 360 people at the north pole
all had due south one degree longitude apart from each other they all end up at the exact same
place there there is only one south on the globe on the flat earth they all end up scattered
around the ice ring with no uber lift home because there are infinite souths fanning out in a circle
from the one north pole gleason felt there was even more to the story and again i'm not claiming or
agreeing this is how it is or how it works only showing you how it could work where it can't work
on a globe the globes themselves say it is computed that the sun's rays lose nearly one
fourth their brilliancy by passing through the earth's atmosphere and if that atmosphere alleged to
be 45 miles extended 15 times as far from the surface as it does or 675 miles we should receive
no light at all from the sun but should be plunged into perpetual night or darkness remember that
light penetrates the rare body like hot or dry air further than the denser like cold or moist air
it also passes through the more transparent more readily than through the less transparent
anyone outside on a cloudy day or foggy morning versus a sunny cloudless day can attest to this
heat expands or rarefies air and cold condenses it the southern atmosphere is more transparent
or rarefied than the northern atmosphere meaning light penetrates farther through the air in the
south thus the tropical or equatorial air is expanded more and rare than the cold arctic and also
the cold antarctic so gleason surmised when the sun is here on the red equator ring on both the
march 21st and september 21st spring and fall equinoxes even though the sun's light should shine
in a full round circle around it because the atmosphere in the arctic inner circle and
Antarctic outer ice wall circle are so cold they are condensed and the sun's light cannot
penetrate their air while the much hotter and rarefied air between the warm tropics and a little
further each way outside allows the light to penetrate further hence making this bean shape
in yellow instead of a perfect circle its light is able to expand through the rarefied air
east and west around the circle in the bean shape but not the cold and condensed air north or inside
circle or south the ice ring circle and since the outer or southern air is more rarefied
than the northern the most light would penetrate farthest from the sore sun in the southern
latitude rings the long green arrow which could also explain why Lake Pukaki New Zealand there
who is still having hot 72 degrees Fahrenheit or 22 Celsius days in March and September like
Denmark's hottest summer days in June in the condensed northern hemisphere air despite the
sun provably being way far north of them on the red equator ring could have the light preceding
the actual sun appearing to come in from the southeast and leave in the southwest
because the sun's preceding and trailing light is penetrating farther in the southern rarefied
air the sun's light is almost as far south as the ice wall there and that same ice wall is
clearly south of New Zealand there so is that preceding light not approaching New Zealand
from the southeast and that light hasn't even fully penetrated the ice shelf yet
whereas this same effect would be even more pronounced on the December 21st winter solstice
which is actually hot summer for New Zealand when the sun is still north of New Zealand
but even more south of the equator on the Tropic of Capricorn ring meaning even more hot air
and rarefied air for the south and allowing even more southern light to get through on its way
to and from New Zealand at sunrise and sunset this time penetrating even into the ice shelf itself
not just outside of it like the equinoxes now imagine the mental globe gymnastics it takes
to look at Ujjayan India there on the northern intertropic of cancer just south below the
peninsula of Dubai there in June on the June 21st summer solstice having their solar noon
90 degrees zenith straight above their head proving the sun is indeed traveling east west
across the Tropic of Cancer and there's Lake Pukkaki New Zealand way down south of the Tropic
of Cancer and way southeast of Ujayan India there on a globe so after Pukkaki's sunset
the sun is provably still moving northwest away from Lake Pukkaki southwest of them on a globe
would be the sun putting on the brakes and shooting straight down there past Fantasy Island
yet here's Lake Pukkaki New Zealand on the same day in June the 21st the northern summer solstice
doing exactly that having their receding sunlight after sunset moving west southwest of them to south
southwest of them this is obviously more than ludicrously impossible on a globe without
the globe suddenly spinning south to north 90 degrees to make the visual sun shoot north to south
90 degrees and killing everyone instantly with cataclysmic tidal waves and earthquakes
every day this provably happens but again it works fine theoretically on the physical flat
earth gleason model with the sun's preceding and following light still reaching approaching
and leaving New Zealand from farther south outside latitude circles than the actual visible sun itself
provably north of New Zealand i think gleason felt the cake eaters of his day were confusing
the source of light the sun or like this flashlight with the actual light projection
coming from it in this analogy this flashlight never leaves the center of the room but since
its light beam is crepuscular it would be approaching and leaving certain objects slightly
from their south as it turns like this but they say it must be the guy holding the flashlight
walking out towards them on an angle well couldn't that also happen on a globe not when they
contradictoryly claim their alleged poles from 80 to 90 degrees north and south latitude
still receive oblique 40 incidental sunlight radiation of equatorial regions accounting for
an alleged 24 hour south polar sun despite the cold and actually causing the cold not deflecting
around the cold towards the center of their alleged globe sorry that's called having your cake
and eating it too gleason's book is riddled with chapters bible passages antarctic voyages etc
and even this on his own map under the december 21st solstice on december 21st the sun moves
around the tropic of capricorn and during the day lights up the southern portion of the earth
from the antarctic circle to some portion of the antarctic ice as he illustrates here
but then he says there is no sunlight beyond 80 degrees south latitude but unknown regions of ice
coincidentally that just happens to be exactly that blue latitude ring where I showed you there
are no bases further outside of other than the highly dubious alleged amundsen scott south pole
base and the same exact latitude where all of the early explorers said there was an impenetrable
ice barrier and the same latitude the globe calls the southern pole of inaccessibility
and the same latitude where dome fuji bases parked 150 miles north of on one of these dome walls
but either won't or can't go any further for some reason and google satellites magically won't
let us see what is beyond that to the alleged south pole apparently thinking great outboxes with their
logo is somehow more important than taking pictures of the alleged mysterious south pole
and the same latitude where the ice wall indents in from the ocean and there are no
Antarctic bases nor have there ever been in the same time zone fantasy island draws bulging
out into the ocean as where they are hiding three hours of time in the north and we're to believe
this is all just one big coincidence no light at all is a far cry from this alleged 24 hour globe sun
that nobody can even agree on when it happens within days or weeks of each other
the new york post recently ran an article about living in Antarctica their expert Byron Adams
a brigham young professor of biology who has spent several stretches at McMurdo base
usually staying for two or three months assures us that the sun at McMurdo fully rises once in
October and sets in March how many times has this guy been there March there's McMurdo
allegedly the 24 hour sun ends February 20th or February 19th nearly two weeks before March
the only base that allegedly gets a March sunset is the dubious Amundsen Scott south pole base
allegedly 860 miles south of McMurdo why can't these people ever get their stories straight
now there is another glaring problem we need to address based on what these
sunglass wearing guys experienced at what they at least believed to be Union Glacier Station
I've already explained in part one why I think there could very possibly be a 24 hour sun
in a certain Goldilocks sweet spot right around the ice shelf that can be experienced in certain
places in that zone but not outside of it in line with Gleason's proposal that there is
total darkness outside of 80 south latitude and not north of it which is where we find the bases
on the Antarctic Peninsula that admit no 24 hour sun for bases there and again like Gleason
that explanation does not allow for a 24 hour sun past 80 degrees south latitude
any more than a satellite dish allows for the receiver to pick up a bouncing signal
any closer than a specific spot I will say that Gleason's theory about the hyper cold
condensed air stopping light from going any further even refracting it east or west like
the jellybean mixed with the modern understanding that light slows down passing through glass or
water and speeds up after could maybe even make something like a condensed air atmospheric
movie screen at 80 south latitude there in the blue line that contributes to this phenomenon
Union Glacier is allegedly only 20 miles north of there at 79 degrees 45 minutes south latitude
so for those in the Dave Weiss Marty Leeds camp that the 24 hour sun was fake plasma tech
projected there the perfect sky to do it on is only 20 miles away according to Gleason's
theory the Antarctic can also be unbelievably beautiful with refracted light causing full
suns and moons and it's incredibly right there I mean do you have to wear sunglasses I hate I
don't like sunglasses I don't like the average sunglasses you have to wear them it's not
impossible to step outside without them yeah bro you like 10 seconds everywhere 10 seconds
you can't see and they're like your eyeballs will get sunburned you need to wear them
and I'm like nah yeah I'm not wearing sunscreen I'm not wearing sunglasses
I was there for five minutes and I'm like all right you got me I mean it's crazy right there
bro every angle but yes there is not one sunglasses wearing picture from any of Scott's
Ammonsons or Shackleton's teams nor mention in their journals of a 24 hour sun nor getting
sunburned eyeballs or vision problems and they were all allegedly there in the exact same
times and months including December when the final experiment was in Union Glacier in fact
Scott's Journal on December 31st says at 10 p.m. there was just enough light to write or work with
on January 25th the sun showed during breakfast and there was just enough light to see their
old track the whole journal is riddled with talk of tonight and the next day and how temperatures
drop to extreme cold in the nights in a 24 hour sun full of eyeball burning light
if they get so sweaty marching why not march in the colder night and camp and relax and dry off
in the daytime and late evening sun if you have a 24 hour sun it just doesn't add up
as for the coastal bases in part two alleging 24 hour suns which I have mapped out on the
bottom in red dots I have already proven during November and December to December 21st the sun
is passing over that orange zone north of the Tropic of Capricorn until it reaches Capricorn
December 21st on the solstice and goes no further south I have also proven the sun is over the
equator on the September 21st equinox so that is 91 days between to make the 1032.7 miles of the 23.4
degrees between the equator and the tropics meaning the sun is moving 11.35 miles closer per day
to both Capricorn and those bases aside from raw Thera there on an inlet bay they are all
coastal bases on near sea level you can see here again for yourself meaning there are no
mountains or elevation between them and the sun north of Capricorn just level ocean
even with raw Thera and Vernadsky bases here on the globe model
alleging to have land between them and the sun as it passes over in late November
way up north of the Tropic of Capricorn at 44 degrees altitude in their solar noon sky
the only mountains between them in that yellow range vary from only 240 meters at the lowest height
to only 2261 meters at the tallest there or only 1.4 miles high 116 miles north of raw Thera
which cannot possibly be blocking their daily sunlight especially when more than one-third of
that mountain would be buried under 0.42 miles of alleged earth curve core dark sorry cake eaters
and since I've already proven Fantasy Island cannot exist these bases would really be
orientated like this as on the Gleason map with the mountains now behind them and not
even between them and the sun passing north of the Tropic of Capricorn just like those other
four bases there the problem for both the globe and the flat earth model incorporating that sun
traveling north of Capricorn as an actual physical thing and not an apparent metaphysical
relative frequency phenomenon as covered in part one is that sun is heading 11.35 miles south per
day in that orange band but raw Thera and Mawson are only 56.63 miles further south in latitude
than Casey that blue line and these are not actual base locations just a visual to show you what
miniscule latitude differences between them we are discussing so on the globe model if that
sun is lighting up a 24-hour day in June on the north top of the globe due to both earth tilt and
position in the alleged annual elliptical orbit then as the maximum light exposure slowly moves
south through the year to light up the south bottom in December as the earth swings around the
orbit Casey should get its alleged 24-hour sun first since it is 56.63 miles further north of
raw Thera and Mawson and the sun is moving from the north to the south from June to December
but raw Thera and Mawson are allegedly getting theirs 10 to 13 days before Casey not only that
but with the sun moving 11.35 miles south per day that should only take 4.98 or say five days
difference not 10 to 13 days again I'm aware these latitudes are correct but these bases are
nowhere near each other in east-west longitude but raw Thera and Mawson should lose their alleged
24-hour sun in January before Casey to its north as the sun would still be shining on Casey but
not them as the sun travels back north from the changing orbital and tilt angles to light up only
the top of the globe again in June not get nine to 11 more days of 24-hour sun than Casey and
again with the sun now moving 11.35 miles per day north back towards the equator that should
be only a five day difference not nine to 11 days Mirney is even worse as it's only 44.13 miles north
latitude of raw Thera and Mawson in the purple line so with the 11.35 miles per day southward
moving sun it too should get a 24-hour sun first in November 3.88 days before Mawson and
raw Thera not six to eight days after them on December 5th and the same in January Mirney should
still have a 24-hour sun for 3.88 days more than raw Thera and Mawson not ending six or seven
days before them on January 7th and no cake eaters the sun cannot strike raw Thera and
Mawson 44 to 57 miles south of Mirney or Casey but not them for seven to 11 days in January
while people living 2,177 miles north of them above the Tropic of Capricorn are experiencing
the source ball of light at 90 degrees zenith straight over their heads moving 11.35 miles
north every day you can't just pretend the sun is down here to fit your model when it's provably
not and again I shouldn't have to point out the absurdity of two coastal bases like raw Thera and
Mawson an identical 67.33 south latitude having two days difference and alleged 24-hour sun
start and stop periods or 41 to 50 minute day length differences with no mountains but only
flat ocean between them and the sun traveling north of the Tropic of Capricorn at 44 degrees
altitude halfway up the sky from their horizon to their zenith that said it is interesting that
in November in raw Thera on the 29th its preceding sunlight angle is indeed coming
from the south despite the actual sun being way up north just north of Capricorn at 44 degrees angle
at raw Thera's solar noon Gleason would say that's because raw Thera is only at 67.33 south
latitude on this ice ledge sticking out into the Atlantic Ocean while the preceding Capricorn
sun's light is penetrating almost into 80 degrees south latitude so not the sun itself
but its approaching light there is still behind raw Thera or south of it or away from north
even though the following sun behind that light is north or in front of raw Thera on the Tropic of
Capricorn but again just like the heliocentric globe model assumes the sun is an actual thing
a burning ball of hydrogen and helium 93 million miles away neuro graphics not to scale
many but certainly not all of the flat earth models also blindly assume the sun is an actual
thing like you could fly up there and touch it like your kitchen counter if it didn't burn
you up only Gleason said both that thing and Polaris were 1725 nautical miles or 1,985 miles away
from our ground and I've heard flat earth models ranging from much closer absurdly mistaking obvious
converging and counter diverging visual perspective for actual cloud level to up to 3000 miles away
which can't verify for certain a source versus a converging then diverging focal point
but what if it's not a physical thing at all but metaphysical like a rainbow you can see but can't
land your plane on and will move away as you try to get closer or like the wind you can feel on
your face see it blowing the trees and even harness its energy but you can't catch the
wind and put it in a bottle the southern hemisphere has its own rotation and the north has its own
rotation but the northern hemisphere rotation is mirroring its rotation out to the south
everywhere around the south this is one star trail photography
someone can stand on a meridian because every man is on a meridian line north to south he can
stand anywhere on here and film a rotation a star rotation well he's only getting a rotation
because there's a permanent vortex which rotates the whole system right hidden in the center arctic
its vortex is always turning 15 degrees per hour so you can film out here you can project a mirrored
image all the ancients have mentioned mirrored mirrors hundreds of thousands of times you're
getting a mirrored rotation a mirror a circular motion of stars okay but that's on a fixed tripod
for star trailing but if you had a if you're following or tracking a star you'll find the
star's moving because the whole clock's moving this is turning so it's turning the star the whole
star's moving right around the earth on the southern hemisphere so one rotation in here
is one rotation all the way around here but if you're just fixed in your little time zone
yet let's say you're really ignorant and don't know there's another part of the world
existing you're just going to see your star rotation here and you think well that's it
15 degrees per hour is mirroring this 15 degrees per hour here but if you're thinking you've got a mind
a full one activated you'll find that this the star here is moving this way 15 degrees
at the same time you're getting a star trail moving in the circle here 15 degrees per hour okay
and this you've got the northern hemisphere you've got them going like this okay
this is slowly winding in right up to this point here
okay when they become balanced then you've got all the extra stars in here forming the new
constellations that's just moving up like this they're overlaying these stars here
there's always this overlaying that's how we get the new constellations
they're moving in and out from here from the south to the north the northern stars are always
there the southern stars are actually the same stars the northern stars but they're inside out
they're inverted seen backwards and as they move out they expand bigger and bigger
like this this is what's happening I've drawn it down here there's a real sun's back here
and he doesn't go far he doesn't go anywhere he's stuck in here maimed he just does circles
and then that but then they talk about the sun we see out here between the between the fields
because it's the electrical charge that's created between here and here bingo and the changing
magnetic field moves the sun around the earth right moving magnetic field changes
moves the electrical current the moving electrical current changes the magnetic field
because there's the sun's moving the field's changed it boom left this one sun moves here
oh boom oh bang sun's here now oh bang it's just changing there bang bang bang bang bang bang
infinitely to create the sun the spark the charge
I can see everything everything moves around from the south south east north and background this way
okay everything moves like that on my meridian the whole cycle everybody no matter where they
are around the earth is on a meridian and they will see that mirrored projection from the north
that cardinoid shape well they don't see it actually but they
certain times of the year you know everything's coming more south
and you know it's just the way it works it all makes sense it goes like this and does a loop here
and then kind of back out again you never see the loop because the loop represents the sunny
side where the stars have spun into the around the sun close to the sun because it's all balanced
within this vortex you see so it spins around and into the center here but it's just it's just one
one s one s cycle like this okay so it comes out and goes back in and this is the daylight hours
we're as close close to the center of the sun because the sun is in the center like I mentioned
earlier center there our sun's out here we see out here in the tropical gap because that's the end of
the murky way that's the image it comes from reality so understanding this complete separation
here in the field is comes about on the 17th of october okay as it is receding
bang 17th of october the sun pops into the far south this is the down and out
and the pair was talking about earlier where the sun is permanently around here because all these
represents these are the pomegranates mentioned in the bible these represent the suns but they're
they're everywhere they're infinite it's all down and out okay then it gets drawn back in again
it follows this system and all the system is created by the the 2d plane up here this is the flexing
down and out of the ecliptic plane contraction expansion contraction expansion
see it's lateral this way it's sort of vertical in our route do you imagine this way
ah you understand all this all these curving magnetic field lines is part of the toroidal field
the field curves this curve if you're following a compass you're traveling a curving field like
this this is why they invented the gyro laser it takes you from a direct route route straight
okay the compass bearing is always curved like this but between the tropics it is dead straight
north to south it's the only one place on earth where declination is dead straight it's well there's
no declination it's dead south dioranum already look there's your south there's your north
well you're here there's your south there's your north we've recently had these characters will
duffer and his comrades liars have traveled out here and said oh here's the south pole
well some south pole stations out there but no you can leave anywhere ahead south
on your meridian wherever you are on earth just so you live there or you live there
you just goes treble south there's your south he travels out there's the south pole
this is south pole south pole south pole it's south all the way around here there is no one
south pole it's a returning north a mirrored prediction of the north could that explain
approaching sunlight from the south and even a 24 hour sun in parts of Antarctica is there really
a 24 hour sun anywhere in Antarctica or was it friggin laser beams i don't claim to know what the
luminaries are or all the workings of their wonders mystery and glory but the ground under
my feet and every engineering project in history built on it tells me it can't work like this
so that's the end of that